If you do not perform the mating dance correctly, will not have sex, family, children, and grandchildren.
Men conquer and women surrender, but men perform and women choose.
Women are frightened by male attention. They don’t want it and they do want it. They are afraid of it and run away, and they desire it and pursue it. They are only sexually excited by men who scare them.
When a man meets a woman who he sexually desires, his natural impulse is to be nice to her, and to put her at her ease. When a woman meets a man who she sexually desires, her natural impulse is to hit him with a shit test, to give him a hard time, to be aggressive and hostile. They want to see what a man is made off, just as a man wants to look at her boobs. If a woman retreats from attention, this indicates that fear and discomfort has outweighed sexual desire. If she is aggressive, this indicates that desire has outweighed fear and discomfort. If she is nice, you are likely being friendzoned.
Which means that boys are apt to find female behavior confusing and stressful. Outright rejection is distressing, and, in an environment where a shit test is apt to be backed by state violence, a shit test is terrifying and you are likely to fail. Which is even more distressing, plus you might go to jail.
It is striking that those women who are most feminist, most indignant about patriarchy, most likely to call the cops on you for sexual harassment, sexual assault, rape, and all that me too stuff, the ones who tell us that what they actually want is sensitive men who share the housework and all that, are the ones thirstiest for men who are cruel, dangerous, and violent, or for men who can plausibly create the appearance of being dangerous, the girls most contemptuous to nice guys, most hostile to nice guys, and most dangerous to nice guys, being apt to respond to niceness with claims of sexual harassment, sexual assault, and all that. It is precisely the feminists who are usually the ones cruising for a beating and a banging. The feminists say they want kind, emotionally, available, and respectful men who communicate well. Perhaps they believe it, but if you fall for that, they will probably wind up charging you with rape and all that, and believing that also. Women are drawn to dominant, confident, risk taking males, and want a man who can and will dominate them, and dominate them even though it is exceedingly dangerous to do so. Women like to believe they have tamed a monster.
Women say, and believe, they want a man who is kind, sensitive, gentle, and communicates well. What she actually wants is a serial killer who is kind, sensitive, gentle, and communicates well, who threatens to kill her and abducts her to hold her hostage. Women want fried ice.
If you empower women to protect them from bad men, who will protect them from themselves?
And if you empower women, you disempower men, and women just do not want sex, or love, or children, or family, from a disempowered man. We see a massive drop in female desire for love, family, marriage, and children, because woman just do not want powerless husbands.
And at the same time, we see a massive drop in male testosterone and sperm production levels, and an unprecedented outbreak of erectile dysfunction among young men, because they are frightened and emasculated.
A woman is incapable of being attracted to a man who does not frighten her. Most men are incapable of being attracted to a woman who frightens them.
And, similarly, men who have internalized a belief in female equality, or consider it inescapable and unavoidable because feminism has heavy handed state backing, are giving up on irl sex and going their own way. A ship and a household has to have one captain. Men try egalitarian relationships, they blow up, men give up on having a relationship with a woman.
Men are giving up, and women are losing interest.
Girls like to play games over text. Participating in these games will get you nowhere, because you are competing with the man who is six foot six, has six pack abs, and a six figure income. The difference between you and him, however, is that he is probably not going to show up physically for Miss Average. Remember that a male who is physically present is a thousand times as scary as a male somewhere out over the internet, and women are attracted to men who scare them, so to have a fair chance at a woman, you have to be present in person. So, you keep the network communications to the absolute minimum needed to organize an irl meeting. Interacting over the internet in excess of this is a losing game. Over the internet, a woman is going to exposed to a whole lot of men who are six foot six, have six pack abs, a six figure income, and a dick like whole salami, which they will show her. She is not going to be exposed to too many such men irl, so irl, you have a shot. Women on the apps are looking for attention and validation, and the more they get, the more they despise the men who give it to them. Keep them on short rations. Most women like to have ten guys chasing them over the internet that they have no intention of ever meeting. They keep your message unopened for a long time so that they have lot of pending notifications on their phone. A pile of unopened notifications is a status symbol she can use against her friends. If you cannot make irl contact quickly , more chats are not going to help.. You merely going to be ammunition in woman’s war on women.
Of course, in a society where women are free to fuck Mister One in Thirty, most men are not going to have sex, family, children and grandchildren anyway, but it seems that about two thirds of young men are unable to perform the mating dance in the first place.
Under today’s extremely adverse conditions — (the economy is run by men who hate you and want to ruin you and are willing to set their own wealth on fire provided yours burns also, interaction between men and women is governed by Karen HR land whales who want to cockblock males from hitting on any women other than themselves, and Miss Average is free to fuck thirty different Mister One in Thirtys) — you are going to be pushing shit uphill even if you do know the mating dance, but if you do not know the mating dance, you are toast.
A woman wants a man who will make her do stuff, whether it is a long walk on the beach, a sandwich, or picking up his clothes, washing them, hanging them on the line, and then folding and sorting them. Despite emancipation and all that, that is still what they want, that being the ancestral environment of successful reproduction. It is just that emancipation has made it far more difficult and dangerous to give women what they want, what they are going to harshly shit test you into giving them. The more feminist and emancipated a woman is, the thirstier she is for what emancipation and feminism have denied her.
Without male authority, women become tense, unhappy, neurotic, and depressed. Women and dogs need a master. Women are angry and getting angrier, because men keep failing shit tests, and men keep failing shit tests because often they can only passed by measures that constitute sexual harassment, domestic violence, sexual assault, and so on and so forth. And the leftist feminist women are angrier, and their shit tests harsher, they can only be passed by considerably greater violence and illegality than those of right wing conservative women. As a result, while the fertility rate of conservative women is, horrifyingly, a mere 1.8, the fertility rate of leftist women is, even more horrifyingly, something like 0.3 or 0.5.
The more feminist the woman, the more she cruises for actual violence and rape. I don’t understand why. It does not make sense to me. The more conservative the women, the less dangerous and drastic the measures necessary to pass the shit test, while feminist women require stuff that is seriously dark and disturbing. You can pass a conservative woman’s shit test without doing anything morally wrong, though you may well have to do things that the state and state sponsored feminism might think wrong, but passing a leftist woman’s shit test is likely to need some messed up stuff.
When the male or the female bungles their role in the dance, the other party is likely to see it as icky at best, and as flat out rejection at worst.
OK, back when we were reproducing successfully how was it done?
CorruptingKnowledge argues that the female is the sexually proactive sex. Which on the face of it seems like an absurdity and blatant nonsense. Trouble is, he is trying to communicate in words that which cannot be communicated in words, and so everything he says is necessarily and unavoidably untrue, confusing, and misleading.
We have to be shown, not told.
The old Walt Disney Cartoon “the moth and the flame” shows the mating dance in symbolic, cartoon, exaggerated, and simplified form, making it readily understandable.
What the Walt Disney Cartoon shows is that female sexual behavior has to be controlled, or they will destroy society.
In the cartoon Disney has a bunch of moths representing male society, has a romance between the Hot Chick Moth, and the mister beta bucks, husband material, nice guy, boyfriend moth, and the flame, Alpha Male Flame. Mister Beta Bucks Nice Guy moth gives hot chick moth less attention that she desires, and she senses the performance that Alpha Male Flame is putting on, so she puts on her own performance, which literally sets the house on fire.
All the actions — Alpha Male Flame burning down the house and continually almost killing Hot Chick, the male moths preventing house from burning down, Nice Guy Moth repeatedly rescuing hot chick moth from Alpha Male Bad Boy Mister Very Wrong Flame are performed by males. Were a feminist to analyze this cartoon, she would tell us that Hot Chick Moth is merely a prize that sets events in motion, an object, not a person. Hot Chick Moth, however, instigated everything. Even though she engaged in no actions at all, she is the one that quite deliberately causes all the actions. In this sense, women are the proactive sex. Hot Chick Moth wanted the drama, and quite intentionally sets it in motion. She intended the drama, the danger, and most of all, intended the danger to herself.
This is intelligible when Disney shows it, but utter nonsense when CorruptingKnowledge attempts to tell it. It has to be shown, not told. Also, Disney is clearly telling us that female sexuality is dangerous, explosive, uncontrollable, and nonetheless needs to be controlled, for the good of society, for the good of men, and for the good of women, while CorruptingKnowledge, despite telling us that women are retarded and need to be beaten every day, tends to mess up an become unintelligible when explaining facts that imply that women need to be unemancipated, that female domestic, reproductive, and sexual services need to be the property of males, that women are not fit stewards of their own bodies. Every so often he is sufficiently purple pilled to make a topic that is already very difficult to understand entirely incomprehensible.
What CorruptingKnowledge means is true, but what he actually says is, unfortunately, ludicrously false, because of limits of speech in explaining game.
This is a near universal problem in the Red Pill community, since they are all namefags, and terrified of being cancelled, deplatformed, and demonetized. Or, like the Tate brothers charged with rape, human trafficking, etcera.
I remember a time when older people knew this stuff, but it could not be said, and so very few younger people learned it. And then those older people, the heroic World War II generation, the people who came of age before 1914, died off, and no one knew it, except a few like myself who were exposed to the fading remnants of the older civilization during their coming of age.
And then the PUA community rediscovered the mating dance and female nature, but trouble is, it is difficult to explain, and is still dangerous to explain it entirely plainly.
