What women want

Women want what they do not want, and love what they hate.

Men understand what they want in love, sex, and romance, and act to attain it in a way that seems to them realistically likely to attain it. There is a straightforward connection between desire, intent, and action.

Women are not like that, and consent culture has imposed upon them an insoluble task to which they were not exposed to in the ancestral environment of evolutionary adaptation. They face a problem that lacks a rational solution, and their response to it is, unsurprisingly, deeply irrational.

Miss Average wants to be loved and cared for my mister one in thirty, by the six foot six billionaire athlete vampire King, and proceeds to act in ways that make it unlikely that anyone will ever love her except her cats, that no one will ever care for her, and that she will die alone and be eaten by her cats.

Some of them panic at age thirty or forty, and proceed to condescend to reluctantly marry mister average, who is fifty years old and involuntarily celibate up till now, but by that time, her eggs and her womb have probably dried up.

And when parents and uncles tell their rapidly ageing daughters and nieces that they should get their act together, it is totally and completely ineffective. They get really really angry on being advised.

Women complain men are not willing to commit, not even willing to approach. Meaning mister one in thirty is not willing to commit to miss average, and mister average is not going to approach miss average, because he will probably be charged with sexual harassment, rape and assault. Women just do not like low status males around, any more than they want rats and cockroaches around.

Obviously women are happiest staying at home cooking, cleaning, serving and obeying their husband. But, in the event that the six foot six billionaire vampire King should fall madly in love with him, have absolutely no intention of cooking, cleaning, serving, and obeying him. They will, off the bat, make entirely unreasonable demands.

Of course these demands are merely a shit test, what they actually hope for is to be smacked and handed a mop. But they are unaware of hoping for this.

Of course we all know that in matters of love and sex, what females intend, and what they believe that they want, have little connection to actual female conduct. “It just happened”. It is all a shit test. But this shit test is preventing successful family formation and reproduction.

There are a number of obstacles to reproduction.

1. Defect/Defect equilibrium. It is in both party’s interest to defect on their partner before they get defected on. It is a woman’s reproductive interest to be in a situation where she cannot defect, thus human females reproduce most successfully as property, men least successfully as property. Notice the tendency of female romances to be set in magical worlds where the main female character is excused from the inconvenience of consent. We all, male and female, long for the ancestral environment of successful reproduction.

2. Women have an absurdly inflated idea of the their value as a wife or a long term partner, because it is easy for them to get semen from a high value man.

3. Women have absurdly inflated idea of their value as a relationship partner, because they delude themselves that they are in a relationship, when they are merely somewhere near the bottom of a long booty call list.

4. Even if a woman has an accurate idea of her value as a relationship partner, it is still female nature to avoid being with low value men, meaning men of value similar to herself, and try to be with high value men. If a women does this, despite having an accurate idea of her value as a relationship partner, then she is a filthy trash slut, as women tend to be unless forcefully restrained by a man with a stick, and since she does not want to think of herself as a filthy trash slut, she cultivates an inflated view of her own value to protect herself from the knowledge that she is a filthy trash slut.

5. Women don’t think they have to bring anything to a relationship except themselves, because they don’t have to bring anything to a booty call except themselves. If they hope to be loved, cared for, and looked after, they need to start by cleaning the man’s house, picking up his clothes, doing the laundry, and cooking a nice meal. Of course a chick is, in practice, never going to do that on her own initiative, because she subconsciously hopes to be made to do that. But because we men tend to be oblivious, we tend not to command until the amount of trash on the floor makes it difficult to move around, we have no clothes left that do not stink, and strange fungi are growing on the unwashed dishes. If a man is looking for a relationship, he needs to command service. If a woman is looking for a relationship, not much she can do except inject herself into situations where service is likely to be commanded, or else somehow overcome the natural female propensity to shit test by cooking, cleaning, and tidying up on her own initiative. There have been a few occasions, not often, where women have just shown up on my doorstep and just got on with sex, cooking, cleaning, and tidying up. Worked on me because I am just lazy and most men are just lazy. But it is much more in accordance with female nature and the mating dance for the man to drag her to his lair and put her to work, and women much prefer this to having to arrive under their own power. In the ancestral environment of successful reproduction, being dragged to the man’s lair and compelled to serve looks a lot more like permanent security suitable for raising children than just showing up under her own power. If the man dragged her there, he probably will not let her go.

72 comments What women want

Karl says:

“And when parents and uncles tell their rapidly ageing daughters and nieces that they should get their act together, it is totally and completely ineffective.”

Indeed, but is there anything that could be said to daughters and nieces that would be effective?

Jehu says:

Arrange meetings where she gets to dance with men you’ve preapproved as suitable future husbands.

