A state exists because its army exists. States exist because armies exist.
A state needs a faith, and an army needs a faith. There is always a state faith. And starting with Obama, the faith of woke is currently being imposed on the army — a faith incompatible with the army’s core function, which efficiently killing people and breaking things. It is also incompatible with war production, or production of anything, as recently became apparent in the Ukraine war.
And the last place where the old faith of the Republic lived was the army. Obama decided to stamp that out and enforce Woke. Pete Hegseth intends to restore the old faith of the Republic in the army..
The trouble with the old faith of the Republic is that it only worked because of unprincipled exceptions. And if you remove all the unprincipled exceptions you get woke.
If all men are created equal, blacks are equal, women are equal. If men and women are equal, they are interchangeable, and you get sodomite marriage, trannies in the army, and you have to mind your pronouns.
Pete wants to restore the recently removed unprincipled exceptions. Men will no longer have an inherent universal human right to be women, nor vice versa. But he does not want the old unprincipled exceptions restored. Sodomy will remain, women will remain, provided they can make the physical, which of course they cannot, and he is going to make sure they cannot. Well, that is what he says, but he is namefag, and I can sense some stuff he is not saying — that namefags cannot say.
With Trump, you know you are getting the whole Trump. Trump really is Trump. Hegseth is holding something back, what he is holding back I do not quite know.
But he is dead serious about restoring the old faith of the Republic. The question that is unclear is which unprincipled exceptions to the faith of the Republic he wants back.
A faith that does not need unprincipled exceptions to meet reality is more viable. I want 1660, not 1770. But certainly 1770, which is what Pete Hegseth is selling, is a whole lot easier to sell in the army.
The inherent contradictions of the faith of 1770 got us to where we are today.
Well, is he a real adherent of the faith of 1770? His experience in Afghanistan and Iraq cured him of democratic universalism. The Afghans don’t want our #^##@& universal human rights, and will kill us if we try to shove them down their throats. And he is rather keen on the Bible. The founding fathers, being Deists rather than Christians, were not nearly so keen on the Bible.
He seems keen on on the faith of 1770, he is selling it, and it is an easy sell in the army. Maybe he really believes. Very likely he really believes. Or maybe he simultaneously believes in something a little bit older.
He is alarmingly keen on Israel, which seems a bit odd after his experiences in the Middle East. Still, we have to get Thermidor on side, if he wants to lead the Department of Defence, which he intends to restore to its old name, the Department of War. He seems a little too keen on war. Which all those Jewish Thermidorians really like about him.
But such points do not really matter much. What is important is that Trump is appointing someone who knows you have to bring a gun to gunfight and a faith to a holy war, and who understands we are in a holy war.
Pete’s position, like Trump’s, uneasily straddles rather too many factions. Albeit unlike Trump, all those factions are current year unthinkable. Well, he is a namefag. War comes, and will produce clarity.
https://archive.is/Y5fgP
These are actually days when decades happen.
On a related note:
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1877785122314875330
No brakes on the Thermidor Train!
Trump is looking to make PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH, and all this seems like part of the negotiations with the rivals. The war faction naturally supports de-trannification, and Trump is intent on using the vibe shift to Make A Great Deal.
I do wonder how far they are actually willing to go with this. For Peace Through Strength, need to actually have strength, which will require swerving to the right on the WQ, as mainstream culture did prior to WWII. The Babylon Bee article is probably not coordinated with Trump (unless it’s a test balloon), but there are glimmers of it going like it did in the previous century, except Trump genuinely has peaceful intentions.
The NYT is REEE-ing over Zuck removing tampons from men’s restrooms at Meta. Interesting though still amusing times.
Can hardly believe that tampons in male restrooms was ever actually a thing that respectable people pretended to take seriously, lol. It’s just too much, man. The compensation should be making smoking permissible everywhere. Of course, I would prefer it if work environments had mandatory sexual harassment courses (where they teach you how to sexually harass) and Two Minutes Hate periods where you have to scream as many profanities as possible targeting sexual deviants, foreign races, disgusting religions, and most of all – foids. But bringing back smoking would be a start.
By the way, I was not a bully in high school. I just happen to think that men should be allowed (and even encouraged) to be men, and that the gyno-sissies preventing this should hang. To solve civilization’s problems as they should be solved, the vibe shift, particularly in this direction, needs to be powerful. You don’t expect “sweet and sensitive” soyboys to bring back coverture, do you?
“ Can hardly believe that tampons in male restrooms was ever actually a thing that respectable people pretended to take seriously, lol.”
Brother there’a a hell of a lot more nonsense we’ve been fearfully pretending to take seriously than just that.
“I think maybe we’ve all changed.” —DJT
To all the Thermidor-affiliated lurkers (I know you’re out there), consider how the fertility crisis — I say it’s a fertility and sexlessness crisis, the problems are inextricably connected — that you claim to worry about needs a Tough Solution. In what cultural-memetic environment would it be possible to implement any such solution – one where you’re dying of estrogen poisoning, or one where men are actually men? The metaphorical estrogen in the metaphorical water supplies was always the fundamental problem. It is, above all, a form of spiritual pollution – it is from Satan, Prince of Entropy. Now, of course, military and civilian infrastructure is falling apart, so there you have it. What are you going to do to change that, Thermidor?
Sure, but it’s peak Clown World – it is surely not the worst thing leftism brought us, but it is possibly the most silly thing. Actually, come to think about it in a little bit more depth, it is not just “silly” – it is sinister, a deliberate attack against all males and against normal male sexuality by the misandrists who run the longhouse. But there is a comical element to this attack, in my view.
By the way, to truly eradicate the metaphorical estrogen in the metaphorical water supply, demolish the schools.