Of course Hot Chick Moth’s sexual proactivity is cartoonishly exaggerated, and thus easy to see. Real life sexual proactivity is a bit subtler. Even I often fail to notice it, and a lot of men are much more oblivious than I am. Thus, for example, if a chick is cruising for a day pickup in the street, she wears sexy and conspicuous clothing, ambles slowly or remains stationary in place, and continually looks around. Because she is dressed sexy, men will look at her, and because she continually looks around, from time to time, their eyes will meet. She then looks away, quickly, but not too quickly, and what the man is supposed to do is quickly respond with a big smile before she looks away. You have to be quick, you cannot afford to wait to see if she is going to take her time about looking away. When the man smiles, she smiles back, then looks away, and the man is supposed to walk up and say hello. So ostensibly the man is being sexually proactive and the female is not, though in reality this is not necessarily true.
If the woman is sexually attracted when you say hello, she is going to hit you with a shit test. I see mgtow influencers complaining how some woman was nasty to them for no reason. They should be asking themselves why tsundere is such a trope in anime. It is noticeable that it is the younger and handsomer mgtow influencers that have this complaint.
The Tates explain the mating dance and female nature rather more plainly that most, and as a result, are now facing flagrantly bogus rape charges. The reason that they are now being extradited to the most oppressive tyranny in the developed world is: sound advice. The “conservatives” that hate the Tates for “undermining traditional conservative values” also hate Trump for “undermining traditional conservative values”. These never were conservative values, and these “conservatives” never were conservatives. Those who blame men for the misbehavior of women have seeking the overthrow and destruction of our civilization for two centuries. They are pissed by Tate defending the double standard, because women being equal to and interchangeable with men is supposedly a conservative value.
The problem has always been that women are incompetent to make exercise sexual choice at any age. It is not their fault, and it is not the fault of the men they bang. It is the fault those who should have kept them under control letting them get out of control. In Walt Disney’s little cartoon, “the moth and the flame”, whose fault is it that the house catches fire? That cartoon expresses actual conservative values. It is the failure to exercise care, supervision, and control over hot chick moth, which she correctly feels is failure to cherish.
The trouble, however, with Andrew Tates advice, is that he spends ninety percent of your time telling you that ninety percent of women are having sex with one percent of men, so therefore you should pay him money to learn to be one those one percent. It is all infomercial with far more commercial than information. You are not going to get useful information about game from talking heads. Text gives you better information, because the people writing text know you are not going slog through a never ending commercial.
Of course he not being persecuted for never ending commercials — he is persecuted for stuff like this, and this
The PUA lifestyle, winning at the game of players and bitches, the promised reward for giving the talking heads money, actually is not that great, as demonstrated by the very high burnout rate. No matter how alpha you are, there is always someone more alpha than you. A rotating collection of whores is not a harem. The point of owning more than one women is to own more than one woman. Hence burnout.
But all this is still only words, and actually understanding what these words mean is difficult if you do not already understand what they mean.
Talking heads are useless for learning game. The one area where the video form is actually useful is field reports. Before and after reading about game, watch field reports.
Correct performance is pre verbal and pre rational, ill suited for a blog post.
To understand the words, you need to see the thing, and to understand what you see, then you need the words.
Video links on odyssee
And males and females are being indoctrinated by media, by school, and by HR in the workplace, that performing their role properly is horrible, shocking, and icky — plus men, who take the actively proactive role, are told that performing the actively proactive role in the dance will get them fired, shamed, financially ruined, and imprisoned, and women, who take the superficially seemingly passively proactive role in the dance, are firmly discouraged from doing so — see all the Karens complaining about PickMe.
A whole lot of women drop hints on a man that he should ask her over to his place, and he does not ask her over, and she concludes he does not actually want to fuck her, or he already has a woman at his place, or he does not have a place and has no room in his life for a woman to perform the role of wife, when in fact the problem was that he was mighty slow to take a hint. I have been slow enough often enough, and I am way better than most men at picking up on female signals.
Sometimes, very rarely, a woman, frustrated by continual failure to get an invite, will just show up and start doing wife stuff, but she is never going to say in so many words “Hey, can I come over to your place for some privacy with you.” She wants an invite — or better still to be commanded, or better still, to be carried off, or better still, forcibly carried off by an alpha male and his lieutenants, and then delivered the place of one of them — she is surprisingly comfortable with the alpha male assigning her to one of his lieutenants. But when a woman gets forcibly carried off, it is usually a result of her rather patiently and persistently trying to get carried off and targeting one particular alpha male to carry her off. The movie “High Plains Drifter” depicts Callie Travers and Sarah Belding playing that role in the dance.
In a leking species, the males do sexual display to attract females, so males brightly colored, extravagantly ornamented, and all that. In species that form families, the females tend to be showy, to attract male support and protection.
And we are subject to massive media and criminalization offensive intended to disrupt, in part because of Karens engaged in intrasexual competition.
Mating is failing for nineteen men out of twenty.
Tom Torero and Johnny Berba committed suicide — because namefags, and psychologically frail, came under attack, plus burnout.
If you reject societal and cultural norms, and do not have religion, you get tend to get lost, particularly when burnout hits — faith solves this problem. You turn back to older, saner, and healthier cultural norms. When you come under attack, you know you have the backing of the ultimate alpha Male.
The PUA text pages have a huge amount of information on minimaxing game, because they needed a never ending stream of content, but this is kind of irrelevant, for what is needed is not to do it as well as possible, but to do it at all.
“Women like to believe they have tamed a monster.”
When it is men who are taming the monster in this case.
The Catholic Church understood all of this right from the beginning. Read St Paul on what he has to say on men and women and matters of the heart. The Church was gutted, skinned and made a skin suit in 1969, and low and behold the dynamics between men and women have gone haywire. The devil loves chaos, and boy did he unleash a good one on us.
Spare us the papist shilling here the Catholic Church did not exist until the 11th century and since they started enforcing celibacy they’ve been dominated by fags
We don’t like the Roman Catholic immigration NGO here stop trying to make us.
Spare me your squealing. If you do not understand that Western civilisation is founded on the Church, Greco-Roman law and the European nations then you’re playing without a full deck.
I’m not shilling in the least; I couldn’t care less whether or not anyone else gets religion, least of all you. Jim’s article is based on objective facts and observations on both the male-female dynamic and its current crisis which is pointing towards a collapse. I am pointing out a fundamental pillar of Western civilisation which has been co-opted and rendered important. Do the math, sweetheart.
Jim has consistently agreed with me on the Catholic Church. Yes the Church did some good things in the middle ages (when celibacy was not enforced) though its attempt to have international secular power have caused nothing but trouble. But its had nothing good about it since celibacy has been enforced and its been run by fags.
Good for you, I’m, so glad you speak for Jim. Your pathetic appeal to authority notwithstanding, your arguments are simply fatuous.
I think we should avoid this turning into yet another Papist-vs-Protestant fistfight. Anything from the early church, such as the writings of the Apostle Paul in the New Testament, belongs equally to all denominations.
Nobody who split from anyone else, in either the 11th or the 16th centuries, was doing so out of different opinions about the proper role of women in society. The gender-egalitarian deception showed up later, and the dark power pushing it does not give a hoot about our denominational differences. It just wants us all dead and gone.
Obviously the eleventh century split was motivated by war and international conflicts — the Bishop of Rome was leading armies in the field. The Pope coveted that which is Caesar’s.
However, the Papacy made female consent an essential part of the sacrament of marriage, which was the beginning of our present troubles, two centuries later, in 1215, while Orthodoxy held the line until the seventeenth century.
This is lifted almost* straight from Teddy Beale, whose deluded and solipsistic theories on game helped turn a generation of somewhat clever, energetic and productive incels into a generation of defeated, lobotomized and compliant incels.
I say “almost” because even ole’ Father Ted made the crucial distinction between “Christianity” and “The Church”. He would never have said that western civ was founded on the church, it was founded on Christianity. It slips by as a minor error, a mere typo, po-tay-to po-tah-to, and yet it all makes all the difference because said church, being mired in corruption and holiness spiraling, had been grinding down civilization for well over a century until the Protestant reformation came along.
I could go on further about the “Greco” part of “Greco-Roman” but for once I think I’ll keep it short.
P.S. Pegging 1969 as the year it all went wrong is nuts. Overt feminism and consent ethics date back to the late 19th century, blank-slate feminism dates back to the French revolution, and fin’amor, the glorification of cads and portrayal of women as naturally chaste angels, started in the 12th century. Whatever happened in 1969 was totally irrelevant in the big picture.
Adam wrote:
One of those three things does not belong with the others, filthy goy.
This Is a foundational essay
Definitely bookmarked and will be studied thoroughly.
One point
“If she is nice, you are likely being friendzoned.”
Most interaction with girls are usually nice rarely you get in front of your face shit test,
How to differentiate between socially nice and friendzone nice?
How to get out if you are in?
Do you instigate shit test by negging?
About online interaction, if it long distance interaction, how to mange through text?
I mean can you pass shit test in text or irl is a must
> text
IMO about text. Text is inhuman, it’s impossible to compress and funnel the range of human social through a broken half sentence on a tiny keyboard and a shit screen, let alone rank among the 25+ other msgs and/or notification noise that hour/day.
Advice on text is avoid using it at all, especially during the first year. Don’t even mention the word “text” in any usable way.
In the first IRL meet/convo just start dropping positive anti-text NLP’s “Everyone knows I’m terrible/slow at it so I just call people Lol / This dumb keyboard it’s impossible to use so I just don’t I’m waiting for a real keyboard brain interface lol / I don’t even text anymore life is ZEN peaceful after I quit I’m never going back so much more free time now”.
