This is not a PUA blog. To learn PUA, read Heartiste and Rollo, But, I seem to have been conscripted by the Dark Enlightenment
How to deal with woman, the pitch.
Call +31 J-I-M-I-A-N-I-T-Y right now and order our #1 best-selling product, how to deal with women.
to issue a post on how to deal with women in a relationship, what do with women after picking them up, and how the religion should deal with women, how the true religion should treat women and support husbands and fathers. So here it is:
Women are wonderful, much better than men in some respects. A woman wants, a woman needs, to serve and obey.
Women are terrible, much worse than men in other respects. All Women Are Like That.
This is the dark enlightenment, so I am leading off with the bad news.
Women are hypergamous. Men want to bang every fertile age chick. My little man salutes most of them. Women, however, only want to bang the very best. So men tend to be nice to every fertile age chick, while women give every attractive man a hard time, to see what he is made of, including the more attractive men in their place of employment, including the boss in their place of employment, so will invariably disrupt the working environment. They will give their husbands a hard time, to see what he is made of, and if you don’t pass the test, you become invisible to her. And if you are her boss, also invisible to her.
A lustful man, such as myself, is nice to every fertile age woman he meets. A lustful woman does the opposite. Like Kate in “The Taming of the Shrew”, her disruptive behavior and misconduct reveals her hunger. And I see a great deal of disruption and misconduct in the workplace, which disruptive misconduct seems to be strangely invisible to everyone else.
Women pay alarmingly little attention to the male hierarchy of status. They want an alpha male, but in our society, alpha males are severely restrained from violence, aggression, and misconduct, which restraint registers with women as not alpha. All Women Are Like That.
Hypergamy never sleeps, a man must always perform, can never relax, is always on stage, can never let his guard down. I generally maintain the semblance of a charismatic arrogant asshole playboy with potential for violence and crime (Marlon Brando in The Wild One) but if General Butt Naked showed up wearing an AK 47, his trademark necklace of human eyeballs, and absolutely nothing else, I would be $#!% out of luck.
You will be $#!% tested, often brutally, and you have to pass your $#!% tests. $#!% tests are hard to pass, and are subconsciously intended to be hard to pass. There is no easy magic trick for passing $#!% tests. Anyone who says it is easy is lying, because women intend it to be hard. They want to separate the men from the boys, and the top men from the ordinary men. If you have an easy magic trick for passing $#!% tests, then as soon as chicks figure it out, it will not work any more.
Although women pay alarmingly little attention to the male status hierarchy, that is because our existing hierarchy fails to register with them as real. They are nonetheless much impressed by males backing the status of other males. If you have a driver, you score pussy points because you dominate the driver. If you have a bodyguard, you score huge pussy points because the bodyguard registers on women as alpha, and because he implies the potential for violence. Similarly, cops impress women, but you will not be able to get a cop to treat you as high status, though you may well be able to get a security man to treat you as high status. Observe the theatrical way in which Trump deploys presidential security. He is very good at this.
God, of course, is the ultimate high status alpha male. So the husband should be the priest of his family. Say grace, don’t let anyone start eating till you start, and don’t let family leave the table till you are done.
Paul commanded: 1 Timothy 3:
- A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, …
- …
- One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity;
- (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)
The Church should support the Sovereign in his state, the husband in his marriage, and the father in his family. And has not been doing that. We got Romance, celebrating adultery, at the same time as the Church undermined the power of the Holy Roman Emperor, and tried to require mandatory female consent to marriage. Priestly celibacy is a Christian holiness spiral, without support in the New Testament or the practices of apostles, which has been blowing up in scandal since it was introduced, because, as Paul observed, God calls very few men to celibacy.
Female consent should only required for virtuous women. Female misconduct should be dealt with by shotgun marriage, and in practice, despite near a thousand years of Church opposition, misbehaving women were shotgun married until quite recently. The holiness spiral that led to Romance, mandatory female consent, and priestly celibacy resulted in a Christianity that has failed to support proper earthly authority for husbands, fathers, and Kings, and in recent times has become dementedly and dangerously hostile to the authority of fathers and husbands.
