And George Galloway is a straight commie.
George Galloway is in his seventies, and for as long as I can remember he was the leading voice and face of the radical left of the British labour party, and was organising protests against the western side in every war that I can remember. (In 2003 he was purged from labour for being too far left.) He is now self exiled from Britain, from his house, his home and the circle of his friends, due to a well founded fear that should he show his face in a British airport, he will be subject to state violence because he thinks that women are not men, because he thinks that it is probably not a good idea for Britain to pick a fight with a state that has three thousand nuclear weapons, and similarly shocking and unthinkable thoughts.
In the Iraq war, George Galloway was a guest on the BBC every day ranting about American imperialism. For the last decade or so, he has been persona non grata in the European legacy media, and, predictably, cancellation, demonetization, and deplatforming has now escalated to state violence.
Nick Fuentes hyperbolically claims to be the most cancelled man in America. Elon Musk thinks that Nick Fuentes is on the fed payroll. And I agree.
Nick Fuentes was invited onto “Piers Morgan Uncensored”, and much hilarity ensued as Piers Morgan was completely discombobulated to find he was debating someone who was actually uncensored.
Piers Morgan would show a Nick Fuentes clip, and complain that the clip was ism and phobia, and accuse Nick of being an ist and a phobe. Nick would smile like the cat that got the cream, and cheerfully say the unsayable all over again. Nick effortlessly won every argument, because Nick has thought all these things through while Piers Morgan has never heard these thoughts nor seen this evidence and still cannot hear these thoughts nor see this evidence.
But Nick is still a gay commie. The reason they are platforming Nick Fuentes while they are still trying to put Andrew Tate in jail is that though Nick Fuentes is right about women and the holocaust, Andrew Tate is a lot more right about women than Nick Fuentes.
The difference between Fuentes and Tate on women is that though they both say that women need to be conquered and subdued, Tate also says that they want to be conquered and subdued, and are bitter and unhappy because they cannot find anyone capable of conquering and subduing them.
Nick Fuentes is a limited hangout. He is the left deciding to open the Overton window substantially, but by no means all the way — not to anyone who actually frightens them.
It was entertaining to see Nick slice and dice Piers, it was good to see the mainstream encounter someone saying the unsayable, but every answer Nick gave was a soft wobbly retreat from the full thought crime. We have better and more important things to say that he was willing to say.
It is great that the British left is now willing to hear what Nick Fuentes is saying. But they still cannot hear what George Galloway is saying, and still less can they hear what Andrew Tate is saying.
Playing with the chinese Kimi LLM and I’m not sure if I lucked into a context window, but it seems profoundly based. Selected chunks from a conversation about capturing the culture if we live in a timeline where woke dies on its own sword but we never got a proper replacement installed at the state level. I hardly nudged it, I just said something to the effect of “we got here through distributed evolution of ideas, we need to enforce virtue on the common man”
I poked it a bit about diminished virtue and our decentralized power being incapable of fixing it, mentioned marriage collapse as the most pressing concern, and suddenly we get ideas that have been tossed around in the comments here. I did not use any ‘Dark Enlightenment’ shibboleths, nor try and guide it there. I was more interested in probing the idea that LLMs and short form video could at least attenuate the worst of the virtue collapse, and found myself shocked at how quickly it spat out the conclusions we so often go over here.
Oh please, JIM just censored and deleted more economic posts that he did not LIKE[*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
If you want to post on economics, or any topic, first pass the shill test
Nothing is censored on this blog. Posts get deleted for what the poster is strangely unable to say, not what he does say.
> shill test
You don’t even have an economics shill test copypasta.
[*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
Any thought crime will do. Discuss the woman question. The point and purpose of the shill test is to detect whether you are sitting behind an office desk in the office of a Soros ngo, with a supervisor standing over you telling you to infiltrate the right, a computer supplied by the ngo IT department in front of you, and your bonus depends on getting engagement for memes cooked up by ngo headquarters.
Isn’t that the exact purpose of a shill test?
Seems like the answer is for you to create a JQ shill test for me to take.
If you yourself are willing to commit crimethink about Jews, then it shouldn’t be too difficult, right?
Whoops, forgot to reply.
Trial and error has taught that the most effective shill test is the women question. Sure, some versions of the race question, jew question and faith question work, some of the time, but the women question has by far the best track record.
Covid was a biological weapon deployed by the CIA against China.
That virus wasn’t strong and long enough to work.
I accept that women being in positions of authority over men does not work, but why exactly is this?
Women seem to be allergic to taking responsibility for their decisions, or being held accountable. Is this because they are naturally risk averse, not getting reproductive advantages from sticking out?