Always say “I’ll call”, “Ring me”, or some other steerage to voice as the preferred and default traditional route.
That you like and want to hear their voice 🙂
The art of text is pretty much only using it to
– capitalize on and cap off a positive event/train, or linguistic wordplay game, that’s already going on IRL
– confirm some positive thing “I’m down for that”, “ok”, “Hey come over I’m off at 5”
Your woman should be your IRL, not some text with the fellas.
And if you tell her she’s your IRL, that has benefits.
Maybe text works for the teen/20s crowd, or the socially challenged, don’t know.
But overall it’s a very limited medium, lacks needed cues, easily misinterpretable, far too easy to get mired and stuck with it.
And since all women have at least some unconscious evil moments (moon cycles or some shit) they will trap you with it, and that convo or their question is on record hanging out there never deleted always hanging ready for when they’re idly browsing their history (or for their evil friends or lawyers to split or use against you).
Whereas with voice or in person you can more often/easily spin out of such things, wait till it passes, forgotten, and there’s no record to respawn from.
IMO, always lead and go with voice, demur and lol away from text, do not use it for anything deep or long, solve context interpretation and things with voice, and ignore and drop text cold on any sign of bedevilment.
Same for messaging on dating sites… goal is to get you two off there and into IRL asap… digits and move to voice, or direct to meetup, within no more than a few weeks. And once in IRL, do not mention or interact on the site again.
The “Infield Game” stuff is real. The good material there will immediately hit you with the “A-Ha, that’s it!” behind what you see happening in real life. And thus helps develop the natural game everyone already has.
> text
Text is kindof massmarket, maybe voice is becoming a high-end channel among peers?
SIM’s being KYC’d by the FCC… maybe get a cheap dating SIM right now while you still can.
Working on seeing what links can be stuffed into dating sites.
If the site doesn’t block (obfuscated) braincodes and links… maybe you can put phone/email or Signal/Sessio
n/Simplex/Zerion in there… any hits from women on those would be interesting.
Problem is getting around pictures, they all require them, because you’re still the product no matter how much you pay them 🙁
> infield links
Bittorrent still has some of the classic infield pua game nlp confidence psychosocial science stuff.
Has anyone done a p2p-distributed BT index client and search yet?
Because web indexes suck.
Needs to be a global database for this… blockchain, whatever.
Now that is a very interesting application.
Can you give us a list of bittorrent infield game videos. Our enemies have been systematically suppressing them.
The mating dance is miserable and dysgenic. We want the government to give us the best quality women as a reward for [*not what we want*]
Are we to imagine some government department requiring that all young woman be registered and assessed for quality, and then each assigned to some man?
This is not how human society is meant to work. Maybe on a small scale where the chief of the village shares out the young women among his loyal warriors, or something.
There is a Japanese anime set in that world. Chicks have to get married by sixteen, or they get assigned. The great majority get assigned. There is also a web cartoon set in that world, where the limit is get married by age twenty two, or else something very bad that the author never clearly specifies happens. The great majority get married before the deadline. Girls seem to like that story environment. These are romances, targeted at very young female readers.
In late eighteenth century, early nineteenth century Australia, the state applied a heavy hand to make sure all girls got married lickety spit, sometimes lining them up as soon as they got off the boat, but what exactly happened is unclear, and seems to have varied from time to time. What is clear is that absent “voluntary” marriage, got assigned to what was in practice concubinage. Which the chick lit webtoon I mentioned was hinting at.
They will volunteer, or we throw them into Maga breeding pits. I think the author and audience of the webtoon were diddling themselves to the thought of the Maga breeding pits.
In the webtoon, men get compulsory military service at eighteen, and women must get married before age twenty two, to produce more soldiers and taxpayers — childbearing within marriage, like military service, is a patriotic act, endorsed by the state religion and state propaganda. What happens with childbearing outside marriage is never specified, but again, the state and the state religion does something drastic about that problem. Spinsters and single moms are somehow very forcibly discouraged.
Coldcards (bitcoin hardware wallets) are compromised. Tldr, they “accidentally” used the PRNG from micropython instead of the hardware RNG, so the generated seeds have much lower than expected entropy. People are getting drained.
If anyone here is using one, do some research and move your funds to a new seed ASAP.
https://blog.coinkite.com/entropy-technical-backgrounder/
In the last 5 years there has been a huge influx of Hispanic females in construction. Especially light duty trades like painting, and light duty roles in tougher trades.
Watching these girls (often quite young and beautiful) really served to highlight the need for group membership and status. The good girls you would look at and instinctively size up as wife material are often fairly reserved, and stick very very close to their group. You will hardly ever see them without 3 or 4 others.
The girls that roam the building alone (often large commercial multi story buildings) are clearly alpha widows and are generally loud and obnoxious. Often also very pretty. But much more insecure.
Jordan Peterson routinely claims that the most overwhelmingly attractive trait for a man is productive generosity. Which is retarded and does not move the needle. What it does though, is absolutely get you in the door with the other males, which then of course helps with access to females.
You can go it alone and still get laid. I have and do, but also I have been giving up on the possibility that long lasting relationships or marriage is possible these days without the supporting group dynamics.
It is always way way easier to score with a wingman acting as if you are alpha male of the group.
Every woman fantasizes about an abduction where the alpha male abducts her with the support of the males around him, thus casually blowing through all shit tests.
Coincidentally, higher testosterone and status is linked to both productivity and generosity. Perhaps it’s the reason why weak leftist men are always greedily coveting other people’s shit.
Crew leaders/foreman are almost always the most manly and the most productively generous. The job is to get lesser guys to perform at a level they could not by themselves. And keep them from quitting or being too disruptive. All while keeping your cool and preserving trust.
The trades are still a very accessible path to 6 figures and a basically endless supply of confidence and self esteem. You’ll have to trade your life for it but what you get in return few ever achieve.
five star comment
because the act of feminism itself is a shit-test, a subconscious hope that some man somewhere is alpha enough to put her in her place so that she might end up married with 5 kids anyways.
The more outspoken a woman’s feminism, the bigger the shit-test, the more violence and rape is required to satisfy her. Hence why so many early feminists like Marjorie Cameron were into the occult: they fantasized about being overpowered by literal demons.
I have a theory, a woman being a feminist is going against her natural instincts to be agreeable and submissive (except when shit testing) and to actually crave the male gaze. A feminist has been brainwashed at her conscious level and at her more shallow emotional level to do the exact opposite. Hence the craving to be rap8d by a violent savage man is all the stronger because the personality she has been conditioned to have is so at odds from her natural state.
Yes, feminism leads to an intense conflict between the evolved hardware and the socially-installed software. This is why left-wing women are so fucking insane.
Also, it must be psychological agony to be in their shoes.
He’s right; women are naturally the sexual aggressors. When a man comes on to a woman in the sense of a cold approach, she finds it gratingly awkward. Women HATE this. Ignore that they’re constantly saying that that’s what they want and expect. Women say a lot of shit. One important aspect of Game is that it tells you how to do a cold approach without it seeming like a cold approach. Or just how to do it so well, so excellently, that it overcomes the default “this is unattractive” reaction.
Modern women, with their idiotic feminist bullshit, will say that this reaction is because being sexually interested in a woman is “oppressing” her or whatever. That’s not what’s going on. The actual reason is that making the first move reveals that you don’t already have a woman, so the very fact that you’re approaching is anti-preselection.
The movie The Tao of Steve also had something to say about this: Be desireless (not thinking about sexing her, no agenda, or at least try to appear that way). Be excellent (“Do something excellent in her presence.”). Be gone. (Withdraw so she has to chase you.)
> the female is the sexually proactive sex
When women are out, they are cruising, by definition.
Because of the option to attach themselves to Man, whether Husband or Kin, for protection.
So in a way, probably more ways than one, this is true.
A good way to do something like a cold approach without actually doing it is when a woman walks by you or you her, quickly ask her what perfume she is wearing as if you really like it. Then go about your business as if you just uncovered the sole interesting thing about her. There’s a decent chance she will begin to wander closer to you and engage eye contact etc. And there is a small possibility that she will convey interest towards you immediately in her response which you can play off of.
Doesn’t necessarily have to be that particular statement but something along those lines. Aloof and playful is the spirit you want to project.
Sure, this can work. Works best, obvs, if the situation is such that you’re both relatively immobile. Bookstore, maybe? Not if you’re just breezing by her on the street.
What I read from the cartoon is that civilization is betas trying to suppress Alpha.
The read that white men are better at civilization, thus more beta, the stereotype is thus accurate.
European civilization excels by providing them a better deal than perhaps anywhere else.
—
The part about scaring hoes is interesting, but modern normie civilization often feels like a bunch of betas hen pecking each other even in the military.
On the subject of romance (and, in the previous post, Greek mythology), I’d like to share my Perseus and Andromeda poem in blank verse (unrhymed iambic pentameter).
Parts of it were Jim-inspired— like the ”banged her like a drum” easter-egg at the end of movement five.
https://allpoetry.com/poem/19015252-Perseus-and-Andromeda-Part-1-by-Jojelo
https://allpoetry.com/poem/19016466-Perseus-and-Andromeda-Part-2-by-Jojelo
https://allpoetry.com/poem/19017955-Perseus-and-Andromeda-Part-3-by-Jojelo
https://allpoetry.com/poem/19018959-Perseus-and-Andromeda-Part-4-by-Jojelo
https://allpoetry.com/poem/19020536-Perseus-and-Andromeda-Part-5-by-Jojelo
https://allpoetry.com/poem/19021207-Perseus-and-Andromeda-Part-6-by-Jojelo
I suspect there could be people here who might enjoy this kind of content.