Humungus says:

Greetings,

This essay carries the essence of what it means to be reactionary. It starts at home. Control of self, wife, family… it is God’s will. Consider it a test.

Once you’ve mastered your household, then you will be confident to go on to greater things.

Mossadnik says:

Yeah, there’s no galactic expansion before things down here on this blue ball are in Order.

alf says:

So it is.

Sher Singh says:

Women ♥️ attention.

“If he doesn’t hit you he doesn’t 💘 you”

Banning domestic violence creates loveless households, divorce, and the collapse of society.

Stand up against government mandated emotional abuse.

ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
https://blog.reaction.la/economics/fertility-and-corporal-punishment/

JustAnotherGuy says:

https://x.com/RWApodcast/status/1984296786027069476

Youtube going back to the usual clamping. Another victory for nothing ever happens bros?

JustAnotherGuy says:

I’m being farcical of course, but its looking like everyone is thinking the temporary government is going to be very temporary and someone is going to do the needful to them soon, so they are trying to get in the good graces of the proggies again. I’m honestly hoping I am wrong about this though.

Jim says:

There has been a startling escalation in censorship on the Ukraine. Supposedly Russia is suffering a bazillion casualties, the Ukraine is winning, winning, winning, and Putin is falling, falling, falling.

This escalation of censorship happened immediately after a large proportion of the Ukrainian Nazis got trapped in the Pokrovsk agglomeration, which represents a major reduction in the Global American Empire’s capability to terrorise and murder Ukrainians.

As RWA said immediately before being banned from Youtube “We are reaching previously unseen levels of copium”

alf says:

Supposedly Russia is suffering a bazillion casualties

This is the number one point I’ve come across. Yes, well, OK, maybe the Ukraine is very slowly losing, but they’re killing 5 Russians for every dead Ukranian!

The copium of ‘Ukraine is losing on literally every front but we’re still slaughtering Russians’ is palpable. Good.

Jim says:

Given that Russians are still volunteering in considerable numbers, while the Ukraine is running horribly short of conscripts, casualty ratios have to be at least ten to one in Russia’s favor, probably thirty to one. Another indicator is that brigades are three to five hundred men when formed, and yet we see areas with many brigades but only a thousand or so troops, indicating that most Ukrainian brigades have very few men left.

Karl says:

That “brigades” are formed with just three to five hundred men is an indicator all by itself. The usual word for a newly formed unit of that size is “battalion”.

Jim says:

My error, I mixed up battalions and brigades.

Mossadnik says:

The troll got his way. Now, having finally switched from Racist Jesus to Anti-Racist Jesus, I’m still trying to figure out how America will actually solve its vastly disproportionate black violent crime problem. Seriously, what is the Realistic plan to properly manage the less-than-perfectly-civilized black population? Look, the root cause of the mismatch is primarily genetic. You can fit some races neatly into modern civilization; others much less so. Let’s we convert the elite to Jimianity. Now what?

Mossadnik says:

I do really like some blacks, and for the most part get along with them just fine. It’s not like I wake up in the afternoon “morning” all enraged about those damn niggers. But obviously their presence, at least under the current conditions, does tend to bring about civilizational disorder. The term “bio-weapons” accurately describes a vastly disproportionate percentage of blacks. This needs to be solved if we are to advance to higher stages, doesn’t it?

Or should crime be dealt with simply as crime, without a special, explicit race-specific policy?

Jim says:

> Or should crime be dealt with simply as crime, without a special, explicit race-specific policy?

Explicit race specific policies always turn out to be necessary, and progressives always wind up reluctantly sneaking those policies in through the back door.

Thus, for example, feather indians need, and generally get, different rules on alcohol to white people. Blacks need simpler and harsher rules, and swifter enforcement. Also many drugs that whites can generally handle OK are just devastating to blacks, so black communities demanded special rules on drugs popular among blacks.

Mossadnik says:

Yes, that makes sense – different rules for different people, under the principle of “salus populi suprema lex.”

Humungus says:

The negro thinks he can build civilization, but due to Dunning–Kruger effect, low skilled negros will limit their own population growth through a variety of methods; drugs, poverty, crime…

Whatever remains can be recruited into the army.

Mossadnik says:

Certainly God can use anybody, even Balaam’s ass (Numbers 22:28).

Hesiod says:

A lot of atheists, whose first spoken word as babes must have been “akshually”, like to point to Balaam’s Ass as evidence of the primitiveness of the Holy Bible. Certainly, an insistence on pigheaded literalness might leave one less than impressed, but I recall the spirit of the story was even a dumb donkey had more sense than the greatest amongst the heathen idolaters. Quite a bit of teh funneyz in the Good Book if you know how to read it.