My plan is, I hope gentler, though hard to predict how bloody and destructive it may well turn out in practice. Send the tanks into Harvard, impose a male Christian married dean with well behaved children, who then fires everyone who is not similar. Probably there is not one other male married Christian with well behaved children directly or indirectly employed anywhere in the entire educational system anywhere in the entire American empire, in which case he brings in a few people like himself. Harvard (synecdoche for the entire educational system) is now radically smaller. Enforceable apprenticeship takes up the slack. Redevelop the vast amount of now unused space for some useful commercial purpose.
It is inherent in universities that they train would-be priests in the state religion. Always have, always will. A sane and healthy state religion does not need all that many priests.
While we want to fund science and technology through universities to some extent, this is only because we want to give tech priests and tech mages a financial and prestige incentive to not sponsor heresies in against the state religion (which they are apt to do, as for example Galileo and Newton). It is not because it is a good method for state sponsorship of science and technology. It is an absolutely terrible method for sponsoring science and technology because the state religion’s control function is apt to poison the scientific discovery function. Universities are inherently religious institutions that exist to promulgate the official social consensus, and so wind up enforcing “the scientific consensus”, which is a gross violation of the scientific method. So we want to keep science and technology out of the universities as much as we possibly can without giving the techies too incentive to dabble too much in issues of social consensus. It is dangerous to science to house it in a university, though sometimes unavoidable. On the one hand, we want to give techies a reason to avoid dangerous thoughts about the social consensus, but on the other hand we don’t want to give them a reason to avoid dangerous thoughts about science and technology.
Of course real marriage has been criminalised, and the current “Christian” marriage ceremony is usually a disgusting, perverse, and sacrilegious parody of a Christian marriage ceremony, so when I say “married”, I mean actually living a marriage, in that he sticks with the mother of his children, and he and she raise them successfully together, not any formal status or religious ceremony. At almost any wedding held today, you will see the groom amoged by the priest and/or master of ceremonies.
“ state religion’s control function is apt to poison the scientific discovery function“
Fundamentally science and technology are priestly. You have to have world view to do science , newton was arian , but kept his head down . Sooner or later those who work in science will attempt to innovate the state and it’s religion.
Understanding and controlling social consensus and the consensus among the priesthood is a different skillset and support base then scientific discovery. There have been priests that have been successful iconoclastic scientists, but I’m not aware of any cases the reverse is true.
We want to minimise overlap. Which means keeping science and technology out of the university as far as possible. But there is significant overlap, the tech priest and tech mage category. As these guys are dangerous, they have to be brought in.
What if loss in Ukraine was beneficial to stemming the tide of US decline. The US has forced the European vassal states to divest much of its last military capabilities for decommission in Ukraine. Their de-industrialization continues. How are they to resist American demands in the future? As we see now, sudden sea change now Trump is taking charge, and sudden regime changes under threat of color revolution have been the main headlines this past few weeks. Now we just need to figure out creative accounting to transfer US debt to them.
“Now we just need to figure out creative accounting to transfer US debt to them.”
The problem with looting Europe is moving zeros around isn’t the problem- the US needs to acquire tangible assets. Which Europe is losing because they are being deindustrialized.
Greenland looks pretty tangible to me, so are all those off shore oil rigs Shell owns, and they have a decent chunk of smart whites that really would be better off working in America. 😉
I can think of plenty of tangible assets the US could loot, the problem is how to loot it without obviously stealing it, and the solution to that is moving zeros around. i.e. on paper Shell would still be a UK enterprise but in reality it’s American investors and government that would be largely reaping the rewards.
The US already exports dollars and imports goods. Taking resources and trading them for Euros is pointless if there aren’t any goods the Euro can buy.
Dear Mr Putin, we’re ready to switch sides now.
The postcolonialism leftists have a valid point. European real assets tend to be offshore — largely because of something the post colonialism leftists will not mention, that onshore assets tend to get looted by the regulatory state and destroyed in the process. France recently lost a lot of uranium because Wagner took over “protecting” it. And similarly, most real European assets, such as those oil fields around Greenland, are “protected” by the US Navy and air force.
France has also recently lost a lot of gold because Mali realized the French have no means of protecting it. Officially the French still own quite a few assets. The US should obviously “protect” French interests.
Here’s a normie-friendly explanation of the demographic disaster:
If you adopt a female kitten, there’s a 100% chance that she will become a mother, guided entirely by instinct. Human reproduction is about 25% instinct and 75% culture, and the cultural part has been forgotten.
If I ever meet Putin, I’ll tell him that the Nikonian reforms were a terrible mistake and we must all join the Old Believers or go to hell, and see if he laughs. Seriously, Old Believer culture rejects all change, so they, like the Amish, remember how to reproduce.
Old books can help. All Russians were forced to read Anna Karenina as children; they should read it again as adults to get some idea how their ancestors reproduced. E.g. when an old book describes someone as “of good breeding”, it means their ancestors carefully decided whom their children ought to marry, like farmers selecting for prize-winning cattle.
The problem with enslaving women is that everyone knows a woman who didn’t fuck around, decided to find a husband before the age of thirty, kept her standards reasonable, and succeeded. If one woman can do it, that proves all women can do it.
I know, it proves nothing, but women want to believe that they are rational actors, and fathers want to believe that they raised their daughters right.
Rejecting all change is impractical, because circumstances change, so the past get re-interpreted, so change comes in through the backdoor. You are at risk of legalism and formalism. Plus, New Testament clearly says you should follow the spirit of Old Testament law, not the letter, and the same must be applied to past interpretations and applications of the spirit of the law.
