Merry christmas, glorious friends! May 2020 bring us ever more winning, may the demon haunted dark pull away and the light reach back from the future to assemble itself!
That had already become a major focus of Heartiste’s in the few months before the WordPress purge.
I don’t know if it’s because his failure to moderate the shills eventually affected his output, or if he naturally gravitated to wignattery for other reasons (age?), but regardless of the reasons, I don’t think we’re going to see a whole lot of red-pill content from Heartiste anymore, even if the platform problem is solved.
His archives remain up at heartiste.org, and they’re still a valuable resource.
this is off-topic, it’s a comment on something I read a long while ago on this blog, which I hated to read. Now I have realized its meaning and purpose, and decided I’d come here to, well, tell you about it. If I were you I’d remove this comment after reading it, since it’s not on your recent subjects.
I once read here, more or less, that “a man stealing another man’s possibility to reproduce [meaning: woman] does a serious crime”. I hated it. I mean, the “woman” and the “stealer” could be really in love, and of course is the woman does what she does she wasn’t in love with the first man (or “man”), and so on, so there’s no stealing, no criminal, no nothing.
But as time went on, I came to know more and more “women”. Thanks to the Internet, I have come to know scores, rafts, of them.
And now (not then) I see when you wrote “possibility to reproduce” you meant EXACTLY a synonym for “woman”, not a part, a reduction, of what a woman was, but her entirety.
They spectacularly, regularly, unfailingly, fail to show they are anything more than a possibility to reproduce. Foremost, they fail to show they are subjects and not objects.
Therefore the “stealing” and the other names you used emerge in their meaning and purpose. It’s like taking a car, a TV set, and so on from that man. You aren’t taking something self-aware, equipped with real will, and so on. And “love” (which in my view justified her change of mate) it’s not inexistent: men can very well feel it (for example if one of the “women” I loved would tell me she couldn’t conceive offspring, it would have changed nothing in my feelings), but “women” can’t.
So it’s not possible that she leaves the first man for a worthy reason.
The last thing I would say is, still, that the second man is most likely unaware that he is taking an object, and not agreeing on a noble dream with a subject. Instead of seeing him as a criminal, I’d see him (and my former self for many years) as someone who has no idea yet of what a “woman” is, a victim of his own dreams. Surely he needs to be stopped in the tracks of what he is trying to do, but with the forgiving attitude due to the unaware,
If he knew what that woman actually is like, he’d never try to “steal” her :))))
this is all, I had to say it because it’s good to admit when we were wrong
Jim, you’ve had a huge impact on me in my life. Merry Christmas to you and to all the magnificent commenters here.
Merry christmas and a happy new year to you too, and to all my friends here.
A blessed Christmas to Jim and to all the blog’s commentariat
Merry Christmas to all of you.
Happy ho- err, merry Christmas, my fellow reactionary heterosexual goyim!
Thank yo– Waaaait a minute !
[…] Source: Jim […]
Thanks Jim. Same to you, your family, your commenters, and their families.
Thank you Jim and the same to you and yours.
Merry Christmas and a blessed New Year to my fellow commenters.
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas!
A very merry Christmas, to one and all!
Merry christmas, glorious friends! May 2020 bring us ever more winning, may the demon haunted dark pull away and the light reach back from the future to assemble itself!
Merry Christmas!
[…] Jim with Christmas wishes for all. […]
Merry Christmas lads.
This blog has answered questions on the WQ that had puzzled me for ages.
Very grateful to you and your commenters for sharing this wisdom.
Merry Christmas Jim!
Merry Christmas!
Belated merry Christmas Jim! Thanks for sharing your wisdom on so many topics, there’s no better revipedia than your blog!
Merry Christmas to you!
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas!
Christ is born!!
A happy Christmas and glorious New Year to you all!!
Looking forward to an insightful 2020 from you, and your Commentariat, Jim!
Merry Christmas, Jimbo! Get ready, there’s a lotta work to do in 2020, boys.
Does anyone know if and when Heartiste is coming back? Its been a while, and afaik he hasnt been arrested or something. What is up?
He’s on Gab, but it’s not the same:
https://gab.com/Heartiste
Its boring semi-wignat shit by the looks of it and not nearly enough space is devoted to the more interesting woman question.
That had already become a major focus of Heartiste’s in the few months before the WordPress purge.
I don’t know if it’s because his failure to moderate the shills eventually affected his output, or if he naturally gravitated to wignattery for other reasons (age?), but regardless of the reasons, I don’t think we’re going to see a whole lot of red-pill content from Heartiste anymore, even if the platform problem is solved.
His archives remain up at heartiste.org, and they’re still a valuable resource.
Whenever i see the term ‘wignat’ it feels like glowing niggers outside my house start flashing a little brighter.
That is to say, it feels like an evil word used by evil people.
Hi,
this is off-topic, it’s a comment on something I read a long while ago on this blog, which I hated to read. Now I have realized its meaning and purpose, and decided I’d come here to, well, tell you about it. If I were you I’d remove this comment after reading it, since it’s not on your recent subjects.
I once read here, more or less, that “a man stealing another man’s possibility to reproduce [meaning: woman] does a serious crime”. I hated it. I mean, the “woman” and the “stealer” could be really in love, and of course is the woman does what she does she wasn’t in love with the first man (or “man”), and so on, so there’s no stealing, no criminal, no nothing.
But as time went on, I came to know more and more “women”. Thanks to the Internet, I have come to know scores, rafts, of them.
And now (not then) I see when you wrote “possibility to reproduce” you meant EXACTLY a synonym for “woman”, not a part, a reduction, of what a woman was, but her entirety.
They spectacularly, regularly, unfailingly, fail to show they are anything more than a possibility to reproduce. Foremost, they fail to show they are subjects and not objects.
Therefore the “stealing” and the other names you used emerge in their meaning and purpose. It’s like taking a car, a TV set, and so on from that man. You aren’t taking something self-aware, equipped with real will, and so on. And “love” (which in my view justified her change of mate) it’s not inexistent: men can very well feel it (for example if one of the “women” I loved would tell me she couldn’t conceive offspring, it would have changed nothing in my feelings), but “women” can’t.
So it’s not possible that she leaves the first man for a worthy reason.
The last thing I would say is, still, that the second man is most likely unaware that he is taking an object, and not agreeing on a noble dream with a subject. Instead of seeing him as a criminal, I’d see him (and my former self for many years) as someone who has no idea yet of what a “woman” is, a victim of his own dreams. Surely he needs to be stopped in the tracks of what he is trying to do, but with the forgiving attitude due to the unaware,
If he knew what that woman actually is like, he’d never try to “steal” her :))))
this is all, I had to say it because it’s good to admit when we were wrong