Political correctness castrates men

A public radio station (Government left wing propaganda station) had its staff testosterone levels tested. They all came out pathologically low, the highest being a gay New York Jew who almost made the official normal range (the official normal range being much lower than the actual normal range) Every one else was less than half the lower limit of the supposed normal range.

In the ensuing conversation, they remarked on how girly and effeminate public radio is.

“Todd had never been seen as especially manly during his life, but thought maybe here, in this group, compared to the rest of us, he might at least stand a chance”

“That at least someone would be girlier than I. If I cannot be the most manly in public radio, where the hell can I be the most manly?”

This suggests that filtering for political correctness is filtering for lack of manliness.

Alternatively filtering against “rape” and “sexual harassment” is filtering against manliness.

Or, and this is my preferred hypothesis, political correctness actually causes lack of manliness, that continually censoring one’s words and thoughts, continual crimestop, has the same effect as continually being defeated, humiliated, and degraded, in reducing testosterone levels, that crimestop lowers your ability to reproduce.

This would explain the continual and major drop in testosterone levels. It is not literal estrogen in the literal water supply, but metaphorical estrogen in the metaphorical water supply.


140 Responses to “Political correctness castrates men”

  1. freedom says:

    The US is dying from a million cuts. Part of the reason the USA is a nanny police state now is that whenever there is a problem, the kneejerk reaction in the US is to call for a new law.

    Nanny state laws are not the best solution, however. Nanny state laws lead to more laws, higher fines, and tougher sentences. Thirty years ago, DWI laws were enacted that led DWI checkpoints and lower DWI levels. Seatbelt laws led to backseat seatbelt laws, childseat laws, and pet seatbelt laws. Car liability insurance laws led to health insurance laws and gun liability laws. Smoking laws that banned smoking in buildings led to laws against smoking in parks and then bans against smoking in entire cities. Sex offender registration laws led to sex offender restriction laws and violent offender registration laws.

    Nanny state laws don’t make us safer, either. Nanny state laws lead people to be careless since they don’t need to have personal responsibility anymore. People don’t need to be careful crossing the street now because drunk-driving has been outlawed and driving while using a cellphone is illegal. People don’t investigate companies or carry out due diligence because businesses must have business licenses now.

    The main point of nanny state laws is not safety. The main purpose of more laws is revenue generation for the state.

    Many laws are contradictory, too. Some laws say watering lawns is required, while other laws say watering lawns is illegal.

    Many nanny state laws that aim to solve a problem can be fixed by using existing laws. If assault is already illegal, why do we need a new law that outlaws hitting umpires?

    Nanny state laws are not even necessary. If everything was legal would you steal, murder, and use crack cocaine? Aren’t there other ways to solve problems besides calling the police? Couldn’t people talk to people who bother them? Couldn’t people be sued for annoying behavior? Couldn’t people just move away? Even if assault was legal, wouldn’t attackers risk being killed or injured, too? Having no laws doesn’t mean actions have no consequences.

    If there is no victim, there is no crime.

    We don’t need thousands of laws when we only need 10.

    Freedom is not just a one way street. You can only have freedom for yourself if you allow others to have it.

    Think. Question everything.

  2. OldStudent says:

    none of them seem to care when some poor littl blue class white trash Nazi gets life with no chance of parole in a BigPharma linked muder. Vaccines cause autism. Billions of lives entwined with Sickness and torture.
    They close their lily white eyes on the mutilation and murder of their own people, children and generations to come.
    All sucking down Viagra Milkshakes and Synthetic Testosterone.

    Truly Begone.
    Or let me out of here. I want Communion with Aliens and to leave the mess behind me..

  3. […] This American Life are low-T shitlibs. More. […]

  4. OldStudent says:

    If you are one of the most brilliant thinkers on your team, “Jim”,
    you are remarkably obtuse about the causes of the loss of manliness has occurred. You are too high and mighty to consider a request from a mere mortal like moi, but I would urge you to pick up that book I told you about a month ago. Stephen Buhner, The Lost Language of Plants.
    All you have to do is read and weep at the fourth chapter of that book.
    Flagging wee-wee’s aren’t the half of it.
    Broaden that famous mind of yours.
    I dare you.

    • peppermint says:

      Jim is a busy man. Please give a synopsis or at least the title of the chapter you want people to talk about more.

      • Anon says:

        I scrolled through chapter 4 on Google Books and it seems to be a bunch of mother earth gaia bullshit with occasional quotes from Hopi Indian chiefs thrown in. Between this guy and the delusional Christcucks this blog attracts some funny characters.

        • fnd says:

          like a stereotypical fedora wearer like yourself. Are you pepper alt by chance?

          • Anon says:

            Keep on with the epic memes, I’m sure you aren’t a fat autistic faggot projecting his fedora stereotypes onto people who make jokes about his ideological cuckoldry.

          • fnd says:

            The lack of self-awareness is strong in this one. Keep on with the memes indeed.

          • fnd says:

            About ideological purity, there are a lot of White supremacists out there who turns out into legitimate SJW’s because the trolling pays better and they can have some status.

  5. Anon says:

    It’s amusing to me to see the Christcuck peanut gallery on this blog resort to internet memes about fedoras whenever they get taken to task. And “Dr. Faust” posting a fucking William Lane Craig video where he bumbles cosmology. Tips fedora indeed.

    The ever-diminishing group of whites who cling to an age-old watered down version of a Jewish religion would probably do well to sit in the corner massaging their assholes with a crucifix dildo while the adults talk. But then again I shouldn’t complain; the world needs ditch diggers and garbagemen too, and the lower echelons of society are filled up quite nicely by people who are incapable of working things out without religion.

    • fnd says:

      “It’s amusing to me to see the Christcuck peanut gallery on this blog resort to internet memes about fedoras”
      stupid people talking memes while i talk memes baaww… At least fedora is an internet classic, meanwhile you resort to the now trending cuck theme.

      If only cuckatheists weren’t a bunch of internet losers pretending to be adult, if only they organized cuckatheism weren’t coopted so quickly by atheist SJW females… lol

      • Anon says:

        >an internet classic

        Fedora is relatively new, and it’s different from cuck in the sense that “cuck” is not a content-free desperate steteotype and it accurately describes Christfag ideology.

        As far as accusations of fedoradom goes you’d probably do better to look at “Alan J. Perrick” who, judging by his typing style, I am convinced is the same person as Greg Eliot from Roissy’s site because they both write like they own the world’s largest private fedora collection.

        • fnd says:

          >Overanalyzes the history and meaning of internet memes
          >fails to see when people post things being tone-in-cheek(the Dr. Faust video link)
          >Call’s people stupid for using memes while using memes

          You might be an autistcuck or even better, an autheistcuck.

        • Alan J. Perrick says:

          L.O.L., how do teenagers like Anon. here even find the blog?

      • peppermint says:

        okay? Organized atheism is cucked because it’s impossible to have a new right-wing organization. If they weren’t cucked, they would get doxxed and be unemployable, like George Zimmerman is now.

        Does George Zimmerman really want to paint Confederate flags for gun shops?

        Christians can even point to a few Bible verses about why they should get married, shun divorcees, have lots of kids, and behave like men. But due to the nature of the religion, they are cucked. Catholics give money to Catholic Charities which imports wetbacks and Catholics are ordered to think the wetbacks their brothers and sisters in Christ. Lutherans import Somalians to the Midwest so that they can be raped and killed by them.