What one can, however, do is notice that current practices are not working, old practices did work, look for a living exemplar of old practices if available, and lift what they are doing. If no living exemplar available (as, for example, the current state of science and the scientific method), read old books, figure out what they mean under current circumstances, and do that. Boyle’s Skeptical Chymist is as valid as it was in 1660.
On reproduction, we have a wide range of exemplars who are currently doing it right, and no end of old books showing how are forbears did it, plus we have modern red pill analysis which explains why what they did worked, and why what we are doing now fails.
Women want to have sex with mister one in thirty. But they also want to have a family, and mister one in thirty is not going to stick with them and raise their children, and they eventually realise they cannot have it both ways, and want to settle. But they usually want to settle rather too late. So state, society, state religion, and family have to tell them to just put up with it. (Which is why we need to radically censor most romance literature, where typically a middle aged divorced women with three kids gets romanced by a pirate king, a six foot seven billionaire athlete, a serial killer, a vampire, and a demon, each of whom has a vast harem, which they dismiss in her favor. Romance stories with tragic endings should be allowed, also romances where she winds up with someone in her own league, possibly because he or her family or his family just make her do so. The latter seems to be a quite popular romance genre, where the heroine does not get the billionaire vampire pirate demon King, but does get the strong tribe that can take her unwanted freedom away.)
All populations everywhere are recently descended from a population that did it right, because populations that do it wrong vanish, so we have plenty of the relevant data lying around.
Female mate choice needs to be abolished.
The leftists, who work for the man downstairs, are already telling you — with a demonic gleam in their eyes — that radical life extension and anti-aging will make it so that no woman will ever have to “settle.” Well, what I learn from this is not that radical life extension and anti-aging are undesirable, but that legally and culturally recognizing males and females as two separate classes, with the female class subordinate to the male class, is absolutely indispensable. (It will also be beneficial to amplify sexual dimorphism by selecting (initially without, but eventually with, genetic engineering) males and females for the different traits that best correspond to their respective social roles.)
The leftists/satanists say that stopping the biological clock from ticking will require radical social changes. That may well be so, but what they propose is “Do what you will shall be the whole of the law,” and the response to that is, has always been, and will always be: “Doing what God Wills is the whole of the Law.”
>Which is why we need to radically censor most romance literature
>Female mate choice needs to be abolished.
Unless you are Genghis Khan, her fantasy mate will always out alpha you. This isn’t directly a problem with the existing literature, and it’s only tangential to female mate choice. The direct problem is the illegality of, and the lack of support by the state faith for, passing shit tests convincingly such that imaginary fantasy alpha is viscerally replaced by immediate physical reality.
I have more than once heard older generations of White American men boast about their success with East Asian women because of their savior role in helping the women escape from a brutal misogynist wife beating society… a misattribution of what made them attractive. Wife beating is what makes Asian women feminine and attractive and is the reason why many White women are beastly whores.
When society allows female mate choice, itself the root of the problem, and (moreover) encourages women to masturbate to 6’7″ billionaire pirate vampire demon kings, the result is that regular men become unattractive in female eyes, and a woman will not stably “settle” for an ordinary man until the biological clock urgently demands it, often not even then. Now, if you combine female mate choice, antisocial masturbation fantasies for women, and radical anti-aging (the focus of my response to Jim), you get a society where no woman ever settles, which is what the leftists of today are already pushing for, and what the leftists of tomorrow, if leftism isn’t eradicated, will all the more so will be pushing for. So the fantasies need censored, and the choice abolished.
The problem with the Y chromosome in mammals is that it is subject to Mueller’s ratchet, so has become degenerate. This impairs sexual dimorphism. We need to move all genes specific to the male from that system to the Sry system so that we can restore crossover in the Y chromosome.
Most men, being on average taller and bigger than most women, naturally are much more attractive to women in person than online because that physical difference in power is on obvious public display. Women have little visual spatial capability and if only dependent on their imaginations and text bios, go wildly beyond what they’d normally be happy with in person. Same happens with income. Whereas in person they’d normally be happy with stable job and ~100k, online they want much higher. Online dating removes that natural disparity and makes an already bad situation much worse. They don’t want mister one in thirty. That matches what I remember before online dating became standard. I don’t know what the ratio is today, but it’s so, so much worse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57S7LFFHA80
One of the comments that stands out is: “I’m a man in Air Force, depressed, 6’0, green eyes, but my B-2 can drop a lot of democracy.”
Just a decade ago, such a man would have no trouble finding women, these days even men like that are having difficulties.
That’s all performative signalling. Back when chastity was at least plausible, they would signal how much of a pious nun they were. Oh don’t corrupt me!
Now that chastity is implausible, you signal that your standards are just oh so high, I’m basically a virgin because no man can measure up! They’re pre-encounter shit testing you. Not a big deal.
The real problems seem to be: social circles are small and getting smaller, women are actively making themselves uglier while unintentionally getting fatter, and the intense status given to women combined with their natural branch swinging instincts means you’re getting insane shit tests while you mate guard 24/7 and by the way your friends are all purple pilled at best and won’t help.
This pilot guy probably just has no avenue to actually encouter a fuckable woman, rather than women’s standards have outstripped him entirely.
Not exactly. It is partly that when in your physical presence, she is apt to submit to your physical authority.
Men perform and women choose, but men conquer and women surrender.
It was great back in the days when you could meet women in person. Back in those days, that airforce pilot was mopping up pussy.
