As our state religion goes lefter and lefter, indoctrination in the schools has become ever more extreme, intense and deranged.
The boys are rebelling against maniacal hatred, demonization, and systematic heavy handed discrimination against males, but the girls are sucking it up.
And in consequence, going every more evil and insane, ever more sad, crazy, and depressed. And every less likely to have sex, let alone love and romance, and most of all, ever less likely to ever have children.
The red pill is an effort to teach men to understand women. But today’s women understand themselves even less.
At puberty, girls experience a sudden and extraordinary shock. They become sexually desirable and desired. This is genuinely terrifying, and they have no idea how to handle it, how to respond, and tend to respond in ways that become every crazier and self destructive.
One day, a girl wakes up and she is a sex object. This is terrifying. Men want her and they are bigger than her and stronger than her.
Of course women want to be desired, and they especially want to be desired by scary dangerous men. They want to be scared. But they don’t understand that they want this. They think that they very much want to not be scared. And they are very vigorously taught that it is bad, wicked and oppressive, that men are scaring them. It is not easy for a woman to understand that she desires to be frighteningly desired, and it is a great deal harder for her to understand this when she is being taught that this is horrible patriarchal oppression. That she does not want it, and in fact hates, what she wants. And there is considerable truth in the story that she is being brainwashed with — she truly does not want it, she truly does hate it. But also she does truly want it and she loves what she hates.
Used to be there were social rules, customs to handle this, and women were firmly steered towards paths for dealing with it. Now, however, all that cultural knowledge has been systematically destroyed, and those customs effectively criminalised.
So girls are now lost, in a storm of powerful forces within them and outside them.
Girls should not be in coed education when they suddenly and shockingly start to get hot. They are not mentally equipped to handle it — not at any age, but even less at that age.
Just as the cafeteria diet, the 24/7 availability of tasty snacks, makes them morbidly obese, the ready availability of the dreaded and desired male gaze makes them whores, resulting in hoeflation.
Within the official Sex-Positivity doctrine, the constraints that steered girls towards appropriate relationships with men are seen as old-fashioned and oppressive. So she is likely to become a social media whore — posting sexy pictures for attention — but somehow all that attention is unlikely to lead to a relationship, other than number twenty on mister one in thirty’s booty call list, which renders all that attention rather less satisfactory than it seemed at first.
The relentless and coercive Sex-Positivity of the education system for girls is not actually sex positive at all, for it amounts to a forceful demand that girls act like sodomites, which, the sexual nature of women being very different, is not only anti love and anti reproduction, is also, for women, anti sex. Gay Sex-Positivity results in schoolgirls having sex with lots of different men, but nonetheless having very little sex.
Love is war, love is a battlefield. All is fair in love and war.
Now it is all war, and there is no love. Sex-Positivity winds up as a social media performance, conducted purely digitally.
Men suffer hoeflation, women find that performing sexiness merely degrades them. Gender dysphoria is one of many self destructive female responses to the male gaze. Women hate themselves, because not only do they compare every man to Mister One in Thirty, they compare themselves to Miss One in a Hundred.
Mister One in Thirty, they discover, sees them as just a hole to relieve himself in. If they were like Miss One in a Hundred, they think, they would get way more of that much hated, and much wanted, male gaze, and Mister one in Thirty would love them.
Sexual norms today skirt around one obvious, horrifying fact: women like being sex objects. And they especially skirt around the most horrifying fact of them all — that women don’t actually like being sex objects for men that do not frighten them. They like being sex objects of scary dangerous frightening men. Today’s young women don’t know this, and dare not admit to it. And this is driving them insane.
Women are deranged, and the youngest women are the most severely deranged because no one is honest with them and they cannot be honest with themselves. If anyone speaks the truth to them, he is apt to be severely punished.
Women are not allowed to know that they desire to be desired and loved. Supposedly they should only desire a high powered career. And it is intolerably low status, horrible, and disgusting, for a woman to act in ways that are likely to result in her being not only desired, but also loved. That if they want to fall in love and want to be a mother, they are traitors to their sex, that they are collaborating in the oppression of women by that horrible male gaze. That it is not OK to be what girls inherently are. Reflect on the outrage and hostility directed against the homemaker Youtube genre.
They don’t know how act in ways likely to result in love and motherhood, so they act in weird and self destructive ways.
Ultimately, this ends one of two ways: either the men of the West at long last say, “No more,” and do what should have been done from the beginning and make women property again with coverture as the law of the land in which case we can begin to sort out the other problems their participation in governance has created. Or we continue until such time as our problems are great enough that some other entity that is not as crazy has the ability to overcome us and by that very expedient, impose their own rules of control on the women of our nations. Be it Islam, be it some kind of Confucian legal arrangement, I don’t know. But I do know that we cannot continue as we are because at some point the whole thing goes tits up otherwise.
The most insidious aspect of how girls are conditioned by the globohomo system
1) Education system lowers relative male status making women unreceptive to their SMV match
2) Feminist conditioning – teaching them they should want to be strong and independent when sexual and subconscious desire of woman is to submit and be a helpmate
3) Teaching them to be offended by the male gaze when women should naturally enjoy the male gaze
Makes them far crazier than they are naturally and leads to widespread use of overeating and hard drug use among women which makes things worse
> Do women absent conditioning by the globohomo system like to be sex objects for Mr average
Very hard to say because under most historical systems for women with any sort of family left, advertising themselves as such was strongly discouraged. Women will break all the rules and be stoned for adultery to sleep with general butt naked for Mr average even naturally would not break rules but it’s not sure they hated the male gaze from Mr average. I have known women (not strippers) who have told me they used to love getting catcalled walking by construction sites and were pissed feminists killed that.
They certainly like being sex objects more for violent and high status men but I think it takes outright feminist conditioning to make them outright hate the male gaze from Mr average. Under more natural conditions all males or almost all potentially scary and desirable.
“Do women absent conditioning by the globohomo system like to be sex objects for Mr average”
No, they don’t. And it is not necessary that they do.
I come from a country where a religious patriarchy ruled when I was a kid, long time ago. Average women were not “mad in love” with Mr. Average. Let me explain an example.
Before I was born, my future uncles visited my future aunts’s home in presence of the entire family (back then, the only respectable way to conduct courtship was under the supervision of the parents). All of them prayed together the Rosary by the stove during the long nights of winter. No movies with handsome guys, no sex before marriage, no social media, … It was about 60 something years ago and it seems the Middle Ages.
My uncles were Mr. Average and my aunts were Ms. Average. My aunts never expressed the desire to marry somebody else. They were content with their boyfriends. The family never thought my uncles were below my aunts. This was assortative mating. There were tons of couples like that.
While my uncles were praying the Rosary, my aunts used to fall asleep. My uncles had to continue the Rosary with the family while my aunts slept on their chairs. This was the extent of the excitement they had for their boyfriends. The only time they could see their boyfriends and they preferred to sleep.
Now, three of these four people are dead. They had good marriages. They didn’t divorce, they didn’t have crisis in the marriage, they raised kids and walked together until death. The women were not madly in love. They did not need this to have a good life. I was close. Not spectacular, not without problems, not Romeo-and-Juliet. Simply, a better life than your average woman in America.
What was the key? The key is that, back then, women did not have unrealistic expectations. They knew that good enough is good enough. They did not want Mr. One-in-Thirty because they knew that they could not get it. They married for companionship, for help, for raising kids… Of course, they loved their husbands but they were not “madly in love” with them.
If you want women to be madly in love, you should go back to the Stone Age, when man evolved and an alpha man could marry many wives. That is, the way it is in some African countries. That is, being poor as dirt: women work, alphas are provided by their wives and beta don’t have incentive to work. Bening, Cote d’Ivoire… I have friends from there. If you want a functioning civilization, women had to be told and taught what to want. No civilization gives women what they want biologically so they are madly in love. It’s excitement or civilization. You choose.
Country (sounds vaguely like it must be De Valera’s Ireland)?
Definitely need a strong hand there because Irish women are left to their own devices unusually domineering and troublesome generally sort of like Jewish women but much less intelligent (i do like redheads though).
@NwrdScissrhands: “We found the answer to the Fermi paradox. As a civilization becomes sufficiently advanced it eventually forgets why women don’t have rights, gives it to them, then all progress stops until the inevitable collapse.”
Based!
Auron MacIntyre is right: the GOP has just torched the last shred of credibility the Trump Admin had, sacrificed deportations and every other domestic policy, deliberately plowed the midterms and 2028 into the hillside, and insulted the intelligence of their constituents with brazen and incoherent lies, all for this so-much-more-important neocon war with Iran at the behest of Israel.
Who needs to blackpill people, when you’ve got the videos from Huckabee, Rubio, and Mike Johnson?
Anyone want to register their predictions for how long until we’re putting boots on the ground in Iran to “spread democracy”? (I’m surprised we haven’t heard any “the Iranian people will greet us as liberators” comments yet, but I’m sure it’s just a matter of time.)
I believe that bat-shit insane and nuclear shit tests are not a natural state of affairs for women, but purely because of the social environment caused by an insane state religion.
Feminism was all right so long as the state religion winked at it and said “ha ha not serious.” Once the evil official state religion made feminism and female emancipation so holy that they started actively punishing men for passing women’s shit tests, men have slowly stopped playing the game and women have become increasingly frustrated because they have no proper way to elicit the strong male hand and the only option is to keep increasing the shit testing until it becomes way too hard for any individual man to even attempt to pass it.
The problem is not individual men passing individual women’s shit tests any more. Because the individual shit tests of women have become too dangerous to pass not because of the women themselves but because of the state. The involved woman doesn’t even have to complain against a man any more; if an inquisitive Karen neighbor merely suspects that a man is “mistreating” his wife inside the privacy of his home, all she has to do is lift the phone and the state can send in the police to inquire.
Basically men, other than the most confident alpha, do not want to deal with that shit.
That’s why a return to monarchy which at least recognizes, if not supports, the patriarchal authority of the male head of families to deal with the women under their authority as per their discretion is the only feasible and stable option to deal with the women problem as a whole. Once women get feedback on their less intense shit tests, and realize that more intense shit testing thereafter may lead to more painful outcomes, they will also slowly alter their behavior accordingly.
Why anyone gives a fuck about the Jews, and to the detriment of themselves… suicidal. What did the Jews ever do for anyone?… nothing.
x.com/jakeshieldsajj/status/2029374588342419676
x.com/jakeshieldsajj/status/2029101454254809390
https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2012/07/23/38-studios-end-game/
How could such a great pitcher be such a terrible businessman? Because of high self-esteem. Pitchers don’t need the slightest trace of self-doubt because the team’s manager decides when they’re getting tired and need to be substituted.