Mossadnik says:

Yes; I’ve read some books on humor in the Bible (which humor there’s aplenty), and that episode is often regarded as one of the lulziest. And it’s full of valuable lessons, too. The ass did humble itself in the Lord’s presence; with superior discernment, it had repented before Balaam did. Thus the famous words of Micah (Micah 6:8),

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?

…had, in a sense, been fulfilled in the donkey before they were fulfilled in Balaam himself. But “better late than never,” as they say.

Mossadnik says:

Moreover, the ass’ submission to the Lord was complete, whereas Balaam’s sin got the better of him. Thus, as you say, it’s more worthy to be a donkey than a mighty sorcerer of the dark side.

Hence Zechariah 9:9:

Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass.

The Lord can use anybody.

Hesiod says:

I’m currently a little over halfway through Malleus Maleficarum, and it’s driving home more so than Daemonologie what the practices of heathen idolatry were. The closest contemporary comparison I can make is Stone Age Herbalist’s reports on modern day sub-Saharan African superstition, now more in-your-face to Westerners thanks to immivasion.

Mossadnik says:

Let’s say Christian fundies get into power and ban all abortions, and birth control while we’re at it. Okay, then in a few generations you’ll have many more blacks, and particularly from dysfunctional backgrounds. Is this not a problem for civilizational advancement that the New Ruling Class will need to solve?

Jim says:

Not necessarily.

Successful reproduction requires cooperation between the sexes. Cooperate/cooperate equilibrium requires enforcement.

Hard to have enforcement on sex and all that, except religiously based, a state religion. If a non state religion can get away with enforcing reproductive cooperation that the state religion is disinclined to enforce, soon enough it will become the state religion — old type Mohammedans are betting on this.

OK, assume we have a state and state religion that supplies enforcement preferentially for high status people, preferentially for those who subscribe to the official faith, and preferentially for those who work hard, pay taxes, and play by the rules. Obviously inferior races will fail to reproduce as successfully as higher races.

Obviously you have to take away women’s inalienable right to fornication, adultery and single motherhood. Abortion problem then largely solved. The abortion problem is basically that booty calls are apt to come in quite infrequently, once every few weeks, so women are reluctant to go on the pill, and when they answer a booty call, are in no position to demand that a condom be used.

Once abortion is rare, no one will demand that it be safe and legal.

Anonymous Fake says:

Abortion already is rare, [*deleted for posting from an alternative reality, the world as leftists imagine it*]

Jim says:

The great majority of women commit at least one abortion, and in a very large proportion of cases, there is a biological father who would strongly object if he knew. Abortions are kept secret not because of social sanction against illegitimate pregnancy, but to avoid paternal demand that the pregnancy be legitimised. The primary cause of abortion is women keeping their options open in case they should get another booty call from General Bucknaked.

The Cominator says:

I thought it was 1/3rd of women.

Jim says:

Official statistics on controversial questions should never be believed. In a world where facefags cannot speak the truth, we have to rely on personal experience and anecdote.

Cloudswrest says:

I remember watching “Fast Times at Ridgemont High” for the first time a few years ago and the Jennifer Jason Leigh character gets pregnant and goes and gets an abortion at the corner abortuary like it’s a perfectly natural thing to do. I was quite put off by this. Can you imagine this same scene in a 1940s, Humphrey Bogart/Carey Grant era movie? The movie would be banned and many principles arrested for indecency and/or promoting crime.

The Cominator says:

I’ve only known two women who admitted to it (not something I typically ask either though).

The Cominator says:

The sad thing is as bad as that is anyone in clownworld who watches it clearly sees a much BETTER world then what we have now. Fast Times does not invoke the emotion of how horrible she was for having an abortion (that was a side note) it invokes the emotion of THIS IS WHAT THEY TOOK FROM YOU. Also I really really love the Jackson Browne song…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xk2NHZukTY

Your Uncle Bob says:

No need to ask point-blank; any woman who is committedly pro-choice has had an abortion. Whether single and on the bottom of a booty call list, or married with kids and going to church; all of them.

Optimistically it might be less than “great majority,” but Jim is right that the official stats have to be the floor not the actual number.

(Applying this rule means a couple of my friends and family with children have a dark past. That’s not good, but another Jimism is that wives are made not born, and from the outside that seems to have happened.)

Anonymous Fake says:

Most women use birth control pills. Abortion is for the morlocks. And Western Christian women have always dated around (but with no sex until the pill was invented) with minimal parental involvement, but there was no such thing as a General Bucknaked.

Just look at your own Christian family and national history. Don’t trust the government.

Jim says:

> Most women use birth control pills.

Most women who are in a relationship where they expect to have regular sex with a particular man, but do not want a baby, use birth control pills.