        The reason is that while Christianity can be read to include nations, it can not be read to include subspecies, so any observed differences between subspecies must be due to transient effects like oppressive hate.

        Jesus was a bastard community organizer, just like Barack Obama. We should not expect him to get the biological facts about our existence right as a man 2000 years ago or as a Nazarene.

        It is beyond ridiculous to hear people in 2015, 50 years after 1965, arguing that Christianity can be pro-White. Marx’s co-author Engels said that the social doctrines of Christianity had had almost 2000 years to manifest themselves, when Christians tried to tell him that Christianity was already Communist enough.

        Christian anthropology necessarily assumes that genus Homo has this immortal soul thing, which is incredibly harmful. Christian anthropology necessarily rejects the observable fact of different subspecies and ecological niches, arguing that all of genus Homo is given the same commands by God.

        • fnd says:

          Christianity today is as SJW as the most ruthless corporation today. Maybe not that much, but it’s getting there, some denominations more faster than others.

          I just don’t get these stupid name calling with people like you or anon that seems to have an axe to grind against christianity. So you are mad because racism is a sin today? Big fucking deal, pre-marital sex is a sin too and most people don’t give a crap about it. If race realism or racism or wathever becomes mainstream ideology sometime in the future, most churches will fall in line, maybe even faster than when they caved in to leftist bs.

          • peppermint says:

            Christian anthropology is necessarily race-blind. That’s kind of how it was possible to promote race doesn’t exist ism.

            Companies aren’t telling Italians they’re going to hell if they don’t love their replacements like they love Rabbi Yeshua. Companies aren’t importing refugees and signing them up for welfare.

            Is it companies that introduce the Jews as God’s chosen, thereby normalizing their presence?

            Is it companies that instruct us to feed the hungry?

            Christianity is not just anti-white today, it is structurally anti-white from the anthropology to the beatitudes.

          • fnd says:

            You dumbfuck retard, companies are firing people for not being PC enough and trying their best to bring in the minorities while firing whites, and you care about some old priest saying that you are going to hell?

            What’s up with atheists knee jerk reaction about going to hell anyway, isn’t the bible some “stupid fairy tale for brainwashed people”. And whites eat it up, lol, is there some “anti-white” thing that whites doesn’t like?

            Secular morality, the kind of morality you need to have to suceed unless you are a billionaire, have nothing to do with christians, SJW’s or not.

          • peppermint says:

            companies are firing people for not being PC enough and trying their best to bring in the minorities while firing whites

            …to comply with the snivel rights, which was passed by weepy-eyed cucktians, and upheld by Newt Gingrich who campaigned on eliminating it because he was told it was the cucktian thing to do.

          • fnd says:

            “…to comply with the snivel rights, which was passed by weepy-eyed cuckwhites, and upheld by Newt Gingrich who campaigned on eliminating it because he was told it was the cuckwhite thing to do.”

            I fixed it for you. See, it’s too easy to create scapegoats instead of researching for real answers. I could make a scapegoat of science too, since they still have a stranglehold on race and such(good work trying to debunk the latest “consensus”)

          • fnd says:

            lol Christians used to have slaves and didn’t have to worry about going to hell over it. What happened to make them flip-flop on this issue? For some people, history begun at 1950 or so. But hey, keep making excuses for nu-atheists turning into SJW’s.

        • fnd says:

          “If they weren’t cucked, they would get doxxed and be unemployable, like George Zimmerman is now.”

          What about alpha ubersmench billionaires like Trump? He still loves Israel and talk platitudes for women and such. Of course he is not an white supremacist, because he wants to win and pride movements are for losers, be them whites, blacks, gays, sluts, etc. In the end, Trump needs to be supported because beggars can’t be choosers.

  6. Alan J. Perrick says:

    No, it isn’t literal estrogen in the water supply. But the people who discuss actual estrogen in the water supply may be showing their hand as materialists when they do it. I don’t think such believing can be helped through direct means, though the percent could fluctuate. It does seem that some portion of mankind will stick to materialism even over factuality, such is our fallen state.


  7. peppermint says:

    Alright retards, calling you faggots and cucks and gullible idiots willing to believe whatever any Jew says individually doesn’t seem to be motivating you, so it’s time for a biology lesson.

    (1) Life has been a race war ever since the first bacteria began fighting with each other.

    (2) The purpose of diploidy and sex is to keep the genome clean. This can only be understood on the reproducing community, a.k.a. nation, level.

    (3) Some of you faggots think the argument from desire, that people want to think of themselves as a part of something larger, implies something other than the obvious evolutionary psychology, that the nation is stronger if people believe themselves a part of it.

    (4) The spider’s natural moral sense is different from the wasp’s, and ours is different from other subspecies. The evolutionary function of morality is to motivate the individual behavior that causes the subspecies to fit in its evolutionary niche.

    (5) Some of you cucks think that there are ‘souls’, which apparently are exclusive features of genus Homo. Genus Homo has exclusive use of language, consciousness is seen in all animals. You cucks then want to give the resources of the nation to other nations and subspecies of genus Homo because it makes you feel good to, and/or because another subspecies’ tribal god told you he would give you an ice cream cone after you die.

    (6) Some of you gullible retards will believe anything a Jew tells you about the sensitive topic of Jewish history, because the Jewish religious stories seem to imply that they are forbidden from lying or whatever. How many times do you need to observe that the Jews have an evolutionary strategy of whining about persecution in order to obtain access to resources from Aryans?

    • Richard Nixon's Ghost says:

      Why don’t you try responding to Moldbug’s “Why I am not an anti-semite”?

    • fnd says:

      I tried to understand your inane drivel thanks to the general insult aimed at some strawman cuck out there and for that you deserve a fedora tip.

      I may be wrong, but you seem to put race and genes above all other things, so i wonder how many whyte children you have…

      • Alan J. Perrick says:

        If only, F.N.D., if only. The motive for “Peppermint”‘s bawling is https://blog.reaction.la/culture/political-correctness-castrates-men/#comment-1084542

        He is a Vatican-Roman “Catholic” who has beached himself on some misplaced notion of a loyalty to ethnic identity, probably Irish. If you read this blog a lot, you know that the goal is to re-establish the English version of Christianity, 1662 Prayer Book format. There has been talk of getting an Inquisition into the mix to prevent future “Leftist singularities”, too. With such an understanding, it should be noted that, Prima Facie, this excludes any involvement with die-hard papists. One universalising church or ecclesiastical structure versus a state church structure…

        Best regards,


    • Texas says:

      What do you think of Moldbug Peppermint? Enlighten me.

    • Trimegistus says:

      You don’t know shit about biology, you don’t know shit about morality, and you don’t know shit about psychology. In fact, you just don’t know shit.

    • jim says:

      (1) Life has been a race war ever since the first bacteria began fighting with each other.

      No, that is where you are wrong. That is the basic Nazi error – not nearly as evil and stupid as the basic progressive error of reifying categories, but an error nonetheless.

      The struggle has never been primarily race against race, but each against all. Kin altruism only extends to the family, at most the extended family. Me against my brothers, me and my brothers against my cousins, me and my cousins against the world.

      Consider a gene variant that causes a man to pursue the interests of his group at some cost to his own. Over time, that gene will be selected against. There will be less and less of those people in the group.

      Consider, on the other hand, a gene variant that causes a man to pursue the interests of his children at some cost to his own.