I’m confused by this all and having a hard time believing in it. [*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
“a serial killer who is kind, sensitive, gentle, and communicates well, who threatens to kill her and abducts her to hold her hostage.” is the main male character and primary love interest of a webtoon romance which appears to be targeted at young adult girls.
Are you confused? You are not alone. It seems the author’s sexual fetish is to be murdered, rather than banged, in that what little I read off the webcomic featured lots of murdering and no banging. That is one way to positively definitely really no kidding pass a shit test.
Main female character shit tests main male character. Main male character murders her. Main female character wakes up six years earlier, having time traveled reset to her save point. Does it again. It is the groundhog day plot, except main female character gets reset by shit testing a serial killer and getting murdered. Until the hostage situation arises, whereupon the main male character has to keep her alive as collateral against her father, and passes the shit test in a less lethal way. (Merely taking her prisoner and threatening to kill her if she does not comply.)
One thing I notice about the sort of retard/antisemite right is that to the extent they aren’t shills they just can’t accept how evil and malovolent leftists at least the modern progressive left really are. They see the left doing really evil and malovolent things but their mind can only process the left’s level of evil if they attribute it to a small group (who in most cases they don’t know any jews, familiarity with jews will make you in some ways anti semitic, you certainly would never want to come under the domination of an older jewish female, but it will disabuse you of any idea they are some kind of cohesive hive mind or grand conspiracy) like the jews.
So the Spanish government allowing mass Morrocan migration in… this was not due to the fact that the evil leftist government wants to allow them in even though the American Biden administration did the same shit every day, no somehow its the fault of “the jews” with no blame on the wider left. Antisemitism is a sort of cope that if we burn 6 million we don’t have to burn a billion…
This attitude is disgusting to me but it seems to be their mentality.
I believe that some of the ones we see, including “The Gasman”, are in fact kebabs playing at being white antisemites. Generally, a white person would never use the phrase “Zionist entity” or refer to Iranians as “Persians” or express how deeply he cares about the difference between this group of Mohamedans and that group of Mohamedans. The unrelenting simmering anger, the inability to write even a single sentence without spitting invective and slurs, is also very consistent with kebab psyche.
There’s one possible exception: white leftist students and some professors who march with the kebabs in campus protests. Kebabs “like” this group of white leftists and are willing to turn a blind eye to their corruption and degeneracy because they are strategically useful, though of course, kebabs would eventually kill every last one of them after finishing off the Christians and Jews. For our purposes, though, they are functionally identical.
It’s very tiresome to see the constant warfare between Islam-obsessed kikes (Rod/Rick Chan) and Israel-obsessed kebabs (Gasman) playing out this fake and gay kayfabe portraying itself as an authentic factional struggle between groups of the dissident right. It’s two groups of hostile entryists trying to goad us into their war… all while banging on the table in hilarious hypocrisy that we and/or Trump are in already bed with the other faction.
The retard right is still a thing but it is attracted to different memes. Rothschilds, Illuminati, qanon, trooferism and so on, memes that are mostly meant to take dissident energy and diffuse it into harmless nonsense and learned helplessness. Still harmful to the “movement” as it were, but of a different character from the memes designed to create internal conflict and escalate external conflict.
The Jew says “look, we have the same enemy” about someone who is clearly not your enemy in the hope that you’ll help him destroy his enemy. The Muslim says “look, we have the same enemy” about someone who might plausibly be your enemy in the hope that you’ll look away long enough for him to knife you in the back. Neither of them are interested in the welfare of Christians and/or Aryans, although at least the former isn’t actively plotting to kill you (unless he’s also a Trot).
Incidentally, this really should have been posted as a reply to the previous blog post and not as another off-topic tangent of this one, so I apologize to Jim for my role in prolonging it.
We really need to be able to have a post about game, or monarchy, or cryptocurrency, or whatever, without it inevitably degenerating into pages of joo joo joo comments, regardless of whether it starts out as philosemitic/anti-Islam, antisemitic/anti-Israel or moderate. There’s a time and a place, and that time and place is not in 90% of what Jim blogs about. The other 10%, like the actual posts about Iran and such, sure, those are fair game.
You have accurately summed up our enemies. The Gasman, who supposedly wants to deport one hundred and twenty million, and thinks all our ills are purely caused by immigrants, seems remarkably like an Iranian playing at being a white anti semite.
If he can pass the shill test, probably because an Iranian shill rather that an SPLC or Soros shill.
I think you under estimate the extent to which they are shills, are in the pay of the EU or the SPLC or someone like that, and are working from an open plan office with the SPLC IT department supplying their computer and a supervisor and SPLC HR breathing down their necks.
I assume some of them are organic because I’ve occasionally met some people who are in this sort of its all the jews memeplex in real life.
Also if at least SOME of them arent organic explain what happened to Rooisy and what has mostly happened to hoe math.
What happened to them?
I don’t recall Roissy blaming all ills on the Jews, and have not been following “Hoe Math” (because I am remarried and PUA single game is too stressful and too much like hard work — I recommend everyone who needs a girl should follow him). What has “Hoe Math” been up to? I don’t see any Joo Joo Jooing on “Hoe Math”. He dumps on the Democrats, whom the Joo Joo Jooers ignore.
Roisy became a wignat on Gab, Hoe math is metamorphsizing into a twatter wignat. People have reacted negatively he has said the following
https://x.com/itispsychomath
Hes been posting under this new handle… and people have not generally liked his new direction he is at least aware of this and has posted the following
https://x.com/itispsychomath/status/2083999423412220143
“Everything is catastrophically ruined and it’s illegal to talk about the only solution
People still expect me to make videos about dumb girls”
You can read the rest of the thread
OK, “Hoe Math” is not Joo Joo Jooing. So I look at Psychomath, whois an alt of Hoe Math.
And when I look at that page. I see an entirely valid rant about browns, and no rant about Joos. Nor do I see any ranting about Middle East stuff that is none of our business.
Your second link links to someone else complaining about Psychomath Joo Joo Joing. Link me to Psychomath talking about Jews, not to someone who clearly intends to murder everyone like you and everyone like me telling us what Psychomath is saying about Jews.
I piss on the Jews a lot also. It is just that unlike Nick Fuentes this does not lead to me supporting brown Islamic open borders Democrats. And Psychomath is accusing the Democrats of being brown or cucked by browns, not of being Jewish or cucked by Jews.
Read more, hes not all gone yet but hes going that way and he absolutely does talk about jews. To be fair he has admitted what some would call his mental health right now is not in the best shape.
You read more. Give me a link to Psychomath Joo Joo Jooing. I read him saying “browns”, “women”, and “Democrats”, not saying “the Jews”.
It is your claim, which claim I find improbable. Your job to find the evidence for it.
And please do not link me to democidal gay demon worshipers telling us what Hoe Math is saying. Link me to what Hoe Math is saying.
https://x.com/Nspne603/status/2083528353005408417
Reposted by him without commentary (since it was just a retweet without commentary I can’t directly link it to him but you won’t have to scroll down far to see he did repost it)
“White people who are focused on Charlie Kirk and other Qtard, conservative brain candy, are literally wasting their lives. Anyone who is not challenging Jewish power and advocating for the interests of White people, is wasting their time. #nhpolitics #boston #vtpoli”
https://x.com/itispsychomath/status/2083558689542410579
Specific belief seems to be that most jews are part of a conspiracy called the “Kalergi plan”.
So my main point is that yes people who organically believe in wignat memes do exist… and sometimes it sucks in people who should be smarter than that. I’m not sure what % on the internet are shills (Gasman using the words “zionist entity” raises suspicion) but not all of them are.
Not everyone who talks about the Kalergi plan is a Joo Joo Jooer. I talk about the Kalergi plan.
The Kalergi plan is not a paranoid anti semitic conspiracy theory, and Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi was not Jewish, and people who today talk about the Kalergi plan think its a plan of the Democrats, not “the Joos”. But most Jews do in fact support the Kalergi plan.
Obviously Kalergi did not think of it as the Kalergi plan, neither to “The Jooos”, nor do those giving effect to the plan think of it as the Kalergi plan. But it is a plan, and a plan proposed by Kalergi. They think of it as “social justice”, “correcting white privilege”, and a little more plainly, “white wounding”
When the state does something about white privilege during law enforcement, this looks very much as if some people are being punished for being white, while others are unpunished for racially motivated crimes against white people. Combined with a wildly unpopular immigration policy allowing in and refusing to remove those who commit racially motivated crimes against white people, and those crimes going unpunished, this looks very like a plan. What then should this plan be called?
The planners of course, do not call it anything, because to give it a name would allow people to think about it, and if people start thinking about it, they might hang the planners.
This is what they mean when they call “the Kalergi plan” a conspiracy theory.
Obviously no one says “We want to brown the white race, so let us apply state violence to accomplish this outcome.” Yet those who desire this outcome are in fact applying state violence in ways that have the effect that they desire.
