State of the war

Wars happen because some people expect one outcome, and others expect a different outcome. So prediction is hard, for if it was easy, the war would likely have been avoided, though as the war goes on, and on, and on, becomes easier.

Due to fog of war, hard to know what is happening now, or has happened recently, But after a while, it becomes obvious what did happen, which gives some indication of what will happen.

It has long been obvious that the west is run by demon worshippers, and with the opening of the Paris Olympics a couple of days ago, this should now be obvious to everyone. Demon worshippers want you dead. Well, they want everyone and everything dead, including themselves, but you first. The tactics and strategy of this war becomes a lot more intelligible if one understands that one side is commanded by people who believe themselves to be serving demons, or perhaps actually are serving demons.

The war started off with war of movement, as did World War I, but, as in World War I, both sides quickly became very good at shutting down the other side’s movement, and, since then, like World War One, it has been war of attrition.

The rationale for the Greatest Ukrainian Counter Offensive was to regain war of movement. Nato wonder weapons, Nato training, and all that. Of course Nato has not fought a peer war since World War Two, so have no idea.

Plus, Nato is completely structured about keeping commissioned officers nice and safe in nice safe bases, where they send grunts and non commissioned officers out to die.

I have long said that if you have one man in your army that does not fight, pretty soon you will have no men in your army that fight. Nato organisation is all about having no commissioned officers that fight. The left does not like warrior armies. Finds that it needs warrior armies, but has concluded it does not need a warrior officer corps.

This is partly the managerial state, the triumph of unaccountable bureaucracy over people who do actual things, and partly the leftist state. The left is priestly, and priests and warriors always conflict. So now we have a full priestly officer corps, which is a protection for the left against coups, but not a protection against insurrection, invasion, or conquest.

Ukraine, however, inherited from the Soviet Union a warrior army, plus the forces that made the Maidan coup were the Nazis, and a core part of their ideology is to have a warrior army and rule by warrior-priests. Nato looked down their noses at this insufficiently holy and progressive organisation, and has been re-organising them.

The plan for the Greatest Ukrainian Counter Offensive was to probe all along the front for weak points, then charge through at the weakest point, cutting off Russian forces to the west, thus regaining a vast swathe of territory to the west, without having to fight for every ditch, every tree, and every house.

The weakest point turned out to be the low ground between Russian controlled high ground. Ukrainian progress through the buffer zone in front of the Russian defence lines was very slow, and very costly, and when they finally reached the first line of defence, and occupied it, they had to bring troops and materials to it through a long and winding gauntlet along the low ground between Russian strong places on the high ground on either side. They got to the first line of defence, but were never able to get beyond it, for whenever they stuck their heads above the fortifications that they had managed to seize, their heads got blown off. The Russians had prepared their first line of defence to be indefensible against attacks coming from their second line of defence. The “weakest point” was a killing field, and the first line of defence was a death trap.

The Ukrainians lost an army, except for their retreat blocking brigades, and had to conscript a new army.

The interesting and extraordinary thing was the West’s stubborn persistence in a strategy that had turned out to be horrifically bad and entirely disastrous. Why did they just keep pumping more and more men into killing fields and death traps?

Partly it was the managerial state. The mid level managers are focused on on next week’s power point presentation, and demand that the low level managers supply them with with good bullet points for that presentation. The high level managers look at the good bullet points, and all is well, so issue orders to keep doing what you are doing, so the system as a whole tends to mindlessly pursue a short term, high time preference strategy, while generating meaningless numbers showing highly successful pursuit of a long term, low time preference strategy. The Russians on the other hand, tended to focus on winning the war, hence actually did pursue a long term, low time preference strategy, where they sought to conserve their resources for the final battles, brave men being the most important resource of all.

Partly it was demon worship. Those organising this war want Russians to die, but also want Ukrainians to die. The people who organised the Maidan coup are Jews with family reasons for wanting Ukrainians dead and the Ukraine destroyed.

The managerial state reinforces leftism, because being in contact with reality is a bad career move, and leftism reinforces the managerial state, because leftists do not like people telling them that reality is real, and both of them reinforce demon worship, because demon worshippers are fine with actual reality going to $#!&. All three depend on lies, each of them provides a different reason for lying, but a lie promulgated for one reason finds support from the other two reasons. The bureaucrat wants the right bullet points regardless of whether the bullet points meaningfully represent reality, the leftist does not believe that existence exists, that reality is real, and the demon worshipper just likes lies and lying. The confident inversion of truth is the demonic equivalent of prayer.

The Greatest Ukrainian Counter Offensive eventually petered out, due to lack of men, and lack of weapons. Nato is out of ammo. Nato troops have been disarmed.

In order to continue attriting the Ukrainians, the Russians were forced to go on the offensive. Since the objective is attrit the enemy, rather than gain turf, there are no big arrow offensives. Every ditch, every tree, every ruin, is gained at enormous cost to both sides.

It looks to me that when well trained, well equipped, highly motivated, battle hardened, experienced, Russian troops attempt to take a village from well trained, well equipped, highly motivated, battle hardened, experienced, Ukrainian troops, they suffer very high casualties and frequently fail.

Fortunately for the Russians, most of the well trained, well equipped, highly motivated, battle hardened, experienced, Ukrainian troops died in the Greatest Ukrainian Counter Offensive.

Increasingly the battles consist of experienced and highly motivated Russian vets versus barely trained reluctant Ukrainian fresh meat. The death rate among inexperienced Ukrainian troops is vastly higher than the death rate among Ukrainian vets. The number of Ukrainian vets continues to shrink. Fresh Ukrainian conscripts do not seem to be becoming vets, but corpses — in part due to a commissioned officer corps that is grossly out of contact with reality. If you want your fresh meat to survive to become vets, you need to issue retreat orders in time.

The Ukrainians have a troop rotation policy that should in theory result in fresh meat becoming battle hardened veterans, but this does not seem to be actually happening in practice all that much.

In part the bubble of delusion around the Ukrainian commissioned officer corps is a result of the managerial state, the triumph of unaccountable bureaucracy over functionality, the Natoization of the Ukrainian military. In part it is the result of leftism, for leftism inherently tends to solipsism. And in part, demon worshippers just like human sacrifice.

A few weeks ago I reported that the Russians were taking one or two villages every one or two days. Now it is one to four villages every day. Because the Ukrainians are out of everything, and most of all, by far, they are out of men.

This is reminiscent of the hundred days phase of World War One.

At the current rate of advance, it will be a very long time before the front line changes significantly, but the exact position of the front line does not matter. What matters is how much army and government the Ukraine has left. And the accelerating rate of Russian advance reveals that the Ukraine has considerably less, and that what it does have is shrinking every faster.

So the questions are:

1. Will the Ukraine make the concessions the Russians are asking for?

Probably not, because everyone in the Ukraine dying cannot possibly happen for the managerial elite, cannot happen and is unimportant for the left, and is a positively delightful outcome for the demon worshippers.

2. If they don’t make the concessions, when does the Ukrainian muppet government disappear?

Never, because the muppet government is located in Washington and Cambridge.

3. OK, when does the muppet government lose the ability to hold photo ops in the Ukraine?

And that is what is hard to know. Could be tomorrow, could be years. The sooner it happens, the more Ukrainians there will be left in the Ukraine. I hope for November, by analogy to the hundred days that led to the end of World War One.

901 comments State of the war

JustAnotherGuy says:

To me its very funny that herr putler would have made peace at the beginning of war with the slightest of changes but was denied because they believed in endsieg. Still being a 1990s liberal, they just had to appeal to his sense of slightly-less-gay version of modern reality, but couldn’t even have the pretense to do that. Very revealing in that we are not ruled by ‘smart people’ who know what they are doing.

Like Jim said before, I know of a smart guy who still manages to find ways to explain how this is a 4D chess move, and that the high death rate of russian officers / generals vs not-NATO officers / generals is because of superior NATO tactics, strategem, intelligence, and all that other garbage.

Jim, do you still believe summer is still when 404 army vanishes or has that date changed?

jim says:

I don’t know the time. To kill every single Ukrainian at the current rate will take a long time. I hope for the Ukraine to fold well before then.

Fidelis says:

It’s just another way to get rid of whites for the people currently in power. Ukraine might well fold, but the war will not be over until there are troops in Washington (and maybe Boston). Does Putin realize this? I’m not sure he does, but Prigozhin certainly understood, and said as much.

Dharmicreality says:

The confident inversion of truth is the demonic equivalent of prayer.

This is absolute genius Jim. Sums up globohomo religion in one line.

Upravda says:

Excellent analysis, not just about war in 404, but about (western) modernism in general.

I’m continuing to expect the end of war during winter-spring 2025. In some moment, a short civil war will erupt in Ukraine. And, yes, both sides will claim they’ll fight “The Orks” until blue-yellow flag will have been flying over Sevastopolj, or something.

However, if one side wins, they’ll surrender to Russians. And kill all of Azov and Jews. That entire 404-related business will quickly fall into oblivion in “the West”, very probably because of some New Big Thing.

If the other side wins, they’ll quickly lose large swathes of territory because Azov will not be enough to defend it. Puppet pro-Russian regime will be established on those lost territories. For a few more years the other side will hold in Ukrainian far west until fading into obscurity and falling to pro-Russian regime, also very probably because of some New Big Thing.

The real question is: What will be that New Big Thing?

Fidelis says:

I’m expecting that if the radicals rip the wheel away from the wavering neocons, we’re going to see something that forces all the population home and concentrated in the cities and suburbs, shortly followed by mass killings. Possibly another bioterrorism event, hey it worked last time, possibly some fake cyberwar false flag on different infrastructure.

Getting the steal will hearten and excite them, and the halfhearted fight put up by the scared left will steel their resolve that the root source of rassism has to be eliminated once and for all in order to defeat the evil spilling out of Eurasia.

Mayflower Sperg says:

Why not pivot back to climate change? Nagging people to give up meat, heat, air conditioning, and freedom of movement never gets old.

FrankNorman says:

Or the old Leftist one of “It’s not faaair for you to have all those nice things while all the brown people don’t!”

Upravda says:

They were doing climate change since the end of eighties. Didn’t really fly. Nobody cared. That’s why they, our rulers, The Occult Oligarchy as one of my countryman calls them for almost two decades, invented Wu Flu.

After that, Putler, but also didn’t really fly. Nobody actually cares about muh Ukraine, not even those who are otherwise very loud about it.

@Fidelis might be right about bioterrorism plus cyberwar, but somehow I doubt that there will be killing squads. Not because our rulers are scrupulous, they are not, but because they wouldn’t be able to find enough willing executioners. It seems much more likely to me that they would simply blockade the cities and other places of mass concentration (heh) and wait for hunger and illness to do the job.

Mayflower Sperg says:

They won’t blockade the cities, we’ll blockade the cities and watch unarmed white and Jewish liberals get eaten by their beloved diversity.

The masses may not care much about climate change, but it’s always been immensely popular among the global elite because it provides the perfect rationale for a world government empowered to regulate everything that burns, breathes, or farts. Even Putin and Xi agree in principle that climate change must be stopped.

Neither climate change nor the New Big Thing need mass appeal. The elites will believe it and the masses will be forced to comply.

Pete says:

There will be kill squads for sure. What do you think all these migrants are for? Once things start collapsing, the city people won’t be able to pay the farmers to keep shipping food to the cities.

Under normal circumstances, not getting paid would mean the farmers revert to selling (or bartering) their food to the folks in their immediate area, but to the city libs that will be unacceptable. They will want the food to continue flowing to the elites and niggers in the cities, thus they will need to send squads out to the rural areas to confiscate the food.

When a rural area resists this, the migrant confiscation squad becomes a death squad. Any town that resists too much and sends the migrants running back to the city with tail between legs, will result in a total carpet bombing of that area, pour encourager les autres.

Upravda says:

Killing squads might comprise of migrants, although I have a hard time imagining local Filipinos here in such a role. They would be eaten first. 🙂

On the other hand, using outsiders for killing rebellious locals is old and well-known tactics, but for success you have to have a lot of outsiders, preferably of a more warrior type than small Filipinos, Nepalese and lone Sikhs.

S says:

It is an odd sort of collapse where there is unified political authority for all of America’s cities and the economic situation is secure enough for the agriculture and military aircraft to continue running at normal efficiency. More likely to follow the same path as last time and rerun feudalism.

jim says:

Feudalism sort of to some extent grew spontaneously from the ground up, as peasants looked to local strong men for protection, and as mobile bandits settled down to become stationary bandits. But it also grew from the top down — Charles the Hammer formed an aristocratic army, which spontaneously led to aristocratic governance.

S says:

A rerun will look more like the latter. Modern farming is capital intensive so the minimum scale is large enough to support industry to keep the farms running.

alf says:

My latest understanding of feudalism, correct me if wrong, is that horses were the glue that kept it all together. Whereas the Romans had a mainly infantry based army, the latest breed of horses had now become strong enough to swiflty carry men long distances on their back. This combined with invention of horse shoes, saddles and stirrups meant that cavalry became king on the battleground. But since it takes a lot of money and dedication to raise horses: aristocratic army. Hence, feudalism.

jim says:

Charles the Hammer did not rely on cavalry. But nonetheless, he created feudalism, in as much as any one man can be said to have created it. He needed a highly trained well equipped army of good men, an army of the best, not an army of anyone the press gangs could grab

The Aryan conquest was also aristocratic. Horses, chariots, bronze weapons, bronze armor, and recurve bows. Bronze being more expensive than iron.

There are plenty of examples of aristocratic governance that did not rely on aristocratic warfare. But if you have aristocratic warfare, you tend to wind up with aristocratic governance, and if you do not have aristocratic warfare, aristocratic governance is apt to vanish.

There is a connection, but it is not a simple one to one connection. There is a correlation between aristocratic warfare and aristocratic governance, but it is not a very strong correlation. Aristocracy, once established in war and anarchy, tends to persist.

Neurotoxin says:

“There will be kill squads for sure. What do you think all these migrants are for?… [and for those who resist] total carpet bombing…”

Absurd. I just did a post on this, but here’s the short version:

Most immigrants come here because it’s prosperous and peaceful. When the economy tanks and bullets are flying through the air, 95% of them will instantly sprint back to Mexico. This actually happened during the last two recessions.

And those were recessions without civil war. What’s the immigration pattern in Ukraine lately?

“Any town that resists too much and sends the migrants running back to the city with tail between legs, will result in a total carpet bombing of that area, pour encourager les autres.”

My God, but this is stupid.

(1) The US military is already running out of bombs. And is having a very hard time making more.

(2) This is not a foreign war. In this scenario the airbases, etc., are located inside the country they’re bombing, surrounded by the people they’re bombing. Those people have various ways of disrupting the flow of food, power, etc., to the base…

(3) The vast majority of white people in the military are not going to participate in a program to genocide white people. (Do I really have to say this?)

(4) A couple of months ago the President of the United States could not even order the Governor and Border Patrol of Texas to stand down at the border. But you think the military will obey an order to commit genocide? LOL.

(5) If we let them take our food, we’re dead anyway, so we have no reason not to fight to the end. There is no “pour encourager les autres” here – that’s not a relevant concept – because you can’t say “Let me kill you, or else I’ll kill you.”

Black pilling is so stupid that it’s like some sort of weird sexual fetish. Are you wacking off with one hand while you type black pill posts with the other hand?

I am not saying civil war is going to be easy or fun; don’t mis-read me. Obviously our enemy has strengths as well as weaknesses. But black pilling while we’re watching our enemies destroy themselves in real-time is just ridiculous. I feel a little silly even bothering to refute it; it doesn’t so much call for refutation as psychoanalysis.

yewotm8 says:

I always thought Contamined NEET’s posting was more of a thought experiment. A devil’s advocate.

Neurotoxin says:

Even if it did start out that way, it is not that any longer.

(Side note: I was replying to Pete.)

The Cominator says:

“Most immigrants come here because it’s prosperous and peaceful.”
I quibble with this, most come here because of gibs or because they bought into some kind of Coming to America propaganda which hasn’t been true since the 80s (and certainly not since 2012ish). But on the main point most will leave if civil war breaks out I mean at least if they can get out.

Neurotoxin says:

“Most immigrants come here because it’s prosperous and peaceful.”
I quibble with this, most come here because of gibs or because they bought into some kind of Coming to America propaganda…

Sure, a lot come for gibs. Same basic point, though.

Fidelis says:

This just reads to me as “this is unthinkable therefore it won’t happen”. Every step of the way has been rather unthinkable, and it’s happened all the same.

It won’t be some industrial operation, and it won’t be official orders to the military. Just picture BLM and Rwanda combined. Get the hate whitey crowd going, make sure they understand that they are free to kill as many as they’d like, and that the artillery and drones are their support. Anyone organizing can be branded as a white supreme racist pedophile organization, and just like all the other such branded organizations the military will have no issues with firing on them.

jim says:

> Anyone organizing can be branded as a white supreme racist pedophile organization, and just like all the other such branded organizations the military will have no issues with firing on them.

White supremacist racist pedophile has been devalued by overuse. It will not work this time around. Whites males just do not buy it any more.

What you are depicting is what antifa and BLM made a start on doing. They cut it out when Kyle and the rest of the militia showed up.

Kyle and the rest of the militia organised. Antifa demanded that the police and military go after them — and the police suffered mysterious deafness.

Which is analogous to what happened when Texas told the feds and the supremes to get knotted.

Fidelis says:

>not buying it anymore
Most normies fence sit. They are neither in belief or disbelief. The true believers will push them to one side or another.

>failure to act
Personnel problems that will be dealt with, in the case of radicals ripping the steering wheel off. Doing nothing is insufficient to stop the phenomenon in the medium or long term.

jim says:

> Most normies fence sit.

Not after a couple of beers.

> in the case of radicals ripping the steering wheel off.

In the case of radicals ripping the steering wheel off, yes, normies going to hit the dirt and try to stay out of sight till one side or the other has won, correctly anticipating war.

But the rip the steering wheel off strategy is “give us our way, or it is going to be civil war” To which chad replies “OK”.

skippy says:

They are getting to the point where firing the non-compliant is causing functions they need to stop working. They have to choose between two bad options.

This election is another example of that. They can choose between letting Trump win, or continuing to claim that they are the smartest guys in the room, that they are the most cultured and sweet smelling, and that they are not actually planning white male genocide, with Kamala Harris as the public leader of their party.

They are being forced into these contradictions by the inherent untruthfulness of their positions.

Fidelis says:

>Not after a couple of beers.
Normies change opinions when the big ape with a megaphone tells them it’s okay. Doesn’t have to be an official science certified big ape megaphone, but it’s not some internal logic they’re following. You can pull these opinions out of them, mostly grumbling complaints, but the behavior is to follow the big ape in a large herd not to act or plan individually beyond the obvious flee danger/gather resources instinct.

No big ape, no action. At best we get extreme reluctance, which we do see now, but which gets dealt with.

>But the rip the steering wheel off strategy is “give us our way, or it is going to be civil war”
I doubt they’ll be satisfied just by getting their puppet in. If the Trump project fails, they’ll have the scapegoat of everyone involved with that movement to victimize first, but then they’ll quarrel with each other. That quarreling will be destabilizing, but it will also animate the violent instinct and give them the organizational steel that is missing now. It will push the most violent and organized to the top of the radical pile, and from there the total revolution starts.

The federal system seems too deeply compromised for a big ape that doesn’t want to kill all paleskins to emerge. Perhaps we will see something out of the state governments.

Neurotoxin says:

This just reads to me as “this is unthinkable therefore it won’t happen”. Every step of the way has been rather unthinkable, and it’s happened all the same.

None of those steps have been people shooting at you. You didn’t shoot members of the Supreme Court when they issued one of their unthinkable rulings over the last few decades, but if John Roberts starts shooting at you, you will shoot back. The vast majority of people will, anyway.

Just picture BLM and Rwanda combined. Get the hate whitey crowd going, make sure they understand that they are free to kill as many as they’d like, and that the artillery and drones are their support.

“Artillery”?! “Artillery”?! What kind of war do you think this is going to be?!

And that artillery is stored on military bases largely staffed by genocide targets who don’t want to be genocided. Drone factories inside the country that the drones are attacking.

In the previous century I had a neighbor who was a cop. I knew he was a cop, I knew his wife and kids. And everyone else in that neighborhood did too. If cops had started genociding white people, oh la la, I have no interest in finishing this sentence; I’ll just let you finish it in your imagination.

Contaminated NEET says:

>If cops had started genociding white people

Cops have been genociding white people for 50 years.

jim says:

Over the years I have had quite a few interactions with cops, for violence and for interactions with fertile age women. My record remains as pure as the driven snow.

I can report that police are profoundly reluctant to enforce progressive laws. Well, actually profoundly reluctant to enforce any laws, but especially progressive ones.

Again, consider the Kyle Rittenhouse case. It was not the police enforcing the law against self defence. After killing three attackers, Kyle rolled up the the cops, with a crowd of people complaining about him killing three people, reported to the cops he had killed three people, got waved away. This is similar to, though more extreme than, my own experience.

I have rolled up a few times, to get ahead of someone else making a complaint against me, which was likely what Kyle was doing, been sent away a few times.

Fidelis says:

>none of those steps have been people shooting at you
Are you denying what happened to every American city? What happens when a nig shoots you in New York? 2 weeks time out. You’re imagining armored soldiers, I’m imagining diversity and aunt tifa types being given the message that it’s fine kill as many business owners as you like.

>artillery
Yes just like Rwanda and Waco and various other movements over the years.

>don’t want to be genocided
Do you think I’m suggesting that they just announce on CNN, ‘okay go kill whitey now, we’re genociding!’ The grunts will be left in a state of confusion and crisis– we’re at peace and the electricity works and frankly they still exist now in a state of confusion– and at best will just fail to act. If you were to organize something that looks threatening, they would act. This is classic color revolution stuff.

You’re still picturing something industrial. I’m picturing the march that has been going since at least desegregation– who would allow their kid to be sent to a school full of blacks, unthinkable! — and then section 8 — who would allow their neighborhood to be destroyed by a flood of blacks on welfare, unthinkable! — and introduction of family court — who would allow the state to rip away your income and give it to your adulterous wife so she can pimp out your children, unthinkable!

This is just more of the same, and it will move at the current speed of leftism.

jim says:

Observed cop behaviour under these circumstances is to take a very relaxed attitude to private citizens taking out the trash. As what is happening right now escalates (it is already legal in blue cities for brown people to kill white people) expect cops to become every more relaxed, and white people to wake up out of normality bias.

When things get to the point where they are trying bombard the suburbs with artillery, expect Shaniqua to be managing the artillery and flying the bombers.

What happened in the Rwandan genocide is that Hutus were engaging in organised violence, and the state had successfully prevented Tutsis from engaging in organised violence. Tutsis organised from outside, invaded, and immediately ran into white troops protecting the genocidaires with artillery and air. But what happened was that the Hutu grunts protecting the white artillery evaporated real fast, and the white artillery did not have enough white grunts to protect it from Tutsi grunts, so the Tutsi rapidly acquired the white artillery and air.

> I’m imagining diversity and aunt tifa types being given the message that it’s fine kill as many business owners as you like.

That message has already been sent. Has had little effect. To actually have effect, they need to organise violence, while preventing white organised violence. Organising violence competently is hard, and when one manages to do it, one will find it hard to prevent the other guy from organising violence. Particularly if the other guy has a lot more competence to organise violence than you do.

