It is easy to understand why Mestizos vote Democrat. They are stupid. Observe Venezuela. Chavez stole their food, told them the evil capitalists were starving them, and the hungry Mestizos loved him and voted for him, without wondering overmuch as to why Chavez was so strangely unsuccessful at defending them from evil capitalists. But why East Asians?
West Hunter reports on Dan Freedman’s research on babies:
Chinese babies adapted to almost any position in which they were placed; for example, when placed face down in their cribs, they tended to keep their faces buried in the sheets rather than immediately turning to one side, as the Caucasian babies did. They briefly pressed the baby’s nose with a cloth, forcing him to breath with his mouth. Most white (and black) babies fight this maneuver by immediately turning away or swiping at the cloth with their hands, and this is reported in Western pediatric textbooks as normal. While the average Chinese baby would simply lay on his back, breathing through the mouth, accepting the cloth without a fight. …
Later, he looked at Navaho babies: they’re like Chinese, only more so.
Japanese babies are like Chinese, but less so: more irritable, but not as irritable as white kids.
From my own experience in Asia and relationships with Asians, Asians strongly believe that it is foolish to say something negative, it is better say nothing at all. It doesn’t mean they will follow you, they just won’t tell you when they are not. I am thinking Asians view life as one of balance and harmony, whereas Europeans view life as one of competition and conquest.
I have a few percent of Cherokee ancestry, and I see we are not genetically close to the East nor SE Asians:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_history_of_indigenous_peoples_of_the_Americas#Haplogroup_R1
So this may explain my fierceness?
So Asians will tend to vote however the hell they’re told. Therefore they don’t need to be replaced when those in power need to elect a new people.
I think it’s more of 2000 years of Confucian compliance.
Yup.
I also think that Asians are more friendly towards socialism in general. China has had public works and legal equality forever.
Legal equality between the sexes?
Between classes. Peasants being able to stand for examination, sue their employers, etc.
The existence of public works doesn’t tell us much about socialism. Indeed, the progress of public works is inversely correlated with socialism, e.g. the “stimulus” bill that was supposed to “build infrastructure” in the US, didn’t – it just went to bail out pension funds and provide sinecures for well-connected Democrats.
Australia and the UK seem to be similar to the US in that regard – their golden eras of public works coincide with times of less socialistic political economy.
At least that’s what it looks like in the west. Maybe the east is different.
I mean in the old days, when there were floods, or a famine, the government did intervene to save the people. It was expected of them, and when the government didn’t act well enough, there were riots.
Wasn’t that a common function of almost all centralized states?
Well they’ve had one for a *long* time
Oh sure, definitely. I was just saying that public works are a poor (at best) or even negative indicator of socialistic political economy.
[…] is the translation of a Chinese concept). Here’s one positive indicator. (And a negative one.) March 18, 2013admin No Comments » FILED UNDER :Uncategorized TAGGED WITH :reaction […]