Biden has just come down with Covid again, or never shook it in the first place.
The quadruple jabbed have damaged immune systems, so keep getting it, and take longer and longer to recover from each case. In any person with a normal immune system, live virus is cleared from the blood and body fluids in a few days, though it hangs around barricaded in the nuclei of the cells causing trouble for a while longer.
The golden purebloods, people who caught covid and have never been jabbed, are largely immune once they recover, and unless they were also coming down with half a dozen deadly comorbidities (usually obesity related) purebloods recover about as fast as from any cold or flu.
Covid was genetically engineered to attack the lungs, the immune system, the ovaries, and the testes, so each case damages the immune system of the jabbed further, and the longer it slowly lingers, the more it damages the immune system. We may soon see a massive outbreak of AIDs like symptoms if the boosted keep boosting. Or maybe even if they stop, but keep getting lingering Covid over and over and over again.
Ivermectin, widely available as horse paste, is highly effective if taken early. This drug has long been used on a wide scale in a humans and animals to treat an extraordinarily wide range of ailments caused by entirely unrelated living organisms and is very safe and cheap, which is why official “science” does not like it. It knocks out for a month or two some basic cellular processes that are non critical for most mammals, and as insignificant as the appendix in humans, but absolutely essential for a huge range of entirely unrelated life forms.
The mechanism of action of Ivermectin against Covid is unclear – indeed its mechanism against many sorts of organisms is unclear, but it may act by disabling a cellular function, non essential in humans, that the Covid virus abuses to get into the nucleus of the cell, where your immune system cannot counterattack without massive collateral damage.
A single dose of horse paste containing 20mg Ivermectin taken in the first day or so of the infection will cure you very shortly, and if taken prophylactically because you have close contact with Covid cases, gives you protection for a month or so. If taken after a few days, not so effective. In that case you might want to keep on taking it, though it has little effect after the first week or few days. Nicotine is also effective, and, unlike Ivermectin, effective later in the infection. Get a patch if you failed to take Ivermectin promptly. And all the usual stuff, vitamin D and balanced divalent salts, in particular zinc.
Despite the powerful prophylactic effect of Ivermectin, I would not recommend taking it every month or so just to be safe, because though widely used for a very long time, with no significant side effects, it has not been widely used in this manner.
Also, we have a state religion of Worship of the Awesome Might of the Covid Demon, thus worrying too much about Covid is demon worship, even if you are using protective measures that his holy priesthood has denounced as sacrilegious (because they actually are effective). On the one hand, Ivermectin represents defiance of the state religion. On the other hand, taking too much trouble to protect yourself against Covid represents respect for the Might of the State’s supposedly mighty and awesome demon.
The correct Christian attitude towards demons is that demons do not exist, and that demons do exist, but are ridiculous, contemptible, and impotent against the power of Christ. It’s just the flu, bro.
The core competency needed by the security company of the future is man portable air defense.
Any smartphone with the standard features can be turned into a tactical data device with the right software. More specialized implementations are possible developments. The warfighter may be attaching TDDs to wrists, helmets, and weapon systems, to facilitate reconnaissance-strike architectures in miniature. The sighting of targets, sensing of weapon system’s orientation, and display of plotted aim points for engagement. Every new weapon is only a patch away from integration.
Automatic grenade launchers and repeating grenade rifles using proximity fused or guided munitions. Mortar tubes for indirect fires or launching of guided munitions, for engagement of targets on the ground or in the air. ‘Combat air patrol’ of portable drones that may physically, electromagnetically, and or kinetically interdict other systems.
Means of swatting a troop of switchblades out of air that can be carried by a squad of men walking the street or riding a convoy of vehicles are what coming Caesars require.
Need a non lethal man portable ECM air defense system for home security in the mean time. It’s only a matter of time before Antifa types are flying quadcopter over the homes of dissidents to spy on them, and for obvious reasons you can’t shoot into the air.
Russia’s using man portable ECM jammers based on a civilian model that’s being sold by China.
Please explain those obvious reasons.
Recently a man in Germany shot down a drone that was flying low over his garden. He used buckshot. He was acquitted in court. In the opinion of the court shooting down a drone with buckshot was justified “self-defense”.
I guess you’re not American. ATF and American legal system is not so kind. Use of ECM will likely get a fine if they can prove it which can be hard depending on the method. Use of gun may result in armed men stacking up on your front door.
Also with the way the hobbyist drone industry is developing, drones are going to get smaller and night flight capable and thus harder to shoot down. ECM methods can more easily deal with that.
