Black privilege

Milhouse in linked to:

On October 21st 2011 a burglary took place a few blocks from Krop Senior High School where Trayvon Martin attended. The stolen property outlined in the Miami-Dade Police Report (PD111021-422483) matches the descriptive presented by SRO Dunn in his School Police report 2011-11477.

as a result of pressure from M-DSPD Chief Hurley to avoid criminal reports for black male students, Dunn wrote up the jewelry as “found items”, and transferred them, along with the burglary tool, to the Miami-Dade Police property room where they sat on a shelf unassigned to anyone for investigation.

So, the reason Martin Trayvon was casing the apartment complex that George Zimmerman was protecting, looking for houses to rob and people to mug, was that the police, under pressure to reduce the disturbing black crime statistics, ignored his burglary.

Trayvon was enraged to be profiled by George Zimmerman because he felt entitled to rob and beat people up – and the reason he felt entitled, the reason millions of indignant and outraged people feel he was entitled, was because he was entitled.

And the moral of the George Zimmerman case is if you interfere with blacks exercising the rights of black people over non black people, you will be punished.

27 Responses to “Black privilege”

  1. Instead of late-night clubbing, our MICHAEL Michael Kors Selma Tote is packed up for some time in Italy at Milan Fashion Week.

  2. Michael Kors is such a pretty!

  3. Instead of late-night clubbing, our MICHAEL Michael Kors Selma Tote is packed up for some time in Italy at Milan Fashion Week.

  4. […] Because No Limit Nigga was black, he was let off, and the property was not returned to the rightful …  If he had been white, would surely have gone to jail, and the property would have been returned. […]

  5. Heya! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any problems with hackers?
    My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended
    up losing many months of hard work due to no backup. Do you have any solutions
    to prevent hackers?

  6. Howdy! Would you mind if I share your blog with my myspace group?
    There’s a lot of folks that I think would really enjoy your content. Please let me know. Many thanks

  7. Zach says:

    In talking about media, Pat Buchanan seemed, in part, to be at least roughly complementary to some of the ideas discussed around here.

    His book “Suicide of a Superpower” got a pretty good review from Sailer.

    Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Suicide-Superpower-Will-America-Survive/dp/125000411X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1375287381&sr=8-1&keywords=Suicide+of+a+Superpower

  8. Scharlach says:

    Does anyone know if this has been confirmed? I can’t imagine that it has been; otherwise, it would be reported outside of The Conservative Treehouse. I can’t imagine O’Reilly (whose balls just keep getting bigger and bigger) not reporting on this if it were found to be true.

    Any new news on the discovery? That CTH article was from several months ago.

    • jim says:

      My expectations are completely the reverse of yours.

      Why wait for the official media to speak? They are going to lie their heads off every time, O’Reilly as much as any of the others. You can instead check it for us and report the results of your check.

      I can scarcely tell the difference between O’Reilly and Harvard. Reality is the world as it was seen around 1800. O’Reilly reports the world as it was seen around 2000 or so, lagging the latest official truth by at most ten or fifteen years or so, which is within the permitted range of official truths, maintaining a feeble pretence of plurality.

      The website gives a pile of links to source materials, names names, thus if untrue, could easily be disconfirmed. The basis of the claim is a bunch of sworn affidavits by police officers testifying that they were ordered to conceal black criminal conduct, among that conduct, Martin Trayvon’s.

      Just check for us to see if these people really exist, really are policemen in the location, and ask them if the affidavits are real.

      • Scharlach says:

        I assumed that someone other than the author of the original article would have already done all this homework and confirmed or dis-confirmed. The fact that no one has yet makes me mildly skeptical because this would be a huge story, basically confirming that Martin was doing exactly what Zimmerman was afraid he was doing.

        But, you’re right, the best thing to do when skeptical is to check it out yourself. This will be my week’s project.

        I haven’t watched O’Reilly regularly in years, but from what I understand, he’s getting crankier. When Obama won, didn’t he say that it essentially signaled “the end of white rule in America” or something to that effect? And he’s pretty blunt about his anti-immigration stance. From my perspective, he’s pretty ballsy for a MSM talking head. But I know we judge these things differently (c.f., my labeling Pinker a reactionary in the academic world).

        • jim says:

          There are no reactionaries in the academic world.

          There are no right wingers in the academic world.

          There is no one in the academic world who lags behind the official line more than is officially permitted, absolutely no one. Theoretically, people have tenure, but one can suffer unpleasant consequences while tenured. Not only can one’s office be moved to the basement behind the water heater, which was apt to happen before the 1960s, but in addition, ever since the 1960s, one can suffer an unfortunate, and quite possibly fatal, accident.

          Pinker spreads outrageous left wing lies.

          Charles Murray spreads outrageous left wing lies, though he endeavors to avoid issues where he is required to spread exceptionally outrageous left wing lies.