Now obviously those who enforce and impose this plan do not think of it as “the Kalergi plan”, or any plan at all, and indeed Kalergi himself did not think of it as the Kalergi plan, or any plan at all, as systematic state violence against whites. He thought of it, and those who today systematically brutalize white people on the basis of race think of it, not as racial hatred, racial violence, and genocide, but rather the arc of history, something that happens naturally without the embarrassment of giving history a little nudge, The planners don’t think it is a plan, let alone the Kalergi plan. It is just social justice and the arc of history, not state violence. But they are planning what is in fact happening, so what shall we call those planning it, and what shall we call their plan?
They do hate, and they do plot. What then should those whom the plotters hate call this hatred and this plot? The plotters do not want their plot to be named, for obvious reasons. And yet it needs a name. “The arc of history bends towards social justice”. And if it does not bend fast enough, they will apply violence to give history a helping hand. Should this violence and this helping hand go without a name?
Kalergi did not say “we shall brown whites by state violence” and in this sense, the Kalergi plan is a conspiracy theory. But there was clear and obvious not-quite-explicit written intent in his works to make it happen by state violence, and now it is being carried out by state violence, and this is indeed a conspiracy. What then shall we call it?
Similarly, nowhere in Nazi writings do they say they intended to murder the Jews, or they were murdering the Jews. Does this make that a conspiracy theory also.
How can we know what is in someone’s heart, except by looking at the consequences of what they do? Kalergi wanted whites to be browned, the people engaged in two tier policing wanted whites to be browned, and the effect of tolerating brown rape of white women is to brown whites.
Sounds like a plan. Whose plan, then? The Kalergi plan. Even though the plotters certainly do not call it that. And calling it the Kalergi plan is not calling it the Jewish plan.
When they call the Kalergi plan a conspiracy theory, what they mean is “there is no plan to eliminate the white race, and even though we want to eliminate the white race, and are imposing coercive policies likely to have the effect of getting rid of the white race, and even though we intend and expect these policies over time to accomplish our goals, this is totally not the purpose of these policies and is merely a happy coincidence. and if these policies are unpleasant for white people, that just shows they are hateful and totally have it coming to them. There is absolutely no malice in our joy over their suffering. On the contrary, the fact that they are suffering just proves they have to go.”
Well I believe in the existence of the Kalergi plan, and I am not a wignat.
The nuttery consists of being so focused on the Joos that you forget that white liberals are the worst people in the world. Has Psychomath forgotten this, as Nick Fuentes has forgotten it?
I believe the progressive left in general supports open borders and welfare for invaders which has the effect of supporting the great replacement. I doubt most jews whether (like most of them) they are on the left or not have heard the phrase “Kalergi plan” which implies they are “read in” to something far more specific.
Obviously no one who is giving effect to the Kalergi plan calls it the Kalergi plan, or calls it anything at all, because to think about what they are doing is to commit a thought crime, and none of them would do that, least of all Kalergi who proposed the Kalergi plan.
This does not make it any the less an intentional plan carried out in an organized manner without regard to the human cost inflicted to achieve intended and desired outcomes.
> Kalergi
Kalergi sufferred the ridiculous enlightened hubris that if you just mash a bunch of random peoples together while playing a cheery political anthem, somehow all their 1k-1M+ years of separate evolution and hardwired affinity for their own kind will just melt away and they’ll all be happily inter-mutting themselves and waving the same flag in like 3 years.
Sorry bro, DNA has a different plan, and utterly rejects shit like that.
Even lefty reviewers summarize…
Kalergi theorized that the historical development causing the death of European hereditary social classes would lead to an all-encompassing race of the future made up of “Eurasian-Negroids”, which would replace “the diversity of peoples” and “today’s races and classes” with a “diversity of individuals”.
Homogenizing bastards like Kalergi write these books and go on pomp-tours, then Prog Politicians with nothing else to do pick them up and implement them using their usual PsyOps upon the victim public.
At least Hitler was trying to preserve what Nature had already designed and figured out eons ago.
Suffice to say that these two were at each others throats for years.
Also, Humans are not the apex species, microbes are.
And if Humans homegenize instead of continuing to fork, everyone dies.
Read more of his posts he isn’t totally monomanical on jews yet but he definitely is at the jews live rent free in his head stage. You dont have to go far down to find a re-tweet about how naming the jew is essential…
Fuentes actually wont go completely mad beyond the level of his faggot narcissism now because he doesnt actually believe what he says (hence from what i hear he constantly contradicts himself) hes just a narcissistic gay (all faggots are narcissistic) grifter.
hoe math on the Jews: https://x.com/itispsychomath/status/2084326904501526825
I fear he is forgetting that white liberals are the worst people in the world.
Cui Bono. Who benefits by bringing in two hundred million black Muslims screaming for infidel blood and white pussy? Democrat politicians. It is a vote bank, because they just promise to give white people’s stuff to the army of voters they import to vote for that.
“Zionist entity” I could see a white leftist doing it or an Arab doing it but not really a wignat. So it does point to Gasman not being who he says he is ie some char
White people wouldn’t call them “Persians”… IDK I call them Persians lol.
Yes I think all this jew stuff sucks up a lot of oxygen but a lot of people even people who know better are drawn into it like a moth to a flame and then draw other people in. Roissy became completely irrelevant following this bullshit and Hoe Math is going down the same road, even though he no doubt saw Roissy do the same thing.
Could we get a post one day about not getting but keeping a woman? Like five, ten years into a marriage when you’re just tired sometimes, start to get comfortable, forget the iron laws. I got my woman and marriage because of what I read here but there is little guidance for farther down the road, with the enemy still howling from the sidelines all the time.
What I am doing works, but I am not at all sure what I am doing. Hard to run a statistically significant controlled experiment.
When there is friction and resistance, which happens often enough, I give her my little speech. “I am required to cherish you, and you are required to obey me. And we are stuck with that.” I do not tolerate disobedience or disrespect.
Shut down any conversation about feels. Feels are a woman thing. Bible says nothing about feels. Wander into that territory, you are going to lose.
Well, that is what works for me, but I suppose Roissy would say I am just alpha as a demon.
You are right, I need to make a post on this matter, but difficult, since I have statistically significant data on what works and what fails with acquiring a wife, but hard to collect statistically significant data on keeping a wife. N=2, which is a lot better data than most people have, but still it is a small N.
Taylor the Fiend says that women need to take responsibility for their lives, and shows clips of women saying that men need to develop emotional intelligence.
Neither of these things has ever happened anywhere, or ever will happen, because they are contrary to human nature. If some women did start making responsible life choices, they would still be outbred by women who just shut up and do as they’re told.
And as far as any woman is concerned, her man has three feelings: angry, hungry, and horny, and she has the means to appease all three.
See my post “Mate Guarding Game“.
everything I have I owe to the success of my marriage, which is a happy one. I have a fairly good idea of what I do right (and what my wife does right!) but of course your mileage may vary.
All the basic game principles apply, for life. But in marriage two become one and that changes some dynamics slightly.
Women are like flowers, but instead of water they need attention. Game says you should focus on your mission, not your wife, but part of your mission must be to give your wife her daily need of attention. A wife always has something to talk about. Give her that room.
F*ck her good. Don’t do porn, don’t masturbate, save it all for the wife. See the book ‘every man’s battle’. Important for a man’s spiritual health, but it works wonders for a wife’s happiness.
Have adventures together. By which is meant: have repeated game theory moments in which you are forced to cooperate or otherwise solve problems. I believe a huge indicator for a marriage’s success is a couple’s ability to engage in and solve conflict. Living two separate lives as so many couples do these days is a recipe for failure. If the relation is not growing, it is shrinking.
Involve the kids. Notice how kids are already indirect involved throughout the above points: mothers love talking about their kids, raising kids is all about adventure and overcoming conflicts, and sex of course has as its purpose… Anyway I am a huge fan of doing things as a whole family. Recommend the book ‘hunt gather parent.’
Great comment
The books are interesting and will read it.
One thing I noticed about failed marriage is that a lot of men enter it with the belief of “partnership “ even those who think of themselves as “alpha” “manly” etc end up treating their wife as partner in marriage.
Jim say he just “be manly”. I think it more an upbringing, same with game, being a manly man is something you grow up into by seeing the men around you and emulate.
Modern industrial education and mainstream media systematically undermined this since paper and tv was invented.
I like watching old media because it show manly men like John Wayne spanking a woman, or Sean Connery telling that female interviewer that yes some time a woman need a smack upside the head.
There are no men like this around.
I believe male children naturally will develop game, it just everyone and everything around them is made to stomp it.
Not to say there are no need for guidance by manly men, because if not it will result in cruel and brutes men.
There a fine line between a Sean Connery and charles manson. Women naturally will go for manson, unless society stomp that nature, and make way for the Sean Conneries.
In the current era society take advantage of the decency of men, to allow and accept evils like women liberation.
The result it is far advantageous to act like charles manson being insane and demonic to get access to women than Sean Connery who in the current age would have been ruined financially and professionally.
Women are kind of inherently cringe, cringe is indiscerptibly, Indecouplably, Indissolubly inherent in them, they are stately at nidification but that’s it as far as their qualities go, but that’s also among the most imperative jobs in omnitudo realitatis.
So I find it indescribably funny to be cruel to them, trivialize them ad infinitum (since most women tend to be supercilious they kind of deserve it), just being boundlessly & capacriously vicious to them, brutalizing them & only showing occasional affection, that’s what it means to show them what real unimpeachable, unimpugnable, unassailable, inexpugnable, invanquishable, undefeatable, unconquerable, Impregnable, insuperable, Inexuperable, Inexsuperable, Inoppugnable authority means.