So the story coming out from Sundance is the Trump raid was mostly about getting ahold of the spy gate docs Trump had declassified but never released because of obstruction of justice threats. IE, the FBI is mostly acting on it’s own.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/08/11/part-2-why-did-the-doj-and-fbi-execute-the-raid-on-trump-the-evidence-within-the-documents/
I find this believable, but I’m really not sure why the FBI would bother. Not like the law matters these days.
But that got me thinking could the FBI take over the US government? We generally assume the FBI is a tool of the elites, but it could be a separate faction. Putin came from Russia’s version of the FBI and with the declining in the legitimacy of the official government I wonder if they’re thinking about taking over.
The news media yesterday seemed like they were walking back these passionate civil servants a bit, but the fact remains that the line was crossed and nobody will be even lightly punished for it.
In short: Just a skit to calm down the herd now that the deed is done.
This is really it. Current conditions Trump murdered by 2024.
Wild theory
After the midterm, catastrophic repup defeat followed by mass arrest statrting with Trump by end of year
@Red
The FBI doesn’t have enough armed men. It’s a puny organization.
There might be a struggle between factions purging the FBI and replacing its staffing with their loyalists in the same manner as Septimius Severus. Or the FBI is cut down to size as multiple PMCs/state guards loyal to each alt-USG faction replaces its function.
(PMC = Private Military Companies).
I love this idea, but it may be optomistic. The FBI has access to a massive manpower boost through their Fusion Center Network, which is something that very few people seem to know about, but is very widespread. If St. Anglin is correct and mass arrests are coming, it will be from the Fusion Centers that the data is collected and the Go Code is issued.
https://archive.ph/2VScr
Read between the lines.
FBI lacks the boots for a full national crackdown, I agree. And they are also really bad at being creative. So they are going to lean on military/PMC advisors, and they’re going to deputize out of PDs, private security, and military POGs. I know this is a leap, but if you look at Hamas Security Forces (the real clown world was between 2002 and 2006) training footage, they had all the gear “donated” by westerners, but did not have the base of operators to staff out their door knockers. So instead of a typical SWAT team (8-12), they would stack, no shit, 30+ dudes on the door, then just Go Go Go them right through the danger window. This worked because Hamas had plenty of young men with high zeal and low talent. I only ever saw training, never saw the effectiveness in the field, and the Official Elements of Hamas didn’t last very long.
So: they will recruit the mid and low level “guys” from city and suburb PDs, supported by private security and rear echelon military. This is like adding flour to a stew with too little meat, right? But they don’t need it to actually work, they just need to portray a media legend that they have overwhelming numbers and excellent gear, which is trivial in an MSM-controlled environment. I think they’re going to just copy the test answers from GWoT and apply it in a domestic situation with orbiting ISR and overwhelming force. This will be coupled with some kind of amnesty program (pogrom lol) where yo trade in your guns & MAGA hat in exchange for a small fine and “peace of mind” and let’s not even think of how many flag waving, beer gut toting Americans would jump into that line after they get a taste of what actual domestic instability feels like.
This is not blackpilling, but I am trying to be realistic. The FBI has never once let incompetence get in the way of initiative, and 400,000,000 guns doesn’t mean a thing if there’s only 10,000 men willing to take up arms. None of this means a guaranteed victory for the Cathedral, it just means this 2 Weeks meme is probably glownigger bullshit priming dissension, despair, and defeat when the Issue drags on longer.
@Kunning Druegger
Bullshit. The shitty performance of the jews’ sepoys and contractors in Afghanistan and Ukraine say otherwise.
Orbiting ISR (intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) that’s dependent on Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos.
RSOs (Range Safety Officer).
POGs (Person Other than Grunt).
People here, including some of the smart OG (Original Gangsta) commentators might not be familiar with your acronyms because different organizations will use the same acronym for the different things. If I said something about military IRS, very few people here are going to know what that means and think I’m referring to a military “internal revenue service†and not the military Informal Resolution System.
Spewing out a flurry of acronyms without spelling them out in the first mention is a midwit tell.
By ignoring the ZOGbots actual shitty performance in Afghanistan and Ukraine. You’re not trying to be realistic by ignoring the actual reality.
Starman, you are making the equivalent of “HA you misspelled this word and your grammar is off, so your point is invalid!”
Look, chink. Engage with the content or fuck off back to gab. You’ve outlived your utility and, to be very frank, you’re a midwit like myself, so pretending at high IQ has just become embarrassing.