    • peppermint says:

      In the war of all against all, the independent digletts and magnetites find it advantageous to band together as dugtrios and magnetons. Sure, the pocket monsters are only as real as souls, but anyone who’s brushed their teeth understands the value of collaboration.

      Kelp are formally independent, but to access the sunbeams they gather together in sheets and face predation by sea urchins. In much the same way, Whites, who could live in small groups of nuclear families, build cities for better access to steealth fighters and nuclear bombs, and then face predation by Jews. Contra Ted Keczynski, there’s no going back, Whites who disarm can be conquered by armed Chinamen.

      Bears are better off solitary. Zebras run around in poygynous family groups, meerkat burrows have an alpha female who is the only woman allowed to breed, elephants have herds, niggers have villages, and humans have even more complicated collaborative behavior, which is, of course, governed by our sense of morality.

      The Nazis did a bunch of stuff wrong, most amusingly, using their German national fraktur typeface everywhere until a memo was circulated calling it judenlettern. Holiness spirals can happen to anyone, though especially people like Christians and communists who don’t really understand thier claimed ideology, and the Nazis didn’t have the last 50 years of ethology and game theory; back then communists would tell each other that animals don’t have borders.

      In addition, Hitler couldn’t really trust anyone; the leadership certainly felt like there was a war of all against all.

      Diploidy and sex only make sense at the national level. It is remarkable that very few species of multicellular life have any parthenogenesis, and shows the importance of the national gene pool.

      Each species has its way of choosing the best men and awarding them better reproductive rights. Humans and goats jockey for position against each other and the best men get first pick of the women. Some goats are trannies and try to sneak into the womens’ herd, which was initially separated from the mens’ herd ostensibly because men need space to fight where they won’t accidentally hurt the kids. But, if the trannies are successful enough, there won’t be separate spaces in their society.

      In the second part of Things Fall Apart, Chinua Achbe explains that christfaggotry caught on initially among the niggers who were left behind. The tribe leader niggers stuck to their tribal traditions, but the niggers who had no reproductive future under those traditions were easily convinced of Christitan communism and #blacklivesmatter.

      It can be objected that I am only describing what is, and what ought may be different, something along the lines of claiming the whole world as our nation, since we would like a few genes from the Jews and maybe some ear genes from the cats as well, and also to end the fighting. My answer is that war is good for the nation and Eisenhower’s schools and hospitals are bad for the nation, that it is unstable to have a nation of more than one subspecies (that’s not to say that there aren’t nations of multiple subspecies in the wild), and cuckold fetishist to willingly become a minority in your own nation.

      It can be objected that the glorious civilization is more important than the nation. My answer is that either the civilization serves the nation, or it dies with the nation, as in Egypt, and Rome, and as is happening here. A nation can survive the debasement of its currency; it can not survive the debasement of its gene pool.

      It can be objected that we could be just as happy serving Rabbi Yeshua bar Yahweh by feeding niggers to alter the population balance of African megafauna as serving the nation that we are literally the ephemeral fingers of. To state this plainly is to refute it, but it can also be refuted with pictures of how happy the transracial adopters are. Deep down inside, they know they’re cucked.

      Moldberg’s reasons for not being a white nationalist are reasons not to follow the Turner Diaries / Hunter or NSDAP strategies to gain political power to get a state that serves the nation. The fact of nation remains, and the historical fact that either state and civilization support nation, or disppear with nation.

      • jim says:

        Yes, but tribes are synthetic, culture more than biology. Whites will never be one people.

        • peppermint says:

          historically it is normal to see Whites as a sub-species with many nations

          • fnd says:

            fighting each other.

          • peppermint says:

            Let’s try to avoid letting Whites know that they have nations, because they will get in wars that way. Instead, get them to become denationalized drifters with no sense of belonging other than material possessions and kooky cults, while their birthrate plummets and they are replaced by sand niggers

            — The EU

          • fnd says:

            both options doesn’t sound good either way.

      • Cavalier says:

        Excepting Jim, of course, you are my favorite poster on Jim’s blog.

        Ancient post, sure, but age has not diminished its beauty.

  8. Zach says:

    “The left singularity” —> “The estrogen singularity”

  9. Mister Grumpus says:

    My man. I vouch for this 100%.

    It’s a silent internal defeat every day — the coward’s thousand deaths — and now I barely get it up anymore. (No trolling no bullshit.)

    Every “Black Lives Matter” banner over the street, while I’m one who paid for it at gunpoint through my taxes. If I have to shoot one for attacking me — and believe me I do it all the time in my fantasies — I’m the pariah. There they are on the corner, strutting about, hustling drugs and making the girls wet like the own the place, because evidently they do. It’s a humiliation.

    Every sane fact that comes out about men and women, Whites and Blacks, the past and the present (and thank God for the Internet so I get to learn this stuff at all) but then I live in fear of being overheard talking about it in real life, is a humiliation.

    Watching my own parents drink up the Cathedral’s bullshit their whole lives, see everything they’ve saved get consumed by them, all while voting it onwards at every step of the way, is a humiliation.

    Too damn many of my friends, many of them my own childhood heroes, getting cheated on and dumped by the wives, and left to live out their days on the Child Support Gulag, is a humiliation.

    I pay to maintain border walls in Israel and Korea, but get no option to pay for one here. Ain’t no kickstarter for THAT dammit. It’s a humiliation.

    I pay ~30-40% more in rent and commute 45 minutes each way just to stay away from Blacks (but none of my neighbors will SAY that), only to see them air-dropped into government-mandated “affordable housing” down the street. There they are, standing around in the middle of the day, leaving trash around and shouting at their kids, on MY fucking dime. It’s a humiliation.

    I also haven’t touched a woman in years, nor even want to anymore.

    I thought I was born in a castle, but really I was born in a burning building.

    This is humiliation. This is Mass Cuckoldry. This right here.

    “The truth will set you free, but first it will make you miserable.” –Glen Beck

    (And feel free to rub it in, Beppermint. Go right the fuck ahead.)

    • Mister Grumpus says:

      Oh yeah, and I bust my ass 50 hours/week in the private sector cleaning up messes made by detail-illiterate bimbos in the public sector who get paid more than I do. Goddammit this is pathetic!

    • peppermint says:

      You sound like you’re in your late 30s? You have a job and a place, which already puts you ahead of most millennials. You can find a woman just hitting The Wall, living in a shit apartment working some gay SWPL job, who never had a realistic plan but wants one. I know of a few women in this situation, but if you don’t, I guess you could try okcupid.

      Personally, I like sarcastically reciting the propaganda back to my still progressive parents and other Boomers in my life. I particularly enjoy shoving nigger music in their ears and making them say they like it. It’s kind of cruel, though.

      The Boomers are they way they are because their parents taught them Cucktianity, then gagged them with the snivel rights. Growing up with a ball gag in their mouth and shown through the somnolent decades the inevitability of the dildo pressing against their anus, it’s only natural that they retreated into fantasy lands about astral projection and became cuckold fetishists.

      They did do one thing right, though: they did not teach us Cucktianity. They thought they weren’t teaching us Cucktianity because they were teaching us dildos. It doesn’t matter why they did it, though, the fact that they didn’t teach us Cucktianity and turned on The Discovery Channel when they left for work put us in a position to understand the facts about the world that their parents ordered them to ignore, and they have resolutely ignored for their entire lives.