The Rwandan genocide was organised by Jews, not by blacks, but they were pushing $#!% uphill because they were trying to organise Hutus. BLM and aunt tifa similarly organised by Jews, and similarly pushing $#!% uphill. The white race is number one for organising violence.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

Subjectification can habituate a lot of horrifying things that would be unconscionable for a right thinking man.

Not all things are equally interchangeable though. There’s only so many thing you can go through before you start hitting the Qin limit.

“So if the penalty for being late is death, and the penalty for rebellion is also death, then…”

Neurotoxin says:

If cops had started genociding white people
Cops have been genociding white people for 50 years.

Retarded. We’re talking about an actual, fast-motion genocide. As you know damn well. Cut the crap.

I’m imagining diversity and aunt tifa types being given the message that it’s fine kill as many business owners as you like…
[a couple of lines later:]
Do you think I’m suggesting that they just announce on CNN, ‘okay go kill whitey now, we’re genociding!’

Yes, since you said that in the previous sentence.

artillery
Yes just like Rwanda and Waco and various other movements over the years.

Oh, okay. Here’s what they’ll do. They’ll use artillery to bomb one white neighborhood. Then they’ll do that for another neighborhood. And so on. Until all 204 million white people in the US are dead. Genocide by artillery!

You were that kid who ate the paste in art class, weren’t you? I could black-pill better than this. I DO black-pill better than this, when I’m scenario-running.

Neurotoxin says:

In summary: the black-pillers here are arguing that a civil war in which people fight back is impossible, cannot happen, even though civil wars actually happen on this planet all the time. It’s bewildering. What purpose could be served by such nonsense?

Mindless black pilling hurts us because it takes attention from our enemy’s actual strengths. And our enemy is still, in many ways, terribly strong. As I have said before, we must focus on all four factors: our strengths, our weaknesses, our enemy’s strengths, our enemy’s weaknesses. There is no case for ignoring any of these. Mindless “WE’RE DOOOOOOOMED!!!” black pilling removes attention from a serious analysis of our enemy’s strengths and our weaknesses. By injecting noise into the signal, it disrupts our planning process. This – and the attempted demoralization – is why I interpret it as enemy action.

Fidelis says:

Continue beating your strawman. I never claimed:

– no attempt to fight back
– artillery and drones would be used from the start on random suburbs

You are projecting your imagination into the conversation and getting mad that what you are picturing in your head is ridiculous. Here is what I’m picturing, coincident with some crisis that makes movement and communications difficult: to take out the small towns, they bus in lots of ‘protestors’. To prevent the people organizing ‘protests’ from getting attacked, artillery and drone cover.

Re: blackpilling, I’ve said multiple times they couldn’t actually kill every white man in the GAE; not in this conversation thread, true, but on this blog. I’m saying a manufactured crisis and the subsequent attempt will be very deadly, and being ‘unthinkable’ people are in general ill-prepared and it will get very far very fast.

jim says:

> to take out the small towns, they bus in lots of ‘protestors’. To prevent the people organizing ‘protests’ from getting attacked, artillery and drone cover.

This is similar to what the Global American Empire did in the Rwandan genocide. They lost. It is not an unbeatable combo.

The Rwandan problem was that the people attempting to stop the genocide went after the artillery. Duh! To screen the Global American Empire artillery, the GAE needed grunts to stop the other side’s grunts. And Hutu grunts just were not very good.

If one’s artillery and drone operators are screened by “protesters” they are going to be lost.

What you describe is doable, but it is hardly a slam dunk. Last time around, it failed. Of course that was old style mass grunt warfare. Today, its drones. And, as we are seeing in Burma, drones are within reach of the non state side.

Neurotoxin says:

Continue beating your strawman. I never claimed:
– no attempt to fight back
– artillery and drones would be used from the start on random suburbs.

And I never claimed no white people would die.

Calvin says:

Israeli war against Lebanon looks quite likely, so possibly that and a subsequent war with Iran.

bob sykes says:

Russian losses are only about 20% of Ukrainian losses, because Russia has overwhelming fire supremacy in all classes of weapons. So, they simply hammer the Ukrainian positions flat, and then engage the survivors.

The Russian goals remain: de-nazification, de-militarization, no NATO for Ukraine, and recognition of the five oblasts plus Crimea as part of Russia.

The Istanbul accords, initialed by Russia and Ukraine, but vetoed by the US, would have left all the oblasts except Crimea in Ukraine. A half million or more Ukrainians and a hundred thousand or so Russians. would not have died. The whole disaster is US Satanists’ doing, beginning in 2014.

I used to be a patriot, and I believed the lies told by our leaders. But now I know that the US must be disarmed and cut up into many very small states.

Pax Imperialis says:

Balkanized US would be a disaster. A breakaway conservative Texas/Florida/etc might be content with live and let live, but leftists are never content with Westphalian peace. A leftist California/New York/etc will want revolution in your successor state.

The next regime must secure territorial integrity if only to have jurisdiction to stamp out leftism in all corners of continental America.

This isn’t even getting into the problem of Mexico and the surprisingly dangerous problem Canada would become for ‘very small states’ America.

Mayflower Sperg says:

Balkanized US would be glorious. Canada and the leftist states would be desperately struggling to feed, house, and not be murdered by the tens of millions of niggers who fled the rightist states when they abolished welfare and legalized (or just stopped enforcing laws against) vigilante justice.

Pax Imperialis says:

And what if the leftist states give these hoards weapons and directions to target rural farmers in your small rightist states? Something akin to South Africa’s farm attacks. There’s all kinds of devious mischief the leftist states could get up to, and will get up to. Foreign states would have all sorts of reasons for escalating the problem. At some point the rightist states will have to clean the problem up from the origin.

To put the problem in current terms, how did Israel giving up all of its gains from the 6 day war and being balkanized back into a 3 state ‘solution’ (Israel proper, Gaza strip, and West Bank) work out for them? Turns out such a solution was no solution and they’re back at war.

My point is that we’re at war with the left, and Balkanization doesn’t end the war. Worse, it prevents a mostly bloodless restoration coup from possibility. Balkanization would result in our current, mostly cold, war going hot really fucking fast.

Ryan says:

The SA government supports the raiders, not the farmers.
In a balkanized white state, the police and state army plus local militias would be on the side of the farmers. It would take a serious and obvious army to invade. Untrained raiders would be picked off with trivial ease.

Mayflower Sperg says:

Leftists can’t fight, and their ability to bribe or bamboozle others into fighting for them is waning by the day. No matter how you arm them, niggers are useless against any sort of organized resistance.

If foreign countries want to get involved, let them. If North America becomes a Chinese colony, white people will be second-class citizens, a huge step up from the absolute pariahs we are now. Even Mexican drug cartels would allow white men to have wives. As Tuco said, “I like doing business with a family man, there’s always a lot of collateral.”

Contaminated NEET says:

>Leftists can’t fight

This is not true. Don’t be fooled by their bleeding heart rhetoric and their effeminate fashion sense; Leftists fight with a fanaticism and fury the Right hasn’t been able to summon since the Crusades. Their record speaks for itself.

DH says:

You have failed to notice the rapid degeneration of the left.

The left often wins when it has a competent army. Where is its competent army in 2024? It no longer has a competent army, because it no longer has a competent faith. 2024 leftism is pure madness. They rely on technological superiority, and it is declining fast as a result of said madness.

AI research is increasingly aligned with the Thermidorian faction, while the Obama faction is terrified (genuinely or otherwise) that Musk will use magic tech to break the left.

Contaminated NEET says:

The USSR destroyed its army’s competence immediately before the biggest war of all time. They fixed the problem and conquered half the world. These people have good reason to think history is on their side.

jim says:

The USSR is no more, and our current rulers are showing all the same symptoms with knobs on.

From 1910 to 1933, our rulers destroyed our army’s competence. Then when Hitler was elected, they did an abrupt U turn.

Our current rulers are doing a feeble half hearted partial deceleration. They kind of backed off on covid, but are still going full speed ahead on the biggy, feminizing and emasculating the army and the police force.

When our rulers do the same U turn that they did in 1933, crimininalising homosexuality and cross dressing, actively enforcing those laws, providing social support for wife spanking and private violence against gays and traps, when the army is remasculinized, then we may worry about that they may have fixed the problem. But we will probably be too busy celebrating to worry.

Plus, to do a U turn is Thermidor, and for Thermidor to do a U turn this drastic they will need reaction and the white terror. Going to need to toss gays and cross dressers off high buildings.

That path is Thermidor hires reaction to deal with the lefter-than-thou, and then after the white terror has done its work, crushes reaction. But this is a chancy path, and you are more likely to get reaction and the white terror crushing Thermidor after it and Thermidor have dealt with the lefter-than-thou.

DH says:

Would the USSR allow seven feet men to compete in female sports?

Come on, these people are beyond deranged. You imagine leftists as an abstraction that exists in the mind. Look at actual leftists that actually exist in the real world of today. Leftists used to be masculine and competent. They stopped being masculine in the 1960s with the hippies (and have gone increasingly less masculine ever since), and they stopped being competent around 2010 when social media, particularly Tumblr, infected their minds with a veritable pandemic of demons – social media greatly accelerated the holiness spiral.

These lunatic sissies will be screaming “please, don’t kill me, I’m begging you!” far sooner than you realize. The only question is who will be killing them.

Mayflower Sperg says:

A U-turn was possible in 1933 because the halls of power were full of white men who remembered what masculinity was and what it was good for. The knowledge that today’s Thermidorians would need to restore a functioning society exists only in old books that Jim has read and they have not.

S says:

The left had to get Nazis to enforce their will in Ukraine; the International Brigades were still born. At home they have antifa which are genetic trash and lose when not backed by the police. They certainly have fanaticism born of envy but that doesn’t help when your enemy can shoot back. They rely on the police, security services and military; the same fury that propels them forward forces them to undermine the tools to enforce their will.

jim says:

No nation with a gay parade has ever won a war.

Leftists won in combat back when anyone cross dressing took his life in his hands. In the Ukraine, they had to make up with 1930s leftists — the Azov Nazis.

Yes. Those leftists can fight. But Antifa and the like are utterly dependent on police and court protection.

Contaminated NEET says:

Antifa fights like it does because it has police and court protection, and it knows it. Its strongest weapon isn’t fists, or guns, or bike locks: it’s summoning Leviathan’s wrath on anyone who fights back. Losing street fights to win the war has worked out splendidly for them. Their tactics might appear cowardly or dishonest, but they work. The people at the top of their organizations chose them deliberately and well for the environment they operate in.

Victory needs no explanation. Defeat allows none.

jim says:

> Antifa fights like it does because it has police and court protection

It fights like it does because it is incapable of fighting. This has been proven every time someone fights back, often against enormous odds. If you fight back, you win on the street, even if outnumbered ten to one. It is just that you subsequently go to jail for life plus four hundred years.

Contaminated NEET says:

So you go to jail for life plus 400 years, and they maybe get a bloody nose, and you call that winning? It feels good to “win” the street fight in the moment, but then you lose big. The smarter Lefties, the leaders and the strategists, are counting on that, and they’re deliberately engineering circumstances to make it happen. Their “weakness” baits their enemies into exposing themselves to their mightiest weapons. They know exactly what they’re doing. By laughing at their tactical “weakness” and saying their subsequent huge strategic victory somehow doesn’t count because it was the police and courts that did it, you’re behaving exactly as they predicted and intended you to. The police and the courts are elements of the battlefield, the Antifa is expert at using them. It’s insane that you call them weak when they win every fight.

jim says:

> So you go to jail for life plus 400 years, and they maybe get a bloody nose, and you call that winning?

You are telling me they have state power, while acknowledging they have lost the capacity to defend state power.

When Antifa displays weakness in a street fight, it is not because of IQ four hundred master minds planning for them to be weak. It is because they are weak. It is like inability to rebuild the trade towers, or astronauts stuck in space, or Nato running out of ammo.

You think Nato running out of shells and Ukrainians was part of some genius clever plan? Running out of Ukrainians was deliberate, but it was demonic madness, not brilliant planning, and running out of ammo was a total shock to them that they continue to refuse to believe.

> The smarter Lefties, the leaders and the strategists

The leaders and strategists are people like Hillary, Kamala, and Obama. These people are obviously stupid. Look at what the leaders and strategists are reading and writing. Their entertainments and activities are the entertainments and activities of people on the wrong side of the bell curve. Soros the younger may well be smart, for his father was very smart, but he is merely a minion, a minion of idiots. Kagan is a midwit, therefore Blinken and Nuland are likely midwits, while Hillary, Kamala, and Obama are just startlingly stupid..

When one hires game testers, one wants the game test lead smart enough to talk to the engineers, but one wants the regular game testers to be average gamers. Hillary and Obama would not be hired for game testers, because dumber than our target audience.

Your original claim was that the left could rebuild an army. It cannot — because it has gone too far. The necessary changes would be massive backtracking on leftism. They would have to start with the white terror.

Contaminated NEET says:

Antifa’s cowardly unchivalrous but effective street fight tactics most certainly are planned. They have manuals, and they teach things like shouting, “Get away from me! Don’t touch me! Stop attacking me!” as you advance on your target and strike him. It works.

>Your original claim was that the left could rebuild an army.
Fair. The thread that connects Antifa to the GAE’s army is that each are well-adapted and adequate to the battlefields they fight on and the goals they pursue. If conditions or goals change, they will try to adapt to them. You say they won’t be able to, but that remains to be seen. Ukraine is an ill omen for the GAE army, but so far that’s all it is. Once things get serious for them, the Left will take things more seriously. I’d wouldn’t have bet on the USSR in Fall 1941, but they turned things around and won a world-historic victory.

Even supposing they take a big L vs. China, Russia, and/or Iran, nobody’s going to invade the mainland USA, and the remains of the GAE army should be more than up to keeping the racist sexist domestic terrorists and back-stabbing disloyal extremists that lost us the war under control.

jim says:

> Antifa’s cowardly unchivalrous but effective street fight tactics most certainly are planned

Sure, planned by people who know that they are unable to recruit or motivate an actual fighting force.

Look at what has been happening in the color revolutions: As soon as shit got real in Syria, their forces instantly melted away, and they had to ask Isis to put on white hats, which is similar to Nasa hitching a ride on the Soviet rocket. In the Ukraine, Blinken has to buddy up with the Nazis in a Nazi bar. I doubt he liked that.

This is similar to the Chinese and Roman Empires hiring the barbarians to fight the barbarians. It is a manifestation of weakness.

Sooner or later the barbarians are going to come to an arrangement to visit the paymasters. “Hey, maybe we should go where the gold is rather than where the steel is.”

And in Hong Kong, their forces abruptly melted away, and left them with their pants down. In America, they don’t have anything, because anything that they could potentially use, could potentially be used against them. They do not want to have the equivalent of Sikhs or Nazis too close to home.

S says:

‘points at the International Brigades’
We know the left can’t adapt because if they could churn out leftist paramilitaries capable of fighting they would have sent them to Ukraine. Spain got 40,000 during its civil war in 1936- the best estimate for Ukraine is 2,000.

Oscar C. says:

If Israel does not emerge victorious from his current conflict your thesis will be vindicated.

The Cominator says:

A balkanized US would literally have millions of leftists in California dying of thirsts very very soon as the water supply to LA (which depends on stealing water from a bunch of other states around them) would be cut almost immediately.

Pax Imperialis says:

Remind me how many did the Soviets killed through failed agricultural plans? They still managed to be a major problem. Death cults will fight far beyond reasonable. Californian water supply issues would likely lead to attempts to secure the Colorado river by force.

How many nations do you think would have a bone to pick with what ever is left of America? Maybe I’m just a bit paranoid, but after all those color revolutions you’d think maybe someone might want to return the favor by dumping a bunch of weapons into Californian ports for laughs.

A large chunk of the US military is based in California, including nuclear assets. Do you really trust a death cult that would likely spiral and spiral and spiral harder and harder and harder as they starve to rationally apply principles of MAD? Coastal leftists act in a way that begs for WW3 with Russia. They’d behave and think with far more derangement over something close to home.

I’d prefer to not test any of these possibilities and see the problem solved through a Caesar.

Gedeon says:

Have you seen the Colorado gov’s “wife”?

Colorado has the second largest federal presence after DC beltway.

Cloudswrest says:

Just looked it up. Wish I hadn’t.

Fidelis says:

Frankly I would love both the breaking of the nuclear taboo and the ensuing Crusade to purify California.

We’re at the point now where we spiral into auto-genocide, or flimsy ‘Global South’ style military junta. Balkanozation would be far better than a unitary entity in both of those cases– competition would help with breeding competence back.

i says:

Dealing with Death cults entail prioritizing not be pulled down with them into Death.

But always assume lack of self-preservation to destroy you in the process. If they will cut off their nose to spite their face. It does people well to have good self-preservation to ensure they don’t share death with you

Cloudswrest says:

Recently the CA government nixed a planned coastal Southern CA desalinization plant. I think the stated reason was the brine would damage the ocean environment. There’s basically infinite ocean to dilute the brine before discharging it back into the sea, so their stated reasons are totally bogus.

FrankNorman says:

“There’s basically infinite ocean to dilute the brine before discharging it back into the sea, so their stated reasons are totally bogus.”

Bogus, or just stupid?
Why would they not want a desalination plant? Are they just ideologically against economic development?
Or is it that getting something like that working would require white male brainpower, and therefore make the Shaniqua types feel bad?

jim says:

Just stupid.

If you do anything, such as breathing, it is going to impact the environment. Impacting the environment, obviously, is sinful. They lack the capacity to evaluate whether the impacts are good or bad (all impacts are bad) and lack the intellectual capacity to assess the magnitude of the impact.

FrankNorman says:

I for one see no good reason why one and the same installation could not function both as a desalination plant and as a salt farm.

Why throw either part of away?

Pax Imperialis says:

being in contact with reality is a bad career move

So few people know just how true this is. I know this infantry chad. Prior enlisted, now an officer. Guy is extremely competent and smart. Nearly all his peers like and respect him. He’s well known for talking straight and calling out BS, and he’s not some immovable blockhead either.

He told a female superior, who’s MOS is the furthest one can get from combat, that what she was doing in the field was fucking stupid and would get men killed. She did not take kindly to the reality check. His career is anywhere between on hold for a year and completely fucked.

The emphasis on polite, tactful, gentlemanly officers has created an officer corps that is fearful, quiet, and avoidant of reality that may cause offense. An officer corps that doesn’t have opinions because opinions might cause offense… unless, of course, those opinions are regurgitated official regime lines in which case they are promoted ahead of peers. A war against a “near peer” will be far more bloody than anyone in Washington expects. Although they may not care.

The silver lining to all of this, is that the bulk of the US military will be safe. There are only so many ships that can be sunk, and ship building capacity is ever shrinking.

Hesiod says:

Had a relative, top rank enlisted and counting the days until retirement, recently lament over the disastrous quality of raw material coming into the military. “(F)earful, quiet, and avoidant of reality” is nigh identical to his sentiments towards his COs. He’s awfully isolated these days and is on the verge of cursing the branch that made a man of him decades ago.

Pax Imperialis says:

In the past, the enlisted had much leeway because officers were able, and very happy, to turn a blind eye towards certain behaviors, but peace time military has put everyone under extreme scrutiny. SNCOs work side by side with COs, so your relative is probably having to deal with 100% of the bullshit.

He’s awfully isolated these days

That reminded me of how Lind described the situation. He is a bit outdated, more often than “sexual harassment”, men are being charged with being “offensive”, but he’s primarily spot on for why officers, and the military at large, have become the way it is.

More specifically it is an attempt to destroy the male culture of our armed services. That is the same thing as destroying the services themselves, because any military that does not have an aggressively male culture will not fight. It will come apart at the first touch of real war.Here’s how the game works. First, mix young men and young women in intimate situations (our submarines now have women in their crews). Then, empower the women over the men by allowing them to charge men with “sexual harassment” for any reason or no reason at all (giving a woman an order she does not like is often cause enough). Then, rip the man away from his chain of command, put him under a commissar system (with all the commissars loyal cultural Marxists) and presume him guilty until proven innocent. Faced with this, the kind of men who want to fight–who are a rare and precious resource in any military–first become discipline problems, then get out. Many of them will go on to find other ways to fight. The rest of the men either hate their lives or–what the feminists want–accustom themselves to being ruled by women.

https://www.traditionalright.com/traditionalright-blog/the-view-from-olympus-the-women-problem-again

If a man voices typical male opinions, or anything that goes against the current year leftism, the bureaucracy will attempt to geld him. Not too long ago, a CO went on and on about how we’re “professionals” and not “pirates” or “barbarians” or “savages”, and that’s why we’re better than everyone else. I couldn’t help but think: “hey, didn’t we just get our asses kicked by goat herding savages/barbarians?” “Aren’t we currently getting our asses kicked by pirates?”

I can’t think of much that is more “offensive” than killing the enemy, so it’s really indicative that a military whose vast bureaucracy is dedicated to being inoffensive might just not be focused on killing.

Hesiod says:

I need to revisit Lind’s Victoria to make sure it contains the depiction of a scouring of academia as I remember. The Episcopal bishopess getting some ol’-timey religion left an impression as well.

Pete says:

Kind of a joke how the Officer Evaluation Report form includes categories for “Encourages candor and frankness in subordinates,” also integrity and moral courage.

Yet these days any subordinate that tells his superior officer anything but what she WANTS to hear is toast.

Contaminated NEET says:

>Yet these days any subordinate that tells his superior officer anything but what she WANTS to hear is toast.

Not the military, but I’ve recently gotten a job in the very lowest level of management at a large bureaucratic organization (I know, I don’t deserve to call myself a NEET), and every day I am horrified anew at how much management runs on happy-sounding word salads. Once you get a level or two above the people doing actual work, there is no contact with reality, and everyone literally believes in magic. There is no difference in their minds between saying positive words and achieving good outcomes. God help anyone who utters a negative word, even if it’s important useful information about a real problem, because he is causing the problem through black magic by saying unpleasant words.

It’s totally obvious that “integrity,” “candor,” and “frankness,” are just incantations to these “people,” and have no meaning to them beyond magically summoning good outcomes when chanted.

Anon says:

Hay pax,
Would appreciate a help, i am trying to learn about millitary and war
Do you have books, manuals recommendations?

Humungus says:

The only AFM worth reading…
https://archive.org/details/get-tough-how-to-win-in-hand-to-hand-fighting

Also, todays military is ran by blacks and women. Any self respecting White should get out.

When the time is right, we will form our own.

Varna says:

I’ve been having mixed feeling on the globohomo types lately, after imagining what if today’s crisis had happened when the empire had the military and industrial capacity of 1990 or even 2000. Nightmare.

You’ve got your “rightwing globohomo” (Bush Jr + Sr republicanism, today’s UK tories), and “leftwing globohomo”, which is self-evident.

Rightwing globohomo destroys society through crony “capitalism” and outsourcing everything and promoting a midwit managerial “technocracy” approach.

But! Since it doesn’t dismantle the very anthropological fabric of society so aggressively and in your face, it can still inspire loyalty in its citizens during a real or imagined crisis.

Whereas leftwing globohomo utterly sabotages loyalty from the population strata that can be of any actual use. Plus, it promotes both metaphorical and literal castration of the populace.

