In order for people to live together in peace, you have to understand your adversary. You don’t have to agree but you have to understand why he says what he says and does what he does. You have to understand how he see the world and how he sees you. The left refuses to know their enemy, thus must be destroyed, or all normies will be destroyed
If people will not discuss, war it is.
The left, all of it, even moderates such as the Young Turks, systematically encourages the murder of its opponents. They have no alternative but to do this, because the left cannot acknowledge, nor meaningfully respond to, their opponents reasoning and position, so must project their own demonic objectives onto their hated enemies. Being incapable of debate, they must exterminate. The end point of leftism is the Seven Kill Stele. There cannot be peace except with those that can criticise the positions we actually hold, instead of condemning us for the voices of their demons. We must conquer them, for if they conquer us, they will kill us.
The Young Turks continued to inspire people to murder political opponents. They piously declare that violence is a both sides problem, while continuing to promote rationales for murder
Cenk Uygur:
“I agreed with Charlie Kirk on some things. I disagreed with him on others, such as race”.
And their audience then fills in the blanks on what Charlie Kirk supposedly says about race.
This was of course a lie, a lie intended to eliminate opposition in order to evade discussion. Charlie Kirk was a normiecon. He agreed with the evil, destructive, dangerous, and deluded left position on race. He agreed with the evil madness pushed by the Young Turks on race. What he disagreed with was affirmative action.
The Young Turks has directly caused the murder of quite a few people. And they are the least bad faction of the left. We can trace some murders explicitly to Young Turks merely because they are an influential platform, and thus connections are traceable, but they were and are saying the same things as the entire rest of the left on exterminate-the-right topics, saying it less, and in a more moderate fashion, with vastly greater willingness to talk to the enemies that they seek to exterminate.
I am not ranting on the Young Turks because exceptionally bad. On the contrary, they are exceptionally good.
I am ranting on them because being major highly influential Youtube platform, they left a trail of blood, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvIjonr5hOs, while with other influencers the trail is less clear, each one’s evil being mingled with the evil of so many others that no one particular leftist is identifiably culpable.
By uttering the lie “race”, when he should have spoken the truth “affirmative action”, Cenk Uygur endorsed and supported the murder of Charlie Kirk that he was piously condemning.
This is inherent in the nature of the left. Because they are unable to respond to the reasons, evidence and arguments presented by those who disagree with them, they have no alternative but demonisation.
And demonisation leads to extermination. To avoid war, no leftist who presents demonisation in place of rational argument, which is to say no currently existing leftist, can be permitted. Freedom of speech is for people who can use it to engage in rational discussion. If discussion is impossible, war it is.
The Democrats are afraid. You have a unique opportunity and momentum to crush the Left for decades, if not permanently. Expect them to pull out the Controlled Opposition in full force to prevent that. Beware the CIA plants.
The Hostile Regime hinges on your distraction.
The trade unions are the beating heart of normal and truly moderate leftists, arguably necessary for the left to remain functional at all in the long run (queers and dopes and cat ladies and dindus and gullible first generation immigrants won’t do). Jews and Hispanics have turned right and the world is running out of fresh meat immigrants because of feminism. And the Boomers are dying.
If manufacturing comes back due to the tariffs, and lots of new union work opens up, it will be a pitched battle to either turn organized labor red (a possible path to national socialism) or concede that the establishment will blue the new crew and we’re going back to boring purple decline as usual. But the overall potential payoff is worth the risk.
Leftism moved on from the working class a long time ago. The left has hated the working class for the last forty years. And, in consequence, Trade Union leadership has hated the working class for the last thirty years. Trade unions are as much a part of the state as the legacy media — and have the same attitude to the working class as the legacy media.
based
https://x.com/StephenM/status/1967940333309923754 says :
“The path forward is not to mimic the ACLU of the mid 90’s.
It is to take all necessary and rational steps to save Western Civilization.”
Seems like people around Trump get it.
Erecting a loyal military force under the ICE budget expansion was an important step. Clearing out FBI, DOJ, Defense etc will take years if it is even possible. Circumvention using ICE at the size it will be in 2026, is a more plausible route.
I’m seeing all these accusatory adjectives thrown at Charlie Kirk (thus justifying his murder for religious reasons), but no actual film of him behaving or speaking in such a manner.