Here are the acronyms I used:
FBI
PMC
PD
POG
SWAT
MSM
GWoT
ISR
MAGA
Anyone that struggles with those is not really at a level where they should be involved in the discourse here. With the exception of POG (which is what Starman and 90% of military “””veterans””” are) and maybe ISR, all of those are commonplace. Further, I didn’t use “RSO.” Don’t know where you got that. I am starting to get the impression that your reading comprehension is just poor, and once you hit the third or fourth word that reminds you of your shit tier comprehension, you get mad and start hammering out a response. This will be the third time wherein you have encountered a substantial amount of text, picked 1 to 1.5 concepts, reddit-responded, then jumped to ad hominem. In no world is that good faith or valuable. You bring almost nothing to the discussion anymore. You have no laurels to rest on, as the one use you seemed to have was crafting RPWQs, so I just don’t understand where you are coming from.
I just used a lot of words, and I don’t expect you to actually respond, so if you just don’t get it, respond with “I don’t understand what you are writing” or “The concepts are not clear to me” or something else befitting your station. Just because your a cockmongler IRL doesn’t mean you have to shit up this comment section (which, I should add, you have time and again belittled and demeaned as unworthy of your time). Stop being a faggot, dude. Engage with what I wrote, or ignore it, you idiot.
I have no idea what PMC, PD, ROG, GWoT, and ISR mean in context, and, because of TLA overload, no one is likely to be able to determine what they mean in context. You are talking in your own private language, preventing communication and discussion.
Stop using uncommon and overloaded TLAs. They are an obstacle to communication.
Private Military Corporation, Police Department, Personnel Other than Grunt(non-infantry Military Occupational Specialty), Global War on Terror, and I do not know off the top of my head what exactly ISR means but it is satellite intelligence. All of them, with perhaps the exception of ISR, are completely common abbreviations in military and intelligence circles.
I was in military intelligence for a single enlistment, but that was years ago and I still can understand it. It is not a hard language to follow, and broadly understood in reference to the subject, so the assumption that if you cannot understand it, it was not meant for you is a fair one. A self-authorizing language to keep people out of the conversation who do not belong.
What KD is saying is that the FBI will form a core of regime thugs that will be expanded as needed with deputies from police departments, mercenaries, and non-combat arms military. They will use satellites to locate you, then zerg-rush you with dozens of poorly trained deputies backed up by a few hardcores. Then he provided evidence of real-world uses of this tactic and a reasonable inferences based on past regime behavior. Starman is just being an asshole. Again.
Well, actually I have some very slight familiarity with a non military intelligence circle, and I am pretty sure that some of them would be incomprehensible in that circle, and ISR is incomprehensible even to you, so not surprising it is incomprehensible to the rest of us.
I was actually wrong about ISR, because I was thinking it is just terminal guidance. It actually stands for Intelligence, Surveillance, target acquisition, Reconnaissance. It still means intelligence support, but along a broader range of capabilities. Still, I knew what he meant, even if I got the specifics of one acronym wrong, and I have been out of that world for a long time.
TLA is Technical Language Acronym, right?
TLA is a massively overloaded three letter acronym usually used to ridicule the use of massively overloaded three letter acronyms.
It means “Three Letter Agency, Three Letter Acronym, a pile of other things, and it is seldom knowable from context which one it means.
@Wulfgar Thundercock III @Kunning Drueger
Real-world uses? I provided actual battlefields where the (((Global American Empire))) got its ass kicked, where the (((GAE))) tried to use the Afghan National Army (“poorly trained deputies”) backed up by US Special Forces (“a few hardcores”).
And now the GAE is trying again in Ukraine and failing… again.
I was in the military for 20 years. And I still use the courtesy of spelling out military acronyms for people who are not familiar.
For space stuff, when I post in larger Gab groups where people might be unfamiliar, I would often spell out acronyms like OLIT as “Orbital Launch Integration Tower.”
Jim is not a midwit, but he is also not military. There are others who aren’t midwits either (such as Alf) who would not be familiar with terms used in organizations that they weren’t involved in.
There’s a short list of people I consider equally interesting enough to pay attention to:
– Jim
– Alf
– Shaman
– judgedread (I’m not in good terms with him, but I still pay attention)
– TrevorGoodchild
– Contaminated NEET (before he kept singing the same tune after Afghanistan and Ukraine)
– Cloudswrest
– Neofugue
– Annodominipubs
There’s a few more. And its definitely not people who think an anonymous blog comment section is a great place to play Battle-of-the-Acronyms.