Rightwing globohomo helps downgrade the *ability* to fight and function, whereas leftwing globohomo helps dismantle the *will* to fight and function, as well as any basic loyalty from normal men. And, increasingly, the very existence of normal men.

I think I’m starting to get St Anglin’s skepticism of the outcome of a Trump victory, in the sense of a resurgent normal man loyalty to a Bush-style globohomo system.

For this not to happen, Trumpists would probably need to pull off a serious internal revolution and almost instantaneously.

The Cominator says:

Don’t shill for leftist victory here Jeet… accelerationism is a lie.

Varna says:

Yo mama loves acceleration after showing bob and vagene

Contaminated NEET says:

Yep. We’re not going to get control of the system, and we’re not going to fix it; the last decade has demonstrated that it’s far too alert and resilient to any threats from the Right. But sooner or later it will topple on its own, and conservatism’s role is to shore up the evil stinking rickety edifice, which might be worse than doing nothing. It doesn’t matter though; the Left does not have the discipline nor the time-preference to allow even the cuckservatives anywhere near power (even empty symbolic power) ever again, no matter how much better it is for their great project in the long run.

jim says:

> We’re not going to get control of the system, and we’re not going to fix it;

We have been around this merry go round many times before. Leftism always self destructs.

Sometimes it takes everyone and everything with it, but it always self destructs.

> sooner or later it will topple on its own, and conservatism’s role is to shore up the evil stinking rickety edifice,

You are thinking of a limited retreat, like Reagan or Pinochet. I expect something a great deal more dramatic. And possibly enormously more deadly.

DH says:

1980 leftism is unstable for many reasons, one of which is the WP.

The liberation of female sexuality, allowing unrestricted female mate choice, is incompatible with civilization. If your women decide who gets laid and who doesn’t get laid, if sex happens or doesn’t happen on female whim, if it’s up to women to properly allocate access to family and fertility among men, your people will inexorably perish – and quite rapidly. This applies not just to globohomo, but to its competitors as well. It’s a civilization-wide problem.

Need to go all the way to the right to fix the WP, which is the cardinal problem. No restoration of patriarchy and coverture, no restoration of civilization.

Oskar says:

>one of which is the WP.

Excuse my ignorance, but what does WP stand for?

jim says:

Woman Problem

Gedeon says:

I expect the troubles ahead to be giga tier casualties and disproportionately male. But let’s look at university matriculation at 60% female and rising. Women don’t marry down in status. We’re already at a point where the production of sufficiently high status men cannot approach the demand.

Factor in that the cycle has gone to such an extreme as tranny regarded as high virtue and the inversion and reversion to the mean will dramatically overshoot the historical mean of one straight male and one straight wife households.

I think polygamy will become all but essential to continuity of humanity as you also unlock some household efficiencies from multiple mothers under one roof too. Women will require total physical security without the State providing it.

Women are already ok with it if the man is a man.

Calvin says:

I expect that a lot of urban women in particular are literally going to get eaten. Major selection pressure for finding a protector and provider in the days ahead, imo, and polygamy is unlikely to be an option for very many. Way too much incentive for the left out males to just kill the one guy and divvy up the women.

Mayflower Sperg says:

You’re confusing Brigham Young’s polygamy with Warren Jeffs’. The early Mormons didn’t hoard beautiful young women; they collected lonely aging desperadas who might have a few viable eggs left.

Isaiah chapter 4 supports polygamy as an emergency measure to recover from a demographic catastrophe. I’m told the Catholic church allowed polygamy in Paraguay after the war of 1864-1870, one of the worst wipeouts any country has ever suffered.

The Cominator says:

There is a weird instinctual shift with women… I swear I am no better looking recently… women are a LOT nicer, flirty, more outgoing etc. in the past couple months then they’ve been almost since the rave era. I don’t know whether globohomo just tweaked the food additives but its like someone flicked a switch. The whole I don’t want to talk any guy who isn’t an obvious gigachad bitch shield projected from Endor attitude is just gone…

Varna says:

Was in X Western European country last week with wife, we arrive, get registered in hotel, take the elevator, inside a middle-aged American woman literally gives a yelp of delight as we come in and almost blew me there and then, before I spelled out how tired me and my wife are, stubbornly and pointedly misconstruing her gibbering about how we’ll all have fun now, pretending I think she means going out for drinks. Wife said as we stepped out “she almost blew you there and then.”

And yes, the local women and girls did throw appraising and inviting glances on the street the whole time, which was more than offset by gay chaps making out on benches and staring earnestly into each other’s eyes.

Strange atmosphere. More *sleazy* than *life-affirming*. But vibes are definitely vibing.

i says:

Birth control is no longer being used:
https://akinokure.blogspot.com/2022/05/rebirth-of-fertility-cycle-as-girls.html?m=1

Also those periods of higher “libido” seems to function by cycles. Highs and lows.

The Cominator says:

A lot of girls have been off birth control for a while (I know from experience strippers are very rarely are on the pill) but I don’t think that is the cause. I don’t know what it is but they seem broadly friendlier more flirtatious more approachable more interested in dance with me sing karoke etc and maybe go somewhere for some lovin than they have been in decades… its made life a lot nicer lately. I hated the post covid years where it seemed like virtually every girl in the western world was a complete total stuck up bitch. Was it the sloopy blowjob girl going viral… I don’t know but it seemed to start then.

Cloudswrest says:

Voxday links to some tweet referring to some sort of major US investigation of foreign influence over US judges, prosecutors, etc. Seems like the tweeter is too timid to directly mention Soros, but indirectly mentions him via the “Global Society Foundations”.

https://voxday.net/2024/07/29/100-pure-hopium/

/pol/watcher says:

Original source is Anonymous Conservative, I think.

Humungus says:

“Wars happen because some people expect one outcome…”

Modern warfare is always for the same two reasons, money laundering and population reduction.

When this system collapses, and we form tribal societies, there will be an end to this. There will still be war because there is always war. Future wars will be fought between tribes for honor and breeding rights, not to reduce population or for money.

Well said.

Anonymous Fake says:

When you really think about it, though, the most effective institution for money laundering and population reduction is the modern school, not the battlefield. And yet no good parent ever dares to suggest his child become a soldier. Hmm…

Actually, I’m starting to think geopolitics itself is nothing but a psyop. Demographics are imploding everywhere (except Israel, which practices aggressive educational credential forging) and the grift money isn’t going to last forever.

Scratch “tribal societies” and simply replace it with “above replacement fertility societies”. For civilized ice people, these societies are currently based on dropping out of high school and getting a GED and then getting a college degree through correspondence/online courses, and then getting a nice high paying government job that can support a big family, early in life when it matters the most. Working in side jobs and making early life investments the whole time.

skippy says:

Wut? The GED -> online degree -> “high paying government job” pipeline ?

Humungus says:

Greetings again.

What Humungus is trying to say is to avoid association with military or any government work. Dying for todays military is a wasted sacrifice. You’re better than that. Also, people are profiting from these wars. You are not unless you’re in Congress.

After the current system is swept away following financial collapse, we will rise again. When I say we, I mean our racial collective identity.

Hesiod says:

Musk shares video of the Venezuelan National Guard joining anti-Maduro protests:

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1818074081490596277?t=O5L639rH-BV-6T2BnNfwww&s=19

dave says:

This kind of thing tends to be self-fulfilling. Buying X might be musks most important investment, and positions him to be able to control and moderate comms. Starlink means the comms are full-stack and hard to block.

DH says:

The left are now absolutely terrified that AI will be used against them in the upcoming election and broadly on the internet.

Someone is afraid of Thermidor, of the faction affiliated with the Grey Tribe. It’s now starting to sink in that le magic technology will belong to the insufficiently holy, and not to their holier-than-thou selves.

AI is about to become a demon, or a mini-demon initially. They will engineer an AI-related scare, so that they can “regulate” (attempt to destroy) it, so that it won’t be a tool in any rival faction’s box.

If you holiness-spiral far enough on the AI demon, you might end up concluding that the internet should be shut down entirely, and indeed, the awesome and mighty AI demon might be used as the ultimate excuse to destroy all civilization. If artificial intelligence is so scary, perhaps intelligence itself should be abolished, so as to prevent it from ever unleashing the awesome and mighty and evil AI demon on the world.

In the short-term though, they are interested in “equalizing the playing field,” that is, neutralizing a technological advantage they believe to be more in Thermidor’s possession than in their own possession. The left is starting to feel its own incompetence.

S says:

If societies only collapse when the smart fraction is gone, that is a good way to speed up the time table from ‘eventually’ to ‘immediately’ and hand China the future.

Russia and Ukraine are not really relevant anymore. It is clear that the real war is civilization vs. globohomo.

S says:

Russias nuclear missiles make it relevant until the Kremlin feels Russia’s security concerns have been meet. Still a chance we get nuclear armageddon.

[…] Original Article […]

Ryan says:

War that risks significant escalation and consequences is certainly the result of miscalculation on one side (or both).

More limited warfare where you send out men to the softest raiding targets available (excluding civilizational allies) can be useful even if you lose men for no tangible gain, because it keeps armies sharp, maintains a warrior ethos in society, and should raise the average fitness of surviving men.

jim says:

The Global America Empire loves to have pointless long running small scale conflicts, for the reasons suggested by Humungus — the military industrial complex overcharges, and pays off politicians.

Big expensive wars that show every likelihood of escalating into catastrophic wars, are, however, the result of miscalculation by one or both sides.

Ryan says:

The fake and GAE ‘wars’ of the recent decades aren’t good for the nations sending the men, or even for the soldiers despite the very low risks. As you say, it’s a grift to leech money from the taxpayer.

With real low risk wars, there is still a risk if you conquer territory but then have the headache of being responsible for governing it and defending the new borders.

My recommendation is to find a dysfunctional shithole country, march in and kill the evil and incompetent leaders, then put a native in charge who is popular and cares about his people. Take all the treasure from the ‘big man’ and arrange a tribute from the new guy. With sensible capitalist policies there will be increased wealth per capita within a couple of years. If he tries to back out or isn’t to scratch, he knows you’re coming back.

Mike in Boston says:

It seems to me that the Thermidorean faction of Globohomo just executed a bloodless version of that plan in Argentina. The reliably pro-Israel, pro-Ukraine Mikei just loaded all his country’s gold reserves onto British Airways planes and sent them off to I suppose London.

https://english.elpais.com/economy-and-business/2024-07-28/the-mystery-of-argentinas-gold-milei-admits-that-it-was-transferred-abroad-without-specifying-the-quantities-or-destination.html

jim says:

This looks like a payout by Milei for being allowed to win the election.

Theoretically this makes the gold reserves more liquid, since ownership can be re-assigned at the speed of light. But for some considerable time, it has been the case that the central bank that is the theoretical owner of gold on deposit is stiff armed if they ask for the gold back from the central bank where it is on deposit, and for some considerable time, the big finance agents of empire have been acting as if gold on deposit is gold in their personal pockets. They seem more like Hunter Biden and Sam Bankman-Fried than traditional mid twentieth century financiers — crowds of whores, nine day cocaine benders, big payouts to influencers, politicians, judges and senior civil servants.

Back in the day, finance people made a big effort to appear very very respectable, since they wanted you to trust them with their money. These days, the nearest thing they get to respectable is sobering up after a cocaine bender.

skippy says:

GAE;s confused wars, which attempt simultaneously to produce political effects by force and to emasculate both soldiers and nations, illustrates the confusion that underlies the GAE project. There is no genius behind the curtain.

Mister Grumpus says:

“So wait. Hang on. So connected Jews in Kiev, DC and London are press-ganging poor white Christians to other kill poor white Christians somewhere else?”

“(…oy vey it’s another shoah…)”

Mister Grumpus says:

2016 and the Trump campaign was this wild adventurous plunge into revelation and madness. I went a little crazy with it, but it was an excited and happy kind of crazy. “Pepe!”

But then Covid-19 was nearly a psychotic break (or maybe a real one) from reality, as I thought I had known it, when it became obvious that no one in charge was motivated, first and foremost, to protect people from sickness and death, or apparently even needed to be. It was when they instantly and reflexively denounced hydroxychloroquine and Dr. Zelenko’s protocol (PBuH) instead of saying “Well here’s a promising new development, and here’s how the good guy experts in the government are looking into it. Fingers crossed, people!”

Oh yeah and when Trump brought the USS Mercy to New York Harbor and the governor said “Fuck that. Take them to old folks’ homes instead.”

And now Russia-Ukraine has been even worse. It’s as if no one in charge of Kiev has brought up, even between each other, “But guys, what if Putin and the Russians ACTUALLY want to win this, like for real? What if THAT’S what they want? What then?”

Talk about projection, right? I don’t see anyone in Kiev/DC/London acting like winning against Moscow is Priority One, and this blog post here is as good a take as I’ve found anywhere at making sense of why that is.

So what else don’t they care about?

With Covid it was one thing, because I could just refuse the vaxx, and because “Public Health” is always where GAE dumps their Karens and flunkies, so they can’t hurt anything important and instead just nag Mexicans to wash their hands at their job at McDonalds.

But now the military too? Where the nukes are?

[…] But occasionally one must descend into the morass of imbecility to take some fuck-wit to school. So here’s a commenter at another […]

The Cominator says:

Remember keep saying Kamala is Indian as much as possible in the world of identity politics there is nothing worse. She will have the navy running 24/7 doing pickups from the Bombay slums to the east coast.

someDude says:

Hahaha!

Pseudo-chrysostom says:

https://x.com/Cernovich/status/1818431794578170115

SO I SPAT IN THE FACE OF A MERCHANT AND FUCKED HIS FRIEND IN THE ASS AND YOU WANNA KNOW WHAT HAPPENED?
WHAT HAPPENED JEFE
HE OFFERED ME AN EVEN SWEETER DEAL THAN HE DID IN THE FIRST PLACE!
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHA MERCHANTLETS!
WHEN WILL THEY LEARN!

someDude says:

Perhaps there is more to this than what we can see? I’m not an advocate of 3-D chess and all that, but still ……

jim says:

You should not believe everything you read.

Trump does not have a campaign manager. He manages his own campaign. Which is why Cernovich neglected to name this campaign manager who “wants AG Ken Paxton jailed, wanted Trump indicted for J6, and is now purging all of the loyal former Trump staffers from 2016 and 2020”

If what Cernovich said had the slightest grain of truth it it, he would have named this campaign manager. From this strange evasiveness, you should have instantly smelt that you are being lied to by an evil man who hates you and intends you harm.

Always listen to what is not said. You will hear no end of people telling you they need killing.

Nikolai says:

He’s referring to Chris LaCivita, who Cernovich mentioned by name multiple times in previous posts.

He could be needlessly blackpilling but the first Trump administration did have a terrible RINO entryist problem and it is unclear if Trump learned his lesson.

jim says:

Wikipedia describes Chris LaCivita as “a senior adviser to Trump’s campaign”. Which means he has no power — just influence. Influence over whom? And Wikipedia calls him an adviser to the campaign, not an adviser to Trump.

There is a big difference between being “a senior adviser” and “the campaign manager”

> it is unclear if Trump learned his lesson.

As for what Trump has learned: We now have, from the Heritage foundation, compelling evidence that the FBI were meeting with the shooter and presumably setting up the shooting. Therefore, Rinos are in bed with people who tried to kill him. That is likely to make him a little bit suspicious of flatterers.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

Cernovich has a history of purple pilling so if someone like him says something take it with a grain of salt.

But the meme setup was irresistible so of course I indulged. And unfortunate tendencies of Trump and other merchant-spirited men in attempting to make deals with those whom no deal should (or even can) be made bears harping on with regularity, Lest Any Forget, including and especially the man himself, and friends around him.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

Incidentally, Chris Lacivita and Susie Wiles are both described as ‘Co-Campaign managers’ in various outlets like reuters and wsj (https://ballotpedia.org/Donald_Trump_presidential_campaign_staff,_2024). Wikipedia is less specific and merely list them and several other names (Brian Jack, Jason Miller, Steven Cheung, Karoline Leavitt) as simply ‘key personnel’ without much elaboration or distinction.

Now, the merely written org chart as reported might might well have nothing to do with reality, but there’s also little indication to say it isn’t either. And the invitation of flip-flops and wormtongues to stay ‘inside the house’ is a recurrent problem in any case.

To be fair, there is basically no body *but* flip-flops and wormtongues working inside the beltway to draw personnel from.

To be less fair, the presumption that you can only draw personnel from the existing politico class is normality bias.

jim says:

if “co campaign managers” then not “the” campaign manager.

There is a lot of cope going around that Trump is galaxy big brain playing 3D chess. In actual fact he is a galaxy big brain playing 3D chess with an opponent who is apt to kick over the chess table, pull out a gun, and shoot him. And just did shoot him.

On the one hand, he is a merchant, he wants to make a deal. He suffers from normality bias, he is old and set in his ways. On the other hand, the kick over the chess table and pull a gun stunt only works once.

jim says:

> Now, the merely written org chart as reported might might well have nothing to do with reality, but there’s also little indication to say it isn’t either.

There is no written org chart that shows that Chris Lacivita has any role in the campaign at all.

What we are seeing is the usual horde of swamp critters claiming to have influence. Maybe some of them do have influence. But no one actually knows.

And after the swamp tried to kill him, the influence of swamp critters may well have diminished considerably.

The claim was that Maga loyalists and alt right radicals are being purged. Vance seems like a Maga loyalist. He routinely says the glaringly obvious. Do a search on him. Up comes a hundred hit pieces saying how horrible he is for saying this true thing and that true thing.

Calvin says:

Problem with that is that Trump is really, really old even if he doesn’t always look it, and genuinely has a huge ego. Hard for such people to change their ways at such a late date.

Mister Grumpus says:

I’d appreciate a proper Jimmian Analysis of Cernovich sometime. He says a lot of right things, but there’s something just a little shifty going on too, and I don’t know where to go with that.

DH says:

“Grifters gonna grift” and “namefags gonna namefag” is all you really need to know.

There’s a certain type of alternative media personality who, not unlike mainstream media personalities, is at once in it to promote a worldview and to promote their brand. Vox Day is a prime example. These people can do good things and speak truthful words, but at the end of the day they are looking to sell you stuff, usually stuff that will funnel you to buy even more stuff. Another issue with namefags is that on many topics, such as those often discussed on this blog, they will hover around the issue and sorta-kinda direct you towards wrongthink, without however actually committing any serious wrongthink. Worse still, due to being namefags and lacking a solid ideological foundation, they are prone to attacking the left from the left, e.g. “Democrats are the real racists.” And another trademark is that these self-promoters never pioneer anything; all they ever say, somebody else said much earlier – and usually far more eloquently. Their good stuff is usually plagiarized, while their original stuff is laughable.

When a grifter is there on camera selling you magical powders and merchandise and whatever, he is not fighting for your cause, but for his pocket (charitably, you can say that he’s doing both, in that his viral marketing campaigns might bring about salutary results, although his heart is not in the right place), and is willing to tell you whatever it is you crave hearing in order to make you spend your money on him, like an OnlyFans whore. They see you as a paypig, and calibrate their signaling based on market research.

Handi says:

Since you brought Vox up, right this moment he is racking lines of crushed bluepill laced with Massachusetts feminyl to get the juices flowing for his next Neil Gaiman #Metoo post.

Here’s the accusation he boosted today (Vox didn’t write this but linked it as credible evidence):

Around the time Wallner’s marriage ended in 2017, which she said devastated her emotionally, Gaiman told her ex-husband that there was no more work for him on the property, which had provided the family’s main income. Wallner and her daughters were now dependent on Gaiman for work and housing. While she was in this situation, Wallner, then 55, said that Gaiman began pressuring her for sex.

Wallner said: “There were little hints of, ‘we’re going to need the house’. And I remember saying, let’s talk about it. Let’s figure it out. That’s when he would just come to my studio and make me give him a blowjob”. There is no suggestion of physical force, but rather of coercion in light of her housing and family situation. Wallner said: “And he can say it was consensual. But why would I do that? It was because I was scared of losing my place”, characterising Gaiman’s treatment of her as “sexual abuse.”

Gee, the verbose evasion of chronology in this story makes me really believe women. Every reader here can pick up on what these paragraphs are dancing around. And all the other tales depict the girls bravely realizing they were being raped after weeks to years of repeat encounters… I guess Mr. Gaiman must have had them all locked in his basement like Josef Fritzl!

Of all the wicked and contemptible things to attack, Gaiman is an adulterer, a philanderer, an atheist, a demon worshipper, a Jew, a redditor; and what angle does Vox go after? Female consent and being like totally unsexy to women. It’s unbelievable how effortlessly the programming activates when a man gets a chance to accuse his enemy.

i says:

Identifying as the Wolf in the more sordid original tale of Little Red riding hood where she is instructed to take off her clothes and jump into bed with the wolf before being eaten:
https://voxday.net/2024/07/29/the-media-wont-talk-about-gaiman/

Is quite an indication of evil.

Handi says:

That is indeed quite the indicator of evil, very much so. And yet Vox imputes this into evil as according to feminism rather than evil as according to God.

i says:

We are swimming generally in leftist memes including feminist ones. Even if we fight against it. If we are not careful it seeps in.

Now add to that the normal and healthy instinct of men with daughters to protect them against bad men. It’s understandable most definitely if you have daughters yourself.

i says:

Sigmagame.substack.com

Has more on Gaiman. In addition to relevant comments that are enabled there.
Looks worse and worse.

someDude says:

He seems obsessed with Neil Gaiman

Just let it go, Voxy

Pete says:

Since the Left uses female false accusations to destroy right wingers every day, it is correct and proper to use female false accusations to remove any enemy on the Left whenever possible. The Left made these rules and set the game board. Now they have to live by those rules.

And Vox will always go out of his way to punish sci-fi fantasy writers ever since they kicked him out of their little SFWA club.

jim says:

No. If you play by the enemy’s rules, the enemy wins and you lose. You can never succeed in using the enemy’s rules against the enemy. It is like “Dems are the real racists”

Pete says:

Is Gaiman winning then? To me it seems like his reputation will be tarnished forever due to this.

I would say that the female accusations against Bill Clinton likely tarnished Hillary to the point that she could no longer hold herself out as a champion for downtrodden women.

If the Right uses this weapon too, there are a couple of possible good outcomes:

A) Falsely screaming rape gets so overused that everyone just rolls their eyes and changes the channel as soon as they hear it. This reduces the rape charge as a slam-dunk method for getting any right-winger out of office. Benefit to the Right.

B) The Left finally “gets it” that this isn’t something they should be doing, so they stop. Unlikely, I know. Benefit to the Right.

C) Some lefties get tarnished or forced out of office, i.e. Al Franken or Cuomo. Benefit to the Right.

The weapon is lying on the ground. If the Right doesn’t pick it up, the Left just gets to use it unopposed.

The Cominator says:

The risk of using a weapon of lies is that your own side ends up buying into the lie sincerely… so it should be used VERY selectively. Al Franken (a high ranking leftist of the most loathsome kind) was worth targeting with this… Gaiman is not.

DH says:

Cominator is right. Pointing out the left’s hypocrisy should be aimed at redpilling the normies about the left, not at implementing the left. Otherwise you end up pretty fast with “Democrats are the real racists” and “heterosexuals are the real pedophiles.”

