The richest man in the world, Elon Musk, is currently in a power struggle with Yoel Roth, the former head of Trust & Safety at Twitter who is featured prominently in the “Twitter Files†released by Elon Musk.
Yoel Roth is a Jewish faggot. That he is a Jew and a faggot is in his bio. As head of Trust and Safety, he displayed a strangely relaxed attitude to child sexual exploitation material on twitter, which would lead one to expect he is a pederast.
Further, all faggots are pederasts and all straights are “paedophiles” for a straight is attracted to youth and indications of fertility, regardless of chronological age, thus attracted to all fertile age females, regardless of chronological age, while faggots find breasts repulsive and youth attractive, thus are attracted to men and to children below fertile age regardless of the sex of the child. Which does not necessarily prove that they acting on that attraction, but Yoel Roth considered accusations of grooming “unsafe”, while somehow considering grooming to be safe.
As head of Trust and Safety, he not only suppressed information on the dangers of the jab, and the truth about Global Warming, but also suppressed information on the dangers of child sexual transition. Child sexual transition is very much in the interests of pederasts.
The current epidemic of gender confusion in schools reflects the interests of pederasts running them. Marriage was destroyed in large part so that professors could get pussy. Now childhood is being destroyed so that faggots can get ass.
[…] The shape of our enemy […]
Marriage was destroyed so that professors could get pussy? I’d like to hear more about this. Professors may have slept with female students back in the day, but to attempt do so now seems like it would risk serious consequences, requiring more balls than most professors have today. Although maybe tenure is enough to protect them?
From wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_education_in_the_United_States
“In 1900, there were 85,338 female college students in the United States and 5,237 earned their bachelor’s degrees; by 1940, there were 600,953 female college students and 77,000 earned bachelor’s degrees.”
First and second wave feminism with the end result there are more women getting bachelor degree’s then men. The next generation doesn’t get the joke and so we get third wave feminism and the professors stop being laid.
The profs are still getting laid they just have to be careful to only choose the women most invested in the academia system. They’re now being affirmatively acted even into hard sciences.
It probably isn’t the cause but it’s real. Administration is not interested in destroying profs who have connections to other profs and admins. They want to destroy fratboys who intend to leave the academia system for business and dont have academic connections.
There were no consequences back in the seventies or eighties. Holiness spiraling on “consent” led to consequences.
But the fall of marriage as far as legal measures came mainly at two points in American life.
1850s: Abolition of coverture (women still didn’t start going to college for about 70 years with rare exceptions though I guess radcliffe and wellesley college existed around 30 years after).
1960s-1970s: Favorable divorce laws for women (and lots of propaganda) and more cultural acceptance of divorce (though divorce statistically was sort of briefly acceptable for USO marriages after WWII as 1946-47-48 divorce rates were close to modern levels before falling back to very low levels in the 1950s until the 1960s) and women had already started going to college before then. And as you said until sexual harassment and the strange ideas about consent came about in the late 80s banging female students was fine (the worst changes to laws regarding women are ALWAYS when feminist and beta McChristian tradcucks are persuaded to cooperate).
So based on the timeline I’m not sure how much blame you can put on the professoriate… and not on the grounds of getting pussy the 1st change there was no pussy for them (and brothels were omnipresent and cheap then anyway) with the 2nd change they already had female students for pussy and things quickly got worse after the divorce laws changed.
In 1839 Patriarchy started to get abolished:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhYF4UBDHwM
Before the abolition of Coverture. The role of the Father is already starting to get dismantled.
Feminism had it’s start in the 19th century and some time before officially:
https://academic.oup.com/book/1486/chapter/140922123
Are you black? That you video you linked to “Black Male Studies and Dr. Curry mentioned in a Major Book” isn’t anything a White man would post. That would explain a lot of your weird behavior. You’re not intelligent enough to read between the lines when it comes Haiti but you don’t seem to a be a shill.
The video is pretty much spot on, but it’s unlikely you could have found it from a causal search.
No
I was filled with rage when I typed that comment. Like this massacre wasn’t avenged like the Spartacus revolt was.
WTF were the French doing the 200 years since then after Napoleon? At least the Israelites remembered what Amalek did.
>WTF were the French doing
The Germans were a far more pressing and immediate concern to the French. What happened on some misbegotten island was of little concern.
Then there were the historical rivals across the channel, and the quagmires of the Italians, and don’t forget the Spaniards to the south west.
Haiti provide what exactly? Sugar? Good thing beets exists.
The Americans also made it clear that Continental influences in the new world where not welcomed either. Spain learned that lesson the hard way with losing New Spain.
The British owned the Caribbean 1805-1945.
Haiti genocide wasn’t exactly British style, but what’s done is done.
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1601894132573605888
If Musk represents the war faction, looks like there’s a power grab in action. The stuff with the funny black hitler-was-cool guy is probably related. If azow naughtzies are indeed the nato speartip, indeed the highest morale and most loyal troops, war faction would know, and war faction would want to cultivate the naughtzies in the rest of nato.
I’m personally in favor of this. As jim says, war is a stern teacher, but a good one. Network war could very well be the catalyst needed for a new kind of Caesar to actually take power, instead of total spiral into trannie sevel kill stele.
The military faction is not the war faction, though the military contractor faction is a different war faction than the holy tranny global bugman faction.
War under our current leadership and military state and given long built up hatred of the US from many parts of the world… and Russian nukes… the result could be an Assyrian style annihilation…
Nuclear exchange is cool and all but you need boots on the ground here to actually do anything but kill concentrated blue hairs, h1bs and nignogs. US is hated by Eurasia, the neighbors of Eurasia prefer america to being ruled over by russia or china. They see the latter as a more existential threat, and for the neighbors of china that is probably a wise assessment of their prospects under yellow dominion. There won’t be some coalition invading north america, I can tell you that much at least. If nukes really do fly, I couldn’t tell you much about the end result of politics in america, but I can tell you eurasia is more interested in subjugating its neighboring states than the sheer civilizational effort of a full extermination of heartland americans. Can you imagine fighting through anchorage or san fran into denver? Or somehow making your way up the mississippi into ohio? Those are the last places it seems we even have real fighters, there’s just no way.
What do you make of muskrat being allowed to say and do all the things he’s said and done lately? He has to have major backing on all of this, at the very least to prevent alphbets giving him a friendly hello.
No idea exactly what happened behind the scenes or why this was allowed, i mean theoretically could contact my old friend Alex Spiro to get some information but im very much not willing to do that because I dont think any good for him or Musk could come about it and at best Spiro would think i was a crazy asshole (hes that himself but he was a great guy) for contacting him out of the blue after many years to get him to tell me non public information about a client.
You make your own choices and I will always back you (though I will be a whiny debate opposition, as the prophecy for-tells), but you should consider that at some point, fate may demand you reach out, possibly to transfer some very powerful memes that will give Them the awareness of options they don’t realize they have.
I know you opposed the academic document proposal, and I understand your reasoning, but imagine the power of being able to hand someone distilled, crystalized, and compact Jimian Christianity. I submit that it’s at least worth considering.
If I have a VERY good reason to try to send an email to my old friend (who no doubt has no damn time in the aftermath of the twatter takeover anyway, he was a “high powered” attorney before but hes probably doing 18 hour days now) I will… but other than Elon messing up the way Trump was messing up in the Covid situation to the extent that I KNOW its the case I’m not going to do that.
Conquering the US and Canada is easy. Just stop guarding the southern border and let the entire third world flood in and devour the continent like a swarm of locusts. Best of all, the Democrats are already doing this for you!
Destruction is not the same thing as conquest. And, ironically, the poz flowing out of the US has become so strong that most of Latin America is now sub-replacement tfr itself from sheer cultural assimilation.
Which is why Soros and company are now busing Africans through Mexico to invade the US.
In the coming years I will much enjoy watching grainy cellphone videos of the enablers of this invasion pleading to the invaders, through a mouth full of blood and broken teeth, “No, stop! I’m not white, I’m Jewish — I’m on your side!”
Better hope the chosen invaders aren’t of the muslim sort.
Yeah, because non-Muslim Africans are natural conservatives who will make America great again.
Muslims are at least theoretically capable of surviving amidst the ruins of the downfall and building their own civilization to compete with anything amerikaners manage to raise. Africans are not.
After civilization contracepts itself out of existence, D and C climate zones will be inhabited by Amish farmers, B zones by Muslim goat-herders, and A zones by naked savages chasing each other through the jungle with pointy sticks. Muslims are naturally suited to herding, not farming; their calendar doesn’t even align with the seasons!
Maybe civilization will rise again, maybe not. Tribalism solves the woman problem, the faggot problem, the Jew problem, and the nigger problem in one fell swoop, but it cannot launch space probes, discover new cancer drugs, or maintain paved roads between cities.
@Fidelis
There’s a faction within the Pentagon that backs Elon Musk because he is a techlord.
And from that, Elon Musk currently has the ability to destroy every single military satellite in orbit.
At some point this faction is going to be removed or liquidated, or is going to remove or liquidate all the other factions.
Do you think they have what it takes?
I see reasons to have hope from the words, mere words!, spouted from muskrat. Name the enemy, in the vulgate: wokism; he has done it. Bring a faith to a holy war, he has a faith backing him that excites and energizes normie engineer types. Scattered footage keeps coming out from speeches he gives to troops, and it looks like he prefers to speak to pale face fighting troops.
I don’t think muskrat is alone in this, there’s some network behind him giving support. It’s not the moment yet where they can mass arrest and inquisition those opposing the imperator infinita marium, so we cannot know the capability, but the mere words lately have been enough to give me a spoonful of faith that some powerful faction knows the enemy.
Does Elon have what it takes? Yes. Does the faction supporting him? Hard to say until it’s kill or be killed.
The best fire is a banked fire; constantly fed and kindled with care, but obscured from view and protected from the ever changing winds.
We, you and I and others, sit in a dark wood, our backs to our fires, feeling its warmth but averting our gaze from its hypnotic brilliance, for even the tiniest flame can dazzle dark stained eyes, and we stare all around at nothing but the sickly illumination of the black stars of Carcosa.
We feel alone, like the only tended fire in an evil wood stretched wide over a bleak expanse, and in this solitude, the fear rises that we tend the last and only fire, the last flickering tongues of hope.
Fear not. Your fire is but one of thousands, banked and fed, obstructed and nurtured, kindled and biding a time when we will fill our horns with flame and march.
Feed your fire. Keep it both secret and safe. Keep it ever at your back so you may spy that time when one day soon, the fires rise.
Yoel Roth wrote his university PhD dissertation, “Gay Data”, on Grindr and why Grindr should let teenage boys on. It used to be available at https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1985/ but has recently been removed without explanation. You can see the old page at https://archive.vn/D7l7d , sadly archive doesn’t manage to get the linked PDF. So I’m going to assume he’s hiding it because he has something to hide, it’s that bad, the dubiously-sourced hostile excerpts and anon accusations are correct, and he really said those things.
If Roth wants to prove me wrong, he’s welcome to contact the university about putting it up again.
Example of dubiously-sourced hostile excerpt from Roth’s dissertation, via anon sources:
> In September 2014, a seropositive man was charged with sexual assault after admitting to having sex with a 15-year-old on at least four occasions – including one instance of unprotected sex without having disclosed his serostatus. In April 2015, another man was charged with sexual abuse of a child after he met and sexually assaulted a 14-year-old he met on Grindr.
> In each case, public accounts of the assaults are framed in largely the same way:
older, predatory men take advantage of impressionable, naive teenagers who have stumbled their way onto Grindr. The Grindr app becomes a hotbed for this type of predation, and both the individuals involved and the service itself are held to task. The District Attorney responsible for prosecuting the 2015 case suggested that such incidents were bound to become more common as social networking services like Grindr continue to rise in popularity; the possibility for abuse, he argued, is “the drawback of modern technology.”
> These accounts echo many of the classic tropes of online child safety narratives: the essentially dangerous nature of new media; the need to impose strict, top-down controls on how minors use the internet; a digital reincarnation of “stranger danger” in the figure of the older male sexual predator; and the importance of raising children to be safety-savvy and highly private. Yet, absent from these discussions is even a cursory recognition that the new medium of gay-targeted social networking may be a crucial social outlet for gay, bisexual, and questioning youth.
> It’s worth considering how, if at all, the current generation of popular sites of gay networked sociability might fit into an overall queer social landscape that increasingly includes individuals under the age of 18. Rather than merely trying to absolve themselves of legal responsibility or, worse, trying to drive out teenagers entirely, service providers should instead focus on crafting safety strategies that can accommodate a wide variety of use cases for platforms like Grindr – including, possibly, their role in safely connecting queer young adults.
End excerpt. “Crucial social outlet”, says the man looking at gay sex hookup app. I also want to draw attention to that “or worse” in the last paragraph. If this is true, the man’s so obsessed with getting boy ass, he thinks keeping 14-year-olds off the gay sex hookup app is worse than criminal liability.
It’s on libgen.
If he hadn’t been a homo he could never have gotten that job. Jewishness no longer sufficient. Revealed preference of the procedural outcome. Like that DOE guy. State mandated. Gotta think.
H.O.G.
F.O.G.
P.O.G.
Paging Dr. Hyde.
If power is to be centralized with the intelligence agencies as indeed it was (I was right again about the intel agencies being the coordinating and enforcement mechanism to make big media speak with one voice) its useful to install gays… gays all commit horrible unacceptable acts (the post 2010 myth of gays as some sort of good thing suppresses the horrific reality) beyond buggery that can be used for blackmail purposes.
I can’t find a clear line between “blackmail material” and “team building”. Can you?
Were there any indications of gay stuff on Epstein’s island? They always say “underage girls” and never “underage girls and boys”, right? Could that whole thing have been or become the disposable Outer Party minor league?
And why am I only asking this now?
I bet Epstein, Clinton, and the others hated faggots privately. I’m no fan of that crowd, but I can completely understand the willingness to use power and status to temporarily sate the natural cravings of the flesh. While I think it unbecoming and sinful, it is natural.
But, having drunk deep the draft of bottomless lust, they raised their eyes to a heaven lost and heard the cackling of the daemon they called friend. And in their despair, they dug their fingers into the very stone, and in the fullness of time a new daemon appeared, and with him came the sodomites, for they are legion.
The traditional is ever displaced by the progressive when God is cast out of the high places. The sodomites crept into the back door and have infected every institution. The old guard progressives just wanted pussy unrestricted, and they got in bed with the sodomites because they had that on tap, but it was a tainted gift. The spurned wives teamed up with the sodomites to displace the males in charge.
I think this pattern is ubiquitous. I bet there are Yoel Rothmanbergsteins in every single important institutions, wheedling and cajoling and creeping into real power positions. Sodomy is a virus of viruses, and to countenance it in any way, any way at all, is to court disaster and doom.
Let the rooftops rain until the earth is cleansed. Leave none alive.
I’m dying. ROFL
“Were there any indications of gay stuff on Epstein’s island?”
No Epstein’s island they were entrapping normal heterosexual guys so they needed to use jailbait that didn’t look like jailbait. Gays are easier to get blackmail information on then such an elaborate setup…
Nobody had to be private about hating gays until 2010 or so… before then it was perfectly socially acceptable to despise faggots.
I did post a link a few posts back here:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1591152036766445568.html
About a guy who reports the continuation of similar blackmail operations but at a different location. But found dead himself not long after.
This is a lynchpin as to their dominance I believe.
I’m confused a couple years ago you were saying any unattended 9 year old deserved and wanted to be raped because a whore and being a father I objected and was called a white knight or some shit. I kept asking what should white patriarchy restoration look like Islam? Or maybe the 1950s but without legal rights. [*Soros script deleted*]
Yoel Roth is rather good evidence for the Soros script (Soros telling us that all our problems would be solved if we gas the Jew that runs the bagel shop), and I would be happy to debate that argument with someone who was able to notice what Yoel Roth has been doing and Soros has been doing. Tell us what Soros has been doing to cause white flight. And, by the way, the post to which you respond tells us what Yoel Roth has been doing to prevent female children from growing boobs. (Being a faggot, he does not like boobs.) If what Yoel Roth has been up to is evidence for your position (and it is) make the argument with reference to Yoel Roth. You seem strangely unable to notice the activities of Soros. Are you able to notice the activities of Yoel Roth?
Can you make your argument while invoking the most obvious evidence for it?
Gassing the bagel shop owner is a displacement activity, like going after men who have sex with young fertile age women while ignoring female misconduct and faggot sex with pre pubertal children.
Soros tells us to gas normie Jews that’s one thing never heard about him. Well there’s him during ww2 literally doing that but survival during war time and all.
I grew up in nyc before immigration. It was the Jews in early 60s filing [*bad deeds by unnamed Jews who no longer matter anyway deleted*]
Soros and others are doing specific bad things by specific actions. Not by emitting magic Jewish thought control beams.
Can you identify a specific action by a specific identifiable Jew who matters now or who quite recently mattered?
Soros telling us to gas normie Jews is the same strategy as “paedophilia”. I remember when normies could not understand the word “paedophilia”. Its meaning was incomprehensible. No corresponding thought or concept existed.
The objective was to have the same word for straights who banged young fertile age women with boobs, and faggots who banged children regardless of age and sex provided that they had not yet developed boobs, to make unlike things the same thing.
Having a single word for both, it then became possible for gays to become schoolteachers, scoutmasters, and so forth. And pretty soon the gay mafia was running the scouts, the schools, and everything else that got them access to other people’s children.
If you tell us all Jews, including right wing Jews on the other side of the ocean, are all equally responsible for bad things, while ignoring particular actions by particular Jews to accomplish particular evil ends, this protects those particular evildoers, in the same way the word “paedophile” protected pederasts and enabled them to take over the schools and the scouts.
Great comment, Jim.
I disagree that the faggotry and toddler tranny thing is about sex availability. The faggot rights was one of many commie Jew projects designed simply to weaken us,divide us, and subvert our culture and demoralize us.
A people can not survive if not unified. This is why non whites must leave the west we simply can’t survive if they’re here. What do you think the niggers and spics Arabs kikes jungle Asians are going to become Christian’s and what it’s crazy. They will still be their race first christcucks second. only whites are capable to our detriment of sublimating race to ideology.
Everything is about sexual availability.
Yoel Roth is a Jew, but that he is a faggot is far more important to his conduct than that he a Jew.
Politely disagree
Look Yoel might be in it for the boys but the massive govt corporate push is by people interested in power not sex some may enjoy both like they enjoy the money that goes often with power but it’s incidental.
Vlad, you’re looking at a thing and calling it X, then jiim breaks off a piece and puts it under a microscope and sees Y, then you’re saying “oh sure, but I’m talking about X.”
X is composed of countless Ys, and each little Y operates roughly the same. It’s Yoel faggots, all the way down.
[*Relevant and persuasive arguments deleted for failure to pass the Soros test (or even the Yoel Roth test).*]
Your arguments are relevant, persuasive, and in large part true. They are worthy of response.
But the trouble is that they are arguments for ignoring Soros as just one more Jew, just as “paedophile” is an argument for allowing gays to be schoolteachers and scoutmasters.
I would engage your arguments if you could tell us what Soros, specifically and in particular, did to drive white people out of their homes.
You have an argument, but if you cannot notice what particular Jews are doing, you are in the pay of those particular Jews.
[*This plausible and persuasive argument is just not going to be allowed through unless you can tell us what certain particular Jews have been doing*]
Surely the best and most convincing argument for the proposition that all Jews have to go is what certain particular Jews have been up to. Name those Jews and tell us what particular actions they took to achieve their evil goals.
[*deleted*]
If you are a father and allow a nine year old daughter to wander off unattended, you are a very bad father.
1800 England, coverture, accomplished by the methods of 1790s Australia. Meaning that chaste women are high status, and unchaste women are without legal rights. An offense against a chaste woman is an offense against her husband or father. No such thing as an offense against an unchaste woman. Including a nine year old who is allowed to wander off and proceeds to wander into places that one would not expect.
My argument back then was not against patriarchy females having no legal autonomy. It was and is how ridiculous you framed it ie the 9 yo rape thing. If you had children you’d know unless you’re a homeschooling farmer you can’t bring your kids to work they will be out of your sight at times so to legalize their open game status it to argue for the end of civilization and return to jungle law.
You constantly do this soros test thing everyone knows things soros does [excuses for failing to pass the Soros test deleted]
Obviously if the schools is a gay brothel, you don’t send them to school. (Gays are attracted to children of both sexes until the girls develop boobs, and thereafter only attracted to boys. So gay grooming in schools involves persuading girls to transition, and have their breast buds removed)
With girls being surgically modified to suit gay tastes, jungle law will be a huge improvement.
Tell us one specific concrete thing that Soros did that really pissed of the alt right, and tell it the way the alt right tells it, not the way Jewish faggots tell it.
Also tell us what Yoel Roth has specifically and concretely done to make it a really bad idea to send your daughters to school.
Wait, the potential Soros shill said something important.
A proper state should not want jungle law, and in fact should do its best to avoid jungle law, for the same reason it doesn’t want 70s or 50s or 30s leftism. It should be aiming for creating a legal code that encourages communities where children can go out without having to fear abduction or whatever (Matthew 18:6), as can be found in some American and European rural areas, and used to be much more common in the past before all the sodomites and Moloch worshipers got emboldened.
Also, Soros astroturfs low intelligence high time preference thugs (mostly blacks, but there are plenty of hispanic and antifa whites in there) to ethnically cleanse white communities and as muscle to smash any resistance to Globohomo (while glowies do D&C and paranoia psych ops), and funds color revolutions to promote “buttsex in Botswana” (like in Ukraine with Zelensky), which Hungary, Poland, Belarus and Russia have been resisting.
Yoel Roth and his sodomite ilk turn kids into homonculi for their sick urges, and because misery loves company (and plausibly because they are Moloch worshipers who hate God).
A very charitable reading of your comments on this subject would indicate that you are advocating stricter parental control, but your decision to double down makes me somewhat less charitable. Could you state exactly what you mean?
And, failing that due to young female misbehavior, marriage by elopement or abduction.
For 9yo? Was there a mass conversion to Mohammedianism recently that I missed?
Until recently (late 19th century) the Christian West recognized that some 8-year-olds tend to sexually misbehave, have to be forcefully restrained, beaten with a stick and chained to a wall, and should be shotgun married if they manage to seduce a fella (or preemptively married off to a suitable gentleman).
Yes, even in the cucked Anglosphere, cf. Delaware’s 1880 AOC of 7.
The sexual dynamics between an ironing-board-chested girl who jumps on her dad’s friend’s schlong (the unsuspecting friend being naturally uninterested in ironing boards) because her explosive urges are permitted to proceed unrestrained and between a pedagogical trysexual sneaky-fucker faggot who’d hump anything boobless (men or children) are inherently dissimilar, it being the point of this post.
“Pedophiles” (fags) are trysexual, they will try to fuck anything without tits, both 50-year-old men and 5-year-old children. The word “pedophile” lumps together trysexual faggots who will try to fuck your son, your daughter (prepubescent or under FtM hormones blockers), and you up the rectum, and a 21-year-old man who fucks a 15-year-old woman.
You are meant to worry about straight men who fuck girls with boobs so that you’ll pay no attention to the trysexual faggot school teacher who molests your son, molests your flat-chested or mastectomized daughter, and given access to roofies and the means to slip them into your drink, will molest you.
Oh really? And how did this dad’s friend get jumped? Is he a quadriplegic or something? Maybe he’s just a crypto-sodomite trysexual looking for excuses. A lot of the suspected Epstein customers are big supporters of sodomy for a reason (see Pelosi’s “husband” and his encounter with the homo-hammer-hoe). Just because white knights are self-hating cucks, doesn’t make the inverse of “he wus a good boy he dindu nuffin” any better.
@Bobthebuilder
That’s not what he said, not what we say.
You are struggling with the terrible thought that a 9yo girl, that picture of sweetness and light as you see it, could ever be guilty of anything so heinous as what’s been implied. This is a You problem, as you are photoshopping in a particular image for “9yo girl” and then working from the position that that was the image implied.
>Oh really? And how did this dad’s friend get jumped?
Typically it’s a horny teenage boy the girl settles for after getting rejected by older men.
Problem is that nine year old girls frequently do not act as if they fear abduction, but as if they are hoping to find it.
Restraining men is ineffectual, because one pin can pop one hundred balloons.
If you successfully control ninety nine out of a hundred girls, ninety nine out of a hundred men will be able to marry a virgin wife.
If you successfully control ninety nine out a hundred men, very few men will be able to marry a virgin wife.
You state the simple, oft-denied truth clearly and indisputably.
First if you can’t restrain men you haven’t got a civilization it’s the very definition of civilization even a troop of monkeys can restrain females and children
Second for the ten thousandth timevWTF do you insist on drawing the line at nine year olds have you ever met one never mind we had that conversation and you’re still wrong nine year old girls are not seductresses except in rare cases where they meet child molesters and even 12 year old girls are just trying on womanhood mimicking again unless they were exposed to bad adults or bad children I would not advocate for marriage of girls under 15 though yeah 14 yo in wrong environment could be trouble.
But Christ we are supposed to be designing an environment that not bad for us
Civilizations fail from inability to control women, not men.
Nature gives women far more power than men, for all a man can do is merely kill you, while a woman can make you immortal.
Many an emperor with ten thousand conservatively raised concubines and the unquestioned authority to execute any of them or all of them for any reason or no reason has had woman troubles, and often enough his empire died of those troubles.
If you put on the plausible appearance of alpha, you will swiftly discover that the problem of female misconducts frequently starts at a startlingly and disturbingly young age.
For our people to survive, must restore virgin marriage. And, empirically, peoples and faiths that were serious about providing virgins for marriage, have always set iron controls on females starting very very early. I know from direct personal experience that to create a society of virgin marriage, we have to do what they did.
Which means we have to be conscious that the tendency of females to misbehave is volcanically powerful, extremely difficult to control, and the volcano is apt to erupt inconveniently early.
And for such controls to stick, girls that escape or successfully resist such controls have to be married off. Which means that the option of shotgun marrying them at a very early age has to be available.
I want our elite to reproduce at substantially above replacement. And for it to reproduce at substantially above replacement it has to do what peoples who reproduced at substantially above replacement have always done. Which is to control females, starting at a very early age. And while it is preferable that girls not marry till their reproductive equipment is fully developed, every civilization that successfully reproduced had to have a solution to deal with the problem of some girls getting started very very early. Which they dealt with by tightly controlling young girls to prevent them from getting dick early, and if they managed to get dick anyway, marrying them off regardless of age.
https://dailystormer.in/ex-cnn-producer-pleads-guilty-to-sex-with-9-year-old-girl/
“At one point, Carriker allegedly references going to meet a man described as her “Dom.†Carriker also texted “Meet Man†that she had a “very eager 9yo,†referring to the girl whom she later took with her to meet Griffin in Vermont, who wanted to come see “Meet Man†engage in BDSM activities, the report stated.”
As Jim has stated before, authorizing the male population to restrain the females is exactly how you restrain the male population.
Consent as a man understands consent is irrelevant. Females are incapable of lifelong monogamous consent at any age, under any conditions.
Fathers are plenty incentivized to find a mate suitable for their daughters, if they have the option. As a father of two beautiful and loving daughters I am not going to marry them off to a man that is not suitable, unless there is a severe shortage of men. These men will become part of my family, and help me grow my family until one day it is their family. This is not a difficult problem.
Female attraction to males is uniform, but men put too much weight on what a guy looks like, not enough importance on status. Most teenage boys, even handsome boys, are dorky and weird and awkward.
If you as a man, as an alpha male that can pull hot young chicks take a look at the boys that teenage girls are happy to date and happy to have sex with, those boys are pretty underwhelming. Especially at an emotional and psychological level.
The standards of a virgin teenage girl are not astronomically high, especially with the male being of sufficient status to the parents, with the union being supported by both families, the church, and by God.
My experience controlling women like herding cats controlling men once dominance determined is pretty self driving
This is true in the workplace when women are pretending to do men’s jobs. It is pretty much irrelevant to the problem of reproduction.
>because one pin can pop one hundred balloons
Kill him. Or look the other way when pops gets angry and makes him dig a grave. You have no problem correcting male misbehavior when he cucks out and pimps his wife, so no reason to not do it here.
Charleston fence is that the age was 12 in Britain and the colonies when you say you liked them, 14 in Nippon, and 15 in the European states less affected by feminism. Caught violating it, treated as rape. I suspect the reason for that (aside from prosecuting aggressive sodomites) is it allows for better male cooperation, since now I don’t have to devote as much time to helicopter parenting, and my kids can socialize, and I can trust my neighbor to look after the kid while I work. Can’t execute pedos = can’t trust my neighbor, as evidenced by stranger danger being a fairly recent invention.
My anecdotal evidence is that my sister began misbehaving well after 9, around the time of historical laws on this thing.
Also, marital rape is a contradiction of terms, all waves of feminism were/are bad, HR is at best make work for 30 year old harpies and more often a commissar style position.
This presupposes he shows up at your house. That chaste and virtuous women are quietly minding their own business and some predatory male shows up.
Suppose, rather, your womenfolk mysteriously wander off to some place you cannot find them and he can.
Women do not exactly go hunting men, but are apt to show up someplace where men can find them. Men chase women, but women are apt to find places where they can be chased, and then run very slowly.
K. Do I have the right to take out the trash if it begins polluting my property in Jimtopia? Do I have the right to encourage the other men in the neighborhood that I live in to adopt my view of taking out trash, under the theory of wanting to live in a high trust neighborhood?
Again you are presupposing that the lustful lecherous male rake comes to your property. The problem is that your daughter is apt to be mysteriously absent from your property.
Men chase women, women do not chase men. But whereas a man will travel half an hour to a pickup joint, a girl will go four hundred miles to a pickup joint.
The scarce resource always gets protected. Eggs are scarce, sperm is cheap. We protect gold by putting it in a vault. We do not put everyone seeking gold in a vault.
The rake problem is solved with shotgun marriage, or the shotgun. But the rake problem is very small, as Mr 1 in 30 is only 1 in 30, and every female is apt to become a whore if unowned by a male not her father in her early teens, if not earlier.