> The real problems seem to be: social circles are small and getting smaller
This is a function of female failure as well (and its one reason I’m not fond of resolving the woman question by making a purdah society I like the old Japanese model, women weren’t exactly segregated from men or made to wear burkhas they just treated as extreme social inferiors to men). Social circles among people outside of school are kind of dependent on women acting amiably and friendly as a kind of social glue because men are naturally extremely wary of strange men so under normal circumstances any sort of social connection, introductions and early stage meetings had to be middle roaded by women and up until 2015 or so they were. Societies which don’t have women in social life at all (or the women become a bunch of man hating cunts who won’t even pretend to be friendly even as a sop to their vanity to any guy who doesn’t check every box of extremely high sexual standards) naturally are very very clannish. In combination with America’s almost 100% rate of social migration this leads to people especially men being atomized because they don’t have clans either.
Yes, women are naturally the social glue makers. Men hang out with other men at parties that women organise.
Western culture has been pussified and inverted into using female sexual interest as the ultimate measure of worth. Tell a man the solution to being constantly disrespected by increasingly ill-behaved and increasingly ugly and increasingly stupid women, he’s going to be pissed. If the woman has no choice, how can she choose him and redeem his manhood?
Exactly so. Modern Western Man seeks salvation from women, instead of seeking it from God. He believes that a woman should “love him unconditionally for who he really is,” lol. People used to only expect that from God. Now women are God. The ancients, like those who successfully reproduce today, had no time for such utter nonsense.
Ephesians 5:
It is men who love and cherish. It is women who should submit and obey. Men, not women, are the romantics. Convincing women that they should “follow their heart,” and fully liberating them to do so – that’s the original sin.
Exactly so. Men are the Romantic sex.
Expecting the relationship to be symmetric is an ideology that comes from Lavender Mafia infiltration of the state religion. Women like an environment where they do as they are told, because that is their ancestral environment of successful reproduction, while the male environment of successful reproduction is that he loves his female property because she is his.
And today, women continue to look for that environment of successful reproduction, and do not find it.
A woman rather likes an environment where she has to put up with sex with her husband they way she has to put up with cleaning up the mess that he makes and the much larger mess the baby makes. They don’t actually like moment to moment consent, because that was not the environment of successful reproduction. If they demand moment to moment consent, the demand is a fitness test that must be passed.
Mary, the mother of Jesus is rightly praised precisely because she was submissive and obedient to the Lord. To a heroic degree, I’d add, for the consequences to her were significant and could have been far more so.
>Mary, the mother of Jesus is rightly praised precisely because she was submissive and obedient to the Lord.
Ah, you see my husband, when I defy you and command you, I am not being defiant and commanding, I am submitting to the Lord, who is infinitely higher than you. So you must not defy me, because then you are defying the Lord.
Mary did not disobey Joseph. Jospeh initially, seeing as she was with child, intended to ‘put her away quietly’. I have no reason to believe she didn’t serve Joseph as a good and obedient wife until he passed away.
Whereupon Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing publicly to expose her, was minded to put her away privately.
20 But while he thought on these things, behold the angel of the Lord appeared to him in his sleep, saying: Joseph, son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife, for that which is conceived in her, is of the Holy Ghost.
Sure. But when you place obedience to God over obedience to her husband, the woman becomes priestess-queen of the family. Her gentle and spiritual feminine nature naturally puts her more in touch with the Lord’s wishes than her brutish husband, so she rules him in submission to God. I’m not making this up – it is official Christian doctrine in virtually every church in America.
My gosh, are you really unable to anticipate the rise of red-pilled Churches? Dude, wake the f**k up.
Notice that Mary doesn’t argue with Joseph. God sends his minion to make the case. Mary just obeys and is prepared to submit to whatever Joseph decides.
You see this also in Peter 3
5 For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands:
6 Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement.
Note that Abraham wasn’t even right in some of the cases where Sara called him Lord. But she is praised for her obedience even so.
Paul lays this out extremely clearly also. The man is to love and cherish, the woman is to respect and obey. Both sexes are given the task that may be difficult for them, but which is according to God’s order and is necessary for peace between them.
https://x.com/AutismCapital/status/1877824433144098866
Zuck:
Interesting.
A sudden conversion after Zuckerberg discovered he had been backing the wrong horse.
He probably himself does not know, nor much care, whether he genuinely believes it, or is just sucking up to the new Sheriff in town.
It does, however, reveal what the Trump cabinet genuinely does believe.
Yes, he’s a high profile Havel’s Greengrocer, telling you which way the wind is blowing. Okay, so we know they are thinking about the WQ. That already is an excellent sign. Will be interesting to see where their thoughts lead them.
Thermidor will never reach a coherent and fully thought through position. But while they are thinking about it, people who do have a coherent and fully thought through position may well be able to act.
Many such cases.
If you are not having fun sparring and learning to fight with other men, you are in a state of spiritual malnutrition.
Would you at least post what I said about Israel? It’s more interesting than any anti-Catholic slop you have allowed.
And do you really think, deep down, that most people enjoy whore school? Or are they just there for the rubber stamp?
I don’t recall what you said about Israel. Indeed I don’t recall what your position was on Israel, except that because of internal incoherence, I did not believe that was your actual position on Israel.
But, I will state the Dark Enlightenment position, and my particular position, and you are entitled to reply to it — provided you say that I am wrong for one reason or another reason, rather than sailing right on as if your position is universally accepted, or generally accepted on the right. Don’t tell us what conservatives believe, because when you tell us what conservatives, or Christians, or the alt right, or Maga, or Country Club conservatives, or anyone like that believes, it is never what they believe.
Your story line is always that the right believes what the left wishes they believed, and should move to a more coherent and consistent position, the coherent and consistent version of what the left wishes that the right believed being radical leftism.
We wish Israel well, and Arabs well, but their problems are not our problems, their biggest problems being each other. Both of them are also causing big problems for us, in very different ways, and we wish they would stop, and intend to stop them.