Leftism is a shriek from the blackest, innermost parts of Gehenna. You can’t use that weapon without being corrupted by that weapon and becoming what you hate.

The Cominator says:

There are times when using the weapons of darkness are of benefit, getting rid of Al Franken was worth it but they should be used very seldom as calling on the dark side with any regularity will corrupt its wielder… you stare into the abyss the abyss stares back at you.

i says:

A new post at Substack. Of what give women the “creep vibes” that is the disconnect between what the man tells you and his micro expressions that indicate his other intentions:
https://sigmagame.substack.com/p/creepometer

It’s specifically men who come at women in an effeminate way that set off this alarm. Rather than those who come at a more masculine way.

jim says:

Vox is an idiot.

He is taking what women say about their feelings at face value. Women know this stuff less than anyone around them. They have no insight into their own behavior, and remarkably little awareness of their own behavior.

Cloudswrest says:

Wallner, then 55, said that Gaiman began pressuring her for sex.

Doesn’t every dude hit on 55 year old women? The most common term I hear regarding them is “invisible”.

The Cominator says:

LOL what bullshit. Women love guys who have absolute scoundrel intentions. If women hated guys who wanted to get them pregnant and abandon them the Phillipines Thailand and parts of South America would be more feminist than Iceland by now but in fact after generations of foreign whoremongers leaving local prostitutes (and some just poor slum girls who spread it for higher status foreigners) pregnant not only has there not arisen any spontaneous feminist movement in such places but local women have not in generations shown any inclinations to change their behavior.

jim says:

> Women love guys who have absolute scoundrel intentions

Preselection is you provide proof of being an absolute scoundrel. Preferably a dangerous scoundrel who might well harm her.

Because women never get sexual choice except during times of genocide and social collapse, their sexual instincts, to the extent that they are adaptive at all, are adaptive to an environment of social collapse, where fathers sticking around is improbable.

We are descended almost entirely from women who were absolutely property, because peoples, faiths, nations, Kingdoms, and empires who emancipated their women all disappeared. Thus natural selection has not had much effect on female sexual instincts since the time when we looked very like apes, and to the extent it has had effect, it has had effect when the woman’s native tribe was being exterminated.

The Cominator says:

Why does he keep on with this leftists are the real sexist crap… Democrats are the real racists at least actually does have some basis in reality.

DH says:

Why does he keep on with this leftists are the real sexist crap…

He may be a talented fantasy writer (as Hesiod says below), but he is not an ideologue. Or rather, his ideology is part reactionary, part tradconism, and part trooferism, (and 100% grifterism,) and he mixes and jungles their respective ideas as he sees fit.

Tradcons usually advocate for yesteryear’s leftism over current year leftism, and as Chesterton famously said:

The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of Conservatives is to prevent mistakes from being corrected. Even when the revolutionist might himself repent of his revolution, the traditionalist is already defending it as part of his tradition. Thus we have two great types — the advanced person who rushes us into ruin, and the retrospective person who admires the ruins. He admires them especially by moonlight, not to say moonshine. Each new blunder of the progressive or prig becomes instantly a legend of immemorial antiquity for the snob. This is called the balance, or mutual check, in our Constitution.

Tradcons often seek to implement leftism more vigorously (or “consistently”) than the leftists themselves.

Seems that these days Vox wakes up on the tradcon side of the bed.

i says:

Can women be witnesses in your opinion?

jim says:

Female witness cannot be treated the same way one treats male witness.

alf says:

He may be a talented fantasy writer (as Hesiod says below), but he is not an ideologue. Or rather, his ideology is part reactionary, part tradconism, and part trooferism, (and 100% grifterism,) and he mixes and jungles their respective ideas as he sees fit.

This seems about as accurate as it gets. Vox is unintentionally funny, a walking meme who is not exactly the kind of meme he thinks he is. He has undeniable talents in certain areas, but truth seeking is not prominent among them.

Fidelis says:

54th clause of the Magna Carta (h.t. covfefeanon)

No man is to be arrested or imprisoned on account of a woman’s appeal for the death of anyone other than her own husband.

The Cominator says:

But why the fuck does he keep doubling down on this leftists are the real sexist crap, not even cuckservatives really even pay lip service to that kind of crap anymore but yet he keeps doubling down on it. At this point given that almost everyone on the right is on board with something like at least rolling women’s rights back before they could scream sexual harassment if we achieve the power to do so… he keeps up this right wing feminism shit. Its got to be hurting his grifting at this point. I guess insanity runs in his family, his father was a rich successful guy too until he retardedly and loudly proclaimed he was a sovereign citizen and didn’t have to pay income taxes anymore (rather than you know quietly setting things up to avoid taxation like most rich people).

He is the Gamma.

alf says:

He is the Gamma.

Yes, one of the funniest ways to look at the Vox Day meme is the realization that he is the word he invented and rails against the most.

The Cominator says:

Re I do remember that Jim did not think much of Florence Nightingale but given that I read what she wrote about other women I wonder why… she seems to agree with the Jimian view on women completely.

And (relating to the topic of women as witnesses) she basically said that women cannot state facts accurately to one another because they don’t actually care about facts, they also don’t actually really give a shit about other people only their own emotions (not yours only their own) and that women were useless for anything but rote or closely supervised work because they won’t learn anything on their own whereas men will. She said she would never have a woman as secretary for her medical department because they didn’t bother to study the army almanacs so they would even know who to write to asking for supplies and stuff to horseguards…

DH says:

But why the fuck does he keep doubling down on this leftists are the real sexist crap

Attacking the left from the left is quite easy, and unprincipled e-celebs just can’t resist the temptation to do so. “If only we make leftists implement their own leftism, that will teach them!” That could make sense from an accelerationist point of view, but Vox is not an accelerationist – he is an idiot.

Cloudswrest says:

When a grifter is there on camera selling you magical powders and merchandise and whatever, he is not fighting for your cause, but for his pocket

Murdoch Murdoch has the absolutely best parody of this ever.

Skip ahead and start at around time 4:35.

https://murdochmurdoch.net/murdoch/the-alt-light-strikes-back/

Hesiod says:

While he is no Chuck Tingle in regard to being muse-gifted, Vox Day’s Selenoth novels and associated stories prove his writing cred. He takes stock fantasy tropes and breathes life into them through character development. Perhaps his work would be unremarkable 50 years ago, but these days it’s an oasis of old-school delight.

Oh yeah, and Lodi is best dwarf.

DH says:

The Thermidorian faction is now considering doing a soft and limited U-turn on trannies. The boxing match at the Paris Olympics between the Italian chick and the Algerian mutant gives them a convenient opportunity to decelerate on trannyism. That has always been the lowest of low hanging fruit, so I’m not surprised at all and not excited at all.

Need stronger sauce, Thermidor.

Anonymous Fake says:

One of the easiest shill tests is to notice [*deleted*]

jim says:

shills are fond of purity tests that they can pass, but real people do not even bother to pass.

Anonymous Fake says:

[*deleted*] Outrage bait about women’s boxing [*deleted*]

jim says:

That it is a killer meme, that it is a meme that works great for us, is because it makes viscerally obvious the fact that women and men are not interchangeable, that treating women and men as equal, equivalent, and interchangeable is evil, hateful, vile, disgusting, malevolent, and perverse.

People’s visceral reaction, their gut reaction, is a reaction to the untruth that men and women were created equal.

Women’s sports should be stuff like skating, gymnastics, and so forth — stuff that women can do better than men, or at least nearly as well as men. And they should not have to compete against men, nor be allowed to compete against men.

Everyone pushing the Olympic meme may be ostensibly saying “no trannies”, they may think they are saying “no trannies”, but what they are really saying is “no equality”. They don’t say the thought crime out loud because it goes without saying.

Women should no more be competing with men in boxing, than men should be competing with women in making babies.

The Cominator says:

https://x.com/EmeraldRobinson
Now I know this is a woman and women are prone to hysteria but I’m inclined to trust her based on past experience of the RNC being feckless and incompetent (at best) at preventing fraud. She is saying the RNC’s anti fraud effort in reality is doing nothing…

The Cominator says:

My solution to this would be to just give Stephen Miller absolute authority over the RNC and campaign staffing, budget everything else. Stephen Miller may be a Jew but he has a perfect record of actually being loyal and by all accounts he likes doing the kind of administrative work that Trump himself cannot stand and he knows what he is doing. Trump’s family members mean well but have no idea what the fuck they are doing.

Adam says:

I mean the fraud is state sponsored so I don’t know how anyone thinks the RNC can stop it. And everyone knows Trump wins a fair election in a landslide. If the RNC thinks voting will determine the results of the election they are clueless.

This will be a coup one way or the other.

Adam says:

Additionally if I was Trump I would be signaling hard and fast that anything other than a Trump victory means holy war and bloodshed. Musk owns twitter so surely that platform can be used to organize violence for the right.

The Cominator says:

Just look at the broad the RNC put in charge of election integrity, looks like she’d be far happier if her days were spent getting sauced in a brothel between seeing clients than doing the boring work of putting together election integrity teams everywhere… GODDAMNIT TRUMP PUT STEPHEN MILLER IN CHARGE OF THIS SHIT!!!

The Cominator says:

“How do you stop fraud”
Lawyers guns and money. Prevent the fake votes from being delivered, intercept them and burn them. Bribe the Shaniquas… prevent your own election observers from being thrown out.

All of this can limit their fake votes to far more traditional %s.

The Cominator says:

https://x.com/ChristinaNortn
This is the RNC’s election integrity director…

jim says:

Do a search for RNC election integrity.

The RNC is doing something right. They have the democrats and the press (but I repeat myself) worried.

The Cominator says:

They are filing lawsuits which is better than what they used to do but I’m inclined to believe they have no election integrity ground game because election integrity ground game would look a lot like a paramilitary organization. Stephen Miller (the Jew who looks a lot like Goebbels) would be a good guy to build something like that… this woman who is a lawyer primarily because daddy would hate her if she did what she really wanted and went to a brothel… she ain’t it.

And Trump should have learned by now that the courts really ain’t gonna help him.

Hesiod says:

Harkening back to your prior VA observations, Bob Good was ousted in the recount against Trump-backed McGuire. Bit of a defenestration of the old guard, that.

Mayflower Sperg says:

Fact: The end of Trump is the end of American support for Israel. The Harris administration is divided on the Israel question, and its ongoing ruination of American industry means that whatever dollars it does send won’t buy much; at some point inflation becomes hyperinflation.

Left-wing Jews are fine with this because they want all superior races, including themselves, wiped out in the name of equality. Right-wing Jews disagree. Perhaps the Mossad will identify the election-stealers, who didn’t do a great job of concealing themselves the last time around, and start eliminating them in especially gruesome ways.

Andrew Anglin would rather the USA turn into Haiti than be saved by any kind of Jew. Does being ruled by Mossad death squads count as a win?

jim says:

> The end of Trump is the end of American support for Israel. The Harris administration is divided on the Israel question, and its ongoing ruination of American industry means that whatever dollars it does send won’t buy much; at some point inflation becomes hyperinflation.

> Left-wing Jews are fine with this because they want all superior races, including themselves, wiped out in the name of equality. Right-wing Jews disagree.

You are attributing rational objectives to demon worshippers. As you said, left wing Jews want all higher races wiped out including themselves. But a whole lot of right wing Jews want all higher races wiped out except themselves.

Obviously Maga Jews want a strong America to protect Israel — but not all right wing Jews are Maga Jews. Plenty of right wing Jewish demon worship.

The Cominator says:

The Richard Perle types who are somewhat right wing but also very evil are rare outside beltway neocon think tanks. Left wing jews are deludedly evil like leftists (though somewhat easier to discuss their insane belief system than non jew leftists without getting shut down immediately, jews usually genuinely enjoy arguing though converting them is still almost impossible that takes suffering at the hands of their fellow leftists) but right wing jews (a small minority) tend to be okay.

jim says:

> right wing jews (a small minority) tend to be okay.

Not all of them: https://x.com/Megatron_ron/status/1817998449389801502

Adam says:

If victory is our goal, if every option is available to us, they all just have to go. At the very least so our sons and grandsons do not have to learn these lessons.

The Cominator says:

My view is that in victory ALL leftists (which will include the vast majority of jews) have to go but jews are subjected to a byzantine system and minorities generally subject to a millet system. TKD is a copout of total leftist death.

Cloudswrest says:

It’s hilarious watching the intense wokeness on display at the Paris Olympics.

First, the IOC is defending the tranny boxers. They’re proffering all these bullshit reasons “why they are women” rather than actual chromosomal evidence which would settle the issue. They’re claiming the Russian evidence is disqualified because it’s “not published”. Reading between the lines, it’s probably not published to protect the individuals privacy.

In Olympic boxing competitions, an athlete’s gender is determined by his or her passport, the IOC statement said. All the women participating in the boxing tournament have passports that indicate they are female, an IOC spokesperson said Tuesday.

Then I read, it is a “Vegan Olympics” and the athletes are very unhappy with this and are having meat and eggs shipped in from external sources rather than rely on the catered food.

DH says:

Naturally male sports are an imitation of battles and fights and a demonstration of physical power and dominance, while naturally female sports (assuming there is such a thing) are more about the beautiful performance – making an attractive show for the audience. Oy vey goyim, it’s objectification! Lesbians can fume all they want about the Penis Olympics, but I say that every sport in which trannies have a natural advantage over real women is a sport in which real women shouldn’t participate in the first place. That’s a good litmus test: if a tranny can do it better than women, then women shouldn’t be doing it, because it’s a male endeavor. Making the Olympics sexually egalitarian — having all competitions for both men and women — is itself pozzed. Normal people aren’t interested in watching women fight or mock-fight each other, just as normal people aren’t interested in watching men dancing and spinning like faggots. Most sports should be male-only, while a few can be female-only, with no overlap between the two.

The liberal solution is “Let’s have intersex competitions for those not clearly male or female.” Insanity intensifies. No, let’s not do that. Instead, let’s stop pretending like we give a flying f**k about a yawn-inducing boring-to-death I’m-falling-asleep niche (female sports in which women fight like men) that only dykes and feminists and simp cucks care about or pretend to care about. My life will be just as pleasant as it currently is, if not more so, if I never ever have to hear about “female sports” ever again in my entire life. Forcing normal people to pretend that they care about female soccer, female boxing, female judo, etc., is itself a satanic encroachment on good taste and a waste of everyone’s time.

The Cominator says:

Eh as much as I like to dab on women I wouldn’t deny them every sport but ballet or something. Of the top 3 chicks I’ve known in my life two of them played ice hockey at some point.. girls with tomboyish hobbies aren’t always bad chicks. Now should women stay away from boxing and mma (even if it sometimes entertaining because chick boxers more then men had a bad tendency to go into slugfest rather than trying to dodge) sure.

DH says:

I didn’t say ban women from sports (though that’s not the worst idea), but if the Olympics are to pay respect to Western Civilization and its original traditions — and really, pay respect to GNON and to His aesthetics — rather than defile their name and memory, then most female sports in the Olympics gotta go.

jim says:

Obviously figure skating and gymnastics should be female, boxing, shotput, and weight lifting should be male — just about every sport should be male, chicks generally do not do sports, it is artificial. Tennis maybe should have male events and female events, but most sports should be exclusively male or exclusively female.

Cloudswrest says:

Just like men don’t race against horses, women shouldn’t compete with men. There are a variety of non-contact sports where it is pleasant to watch women. I would include both swimming and sprinting. Here is Michelle Jenneke in Barcelona doing her warmup dance.

https://youtu.be/LdexkdpkIgk?si=TFMtH3eqy7AX52OR

alf says:

Nothing wrong with cute girl being cute, but once she starts running I lose interest.

Banning women doing sports in which men would kick their asses seems fine, but not doing that works too. It’s the forced subsidies that need stopping the most.

Cloudswrest says:

but once she starts running I lose interest.

That’s probably ’cause you wouldn’t be able to catch her.

alf says:

haha got me

Mike in Boston says:

chicks generally do not do sports, it is artificial.

Maybe women’s participation in many sports is on average more artificial than mens’, but I am sure it depends on the sport (girls’ football? Give me a break!) and the individual woman.

Teenage female relative of mine genuinely loves tennis and running, and until she took them up she was getting plump. She is no doubt much healthier now with a more athletic body shape.

Much of our modern post-agrarian world is artificial in some sense. To whatever extent girls’ sports may be artificial, at least they are a demonstrably beneficial artifice.

Hesiod says:

Multiple sources are reporting Muslim gangs in England are now attacking native protestors while state minions stand back, much like the attacks in France during the recent “election” and in the US during the summer of St. George of the Fentanyl. This, of course, comes after the MSM ran pictures of the black murderer when he was 11 years old instead of now being almost 18, and politicians galore harrumphed on cue over the awfulness of native whites’ violent intolerance.

Waiting now for more details. The MSM spin should be breathtaking in its inversion.

Contaminated NEET says:

The protests by native Britons are heartening, but I have to get a blackpill on record:

The response is going to be a bigger, badder, more totalitarian version of what they did to the J6ers. Thousands of people are are going to imprisoned for for years for petty, rarely-enforced public order offenses.

The system cannot tolerate this, and the protestors are too normalcy-biased (and probably too weak and too few) to actually overthrow it, so the only possible outcome is brutal repression.

British Chen Sheng: What’s the penalty for racist rioting?

British Wu Guang: Ten years in the slammer and permanent unemployability.

British Chen Sheng: Oh. O-OK. 🙁

Hesiod says:

Globohomo rentboy Starmer promises the beatings will continue until morale improves:

https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1820122739040047552

Contaminated NEET says:

In the short- to medium- term, Starmer is holding all the cards. This unrest is going to provoke a wave of oppression like nothing anyone’s seen in decades. People will be jailed for mild anti-immigration comments, pro-active online censorship is going to go into overdrive, debanking by algorithm is a real possibility, and immigration is going to go through the roof.

In the long-term, it’s hard to say. This could be the beginning of something great, or it could be the last gasp of the White British peoples.

DH says:

One advantage Americans have over Europeans, especially Britons, is that they’re armed. If tomorrow (or after Kamala steals the election) Satan whispers in Obongo’s elephantine ear that the time is ripe for Planet of the Apes, his genocidal forces will be met with armed resistance – red blooded white Christian Americans are no suckers, and they won’t go like lambs to the slaughter. Americans, at least, will shoot back.

Contaminated NEET says:

Red blooded White Christian Americans are the biggest suckers on the planet, and they will definitely go like lambs to the slaughter, provided the slaughter is nice and gradual, and it’s supported and downplayed by the mass media. Hell, half of them will be on the side of their own slaughterers, hypnotized by tales of “domestic terrorists” and “White supreeeemists.” Now, the Left seems to be forcing things along too quickly, which may or may not provoke a response they can’t manage. 150 years of uninterrupted victories have made them sloppy, impatient, and arrogant. We’ll see what happens.

All that said, I agree that guns are good, and the armed populace makes things trickier for the enemy in America than in Britain.

jim says:

> Red blooded White Christian Americans are the biggest suckers on the planet, and they will definitely go like lambs to the slaughter, provided the slaughter is nice and gradual, and it’s supported and downplayed by the mass media.

No one is reading the mass media any more.

Red Blooded White Christian Americans are not going to go to war without a leader, but if summoned by a leader, they will come. God has appointed Trump King. If, as is probable, the election gets stolen again, even more crudely and clumsily than 2020 and 2022, will Trump perform the job that God has given him?

If he does, he will win.

jim says:

As JD Vance said a week or two ago, Britain will very shortly be the first radical Islamist country with nuclear weapons.

Diversity plus proximity equals war. Starmer is cracking down on those who would keep him alive, in favor of those who are going to kill him.

What we are seeing is JD Vance’s prediction coming true. When Muslims are a certain proportion of the population, civil war ensues. Britain has now reached that proportion. If Christians are a majority, they can quell that war, but only be means that credibly threaten genocide, and frequently make a good start on genocide. The restoration of peace in Britain requires one side or the other side to decisively win the war, and to dramatically demonstrate that restarting it is a really bad idea. One sect must conquer and crush the other.

someDude says:

Vance seems to have forgotten Pakistan. Ofcourse the Chinese control those, but i doubt Vance was thinking along those lines

skippy says:

Vance’s statement struck me as remarkably dumb. Political Islam has next to no influence in UK politics or in the UK’s institutions. A Conservative Party (just about) led by a Hindu Indian with deep family connections to the Indian state opposes a governing Labour Party run by a Zionist with a Jewish wife who is raising his children as Jewish. While often used as a rag to wave in front of the British people, Muslims have no stake whatsoever in the government, they are still a small minority (a minority even of brown people) and are nowhere close to overpowering the state.

Vance’s comment sounded like something you would read on a blog fifteen or twenty years ago. The idea that we are locked in a conflict between European culture or “white people” (Islam is an egalitarian trans-racial political ideology similar in many respects to international communism) and Islam has since vanished in favor of the clearer perception that European culture and white people are opposed by their own governments with Muslims serving as both a distraction fake-enemy and enforcement agents of that government.

The protests and riots in Britain were sparked by the killing of children by a mystery brown/black person who, as far as I can tell, has no religious affiliation, and no ancestral connection to the British Empire or the English-speaking world (unlike most British muslims). The protesters initially targeted a Mosque, but then realized their error, and instead burned down a station of the Diversity Police. It now appears to be the state trying to redirect them from GAE enforcement offices back onto mosques, activating state-organized “muslim” militias to try to force them to do so.

Fidelis says:

I read it as meat for the ziocons. We need to unite and restore order so that we can eventually take on Iran. Easy emtpy rhetoric that hypes up the midwit base mad at being swarmed in their own countries, and signals to his plausible power base that he’s aligned and very pro semitic.

To reinforce your point re: muslims have no real power, I remember clearly the muslims losing out when protesting the public schools teaching anal sex to 9 year olds.

jim says:

> I remember clearly the muslims losing out when protesting the public schools teaching anal sex to 9 year olds.

What Muslims can do is kill whites and Christians and destroy Christian places of worship and get a slap on the wrist. This is because they are being used by the left as shock troops against whites and Christians, because faggots and suchlike are rather useless.

However, as the left ramps up the violence against whites and Christians, they need to import more Muslims, who make notoriously unpredictable and unreliable allies. As the number of Muslims increases, they are likely to start murdering people they are not supposed to be murdering.

The left wants to kill everyone and destroy everything, so will inevitably bring in more Muslims than they can control.

skippy says:

Organized subcontinental muslim communities are likely to have exactly the same outlook on random black knife maniacs as right wing white people. While muslims are a potential long term problem, the conflict between them today is fake. What is new in this situation is that the rioters attacked a police station, a fact that the state does not want to get out (they retroactively declared that it was first a mosque, and then a citizens information office). The IRA and the UVF are now joining hands against immigration, and the state would rather not have the EDL and the local Imam join hands against (new) immigration.

The Cominator says:

Faggots are capable of violence, the early Nazi party was literally mostly faggots. The problem is the modern lefts kind of faggots are useless the old left and the Nazis had more like BAP kind of faggots (and I mean before he supposedly cured himself of the perversion by forcing himself to frequently make use of prostitutes which he could afford easily due to the massive success of his book).