      • Dr. Faust says:


        Some pastors are not preaching Cuckianity as you put it. Steven Anderson gets mosts things right. He believes race mixing is ok though because Moses had a black wife.

        • fnd says:

          Sounds like peppermint have some daddy issues. I have yet to find a atheist who behaves lika a normal healthy person.

          • Samson J. says:

            Agreed. It’s been interesting to me that in real life, I have noticed an extremely strong correlation between atheism and parental dysfunction (whereas online the correlation is between atheism and personality disorder/autism).

          • Richard Nixon's Ghost says:

            Lots of Americans don’t believe in God.

            Atheists are people who publicly and loudly declare that they don’t believe in God. They are about 1/10th of Americans who don’t believe in God.

            In general, Americans who call themselves “Atheists” are loudly objecting to God. That is, they hate God.

      • Mister Grumpus says:

        “…shown through the somnolent decades the inevitability of the dildo pressing against their anus, it’s only natural that they retreated into fantasy lands about astral projection and became cuckold fetishists.”

        You have a way with words, sir. The inevitability of the dildo pressing against their collective anus indeed.

        I’m trying to imagine the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s not as a child (you’re right: I just turned 40), but rather as a grown-up adult. What in the world did all that look like to adults who should have known better? Of course hindsight is always 20-20, but that’s no excuse to be a dumbass today.

        I suppose they simply assumed that “Well, it’s only Detroit.” “It’s only Birmingham.” “It’s only Newark.” “It’s only Baltimore.” “It’s only Cleveland.” “It’s only Arizona.” “It’s only California.” “It’s only the Executive Branch.” There’s a Lot of Ruin in a Nation, and they must have assumed that there’d still be plenty of ruin left for them. Or rather, enough ruin left for the government to tax in order to cover their retirements.

        My best plan now — such as it is — is to just take some time off, stash some money somewhere safer, ride my bike around some foreign countries, go on a couple dates, and hopefully just rinse off some of The Crazy.

        I learned this from Donald Trump, of all people. When the bimbo on TV asked him something about immigration, he replied, in part, that “Before I even THINK about that I’ll build a wall along the border…”

        “Before I even THINK about that.” I really admire his mental efficiency. Before I measure the depth of the hole I’m in and try to master-plan a way out of it, I should FIRST hammer-out the ceasing of my digging any deeper. He’s a smarter guy than me, that’s for sure.

    • spandrell says:

      What the hell makes you wake up in the morning? Save some money and move the crap out, the farther the better.

      • Mister Grumpus says:

        “What the hell makes you wake up in the morning?”
        Habit and fear of starving on a sidewalk someday.

        “Save some money and move the crap out, the farther the better.”
        Thanks for that! I need all the sanity I can get.

  10. Beau Geste says:

    Are you hopping onto the Ethereum chain, James?

    • jim says:

      What is Ethereum?

      • Mister Grumpus says:

        My Over-30-Retarded understanding is that it’s some kind of crypto-heavy web-within-the-web platform that lets people write and deploy applications that don’t “live” on any particular identifiable web server, but rather in some kind of distributed form, sorta-sorta like bit-torrent.

        Crucially, it includes a way to pay for said distributed “hosting” with nano-payments of crypto-currencies.

        I mean yeah, it sounds hella-awesome, but this stuff is so wildly math-heavy that I’m not even intellectually able to tell whether it’s for real, or fatally flawed somehow, or even some kind of intellectual honey-trap to identify and draw in the sort of fellows (and they’re ALL fellows, trust me) who would be into developing this sort of thing in the first place.

        Still, I wish them the very best of luck. Maybe I can volunteer, sleep on the couch and make them coffee and sandwiches.

        • Beau Geste says:

          Yeah, and apparently a lot of the bitcoin devs switched to working on it.

          My interest consists of trading a portion of my bitcoin for ether, encrypting, and shoving it into a safe in a drawer in an attic. A few years later and should be clearer what is going on.

          But seems to me that the potential of long-term decentralized prediction markets is going to be big.

  11. Bruce says:

    Low-T liberals?

    I think it’s because they crush their nuts while riding 100 miles a day on those tiny 10-speed bike seats.

    And some of them crush their nuts in tight leather pants for world peace:


  12. TeenagerinPublicSchoolHell says:

    Jim, you’ve been talking about leftism taking hold in England, especially around the time of Queen Charlotte and King George IV and beyond. You also mention the Calvinists in England during the time of Cromwell.

    What I’m surprised that you haven’t mentioned in any past posts, as far as I can tell, is the worshipful attitude of the English towards Queen Elizabeth I. Most of the people of the her reign (1558) seem to put on so much undeserved praise as to make her one of the greatest, probably THE GREATEST, ruler of England ever.

    While she was ok in some respects a lot of it was luck and her parliament, and there’s a pretty good case for her later reign as actually being some of the worst years ever by an English monarch, absolutely terrible. Why haven’t you mentioned her, it seems like a natural thing to notice given your arguments against giving independence and power to women.

    Another neat point is she made a big point of being a virgin, never marrying, and being a strong independent woman. People worshiped her for this in England and I think it’s a good case of leftism already taking a good foothold in that country. There’s also a strong chance of her doing lewd acts with her favorite “boy-toys” and taking booty calls from various court favorites while pretending to be a virgin.

    • jim says:

      Well, her early years really were great – although her execution of the one of the greatest men in England for typically female reasons illustrates the perils of female bosses.

      • WhiteinMinorityhell says:

        That’s true. Another point I find interesting is that your favorite government according to one of your previous point was Restoration England. You gave high marks to Charles II. What I find interesting is that the two rulers of Restoration England, Charles II and James II, are both widely accepted as Catholics, James II obviously indisputably so. The difference between them is how they handled this issue in relation to their subjects.

        Charles II chose to keep his Catholicism from being explicit up until his deathbed, converting to it after he was fairly sure he was to die soon. He allied with Louis XIV against the Protestant Dutch and secretly promised to convert as soon as he thought he publicly could without his subjects getting enraged against a Papist King.

        He tried to lessen the penal laws against Catholics but couldn’t even get that far without people strenuously objecting. After this I think he pretty much gave up whatever sliver of help he had of slowly restalblishing the Catholic Church to being a tolerated religion or being the state religion, much less the religion of most of the population.

        James II obviously took a much more active route towards trying to reestablish the Catholic Church. He took incremental steps but was speeding up and enlarging the increments. He probably overreached a little, the biggest mistake probably forcing the Declaration of Indulgence to be read from every Anglican Church. But I believe that he could have survived this if he hadn’t had a nervous breakdown/ acted cowardly.

        By fleeing to Ireland he gave up the apparatus of London and loyalists who would be loathe to support an invading foreigner against the rightful King, even if he had the wrong religion. I believe that James II could at least have reestablished parts of the Catholic Church and had a Catholic Stuart dynasty in England with Catholics as most of the favored nobility. The problem was that he panicked.

        Who knows, he might have even been able to make a much larger number of English people Catholic. Large areas of Switzerland, Germany, the Czech Republic, and Hungary have been reconverted in the past.

    • jay says:

      Apparently there was a protestant reformer that repudiates Queens as head to state all together:

      His tract offended Elizabeth the I and she did not permit him to participate in England.