However most women are not, in fact in a relationship that involves the expectation of regular sex. Sex “just happens”, and since they are theoretically not expecting it to happen, and it probably just happened with a man who did not meet any of her sixty eight bare minimum necessary requirements for a potential husband, partner, date, or even hookup, they were not on the pill, and did not even have a packet of condoms in their handbag.

He, if he learned of the baby, would probably want to keep her around, so she does not tell him, because she feels entitled to a six foot six billionaire athlete vampire king, and a baby would lock her down into permanently having regular sex with a man who failed to meet any of her sixty eight bare minimum requirements, just because she strangely and unexpectedly had sex with him once.

Most women are not prepared for unexpected sex, yet, strangely, unexpected sex somehow keeps happening with unexpected men.

Mossadnik says:

Christianity is facing an existential threat in Nigeria. Thousands of Christians are being killed. Radical Islamists are responsible for this mass slaughter. I am hereby making Nigeria a “COUNTRY OF PARTICULAR CONCERN” — But that is the least of it. When Christians, or any such group, is slaughtered like is happening in Nigeria (3,100 versus 4,476 Worldwide), something must be done! I am asking Congressman Riley Moore, together with Chairman Tom Cole and the House Appropriations Committee, to immediately look into this matter, and report back to me. The United States cannot stand by while such atrocities are happening in Nigeria, and numerous other Countries. We stand ready, willing, and able to save our Great Christian population around the World!

DONALD J. TRUMP,
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/115470116607441456

I see some on Right Twitter being against any intervention here.

What is the Jimian Christian position?

Hesiod says:
Mossadnik says:

Looks to me like the non-interventionists on Right Twitter have a point. Assistance to the Christians should be provided, but the US should probably avoid going to war in Nigeria.

S says:

The United States shouldn’t intervene, but Christian charity should be directed to Nigerian Christians to aid them and if necessary arm them.

While military support for co-religionists is a Christian option, Nigeria has a population of about 220 million people (35-45% Christian) so 3,100 Christians murdered, while a problem does not call for the blunt force of American intervention.

Neurotoxin says:

I haven’t thought enough about the Nigerian situation to have a position on it, but one benefit of military “intervention” there would be that it would use some US military capacity. This would let Trump say to the Thermidorians, “Hey, sorry, we already have military commitments elsewhere, can’t spare the soldiers, planes, etc. for Ukraine.”

Overall I’m not big on bombing, occupying, etc. every corner of the globe – God knows we have enough problems of our own – but that would be a silver lining of such a venture.

Speaking of which, I wonder how Venezuela’s doing.

Mossadnik says:

I believe at this point any American boots on the ground outside the Western Hemisphere are a bad idea. As long as you have the Prog Regime in power, “invade the world” is highly likely to be followed by “invite the world,” and then with Nigerians you will get a particularly unpleasant strain of infinniger. I do think that perhaps some humanitarian assistance should be provided to the Christians, but I’m with the Moderate Paleocons on non-interventionism here, as per Thomas Aquinas’ Just War theory.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

It’s got that “strongly worded letter” vibe, so probably amounts to nothing substantial.

Importing a horde of Nigerian migrants would be a total disaster; Christian or not, Nigerians are among the worst (if not the worst) blacks, quickly assimilating to the obsolete farm equipment’s racial resentment but being ten times as industrious with the grift, even more so than the dot-Indians. The only reason they aren’t a bigger problem is that they number relatively few.

Military intervention would also be a disaster, for all the reasons we’ve become accustomed to. We’ve more or less retained the ability to blow stuff up when facing a vastly inferior opponent, but long ago forgot the art of effective rebuilding or vassalage. There’s no more reason to expend blood and treasure there than there is in the middle east.

Resettlement to other parts of Africa is possible in theory, but always seems to be a shitshow in practice, I think in large part because the various “regions” of Africa that we in the west tend to think of as analogous to European nation-states just aren’t that at all; most don’t have clearly-defined borders or even functional governments, and the ones that do, usually aren’t agreement-capable. So intra-African resettlement tends to be confusing and unproductive.

Whenever I read on-the-ground reports about (de)colonized Africa, it seems clear that the old European Colonizers were far more effective than Team America World Police. More effective at creating zones of stability and productivity in general, and more effective at converting Christians and keeping them alive in particular. That system just worked, probably because the colonizers had very literal skin in the game; they were there for the long haul.

We will see what happens with Trump’s idea of commercial development in Gaza. Conceptually it seems to share many of the same elements, but with a much more secular flavor and far less emphasis on the Church, which may turn out to be a non-issue in the modern world or may (more likely) prove to be its principal failing.