Starman, that was an army against another army in both cases. We do not have an army. All we have is a lot of people who might fight in such an army if we could organize. Think Soviet Russia and Solzhenitsyn’s lament about the cost of not organizing and understanding the stakes. If you look at Afghanistan, the GAE did not win, but if you got on their radar and they sent someone you, you ended up dead.
That situation ended up lasting 20 years. Which was the whole point of KD in the first place. This is not going to end in two weeks, unless one side completely collapses for some reason. It will be a long slog, with a lot of brutal fighting on both sides. Yes, the GAE will probably lose, but it is not a given thing by any means.
I will make an effort to spell out acronyms. I didn’t realize people here hit terms they don’t understand, throw up there hands and move on. I assumed that they highlighted the term and searched it, which is what I do when, quite frequently, I encounter a term with which I am unfamiliar. I genuinely assumed this was a common habit, given the orientation of the GUI (which is the graphical user interface, which is the conduit between the meat and the metal), and how easy it is.
But this is all BS (bull spit) Jim. I am pretty sure I nailed it: Starman reads half a message and goes off halfcocked. My message was clear enough to contend with, specified and argued in a manner that disagreement, agreement, or inquiry were all easily attainable. His rebuttal is “HURR DURR AFGHANISTAN DURR DURR 2 WEEKS HURBA HURBA PAPER TIGER.” It isn’t a rebuttal. I understand he doesn’t like me. Ironically, I really want to like him, but I get so tired of people who pretend they are smarter than they are. So I guess I do poke him a bit. But he also always talks about a narrow range of topics, and they are all topics with which I am greatly interested or have strong feelings and opinions on. I am not trying to target him, and if one were to review the exchanges (there are 3, at least), they all follow a pattern: Starman says something; I ask for more details, or propose a different opinion on the same topic, or disagree and attempt to qualify my disagreement; Starman repeats himself, and begins layering in ad hominem. This pattern repeats whether I go to great lengths to address the topics, or respond in short, clipped format.
Maybe this is a failing on my part, but Begging The Question is not making an argument. Saying the GAE (Global American Empire) failed in Afghanistan is true but trivial in the context of a crackdown in the domestic sphere. There’s a newish comment on one of your newer posts (thanks, by the way, both are timely and interesting) postulating on the Why of the 87K IRS targeted hires, and I think it is bang on the money. It is relevant, worthy, and I think critical for us to discuss how, as precisely as possible, the GAE is going to deal with its internal problems. We’ve seen it in the gun free populations of Canada and Netherlands; AFG (Afghanistan) was of precisely 0 use as an example. The US is different, and it is quite clear that the GAE is looking around for a solution. Wulfgar was able to pick up what I was saying, and I am genuinely seeking discourse on the topic. I think we need to game out how they’re going to go about purging dissidents, both tactically as well as memetically.
If Starman thinks this is an unworthy topic, is it not better to ignore the message. If he thinks it is a worthy topic, but I am mutilating it through stupidity or ignorance, is it not better to systematically demonstrate that? As it stands, he just points out Kabul (well, he says “Afghanistan,” but he should say Kabul) and assumes that that is a sufficient message, memetically intact, payload delivered, and lessons learned. I disagree. There is no single group or identity in the USA (United States of Analmerica) that is on par with the Taliban, or the Haquani Network, or even the Northern Tribes (though the antifa trannies are probably close lol), so the problem, for both the GAE and the dissidents, is fundamentally different.
A lot of words, I know. Here’s the point: the collapse in Kabul and the rout in Ukraine are good windows into the incompetence of the GAE’s international martial standing. The domestic situation is very different, and the differences are across the spectrum, so much so that I feel like everyone is probably off base, primarily because we use historical precedents and examples that aren’t really applicable.
It is a rebuttal.
During the Yugoslavian civil war it became apparent that Western European armies simply could not fight a real war.
Now the American army cannot do so either.
Can it repress domestic dissent? Almost certainly. Can it repress internal dissent while facing military defeat abroad?
The entire Afghanistan adventure was a humiliating disaster, not just Kabul. Kabul was only a symptom.
The moment Trump was removed, the Taliban proceeded to roll over everyone everywhere throughout Afghanistan like a hot knife through butter.
As you correctly point out the US Government can defeat domestic opposition, because no leader. Can they do so while losing in external wars?