Women have higher self-esteem than men (even the fatties think they’re 10s!), which results in a much lower suicide rate, but also leads to poor life choices. This wasn’t a problem in the old days, when women’s important life choices were made by men.
Old headline and I lived around there… Schilling was not such a bad guy personally but given that he took government money in such an amount and failed I have to say in any competently run state he probably should have been executed for such a collossal failure (along with those who gave it to them). In China it certainly would have happened. When you invest government money into things (which is sometimes necessary for some capex heavy industries, I would never do it for a game studio) you need to have dire consequences for failure since there are innately such corrupt incentives around government money.
Speculation on possible motives for the Iran “SMO”? Who was pushing for it, why, why did Trump go along, etc.
Houthis still a problem and they are much smaller than Iran. Did they expect regime change to just work? They got cocky because kidnapping Maduro just worked?
Looking like a very likely outcome is Hormuz gets blocked indefinitely. Is this 4D chess to do with East Asian energy supplies? Doesn’t have to be smart and well planned 4D chess, I mean only that the Empire somehow converged on “deny China Iran’s oil” and just went and did it.
Yes all the guesses are likely to be wrong but I’m interested in thought processes that aren’t “ZOG strikes again boots on the ground two more weeks Trumpzog is finished.” Asking the right questions might reveal structure underneath the actions of the Empire, even if the answers we arrive at first are likely to be incorrect.
China is plausible rationale, since about a quarter of their oil comes from (or was coming from) Venezuela and Iran in particular. Drive up global oil prices, make the faltering U.S. dollar more competitive in the short term.
Another plausible rationale is to try to re-orient the Russia rivalry. Combined with a quiet withdrawal from the Ukraine, could be a way for the USA to try to establish a narrative of “OK, you get to be the regional power, but we are still the superpower, and we still have the biggest dick.” Try to save face, reassert dominance on a smaller scale than before, etc.
Third plausible rationale is that, as much as it pains to admit it, this crap still plays well at home with boomers, who remain Trump’s most enthusiastic and loyal constituency. It’s easy to lose sight of this if you spend a lot of time online listening to the perpetually online millennial and zoomer right, but I interact regularly with a lot of boomers offline and, sickening as it is, this stuff excites them.
These are all just possibilities, and maybe it really just comes down to “Zion Don” finally showing his true colors, but one reason to be skeptical of that is that the Bill Kristol bunch are coming out against this. They’ve been banging on the Iran drum for 20 years and now when Trump actually makes a move, suddenly they are questioning his motivation and need more justification. Maybe that’s just TDS, but it’s reminiscent of the Venezuela reaction which also had “you didn’t do this the way we wanted” energy and suggests there might be more to this than meets the eye.
We’re all just guessing, of course, but it’s probably a pretty safe bet that literally everything the U.S. does on the world stage has at least something to do with China, Russia or both, since they are the only other powers that matter right now.
Also trying to prop up the dollars value vs gold which is again the true international currency (and thus other commodities) for a little bit longer while Trump tries to position us to have secure commodity supply chains.
Boomers are actually pretty weak supporters by proportion, nearly on par with millennials, though they do have a core of more die-hards than the other age groups if I’m being subjective. Boomers are about 50-50 MAGA to cable news communist. Its the Gen Xers that are the biggest supporters by proportion, oddly enough.
I don’t think this escalation at the current time is good for Israel at all. Iran’s economy is all ballistic missiles, drones, and donkeys. They’re like the nationstate equivalent of a guy holed up in a cave network with ammo and supplies for years. Sure you can get him eventually, and he’s not really having the best time, but he’s gonna do a lot of damage to you in the meantime and make your life hell always looking over your shoulder. Production of anti-missile and antidrone equipment is too low, there will be a lot of damage if the regime change stays indefinitely delayed. That doesn’t mean that Israel lobby types did not demand the war, only that I don’t think it is to their benefit.
A theory I have that is hare-brained but fun to consider is that this is not just squeezing China, but also Taiwan, South Korea and Japan. They are all extremely oil dependent manufacturing heavyweights, making stuff that US wants onshored. Now they have no energy, uh oh, guess you have to move all your factories and processes requiring intensive energy to the continental US. Since US has lost plausible naval dominance due to the hypersonic missile and drone meta, this could be desperation to force onshoring cooperation where the asian vassal states may not want to be fully committed.
The Kristol and co reaction in this case is not derangement it’s that they are grifters of war, but Trump does war in a way that though Raytheon and drone manufacturers still make money occupation wont happen therefore no occupation corruption so Kristol and his friends dont make money.
I dont think it is money. The Afghan war was fought to teach Afghan schoolgirls to put a condom on a banana. The Cathedral is not only unable to endure the existence of rightism anywhere, it is unable to endure the existence of any leftism anywhere that does not adhere to Cathedral Orthodoxy in every jot and tittle. Any time they see a deviant faith, they want that country under military occupation.
For people on the left its ideology. For people previously on the fake right like Kristol and Bolton its absolutely about money.
Of course cathedral orthodoxy wants war with Iran. The relevant question is why the Trump administrations chose war with Iran.
Money might be a motive for some elements of Trumps coalition, but what about the rest?
here’s another:
Israel was on a short leash and wanted to scrap with Iran.
Regional allies like Saudi Arabia knew Iran was a retarded bomb thrower.
Trump wanted a negotiated settlement to bring Iran into the real world (partly to get Iran selling oil to China at market rates, HT Tom Luongo).
Iran didn’t negotiate in good faith. Israel is let off the leash and does their typical decapitation BS. All of Trump’s actions are to protect the regional allies from Iran.
This requires the capability and will to continue manufacturing drones. If they are determined to keep that capability, it is very hard to deny it to them without boots on the ground. In fact it is hard to deny it to them even with boots on the ground. So, the only solution is to strike at will. Which was Trump’s plan from the beginning.
But striking at the enemy’s will is a chancy business.
I think there is almost no chance of a long term closure of the strait, it would kill China and Europe way worse than the United States. The spice must flow.
For the straights to remain open, the countries on both sides of the straight have to agree to this. Iran is in a rather disagreeable mood right now.
There has been a fair bit of stick. Has to be some carrot.
Well there is some bad news…
Uh oh Cramer says war wont spiral
http://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/03/04/jim-cramer-oil-is-flashing-a-bullish-signal-for-stocks-amid-iran-war.html
High on the success of the Venezuela operation.
Trouble is “America’s most important ally” does not want a successful Venezuela style operation. It wants to destroy Iran. They killed the people Trump expected to make a deal with, and they will kill anyone else who tries to make a deal with Trump, throwing the plan into chaos.
If you kill every leader you can find, Iran will be led by leaders you cannot find, and those leaders will likely be true believers, willing to embrace martyrdom, while Iran was formerly run by corrupt cynics.
Very idea bad to go to war with unreliable allies as Germany discovered.
On the positive side Trump has the warriors to force fair midterm elections. Pete Hegseth is probably the most important cabinet pick in a century.
> “On the positive side Trump has the warriors to force fair midterm elections”
Perhaps. But does he have the will, and the willingness to endure the counterattacks — in the media and elsewhere — that will result?
The problem with crossing the Rubicon with your legions is that your legions have to actually follow you across in good order, which requires that you have your legions organized and ready to move as one at your lead. There are indeed some signs that Hegseth has been working to bring that order (indeed making him the most consequential appointment, like you said), but has he done enough?
Or, if that time does come, will enough get cold feet? Will enough start quibbling about “but muh oath to the Constitution, ’cause the Supremes say the Constitution…”? When Hegseth gives the order, and the base commander comes on to declare that order illegal and treasonous, and that he has ordered the base MPs to shoot dead on sight any “traitorous mutineer” who dares obey that order, how many will note that Hegseth is all the way over in DC, while the MPs are standing right next to him with guns loaded and fingers on the trigger, how many will decide to go with the obviously safer option?
He has an executive order in his pocket. Roll it through on the grounds than elections must be fair and seen to be fair, and current elections do not give anyone any confidence that they are fair. Pretty sure that if the cheating is off, Republicans win by a landslide.
It is a miracle sent by God that Pete Hegseth got through confirmation. Now that he is in, and he has the loyalty of the tip of spear, all problems are soluble if Trump gives the order that they be solved. If one miracle, I hope for another. Trump 2.0 is a different man to Trump 1.0.
Iran increasingly looks like a really bad idea. It is merely a matter of Iranian will, and Trump gets no say on their will.
>Iran increasingly looks like a really bad idea. It is merely a matter of Iranian will, and Trump gets no say on their will.
Trump still hasn’t learned not not to trust Jews. Their blood thirst is endless and short sighted. truly the worst of allies.
Re Iran their missle and drone attacks have dropped 86% from their height and their command structure is sort of regional RG commanders operating under the authority of the equivalent of wing attack plan R from Dr Strangelove.
Regimes as generally unpopular as Iran’s (i assume unpopular given how many leave) also dont generally survive an extended power vacuum at the top peasant revolts dont work when the elite is united but regime unpopularity is usually fatal when the crown is in the gutter as ambitious elites start arming and organizing the populace into their own militias. Also Azerbaijan is apparently set to send troops in…
I think the regime is done. No idea what happens after though.
Question: What’s this I keep hearing about US/Israel only having 4000 missiles and Iran having 450,000 missiles? I found that hard to believe.
I hear that Iran has the advantage of highly distributed missile launchers, many buried invisibly in large tracts of inconspicuous land. Allegedly the US has the disadvantage of having to reload a destroyer frequently because they only carry about 70 missiles, and now the destroyers are having to make long round trips of several days to reload. I also hear that Israel’s stock of missile interceptors is being depleted, and some systems themselves have been destroyed, making Tel Aviv and other targets more vulnerable.
IF this is true, it would seem that Israel would suffer from a relentless barrage with increasing effectiveness, to the point where it’s intolerable and they start using their nukes.
Does any of this sound plausible? Or is this war really a 15 out of 10?
> Iran has 450000 missles
I don’t know where you heard that but its the equivalent of Baghdad Bob information sources…
The other thing that makes me think Iran’s situation is very not good is that what missles they are firing seems to be just saturation targetting Dubai now.
Now to me its clear thats not something they are doing because its a winning strategy its because they can’t hit any military or strategic targets and its reminscient of Hitler in 1944 prioritizing V2 production in order to kill a few random civilians in London because strategically he was kind of fucked.
MP are cops, they’ll do what cops always do: making sure they’re elsewhere when fighting men start shooting.
Trump didn’t cross the Rubicon last time because he had no legions. Now he has ICE and loyal army lead by a real warrior. Base commanders issuing such orders are likely to meet with charges of treason and summery execution and most will not issue them knowing that.
Enforcing free and fair elections is both Trump’s constitutional duty and wildly popular.