Unfortunately Trump needs to back Israel to the hilt, because he needs Thermidorian support, and is genuinely inclined to support Israel regardless. But their wars are not our wars, and Trump last time around was doing his best to get us out of them.
Israel really needs to genocide the Palestinians, though it is largely Israel’s fault that it got itself into this position. Similarly, the Arabs need to genocide the Israelis, but are too busy quarrelling with each other. This is deplorable, but not our fault, not our problem, and not our business.
Jews have undue influence in America, Israel has undue influence in America, and mosques are organising terror against Americans in America. These are separate problems, and the existence of one problem does not mean that the other two are not problems, nor does the existence of any of these problems make events in the Middle East any business of ours.
Israel’s most remarkable characteristic isn’t its expansionism or even its American influence. It’s its fertility rate, over 3 children per female, and they do this despite [*all the standard excuses for collapsing fertility that no one takes seriously any more*] What they figured out is that [*deleted*]
They did not have to figure anything out. Some influential subgroups retain the old social technology and are breeding like flies, and their social technology has significant mainstream influence.
Not only that, but the actual reasons, rather than the usual excuses, have suddenly become speakable on Youtube and Facebook. Thermidor is thinking about this.
A TFR of 8 is what you get with a healthy society that is able to expand rapidly in an environment of surplus resources—as in when a young man of 18 can immediately support a family nearly all the time.
Near as I can tell the flavors of Amish are the only ones in that league among white people. The rest of us have less functional versions of that social technology, even groups like homeschoolers (who last I looked had around 3.5 children on average).
> the actual reasons, rather than the usual excuses, have suddenly become speakable on Youtube and Facebook
What are you seeing? I’m not seeing this. The real reason being endless consent doctrine produces defect-defect equilibrium. No one I see says this, or provides the solution: consent if allowed limited to a small hand picked group of suiters, and no more.
I see a lot of talking around the real reason. I see a lot of hand wringing about “culture” and “social media” and “waiting too long”, I don’t see anyone point out we are in a society where the short term rational decision for both sexes is defection. Well, actually I do see that, but that is rather old, it has been allowed for a long time to point out that marriage is broken so you shouldn’t try. I don’t see anyone proposing solutions as a facefag. I see them instead pretend there is simply pure unfathomable magic to those microcultures that maintain marriage, and then propose we shuffle people into them.
No one is quite saying the actual reasons in so many words, but they are saying that the great majority of women are fucking a small minority of men, and that in order to reproduce they have to settle for someone they are not all that attracted to, and have sex with him, and not cheat on him, which is getting mighty close.
They are saying that female sexual impulses are counter productive to family formation and reproduction, in an environment where they are free to act on those impulses.
While delicately evading the implication that females are maladapted to free moment to moment sexual choice, and such freedom makes them unhappy.
That’s not a change, you’ve been allowed to say that even as a facefag for a long time. You’re allowed to say the old “alpha fux beta bux”. What you aren’t allowed to say is that women’s hindbrains have a different subhuman notion of hierarchy, and their “alpha” is a retarded petty criminal. You aren’t allowed to say that female choice inevitably leads to dysgenics and a breakdown of male status games, as men now instinctively compete to display defection to the real hierarchy in order to get laid.
This is not nitpicking, because what I’m seeing them want to do is encourage people to join the microcultures that maintain enough of the old ways as to be replacement or slightly above, without understanding why these microcultures work (quietly 18th century family norms). They think they can fix breeding without removing moment to moment consent, because they don’t understand or don’t want to say that moment to moment consent is incompatible with humans, that moment to moment consent inevitably breeds subhumans.
Well yes, they are stumbling through fog. And are still stumbling through fog. But they are getting quite noticeably closer. It is on their minds.
“I am not saying that women should just grin and bear it, but …”
They are not saying that free moment to moment consent is “going to work out great, go for it girl”, and that men should just grin and bear it.
Equally they are not saying the unthinkable crime thought, that maybe all this sexual freedom for women was a bad idea and it is not working out, but they are wandering in circles adjacent to that thought, and circles have gotten noticeably closer.
University of Iowa cancels its department of Gender, Sexuality, et cetera.
Major Hollywood studios have massively rewritten and reshot movies in production, and then rewritten and reshot them again, at enormous expense. Captain America on its third radical rewrite.
That does not mean they are going all the way to the truth, but they are definitely abandoning the lie.
Meta, McDonald’s, Walmart, Boeing, Coors, Lowe’s, Ford, Jack Daniels, Harley Davidson, John Deere, Tractor Supply, Toyota, Nissan, Caterpillar, all have announced an end to DEI.
The LA Fire Department is run by three Lesbians, who hilariously and infamously put out a video saying that if a woman cannot carry you out of a fire, you should not have gotten yourself into a fire. They did not say “You sexist pig, you deserve to burn”, but that was the clear implication. And now people are burning.
Well, if female firemen are kind of stupid, then different rules and roles in the mating dance become thinkable.
Thermidor wants to go back to the rational middle, but there never was a rational middle. There were people who thought that men and women had a right to be perfectly interchangeable, but did not think about the implications for firemen, women’s sports or war. Their “rational middle” is people who were reluctant to consider the implications of what they theoretically believed. Well, now the implications of what they theoretically believed are burning people alive in LA. They want to go back to not thinking about it.
Trump points out they ran out of water, because it might adversely affect sea life. The left complains that Trump lacks compassion. Presumably compassion for the possibly endangered smelt and lesbian firechiefs on five hundred thousand dollar salaries.
A long time ago, I told Scott that his ideas would lead to war and death. And now they have led to war and death. The entire left is in similar straights.
