If you do not perform the mating dance correctly, will not have sex, family, children, and grandchildren.
Men conquer and women surrender, but men perform and women choose.
Women are frightened by male attention. They don’t want it and they do want it. They are afraid of it and run away, and they desire it and pursue it. They are only sexually excited by men who scare them.
When a man meets a woman who he sexually desires, his natural impulse is to be nice to her, and to put her at her ease. When a woman meets a man who she sexually desires, her natural impulse is to hit him with a shit test, to give him a hard time, to be aggressive and hostile. They want to see what a man is made off, just as a man wants to look at her boobs. If a woman retreats from attention, this indicates that fear and discomfort has outweighed sexual desire. If she is aggressive, this indicates that desire has outweighed fear and discomfort. If she is nice, you are likely being friendzoned.
Which means that boys are apt to find female behavior confusing and stressful. Outright rejection is distressing, and, in an environment where a shit test is apt to be backed by state violence, a shit test is terrifying and you are likely to fail. Which is even more distressing, plus you might go to jail.
It is striking that those women who are most feminist, most indignant about patriarchy, most likely to call the cops on you for sexual harassment, sexual assault, rape, and all that me too stuff, the ones who tell us that what they actually want is sensitive men who share the housework and all that, are the ones thirstiest for men who are cruel, dangerous, and violent, or for men who can plausibly create the appearance of being dangerous, the girls most contemptuous to nice guys, most hostile to nice guys, and most dangerous to nice guys, being apt to respond to niceness with claims of sexual harassment, sexual assault, and all that. It is precisely the feminists who are usually the ones cruising for a beating and a banging. The feminists say they want kind, emotionally, available, and respectful men who communicate well. Perhaps they believe it, but if you fall for that, they will probably wind up charging you with rape and all that, and believing that also. Women are drawn to dominant, confident, risk taking males, and want a man who can and will dominate them, and dominate them even though it is exceedingly dangerous to do so. Women like to believe they have tamed a monster.
Women say, and believe, they want a man who is kind, sensitive, gentle, and communicates well. What she actually wants is a serial killer who is kind, sensitive, gentle, and communicates well, who threatens to kill her and abducts her to hold her hostage. Women want fried ice.
If you empower women to protect them from bad men, who will protect them from themselves?
And if you empower women, you disempower men, and women just do not want sex, or love, or children, or family, from a disempowered man. We see a massive drop in female desire for love, family, marriage, and children, because woman just do not want powerless husbands.
And at the same time, we see a massive drop in male testosterone and sperm production levels, and an unprecedented outbreak of erectile dysfunction among young men, because they are frightened and emasculated.
A woman is incapable of being attracted to a man who does not frighten her. Most men are incapable of being attracted to a woman who frightens them.
And, similarly, men who have internalized a belief in female equality, or consider it inescapable and unavoidable because feminism has heavy handed state backing, are giving up on irl sex and going their own way. A ship and a household has to have one captain. Men try egalitarian relationships, they blow up, men give up on having a relationship with a woman.
Men are giving up, and women are losing interest.
Girls like to play games over text. Participating in these games will get you nowhere, because you are competing with the man who is six foot six, has six pack abs, and a six figure income. The difference between you and him, however, is that he is probably not going to show up physically for Miss Average. Remember that a male who is physically present is a thousand times as scary as a male somewhere out over the internet, and women are attracted to men who scare them, so to have a fair chance at a woman, you have to be present in person. So, you keep the network communications to the absolute minimum needed to organize an irl meeting. Interacting over the internet in excess of this is a losing game. Over the internet, a woman is going to exposed to a whole lot of men who are six foot six, have six pack abs, a six figure income, and a dick like whole salami, which they will show her. She is not going to be exposed to too many such men irl, so irl, you have a shot. Women on the apps are looking for attention and validation, and the more they get, the more they despise the men who give it to them. Keep them on short rations. Most women like to have ten guys chasing them over the internet that they have no intention of ever meeting. They keep your message unopened for a long time so that they have lot of pending notifications on their phone. A pile of unopened notifications is a status symbol she can use against her friends. If you cannot make irl contact quickly , more chats are not going to help.. You merely going to be ammunition in woman’s war on women.
Of course, in a society where women are free to fuck Mister One in Thirty, most men are not going to have sex, family, children and grandchildren anyway, but it seems that about two thirds of young men are unable to perform the mating dance in the first place.
Under today’s extremely adverse conditions — (the economy is run by men who hate you and want to ruin you and are willing to set their own wealth on fire provided yours burns also, interaction between men and women is governed by Karen HR land whales who want to cockblock males from hitting on any women other than themselves, and Miss Average is free to fuck thirty different Mister One in Thirtys) — you are going to be pushing shit uphill even if you do know the mating dance, but if you do not know the mating dance, you are toast.
A woman wants a man who will make her do stuff, whether it is a long walk on the beach, a sandwich, or picking up his clothes, washing them, hanging them on the line, and then folding and sorting them. Despite emancipation and all that, that is still what they want, that being the ancestral environment of successful reproduction. It is just that emancipation has made it far more difficult and dangerous to give women what they want, what they are going to harshly shit test you into giving them. The more feminist and emancipated a woman is, the thirstier she is for what emancipation and feminism have denied her.