All marriages that actually work are quietly eighteenth century. If your Church is hostile to such relationships, and it very likely is, you just cannot go there. Because then your wife or girlfriend sees you emasculated by other men, and by the the most alpha male of them all, God, and then she starts cruising social media looking for someone more alpha. The Pauline rules of worship (that women should cover their heads, and should not speak in church, nor exercise leadership positions) provide psychological support for the proper relationship of men and women, thus provide social support for durable relationships, thus make it possible for men and women to cooperate to conceive and raise children. If a Church deviates from these practices, it is likely not just failing to support, but aggressively undermining, the relationships necessary between men and women to form families. Dalrock has a great pile of horrifying anecdotes on this topic. Don’t get burned. Do not let your wife or girlfriend see you bow your head before enemies who hate you. You need a God that backs you, not a God that emasculates you. If your church edits Ephesians 5:21 into Ephesians 5:22, and then drops Ephesians 5:23-29, they are your enemies, they hate you, they intend you harm, they intend to deny you children and grandchildren. Ephesians 5:21 is part of Ephesians 5:19-21, referring to the congregation, while Ephesians 5:22-29 refers to the husband and the wife. If they cannot say 5:22 without first saying 5:21, they are evil people who intend you harm, they twist the words of the bible to emasculate you before your women. By quoting 5:21-22, without quoting 5:19-21, or 5:22-29, by joining these two verses, and separating them from their context, they place a false context on 5:22, which false context is intended to harm you and poison the relationships between men and women, for the context of 5:22 is 5:22-29, not 5:19-21. Whosoever does this is is a heretic and a white knight. White knights are evil and dangerous, and need to be punched out whenever you can get away with it. The God of Saint Paul’s Church backed husbands and fathers. Accept no substitute Gods. The usual substitutes will destabilize your sexual relationships, impairing your ability to reproduce. There is no better ground for violence than that some male is impairing your sexual relationships and capability to reproduce. You need to defend your extended phenotype.
For your relationship to survive, you cannot be hardcore asshole all the time. From time to time you have show her a bit of nice guy beta provider. But not too much. Hard exterior, soft inner core that only she can reach. It is easy to overdo the nice guy. You have to make her earn it, or she will not appreciate it. You have to keep her on her toes. Having gracefully handled an exceptionally brutal $#!% test, then it is a good time for a generous chivalrous action. Having failed a $#!% test, then it is a really bad time for any action that is the slightest bit chivalrous.
Women want attention. They want a lot of attention. I wish women had an off switch like a television and could be put in a closet, but unfortunately they do not. Women want to help you. They want to be valuable to you, and you have to find ways to keep them busy, and then spend time appreciating what they have done. Quite frequently she will however not do stuff you have told her to do. This is both a $#!% test (she is daring you to make her do it) and also a cry for attention. Hear that cry.
Yes, you have to give a woman lots of time, energy, and attention, or she is going to go looking for attention on social media, where she will find a hundred males richer than you, handsomer than you, and with bigger tools (which they will show her) than yours. But at the same time, Poon Commandment Number Three: “You shall make your mission, not your woman, your priority” The natural order is that a woman’s focus is her man, and a man’s focus is something higher. If your focus is her, suddenly and mysteriously she will lose interest in your interest. You have to give her attention, but you have to keep her on short rations and make her earn it, because you are an important person with important things to do.
When you get her doing stuff for you, reward her liberally with attention. When not satisfied, turn your face away. She wants attention, but also wants to earn it, not simply demand it. Shouting and spanking is attention and drama, and women love attention and drama, so shouting and spanking is not very effective in getting compliance. Women love to be made to comply. Just as you tip generously so that you can not tip when displeased, you should supply attention generously so that you can not supply attention when displeased. This is more effective in obtaining compliance.
But some kinds of attention are bad. If you are looking at her, and she is looking at her task, this is the wrong dynamic. She should be looking at you, and you should be looking at your mission. Reversing the dynamic will make her unhappy.
A woman wants you to use her, to exploit her, to take advantage of her. At the same time she is going to make it difficult for you to do so. Life would be so much easier if women had an off switch, but since they don’t, you just have to get on with the use, the exploitation, and the taking advantage. She wants to please you, so you need to give her avenues and opportunities to please you. At the same time, she is going to test you for weakness and neediness, and the tests are going to be hard. You cannot be weak or needy. Have to be arrogant, not weak, and demanding, not needy. You should want lots of things from her, and communicate that you are pleased when you get those things – while at the same time being totally entitled to get it, pleased but not grateful, because you are completely entitled to get whatever you want from her.
And, of course, there is that soft inner core. You should care, not about what she wants, for that will only irritate her, but about what she should want, as though she was your own flesh.
You will notice that for everything I have told you to do, I have also told you almost the opposite: Be an asshole and cherish her. Give her attention and don’t give her attention. But it is worse than that. The difference between what I am telling you to do, and telling you to not do, is pre verbal, and by expressing the difference in words, I necessarily oversimplify and exaggerate the difference.