The “rational middle ground” wants to go back to believing in all the right things, without being inconvenienced by those beliefs being actually put into practice.
They don’t want to hear that men and women are not equal and interchangeable, but in LA, that issue burns.
And if men and women are not interchangeable, maybe the rules for female sexuality are a bad idea.
They DID have to figure out modern credential forging. It DOES require work, novel, not “old social technology”. It very often involves transferring college credits across multiple institutions and languages. Paying off the right people, in the right order, etc. African diploma mills. It’s a skill that takes effort to master, and the hardest part is apparently accepting that it exists in the first place.
Education is the most obvious population sink there is. This cannot be ignored. The “red pill” dorks of the 2010’s are not succeeding. Israel is. And I have told you why.
Maybe the right loves the nerdy nebbish Jew stereotype too much to let it go. Even after the Jews themselves have dropped that baggage.
Not to successfully form families, they did not. Most Israeli fertility comes from the same groups that have kept their old fertility in the old ways.
I am rather worried that this random walk game of resolving the marriage and fertility problem lands us in a local optima that allows dysgenics to continue while being tolerable enough for men and producing enough fertility that people stop caring.
It’s not enough to just say “men and women are different and have different roles”. You have to make explicit that women’s sexual preferences are protohuman, and that allowing them any choice outside of already preselected candidates is going to cause a drift towards lower cooperation, lower IQ, and lower forethought every generation.
I can imagine a steady state where women are removed from presitige, and marriage law is rolled back to 1930s, and instead of 40+% never successfully marrying or reproducing, we get that down to 10-20%, and tfr hits the 2-2.5 range. We get that from having “sex roles”. Not enough to fill the stars, and not enough to once again favor the upper 20% in brightness for fertility. It’s a trap, and an insidious one because it will be much more comfortable than the unbearable present.
Sure, it is nowhere near enough, and Thermidor is just not willing to go all the way to where it needs to go. It never does.
But Thermidor, lacking faith, has a tendency to lose to the right, or lose to the left,
They are tootling around in the direction of solving the woman problem and problem of the missing grandchildren in the same way Stalin was tootling around in the direction of national capitalism. He was never going to actually get there.
But at the same time, not willing to root out the true faith with fire and sword, which is the situation Contaminated Need is talking about. That if you said these kind of things, you would lose your job, the banks would freeze your money, and child protective services would take your children and sell them to gays. Thermidor is not willing to do that, because they are not sure exactly what their faith is and were themselves in line for the next purge by the left.
Stalin hired Beria, Cromwell hired Monck, Hua hired Deng. And Trump hired Pete Hegseth. Hegseth wants to bring the faith of 1770 back to the US army, in place of the faith of woke. But does he adhere to the faith of 1770, or to a faith considerably older? His bicep is tattooed with a symbol of the faith of the Crusaders.
The faith of 1770, like the faith of the Thermidoreans, was internally incherent, resting on falsifiable and false claims about this world, and unprincipled exceptions, most of which have long been erased, but Thermidor is shocked by what happens when you fix all the unprincipled exceptions. They want to return to the “rational middle”, keeping some of those unprincipled exceptions around.
The faith of the Crusaders has no such problem. Pete Hegseth, unlike the Thermidorians, knows you have to bring a gun to a gunfight and a faith to a holy war. And he has one. Which does not mean we are going to win, but we no longer face and overwhelmingly powerful monolith, bent on eradicating every thought about anything except its own solipsistic thoughts.
We have a faith and the woke have a faith. Thermidor, not so much. Thermidor, therefore, needs Pete Hegseth. Will Pete Hegseth still need Thermidor in a little while?
Thermidor tends to purge to its left and to its right. But lacking a faith, need left to purge the right, and the right to purge the left. Horrified by the state of the army, it wants the army purged of woke.
For us, the spy agencies are more important. And I am not really seeing the will and capability to purge the spy agencies of woke, only the will to prevent them from purging anyone insufficiently woke. Without a faith militant, not going to succeed in making real change among the spooks.
The spy agencies have been treading on the tech oligarchs, who do want the spy agencies purged. But the tech oligarchs have not got what it would take to purge them. Maybe they will find someone who does. Pete Hegseth has what it will take to purge the army. Tulsi Gabbard intends to purge the spooks, but probably will not get far.
What is interesting is the sheer amount of pure unadulterated COPIUM you’ll ingest before admitting that Satanic Lavenders control your church.
Orthodox Jews succeed where Roman Catholics do not because their memeplex is possessed by a different type of heresy. The heresy of the Orthodox Jews is rejection of the Logos. The heresy of Roman Catholics is that gay, homosexual faggots who engage in orgiastic coprophagia parties have long, long been in charge of their memeplex. So Jews have a legalistic, superstitious, soulless religion that puts the letter of the law before the spirit of the law (and suffer the consequences), and Catholics fail to reproduce and suffer blue balls.
You are a heretic. If you were not a heretic, you would drop the COPE and figure out how to sneak in the Cult of Gnon into the Catholic Church so that Western Civilization can really be saved. There needs to be a Jimian Pope who will cleanse the Catholic Church of the Lavenders once and for all, which will necessitate eliminating the Lavender Doctrines; those very doctrines have ruined the West.
Again, I’m not telling you to convert to anything else, on paper that is. You should seek to fix Catholicism from within. That means eliminating the Lavenders and their Demonic Doctrines, which have been embedded in the Church for a long while.
Remove the Lavender Heresies and you will prosper more than Orthodox Jews ever will.
Lavenderism can be summarized in three words: “Sex is icky.”
If sex is icky, then you either join the other celibates in the gay bathhouse, or “redeem” sex by turning women into the Goddesses of Love (now they, rather than God, impart divine Love as they see fit), followed by turning them into the Goddesses of Consent (now they possess the metaphysical capacity to metaphysically deem sex as icky or non-icky).