I like 1800. The clandestine marriage act of 1753 requires parental consent for marriages under 21, but put no lower limit on the age of marriage with parental consent.
There was no well defined age of consent for illicit sex until 1875, in part because it was not exactly legal regardless of age. Not exactly illegal either. Rather, prostitutes and pimps were given a really hard time, but it was fairly safe to be the mistress of a powerful man. Attempting to ascertain the “age of consent” before 1875 is anachronistic. People did not think like that, nor enforce laws on sex, marriage, and family like that.
Yes Adam, we do in fact put people seeking the gold of others into vaults, if not shooting them outright. To be clear I’m not against shotgun marriage, but I am of the position that certain groups can’t get married, leaving only the shotgun.
To refine my position, if your kid wanders off to somewhere they shouldn’t be, the supervisor should be non-lethally but humiliatingly punished for negligence in a status lowering way, for the crime of undermining group trust and feeding the untouchables. This is similar to how a husband can’t pimp out his wife, even though Jim’s model of society makes her property, because that nukes the group’s cohesion.
>K. Do I have the right to take out the trash if it begins polluting my property in Jimtopia? Do I have the right to encourage the other men in the neighborhood that I live in to adopt my view of taking out trash, under the theory of wanting to live in a high trust neighborhood?
You have the right to restrain your daughter if you are able.
I read a story not too long about an 11 year old girl who perused and invited in a 23 year old man into her bedroom. She was being raised by her grandfather who was a bit too old to really handle her. He’d chased the man out a few times after having caught her fucking him, but she kept calling him and opening the window to bring him in.
The proper solution is to marry them off once her virginity is gone.
Then you’re going to have to shoot the girl as well, which is a waste of a child. Better they should be shotgun wed. And if he dumps her then you can shotgun him.
We do not put everyone seeking gold in vaults. Thieves and men that promiscuously seek chaste women are dealt with accordingly after the fact, when possible.
An ounce of prevention is more valuable than a pound of cure, so best to be in the business of prevention.
[*deleted for misrepresenting my and other people’s position*]
Nine year old whores do not need to be raped. They get plenty of that already. There is a whole lot of that going around. They need to be shotgun married.
Yoel wrote a thesis about what he called something like social media while obviously talking about sex hookup apps [*deleted for a wall of text strangely unable to mention the glaringly obvious*]
The glaringly obvious being that as censor in chief, the Jewish faggot Yoel Roth failed to censor child sex material, while censoring the information that modifying schoolgirls with drugs and surgery to suit faggot sexual preferences has extremely bad and irreversible consequences for those schoolgirls.
Because glaringly obvious ? So yeah he like the school system the internet providers and FBI and library’s and Disney and the rest didn’t censor the kiddie porn because as the JEWSJEWSJEWS HAVEVBEEN TELLING US FOR HALF A CENTURY SEX IS LIKE CALORIELESS CANDY CHILDREN ARE SEXUAL WE MUST DEAL WOTH IT
INON THE OTHER HAND HAVE BEEN SAYING PORN AND KIKE SHOULD BE ILLEGAL
You are still strangely unable to mention what Yoel Roth did not like. Which was accurate information on consequences of transitioning prepubertal girls from development of normal reproductive body type towards his sexual preference.
It matters that as chief censor, he failed to censor some things that need censoring. What matters more is that he censored truths inconvenient to faggots.
You are telling us minorities have to go because culturally different. That is like telling us that white flight happens because black neighbors have loud parties.
Your position is that you hate Jews, women, and blacks, because Jews are clever, women are wonderful, and blacks are magical.
Have passed soros test a million times what can be said more he’s like the worst Jew since Roth Childs
SOROS CURRENTLY FUNDS LAWFARE [*nebulous accusations applicable to no end of Jews deleted*]
What I have been needling you to say, and what you have not said, is that Soros installed prosecutors who decline to prosecute black race hate crimes against whites, while vigorously prosecuting white self defense, resulting in whites being forced to flee murder and arson and to abandon the homes that whites built for whites to diversities.
I have also been needling you to say what Yoel has been up to.
The trouble is that you are telling us you hate blacks and Jews for no good reason. If you actually hated blacks and Jews, a plentiful supply of reasons far more potent than anything you are inclined to mention are available.
You say “Lawfare”, which lawfare in some nebulous way related to nebulous bad thing happening to whites. But I just laid out the specific concrete causal path between George Soros, white people being unable to afford homes, white people being murdered, and white people getting their homes burned down. Which I have been endlessly nagging you to do, and you evade with generalities.
Tangential topic:
Footage of contact between English speaking/”American” forces and Russians:
https://t.me/BrokenNews1/7860
The post asserts that Mozart, the “Wagner at home” rip off PMC, is moving into/towards Bakmut in an effort to stabilize collapsing AFU lines. We here know that Americans and their vassals have been fighting and dying in the Ukraine for a while now, but normie-land is curiously ignorant of this. The only GAE country that’s publicly suffered heavy losses thus far is Poland, but I think the Cockroach Principle (for every 1 you see, assume 10 you don’t) applies here.
We are moving towards a serious exchange between no-shit, flag wearing GAE troops and RF forces. The war faction at State Department has moved heaven and earth to expand this conflict while minimizing its realities. Any faction opposing them would want to have publicly available footage showing what’s actually going on.
Twitter is ablaze with the Twitter Files, and it should be, that information is interesting and important. But we can state objectively that 1) Musk is not an impulsive and shortsighted elite, 2) he is a skilled engineer, meaning he knows how to build towards building towards dominating, and 3) the hostile takeover of Twitter was not the end, but the means to an end.
I think Musk is clued in to IEW, and he knows that Twitter is an IEW super weapon. I think his DoD patrons and their peers are giving him top cover, and in exchange he will be a conduit for their memes, rhetoric, and infowar operations. The Twitter Files is the beta test of this system, and we can see the outlines of the IEW machine he is building:
-Musk says there’s important/special/revelatory information (Prime stage)
-Musk says he will release it (Promise stage)
-Musk hand picks certain priests who are fringe, independent, or heretical (Pick stage)
-These priests dole out the information via Twitter, meaning it is systematized and boiled down due the character limit and structure of the medium* (Push stage)
-The information dumps are limited and targeted, not just a tidal wave of files 99.999% of people will never go through; they are bite size and easily sharable (this is meme warfare, similar to how soldiers learned to use grenades in WWI through experience) (Propagate stage)
I think the Twitter Files are a proof of concept, and I think this system will be used and imitated going forward: Prime-Promise-Pick-Push-Propagate. This is a primitive Kill Chain for an early IEW weapon system.
*I don’t know why they are talking about increasing the character limit, but I bet it has to do with Twitter as an IEW weapon
As a general rule, enemies in battle are killed by judicious application of high explosives.
You guys know how im always harping on about how grenade rifles and man-portable automatic cannons are peak small unit lethality, and you can see why through anecdotes like this; if that detachment of RU troops had two or three AGMs like the atlant or balkan, then that first contact would have instantly resulted in terrible casualties for the zogbots, rather than a sporting trade of suppressive fire.
Yeah, I cannot help but get the sense that the American came out of that one ahead. Looks like none of them got killed, and they got to bring back good intel on enemy forces. Too bad.
It’s a 5 minute clip, and that front is not going well for Team Zog. The mercs are smarter than the AFU conscripts, but there’s only one outcome for those fighting against the Rodina in this theater…
Seeing a number of clips out of Myanmar, it appears that they are so fond of the personal grenade launcher, they are building them for themselves.
Truly the weapon of the future.
Personal grenade launchers have severe limitations. If it’s low weight enough for average infantry grunts you tradeoff lethality and range. That’s at best a stay the fuck away system or in other words area denial. That has value, but not the lethality you would expect for a weapon of the future.
The future looks more like a low profile, lightly armored dune buggy with a 40 mm grenade launcher mounted with thermal and night weapon sights that are computer assisted. That already mostly exists with the ALSV.
>The original tests used commercial dune buggies modified to carry weapons such as TOW missiles and recoilless rifles. However, the recoilless rifles still had enough recoil to flip the lightweight dune buggies and were abandoned. The TOW missiles had much greater success, but they violated existing Army TOW doctrine. The Army had determined that a TOW needed a 3-man team to operate it. The DPVs could only carry a two-man crew and they seemed perfectly capable of operating the TOW, but this would have meant revising Army doctrine and possibly changing TOW deployment throughout the Army[citation needed]. Fort Benning decided to offer a “superior” DPV design that allowed a third crewman. This design was rejected by the HTLD team and was never produced.
Lmfao. Der ewige nominalist strikes again.
The XM25 was the future of infantry combat, and I suspect it was nixed because it would have made large swathes of the welfare program that is the US Army irrelevant, and caused a shift toward more elite warriors.
>The XM25 was the future of infantry combat
Forgive me for ranting, but that’s completely detached from reality.
There are a number of problems with the XM25 that killed the program, but it was predominately weight. It was heavy (extremely so with ammo). Weight is a huge factor of any infantry system. I encourage you to get on a treadmill holding two 5 lbs dumbbells and run. Toss on a backpack with 40 lbs stuffed into it and you’ll have a good idea that weight matters.
A really basic light infantry load will weigh you down by around 50 lbs. A more typical load will be 80 to 130. M4 plus Ammo will consume ~20 lbs alone. XM25 system will by itself be ~40 lbs which means swapping out* the M4 for the XM25 leads to loads of 100 to 150.
It’s true that infantry can be loaded out with ~150 lbs of gear… those guys are typically some form of motorized infantry. At that point you might as well just put that 25 mm grenade launcher on a vehicle or better yet just go with a mounted 40 mm which has better range and lethality.
*The XM25 with only 36 rounds would probably mean the soldier would also carry a rifle as backup… the load is now 120 to 170. The VA will be more than happy to say back injuries are not service related.
The question to always keep in mind is, what in the weight you are adding yourself, is doing anything for you?
A 5.56×45 rifle is a good trade for a 7.62×51 rifle in many cases, because more ammo means more shots down range, means better suppression and higher chance of hits.
A QLU-11 is a good trade for an M4 in many cases, because you can expend your entire ammunition load for the M4 and fail to do what a single shell can do. A point in possibility space has nothing on an area of effect, when it comes to ‘hit’ probability.
Square cube wins every time. In modern warfare, casualties are caused by high explosives. They come from artillery, mortars, rockets, and MKs. That’s just a fact.
Something else one should remember to keep in mind, from another angle, is that soldiers fight in armies, not as individuals alone.
To give one illustrative example, the basic unit of organization in the wehrmacht was the crew served weapon, with the individual soldiers main purpose being the transportation of and carrying extra ammunition for the crew served weapon.
In the state department’s war against the pentagon in vietnam, the weapon system that shot down more US jets than any other across the length of the conflict, wasn’t the SA-2, or any other SAM system, it was the S-60 57mm cannon. And part of the reason why was the fact that NVA troops could carry the guns and directors in pieces and place them everywhere they wanted them.
Add to this the Boston Dynamics Big Dog style of drone. Then consider power armor/exoskeleton type enhancements. Then consider performance enhancing drugs.
Of all the things we hear coming from our illustrious veterans, it is always sandwiched between complaints about knee and back problems, which is always quite amusing to me. Proof positive that we have a national army of chair bound paper operators, 7-11bravos playing paintball at Quantico while they eat goyslop and mainline energy drinks. I kid, I kid, brave and true heroes every blessed one of them. Thank you for your service Jamal, Pedro, Ch’aneekwa, and Karen.
The best way to settle this debate would be to ask RF troops, Wagner guys, and Donbas militiamen if they’d suffer the extra weight to gain the enhanced firepower. My guess is they would, and gladly.
Speaking of the Orchestra, did everyone here clock that Victor Claus Bout was immediately hired by Wagner for an upper level position? And that Mozart Group, the made in Nigmerica knockoff of Wagner, is pulling out of Ukraine because they were targeted by the enemy?
Something that migratory peoples throughout history have always discovered, is that there is an exponential difference in transport capacity between whether you are bearing the weight directly or merely moving it. The humble hiking trailer is a force multiplier that is yet to be exploited in a combat setting. Both on foot and on your bike dragoons.
>The best way to settle this debate would be to ask RF troops, Wagner guys, and Donbas militiamen if they’d suffer the extra weight to gain the enhanced firepower.
The Russians are lunging around 40 mm systems. Their defense industry is modernizing their 40 mm systems and not their 30 mm. 30 mm is already at the lower bound of usefulness. No one wants to carry weight for anything lower than 30 mm.
Only the Ukrainians are attempting to create a miniaturized handheld version of AGS-17 with 20 mm and 25 mm variants. They are going to find out what the Russians and the Americans found out. That it’s a stupid idea.
The Boston big dog, to be useful, has to become enormously cheaper, but yes, would be a battle changer, because could transport heavy weapons anywhere. But not a game changer unless mass production can bring the price right down.
Until we have a cheap Boston Dynamics Big Dog, soldiers should have hiking trailers.
The future of warfare is that you have a drone above, so you can see soldiers behind cover, and you have a small mortar, based on the L9A1 51 mm mortar that weighs fourteen pounds, but with integration with the drone, so that you can see on a screen where your mortar shell is going to land.
I figure one soldier carrying a hand launched drone, and two soldiers carrying two mortars.
Alternatively, the heavier M6 mortar, which requires a two man crew to transport and operate, but has a four kilometer range, which means your three man team (one drone man, two mortar men) can control sixteen times as much turf.
Theoretically the M6 mortar is man carryable and operable by one man, but really that is a stretch.
To resist jamming, the drone uses spread spectrum communications, or laser spread spectrum. Existing laser spread spectrum systems are rather heavy and expensive, but they do not need to be. They are not inherently heavy and expensive, it is just that it is a bleeding edge little used technology.
On the other hand, you probably do need laser communications between the drone and the mortar, so that the system can figure out exactly where the mortar is located and oriented relative to the drone. Laser is inherently unjammable.
We also need personal iff, so that a three man team controlling about twenty square kilometers can just kill anything that moves that fails to identify as friend.
>The question to always keep in mind is, what in the weight you are adding yourself, is doing anything for you?
>Square cube wins every time. In modern warfare, casualties are caused by high explosives. They come from artillery, mortars, rockets, and MKs. That’s just a fact.
I’m not disagreeing with that. 90% of Ukrainian casualties are from explosives. My point is that 40 lbs for a 25 mm system is ridiculous. That’s a lot of weight with limited lethality. There’s a reason why 40 mm is near ubiquitous and 25 mm is not. A slightly up-sized M203 with modern thermals and programmable munitions would be far superior and likely weight less than the XM25.
There are many fair reasons to criticize DoD acquisitions, but killing the XM25 program is not one of them.
Color me tinfoiled, but I think XM25 was killed because high command wants controllable drones with limited capacity for self-guided combat capability. They love to praise SOF in hollywood, but look at how they are treated once they get out or move on to an outfit that starts paying them what they’re worth or arming them how they wish to be. The DoD/State Department complex hated Blackwater for more than just their leadership.
XM25 was the first step towards a rebirth of a warrior elite similar to fully armed and armored mercenaries in the medieval battlespace. “Cute conscripts, kid. be a shame if something HE-happened to ’em…” Maybe not, this could just be flowery fantasy borne of too many books and too few IRL experiences. But Rambo: First Blood was an indy movie much maligned by the establishment for a reason.
Army hasn’t given up on smart grenade launchers. Precision Grenadier Program/Precision Grenadier System (PGP/PGS) is rebooting the program.
>A key difference between the XM25 and the PGS is that “this time the U.S. Army will solicit more soldier feedbackâ€
They didn’t do that first time around.
>LTC Kennedy was mum about other specifics, such as caliber: “I don’t have a caliber; you guys are going to come up with the caliber. Industry is going to come back and tell me … ‘Here’s what I’ve got.’â€
DoD speak for we fucked up with 25mm and are going to ask grunts what they want and then talk to industry. 40mm munitions are being reworked because of complaints about limited lethality. PGS will likely go with 40mm.
If USM had gone with the XM25, all the “needed changes” you’ve listed would have happened. I don’t think the -25 was a superweapon, I think it was a proto-weapon, the first tentative step towards the thing it would inevitably become. This is the issue with unbloodied, bureaucratic militaries: they have no vision and they ferociously resist change. So instead of having whatever the XM25 would have become or inspired, we have the Sig Spear, which will be seen as a colossally stupid, decline of empire decision in the future.
>If USM had gone with the XM25, all the “needed changes†you’ve listed would have happened.
Over what time period? Once DoD fully commits to a system the bureaucracy ensures that it never changes substantially. Look at F35 program for reference. We are set to have 50 years or so of a multirole plane that is not particularly good at anything making up the bulk of the combat aircraft fleet.
The XM25 being adopted would have resulted in the end of 40mm systems and reshaping all NATO doctrine around 25mm for the next 40-50 years.
You are seeing what the XM25 could have lead to in a functional DoD. I’m seeing what the XM25 would have lead to in the DoD I’m familiar with. I would much rather see M203/M320 being used as a stop gap in the meantime.
Ask any combat arms soldier with actual combat experience if they’d take the extra weight if it gave them highly accurate, programmable grenades.
A programmable 40 mm would be peachy. They would love it. Heck they already are lunging around the 84Â mm Carl Gustaf and the M3E1 variant has programmable munitions.
40lbs for 25 mm is just not worth it.
It is not a debate- the XM25 was wildly popular among the infantry who got it when it was deployed for field testing. It gave the squads it was deployed in an extreme increase in effectiveness.
>the XM25 was wildly popular among the infantry
It wasn’t and it did not give squads an extreme increase in effectiveness. You’re reading a few hype articles when the grunts had a far more nuanced/negative view on it. The XM25 was better than nothing, but compared to the M203 and later M320 it was subpar in everything but capability to use air burst to hit targets in defilade. A job that infantry soon found the M3 Carl Gustaf was far better suited for as well as far more versatile.
This is the sort of narrow thinking I despise. Weight doesn’t matter when the soldier is a DRAGOON, with a personal vehicle, or you have an apprentice soldier carrying your ammo for you.
What you are saying is that the army was not farsighted enough to overhaul their entire combat doctrine. Which I agree with. But the force that does will win in the end.
And by the way, I am an outdoorsman who regularly rucks it over rough terrain with a lot of weight on my back. I know what it feels like. Combat loads are too heavy in general. Soldiers need apprentices to ruck the nonessential shit for them.
This is the way. You have a squad of dragoons with technicals supporting with heavy weapons and a drone command. Weight of ammo becomes a non-issue. Weight of weapons becomes an issue of whether or not you can aim and fire it, not whether you can carry it during a movement.
>Weight doesn’t matter when the soldier is a DRAGOON
I said
>At that point you might as well just put that 25 mm grenade launcher on a vehicle or better yet just go with a mounted 40 mm which has better range and lethality.
DoD should have been modernizing the MK19 and putting it on more Humvees. It should have been buying more Carl Gustav recoilless rifles. Instead it was fucking around with 25 mm.
The logical choice for a high command that wants to utterly dominate the battle field is “all of the above.” There’s a reason LEO screams bloody murder and starts accidentally the whole family when explosive 12ga shells appear. The machine gun gets all the attention regarding WWI weapons advancement, but it was the hand grenade that had the staring role for the infantry. Of course, machineguns, airplanes, tanks, and radios all head massive impact, I’m not saying they didn’t. Artillery is the queen of battle, and the hand grenade is the fine ass side bitch of battle.
In both the world wars the majority of combat causalties (not from weather or disease or more rarely cutoff ) were inflicted by artillery.
A vehicle is a sitting duck. It is hard to get it behind cover and concealment. The role of infantry is to mop up what artillery does not take care of. That means you need more tactical flexibility, need man-portable weapons to flush people out of the holes they were using to hide from artillery. When the opponent is hiding, you use fire and high explosives.
A fighting vehicle as we know it is a sitting duck because it was designed to be a sitting duck. IFVs were designed to be as much as an APC as well as a subpar tank. Tank shots via armor and shoot back while stationary. Those days are gone. Shaped charge munitions are too deadly.
Flushing enemy out of their holes requires more explosives than a single infantry man can reasonably carry. You need at minimum 40mm and more ideally much larger, but also need the number of rounds that 25mm systems promised to accomplish superior fire.
That’s why we need to get cheaper, smaller, and faster vehicles. That looks like a souped up dune buggy. We almost have that with the Desert Patrol Vehicle, it just needs to get a slightly lower profile. The primary purpose of the vehicle of the future is to move troops and systems around fast and not to provide armor. Doctrine will look something like:
1) Find advantageous position
2) Use vehicle to quickly get to it
3) Dismount troops and systems
4) Set up camo net to hide vehicle
5) Spot and hit the enemy
6) pack up and go back to step one so you don’t get zeroed in by enemy arty
>Flushing enemy out of their holes requires more explosives than a single infantry man can reasonably carry.
Which has a number of more and less obvious solutions:
– Have more than a single infantry man carrying
– You aren’t carrying them, you are pulling them in your pack trailer
– You aren’t carrying them, you are pulling them in your bike trailer
– Carrying? what do you mean carrying? we are just hanging out here in our bridgeheads, while supplies and successively heavier equipment are delivered each night. Next night we will be infiltrating forwards to dig a new set of bridgeheads behind their front, and the cycle continues.
– Carrying? what do you mean carrying? the steroscopic IR cameras on my tactical PDA and phased array transmit/receiver in my pack are my most dangerous weapons.
>Have more than a single infantry man carrying
We want to increase the capabilities of a single man. Make it so that a single mortar team is replaced by a single mortarman for example. As you pointed out the 3-man TOW team could have been reduced to a 2-man team. Imagine if it became a single man TOW and retain effectiveness and each squad had half a dozen TOW missiles.
Concentrated firepower wins.
>You aren’t carrying them, you are pulling them in your pack trailer
Too slow. Mobility is everything.
>pulling them in your bike trailer
That stops being effective as soon as you reach uneven terrain. Then it becomes additional weight.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/BicycleBersaglieri2.jpg/1024px-BicycleBersaglieri2.jpg
If you use motorcycles you now have a shitty version of a Dune Buggy. Just combine the engine with the trailer and get 4 points of contact.
>we are just hanging out here in our bridgeheads
Too stationary. Enemy artillery says hello. Ukraine war is showing mobility is everything. The Russians learned that really fast. The Ukrainians never did.
>the steroscopic IR cameras on my tactical PDA and phased array transmit/receiver in my pack
I want that in a squad too along with a ton of explosives. Something like 4 riflemen who also operate a Carl Gustaf, 1 grenadier, a man on a 1 man mortar system, a man on a 1 man TOW system, a machine gunner, 1 radioman/spotter, and lastly a clueless Second Lieutenant placed there to learn.
Pax, you are so fucking American. Throwing in the 2LT is just not up for debate xaxaxaxaxaxaxa.
>We want to increase the capabilities of a single man.
We want to increase the capabilities of an army to be ore than the capabilities of their army.
>Mobility is everything.
Which is why you should be using hiking trailers, so you can range faster than they can and range longer than they can while carrying more stuff than they can.
>Concentrated firepower wins.
Which is why grenatgeschutzen and machinekannones are winers. A pax armed with a QLU-11/LG5s instagibs a pax armed with an M4 1488 times out of 1776.
I hope someday to embarrass you in person by telling you how much I appreciate you, St. John.
>We want to increase the capabilities of an army to be ore than the capabilities of their army.
You do that by making each Corps more capable. Each Corps is made more capable by making each Division more capable. So and and so forth until you end up at each man.
>A pax armed with a QLU-11/LG5s instagibs a pax armed with an M4 1488 times out of 1776.
Oh look. A 35/40mm system developed after looking at an American 25mm system and realizing 25mm was a stupid idea.
One guy armed with a M3E1 instagibs a whole platoon/tank crew/fortified position at 1000m.
>Which is why you should be using hiking trailers
What is your problem with motorization?! Look at this:
https://youtu.be/FY4ZGe-6tbY
Isn’t it great. The MRZR-D will have a rear cargo box that can accommodate 226.8kg of cargo. You like trailers right? It can even have a tactical trailer attached!
I find the insistence on foot travel to be distressing and disturbing.
A veteran with a cool toy and 1 to 3 apprentices carrying ammo for the cool toy is the squad of the future. The age of democratized armies where each disposable NPC needs to have the same kit because each disposable NPC needs to have the same status has been over for centuries now, people just haven’t caught up yet.
>Oh look. A 35/40mm system developed after looking at an American 25mm
I think you’re getting different arguments with different people mixed up.
There’s nothing wrong with recoiless rifles, besides the fact that they lack weight of fire. There’s a sweet spot there, and i dare say it’s not something larger than 2.2 inches.
Larger systems have a niche. This is very much a case where you have your cake and eat it too. Simple large diameter tube designs can conceivably double as both mortars and RRs with the right breach designs (be they adjustable or interchangeable), for direct, indirect, and specialized munition applications (like starstreak style missiles). You can field a range of different equipment systems, and let experience sus out the finer details of which precise configurations work best.
>I find the insistence on foot travel to be distressing and disturbing.
I’m not insisting on foot travel, i am simply responding to the topics the conversation keeps going back too, like objectively superior methods of enhancing the individual soldier’s kit. I’ve been shitposting about the wonders of technicals for years now too. You’ve seen me do it.
Foot v. Mounted will always be relevant due to terrain and repair needs. Yes, way better to move fast and be daisy fresh when you get there. But still… “Holy fuck where did that come from there isn’t even a road up there?!?” has happened in every single war. The motor pool is just too juicy of a target, Pax. Sneaky Salamander Detachment of the Freaky Frog Division gonna hump til we bump, ya’herd?
Self repairing powered armor. Until this happens, it will always be a combination of mounted and marching.
Speaking of shocked and dismayed, who would have ever predicted that CAS was going to not be the star role in the first real war of the 21st century? I don’t think this is a failing of Russia, either. If/when GAE escalates in UKR or elsewhere, I think a lot of flybois are going to heroically die for their cuntries to drones and AA.
Ever more advanced firecontrol teche entails ever smaller targets that can be easily engaged by ever smaller platforms.
Most crewed aeroplanes, being rather large, started falling inside those envelopes a long time ago.
Needs some degree of redundancy.
>I think you’re getting different arguments with different people mixed up.
That was mostly me being generally pissed off by the state of DoD. Not only did the Chinese appear to make a superior knockoff, they did it 5lbs lighter.
>i dare say it’s not something larger than 2.2 inches
I don’t have a good argument against that even though I disagree heartily out of a bias for bigger boom.
>I’m not insisting on foot travel
You have a fair point. If I get the chance I will push for a tactical hiking trailer, but you have to understand I come from an indigenous car culture where walking is anathema and triggering. The 15 mile ruck marches gave me PTSD and 19D envy.
I’ve also been told my sense of humor is a little off.
>The motor pool is just too juicy of a target
That was because of GWOT where we simply packed more armor on for every problem. That’s no longer viable, hence we are loosing the armor for speed and developing stealth to avoid being seen in the first place. The motor pool is going to get much harder to hit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAhVkD9fzkg
>who would have ever predicted that CAS was going to not be the star role
It’s hard to say how big of a role CAS is playing in the conflict, but our idea of what CAS looks like is being updated. CAS is best performed by low and slow flying. You need to be able to loiter in an area because if can be really difficult to see little camouflaged men from up high. It’s why the A-10 is so beloved and the F-35 replacing it raises some eyebrows. Turns out cheap drones can fly lower and slower than the A-10.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHeBkXbweZE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UP7A6UIxo-8
Both Russian and Ukrainian grenade drones have been fairly cost effective and there is a lot of room for improvement. Imagine how effective this will be when there are specialized munitions for better guidance and programmable air/ground burst modes.
>bias for bigger boom
The Tao of maximizing Boom can appear simple in theory, but often expands into profusions of subtlety in praxis.
For example, a Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-30-1 launches a 390 gram shell at 1500 RPM at over 3000 FPS; that’s more weight of fire in 10 seconds than an m777 gets in one minute (in normal operation anyways); pretty hefty firepower for something that weighs less than 50 kilos.
Something with a heavier barrel, hitching muzzle device for your belt, and a pair of road wheels that can flip into ground anchors, and you put new meaning into the phrase ‘towed artillery’.
Some more anecdotes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_89_grenade_discharger
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M18_recoilless_rifle
One can notice a common dynamic running through all these different examples; which is, ability to instantly point and shoot high explosives in high volumes carries the day.
There are implications in other tactics as well. For example, a talented sniping team of spotter and shooter has a reasonable limit of around fifteen hundred yards or so, points where the small arms ‘laffer curves’ of size, velocity, and recoil start intersecting. Once you start adding high explosive fragmentation to the mix though, the calculations change, as one now has an exponentially larger ‘hit area’. Ranges of three thousand yards or more for point targets begin entering the realm of possibility, which has any strategic implications, not least of which of course being relevance to elimination of high dependency nodes in the enemy’s social network graph.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3.7_cm_Infanteriegesch%C3%BCtz_M.15
>Infantry in WWI often faced well protected lines of trenches, defended by machine gun nests with interlocking fields of fire. These machine gun nest could be constructed of sandbags, timber, corrugated metal and concrete with overhead protection. For infantry advancing across no man’s land against these positions, all they may see is a small horizontal opening at about waist level, with just the top of the machine gun’s gun shield showing.[2] Infantry would have to close on these positions while under fire and destroy them with rifle fire, grenades, and flamethrowers. The combatants experimented with mortars, rifle grenades, and mountain guns in search of an answer but these positions could only be defeated by direct-fire artillery support. Small caliber mountain guns and mortars such as the Skoda 75 mm Model 15 and the German 7.58 cm Minenwerfer showed promise, but their size and weight combined with the roughness of the terrain weighed against their use.[2]
>The Austro-Hungarian Army’s answer to this need was the 3.7 cm Infanteriegeschütz M.15 which was based on the earlier 3.7 cm Gebirgskanone M.13 and soon after its introduction other nations introduced similar infantry support guns such as the French Canon d’Infanterie de 37 modèle 1916 TRP, the Russian 37 mm trench gun M1915, and the German 3.7 cm TAK 1918. The precision of the 3.7 cm Infanteriegeschütz M.15 compensated for the reduced caliber of the ammunition and the lightness of the piece allowing it to be transported during assaults, unlike the mountain guns used until then in the same role.[2]
Reading between the lines, the ability to point and shoot high explosives at enemies beats almost everything else in almost every situation on a squad level.