Without male authority, women become tense, unhappy, neurotic, and depressed. Women and dogs need a master. Women are angry and getting angrier, because men keep failing shit tests, and men keep failing shit tests because often they can only passed by measures that constitute sexual harassment, domestic violence, sexual assault, and so on and so forth. And the leftist feminist women are angrier, and their shit tests harsher, they can only be passed by considerably greater violence and illegality than those of right wing conservative women. As a result, while the fertility rate of conservative women is, horrifyingly, a mere 1.8, the fertility rate of leftist women is, even more horrifyingly, something like 0.3 or 0.5.
The more feminist the woman, the more she cruises for actual violence and rape. I don’t understand why. It does not make sense to me. The more conservative the women, the less dangerous and drastic the measures necessary to pass the shit test, while feminist women require stuff that is seriously dark and disturbing. You can pass a conservative woman’s shit test without doing anything morally wrong, though you may well have to do things that the state and state sponsored feminism might think wrong, but passing a leftist woman’s shit test is likely to need some messed up stuff.
When the male or the female bungles their role in the dance, the other party is likely to see it as icky at best, and as flat out rejection at worst.
OK, back when we were reproducing successfully how was it done?
https://corruptingknowledge.substack.com/p/the-human-mating-dance CorruptingKnowledge argues that the female is the sexually proactive sex. Which on the face of it seems like an absurdity and blatant nonsense. Trouble is, he is trying to communicate in words that which cannot be communicated in words, and so everything he says is necessarily and unavoidably untrue, confusing, and misleading.
We have to be shown, not told.
The old Walt Disney Cartoon “the moth and the flame” shows the mating dance in symbolic, cartoon, exaggerated, and simplified form, making it readily understandable.
What the Walt Disney Cartoon shows is that female sexual behavior has to be controlled, or they will destroy society.
In the cartoon Disney has a bunch of moths representing male society, has a romance between the Hot Chick Moth, and the mister beta bucks, husband material, nice guy, boyfriend moth, and the flame, Alpha Male Flame. Mister Beta Bucks Nice Guy moth gives hot chick moth less attention that she desires, and she senses the performance that Alpha Male Flame is putting on, so she puts on her own performance, which literally sets the house on fire.
All the actions — Alpha Male Flame burning down the house and continually almost killing Hot Chick, the male moths preventing house from burning down, Nice Guy Moth repeatedly rescuing hot chick moth from Alpha Male Bad Boy Mister Very Wrong Flame are performed by males. Were a feminist to analyze this cartoon, she would tell us that Hot Chick Moth is merely a prize that sets events in motion, an object, not a person. Hot Chick Moth, however, instigated everything. Even though she engaged in no actions at all, she is the one that quite deliberately causes all the actions. In this sense, women are the proactive sex. Hot Chick Moth wanted the drama, and quite intentionally sets it in motion. She intended the drama, the danger, and most of all, intended the danger to herself.
This is intelligible when Disney shows it, but utter nonsense when CorruptingKnowledge attempts to tell it. It has to be shown, not told. Also, Disney is clearly telling us that female sexuality is dangerous, explosive, uncontrollable, and nonetheless needs to be controlled, for the good of society, for the good of men, and for the good of women, while CorruptingKnowledge, despite telling us that women are retarded and need to be beaten every day, tends to mess up an become unintelligible when explaining facts that imply that women need to be unemancipated, that female domestic, reproductive, and sexual services need to be the property of males, that women are not fit stewards of their own bodies. Every so often he is sufficiently purple pilled to make a topic that is already very difficult to understand entirely incomprehensible.
What CorruptingKnowledge means is true, but what he actually says is, unfortunately, ludicrously false, because of limits of speech in explaining game.
This is a near universal problem in the Red Pill community, since they are all namefags, and terrified of being cancelled, deplatformed, and demonetized. Or, like the Tate brothers charged with rape, human trafficking, etcera.
I remember a time when older people knew this stuff, but it could not be said, and so very few younger people learned it. And then those older people, the heroic World War II generation, the people who came of age before 1914, died off, and no one knew it, except a few like myself who were exposed to the fading remnants of the older civilization during their coming of age.
And then the PUA community rediscovered the mating dance and female nature, but trouble is, it is difficult to explain, and is still dangerous to explain it entirely plainly.
Of course Hot Chick Moth’s sexual proactivity is cartoonishly exaggerated, and thus easy to see. Real life sexual proactivity is a bit subtler. Even I often fail to notice it, and a lot of men are much more oblivious than I am. Thus, for example, if a chick is cruising for a day pickup in the street, she wears sexy and conspicuous clothing, ambles slowly or remains stationary in place, and continually looks around. Because she is dressed sexy, men will look at her, and because she continually looks around, from time to time, their eyes will meet. She then looks away, quickly, but not too quickly, and what the man is supposed to do is quickly respond with a big smile before she looks away. You have to be quick, you cannot afford to wait to see if she is going to take her time about looking away. When the man smiles, she smiles back, then looks away, and the man is supposed to walk up and say hello. So ostensibly the man is being sexually proactive and the female is not, though in reality this is not necessarily true.