Here the thoughtcrime model works very well. It’s not only a thoughtcrime to speak a thoughtcrime, but also to understand what someone else’s thoughtcrime even is or means. So every thoughtcrime will “ricochet” off a leftist in a wild religious direction, “demonization”.
They can’t just return the serve.
I’m sad but shouldn’t be. Charlie wasn’t stupid and knew this was coming. They had to silence him somehow.
So this post here is timely and much needed. There’s no more wondering whether the left speaks only in bullets. The inquiry and discussion now is WHY, and how to describe this terrible mechanism that is now blatantly and undeniably at work.
But given all of this, is there an IRL “interface layer” to normiedom left? Because that’s what Charlie was doing — interfacing with normiedom — and better than anyone else was to boot. Is it nothing but anonymous shitlord blogs from now on?
And a nasty position it is to be in. The irony is that in a way the left is correct, in that far far behind Charlie Kirk stand people like me, who absolutely think black women tend to be dumb as rocks. Women are barely able to think an abstract thought. And black average IQ is, what, 75? So it is easy to add up 1 and 1, unless of course you are a black woman.
You’d be surprised. Black society has been matriarchal for a long time, and so their women can be surprisingly competent and functional when compared to the average man. There are definitely black women that are high midwit and well put together. Not discovering any new ideas or inventing Wakanda, but far from dysfunctionally stupid and impulsive like much of their race proves to be. They’re an alien species, the same rules do not fully apply. Not just an alien species, but many many distinct breeds of an alien species, and so you get a very large variance in behavior and ability.
But not so alien that a basic “Bell Curve” observation does not apply: that women tend more towards “average” on the curve, much less likely than men to be on the extreme left or right of it.
This is because some of the genes relevant to innate intelligence are on the X chromosome, so that a woman can have two different versions of a gene, that balance each other out, while a man has just one… so men are far more likely than women to be either Darwin Award candidates or super-geniuses.
Yes and no. There’s more to intellect and personality than ability to score well on IQ tests. There are deceptively many, going by the much shared flat curve with a mean around 80, midwit black females. Something else is going on.
Similarly, there are deceptively few outlier intelligent black males. The STD on their curve is very large, as they are in fact several different races and breeds lumped into one category, and yet you find fewer than expected far right high intelligence black males.
IQ curves are great to throw at midwits, whom cannot handle many dimensions of detail and drown in nuance, but altogether fail to adequately describe reality in full. People act as if IQ outcomes are a perfect 1 to 1 correlation with life outcomes, which no one actually supports when said out loud. I also find them about as useful as BMI numbers, perhaps a bit more so but not by much, which fail tremendously at the extremes and which assume some sort of normalized man that does not exist in reality, except in very small well-related groups like e.g. the Icelandic.
Nigerians, Ugandans and some other immigrant blacks are literally a different breed. Much closer to the white mean IQ, but still tend to have all the other undesirable traits (aggression, high time preference, etc.). I think more so, actually, since the former slave races were selectively bred for docility while these immigrants are more authentically African in temperament.
Black society is a political monolith, and always will be as long as there is a left and/or a Democratic party, but it is not exactly a racial monolith. Which doesn’t make them any less objectively monolithically alien to and largely incompatible with the European phenotype.
Anyway, some of this is just math. People can’t seem to intuitively grok probabilities, same as it ever was. 15% of 15 million (that’s the 1-2 sigma group) is still over 2 million; unless you successfully avoid negroes for your entire life, you’re going to run into a bunch of the semi-functional, moderately intelligent ones. And even the roughly 2.5% in the +2 SD range amounts to almost 400,000, which isn’t something you’re liable to run into by chance, but is plenty large enough of a pool to draw from for a nationwide affirmative action apparatus fervently dedicated to raising them up as idols, so you’re guaranteed to see them on TV, in academia and in companies with diversity programs.
This isn’t about “muh IQ” specifically, you can apply it to any normal distribution. I dispute that there’s “something else” going on with regard to the actually-expected outcomes of the actually-extant probabilities; there’s only “something else” relative to the caricaturized straw-man that replaces “most” with “all”.
We can, by the way, apply the same formula to the main topic of this post. Are there functional leftists out there who aren’t horrifying mutants and perverts and don’t really hate and want to kill everyone an inch to their right? Yeah, some, perhaps 10-15%. You probably know several. I know several. The math nearly guarantees it. But they are the exception that proves the rule, and even to the extent they are exceptional, they still have more in common with their unexceptional demonic comrades-in-arms than they do with you or I.