In any case, a return to some form of that is probably the only viable solution. America sympathizes with our Christian neighbors and yadda yadda, but we are not going to commit our military and are definitely not going to commit our own soil. Rather, the USG grants official license and development rights to any network of missionaries and PMCs who care enough about the issue (or see enough potential profit in it) to establish some outposts there, build them up, defend them ruthlessly, and become a haven for all those oppressed Nigerian brothers in Christ. The nominal goal of the “Nigeria Corporation” will be to generate profit, but it will inevitably have a heavy contingent of missionary types who are more interested in spreading and preserving the faith.

This will probably not happen; Cruz wants sanctions and other BS, as if any country in Africa would or could be weakened by such things. Economic sanctions work when there is a well-established regime whose productivity depends heavily on trade, or alternatively, when there are belligerent/rival neighbors who could use the sanctions as a pretext to move in for the kill. Is any of that true about Nigeria? Honestly, I don’t know much about the country’s inner workings, but somehow, I doubt it. So Cruz is just playing politics, wants to do some cheap and ineffective virtue-signaling to appeal to his Christian voter base, and Trump is throwing him a bone with some Royal Proclamations, as the king often does to mollify his feistier lords. Beyond that, hot air.

Jim says:

> We’ve more or less retained the ability to blow stuff up when facing a vastly inferior opponent, but long ago forgot the art of effective rebuilding or vassalage

Obviously the only way to protect Nigerian Christians is to subject them to rule by white Christians.

Which requires a fertile elite, which requires that America be ruled by old type Christians.

Contaminated NEET says:

Fuck the Nigerian Christians. Any US involvement is just going to bring millions of them here, place them above me in the status hierarchy, teach them that everything I have is stolen goods and theirs by right, and justify further interventions and reparations to make up for the damage Uncle CSAM will do over there. I’ve seen this show enough times to know I don’t want to watch it again.

Mossadnik says:

If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country, “guns-a-blazing,” to completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities. I am hereby instructing our Department of War to prepare for possible action. If we attack, it will be fast, vicious, and sweet, just like the terrorist thugs attack our CHERISHED Christians! WARNING: THE NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT BETTER MOVE FAST!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/115476385101120405

We’ll see where this is going.

Mossadnik says:

Pete Hegseth:

The killing of innocent Christians in Nigeria — and anywhere — must end immediately. The Department of War is preparing for action. Either the Nigerian Government protects Christians, or we will kill the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities.

https://x.com/PeteHegseth/status/1984751436102791607

I’m not entirely sure that, from the JUST WAR perspective, doing this is a good idea.

(See, goyim? An Israeli patriot need not be a war-mongering neocon shill.)

FrankNorman says:

None of that is the fault of the Nigerian Christians.

In case you did not notice, the people who would use their plight as an excuse to make them welfare clients are not in power in the USA right now.
The people who would rather make the Nigerian Christians safe in their own land, by the simple method of killing the Mohammedans who are wanting to kill those Nigerian Christians.. are in power at the moment.

Contaminated NEET says:

Nigerian Christians wouldn’t piss on me if I were on fire. They could murder me and sleep like babies that night, because I am outside their in-group. Their in-group, by the way, is not Christians; it’s not Blacks; it’s not even Nigerians; it’s their clan/extended family, and that is part of why Nigeria is Nigeria. Anyone outside that in-group is enemies or prey. Do not accept them into your in-group, because you will never, ever get into theirs.

Fuck Nigerian Christians. I don’t owe them a goddamned thing.

Jim says:

When the lips are gone the teeth will feel cold.

If we let people genocide the Nigerian Christians, we are up next. They may not see unity with us, but those killing them see unity with us.

Contaminated NEET says:

Nigerian Christians have nothing to do with me. I’d be perfectly happy with a policy of salutary neglect toward every African on Earth, Christian, Muslim, animist, or atheist. But that is not in the cards. Our evil and arrogant rulers insist on using the irrelevant problems of far-away peoples to coerce me into joining their telescopic philanthropy. You might say those evil arrogant rulers are my enemy, not the Nigerian Christians. OK, sure. But conceding that you care about the woes of their little overseas wubbies plays into their hands. I would prefer that Nigerians Muslims murder every last Nigerian Christian male and kidnap, rape, and convert every last Nigerian Christian female than that we bring one single Nigerian Christian refugee within 1000 miles of the USA.

Even here, I see people falling for this garbage for the 100th time because they pasted a cross on it. Disgusting. You’re out of your mind if you think Nigerian Christians are standing between American Whites and genocide in any way whatsoever. They are a tool of that genocide, a pawn of that genocide’s architects, and active and enthusiastic participants in that genocide the moment our wicked rulers use our pity to bring them over here.

SkipRamen says:

In Old Times, the Pope would handle this, he would get word, and make it so that Kings, the Maintainers of Armies, would find reason and incentive to intervene in faraway lands.