  13. Dr. Faust says:

    Could another possible reason be that these feminine men tend to be raised in cities? Desmond Morris believes cities mimic prisons and that animals in captivity will tend towards abnormal forms of sexuality and behavior resulting in gays and other freakish behavior appearing more often.

    If we assume that prisons give some men same sex desires and these gay couples will often have one man with feminine traits would it be a stretch to assume that it could apply to a city as well?

    I think the question is essentially a religious question. Which is supreme the spirit or flesh?

    • Mister Grumpus says:

      There was a big survey of millionaires in the 60’s and 70’s. The only (reportable) statistically-significant and interesting trend in their early lives and education was their over-representation by people who were NOT raised in big cities.

      I mean really, how many big inventors or innovators ever came from New York City?

      • peppermint says:

        Live in the cities -> go to large scale schools to be taught what not to think about. Jim repeatedly has amazed me, not by discovering something I didn’t know, but by saying something I had been taught not to think about.

        Revilo Oliver says everything better than me: http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/the-most-well-educated-man-i-ever-knew-2/

        • Mister Grumpus says:

          “Jim repeatedly has amazed me, not by discovering something I didn’t know, but by saying something I had been taught not to think about.”

          Nailed it. That’s right. He does exactly that for me too and I appreciate it very much.

    • Richard Nixon's Ghost says:

      >animals in captivity will tend towards abnormal forms of sexuality
      Yeah. Often because there are no females around. Or an improper ratio of males and females. Or because they don’t hunt, so have lost a significant part of the sexual dynamic. And various other reasons related to the artificial environment of Zoos.

      Did you think that the gay penguins were actually gay? For that matter, do you think that lesbians exist? Or that gays are primarily homosexual?

  14. Dr. Faust says:

    I’ve been researching the pagan religions for the last few weeks and I’ve realized that most of them are progressive. From the New Age goddess worshippers, to the pantheistic “coexist” crowd to the nature worshipping green activists all of their roots are founds in feminine paganism.

    I no longer agree with something I said earlier which was that Christianity is feminine. Historically, it appears to be a masculine religion and served as a guard against an uprising in pagan thought. Nearly all of Christians churches have turned pagan in their practice of pantheism and their veneration of the feminine.

    From Druidry.org “One of the most striking characteristics of Druidism is the degree to which it is free of dogma and any fixed set of beliefs or practices.”

    This dogma free belief system is organic in nature and not fixed similar to how we see women incapable of defining any of the terms that use ie. rape, patriarchy, rape culture, privilege, etc. These words reflect a deeper nature found in the feminine and which is reflected outward into the world which adopts those practices.

    This shift from a Christian source whose beliefs are fixed, who has a dogma and ritual to follow is the same shift from right/left and feminine/masculine thinking.

    As this blog points out this paganism is a failure at any large scale organization and is the source of the corruption and eventual destruction of Western Civilization.

    I have to point that I do no obfuscate feminine with woman as the article I’m replying to points out men are behaving much more feminine lately. I also agree with the idea that this feminization of men could be some type of social adaptation the more advanced races are adopting. We see little feminization in black and muslim races and much in white and asian.

    • Contaminated NEET says:

      You’re giving pagans short shrift. What you’re looking at aren’t real pagan religions, they’re social clubs made up of misfits who project their own kooky ideas onto something long dead. We know progressivism hollows out its victims and wears their skins; it’s hardly surprising that it can also cloak itself in the skins of Christianity’s old victims.

      • jim says:

        The pagan icelanders had the manliest religion ever.

        • Alan J. Perrick says:


          Some of us consider the constant internecine warfare to be rather feminine.

          Best regards,


      • Dr. Faust says:

        I’m aware that not all paganism follows this pattern. Odinism for example.

        But the only modern group adopting Odinism are the neonazis and only a subsect of that group so it’s impact on the world is slim.

    • jim says:

      I think Japan illustrates that this feminization is a response to defeat and subjugation, which is well known to lower testosterone.

      Starting with the ethnic cleansing of whites from the inner cities in the early fifties.

    • peppermint says:

      Christianity is feminist and all organized pagan groups are progressive. Adults do not need imaginary friends.

      • fnd says:

        Adults only needs to tip fedoras

        • peppermint says:

          Christianity in general exalts the low and denigrates the high – as Christ said, “Blessed are the niggers, they shall inherit the cities”. Organized pagan groups are required to be progressive, not just because all organized groups are required to be progressive, but also because anything that hints of White self-awareness is especially monitored.

          Christianity being the preferred religion of cucks since St. Joseph is the reason the John Birch Society accomplished nothing.

      • Dr. Faust says:

        Adults really do need imaginary friends. Without it our actions become meaningless and yet we still suffer. Suffering without purpose is hell and unbearable.

        • peppermint says:

          you’re a faggot. There are real issues here, viz. the future of our genes. Go jack off in the corner with your faggot friends and come back when you’re ready to be serious.

          Life is a race war. If you think you don’t have a purpose in life, perhaps you should pick a side, I suggest ours.

          • Dr. Faust says:

            Peppermint, a look at history shows up that people obviously need gods and religion. There is really no other conclusion to draw. There is no substitution that can be made for it. Supplant science with religion and you get science as a religion. You’ve only successfully changed the names while the core remains the same.

            Evola believed that religion was a natural outgrowth of the people and to the ideas that they operated under. Consider religion not something found and studied in a book but the spirit of a people. If you removed Christ from white people some would simply make a new Christianity with different names. Likewise, if you remove the edifice of New Age beliefs from women and you get narcissism or self-worship.

            Religion is not going away. Ever. To believe you can remove it is it believe we can make paradise on earth which is one of the essential beliefs of progressives.

          • Rollerblades says:

            Peppermint, you keep on mocking Christ as a complete Pacifist. But observe that he whipped the money-lenders out of the Temple and overturned their tables, effectively driving them out. It is attested in all 4 gospels.

            John 2:13-2:16″And making a whip of cords, he drove them all out of the temple, with the sheep and oxen. And he poured out the coins of the money-changers and overturned their tables. And he told those who sold the pigeons, “Take these things away; do not make my Father’s house a house of trade.”

            So, at the very minimum, to perform an act that would be considered as manly as that you need to go into a bank and overturn all their tables and whip the employees there. I won’t even ask that you successfully drive every employee out of the bank, just one because I’m being generous. You have to document this well and prove it to everyone by posting it somewhere on the internet and linking it to us, of course, or get it into local/national news.

            If you don’t do that, then you have proved yourself to be what exactly I’ve always thought you to be, the biggest faggot on this website. The fact that you can’t do anything but passive-aggressively post on a website that people are faggots constantly would be pretty sad. The best that you can do IRL is make people listen to rap music IRL, wow, what BALLS OF STEEL. For all we know you made this story up and you just sit at your computer 10 hours a day.

            None of this would matter if you didn’t talk so big.

          • Richard Nixon's Ghost says:

            >he whipped the money-lenders out of the Temple and overturned their tables
            You herd cattle by cracking the whip. Not by physically whipping the cattle.

            Throwing over some tables is a temper tantrum, not full-on violence. You’ll find similar activities at your local trans-autistic multicultural gay protest.

          • R7_Rocket says:

            European Whites are the best warriors of the human species, but they are susceptible to pathological altruism… At least those west of the hajnal line.

      • Dr. Faust says:

        The reason I would say Christianity is not feminist is that is this passage: “Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” John 14:6

        This is a fixed position and dogma which explicitly rejects other religions. The feminine nature is to be organic and receptive and inclusive. The masculine nature is to be stiff (pun intended), unchanging, and exclusive.