Just occurred to me after I hit the Post button that my numbers are low. There should be close to 50 million blacks in the USA, I don’t know what faulty memory bank I pulled the 15M number from.
That works in favor of what I posted, not against it, but I’m correcting myself before someone decides to nitpick.
It is a comparison between the sexes that is the oddity. Absolute numbers in the population aren’t relevant. This has been noticed by others (December 2005):
https://www.unz.com/isteve/do-black-women-have-higher-iqs-than/
“Thomas Sowell has been arguing for a number of years that black women score higher on IQ tests than black men:”
“Studies had shown that females predominated among high-IQ blacks. One study of blacks whose IQs were 140 and up found that there were more than five times as many females as males at these levels.”
“So, at least on the AFQT, Sowell appears to be right: black women score 2.4 points higher than black men, while white women score only 0.8 points higher that white men.”
(white men had the highest standard deviation, while black male SD was the same as white female SD (with black female slightly higher)).
> he died for the ability to hold a conversation…
… one based on Truth, and Faith.
> The assault on USAID
Was full of win. But no gov critter ever imprisoned yet, only riffed. USAID isn’t even completely shutdown, but was subsumed into the office of a guy who just went to Israel, kissed the ring, stuffed paper in the wall, and wailed.
So much more to assault.
RICO on the Soros, Foundations, and NGO… patently obvious, but who will do time? Who will actually be shutdown vs shifted to new entity and tactics.
> unable to respond
This behaviour pattern.
I see it in both the Left, and Islam.
When presented with sound evidence and/or counter proposal,
they both manifest rage and murder, and/or dodge redirect and flee.
In the hierarchy of races, this behavioural trait (presumably inherited, but perhaps susceptibly learned in sordid communes) must lie somewhere between that of the reasonable NorthWest White-types, and that of the incomprehension of the “Plains Apes”.
There should be research studies on
– What caused them to do that
– What enabled the few of them to leave that
On the other hand perhaps we are at the point of looking at history…
Any side’s “Thermidor” has a relatively small capability for correcting its side’s things, once that capacity is exceeded by the breadth times distance-of-excursion sum, and your civ has already bifurcated along lines…
Well, history shows bloody reboot is all that’s left.
It’s not a happy acknowledgement, nor preferred, nor proferred.
But what’s left, really, at such a point, but the unstoppable fall into that?
How much more tolerance of blood spilled by the Left will there be? One more clearly political attempt or success? 10? 100?
How much more mechanical encroachment by Leftism upon the Liberty enjoyed for say ~100 years post-1776?
Genocide of the 2000+ year prevailing Civ-type?
In the spirit of Charlie, I’d be inclined to give peace a chance at the 2026 election, for the Right to completely eject the Left from office. Maybe the Libertarians can fill their seats.
Given the Left must know their odds at 2026 are approaching zero, I doubt the Left will wait that long before breaching the peace in a major way.
The war won’t be pretty, but the Right will win in the end.
The left has already spilled quite a lot of blood. But Charlie Kirk was different, because very large numbers of people knew of him and liked him, and in particular, Trump and people around Trump knew him and liked him. It came home to them in a way that killing a landlord or a cop does not. The left reaction varied between dancing in the streets, to piously deploring (right wing) political violence while delicately implying that it was Charlie Kirk’s fault for being a fascist and a threat to the existence of blacks, gays, et cetera, that the left was just reacting to the terrible shocking violence of Charlie Kirk trying to engage the left in uncomfortable conversations, and the right needed to tone down this terrible right wing violence.
The right was just horrified by the left’s reaction. Charlie Kirk was a normiecon, and every normie can do the arithmetic. If the left wants to murder Charlie Kirk, they want to murder every normie.
This is what has changed, and changed radically and fundamentally. The left has dropped its mask. If fascists need to be killed, and Charlie Kirk was a fascist, every normie is a fascist, and every normie needs to be killed. I just watched the latest episode of the The Young Turks, where they dropped their position that Charles Kirk was murdered by right wingers, and pretty much conceded that a trannie cult was involved in his murder, but they have yet to walk back all the nasty lies they have implied about Charlie Kirk.