When an amazing method of doing something to great effect is innovated, the reaction of the invidious so often is not to adopt it themselves, but to stop anyone from doing it at all. The stipulation against ‘explosive bullets’ in the Hague Convention – much like all forms of bureaucratia across the course of history – can be understood in this context. The innovation of explosive fragmentation shells obsoleted the democratized army of mass peasant levees, and it has been fighting a steadily retracting rear-guard guard action ever since.
When the germans were developing aircraft cannons for fighters, analysis found that while it took an average of 15 to 20 hits with the 20mm MG 151/20 to bring down a bomber, it took only 3-4 hits with the 30mm MK 100’s. A similar dynamic can be seen in the Japanese development of the Type 5 6 inch AAA, where the larger area of effect provided exponentially greater kill probabilities compared to the the next largest Type 3 4.7 inch AAA, including after accounting for the slightly lower rate of fire.
As a general rule, unlike with solid shot, one wants the largest bursting charge they can get, that can reach out to the ranges they want, at a weight and recoil the platform can support.
Tube firing can help simplify the logistics of this issue, by allowing the delivery of a given payload to longer ranges with less propellant through higher velocity. The number of rounds one can field is relevant, since volume of fire is also how you multiply the amount of HE you can deliver to your counterparts. Another efficient trick for larger bursting charges is increasing your projectile weights through higher sectional density (ie, making them longer). One of the late great Gerald Bull’s many innovations was along these lines, through his development of what came to be called ‘extended range full bore’ shells, which are now standard use for howitzers in every major country.
I’ve often felt that something in the 2 bore (~33mm) to 1 pounder (~37mm) range was a sweet spot for infantry scale minengeschutzen and automatic cannons. The chinese evidently have felt the same way, as they’ve developed a wide number of weapon systems in this class. The key is having a size sufficient not just for larger bursting charges in general, but so it can be used for firing PGMs in particular (eg, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pike_(munition)), providing small unit means of engaging otherwise difficult targets like distant helos, drones, or loitering munitions; a force multiplication on an unprecedented scale.
OT:
https://probablyalexandra.substack.com/p/the-inversion-chronicles-822-1022
My fav loopy bitch alexandra posts Trump retruthing obvious Qanon stuff from obvious Qanon accounts, using their slogans as soundtracks for rallies, playing the song “I am Q”, etc.
(Her idea of current events is that the cathedral “the cabal” is the first beast of revelations, while Q and MAGA are the second beast of revelations, where the purpose of the first is to be so mindshatteringly insane, retarded and evil that the people are scared into the trap of the comparatively light and benevolent second beast “the alliance”, which will cement humanity in servitude to a luciferian ruling caste during the shellshock saviour phase. Loopy. Pretty fun. She’s kinda cute too. def would.)
So what gives? Why does Trump actively court Q?
– Trump is now actively manipulating the Q base for his benefit
– Trump has sold out to avoid romanov treatment
– Trump is in on it now, but was not before
– Trump was always in on it
– Other alternatives that i am too smoothbrained to think of.
As is typical of the mentally disturbed, she sees relevance where it is not. I do not see in her data what she sees in it. Q is reaching out to Trump, Trump is not reaching out to Q.
Yes Q obviously reaches wildly towards trump with no pause. Just to pick one example of the reverse:
shorturl.at/itM57
Maybe not reaching out to. But maybe going through the motions of reaching out to.
And i am sick to my core of the Q shit. There was a still until this summer, where the message was “just vote harder bro”. Wherever clowns go, there will be a clownshow.
Q is bullshit though if Revealations turns out to come true obviously the real man of sin has to initially fool the elect so the real final NWO cant be Klaus Schwab and globohomo types.
Pretty funny how all the vaxmaxxed globohomo journalists who went to the world cup are all getting sick and dropping dead lmao.
Well, not all of them. But sufficient to be strikingly noticeable.
My schadenfreude floweth over.
By now everyone has seen this story:
https://nypost.com/2022/12/11/georgia-man-charged-with-killing-ex-wifes-divorce-lawyer-then-torching-office/
KD link:
https://archive.ph/tKOmX
This sort of event isn’t unusual but what is very unusual is the correct motivation is being reported. I undertook an informal study of murder suicides and other violence related to families 15 years ago and I found that pretty much every case involved a wife stealing a man’s children or wealth from him via family court. However Newspaper, TV, and even internet stories on such murders never mentioned the motivation in these killings.
The fact that women don’t know they have a decent chance of dying from divorce raping their husbands has utterly robbed the killings of their deterrent nature. But suddenly it’s being reported and even made it to the top of /r/news on reddit says something has changed.
Fourth Wave Feminism getting the First Wave treatment as the more martial parts of the deep state take a more active role. Musk seems to have partnered with a part of the Red Empire that does not want to get nuked by Russia, China, or North Korea. Same with Patriot Front being permitted to do their thing. They are preparing for what will probably be a pretty nasty war.
Feminism only went lower key during the Wars. But came back with force later. It never went away.
They want to avoid copycat murders. The left’s great power consists in making you feel alone, in making you feel that only you have such and such an opinion and that only you feel such and such urges.
If they report the correct motivation, you know longer feel alone, you instead feel a part of a band of brothers, albeit brothers you have never met face to face, but brothers all the same. And that scares the left.
As well, if the “whole story” comes out, many females will moderate their behavior subconsciously, like cartel wives and girlfriends almost certainly do. Can’t have that, can we! They need women rockin’ & rollin’!
>But suddenly it’s being reported and even made it to the top of /r/news on reddit says something has changed.
>many females will moderate their behavior subconsciously
I would caution against those line of thinking. These types of incidents do get reported on every so often that most people are vaguely aware of such possibility. Ergo it’s not suddenly being reported.
People have a tendency, women much more so than men, to ignore personal dangers that are seen as unusual. We do not consciously think about dying in car accidents even if they account for 46,000 deaths per year in the US. For men, such personal danger simmers in the back of our minds. For women, it doesn’t really register at all. Most women treat the danger of being killed by a divorced raped husband similar to dying in a car crash. They are vaguely aware but not so conscientious to think twice about it.
The partial reverse is true for non-personal dangers. Men don’t really register danger others may face whereas women will fret about even the potential of another getting a light scrap.
Can you post some examples? This issue used to be a hobby horse of mine and while I don’t follow the news that closely these days, I know they used to censor the motivation every time in the past. This is just one data point and yes it’s not enough for a trend.
Women are keenly aware of what men might to do them for their bad behavior based on observed group behavior. This is both evolutionary adaption to avoid being killed since they’re so much weaker than men. A woman who thinks he husband might kill her over divorce rape views her husband as more alpha and women seldom intentionally shit test themselves to death if they know death is a likely outcome.
Just google and you get many results. Here are two that happened this year and are top results meaning people were clicking on the links.
>Women are keenly aware of what men might to do them
They are keenly aware of how they may be abducted, not so much about how they might be killed. Look at how women will venture out to highly dangerous areas (in example Western woman who visit Islamic nations) to “find themselves” while simultaneously not wanting to die (those women did not want to be decapitated). Danger is abstract until it isn’t. Abstract reasoning isn’t a strong ability in most people.
Women are keenly aware of boundaries that have been tangibly demonstrated. Since demonstration has been made largely illegal, many men have depended on unspoken or inferred boundaries. Those boundaries are now abstractions. Women are geared to shit test until they hit a tangible boundary and as a result of modernity shit test far beyond safe. Most of human evolution involved tangible boundaries that were not lethal to women. Hence women did not generally have to worry over being killed for bad behavior because it generally did not ever get to that point.
Moreover, most of the Christian West dealt with adultery by refusing to prosecute the man for killing his wife’s lover. The women would be punished and enclosed with the option for the man to retake her as his wife. Death is not a likely outcome for the woman here as the act of killing the other man is catharsis and re-abducting the woman is the reward. Today’s men will kill the woman because killing the lover results not in catharsis but condemnation. The woman can’t be re-abducted or officially punished so she becomes a liability. When the state is the intangible abstract lover, there is no one other than the woman for the man to target in his rage. This is an alien environment and it shouldn’t be surprising when women are incapable of seeing the dangers in it.
Women behave according to feelings and not according to some type of risk analysis. If their current man fails shit tests they will continue to shit test him until he is completely and utterly destroyed regardless of the consequences to herself or her children.
Musk is a piece of shit and he’s still banning my friends for engaging in legal speech. Tell me you didn’t fall for the Ironman cosplay; he is the living incarnation of a limited hangout. Your star prophet is a joke on wheels. The technology he uses was developed in the 60s, nobody is impressed by jew factioneering, and israel is an illegitimate state.
You are a shill, so presumably your friends are shills, so he should be banning you for the same reasons as I ban you and your friends.
Going forward, context-less or arbitrary anti-semitic posturing should be recognized as automatic shill detect. I’ve seen it on every platform: the feds/groomers/shills always use “hail fellow anti-semite…” and then just deliver their payload, because they cannot conceive of an adversary with any more depth than that.
Com’on at least mark me as deleted.
I’ve heard from reputable friends that CS Lewis deeplore is Soros’ favorite author. They teach it in Shill School They teach it between The Horse and His Boy and the Screwtape Letters. I have, and will denounce the talmud. I denounce soros and I denounce the talmud. When will you denounce Net and Yahoo? As long as you act as a gatekeeper I’ll keep treating you as a gatekeeper; maybe elon muskovitch still has room for you on his staff once he’s done meeting with ari emmanuel.
You have denounced Soros – but only for the vague cultural offenses that can plausibly be attributed to every Jew everywhere ever – only for offenses that fit the Jewish narrative that we just hate Jews for no good reason except that Jews are so smart and we are so stupid.
And I am certainly not going to denounce Benjamin Netanyahu, for he is the enemy of our enemies, and some of our enemies are proposing to give him the Trump Bolsonaro treatment.
What has Benjamin Netanyahu done to harm me and mine?
>What has Bibi done?
Last time I told you you deleted it.
Since you’re so utterly fascinated by my background, [*Hail fellow white male Christian, I am white and Christian too, fellow Christian*]
If I recall correctly, you told me Benjamin Netanyahu was issuing harmful Jewish thought rays that caused white people to strangely and inexplicably do stupid self destructive things.
A more concrete and causal explanation of how he causes evil consequences would not be deleted.
The forever wars are wars for US empire. If they were wars for Israel, we would be fighting in Lebanon and the Gaza strip, rather than Afghanistan, Iraq, and Ukraine.. During the time Netanyahu was in charge, there were frequent vigorous conflicts between America and Israel with America demanding that Israel make expensive and dangerous unilateral concessions to the Arabs. Which for the most part, Israel did, sacrificing its interests for the Global American Empire
I gave you concrete and causal explanations of how Soros causes harm and how Yoel Roth causes harm – which accounts you were strangely unable to give, even after I repeatedly needled you to give them, and when I finally gave them, you remained strangely and mysteriously blind to the fact that I think these unthinkable crime thoughts, that anyone anywhere ever would ever think such a thing.
What you think you know about Christianity is what Jews think they know about Christianity. There are no Christians inside your bubble.
You are a Jew, and when you told me about your Christian upbringing, it was even more obvious you are a Jew, or, at least, entirely unfamiliar with Christians.
Probably nothing, but who would ever think to write “com’on?” It is always written “C’mon”, which makes me wonder if Kikle Shellbergsteinowitzstein here is an ESL joo.
I’ve never seen any anti-Semite “denounce the Talmud” before. I’ve described the Talmud as a source of social pollution before am I’m not sure even I would write that I “denounce the Talmud.”
What exactly is wrong with the Talmud?
Can you even describe the Talmud?
Actually, the Talmud is pretty based. However, that is EXACTLY the reason they don’t want others to be based as well. Look up Mil7emet Reshut which is necessary for a society with above replacement fertility, but which Noahide Law denies to non-Jews.
I liked you better when you were absent.
Your likes are not relevant.
Your life is not relevant lmao gottem
I think there are plenty of valid arguments against the Rabbinic system of government and social organization of which the Talmud is the central document.
But can he make one? Can he even describe the Talmud or the religio-legal system it grounds?
“I denounce the Talmud” sounds like “I hate black people.”
OK. Why do you hate them? Why do some people want to do disallowed things to black people without the passion of hatred?
lmao cry harder.
Who loves Truth may criticize us.
Who bows to a narrative, may not criticize us.
@Rite of Fire
I don’t see any 14 story tall orbital boosters routinely making rocket powered landings in the 1960’s, nor do I see any mass produced satellites in the 1960’s.
Proof that the ruling jew brahmin class and their shills have no clue about the state of the orbital environment. Even outsider Brahmins on Substack, some of whom are one of us, have no comprehension.
I wasn’t the first to realize that Starlink can be repurposed to destroy every military satellite. The Chinese government was the first to realize this.
In many ways 1960s rocket technology was superior to 1980-2000s technology. They put a man on the moon. We had to rediscover the technology. They didn’t blow anyone up. Challenger and Columbia tech killed 13 Americans during flight.
Rite of Fire is a shill, but he’s loosely right for the wrong reasons. Much of the tech Elon Musk used was tech that was rediscovered and given a really good update with modern production methods (a really hard task). The major departure from 1960s tech was the development of reusable rocket engines.
You and I are both excessively pedantic, so it is pretty challenging for me to call you out on it. You’re not wrong, but it is very much the case that Musk has picked up 60s tech and run with it. Inner circle talk about the nuance is fine. In the Outside, Musk is a brilliant visionary and any who say otherwise get Groupon’d.
He does have brilliant vision, but people today seem to obsess over the scaled up 60s tech instead of the reusable rocket. Myself included at times because rediscovering how to do things is extremely hard when all the old timers are retired or dead. Just look at all the arguments over the pyramids.
The 60s dream was being able to fly off planet, go to space, and land again like a plane (or a VTOL flying saucer). They didn’t accomplish that. They weren’t anywhere near. Their solution for lower lift cost was simply to go big (Sea Dragon). Musk managed to completely shift the paradigm with the Falcon rocket.
Starman’s argument isn’t effective because it sandwiched an esoteric truth between boring details. People largely don’t care about “14 story tall orbital boosters” or “mass produced satellites” while the “making rocket powered landings” is easily overlooked. They look at that and think “huh, been there done that.” In fact it’s easy to make the case we use to make rockets better in the 60s if going purely based on inflight deaths.
Musk is on track to reignite the old dream, but it’s going to take something like an orbital hotel at reasonable cost. Check out Voyager Station which is getting assistance from SpaceX. Probably more than 2 decades from now to get costs down if nothing goes wrong.
@Pax Imoerialis
The bovine masses don’t know how anything works in their technological world.
But more importantly, the ruling jew brahmins don’t know how it works.
Boosters returning to launch site (RTLS) is a major improvement in orbital rocket technology, a holy grail of rocket tech for sixty years.
Thus anyone who thinks that tech existed in the 1960s is a retard.
>the ruling jew brahmins don’t know how it works.
>Thus anyone who thinks that tech existed in the 1960s is a retard.
You are not wrong about the ruling class, but you are missing nuance and it throws your analysis off on a consistent basis. It’s worse than not knowing how it works, they don’t even know what the tech is or what the implications are. All they see is tall cylindrical shapes and then they start trying to interpret it under a Freudian lens. As I said it’s completely esoteric knowledge.
The ruling class suffers from complete spiritual and moral rot along with retardation that has crept in with the decadence. Musk’s enemies don’t know his technology or the implications. He can have all the deterrence in the world and it will not matter. They are not deterred at all because they are incapable of understanding what they stand to lose.
They think they can can simply nationalize Starlink/SpaceX and nothing will change. It will work about as well as every communist nationalization in history. It starts with things not just working and ends with purges of “counter revolutionary saboteurs.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_reusable_launch_system_development_program#Technologies
I see shills everyday on youtube trying to make the case that Musk didn’t invent anything new and it’s all 60s tech. They get laughed at. The key factor is the massive reduction in cost to orbit which shill lie about and no one believes them.
The proof for normies is Starlink. High speed internet anywhere you go and soon we’ll have cheap phones service through an improved Starlink network. People can see that’s something new and very high tech.
>They get laughed at.
And they get taken seriously on Capitol Hill. Those shills have institutional backing evidenced by being allowed to propagate “their” ideas uncensored on all the major social media platforms by the powers that be.
They’re Soros shills, of course they allowed. There’s no such thing as free lance shills, they do it for money.
The point is they’re ineffective at shilling and the US military knows that SLS isn’t doing shit for them. Elon has cleverly tied up America’s only Trump card in a war against China or Russian into his Rockets. It’s either let him build Starship, Starlink and Starlink’s military version or watch the GAE crumble.
Don’t ask don’t tell (1993)
Repealed (2010)
Gay marriage (2015)
Transgenders allowed in military (2018)
Does that look like ineffective? Of course a lot of that was the regime drinking their own Kool-Aid, but that’s just more evidence of shilling working even if that was not the intended audience. For now the military follows orders. The question will be how many carrier groups have to be sunk for that to change?
[*deleted*]
They’re really attacking Elon now, and I’m also seeing more mentions of “Jim” and “blog.reaction.la” by name. Acceleration and revealing spilling out all over.
@Jim I suggest you considering doubling down on ever-more-succinctly condensing and streamlining your Social Networking white paper, and linking it on your front page somewhere. Not the coding and execution. Just the white paper. Maybe that’s as far as you can take this on your own. Maybe that’s the best you can actually do.
If you really can prove yourself to be the Secret Super Genius who Satoshi Nakamoto’ed this whole motherfucker himself from the top, well that would be great, but also, “try on” the idea that you needn’t achieve that to ultimately get what you really want.
I think it was Metcalf who said there’s no limit to what you can achieve if you don’t care who gets the credit.
Satoshi was inspired and guided by others before him who lacked the super-chops to finish the code, but did have the perspective to concisely explain what The Problems really were — better than Satoshi himself could understand them at first — and therefore what their Solutions would “look like”. They couldn’t get to the finish line, but they could and did describe where it was, and then Satoshi picked up their treasure map, ran with it, and found the finish line where they said it would be.
This world is a Panopticon for them, and a Dark Forest for everyone else. The game theory of such a situation I can’t begin to imagine.
There’s no way to properly measure your “reach”, to count the ears listening when you shout into the darkness, but I’ll bet they’re more numerous and capable now than you presumed in 2008, fourteen whole years ago.
(This exhortation applies to me as well obviously, probably moreso, if in a different direction.)
Where are you seeing Jims name mentioned elsewhere a lot…
I rarely see anyone explicitly namedropping BJC on their own, but if you post something that sounds like something someone would post here, there will always be a comment recognizing it, one way or another.
I’ve seen it linked a few times recently on twitter. There’s a bunch of explicitly NRx people on there now.
Here is one in this thread:
https://twitter.com/_MedGold/status/1601232171641208834
Fair enough, but for some extra context for those who don’t know:
MedGold is a BAPshere character, and in that sphere/those adjacent to it, Jim’s Blog is fairly well-known I’d say. MedGold got big by posting pictures of hot women as an “aesthetics” account, so while his audience probably slightly more normie than your average BAP twitter follower, they’re not really normies. Good sign though.
The latest mockingbird script seems to be ‘african blood mines colonizer imperialist’; any social media post tangentially related to Musk in any way will always have a peanut galley of cutouts bringing up that talking point.
Of course, Musk doesn’t run a mining company (though maybe he should). He runs manufacturing companies, buying materials from suppliers for turning into products, much like how the bugman buys food from various suppliers for turning into shit.
Were we to broach the conversation about whether the ability of kids to earn wages to support themselves and or their families makes the baizuo feel good about themselves or not – the most important metric for deciding anything about civilization and the affairs of nations for any twitter user – then we can start by asking why Congolese businessmen themselves find it copacetic to do so.
If Musk – and anyone else – doesn’t like it, they could simply stop buying resources from the Congo; then the tranzi can go without all the things they take for granted that they can’t even imagine what life would be like without, and the noble savages can go without anything at all, including food shelter and safety. And then this one supposes would be the point where the heroic communist vanguard would say ‘death is preferable to life tolerating injustice’, and i’m sure the neo-holodomor victims would all appreciate the nobility of their ‘principles’ that other people have to pay the cost for. As Zap Brannigan would say, ‘many of you will die: but that is a sacrifice im willing to make’.
The reality of post-19th-century colonial administration can be seen in ‘Shooting The Elephant’; the men staffing them ironically in fact men who themselves were just the same sort of men as their ostensible opposition; who each individually believed in the moral worthlessness of each other, of any of the goals or projects they were nominally in charge of accomplishing, and of the broader societies they were nominally a part of. When push came to shove, rather than make any real spirited attempt to impose a vision of order of their own on their nominal subjects (they reserve such zeal for the prosecution of their own neighbors), we find them, simply, ultimately, drifting along with the prevailing tides of the ‘subjects’ they supposedly ruled over – until eventually they and all their trappings were in turned washed out to sea, and things once and again return to that which was what before them.
It was so long ago that I’ve nearly forgotten it myself, but try to remember how the confluence of 2015 Twitter, Wikileaks, and the DNC email leak (anything else?), together, caused the train of history to switch tracks so quickly and so radically. I can barely remember the world that today was supposed to be.
Once there’s a truly working “hamburger-ready†cryptocurrency then boom, fiats will vanish like smoke. Likewise, social networking done right will leave the GAE a global laughingstock in 24 months max, without firing a single shot. Turbo stereo samizdat skywriting. So many will never owe so much so few.
BTW if you want any more evidence that Elon is part of the NRx worldview…
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1469762144786919427
Gentlemen… the Sulla meme. From a little over a year ago.
This might explain why Musk is still alive. Which does not necessarily guarantee he will remain alive
He must have some pretty good ex specops types looking after his physical security what I’ll never understand is how the twatter sale wasn’t just blocked via some legal pretext or when Musk said he didn’t want it on account of how many users were bots (this might have been some kind of stratagem).
His main lawyer (and I guess with his Harvard background and even I recently learned a brief stint in the CIA a man with the right priestly background) my old friend Alex Spiro is a great guy (I swear to everyone here despite all those things hes a great guy) but can he stop them from outright rigging the legal system against him the way they did in every Trump election challenge… I doubt it.
If Musk is operating from the correct frame, the in-place legal framework is largely irrelevant. To win, he’s going to have to do an end run around the system, not work with or in it.
Yes of course but the twitter deal ended up in court and somehow did not end up getting blocked in court…
I wish I could give my old friend all the credit there but other things must have been done behind the scenes, some involving him but other things probably involving moving heaven and earth by Musk’s military friends.
If some faction/group in the DoD is planning to Restore American Democracy (with imperial characteristics) then they’ll probably wait until:
-things get substantiallly worse on the domestic front
-the Cathedral loyal units get even more incapacitated by DEI
-more elites become disaffected
-the Regime provides a final casus belli
That last one rankles for us, as it appears that there’s a literal endless list of perversions, violations, corruption, and criminality, but we are too far ahead of the curve in many ways. Coronatarianism’s high priest is now on Musk’s hit list just as more public acknowledgement of massive deception and overreach during Covid is becoming reportable. The nation’s highest ranked open pervert just got fired from DOE (this department has a long history of being a frontline battleground between civil service and military since its formation) for quite possibly the dumbest reasons ever. The Biden Regime just traded away an “International Arms Dealer” to secure the freedom of an anti-American malcontent of 0 strategic value while publicly spurning one of their (DoD/IC/military) lost sons.
It must be incredibly hard for even the most blindly loyal sheepdog class servants to ignore these terrible blunders and erosions of perceived power/competence. Macgregor is sounding off weekly about the incompetence of the court advisors, and I imagine there are lots of whispered conversations going on at the major-colonel level.
I may be painting an overly optimistic or fantastical picture here, but I don’t think it’s completely unlikely that moves are being made. Musk seems to be acting with near impunity, so I cannot fathom he’s acting alone. If there’s any validity to Twitter rumors, the SV tech priest class is starting to whisper about purging dead weight, and Republican politicians are openly pointing to the headcount reduction/quality-fuction increase at Twitter as a possibly viable model for “fixing” government.
The Cathedral lost a significant castle on the map when Twitter was taken. I wonder which other castles are less secure than they seemed a few months ago…
As for who might be backing up Elon.
The schitzo take is that freeing up Twitter is to organize, embolden and honeytrap some new suckers into the next J6 so they can cancel the 2024 election, even moreso. Digital Bakhmut. So there’s that.
I still can’t take seriously that GAE will do anything about Taiwan, but I also never imagined that Vladimir would put his foot down on Donbas, or that GAE would push back as it has.
If this Taiwan thing goes down, they’ll have to do it themselves. No local whites to use and kill off, so they’ll have to bring them in. It’ll also be much more naval and air forcey, and you can’t do that stuff with Shaniquas everywhere. Where’s Maverick when you need him?
I mean seriously people, when was the last actual American naval battle? And who was on those boats for it? There’s a faction in there who knows they’re fucking doomed as they are now.
I still believe IVI was a hastily thrown together operation, not some elegantly formulated and executed masterstroke. That crowd was lousy with glowniggers of every type and shape, and it took a ton of goading as well as literal doors being opened, basically had to invite the lowest IQ morons in. It is a travesty that anyone is unfairly incarcerated at all, but they didn’t get Trump behind bars and, if anything, the terrible execution has galvanized opposition, at least spiritually.
All this to say, I genuinely wonder if they have any capacity for grand conspiracies of any significance at this point. While They will of course attempt to use FreiTwitter to entrap, I really doubt it’s some elaborate honeypot. Losing Twitter was a significant blow to the Regime, the Cathedral, and the whole progressive culture. Traditionally, it’s the Cathedral’s turn to make a move, but if Musk has a “side”, I don’t think they’re going to rest on laurels. Too much at stake.
@ElonJet got suspended after some sort of stalker used the real time location data to jump on top of Musk’s car. Musk is taking legal action against the twitter user and organization behind him.
Musk’s survival chance is slowly ticking up.
Throughout COVID I thought it likely everything was building to war with China. That our causus belli would be they caused COVID and /or the politicians who were responsible for it were in China’s pocket/stolen elections. Revealing this to the population to get them onboard and change the media narrative seemed the toughest part as there’s no way they could have CNN and NBC do such a quick turn around.
Perhaps Twitter’s ownership change could do that. The bots creating the false reality before get removed and everyone can see that the real humans felt the way they did all along. Leaving the last trick to be pushing that rage towards the foreign adversary instead of blowing it back in their face.
The biggest hole in this logic however is the fact that the powers that be seemed to pull us back from the brink of war when it was reported that Russian missiles had landed in Poland and killed two service members. That stands out to me is more of an aberration than anything else.
He knew all about the bots from the beginning. Come on man.
He knew there were lots of bots, im not sure he knew that most twitter “users” were bots.
Elon is not a secret reactionary lmao. He’s very obviously playing into the populism for his own personal clout/attention/power.
Caesar Elon Musk will be competent but trannies and gays will still be the norm and won’t be going anywhere.
Musk is playing into populism by referencing an extremely obscure Roman Patrician (not named Caesar)?
I dont know what he’s doing but this is not a populist signal. I agree with the others, this is a signal/dog whistle only for very specific people. Musk is also putting a target on his back for those who can hear the dog whistle?
Pretty sure that only our guys can hear the dog whistle. The shills reading this blog can hear it also, and will explain it to their masters, but their masters will not understand.
Shill script is always obvious because it is a kneejerk reaction to an unwanted/feared/worrisome signal, but it is not a fully fleshed out thought.
Bill is a D&C shill that frames from the “right” and is always ready with a message of “if you think it’s good news, I’ve got news for you” or “if you think that’s bad, you don’t know the half of it.” This type of shill sprang up on /pol/ and would usually come in after some slide thread incidentally scored a hit, or some other misdirection needed backup/reinforcement. His purpose is to initiate and instigate, letting the naturally dreary carry the message further with his gentle prodding. When questioned or called out, he will reply with a pithy rejoinder or dismissive utterance, but otherwise disengage, as it is his job to death spiral or derail an unwanted discussion (or, naturally, accelerate up or down a fruitless path).
In this specific instance, we see his shoddily developed script:
>musk + unfortunate truth + “lmao” [only fools believe this]
>musk + “obviously” [I, an intellectual; you, a blind fool] + faking/misleading + evil/pernicious/not-our-side motivations.
[this is an interesting turn: he’s ceding the frame, but pretending that it isn’t relevant or important, and this leads me to believe it was hasty and poorly thought out]
>”Caesar Musk” [literally populist, NRx Musk? after the previous? which one is the lie?] + “competent” [but not messianic, dominating, or something else, just a lowly competent, bah] BUT (trannies and sodomites will still have access to your children).
And this is the stupid turd in the tepid punchbowl. Musk’s son has been taken from him and violated out in the public square. Musk wants to go to Mars, and I submit that he was always going to need to get very involved in the socio-cultural sphere to do that, as the scientific challenge can be solved with the consistent application of money and smarts over time. But instead of the impetus being “we need to alter the social discourse to get back on the Sputnik/JFK/moon train” it is now “I am going to Mars, and I am going to ruin a few thousand people while I do it.” It is 100% speculation on my part as to how significant the cultural seduction/abduction then memetic murder of his son is for him. I don’t know if his son has been gelded yet or is just being paraded around by exultant puppet master perverts. Imagine being as close to a scifi tech priest protagonist as anyone in history, the type written about by all the best scifi authors, and you cannot protect your son from literal daemon worshipers that pray on children. Alex Jones got a tiny test of this treatment for the flimsiest of excuses. Musk is not going to be kind or delicate with the sodomite evangelists if he gets a chance.
He married several trannies already so I’m not sure whose “side” he is supposed to be on.
Which of Musk’s former wives is a tranny…
One of his kids from his 1st wife became a tranny, which I’m sure did not make him like clownworld all that much. Grimes is crazy though and dated the tranny thing Chelsea Manning (which I don’t get but it may have been a revenge thing on Musk) but isn’t a tranny herself.
One of Musk’s ex wives despite being an actress apparently hates the globohomo religion and texted him during the twitter acquisition that he should go through with it in order to fight wokeism…
Point deer, make horse
How many children have your wives given you?