        • peppermint says:

          Rabbi Yeshua bar Yahweh said things and other things. If the most important parts aren’t the commands to feed the hungry and the beatitudes, then there’s the underlying worldview that we are fallen angels needing redemption at any cost, up to and exceeding cuckoldry.

          In reality, we are beasts. Consciousness is not unique to genus Homo, language is. Not all subspecies of Homo Sapiens are capable of building civilization. And, of course, those of us who would put other subspecies, such as the parasite Jew, ahead of our subspecies, are cucks.

          How do you reconcile these facts with your stories about souls going to Heaven for an eternity of coitus if they do their best to redistribute other people’s resources in the here and now?

          • Dr. Faust says:

            “That we are fallen angels needing redemption.”

            Yet you wish to change the world. The assumption in that is there are things are not following right action and must be put to right action. Are those following wrong action not another word for the fallen?

            “Not all subspecies of Homo Sapiens are capable of building civilization.”

            I agree.

            “How do you reconcile these facts.”

            Man is beast therefore man has no soul is a non-sequitur.

            Man is beast and needs science to save him sounds like a Christian cult with the names changed.

            How do you reconcile the fact that if there is no God then there is no objective right action nor wrong action? Without this standard all actions are equal and the only difference is a subjective ethos of right and wrong which is as accurate as saying vanilla ice cream is good and chocolate is evil.

            If you wish to structure an ethos which places white nationalism as its prime virtue then first you must establish a standard of virtue or else it’s just subjective and opinion.

            Instead of forming your own religion, which will be Christianity with the names changed, it’s better to insert white nationalism into Christianity, inherit it’s traditions and holy books, and take up your cross for the white race.

            Gonna link to a Christian apologetic who is gaining a lot of attention for debating (and beating) some high profile atheists.


            • jim says:

              How do you reconcile the fact that if there is no God then there is no objective right action nor wrong action?

              Of course there is right action and wrong action regardless of whether God exists or not. If God had insisted on Abraham actually sacrificing Isaac would you feel so sure that God’s will defined right action?

          • peppermint says:

            Would you sell your childrens’ birthright for a mess of pottage in the hereafter?

            If you say no, you’re a heretic, guilty of idolatry towards race, which the Lᴏʀᴅ will provide for as pleases Hɪᴍ, and need to seek the absolving grace of Rabbi Yeshua bar Yahweh or be damned.

            If you answer yes, you’re a cuck.

            I wish to change the world to secure the existence of our race and a future for White children, so that the beauty of the Aryan woman does not vanish from this Earth.


            Does the spider think the wasp is violating a universal moral code?

            The only objective test of superiority is survival. If the Jews manage to convince us to miscegenate and die, then they really are superior after all.

          • Mark Citadel says:

            “If God had insisted on Abraham actually sacrificing Isaac would you feel so sure that God’s will defined right action?”

            This enters into the problem of definitions. God by definition is a maximally great being, incapable of error. So if God declares something to be right, and I perceive it to be wrong, the only explanation of this conflict is that I am mistaken (either in my interpretation of the action or the declaration). Also it is not often argued that God’s will defines right action (although it is bound by it), but instead God’s nature defines right action.

            • jim says:

              Just as no one is really a utilitarian, no one really believes that God defines good and evil.

          • Alan J. Perrick says:

            “God is dead”- “Jim”, 2015

            “‘Jim’ is dead” – God, 2115

            And what’s the matter with P., lately? I’ll take a guess. It’s because his papist clergy has been denouning Mr Trump for causing the fault-lines below the surface of “respectable” or anti-white, genocidal society to re-emerge.

            …nativism, defined by the scholar and author Ray Allen Billington as, “organized, white, Protestant antagonism toward the Catholic immigrant.”…


            You know what to do, boys. Them or us. White Genocide is here and you can’t say we didn’t warn you about it…


          • Mark Citadel says:

            I suppose the great thing about these concepts of objectivity, is that they can remain true even if nobody believes them.

          • Samson J. says:

            Just as no one is really a utilitarian, no one really believes that God defines good and evil.

            You’re really wrong, Jim.

            • jim says:

              People do not believe in Heaven the way they believe in Australia, and they do not believe God defines good and evil they they believe that parliament sets the immigration laws.

          • Alan J. Perrick says:


            There’s your cynicism again. Many people who discuss Neo-Reaction believe that any popular sentiment can and should be overlooked since elitism is often confused for NRx’s essence.

          • Contaminated NEET says:

            Are good things good because God loves them, or does God love them because they’re good? Socrates said it first and best 2500 years ago in the Euthyphro.

            You Christians think you’ve answered him cleverly by making “good” and “God” into synonyms, but where has that gotten you? Cthulhu’s gullet, that’s where. When good = God, there’s really no need for God at all, so you become Unitarians, and then Secular Humanists.

          • Mark Citadel says:

            “People do not believe in Heaven the way they believe in Australia”

            They may not believe in these things in the same way, however one should note that more people in the world will end their own lives and the lives of others for the former rather than the latter. The latter is just a chunk of geography, whereas heaven describes an eternal perfect ecstasy worth any earthly price.

          • Samson J. says:

            People do not believe in Heaven the way they believe in Australia

            Of course not. Australia is a physical place in this world, that people have been to and come back, and any of us could go to and come back. Of course we don’t “believe in Heaven” in quite the same way. I don’t think this is saying that much.

            I would say I “believe in” Heaven in a way similar to the way that I believe YOU, Jim, and assorted other male commenters, about certain female behaviours that I have never witnessed and have trouble fully imagining, but yet which seem congruous with the rest of what I understand about socio-sexuality.

            they do not believe God defines good and evil they they believe that parliament sets the immigration laws.

            I agree; I don’t believe that either. Parliament debates laws, sets them, and perhaps alters or rescinds them. That is not at all the same as the universal moral law being a part of God’s essence, which is what I actually believe.

          • Just sayin' says:

            “They may not believe in these things in the same way, however one should note that more people in the world will end their own lives and the lives of others for the former rather than the latter.”

            Too bad the people you refer to are all Muslims.

            Christians in the West appear unwilling to fight for their faith, let alone die for it.

            I’m optimistic that people may yet prove willing to fight to defend their territory, however.

          • Mark Citadel says:

            They are just as unlikely to fight for that. Just look at the invasion at Calais, with the grinning baboons hanging off of trucks.

            The Traditional ideal must be revived, and this includes both kin loyalty and religious zealotry. I see seeds of hope in the great white east.

          • Alan J. Perrick says:

            To the commenter using the pen-name of Mark Citadel:

            Let Germany push back against Russia, that should be a good way for North American and other Western whites to regain some sovereignty from the Eurasian yoke.

            As far as looking to the Orient or Oriental Church for salvation, well, that is way too much over-extending.

            Let Germans, which get a lot of Russian gas, to actually stand on something regarding the Russian sphere of influence and the area known as the Ukraine and then decide whether they want to do anything for or against it.

            Yes, there is a big, nearly gravitationa,l pull towards the vast land-mass of Eurasia, but that must be resisted. Sovereignty in North America depends on it.