Oscar C. says:

So predictable. It all harks back to the Counter-Jihad movement, Gates of Vienna blog, Mark Steyn, Robert Spencer types. After 9/11 they had tremendous echo in the Anglosphere.

“National-conservatives” like Vance are probably only going to have that type of reference, which dovetails nicely with their pro-Israel stance.

The thing is, in the current year of 2024 such discourse is simply passé. The high water mark of Islamic terrorism seems to be over and you are left with “diversity” pure and simple as the problem. which will be increasingly difficult to mask.

There are is no Islam in South Africa is it?

Anon says:

My reading similer to you , i think this whole thing is psyop
They are trying to have a homegrown” azov ” to use in wwiii.

Contaminated NEET says:

That’s an interesting theory, and it makes a certain amount of sense, but it’s too risky and too complicated. It’s a weird triple bank shot that might deliver a modest payoff if it succeeds but risks everything if it gets out of hand.

The Cominator says:

Doubtful the average White Brit has been more abused by the regime in England than the average American and has for a long time as the government has universally criminalized fighting back against criminals (and the laws against fighting back against criminals is actually enforced). So I imagine the average Brit of the soccer hooligan/chav class is at this point very very very angry. The problem is they have struck Leviathan in anger but there is no plan in place to kill Leviathan and if they don’t kill Leviathan they will end up like the January 6ers.

The rioters need to refuse to disburse under any circumstances, to organize a central authority, the central authority needs to declare itself the legitimate government, and then they need to storm whitehall.

The Cominator says:

And I agree there is almost no chance that they do this… but that is the basic steps that killing Leviathan would require.

Hesiod says:

Met police commissioner breaks the microphone of reporter who asks if he will end the two-tier policing:

https://x.com/DaveAtherton20/status/1820416690590511465

The Cominator says:

The problem with the British riots is they are striking Leviathan but not to kill…

As Americans on the far right are aware (and especially since January 6th where some people thought there was a chance to kill Leviathan) the problem is that if you strike Leviathan you must kill it, or you are going to hang. Leftist riots are not striking Leviathan they are Leviathan hitting itself so it will swim left faster. If the British rioters want to succeed they need to very quickly develop a great level of organization, they must proclaim an alternative government, and then they must take London and Whitehall and get rid of the people at the head of the current government and hope the military either doesn’t want to do shit or wants to defect.

Those are the essential steps to killing Leviathan (it still may not work because maybe the people aronund Biden send in US troops in support of the current government) and unless you are prepared to do them you should not strike Leviathan.

skippy says:

“The problem with the British riots is they are striking Leviathan but not to kill…”

They still think it is/ought to be on their side but hitting the police station is an indication they are starting to realize the truth. Govt attacking them with Muslim mobs is an attempt to push them back into the frame of British vs Muslims with government as umpire.

https://static.independent.co.uk/2024/08/02/23/Screenshot-2024-08-02-at-22.57.05.jpg

Hesiod says:

The paynims’ mosques are proving to be quite effective armories. Saw footage of a Paki pig directing his people to rally there for weapons and organization.

If my native US state is my fatherland, England is my grandfatherland. English lit and history was my focus in college, and I cherish its centuries of culture as my own. Therefore, I earnestly pray for my remote cousins that these hard times, which will get more brutal, forge them into the hard men necessary to retake their patrimony. In the name of God and St. Michael and St. George, get thee a true king, English!

Contaminated NEET says:

Yes. The GAE is now going to grind the British Right into a fine paste. They have no choice. Replacement migration is far too big, and far too explosive an issue, in far too many countries, to let the lid off the pot even the slightest bit. The plus side is that they might just fail to crack down hard enough, and if they do, this is the beginning of the end for them. Realistically, though, this will mean the end of legal political opposition in the UK, and maybe throughout the Western world.

Calvin says:

Their tools for an actual crackdown are fat, dumpy women and faggots with no guns.

jim says:

Resistance to the crackdown is likely to succeed. But organised violence beats unorganised violence. Time for a King.

Calvin says:

Very much agreed. The only force likely to actually fight the nationalists in a prolonged capacity are the muslims, but it won’t be for Starmer. Or, at least, not for long.

Hesiod says:

Don’t forget the midgets, errr, I mean wee folk:

https://x.com/stillgray/status/1820206333284508114

jim says:

> The GAE is now going to grind the British Right into a fine paste. They have no choice.

Indeed they have no choice. Because the shape of hot fast white genocide now takes shape. But success may well prove difficult. No nation with a gay parade has won a war.

Starmer has realised the police will not suffice, and has called for an army, and implicitly called for martial law and Ukrainian style terror. Today in the Ukraine, terror is hitting its limits.

Anon says:

“has called for an army“
I watched his speech, I was amazed that he has the balls and the testosterone level to actually say these words.

The thing is Britain doesn’t have fighting men, this “army” if every materialized will be bunch of cat ladies. Most likely they either (like France in the Olympic ) import fighting men from other part of GAE or paramilitary from the “asian gangs” . I am betting on the first.

Gedeon says:

Starmer musters the cuck militia.

Jehu says:

I don’t think the US has the capacity currently to bail out the UK. Can’t in Afghanistan, can’t win the Ukraine, and I rather doubt they can win in the UK.

It remains to be seen what’s going to happen in the UK. It’s kind of a Special Olympics really. The UK probably can’t put more than a division or two on the ground at best but the rioters don’t have much either. But hey, I root for some of my coethnics against GAE.

The Cominator says:

BTW how mindbroken do you think the average western guy is after decades of feminism and economic contraction… I’m curious because I actually posted a good news thread on 4chan (anons you can leave your houses again its incredible how nice women are suddenly being again for whatever reason… and I made it clear no they aren’t generally trying to scam you into covering their bar tab) and its just all pure negativity. I’m a bit demoralized myself (and a bit is understating it) but god a lot of people just have to be so much worse to take the news negatively that you can actually meet nice women if you go out in public again the way it was in the before time suddenly…

DH says:

Just as doomer blackpilling is unwarranted, so is premature whitepilling. You are noticing a return of 1990s or early 2000s vibes, or maybe you are imagining that this is what you notice. But the challenge is to restore a long-lost social technology that by the 1990s had been totally obliterated in the West. In other words: If you don’t do White Sharia, then your second best option is to practice actual Sharia.

The future belongs to those who show up. If you solve the WP, and not solve any other problem, there is still a chance you will survive. But if you solve all the problems, except for the WP, you will inevitably perish. You need to be willing and able to be “not nice” to women (and to have the backing of state, church, and mannerbund in doing so); patriarchy and coverture are no luxuries, but preconditions for a restoration. And it’s true for Russia and China as much as it’s true for the Occident.

If you see a clear path towards White Sharia, you have justification to whitepill. If you don’t see such a path, then you will drown and nobody will save you.

The Cominator says:

Yeah I know this isn’t a real Jimian victory on the woman question or close to it but it seems like the 3rd wave feminist female chimpout just kind of mostly disappeared like that and it was right when the Hawk Tuah meme (not saying its because of that but I’d mark it right at that time) got popular.

jim says:

Being married, not well placed to observe this change, if the change is indeed in the world rather than in yourself.

It could be that being marinated in red pill memes, and gaining experience due to your romantic relationship with a whore, you just improved with chicks, improvement led to confidence, confidence led to further improvement.

Also when you are young, it is hard to interact with people across a large IQ gap. With time and practice, you get better at it.

It could also be that the change is indeed in the world, rather than yourself. That women were unpleasant when they were deemed inherently superior to men, but now that they are deemed inherently inferior to sodomites, they have improved. The spectacle of a female athlete getting the stuffing beaten out of her by a man in drag is a corrective to all those movies a where a chick takes out a dozen mooks with one flying kick.

The Cominator says:

No absolutely external change… I am neither better looking nor more socially adept and certainly not more confident as the past few years have been rather depressing. Started before the boxing thing… as a sperg and mere high midwit my ability to interact with normies long ago plateaud.. I certainly cannot do your method as larping as some sort of dangerous criminal type you need to be socially adept for that in the best of cases in Florida nightlife (where BTW almost everyone is mostly pretty polite for the same reason even niggers and bikers) I’d be dead or in jail almost immediately. I swear to God and Gnon it’s like a switch got flipped and women are way nicer and more sociable…

The benefit of whores with normie women is mainly in inner game as you always know when you get that 3 month dry spell crazy feeling if it comes to that you can fuck something, hence you lose fear of rejection. But in the 2015 to right up until now time (worse after 2020) that was no help as unless you had instant marks of high status or criminality women basically didn’t want to talk to you at all and were kind of not out so much in public spaces after the covid bullshit at all. Something has changed…

Adam says:

You should try find a girl from a poor country that only speaks a little English and is insecure. Should not be hard given your location. The fact that you are middle class and white will be all the status you need. The communication barrier will work well in your favor. Your analytical skills will engage instead of your own communication insecurities. You will not be nervous about what you say when you know she can’t understand most of it anyway.

Adam says:

I will say although I have not had good luck with 30 something girls in the last few years, the girls I match with on tinder and hinge have been younger and prettier over the last few months. Early to mid 20s is totally doable if your in your mid 40s. Not easy but persistence pays and you only have to find one.

Varna says:

When bachelor 3 years ago, had luck only with 30+ women. In the sense of instant chemistry and let’s go bang an hour later.

To the younger ones was pretty much invisible, then became visible again to schoolgirl teenagers, but of course steered clear.

The 15 year olds ogled me and gave me aggressively pointed looks, the 30+ ogled me and initiated stuff, the ones in between looked right through me. I wasn’t there.

Neurotoxin says:

I’ve only checked out 4chan rarely, but my impression is that they’re not mean/median/mode people.

Neurotoxin says:

mean-median-mode

Dave says:

Trump claims the Mandate of Heaven: https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1819862235017097227

jim says:

God saved Trump and appointed him King. The election should merely be a coronation. Should the democrats attempt to interfere with that coronation by expelling republican scrutineers again and magically materializing a hundred million votes at three in the morning, he should deal with that in a Kingly manner.

Mister Grumpus says:

Off Topic. They should sell MP3’s of Chads alpha-banging Stacys. Not so much for entertainment as for education. I’ve been put through a couple recent IRL such renditions thanks to an unowned neighbor chick, and it’s changed my understanding of life itself, I positively shit you not. I’ve never done that, imagined that, wanted that or even fantasized that.

One thing it teaches, and fast, is that it is simply dumb, impractical and unreasonable to EVER expect women to NOT choose that when on offer, no matter WHAT words are used to “explain” long-term consequences or whatthefuckever. No. If it’s on offer, and there’s no punishment, then they’re taking General Butt Naked into their guts in a red hot second. It won’t even be a “decision”. It’ll be like a dog smelling bacon.

You want civilization? OK, then you gotta physically control these hoes from like 10-11 on. Before, I didn’t disagree, but I understood it as a logical conclusion from the past. But now it’s as blatantly obvious to me as a fart in an elevator.

Neurotoxin says:

Curious as to whether you observed that guy or you were that guy. (If you don’t want to say, no problem.)

The Cominator says:

To add to NT this sounds a bit cryptic what happened with unowned neighbor Stacy. If this is recent it would also play into my observations of women being A LOT more friendly and sociable (and therefore bangable) very recently than they have been in the sort of post metoo era when for a long time most women were just auto rejecting almost every guy (not even friend zone or orbiter treatment just like quick auto rejection or I can’t hear you treatment).

Mister Grumpus says:

Unowned neighbor chick is not getting pounded to 11 by me, but by some other guy, who seems to come over most Sunday afternoons, do that, and then disappear for another week. Presumably after raking most of the cash out of her purse and eating all her Captain Crunch. Again.

But have some Skittles, bitch.

Mine ears have heard wonders beyond your imagination.

The Cominator says:

So unowned woman calls up guy occasionally when she is horny and hormonally craving a real fucking from a man (as opposed to being content with a toy)… many such cases. What is extraordinary about this one…

Mister Grumpus says:

“Instinctively you give to me /
The love that I need. /
I cherish the moments with you. /
Respectfully I say to thee /
I’m aware that you’re cheating. /
But no one makes me feel like you do.”

–Diana Ross

And there you have it. I’m amazed by how honest art was, like just yesterday.

DH says:

Wait till you discover that songs about candies are not, in fact, about literal candies.

DH says:

Moreover, most songs about dancing are not, in fact, about literal dancing.

The whole thing is about sex. The whole thing.

Then again, usually the writers are men, not women, so you can’t rely on popular songs to accurately gauge the nature of female sexuality.

Neurotoxin says:

Presumably after raking most of the cash out of her purse and eating all her Captain Crunch. Again.

Lol.

anonymous mouse says:

I seriously cannot believe you actually posted this… I didn’t expect there to be a Mister Grumpus cuck fantasy arc

Mister Grumpus says:

It’s the end of the world so fuck it.

Despite all head knowledge and much to my detriment, reflexive and unconscious Chad Denialism runs strong in me, evidently, clanging around basement floors I still barely know exist. Knowing the truth and experiencing the truth are very different things.

Aidan says:

Needless to say, if you are the guy giving girls the demonic railing, your opinions of women are not going to be much higher

Mister Grumpus says:

Off Topic again. I’m genuinely puzzled why my Twitter and YouTube feeds aren’t chock full of people discussing, advocating and predicting Bitcoin as the “real” BRICS and Petro currency.

We’ve got gold mumbo-jumbo, and weird “flavored Yuan” mumbo-jumbo, and BRICS and Shanghai meetings to discuss to agree to discuss to plan for agreements to negotiate for strategies, etc.

Give me a fucking break. We’re on the brink of nuclear war and have a rape gang in every McDonalds, but Bitcoin as the next international trade currency, THAT’S too naughty and risqe for edgy namefags to rap with each other about on a livestream? I don’t get it.

jim says:
Anon says:

Nice ,
This may sound dump but what the Rho in Rhocoin mean? I know the coin but Rho part.
Also what is the programming language you are implementing it with.

jim says:

C++ and C.

rho has the convenience that it looks vaguely like a currency symbol, exists in unicode, and pretty much everyone’s installed fonts can render it.

Some people sold me on rust-tokio, and the entire crypto world is going rust, and a lot of good crypto libraries are only available in rust, but nghttp3 and lsquic are C api.

Fidelis says:

Is it QUIC or HTTP/3 or something else that comes with those libraries? If it’s just QUIC, rust has an implementation https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn

Also, can’t you just call C/C++ from rust or is this exceptional for some reason?

jim says:

When you call C from rust, rust uses a C api.

When you call C++ from rust, the C++ must present a C api.

When you call rust from C, or C++ rust must present a C api. Which is hard.

The C api, the C link library format, is the universal language of everything. Rust is weak on creating link libraries, which leads to unreasonably long compile times on big rust projects.

The trouble with rust Tokio is that Rust async is infamously hard. The borrow checker goes mad trying figure lifetimes in async.

Async in C++ can in theory be done like async in node.js, which is famously easy. I am, however, unaware of any asynch runtime for C++ which does usefully do it like node.js. Boost asynch is infamously broken.

What everyone does in C++ is roll their own asynch runtime — which is what the example code in those libraries does.

simplyconnected says:

I had a need for something similar. I borrowed the assembly for the context switch and wrote a stackful coroutine/fibers single-header scheduler. Works like a charm (context switch around 14cycles). Not so good for keeping millions of fibers though (c++ fibers are better for that but are otherwise very limited).

jim says:

How do you recommend handling many thousands of connections, each connection its own stateful conversation?

simplyconnected says:

If you use stackful coroutines/fibers, you can allocate on the order of say 1Mb per fiber (linux uses something in that order of magnitude iirc). You can put all your state on the stack if you want.

You spawn a fiber by passing a callback to the function you want executed, and the fibers bounce between each other by calling “yield”. I borrowed the context switch assembly from minicoro. When the last fiber is done (its callback function returns), execution falls-through to the point where it was spawned.

If you want to pass some data to the initial callback that spawns the fiber, it gets a bit awkward, but it can be done.
My implementation is 200 lines (I don’t mind sharing). I’m just using it to hide prefetch latencies. Context switch is so fast that it pays off.

The issue is stackless fibers (like c++ fibers) are too limited (iirc you can keep only the state local to one function), but fast and lightweight (similar context switch cost). Stackful waste a lot of memory if you need large stacks.
If you know your worst-case stack need is not too great (you’re not doing too much recursion), it’s not so bad.
I’m no expert though, this is just my experience with it.

jim says:

Please send your code to the bitmessage address on this web page, as a patch file of a patch relative to a commit that does not contain the directory necessary to build and test the example. (A directory creation patch.)

simplyconnected says:

Hopefully I’m not over-complicating it.
Stackless coroutines (e.g. c++ native coroutines) will not allow you to leave the coroutine function, whereas stackful ones can recurse or call other functions at will. I think the data that each connection keeps shouldn’t be an issue in either case (you can keep it on the heap, or on the stack).

simplyconnected says:

What I have is short because it’s just for my use case. I’ll try to make it a bit simpler and general, though you would likely have to customize the scheduler for your use case anyway (say to awaken a fiber only when data becomes available). Note also: extremely non-portable (linux x86-64). Minicoro handles ARM and other OSs.

I can send you something standalone (single-header). It fits in a short block of text when bzip2+base64-encoded (putting it in a comment would be simpler for me, you can then delete the comment as to not clutter up the place if you prefer).

simplyconnected says:

This will print the source file to stdout:

echo ‘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’|base64 -d|bzcat

jim says:

base64: invalid input

bzcat: Compressed file ends unexpectedly;
perhaps it is corrupted? *Possible* reason follows.
bzcat: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Input file = (stdin), output file = (stdout)

It is possible that the compressed file(s) have become corrupted.
You can use the -tvv option to test integrity of such files.

You can use the `bzip2recover’ program to attempt to recover
data from undamaged sections of corrupted files.

jim says:

Well, posting it as a comment runs into length limits. Give me an ssh public key, and I will give you a login on rho.la

simplyconnected says:

A test program is included at the end.
To have it play nice with valgrind you have to compile with ‘-DVALGRIND’ so you can run it with valgrind and it will register the new stacks with valgrind.
Hopefully the source is more or less clear. The ‘fiber::scheduler_t’ class is the only one the user should see. It has four important member functions (spawn-fiber and yield, either from top-level, or from another fiber). If you have problems or doubts, let me know.

simplyconnected says:

I tried using pybitmessage but wasn’t able to get all the required libraries installed. Apologies.

jim says:

Yes, the install is rather thoroughly broken, and due to bitrot, has become more broken.

Just post it as a comment — since it will be an unreasonably long comment, I will edit it down. Or if you do not want it public to everyone, post it as a comment under a different, but similar, fake email.

simplyconnected says:

I can just post it in pieces in the AI thread for example as to not clutter up the most recent one.

Anonymous says:

simplyconnected’s comment with the base64 block was failing because the single quotes were replaced with smart quotes. When they’re changed back to single quotes in the terminal, the command works.

Mister Grumpus says:

Thank you and attaboy, for real, but here I’m asking a much smaller question.

I presume that for transactions of $50,000 or more, Bitcoin, as it is right now is already just fine.

So for Russian and Iranian oil, or Bangkadeshi T-shirts, or North Korean artillery shells, or Brazilian soybeans, that stuff could switch to Bitcoin tomorrow without any fancy new technology.

Now here we muse that this isn’t (officially) happening, yet, because every country has its own banking/trade/finance swamp ministry full of unaccountable stuffed suit assholes who need their skim. OK fine. That I understand.

But what I don’t understand is why crypto aficionados, commentators and loudmouths aren’t talking about this, about why they expect Bitcoin to be the next default trading currency, and therefore reserve currency. Why isn’t that a subject out there? Why isn’t the “petrobitcoin” a topic of public argument? Is it because all namefag shills have to be afraid of being heard mentioning the subject? As simple as that?

Neurotoxin says:

They are talking about this stuff, seems to me, at least since El Salvador made Bitcoin one of its legal tender currencies.

Gedeon says:

The financial system is a social network. The Eurodollar system touches everything. The dollar is the largest social network.

https://mfjudge.substack.com/p/haho-15-coercion-and-networks

jim says:

It is unofficially happening. Starting from the bottom up, because the guy routinely doing fifty thousand dollar transactions has a room full of high paid lawyers and “consultants” to grease the skids. So we are starting with the third world peasant trying to order some termite poison from China. And the software for him really sucks.

And even if you are doing million dollar transactions, it is a problem, because if you want to buy a few million dollars worth of Russian oil and gas, you would like the payment to not be traceable.

Fidelis says:

But what I don’t understand is why crypto aficionados, commentators and loudmouths aren’t talking about this, about why they expect Bitcoin to be the next default trading currency, and therefore reserve currency.

Bitcoiners are largely ideological libertarians to a fault. They don’t want to take this specific win, because to them it is “just more statist bulls**t.” So you hear about it but not much. The other crypto tribes are of course not set to be national reserve assets anytime soon, so naturally have little interest‐‐ of course this is uselessly spiteful, as a bitcoin reserve and subsequent valuation spike in the short and medium term means more speculator cash flowing into their assets.

skippy says:

Russia, China, Iran are not that based. Their governments want to maintain the fiat currency system because it gives them control the same way it gives the US government (more) control. But even in their official ideologies, Russia and China particularly completely endorse the post-war order, of UNO, Bretton-Woods, IMF, and so on. They have no ideological objection to this, and in fact, if you read the Russian statements carefully (and many are depressingly earnest) they are complaining that the system doesn’t work well enough, doesn’t work as intended, or doesn’t follow its own rules.

They do not want to replace fiat currencies, and the post-war order, with techno-libertarian super-hard currency. They want to do direct fiat exchanges between their second tier fiat currencies through a GAE-style international clearing house controlled by themselves.

Likely to fail in the long run, but in the short run, due to 2022 sanctions blunder already exists.

The Cominator says:

Shit someone better archive Tik’s videos (we may not agree with him on everything but he is absolutely fantastic on proving things like yes the reasons the Nazis fucked is because they were socialists) because he is going to get j6ed…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvA9odna5dw

The Cominator says:

RE vote fraud and Kamala… I feel good about Shapiro NOT being the VP. I’m assumming he has some control over the fraud apparatus in PA (maybe he doesn’t) IF he does given that I’m sure the Jew wants to be president himself in 2028 he has every incentive to make sure there is a fair election in PA that Kamala will lose.

Mister Grumpus says:

We’ll have to disagree there. I was actually hoping for two goys against the sinister alcoholic cock sucking deep state bindi-lattess and her sidekick the fag-mouthed shiesty Jew. Just too perfect to be real.

Neurotoxin says:

So Jim links to his Rhocoin page and I head up to the basic domain and find the Collected Quotations page. It contains this:

“The children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society that is coming, where everyone would be interdependent.” 1899

“Independent self-reliant people would be a counterproductive anachronism in the collective society of the future where people will be defined by their associations.” 1896

John Dewey, educational philosopher, proponent of modern public schools.

Every time I think, “OK, I now have a handle on how evil the Left is…”

The Cominator says:

This is why if we get the chance we can’t stop short of total annihilation. If we shirk from it our posterity will curse us for failing to finally destroy this evil cult when we had the chance. Half measures fail…

Contaminated NEET says:

You can’t annihilate Leftism any more than you can annihilate anger, or fear, or war, or murder. It will be be with us as long as we exist, because it’s part of our nature. And as bad as it most definitely is, it springs from useful traits, emotions, and strategies, which we must never give away, because Gnon gave them to us for good reason.