Then wisdom for trump would be dealing with the ally in a manner that benefits American interests.
Every culture has old proverbs and fables illustrating how a foolish or unreliable ally or friend is far more dangerous than a rational enemy.
You don’t have to go as recent as the Germans to figure this out.
[*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
Your comments read like fedposting. Take the shill test to show you are not a fed.
I forgot exactly what the shill test is. Afair, you are want to be sure I can speak unspeakable truths, as your heuristic for determining if I am an entryist.
For example, Soros was essentially an agent of the State Dept, as he was funded indirectly by having him make certain investments and then having those investments win spectacularly. Or other means of indirectly laundering money to him such as the $23 trillion missing black budget Catherine Austin Fitts talks about it. But you may or may not consider her credible. Can not remember seeing you write anything about her.
Other unspeakables which I can voice with no qualms whatsoever is the game theory around genders. That females are ruled significantly by their ancestral environment hindbrain hypergamy. Actually I think nature requires both K and R-strategy reproduction for optimal annealing, but I still concur with you about the nature of females and the decadence of civilization when everyone is empowered to be equal as we are not all equal in a meritocracy or even in any necessary hierarchies for stable civilization and rule (e.g. your and Yarvin’s neo-reactionary focus on restoring monarchy essentially, but where I disagree is the empire has moved from the nation-state layer to the global entity behind the curtain that none of us can see and you ostensibly hate this concept because it would mean your monarchy idea is subsumed as it is being subsumed right now in real time by Drumpty’s Idiocracy in Iran).
Did I fail?
If I pass, can I repost my full comment because I think it is important that you really understand Bitcoin. But if you are not interested in what I learned from Mircea Popescu (the 500,000 BTC whale), the no problem. I can leave if you prefer?
Not exactly a pass, but pretty sure you are not a shill, or if a shill, not shilling for any of the usual suspects.
And you are somewhat entertaining, though you appear to be high on drugs.
Not on moderation for being a shill. On moderation for “It was Jim who taught me the narrative that …”
Pol Pot was a saint of communism. He sincerely believed in what communists theoretically believed, but have been increasingly cynical about starting with Lenin. And this superior holiness unmanned his communist sponsors, who should have instantly canned him for deviating from Stalinism-Leninism. Stalin would have instantly shot him.
Pol Pot was a resumption of the Marxist holiness spiral that Stalin shut down. Plus, he was a Cambodian, and Cambodians have never forgotten that they had an empire once.
Pol Pot was a creation of the Vietnamese communist party, which was a fully owned creation of the Soviet Politburo. He was backed by the Democrats who believed in Startrek 1.0 convergence of Globohomo and communism.
Did you miss the “iirc”? That is an admission that I might be misremembering where I had read that. Since you write often about needing a Stalin to arrest the leftist holiness spiral, it would not be uncharacteristic if I had read it from you that the tactic to stop his spiral was pouring concrete in the sewers.
Whatever I had read years ago seemed to imply China got weary of Pol Pot and when he would not stop, they poured concrete in the sewers to stop him.
If you ignore the game theory around Bitcoin that you have still asked me to fully explain to you, you will lose all your Bitcoin. You will be left holding only worthless scaling fork, when it is forced to fork off when the miners starting taking the 96% of the tokens that are in non-legacy address format as ANYONECANSPEND. Have you worked out in your mind why the miners who do that win? It is an economic and game theory problem. Should I explain or surely you can figure it out if you realize that everyone who holds in addresses that begin with 1 get both forks but not vice versa. And you know what happens when the price falls too much, too fast, the 900 blocks never arrive and chain halts because mining becomes unprofitable.
I worry that the pro-war faction has hacked Trump’s brain at the software level.
The President gets security briefings daily. These are written by the Deep State, particularly people in the pro-war faction, especially the CIA, a.k.a. Deep State Central.
Trump is being bombarded with one-sided propaganda, I fear.
And if he gets us into a war and that lowers his popularity, so much the better, from the Deep State’s point of view.
OTOH, the apparent loss if interest in the Ukraine thing is a bright spot. Assuming it really has been ended, and not merely paused.
> The President gets security briefings daily. These are written by the Deep State, particularly people in the pro-war faction, especially the CIA, a.k.a. Deep State Central.
Exactly. And we’re already seeing some of the talking heads of the pro-war faction going on about how Iran isn’t enough, we also need to be intervening in Lebanon, and in Turkey, and…
> And if he gets us into a war and that lowers his popularity, so much the better, from the Deep State’s point of view.
As seen by Fuentes (demonstrating quite clearly that he is a gay commie fed) using this opportunity to tell his followers to vote Dem in the midterms.
> Assuming it really has been ended, and not merely paused.
Based on Tusk’s comments about Poland needing to get its own nukes, I don’t think that’s a very safe assumption. Too many Euros look determined to keep it going.
And I should have read the newsfeed again before posting this comment, because I see Trump himself is already talking about going after Cuba next…
…which, I suppose, is better than the neocon Middle East alternatives in that it’s a move back toward Monroe doctrine; but still, it hints at the war faction having massive influence, which in turn raises the risk that the admin, and especially the War Department, can be kept too busy and distracted with foreign interventions to be able to act in time when domestic action becomes necessary.
Cuba was fairly obviously on the agenda as soon as the news came out about Venezuela, even it wasn’t stated outright. We all assumed they were next, the surprise was going after Iran first.
What you’re calling the War Faction isn’t really a single faction. The Trotskyist Russia-haters and Zionists are separate factions, although they do have some large overlap that we can lump together as “neocons”. The progressive faction stages all the color revolutions and backs endless occupations with the goal of teaching Iraqi children to put condoms on bananas. And there is an entirely different faction worried about China, a faction more grounded in realpolitik, and that is probably the faction pulling the strings on Venezuela and Cuba, a faction that it is reasonable to assume Hegseth represents because it is the faction that appears to retain some basic military competency.
If you just think “war faction” or “neocons” then that’s more or less just the updated label for “military industrial complex”–which does have certain utility as a political/economic model, but if you rely too heavily on it then you become vulnerable to lefty meme-hacking. No one is authentically “pro war” or “anti war”, people are for or against specific wars and specific methods of warfare.
His base is clear. No forever wars. If this means losing on Iran, he will lose on Iran.
I wish I shared your optimism. Trump haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaates to lose.
Trump is a deal maker. He went into this war saying he wanted a deal. If he comes out with a deal, even if falls far short of what he would like (and what he would like is far, far, far short of what some in the administration want) he can spin it as a win.
China has announced intention to mediate — which is not what everyone expected — what everyone expected was lend-lease. Trump has lost to China before over tariffs and sanctions, and accepted that loss. So, chances are, China being the eight hundred pound gorilla, we are going to wind up with Trump and Iran coming to a deal that is acceptable to China. Which is probably not the deal that Trump would like, but Trump, unlike some in the administration, knows that China is the eight hundred pound gorilla.
Trump always plays nice with countries that have nuclear weapons. He is going to play nice with China over this.
The US wants a proxy controlling the straits, and controlling Iranian oil. China wants the straits to be safe for everyone, does not want Iran with nukes, but does not want a US proxy controlling Iran’s oil. So, chances are, that is what we will get. Iran will wind up with a regime that promises to play nice, but is not a US proxy.
I get the impression that the China mediation deal is already mostly in place with Iran already agreeing to not fire at its neighbors anymore.
China deal likely provision
– Neutral Iran, free navigation of the straights
– Sanctions dropped, trade open to Iran with all powers. Trump admin is not to tariff them beyond what a normal country is tariffed for a long time
– Iran as a neutral power to stop any belligerent poster to anyone around it including Israel
– Whats left of the Iran regime remains in place but its to be more of a Dengist version of itself in practice, perhaps the RG is to be merged with the regular army over the next 5 years
– Likely no discussion of the Kurdish question
Which is the antithesis of what we need for an emperor who can strategize. Trump is so easily manipulated and set up by his “handlers.” The question is who is actually in control. The Neocons? Who controls the neocons? Who is the true power at the center of the globe? What is the next global empire after the dollar? (It can not be China nor Russia nor BRICs.)
Prof. Jiang posits it was all master planned. First the migrants into the US. Then Venezuela to pump up his confidence and ago, with Cuba to be easy next, so just take a little excursion into Iran, which all the players (Russia, China, Israel and Iran) all want the US to get mired in inescapable Thucydides trap tarpit. Trump can not extract himself anymore. The outcome is predetermined. Jiang is myopic about his beloved China though.
Could be a demoralization tactic. So is Prof. Jiang’s holistic thesis (unwittingly?) deluded? Because weaves a narrative of game theory that implicates the Chabad and secret societies (freemasons, etc) as pushing for eschatological outcome. And he argues this is why they have manipulated Trump into attacking Iran.
Jiang is implying Chabad are societalcidal. He says fundamentalist Jews believe they are only trapped on earth because of our sins. Essentially they want to apply bleach to the planet and depopulate the human plague.
Probably more willing to scorch the earth of his Arab neighbors’ desalination plants. Power vacuums are captured by the most ruthless, especially as you implied, if Israel is sieving out all the moderates and less ruthless. Israel is intentional and not stupid. So why do this? Obviously they want a different outcome than is professed. Again Prof. Jiang for edification.
If all desalination plants in the region have been entirely F.U.B.A.R.’ed?
Why are you surprised? C.f. Prof Jiang interview on Jimmy Dore for the most succinct, replete statement of his game theory assimilation. (Note I am not recommending Jimmy Dore!)
You are pumping the obviously false claim that Iran can destroy its neighbors. Obviously it has lost that capacity, or else it would have done it already. That story comes from people who are in the pocket of Iran (I have small infestation of Iranian shills) and from people with Jews living rent free in their brains.
The secretary of war does not have Jews living rent free in his brain. It is certainly possible that he was manipulated and deceived by Jews into a war that cannot be won — the Straits are currently closed, and if they cannot be re-opened, the war is lost.
We shall see.
Does it still have the capacity to block straits? Obviously it does, but Pete Hegseth believes, or claims to believe, he can fix this. Can he? We shall see. So far Iran has not applied any unknown unknowns towards shutting down the straits.
It should be mining the straits using very low speed low noise fully submersible drones, with underground launch points that launch subsurface the whole way from subsurface land to subsurface sea. If it had that capability, that would be an unknown unknown. Without that capability, Pete Hegseth is probably correct.
Non-sequitur.
They would want to lure the US into overconfidence and hubris [*deleted for being more of the same that has already been said on this blog far too many times*
Hmm, they are giving the US confidence and hubris by allowing the US to blow up their missiles and missile launch systems on the ground with gravity bombs. How very clever of them. 🙃
Obviously Iran has only one card left. The straits. Which is their biggest card.