He’s a wierd guy so what. Not everyone ends up with Barbi.
He can’t even answer TC or support his claim. Why bother? Either a low skill shill or just stupid.
Breitbart reporting that Elon Musk has fired The Cominator’s old friend, Alex Spiro, who apparently made the decision to retain former FBI lawyer/stooge James Baker, who tried to disrupt the release of internal files and was, as a result, fired by Musk a few days ago.
You meant to say he’s no longer working at Twitter, right?
Sounds like hes just no longer working as the de facto general counsel at twatter.
Homophobia is a strange word. Fear of homosexuals? Is that really a thing outside of prisons, or is the primary reaction to homosexuals disgust? I believe it’s disgust. Got curious on where the term came from because the word’s etymology is so counterintuitive.
Discomfort sounds more like a general icky feeling rather than shrieking in irrational fear like one would expect with a phobia.
Senses dislike so it’s obviously fear! Projection?
I suppose Weinberg, our most progressive friend from the holiest of tribes, may have gotten one thing right. I do fear the contagious aspect homosexuals embody by them being walking petri dishes of diseases, but that fear ultimately roots back to a disgust reaction.
Ah, the old communist trick that any opposition must therefore be mentally ill.
Just more evidence that the behavior of the woke today has deep roots in American history.
https://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2008/09/either_conservatives_are_cowar.html
https://archive.ph/4NvVc
Lack of disgust reflex is a common epiphenomena of congenital solipsism. The only thing that really influences the decision making of such sorts of creatures is fear, pain, or shame; and since they cannot imagine a model of other people working in any other way, they assume the object of their ire are just the same as them (except somehow defective and or in the service of the devil, because they aren’t agreeing with them for some odd reason).
Thus, if you don’t like faggots, then the only reason why must because they make you scared, hurt, or ashamed in some way.
And of course obviously there is a tactical angle to the rhetoric as well. ‘A real man would not be afraid of letting me organize my forces’; ‘a real man would not be afraid of letting me occupy his sudentenland’; ‘a real man would not be afraid of letting me stab my knife in his chest’.
So on it goes.
Homophobia is an enemy word and a lie. Normal men feel disgust, but not fear.
Some phobias are aptly named, e.g. acrophobia. Some people really fear hights.
If a fancy word is needed, a greek word might be used that means disgust, e.g. nausea, instead of phobia. Of course, most people won’t understand a word like “homonausea”.t
Skeptical Karl for the fucking win.
Homonausea. So it is written, so it shall be.
Homonausea ex homoamericae ad nauseam?
Apparently homophobia has a higher heritability than homosexuality itself. #bornthatway.
Makes sense. Independently why homosexuality exist, groups of men with the genes for disgust at it would have less gay men and would cooperate better.
And considering also the habits of gay men it would exist less spread of diseases in the group.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network-centric_warfare
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_Warrior
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratnik_(equipment)
The most notable thing about all these prevailing ‘future soldier’ concepts coming out of the prevailing institutions, is that out of all the verbiage involved, there is not a single explicit notation of the most important capability of all: portable rangefinding and transmission of dataset to nearby ordnance asset for immediate pinpoint disposal. They say ‘network centric warfare’, and the only thing they think of is heartbeat monitors for the central general bureaucrat to gaze approvingly on even more tabs he can keep on his colony of ants.
The bureaucracy is always expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.
Besides that only now with the ukranian war are we seeing what 21st century may look like. We all much to learn about what works and doesnt work.
Shocking that this doesn’t already happen. Recon gets eyes on a target, tags its precise latitude and longitude with LiDAR (relative to the known quantity of the soldier’s GPS location), and these coordinates get sent to an automated artillery piece that drops a shell on the exact position.
Don’t even need the GPS for that matter; the transmission of unit to asset is itself a vector, which when combined with the vector of unit to target, can be interpolated into a vector of asset to target.
There are probably many possible answers, but the two obvious ones are: bureaucracy can’t even, and modern war is more about maiming and culling unwanted men than it is about winning. As Fidelis said, sort of, UKR war is going to teach us a lot.
War is always about winning and there arent that many unwanted men in modern societies. The fertility is so low and the populations getting so old that sacrificing young men is a sure way to destroy a nation.
That is a sacrifice the Jews are willing to make. White men are extremely unwanted because each of us is a potential Hitler eager to take back our homelands and finish the job. Everything Jews do is a scheme to shoah us before we shoah them. Ukraine is their greatest success so far; more will follow.
Firebro, you are making the mistake of letting logic mix in with existing rationale. You are correct, but it is irrelevant. There is no one sane in control.
In the west there isn’t but the kremlin looks scared about suffering causalities likely because russia can no longer fight an attrition war the old way.
Possibly, yes. But I maintain that they are absolutely certain that Ukraine is the beginning of a conflict, not the end of an operation. I think they fully expect an expanded conflict and must juggle the necessities that implies with internal cohesion and capacity. RWAbros referenced this in one of their podcasts, so I am just lifting and mangling their analysis here, that the Kremlin is far more concerned with internall dissent than they are external opinion. Back in the early days of the SMO, everyone, including this blog and many commenters, were stating that the RF was losing the propaganda war. I think this was incorrect. I think they are taking the long view in all this, and they know that the real threat to their State is not NATO bases/bombs on the border but is demographic decline, GAE soft power infiltration, and GAE insanity resulting from internal collapse and factional squabbles. At no point was Ukraine ever going to invade Russia proper or present a credible existential threat to the RF. But a GAE gone mad with internal collapse is a terrifying threat. Imagine that tranny faggot luggage stealer being in the chain of command. Imagine the damage a childless HR catlady could do if she (Harris) was calling the shots.
Helter skelter response, I admit it, but we must look at every State Regime as a system of internal and external states of being. Countries may be internally coherent but externally toothless, or externally powerful but internally destabilized. It’s like a game of Prisoner’s Dilemma but each prisoner is also a game of Prisoner’s Dilemma.
In kinda agree with you but i think that NATO military power is as much of a threat as infiltration. It may be now even more of a threat because infiltration may not longer be working well.
If Russia loses a war agaisnt NATO it will be immediately dismantle and genocided.
Also Ukraine in NATO is a existential threat in to Russia.
Ukraine in NATO + a decade of “development” is existential threat. That’s why the balloon went up in February 2022. Dumb fucking Russians believed Minsk 02 was a good faith agreement, and it took 8 years of blatant violations before Vlad was like, “Vasily, I dnot thnik these Amerikanskys are telling treuth”. They were caught flat-footed by the 2020 steal just like every group of good, honest people was and then had to very quickly develop contingencies they previously thought unneeded. Trump really was a godsend to the world, and his failure to cross the Rubicon may have doomed many of us currently drawing breath.
At this point, they really have no other option but to turtle up and wait for the GAE to collapse, being ever ready to secure their frontier and possibly even first strike if things get too crazy. I still maintain that the destruction of Nordstream was a Red Line and they are literally on a Snapcount Timeline that’s probably 3-5 years long. If GAE doesn’t collapse and/or Biden or worse gets elected, they really have no other choice but to do the needful.
What examples do we have of militaries that were entirely structured/restructured after 1980 or later, to account for modern technologies?
The Taliban? Mexican drug cartels? Hezbollah? ISIS?
None of these are what I would call a “military”. I suppose that’s the point.
[*Deleted for presupposing facts not in evidence
Argument from fake consensus not allowed on this blog*]
The evidence that I see is that Ukrainian shelling is indiscriminate and aimed at mass extermination of Ukrainian civilians, as for example their shelling of Donbass and their shelling of nuclear waste storage, while Russian shelling is highly selective, and aimed at rescuing Ukrainian civilians from the merciless and murderous clutches of the Global American Empire.
You may disagree. You may have convincing evidence that I am wrong. But you will have to present that evidence and make that argument rather than just assuming that everyone knows and agrees with your version of reality, that everyone already knows and agrees that Russia is engaged in brutal conquest, rather than self defense against a savage, insane, and indiscriminately murderous conqueror.
Hand-rubbingDemocracy intensifies in Ukraine with the seizure of church assets and persecution of clergy:https://archive.ph/urloe
Perhaps one of our resident shills would be so kind as to remind us again how Russia is the baddie?
[*Loud denunciation of the mote in Russia’s eye while ignoring the beam in globohomo’s eye*]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Krasovsky
Seems like good evidence that Russia is the good guy.
Faggots need killing. Russia is at least making a small start.
[*Deleted for presupposing facts not in evidence
Argument from fake consensus not allowed on this blog*]
If Russia were a good guy, this person would not represent Russia in the information space.
It is not difficult to notice the vices of the West, and only the lazy do not. Russia/China/Third Reich/Israel/Japan or South Korea, which some see as an alternative, deserve separate criticism, because too many on the right wishful thinking.
He does not “represent Russia in information space”. He got purged, or purged himself. He does not represent Russia. He hates Russia, he denounces Russia, Russians hate him, and denounce him. And they fired him or forced his resignation.
Because Russia, unlike America, is a relatively free society, many voices are heard. That does not mean that any one of those voices “represents” Russia.
One of the downsides of freedom is that bad people may speak. Still, it is an improvement over America, where only bad people may speak.
China is in many ways better than both Russia and the United States. For example, the Chinese have effectively solved the issue of their Chechnya: the birth rate of the Uighurs is now lower than that of the Han, while Russia pays tribute and humiliates itself. The Chinese have the most meritocracy-like political system of any major country in the world. China has made great strides in reproductive technology. China is exporting tiktok to the west, cooking the brains of girls and stealing the data of millions. China effectively turns the surrounding countries into satellites while Russia loses its own.
Does this mean that we need to become Chinese shills, praise the Communist Party and the great leader Xi, expecting that the rice empire is about to be able to pull us out of the crisis straight to the stars, along the way giving out cat-girl wives to its supporters?
The problem is that Xi is disinclined to give cat girl wives to his supporters, and his ideology renders him incapable of doing so. His ideology is likely to undo the good work done by Deng, and return China to the dark ages.
If his ideology was able and willing to supply cat girl wives, he would win, and I would sign up in an instant.
China between the time of Deng and Xi is great but Xi has wrecked it.
Xi is a wannabe Mao with some Erich Honecker (surveillance state control freak) thrown in…
Deng reformed China and the CCP’s source of legitimacy changed to be based off of economic growth. Most of the growth was fueled by exports. That is sustainable so long as China can freely trade.
Xi is not a Mao. He gives Deng face by calling Xi Jinping Thought a broad framework for Deng’s socialism with Chinese characteristics. He has canonized Deng over Mao. Under Xi private land ownership rights have been expanded rather than restricted. This trend towards private ownership and capitalism has only been offset by very recent developments.
The Chinese are preparing to be completely cut off from maritime trade. It’s why they’ve likely spent a trillion USD equivalent to expand land based infrastructure to bypass having to do shipping through South China Sea. Rail, trucking, and pipelines through Central Asia and Siberia. That is also a factor in why they’ve cracked down on the Uyghurs so harshly. Troubles in Xinjiang would put those investments at risk.
They are preparing because there is no way to reconcile with the West over the Taiwan question. Having a hostile, large, unsinkable rock just off the coast of their populous manufacturing coastline is unacceptable. That has to be dealt with sooner rather than later, but doing so will result in the end of Chinese shipping. Xi has told the PLA to “focus all its energy on fighting†in preparation for war.
The economic ramifications would be severe and shake the legitimacy of the CCP. Xi has attempted to change that by shifting the source of legitimacy away from economic growth and towards a nationalist one China ideology. China has a long history of warlordism combined with a plethora of separatist ethnic identities that have been suppressed by paying them off. Surveillance state is being implemented to hold everything together when easy money to bribe runs out.
Presumably after a successful reunification war and the economic damage has stopped, China can start rolling back towards Deng style China and start rebuilding, but that’s likely a good 10-20 years from now.
The zero covid stuff (yes VERY recently abandoned) makes it hard for me to take this Xi is a rational Machiavellian actor stuff seriously, people understand the economy not growing if there is a blockade too anyway sabotaging it beforehand is just stupid.
[*deleted for untruth*]
We already discussed kravosky. What you are saying is demonstrably untrue, and upon being called on it, you just repeat yourself, wasting space and reader time and bandwidth.
In the US, everyone who gets to speak on television is the voice of the state. In Russia, not so, in particular it is completely obvious that Kravosky is not the voice of Russia, not the voice of the Russian state, not the voice of the Russian Church, but a hostile dissident whose hostility to Russia, to Russian society, to Russian moral norms, and whose continued service to the Global American empire and to the US officially unofficial state religion is getting him into hot water.
If Xi changed his mind and decided to give cat girl wives to his people, could he do it? Are there structural reasons why he can’t? Is even he not powerful enough to make that happen?
Xi doesn’t rule alone either, but for this question, I’m not sure what that means. On the news he’s an unopposed dictator, but that can’t be literally true. Not true how? You tell me.
If you are going to reward the people you need by ensuring that they have the opportunity to reproduce – sex, family, grandchildren, you need a state religion that justifies doing it.
Which would mean he would have to toss the existing state religion “socialism with Chinese characteristics” You might well say Deng already tossed it, but Xi is encountering a crisis of cynicism and disbelief, and is attempting to deal with that crisis by being less blatant about abandoning Marxism than Deng was.
To supply cat girl wives, either old type Confucianism, or old type Christianity. Both of these are unthinkably and obviously reactionary and anti Marxist.
>makes it hard for me to take this Xi is a rational Machiavellian actor stuff seriously
For the same reason why I believe the main driving force behind the lockdowns in America were to consolidate power and not because of Covid, China’s lockdowns were also likely incidental to Covid.
If you look at the severity of the lockdowns in China you will see an extreme relaxation after the initial wave that would only intensify again with Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan.
That’s not to say those were purely rational decisions. People react irrationally all the time in regard to their rational motivations. I do think China got extremely close to declaring war on Taiwan far more than Western analysts realize. Going off of Xi’s speech in November, it’s clear they got cold feet on going to war immediately and it isn’t surprising restrictions were lifted a month later.
Maybe I’m reading causation into a correlation not linked to causation, but East Asians don’t think or speak in open cause and effect like the West and correlation is really the only tool to derive intent from Chinese political signaling.
Is Xi Thought just a framework for “socialism with Chinese characteristics” which between the lines means a framework for pretending they are socialists while readopting Chinese heritage? I can’t say for sure, but that’s what Deng meant if going by results. Time will tell.
If lockdowns were a cover for a covert mobilization for invasion Taiwan would be getting attacked probably a week ago at the latest so I can’t buy that either…
Zero covid so long after even Demoshit states in the US stopped it just seemed insane any way I can look at it.
“One of the downsides of freedom is that bad people may speak. Still, it is an improvement over America, where only bad people may speak.”
That’s one for the Quotable Jim file.
>Sodomite
>Hates children
Many such cases. Sad!
Hopefully they won’t let anymore faggots near media outlets going forward, although I’m a bit surprised it took them this long to get rid of him.
https://karlstack.substack.com/p/breaking-harvard-taps-gay-as-next
It appears Harvard is fully converged.
Harvard is what everyone else converges on.
Sounds like excellent news.
It isn’t. Harvard somehow manages to bless anything it touches, and yet nothing ever pulls down the reputation of Harvard.
Harvard’s power is based on its position as an informal center of meritocracy in a Christian civilization. There is no equivalent in heathen civilizations because they only see schooling as a way for the government to rear children, but there is no meritocracy tradition. But every Christian American student wants to make it into Harvard based on merit and his academic background and activities will revolve around this goal.
Harvard can only be reformed by formalizing meritocracy standards to a universal level (including equal salary levels across different cost of living areas for the same job title), or just by abolishing it. Allowing deviants into Harvard and hoping that will bring it down is a proven absolute failure.
Pretty sure its name is mud among smart people, as for example Musk
What you call meritocracy is priestly rule by centralized authority, which is not at all meritocratic, which is why Harvard’s name is now mud among smart people.
The job of universities has never been determining merit, but inculcating the state religion. Always has been, always will be.
Even 20 years ago when I was in High School as far as schools go Harvard was not the school of the top brains only the most organizationally/politically ambitious so not the “center of meritocracy”.
The top genius/brain school was MIT followed by Caltech but even they had bad quotas against white and east asian males at that point.
The meritocracy model is the only way to explain why anyone, especially a Christian, would force his children to go to a modern public school. The overwhelming majority of people still support this model and demand respect for it, except obnoxious grifters who only see value in quantifiable performance rather than quality, and most importantly of all the common good.
Elon Musk is a very recent phenomenon. He did not exist in the 90’s and he might not exist a decade from now. We’ll see.
I have no interest in the state religion, to put it mildly. Most people don’t. But most people want their merit level judged fairly and compensated or else they wouldn’t have anything to do with academia whatsoever.
By the way, I suspect USNWR might actually have more soft power than Harvard now. Notice that they aren’t even forced to put up a deviant frontman like Harvard. And their rankings are as legally untouchable as Covid vaccines. And there are a lot of hungry lawyers out there…
Lots of jobs are only issued to adherents of the state religion. The accreditation represents adherence to the state religion.
You talk about meritocracy but you mean a conformist midwit busywork midwitocracy.
True meritocracy would be based purely on reliable cognitive tests, dumb people and lower midwits could only get “enlisted” ranks in large organizations and while hard work and accomplishments could get them more money and more enlisted status (to the point that higher ranks would respect them the way senior non comms are respected in the military) they could never be promoted beyond that level unless somehow their intelligence truly went up (I think it is probably possible to do this even without drugs or new tech thru doing certain types of puzzles and math obsessively as a hobby). High midwits (120-140) would be on the officer track and could perhaps get to upper ranks though in some organizations the highest (but not all organizations as we need some geniuses to do independent outside stuff) ranks could only be reached by the 140+ IQ types…
Doing school busywork is not a good analogue of this system.
“Elon Musk is a very recent phenomenon. He did not exist in the 90’s”
The heroic entrepeneur type had actually renaissance in the 80s-90s because the institutions got more intolerable for people like Musk to work in… it was much rarer in the 40s thru early 60s when the US was more efficiently dominated by institutions and megacorporations (which were much more competent than today). Part of what makes clownworld so awful is that the big institutions of various kinds want to and largely have asserted the kind of dominance of life they had in the New Deal/Postwar era but massively more corrupt, womanized and incompetent. Also academia due to subsidized credit is massively more expensive…
Reagan to Romney was arguably the big business conservative era, but after 2012 the corporate world became woke capital and entrepreneurs became more heroic, rather than being loser dropout types. You could be charitable and call them “eccentrics”.
The dream job of most conservatives is corporate management from the Cold War or War on Terror era, though Clinton in between didn’t push leftism like Obama did later.
And conservatives generally like management to be taken from elite universities, not the mail room laborers who work their way up, because educational upward mobility is the reason why conservatives still send their children to modern schools even if the curriculum is now outright evil.
It’s an interesting and tragic situation, when an evil IQ test is still an IQ test. That’s Greek tragedy material there. But plain IQ tests are called evil, too. Maybe they are.
[*account of what conservative businessmen think and want deleted*]
I was there. You don’t know any conservatives, you don’t know any businessmen, and you don’t know any conservative businessmen.
That stuff is absolutely not what they wanted, but was imposed on them by state terror.
I’m going to pretend that jim wrote something, realized it was an incorrect [*account of what conservative businessmen think and want*] and solemnly deleted it because those are the fucking rules.
>Clinton in between didn’t push leftism like Obama did later
Interesting note here, though I don’t know the implications thereof: completely false, if anything, the acceleration of convergence under Clinton regime was actually massive, but it was foundational and long lasting. This was when the worst woke enablers of today were building their identities, perceptions, and social networks. Clinton era Elite Formation was operationalized under Obama Regime after being supercharged under the “dark days” of Bush Regime. Under Clinton, the great leftward radicalization began. Under Obama, the slaves and fuccbois of the Clinton elites we’re dressed up in purple and given crowns and status.
I hate the word meritocracy so much.
“Okay, everyone i meet thinks i am a worthless person for some reason – which just goes to show how humans are all stupid and blinded by ignorant biases (except for people like me of course). Therefore obviously we need some sort of abstract, impersonal procedure proceeding from some sort of abstract impersonal institution which will be able to correctly validate me as having worth.”
Pretty much because of that, variations and spin offs of that.
Never thought of it that way. So perhaps you could say meritocracy is meant to mean ‘that which is useful in a free market society’, only as determined by a central (priestly) authority. So an anti-concept?
Suppose you, the emperor, want governance by competent people. So you set up a centralized bureaucratic system for selecting and training competent people. Which inevitably becomes priestly and run by priests, and bye and bye, no longer selecting for smart people, but for characteristics that may be less desirable.
Not an anti concept, but it presupposes that a hard problem is soluble.
Compare with aristocracy, rule by the best, where the selection of best is local, distributed, disorderly, and violent. Aristocracy is a lot better at producing a genuinely superior ruling elite than meritocracy, but is apt to have a great deal of violence and destruction.
Obviously a peaceful and bureaucratic selection of best would be better, if it actually worked. Unfortunately, making it work is, not an anti concept, but is an unsolved problem.
As I said above if you wanted to establish a merit screen you’d use real cognitive test you wouldn’t require years of academia.
Of course you would. IQ test, plus job performance, plus evidence of good character. It is not hard. Not hard, but the people administering it have incentives to make it hard. Your bureaucracy to administer this grows, and winds up requiring twenty years of priestly schooling.
The trick to ‘rule of law vs rule by fiat’ rhetoric is that in reality, both are rule by fiat.
For any given standard there will naturally be effort to game the standard; not just in terms of malicious compliance, but also in terms of ‘updating’ the standards themselves. ‘The Constitution is a living document dontchaknow’.
I think John has the right of it. Rule is always by fiat of the ruler, and so the reason an aristocracy produces the best is that it is hard to game war. War games would no more work than bureaucrats taking tests. Delusions and hype cannot survive an environment like war, so the clever tricks available to warriors are just another way to prosecute a war. The art of war is deception; truth is the first casualty in war.
https://www.bernardoption.com/the-asymmetry-of-the-holon-governs-chaos/
With a king overseeing it IQ tests wouldn’t go off the rails by additionally requiring “schooling”.
I remember reading about a guy who quite literally was walking around looking for a job in the 60s and by happenstance walked into NASA. They gave him a cognitive test and in a couple of years was a rocket engineer. He had no degree or formal training. There was no bureaucratic process. Quite informal. Just a quick interview with a manager and some test taking.
NASA today has bureaucratic selection that is not meritocratic.
McDonald’s is one of the most successful fastfood franchises in the world. Hiring involves walking in and asking the manager for a job. They make the call on the spot. The more ambitious and intelligent ones become managers and eventually owners. It is meritocratic without being bureaucratic. It shows no signs of changing after 67 years. It predates NASA.
So maybe the solution is to avoid bureaucratic selection be it centralized or decentralized. McDonald’s franchise model aristocracy?
@Pax
Sounds like any knight can make another man a knight (with the cost of gear encouraging intelligent behavior).
@Com
That works, but for the government you run into the problem of loyalty. I’m not Spandrel, but my understanding is the Chinese were the most successful at this and it didn’t work. Try selecting for morality and you get subordinates who claim they are moral and deserve to rule (Wang Ming).
Chinese imperial exams were for essays and calligraphy and crap not intelligence. Standardized tests should NEVER have essays.
Essays can be tests, in the sense that they are expressions of the writer’s character, which the assessor can use to make a decision based on any reason or no reason at all.
Tangential to this topic is word problems, which don’t necessarily have anything to do with writing exercises at all, but are a most convenient way of expressing complex problems requiring high world formation capacity to solve; which is incidentally why such things are often also the first things to go when a test is debased.
Word problems yes but no essays on standardized tests…
[*account of what conservatives think and want deleted*]
I remember taking down meritocracy from a dharmic viewpoint. Here’s the link to the article
https://dharmicreality.wordpress.com/2022/05/04/non-dharmic-non-concept-meritocracy/
Isn’t the board the echelon of the Cathedral?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/japan-to-build-a-more-powerful-military-citing-china-as-its-no-1-menace-11671177530
Japan announces remilitarization, this could turn out to be a big deal…
As the american empire contracts Japan is going to need to remilitarize but for that they are going to need to resolve their fertility problem first and try not be turned into cannon folder against china by the empire.
They have 80 vax rate and about half their shots were the clot ones. I’m not seeing a way out for them.
Japan brute forced their society from isolated feudal agronomy to cutting edge world power in 4 decades because a dude in a dress felt inspired by the 19th century equivalent of a PowerPoint presentation. If anyone is going to make lemonade, it’s them.
“because a dude in a dress felt inspired by the 19th century equivalent of a PowerPoint presentation.”
This is interesting, are you talking about the meiji restoration?
Who did the “equivalent of a PowerPoint presentation” to – i presume- the emperor ?
Doesn’t sound that bad.
Maybe some of those clot shots were counterfeited saline, after paying fair and square for the poisonous real ones and trashing them. Who knows?
Take Israel. High vaxxing there, but I can’t believe there wasn’t a ton of saline going on there also.
Trust the Plan? Yeah I guess. But when a country with a strong identity and decent IQ gets hit with a situation like Covid, who knows what kind of instinctive self-defense mechanisms can kick in.
“Take Israel. High vaxxing there, but I can’t believe there wasn’t a ton of saline going on there also.”
You antisemite….
Israel’s vax rate is about 65%. They did a massive push early and quickly and then everyone else refused to take the shots. This suggests people started dying early and obviously.
The CDC says that 80% of Americans have had at least one shot, but only 68% are “fully vaccinated”, defined as two mRNA shots or one J&J.
Which means that forty million Americans took one mRNA shot and said, “I’m not doing that again!”
I don’t buy that America is 80% jabbed. As the curtain drops and the tipping point is reached then passed, I guarantee that that number will do the same slide the “vaxx efficacy” percent did. You can look it up, I didn’t save the link, but there are at least a few videos that show the reporting started at “100% effective” then crept all the way down past 50% before the tune changed to “it was always experimental, it was always voluntary, it was never supposed to give immunity”.
As soon as class action and individual cases become remotely possible, we will suddenly have always known it was barely 20% of America that got jabbed, and of course OF FUCKING COURSE it’s blacks, gays, and single moms who are suffering the most, so bend over for some more of that un-lubed effective altruism baby.
Completely unrelated, I heard that if the 20 largest cities in America got Smuked by Smrussia, America would pretty quickly become an 80% white Christian nation.
Asians were jabbed in huge numbers. Blacks were generally given an exception not to be jabbed unless in the medical industry, but I don’t know if they avoided the jab or not. Ice-T said he lost some movie deals because he refused to get jabbed.
Unfortunately white women who were not married to a right leaning man pretty much all got jabbed.
“Unfortunately white women who were not married to a right leaning man pretty much all got jabbed.”
New ager girls and literal whores (and there is some overlap) mostly did not. Some super redneck type girls did not… A lot of nurses also got fake certificates (from what I heard its the norm in Florida) or more like real certificates but never got jabbed.
But unmarried normie women outside those categories you’re screwed. Over 90% vaxxed.
The NRx “Western tech decline†people may need to reset their priors. I’m not seeing China, Russia, Turkey, Iran, etc come close to this.
https://www.anduril.com/
Nuts.
These are drones. The west is behind everyone else in drone warfare. As has been repeatedly demonstrated on the battlefield.
As a counter argument, observe the Fusion bullshit. A 300 [energy units] laser complex creates a 3 [energy units] output from firing a 2 [energy units] beam. The media reports fusion has a breakthrough, millions of people read the headlines and adjust their worldview, and by the time it’s actually explained, the press room is empty.
Bill, I am engaging as an object lesson for others, please don’t forget, ever, that you will never be a woman, that you are a tremendous faggot, and that there’s a rope with your name on it.
Any example that is brought up in the argument of tech not declining must first contend with the tidal wave of examples that it is declining. The Courland Pocket could have held out for many months, possibly years, but in retrospect it was obvious that Germany lost when it fell short of Moscow. Looking even closer, Germany’s fate was sealed when it introduced wholesale socialism. In the moment, the German economy was Hitler’s miracle. During the war, the German army seemed unstoppable, and it largely was. But every kilometer gained was merely delaying the inevitable collapse by some small measure of time and space. In this example, for Germany to have one, foundational elements would have had to have been significantly altered or dispensed with entirely, but to do so was not possible due to the constituent parts of the structure created, both the rhetorical framework and the personages attached.
It is simply irrelevant that there are breakthroughs and advancements in the Cathedral “the science” department because of the underlying structure of the Cathedral itself means that all forward motion will be halted then degraded. It ill always be one technology step forward, three cultural steps backward, occasionally a retrograde shuffle to the side.
Mid 20th century sci-fi: “We are living on other planets with nuclear powered spaceships a few decades in the future.”
Late 70s sci-fi: “Okay, maybe not in a few decades… but at least at *some* point in the future.”
90s cyberpunk: “Okay, maybe we haven’t gotten off the planet, and a lot of things look kinda grimy too, but at least it’s still visibly *a* future.”
21st century: “Actually uhhhhh lets take a rain check on this while ‘future’ thing, human civilization is Problematic for the planet mmmkay? Those grapes were sour anyways.”
In later days ‘Progressives’ don’t even dare to dress up their positioning with aesthetics of progress anymore – which was only inevitable. You will own nothing and no you won’t be happy either lol.
Neil Armstrong walked on the moon three weeks after the Stonewall riots. If you’d asked anyone then which event was more portentous of life in the 21st century, they’d have thought you were nuts.
Excellent observation. Fuck, that’s depressing.
I’ve been doing resear-, eh, watching a lot of videos at 2am on Project Orion.
Basically the idea was to kick small nukes one at a time out the back of a spaceship with a massive metal plate, and the explosion would hit the plate, that was on giant springs to cushion the blow, and that would propel the ship forward. They estimated they could make about 3% the speed of light.
Not being an engineer, I can’t tell you if the tech is solid or not, but from what I heard, they all claim that no one argues that they could have done this as far back in the 60’s. Which is amazing, because it means that we could have gigantic aircraft carrier sized spaceships going out to Jupiter and back in a few years carrying thousands of crew.