In this blog, I make a lot of predictions, and when one of them does not work out, I fear that someone will jump on me, so I get out in front and issue a retraction, to defuse the issue. That way I can spin the retraction my way, and if anyone else raises the issue, no one is going to care. If I remind people of my mistakes, that ensures that no one else does, and while admitting my own mistakes is painful, it is less painful than someone else calling them out.
If I was in the Young Turk’s shoes, I would start going through the archives for all many things they have said that contributed to the murder of Charlie Kirk, and start explaining that they really did not mean it that way, it was not what it sounded like, they were really sorry that they said it that way and in future they are going to be a lot more careful about throwing gasoline on the fire. They just are not doing any of that. Indeed, they are unable to do any of that, because Charlie Kirk’s positions are to them unthinkable and unspeakable, so they just have to substitute the screams of demons for whatever Charlie Kirk actually said. Any clean up of their past crimes would have to consist of admitting what Charlie Kirk’s actual positions actually were. Which they still cannot admit.
So, to normies, this looks like the left is rock solid united on killing them all.
It is psychologically more complex than “kill all normies”. It is not that they want to kill all normies. Rather, reality is unendurable, they want to substitute their own reality, they want to immanetize the Eschaton. They think that reality is socially constructed, so that if they make everyone everywhere in the entire world agree with their reality, then their reality will really be real. And if reality is not conforming to their social construction, it is because of doubters, and these doubters have to be persuaded, or, if unpersuadable, eradicated. It is not exactly that they want to kill all normies, but that they want to immanentize the Eschaton by social construction of reality, and the Eschaton is obstinately failing to become immanent, because those irritating normies keep being obstinately normy.
So for them, they are good people, because they want to immanentize the Eschaton, which is going to be absolutely wonderful for everyone, where it not for horrible people preventing it from becoming immanent, Out of sheer hostile nastiness, these bad people keep bringing up hate facts, thus making those horrible hate facts real, and the Eschaton unreal. But, when it comes down to blood, to normies it is now looking awfully like “kill all normies”.
Random walking your way toward truth is fun. Some of my predictions turn out right; some don’t. I predicted the Biden “resignation” thing. On the other end, regulars here will recall that I felt pretty damn sure that electoral fraud was decentralized, so the left had no way of controlling it. After the election of November 2024, I know better. Never adjusting one’s beliefs would be both stupid and boring.
As for leftists, they have more fundamental problems. Since they’re obsessed with power, they see everything as a social dominance contest. (Some things are, but then some things aren’t.) So they suffer horrible emotional pain in ever admitting to being wrong about anything – it sets up the possibility that someone could say “Ha! You were wrong; you stoopid!” which would be not just mildly annoying but psychological agony to them. And it would even worse if it were a person on the Right saying it. That’s why leftists never admit error. They do U-turns all the time, but they never admit that they have done so.
These two things together are key. Kirk’s martyrdom is big offline, and big online in chambers other than this. And it’s got elite impact – a sitting Vice President filling in to host a podcast (and wave the deceased host’s bloody shirt while he was at it) is a big thing. (Though with Trump I always bake in the likelihood his rhetoric is being A-B tested, sometimes he does run with the red meat version. And the Vance-Kirk podcast was a hell of an option to even put to the test.)
The lesson of everything from Uncle Adolf’s rise to power, to the left’s long rise and reign in the US, to Trump 2.0, is that you’ve got to be in the fight in the first place to win it. I’ve had this feeling for a while, that I could have posted in response to any of half a dozen commenters* if I’d developed it further, that they’re not wrong but the time has come to be in it to win it. First gotta do this, first gotta nail down that, must solve the WQ first, or the immigration Q now before we’re past the point of no return, or really nail down the status of blacks or the right to bear arms, or not simp for Hatchet Girl… I have no logical rebuttal of any of that in the abstract.
But my instinctual or emotional rebuttal is that events are moving now, and much more importantly momentum is moving in our direction now. Posters here may not get to pick the schelling point; normies may decide for us. The legal and aboveground movement, which for all practical purposes is to say the Trump movement, has got to be in it to win it. Needs to fight every battle and win every small win that it can for the momentum, not for the abstract principle.
*Unwise of me to reply to our host when I’m not trying to call him out specifically. Of all people he gets a pass on nailing down the principles; he’s who I’m here to read. But neither do I now want to dig back through previous posts to find one of six to call out, and the quote was very germane.