          • Mark Citadel says:

            Although Oriental Christianity is indeed interesting considering its Chinese explosion, I was more considering the Eastern Orthodox. It’s a trend of recapturing Christianity’s martial character that I would hope to see spread due to various factors. Remember Islam went through a very passive period and then in some sects, awoke to resistance to Modernity, which spread from there.

            Germany will always look out for Germany. If a relationship with a revived Russian Empire benefits them more than a relationship with France, the rathole island of GB, or the United States, you bet they’ll take it. I would say, watch Greece and Hungary in the next five years to see which way the wind is blowing.

            The Eurasian project has little to do with North America other than necessitating the dismantling of its cultural influence in Europe, which I think we would all agree is a chaotic and degenerating influence. Those in North America, particularly the USA, need to focus on what comes after the death of this contradictory empire, especially with regard to its brewing race war. Any worries of sovereignty for Occidental Americans have two primary subjects: the other race’s violent hatred of whites, and getting rid of the leftists who likely will want to go full Pol Pot.

          • Alan J. Perrick says:

            “Mark Citadel”,

            I am working to move the so-called Overton Window away from acceptance of any non-English Churches and the Oriental Church is the traditional name for what is today sometimes known as Eastern Orthodoxy. In fact, the terminology “Oriental Church” is what was used during the Restoration era, so that gets extra points for usage at this blog. It’s hard, wonky work, getting this wording right but it is also rewarding in it’s own right, plus helps pass the time before my classes begin again!

            The deal with Eurasia is that, according to the worldview called the Rim Theory, North America is considered a mere periphery! It is, therefore, even more important at this juncture when the greater West is fragmenting and being submerged by foreigners (Sweden scheduled for third-world status by 2030, European-Americans to become a minority in the U.S. by mid-century) to not be pulled into the Eurasian core as that would probably exacerbate and worsen the loss of sovereignty. The asiatic quality of Eurasia shares both the asiatic character of Arabic or Turkish migrants into Western Europe and the asiatic character of the mongoloid mestizo or indio migrants into North America-alarming as it could well be an ominous pattern. There is also a large number of migrants from Russia moving into the United States every year, and Russians have many Eurasian ethnic groups in their country (Chechnyans, for example).

            Perhaps at a different time, were Western whites to survive into the future, a more unified and healthier (with better integrity) West would be able make a cultural exchange with the East, but to do so now is, in short, courting disaster…

            Best regards,


          • Mark Citadel says:

            I’d say that it’s preferable that Hungary become a Russian tributary state rather than be overrun by every Third World parasite fleeing the Islamic Awakening. There isn’t the will, nor will there be the means, to stand alone in Europe considering what is already occurring, the self-destruction of an empire. The choice may come down to either side with the east, or become part of the south, demography-wise. Every media outlet is lying about the numbers that are landing on Italy’s shores like a tidal wave. As soon as whites become a minority in their own countries, they will be killed (see Zimbabwe).

            With regards to ‘Rimland’, I don’t think Eurasia will get that far because of the external threats already pressuring it. Like it or not, they will have Islam at least, pushing their frontier. American whites fearing Russia are giving it too much credit. I’d doubt they even push as far as France before that is overrun, with one of the highest Islamic populations in Europe now.

            The West is already a disaster. How much worse must things get? Pretty soon, within this century certainly. European countries which by then will have only slim white majorities, must come to a decision. Stick with anti-Russian democratic parties who flood them with swarthy, machete-wielding immigrants, or authoritarian parties like Jobbik who take a more pro-Russian and more anti-American stance. I think we both know which way they will go while their daughters are being raped by Jamal and Hussein.

            If far right groups promise to forcibly and brutally round up the people wreaking havoc and ship therm back across the Med, the people will be happy to give up a little sovereignty. As for Americans, they should probably be more concerned about losing sovereignty to the whole of Latin America to be honest. Give it a couple of decades and decisions affecting Arizona will be made in Caracas.

          • Alan J. Perrick says:

            “Mark Citadel”,

            In your opinion, it is “fearful” to be suspicious of a culture that comes from literally the other side of the planet and from an area completely outside of your own sphere of influence…Well, well, well. (1)

            And, also, in your opinion, it is a proper argument to say that because things are bad and getting worse, then it hardly matters if we do something that will likely make thing even worse. (2)

            American whites fearing Russia are giving it too much credit.

            The West is already a disaster. How much worse must things get?

            No, I don’t agree with such argumentation, but I’ll leave it up to you to figure out why…

            Best regards,


          • Mark Citadel says:

            I just don’t see how Putin is any “worse” for a Hungarian than the ex-Spanish communists who run the European Union. As I’ve said, I don’t think Americans have to worry about North America coming under Russian influence for at least the next 100 years… except maybe Alaska. But if Russia really is a huge threat to the sovereignty of white Americans, time will tell.

        • Richard Nixon's Ghost says:

          >Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
          This doesn’t quite mean what you think.

          In the gospel of John, Jesus is the “Word of God”, taking human form. Literally, God’s message incarnate in a human.

          God does not interact with the world directly, only through his Word. This concept is explained in John chapter 1, or by Philo of Alexandria. You find numerous references to the “Word of the LORD” in the Old Testament.

          So, this isn’t really taking the position that “anyone who doesn’t believe in Jesus goes to hell”. Because the “Word of God” has taken multiple forms in history. Most notably, appearing to the Hebrew prophets.

    • Alan J. Perrick says:

      Of course, but that is why many Protestant Christians hold to scriptural authority. It’s common phenomena to recoil in horror when they hear that papist clergy are requried to accept the basically Feminist, Marian doctrines as undisputable.


      • peppermint says:

        The question, would you trade your childrens’ birthright for a mess of postage in the hereafter, would have been considered purely theoretical 500 years ago. Today, Catholics, Lutherans, Anglicans, and Methodists agree that the answer must be yes. Mormons, Baptists, and Orthodox refuse to answer. Since saying no is still heresy, so they have to come up with reasons the New Testament doesn’t mean multiracial communism here and orgies in heaven.

        Does the spider that the wasp kills have a soul? Does it go to Heaven if it makes a nice web for the wasp?

        Does God really believe that the record of Jewing everyone in the Old Testament is the pinnacle of moral behavior? Why are the Jews always in other people’s lands? Why don’t they just build their own stuff?

        Why do Aryans want to believe in a God who commands His Chosen to consume other peoples’ resources? Aryans are builders.

        Why do we need to suppose that there are souls?

        • Richard Nixon's Ghost says:

          >Why are the Jews always in other people’s lands?
          Google “Jewish diaspora”. Those nasty Jews, living in land originally occupied by the Romans.

          >Why don’t they just build their own stuff?
          I don’t have a source, but Americans Jews probably pay more in taxes than the average American, since they’re richer.

          >The question, would you trade your childrens’ birthright for a mess of postage in the hereafter, would have been considered purely theoretical 500 years ago.
          Monasticism is a rejection of children. Not a theoretical question 500 years ago.

          Of course, if we’re nazis, then all the monks expected their bloodline to be passed on by their non-celibate relatives. But people are not inclined to sacrifice for their race. A White stranger (or distant relative) is not much more valuable to you than a Black stranger. People don’t sacrifice for strangers.

          >Why do we need to suppose that there are souls?
          The “soul” is a concept that has been viewed in multiple ways. Different people use in in a way that is synonymous with “mind”, “life-essence”, or “supernatural essence”.