In My case that much is enough, I have also internalized that despite what vicious, hostile, subhuman, vile androcidal regime propaganda says Men are infinitely superior to women & that Men especially alphas like Myself have Omnitemporal Godhead-ordained authority over women, Illimitable authority to do whatever we want to women, since I’m the Cazottean-Byronic-Goethean-Coleridgean-Marinian-Tassian-Guarinian-Heinsian-Opitzian Ad Aeternitatem Demon Lover Archetype.
Keep all the evolutionary game-theoretic dynamics & their subtleties in Mind & keep the Patrimonial Hand Plenipotent, the Aeternal mating dance is Men conquer & women surrender so Men are justified in applying proportionate force to control women according to their adjudicative discretion.
As Jim said don’t take any disrespect, disobedience & insubordination impetuosity or insolence, treat like a subordinate or the most cherished servant of your Sempiternal Palatial Kingdom, internalize that you have Inexpugnable, Insuperable & Untranscendabe overlordship over her as her Overlord & Master and assert your overlordship by supervising her wisely, prudently & judiciously as Omnitemporal, Omnisuperordinate, Omnisupernal, Omnisuperjacent, Omnisuperscendent Godhead-Ordained Natural Order has ordained for you, that’s how you keep her.
You should also be willing to punish her in the most gruesome & disturbing of ways for any insolence, including upto killing her for any perceived insolence or for shit testing you, this is prescriptive I’m just saying that if she endangers you (though women are unlikely to do so as they love the men who pass their shit tests) then you should be ready to assiduously kill her, or even if you do end up accidentally killing her in rage & wrath during a particularly hyperstressful shit test (though the supermajority of shit tests can be passed with more gentle means such as spanking with a coal shovel) then you will be infinitely righteous in doing so and it’ll be super-exaltation of Coeternally-preordered Imperishable, Immarcessible, Indestructible, Inexsuperable, Indefectible Supramundane Transcosmic Divine justice, you should also kill her if she tries to hold children hostage against you.
I know gentler means do suffice but anyways I just feel an omni- anger towards emancipated women & want to immanentize the equifinal omni- of female emancipation.
I no longer think doing anything to them or any whiteknight in their vicinity should be off limits as we must deal with the wicked with boundless infinitudinous cruelty, but this should only be reserved for particularly wicked women, if you get the occasional shit test you should show her capricious & virtuous terror with Plenipotent authority, that’ll suffice but if they’re doing consciously or unconsciously doing something wicked, evil, grotesque, cruel, maleficent, peccant, malignant, reprehensible, lurid, Ill-inclined, Ill-spirited, Ill-willed, Ill-minded, Ill-natured, savage, barbarous, onerous & ponerologically contra naturam, if they’re doing something wicked to your progeny or committing adultery kill them.
*I know gentler means do suffice but anyways I just feel an omni-plenitude of anger towards emancipated women & want to immanentize the equifinal alchemical omni-depuration of the feculent & excrementitious epiphenomenon known as female emancipation
“Women are kind of inherently cringe”
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/rkk6FQ0xjsI
There’s that fag talk we talked about.
It’s a valid observation of women as they are now, at least a good portion of them that the Cathedral amplifies as ‘virtuous’. The ‘strong independent womyn who don’t need no man’ and ‘girls in gayming’ and ‘womyn in STEM’ is sad, annoying, and cringe. Have you seen their “slam poetry”?
I wouldn’t use cringe… thats still fag talk. Depending on the women I want to fuck them, hug and cuddle with them (or both), or burn them as witches… but in no case would I describe them as cringe.
The boys raised in the 90s and early 2010s exude cringe then as boys and now as lesser men, and so they observe and behave in terms of cringe. Like you, they are disgusted by witches, but unlike you, had fear installed in them by power and so recoil from it, and power resides in the disgusting and revolting as vessels to invert truth so they fear and recoil from the vessel.
Indeed, ‘cringe’ is faggot talk in the spiritual sense (and why so many men fail shit tests), but the overall use of the term to describe women is not done so by homosexuals.
https://youtu.be/4fiOSGvYMBA?si=FZ3FHeOL5UPfZJDy
That was a tame example of what the schools were pushing hard at the time. Did you see any real pushback at the time? I didn’t among my generation. To do so invited social ostracization enforced by public education and other forms of administrative punishments. Yet boys intuitively know what they want, and it isn’t what was promoted, and so they cringe in the absence of being able to push back.
Cringe is a valid observation in that it tells you both how disgusting feminism is and how a large section of young men have to live in fear of it.
The fags are all saying ‘slay queen 💅’ as the women cruise for dick and failing to have children.
30+ yrs
1. keep her filled with babies & nut inside her (there are hormonal things that balance them out)
2. pray before sex for God to use the moment for strengthening your marriage; whether she wants to or not (I think the “This is just for you” sex is probably the most useful submission for her)
3. teasing should be fun, not cruel. nobody respects anyone who doesn’t respect them. (she does an awesome job of nesting, thank her for the sandwich and doing laundry)
There used to be a subreddit called Married Red Pill, not sure if it survived the purge. Look up “dread game”.
Your biggest enemy is her boredom and fear of missing out. She needs to feel stuff, and would rather feel bad than not at all.
If you can, keep her feelings swaying back and forth the way you would teeter back on a chair. Sitting in a chair with all legs on the floor is boring. Falling back from teetering is terrifying. This is more work than I like.
Lastly a good relationship with your wife should be a byproduct of a larger effort. It is a terrible target to hit all on its own, and unfulfilling.
Based camp endorses my view that the right has to endorse that when we get to chance leftists must be resettled to Alaska to become part of the Final Solution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOZJczfToug
As a lifelong Alaskan, I must once again register my personal objection to our beautiful state ending up the dumping ground for such people.
For the vast majority of them there stay there will be less than a year.
Buzzards gotta eat, same as worms.
Alaska, like Siberia has a lot of room. And, more importantly, like Siberia, terrible transport, reducing the need for walls and guards. Walking away from a re-education facility is likely to be difficult.
I bowed out of the dating/banging game right before the Tinder era commenced. Back then, having at least a few friends and going out semi-regularly was enough to get laid pretty regularly. I’m several inches under 6 ft. tall and have shitty game, yet I still managed to slay lots of pussy in my youthful prime. And getting friend-zoned back then wasn’t a death sentence. If 9/10 hottie friend-zoned me, chances are she had a cute 6 or 7/10 friend who was eager to fuck me.
I feel really bad for Gen Z dudes today. If youthful me was in this era, I’d probably be an incel, or at least some chump lucky enough to score the occasional 3-4/10 porker. From everything I hear, things are absolutely terrible now except for natural alphas and looksmaxxing faggots who manage to fake it until they make it.
Today’s crop of hyper-entitled cunts who make up much of the young female population will only be brought down to earth and forced to once again settle for dudes at or a notch above their looksmatch level once there’s mass-layoffs of all those pointless girlboss office jobs they tend to work.
One Gen Z friend I talk to online pretty frequently is convinced that looks is all that matters in the dating market for men. He constantly gloats about how the black pill has surpassed the red pill. I can understand why they would think like that, going by the awful situation they’re in. Like so many other men his age, he himself has very little in-person experience with women so all he has to go on is incel forum talking points. When you haven’t experienced the mating dance yourself, then it’s nothing more than a bunch of spergy abstract theory. Every time I’ve tried to explain to him that women just need to be owned again he says it’s “cope” for men who aren’t good looking enough to have pussy effortlessly fall into their lap, LOL.
A lot of Gen Z men aren’t afforded the situation of being Alpha in any situation. In my own experience, being Alpha can be very situational, especially for a man who isn’t a natural. I could get all the female attention in one environment and be invisible in another. Also, a chick who wants your dick one day can be totally cold the next. In today’s situation where Becky (i.e Miss Average) will taking nothing less than Chad (8+/10), she will be cold to any man who doesn’t measure up to the grandiose delusions that feminism, pop culture, and dating apps have implanted into her consciousness. When there’s no longer any Chads available to Becky, then she will have to settle for Brad (average looking guy) and we will return to some semblance of sanity. Without dating apps, Chad will marry Stacy (hot chick) early on and not have the opportunity to assemble a revolving door harem.
If you got laid regularly with “shitty game” in any era in the US after the 80s you are sort of a natural Chad despite being short… or you had drugs. You are right that being friendzoned wasnt so bad.
Also the YOUNG zoomettes (like 24 at most) are actually the nicest most good natured least entitled etc etc that women have been since like 2010ish era raver girls.
No. This is your own demons talking, not reality.
“Shitty game” is not no game, nor is it anti-game. It’s been stated repeatedly here that bad game is still better than no game. On a practical level it means that instead of pulling around 1 out of 3, which is the success rate the veteran PUAs seem to have, you’ll be able to pull closer to 1 out of 100. That is not a good ratio, but it is a lot higher than 0 out of 100, especially if you’re practicing in or near a big city with a pool of several hundred thousand to a few million regularly out socially.
You can’t win if you don’t play. If lottery tickets had 1/100 odds but still paid out millions and cost only a few bucks then you’d be a fool not to play regularly.
The problem today, of course, is that the cost to play has been raised drastically, with many if not most of the casual hookup spaces being closed or trannified, and it being illegal to do most of what you need to do to pass a shit test, not to mention the constant surveillance and cock blocking by karens. So I sympathize with the black-pilled even though they’re still wrong. But this was definitely not the case in the 1980s, or even the 2000s. It didn’t come up until the mid 10s.