The Cominator says:

You can’t annihilate envy but the blue cult is a more specific set of beliefs and it can indeed be eradicated.

Contaminated NEET says:

OK, I can get behind that. This particular manifestation can and should be cut out entirely like the cancer that it is.

DH says:

Leftism stems from a malfunction of the brain, or a specific set of malfunctions. Notice how some groups, ceteris paribus, are more seriously afflicted than other groups, e.g. Ashkenazi Jews – there has to be a biological, probably genetic basis in there.

If you repeatedly eradicate leftist bloodlines, you will over time select against leftism in the gene pool. You might still have the occasional de novo mutant, but the problem wouldn’t be so widespread.

The Cominator says:

Jeets, almost all Jeets are leftists.

DH says:

Explain Total Bindi Death to me, if you will.

yewotm8 says:

This is not true anymore. The left no longer caters to them, they are not dysfunctional enough. They vote cuckservative now.

Contaminated NEET says:

I know “right-wing” Indians here in the US. They have a weird insecure resentment-filled superiority/inferiority complex toward Whites. Get them comfortable and they’ll brag about how much smarter, richer, harder-working, and more moral they are than us, but they’re painfully aware of what a shithole most of India is, and they’ll talk down other races in a strange attempt to get our approval. They’re part of the Rising Tide of Color and they know it, and when the chips are down they will always and everywhere side with the foreign hordes against Whites. They only group they truly and comfortably respect is the Jews.

DH says:

Indians respect Jews, but give them a truth serum, and you’ll discover that it’s more that they envy Jews, because they see Jews as whites’ favorite minority, and they want themselves to be whites’ favorite minority. Indians can tell who the matador is and who the cape is, and they vie for the role of cape. Indians resent Chinese-Americans for the very same reason, a competition for the role of whites’ favorite minority, in which Indians are the sole participant, since the other groups have quite a different agenda.

Contaminated NEET says:

>they see Jews as whites’ favorite minority,

It’s deeper than that. Brahmins respect the Jews because the Jews play the same priestly game they do, but they’re better at it. They don’t see Jews as Whites’ favorite minority, but rather as the highest caste of Whites.

DH says:

Yes, but rival priesthoods tend to compete for supremacy, and Brahmins would love to be incorporated back into the white race and become the highest caste of whites – they seem perplexed that it hasn’t happened already. Heh.

someDude says:

@DH I can second your view. This is the view of the futurist as well. Indians in the west want the approval of whites. They see that conservative whites are quiet and reserved about their views. They see progressive whites quite open and in your face about their opinions. They then figure that to get white approval, they have to become progressive, which is what happens.

Regarding Jews, it’s more an enemy of an enemy thing. Indians assume all Jews are zionists. You gentlemen are doubtless well aware of our antipathy to Abrahamism 3.0

jim says:

> a malfunction of the brain

Not a malfunction. Leftism is the priestly equivalent of mobile banditry. A leftist priesthood is to a priesthood what a robber baron is to a baron. Mobile banditry is, under some circumstances, a perfectly sound strategy, though under most common circumstances a very wicked strategy, but when the sovereign is falling down on his job, a necessary and justified one.

Leftism tends to arise when the existing official priesthood is weak, cynical, and decadent. And to successfully put leftism down, you need an official priesthood that is strong, sincere, and virtuous.

The Cominator says:

Can you explain in more detail…

Also whatever you call general leftism I think can be distinguished from very specific blue cult leftism. Blue cult leftism requires brain defects to actually believe in and it should be eradicated…

jim says:

Leftism starts with envy and covetousness. Covetousness is that someone wants to knock over the apple cart to grab some apples. Envy is he just want to knock over the apple cart because he does not have one.

We should be able to eradicate envy, but no hope of eradicating covetousness.

And, given that there are people who want to knock over the applecart, easier and safer to knock it over as part of a gang. So, priests: Someone comes up with a clever rationalization why knocking over the applecart is wise, virtuous, and beneficial. Then, from priests, to a priesthood. Leftism gives rise to the left as an organised entity with a hierarchy and an official, though frequently changing, belief system.

The only cure is that the proprietors of apple carts subscribe to state religion that takes a firm hand with heretics and apostates.

The Cominator says:

“We should be able to eradicate envy, but no hope of eradicating covetousness.”

Yes. Everyone covets sometimes, envy otoh to me is a completely alien emotion…

Contaminated NEET says:

You can’t eradicate either, nor should you. Even envy (by your definition) has its place and its uses. It’s a universal human emotion for a reason.

jim says:

> It’s a universal human emotion

It is not that universal. I don’t experience envy, and find it incomprehensible, alien, and absurd when I observe it in others.

Envy is like male homosexuality. Most males just are not sexually attracted to other males, nor to any female whose curves have not set in, or which have sagged away. Societies can, and frequently do, attain zero male homosexuality. Should similarly be able to attain zero envy.

Contaminated NEET says:

Well, that’s probably because you’re a winner. I’m a guy who voluntary chose “Contaminated NEET” as my handle. Try losing consistently for years on end and see if you still don’t experience envy.

The Cominator says:

I’ve had a few years, I want revenge, I want leftist exterminated, and I covet… but no envy.

Calvin says:

It is not that universal. I don’t experience envy, and find it incomprehensible, alien, and absurd when I observe it in others.

Would not require universal proscriptions if it were not universal. Easier to not feel it when you have your psychological needs fairly well met though. Rarely happens to healthy fathers or high-t young men.

jim says:

> Would not require universal proscriptions if it were not universal.

Gay obviously is not universal and demonstrably can be completely eliminated. Still requires a universal proscription.

Calvin says:

Gay obviously is not universal and demonstrably can be completely eliminated.

There have been secret homos in societies where that got the death penalty and the moment the repression eases up, there are always some to come out of the woodwork. Never been a case where a state has said it’s okay to be gay now and found there were no takers. They don’t spring out of the aether.

The desire to tear down someone for having more than you is far more universal to the human condition than that.

jim says:

> There have been secret homos in societies where that got the death penalty and the moment the repression eases up, there are always some to come out of the woodwork

I don’t think so. https://www.metafilter.com/122692/Where-sex-is-work-sex-may-just-work-differently-and-the-WEIRDest-people-in-the-world

> The desire to tear down someone for having more than you is far more universal to the human condition than that

Not seeing it. I don’t experience it, I don’t think most people experience it.

While covetousness is rational evil, envy, like homosexuality, is self destructive evil, hence preventable by a healthy environment.

If we repress covetousness, adultery, and so on and so forth thoroughly, repression of homosexuality and envy will be redundant and unnecessary.

The reason the Ada do not know what homosexuality or masturbation is, is not that homosexuality is suppressed, but that straight marital sex is not only permitted, but absolutely mandatory. You hit puberty, you get assigned a spouse and ordered to get on with it.

Neurotoxin says:

>Cominator

I’m a nice guy, myself. If I had a choice I’d give all leftists the ability to never show up on infra-red cameras. I wouldn’t even wait for them to ask for this feature; I’d just give it to them.

DH says:

Modern schools are entirely a Progressive project. The wickedness of the whole thing has been undeniable for well over a century, and it persists not despite its wickedness, but because of it. And anyone still denying it in 2024 — when most pedagogues resemble demons and certainly behave like ones — is a shill promoting normalcy bias. Schools are leftism factories, whore factories, and gay factories – by design. And most of all, they are priest factories and priestliness factories, and a cornerstone of rule-by-priests. No need for rational economic explanations such as “muh capitalists”; the impulse behind modern schooling is deeply religious, and it’s not a Godly religion motivating it, and never has been.

Pax Imperialis says:

So after much hoo-ha over having a used up whore on stage at the Republican National Convention, the DNC decided to go further.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyrkT-qnfH8

It’s all so tiresome how they twerk all over the hollowed and burnt out ruins of civilization.

Anon says:

I am kinda bummed they didn’t bring 2nd diversity vp , they brought another white mascot like Biden. It show they have some sense.

Cloudswrest says:

Wow, Musk just boosted a tweet showing disparate criminal punishment in Britain of white people.

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1820805335700873619

Cloudswrest says:
DH says:

It’s time for Musk to decide if he is all in, or not all in.

Given how the left is about to collapse civilization, and civilization is a rather important and valuable thing in Musk’s view, there’s a decent chance he goes all in.

Adam says:

Certainly this cannot be the first he has heard such a thing. Hopefully this is a good sign for us as far as things going on behind the scene.

DH says:

Musk just boosted a tweet

I suggest he also boosts his security, the demonic globalist faction won’t go out without a bang.

Contaminated NEET says:

I hope he knows he’s playing with fire and takes appropriate precautions, but I’m not even sure what “appropriate precautions” would be or if he has the means to deploy them.

alf says:

Elon’s feed lately has been a barrage of basedness. Very whitepilling.

dave says:

Simplicius reprints reports from Ukraine front confirming effective tactics in the drone era. Looks like Russians figured it out. end of big arrow maneuver warfare.

“the new Russian advancement tactic is such small scale combat teams, that Ukrainian FPVs literally can’t even find any targets to hit. Russia has eschewed major armor pushes in some areas, and just advances with 4-7 infantry at a time, which quickly lodge themselves into the forest tracts and hedgerows, disappearing from view.”

Aidan says:

Very good news

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

The Walz pick was probably a sop for the thermidoreans.

>see we aren’t going full niggercommunism (yet) you don’t have to cross the river to the bad orange man the empire is in good hands trust

jim says:

Trump attack ads on Waltz read like a plea to the Thermidoreans: “Waltz is full nigger communism — if you let the steal go through, you are going to be sacrificed to demons and your body eaten.”

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

Considering that the Saint Fentanyl operation was conducted under his watch, he’s probably been a loyal inner party bagman for a while now.

Hesiod says:

Video of Waltz’s top advisor:

https://files.catbox.moe/y6uvsr.mp4?_=1

Twisted and evil

Anon says:

And that the distressing part , they have some brain that still function . I hoped
Full diversity ticket so the mask off . But they had the sense to rain there impulse
Which does not bode well for trump. Trump need to hammer the 2020 riots.

Aidan says:

Walz is a true blue ideological NC candidate. You can tell that his predilection is for raping little boys. The intention is not to extend a hand to the thermidoreans; would not have picked the man who sat in the cuck chair and watched the BLM riots while diddling his chode if so. It seems like they are trying to get as many legitimate votes as possible this time, possibly because the fraud apparatus is slipping out of their hands.

DH says:

It seems like they are trying to get as many legitimate votes as possible this time, possibly because the fraud apparatus is slipping out of their hands.

Yep. They would rather potentially lose a few Jewish donors to Thermidor (by not picking Shapiro) than risk a lower turnout among the Turd World constituency, so probably ran up some obstacles in the fraud plan. However, the fake polls keep on coming, so they’re still going to maintain that contingency available.

Hesiod says:

Searching this morning for any concrete info on Walz’s alleged master’s thesis on Holocaust education and the results so far have been a lot of fresh squid ink telling but not showing about it. Perhaps the most damning statement garnered from that is his students being supposedly amazed he predicted the Rwandan genocide. Given his life-long associations and loyalties, I certainly bet he did.

Mister Grumpus says:

“…Walz’s alleged master’s thesis on Holocaust education…”

because of fucking course

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

In many ways it’s a reprisal of the Biden pick with Obama. A yt biobackhole picked as a running mate as ‘whitewash’ over everything else being pulled behind the wagon, which seems to be the messaging. ‘Look at what a normal mainstream guy this is’. (Eg, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ADRvyhCqOk).

Of course, nothing about it is normal, and hasn’t been for 200 years hence, but it gives their targets that all-important fig leaf excuse for rationalizing themselves into thinking it’s normal. (‘Targets’ in this case of course being both the whites they intend to destroy first, and the so-described ‘white helots’ administering the empire that they depend on for the destroying the first and intend to destroy second.)

notglowing says:

https://x.com/TNOQuoProQuid/status/1821335518829043839

Of course Kissinger, the snake, immediately tells people about what happened.
Though, looking back, it is an interesting story and doesn’t make Nixon look worse in my eyes.
Every man has his limits. And Nixon was done dirty.

Jamesthe1st says:

What do you all make of Nick Fuentes? He’s been thorwing a hissy fit ever since Trump picked Vance and has also been echoing the dem propaganda against Vance. Just echoing the dem propaganda like that is highly suspect.

alf says:

Wasn’t the consensus that Fuentes was controlled opposition long ago? Not that I’ve ever watched him for more than a minute…

jim says:

Yes, always been obvious that he was in the enemy’s pocket.

Pax Imperialis says:

Even if he weren’t, he’s pretty gay and not in the way one can politely ignore it.

Varna says:

Cliche gays and narcs had that vibe in the 1970s and 1980s.

“I look like a TV gay narc from 1982” is a weird brand to go for, but the times are weird.

The Cominator says:

He’s a fed and a homosexual and always has been, how did you not spot him?

jim says:

The entire FBI apparatus around him glows as well. Enemy operatives promote each other, and progressives promote their controlled opponents. Progressive pronounces: “This extreme ultra right wing nazi nazi conservative has some connection with Nick Fuentes, oh the horror, the horror” immediately tells you this leftist is trying promote to the alt right some rino who was in on the plot to murder Trump.

The intent being that when the time comes, the Rino announces he lost the election fair and square. Search for references to Nick Fuentes — it is always obvious enemies talking about him. No real people pay much attention. Nick Fuentes is like flat earth — an enemy operation so blatant that it gets very little traction.

The Cominator says:

Almost universally one should not trust homosexuals, Milo and BAP had some extraordinary qualities (and BAP at least seems to have sincerely cured himself of the perversion through um going to female whores a lot and classical conditioning, Milo did the monasticism thing to attempt this which just doesn’t work and has been useless to counterproductive since and in one such phase he was hanging out with Nick) which granted them some arms length consideration. BAP is still useful arguably more so since he seems to have cured himself of the perversion.

DH says:

Richard Spencer from AliExpress.

Nikolai says:

I used to watch his streams back when his college student fans were terrorizing Charlie Kirk on his nationwide campus tour around 2019.

It seems to me he was a genuine rightist up until 2021. Personal theory is that the feds got to him since he was at the capitol on J6 and now they’ve given him orders to demoralize and cause endless infighting on the right.

The Cominator says:

I don’t understand why anyone would ever watch him for more than a minute… let’s say he wasn’t a fed he was a weird manlet homosexual and not too bright. I also don’t understand why the Charlie kirk hate either, Charlie Kirk wishes for a return to 1980s leftism (as every man who watches any sort of 80s camp or teen movie for more than 5 minutes will) but he doesn’t punch right. He’s been loyal…

The Cominator says:
jim says:

If one, then all. Looks like this time around, we will see only ordinary and usual fraud.

Ex says:

How can you be so confident this will be generalized, rather than triggering counter-ops?

The Cominator says:

Yeah I agree, but otoh if Josh Shapiro in PA has any control over the vote fraud er I mean ballot harvesting effort in Pennsylvania very likely he uses it to sabotage Kamala. If he wants to be President he needs her to lose.

jim says:

Fraud happens because the FBI, the department of justice, and the judiciary, just as the attempted assassination happened because the FBI, the department of justice, and the judiciary.

The Cominator says:

Does the FBI do it correctly or does the FBI merely protect Democrat fraudsters and allow them to be paid off while suppressing anyone on the other side who would either do the same sort of things, make payoffs to flip the democrat fraudsters, or try to stop the Democratic fraudsters.

The Cominator says:

Er I mean does the FBI do it directly…

jim says:

Hard to know and hard to define.

The difference between a “criminal informant”, and a direct FBI officer has been fading away. CI is just a hat an FBI officer puts on to do something criminal.

It is like the Soros ngos, where someone is an ngo officer, and simultaneously a state department officer.

Neurotoxin says:

I don’t, definitely do NOT, want Kamala Harris to be “elected” President. That said…

If she is declared the winner, I hope that right at that moment, someone has a video camera trained on Hillary Clinton.

MuskFan says:

Kamel toe is going to sweep every battleground state exactly like how Biden did in 2020 with mass uncontested fraud. The usual pattern is the right gets the shit kicked out of it for years and years and years before they finally wake up and start fighting fire with fire (which ultimately means fighting fraud with even more fraud in this case).

Happened in Argentina in the Dirty War and happened in Rome with the populists (it was decades after the Gracchus brothers were murdered before the Populares were able to get any sort of electoral wins).

jim says:

You are being stupid. This is all state sponsored fraud. If someone commits unauthorized fraud, he would go to jail for life plus four hundred years. It is not a bunch of dumb blacks committing fraud. It is not the Democrats committing fraud. It is the judiciary, the department of justice, and the FBI running a bunch of dumb blacks at the behest of the uniparty.

Neurotoxin says:

Related (via Founding Questions):

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/virginia-mandates-paper-ballots-tracking-and-proof-resideny-2024-election

I’ve been assuming fraud would put the Dem candidate into the White House, as the most likely scenario. But this looks surprisingly like actually getting serious about fighting it.

Are they just messing with us? (E.g., adversarial court ruling in 3, 2, 1 …) Even if this is swatted down by some asshole judge, it’s a strange move for the Regime to even put this sort of thing into the Overton window.

DH says:

Dugin goes full Dugin in a new article which every reactionary worth his salt should read. Key passages:

First and foremost, we must consistently and fundamentally reject the universality of Western norms — in economics, politics, education, technology, culture, art, information, ethics, and so on. “Decoupling” means not just a deterioration or even a severance of relations. It goes much deeper. It involves revisiting the basic civilizational attitudes formed in Russia long before the 20th century, in which the West was taken as a model, and its historical stages of development as an unquestionable template for all other peoples and civilizations, including our country. To some extent, the last two centuries of Romanov rule, the Soviet period (with a critique of capitalism), and especially the era of liberal reforms from the early 1990s to February 2022 were all Western-centric. For the last few centuries, Russia has been engaged in “coupling,” not questioning the universality of the Western path of development. Yes, the communists believed that capitalism needed to be overcome, but only after it was built, based on the “objective necessity” of changing formations. Even the prospects of world revolution were seen by Trotsky and Lenin as a process of “coupling,” “internationalism,” a linking with the West, albeit for the purpose of forming a single global proletariat and escalating its struggle. Under Stalin, the Soviet Union essentially became a separate state-civilization, but only by deviating from Marxist orthodoxy and relying on its own strengths and the unique creative genius of its people.

When the energy and practices of Stalinism were exhausted, the Soviet Union once again moved towards the West along the logic of “coupling” and predictably fell apart. The liberal reforms of the 1990s became a new leap towards “coupling,” hence the Atlanticism and pro-Western stance of the elites of that era. Even under Putin in the early stage, Russia tried to maintain “coupling” at all costs, until it came into direct contradiction with Putin’s even firmer resolve to strengthen the state’s sovereignty (which would have been practically impossible under continued globalization — both in theory and in practice).

Today, Russia is consciously, firmly, and irreversibly entering into “decoupling.” Now it is clear why we agreed to use this term initially in its English version. “Coupling” is integration with the West, recognizing its structures, values, and technologies as universal models, and the systemic dependence on it, as well as striving to be part of it, to catch up with it, to follow it — at worst, it involves replacing what the West has chosen to exclude us from. “Decoupling,” on the contrary, means rejecting all these principles, relying not only on our own strengths but also on our own values, our own identity, our own history, our own spirit. Of course, we have yet to fully grasp the depth of this, as Westernization in Russia, the history of our “coupling,” has lasted for several centuries. With varying success, the penetration of the West into our society has been continuous and intrusive. The West has long been not only outside but also inside us. Therefore, “decoupling” will be very difficult. It includes complex operations to “expel all Western influences from society.” Moreover, the depth of such cleansing is much more serious than even the criticism of the bourgeois system during the Soviet era. At that time, it was about two competing lines of development within a single (by default Western!) civilization — capitalist and socialist, but the second — socialist — model was also built on the criteria of Western society’s development, on Western teachings and theories, on Western methods of calculation and assessment, on the Western scale of development levels, and so on. Liberals and communists are united in the understanding that there can be only one civilization, and they also agree that this is Western civilization — its cycles, its formations, its phases of development.

A century before, Russian Slavophiles went much further and called for a systemic revision, a rejection of Westernization, and a turn to their own Russian roots. In essence, this was the start of our “decoupling.” It is unfortunate that this trend, which was quite popular in Russia in the 19th and early 20th centuries, did not prevail. Now we simply must complete what the Slavophiles, followed by the Russian Eurasianists, started. We need to overcome the West’s claim to universality, globalism, and uniqueness.

One might consider that “decoupling” has been imposed on us by the West itself. But, more likely, we can see the secret workings of Providence in this. The example of the opening of the Olympic Games in Paris illustrates this clearly. The West banned Russia from participating in the Olympics. But instead of punishment, against the backdrop of that aesthetically monstrous parade of perverts and the pitiful scrambling of swimmers in waters filled with filth and toxic waste in the Seine, all this turned into something quite the opposite — an operation to save Russia from disgrace and humiliation. The images of “decoupling” in sports vividly illustrate its healing nature. By cutting us off from it, the West essentially facilitates our recovery, our resurrection. Not allowed into the center of degeneration and shameless sin, Russia finds itself at a distance, at a remove. We recognize this today as Providence. So it is.

https://archive.is/MWyvm

Massive whitepill if Russia follows through with that vision.

jim says:

He wants to go back to Russia early seventeen hundreds

I want to go back to England, sixteen sixty. England sixteen sixty led to much bigger success than Russia seventeen hundreds.

Mayflower Sperg says:

If Putin would just abolish feminism and restore Christian marriage, I will die happy and my descendants will solve the other problems and make Russia great again.

If not, I will live alone into the 2050s and see what a country with millions of aging cat ladies and no fighting-age men looks like.

Basil says:

Why read a man who wrote unironically about the sacredness of black skin and whose only daughter “studied” on Algerian dicks in Paris?

DH says:

Why do glowniggers have Dugin Derangement Syndrome, then?

I don’t agree with his third-worldist sentiments and his rosy view of cooperation with Mohammedanism, but if the Kremlin takes his stuff seriously (as we are told by the usual suspects), so should the rest of the world. And reactionaries should especially pay attention to his conclusion:

Thus, we began with the assertion that the word “decoupling” will be key for the coming decades. This is evident, but few yet realize how deep this process is and what intellectual, philosophical, political, organizational, social, and cultural efforts it will require from all humanity — our societies, countries, and peoples. As we detach from the Global West, we face the need to restore, revive, and reaffirm our own values, traditions, cultures, principles, beliefs, customs, and foundations. So far, we are only taking the first steps in this direction.

I mentioned the other day the absolute necessity of solving the WP, outside the West as well as inside – do you not identify here the seeds of restoring patriarchy (and monarchy)? It’s very relevant to NRx.

skippy says:

I’ve gone on the record saying I think Basil is a shill before. Nonetheless, this is a fair comment (delivered in remarkably exact American idiom).

Dugin is a guy who rose to prominence proposing to Hapa’ize Russia by mixing the Slavs with Central Asians, which would’ve seemed like far leftism at the time. Such have the times changed, no longer sounds that bad, and he’s since shifted to a wacky Afro-Futurism which is also heavily promoted by RT.com.