Iranians like many Eastern cultures (e.g. Filipinos are very much so also) are highly attuned to respect. They study body language even no words are spoken. Westerners (especially outspoken America) are completely oblivious to this cultural distinction.
For them to fight a justified war from their (collective, i.e. including motivating the troops) prospective, they must be repeatedly disrespected and they must escalate only as their attacker escalates.
[*deleted because insulting each other is not going to make fog of war any less foggy*]
Obviously Trump has escalated to the max. Therefore Iranians have already escalated to the max. All their cards are now on the table.
Their missile card has been trumped. Anyone still going on about Iran missiling Dubai is full of it. Hezbollah and the straits remain in play.
Your stuff on Bitcoin appears to be incoherent knowledge randomly copied from shill scripts.
Tell us about Thorchain. Give a critique. If you show some understanding I will not instantly dismiss your stuff on Bitcoin.
[deleted for obstinate and repetitious idiocy, and for not being able to make a relevant response to a quite easy and vague crypto currency question*]
Waste of space, you are just repeating yourself unresponsively in different words. We already had this conversation.
The energy secretary says that tanker escorts could begin by the end of the month — which is alarming.
Well, at the end of the month, time to get even more alarmed. Until then, fog of war makes announcing a US defeat premature.
If you fail to post this *entire* post which addresses Thorchain and more, your disingenuous circle-jerk will be discarded, so you can proceed to lose all your Bitcoins and lead your flock to destruction as you have been doing. You are not agreement compatible.
The key innovation of Thorchain is to custody and sign exchange of native assets on other blockchains via a threshold group signature scheme mechanism for the private key. If a certain threshold of the bonded nodes in the system are honest, then the system can be alleged to the “trustless” and “permissionless.” Tangentially, of course this fails for the same reason that proof-of-stake is complete BS (and I laugh at your idiotic rho crypto project), because the power-law distribution concentration of fungible resources is undefeated since time immortal. Which is also the same reason that proof-of-stake can not provide public randomness, thus the entire concept is a surreptitiously captured system. You are clueless a.f., as further evidenced by you not immediately grokking the asymmetrical game theory of the ANYONECANSPEND in Satoshi’s legacy protocol. P2SH broke the Nash equilibrium.
“Should Iran, or anyone else, do anything to interfere with the Free and Safe Passage of Ships through the Strait of Hormuz, I will immediately reconsider this decision.”
Drumpty-Humpty sticks his dick in his mouth, because now anyone can false-flag the conflagration scorched earth Armageddon trajectory.
Jim, stop clowning around like a fool. Have some respect for those who are far more expert than you. Enough said!
In so far as your analysis makes any sense, it leads to the conclusion that blockchains cannot work. Obviously they do work. And similarly, Iran is obviously incapable of destroying its neighbors. You are confidently lecturing us that what is happening, cannot happen. If blockchains could collapse in the way you imagine, they would have collapsed a few weeks after the began, and if Iran could wreak destruction on its neighbors, the wreaking would be under way right now.
Your analysis, like your analysis of Satoshi’s scheme, fails to comprehend the economics of it, the alignment of individual interests to collective interests — Satoshi goes over your head, and Thorchain goes over your head. The innovation is not threshold group signature — they are ancient. The innovation is what Thorchain does with them to node incentives.
That you can not distinguish the absolute truth from gibberish or copy & paste, proves that you are impoverishingly ignorant in a field in which you feign expertise. If Satoshi came here and told you (by any other name), you would censor him also. If God came here (again speaking through any human), you would censor them also, because you are agreement incapable with truth.
I will not allow you to waste anymore of my extremely valuable time. I tried to help you and your flock, but you are just a basket case. Goodbye.
Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.
[deleted] the looming ANYONECANSPEND event, and given Mircea did not explain it directly in his hundreds of blogs,[deleted]
You have finally explained your lack of explanation.
To summarize your story, for those readers who have not bothered to follow it, and for those parts of the story that I deleted, though I think I let everything got through at least once, and for the most part several times: A very smart guy claims that Bitcoin is doomed due to miner concentration. Which is in fact a plausible, grave, and looming threat, which I have mentioned several times, and the failure to take action to prepare to this threat is alarming. But that the crisis is due to unfold at the 2028 halving is by no means inevitable. It is a plausible guess. And each halving incentivizes such misconduct, hence the 2028 prediction, which you were unable to explain or understand.
Before miners cheat by stealing Bitcoin, which would instantly render their and everyone’s Bitcoin worthless and put them out of business, they will cheat by using various forms of trickery to inflate transaction costs. Which they have in fact been doing. And whenever this happens, other people institute mechanisms to bypass level one Bitcoin transactions, bringing the price down again. And, predictably, it has come down again. Transaction costs soared to nosebleed levels due to shenanigans following the 2024 halving, people took bypass actions, which solved the problem. transaction once again costs only a few cents. We may well see such shenanigans again shortly after the 2028 halving. But probably not, because I expect the grail bridge to be fully working by then.
So this is not news. It is a known problem, it has been a known problem for a very long time, and somewhat to my surprise, seems to be under control. I was troubled by nosebleed transaction fees, which severely disrupted the lightning network. Which itself urgently needs well known fixes that have not been implemented.
The fix to make a blockchain immune to miner concentration is now known, but has not been implemented.
Assume a blockchain that uses concise limited knowledge proofs (not necessarily zero knowledge — limited knowledge proofs have the potential to be equally secure, but much faster. Any concise proof system discards a lot of information, and one can ensure that the information that you do not want hanging around is discarded)
People who had the base crypto currency of the blockchain at a multiple of a certain blockheight, which comes around every few months, can vest a voting right over the blockchain to a peer. From time to time a peer proves how much is currently vested, and its chance of its view of the blockchain history, the block it creates, having a high rank, is proportional to that voting right. Instead of longest chain winning, chain that is longest with highest voting rank of its blocks wins. Thus power over the consensus is rooted in the whales.
This is a variation on proof of stake, but actually existent proof of stake systems are really bad, leading to behind the scenes concentration of power and massive loss of privacy. To solve the miner concentration problem, have to do proof of stake right. And currently it is done very wrong, and doing it right is not easy. Naive correct implementations are impossible, but concise proof systems make them possible.
This is not yet the promised meticulous elaboration on the alleged, looming ANYONECANSPEND. I will wait first to see if you “instead choose” (typo in prior post) to be agreement incompatible. [*deleted yet again for not giving the promised meticulous elaboration on the alleged, looming ANYONECANSPEND*]
I do not make agreements. I am absolute dictator of this blog. I lay down rules, and I follow those rules. And the rule I earlier laid down for you was that you had to give a coherent explanation of ANYONECANSPEND.
And, in accordance with that rule, I will pass the promised meticulous elaboration on the alleged, looming ANYONECANSPEND, and until then, not pass the rest of your stuff.
Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.
No you got all the game theory wrong. You make the same incorrect assumptions that I had to correct every time I explained it.
[*deleted*]
You did not explain. Your story is that a very smart guy claims a well known and quite real threat dooms Bitcoin. But I understand this threat far better than you do, and have been watching the action around it with keen attention since, I think, around 2016 or so.
And yes, it bothers me. A lot. But we seem to have weathered it. Somewhat to my surprise.
You say I deleted the explanation. I did not see any explanation, just a claim that a really smart person says this is a terrible threat. Which I systematically deleted after you had said it far too many times. Well I am a really smart person, and I also said, some considerable time ago, that it is a terrible threat. But after the events, seems to be less of a threat.
If you repeat the explanation, and it sounds like an explanation, rather than a claim that really smart people have an explanation that you are not telling us, I will allow it through.
Miners as a whole cannot go bankrupt. Mining will forever be profitable. Due competitive forces, some individual miners will go bankrupt, but Satoshi designed Bitcoin so that mining will forever make a profit for some miners. His design had unforeseen and very bad consequences, which are difficult to fix, but we seem to have weathered them.
With each halving, miners become more fee dependent. But, open entry seems to be working against any adverse fee related incentives. Excessive miner concentration has led to some very bad misconduct, and will doubtless lead to more of it. This needs to be solved, and no one seems interested in solving it, but nonetheless, things are now back to normal.
The miners will not have any choice you idiot! The miners will go bankrupt otherwise. [*deleted*]
You do not understand the threat you are talking about.
[not the promised meticulous elaboration on the alleged, looming ANYONECANSPEND (or if it is, it is incoherent, incomplete, and implausible)*]
You throw around impressive sounding phrases like “Nash equilibrium”, but if you know what a Nash equilibrium is, which I am inclined to doubt, you don’t seem to care.
Any alleged Nash equilibrium needs explanation of why it is a Nash equilibrium. Your entire explanation consists of smarty pants words that you seem to be using incorrectly, and without knowing or caring what they mean. Your explanation is that you use smart words that you got from a smart person, so should be believed. This does not work when used against another smart person.
And in any case, the problem with miner concentration is that it is apt to deviate from Nash equilibrium. Possibly this is what you meant, in which case it is a valid point, but it was unclear what the point of your invocation of Nash equilibrium was. If that was what you meant, it is not what you said.
This is reminiscent of the conversation I am having with Omnisuperessentialiter Gyalpo about his malapropisms. I suppressed him, and I am suppressing you for similar reasons.
You are vaguely pointing in the general direction of valid concerns about Bitcoin, which I have frequently expressed, but failing to explain them, and I doubt that you understand them.
[*not the promised meticulous elaboration on the alleged, looming ANYONECANSPEND*]
[*not the promised meticulous elaboration on the alleged, looming ANYONECANSPEND*]
They’re waving around a supposed letter from the purged PLA general, claiming he was purged because he was a Taiwan dove.
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/paper/1746068
Do I believe the letter is real? Probably not. Do I know if this general was a dove and Xi a hawk? I have no idea.
I do know that the Pacific branch of US Empire has been ramping up the contest with China, and I do know the weather window for Taiwan assault is March-May (or September-October). The timing of this SMO means oil supplies for something like that will be at the very least disrupted.
Just speculating as both US and Chinese politics has been a black box, and I don’t like black boxes.
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/03/04/world/politics/poland-nuclear-weapons-tusk/
Forget Iran this is going to be a problem…
while Trump and everyone are focus on Iran
James Talarico has won dem primary in Texas.
some interesting tweet:
white genocide are back on the agenda.
and this guy (as white as can be) just defeated a holy neg.
which tell you
>white genocide are back on the agenda.
It was never off the agenda.
> If you kill every leader you can find, Iran will be led by leaders you cannot find
Seems to me that in a world of heavy mass surveillance, delta force, and bunker busters, you can just keep killing them. So you either get a leader that represents your interests or you eventually get a Somali style anarchy, which still solves the nuke problem
Mass surveillance can be evaded. You cannot keep on killing them. The process ends with those who can evade it winning.