In the 90s and 00s you could go to any nightclub and pick up some tail without having to say a single word, just grinding on the dance floor with any chick willing, which again might be like 1/100 and you’d make an ass of yourself in the process but who cares. Usually the worst shit test you’d get from those women was “oh I’m just here to dance and have fun” which was possibly the most transparent lie ever told and trivially easy to blow past.
The cold approaching that the serious PUAs do is way harder to learn, and consequently has a better payoff of prettier girls with lower n-counts, but you don’t have to do cold approaches, or didn’t until very recently.
That guy (not saying he’s entirely meritless, insightless, qualityless or virtueless as his posts around the incipience of coronahoax seemed substantial) clearly just doesn’t understand game, doesn’t understand that game is the science of charisma & the science of applied game-theoretic evolutionary psychology, he’s probably not charismaless but does not apprehend how to apply that in a way that registers on the hypersensative & all-sensate female alpha radar, because he’s preselectionless & thus does not understand the subtilities of the female sosein let alone their Existenzialurteil/Seinsurteill of Men as women are incomparably alien after all, he’s clearly an invisible beta with no preselection, because he ingratiates himself with women & is obsequious to them hence they find him repellent.
He doesn’t understand that game is the science of commanding women, game is the evolutionary all-predicating behavioural science of being an asshole, of being alpha & of being the primordial killer apeman in the evolutionary ancestral environment which women are pre-coded to find irresistibly attractive
Game is commanding women so being an arrogant, cruel asshole works infallibly, we have a supedeficit of alpha due to the all-totalitarian demonic androcidal war on masculinity emasculating us all, so outcompeting other alphas & outmatching them isn’t necessary, even being an asshole to men isn’t necessary but it helps substantially if other men act terrified of you, grovel before you or appease you on an intuitional level, if other men act subjacent & subject to your authority & are commanded by you whether as thralls or if you just dominate them in interactions with women perceiving that through their supersensitive alpha radar works as they perceive that as the fear of you ingrained indissolubly in others, if they are your subordinates or just cringe in fear before you or are just afraid of you like all everyone was just terrified of Stalin after he had consolidated power around the timeline of the Great Purge.
What helps most of all is if you cheerfully terrorize & terrify women directly while being dauntless, dreadless, fearless, unquailing, unterrified, intrepid, impavid, indomitable, unflinching, unblenched, undismayed in front of others, being outcome independent on an absolute inconditionate level so finding all the omnicompossibilities of dreadful outcomes that can happen to you as trifling & meagre in front of your in invincible, invulnerable, unassailable, impregnable, unconquerable, inespugnabile, inconquistabile, invanquishable, unsubduable, undefeatable, inviolable might.
If he acted upset with women or just irrationally enraged towards them (In a stone cold furious, incense way) & behaved cruelly towards them due to infinite indignation, put them through illimitable austerities to please & soothe him, just was irrationally vicious towards them & put them through trials as well as just being boundlessly cruel-hearted towards them & punishing them not only will the shit tests be reduced enough to not leave a print but he’ll find it infinitely easier propertize women & own multiple women as his chaste unadulterated indissoluble & unforfeited property.
As he is he’s likely to die childless leaving nothing in this world & being doomed to damantio memoriae & lethean oblivesvence, not to mention since all joys are like an infinitesimal flyspeck in front of the sub species aeternorum joy of having your own patrimony & your own flesh & blood descendents as sempiternally cementitious representamen of your sempiternal patrimony, he’s likely to despair & self-destruct.
I suspect I am being overly harsh but he needs to learn to put women in their place & needs to learn to keep the pimp hand inexpugnably plenipotent, he needs to internalize the the pimp hand is Omnipluripotence-Decreed, Omniprovidence-Decreed, Omni-inexuperability-decreed to be unopposably, unimpeachably, inexpugnably, unimpugnably plenipotent.
Imo he should become a pimp then roam from continent to continent as some Insatiable, insatiate superalpha cad player prowling for his aeternitatis consort & aeternitatis servant among the excrementitous pile of measureless feculent sewage that is emancipated women, then he should hit on thousands of girls, date (I despise using that term) thousands in his sultanate harem with him as some supremum sultan/soldan and then he should beat them up for miscondut and throw them on the street as a lesson and eventually after an unimaginably higher notch count that the pitiful notch count he has now & after beating up thousands thots he should find himself a worthy aeviternally prized wife seculded from the globohomo-indoctrinated evils by then hell be infatigable, indefatigable, inextirpable as a superalpha after beating thousands of emancipated high status cuntwhores up (he should also take their money) the he’ll be naturally able to command her.
He needs to increase his notch count through deliberate cruelty only then will he perceive the boundless inexhaustible infinitudiem darkness in the hearts of women & only then will he be able to internalize the redpill (their hearts are really unimaginably dark & I’m shocked by how much blatant limitless mistreatment they including really high-status, high-born, high-bred, highly-cultivated 10/10 types put up with)
I have a difficultly believing this guy ever internalized the redpill after all, he has no experiential knowledge of game I just know that someone like him wouldn’t be able to punish female misbehaviour especially in its subtler forms hence shit tests escalate with his type and tend to turn into nuclear impassable shit tests (which he also won’t pass unless he’s really shows willingness to damn well kill her but I don’t advice him to even attempt to pass such shit tests not because I think he’s fortitudeless or gallantryless but because he will likely end up getting killed trying to pass them by some whiteknight in his vicinity if he doesn’t exercise judicious judgement as plenty of men have been killed due to failing nuclear shit tests & plenty frequently do end up perishing in an ever-exponentiating number in Asia especially where the gynoterror unimaginably potent still & the PUAs are equated & classified along with terrorists & traffickers)
Anyways he’s bluepilled & doomed to patrimonylessness & I have sympathies for those afflicted by globohomoo female emancipation but since he is so obstinate that he demonizes Men for relishing in the misery & slaughter of emancipated women (as he demonized that Kawaii kike guy among others in the past when they were making fun of emancipated cunts getting their just desserts through aeternal quietude & I’ve observed him do so on innumerable occasions whenever the redpill is discussed in the past, he ostensibly agrees with all the empirical redpilled observations but clearly can’t internalize them & can’t close his heart to pity for emancipated women), I doubt he will ever change his defectible ways.
Jesus christ use less words or shut the fuck up altogether.
Daddy Scarebucks is correct. “Shitty game” in my case means lots of missed opportunities, especially with chicks who were expecting me to make the first move. Easy lays for me were easy sluts who made the first move.
I had game, just not the best game. For example, I could never bring myself to cold approach. But if I was already acquainted with a woman (even just 10 mins of banter makes a huge difference and can result in a same-night bar hookup), I was alright at it. Also having a good wingman makes a huge difference.
Yeah I agree that the young zoomettes who aren’t constantly staring at their phones have way sweeter personalities than your average millennial chick. The vast majority of girls I banged were millennials and they were all “live and let live” libertines up until about 2014-2015 hit then so many of them did an about face and became frigid woke harpies.
Okay this all sounds right but yeah despite your short stature you sound like a natural chad. Trust me its better to be short than an autist. Find the nearest younger zoommette night spot (there aren’t many but they exist) they are amazingly nice compared to millenials since 2014-2015.
Undoubtedly true, as anyone who has been around the latter can attest, but there is an ocean between “autist” and “natural chad/alpha”.
I was there with Chadlite–not literally, I mean, not in the same place at the same time–but in any of a dozen other places that were essentially carbon copies of each other, around the same era. It just wasn’t that hard. The girls were easy, because they were literally out cruising for cock, why wouldn’t they be easy? The difference between being a natural alpha and a natural beta was that as a beta, you never flew solo, quality was an issue, marital prospects nonexistent (not that we cared about such things in our early twenties), and quite a lot of opportunities were missed or blown. Sometimes we’d go home alone or hook up with a fatty after last call, fatties back then being the universally-accepted last resort, usually only somewhat chubby rather than morbidly obese, and generally grateful for the attention rather than shrill and bitter bulldykes.
I wasn’t anything close to a natural alpha, and neither were the friends whom I usually went with, but we got by, because we were willing to put in a modicum of effort. The best deal was always to be wingman for someone who WAS a natural alpha, because they’d do all the hard work and all I had to do was pretend to be interested in the chick’s friends, agree and amplify everything the alpha said, and maybe have a few curated funny stories on auto-repeat. Easiest job in the world, and if the alpha succeeded in his pickup then there was a 50% chance the wingmen would get some too, which on a bad night might be wolf-ugly but were just as often only 1-2 points down from the primary.
Those days are gone now, and I’m sorry you missed out, but these doofy claims of “oh you had to be a chad to pull that off normal humans can’t do it” have to stop. The scene was totally full of average guys who missed way more often than they hit, that’s why it was and still is called “getting lucky”. You yourself like to go on about the rave chicks and how nice they were, and even though that peaked closer to 2000 than 2010, I still have to ask, what the hell were you doing to not get laid? It must have taken some serious, crippling anti-game, because with all the mdma in the mix, you could compress 20 minutes of what would later be called “kino escalation” down to a clumsy ten-second grope. Pop nightclubs were PUA game on easy mode, and raves were pop nightclubs on easy mode; the only way it can possibly be made any easier is arranged marriage.
The problem with those scenes wasn’t getting laid. The problem was low quality, burnout, substance abuse, hearing loss and a host of other problems that make vice, vice. For guys with even moderate ambition, it was hard on the body and even harder on the soul. But claims that you had to be a handsome chad to get laid are preposterous. We were there. I was there. You didn’t need muscles or a chiseled jawline and you didn’t need more than “I’m OK with who I am” levels of confidence.