          • Scharlach says:

            Whatever lies Pinker spreads, he also tells the occasional unpleasant truth. I think he certainly does more than “avoid issues” that require him to tell particularly outrageous lies. As an example, did his public debate about women in the sciences count for nothing? He’s been something of a pariah ever since. Why do you think most of what he publishes these days is with non-academic presses? Sure, he’s a long way from assailing the democratic project, but you take what you can get. Not reactionary, but at least putting the reins on even faster leftward movement.

            • jim says:

              he also tells the occasional unpleasant truth. I think he certainly does more than “avoid issues” that require him to tell particularly outrageous lies. As an example, did his public debate about women in the sciences count for nothing?

              Had Pinker spoken the truth, the truth is that female academics are on average quite noticeably and visibly dumber than male academics, that women are being affirmatively actioned to far greater representation in academia than they deserve, that females are uncommon in science because maths is hard, and should be a lot less common even in the fuzzies, that if women were represented according to ability they would not only be vastly rarer than they are in hard sciences, they would also be considerably less common even in English lit. It is pretty much unthinkable that he would speak the truth, and he deserves no credit whatsoever for lying somewhat less flagrantly than others

              The truth is that women are on average slightly less smart than men – the fact that IQ tests are gender normed demonstrates this. The average is however misleading because of the long fat tail of subnormal men.

              Among the middle and upper class, among people like Pinker, women are, due to a narrower standard deviation, considerably less smart than men, as shown by their LSAT scores, even though the LSAT is heavily loaded in those areas where women perform better, rather than those areas that predict success.

              Giving Pinker credit for weaseling is like giving Martin Trayvon credit for not yet being charged with assault.

  9. VXXC says:

    With Blacks Tyrants practiced. With Whites they’ll perfect Tyranny.

    Here is how the majority should view the minority, as an object lesson in not trusting your Politicians.

    We stand exactly where they stood in 1968 when Moynihan warned of the inner city family’s destruction, at 1/3 illegitimacy, high unemployment, high rates of the dole, a mass of idle men neither working nor being fathers. Foolish women will greedily take the extra few thousands for not having a father to her children as the price, not anticipating the near certain doom of her children. Welfare pays more than marriage month to month, drug addiction, prison, pregnancy seem far off. Crime is rising. Communities are beginning to fall apart.

    In short the fate suffered by others is now happening to us. We should reflect that elites openly HATE us and not hope for kinder treatment. We see the fate of those they preach they love. Our fate is literally before our eyes, we should not expect mercy, we should recognize the others were practice, with us they’ll perfect it.

    We need now to turn the jaundiced eye we view others rabble rousers with towards our own, and recognize the same methods are being applied to US.

  10. VXXC says:

    I’m going to grant absolutely the absolutely obvious, Detroit cannot have anything like democracy. Mind you I have said the franchise must be restricted to the responsible and informed.

  11. Zach says:

    Even in the face of what I thought to be insurmountable odds, George walked. I think I was too emotionally involved in this entire ordeal because if George didn’t walk, then for me courtrooms and law are now meaningless. I did not see the OJ trial, so I am not able to give opinions there.

    Many laws are bad laws. But any law defending the (natural) right for self defense is not a bad law as you know.

    There is some good that happened here too, that’s all I’m getting at here even if this little comment hasn’t spoken to your point.

  12. […] Black privilege « Jim’s Blog […]

  13. rightsaidfred says:

    I have found myself dwelling a bit on the problem of how to dispose of an entitled body…

  14. gokart-mozart says:

    “If you see something (that looks suspiciously like a dead black guy being loaded into a delivery van by a non-black),(don’t) say something.”

    Snitches get stitches. Pass it on.

  15. Thanatos says:

    “And the moral of the George Zimmerman case is if you interfere with blacks exercising the rights of black people over non black people, you will be punished.”

    That’s the message I’m hearing. As a response from non-blacks, I predict millions of blacks going “missing”, never to be heard from again.

    We all know what time it is now. If you see a dead black guy being dragged into the bushes by a non-dead non-black guy, assume the black guy was a criminal and forget you ever saw it.

    We can’t get justice through the courts, they’ll try to hang us even if we are acquitted. Can’t get justice from the police, they’re not doing anything about the random black-on-anybody-but-black assaults that are taking place in cities across the country.

    We need a new campaign.

    “If you see something (that looks suspiciously like a dead black guy being loaded into a delivery van by a non-black),(don’t) say something.”

  16. Alcestis Eshtemoa says:

    Via Steve Sailer, George Zimmerman is being civic minded according to the ABC news network –> http://isteve.blogspot.com/2013/07/george-zimmerman-runs-amok-again.html

    • Thales says:

      Wow, George just cannot stay in his truck. 🙂

      Regardless, if that family was not happy with Zimmerman’s acquittal before, they sure are now.

    • Zach says:

      He’s got a nice piece on Detroit, taxes and demographics as well.

      (And yet another incoherent juror utters her nonsense publicly)

Leave a Reply for Zach