So it is advisable to stop killing them at some point — as a carrot. But Israel does not want there to be any carrot.
Trump would like someone to be in charge that he could still kill — but if Israel keeps killing them, the man who winds up in charge is likely to be someone who is both very hard to kill, and not all that afraid of dying.
Exactly. If the strike does not decapitate, or rather decapitate while allowing regeneration of the head, you’re applying evolutionary pressure for the next head to be decapitation resistant.
Whether it’ll turn out that way, we’ll see. In time the trick of the Khomeini removal wears off, and if nothing else changes, will Trump have dragged us into another forever war? It’d be a sad prospect.
As I said, I found it hard to believe. I first heard it from retired Army colonel Douglas Macgregor. I was shocked and thought hey wait a minute. Later I heard it on some other youtube video but forgot who that was.
I suppose I could believe that Iran has more missiles than US/Israel, but I don’t know about 110 times more.
Well if MacGregor said that hes gone completely mad…
450,000 missiles if we assume they’re all their cheap drone model is about 16 Billion dollars US in drones. That’d be a year or so of their military budget right there. Calculation assumes $35K per drone which I’ve seen estimates of 25k-50k in the literature. I rate this possible but highly unlikely, unless there’s way more production of such going on in Iran for foreign sale than anyone dreamed. Also the observed volume of drone strikes by Iran aren’t consistent with that kind of stockpile.
Its not just budget it’s production capacity
I automatically disbelieve everything said by Douglas Macgregor. He has said far too many things that are untrue.
The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend. You would like the enemy of your enemy to be your friend, and it is wise for both to strive to accomplish this, but is not trivial to accomplish.
Really. I have no idea who the guy is, yet he is continually cited as someone whose opinion on these matters I am just supposed to respect implicitly.
All I know is that (a) he’s been wrong a lot, (b) he’s trotted out whenever someone wants to push a joojoojoo narrative, and (c) he’s popular on breadtube. None of that sounds like something I want to listen to, except maybe to know what the enemy is thinking and planning, but he has probably been out of the loop too long to even be reliable for that.
Seems to be the anti-bagel social media equivalent of the Retired General Turned Cable News Correspondent, i.e. someone who tells the audience whatever the network wants them to hear with a subtle hint of authority that is not actually relevant to the topic they are commenting on but appears more trustworthy than the usual “anonymous sources”.
He uses conventional demographics and logistics models to analyze the Ukraine war, but the war shouldn’t have happened in the first place based on those models. You can’t teach an old dog new tricks. Geopolitics in a collapsing fertility rate world is a new paradigm. No one knows much of anything, it seems.
He’s probably much better at analyzing Iran, I would guess.
I am sure I know far more about Iran than MacGregor does, and what I do not know, I will not make up, unlike MacGregor.
What say you about Scott Ritter? Is he in the same category as Mac Gregor or more trustworthy?
>”…the most horrifying fact of them all — that women don’t actually like being sex objects for men that do not frighten them. They like being sex objects of scary dangerous frightening men.”
Women don’t know what they want, but Mexican woman don’t seem to have this problem. Western Civ has been under intense brain washing for decades. The goal of which is population reduction of primarily Europeans. See Malthus.
The age of men is over. The time of the orc has come.
There are those that believe an hybrid admixture of race “orcs” is more malleable to their ends, but they likely have never been on the receiving end of a negro-mexican riot.
Their social experiment with multiculture adventurism will fail.
Yes, that’s always been the dream: a population of submissive slaves, just competent enough to keep society running, but never competent enough to challenge their betters. Ever since Count Kalergi, in his hapa rage, decided we must all merge into a Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, excepting a small minority of pure-blooded Jews to oversee us, that has been the goal.
Obviously, it’s idiotic hubris. These people don’t know history, they don’t understand other places or cultures, and their image of non-White races is entirely shaped by their ass-kissing immigrant servants. The Bush dynasty raved about how great Mexicans are because their commoners know their place and they serve cheerfully. Mexican history, or even Mexican current events, tell a different story, but that can’t overcome their daily experience with all their lovely sweet servants. We shall drown and no one will save us, but at least our traitorous leaders will go into the cannibals’ pot.
You got a chuckle out of me with the cannibal pot. I’m unsure who is steering this, probably many different factions. Reps want cheap labor, Dems more voters, Catholic charities more donors. In the end, people are going to mix.
Mexican women seem content to keep house and family. They will outbreed the Europeans. This seems inevitable and the table is already set. Breeds have a voice in government and control the center of the board, so now we enter the end game.
The US is the overturner of applecarts. The destroyer of goodness.
Attached is a tour of Tehran from last year
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YrFtjOo2U5Q
This is a very modern city unlike cities in the US with roving bands of negros, mexicans, and antifa. I’ve seen a few cities in the US, they are like slums. So the US will destroy this city out of hate for beauty.
This area will become rubble like Gaza and for what. Oil, distraction, no. Evil acts for the sake of evil. There is never truth in it. Iran, they will put up a good fight, but in the end 90Million or so like Palestinians.
You may disagree with Humungus, but he knows evil when he sees it.
https://xcancel.com/mtracey/status/1856774955372818446
(with video of Hegseth speaking accompanied)
This is deeply disturbing. Apparently SecWar is not our guy. He is, as the shills say, a crazed lunatic Zionist. Not, merely favoring Israel as a regional asset, but religious fervor for the lunatic Evangelist Israel worship memeplex.
source for full video:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=7wP5wEEt-uQ
times of Israel confirming:
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/trumps-nominee-for-pentagon-chief-suggested-new-temple-could-be-built-on-temple-mount/
crazy “Christian” zionist supporting:
https://www.christianpost.com/news/pete-hegseth-floats-third-jewish-temple-in-unearthed-speech.html
I wish people didn’t think about Israel and jews as much either way. Hes still ourguy on things that count more who cares about the west Bank most of the Arabs dont anymore.
Apocalyptic faith that assumes the second coming of Christ is determined by establishing some weird religious Israeli kingdom is not something I see as a sane or stable belief system. As always, I am pragmatic. Seeing this, not going to go into any explicit defense contracting. Not until I see support for my tribe, which is not interested in this weird project, finds it abhorrent. Dual use industrial and digital systems, however, sure.
It’s just very demoralizing, at the end of the day. Not We get someone that seems to be perfect for the role, yet subscribes to the second most harmful strain of folk Christianity after wokism. Is this really all we have on the table? I would be more optimistic if we were not escalating in Iran, but regardless no point dooming about things, we shall carry on.
Well yes if you are any sort of Bible believing Christian it absolutely posits a 3rd temple as a precondition to the end game. It says what it says.
(Hence my lack of enthusiasm for Sola Scriptura styled protestant consensus. Lots of these things that may or may not be literal that can be harmfully acted out.)
Catholicism is worse. Orthodox dont like that they have to acknowledge there is to be a literal 3rd temple because they believe the church is the true Israel now but they grudgingly agree with the Protestant narrative on this too because the text is very clear on the 3rd temple.
Apparently this isn’t true there are metaphorical interpretations of it in Orthodoxy but the OC has not specifically ruled in council or anything on this. They do consider the true Israel to be the Orthodox believers and those otherwise “mystically joined” to the church.
I don’t think so. The bible is more poetry than it is history and geography, and this goes ten times over for prophecies.
Building a new temple is, in new testament prophecy, a bad guy activity.
Trying to bring about the return of Jesus by building a new temple is like trying to bring about his return by holding a nuclear war. Could arguably work, but it is not something Christians should be bringing about.
Yeah im not saying Christians should try to force God’s hand by fulfilling the preconditions im just saying from the text a literal physical 3rd temple that’s clearly described as a jewish temple with sacrifices.. hard for me to see it otherwise. So it is both a precondition under the biblical text and not something you should try to bring about
So, you or someone you follow dug up a year-and-a-half old article quoting something Hegseth said more than seven years ago, and you lose your shit?
What does this extremely old speech change about everything that Trump and Hegseth have done in the last two years?
And the Youtube comments – #1 from yesterday “here because of Tucker Carlson”. Yeah, that figures.
I think I can count on one hand the number of right-wing bloggers and commenters who can keep a cool head for more than five seconds. Thanks to rage-baiters like Tucker, we’re becoming a bunch of gibbering high-time-preference morons.
I’m saying this is a sign of Hegseth belonging to a very destructive strain of the protestant memeplex, and therefore we should be cautious in promotion and glorification. As I said to Com, I would be more optimistic if we were not currently escalating in Iran. I remain composed and pragmatic, who knows the whys of that escalation, but SecWar subscribing to a loony ziocult strain of evangelicanism is not something to ignore.
I remain hopeful otherwise, and am Monitoring the Situation.
Au contraire, ignoring it is exactly what I intend to do. Hegseth was brought in to trim the fat and restore America’s failing military capabilities, and to all accounts he has done/is doing that. It does not matter to me what he said seven years ago in a speech, especially given his well-known colorful past and the changes he’s gone through since then.
If you have a written or video record of everything someone has ever said or done, you can find dumb or hypocritical stuff. I’m sure that you can find dumb stuff you said seven years ago, and I can find dumb stuff I said seven years ago. People say dumb stuff. Actions speak louder than words, and recent actions speak louder than ancient actions. Plenty of men with impeccable records turn out to be duds, like Mattis.
The left has started to cotton onto the fact that cries of racism, sexism and anti-semitism aren’t working very well anymore, and that digging up some 20-year-old video of an off-color locker room comment or finding a post-menopausal woman to say she was assaulted in the mesozoic era does not elicit cancellation or much of a reaction at all. So their new hobby horse is Zionism, to try to fracture the MAGA/Thermidor coalition. Amid a constant drumbeat of memes such as “ZOG”, “Zion Don”, “Israel First”, and so on, they want to have everyone in the right-wing coalitions walking on eggshells, feeling like they have to countersignal on Jews and Israel at every opportunity, and worry constantly about the optics of ever saying anything nice about them or working together on anything.
The best defense against this shilling is the same as that for all the previous istophobias: bored indifference. Yawn, and reply with “what else you got”. Our friends are our friends unless they actually betray our trust. And they are free to pursue their own interests, as long as it is not at the expense of our own.
Am I personally happy with this Iran business? No, I think it could backfire spectacularly. But it hasn’t backfired yet, and I don’t have access to top level military intelligence. I ask people to consider the possibility that this is not about Israel or crazy Christian Zionists; to consider that Iran has been hostile to the US ever since the Carter administration, and is considered even by Islamic strategic allies (Saudis, Jordanians, etc.) to be a troublemaker in the region, with recent Chinese influence and resources worsening the situation, and that just because the USG failed to do anything about that for decades didn’t mean they were never going to. Someone saw an opportunity, or perhaps, someone saw the opportunity slipping away.