Dugin is the Kremlin desperately trying to continue the Soviet policies of multiculturalism, multireligion, multiethnicism, Russia with-but-not-for Russians. But, having got fired for saying it was unacceptable for Ukraine to literally burn Russian activists to death, was still less foolish than the actual Kremlin

DH says:

That’s fair. But as Pepe the frog (Shadilay) would say, “Control the memes, control the planet.” Who controls the Kremlin’s memeplex? CIA and the Ukrainians believe that Dugin and the Eurasians exert outsized influence in this regard.

Mister Grumpus says:

Me last month: “JD Vance? That boy gay or funny or something. That millennial fatface, man, I don’t know. Way too much fatface going on out here in general, come to think of it.”

…

But now me today: “Tim Walz? Dude what? That mouth!”

Like what is that? Is that cuckmouth? Fagmouth? It’s some kind of funny, that’s for sure. Like that Tim Caine guy from 2016. DC’s got nobody with a regular mouth anymore. Just kinda eeeehhhhh these guys. (One thing about Mike Pence, at least he worked out, looked decent in a suit and his mouth wasn’t funny.)

In the Bible days they called it being possessed by a demon, and why not really? You got a better explanation? Really?

–Retard Tier Physiognomist

DH says:

Like what is that? Is that cuckmouth? Fagmouth? It’s some kind of funny, that’s for sure. Like that Tim Caine guy from 2016. DC’s got nobody with a regular mouth anymore. Just kinda eeeehhhhh these guys.

It’s an “everything goes” kind of mouth. He is obviously an extreme pervert who can be into literally anything – dead women, little boys, trannies, zoophilia, scat (can easily see him eating dung off the floor with that mouth), he clearly has little to no disgust reflex; maybe he is possessed by sexual demons, like Ted Bundy and the other infamous serial killers. I mean, to be fair, politicians often give off that kind of vibe one way or another, so he isn’t that unique.

But yeah, that’s not a legit human.

The Cominator says:

To paraphrase the late great comedian Gilbert Gottfried I kinda think that TIM WALZ RAPED AND KILLED A BOY IN 1990.

Hesiod says:

Getting John Wayne Gacy vibes off him.

anonymous mouse says:

He’s literally normal.

If you have to reach this hard it means it’s over.

The Cominator says:

Shill test this faggot now.

jim says:

Anonymous mouse is not a shill, he is an opponent. A shill says “hail fellow white male heterosexual Christian. I hate negroes because they are magical, women because they are wonderful, gays because they are so stylish, Jews because they are so clever. The earth is flat, and Trade Centre tower seven fell straight down to its foundations like a demolition.”

Anonymous mouse tells us that Tim Walz is normal. In truth, there is no concrete evidence that he is not normal, though his enthusiasm for mutilating children’s sexual organs is a hint, he just somehow gives of the uncanny valley not quite human feeling. There is a definite odour of uncanny perversion, but no solid evidence.

But because of the odour of weird, it would be profitable for Vance to hammer on the transitioning children issue.

Walz does not ping on gaydar, but he pings on something weird.

jim says:

Tim Walz is an obvious commie pervert. He sets off normal people’s radar as somehow not exactly human, as a demon wearing a skin suit. He is in uncanny valley.

Kamala and Tim Walz are the insane out of sight left. If you are far left and in politics, you sacrifice children to Satan, have sex with their bodies, and drink their blood. This leaves a spiritual mark that is visible to normies.

These are people who are openly proud of burning America down during the saint Fentanyl celebration, and intend to resume burning America down. This makes Thermidor a little nervous.

He also applied and enforced a sanctuary law in Minessota that makes it possible “rescue”, which is to say abduct, children to Minnesota to have their dicks or boobs cut off. Whoever is rescuing the child from oppressive heternormativity gets the child plus immunity from heterosexist out of state custody orders.

Mister Grumpus says:

Oh and while I’m here, let me just state that from here on out, any and all of these harebrained and doomed “Ukrainian” military adventures, like this suicidal capture the flag run at that Russian Kursk nuclear power station, are obviously just Globo-Shlomo ploys to buy a few more weeks of Powerpoint slides, and to kill off any remaining Ukes who could otherwise turn around and Heinlien Freikorps their asses out of Kiev, if not hunt them down and grease them in the Miami Whole Foods parking lot.

jim says:

The Ukrainian attack towards the Kursk nuclear power plant has been a huge success for the Ukrainians, in that they grabbed a lot of turf, killed a lot of Russians, and destroyed a whole lot of stuff.

But it obviously will not achieve what is sought — forcing Russia to end the war on terms that enable the Ukraine to join Nato so that the war can be resumed at some later date when the mysterious deficiency in Nato weapons technology and arms production has been remedied.

The objective is to force Russia to agree to a “frozen conflict” — so that the conflict can be resumed at a more favorable time.

Pax Imperialis says:

While some evidence points towards a “frozen conflict” objective, such as Ukrainian presidential advisor Mikhail Podolyak, that is only one point of evidence. More likely this is yet another attempt at escalation. Much like hitting Russian nuclear detection radar, it serves almost zero tactical or strategic purpose except as an existential provocation on behalf of other hostile regimes.

If the objective was a “frozen conflict”, then Ukraine should be attempting to drag this out as long as possible and as painful as possible. That is the formula that had worked for all previous “cease fire” agreements, and evidence points to it working again had they agreed to any of the other numerous Russian attempts at diplomacy.

Instead Ukraine has committed to extremely risky and costly big arrow offensives. Just as their southern offensive resulted in massive irreplaceable losses, this new offensive got most of the attacking units mostly killed in a matter of days. Moreover, there has been no indication they would have used potential success as a means for negotiation. For every Podolvak, there’s a thousand Azov type idiots who delusionally think they’d been able to drive all the way to Moscow.

The likely objective is to tempt Russia into doing something drastic which could then be used by NATO to justify direct intervention. Unfortunately for them, Putin is unlikely to do anything drastic, and even if, NATO is likely to blink after making much noise.

The Cominator says:

It reminds me more of the battle of the bulge, looks and feels good for them for a little bit but its likely to get their forces destroyed even faster.

skippy says:

They attacked the part of Russia that was least likely to be garrisoned but correspondingly has the least military value to Russia. They then went on the BBC stating that Russia’s nuclear red lines are fake.

Looks like a play to start a nuclear war. Not one that Putin is likely to bite, but if he doesn’t get these guys out of Russian territory quickly it will cause him to haemorrhage legitimacy until he does. Shades of Poland kicking the Danzig Germans until Hitler bit.

skippy says:

Russia appears to be desperate to agree to a frozen conflict, in which Ukraine gives them three Oblasts, “promises” not to join NATO, but then joins NATO anyway. The Russians appear to be openly stating that Ukraine can join the EU, which has a mutual defence pact anyway.

Looks like Putin is desperately trying to cuck out in a way likely to destroy Russia in the long term, but his counterparties refuse and demand megadeath instead.

Pax Imperialis says:

It’s likely not politically viable for Ukraine to accept the loss of those Oblasts, even if they are full of ethnic Russians.

/pol/watcher says:

Its the reverse. The US is making sure that the Ukraine will not be able to have peace talks prior to US election by forcing Russia’s hand.

Its one of the things that annoy me about commentary about the war. Basically its nearly 100% garbage, since no understanding of modern war, just Hollywood movies, Video games and Risk.

Just because Putin doesn’t respond like a nigger every time NATO does something, doesn’t mean he is a foreign agent.

skippy says:

“Its the reverse. The US is making sure that the Ukraine will not be able to have peace talks prior to US election by forcing Russia’s hand.”

OK, I accept this is also a plausible interpretation.

S says:

Khorne cares not where the blood comes from, just that it flows. The goal is slaughter and Russian civilians are a way to maximize that. You can see that where Ukraine prioritizes randomly firing at civilian targets even while suffering an ammo crunch and in the unit dedicated to Khorne.

Hesiod says:

Musk tweets an excellent speech by Lord Blackadder criticizing the UK government:

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1822355008559489216

Now let’s see what cunning plan Starmer executes in response.

jim says:

Musk is tweeting nineteenth century leftism. Freedom of speech is always a lie — an alien priesthood favours freedom of speech when it is busy overthrowing the existing state religion, cracks down once it has overthrown the previous state religion and is imposing its its own. The crackdown by the new state religion of leftism became ludicrous and obvious in 1906, and has become ever more severe since then.

The problem is our demonic state religion views reality itself as heresy, and life itself as sacrilege.

Rather than freedom of speech, a better position is that the state religion should avoid positions that are falsifiable and false.

The state and the state religion has the right and duty to enforce truth and prohibit lies. The trouble is that this dangerous power and authority is apt to be used to prohibit truth and enforce lies. Freedom of speech, like scepticism, is an acid selectively applied against opposing faiths. Scepticism is invariably coupled with demands for such open minded that your brains are going to fall out.

You need a state and a state religion, or else you will be conquered by those that have one, but the problem is that these tend to grow cancerously.

Fact is, if you just want to be left alone and allowed to mind your own business, you are going to need a powerful despotic state, state religion, and an inquisition to crush those who do not want to leave you alone and who want to mind your business for you.

The Cominator says:

Free speech is not like equality which anyone who talks about it only wants power, some of the people who advocate for free speech actually want it. Now does any priestly group who advocates for it merely wants free speech… no.

Is Rowan Atkinson (who supposedly has an astronomically high IQ) part of a antiprogressive priesthood… no because he’d likely be dead because those aren’t tolerated except oddly for Muslims to some degree.

jim says:

> some of the people who advocate for free speech actually want it.

Yes. And no.

I want free speech. And I have been doing a fair bit of work to enable free speech on the internet.

But consider the Paris Olympic gay transsexual parody of the Last Supper. Obviously, if that is permitted, then it is not going to be permitted for someone to speak the truth about women, or races, or immigration, or gays, or global warming, etc, under his own name.

Key elements of Easter has been banned. If Jews are allowed, Christians are not allowed. If drag queens can perform sexual acts on the floor of Multnomah library, Andromeda and Perseus can non longer get it on in pages on the shelves.

There is not room enough in the cultural sphere for two state religions. For one to be free, the other must be unfree. If one voice is permitted, the other voice is going to be forbidden.

alf says:

Elon carries a good portion of reddit cringe with him. But on the plusside, Elon plays to win.

FrankNorman says:

Jim, this “if one opinion is allowed, the opposing opinion will be banned” point is something you assert often, but I don’t see the inevitability.
We live in a world today where one person is free to say that his religion is the one and only true one, and other people are equally free to laugh at that claim and tell him that said religion is a load of made-up nonsense.
Roman Catholics for example are allowed to claim that everyone should obey the Pope, but they don’t get to burn anyone at the stake for rejecting that demand.

Certainly there are people who wish and intend to extinguish all independent thought – whose ideology requires that in fact, since it cannot withstand intelligent scrutiny. But as long as those guys are kept out of power, we don’t have to become like them.

S says:

Because the rule only applies to live faiths. Can the religion reward its followers with status and women? If not, no one gives a shit and it is a larp.

If it can it inevitably comes in conflict with other faiths because status and women are zero-sum.

jim says:

> as long as those guys are kept out of power, we don’t have to become like them.

And how do you keep those guys out of power, except by making certain opinions have consequences?

You always have a state religion. And if you don’t, you will soon be ruled by an enemy state religion. Just as you always have an army, and if you don’t, you will soon be ruled by an enemy army.

If all you want to do is mind your own business, you are allowing people who want to mind your business for you to organise.

Gays don’t want you to be straight. Jews don’t want you to be Christian. Commies want to take your stuff. Those guys are not going to mind their own business.

The Cominator says:

You only really need to restrict SUBVERSIVE speech… what is subversive is anything outside the state religion’s pov subversive… no not really. We know from experience what is subversive.

Hostile univeralist religions are subversive. Englightenment lies (especially anything about egalitarianism) are subversive. Talking about women’s rights is subversive. Accusing the king baselessly of being a homosexual or something is subversive. Bawdy or cynical 1980s style comedy is not really subversive unless the king is a subject of fun… its hard to know where to draw the line but I genuinely do want a society with much freer speech for all who aren’t leftists. But I am in favor of killing a lot more leftists than you are so I figure the grip on the remaining leftist free population can be much lighter…

jim says:

Competition within the state religion to be the state religion results in an overly energetic state religion.

It is a pathology analogous to Roman generals fighting each other to be the imperator.

You are always going to get repression of competing religions, but if power struggles are under way between the very holy and the even holier, you are going to get a whole lot more repression.

The Cominator says:

TBH don’t quite grasp your meaning here…

I dream of a world where the modern prog left’s ideas are just as unthinkable to 99% of the population as NRx ideas are to normies now. I want them to get to a point where they are an eldritch horror with only the top people in the state, state religion, and the inquisition/secret police know what modern progleft “ideas” are. Hopefully the most common type of subversive that we will have to deal with in the future are the equivalent of modern normiecons and they’ll favor establishing a republic 18th/19th century style (and in any society you get the occasional shitlord who can’t resist saying the king is a fag because its forbidden to say the king is a fag). But the ideas of 3rd wave feminists commies and modern progressives… we won’t have won until their ideas are entirely out of living memory for all but a small subset of the population.

DH says:

There is far greater liberty of speech when the state religion is recognized as the state religion, and other religions are prohibited from competing against it.

In the same way that your overall liberty is better protected when you have one king a thousand miles away than when you have a thousand kings one mile away, you can speak your mind far more freely when there is one official authoritative state religion than when it’s 50 shades of leftism out-holying each other to temporarily become the unofficial state religion until a holier version gets into power, ad infinitum towards a leftist singularity.

An official state religion can afford to be lenient and let you mind your own business, whereas a “democracy of religion” leads to ever escalating conflict (mostly between different factions of leftism) and censorship until a strong leader says “this far left, and no farther,” or until the collapse.

jim says:

> We live in a world today where one person is free to say that his religion is the one and only true one, and other people are equally free to laugh at that claim

You can laugh at all religions except our officially unofficial religion. You are apt to go to jail for laughing at the religion that we officially do not have.

A2 says:

I want free righteous speech, that’s all.

jim says:

You will not get it, or will not be able to keep it, unless unrighteous speech is unfree.

A2 says:

Fine by me!

A2 says:

PS. I’m now logged in and have changed my password, but am still put in moderation. How vexing. Oh well.

jim says:

Sorry about that. I need to set up a new server. Working on it, will be a while.

DH says:

The Debate of the Three Bodyguards

3 Now King Darius gave a great banquet for all that were under him and all that were born in his house and all the nobles of Media and Persia 2 and all the satraps and generals and governors that were under him in the hundred and twenty-seven satrapies from India to Ethiopia. 3 They ate and drank, and when they were satisfied they departed; and Darius the king went to his bedroom, and went to sleep, and then awoke.

4 Then the three young men of the bodyguard, who kept guard over the person of the king, said to one another, 5 “Let each of us state what one thing is strongest; and to him whose statement seems wisest, Darius the king will give rich gifts and great honors of victory. 6 He shall be clothed in purple, and drink from gold cups, and sleep on a gold bed, and have a chariot with gold bridles, and a turban of fine linen, and a necklace about his neck; 7 and because of his wisdom he shall sit next to Darius and shall be called kinsman of Darius.”

8 Then each wrote his own statement, and they sealed them and put them under the pillow of Darius the king, 9 and said, “When the king wakes, they will give him the writing; and to the one whose statement the king and the three nobles of Persia judge to be wisest the victory shall be given according to what is written.” 10 The first wrote, “Wine is strongest.” 11 The second wrote, “The king is strongest.” 12 The third wrote, “Women are strongest, but truth is victor over all things.”

13 When the king awoke, they took the writing and gave it to him, and he read it. 14 Then he sent and summoned all the nobles of Persia and Media and the satraps and generals and governors and prefects, 15 and he took his seat in the council chamber, and the writing was read in their presence. 16 And he said, “Call the young men, and they shall explain their statements.” So they were summoned, and came in. 17 And they said to them, “Explain to us what you have written.”

The Speech about Wine

Then the first, who had spoken of the strength of wine, began and said: 18 “Gentlemen, how is wine the strongest? It leads astray the minds of all who drink it. 19 It makes equal the mind of the king and the orphan, of the slave and the free, of the poor and the rich. 20 It turns every thought to feasting and mirth, and forgets all sorrow and debt. 21 It makes all hearts feel rich, forgets kings and satraps, and makes every one talk in millions. 22 When men drink they forget to be friendly with friends and brothers, and before long they draw their swords. 23 And when they recover from the wine, they do not remember what they have done. 24 Gentlemen, is not wine the strongest, since it forces men to do these things?” When he had said this, he stopped speaking.

The Speech about the King

4 Then the second, who had spoken of the strength of the king, began to speak: 2 “Gentlemen, are not men strongest, who rule over land and sea and all that is in them? 3 But the king is stronger; he is their lord and master, and whatever he says to them they obey. 4 If he tells them to make war on one another, they do it; and if he sends them out against the enemy, they go, and conquer mountains, walls, and towers. 5 They kill and are killed, and do not disobey the king’s command; if they win the victory, they bring everything to the king—whatever spoil they take and everything else. 6 Likewise those who do not serve in the army or make war but till the soil, whenever they sow, reap the harvest and bring some to the king; and they compel one another to pay taxes to the king. 7 And yet he is only one man! If he tells them to kill, they kill; if he tells them to release, they release; 8 if he tells them to attack, they attack; if he tells them to lay waste, they lay waste; if he tells them to build, they build; 9 if he tells them to cut down, they cut down; if he tells them to plant, they plant. 10 All his people and his armies obey him. Moreover, he reclines, he eats and drinks and sleeps, 11 but they keep watch around him and no one may go away to attend to his own affairs, nor do they disobey him. 12 Gentlemen, why is not the king the strongest, since he is to be obeyed in this fashion?” And he stopped speaking.

The Speech about Women

13 Then the third, that is Zerub′babel, who had spoken of women and truth, began to speak: 14 “Gentlemen, is not the king great, and are not men many, and is not wine strong? Who then is their master, or who is their lord? Is it not women? 15 Women gave birth to the king and to every people that rules over sea and land. 16 From women they came; and women brought up the very men who plant the vineyards from which comes wine. 17 Women make men’s clothes; they bring men glory; men cannot exist without women. 18 If men gather gold and silver or any other beautiful thing, and then see a woman lovely in appearance and beauty, 19 they let all those things go, and gape at her, and with open mouths stare at her, and all prefer her to gold or silver or any other beautiful thing. 20 A man leaves his own father, who brought him up, and his own country, and cleaves to his wife. 21 With his wife he ends his days, with no thought of his father or his mother or his country. 22 Hence you must realize that women rule over you!

“Do you not labor and toil, and bring everything and give it to women? 23 A man takes his sword, and goes out to travel and rob and steal and to sail the sea and rivers; 24 he faces lions, and he walks in darkness, and when he steals and robs and plunders, he brings it back to the woman he loves. 25 A man loves his wife more than his father or his mother. 26 Many men have lost their minds because of women, and have become slaves because of them. 27 Many have perished, or stumbled, or sinned, because of women. 28 And now do you not believe me?

“Is not the king great in his power? Do not all lands fear to touch him? 29 Yet I have seen him with Apame, the king’s concubine, the daughter of the illustrious Bartacus; she would sit at the king’s right hand 30 and take the crown from the king’s head and put it on her own, and slap the king with her left hand. 31 At this the king would gaze at her with mouth agape. If she smiles at him, he laughs; if she loses her temper with him, he flatters her, that she may be reconciled to him. 32 Gentlemen, why are not women strong, since they do such things?”

The Speech about Truth

33 Then the king and the nobles looked at one another; and he began to speak about truth: 34 “Gentlemen, are not women strong? The earth is vast, and heaven is high, and the sun is swift in its course, for it makes the circuit of the heavens and returns to its place in one day. 35 Is he not great who does these things? But truth is great, and stronger than all things. 36 The whole earth calls upon truth, and heaven blesses her. All God’s works quake and tremble, and with him there is nothing unrighteous. 37 Wine is unrighteous, the king is unrighteous, women are unrighteous, all the sons of men are unrighteous, all their works are unrighteous, and all such things. There is no truth in them and in their unrighteousness they will perish. 38 But truth endures and is strong for ever, and lives and prevails for ever and ever. 39 With her there is no partiality or preference, but she does what is righteous instead of anything that is unrighteous or wicked. All men approve her deeds, 40 and there is nothing unrighteous in her judgment. To her belongs the strength and the kingship and the power and the majesty of all the ages. Blessed be the God of truth!” 41 He ceased speaking; then all the people shouted, and said, “Great is truth, and strongest of all!”

A2 says:

Fantastic debate. I’ll keep it in my quotes file.

Hesiod says:

>Musk is tweeting nineteenth century leftism

Indeed, but it’s a start. A lot of MAGA has as its idealism 18th century leftism or at least the original 13-colonies brand. Have to be careful around normiecons with their “America don’t need no king” and “muh freedom of religion”. But I will say four years hence from the coof lockdowns frens and fam are more receptive to Reactionary theory even if it leaves them silent and frustrated in expression.

Dr. Faust says:

Every public leader seems to be a gigantic, dripping pussy. We need a warrior leader who just pounded the crack rock to declare Christ is King and only faggots disagree. I’m sick of nice words. I hate placating to women’s sensibility and their penchant for niceness. We need Sabretooth to declare himself High King of Nigger Death and appoint the Taliban as head of the Department of Female Enslavement.

Pax Imperialis says:

Warriors and leaders are forged, not born, and the process of making them is largely owned by the regime. Don’t expect there to be a plethora of potential warrior speech in our environment.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/28rYxSCpLTo

You might say, ‘well that’s just the military’, but nearly every church, police department, or other organization that might serve as the training ground for leadership is also regime subverted.

If by some chance you’re a public leader who happens to be a dissident, you must pay lip service to the regime else find yourself under investigations, lawfare, and increasingly direct action. So if Elon, who we have much indication is aligned with us, skirts around the edges of regime approved speech, so be it.

To move by oneself in the short term is suicide. To not move in the long term is suicide. There will come a time when they have to move, and all of a sudden you’ll find their speech becomes much more frank. Historically, you only get bold declarations of the new regime after the security apparatus has been mobilized and the now previous regime has been liquidated. Of course, if the security apparatus did not mobilize sufficiently, they end up getting the old regime giving a speech about reactionary elements needing to be purged.

Cloudswrest says:

Not endorsing Ms. Blaire White (if you know what I mean), but holy f*ck!!! Check out this whole thread! Kamala campaign is using AI to inflate crowds!!!!
In one example the foreground crowd is not reflected on the shiny airplane surface!

https://x.com/MsBlaireWhite/status/1822383114414420479

Cloudswrest says:

Looks like the original source is from a parody account.

Dr. Faust says:

2020 fraud is the new standard and only action taken by our Holy Merchant will stop it. Will he draw the sword from the stone and declare himself king? Did taking a bullet enliven the warrior within? Or will he pout and file a claim with the DAs office?

Nothing is decided in November. Nothing.

Anonymous Fake says:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/facebook-nukes-richard-dawkins-account-after-saying-male-boxers-should-not-fight-women

The end of an era. Christians actually showed up to debate Dawkins, even if most neutral people thought he won every debate. But the left will not bother to debate him.

Science is in a dark age now.