Unowned women misbehaving to try and get stopped by a strong man is easy enough to understand, and causes trouble in organizations where they are managers.
What about all-women groups? They don’t have the acting out problem, and various traditional groups like sewing clubs or whatever can seem to function ok aside from occasional interpersonal drama. I guess these groups don’t need actual leadership, as their existence just requires some routine procedures. Female groups do seem to establish a pecking order based around subtle political factors, but they seem to sabotage each other more than male groups, who perhaps depend on each other to take on the world together, as opposed to the women who only benefit from sabotaging rivals.
They attract and are attracted to anti-social men. And they will gate keep against good husbands and fathers. Sewing circles are great, providing the men responsible for the roof are also guarding the gate.
It is because they evolved for millions of years in an environment where they weren’t responsible for their decisions, and could not be held accountable. Security of woman and children derived solely from the capacity (note, capacity does not necessarily mean predilection) of the husband/father to commit violence against other men.
Asking “why” is a little like asking why a dog cannot comprehend the anger of its master yelling at it after coming home to find a mess on the rug. The dog has no memory of the act itself, nor the circumstances leading up to it, and merely acted on instinct in the first place, and the yelling only serves to terrorize the animal while serving no training purpose.
For women to act responsibly, it must be a conditioned behavior, and the only people who can condition them are men they look up to, almost always a husband or sometimes a father, exercising careful discipline.
They are far worse than you imagine, full of drama and infighting. Exceptions can sometimes be made if, as Adam says, there is a virtuous man guarding the gate, and/or if all the women in the group are happily married outside of the group.
But an all female group of single teenagers or twenty-somethings? Turns into “mean girls” instantly, or just goes cruising for cock, preferably the kind that won’t take no for an answer. And older, less-fertile groups go all-out Karen, which you can observe by going to an HOA meeting or signing into Nextdoor.
I spend too much time watching Taylor the Fiend and similar YouTube channels where a male cartoon avatar plays and comments on videos of women saying retarded shit on TikTok.
My only disagreement is that they expect women to be responsible and accountable, which is as unrealistic and unnatural as women expecting men to exhibit “emotional intelligence”.
I’m re-reading an old interview of Khomeini by Oriana Fallaci. Lol, shocking and backwards in an earlier time, now he seems pretty based. Here is the WQ:
https://archive.ph/MAvva
Basedness does not somehow make a False (and frankly bastardly dark and evil) Religion, a True and Good Faith based in Light and Good Will.
If people want to borrow elements of basedness, fine, but don’t be quoting where it came from because 95% of people are weak and aren’t knowledgeable enough to protect themselves from the Lying Dawahganda of the Islamic Apologists, let alone able to hold frame and defeat their BS with polemic facts.
As the great sage has told us, “La religion la plus con, c’est quand même l’islam”. Iran is furthermore unsuitable as a paragon because they have Altar but no Throne. (Then again, we have neither, or, here in Europe, almost only empty Thrones and mostly desecrated Altars.)
Even so, I think we can appreciate basedness, whatever its source. Khomeini is one more example, like Qutb, of someone Islamic who was sheep dipped in the Post-WW2 Liberal Order (as a long-time exile in Paris, if memory serves) but rejected it.
What does everyone make of the blackmailed/bribe/secret democrat but definitely traitorous GOP congresscritters funding the National Endowment for Democracy and the Justice Departments Community Relations Service?
They should be hung, same as white parents who put their children in nigger/muslim/jew/hindu daycares.
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/2011884747488968711
They love faggots and niggers, and not even the cominator noticed the proof… maybe someone will stop the insanity, but I doubt it.
https://x.com/amuse/status/2011913141328728141
I think you put it pretty well!
But the 2026 timing strongly suggests another 2017 throw the midterm election effort. We didn’t send them to the Congress with a mandate to do almost nothing, as happened in 2025, so formally being out of power 2027-8 puts less heat on those who manage to keep their seats.
I mean, it’s largely performative, it’s not like the post-Watergate normal order legislative process is going to determine the next spending bill, which is hinted to be “shutdown the government to stop ICE.” Which _is_ an existential issue for the Democrats.
In general that process has more and more been an abject failure, although now there’s the wild card of AI to help analyze thousand page bills in hours, as we saw after the 2024 election but before the handover. The sort of thing that might have caught Moynihan’s Section 1706 destruction and more of the existing technical independent contractor arrangement at the time. Well, if we’d had a way to publicize it back in 1986:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Reform_Act_of_1986#Tax_treatment_of_technical_service_firms_employing_certain_professionals
In 1942 there were effectively ZERO of these foresworn conquerors in your country, things were good… then somehow you allowed both Leftists to takeover, and Conquerors in…
But what’s even more unclear to me is what anyone will actually do to shove them all back out.