If we start hearing words like “occupation” and “democracy” from Trump or Hegseth or people who matter, then you know we’re in deep trouble. Until then, it’s a tempest in a teacup and the noise coming from Tucker and his ilk is an annoying distraction.
Hegseth, in a press conference clip from earlier this week, emphasized there are plenty of countries within the immediate region that can deal with refugees when asked if the US would take them in. So, this is at least not another invade the world/invite the world GAE rodeo.
We’re at a place in historical time where a man like Hegseth may have the total leadership of the Empire on his shoulders. Come such a time, I would be much happier if he wasn’t part of a folk Christian memeplex that believes in bringing about an Apocalypse in order to induce the second coming.
To be clear, because there are such people out there, I am not obsessed with zio bullshit. I find it tedious to discuss, it’s been overdiscussed. Earlier, I tried to start a conversation about plausible reasons for the Iran SMO that didn’t have to do with Israel or Jews, so you know I am not pushing hysterical memes about da jews. I’ve said multiple times here we should ingroup Converso Jews, and if they are not strongly connected to a foreign or domestic counter-weight power network, don’t scrutinize their conversion too hard. If they can mouth the words, show up on holidays, and go on to do good statecraft and science, that’s plenty. Their kids can do the full conversion. Not that worried about da jews or that “terrible horrible colonizer state” in the Levant. Not my problem, don’t want that problem, they can handle it.
For Hegseth, I find myself quite wary of a man subscribed to that memeplex. It’s obvious on its face that it’s potentially very self destructive, and could drag us all into something terrible. This isn’t some locker room comment, and I wont treat it that way. I need to see some kind of sign that he has decided the Apocalyptic bringing about of the second coming is in fact a bad idea, before I surrender my worries. I don’t plan on dooming, blackpilling, or hysterics of any sort. I do think it’s important to acknowledge, so I have done so. Won’t continue bringing it up except for summation of this discussion or an event that is directly related to this in a way that is not ambiguous.
Bringing about the end times is a leftist Christian meme, the Christian variant of immanentizing the eschaton.
The prophecies concerning the end times tell us that it gets really bad, then it gets worse, then it gets much worse, and then it gets worse than you can imagine, which is par for the course for leftist efforts to immanentize the eschaton. So Christians are not supposed to do this.
Plus, we have a Christian tradition that you don’t allow the inanimate temple to be rebuilt, and if Christians cannot stop it, God will stop it. And to the extent that prophecies say that in the end times the temple will be rebuilt, which is not altogether clear, this is part of things being really bad. God stopping it is a divine intervention in favor of the faithful.
That really is not what he said or implied, though. He said “I don’t know how it could happen, you don’t know how it could happen, but it could happen.” Or some words very close to that.
It was 20 seconds of pandering to an Israeli audience within a 10-minute speech primarily about sovereignty, and even if he does sincerely believe it seven years later, it is not loony ziocult evangelicalism and it is not “apocalyptic bringing about of the second coming”, it is fairly typical evangelical doctrine.
If Gafcon or Doug Wilson or whomever don’t agree on that doctrine, then that’s OK with me; I certainly don’t consider it an essential element of Anglican or Protestant Christianity. I just don’t consider it offensive or crazy or disqualifying, either. I am more concerned with what gets built at the World Trade Center site in New York than what gets built at the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.
In any case, every one of the GCC states–those stable Islamic monarchies that Jim says are nice places to live and/or work, like Qatar, Jordan and the UAE–have made statements in the last several days against Iran, not the US or Israel. I doubt they’d be cooperating if they believed the long-term plan involved blowing up al-Aqsa. It’s just Tucker Carlson and his new besties from the Groyperverse who are up in arms about it–along with, ironically, many of the warmongering neocons they deplore.
Does anyone know anything about this Markwayne Mullin guy who’s replacing Noem at DHS? I mean, I’ve literally never heard of the guy before.
Well he was a senator and they normally all suck. Trump otoh seemed to make a man out of Rubio so we shall see.
https://x.com/joysamcyborg/status/2030681421463867517 this Jeet apparently lives in the US
The more one saw Indians talk the more one got to know their dialectic. At first counting on the ignorance of their adversary they would claim they were a wealthy well behaved positive asset immigrants who did and got the good jobs because they were capable people but if you provided evidence that they in fact got those jobs at the expense of people taking them in through fraud, economic nepotism and DEI programs they would claim they were reclaiming reparations for colonialism. Then if you pointed out that not only that white Americans have nothing to do with the colonization of India but that Indians treat other races in other countries just as badly they would show their true form of smug gloating over your supposed impotence to stop them. And if you later ended up in an argument with that same Indian the next day to your astonishment they would have no recollection of what you were arguing about before. I didn’t know what astounded me before their lack of self awareness or their dedication to lying.
Gradually I began to hate them.
https://x.com/WatcherGuru/status/2030833197194391613
Iran believe it or not looks like it’s going to be okay
Iran has offered to abandon its nuclear weapons potential.
Not, however its development of nuclear power, nor its development of missiles and drones.
Asking it to abandon drones is unreasonable, because this would render it totally vulnerable to further hostile acts, thus amounts to unconditional and total surrender. Of course Trump wants unconditional and total surrender, but is a hard sell.
On the other hand, if the war is not going anywhere — if he cannot get sufficient control of Iran’s airspace to enable gravity bombing, he will just take the win that has been offered. He is a deal maker, and what is on the table already gives him a win — not as total a win as he would like, but Trump has a long history of settling for what he can get.
But if he can get sufficient control of Iran’s airspace to engage in gravity bombing, then he can demand a whole lot more, and probably will.
It seems that US already has control of the airspace. While we might expect the official sources and “America fuck yeah” commentators to exaggerate, the reasonably well-informed skeptics like Simplicius have been conceding that point as well. What they dispute is its impact, pointing out that air power alone doesn’t win wars (true) and asserting that Iran still has an abundant supply of missiles in reserve in hardened underground facilities (plausible and likely), is producing enough missiles every day to keep up the pressure indefinitely (plausible but unlikely) and successfully destroyed more than half of the US allied missile defense systems in the alpha strike (rather implausible, but very serious if true).
I think a major difficulty in coming to any kind of agreement with Iran now is that Iran is no longer agreement-capable, not really through any fault of their own, but because of the decapitation strike and whatever contingency it triggered. The new official leader–Mojatba, or something?–is apparently disconnected from the C2, as evidenced by when he issued an apology for attacking the neighboring Gulf states and said they would stop the missiles, and shortly afterward the various IRGC cells issued an official response along the lines of “haha, no way, fuck you, we’re not stopping until they kick all the Americans out” and kept going.
Trouble for armchair analysts like us is that the optimal Iranian strategy looks the same whether they really have the materiel/manufacturing to keep up, or whether this is Baghdad Bob levels of bluffing. It therefore makes sense that Trump is not going to commit to pulling out tomorrow, or this week, because, I assume, he has decided to call their bluff, and at least so far (though this could change) Iran’s threat against the Gulf states has backfired on them, not worked to their advantage. As of today, the Gulf nations are pissed at Iran, which is a complete turnaround from their attitude during previous attacks on Iran, and not surprising given Iran’s latest scorched-earth tactics. But reading between the lines, the GCC are also pretty worried about the damage being done, and might ultimately capitulate.
I think it is just far too early to draw conclusions or make predictions. Venezuela was a milk run by comparison, this is more serious business, it is practically a stress-test of US logistics and alliances, and historically, even very successful invasions take at least a month or two to complete and wind down. Unless Iran folds like a cheap suit, which is looking increasingly unlikely, I don’t expect an immediate end. But Trump will probably end it well in advance of the midterms.
Iran does not in fact have enough missiles or the ability to keep using them at any kind of rate for very long, the thing they do have and can launch are drones.
Possibly. I am only recounting what other people have to say. I have no way to verify any claims made about Iran’s missile reserves, positive or negative.
The sudden and drastic reduction in launches would certainly be consistent with depletion. On the other hand, would also be consistent with a single massive alpha strike to identify and destroy air defenses followed by conservation for more strategic targets and/or leaving room for escalation. I think it is too early to know. Men in Trump’s position have to decide whether calling the bluff is worth the risk; he has obviously decided that in this case, it is.
My understanding of current drone warfare (which is next to none) is that long-range drone attacks are not terribly effective, especially against intact defenses, but if they have been able to use their missiles to substantially eliminate those defenses, then the drones would be a much greater threat.
The feeling I get, although everyone who might know for sure is being cagey and everyone who doesn’t know jack is talking way too loud, is that Israel was prepared for a counterattack and so their defenses are fully intact, but the GCC nations were not prepared to be targeted in the counterattack, and took a nasty beating. Which puts a lot of pressure on the US to completely castrate Iran if they don’t want those GCC nations to accede to the IRGC’s demands to shut down all the US military bases. Another reason why, even if Trump did really badly want to pull out all forces right now, he cannot do so without an extremely high risk of leaving things much worse off from where they started.
This sudden realignment of the Gulf states against Iran is probably considered an outcome beyond USG’s or Israel’s wildest dreams, but rests on a precarious powder keg of a situation that requires extremely careful diplomacy on one end and decisive deadly force on the other. A very juicy carrot along with a very sharp stick. I can’t even guess what kind of wheeling and dealing is going on right now, but I’d bet on the negotiations being extremely tense.
Islam and Muslims are not beneficial to, or in, the West.
Judaism and Jews are not beneficial to, or in, the West either…
x.com/NoahsArk1000/status/2029889734085070977
x.com/SpeakWithDeeDee/status/2030617885660307744
x.com/BackupJeffx/status/2030126056657518983
x.com/Uncommonsince76/status/2029984206864986167
x.com/JOKAQARMY1/status/2030409235113087029
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cubO0lhOMcs
Yes, but that is not our big problem, it is a distraction from our big problem, and is impossible to solve unless we solve our big problem first.
The Big Problem are the White Western Men (most at that time Christian) who gave Women Suffrage, purview in Men’s affairs, and other foolish things… and the White Western Men (some still Christian) who still swear by that today.
The Big Problem are the White Western Men (most at that time Christian) who gave the Pope reign over Secular affairs, insisted on clergy being unmarried thus gay, and other foolish things… and the White Western Men (some still Christian) who still swear by that today.
While fixing those two may take a little more work…
Simply telling all the Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Africans, Chinese, etc… that they are, due to prior error, and for incompatibility, no longer welcome, please make and effect term plans to leave… that’s an easy first verbal cut and win… millions will leave from that alone.