And if that works … it means we can do just about anything. We could mine whatever we wanted, do all sorts of testing far from the Earth’s environment, manufacturing, anything.
What I’m wondering is if the people here can confirm that this is real technology or just a pipe dream.
I mean, my God.
Just to clarify. They don’t claim one nuke would do it. Rather they’d kick out about 1 nuke every few seconds or so. One after the other, constantly properlling the ship forward.
Here’s an intro to the topic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnNVVVjmfss
Your inquiry had a “midwit feel”* so I will give a midwit observation: Project Orion demonstrated that there were options on the table. Another example of this “big thonk” atmosphere was Sea Dragon. On paper, both were very much in the possible category, though practical execution would probably have gone different directions for all the reasons stated by Jim, St. John, and others in the past as there’ve been some very detailed discussions here on this topic.
When you look at the progression of the US space program from the modern era, there’s a tendency to see it as all kind of ad hoc, doing stuff just to do it and ooops look at that we landed on the moon! While there was definitely a ton of improvisation involved, each mini-era was building towards something. Every Gemini was a testbed, a battery of tests, a proof of concept, and a massive risk all with the goal of building Apollo on sound conceptual framework.The mental shift regarding the horizon of the possible from 1935 to 1955 is staggering, and the devolution of that horizon between 1965 to 1985 is so fucking sad. A whole future thrown away for negros, sluts, and faggots.
The greatest leap forward for mankind was 1850-1910. The scientific revolution from 1920-1960 was completely powered by the “heat of formation” of that leap. The Space Shuttle program was the dress rehearsal for Tech Decline, a bold assertion that the dreams of our ancestors were too big, too expensive, and too foolish for us Moderns. What good is it to conquer new worlds of Jamal and Karen and Yoel aren’t free to do whatever pops into their little heads?
A wall of text and no answer lol. I honestly think that if Project Orion had gotten off the ground, it would be just like the part of the S A Corey series where the dude that invents the Epstein Drive gets pancaked by his invention. Some 6’2″ gigachad would have nuked himself into the Valles Marineris by accident, and every kid would know his name. So I will say Yes. Project Orion would have worked brilliantly by failing spectacularly.
Also, Nuclear Salt Rocket is the name of my dubstep ska-metal band.
*this isn’t an insult, it isn’t intended as an insult, I am a midwit with good instincts, and the most scientific book I’ve ever read was The Bell Curve. please don’t be insulted
I’m not insulted, its ok. I thought it was a fun read.
>Basically the idea was to kick small nukes one at a time out the back of a spaceship with a massive metal plate, and the explosion would hit the plate, that was on giant springs to cushion the blow, and that would propel the ship forward.
Immediately reminded me of Wile E. Coyote and Roadrunner.
I really do not think this is practical. Your shock absorber needs to be immensely big and heavy. After every blast, it becomes extremely hot and has to cool down. To accelerate this immensely big and heavy object requires a whole lot of nukes and, because of the required cooling time, this is going to take a very long time to pick up speed. My seat of the pants guesstimate is that you are going to need approximately a billion nukes.
The basic problem with using nuclear power to get up to a few percent of the speed of light is that whatever you do, it produces heat, and the heat has to be radiated away. Which means your are always going to need a great big radiator.
No matter how you apply nuclear power, this is the practical limit, so a simpler and cheaper solution is rather than one one billion nukes, just one fission reactor (or better, one fusion reactor, which gives you double the speed) and use the power for an ion drive.
@jim
The heat, blast, and bright light of an atmosphere tested nuke comes from the immediate atmosphere around the nuke absorbing the intense energy of the nuke’s gamma rays and neutrons.
When detonated in space, only the bomb’s components absorb that energy, and it is radiated out into space, limited by the inverse square law.
For the propulsion bomblets, a depleted uranium cone directed a portion of these gammas and neutrons towards a berellium plate. This plate then absorbs that energy and converts itself into plasma that is directed against the pusher plate. Oil sprayed on the pusher plate carries off the heat of a small part of the plasma that touches the pusher plate oil. The mass of the plasma is a tiny fraction of the mass of the pusher plate.
Easier way to do highly ‘brissant’ propulsion is nuclear salt water rockets.
Less practical than it seems. To be useful, your exhaust has to be very very hot. But that will melt your rocket motor in no time flat.
If you want to achieve very high delta vee, have to have very high exhaust velocity. Which means you have to squirt out the gas electromagnetically, without it touching anything solid. Electric and magnetic confinement, as for example the vasimir drive.
There are several ways of inducing atomic fusion, one of them is high neutron flux.
There is a possibility space for fusion boosted reactors, much like how there are fusion boosted bombs. Running microstreams of fusible material through the core assemblies for enhancing the neutron economy. This would be a step up in next generation power production wrt civilizational energy levels.
@ron
The Orion nuclear pulse spaceship would’ve had high thrust and high Isp.
The 3,000 metric ton Orion had an Isp of 3,000sec. The same as a Starlink, but with very high thrust-to-weight ratio and the power of nuclear bombs.
The military version presented to JFK, the 10,000 metric ton Orion Space Battleship, had an Isp of 10,000sec.
It would’ve been effectively an unassailable battle satellite. Nothing could challenge it, except another Battle Orion.
ISP, SFC … got my reading cut out for me thanks!
http://projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/
You can reference here for simple layman’s introductions.
@ron
“Isp” (Specific Impulse) can be roughly explained (if you’re using imperial units) as 1 lbm of propellant produces 1 lbf of thrust for ______ seconds.
It’s actually derived from exhaust velocity using metric units though.
But the explanation above is a good starting summary.
Iran, Russia and Turkey are applying drones to national defense. National defense in the West is illegal. We can’t keep Hondurans out of the territory or tranny groomers out of the library. Only profit seeking is legal. Therefore the west cannot possibly compete in this space, because it is the space that actually matters.
Iran, Russia and Turkey are fighting to survive, and using drones to do it. Therefore their stuff will always be better and more cost effective in real life.
I regularly purchase commercial refrigerators and freezers. I now expect them NOT to work on delivery, and to have to have the brand new units repaired under warranty over the course of several months after purchase, regardless of vendor/manufacturer. Part of tech decline is everyday mundane things simply not working.
Even toasters got shittier. Compared your toaster to this design from 1948. Fully automatic, fully mechanical, and produced always perfectly toasted toast.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OfxlSG6q5Y
I am vexed by product decline. I cannot figure out what is driving it, I think debt credit has driven it as people have not known actual deprivation in so long they are callous of waste, but how is it possible for products to be getting more expensive even as they are made cheaper? Is it just that regulation has built a moat around every single fing business so there isn’t any competition anymore?. What were we doing right between 1850 and 1950? I don’t bother to buy new vehicles anymore because they are so complicated and I’ll designed to work on. I’m not spending thousands to have a dealer mechanic curse at a new Chevy pickup which requires the fucking cab to be removed to change two sparkplugs. The old stuff works and when it doesn’t I don’t have to remove the fucking wheel well plastic gaurd to change a headlight, which gaurd is attached with single use clips. Corporate greed can’t be it but even toasters are garbage and they don’t seem to have the monopoly fed protection that automotive does. Got a new 600$ toaster as a gift and it broke within 3 months, that’s like 6-10$ a price of toast wtf
Female employment, IQ decline, social organization decline, competent people vacumed up into make work- take your pick.
The toaster was probably banned due to the safety faggots. It’s an always on design, so if you dropped into a sink full of water you’d get shocking experience.
As for your Chevy, that’s the Harvard trained bean counters in charge. I read a book years ago by a Ford executive who talked about the decline in car quality in the 70s and 80s. He described the basic issues as green regulations forcing them to build cars and small engines Americans didn’t want, which took years work out the bugs and by the Harvard School of Business trained accountants and mangers running the companies. The accountants viewed engines that regularly failed at 15,000 miles as a positive thing because the company earned more from replacing them. Everyone else realized they’d lose most of their customers but they were no longer in charge.
I’m sure it’s gotten even worse with Shaniqua running everything.
Today the IQ decline is starting to bite hard. Smart men of the last generation either didn’t reproduce or they reproduce with dumb girls who were easier to knock up that college educated women.
Lee Iacocca? I read his books long back and vaguely recollect that he lamented the loss of manufacturing capability and the industrial downfall of America.
Bob Lutz.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Lutz_(businessman)
His book has a goofy title, but it’s contents sounded right on the money.
There are a number of contributing factors.
1. The conquest of society by credential fetishism destroying actual knowledge transmission through social technologies of apprenticeship
2. The conquest of society by procedural fetishism destroying actual quality control through social technologies of freehold
3. The superset containing the foregoing and more besides, spiritual malaise; there no thing made good because there is no faith validating the Godliness of making things good.
It is absolutely obvious what is driving it. Same thing as is driving tech decline.
The destruction of the corporate form, and HR demanding that credentialed lazy morons be given the high status jobs.
Tucker had a hilarious video on the useless elite: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2022/12/10/tucker_carlson_musks_twitter_experiment_showed_at_least_80_of_payroll_wasnt_doing_much.html
I just want you to know that I hate you more than I have ever hated the blacks, Jews, homos, or other undesirables.
Says the man who supposedly hates blacks because they are magical, Jews because they are so clever, and homos because they are just so fashionable.
Tell us what Soros did to expel white people from their homes, what Yoel Roth did to modify schoolgirls to his sexual preference.
[*deleted for vagueness*]
And who in particular cultivates black violence against white people by doing what in particular?
You will never be a woman you have no womb and no ovaries etc etc.
He talks like one. “I hate you!” is a very girly thing to say, as if Jim’s feelings would be hurt because some anonymous faggot on the internet hates him.
Correct.
Well at least youve accepted that and detransitioned but youll never get your dick and balls back.
Detransitioned? Sorry, you’ll have to clarify: I don’t speak retard.
Transition:
Removal of dick and balls, and pretense at being a woman.
Detransition;
You stop pretending to be a woman, because embarrassingly unconvincing, but do not get your dick and balls back.
Analogously for women, who do not get their breasts and ovaries back.
The majority of those who transition wind up killing themselves or detransitioning.
The most racist thing America has ever done is saddle Kanye West with the followers he has.
So true…giddyup!
Kissinger summed up the results achieved by Putin and the army of the multinational state:
[*deleted for false consensus (Kissinger presupposing universal acceptance of facts not in evidence*]
[*deleted for noticing the mote in Russia’s eye while failing to notice the beam in the Global American Empire’s eye.*]
The birth rate in large Russian cities drops to the level of Japan-China:
Voronezh – 1.15 children per woman
Volgograd – 1.14 children per woman
Saratov – 1.12 children per woman
In the 2030s, most likely, the birth rate in Russian cities will drop to the level of Taiwan-South Korea-Hong Kong (0.6-0.8 children per woman).
Putin is taking measures that should reverse this trend. I am seeing substantial fertility among based Russian Orthodox. Over time, going to get more and more of the population based Russian Orthodox.
Russia’s problem, ever since Alexander the liberator, has been intellectual and cultural domination by the anglosphere left. This is now being reversed, which reversal should show up in fertility.
Lots of academics spout this or that trait as far as most likely to determine one’s level of success. But by far, as an individual or group the biggest indicator of future success among men is their ability to possess a woman.
Not that it’s the only thing but if you have that going for you at least you can reach your potential. Demoralized men, men with no hope get nowhere.
Among the “measures” adopted by Putin, the main place is occupied by the creation of legal and status privileges for Chechens, Tatars, Tuvans, Yakuts, Tajiks, Uzbeks, Armenians and Azeris (…). Creation of political centers of power for foreigners and non-believers, forcing Russians to bow to the new masters of Russia. Having a family is an ethnic and religious privilege for non-Russian Muslims. Even France is not so outspoken in its genocidal plans.
I haven’t seen any reliable statistics on the Orthodox birth rate in Russia, but when someone claims that the Orthodox have a high birth rate, like this
http://www.pravoslavie.ru/23160.html
does not show specific figures for this high birth rate. If they were impressive or even noticeable, we would hear about them. But for now, we can hear a criminal report about how Russians are getting rid of in the cities of central Russia. Once Grozny was a Russian city (previously over 70% Slavic population, now 3% of Russians officially) and now Nizhny Novgorod and Krasnodar are turning into a new Grozny.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9#%D0%9D%D0%B0% D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5
I saw a video about the Old Believers, the most reactionary part of Russian society, many times more conservative than the Orthodox, and these cuckolds send their daughters to colleges of whores so that they can give their virginity and five years of their youth to representatives of some ethnic mafia. Therefore, even they lose their 4-5 children in a generation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S43OuR7sbYM
In a world of official lies and an untrustworthy and untrusting elite, anecdote and casual observation is far more reliable than statistics, and I can see that the Russian Orthodox who attend based Russian Orthodox Churches have a high birth rate in the west.
I have had an old believer on this blog. Leftist.
The old believers may well have been reactionary and based in 1652, but they long ago holiness spiraled into leftism and assimilated to Harvard. It is completely obvious to me, an english speaker, that regular Russian Orthodox far more based. Old believers are leftists, same as Nazis are leftists.
The Old Believer schismatics were instrumental in the 1905 Revolution which replaced the Tsarist system with a constitutional monarchy similar to that of France in 1789. Living in mud huts like the Amish does not make a man a Reactionary; the Old Believers were one of the many latent cancers in the Russian Empire, taking advantage of her decline.
The Old Believers may be leftist by the standards of 1900, but a society can only go so far left before it succumbs to mass starvation. Post-1960 leftism just doesn’t work without EBT cards and Section 8 housing, and the fags would all be dead in a year if the government stopped paying for their AIDS drugs.
“The Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs stated that in nine months, from January to September of this year, 119,000 or more than one percent of the population of Tajikistan received Russian passports.”
https://rus.ozodi.org/a/32189090.html
If anything, in Tajikistan, Russians were expelled from this beautiful country after the collapse of the USSR, using methods that you could observe in South Africa. To evaluate this excellent initiative, the average IQ in Tajikistan is less than 70, and the fertility rate is at 3.5.
Also, thanks to a wise and prudent policy, not only young fertile girls who convert to Islam now appear in the information space, but more and more young guys do it, including young guys at the front.
Everyone living in Tajikistan was forced to take the Covid vax, so you’re lucky that your family was expelled decades ago. Maybe you can go back there after the Tajiks all mysteriously die off.
[*deleted unread. When I go to the trouble of getting a Yandex translate for your stuff, it usually fails to show what you claim it shows. If you want your stuff read, make it easier by providing yandex translate quotes of the part of the link that allegedly supports your claims, rather than telling us that a link that points to a tediously long document in Russian proves all sorts of improbable claims*]
You keep making all sorts of claims about Russian society that I find very hard to believe. If you want to persuade anyone, provide yandex translations of the selected relevant parts of your source documents supporting your claims.
I am not going to go through a long document in Russian to dig up your evidence any more, for when I went digging, found that you had pointed me to cat turds and told me gold was buried there.
If you want your stuff to not be deleted, give the link, the yandex translate link, and selected parts from the yandex translations. Do the work for your readers, that your readers would need to do to check out the veracity of your claims.
On the vax/bioweapons front, Sasha Latypova has been presenting some new information that explains a lot of how the operation was prepared and executed (from 17m to 1h 10m).
Some key points (sorry for the lengthy comment, please delete were :
* EUA (1997, under Clinton)) gets rid of “safety and efficacy” requirements
* “Other Transaction Authority” (2015, under Obama) Enables DoD to order undisclosed “military prototypes” from pharma.
* PREP Act (2020, Trump) Absolves of legal liability
* “Public Health Emergency” (2020 onward, Trump, Biden)
* OTA:
– not normally regulated/accountable contract
– bypasses regulation
– BARDA/DoD/HHS/NIH use to funnel billions to private contracts under “codiv countermeasures”
– shields private companies from government rights to taxpayer funded IP including disclosure
(no regulations plus they keep taxpayer funded IP)
– hides IP not just from public but also between government agencies (e.g. FDA doesn’t have access to vax ingredients)
– DoD uses OTA to order “prototypes” and “demonstrations” not subject to regulatory scrutiny.
– 10 USC 2371b/10 USC 4022 used to legalize purchase of biochemical weapons (“countermeasure prototypes”) from private contractors
* During HHS-declared “public health emergency”, under 21 USC 360bbb-3(c) “Criteria for Issuance of Authorization”, HHS Secretary may issue EUA if he/she concludes that:
a) the product may be effective, [they don’t have to prove safety or effectiveness]
b) the known and potential benefits of the product outweight known and potential risks. [evidence does not have to be available, and they can hide it]
That is, if they think “known and potential benefits outweight known and potential risks”, they can keep vaxes on the market regardless of any deaths that are occurring.
Explains why there’s seemingly no stopping condition, and FDA does not stop it.
* 21 USC 360bbb-3(k) (adoted 1997, amended 2003,04,05,13,17)
– Hence countermeasures are not considered pharmaceutical products, not regulated as such.
– Competent authorities (FDA (US), EMA (EU), TGA (AUG)..) cannot regulate countermeasures, only pretend to.
– FDA development and approval process is theater to convince the public.
– Clinical trials were not ordered by DoD/HHS contracts as they are not necessary for countermeasures
– “Good Manufacturing Practice” compliance not ordered
– Legally no clinical trial subjects, investigators, hence no informed consent.
* Proof FDA does not regulate these vaccines:
– Regulators don’t know what protein is coded by the mRNA injections (claimed encoded Wuhan spike weights 141 kDa, western blot of spike from synthetic mRNA is 180kDa)
– Hence primary mechanism of action has not been demonstrated, on which EMA (EU’s FDA) complained:
* Became a “SPECIFIC OBLIGATION 1” on CMA Dec 20, 2020
* Not met by Dec 2021
* Granted Feb 2022 (EMA gave up on the issue and just “approved”)
– Regulators don’t have information on propietary lipids:
* ALC-0159 Pegylated lipid, ALC-0315 ionic/cationic lipid
* Not pharmaceutical grade (purity), unknown manufacturing steps, unknown pharmacology/kinetics.
* Normally would have to ensure purity, characterize, testing assays, etc.
* Concern brought up by regulators, but information was not provided. Ultimately was not enforced by regulators even though they have enforcement power.
* National Security Council set Covid policy. March, 2020: “PanCAP Adapted U.S. Government COVID-19 Response Plan” (PanCAP-A) states that US policy in response to
SARS-CoV-2 was set not by the public health agencies designated in pandemic preparedness protocols, but rather by the NSC.
– Just in time, PanCAP amended so NSC handles response, instead of HHS.
– NSC has no representatives from healthcare, all members are defense and intelligence.
– PanCAP-A org chart (p. 9) has NSC under “policy”, FEMA leading “coordination” over HHS.
* Operation Warp Speed
– announced as collaboration between HHS and DoD
– OWS org chart has DoD as “Chief Operating Officer”, and HHS only as “Chief Science Advisor”. Also in charge: NSC, DoD, BARDA, DoJ.
– Explains why DoJ lawyers were arguing on behalf of Pfizer, with Pfizer not present, in the case where Pfizer was trying to hide clinical trial data for 75 years.
– From statnews: OWS “looks a lot more like a military operation than a science project”. “Roughly 60 military officials – including at least four generals –
are involved in the leadership of OWS, many of whom have never worked in health care of vaccine development”. “Only 29 of the ~90 leaders on the chart aren’t employed by the DoD”.
– Sold to public as DoD only doing logistics.
* Vaccine manufacturing:
– BARDA has very large vaccine manufacturing capacity
– Pfizer, moderna, AZ, J&J etc. didn’t have manufacturing capacity for COVID-19 vaccines.
– BARDA RQA, not FDA, claims to have tested all mRNA doses for release (FDA has no regulatory authority over countermeasures)
– BARDA RQA in 2022 did product acceptance of 600mm doses of covid vaccines.
Hence while researchers were asking the FDA for records of vaccine tests, BARDA had them.
– BARDA partners with hundreds of companies, paid $33b for vaccines (a large portion of the sector)
– This money paid for DoD contracts for manufacturing vaccine “demonstrations”
– Contracts managed by “Advanced Technology International” (ATI), with expertise in OTA
– DoD had established vax manufacturing and “surge capacity” since at least 2012 (millions of sq ft manufacturing capacity, staff, raw materials, assays, kits, equipment, logistics, etc)
– DoD-Pharma contracts for C-19 injections simple “switched on” the manufacturing machine:
* Pharma had no capacity to fulfill contracts in time except via DoD infrastructure
* No accountability except “reasonable effort”
* DoD micro-managed operations (not “arms length”)
* vials no serialized, shipped to DoD (not pharma distributors)
* product explicitly described as “civil and military application”
– for non-US, pharma-government contracts:
* waived relevant drug import regulations, rules, standards, etc
* removed national sovereignty, prohibit changing national laws to make pharma liable for injury
* prohibit independent vial testing of imported product
I should mention apparently Robert Malone has mentioned the existence of large vaccine manufacturing capacity which uses the flu vaccines to stay operational. This explains why they keep pushing flu vaccines despite them not working.
This is my summary, but imho the presentation itself is worth taking a look at.
Thus Mr. Roosevelt put “Philip Dru’s” ideas into further practice. Of Mr. Wilson in the earlier generation his Secretary of the Interior, Mr. Franklin K. Lane, had said, “All Philip Dru had said should be comes about; the President comes to Philip Dru in the end”. As to Mr. Roosevelt, twenty years later, Mr. House’s biographer (Mr. Howden) says, “It is impossible to compare Dru’s suggested legislation with Mr. Roosevelt’s and not be impressed by their similarity” .
This is an illustrative example of the transmission of ideas from generation to generation, among a governing group. Mr. House’s ideas were those of “the revolutionaries of 1848”, which in turn derived from Weishaupt and the revolutionaries of 1789, who had them from some earlier source. When Mr. House abandoned them they were transmitted without a hitch to the ruling group around another president, and the one man who had modified these ideas was left behind.
https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1671/38/1671386698404119.jpg
A claim I saw elsewhere regarding Mary and the virgin birth:
“it should be pointed out that this whole idea of “pure virgin†is the result of a mistranslation of the Septuagint. The original word simply meant “young girlâ€. This misunderstanding that Joseph is not the father of jesus is quickly dismissed by the fact that several lineages are given for jesus that include Joseph so that he could be a descendant of David.”
I rather expect Jim to reject this claim and I am curious what the specific argument would be. (Or if, on the contrary, he agrees with it, that would be interesting too!)
Bible states that Joseph did not think it possible he could be the biological father of Jesus, because Mary was pregnant before he banged her.
Mary was always a lifelong virgin. A literal “young girl” translation completely ignores context and tradition and misses the point even by common sense standards. There’s nothing meaningful about a “young girl” giving birth, only a virgin. Deliberately pseudo-autistic translations are heretical and possibly demonic, with the fate one tempts being cursed with unironic autism.
That claim you saw “elsewhere” is ultimately traced to the Jews. Don’t trust them to interpret Christian dogma. Or for anything, if you can help it.
“Lifelong” is contrary to divine law, which requires husband and wife to have sex if they can. According to Mathew she was a virgin until after she gave birth to Jesus.
Mathew 1:
In context, “knew” clearly means took her sexually after she recovered from pregnancy.
Saint Jerome has an easily readable essay on this point among others which I always thought was brilliant, but at the same time, given some reflection, seemed like a too-clever cope compared to the plain meaning of the text and the general themes of the Bible. It is a prime example of the problems which made me a protestant again. As much as I like everything about the eastern orthodox, I never had it in me to make the leap into accepting their doctrine with the same faith. If their sacred tradition is as solid as the text, why does it feel like the text has to be wringed about to match it?
John Chrysostom says otherwise.
https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/200105.htm
I think you will be hard pressed to find a single Orthodox Christian church that does not declare Mary to be the “Theotokos and ever-Virgin.” Those exact words are contained in every prayer to her and are spoken at every service I have been to. The words of these services are at least 1600 years old.
On the other hand, the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed calls Mary “Virgin” but not “ever-Virgin.” But I, personally, will not argue either way. The fruits of either position must eventually become apparent.
Clear meaning of Mathew is that Mary was virgin till she gave birth, and shortly thereafter, she and Joseph had the proper relationship of husband and wife.
Making Mary “ever virgin” undermines families and husbands.
Old and New Testaments make it clear that husbands and wives have a sexual duty to each other. Making Mary “ever virgin” kicks away one of the foundations of marriage.
The very first thing that God tells us to do is to “be fruitful, and multiply.” It seems to me then that we ought to read the teachings of Christ and the writings of the Fathers with at least some acknowledgement of this commandment. Doing so leads us to two questions:
1. What is the relationship between the holiness of celibacy for men (monks) and the overall reproductive success of the tribe?
2. What is the relationship between the holiness of celibacy for women (nuns) and the overall reproductive success of the tribe?
I suspect that plotting the holiness of celibacy (for men, and then again for women) on the x-axis and the overall, long-term success, reproductive or otherwise, of the tribe on the y-axis will result in an inverted U-shaped curve. There must be some optimum amount of holiness of celibate men and some optimum amount of holiness of celibate women. The debate, then, is what exactly this level of holiness is, for men, and for women.
@A
God could have created us asexual. And had us reproduce asexually. Like how some Church Fathers like Augustine would have liked humanity to reproduce. Like how lower animals often do.
But to model the relationship between God and Humanity. He made Man and Woman.
Yet as he made us Male and Female he made sexual intercourse.
The Madonna/Whore distinction allows the whore to monopolize sexuality. Whilst making Virtue of lifelong Celibacy even within wedlock.
Man become one flesh through sex with his wife. But without said one flesh union. How can it be called marriage? It can be called being roommates or some other covenant.
Its the separation of Marriage from Sex which God designed for Humanity that is the problem.
The idea that we even need to “test” or “measure” for this is like saying we need to test if the emperor is wearing clothes when we can clearly see his dick swinging in the breeze.
Pretty much all women have volcanic, hard-to-control sex drives. By pretending that nuns are being celibate, you raise them to being high status. the problems is that they are in fact being whores, and high status whore are an ABOMINATION to a healthy society. Quite frankly, since (according to the cathedral) women are pure angels no-matter how much sex they have {in fact their even HOLIER for having lots of sex} :), we live in a world where we have reach the highest % of nun per population ever known. 🙂
For the small amount of women who don’t have volcanic, hard-to-control sex drives, having them be a wife, and bear children is still a better use of their time and skills than anything they could do as a nun.
Those smiles should be the upside down versions to indicate sarcasm.
So the up right one is done “:” then “)” 🙂
Is the upside down the inverse? “(” followed by “:”? (:
As Jim notes in this very topic post, it is quite easy for a secular professor to take for himself the women in his class while calling them chaste. It follows that is is even easier for a prophet to take for himself the women of his following while calling them nuns. This prophet, then, is a false prophet. One must be wary of such, as Christ commands.
I am more interested in true prophets; true saints. The goal of life, according to Orthodox tradition, is to return to God; to be saints. This is called Theosis.
Is this a worthy goal? Is it achievable? Is pursuing this goal worth giving up one’s earthly telos? To what extent?
Doubtless it is a worthy goal, but observed behavior by Churches is that it a rationale for abandoning their mission in this world. Tends to be accompanied by quietly forgetting Saint Paul’s words:
That the goal is theosis is apt to be in practice, a rationale for the inability to say “Groomer”, a rationale for going along with evil at the expense of the congregation, a rationale for speaking power to truth.
You cannot pursue theosis directly any more than you can pursue happiness directly. Trying to pursue happiness directly leads to a needle in your arm, and trying to pursue theosis directly leads to a Church full of faggots.
You pursue your telos in this world, and if you pursue your telos in accordance with the logos, then you get to theosis.
Theosis, like Gnosis, is a goal that strangely seems to require neither effort, nor courage, nor ordinary everyday virtue in this world.
King David is considered a prophet/saint in Orthodoxy. He also had many wives and concubines and Christ was born of his line according to earthly genealogy. Clearly, then, following this particular earthly telos and sanctification were not mutually exclusive.
Jim, can you elaborate on that part of pursuing happiness directly? what is meant by pursuing happiness indirectly? Do we first pursue happiness indirectly by getting rid of things that make us miserable? The context is not clear to me
You do not pursue happiness. You pursue your telos. Should you succeed, you will be happy.
In highly fecund patriarchal societies, monasteries and convents serve to depress fertility and keep the population from hitting the Malthusian ceiling. They’re also a genetic sink to dispose of less capable sons and ugly daughters while making them feel that their lives have purpose.
Tribal societies don’t need any of this; when resources get tight, they say, “Praise Allah, death to the apostates!” and start genociding each other.
Do monasteries and convents (in highly fecund patriarchal societies) serve any other, higher purpose than this?
Well, they already got Musk to quit as Twitter CEO. That was quick lol.
Anyone wanna bet on the replacement? He hinted it would be a controversial figure. Blake Masters? Peter Thiel?
Musk will still run twitter imho I suspect he is installing someone else as “head” of twitter for the same reason Jesuits try to make sure Jews are massively overrepresented among people doing bad things and other than Covid (which was do or die to go “right” for them so they had to do it themselves) they try to never tip their hand…
“Jesuits try to make sure Jews are massively overrepresented among people doing bad things”
You’re positing a hierarchy of conspiracy with the Jesuits at the top and the Jews underneath (in contradiction of the typical conspiracy narrative that Loyola was a converso).
What possible evidence is there for this?
Pretty sure no one is on top, except for relatively short periods – no one is permanently and durably on top.
Well for one thing Loyola could not have been a converso, he was Basque nobility and thus was examined under the “Limpieza de sangre” laws and he was also questioned by the Inquisition. If he had been of Jewish descent it wouldn’t have gone well for him.
Jews are not an organized order of spies, Jesuits are. The organized group has to be at the top not the disorganized one.
While there are no end of Jewish conspiracies, two Jews three factions, each conspiracy is organized. Organized in large part with the objective of cutting the throats of each of the other conspiracies.
Judaism is a mystery religion that preaches loyalty to adherents and punishment for “defection” which included e.g. going to gentile courts to get rulings that were morally fair and would have been equivalent to those given by Jewish courts. The penalty for this under Jewish law is death.
Jews are not an “order” in that they are a people and some parts of this people have surely broken free of the cult discipline. That doesn’t mean there aren’t large orders of spies – perhaps even one very large one – still remaining.