People better start growing some guts to do the nasty, because history shows that’s what’s required if you want your grandchildren to still play outside and look and pray like you.
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/2012316909778415842
People have to stand up together in public and start speaking the Real Talk. Church Militant, anti-heritage incompatibles commies and ill-willers out… type talk.
Chinese? CIA is hiring.
https://x.com/CIA/status/2011802282589835414
此视频提供安全联系中央情报局的全套步骤。以下有几个在进行安全联系之前及在过程中务必考量的事项。中情局想知道中国的真相，我们正在寻找知道并能告知真相的人。
Maybe some Chinese are having second thoughts about what their Govt is doing.
China has a large Internet PsyOp army, Great Firewall, etc.
The old “Xi-The-Pooh” memes evolved into AI movie trailers 🙂
Remember the “Chinese Dissidents” spreading Hunter Biden’s Laptop around… whatever happened to that side of the story.
Would be much better if CIA would run implosion ops against the GloboHomo Left and Corrupt types… say Soros Gates Schwab etc (schemers at the top), Vonderleyen Omar Starmer Cenk etc (bitplayers), their “Foundations/NGOs”, the WEF, the US DNC… but if getting some OPLAN’s and Lefterizing the ChiCom’s against each other is all they can muster, so be it. At the very least that would give reason to implode Newsom, who shoved the homeless out to paint the streets Hammer-Sickle Commie Red Star for Xi’s invite to CA.
Supporting the refugee-industrial complex, of course.
https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th/id/OIP.6HOk6UFUA-As5o-fo_8t-QHaFI
WTF, Bhutan? The others are fourth-world shitholes, but why are refugees fleeing the Happiest Country on Earth? Because Bhutan’s population was 20% ethnic Nepali, the majority Bhutanese felt they’d be happier without them, and the US agreed to take them. These Nepali-Bhutanese-Americans now have the highest welfare dependency (81.4% according to DJT) of any immigrant group.
America has become a dumping ground for the world’s unwanted diversity!
It’s more than ethnicity driving the split
Buddhism/Hinduism % Bhutan 75/22 Nepal 9/82
Would it be improper to hang the Importers if they were importing over 85% eligible women, but now they’re importing 80% men and effectively 0% eligible women.
In part because if the below WQ trends continue, there may be no other option.
https://x.com/IterIntellectus/status/2012220254504530043
https://x.com/zarathustra5150/status/2011851505834352809
Men need to bring back Finishing Schools to send their daughters to, no cell phones allowed.
Not to pick nits, but the word “gay” must be retired as an anticoncept. Same for “homosexual” , though with different reasons why it’s an anticoncept.
Buggerer, pederast, invert, epicene, pervert etc are better as terms.
Homosexual is a clinical term its fine.
Gay is an evil rebranding of language. If you are a fan of music from the 1950s and early 1960s as I am you will note that gay is very often used to mean very happy. Rebranding faggots or “homosexuals” as gay was an attempt to improve their image while messing up the lyrics of a lot of old really great songs. So yes homosexuals/faggots should never be referred to as “gay”.
It makes older cinema a bit awkward as well:
https://youtu.be/pJ-2V1aHhds?t=1039
That it is used clinically is part of the anticonceptuality of it.
“Sex” is an anticoncept shorthand for the real concept, “sexual intercourse”, that is, something that occurs between the two (that is, two different) sexes. “Homosexual intercourse” and “homosexuality” were terminological steps on the way to replacing the ancient concept of sexual intercourse with the fake modern surrogate, “sex” as a form of erotic friction — masturbation — with the particulars of the SEXes involved as something merely accidental.
The modern mind has many things to unlearn and this is easy terminology to stop using.
Maybe you’re right I hadn’t thought that far but homosexual was used way before there was any tolerance of them.
But definitely the priority is to nuke using “gay” for faggots first.
“Homosexual” also shares with “gay” the problem that having a label that sounds like a category, instead of a label for a behavior (buggerer, pederast) or a term of derision (pervert, faggot, sissy, nancy-boy), creates from thin air the impression that it is an actual Type Of Person rather than simply a disorder that some people happen to have. Which is foundational for prog LGBT-ism.
As someone here (Aidan?) said, it is imperative to deny attention to poofs, and denying them the category status suggested by “homosexual” is part of that.
Valid point, but ‘gay and fake’ just rolls of the tongue so nicely.
Yeah, “fake and gay” is indeed a great phrase. Keeping “gay” around as a term of derision seems fine even if the non pejorative forms must be banned.
But variants like “fake and epicene” are not bad either. “Fake and fag” or even “ersatz and epicene” are alliterative.