Exactly so.
And with all due respect to all of us internet spergs, the Trump Movement has the best realistic chance to actually bring about at least some of the changes that the Right (or even Reaction) desires.
Which is why Trump must be supported and encouraged, and anyone who suggests siding with the Democrats (or otherwise countersignals MAGA) is an enemy agent.
“The assault on USAID
Was full of win. But no gov critter ever imprisoned yet, only riffed. USAID isn’t even completely shutdown…”
Translating: “Oops, an example was provided of a key win – significantly destroying a key source of leftist funding – so I’d better move the goalposts.”
Cut it out. We are just getting started going on the offensive – you’re not wrong about that. But that’s no excuse to whinge that nothing has changed and dismiss the quite significant victories that the good guys have posted since January.
re: USAID,
Antifa was just declared a terrorist organization. Miller and others are talking about dismantling networks. Strange time for cope-and-whine when victories with large and lasting effects are at hand.
“Antifa was just declared a terrorist organization.”
Excellent!
> Women are barely able to think an abstract thought.
Dumb ones were a blessing, try those. The incoherent disorganized crazy ones were a curse.
Another Man comes to the light via CK…
https://x.com/Girlpatriot1974/status/1967376290257985978
Democrat crime strategy vs Normies
https://x.com/JesseKellyShow/status/1965486820281778607
Trump is starting to counter by flooding select cities with troops.
Whatever happened to deputization of citizens? Or the instant self-deputization of a town via Posse’s? And the even older ways of them being the whole of the law? (Way before silly Statutory Law neutered and corrupted everything.)
Are they really trying to scare off China/Russia/DPRK with these recent videos? That’s absurd. What’s going on?
https://x.com/RepEricBurlison/status/1965438792493355291
https://x.com/UAPJames/status/1965428012934901842
https://x.com/UAPJames/status/1965433261896966468
Some of these are shill links.
Your posts are often thought crime adjacent, but much of this is obvious shill material. So either you are a shill, or you are indiscriminately reposting shill material because you cannot tell the difference.
Maybe my tests just don’t work on Thermidorian shills. Or maybe you are insufficiently suspicious. Please stop indiscriminately posting links. None of these are links I want in my blog.
Example: The Charlie Kirk effect link makes Charlie not merely normie, which he was, but positively Rino adjacent, which he was not, rewriting a Christian martyr and free speech martyr as a regular old type Republican martyr.
The UFO links are QAnon type shilling — distracting nonsense.
The crime link was thought crime adjacent, but evaded the actual relevant thought crimes. Asserts the democrats are pro crime, which obviously they are. Fair enough, and says that their objective is disruption in pursuit of despotic power, which it is, but neglects the underlying rationale — that all men are created equal, therefore we cannot judge the likelihood that further crimes will be committed merely because the criminal has already committed a whole lot of previous crimes — that the rationale is just self consistent liberalism with unprincipled exceptions removed. Evades the implication that liberalism is a suicide pact, that all men are not created equal. Says the Democrats are communists. No they are not. They are liberals taking liberalism to its logical conclusion.
Please stop linking. These are hostile links.
Jim, the left-liberals seem to have no problem accepting that all humans are not equal, when it comes to the types of people they seek to paint as the cause of all the problems. They hate white people, quite openly. The whole “oh let’s not be prejudiced” thing only turns on when it’s wrongdoing by non-whites.
Maybe they don’t really believe in human equality at all – they just believe in “grab everything for ourselves, and treat all other white people as enemies.”
Are you talking ‘assign magical powers to education and claim the unbelievers are low status’ or something else?
LA Times writes a rather sympathetic article on Tyler Robinson. But it seems clear it’s murder one.
Interesting tidbit:
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2025-09-17/charlie-kirk-tyler-robinson-discoveries
I wonder to what extent it’s judicially a conspiracy. And are there any interesting tendrils going out from this little social network?
Saw a clip of an ABC reporter yesterday getting almost teary-eyed over the assassin’s expressed love for his troon accomplice. Reminded me of a Sam Kinison comedy routine from the late 80s concerning the normalization of faggotry at the time picking up steam. “‘It’s love!’ No, it’s another guy’s hairy ass.” The irony is Kinison’s bit referenced the RCC’s hard stance, again at the time, against homosexuality. “Dick or the Cross, you decide, queer.”