Thus there would no longer be any call/interest in importing foreign people away from their homelands, they would stay and make them great again.
https://x.com/EYakoby/status/1984107619380838909

When your Popes are Woke, flying gay colours, blessing blocks of ice, and building Islamic prayer rooms in the Vatican… Christians die, you get “refugeed”, and your enemy lives another day to grow even stronger.

It’s time to evict and replace your Popes.

Mossadnik says:

> It’s time to evict and replace your Popes.

That’s true, and moreover, it’s time to be ruled by warriors rather than by priests. If, as Yarvin likes to say, Sovereignty be conserved, then the ultimate sovereign (on Earth) ought to be the King, not the Pope.

Mossadnik says:

(By the way, this might be slightly off topic here, but I legit don’t get KD’s troll re the Parousia. Does he claim to be the Second Coming? Or is it me? Both of us? Lol. I’m honestly not sure where this is going. At least as far as I’m concerned, I’m literally just a shitposter. Not a temporal and/or religious authority of any kind.)

Mossadnik says:

(If I get my theology right, the first time around the Lord showed up as a High Priest figure a la Melchizedek, while the second time He will show up as a King crowned in all glory. If the Parousia is a temporal authority, e.g., the future King of America, Commander of the Christian Armies, then clearly it’s not some random Israeli shitposter on an anonymous blog with no worldly ambitions. I don’t mind contributing whatever I can to the arrival of that Divine King, but obviously that’s not me; my contribution — such as it is — is intellectual and spiritual, but I’m not qualified to be a Literal Monarch or some such. Alt-Master KD, however, can probably serve as both King and High-Priest, so it makes sense that he is in fact the Parousia, assuming that’s any of us, lol. Anyway, sorry for the digression from War in Nigeria.)

Mossadnik says:

(Sorry for samefagging, but I think the most any commenter here can aspire to be is a Paul-like figure spreading the Word on Earth to prepare it for the Second Coming. I highly doubt that any one of us can realistically claim to be an Avatar of God. I’m not entirely opposed to the idea, but God is supposed to be infallible, inerrant, sinless, etc., and I just don’t feel like any of the regulars here fit this description; no offense to anyone. It’s an entertaining troll, though.)

Neurotoxin says:

No one here is within a parsec of being an avatar of God. What are you doing?

If this is an attempt to do some sort of reverse psychology* or whatever, it is not going to work.

*Like Dirk Gently in that Douglas Adams novel, in which Dirk constantly went around denying that he had psychic powers, in an attempt to get everyone to believe that he had psychic powers.

Mossadnik says:

Nah, I only use reverse psychology to shill for Israel. I’m responding to a certain post from some time back; I also try to figure out what the purpose of running this Alt-Theater is, considering most of it is directed at me, for some reason. I mean, you don’t need to “troll me into” holding any position; we can just talk like normal people.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

I also try to figure out what the purpose of running this Alt-Theater is, considering most of it is directed at me, for some reason.

I’m reasonably certain that this theater is inside your head, and entirely certain that said personal targeting is inside your head.

We are living in unusual times and thus have had some unusual shills, some of whom really aggravate me personally, but I would never claim to have been the subject of their activities, as circumstances and plain old common sense don’t support that. It’s online gangstalking, taking a bunch of anons (or even just one troll) who are merely going about their business and interpreting it as a big conspiracy against you.

This is Jim’s blog. The dumb shills are here to shout scripts into their megaphone and don’t care whose blog it is, only that there’s a comment form. The smart shills are here to perform the Trotsky dance, pretend (usually badly) that they’re one of us and try to gradually direct our energy toward topics and actions that help them and hurt us. And the trolls, if there are any, take pleasure in provoking anyone at all, doesn’t matter whom as long as they get their lulz.

There is just no archetype, no internally consistent behavior model for what you describe; it can only be fantasy.

Mossadnik says:

I won’t argue against this.

Mossadnik says:

Also, I probably do need to take a break from poasting. I rejoined in full-force following October 7 to achieve certain political goals (this is a highly visited blog), and looks like my work is pretty much done. Until next time. Peace! 😉

Mossadnik says:

> In case you did not notice, the people who would use their plight as an excuse to make them welfare clients are not in power in the USA right now…

While I don’t believe in being AUTISTIC re Thomas Aquinas’ Just War Principles, it is vital to have the war waged by a proper authority – a Sovereign who can make war/peace and be obeyed in the long-term. The problem in the US is that the Cathedral has not yet been dismantled, and if you start importing Nigerians, the leftist deep state and perhaps future Democrat politicians — whose sovereignty, if you pardon the pun, trumps Trump’s — will make them into tools for dispossessing Real Americans.

Dismantle the Cathedral of Demons, have a Sovereign who actually is sovereign and can make long-lasting war/peace (he need not be literally a King; Putin is a “President,” for instance), and then this won’t be a problem.

