A realistic path for men

The Youtube channel “Based-Camp” does a collab with the Youtube channel “Hoe-Math”.

Hoe-Math thinks there is no realistic path for men. And, indeed, there is no realistic path for him.

But obviously Based-Camp is doing OK, and I am doing OK, so there is a realistic path for us — just not for Hoe-Math and BetterBatchelor.

The majority of women believe they do not want children, do not want family, do not want perform the traditional role of a wife. What women think they want in a relationship is just not what men are likely to accept.

So the vast majority of men do not want the vast majority of women, because they are not offering anything men want other than sex, and while sex matters a lot, it does not matter so much that men are willing to put up with all the other crap all the time indefinitely. Worth it, more than worth it, for a roll in the hay, but having her around for the rest of the time is just too much like hard work. If she is disinclined to perform the duties of a wife, being together is going to get old mighty fast. And the vast majority of women do not want the vast majority of men, because inferior to their own artificially inflated status.

Because women have been artificially helicoptered up the academic and corporate status ladder, almost all women are higher in status than almost all men, and because hypergamy, women only want men higher in status than themselves.

What these women are looking for is a six foot nine inch billionaire vampire werewolf king who is madly in love with her. And if the six foot nine inch billionaire vampire werewolf king showed up and fell madly in love her she would expect him to shower her with gifts, also make his own sandwiches, pour his own beer, clean the bathroom floor, make the bed, and put the toilet seat down after he pees. She not only expects the six foot nine inch billionaire vampire werewolf king, she also expects the princess treatment, because she is accustomed to receiving the princess treatment during her brief booty calls.

It is reasonable to give a chick the princess treatment if you called her in at nine at night and are planning to throw her out once you have gotten your rocks off, but giving her the princess treatment on a permanent basis is just way too much like hard work, and there just are not that many men who would be willing to put up with that.

Well, that is what she thinks she is looking for. But it is just a shit test. If she was to actually get what she thinks she wants, and permanently got the princess treatment from the six foot nine inch billionaire vampire werewolf king who was madly in love with her, she would be mysteriously and inexplicably unhappy with the six foot nine inch billionaire vampire werewolf king, and would mysteriously and inexplicably sabotage it all by having sex with a low IQ semi homeless criminal who lives on a welfare, shoplifting, burglary, drug dealing, and sponging off his numerous high IQ high socioeconomic status girlfriends.

What she thinks she wants, is not in fact what she does want. She wants to be smacked and told to make the bed, mop the floor, and make a sandwich. And after some drama, and possibly a fair bit of smacking and maybe some choking, that is what she will do.

What women actually want is an environment resembling the ancestral environment of successful reproduction, the environment of evolutionary adaptation.  But our officially unofficial state religion requires them to officially believe that this is the worst thing in the world and an absolutely horrid and terrible crime against women.  And, because women tend to be profoundly unaware of their own conduct, actions, desires, and motivations, it is easy for them to believe, or at least believe that they believe, in what they are officially required to believe, believe in what makes you an officially good person if you believe it, and officially a very bad person, an absolutely horrible horrible person, should you doubt it.

The trouble with Hoe-math and BetterBachelor is that they are apt to take what women think that women want seriously, and they are disinclined to take a substantial risk of going to jail in order to give women what women actually do want.

OK, giving women what they actually do want is dangerous, terribly dangerous, but, if you are prudent and brave, probably less dangerous than hunting mammoths or wife raiding the Irish.

And irrational optimism is safer than rational pessimism, because if you believe you can get away with it, women probably will let you get away with it. If Hoe-math and Better-Bachelor tried doing what I do, they would probably be in jail for twenty years, because they are rationally pessimistic.

But individual solutions can never save the race or the civilization, because hypergamy means that most men are inherently excluded, no matter how good they are at game, someone handsomer richer, and better at game will mop up all the chicks, and if the ordinary man briefly manages to score one of the heavily used and somewhat worn leavings, she is going to cheat on him at the first opportunity.

Under our current officially unofficial state religion, the white race and western civilization is going to disappear in a few generations.  The future belongs to those that show up, and right now the only groups reproducing are old type Muslims and Christians in subsaharan Africa, old type Muslims in Afghanistan, and various minority denominations here and there.

The civilisational solution is:

1. Restrain female sexual choice. Women should only be allowed to sleep with someone who can reasonably be expected to marry them. This means criminalizing hypergamy, coming down hard, very hard, on female sexuality. Recall the Old Testament had the death penalty for women that slept around, but no penalty for a man who seduced or abducted an unbetrothed non virgin. Hypergamy prevents family formation. It is female sexuality that is the problem.
2. Require wives to obey their husbands. Require husbands and wives to have sex with each other. Authorize husband to apply reasonable and proportionate physical discipline. And back all this up with theocracy, as Anglicanism did from 1660 to 1820. Scripture does not tell men and women to love each other. It commands husbands and wives to have sex, commands men to cherish their wives, but wives to fear and obey their husbands. And, surprise surprise, woman rather like to stick around with men that frighten them.
3. Exclude women from teaching men. Require women to remain silent in the most important social situations.

The prescription for above replacement fertility is in the bible. Unfortunately, today’s priests and pastors have the same attitude to the people and stories of the bible as the Disney staff who produced live action Snow White had to the original Snow White and its fans, as the people who produced Starfleet Academy had to the original Startrek and its fans, as the people who produced “The Acolyte” (Lesbian Witches in Space) had to the original Star Wars movies and their fans: Contempt, condescension, derision, hatred, and malice. Therefore no one shows up for those Church services, just as no one shows up for those movies. Why show up so that your enemies can piss on you? Thus any Church that goes post Christian vanishes in two or three generations, turning into a real estate business, a Gaia Global Warming Climate Change museum, or an anarcho communist bookstore.

Disney producers hate the original intellectual properties and want to punish the fans and make them suffer, because toxic masculinity, sexism, racism, colonialism, and so on and so forth, but none of those intellectual properties has nearly as much toxic masculinity, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, and all that as the Bible.

Our officially unofficial state religion requires us to believe that human nature is infinitely malleable and that the right education, therapy, or political reorganization can redeem and perfect mankind.  The current failure to reproduce or form families is the result of terrifyingly drastic coercive measure intended to remake us into something we cannot be and should not be.  Something the Book of Genesis tells us is contrary to the Divine plan.

The individual solution for successful family formation is to refuse to be terrified and go right ahead implementing a family in accordance with the extremely illegal Divine prescription regardless of the potentially horrifying consequences. Women are like dogs.  They are just not happy except as property.

But this will not save civilization.  The collective solution, which will save civilization, is to reject the enlightenment as heresy, a heresy with an enormous body count, and accept that men and women are what they are.

Women hunger for the ancestral environment of successful reproduction, which is the social environment that scripture commands men to provide for women. But our officially unofficial religion requires us to believe that this is a horrible horrible crime against women and that women absolutely hate it. My empirical experience, however, is that they do not hate it at all.