The Jews also have Mossad, a literal sovereign spy agency, which as far as I am aware the Jesuits are not recognized as a legal military actor by the UN.
You are clearly trying to suggest that Jews are just patsies of Jesuits. If that is so, there should be extraordinary evidence for Jesuits influencing the world in recent decades and for Jesuits opposing and defeating Jewish projects.
In the great Covid scam, the Jews were patsies for the Jesuits. Fauci developed the virus and the jab, and got the Israelis to take it, sending their excess death rate through the roof.
Fauci, a Jesuit, got the Israelis to poison themselves more than anyone else on the planet.
Why the fuck would i care what the UN recognizes this is a bizzare line of reasoning, the Jesuits were literally the worlds 1st spy agency. Not the 1st spies but the 1st agency.
Ive known too many jews to think they are anything close to a cohesive hivemind…
Elon had no idea what he was getting into with Twitter and no plan. He’s shocked and hurt by how quickly and decisively the entire press and everyone he respects and wants to impress turned against him. A year ago he was the eccentric but beloved world-saving tech-genius maverick billionaire doing cameos on Rick and Morty. Now he’s the mortal enemy of all right-thinking and intelligent people everywhere. It’s quite a comedown, he obviously didn’t expect it, and he can’t handle it.
Stepping down won’t set things right for him, though. He is now the enemy of Democracy, Progress, and Our Values, and it will take something much more humiliating and costly to clean up his reputation. How much does Elon want to be accepted and respected by the cool kids? How much is he willing to abase himself to get to Mars?
Dont think its wise to think he didnt plan for this, im sure he was given a chance to play ball with the spooks and told them to fuck themselves now he is just going to keep a lower profile.
Elon recently quoted Brian Herbert’s The Machine Crusade. It’s not possible to like those abortions.
Elon needs to concentrate on Starbase anyway.
He’s not acting like he planned for anything; this all looks like an unpleasant surprise to him. I have no doubt he got a stern talking-to from some secret squirrels, but there’s no way he told them to fuck off. He apologized for messing around with their zeitgeist-control machine, promised he wouldn’t do it again, and begged them to let him keep his rockets and his electric car subsidies.
@Contaminated NEET
I don’t know if Elon set up a deadman’s switch.
He can’t sink aircraft carriers, but he can destroy every single military satellite in orbit.
Then they execute him for treason and cut off his remaining sons’ dicks. That doesn’t get anybody to Mars.
@Contaminated NEET
Well, it’s a deadman’s switch.
That would not replace any of the military’s satellites however, LOL.
I don’t think you brahmins have any idea how dependent the US military is on satellites. There is a lot of military equipment that requires multiple satellite comms to verify no spoof, before a launch can be activated. A total loss of satellites would cripple NATO enough for Russia and China to exploit the new weakness.
Without satellites, the US cannot command its SSBN fleet to launch nuclear weapons at Russia and China.
Without satellites, there is no early warning of incoming Russian and Chinese nuclear missiles.
Without satellites, the Navy SEALs and the FBI becomes just another private militia. That can be easily killed by another private militia (six Taliban goatherds killed a SEAL team, and that’s with full functioning satcom for the SEALs).
The real problem would be the random submarines launching uncoordinated strikes here and there. The aircraft carriers would still be a problem too, but they would be much more vulnerable, and their screen of ships would be much less effective in protecting their carriers (all ships would have to be within line-of-sight of each other for radio comms). A Chinese submarine can be in a position to destroy such a weakened aircraft carrier group.
The power to kill enemy aircraft carriers and enemy bases with Rods-from-God would be far more effective though. Something a group of Pentagon types would love to have.
>Well, it’s a deadman’s switch.
It’s a hypothetical deadman’s switch. It’d be nice to have, no doubt, but just setting it up would be an act of war against the USG.
Elon’s got a bunch of really smart go-getters working for him, right? He doesn’t get suckered by bullshit credentials. What happens when one of these really smart go-getters finds some weird kamikaze flight plans?
On top of that, there’s no way Elon made all the thousands-upon-thousands of orbital calculations single-handedly and constantly updates them himself as target and attacker satellites maneuver. This is a conspiracy of dozens, probably hundreds of people, each of whom faces utter destruction if exposed and sizeable wealth and immense prestige if he exposes it. Your deadman’s switch almost certainly doesn’t exist.
>you brahmins
I think my posting history makes it pretty clear I’m a failed brahmin. I hate them like only a spurned suitor or disinherited family member can hate.
@Contaminated NEET
You have good reason to hate them. They promised you a place in the Brahmin class, but instead, they screwed you over.
The Brahmins would have no idea what it is.
If you can write software to make Falcon 9 landings on barges on swelling seas and winds (constantly changing conditions), you can write software for more predictable changes in orbits. (Note that docking with another spacecraft is much much harder than crashing into one).
Most military satellites, except a few recent ones, use hypergolics for maneuvering, and each one is a billion dollar hand built bespoke creation. Hypergolics have an Isp of only 200-300sec. At most, the delta v would be 400 m/sec. Something that can easily be overcome with a Starlink with 3000sec Isp with a potential delta v of 11+ km/sec.
An inner team would have to have a live faith behind them to set up a deadman’s switch “against the Enemies of Mankind’s Destiny.” Against the “woke mind virus” that would “destroy civilization.”
Starlink has a workforce of several hundred, most of whom are involved with its mass production. The actual orbital control team is much smaller.
This is only useful as a deadman’s switch that could cause significant crippling of the Brahmin’s to command their high tech forces.
It isn’t sufficient to actually conquer an empire.
That needs devout paladins and Rods-from-God. And even then, a triumvirate with other techlords will be needed.
Given that he released a lot of embarrassing information about their nefarious activities he obviously did tell them perhaps politely to fuck themselves.
If he told them to fuck themselves, he wouldn’t be backing down now. He’s scared, and he thinks he can make a deal to surrender Twitter but keep the rest of what he has. We’ve seen this before: they’ll take any concessions he gives, but won’t keep their part of any deal. If Elon really understood his situation, he’d know that peace is no longer an option, and he wouldn’t give them an inch.
I think you’re misreading the hierarchy here. DoD has made Musk off limits for Removal by Glowies. He’s struggling with the priests, not the merchants or warriors (I know, I know).
@Kunning Druegger
All we know that is not hypothetical about this is that Elon Musk has tremendously lopsided physical power in outer space, with the majority of the World’s satellites under his control, and the physical ability to destroy other satellites. As well as providing unprecedented satcom network ability.
And that there is a faction within the Pentagon that is effectively Elon’s private militia because they really really like that capability that already exists. And that the Starship would make every single US military SDI wet dream possible.
@Contaminated NEET
And the niggers and kikes (“the woke mind virus”) are the Enemies of Mankind, and a threat to Mankind’s Holy Destiny of the Stars.
Oh, no doubt. I agree 100%. Your prophet is being sorely tested; we’ll see if he has the strength and the will to overcome them. I wouldn’t bet on it, but stranger things have happened.
@Contaminated NEET
The main advantage of Elon, and other techlords like him, is that the Brahmin class have no idea how the advanced weapons, that the US military relies on, work.
But Elon has the same problem that the Roman politician-generals like Pompey and Crassus had, they couldn’t challenge the Senate and the Assemblies by themselves. Pompey was careful to pay lip service to his fellow Senators, and Crassus found that he couldn’t buy everyone in the Senate.
>the Brahmin class have no idea how the advanced weapons, that the US military relies on, work.
Elon’s problem is that they don’t know that they don’t know, and they don’t care that they don’t know. To deter someone, he has to understand that you have something you can threaten him with. That was the problem with the secret Soviet doomsday device in Dr. Strangelove. The Brahmins don’t think they need Elon, or Whites, or men, to have advanced weapons, and they can’t be made to understand this until they lose a war because of it. Afghanistan doesn’t count, because it didn’t hurt them nearly enough.
@Contaminated NEET
It’s going to get to the point where future techlords are going to tell the brahmins:
“Stop quoting laws to men with swords”
I hope that days and I live to see it. I doubt I will, though. The brahmins own the techlords’ minds, and even better, they own the techlords’ status hierarchy.
@Contaminated NEET
The Muslims in Afghanistan didn’t care about globohomo’s status hierarchy, nor did globohomo owned their minds.
The early Christians didn’t care about the Pagans’ status hierarchy, and the Pagans didn’t own the Christian’s minds.
Come to think of it, the politician-generals didn’t care about the pagans’ status hierarchy either.
Imagine Pompey’s mind “feeling remorse” for saying “Stop quoting laws to men with swords.” Yeah, I didn’t think so.
And so it was preached, “The Woke Mind Virus is the Enemy of Mankind” “It is the Fermi Paradox” “It must be defeated, or nothing else matters.”
>The Muslims in Afghanistan didn’t care about globohomo’s status hierarchy, nor did globohomo owned their minds.
>The early Christians didn’t care about the Pagans’ status hierarchy, and the Pagans didn’t own the Christian’s minds.
>Come to think of it, the politician-generals didn’t care about the pagans’ status hierarchy either.
Of course. They wouldn’t have won if they had. But your “techlords” observably do care about the globohomo status hierarchy. They waste immense amounts of wealth, which they can afford, and immense amounts of their dignity and integrity, which they can’t, to climb in it. Maybe that will change someday. Probably it will. But that day is not today, and probably not tomorrow.
@Contaminated NEET
“Woke Mind Virus” and lack of respect for brahmin credentials say otherwise. At least with Elon Musk. He treats that hierarchy the same way Pompey did.
Fauci cares though. Assuming he knows exactly what he was doing and isn’t merely a bagman.
“Fauci cares though. Assuming he knows exactly what he was doing and isn’t merely a bagman.”
He does, Jesuits aren’t mere bagman.
“The brahmins own the techlords’ minds, and even better, they own the techlords’ status hierarchy.”
Next republican govt needs to strip titles from humanities phds and seperate the humanities from STEM in academia. e.g. can’t teach humanities and STEM on the same campuses or in the same institution.
>seperate the humanities from STEM in academia.
Academia in general is too far gone. Separating is no longer possible.
Pol Pot’s guys didn’t care that everybody was hungry or starving. They barely cared that they were hungry, starving, nearly out of ammunition, tires and gasoline, and vulnerable to Vietnamese invasion.
Not trusting the plan was blasphemy and required the unbeliever’s liquidation. What consequence is worse than that?
So don’t give me this business about the war faction fighting back against Cathedral just because the latter are stupid, crazy and will get them killed. Or rather, don’t just give me that only.
I know The Jim does not agree, but I think we really do have an unprecedented situation with this social media. Before social media, and the Internet, if you were not popular enough to given newspaper space, only your personal friends knew about your virtue-signalling, personal brand making. So it was not really paying much to be dishonest on your politics if you were not important enough.
Today, everybody wants to be the next social media star and all it takes is one approval from those who have millions of followers. It can make a career.
So I think it is different now. Many will attack Elon because of that one career making approval from an acc of millions of followers.
Unless one’s career is about being elected for a public office, approval of millions doesn’t affect a career. Only superiors or (if self employed) customers are relevant for a carreer.
Most people don’t do virtue signaling for direct material benefits. Usally they do it to feel good about what they are doing, they enjoy being part of a crowd.
This viewpoint seems quite naive to me. You really think muskrat isn’t aware he’s smacking the beehive with a stick? He published all the known but unconfirmed truths on the shady dealings going on internally. That he was even allowed to take control of the company in the first place, considering the magnitude of these shady dealings, and just how tightly our alphabet friends like to grip information channels, shows this is not some whimsy. This is the work of an entire political faction, the same political faction that allows muskrat to operate all of his highly relevant to national security operations.
DIA & frens v. FBI & frens. This is a secret war going back for a long time, and CIA & frens seems to change sides or act as third side.
Musk says “As the saying goes, be careful what you wish, as you might get it” referencing his CEO poll.
Is it too much hopium to dream of Musk, tiring of his new toy and wanting to move on to the next, appointing Trump as the new CEO and renaming the platform GrabEmByThePussy?
At that point they just the seize the company. Maybe they run it as a public utility for a bit, but probably they just re-privatize it with more “responsible” ownership.
Exactly. Elon is waving a pink Barbie toy gun around when he warns that Twitter is unprofitable. Please. Any Karen or Shaniqua can walk in there and do nothing but have her nails done and recite million dollar Ted talks until the end of time. She won’t even have to turn her computer on. Just answer the telephone while Jared Kushner listens in and takes notes.
Don’t ask questions you don’t know the answer to, as they (the lawyers) say.
But it’s not a big deal even if Musk goes through with it. He still owns Twitter, he’s still on Twitter, he can appoint a trusted and quietly competent guy to run it for him now that he’s cleared out the (poisonous) deadwood.
Disagree. Even Steve Jobs got rolled out of Apple and that was penny ante stakes in comparison.
Jobs didn’t own Apple at the time he was ejected. I don’t think Musk can be deposed at this time without voting for it himself.
Musk’s silence after the vote is odd.
If someone willingly took the jab *and* the booster, do not trust him as one of us.
If someone was coerced to take even the booster, he broke too easily, and shouldn’t be admitted into Fight Club.
Did anyone here voluntarily took the jabs?
Did anyone here voluntarily took both the jabs and the booster?
Amen to that. Anyone who took the jab has proved himself too malleable for any position of responsibility in any hypothetical organization.
@Contaminated NEET
I think this would be a useful test in addition to the Redpill on Women shill test.
100% agree. If someone claims they were for ed, we could force them to give details, but I can only imagine a very few scenarios where the details matter.
Anyone who jabbed their kids is scum.
This is quite harsh! My cousin jabbed her kid against my strident objections. I just can’t get myself to think of her as scum. Foolish, sheeplike, conformist, credulous ….. sure, but scum? This is a leap too far!
At a certain point ignorance becomes willful ignorance, the willful denial of truth and the unforgivable sin. So scum is appropriate.
It would be for a man, but a woman should defer to her husband. Jabbing or not jabbing is the man’s decision. The wife should go along with whatever her husband decides.
So scum is too hard for someDude’s cousin.
The problem is I personally do know some women (yes even unowned women) who were smart enough and had enough logic to go against this even outside of Florida back in the blue state hell I used to live…
So on all things covid I make no distinctions… covid required too many sacrifices of its followers to make any distinctions between men and women. Even with women ignorance at a certain point becomes willful… the point where that happens is further out there with women but it does exist.
The jab is in the exact same realm as puberty blockers, aesthetic mastectomy, and castration.
I have family I love who did the same. They are dead to me precisely because they sacrificed their children to conformity on the alter of a daemon.
Thats a bridge too far, mate! I don’t think the Jab is at the same realm of evil as puberty blockers and gender transition. Puberty blockers and gender transition go up right against taboos that every functional culture has had for ages. Anyone who goes for those two against the accumulated culture of his people has proved his evil.
The Jab on the other hand took advantage of the respect the medical profession has historically enjoyed which has now been squeezed dry.
Hell, my parents jabbed themselves against my objections. My mum started getting shoulder pains right after the Jab which never went away. I’m not doing to disown my parents over this.
Yeah same for me. Some people I hoped knew better, did not.
But none of those people pretend to be part of our synthetic tribe. As a shill test, very good still.
The arguments for parents putting their own children on hormone fucker-uppers and experimental mRNA vaccines have almost perfect overlap. I get that you don’t want to see your loved ones as scum, I don’t either. The more important question, to my mind is twofold: are they scum, objectively, and what else would they be willing to do to me or my kids if a The Science representative told them it was good or necessary or needed?
Yes, if they advocated that you must be forced to Jab your kids or else your kid get taken away, then i would be unable to defend them. In that case they are objectively lost to me as well and I would avoid them as there is a chance they will turn me in for my own good.
But my parents have come over to my view after what the jab did to my Mum’s shoulder and as for my cousin, she jabbed her kids out of fear of what would happen to them if she did not, rather than as a sacrament.
What you are experiencing in these discussions is exactly what was intended by doing something as heinous as what was done. They wanted to destroy the Family as a concept.
Unwittingly, they have accelerated the construction of a streamlined opposition. The fire that tempers burns away what could not withstand it, weakening all else. As the steel cools, it becomes that much harder. Heating and cooling. The heat of firings, shaming, isolation have been withdrawn, and we are in a brief cooling stage. We must harden our hearts, and that’s a travesty we must bear for the sake of our grandchildren.
Claiming ignorance is valid. Pretending claims of ignorance justify great evil is invalid.
I understand your point, but do you know whether they really had their children jabbed?
I know some people got forged vaxx certificates for their whole families, but you have to know people extremely well to have such information (or be involved in providing them with forged vaxx certificates).
Anyone who has a forged vax certificate can be expected to be silent about it. Unless people suffer from common sequela of the clot shot, there is doubt.
This is hard to dispute. I know people who did that and mostly did it because it was a pain to get their kids covid tested every week for school. But I very much doubt they knew what it would do to their children.
In the end it’s outcomes that matter and they well have destroyed their children’s ability to reproduce.
So far all test checked whether someone would commit a thought crime. This is different because anybody who has a certificate, but wasn’t jabbed commited a non-thought crime.
Do you want him to confess he forged his vax card? Do want to exclude him because he forged his vax card and doesn’t want to confess this crime?
Of course, the seriousness of a crime depends on jurisdiction, but in Germany it is very serious for some professions. Physicians, pharmacists, lawyers will have their license revoked for such a crime. For others it would still be a far more serious crime than beating someone up, for example.
A usefull test cannot go farther than denoucing the clot-shot as harmfull and the coercion to get anyone jabbed as evil.
@Karl
Anyone coerced into taking the jab, especially the booster, broke… and thus cannot be admitted into any hypothetical fight club.
Anyone who willingly took the jab, obeyed the TV box, and has no business calling himself a dissident.
Anyone who willingly took the booster, cannot be trusted at all.
I think the question is, how can someone who has not taken the jab but who has forged a certificate pass the test?
If we can prove we forged it, I guess we get to join His Majesty’s Spy Service to subvert, spy on, infiltrate the enemy etc etc.
And bang the enemy’s hot women in exotic foreign locations while spying on and subverting said enemy.
Patriotism is fine and all, but the paycheck matters, you know!
Sam Bankman’s Fried’s death will almost certainly like the 1st Bond movie opening, be a murder in the Caribbean.
Unlike that though it won’t likely be preceded by a cool Calypso song 1st.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XTSOYGI9GU
I can see from your attention to detail, that, you Sir, are a professional. You’ve done this before haven’t you? Only professionals think about little details like opening credits to an assassination.
Once I start working for His Majesty’s Spy service, i will forward your resume to the chief and collect my big fat referral bonus.
Sure, but you missunderstoond. What do you do with the man who forged his vax card, never took the jab?
Do you want him to confess his crime of forging a vax card? Do you want to exlude him for denying that he forged his vax card (and that of his wife and children)?
When His Imperial Majesty is restored (Isn’t that what the restoration is?) to the Throne having gained the Mandate of Heaven, pray why would I deny that I forged my Vaxx card? I would indeed shout it out from the rooftops
Of course you would, but so will then numerous others – and only some of them will indeed have forged a vaxx card
Right, and therefore only those of us who can prove that we forged it and are unvaxxed will get to join His Majesty’s Spy service. Call it an eligibility test if you will. Even you will agree what we have proved our fitness to conduct wet ops against the enemy.
i have a certificate that says I took the jab
Rumor has it that gangs target unjabbed people for organ trafficking. Surgeons complicit in this kind of harvesting should have their hands scalded. Boiling water makes very nasty burns.
I do not fear death, my enemies do.
I did. Feel free to not trust me. Fred Sinistra, one of the fittest and healthiest 41 years old men of the world, was reported died from COVID https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10345933/Anti-vaxxer-kickboxing-champion-refused-acknowledge-Covid-discharged-dies.html
Yours chain-smoking, alcohol-addicted, fatass truly decided he has no chance against it then.
I don’t care about trust because I do not want a job of responsibility, I just want to be a historian-monk analysing what goes down. I believe warriors not scholars should take the jobs of responsibility.
@TheDividualist
Fake and gay.
Really? After all you knew about the media, their detachment from reality, their consistent lies, all it took was one article about some tatted and roided up K1 fighter for you to take the jab?
‘fittest man in the world’ and ‘K1-fighting’ are an oxymoron. You don’t go for years in that circuit without sustaining minor or major injuries. And that’s assuming no other media lies.
That Sinestra was still kickboxing at the age of 41 is a giant red flag by itself.
why was it a red flag? does not that signal extraordinary fitness? why would it flag something red?
@TheDividualist
Right now, I have more reason to trust Jimmy Dore than to trust you.
At least Dore was willing to admit he got jab injured and made a mistake.
It signals that he had no better options outside fighting.
No man wants to stay in the MMA/K1 business long beyond 30. The kind of repeated beating you take in a serious match is just not a recipe for a long and healthy life. That’s why all the big fighters retire early.
That he did not retire early signals at underlying problems.
I have to disagree. Light heavyweight and heavyweight fighters (200 lb or above) are an anomaly in that those guys are the most likely to compete and dominate into their 40s. It’s the lighter weight classes that are dominated by young guys. The really light weights seem to be a revolving door of who is youngest and has the most energy.
Big heavy guys who are coordinated are scarce, and experience counts for a lot. And it doesn’t really matter how good your chin is, because at that size even the best chin is no match for those punches.
Not to mention among the best trainers there seems to be an over representation of former heavyweight champions. My guess is heavyweights learn things that lighter weight guys don’t, like patience, and how to minimize certain risks. Just a guess though.
Ha, that is a fair counterpoint.
Anyway, as not to give Dividualist any false hope on his choice: check out the singular comment on this news article reporting Sinistra’s death.
What, he had underlying health problems? Surely can’t be anything serious or the media would have reported on it, no…..
I remember how the media pulled a very similar trick on a Dutch patient. The viral story was, an anti-vax guy became very ill with corona, was admitted to the hospital and changed his tune: ‘I used to be a skeptic but now I understand it’s serious!’ Or that’s how it was reported.
By a stroke of fate I happened to listen to the radio later where, lo and behold, that same guy was interviewed. In which interview he mentioned he had some kind of rare immunodisease which had made him very susceptible to covid. Ooh! If I had not heard the man himself talk, I’d had never known the truth.
I wouldn’t put it past a hospital staff member to have jabbed him without notice as well. A big obnoxious guy like that… he’d be a magnet for it.
You have to figure if your in a hospital or doctors office that isn’t 100% private you are deep in enemy territory.
Everyone who died of Covid died with Covid. All of them had one foot in the grave, and a couple of demons hanging onto that foot and hauling while chanting “heave ho, heave ho”, and then covid gave them a bit of a push on top of all that.
Or, murder by ventilator.
They only stopped murdering people by ventilator when the normies realized that the ventilators were instruments of mass murder, and started to flee screaming. The doctors stopped eventually, but the normies woke up before the doctors stopped murdering them.
Recording history accurately requires immense responsibility. It also requires immense bravery. Do you have these traits? You can’t even take care of the body God gave you, but you propose that you can care for an abstract body of knowledge?
A lot of men took one shot realized they’d been sold a bill of goods and didn’t get another. Some of this was driven by their own fear of their own morality and it was an act of cowardice. There was also incomplete information about he dangers of the jab at the start. It’s novel situation where science fiction comes true where a government unleashes a virus and then a sterility shot to “stop” the virus but they fucked up both the virus and the sterility shot. Such things don’t happen, or so we all used to think.
However, a lot of people who took more than one shot did so out of almost religious devotion. The vaccination caused them harm, but they felt that they would be protected as long as they had faith so they took more shots and more shots. I see this people now who are always sick, wearing masks everywhere they go looking at everyone fearfully. They’re the lucky ones, the unlucky ones are already dead.
A friend of mine took a 3 shot in total. After the second shot he almost died of a heart attack that his doctor and he swore had nothing to do with the jab, but it was the jab. He endlessly promoted the shots, chastised people for not wearing masks, refused to spend time with his parents who refused the jab. But even he stopped after the 3ed shot fucked him up. His faith in the great and mighty COVID demon was shattered, but I no longer trust him. I’ve known him for 20 years but I sense something is wrong with him now.
There has to be forgiveness and redemption as Saul found on the road to Damascus. But redemption requires a real change of heart with a public admission of their evil actions.
agreed.
On the subject of Redemption here was one of the original useful idiot Vax pushers now dying from his own poison after only one jab:
https://twitter.com/rycunni/status/1605002821547757568
KD Link:
https://archive.ph/wip/Gpiyg
Yes, a whole lot of people were caught with their pants down. They were not on their guard against evil men who sought to harm them.
I am looking at leftists who are waking up. They cannot get their mind around it. They tell this big stupid story that big corporations are engaged in “psychopathic pursuit of profit”. If covid and the clot shot were driven by “big pharma”, and “big pharama” were motivated by profit, would have given everyone the saline shot that the elite got. It is simpler, way cheaper, and unlikely to result in one hanging from the lamp post.
It is demon worship, and the reason the left cannot process it is because it reveal that gaia worship is demon worship.
Just as peta will kill any animal it gets its hands on, rationalizing that the animal has been contaminated by contact with humans, the people who talk about global warming, species extinction, and resource exhaustion, want everyone dead, and everything dead. They hate life itself.
Holy war approaches.
Still have not personally seen one instance of this. I look often for rumors on this topic on the chans, so far seems extremely rare to see any sincere apology or admission of wrongdoing.
Sasha Latypova, whom I keep quoting because she’s a rare smart actual pharma expert, tells her personal experience with her mostly jabbed, mostly PhD-level scientist friends [41m 53s]. They completely stopped talking about it, and are dealing with the trauma by ignoring it. This matches rumors on 4chan: they don’t engage in conversation about it.
That lady talks about something I’ve been wondering about: what about the non-covid vaccines?
The way I used to look at it is that they are useful; polio sucks, being vaccinated against polio is great. But the same people who made and pushed the jab are in control of those other vaccines as well, or at least, that’s what I presume. What will happen with quality control on these vaccinations? Is it safe to vax my children against diseases like polio and measles? Tough choice.
Measles, probably. Polio, smells funny. I suspect it is vaccine related. Recent events have cast doubt on all vaccines. The technology has been collapsing. Do you want to be injected with mysterious substances produced by idiots? At least the decline in toasters merely makes toast slightly less convenient and predictable.
What has been happening is that people are producing more and more vaccines for diseases less and less serious, and these vaccines are worse and worse, more and more dangerous, and less and less effective.
Sasha Latypova describes the way the stuff is made. This stuff is heterogeneous and inhomogeneous, it is just witchdoctoring, these guys could not make hamburgers.
The objective of jabbing enough women to cause a sterility plague has been met.
Friendly reminder that the jab was designed to also make men infertile.
but how could they do that if goal is not just infertility but Moloch worship (aka miscarriage)?
There is a couple I know who has had 2 miscarriages in the last couple of years. They both Happened at around the same stage of the baby’s development. One of the things the doctors think it could be is a issue where the placenta has different DNA then the baby, which doesn’t kill the baby until at least a few month pass, and the placenta doesn’t recognize the baby as what it’s supposed to be helping.
The issue is “Genetic” and either mom or dad can have the issue. If one of the parents has the issue, it’s a 70% chance that the baby will miscarriage.
I’ll need to look further into it (as well as learn the name of it) but I think I’ve found the method as to how the clot shot might have been designed to create miscarriages.
That is horrifying. Is there an accepted term for this phenomenon? Is there literature on “placental mismatch” prior to the great Jabber Shocky of 2021?
I expect that will find it very difficult to vax your children only against polio or only against measles. In the EU such single vaccines are rare (in the case of measles, Germans can individually import a Swiss vaccine against measles only – if (!) they find a physician willing to order and adminster it). Usually all that you will be offered is a cocktail of 6 different vaccines or so.
Maybe that makes your choice less tough.
One thing that bears looking into is the risk of inflammation. Before covid (really, before medical letting the mask slip) I considered a link between allergies and vaccination silly and a link between autism and vaccination fringe. Post the mask slipping, everything is on the table, and the autism-vaccination link doesn’t even depend on killshots or sabotage, just a statistical risk of inflammation they wouldn’t otherwise have.
Now I think if you must vaccinate, pick a few worst-case diseases, and do one at a time not a battery, with a long recovery phase in between.
Practically speaking, if you’re even thinking of going this route start quietly scouting a sympathetic pediatrician now. After your wife/gf gives birth and you’re both in a normie doctor’s office is exactly the wrong time to put your foot down. Might even have to look into a midwife at home, just for network effects.
I have a child born in the center of all evil, within one of the most converged hospitals there are. Despite my distrust going in I found the nurses,midwives and doctors in the maternity ward to be competent, caring, and mostly moral, at least compared to the average person nowadays. There was absolutely no pressure to vaccinate and no pressure to circumcise.
I wish the same could be said about the doctors I have dealt with since, but at this point we pick and choose what we use them for and ignore the sales pitches. It’s not a guarantee that you’re going to get demon worshipers… at least during the birthing process
It is worth remembering that Saul was there when Steven was murder, but was not one of the murderers, means there was room for him to change. I’m not sure if he had actually helped in the killing that he’s have been able to have a real change of heart.
>Marriage was destroyed in large part so that professors could get pussy.
I am unsure about this one, Jim. Progs are saying relationships with power inequality are RONG.
Or was it one of the previous turnings of the ratchet?
I think you are right on the general note. Why are fashion models thin titless women with short hair? Because faggot fashion designers find only women who look like boys attractive. Basically the female body consists of curves, the male body of straight lines.
I wonder where does the faggot bug come from. My basic idea would be it is boys who sexualize wrestling with other boys. I think they enjoy being dominated.
Not Jim but I imagine the mental gymnastics needed to make professor-coed relationship “OK” in terms of power inequality aren’t too tough.
Besides, if/when professors fail a shit test and coed gets tired of him, the power inequality card will be played on him by the coed, especially nowadays I imagine. I do wonder how much professors are even getting nowadays compared to the 60s/70s.
From my experience professors get tired of coeds not the other way around. It depends on the university but they are getting plenty of pussy.