Doubt taking over the government is what FBI is up to. They are trained attack dogs that like to sniff around in your underwear drawer. There’s probably only 30k of them.
The bulk of civil servants are DoD and VA. A lot of them are hired ex-military and their family. Most FBI hires are probably ex-cops or crossovers.
Civil servants from different agencies are suspicious of each other. Most of the heavy government work is done by DoD.
This raid is just an intimidation tactic. If you actually find them at your door it would be rare. It will probably be two or three. One would pretend to be friendly and ask a few questions while the other just stands to the side.
Most of these people aren’t too bright. Anyone here on this blog could easily navigate through their questions.
FBI are a bunch of lawyers and bean counters.
I doubt anyone could navigate through their questions. When they come to your door, they have been sent to your door by someone. This means that the FBI men in your house cannot decide to drop the matter. They cannot close your file. They can only add content to your file.
I doubt it is possible to navigate through their questions. E.g., it doesn’t matter what Trumps says to the FBI agents in his house. Or maybe it does matter in the sense that he can only make it worse by anything he says. He’ll be indicated no matter what he does.
Talking to LEO might work, if the officer you are taking to can decide to drop the matter. If he can’t, nothing good can come from talking to him
If they thought they had you, they wouldn’t be asking you anything.
They’re just going through a checklist of questions. Once they’re done, you probably wont hear from them.
When you go through a clearance process, you sit down with one of these types of people (straight faced, stick up there ass). They go down a list about twenty pages long. They’re just filling in the squares.
The majority of civil servant types are pension hunters and don’t like to make waves.
If they thought they had something, there would be a warrant and come in amped up high speed.
>When they come to your door, they have been sent to your door by someone. This means that the FBI men in your house cannot decide to drop the matter. They cannot close your file. They can only add content to your file.
Karl has nailed it completely with this statement. Case files, or profiles or whatever, are built up over time. Moving from passive surveillance to interviews is an escalation. Usually, the next step is an invitation to attend an interview.
Well, they probably keep files on everyone. And Internet history is cached by your ISP about two months worth.
I wouldn’t loose sleep over it.
But, if you think you’re on some list, the quickest way to find out is go to purchase a hunting rifle. You should own one anyway. They run a NICS and you’ll know if you’re marked.
I know Anglin says we’re all getting rounded up. But, he likes to kid around a lot.
I worry about how fast I clear the NICS. Dude at the LGS said mine came back the quickest he’d ever seen, and it made him visibly suspicious of me
I think we should wait until Jim gives his guidance, but St. Anglin’s joking and his foretelling are not always overlapping. For my part, I think he is too on the money. Epochs are always decided later, and typically some elite-concerned event is used as the demarcation line. I think this is The Beginning, or at least will be seen as such upon looking back.
You can nail anyone for ‘lying to the police’ if you question the long enough, simply because it is physically impossible to not ‘lie to the police’ in the sense of perfect consistency across all contexts, permutations, and repetitions, on a long enough time scale. Mere innocence of any ‘official’ crime avails nothing when the power wishes to destroy an enemy… which of course is the whole point. A fig leaf of procedure for the cattle over exercise of fiat authority.
@Ghost
Never answer questions from cops, especially FBI. Because lying to the FBI is a crime, and “lying to the FBI†includes saying your car is red when your registration says “cherry red.†Yes, that actually happened (see Robert Mueller).
Hear, hear! The only thing you say to the FBI before the shooting starts is that the Fifth Amendment permits me not to answer that question. If they try to arrest you, then you tell them to die, motherfuckers, die.
While most people, if they tell a cop the time of day, they are likely to wind up being convicted of all unsolved crimes in the general vicinity, the situations where I have wound up talking to cops are situations where they could overlook a crime, which being lazy they are naturally inclined to do and happy to have comfortable reason for doing so.
Guys, quick question. Female relative, 3rd trimester pregnant has Covid. Take to doctor or no? What are the best steps to take?
Depends on what you mean with “has Covid”? That might be anything from a positive test without any symptoms up to pneumonia.
This link is a good summary on treatments:
https://swprs.org/on-the-treatment-of-covid-19/
Unless she is actually sick (aka has symptoms) no reason to go to the doctor at all.
Even then, unless things are bad, still no reason to go to the doctor, unless she is needing a doctor’s note to stay home from work.
Any thoughts on the recent tornado cash stuff? What’s with these “defi” projects agreeing to enforce this? Is this what you mean when you say ethereum is run by our enemies?
Tornado is Wasabi wallet for Ethereum.