You are still on moderation for not conforming to the moderation policy by passing the shill test, and further comments from you are likely to be silently deleted unless you do take the shill test.
Obviously only a regime whose state religion is old type Christianity is capable of doing that, and such a regime would be unacceptable and violently unpopular unless it first does the primary thing we need an old type Christian regime for: Solving the woman problem.
How do you solve the woman problem and crisis of the missing grandchildren?
1. It is obvious.
2. Regimes that do solve it are a trope in women’s porn, often loosely based on real regimes that solved it. Just RTFM.
Attacking simp feminists for the crime of emancipating women and the bishop of Rome and his enablers for seeking secular power sounds like a thought crime to me.
Shills can do that kind of thing and do do that kind of thing all the time. What they cannot do is explain why emancipating women was bad for everyone, especially women, nor why the Bishop of Rome wound up worshiping demons.
They can say that Soros is a very bad man, but cannot actually describe any of the bad things he did.
Up to you but shills try to mix partial approved thoughtcrimes with a payload, his posts looks like more of a full thoughtcrime without a payload but you see more of the shill posts then I. I’m not getting the vibe personally…
Reflect on the Nick Fuentes vibe. “Muslims are horrible, and Muslims in America are worse, therefore you need to vote for the Democrats in the 2026 elections.”
Speaking of shills , how to solve the shills problem in social media , specifically X / twitter , Facebook etc , every time you post something remotely controversial, you get swarm of shills , derail, obfuscate, misdirect and just plain stop the conversation through ad homonym and other ways.
Jim is very good at smoking them , but you can’t do this at scale of millions users. Then how ? You restrict access , based on what ?
You don’t, unless you own the platform.
The shill problem can never be solved in any form of media that accepts public broadcasts. The media itself must operate on a trust model, where every individual acts as the individual owner of his/her “page”, and replies to you are only visible to others if they come from someone you have chosen to trust or if you explicitly choose to publish them.
Twitter, Facebook 4chan and the rest don’t have that model and never will. It’s technically possible and not even very difficult to create a system that does, but extremely difficult to make that system resilient against hostile actors including state-level actors, and everyone who has tried has fallen victim to that. You need almost everything in the stack to be independent including hardware, connectivity, and protocols like DNS. And then you need to be good enough at community-building (or find someone who is) to actually get people to use it, because of Metcalfe’s Law.
I don’t try to wean normies off social media, because I can’t and it’s pointless to try, but our own people should GTFO because it’s absolutely full of harmful memes and bad actors, some of whom have spent a lifetime learning and practicing how to sound appealing at first and then gradually shift the overton window after locking down an audience. If you want to try to be an influencer yourself, and just post stuff and never read replies, then fine, go nuts, but if you can’t resist the allure of “engagement”, and most people can’t, then don’t go there. It’s like filling your pantry with cheap Halloween candy, you know you are going to eat it eventually and you are going to regret it when you do.
Anecdotal experience, peak hoeflation may have passed. Younger zoommettes seem to be okay with having men around without massive preselection and without reacting with insane hostility. I think most of them were never in the college to fake DEI jobs pipeline as its closed off (fake female email jobs are not being protected by the Trump admin and where they are needed Ai is replacing them) hence a lot of them are only at the high school level of feminist conditioning (and HS is when such conditioning is most ineffective).
A major factor in hoeflation was DEI and ESG — Doge and Trump directly attacked this, and this is the primary grounds of the lawfare now directed at Doge staff.
So one would expect an immediate and direct impact on hoeflation, and a corresponding rise, or reduced fall, in the collapse of fertility.
BTW Jim stumbled on this its sort of a redpill critique of certain aspects of the redpill (while affirming many other aspects). Its not a BS feminist PC critique… wonder what you think. Kind of a long read… but when you’re bored maybe you should look it over.
https://www.jsanilac.com/dominance/
But women, of course, do not want submissive slaves, And that is not what the red pill delivers.
But there is a grain of truth that it misrepresents.
And the truth that it is mangling is that men conquer and women surrender, but men perform and women choose.
We must always dance the pimp monkey dance. Has any practitioner and teacher of the red pill ever promised any man anything else?
Me. And a long time before you were doing it.
Performing like monkeys for women instead of like Cherished Sons of God for God is exactly what got you into this mess.
You can’t let go of your Game dogma.
Nuts. We are commanded to be fruitful and multiply. Which means we males are commanded to head our households — which means be alpha, and be perceived as alpha by women. We are commanded to perform game.
This feels like a Motte-Bailey.
The Motte is, “you have to be masculine, self assured, via belief in higher power or otherwise, and not led around by your woman.”
The Bailey is, “game is being masculine, self assured, via belief in higher power or otherwise, and not led around by your woman.”
Much before you even get to the nuclear shit tests — which you are very vague on anyway, and you seemingly imply that they need you to somehow smoothly convince the cops that no officer I am not kidnapping this woman even though she claims I am abusing her, or somesuch related scenario — you have to play a jester game that gets increasingly deranged each timestep. It’s not enough to be manly, you have to display manliness in a way legible to females, which is what the kids are now calling “jestermaxxing”, because it involves playing a peacock game.
We all want to go back to “men have to perform” via mostly friendly intramale competition in sports and business, and not so friendly intertribal competition in business and warfare. No one wants “men have to perform” via the Red Queens race for maximizing your ability to capture social attention and be generally antisocial in order to be percieved as an upstart alpha protohuman.
Your bitter and stubborn refusal to comprehend game and the true nature of women, makes it impossible for me to respond to this deranged absurdity.
If you are unafraid of the possibility that you might be charged with kidnapping, abuse, and all that, you are highly unlikely to be charged, even if obviously guilty, especially if obviously guilty.
If you are afraid, likely to be charged and convicted even if entirely innocent.
A woman is like a noisy dog. A noisy dog will not attack unless you show fear.
I feel this is an unjustified response. The last time I posted about my personal experiences, you implied I should literally pick the girl up and carry her away. Implied is a weak word here, because it was short of directly telling me this, but you specifically mentioned the scenario in a way that any rational reader would assume you were telling me this was the correct course of action to take.
You also frequently mention your capability to smooth talk the police in various scenarios, and imply a connection between this skill and the management of your household. If a nuclear shittest, of which you frequently allude to, does not involve some direct or near-direct conflict with agents of the state, then what is it? This is partially why I say you are unclear and playing a Motte-Bailey every time the topic comes up. The other part is that the game of pre-selection involves what the kids of today call “jestermaxxing”, acting a peacock role in order to gain enough social clout to trade for higher quality women. Unless you are plausibly committing crimes, need to play a peacock game to get enough attention to even begin generating pre-selection. Is this incorrect? What else does one do to generate pre-selection beyond those two options? Is passing shit tests in the context of marriage and family plausibly confronting the state, or is it something else? If it is something else, then why are they so dangerously hard to pass?
What am I not understanding? What part of any of my posts, which I’ve been making here for a better part of a decade now, shows a bitter refusal to understand anything? I play devil’s advocate quite a bit, but I respond to and engage with arguments without undue obstinance, and drop the discussion when it becomes clear nothing more worthwhile can be said.
I don’t recall the conversation, perhaps you could give me a link, but this sounds like something I probably would have advised. That is a shit test that offers a high reward for passing. Fireman’s carry if you are expecting some resistance. I fail to see any relationship between this advice and the quoted accusation.
I assume I interpreted your situation as a shit test that required you to physically control her location.
I did not intend to imply that connection. That is a conclusion you jumped to out of pessimism about the risk of passing nuclear shit tests.
The need to smooth talk the police in connection to sexual assault charges has only arisen once, and that was because I failed a shit test.
A nuclear shit test is one that can only be passed by committing acts that are illegal, and usually grossly immoral. One can easily get out of the grossly immoral ones by claiming Christianity, but you will still face the ones that require illegal acts to pass.
So, pass them. How is this Motte and Bailey? How are nuclear shit tests undefined?
As I said, be able to plausibly confront agents of the state. Ideally you do not actually confront agents of the state, but you need to plausibly project this, and be willing and able to do so.
This is far different from any reasonable interpretation of being manly, or at least sets an unreasonably high bar. The Motte is you have to not be a pussy, and not get pushed around by your woman. Hence the story of Adam and Eve. The Bailey is you need to be plausibly self assured enough that taking on agents of the state is something you are willing to do.
Need to bluff ‘willing and able to confront the state’ and sometimes this bluff gets called.
Another, rather less Motte-Bailey but close, point of contention is the pre-game and pre-selection. Generating preselection in today’s social environment requires becoming a jester in some form, some forms more palatable than others. You can via the nature of your role in society become a celebrity, this is more in line with nature, be so good at what you do you by-default win social status pre-selection. The other option is peacocking, either peacocking in a jocular sense as colorful and comedic and musical, or peacocking to look like a gangbanger. This is “men perform and women choose,” except the performance is not really natural for a civilized man, and by civilized I mean prosocial not the contemporary meaning of oversocialized into a meek role. The Motte is “men cannot get something for nothing, you have to perform/compete”, which is agreeable. The Bailey is something like “even if the competition is peacocking to appease the out-of-date female status instinct, this is what God wants so dance or have your bloodline die.” A bit strongly worded, but as a Bailey its never so directly stated anyway.
That depends on how decadent and oppressive the state is. Given that the state is shockingly decadent and oppressive, seems reasonable enough to me.
Obviously you don’t want to get into confrontation with the state. But you just have to be willing to risk it. That really is a reasonably minimal bar for any honorable man.
As Confucius says “Remember this, my children. Oppressive government is fiercer than a tiger.” A man should be willing to face a tiger. Facing the state is less risky than when Vikings went raiding for women and land.
Surely don’t want to take on agents of the state. But since the states demands are unreasonable, over the top, and wicked, risking it is something I am willing to do, that every man should be willing to do.
How is this a Motte and Bailey argument? A Motte and Bailey argument is when you retreat to the Motte when challenged on the Bailey. Has anyone ever retreated to the Motte when challenged on this? Of course you should be willing to die, while trying to avoid dying. Duh! That is being a man 101.
A prudent man avoids unnecessary risks. But this is a necessary risk.
Nuts. You do mean oversocialized into a meek role.
Women don’t like that. And they should not like that.
Women are far too keen on wicked conduct. But their preference for manly conduct is about what it should be.
One should prudently avoid unnecessary risks. But under an oppressive regime, some risks are unavoidable, and trying to avoid them is self destructive.
That’s the kind of manliness that is quite literally mythological. It’s not facing a battle, a battle is something you can win. You are saying I have to act from the psychological frame I am willing to go against the state, the state that has already demonstrated willingness to take all my property, lock me in a cage with the low IQ petty criminal retards, and kill me if I resist. With no men in arms at my side, and no potential for victory should the fight be triggered. That’s not a viking raid, and that’s not a tiger.