OT, the origins of Omicron: When Omicron first hit it was noted that it seemed be a strain that was run though mice rather than run through bats with the original covid19 virus in order to help hide the lab origin. They couldn’t find it in the wild and it kind of came out of no where when it popped up in South Africa.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/covid-19-did-omicron-evolve-in-mice
So the question is: Black Hats trying to build a more infectious COVID19 but fucked the lethality, or a white hats that where releasing the real vaccine into the wild after building it up via mice? I suspect the former but it’s hard to say.
In the context of tech decline, there is much discussion as to the open question of whether the GAEs nukes will even work anymore. Related to this, there is one particular area of tech decline i haven’t seen discussion of, but is also something of special relevance to viable strategies of nuclear deterrence;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clam_Lake,_Wisconsin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chequamegon-Nicolet_National_Forest
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic,_Michigan
US Navy’s 5,000 kilometer wavelength ELF transmission sites, for communicating with submarines at depth on silent patrol, have been quietly shutting down one after the other over the years, without even a discussion of replacements.
This is so unsurprising when considering our inability to make tritium. Of course we can’t communicate with our likely non working nuke boats commanded by Captain Faggot and Xo Trayvon.
I would guess that military satellites are also suffering. Musk offering Military Grade Starlink sats both indicates how weak we’ve become and how useful Musk is. Doesn’t mean they won’t off him.
>Captain Faggot and Xo Trayvon
That’s a Colonel Faggot [1] and Brig. Gen. Shaniqua [2]
Last Friday Biden appointed the first Black Woman (born in Jamaica and immigrated at 17) as a two-star general in the service. Brig. Gen. Mahlock holds a Master’s degree in Adult and Higher Education; a Master in National Security and Strategic Studies; a Master in Strategic Studies; and a Master Certificate in Information Operations. Now that’s a lot of education but notice how none of it is in a technical field. She is the deputy director for combat support of the National Security Agency’s Cybersecurity Directorate. Her entire military career prior to being put in Cybersecurity was in Air Control.
Check out second link and zoom in on the facial expressions and body language on the men. Yes they are in the field. Military bearing and everything, but they are a lot more stern looking than usual for what appears to be an informal photo op. Can’t help but wonder what’s going on in their heads.
[1] https://archive.ph/3SloO
[2] https://archive.ph/zhA9R
your reply sent me down a bit of a rabbit hole trying to figure out the current state of tritium production. Its not great. best article I could find:
https://archive.vn/bSM8P
There’s an incredibly long 54 month cycle to get new tritium harvested from irradiated rods of LEU (Low Enrichment Uranium, which we are also running out of). next cycle (starting 2024) they want to get more LEU rods irradiated, then 54 months after that, we could start harvesting more tritium. yikes. meantime every year 5% of our tritium inventory decays.
This technology for creating tritium was obsolete a very long time ago. We have long known in theory more efficient ways of manufacturing lithium, but progress in implementing them just stopped.
And now, reality is that tritium is diminishing every year, and plans to produce more of it have been being made for a very long time, and somehow failed to produce tritium. So, they have made new plans to produce tritium.
$11.33 billion for the FBI.
$1.75 billion for the ATF.
& $2.63 billion for US Attorneys, with an emphasis on J6 prosecutions and domestic terrorism cases.
https://twitter.com/RepDanBishop/status/1605318708347314176?cxt=HHwWgIClpYS3nscsAAAA
If they haven’t already started arresting people for question stolen elections, they’re going start doing so next year. Also expect the ATF to bribe local cops on raids. People are far less likely to shoot back if their local sheriffs are with the ATF.
Of course there’s a decent chance most of that money will just be looted.
Remember how the whole ‘J6 hearings’ kabuki theater was still going on?
Yeah me neither, but apparently they ‘concluded’ some time this week, and (of course) decided to go ahead with prosecuting lawfare and charges of heresy against Trump.
Will be interesting to see how that plays out.
Though the ratings and viewership were quite low, I think that particular series will really find its footing in the replays and spinoffs. One day, folks will look back and say the J6 show trials were groundbreaking and paradigm setting.
https://dailystormer.in/taliban-whipping-women-who-try-to-enter-universities/
These men are incredibly based.
Talibros continuing to do the Lord’s work. Those men will be blessed for this.
The big test will be Pakistan and the opposition to or seeking of Pashtunwali. We see a IEA (Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan) attempting to incorporate the abandoned equipment of the GAE as well as the infrastructure and methods of “modern” civil management. As we, the Talibros of the West know, this is a vector by which the eternal managerial manager infiltrates institutions. Will the Taliban be able to suss out and destroy shills and entryists? Certain blips in media indicate they are calling any type of saboteur, spy, or miscreant “gay”, citing homosexuality, implied or explicit, as a reason to or for removal. This is a very good sign, actually way better than the “no broads in college” one for 2 reasons: the actual based position is “No universities at all”, and dealing with female misbehavior is a core competency of the Taliban, but dealing with perceptions of hyper-competence and “advanced-ness” so common in the outside-of-GAE world is not.
If you look at IEA soldiery and constabulary, they are aping GAE military aesthetic. This is only logical if you have $80 billion worth of gear laying around, but memetic sovereignty is an iron law, and one not yet explored, so simple decisions, like using AR platform or picking hiking trainers over hiking boots, may have spiritual ramifications poorly understood (feel free to think this is asinine or BS, but don’t forget that the Slut Pipeline starts with dressing toddlers like prostitutes).
The IEA waited for a short time before they started skirmishing with Pakis on their border. They need to expand, and they need coastal access unmediated by the GAE. They also need to expand both their military legend as well as their actual materiel, as their next natural target should be the -stans, both in terms of hard power and soft power.
The Taliban Experiment is the closest thing we have to Jimian Christianity in the wild. I am not conflating the religions themselves, and I do not hold Muslims in high regard culturally, but the fact remains that they, more than anyone or anything else, are operationalizing the WQ as a force multiplier as well as a society management rubric. We should watch closely.
[*deleted for idiocy*]
>Certain blips in media indicate they are calling any type of saboteur, spy, or miscreant “gayâ€, citing homosexuality, implied or explicit, as a reason to or for removal.
It is critical to the rightist position that we are overtly hostile to even the slightest hint of liberalism. Our actions can be measured but our rhetoric must be absolute, if only to make it that much easier to spot entryists.
It is not difficult to tolerate don’t ask don’t tell, providing fags stay in the closet, but we must always speak of sodomy as among the gravest of sins.
Interestingly, this is a Russian guy who, as part of the Soviet army, ended up in Afghanistan, and then captured, now he could fight for the Russian world in southern Ukraine, so that his ex-wife and her Armenian lover would receive tribute on time, and those who had served time in the rear could get glory of his military connection. His hypothetical only son, traumatized by his parents’ divorce, too.
https://bigpicture.ru/navsegda-v-plenu/
This is evidence that the Soviet Union was leftist and that leftism makes its soldiers suffer, because it hates them.
Like all your other rants, it is not evidence that Putin’s Russia is leftist.
Strange, I watched those first four videos and didn’t see any footage of women being whipped.
Oddly you don’t often have to beat a women if you’ve proven your willingness to beat her.
>Eurocrat Space Abscess can’t use Soyuz capsules for payloads anymore
>try using one of their own capsules
>it breaks up immediately after launch
Sasuga.
https://twitter.com/AMcCarthyNY/status/1605670814854045698?cxt=HHwWhICzmarGvsgsAAAA
@Pseudo-Chrysostom
The Eurocrats will need to be nicer to Elon Musk, unless they want to use trampolines…
Here’s a 42 minute video:
https://youtu.be/CGuEdN-ju2g
You have 2 options: watch it now, and ignore my analysis, or read my analysis and decide if it’s worth watching. Your call.
This video is a detailed analysis of the interrogation of George Hugely, the scion of a fifth generation wood magnate family. Hugely is alleged to have beat his recently ex’d girlfriend into a coma, whereupon she expired before being discovered by her roommate. Hugely was then approached and “picked up” passively by a lady detective who took him to the station under his own recognizance whereupon a skillful interrogation technique met up with a depressingly dense elite youth unaccustomed to wiliness from his inferiors to create a stunning slam dunk conviction. The analysis proffered in the video will point out, quite accurately, how the whole thing could have been avoided, how Hugely could have sidestepped the law easily and set the circumstances in the most positive way for himself, but utterly failed to do so.
I implore you, don’t read the comments, you’ll just lose braincells. The channel is excellent in content, but it is not going to line up enough with the proper frame to be based. It definitely touches on topics relevant to our work here.
There are some key takeaways I’d like to point out. First, foremost, and forever: never speak to the LEOs without legal council, and never let your children grow up without learning this.
Second, the murder victim in this scenario was a turbo-slut. She fucked around and found out hard. I think it would be trivial to make the case that she not only invited violence into her world, she actively courted it, and eventually came to need it.
Third, if Hugely had done the needful and smashed the pussy instead of her skull, he would have alpha-widowed her and moved on to better things. Instead, he took the blue pill, and a women was killed and a life was ruined, which will almost inevitably ruin an elite family, and maybe more than one.
OK, dispensing with prevarication and niceties, let’s discuss where Hugely fucked up. First, he maintained a relationship with an obvious slut. He treated a whore like a possible fiancé. Always dumb. Whores can become wives, great wives even, but the only, ONLY way that can happen is if you find the whore, take her home, and she never, ever whores again. Very doable, and always has been.
Second, he begged. This is a sin I have committed. I guarantee you that the night of the killing was a repeated event. She cheats and tells him, he gets mad and confronts her, they get rough and bang, they’re back together. This is a pattern repeated in a million different ways. I am willing to speculate that this mental/emotional abuse train is the male equivalent of the cock carousel, but that’s above my pay grade. Whatever the case, this is untenable for any man. If you continue this process, you will catch feelings, and she will come to despise you. It may not end with murder, because it could also end with suicide, murder-suicide, ruined men, ruined women, ruined men and women, abandoned children, the possibilities are endless.
Third, he dropped his guard. I’m not going to sit here and pretend every man is some sterling representation of chadliness and Godliness. Good warriors can be bad men just as good men can be bad warriors. It behooves you to train up your son in the way he should go. This is open ended if you look at it: the way he should go is case dependent. I guarantee you Hugely was given so many valuable things, things I and my sons may never have, but he was deprived of guidance, of mental the weaponry to withstand the evil of this world. He put a whore on a pedestal. He let some frail little she-pig draw him into a trap of body, tongue, and mind. he was given power by genetics and birth, and he squandered it on a slut and cheap thrills, never given a sense of gravity, restraint, or power over impulse.
“Second, the murder victim in this scenario was a turbo-slut.”
A slut but not a turbo sluts. The real turbo sluts (who I have a soft spot for) you don’t need to be particularly violent or alpha to screw. Real turbo sluts you just kind of need a few moments alone with and to ask nicely or sometimes they’ll ask you…
Nah bro, definitely a turbo-slut. The missing ingredient is institutional empowerment. If you took Yeardly off the lacrosse team and put her on the pole, totally different outcome. Sadly enough for you, the addition of the Umbrella to the fag flag means the pole dancers and smokers are soon going to elevated to college girls status. I recommend you find a nice whore and settle sooner rather than later.
Smokers are you talking about tobacco or crackwhores? Smoking tends to correlate with being slightly sl00tier but not a huge indicator of behavior. I think its certainly a lesser evil than being fat and 10 years ago most attractive women smoked (I don’t care what statistics say) now its much rarer. The closest thing I knew to a trad waifu (enginerette but super sweet girl from Maine) I think badly wanted to get nailed after mostly restraining herself literally did the Sandra Dee thing from Grease and got a leather looking jacket and started smoking in one night, her affectation of being a bad girl was kind of cute and amusing. Shes married with kids now. Crackwhores are low status for good reason…
———————
As for strippers lately I’ve been saving money lately this is an extremely nasty bear market and unless you were short early nothing works (the interest rates going higher than I anticipated because Biden admin frauded the job numbers a new low that has just come out)… but no strippers NEVER change the floating world is in clownworld but not of clownworld. Feminist Iceland (well run in some ways but totally feminist) banned them for a reason. Strippers and new age girls sometimes say they are feminists as idk some kind of shit tests or because they mean some kind of sex positive feminism that disappeared from the US after the early 70s but
Strippers who want to be feminist ice queens either quit or get on hard drugs (that is their failure mode) because they hate their job… its the turbosluts who like doing it who do well in the job and stay and they tend to find a guy who will marry them too.
I waste no time with unrepentant narcissistic women but I too have a soft spot for other anti-socials. I know tons of girls who have ended up in a 12 step program, get married and start having kids (with guys from the program).
Girls are generally bad at game, and the bad girl act which starts as a larp to get attention can often lead to becoming a genuine bad girl as we are not adapted to modern narcotics. But once they snap out of it they are often very sweet and willing and loving.
There was no way she was ever going to get on hard drugs (and she didnt she got married a couple days over) she didnt have any personality disorders or super poor impulse control… pretty super girl i always liked her and she was genuinely very nice to me but i was not a suitable guy for marriage at the time so no way i was going after her… I literally think her semi bad girl temporary larp was driven by her feeling she had a too goody goody nice girl image (because she genuinely was that way) she probably subconsciously wanted to get nailed and she had watched grease recently…
I hate narcissistic modern women too but this girl was a throwback to a better era, temporary affectation as a psuedo badgirl didnt change that.
That you know all the nuances between tobacco smokers and crackwhores, strippers and turbosluts, and sex positive feminists and engine/lawyer rettes is fascinating. Also concerning. Overseas wife market is going to have a bear market rally. All those Ukrainian women with dead father figures are going to temporally tank the Western European wife market and lower costs across the board until excess demand can be consumed. Next 5 years is going to be the best opportunity in a generation or two. Find a woman and get married. You’ll be happier.
You’re posts have been really good of late.
When you’re naturally severely spergish and you want to get laid in clownworld you have to…
The girl in question here is one of the very few id consider marriage material in my life…
Oh if you mean “pole smokers” I just don’t want to be near them and their status is already elevated.
Yeah, I meant “sex workers” in general. They’ve been added to the fag flag, which means they are being targeted for Bioleninist recruitment. Yes, there will always be whores, but you are kidding yourself if you think a bunch of low status females aren’t going to jump at the chance to raise their status. Everyone is susceptible to it, so moreso and others less so. I guarantee there will be based holdouts, but there’s always a hierarchy, that’s why Bioleninism works.
KD is right, massive turbo-slut.
Classic case of Heartiste’s “100 C**k Eye Stareâ€
Disgusting, gross, makes me want to wash my eyes out with bleach. Feels like staring into the abyss. Quite sad that a man would throw his life away for this creature.
Lmao that pic screams “I’ll find you!â€.
Things like this are how I imagine the elite wake up to the woman problem. Let’s hope the dad finds his way here and tells all his buddies.
>Things like this are how I imagine the elite wake up to the woman problem.
>Let’s hope the dad finds his way here and tells all his buddies.
>George Hugely, the scion of a fifth generation wood magnate family
The problem started easily ~40 years ago. The father’s father would have had to be the one to tell all his buddies. Considering how things are today, few of the elites woke up to the woman problem. George was the degenerate offspring of a decadent fourth generation magnate father. That never would have ended well. This is how elite families die out over a couple of generations. From the Baltimore Sun:
Well that’s a lot more troubling than the paper is willing to admit. Broken home (an understatement as you’ll see), low class face (suggesting genes with a propensity for ignorant violence), “part-time model” (whore) mom, and likely raised by her (if he only spent some of his teenage years in the million dollar home, where did he spent the rest?). Kid was fucked from the beginning.
That’s more fucked than most divorces.
and
No respect, no boundaries, and no discipline like he lacked a father figure.
Yep, more evidence of no father figure and being raised by a whore mother. Discord between father and son is fine, but one should at least wait to be in a private location to maintain the dignity of both parties. And the last thing one should do is act in a way that invites third parties into the scene.
Scions of a multi-generational wealthy family don’t do this in public; they are sensible enough to keep debauchery behind closed doors.
Confronting a teammate over such an allegation is fine. Fighting over it is situationally fine. Assaulting him while he sleeps and boasting about it… bruh? No honor. Ignorant as hell. Makes me wonder what type of women he would go to such lengths for.
Oh look, likely daddy issues and single mother home wrapped into a single package.
In conclusion you are looking at the byproduct of dysfunction being dysfunctional and getting involved with dysfunction. A train-wreck. I know I said the problem easily started ~40 years ago, but one must ask what type of grandad raise the father of Huguely for him to marry a whore? The problem likely started more than 60 years ago. That puts the problem around the 50s-60s when the sexual revolution and hippies happened. I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.
I wonder how prevalent dark triad traits are among the elite. I always imagined them as a fairly villainous group, but maybe it’s just a bunch of nice guys.
Fairly prevalent but quickly diminishing. Machiavellianism is probably the first trait to be lost followed by the subclinical psychopathy. The narcissism remains although we might need a few more generations to determine that.
Villainous and virtuous-heroic elites both have dark triad traits. What is turning the elites villainous is that the machiavellianism no longer has a faith to guide it, the subclinical psychopathy has turned in-group rather than be pointed out-group, and the narcissism no longer has strong patriarchal men to temper it in their children and underlings.
These traits are being lost because the previous generation of elites were very successful. Their descendants are enjoying decadent times. Machiavellianism is no longer needed, no longer utilized, and overtime disappears as elites marry without the need to secure advantageous strategic marriages due to being so secure. This is George Huguely IV. Kids are less smart and not very cunning as a result.
Without the intelligence to keep the impulsivity/boldness/risk taking from the psychopathy in check, and with no out-group to liquidate, they start to run into trouble with the law. The psychopathy gets culled. This is George Hugely V.
This leaves a narcissistic and dumb elite that no longer have the required traits to defend their status. They quickly piss everyone off and get replaced, or at least that’s what happened in the past. The previous generations made their descendants so secure they may even have the time to lose the narcissism. There are some old money families that are genuinely nice, but they are more wealthy than elite if that makes sense?
Is a minorly wealthy merchant family in the lumber trade truly elite?
If they aren’t now, they definitely were. How do you define “elite?”
The head of the family must if not part of the ruling oligarchy must have at least immediate access to them.
I probably should have included this part:
This doesn’t sound like a minorly wealthy merchant family. Those tend to burn out in a generation or shift to a different trade. This sounds like a family with a small state backed regional monopoly very close to power, so he’s elite but not elite elite. In medieval terms he would be a minor Baron or something, but clearly much higher status than say a village peddler.
Landed aristocracy (elites) involved stewardship which is really just ancient speak for business management. Elites and business are inseparable no matter how much American liberalism might REEEE about it. The lumber trade is really not that far from say England’s royal prerogative forest law which involved monarchs and designated aristocrats selling access to firewood, pasture space, and turf. Elites of yore were lumber traders!
As they became increasingly unlanded in the 20th century, aristocracy developed a money problem made worse by WW1 stripping away their legal status and WW2 finished the job. America had an overabundance of new money looking for status. European aristocracy had the status. It was a match. Many marriages happened between the two groups.
Huguely IV even looks aristocratic even if marred by obesity and a bulbous nose (that neither of his children have) possibly from drinking but not so much it turned red (makeup could be hiding it but some people just don’t get red). Skin quality definitely looks like either too much sun or drinking. That divorce must have been rough. Long and narrow facial structure when looking at the bones, delicate features, etc. He just looks like an elite. I would have to look at the genealogy, but chances are high that one of his ancestors married some minor European aristocrat’s daughter.
Excellent research and accompanying analysis Pax. If you ever want to get into investigations “and stuff” let me know, I bet we could have some fun.
If you watch the Jim Can’t Swim video, through the filter of what you found, you see why it’s a tricky source. I stand by JCS as great analysis for normie tier, but obviously it falls down when stacked up next to Our Jim. Still, the pieces are all there for those with the tools of interpretation and powers of observation. I watch it for the interrogations, but the cases are usually pretty fascinating.
In investigations of accidents and disasters, it is almost never single-factor. It’s always a causal chain, a series of poor choices, corrupt influences, ignorant decisions, laziness, the whole panoply of human factors, that lead to a catastrophe. The sexual revolution was the worst thing that happened to occidental society, and the preceding commentary applies there as well. It wasn’t just the beatnicks, or their adversaries, or some single factor. Layer upon layer of self-delusion, choice after choice to take the easy way or the shortcut, can upon can kicked down the road for someone else to confront. I have arbitrarily chosen the boomers to focus on in my internal rhetorical framework as the X factor, but this is just a time saving technique+lowest common denominator, as they were raised by the silent generation and/or the gayest generation (the assholes that ruined Europe).
The sexual revolution was inevitable given both female emancipation, female privilege and then female legal empowerment.
Agreed. The sexual revolution was a societal failure mode. Female emancipation, privilege, and legal empowerment were causal factors. If we resurrected our societal equivalents from that era, they’d say they were in a failure mode, and give us a list of causal factors. In essence, this is Jim’s Eternal Leftist Recurrence thesis. Causal factors for societal failure modes are perennially nascent.
Thanks to Pax contribution to the analysis of Hugely, we know that the Yeardly incident was just the mistake that overtook him and none of his benefactors could forestall the earned consequences. Successive causal factors, initiated failure modes, foundations eaten away until the inevitable collapse.
I’ve seen Slavic and Turkic girls with round faces and found it quite adorable. Are there specific traits linked to round faces that make these girls a bad choice for marriage?
I felt bad for him. He really freaked when he realized his life was over. It was like watching a man slowly die. I’m not the biggest fan of low IQ sports players but it was hard to watch, his willingness to beat a whore was admirable. The problem with society is that most men are too weak to beat whores. I wish I could let him out of jail and give him a job as a professional Whore Beater. He needs to be taught however that nature provided a better way than her head and a brick wall — her butt and a belt.
I didn’t feel bad watching that at all. He beat a woman to death and left her to hemorrhage out slowly. Should have just walked well before it came to that; going back again and again to talk (/yell/beat) it out was cuckoldry not strength.
More interesting to watch from the perspective of “what if I’m innocent and get hauled in.” Which I notice there’s not as many videos of. Conclusion is still shut up even if innocent, especially if innocent. Don’t give them the year in prison for “perjury” (i.e. getting a date wrong), don’t give them any hypotheticals about how someone else would have done it, don’t give them any angle at all. I wonder how many J6 political prisoners started out sincerely trying to just clear up the misunderstanding with their interrogators, only to find out that didn’t help at all.
He beat a thott to death. That’s a public service.
>Should have just walked well before it came to that; going back again and again to talk (/yell/beat) it out was cuckoldry not strength.
Cuckoldry was allowed to stand when he did not beat her to death the first time she cheated.
You talk like faggot.
Red, go easy bro. Not saying you don’t have points here, just saying Bob isn’t necessarily a bad dude.
Bob, watch this one: https://youtu.be/BemHqUqcpI8
If you ever needed confirmation that the criminal justice system is wholly evil, it is this: guilty or innocent, you must do the exact same thing. Think about that; the facts have 0 bearing. That’s so fucking perverse.
Say nothing.
Demand a lawyer.
Sign nothing without a lawyer.
Don’t take bait, don’t engage. If you are a blabber mouth like myself, bookend literally every statement with “I don’t know” or “I cannot recall”, even better to just say those things only. Refuse to be definitive.
Be patient. Sit in silence while you wait them out. They will give you ample opportunity to “just get through it” or answer a few questions.
Decline entry, dialogue, discourse at every step.
Listen for questions buried in statements, and respond to those questions with conversation ending statements.
Find a defense attorney willing to give you their number. Go about it any way you like. They don’t need to even be a good attorney, but best if they’re savvy, as they will smell an opportunity to either make bank defending you or earn favor with a big shot by handing you off.
What does killing her accomplish?
You can’t reform a thot you kill, and you’re not going to make other thots better unless the violence is systematic. And in a purely personal sense a girl divorce raping you justifies this kind of thing but a girl you knew was a thot acting like a thot is not a surprise…
She fucked around and found out. She absolutely deserved it.
If a man choose to kill his cheating woman that’s his choice. Com you need to stop white knighting for hos.
He wasn’t married to her, wasn’t her high school sweetheart if she was a turboslut he was just a John… one of many in his social group.
There aren’t all that many attractive (she’d be pretty if she grew more hair over her forehead) nonfat woman anymore and most of them chastely await their criminal chad and spurn lesser men, I white knight for the hos than normal men can still fuck sometimes because in clownworld they are rare and valuable.
What we need is a bunch (like 100 of them) of serial killers who targets only fat women ala Buffallo Bill in Silence of the Lambs. The problem with most women today isn’t that they are fucking too many people its that they are fat and that they aren’t fucking anyone because they are waiting for Jeremy Meeks, and Jeremy Meeks isn’t interested because he has one hot bottom bitch and 3 hot side bitches already, and those are the women who need to be forced to pair off. The true whores otoh have some value.
I understand what OJ Simpson did and started a thread on it, but this wasn’t like that.
Dude you need to stop whiteknighting in general. Hookers and turbosluts have regularly ended up dead and no one gave a fuck. The cops couldn’t be bothered to even investigate in most cases and of course the family doesn’t care. Take some wisdom from your forefathers, a ho’s safety is not worth worrying about.
Rolling back the sexual revolution to 40 years ago isn’t going to work Com. Jeremy Meeks is here and he’s fucking all the best bitches, pining for the past isn’t useful.
Dude you live in Florida there is a billion young hot fuckable chicks here. Ok maybe 1 in 10 but whatever there’s tons of hot single chicks under 30.
The sperg thing just doesn’t fly Elon has had like 3 wives and he acts like an electrocuted Jeff Goldblum.
People don’t care about low class crackwhores they are going to kill themselves anyway, people do care about more charismatic whores they actually like.
Marilyn Monroe was a true turbowhore (and her personality is very similar to what most non addict whores are actually like) would pretty literally take her clothes off immediately whenever she was alone with a guy including deliverymen and bellhops and other low status guys. DiMaggio regularly beat the crap out of her for this but he didn’t kill her and he never wanted her dead (apparently his last words were “I’ll finally get to see Marilyn again”) and he was damned pissed that Joe Kennedy Sr. ordered her whacked. The public wasn’t celebrating her death either even if most of her obsessives these days are fags for some reason.
Whores need to be controlled and kept apart from decent society, and perhaps married off if a man is willing to take them and they are willing to reform… but they serve a purpose. The fat feminist cat lady Karen serves no purpose and some should be publically burned while the others are put into fat camps and beated until they learn to respect men.
No one came to Marilyn Monroe funeral besides her half sister and the whoremonger who had onenitis for her. She died childless and alone like almost all whores do.
She literally couldnt have kids for some medical reason and she had 30 people, DiMaggio being the whoremonger with oneitis kept the mob and anyone he associated with the Kennedies (cuz he knew damn well it was Joe Sr who gave the order) away.
Upon the Restoration, Cominator needs a beautiful 14-year-old virgin bride to cure his whore obsession.
Once he understands the love of a young girl, the Cominator will be spoiled to the extent that even if all the whores he currently visits ends up meeting Jack the Ripper, he would not even care.
If you plausibly have the potential to kill her for acting like a thot, this will make it possible to restrain her from acting like a thot, and will also attract her.
So the American dollar regime is headed for total collapse in at most 4 years now… the omnibus is clearly a symptom of everyone looting a failing state. So can we expect a Jim article on the coming collapse and what that will look like?
Nobody has any comments on the elite acting OPENLY as thieves robbing a burning building with zero thought of any long term…
The omnibus being clearly sucking everything they can from a dying host.
What’s more to be said? You pretty much nailed it. Ukraine is the Select Committee’s personal money laundering location. They let allies use it and keep adversaries out of it. They are dumping in billions of dollars to protect their personal wealth, and everyone is cheering it along.
I think the future looks good as a reactionary. The more things collapse, the more single women will be looking for stability and such. The priesthood will suffer, the fire economy will suffer, but the stock of rightist men, honest capable strong men will go up.
The vaxxies will continue to drop. Pure blooded will continue to remain healthy. The day of the pillow may come sooner than later. The boomers I know are clueless and terrified, having indulged in a lifetime of self serving lies.
Time is always eliminating the weak. If you have it in you to embrace hardship and make the best of it and lead, it could be a time of opportunity.
Every loss by the GAE is a victory for our side. The death of gay anal democracy is near.
The good thing is its definitely over soon, because this is the elite acting like there is no tommorow. Even in utterly corrupt regimes acting like a 100% mobile bandit aint normal.
They’ve been acting that way since Trump was elected. It’s just accelerating.
Accelerating to “fuck you we’re openly stealing everything and we’re not gonna even pretend otherwise” is a new step.
Stolen elections have consequences. They no longer need to worry about public opinion. So of course debased elites are stealing everything.
Nah but even in Mexico and Nigeria the stealing isnt this blatant in such huge amounts.. this is looting a burning building.
It’s really not, but I see what you mean. Red is absolutely correct in they the “step” began in the 2016 campaign, that was when the foot lifted, and parading a literal actor-cum-leader-cum-rebel alliance general in front of everyone is the toe falling into place. They will be “lifting the heel” and pushing off, probably quite soon.
This is not sinking to a new level, this is settling at a level sunk to.
I’ve been thinking about this. Trump really was the right man at the right time. Merchant chad with many wives and children defeats the culmination of post-ww2 progressivism from out of nowhere.
The moment Trump won was when their mask came off for good. The Democratic Party will never have that level of enthusiasm again. It broke them. It’s just hate and death now. Thats all they have left.
That may also explain why Desantis get shilled by anti-Trumpists. Even if he is potentially more effective for our side, leftists are children and he wasn’t the one who defeated Hillary.
I prefer Desantis at this point but unless Musk gives him 20 billion it doesnt matter…
https://mobile.twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1603975564909576192
Relevant to my interests.
Incidentally
https://mobile.twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1602799576007819264/photo/1
#gastherifesgranatgeschutzennow
Here’s a Southfront Video:
https://t.me/southfronteng/33212
02:35-did you catch that? roll it back than play it slow, warriors controlled by a little hoe
The video is very interesting. I don’t think Putin reads Jim’s Blog, but I absolutely believe Jim’s Blog is reading it right. Every single facet of IEW is being discussed in the Kremlin, and the goal is to implement it. We are right over target, gentlemen, on literally every topic that matters.