This entire memeplex is from Satan.
The Satanism of the Lavenders is evident in their doctrine that it’s not (or not just) the perversion of sexuality that is against Gnon’s will, sexuality manifest in entropic forms, but rather it is sex itself that is inherently icky, therefore the married man is lower status that the celibates at the gay bathhouse, therefore you need to “redeem” marriage and sex with some strange demonic doctrines such as the Doctrine of Love (from the early second millennium AD) or the Doctrine of Consent (from the 17th century AD). You worship women so they will bestow upon you Love, or worship women so they will deem your sexual desires as Consensual, meaning non-icky. This leads to everything we have seen it leading to.
A very old heresy.
Look at the groups that successfully reproduce in the long term. Do they believe in the demonic doctrine of Love (women should be worshipped, so they will grant you Love – women assuming the traditional role of God) or the demonic doctrine of Consent (women possess the awesome metaphysical superpower to determine whether sex be icky or non-icky)? Again, do they believe in those doctrines?
When your faith is hostile to the kind of social technologies you need in order to reproduce, you will eventually lose those social technologies and will stop reproducing. There is no avoiding this conclusion. Fix the faith.
Lavenderism (“sex is icky”) leads to the first doctrine, which in turn leads to the second doctrine. That is literally what happened, historically. The roots of the heresy have been there all along – it is a very old heresy. In fact, Lavenderism long predates the Church; like Gaia and Ishtar, it was always there; unlike Gaia and Ishtar, which gained their modern high status when Harvard adopted them (and will rapidly lose their status if and when the Cult of Gnon takes over Harvard), Lavenderism has clung to the Church since its early days.
Catholicism needs Jimianity.
Some cults are perennial. For instance, Gaia, Ishtar, and Moloch always recur, and often sneak into the Priesthood. Same with Lavenderism – and they are especially subversive, because less obvious than the other ones. Roman Catholicism has been thoroughly subverted by the Lavender cult, and proceeded to give unholy birth to demonic doctrines that destroyed Western Civilization. Lavenderism needs to be rooted out into a lake of fire, or at least relegated to the fringes of society, together with Gaia, Ishtar, Moloch, and similar perennial cults.
What BAP is promoting is simply inverted Lavenderism.
Realizing that “sex is icky” leads to endless problems, BAP the sodomite inverted it into “sex is never icky,” but that is itself wrong. Gay sex is indeed inherently icky. Perverted sexuality is indeed inherently icky. What old-time Lavenders did was lump together both perverted and non-perverted sex, and declared both to be icky. What BAP seems to be attempting is to lump together perverted and non-perverted sex, and declaring both to be equally non-icky. Though obviously he signals very strongly what he prefers.
I’m not letting you do this, BAP. Sex with one’s wife is not icky. BIG BOOBA are not icky. In contrast, your preferred activity, which is shoving your penis into another man’s shitty rectum, or having that done to you, is absolutely disgusting, it is fundamentally contrary to Gnon’s will, and it will never be normalized.
Watch out for both Lavender and for its inverted version, which are both satanic, both motivated by sodomy, by the desire on the part of faggots to turn straight men into faggots. That is traditional Lavender (sex is icky) and inverted Lavender (no sex is ever icky).
Not falling for it, BAP.
Vendramini’s book on neanderthal predation theory Them and Us threatened to place me in a dire imaginative state, sourly unsuited for Christmas, much like BAP’s dissertation did the prior Christmas. Both conjured complex models of certain developmental crossroads, though each deal with events tens of millennia apart. Their explanatory prowess is impressive but ultimately limited.
This time around, Brother Chesterton came to the rescue with his love of paradox. Our mythical and philosophical searches have produced a wealth of explanation and are quite necessary for intellectual daily bread, so to speak. The trap is being so impressed with either that we limit ourselves to those delineations, those closed circles, and claim they cover far more than they actually can.
Forgive my Sunday morning ramblings as I struggle for meaning. GNON humbles us with these limitations, yet there’s comfort in the things which are impossible with men are possible with God.
BAP seems to have genuinely have cured himself of the perversion through hooker therapy once he had money he made himself fuck whores until he was cured. I think most faggots could probably be cured in the same way.
A prosperous society contains many different “types” of people, each (ideally) filling its own niche. The warrior, the priest, and the merchant are often discussed here, but really there are many different types that are needed to make society work. We can’t all be the same, naturally.
A “type” that is not needed, however, is sexual deviants – they always promote things that harm reproduction within the tribe. So the tribe, if its leadership is astute, physically removes them. Failure to do that results in them preying on society, or as is often the case, sneaking into the Priesthood so they can promote anti-natalist anti-breeder anti-marriage anti-heterosexuality ideologies.
That is what the faggots around Thermidor seek to do right now. Since “sex is icky” will not fly, they are going with its inverted, “libertine” version. They must not be allowed to get away with it. If a religious worldview or political ideology, which is naturally the domain of men, fails to identify BIG BOOBA as majestic, and fails to identify hairy scrotums as repulsive, then this religious worldview or political ideology needs to be physically removed for the safety and well-being of the tribe.
When it comes to the “sexual orientation” of a society’s memeplex, it is absolutely a zero sum game. The more gay, the less straight. If it is pro-gay, it is anti-straight. And for it to be pro-straight, it has to be anti-gay. One necessarily comes at the expense of the other and excludes it; and one is fundamentally healthy, the other fundamentally diseased.
Lumping them together, whether promoting both or prohibiting both, is always the initial stage of the Lavender subversion.