> the simple method of killing the Mohammedans who are wanting to kill those Nigerian Christians

Nah, it’s not so simple; I don’t know much about Nigeria, but “just go in and kill the terrorists” never works on its own – you always need a longer-term plan than just doing that in order to be successful.

Again, I don’t autistically subscribe to Just War theory — or any theory, for that matter — but its principles are sound, and “hope of success” (spes successus) sure is one of them.

Nikolai says:

Another problem I’ve noticed (and personally had to deal with) is that if against all odds, you actually do get a happy relationship then her friends will do everything in their power to break you up.

This particularly happens when she’s outwardly appreciative, respectful, agreeable and submissive to you. Especially if her friends are single women, recently divorced women or gay men.

It’s actually a very severe problem. People see a woman who’s nice to her bf or husband and act like a vampire seeing the cross.

They’ll try to convince her to needlessly start fights with you, defy you, disrespect you, exacerbate any existing disagreement, convince her she’s being abused, etc. If she refuses to comply, they’ll start making fun of her and socially isolating her.

I remember a couple years ago some woman wrote a Twitter post along the lines of “Every morning my husband makes me coffee and we sit in the backyard for 20 minutes sipping and talking. It’s my favorite part of the day, I’m so lucky to have him ☺️”

People just went completely apoplectic at her for weeks. They couldn’t stand the thought of a woman being happy and grateful to her husband. It’s on par with holocaust denial.

It’s nearly impossible to have a happy marriage in such an environment. You just can’t make things work if interlopers are constantly trying to sow discord and go frothing-at-the-mouth insane over the most mild prosocial sentiment.

Jim says:

> People see a woman who’s nice to her bf or husband and act like a vampire seeing the cross.

All happy marriages are quietly and furtively eighteenth century. There is one family structure that works, and nothing else can work. And that family structure is sacrilege against progressivism. What you are seeing is people thrown into outrage by sacrilege against their faith.

This outrage reveals their faith to be demonic.

People know in their hearts that a happy marriage inherently involves gross violation of the most sacred doctrines of progress.

alf says:

So you tell her: your friends envy you, and like crabs in a bucket want to pull you down to their level.

If you indeed have a happy relationship, and especially you knock her up, she will just lose interest in those friendships. Works the other way around too: I’ve seen some single women react to babies not unlike a vampire reacts to garlic.

olin says:

Apparently women want to get fucked by hard men, such as the 2 throat-slitting Muslims in the UK that just did 10 people on a train, lol.

SkipRamen says:

Short good video of Mamdani exposing himself multiple times
https://x.com/RealDonKeith/status/1984574557932462470

Lying is one of the wholesale strategies of the Democrat/Left Politicians, Socialist Economists, and Muslims.
At least some portion of the Internet, though small, seems to be waking up.
But everyone is still very far from doing what needs to be done.

Dark Forces are very strong… people will need to start deploying a lot more Light, Strength, and Numbers in public to beat them.

Military General spews litres of Wokism’s Crocodile Tears
https://x.com/RealDonKeith/status/1984559007328321900

Mossadnik says:

There used to be a commenter here who wrote a great post about Just War in the context of Russia-Ukraine. I’d like to reproduce it here:

It is excellent that you agree Ukraine is in the wrong. As surprising as it seems to some, war is not murder, and killing is justified after grievous provocation.

Just-war theory as originally formulated by St. Thomas Aquinas states that to be considered as fought in accordance with God’s will, any war must be:

A. Waged For A Just Cause
The war criteria of “just cause” means that, in some overt way, a nation’s sovereignty is directly threatened. A hostile nation intent on actively pursuing ethnic cleansing of your ethic group, on your border, which is negotiating with a belligerent nuclear-armed opponent for the installation of military bases on your border also definitely ticks that box. Also, American expansion in eastern europe since 1991 is ungodly under Genesis 11:8, which states God deliberately scattered the nations and intended for them to remain thus. Collecting the nations into a single group is therefore ungodly, and how appropriate that the EU building in Brussels is styled after the tower of Babel.

B. Fought By and Against Competent Authority
The aggression against ethnic Russians living in Ukraine was promulgated by the authorities within the Ukranian government (at the gleeful prompting of the Biden government and the Obama government). Multiple people directly involved in burning people alive in Odessa are now ministers under Zelenski.

C. Comparative Justification
Ukraine’s actions are morally wrong according to biblical rules and Russia’s actions bringing the war are morally right – this should be apparent to anyone not blided by one-sided media coverage. There’s a 2016 documentary titled “Ukraine on fire”, which might help clarify Ukraine’s antagonism if you’re one of the people who never heard of the place before 2022.