Some of you can comprehend and express this more succinctly than I can, and this is my request that you do so.
For what it’s worth, I can also sense that this topic is conceptually adjacent to the Elon Musk vs. Yoel Roth situation.
The commentary that I follow on the Russian invasion of Ukraine/NATO/etc keeps coming back to the theme of the Russians explicitly deciding and now “operationalizing” that the “the West”/”Cathedral”/”Empire of lies”, as a beehive, as a collective structure and emergent phenomenon, simply cannot be trusted to honor any promise at all. Even if the guy signing the treaty or agreement “means it”, there is no structure or institution to carry the authority of his signature forward into the future. Like the Minsk Accords stuff.
Thus the Russians are taking their economic and security situation entirely into their own hands, brute force, as if any words that come their way, from London or Brussels or DC or Paris, are meaningless gibberish at best, or Satan’s attacking lies at worst. Don’t talk, just kill it, and if you can’t kill it, wall it off.
Jordan Peterson once pointed out that there is a word for someone you simply cannot talk to, and that word is “enemy”.
So how can this situation be expressed or described more succinctly, using proper vocabulary, after rectifying the names?
Is this “the confrontation of two live faiths”?
Is this “the imposition of cooperate:cooperate equilibrium in the only way possible”?
Is this “Russia halting our left singularity, from the outside”?
Is this simply “Russia passing the shit test”?
How would you put it?
Sometime it can help to use fiction terms, if they fit the bill. In the Ender’s game series, there is a word that might work for us. The word is Varelse. (Note: Varelse means “creature” in Swedish.)
“Varelse were defined [In Ender’s Game] as true aliens; they may or may not be sentient beings, but are so foreign that no meaningful communication is possible with the subject.”
The GAE, and all of it’s priesthood are Varelse in as much as that they are not able to meaningfully keep promises, or argue/debate in good faith.
Russia has now (correctly) identified the GAE as Varelse, and is acting like it.
The Enders Game books were pretty based. Full of Machiavellianism and game theory, just as you give example to above.
Orson Scott Card is based. They have tried to cancel him.
The Russian Federation is attempting to gain memetic sovereignty by establishing geographic certainty outside the constructs of the modern institutional framework.
Putin is forcing his country to take up the mantel of realized sovereignty by breaking with the status quo maintained by the GAE.
The Kremlin is resisting the further religious expansion of Harvard after they failed to withstand it in the 1990s. At gunpoint, they were forced to admit the carrion bagger class into their society, and now they are extirpating the resultant institutions at gun point.
Do any of these suffice, Grumpus?
Reminds me of something called the “Cold War.”
The Cold War wasn’t an existential conflict.
Related. The great Zelensky Love In at Congress was an obvious Point Deer Make Horse exercise. Junior Kadets on Twitter are already making public lists of Republicans who stayed seated or didn’t clap enough.
Who is the most profound far-right thinker / writer on the internet? There seems to be a serious lack of profundity. Lately I feel like everything on Substack, Youtube, Twitter and the like are just the same rehashed, verbal crap from 5 years ago. It’s getting stale. Jim’s takes are some of the best but I’d love to find someone who does lengthier, more researched work. Kevin MacDonald comes to mind, his books are what I would call high profundity. Evo psych is getting stale too though.
Evo psych never gets stale. It is survival knowledge. Learn or die childless.
Do you recommend white men marry black women? There’s a strong comparative advantage there, and blacks have a persistently higher TFR and more resistance to wokeness. Yes, they’re on average less capable of abstract thought, but also less capable of abstract stupidity.
Permanent and major loss of self control and intelligence in your descendants, and white/black crosses have substantially reduced fertility.
The African Americans who give Americans so much trouble all the time are themselves the result of interbreeding between whites and darkest Africa’s blacks.
“Kevin Macdonald profound”
You have to go back.
What’s your problem with Kevin MacDonald? Go back to where? Post nose?
He posits a jewish ethnic conspiracy as a scheme to reproduce more than gentiles…
The leftist reform jews who are part of the problem dont reproduce, the ethnocentric orthobros who do reproduce aren’t part of the problem.
The chasidim are as much your bros as the average inner city nignog. There’s a reason every aristocrat that managed to tolerate them on their land forced them into a ghetto.
We’re in a low trust society no so almost no one is my bro, the point of my post is not that all jews are good its that Kevin Macdonald’s theory is fucking stupid.
A lot of what Cominator posts is cover for Jews.
He’s strongly pushing this kooky theory that a few thousand Catholic priests are more powerful than a nuclear armed state that has the world’s best intelligence agency and loyal coethnics in every Western government, because Anthony Fauci went to a Jesuit high school in the 1950s.
He also says he was friends with Musk’s Jewish lawyer and that the Jewish lawyer is completely trustworthy.
A bunch of people with strangely close connections to the Jesuits sodomized Israel mighty hard.
You know the saying “Its always a Jew every single time”. Well if you look at the Covid operation, very few Jews in sight. Not a Jew this time.
Talking about Israel getting screwed: this is B.Netanyahu bragging how they got early access to Pfizer injections by offering up the citizen’s medical data, so pharma could analyze the injection’s effect depending on people’s medical history, plus they want to sequence their genome to give all the matched data to pharma.
And a Jesuit college afterwords, and got an award in Rome after covid, and has hinted at being a Jesuit. And its not just me both Steve Bannon and Robert Malone think hes a Jesuit…
Israel is a regional power with a regional focus.
The Jesuits got expelled from nearly as many countries as echoes but in 1/4 of the time. Theyve always been an order of spies, Weishaupt was a Jesuit, and Covid should mean their extermination…
It’s utterly disingenuous to suggest Israel does not have a worldwide interest in the Jewish People and vice-versa. It’s statements like this that make me doubt your sincerity, along with the unjustified certainty and sudden enthusiasm with which you present this Jesuit hypothesis.
(The hypothesis is not totally worthless but evidence is lacking and alternatives are not considered. Historically far rightists consider the Jesuits a puppet of the Jews rather than the other way around. The level of resources available to the Jews, even only Jews interested in the interests of “the Jews”, is thousands of times greater than that of the Jesuits.)
There are a whole lot of anti Zionist Jews, notably Soros, who want to see Israel destroyed even more than they want us destroyed. They are very comfortable living in our homes, and do not want a home for Jews.
Two Jews, three factions.
I am not implying that all Jews are Zionists or that Zionism is the only harmful conspiracy by Jews.
I am merely pointing out that one advantage – not the only one – that the Jews have over the Jesuits is a sovereign base of operations with nuclear weapons and an external intelligence agency that operates with the partial immunities enjoy officially and unofficially by such agencies.
The Jews did not have that 100 years ago. Seems like the past 100 years, the Jews have gained an awful lot, and the Catholics (including the Jesuits) have lost an awful lot.
Yet we are now to believe that the Jesuits are in control.
No one is in control. And that is the problem. At any one moment one conspiracy has the upper hand on one matter, while half a dozen other conspiracies are wrestling with them for the wheel.
The most powerful and dangerous Jew in the US rather obviously seeks to destroy Israel, and the FBI hates Mossad and tries to stop them.
If the Jesuits are embedded in DC as the covid hoax suggests then they have many sovereign bases of operations.
A more intelligent line of inquiry vis a vis the Jesuits and Covid is why would they ever tip their hand the way they seemed to do so with Covid…
My answer is that with Covid Fauci’s role and the CDC were perhaps deemed so critical that they couldn’t risk a frontman screwing up or perhaps being bought off or threatened so they had to make sure that at least for the job of CDC director (Redfield) and NIHAID (Fauci) had to be occupied by real Jesuits and that while some people might notice that its not the Jews this time and these guys seem to outrank them and anyone else in the government and media most people would not and if they blamed anyone for Western decline would continue to blame the Jews.
The Nazis were not far rightists, lurk more if you think they were. Israel only goes back to 1948 and Israel was a victim of the covid scam not a perpretrator.
In the 19th century the Jesuit conspiracy was far more popular and before WWI they were being booted out of European countries again (even Catholic ones) the problem is this doesn’t get the plainclothes Jesuits. The Jews are not all that cohesive, the Jesuits have a formal command structure which the jews lack.
How is an informal fractious neurotic religious group going to puppet a Roman Catholic (using that term loosely for the Jesuits) order of spies.
Two Jewish populations, three jew advocacy institutions.
[*deleted for rectification of names*]
Lumping unlike ideologies together.
[*deleted for argument by false consensus*]
You sail right along ignoring the frequent assertion “two Jews, three factions”, as if no one could possibly say or think such a thing.
Horse comes to only known river flowing with fresh clean rejuvenating water right next to the source, asks, “Hey, where do I find the cleanest water?”
Seriously.
…though this retard has a point, though it’s above him: I cannot send people to BJC and move on. Bad infosec and unlikely to do anything more than make someone think I’m an ultraMAGA christofascist racist, which may or may not be true get a warrant faggot, but is hardly the best way to get people moving in the right direction.
It’s not really an option to say “you need to go read 100s of hours worth of essays and comments then we can talk” though I have actually done that. We need a distillation.
Jim’s greatest gift his is ability to break complex issues down into understandable chunks without 30 pages of text. It’s also a liability because a lot men can’t take it seriously because every intelligent man has to write a book’s worth of crap to make a serious point.
Look at skinsuit McChristain Aron: 10,000 lines of text and nothing meaningful. He’s just trying to look smart while spreading progressive crap. KD summed his bullshit up as gay about 30 seconds in.
I liked Moldbugs very long prose, but mostly because he was funny. His points could have been much easier put in fewer lines but he would not have been taken seriously. Also when Moldbug tried to propose solutions he went of into Libertarian la la land. Starship troopers while interesting, ignored how hard it is to actually rule without a civic religion.
It’s a Gordian knot. If it’s too long, you lose “the most”, and if it’s too short you lose “the best.” In a society dominated bu the managerial elite, it becomes a sacrament to proffer texts so laden with footnotes that a 100 page book is a 25 page essay with 25 pages of references. Too many of us have been steeped in this pedagogy for too long, and we are initially mistrustful if we don’t see the references, footnotes, and positive signals and labels applied by “acceptable thought leaders.”
Acknowledging that I am a warped vessel, I nonetheless maintain that there is a happy medium and Jim isn’t hitting it. This is not a critique, merely an observation. I think Jim knows this full well and, as he articulated in one of his responses to Aron the Idolater, he goes specifically for the most relevant section and dispenses with the rest. That is what this place does, and it is working as intended. It’s like some kind of pressure cutter that utterly annihilates what it gets pointed at, cutting away everything because so much is unimportant.
…but some important stuff gets cut away. We might benefit from having some other device, some thing that explains why the pressure cutter is doing what it does, why it blasts everything away so cleanly. BJC was inscrutable to me until I started reading the comments, and for a long time the comments served that purpose, they had that explanatory power. The post was hyper concentrated, and the comments were the follow up procedure. But things have changed, and it isn’t a single thing, and they are immuno-memetic changes, thus unavoidable.
>Starship troopers while interesting, ignored how hard it is to actually rule without a civic religion.
I think he assumed it would be a given that it was unnecessary (early The Science delusion) or that it would be ubiquitous and therefore go without saying.
I think Jim is doing it right. Simpler is better. There is a saying that addicts complicate everything. And it’s true, but the whole truth is that it’s not addicts, it’s people in denial.
Short and sweet is hard to manipulate.
Nicolas Gomez Davila – took down modernity one sentence at a time:
https://twitter.com/quothdavila
Moldbug’s weird prose style is a result of his Anglo-Ashkenazi genetics. He likes to impress people with pointless length and complexity of his writing like an Ashkenazi but he has an Anglo sense of humor.
Ultimately he proposes Ashkenazi solutions to problems. His Anglo genetics is what allows him to see the current Ashkenazi setup as a problem.
I like Jim, that’s why I’m here. However, I’d like to find more writers like Kmac, who dig really deeply into the evidence.
I want a real history of the last 300 years, especially the last 120.
I want to actually know how the sex market works and who women are actually screwing.
I want to know the names of who rules me.
I want to know why most people don’t find this blog better than every other blog out there right now. How could Nature produce such trash as we see go to the polls every couple of years to vote Democrat and Republican?
Geoffrey Miller >>> Kevin MacDonald
Actual EvoPsych that directly addresses the WQ.
>Based History Book
I’ve tried to push for a Book of History. I laid out a methodology, one that I feel might work but would almost certainly suggest better options to better minds. It is needed.
>Sex Marketplace for Idiots
It has been done. This blog explains literally everything. Solved problem.
>Names of the Elites
I also expressed a desire to map the elites, but there are two critical issues: taxonomy and camouflage. I guarantee that popular sociological drivel has you convinced that there’s a “top 100” or “league of 500” that are ruling things. If you actually sit down and try to generate a list, you will collect thousands of names and no one will agree with your findings. The taxonomy is forestalled by the methods of active camouflage deployed by the managerial elite. Power hides itself, and quite effectively.
How long have you been here?
>Sex Marketplace for Idiots
Across Jim’s Website is pretty much all the red pills on women, could use a few supplements of Game, but it is complete.
HOWEVER
It is all over the place, scattered between comments and posts, and in a way that the reader has to organize it themselves.
I’ve thought about working to find the highlights and compile it all together, but it would be much easier if others were helping. Anyone here want to join me in find all the good WQ and Game content and putting it together into a single whole?
The problem with Jim’s game advice is that you have to convincingly be some kind of violent criminal (and yes this absolutely works with women) but you need a great deal of social skills/so called “emotional intelligence” to pull this off and not end up dead or in jail for a long time.
If you’re too spergish to have even normie luck with women you’re probably going to end up dead trying to larp as Snake Plissken.
Men are so weak and emasculated these days that it doesn’t take a lot to be more dangerous than most of them. You need to consider the idea that you’re acting like a coward and letting fear control you instead of doing what’s necessary.
What makes me feel like a coward is not following the example of the commie killer saint of Norway. I think we all feel like cowards for not doing that…
I don’t feel like a coward for being unwilling to stick my neck out (especially against Florida man) for bar th0ts and such.
That is a real problem, yes. There was a parallel real problem with 1st gen pua’s and game blogs, that an incel really isn’t going to bootstrap himself into Mystery or Heartiste.
But knowing the theory, knowing what’s going on, still helps. I don’t try to drop nuclear negs like heartiste bagging a club slut, but I’m better at teasing than I used to be. I can’t present as a stone cold killer, but getting fit and starting martial arts lets me present as a very different kind of nerd than I used to. Sometimes that’s enough, and just as much or more if you’re trying to keep a woman as if you’re just trying to bang.
I think you can raise yourself up to 2 points on a 10 point scale with fitness and game, but not from a 1 to a 10. But, why turn down 2 points?
Oh knowing the fundamental psychology helps.
The problem is i learned it just as women decided to start getting woke, fat and feminists.
The tags are used to organize articles.
But there are some articles that are not organized into tags, and there is a large amount of stuff in the comments that probably should be promoted into articles so that they can be organized by tag.
Just give me a list of goodies inaccessible by tag, and I will do something about it.
Pretty good Sundance article on the FBI behavior and how they’re still censoring people at twitter:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/12/22/elon-musk-perplexed-as-twitter-begins-widespread-suspensions-of-accounts-critical-of-u-s-funding-for-ukraine-and-zelenskyy-grift/
KD Link:
https://archive.ph/LjoGg
Modern feminism has occultic roots:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/26823012-satanic-feminism
Btw Theosophy not only helped to birth Feminism in the 19th century. But inspired Nazi occultism in the Thule Society.
In contrast to feminism in the Roman Empire? Talking about Romans, is eating fish when you should’t eat meat a case of excessive legalism?
im permabanned poster uighurstomper58. i first started reading The Governance of China when i was about 12. by 14 i got really obsessed with the concept of “Xi Jinping Thought†and tried to channel it constantly, until my thought process got really bizarre and i would repeat things like “Jointly Maintain and Develop an Open World Economy†and “A Moderately Prosperous Society in All Respects†in my head for hours, and i would get really paranoid, start seeing Red Guards in the corners of my eyes etc, basically prodromal revisionism. im now on self-criticism. i always wondered what the kind of “Dengist†style of socialism was all about; i think it’s the capitalist roader leaking in to the Communist Party, what Maoist theory considered to be the cause of revisionism and rightist deviation. i would advise all people who “get†socialism with Chinese characteristics to be careful because that likely means you have a predisposition to a type of liberalism. peace.
Capitalist road brought China prosperity. What did Mao’s road bring?
So I know that what I’m about to say might be redundant to stuff that has already been said on this blog, but I’ve recently had an insight into Women behaving badly. Jim’s theory says that women (and girls) behave badly so that some man will take ownership of them and punish them, but I’ve realized That this seems to be technically right, but functionally gets it wrong. It seems to me that women (and girls) do bad behavior to Signal to men that they are unowned, because if she were owned, her owner would not allow her to do the bad thing. Metaphorically, it’s like she’s painted a big sign on her back that says “Iâ€M UNOWNED! NOBODY WILL STOP YOU IF YOU TAKE ME!â€
The thing that triggered me to think about this was how my friend’s sister (who lives at home still) keeps engaging in bad behavior (that any sane parent would stop). By doing the “bad behavior†she is basically trying to that even though she lives at home, her parents won’t really get in the way of with mating with her.
Women acting badly to signaling they’re looking for an owner, or women acting badly because they don’t have a master amounts to much the same thing: Bad behavior by a woman because she’s unowned. You see the same thing in dogs. Both dogs and women will go looking for a new master if they don’t have a master currently.
You see the same thing in male children. They’ll break rules to test boundaries and are reassured when punished for breaking the rules. If they failed to be punished they’ll keep pushing. They find security in real authority over them and are distressed if they don’t find it (see spoiled/bratty kids).
I just had a sort of original idea… while other people have had some elements of this thinking I don’t think anyone even in NRx has expressed my idea in these terms.
Republics with a Democratic element (Roman Rome and the US, but not Venice or “People’s Republics”) are sort of like a generational pyramid schemes.
The early generations get the benefit of good government by a virtuous elite they can steer the opinion of without having to worry about bad kings and court officials arbritrarily doing bad things and less censorship than they would deal with even in a good monarchy.
However with no king above the elite or the bureaucrats the quality of the elite both intellectually and morally inevitably decays over time. So like any pyramid scheme the people in it early benefit greatly but people later hold the bag until it collapses completely.
I don’t this description reflects the reality of the process accurately, because it’s not like having a king necessarily maintains the elite’s quality and self-sustains. Many kings get to be as bad or worse, the decay happens no matter what because entropy is inherent to the universe. Nothing remains the same, it goes up or it goes down but it always goes somewhere, and inevitably there will always be bad rulers. Humans can’t build perfect systems because they are imperfect pieces.
In this regard, the true difference between the “recovery potential” of monarchy against aristocratic republics would lay on the fact that it’s easier to replace one bad king than a thousand petty tyrants, and I think it’s also easier to survive it. A monarchy can always make a comeback in one generation, but it’s impossible that a thousand petty tyrants will have a thousand virtuous sons or heirs, so there is no recovery without a civil war and reunification of power into a king to rebuild, which becomes the long process you have defined as a generational pyramid scheme.
But aristocratic republics happen in the first place because of bad kings, they are themselves the evidence that monarchies cannot prevent this situation. Both the Roman Republic and the US were born out of the elite toppling their king because of grievances, regardless if they were real or imagined, the king still failed.
If we deal with the facts, and we must deal with the facts, we are simply going through a civilizational step which has been seen and has happened many times before, we are not special or different, it’s just another spin of the wheel, humans being human. We had kings above the elite, then we didn’t. Obviously they failed at what you’re implying they are meant to prevent. They always do. And then some other king some other place some other time starts civilization all over again, but when he dies the coin restarts the spin.
So I don’t think you can define this process as a generational pyramid scheme since it’s the normal and historical development of every civilization, though in a way you’re right that it is indeed like a pyramid scheme. The children, or maybe the grandchildren, of the king’s generation squander everything their parents built for an easy life and leave their children to eat shit. Pretty much average boomer behavior across the western world in the 20th century.
If you think about it, everything we discuss in this website, the situation itself is quite humorous. We are the grandchildren who are rediscovering what our ancestors of the king’s generation already knew, only so that we can again build something better for ourselves like they did in their time. However at some point some degenerate children of us will probably get to boom again, and their children will make crypto-corners to discuss the same shit we are, suffering through some variation of the same social decay.
What I find the most vexing in our own situation is inability to channel our efforts into a specific purpose, as a society. If you’re living in some shit cave, the situation is bad but if you get to efficiently work everyday into building a house you feel you’re going somewhere and it’s satisfying enough. If you’re living in the war, well, you get to kill the enemy or die, but there is an outcome. If it’s conquest of other nations it’s conquest, if you have the backing of Charles II and the Royal Society you get to unravel the world and move towards technologies capable of further conquering the stars.
However the American Global Gay Empire is currently actively preventing any outcome and promoting complete stalemate and non-direction. It’s all about working so that worthless niggers, womyn and faggots can wallow in their worthless mediocre existences. You never get to build a goddamn thing anywhere, you’re just there, “surviving”, and everything is a slow, fucking slow crawl, like being stuck in a mire. You can have a million dollars and you’re life is still as stuck as before, only you’re eating beef every day, which it’s good but it’s just not it.
It’d be nice if we were actually going somewhere, but like, actively. If it’s doom make it quick, if it’s greatness let us work towards it. But no, just fucking clown world every goddamn day. It really makes me sympathize with Anglin’s position for global nuclear war.
Most of the time in history the elite exerts some restraint on the king and vice versa, its a check and balance that actually somewhat works as opposed to the gay three branches of government.
What happened with Tarquin is not typical. But it can happen. What happened with the American revolution is more complicated.
What happened with Tarquin is absolutely typical. Machiavelli tells the prince that if the prince refrains from doing that, he will fine.
Lucretia was allegedly raped, and committed suicide. But women are attracted to powerful men, and love to set up conflict between powerful men to test them for actual power. Maybe she was raped, or maybe she misbehaved and was killed by her husband, and her husband just announced it as a suicide for better justification in dealing with Tarquin. But usually the powerful man is seduced by the wives of his subordinates, and remains nominally in his position, but finds it extremely difficult and stressful to exercise actual power. That is what happened with George the Fourth.
Didnt happen too often in history i mean, George IV womanizing was part of it but being a fat drunk at a time when the monarchy had already been weakened didnt help either… cant think of too many more examples.
I agree that the restraint between the elite and the king exists and it works well when there’s monarchy, I’m not contesting your point from this angle.
Your premise is that there is a sort of opposite choice between monarchy and aristocratic republic, two different positions or possibilities to rule. My conclusion and my point based on looking at history is that this is not so, since every aristocratic republic is born out of a monarchy. Good monarchies are far superior to aristocratic republics, it’s not an “either” choice, it’s not an “or” function, but rather that monarchies degenerate into aristocratic republics because of natural entropy. Of course good monarchies are better than aristocratic republics and all their weird rationalizations, the good monarchies made them possible!
Every civilization is started by a king, because only specific individuals with high competence and the right traits can produce things of such value. A million idiots cannot overcome a genius. Kings individually and personally lead a group of competent men, and they together lead the masses to something. The tribe survives and shines because of its tribal leader, whose competence brings the trust and loyalty of the leader of the hunters and other competent individuals, and then they work together under this unified leadership and get out of the ape forest existence. There has never been a argument against monarchy except “but the king is bad”, aristocratic republics are built because “the king is bad” and the French revolution was justified because “the king is bad” and the Tsar had to go because “the king is bad”. It is always so. The only reason people ever feel or agree that power “needs restraints” is because “source of power is bad”. No one has ever seriously said “we need to put restraints to this good king who is leading us into greatness”, no one.
You need to have a monarchy to start civilization, then you have a monarchy and eventually you won’t have a monarchy, monarchies didn’t prevent the ultimate outcome and nothing has ever done. We also don’t have any reason or evidence to believe it can be prevented as long as humans are humans. The father can be a great man and pass on his greatest wisdom to his bloodline with his great example and his words, but the bug that can only live in summer has no way to understand the snow.
Aristocratic republics are then, in essence, not a genuine different form of government. They are a degraded form of government that happened after certain conditions and social entropy appeared in a nascent and growing civilization. And this civilization always started with a tribal leader who made himself a king. Then, when the aristocratic republic is established the initial inertia maintains its existence for a while, until it doesn’t, and something else even worse comes. Eventually you need a king again or civilization leaves the room, which is the step we find ourselves in.
My current thinking is that there is simply no stable form of government. All is flux.
This does not mean political institutions don’t matter. E.g. if we could get political arrangements that would help people like us have fast population growth for say two centuries, that would be fantastic. (After that, our descendants will have to fight whatever fight presents itself to them.) Much better than population decline to extinction.
I no longer believe that political stability is possible even in theory, because wherever there is political power, there will be someone scheming to seize such power. Sooner or later, by the Law of Large Numbers, one such group will succeed.
If they’re leftists (“if,” LOL) they eventually destroy themselves through their sheer fucking insane assholery, and something else takes their place.
Thus completing the magic circle of life.
Not exactly. The primary mechanism by which Kings lose power is not misgovernment, nor neglecting to govern, nor governing irresponsibly, cruelly and arbitrarily. It is banging the wives of the powerful men in the Kingdom on whom their power relies.
Definitely the case with Tarquin who decided to treat an aristocratic virgin girl like a whore.
I would call that governing irresponsibly or misgovernment, for kings sex is also government and has always been considered so. Aristocrats and kings tell their sons you don’t get to choose your marriage partner because you have a duty to fulfill, and it’s true.
To answer to the initial question, I’m not particularly interested in the specific details since I believe they are beyond the point.
For some kings like Tarquin the story begins like this, but would you say the same of George III, Louis XVI and Nicholas II? There can be a different reasons and different developments, but there was a king and then there wasn’t.
George III who to my knowledge never even had a mistress definite no, Louis XVI no in terms of his personal conduct though Versailles was a place where marital fidelity was so uncommon it would be considered weird… cutting the balls off the old french elite and reducing them to cucks probably didnt help them.
Nicholas II did almost nothing right except for appointing Stolypin, all the rumors about Rasputin didnt help though. Nicholas II personally didnt even have a mistress though that i know of.
This is completely the opposite of your earlier statements.
King lose power because he build a powerful beuracracy to help him rule which then have a well of its own and start to rule him.
That is what happened to the King of France and to the Tsars. But they were also caught in holiness spirals that their dangerously powerful bureaucracy promoted.
What happened to Tarquinius was banging the wives of the men on whom his power depended. Which did not help George the fourth either.
Charles the First got hit by a holiness spiral without a big bureaucracy problem.
So I guess that when I give any monocausal explanation for the fall of Kings, I am wrong. There are many ways for Kings to fail, and only one way for them to stay in power.
James I? You mean Charles I?
I stand corrected.
I have to get my code ready – not for use, but for other people to give a hand.
Are we sure that it is kingship from which aristocracy arises? I have a deeply held suspicion that the real force behind a well ordered “elite” is total war. Constant, unremitting, struggle for survival. Many monarchs reign over a bunch of losers in soft tropical territories. Hard to find an ailing republic in the middle of a bunch of warring states. The fire of countless genocides purified the steel in the spirit of man.
I don’t think we get back what was had until the tooth and claw returns.
The value of overcoming hardship cannot be overstated. Defending one’s territory, exploring and conquering new territory are in many ways what makes a man.
What you mean to say is that many loser nigger monarchs reigned over a bunch of soft nigger losers and they never did anything worth mentioning anyway.
Hardship creates an environment with evolutionary pressure and selection, to survive you have to do better so you’re better or you’re dead. And this environment is conductive to a better elite. But where there’s a great king there’s a great aristocracy there or in the making, the genius doesn’t abide the retard.
On the other hand you can find hard environments without great elites, without great kings, hardy tough people like Germans and Nordics overrun with tribe warfare doing nothing but being a bunch of snow niggers because there’s no leadership, until they do get a king and he leads.
You can’t find an ailing republic in the middle of a bunch of warring states because they become food. What you for sure can’t find is an ailing republic in the middle of a bunch of warring states that magically made a comeback because magically some elite people appeared and magically solved things. The notion of spontaneous order is fake and gay liberalism, fake and gay marxism, fake and gay progressivism. There’s nothing spontaneous about order even by definition, order is always created by someone with a name.
Yes. You won’t find a soft monarch and weak aristocracy for the same reason. The common ingredient being true struggle.
“The notion of spontaneous order is fake and gay…”
If this is a general statement it’s wrong. If it’s meant to apply only to a particular context then it may be right.
If “The notion of spontaneous order is fake and gay” in general, then you’re denying natural languages, the theory of evolution, and about ten trillion other things that are obviously the products of spontaneous order.
Spontaneous good order is fake and gay, but power over a population is neither created nor destroyed only transferred.
http://nobabies.net/A%20table%20of%20contents%20Third%20Book.html
I am not as pessimistic as the author, but it seems to me that he touches on a very important topic that is not talked about enough.
In short, one of the main problems of modern extinction is related to the fact that we have ceased to take in women who are sufficiently similar to ourselves. The best thing we can do to get big and happy families is to go to our grandparents’ home country and find an attractive young girl with enough genes in common (optimally third/fourth cousin). On the one hand, it is encouraging, because there is something lyrical and romatic in it.
On the practical side, this is horribly frustrating, because it means that the optimal marriage pool is quite small and limited, even without taking into account the terrible situation in the culture.
A trip to Mongolia for a bride is a shot in one’s own foot.
African Americans? Mestizos? Egypt? Central Asia? Azkenazi Jews? I’m not seeing genetic gulfs leading to low fertility and extinction.
Based:
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1606230828652105735?cxt=HHwWjsC4kbabvcosAAAA
As Jim said, just another Trump moment:
https://twitter.com/L0m3z/status/1606384710950785032?cxt=HHwWkMC4zcaYg8ssAAAA
They’ll slowly banning everyone again.
Steve Sailer is back
https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1607733672635158528?cxt=HHwWgMDSrbrQ6M8sAAAA
Elon hasn’t completely given up the fight, but he doesn’t appear to be winning right now.
Looks like the Feds failed to pay the national guard troops today. Weird considering that they’re literally just creating the money out of thin air.