Participants in the discord chat that had foreknowledge of the assassination were geographically located near the shooter, so looks like classic faggots plotting naked in a great big pile.
The discord chat was tranny antifa, and a related tranny antifa group that fired thirty shots at unarmed ICE agents was government funded, part of the extensive government funding of organised trannyism and antifa terrorism. Deep State is still at it.
On current polling data, Democrats will win the midterms, but at the same time in the leaderless Democrat party we are seeing the classic boiling off phenomenon, where the most radical of radicals grab the reins. Transtifa is the leftmost, and the leftmost always wins. This was not a solo shooter. This was a solo shooter who was put up to it by the leading edge of the Democrat party, which no voice among the democrats is able to oppose or criticise. Not one voice can separate the Democrats from trans antifa, while Effective Altruism has been willing to separate itself from the Zizians. Effective Altruism disowned the Zizians, but the Democrats are unable to disown Trans Antifa.
“On current polling data, Democrats will win the midterms”
Whazzafuck? I havent seen any such polls, but since Dem popularity is at a historical low, I take any such polls as the left announcing that they are going to try to steal the mid-term elections. Any polls saying the Dems are ahead are just the usual propaganda op: pre-emptive cover for the fraudulent results.
this question for jim and everyone here.
there a lot of talk in certain circle about post-scarcity”, “abundance”, “growth” etc where the idea is AI plus robotics will result in massive productivity that offcet any industrial decline , where factories run by AI worked by robots will replace industrial cities. like ports now have reached semifull automation.
this of course not necessarily in US nor Europe but china is closer, however if they do it ,then everyone can.
my point is , i belive in jim theory about decline since the 1800s but can AI and Robots change this , can GAE thinking they can go full genocide and population replacement and control because AI plus robots will be able to maintain industrial capacities and productions.
> the idea is AI plus robotics will result in massive productivity that offcet any industrial decline
I routinely and continually use AI in my work.
And the answer is no. AI is useful, it will be more useful in future. But it is not going to issue in an age of abundance.
A more interesting technology is biomimetic nano technology integrated with biotechnology.
Photosynthesis is designed for a world where CO2 was a major constituent of the atmosphere, and oxygen was rare. It is still designed for that situation, with the result that Rubisco has become a major roadblock to photosynthesis. Needs to be redesigned from the ground up. We need a plant that extracts carbon dioxide from the soil, convert it into oxomalate, transports an oxomalate derivative to the leaves and then directly reduces a carbon dioxide derivative with the CETCH cycle, rather than Rubisco. The most plausible path to a world of abundance is to create living things that just grow what we need directly. The most plausible path to terraforming mars is to create plants that can grow their own greenhouses, creating a martian forest that absorbs most sunlight and radiates very little infrared, raising the surface of Mars inside the greenhouse forest to above the melting point of water.
White Nationalists believe in white countries for white people – they support white ethno-states. As a rabid frothing Zionist who believes that Jews belong in Israel, and a big fan of civilization also, I am 100% okay with white nationalism. I, too, believe that whites should have their own ethno-states, though I don’t personally self-define as either white or nationalist, being a kike.
For the white race to thrive, and to have white ethno-states wherein it can thrive, it first and foremost needs to crush the Left, utterly. Once you defeat the Left, an endless number of policies that are implicitly or explicitly pro-white can be implemented. Heck, you could ban race-mixing if that’s what you like. I don’t care, really. With the Left crushed, you will hopefully be able to make the white race BREED again, and send the Turd Worlders back to the Turd World, where they belong.
If one is a sincere white nationalist, rather than a Federal Agent posing as a white nationalist, he should pay close attention to who is trying to prevent him from defeating the Left by distracting him with endless bullshit – these are the Left’s assets.
If you want white nationalism, you must defeat the Left. The assassination of Charlie Kirk provides an opportunity to defeat the Left. If you’re a white nationalist, rather than a Federal Agent posing as a white nationalist, you should notice who acts like leftist controlled opposition in this crucial hour.
I’m seeing a lot of encouraging news from America these last 24 hours. Looks like the assassination snapped almost everyone (who matters) out of normalcy bias. I suspect the God-Emperor himself is finally starting to grasp… what time it is.
Ecclesiastes 3:8:
Cuckservatism is dead.
It’s about time for war against the Left.