          Better questions would be

          1) Do people of different mental abilities have different souls?
          2) Is there such thing as a “black soul” or “white soul”?
          3) Why should a white person value a black person’s soul, or a black person value a white person’s soul?

          >Why do Aryans want to believe in a God who commands His Chosen to consume other peoples’ resources?
          The most Aryan country in the world is Iran. And they’re pretty harsh on “the chosen”. At least if we believe Netanyahu.

        • Korth says:

          I’ve read you denying that black people have souls on several occasions.

          Why do you believe that? Honest question.

    • Richard Nixon's Ghost says:

      >Christianity is feminine
      You need to stop thinking in such simplistic terms. Christianity is not inherently feminine or masculine. Neither is paganism. Both have a long history, and have very widely varying forms.

      For example, here is a website that accurately represents historical Eastern Christianity. It may have a somewhat monastic bent:


      It’s not feminine, but not very masculine either. You’ll find language that assumes wife-beating is commonplace, and morally permitted. You’ll also find language that elevates male “virgins”.

      >This dogma free belief system
      Judaism has no dogma. Christianity had no dogma, until the Council of Nicene. Eastern Christianity has very few dogmas. The reliance on dogma is a relatively recent Western Christian approach.

      >ritual to follow
      Christianity doesn’t have fixed ritual. Specific forms of Christianity might, but their rituals vary. Confirmation is not equal to Chrismation, which is not equal to “Baptism in the Holy Spirit”.

      >We see little feminization in black and muslim races and much in white and asian.
      Really? I’m sure there are masculine Negroes. But they seem to be somewhat rare. Most Negro societies are matriarchal, including the ones in the USA.

  15. Samson J. says:

    What was controversial? That pre-teen girls are commonly down to fuck?

    By this point I have accepted so many “controversial” ideas that this one doesn’t offend me, at least not very much, but it does raise the baffling question of how one would know this.

    • peppermint says:

      by having been a pre-teen guy, or having been a teenager or young adult and having been hit on by pre-teen girls

      • jay says:

        Who were historically considered young women by virtue of puberty and subsequent 1st menstruation termed menarche starting at the age of 12 years 6 months.

        • peppermint says:

          Plato recommends that men around 30 should marry women in their fifth year since menarche, which used to be later than it is now. I think it’s historically normal, and certainly it was normal up until the last years of the last century, for White women to wait until 19-24, and White men to wait until 25-30. Today, White women are pushed into waiting due to pressure on them to go to grad school or do career stuff first, and furthermore they need to wait for their men to get careers going, which don’t even start until 30 if ever for the milennial generation.

          • jim says:

            Keep in mind that in the old days delayed marriage meant keeping women under tight supervision and not letting them out.

            A girls coming out party was held to announce that she was now allowed out (with parentally preselected men), whereas before she had been kept in, which is to say, not allowed to leave the home.

            The protagonist of “Pride and Prejudice” complains that this involves young women being imprisoned for an unreasonably long time.

          • jay says:

            ”I think it’s historically normal, and certainly it was normal up until the last years of the last century, for White women to wait until 19-24, and White men to wait until 25-30.”

            True. Yet marriages between the age of menarche and the norm of 19-24 which did occur are not criminalized and demonized like they are today. As a result of developments in the industrial era in the 19th century.

      • fnd says:

        From where i live, even the media shows a lot of teenage women getting into fights over the local alpha tug. Virginity in women is getting rarer the older she gets, so asking for virgin wifes will be akin to being a pedophile.

  16. Korth says:

    Offtopic, but this video seems to support some of the most controversial assertions that you’ve made about female sexuality on this blog:


    • jim says:

      I come from a time and place that was not nearly so far out of contact with reality as present day America, so it is hard for me to know what is “controversial”

      What was controversial? That pre-teen girls are commonly down to fuck?

      • Korth says:

        Not to me, but I have noticed that is one of the few subjects covered by this blog that is routinely met with moral outrage and leftist virtue-signalling from total outsiders in the comments section.

        I don’t particularly care about the public respectability of opinions. Heck, I don’t even disagree with you on that one.

        • fnd says:

          Would be more interesting if these girls would try to hook up with old men instead of adult males disguising themselves as teenagers. I suspect they could pull it off, but that would be denigrating for women so no dice.

          • peppermint says:

            if you had talked to the teenage girls when you were a teenager, you would have discovered that they wanted to hook up with 25-30 year old men and often would hook up with 30-40 year old men

          • jim says:

            Preteen girls are pretty keen on teen boys to forty five year old men, Their age preference tends to become closer to their own age as they become teens.

          • fnd says:

            “if you had talked to the teenage girls when you were a teenager, you would have discovered that they wanted to hook up with 25-30 year old men and often would hook up with 30-40 year old men”
            lol nice backhanded insult. Kinda disturbing to know that there are people who thinks teenage women don’t like old guys. The sexual exploitation of minors issue are rarely adressed by the minor sexuality. We still have a sexual code of conduct, but cannot actually enforce our own morality

        • fnd says:

          “I have noticed that is one of the few subjects covered by this blog that is routinely met with moral outrage and leftist virtue-signalling from total outsiders in the comments section.”

          AKA MPC forum posters calling Jim a pedophile for suggesting that teen girls would fuck adult males if given the opportunity,lol.

    • TTAAC says:

      Not really, considering they got the same results with boys: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4sHoDW8QU4

  17. CamelCaseRob says:

    I suspect male librarians as a group have lower testosterone. Anyway, I am not very masculine with my 875 level (I never developed an Adam’s apple for example). There has to be more than simple testosterone levels controlling masculinity.

    • Samson J. says:

      There has to be more than simple testosterone levels controlling masculinity.

      I agree, and was going to say as much. I am not an expert in the field, but I remember being told by an endocrinologist once that T levels really have little to do with phenotypic personality. He may have been wrong, of course, but in any event I have never been impressed by constant discussion in the manosphere about “testosterone levels”.

      I suspect mine are not high (I am not very pilose, for instance) and yet I am more adventurous, physically active, and energetic than most men my age, I would suppose.

      • jim says:

        Testosterone levels may be more a symptom than a cause, but the uniformly low levels found in public radio indicate tight correlation. Near perfect fit to stereotype.

  18. Laguna Beach Fogey says:

    That could explain the rush one gets when talking freely, uncensored, about feminists, niggers, and eskimos, particularly in public.

  19. Trollercoaster says:

    See also pop music featuring male emotional wallowing. And the many songs that feature black male rap artists with white women singing, subtly impressing race cuckoldry as proper and right in white males.

    • peppermint says:

      Well, that’s the conspiracy theory view, and it makes a certain amount of sense, anyone who wants to know knows that Jews often do say that they hate Whites and enjoy seeing Whites degraded.

      But there’s also an economic reason for nigger rappers.

      Thanks to copyright law, morons with IQs between 115 and 100 determine en masse what kind of music is produced. They choose degeneracy, as much as they can get away with, and have since at least the days of Henry Ford, as recorded in The International Jew. While White male musicians have been policed by feminists since the ’70s, to the extent that Robin Thicke’s recent song Blurred Lines was called offensive, niggers can say pretty much whatever they want to, which is to say, muh dik and/or muh poosie. There are some attempts by to parody rap music, which comes out sounding exactly the same as normal rap music, the only way to tell is to see the Comedy Central logo on the music video.

      White women are featured because it is an empirical fact that White women are the most beautiful. There is a good theoretical reason for this.

Leave a Reply