I made the commitment to join the Russians in the Ukraine war should Kamela have won in 2024. Yes I cannot prove this, but I know in my heart I am willing to face death. It is greatly aggravating to me when you compare the situation I face domestically to facing battle. They are not the same.
If you stand in the way of the bulldozer, you will be crushed, but if you dance out of the way, the bulldozer will not energetically change course to get you. A decadent state is not effectual in enforcing its own laws. So many people get away with murder, chances are you can get away with righteous execution.
A state that is capable of criminalizing marriage 1.0 is a state incapable of enforcing its own laws.
As men we are disposable. If you are not taking risks, sometimes life threatening, or feels like life threatening, or career threatening, you are not going to make progress.
If your life is so comfortable that you cannot take risks, overcome fear and even terror, count your blessings.
If your life sucks and you want a new one, burn your ships and roll those dice.
There is no game like natural game. Which largely comes from failure (experience). I date quite a lot. Do these girls shit test me? I don’t know. I can’t tell. They mostly do what I want. Sometimes not.
Now is about as good of a time to start a family as it is to start a business. Either or both will require you to risk everything, and decent chances of failure even for the best of us.
Right, this is what I am calling the Motte-Bailey, though it’s not so explicit as we are talking in vague terms.
You are saying you don’t need to worry about direct confrontation with the state, but also you have to do things that might catch the attention of the state, but also the state is incompetent so don’t worry. Well, which is it? Do you see how this comes across as some mystical speech at best? You should not confront the bulldozer, but at the same time feel in your balls you could confront the bulldozer. If your balls shrivel, the bulldozer will know, and swerve to you. I’m rephrasing but this is actually what you are saying.
You in one comment say, don’t show fear because women will act on it like a stray dog would act on it, and say that you would ordinarily not confront the state, except if you mess up, woops lol had a little mortality and showed weakness heres a sexual assault and kidnapping charge! This is not serious advice. This is mysticism. It reads exactly like a koan. I’m sure you would be beating me with a broomstick if we met in person.
It’s not one test, it’s not a battle. If we get Humongous’ world, or we get a civil war and a tribe that isn’t self destructive and retarded, I will reconsider. Until then, I’m gonna try and make money, avoid the coming explosive war internal and external, and not worry about this.
@Adam
Were you not posting about dating 30yos and latinas? I am not trying to turn this into some status contest, but I am not interested in either of those categories. I can get laid on occasion, when I’m horny enough to overcome the apathy, but the long game has me at a loss. I don’t feel like I hopelessly misunderstand women, I feel as if the current condition is so adversarial that I don’t want the stress of it. If conditions change I’ll re-evaluate.
All of the above, plus quite a few more. I am not saying you don’t need to worry. I am saying it is a lot easier than dealing with tigers, mammoths, or the Irish.
What is typically going to happen is that your women are going to put you in a situation where you have to apply some quite mild, but nonetheless unambiguously illegal, domestic discipline. You apply it. That is that, problem resolved. Happens all the time, everyone does it.
Am I saying it is safe to do this? Hell no! It is very dangerous. But not nearly as dangerous as hunting mammoths or raiding the Irish for wives. Men are the disposable sex. Women have to put up with inconvenient plumbing, we have to put up with being disposable. If you are not willing to face up to disposability, women will think you are not a man, and they are correct.
I am not saying that long term relationship game is safe. I am saying its safer than hunting mammoths or wife raiding the Irish.
Yes I have dated lots of central and South American girls. They cluster around 26 years old. Never dated a girl 30 or over in many years. Banged some though.
I didn’t realize you had experience. The long game is a little different in that the girl has to in ways inspire you, either by beauty or performance to keep putting in the work. I have not found one of those though. I thought I did a couple times over the last few years but I lose attraction to them eventually. And I probably enjoy seduction too much.
I already have kids of my kind I am proud of, so probably just going to continue the decline poolside until hoeflation crashes.
I want to clarify something for Fidelis:
It IS okay to just Nope out of being involved with a particular chick. If her shit tests are likely to get you arrested or involved in a gang war with the Crips and/or the Bloods, the Jimian solution of escalating to some nuclear response is not your only option. You ARE allowed to say, “To hell with this bitch” and exit. The discourse in this forum often gives the impression that that is an unacceptable move that brands you as a wuss or something. Nonsense – plainly some women are not worth the trouble. Jim’s response will be that this is endogenous; that the extent of a woman’s trouble-making depends on how well you have handled her shit tests up to that point. While that’s true, it’s also true that how much trouble a given woman will give you is also a function of her individual personality. Obviously, some women are simply not worth it.
Do remember that Bitches Be Crazy, and some are crazier than others. Let them be some other guy’s problem.
(I just checked in here and did some superficial skimming before posting this; just wanted to get it down while I was thinking of it. Apologies if this duplicates a point already made.)
Made this point before but yes worth repeating.
Anyone taking their game journey seriously will notice at some point they will take things too far and be too much of an asshole. Does not hurt your chances with the ladies (indeed that’s why you’re an asshole in the first place) but does -or rather, should- make you ask yourself: is this really who I want to be? There’s a limit on the amount of shit you ought to take from women, and determining the line between ‘this is the act I must put up’ and ‘this I refuse’ is what keeps you healthy and sane.
True. Some women are more crazy and dangerous than others.
But also untrue. There are no unicorns. You have to be willing to take very great risks. All women are like that.
To prove its not the usual anti redpill white knight and/or feminist bullshit I’ll give a couple phrases from it
“Would you still rape me if I was a worm”
“I’ll rape you forever just the way you are” (the phrase was something like that)
Writer apparently claims to be female.
And she very well might be because the article makes all the typical female thinking mistakes.
We are performing monkeys. Yes, typically women crave dominance more than man crave dominating. For a happy marriage, a man must submit to acting dominant. That is simply how the world works. No paradox there.
Obviously there is a limit to how much you can give a woman what she wants. Not going to murder anyone to impress her, and if possible, not even going to beat anyone up. That’s why the red pill must be combined with patriarchy: women must be restrained not just domestically, but societally. Again, really no paradox here. The writer of that article is debating the ghosts of PUA past.
Her analysis of the catastrophic and historically unprecedented failure in modern gender relations is surprisingly i think the best I’ve ever seen.
A woman in a state of nature absent feminist conditioning wants to feel desired and lusted after like a plant needs water this is the default of female sexuality more than seeing extreme displays of dominance and violence but the problem is women are subjected to very extreme social conditioning to find being desired offensive this produces a sort of almost schizophrenic effect. Furthermore her arousal by displays of dominance and violence is amplified to way higher than it should be by the type of porn women consume. Modern female sexuality is thus a caricature of what it should be and the only people who can convincingly black knight convincingly enough to get through it are a few genuine psychopaths and of course there are almost no relationships under such circumstances.
What is missing from her analysis is God.
supposedly you submit to women when you act the role of dominant husband. But really, you’re submitting to God’s will.
PS Com how’d it end with that one chick you were on about? Lay report pls.
She seems to have a cluster b personality disorder and its not the good king (I like bpd chicks) she was a lawyer chick so always a risk. Seems to have lied to a lot of people more than chicks normally do so no meetup has happened and I ain’t seen her in public since nor have other people I know who know her. Too bad its rare to find a girl anymore I like looking at and I actually find it easy to talk to. I’m not worried though zoomette hoeflation seems to have passed peak whereas post metoo and especially post covid was sort of years in the desert when you just couldn’t talk to girls in real life.
I don’t think so. Women just need to be dominated, and since they are so short of it in modernity, they get thirsty. The frequently weird and perverse porn they consume reflects the desire, it does not cause it. If they feel securely owned, their demand for rather tiring domination eases, considerably, along with the frighteningly dangerous shit tests, and life gets easier.
We all long for the ancestral environment of successful reproduction, which for women was as securely owned property. But she cannot be sure of secure ownership unless she presses on it. Hence the shit tests.
Interesting Columbus era anecdote regarding a violent shit test by a native woman.
https://x.com/escapefrommelos/status/2034575104815030720
‘Nuts. We are commanded to be fruitful and multiply. Which means we males are commanded to head our households — which means be alpha, and be perceived as alpha by women. We are commanded to perform game.’
Hmm. Be male the way Jim says to be male and be a performing monkey for women instead of being a proud and rigtheous Son of a holy Father, who disdains the machinations of women and does not suffer them.
Yeah, no thanks Jim. You go from a REAL command — ‘be fruitful and multiply’ — to your absurd and FABRICATED conclusion that God therefore ‘commands us to perform game’. Gee, Game eh? I mean it’s right there on Moses’ tablet . . . not.
You have to decide what your real religion is, Jim. Is it the Religion of Game on which you’ve staked your reputation these decades past? With its interminable shit-test ontology and the requirement to be Performing Monkeys, oh hello Tyler Durden lol.
Or is your religion the Religion of the Father and his Holy Patriarchy? Because like it or not, these two are not the same thing.
You are correct about many things, with a fine commentariat, including understanding that a very kinetic and authentic holy war is taking place for the soul of America, and of the planet . . . which ought not really be too difficult to discern given that most Western men live in feminist nations, under collective female dominance. Like performing monkeys, come to think of it.
You hate God, because you hate his creation. You defend effeminacy and weakness, that God has condemned.
The state has forbidden marriage 1.0, God has commanded marriage 1.0.
You are rationalising up a disgusting slimy excuse for obeying the state and disobeying the Lord.
The key point of the performance is domestic discipline. Which is not a performance, but a duty.
I might be less likely to kill people who get in my way than my wife believes. That is performance. I am exactly as likely to be the head of the household and enforce right conduct upon the weaker vessel as my wife believes. That is not performance, but fullfilling the will of God, which you are afraid to do.
That is what everyone calls the nuclear shit test.
Negs, amused indifference, teasing, and all that are a mere performance of masculinity. Women sense that and demand proof of the real thing. That is the nuclear shit test. And the real thing, you are commanded by the Lord, and forbidden by the state, to deliver.
Effeminacy, lack of masculiity, is forbidden by the lord, and commanded by the state. Women demand we act like men, and the Lord demands we actually be men. You are rationalising an excuse for rejecting the demands of women, to justify rejecting the commands of the Lord.
Female emancipation is just a shit test, and we have a mission from God to pass it. You are begging out of this mission.
I am effeminate and weak and hate my own Father? My Papa, whom you do not know?
I will let the King be the judge of your slurs, accuser.
Here are a bunch of Muslim and Nigger Rape Gangs in France, staging to go rape young white girls in UK, Ireland, Scotland
https://x.com/HJB_News__/status/2040367402483847311
The pieces of shit that let them into France need to be hauled out and shot.