Real talk, you’re more of a redlining sperg than a full-blown autist, and you should take that in the spirit intended, not as ball busting but as words of encouragement. Because unlike true autists, spergs do have a model of the outside world, albeit a distorted one, and can learn how to socialize and by extension learn game with sufficient effort. It is a lot like lifting weights, if you have crappy genes then you are never going to look like Arnold, maybe you can never look buff at all, but you can still look like your best self, which is 1000% better than some limp ball of flab and good enough for a lot of girls. As it is with masculine appearance, so it is with masculine behaviors. Autists are 100% positive that the world is wrong and can’t accept that they have any flaws; if you have the self-awareness to recognize you’re socially immature then you have the capacity to fix that IF you simply put in the effort.
fwiw, I came across roissy while I was learning to train hunting retrievers.
it was truly funny to see most of the behaviors roissy discussed; show up in training my lab; e.g. the difference between a challenge to authority and just being a spaz because the executive function was overloaded or tired.
it also gave me some emotional distance when seeing stuff play out that you can’t normally learn with people.
I expect the training part of forcing your will on an uncooperative but, wanting to be led subject is the key skill.
The claim that you need topflight games comes from people who want to charge you for learning it.
The most important part of game is being willing to do it at all, which in today’s world requires a fair bit of confidence and courage.
And it also requires a fair bit of confidence that it is morally right to do it, which is why the left tends to be so bad at it.
I see a lot of people making very heavy going on stuff that seems effortless and easy to me when I do it. The difference is that I internalized patriarchy as morally right, so naturally act in accordance with the natural order, while they struggle against the natural order.
Yeah, in my experience, once you start overthinking things, everything goes to shit. Women’s attraction really is pre-rational; this kind of thing can’t really be sperged into a D&D ruleset. You’re right too that confidence is likely the most important factor when it comes to determining vaginal hydration levels. Women can instantly attune themselves to what I like to call “sovereignty signals.” They don’t rationally think about this at all, it just happens. In other words, this is a man giving off a “I fucking own this place and I don’t give a shit what anyone else thinks of that” vibe. After a few drinks (and being in the right environment) that kind of thing came much easier to me.
My favorite and most ridiculous bar hookup was one evening many many moons ago I was partying at a friend’s place just a few blocks from my town’s main hipster dive bar bar. I left my friends place already pretty sloshed and cycled a few blocks over to the bar. I never even went in, just hung out on the patio and had other people brining me drinks. Within like three minutes I had some shortie chick I never met before with a great ass all up in my face. She was (performatively?) being a total bitch and for the life of me I can’t remember what sort of things I had said to her in response, but within a few minutes she was attacking my mouth with her tongue. Suddenly, my ratchet skank housemate (at the time) appeared and pathetically tried to cockblock this quickly-escalating encounter, “Chadlite, WTF are you doing? You have a girlfriend!!” I shooed her away and within minutes I was telling the new chick, “let’s get the hell out of here already.” She nodded.
We had both cycled there so it was logical that we both cycle together back to her place. Then we banged multiple times throughout the wee hours of the morning. Was funny, after the first session she suddenly out of the blue started grilling me on my political beliefs. I thought that was odd, as at that time much of the art hoe scene wasn’t all that politically-minded. Anyway I quickly found out she was the ringleader of some local lefty activist group. Of course, I found all of that blissfully uninteresting. “Yeah, whatever, wanna go again?” Hours later that morning I left hungover as hell and quickly forgot about the encounter. When I got home I realized, “oh damn, that right, I do have a girlfriend.” Though that relationship had grown cold (another story altogether) and a few weeks later we mutually broke things off. Anyway, those same few weeks later I ran into shortie hot ass chick at some party and she looked like a train was about to hit her the moment she spotted me. No, not because I’m freigtening, but because she had her cuck bf in tow. She immediatley did a “shhhhush” sign over her mouth and I instantly understood the situtaiton and then went on pretending I didn’t know her.
What’s the point of me relaying this tl;dr historical field report? It’s that, from everything I can remember from the encounter, much of it was sprurned on by reptilitan-brained shit. I showed up that night not giving a shit if I got laid that night, I was just having fun and being myself. There’s nothing like putting out thrist signs that instantly dries up a pussy. Thirst means you don’t own anything, you’re just another chump desperate for scraps. Females want a man who can control territory. Secured territory means a safer place to raise children. Material provisions are much less important, as they can secure resources through different sources. Betabux can only procreate when there’s rules in place to restrict women’s resource-provisioning strategies.
Anyway, I miss the good old days before third wave feminuttery ruined everything.
If this was true, I would be in trouble. Looks get your foot in the door, make it a way way easier to meet girls — but ten minutes after you have met her, looks do not matter all that much.
I know a man who gets paid to allow people to put his face on their products. I have seen shopgirls leave their counters and walk up to him the street and start talking to him. Which is unbelievably amazing. But his success rate is rather less than amazing.
True, but size matters, even 10 minutes after you have met her. Big, tall men have an advantage over small men.
Women want a man who can compel them. That implies a minimum size and stength in addition to a mindset.
they dont want a fag that exudes no confidence, which believer it or not is most complainers, just practice
While looks matter don’t matter much once you are a quarter of an hour into in to interacting with a woman, height just matters and goes on mattering. You just have to be big enough to scare them.
This is true. I could never compete in the height department. I had very good looks in my prime but those looks got me low-effort sexual encounters with 5s, 6,s and the occasional 7. If I was 6ft or taller, those would have been regular hookups with 7s, 8s, and the occasional 9. There were a few chicks TALLER than me who were totally into me, but I consider those to be weird outlier cases. I learned that when as a man you don’t have the stature or personality to intimidate women, they still might be attracted to you for entertainment value. But that tends to not have much longevity; they have their fun and move onto the next dick of the week.
The girls I really really wanted I could never get, but if I had decent game (see below), I could have probably bagged maybe one or two of them. The ones I thought were cute but otherwise indifferent towards were the easy lays.
One time at a job years ago, a really hot coworker I had one day sexually propositioned me out of the blue, and in a very straightforward way. I didn’t know how to react at the time (I was bluepilled as hell back then), but in retrospect she was obviously prompting me to use force on her and drag her by the hair to the nearest bathroom to fulfill her momentary lust (I had consistently been a flirtatious dickhead to her). Plus I had a gf at the time, though that hadn’t stopped me from cheating on her in the past.
That missed opportunity still haunts me to this day, as she was one fine piece of ass. Man, workplace flirtation (before the metoo HR mass hysteria happened) was endless loads of fun. Coincidentally, I first became acquainted with game after I finally broke up with that longterm gf. A female friend suggested I get this book all about the PUA scene and its methodologies. I had never heard of this before, but my curiosity was piqued, so I dove in. And that was my gradual introduction in the manosphere. At that point was still about 5 years off from abandoning progressivism and becoming right wing. I had no aversion to learning about game though, as the politically correct side of leftism never ever appealed to me. Even back when I still thought that socialism was a good idea, I valued my freedom to enjoy making racist and sexist jokes. I remember that in 90s and 00s leftism, locker room humor from men was still quite acceptable. Remember that Trump’s little quip about grabbing chicks by the pussy was an apolitical type of joke up until the gamergate era suddenly happened. And then it was no longer funny. And then flirting in the workplace was all of a sudden a reason to be pulled into the HR inquisition room.
born with looks, cant change em, but can get out of your basement, shower teeth hair nice clothes, most cant even grok this, stop being a slovenly slug, youre now better than 30% of the male pop.
quit whining, now youre better than 40% of the male pop.
get a job and a place, clean your place, now youre better than 50% of the male pop and have become eminently fuckable on a whim.
now to fuck, you need to talk, if you cant talk, you need to practice talking, with women, to practice talking wit women u need to go where women are, church, bookstore, library, university, park, grocery. hey you, comment on whatever they’re doing buying, end with a question, make up ridiculous stuff, it dont matter, talk.
there are 1000+ women near you, nothing but practice, churn n burn the talk and the digits till you get laid, aint no big deal so dont make it one.
now after you get laid, i personally advocate banging that one for a while, or maybe one more, then going for ltr, not with those because rarely works out unless youre both virgins or some type of special keeping you together, but the next ones.
yes, PUA videos help, but only if you’re going out and practicing talking.
talk, next, talk, next, talk, next… bang… ltr… kidlife
u were programmed to do this, quit obscuring it and go get it
Nuts.
Bullshit.
Nonsense. Are you gay?
All of that is helpful, but it is not sufficient, nor is it necessary. It matters, but, like good looks, it does not matter much.
If you have all of that, not sufficient to get laid. If you have none of that, not so great an obstacle to prevent you from getting laid.
Height matters more than all of those put together, and courage and confidence matters more than height. How do you think we managed to reproduce when we were swinging through the trees, and women have not changed much since then. The mating dance is pre-verbal and pre-rational.
[*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
Anarchonomicon has an interesting essay on author John Norman, who’s fiction books are very politically incorrect by feminist standards.
https://www.anarchonomicon.com/p/the-banned-fantasy-novels-feminists
this something I always struggled with.
I prefer to watching old movies that correctly show the mating dance
like Gone with the wind and john wayne movies , as it show an old form of male and female mating dance
The Dance likely to be botted and trojaned in some future topia via Alexa’s AI descendants or some shit
https://x.com/charliebcurran/status/2085348949498732888