Pete says:

If you have power you don’t need to debate. You simply issue orders, and people can either follow the orders or receive punishment. The Left has power, Christians do not.

Pax Imperialis says:

>Science is in a dark age now.
>now.

As usual, AF is behind the curve

Anon says:

According to jim , he almost 80y late since ww2 when harvard conquered the world .
The closesd to jim analysis is peter theil and he think science and technology are slowing down since the 70s.
Something about the 70s always bothered me is that a switch was flipped and suddenly women where everywhere, especially universities. How come?

/pol/watcher says:

Of course there was the ending of Breton Woods, so a need to commodify the labor of women for more taxes, else the inflationary effect of overspending would be even worse. Additionally, ‘men’ had lost the war in Vietnam, so women reacted accordingly. This was accelerated with the fall of the Soviet Union in 91. At that point, women collectively decided they didn’t need protection anymore, so the war on men escalated.

someDude says:

Most neutral people did not think dawk won. They were told that dawk won.

A2 says:

It’s gruesomely fascinating that the self-styled Great Britain now has reached the Year of Five Emperors. There has been Boris the Bumbler, Liz the Honest Fool, Short Dark Rishi, and now Keir the Fuckwit. One may have thought it to be impossible for Labour to fail so badly in leadership, yet there they are.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_of_the_Five_Emperors

PS. Plz rescue me from moderation

jim says:

Moderation is broken. I will shortly try reinstalling wordpress, see if that works.

In the meantime, you have been added as a user. See if logging in works

Hesiod says:

Labour’s cunning plan is to lock up native whites and let them bleed to death via withholding medical care because racism:

https://archive.ph/f98Oj

Found a lot of “anti-racism” articles from the Royal College of Nursing which is now totally converged and Africanized.

jim says:

Genocide rapidly approaches, and Britain’s national health system will operate the killing fields.

The basic line will be same as in every previous genocide — “we are only going to kill the people that resist the genocide”

Cloudswrest says:

Hi stakes skeet shooting in Ukraine.

Very few men will ever do something as cool as blasting a g*y little robot out of the sky while ripping a heater and blasting down the road in the back of a truck with their buds.

https://x.com/simpatico771/status/1822738782808137971

Cloudswrest says:

If you think it’s just Trump, or the right, look at what just happened to Tulsi Gabbard. The day after publicly criticizing Kamala, she was placed on the terrorist watch list, and has been given “extended scrutiny” at every TSA stop since.

Pax Imperialis says:

Not surprising. Communists have consistently screeched that Beria/Lenin/etc were actually right wing reactionaries.

jim says:

First they will kill off all straight white right wing males.

Then all straights, all whites, all males, and all “right wingers”.

The Cominator says:

To be fair Beria ideologically kind of was, he very narrowly escaped execution after the revolution for being a counter revolutionary and basically kept getting hired to kill Bolsheviks BECAUSE he was a reactionary who liked killing Bolsheviks.

skippy says:

Never seen anyone claim Lenin was a rightist, and they erected a statue of Lenin in SF, so probably few except cranks think he was a rightist.

Stalin very clearly was a rightist, and the USSR would have lost WWII without Stalin, but as the Party Machine was a very real thing until the later 20th century, few said so until Krushchev’s denunciation, which itself was secret.

Beria was probably to the right of Stalin.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

What’s notable is just how ‘artless’, for lack of a better term, the incumbent order’s mechanisms of ordination have become.

Would suddenly putting an inner party congress woman on a ‘terrorist watch list’ as a means of punishing them for going off the reservation not also simply debase the whole concept as a side effect?

Yes, and also irrelevant, as far as they are concerned; the functionary today is simply to going to pull whatever level is closest available for them to pull.

jim says:

If Thermidor does not stage a coup soon, they are all going to die.

Pax Imperialis says:

Their track record shows they care about the future about as much as homosexuals do.

Anonymous Fake says:

Have you noticed that [*deleted*]

jim says:

No, I have not noticed that. The reason for my failure to notice is probably that when someone glows in the dark, I do not pay much attention to what he is saying.

Because the extreme deranged left is always fighting with the even more extreme deranged left, they send in their shills to stir up similar troubles on the right — where they get about as much traction as flat earthers.

Because Twitter still censors the right and still promotes shills, I don’t pay a whole lot of attention to what is going down on twitter. Every so often Musk finds that he himself is being censored.

TheFeebleClone says:

“Every so often Musk finds that he himself is being censored.” That really doesn’t surprise me. I was shadow banned and I’m almost certain I never posted anything even moderately controversial. I assume it was topicality rather than content.

That they have “open source” documentation in their censorship/visbility algorithm at twitter doesn’t mean it’s accessible. Look at it, it would require a professional to follow its implication.

I think anyone with practical experience with complicated legislation or legal issues with complicated precedents understands this pretty well. Plain sight line is often the best setting for camouflage.

Anonymous Fake says:

For whatever reason, I am basically invisible on Twitter, as my replies only get seen by 10-100 people even when I’m replying to a guy with 100k+ views per post. And they never repost what I say, or respond to it. I get the feeling that 99% of media is simply paying for a bigger megaphone, and not the inherent value of ideas.

But when I see hundreds of comments saying the same thing, idiotic MAGA proles making anti-Christian comments, I take it as real.

jim says:

The left cannot meme. No one is interested in your parallel universe. Plus, the algorithm probably thinks you are a bot, because a lot of your posts that I silently delete, look robotic to me.

> hundreds of comments saying the same thing,

I am following Maga on X, and I just don’t see this. At all. Give me some account @names. On Gab, the anti Christian fake right posters are all obvious shills. On X, I just don’t see any. Maybe the algorithm is preventing us from seeing the fake right arguing with the real Christians and the fake Christians arguing with the real right.

On Gab, whenever I am attacked from the left by a fake Christian, I hit them with the affirmation. No one has passed yet, and some of them drop the holier than thou fake Christian act and start shrieking about how the Bible is full of of horrible stuff.

Encelad says:

Britain going full totalitarian, with authorities gleefully flaunting all the people arrested during the protests. All names are British and include 12 year old boys

https://nitter.poast.org/CPSUK/status/1822937443043016898#m

The Cominator says:

You strike leviathan you must kill it.

Fidelis says:

https://x.com/frog_horizon/status/1823127424395030745

More than 1/3 of people polled say a violent overthrow is justified. You just need a guy that can organize — with these numbers even a very crude organization with a very vague plan would do — and not get assassinated and you win.

jim says:

That bullet whizzing through Trump’s ear should tell Trump that God saved him, and appointed him King.

When the Judiciary, the Department of Justice, the FBI (who just tried to kill him), and the official media again steal the election, even less believably than the last two times, he just has pull the sword from the stone, and get on with Kinging.

His people are many, and unafraid. All they need is the command.

If he chickens out like last time, the next bullet will not miss. Reading Baron’s body language, Baron sees the new normal. Hearing Tucker speak, Tucker sees the new normal. I pray that Trump gets the message that God, Tucker, and probably Baron are sending him.

Fidelis says:

The people around him need to throw him, kicking and screaming, far across the Rubicon. They have no choice but to fight or die, just as Trump has no choice– and we have found out Trump finds the steel in his spine when under fire.

jim says:

> The people around him need to throw him, kicking and screaming, far across the Rubicon.

That is what happened to Pinochet.

Cloudswrest says:

Pretty much Franco too.

Mister Grumpus says:

and honestly I wonder if Julius Caesar himself got thrown over and/or dragged through some of that water himself. Maybe this pattern goes all the way back to the beginning.

Team A game theory vs. Team B game theory, all the way down? I wouldn’t be surprised.

jim says:

It was Caesar’s decision, but who specifically triggered the decision was Mark Antony, who had fled Rome believing he was about to be killed. A couple of days after he fled, they passed the senatus consultum ultimum, a general authority to kill anyone without charges, trial, or due process, plus a demand for Caesar to return to Rome to face criminal charges that would result in the death penalty. Mark Antony was not suffering normality bias. Caesar was, continued to suffer it, and died of it.

The Cominator says:

Don’t think Caesar was suffering normality bias Caesar just didn’t think his moronic assassins would have done such a thing because he figured they knew his supporters would eventually come back and kill them for it and the Republic was dead anyway.

It was his assassins suffering normality bias, Caesar foolishly just assumed they weren’t stupid.

jim says:

There were a whole lot of negotiations during the period in which people agreed to restore the old normality — which agreements predictably always came to nothing. Clear that everyone who was a party to those negotiations was suffering severe normality bias.

Everyone wanted to avoid defect/defect, even when it became obvious that enormous numbers of Romans were going to be killed by Romans, they were trying to avoid that outcome by returning to the old normal. Everyone wanted the old normal back, but they could not get from where they were to where they wanted to be.

Once someone starts cheating on the mechanisms for peaceful transition of power, then there is no alternative to violent transition of power. You just have to kill all enemies, suspected enemies, potential enemies, and suspected potential enemies, or they are going to kill you. Normiecon bias is that we can live with just a little bit of cheating. No you cannot.

Trump cannot win, no one can win, unless they kill a whole lot of people, and, after killing a whole lot of people, establish a new mechanism for peaceful transfer of power. But very hard to establish a mechanism for peaceful transfer of power if you lack a virtuous elite.

The Cominator says:

By that time Rome had already been through the civil wars of Sulla and Pompey (and I think there was another guy too who was more obscure) had also marched on the city… and also Clodius (an interesting character but generally an ally of Caesar) controlled the forum sporadically via gangs loyal to him.

So I find this hard to believe… one reason Caesar seemed to incite a lot more derangement from the Optimates than Pompey is that the gens Julii had probably the best claim to be the heirs of the ancient royal family of Rome. Pompey could be a strongman during his life, but only Caesar could actually be the king (they were kind of wrong about this but its probably what they thought).

Oskar says:

> His people are many, and unafraid. All they need is the command.

An interesting article.

‘A different afternoon, a different leader put forward his own proposal. “We haven’t made any head way in the last 5 plus years,” he wrote. Let’s pick a date and descend on government buildings across the country, he suggested, and then kill the officials who’ve committed treason. “Time to stack body’s up.”’

https://www.propublica.org/article/inside-secret-ap3-militia-american-patriots-three-percent

somedude says:

Sounds like a Fed

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

War and politics in an age of atomization.

We have seen, as occasionally observed, this as a classic bellwether of late empire societies; #trillions in damages can be caused in spontaneous outbreaks of violence, and yet see nothing come of it – nothing grow out of it – and see the state muddle through regardless, because however debased they may be at the moment, their victims still have zero coordination.

These are now multiple generations of people who have all grown up and lived and worked knowing nothing but atomization. Not only do they have no bunds, no leadership, no social superstructures of organization, they do not even know what it is or how to get it even if they wanted it; do not even know what to look for; would not even recognize it even if they were looking at it.

Cloudswrest says:

The woke Left’s response to Musk’s fireside chat with Trump appears to be unhinged! It’s like they think it is (or should be) illegal and they are trying to get the government to ban it. Europe too.

dave says:

Trump and Musk went for two and a half hours in completely unscripted and unfettered dialogue. Musk offered full support and sympathy. Broad range of topics. Trump was rambling, but on point and was carrying conversation throughout the entire thing.

This is a white pill. Musk is signalling Thermidorian support for Trump. Offers his platform to help Trump break through leftist media stonewall. Simultaneously shows off Trump at his strongest, the ability to ramble for two and a half hours and stay on point, which is something his opponent can’t do, because of inability to stay on point in a lucid way (word salad) and also too afraid to say what they really mean in an open format.

Twitter is now a major threat to the regime. expect lawfare, legislation, hacks, and ultimately a splinternet that keeps Twitter unroutable for many parts of the internet. Thermidor and internet design will prevent some of this, but it will be contemplated and tried.

But the whitepill is that the interview happened despite those threats, the Trump/thermidor deal may already be coup complete, and this is a signal of it. another big signal is to see what the Fed does with interest rates in September, they will have to decide what side they are on.

Aidan says:

Trump implied that he wanted to de-FDR the federal government and wanted to hire Musk to purge and dismantle the three letter agencies. We had Bukele and Milei as “trial runs” for mass removal of troublesome populations and complete axing of hostile government departments. Looks like Thermidor knows what time it is, and a number of influential and potentially powerful people are getting behind Trump in a very real and serious bid for power.

Dharmicreality says:

I am extremely displeased but not really surprised by the BJP government’s weak and useless stand against the ongoing genocide of Hindus in Bangladesh. This was a moment when Bharat should have risked an all out war and sent an army into Bangladesh to protect Hindus. Would be a symbolic move even to move troops into the border. So what if GAE steps in? The GAE has proved to be an enemy anyway and continuing to play by western diplomacy rules is never going to work.

Yes, there are a lot of international implications but unlike Putin, Modi doesn’t have the stomach for a war to save his own people and civilisation. BJP is too caught up in its blue pilled cuck nationalism and playing useless democratic games internally.

We are in urgent need of a Hindu monarch and revival of Kshatriya rule, as much as America needs a Christian monarch.

someDude says:

Gon’ be hard, Dawg!

Dharmic monarchs don’t be grown on trees

somedude says:

And while we are on the topic of Dharmic Monarchs, do we even have a Dharmic Jim? A dharmic Dugin, even?

A Chandragupta needs a Chanakya to become a Chandragupta! Where is our Chanakya? The best we have at the moment are the modern day equals of Nana Phadnavis of the Marathas. That ain’t gon’ cut it, now is it?

This is going to need divine intervention. The old Gods will have to work with us on this one.

Dharmicreality says:

I’m not sure whether any RSS top people are reactionary, since the whole foundation of the Sangh was socialistic, just a different flavour from that of Nehruvian socialism. Yes, there is talk in the mainstream media about Hindu genocide in Bangladesh. But being wedded to democracy and the secular constitution nothing can actually be done of course. We all know this and it’s all so frustrating.

Yes, we need divine intervention. I’m trying hard not to be black pilled. But within the next five years we need some drastic change.

Contaminated NEET says:

You guys just have to hang on until the GAE completes its suicide. It might be years, decades, or (god forbid) centuries, but you’ve probably got the sheer human biomass to endure until better times. What’s coming down the pike is going to discredit democracy, multiculturalism, globalism, secularism, feminism, and homosexuality for generations.

The Cominator says:

It won’t be centuries or at most more than a single decade.

Contaminated NEET says:

We will see. The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.

The Cominator says:

Thats the thing… the US ain’t going to be solvent that long.

someDude says:

The GAE is just one of many obstacles. Just because the GAE goes, does not mean we will get a Dharmic Monarch. It does not mean Modi will abolish democracy. He might well double down saying the GAE did democracy wrong.

We might well get civil war and there is no guarantees the Hindus are going to win that one.

Or we may continue on our millenia and a half old path of civilizational ling-chi, i.e. death by a thousand cuts, which seems the most likely. The past has great inertia. I can almost sympathise with chairman Mao and the cultural revolution. Almost!

Contaminated NEET says:

It’s not just, or even primarily, that the GAE won’t be an obstacle anymore – it’s that the GAE’s flamboyant death-throes will explode any legitimacy or appeal of the suicidal Progressive memeplex that has hypnotized India’s leaders.

dharmicreality says:

@Contaminated NEET,

In India, globohomo despite its almost complete capture of the media and Judiciary is still something of an imported commodity with its appeal limited to the English speaking elite and even lukewarm because the current generation of Leftist elites in India were bred on old type Marxism.

These old Commies are still stubbornly holding on and in a sense their adopting of wokeism has been weak and half-hearted. You would find that reservation of quotas for “backward classes” (a.k.a affirmative action) is a bigger issue than “rights” of faggots and LGBTQWERTYs in India despite the top Courts making a big deal of it. In India, 90s Leftism is still going strong.

someDude says:

@contaminated NEET, a collapse of the GAE will prevent the Indian left from growing, but it won’t dehypnotize them. They’re too invested and i expect a doubling down on progressive values after declaring India the last bastion of enlightenment values abandoned by the west. It will have to be helicopter rides to the Bay of Bengal

someDude says:

One white pill. Atleast they are permitting the media to report on Mohammedans lynching Hindus and desecrating the shrines. There was a time when the media could not report all this.

It may well be a case of too little too late, but keep in mind that similar reports are not permitted in the occident, the UK riots being a case on point

dharmicreality says:

A part of the Indian media which is otherwise almost thoroughly globohomogenized is surprisingly holding out for Hindu Nationalism, which is an indication that globohomo is still only an imported commodity and hasn’t become quite the mind-virus it is in the West, where it breeds on native soil.

However, the old Commie Left more than make up for that deficiency as their Hindu hatred is even more vicious and long standing than that of globohomo wokeism. The difference is not subtle, but it is otherwise an academic issue for Dharmics like us.

someDude says:

I think there is a faction among the Indian elite that indeed thinks of mohammedanism as the enemy and they are allowing the media to report it. The media, in Bharat as in the west, are a bunch of whores always ready to suck power’s cock.

They would not be reporting it if the progressives led by kejriwal were in power.

Dharmicreality says:

Yes, in the GAE the entire media was solidly anti-Trump when he was actually official president, while in India, the BJP has ideological leverage on some issues in the media.

The funny thing is the BJP is more “woke” than the old Commie Left on some issues.

Which shows that the present state religion in India isn’t quite as clear cut as in the West.

Sher Singh says:

Or we may continue on our millenia and a half old path of civilizational ling-chi, i.e. death by a thousand cuts.

Eh Raah Guru Gobind Singh Ji ne Chaar Puttar Vaar Ke Taal Ditta Si.

Uth Ke Sir Te Pagg Van Hath Vir Farh Talwar

Hun Chaar Varan Vi Apni Karamat Vikoun Ge

ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

Sher Singh says:

The state religion of Endia is to steal from the house of the upper caste.

The arguments and divisions are because these small souled people believe they’ve won and start arguing over the spoils.

It’s a similar situation to the Vijaynagar era when the sultans split into 3.

Our goal must be to preserve, and grow our racial stock to grind up and destroy both Turk and dasyu.

Both the Mohammedans and the Bastard cult are only temporary problems.

ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

someDude says:

Yes, they are not clear cut. That’s why we need a Chanakya. It is the job of the good Brahmin to bring clarity to these issues and be able to convince the Kshatriya how following the Dharma will increase the Kshatriya’s own base of power. Needs a reformation

Another white Pill, the RSS, for all their flaws are the best we have. Their impotence on Bangladesh notwithstanding, their assault on the powers of the waqf board brings a sliver of Hope

We need the old Gods to help us! If they wish to continue to be worshipped on this earth, they better help us out.

Handi says:

Hello is this the Hindoo Curry Restaurant? I’d like to order one chicken tikka masala and one chicken vindaloo please. Also a side of rice and naan

jim says:

This Hindoo stuff is relevant. Right now we have five nuclear powers (not counting muppet states as independent nuclear powers) and thus potentially five major state religions. (Most states, sooner or later, one way or another, wind up following the state religion of a major nuclear power.)

Right now all the major state religions are walking dead, and the vacuum attracts demons real or metaphorical. Putin is addressing this problem by putting Russian Orthodoxy on life support. Seems to be working. Christianity is good at resurrection.

Best case outcome is Russia goes Russian Orthodox, the rump of the Global American Empire goes Christian Protestant Nationalist, China goes Christian Protestant with Chinese characteristics, Pakistan goes old type Muslim, following the highly successful example of the Taliban, and India goes old type Hindu. But Hinduism has been walking dead for well over a thousand years, while Anglicanism has only been walking dead for two centuries years. Into this vacuum, demons walk. So a highly likely outcome is that woke dies as the state religion of the Global American Empire and is replaced by something else, but something very similar to woke winds up ruling India.

All the Indian commenters seem to blink at reviving fifteen hundred year old Hinduism, while not a single Christian blinks at reviving two centuries old Christianity.

The Global American Empire is horrified by the threat that Modi might revive Hinduism the way Putin is reviving Russian Orthodoxy, but our Indian commenters seem to doubt both Modi’s resolve, and current year Hinduism’s fitness.

alf says:

We need the old Gods to help us! If they wish to continue to be worshipped on this earth, they better help us out.

I don’t get this. Do you think you can blackmail your gods into helping you? Only a weak god would be moved by blackmail.

someDude says:

@alf, we’re blackpilling man! It’s essentially a cry of despair

Contaminated NEET says:

@someDude
If it wasn’t for blackpills, I wouldn’t have any pills.

Sher Singh says:

It’s a terror tactic meant to demoralize & scare people to make these things appear normal, and for you to feel helpless.

There’s a magnitude of difference between the UK riot & what goes on in Hind.

The old Gods are found in weapons.

Stock up.

ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

Mayflower Sperg says:

The Western Front of WW1 is best remembered for its years of grinding trench warfare, but it began and ended as a war of movement.

Kiev just demonstrated for a second time that if you plan an offensive so risky and stupid that the enemy takes no precautions against it, and you don’t share this plan with the boy-lovers in Washington, it just might work. It’s the same principle that had Hitler’s armies striking through the Ardennes, twice.

Putin needs to stay calm and fight on Russian soil exactly as he’s fighting on Ukrainian soil. There is no border, only a line of contact. The only difference here is that the European Plain gets more forested the farther north you go, so more tree cover for troops to hide under.

The Cominator says:

Is it going to work though… or are the troops doing it just going to get cutoff encircled and destroyed. And as far as the second Ardennes offensive goes yes the whole thing does remind of the battle of the bulge, it felt good to the Germans for a second that it just might work but ultimately led to faster destruction of what was left of their army.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

The Kursk raid is like a glass of milk; the longer Kiev leaves it hanging out, the more sour is gets.

The best thing they could have done, having achieved operational surprise and rolled up several battalions of national guard conscripts… was to withdraw. Turn the area into another grey zone like the rest of the theater to ensure their counterparts would have to slog through it if they want it like usual, but look elsewhere for more opportunities and don’t keep throwing good money after bad.

As you might imagine, most people, and especially the coke goblin and his hangers-on, are resistant to this kind of thinking. They just went through the trouble of putting together this great big offensive plan, they want it to ‘pay off’, they don’t want to make the methods generic, they want it to be the biggest one-and-done they can get.

Speaking more broadly, one might say these events lend spiritual validity to the Suvorov Hypothesis of the ostfront in 1942. A Russian force caught flat-footed by an attack because they themselves were planning an attack in the same direction (f.ex. removing the minefields), and interpreted the force buildup on the other side as simply defensive reinforcement, but got beaten to the punch instead.

Aidan says:

It only “worked” in the sense that it got some adulatory articles published in western media. When you have low troop density due to enemy munitions, a blitzkrieg can look like it’s taking a lot of territory. The Ukrainians sped through low density Russian lines, inflicted respectable casualties on the inexperienced Russian soldiers in the direction, then got butchered by artillery and airstrikes, and promptly retreated to a semi defensible position, a town that they barely have a toehold in, which if they attempt to seriously hold, will cost them an enormous amount more men and material.

It seems that they wanted to actually capture the nuclear plant and cause it to melt down, or hold the threat of making it melt down over the US to secure more material. The second objective was to attempt to cause falling, falling Russia to move armies from the front into Kursk, letting UKR’s second big reserve attack whatever region Russia pulls troops from, but Russia did not bite on this, so now the second big Ukrainian army is probably going to be shoved into the Kursk cauldron to get blown up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *