Emmet Till was not lynched, but he should have been.

You tube video of white woman walking for ten hours through the vibrant part of town. Numerous catcalls and numerous menacing pickup attempts, 108 catcalls and crude and menacing pick up attemps, one every six minutes, all of them from vibrants.

You tube video of white woman walking for ten hours through the white part of town. A few stares, mostly from vibrants, no catcalls, and two courteous pick up attempts, one every five hours.

29 Responses to “Emmet Till was not lynched, but he should have been.”

  1. Dave says:

    Off-topic, but I’d be interested to read your opinions of the Iguala case. Mainstream media reports it as a senseless atrocity, but from what I gather at Wikipedia, the students were Marxists who made a habit of commandeering buses to get to their next protest march. Local authorities tolerated their crap, but when they tried it in another city, not knowing that its mayor and police were all mafia, they got massacred.

    • Alan J. Perrick says:


      Sweet story. Too bad the Rightists didn’t win in the end, but we’ve got to celebrate what we can…

      Best regards,


    • jim says:

      Sort of on topic, since the header says that lynching is often a good idea.

      I don’t know any more about this than you, probably less, but, given the information in Wikipedia, I interpret this as a clash between mobile bandits and stationary bandits. The Ayotzinapa Teachers Training college is an organization of mobile bandits, who claim the right to predate on anyone anywhere, including bus companies, due to their superior holiness.

      The Guerreros Unidos Mafia are stationary bandits, who claim that no one has the right to predate on those that pay them protection money.

      Students predated on a bus company that had paid the Mafia protection money.

      The problem, however is that students were, of course, holy, while the Mafia were low life scum. We need stationary bandits that are more like samurai – claim superiority due to nobility and performing their duty.

  2. Alan J. Perrick says:

    I really liked seeing that New Zealand video. That’s what the internet is about, getting the truth out there. Going to peruse that video’s comment section for luls.


  3. Mister Grumpus says:

    Also: I love this. The internet doesn’t make lying any harder, but it does make the truth much-much easier to discover for those inclined.

    And there I was, just 10-15 years ago, such a dumbass, believing that finally, with the Internet, the Pink Progressive Sesame Street Gospel would conquer the earth. Sheesh.

  4. Mister Grumpus says:

    Of course there’s Google and the Laserjet at work, but can I just buy a Big Book of Moldbug? He could definitely sell them if he wanted to.

  5. Wyowanderer says:

    Poor white princess.

  6. Adolf the anti-White says:

    One suspects that harassment was the beginning of most white-female/black-male sexual relationships.

  7. Adolf the anti-White says:


    Have you posted all (or most) of the old books you’ve read on this website?

    • jim says:

      I have not really kept track of them. It is not that any of them caused the truth to strike like lightning. Rather, their reality just slowly percolated in, and just seemed decent, civilized, and normal. Mostly they were not specifically on explicitly political issues, but rather I gradually became aware of their taken for granted background world. Moldbug favorites some books specifically about leftism “The Bow of Ulysses”, a Moldbug favorite, was about anti colonialism and led me to realize that it went back a long way, that the British empire was an anti colonialist project.

  8. peppermint says:

    Leave it to Jim to say the things that I should know but apparently don’t have the balls to know. Yes. This video is proof that Blacks getting beaten for whistling at White women was justified. When I was in school I would always hear about how terrible it was that Blacks were beat up for whistling at White women. I did ask the question, isn’t whistling at women bad? And the answer was oppression.

    Actual sexual abusers are not dealt with on their first or even their tenth offense, while pretend sexual abusers are dealt with harshly and immediately. Till and his father should probably have been lynched before they were both killed for attempted rape and rape, one furtively, the other by the Army.

  9. grumpy the grump says:

    “I read old books, and Mencius Moldbug read old books.”

    Heh. For your next trick, maybe you’ll read some actual Mencius, and then we’d have some stuff to really discuss.

  10. Brian says:

    Which old books?

    I need to start reading them.

  11. Dr. Faust says:

    What’s the point of this?

    • jim says:

      The original video was to prove that men are evil and women are victims

      The second video was to prove that women are protected by white men, and don’t seem particularly grateful.

      • Brian says:

        Great insight.

        But how was Emmett Till not lynched?

        • jim says:

          Emmet Till was quietly and furtively killed by the husband of the woman he groped, and his body hidden.

          A lynching takes place in public and is performed by the most eminent and respected members of the community, who gain status and power by very publicly protecting the community from wrongdoers.

          The man who killed Emmet Till acted as if it was illegal and socially unapproved to protect one’s wife from groping blacks.

          • Brian says:

            Wait. Wow. Damn.

            Where did you learn to think like this?

            • jim says:

              I read old books, and Mencius Moldbug reads old books. Mencius Moldbug posted a bunch of very long blog posts telling us that leftism went back a very long way, has been insane for a very long time, and getting steadily more insane for a very long time. Upon reading him, I realized that not only was this true, but I had long known it to be true, and not known it that I knew it to be true.

              You have heard of known knowns, known unknowns, and unknown unknowns. Well this was, for me, an unknown known.

          • Alrenous says:

            Unknown knowns, alias aliefs, though aliefs can be either known or unknown.

          • josh says:

            Good points. What do you make of the acquittal? A knee-jerk response to outsider interference?

            • jim says:

              There was evidence that they abducted and beat Emmet Till, but, seems the fish had been busy before the body was recovered, hence no very clear evidence that the body was Till’s. Maybe Till had just run away. Reasonable doubt.

          • josh says:

            I’m not sure. The ring is a fairly strong identifier (though without the benefit of hindsight and a confession not necessarily iron clad) along with the mother’s identification. Taken with the circumstantial evidence that it was known that these men had abducted a young black boy and beat him severely, these identifications of the body of a severely beaten young black boy probably should has sufficed. Not to mention, why weren’t Bryant and Milam indicted on kidnapping charges?

            Till’s funeral had something like 50K viewers. Northern newspapers started calling the murder a “lynching” which it obviously wasn’t. If you were a white southerner you might be forgiven for thinking that this is Leo Frank or the Scottsboro boys all over again (which it pretty much was).

            On the other hand, I actually wouldn’t be shocked if there was some kind of jury manipulation or bribery from the left as there was in the Leo Frank case. It certainly worked out in their favor.

      • Dr. Faust says:

        Women are never grateful. Nor will they ever be.

        White men have this nasty history of worshipping women. It makes me sick. White men enable the narcissism of women.

  12. Adolf the anti-White says:

    It would be interesting to see how many cat-calls would be made is a swastika-tattooed skinhead was walking alongside her.

    • Alan J. Perrick says:

      You mean one of those anti-white thugs we’re always talking about.

      “The thugs are the white version of the Polar Bear Hunting done by black thugs. They control all campuses. If a speaker might question white genocide, they simply threaten to riot and the speaker is banned by the faculty “to prevent trouble.””

Leave a Reply