Gay families bang their children

Obviously I totally endorse “marital rape”, a category of “rape” that did not exist until the seventies or so. I am also in favor of slavery for able bodied and undeserving poor – for those that are simply disinclined to work, and will, if left to their own devices, hunt and gather in the urban jungle. Most single mothers should be forced to marry someone.

Even real rape, as in a naked stranger jumps a woman and drags her into the bushes, we overpunish and overreact to it because we are forbidden to punish and condemn what we really want to punish, the violation of male property rights in a woman’s reproductive and sexual services. A husband is far more concerned that his wife might be raped, than a wife is concerned that she might be raped. Hence the extreme condemnation of real and imaginary “sex crimes”. The harm done by rape, genuine forcible stranger rape, real no kidding rape, is primarily that it undermines paternal certainty and male property rights in women. Therefore, as in the old testament, we should punish sexual misconduct primarily as a violation of male property rights in woman, with coercion being primarily a female excuse and justification, rather than an aggravating factor in the offense committed by the male.

In the Old Testament if a wife or betrothed virgin voluntarily slept with a man other than her husband, she and the man both executed, if raped, only the man executed. If a man seduced or raped a virgin, the primary punishment was that he had to marry her and stay married. If a man raped an unmarried non virgin … well this case seems to be too minor and inconsequential for the old testament to directly address. The Old Testament does not distinguish between raping and seducing an unbetrothed virgin. Would the Hebrews then have distinguished between raping and seducing an unmarried non virgin?

With most crimes we realize there is a continuum, between minor stuff that should generally be piously and hypocritically overlooked, even though technically it is illegal and potentially subject to drastic punishment, minor stuff that requires minor enforcement, generally social or warnings, and major stuff that must be stopped by violence.

With sexual activities, everything is either absolutely sacred, or the absolutely vilest crime ever. All sex criminals are the most horrible human being that ever there was, or they are sacred victims. Our extreme overreaction to some relatively minor sex crimes is because there are so many major sex crimes that we are forbidden to punish, forbidden to condemn, and indeed required to celebrate – such as actions that deprive children of their biological parents.

In the ancestral environment women were not allowed agency in sexual and reproductive matters, and when allowed agency today, exercise it poorly. They should exercise agency in such manners only under strict supervision, as for example the seventeenth century upper class system, where daughters were kept locked up once they became fertile, until their “coming out”, when they were required to engage in sexy dancing with parentally preselected batchelors. They then either promptly married one of those bachelors, or they became engaged, “engagement” meaning that if she had sex, or perhaps if she became pregnant, they were legally and socially required to marry, and the marriage was irrevocable. Female choice, rather than being treated as absolutely sacred and protected by law, needs to be legally and socially restrained. The modern Christian idea that women should wander around freely getting drunk, but remain virgins till thirty or so, and then get married, is absurd. The medieval system of relatively late virgin marriage was based on extreme coercive restraints on women to stop them from banging like a dunny door in a high wind.