Stone Age Herbalist’s essay The Origin of ‘Two-Spirit’ & The Gay Rights Movement details the mountain of lies the whole LGBTWTFLOL ideology is founded on. The alleged two-spirit shaman archetype is pure bovine feces, at least as evidence faggots and other sexual deviants are spiritually more advanced than us breeder rabble. Here’s an actual example of an Injun troon preserved in folklore:
Apparently, the aspiring rentboy took up residence in another village due to the women finding his talent in feminine work valuable in addition to enough of the influential men being on the down-low or at least turning a blind eye.
You mean gays and trannies, sexual deviants can mean a lot of things most of them relatively harmless but gays and trannies not harmless.
The line may be between using erotically a feather versus the whole chicken.
Arguably the tradcuck is the most dangerous type of sexual deviant besides the gay/trannie/boy raping type. The most hilarious recent manifestation of tradcuck bullshit is white knighting for Lily Phillips (the porn whore who having fucked 100 men in a day now wants to beat the world record and fuck 1000). Stupid tradcucks, Lily Phillips clearly likes being a giant whore that is why she is going for the whore world record (because in itself thats can’t be enjoyable even for her what she enjoys is knowing she will have the biggest slut in world history title, she clearly loves the idea). She does not want to quit, she does not appear to be doing hard drugs to cope. She absolutely looks way happier than any career girl. Tradcucks want to blame men somehow when she does this voluntarily and likes it.
I’m not interested in Fetish Police, but I am interested in removing whatever genes (or other non-genetic causes) that predispose people to forms of sexual behavior that in the ancestral environment would have compromised their reproductive fitness, and that, moreover, undermine Order within civilized society.
Ned Flanders should be out of the Priesthood, but in some measure, and in non-priestly social contexts, his type can be beneficial.
Now, when it comes to White Knight simps (which is not exactly the same thing as conservadaddy) – they of course will BURN BABY BURN on live broadcast in the style of Muath al-Kasasbeh.
The official Lavender position is “Sex is icky, regardless of which type of sex, but oh well, if really you insist on it, we permit you to marry a woman and have sex with her so you can have progeny (and only for that purpose!), but then you must recognize us, the totally chaste totally celibate definitely definitely (we promise!) not gay priesthood, as your moral and spiritual superiors.”
Yeah, so it’s a bunch of fags telling you that they are your superiors because your sexuality is actually healthy and aligned with Gnon. The audacity of these faggots reminds me of Aesop’s classic:
Exactly so, Aesop.
The cult of Ganymede is an example Chesterton gives in The Everlasting Man of a civilization grown tired and its mythology demonic. Plato attributes the myth to the Cretans.
The Everlasting Man, however, should probably be read side by side with Mencken’s A Treatise on the Gods.
> be Elon Musk
> re-invent EV’s
> single-handedly save spaceflight
> build reusable rockets and rocket-grabbing chopsticks
> date models
> satellite army
> self-made richest man on earth
> still feel the need to lie about being a top10 path of exile 2 player
The whole story is just hilarious to me. It’s very easy to project noble qualities on men spearheading the movement against globohomo, but in some aspects they are as petty as if not pettier than each of us. No man without sin.
Ayo, Elon, I’ll level you up a toon in whatever game you wish as long as you hook me up with one of those Martian princesses in traditional Barsoomian jeweled bikinis, snoogins.
Dejah Thoris. I’m all over that.
His reaction to being flamed over H1B was petty and just Streisanded the flamage.
Further, his position on H1B fails to notice the damage done by diversity. Different cultures have different expectations of good conduct. When those expectations collide, they fall. And many an indianizing company has encountered disaster due to a collapse in good conduct and cohesion. A company lives, in that it coheres. Loss of cohesion is apt to manifest in insolvency, as for example Ubisoft and Informix. Ubisoft died of faggots and cat ladies, but Informix died of dot Indians.
The ultimate source of cohesion in a company are the company books. If these books are meaningless (Sox accounting) you lose cohesion, because there is too much opportunity to steal from the company, and no objective standard to tell if someone is stealing from the company. But to get from the books to actual social cohesion, you need the more familiar and intelligible human forms of cohesion. Good conduct. Which tend to collapse if a company is diverse.
There’s a lot of boomers (no offense to Jim) and the likes of Musk who don’t really see the problem with Indian-dotting a whole company. They think if dot Indians are being hired and you aren’t you simply aren’t pulling your bootstraps up hard enough. Wonder what they would think if I told them about employment areas where you need to know Spanish to be hired.
Same boomers of course won’t tell you how women operate but scold you like a schoolmarm if you don’t have a wife and kids. Living behind a Chesterton fence that they never checked if its still there.
In contrast to the H1B fiasco, he has kept his mouth shut on it this time. I wonder if it’s in him to realize how out of touch he is after such extreme miscalculations, or if that is not becoming of a proper Star Prophet.
DeepState obviously has nothing on Hegseth…
https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1881845594874118646
Hegseth’s second wife completely denied the claim, and NBC News decided to run the story anyway.
“I do not believe your information to be accurate, and I have cc’d my lawyer,” adding “There was no physical abuse in my marriage. This is the only further statement I will make to you.”
Alinsky 101. The editors know the public won’t buy pieces criticizing Hegseth saying everything is just fine at the Pentagon and that endless foreign wars are cool, so they resort to smears and character assassination.
It is journalistic malpractice to run an accusation when the…
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) January 21, 2025
In this case, Dem Sen. Jack Reed just so happens to contact the source on Jan. 18, who then comes back w/ a bombshell claim about Hegseth and his ex-wife, which both of them vehemently deny on the record. But news orgs have their hook to make a story on it, truth be damned.
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) January 21, 2025