Anyone enabling Tornado is an ally, not an enemy, but anyone involved in Ethereum is closer to the enemy than is a good place to be.
Some guerrilla actor has taken to withdrawing money from Tornado and sending it to a large amount of big, famous wallets, thus tainting them with it.
A clever move, though I wonder what will happen from it.
At least it should be obvious to every other actor in the space that they cannot comply and survive. If they are coming for tornado they will come for them – blockchain cannot function at all when the government sanctions which coins are clean.
>At least it should be obvious to every other actor in the space that they cannot comply and survive. If they are coming for tornado they will come for them – blockchain cannot function at all when the government sanctions which coins are clean.
There’s a lot of soy, you would be surprised.
Just a quick update re whether normies will wake up to the injection risks.
Very roughly (and in the US): 30% fully uninjected, 10% uptake of 4th injection, 90+% of parents no longer injecting their children. But only 10% of total population is injected and regrets the decision (it may be 15%, I forgot the exact numbers).
This implies (roughly) 50% of US population is: 1) injected, 2) no longer takes more injections, but 3) is glad to have been injected. This suggests to me that most normies may never wake up. Sounds like bad news to me but, as is discussed here, perhaps it simply makes no difference what normies think.
I think that’s a little bit too pessimistic. People have mental barriers to acknowledging they hurt themselves or made a mistake, and most who get it probably have only had subclinical issues so they don’t have much to point to.
I’d take heart in that at least as regards their action and the future, they seemingly have rejected it.
Yes, there seems to be a disconnect between what they say and what they do, and perhaps at some level they are suspicious already, but cannot express it due to crimestop.
And perhaps, as you say, the fact that they are rejecting it gives hope that they may at least oppose mandates or travel restrictions, which would help a lot.
40% against and only 10% actually still injecting their children are very good numbers. Much better than I expected.
Numbers were off the top of my head. I tracked down one source [Zogby poll: 10% of americans regret taking the covid vaccine].
Actually the number I recall was 95%, but I wanted to err on the conservative side.
Woops, 95% not injecting their children.
I meant to say 95% not injecting their children.
It is a rationalization.
No one who makes demonic sacrifice to the state religion admits to regretting it, certainly not to a stranger taking a survey.
I assume you are referring to “Zogby poll: 10% of americans regret taking the covid vaccine”.
There was some poll in Australia where 3/4 of the injected reported having “felt strong pressure” to get injected. So at least 10% of Americans that felt pressured and went along, but later admit to regretting it doesn’t sound unreasonable.
If I read it correctly, what you say implies that it’s possible more than that 10% regret it, but only a fraction would admit it in a poll. That would match their behavior (most not taking any more shots, nor injecting their children).
Just clarifying because (imo) it’s an important question.
If I understood, you are saying there is a large part of the population that regrets taking the injection, but is rationalizing their choice and saying they are “glad to have been injected”.
Greetings from 4ch
Enjoy a story exemplifying our times: https://pastebin.com/pywM1agt
This story is not very interesting. Why post it here?
Tldr: a narrative with a fair number of inconsistencies about some guy that got arrested for accepting pictures from a 17yo would-be model who is also being forced to take testosterone by her nurse mother.
It sounds like bullshit.
It has a bit of everything.
Loser guy chatting up chicks online, dropping everything for some gross chick on test. Said gross chick on test that got brainfucked by tumblr and the tranny religion. Mother that enforces tranny religion. Climaxing in said loser guy getting fucked for life for receiving noods while the chick continues to recieve her hormone injections.
Yes, that is what makes it feel inconsistent. To be so chockful of architypes strains credulity. The whole bit at the beginning, the personalized lament about having to retell the story feels like a young/inexperienced author setting the stage/circumstances for their story.
The world is chockful of archetypes. That is what makes them archetypical.
RFK Jr. describes how Bill Gates made $242 million in a Pfizer vaccine pump-and-dump scheme:
“The last chapter of my book… goes through the history of pandemic preparedness simulations.”
“They were about… using these pandemics as a pretext for clamping down totalitarian… pic.twitter.com/Czuu2Sgey0
— Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) November 14, 2024
Having been called a liar by Anthony Fauci for saying that “not one of the 72 vaccines mandated for children has ever been safety tested”, RFK Jr. sued Fauci.
After a year of stonewalling, Fauci’s lawyers admitted that RFK Jr. had been right all along.
“There’s no downstream… pic.twitter.com/1ftMkrbB3J
— Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) November 12, 2024