If the woman is sexually attracted when you say hello, she is going to hit you with a shit test. I see mgtow influencers complaining how some woman was nasty to them for no reason. They should be asking themselves why tsundere is such a trope in anime. It noticeable that it is the younger and handsomer mgtow influencers that have this complaint.
The Tates explain the mating dance and female nature rather more plainly that most, and as a result, are now facing flagrantly bogus rape charges. The reason that they are now being extradited to the most oppressive tyranny in the developed world is: sound advice. The “conservatives” that hate the Tates for “undermining traditional conservative values” also hate Trump for “undermining traditional conservative values”. These never were conservative values, and these “conservatives” never were conservatives. Those who blame men for the misbehavior of women have seeking the overthrow and destruction of our civilization for two centuries. They are pissed by Tate defending the double standard, because women being equal to and interchangeable with men is supposedly a conservative value.
The problem has always been that women are incompetent to make exercise sexual choice at any age. It is not their fault, and it is not the fault of the men they bang. It is the fault those who should have kept them under control letting them get out of control. In Walt Disney’s little cartoon, “the moth and the flame”, whose fault is it that the house catches fire? That cartoon expresses actual conservative values. It is the failure to exercise care, supervision, and control over hot chick moth, which she correctly feels is failure to cherish.
The trouble, however, with Andrew Tates advice, is that he spends ninety percent of your time telling you that ninety percent of women are having sex with one percent of men, so therefore you should pay him money to learn to be one those one percent. It is all infomercial with far more commercial than information. You are not going to get useful information about game from talking heads. Text gives you better information, because the people writing text know you are not going slog through a never ending commercial.
Of course he not being persecuted for never ending commercials — he is persecuted for stuff like this, and this
The PUA lifestyle, winning at the game of players and bitches, the promised reward for giving the talking heads money, actually is not that great, as demonstrated by the very high burnout rate. No matter how alpha you are, there is always someone more alpha than you. A rotating collection of whores is not a harem. The point of owning more than one women is to own more than one woman. Hence burnout.
But all this is still only words, and actually understanding what these words mean is difficult if you do not already understand what they mean.
Talking heads are useless for learning game. The one area where the video form is actually useful is field reports. Before and after reading about game, watch field reports.
Correct performance is pre verbal and pre rational, ill suited for a blog post.
To understand the words, you need to see the thing, and to understand what you see, then you need the words.
Video links on odyssee
And males and females are being indoctrinated by media, by school, and by HR in the workplace, that performing their role properly is horrible, shocking, and icky — plus men, who take the actively proactive role, are told that performing the actively proactive role in the dance will get them fired, shamed, financially ruined, and imprisoned, and women, who take the superficially seemingly passively proactive role in the dance, are firmly discouraged from doing so — see all the Karens complaining about PickMe.
A whole lot of women drop hints on a man that he should ask her over to his place, and he does not ask her over, and she concludes he does not actually want to fuck her, or he already has a woman at his place, or he does not have a place and has no room in his life for a woman to perform the role of wife, when in fact the problem was that he was mighty slow to take a hint. I have been slow enough often enough, and I am way better than most men at picking up on female signals.
Sometimes, very rarely, a woman, frustrated by continual failure to get an invite, will just show up and start doing wife stuff, but she is never going to say in so many words “Hey, can I come over to your place for some privacy with you.” She wants an invite — or better still to be commanded, or better still, to be carried off, or better still, forcibly carried off by a alpha male and his lieutenants, and then delivered the place of one of them — she is surprisingly comfortable with the alpha male assigning her to one of lieutenants. But when a woman gets forcibly carried off, it is usually a result of her rather patiently and persistently trying to get carried off and targeting one particular alpha male to carry her off. The movie “High Plains Drifter” depicts Callie Travers and Sarah Belding playing that role in the dance.
In a leking species, the males do sexual display to attract females, so males brightly colored, extravagantly ornamented, and all that. In species that form families, the females tend to be showy, to attract male support and protection.
And we are subject to massive media and criminalization offensive intended to disrupt, in part because of Karens engaged in intrasexual competition.
Mating is failing for nineteen men out of twenty.
Tom Torero and Johnny Berba committed suicide — because namefags, and psychologically frail, came under attack, plus burnout.
Tom Torero took his own life after he had been “canceled” and publicly shamed.
If you reject societal and cultural norms, and do not have religion, you get tend to get lost, particularly when burnout hits — faith solves this problem. You turn back to older, saner, and healthier cultural norms.
Nick Krauser complains of Tom Torero not giving him credit.
https://rumble.com/search/all?q=Nick%20Krauser
The PUA text pages have a huge amount of information on minimaxing game, because they needed a never ending stream of content, but this is kind of irrelevant, for what is needed is not to do it as well as possible, but to do it at all.