D. Right Intention
The clearly-stated purpose of the war is to stop Ukraine’s murderous actions and ensure the safety and political freedom of the people of Lugansk and Donbass in the eastern regions of Ukraine. Had Zelenski & Co. not tried to pull a fast one, this would have all been avoided.

E. Last Resort
All other reasonable means of resolving the conflict were seriously tried and exhausted – NATO encouraged Ukraine to negotiate between 2014-2022 only with the intent of rearming Ukraine to continue its vicious policy in the eastern provinces. Boris Johnson instructed Zelenski to not agree to any sort of negotiated peace treaty when fighting began in 2022.

F. Probability Of Success
Entering a war is foolish and harmful unless there is a high probability of success. Russia is winning the conflict, Ukraine is inventing whole new categories in the concept of “picking a fight and losing it”.

G. Proportionality Of Results
The positive results of the war’s success must be greater than the losses that will inevitably occur from pursuing the war. Russia will gain stability, peace for ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine, and reduced global support for US government warmongering like what led up to the present “crisis”.

H. Right Spirit
All war must be undertaken with reluctance, sobriety and counsel. Those who engage in war must do so with great sorrow. As Psalm 68:30 says: “He has scattered the peoples who delight in war.”

Pretty obvious that that neocons and warhawks who encouraged Zelenski were delighted at the thought of millions of deaths, never expecting them to be from their own side.

Extrapolating from this to Nigeria, military action should be strongly reconsidered.

Ryan says:

Some women are more self-aware than others.

https://old.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/

Remember that owning, commanding and punishing a woman is completely above board if it is framed as a kink. I’m content with my sheltered religious wife, but some of you psychos could try and ‘adopt’ one of these poor neglected girls. Offer to ravish, degrade AND provide them food and housing for them and they’ll be lining up. I wouldn’t be surprised if some of them had quite low bodycounts as they are saving themselves for General Butt Naked.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

if it is framed as a kink

That is the problem; by doing so, you accept the progressive frame that it isn’t normal, is done only per her “consent” and can be terminated by her at any time. That is not marriage, it is gay marriage.

In a more general sense, you’re describing this as an improvement on the status quo, but it is not. As we’ve said a number of times in the past, body count isn’t just a number, it’s quality over quantity: an alpha widow of just one alpha male, while unlikely to be encountered in the wild, will shit test with far greater frequency and intensity than a regular whore who has dumped ten betas but never really been with an alpha–that is, not any guy she considers much more alpha than you. Body count should really be “alpha count”.

We don’t discuss or perform the monkey dance because we like the monkey dance, we do it because it is necessary from time to time. To the extent that the reddit content is authentic, and not just porn bait, women who are out there in public demanding ever more elaborate performances are not good wife material.

Ryan says:

Very reasonable caveats.

It should be possible to move things into a normal marriage over time. Having submission as a fun ‘secret’ within the relationship, acting as legal plausible deniability, is better than nothing. Making her loyal by passing shit tests is also important. Until we get a sane and sympathetic society and legal system, do you have any better ideas?

Lots of zoomer girls are virgins despite being porn addicts. Trying to rehabilitate one is again better than nothing, but of course if you can marry a well raised daughter of a patriarchal fellow then that is far better, but hard to find.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

Having submission as a fun ‘secret’ within the relationship, acting as legal plausible deniability, is better than nothing.

I didn’t realize “nothing” was the frame of reference. Plate-spinning is also better than nothing, it’s just not very good. But is shacking up with a bondage girl better than spinning plates? I’m not so sure. Very high likelihood of total loss on investment and ruinous personal consequences. At least plate-spinning is low investment and gives you the slim but compounding odds of a lottery win.

Lots of zoomer girls are virgins despite being porn addicts.

Every time I read this, the primary source inevitably turns out to be the girls themselves, posting on TikTok or Instagram about who they are still virgins at 23 or whatever.

I don’t believe it. Women lie. Women have always lied. That they are lying in favor of virginity, as opposed to boasting about their sexual history as the previous generation did, is an encouraging indicator of the cultural winds. But the men who believe them are still fools.

I can believe that zoomer women have had fewer partners on average than millennial women did at the same age, because zoomer men are more pussified than ever, and opportunities for real in-the-flesh social contact are fewer than ever. But virgins? Nah.

If someone out there reading this has a zoomer daughter, and can honestly say with any confidence that his daughter of fertile age really IS a virgin, then what the hell are you waiting for? Find her a good man, or even a nice boy, and get her married while there’s still an opportunity. If she really is a virgin at age 23, or even age 18, then setting her up should be the easiest thing you have ever done. And if it is not so easy, then maybe daddy’s little princess isn’t really such a princess.

Brother Jim: how do you feel about the “trad wife” movement? Are some of them genuine Proverbs 31 women, or do they turn into low-value women the moment they get off Instagram?

Leave a Reply to olin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *