In order for people to live together in peace, you have to understand your adversary. You don’t have to agree but you have to understand why he says what he says and does what he does. You have to understand how he see the world and how he sees you. The left refuses to know their enemy, thus must be destroyed, or all normies will be destroyed
If people will not discuss, war it is.
The left, all of it, even moderates such as the Young Turks, systematically encourages the murder of its opponents. They have no alternative but to do this, because the left cannot acknowledge, nor meaningfully respond to, their opponents reasoning and position, so must project their own demonic objectives onto their hated enemies. Being incapable of debate, they must exterminate. The end point of leftism is the Seven Kill Stele. There cannot be peace except with those that can criticise the positions we actually hold, instead of condemning us for the voices of their demons. We must conquer them, for if they conquer us, they will kill us.
The Young Turks continued to inspire people to murder political opponents. They piously declare that violence is a both sides problem, while continuing to promote rationales for murder
Cenk Uygur:
“I agreed with Charlie Kirk on some things. I disagreed with him on others, such as race”.
And their audience then fills in the blanks on what Charlie Kirk supposedly says about race.
This was of course a lie, a lie intended to eliminate opposition in order to evade discussion. Charlie Kirk was a normiecon. He agreed with the evil, destructive, dangerous, and deluded left position on race. He agreed with the evil madness pushed by the Young Turks on race. What he disagreed with was affirmative action.
The Young Turks has directly caused the murder of quite a few people. And they are the least bad faction of the left. We can trace some murders explicitly to Young Turks merely because they are an influential platform, and thus connections are traceable, but they were and are saying the same things as the entire rest of the left on exterminate-the-right topics, saying it less, and in a more moderate fashion, with vastly greater willingness to talk to the enemies that they seek to exterminate.
I am not ranting on the Young Turks because exceptionally bad. On the contrary, they are exceptionally good.
I am ranting on them because being major highly influential Youtube platform, they left a trail of blood, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvIjonr5hOs, while with other influencers the trail is less clear, each one’s evil being mingled with the evil of so many others that no one particular leftist is identifiably culpable.
By uttering the lie “race”, when he should have spoken the truth “affirmative action”, Cenk Uygur endorsed and supported the murder of Charlie Kirk that he was piously condemning.
This is inherent in the nature of the left. Because they are unable to respond to the reasons, evidence and arguments presented by those who disagree with them, they have no alternative but demonisation.
And demonisation leads to extermination. To avoid war, no leftist who presents demonisation in place of rational argument, which is to say no currently existing leftist, can be permitted. Freedom of speech is for people who can use it to engage in rational discussion. If discussion is impossible, war it is.
The Democrats are afraid. You have a unique opportunity and momentum to crush the Left for decades, if not permanently. Expect them to pull out the Controlled Opposition in full force to prevent that. Beware the CIA plants.
The Hostile Regime hinges on your distraction.
The trade unions are the beating heart of normal and truly moderate leftists, arguably necessary for the left to remain functional at all in the long run (queers and dopes and cat ladies and dindus and gullible first generation immigrants won’t do). Jews and Hispanics have turned right and the world is running out of fresh meat immigrants because of feminism. And the Boomers are dying.
If manufacturing comes back due to the tariffs, and lots of new union work opens up, it will be a pitched battle to either turn organized labor red (a possible path to national socialism) or concede that the establishment will blue the new crew and we’re going back to boring purple decline as usual. But the overall potential payoff is worth the risk.
Leftism moved on from the working class a long time ago. The left has hated the working class for the last forty years. And, in consequence, Trade Union leadership has hated the working class for the last thirty years. Trade unions are as much a part of the state as the legacy media — and have the same attitude to the working class as the legacy media.
based
https://x.com/StephenM/status/1967940333309923754 says :
“The path forward is not to mimic the ACLU of the mid 90’s.
It is to take all necessary and rational steps to save Western Civilization.”
Seems like people around Trump get it.
Erecting a loyal military force under the ICE budget expansion was an important step. Clearing out FBI, DOJ, Defense etc will take years if it is even possible. Circumvention using ICE at the size it will be in 2026, is a more plausible route.
I’m seeing all these accusatory adjectives thrown at Charlie Kirk (thus justifying his murder for religious reasons), but no actual film of him behaving or speaking in such a manner.
Here the thoughtcrime model works very well. It’s not only a thoughtcrime to speak a thoughtcrime, but also to understand what someone else’s thoughtcrime even is or means. So every thoughtcrime will “ricochet” off a leftist in a wild religious direction, “demonization”.
They can’t just return the serve.
I’m sad but shouldn’t be. Charlie wasn’t stupid and knew this was coming. They had to silence him somehow.
So this post here is timely and much needed. There’s no more wondering whether the left speaks only in bullets. The inquiry and discussion now is WHY, and how to describe this terrible mechanism that is now blatantly and undeniably at work.
But given all of this, is there an IRL “interface layer” to normiedom left? Because that’s what Charlie was doing — interfacing with normiedom — and better than anyone else was to boot. Is it nothing but anonymous shitlord blogs from now on?
And a nasty position it is to be in. The irony is that in a way the left is correct, in that far far behind Charlie Kirk stand people like me, who absolutely think black women tend to be dumb as rocks. Women are barely able to think an abstract thought. And black average IQ is, what, 75? So it is easy to add up 1 and 1, unless of course you are a black woman.
> he died for the ability to hold a conversation…
… one based on Truth, and Faith.
> The assault on USAID
Was full of win. But no gov critter ever imprisoned yet, only riffed. USAID isn’t even completely shutdown, but was subsumed into the office of a guy who just went to Israel, kissed the ring, stuffed paper in the wall, and wailed.
So much more to assault.
RICO on the Soros, Foundations, and NGO… patently obvious, but who will do time? Who will actually be shutdown vs shifted to new entity and tactics.
> unable to respond
This behaviour pattern.
I see it in both the Left, and Islam.
When presented with sound evidence and/or counter proposal,
they both manifest rage and murder, and/or dodge redirect and flee.
In the hierarchy of races, this behavioural trait (presumably inherited, but perhaps susceptibly learned in sordid communes) must lie somewhere between that of the reasonable NorthWest White-types, and that of the incomprehension of the “Plains Apes”.
There should be research studies on
– What caused them to do that
– What enabled the few of them to leave that
On the other hand perhaps we are at the point of looking at history…
Any side’s “Thermidor” has a relatively small capability for correcting its side’s things, once that capacity is exceeded by the breadth times distance-of-excursion sum, and your civ has already bifurcated along lines…
Well, history shows bloody reboot is all that’s left.
It’s not a happy acknowledgement, nor preferred, nor proferred.
But what’s left, really, at such a point, but the unstoppable fall into that?
How much more tolerance of blood spilled by the Left will there be? One more clearly political attempt or success? 10? 100?
How much more mechanical encroachment by Leftism upon the Liberty enjoyed for say ~100 years post-1776?
Genocide of the 2000+ year prevailing Civ-type?
In the spirit of Charlie, I’d be inclined to give peace a chance at the 2026 election, for the Right to completely eject the Left from office. Maybe the Libertarians can fill their seats.
Given the Left must know their odds at 2026 are approaching zero, I doubt the Left will wait that long before breaching the peace in a major way.
The war won’t be pretty, but the Right will win in the end.
The left has already spilled quite a lot of blood. But Charlie Kirk was different, because very large numbers of people knew of him and liked him, and in particular, Trump and people around Trump knew him and liked him. It came home to them in a way that killing a landlord or a cop does not. The left reaction varied between dancing in the streets, to piously deploring (right wing) political violence while delicately implying that it was Charlie Kirk’s fault for being a fascist and a threat to the existence of blacks, gays, et cetera, that the left was just reacting to the terrible shocking violence of Charlie Kirk trying to engage the left in uncomfortable conversations, and the right needed to tone down this terrible right wing violence.
The right was just horrified by the left’s reaction. Charlie Kirk was a normiecon, and every normie can do the arithmetic. If the left wants to murder Charlie Kirk, they want to murder every normie.
This is what has changed, and changed radically and fundamentally. The left has dropped its mask. If fascists need to be killed, and Charlie Kirk was a fascist, every normie is a fascist, and every normie needs to be killed. I just watched the latest episode of the The Young Turks, where they dropped their position that Charles Kirk was murdered by right wingers, and pretty much conceded that a trannie cult was involved in his murder, but they have yet to walk back all the nasty lies they have implied about Charlie Kirk.
In this blog, I make a lot of predictions, and when one of them does not work out, I fear that someone will jump on me, so I get out in front and issue a retraction, to defuse the issue. That way I can spin the retraction my way, and if anyone else raises the issue, no one is going to care. If I remind people of my mistakes, that ensures that no one else does, and while admitting my own mistakes is painful, it is less painful than someone else calling them out.
If I was in the Young Turk’s shoes, I would start going through the archives for all many things they have said that contributed to the murder of Charlie Kirk, and start explaining that they really did not mean it that way, it was not what it sounded like, they were really sorry that they said it that way and in future they are going to be a lot more careful about throwing gasoline on the fire. They just are not doing any of that. Indeed, they are unable to do any of that, because Charlie Kirk’s positions are to them unthinkable and unspeakable, so they just have to substitute the screams of demons for whatever Charlie Kirk actually said. Any clean up of their past crimes would have to consist of admitting what Charlie Kirk’s actual positions actually were. Which they still cannot admit.
So, to normies, this looks like the left is rock solid united on killing them all.
It is psychologically more complex than “kill all normies”. It is not that they want to kill all normies. Rather, reality is unendurable, they want to substitute their own reality, they want to immanetize the Eschaton. They think that reality is socially constructed, so that if they make everyone everywhere in the entire world agree with their reality, then their reality will really be real. And if reality is not conforming to their social construction, it is because of doubters, and these doubters have to be persuaded, or, if unpersuadable, eradicated. It is not exactly that they want to kill all normies, but that they want to immanentize the Eschaton by social construction of reality, and the Eschaton is obstinately failing to become immanent, because those irritating normies keep being obstinately normy.
So for them, they are good people, because they want to immanentize the Eschaton, which is going to be absolutely wonderful for everyone, where it not for horrible people preventing it from becoming immanent, Out of sheer hostile nastiness, these bad people keep bringing up hate facts, thus making those horrible hate facts real, and the Eschaton unreal. But, when it comes down to blood, to normies it is now looking awfully like “kill all normies”.
> Women are barely able to think an abstract thought.
Dumb ones were a blessing, try those. The incoherent disorganized crazy ones were a curse.
Another Man comes to the light via CK…
https://x.com/Girlpatriot1974/status/1967376290257985978
Democrat crime strategy vs Normies
https://x.com/JesseKellyShow/status/1965486820281778607
Trump is starting to counter by flooding select cities with troops.
Whatever happened to deputization of citizens? Or the instant self-deputization of a town via Posse’s? And the even older ways of them being the whole of the law? (Way before silly Statutory Law neutered and corrupted everything.)
Are they really trying to scare off China/Russia/DPRK with these recent videos? That’s absurd. What’s going on?
https://x.com/RepEricBurlison/status/1965438792493355291
https://x.com/UAPJames/status/1965428012934901842
https://x.com/UAPJames/status/1965433261896966468
Some of these are shill links.
Your posts are often thought crime adjacent, but much of this is obvious shill material. So either you are a shill, or you are indiscriminately reposting shill material because you cannot tell the difference.
Maybe my tests just don’t work on Thermidorian shills. Or maybe you are insufficiently suspicious. Please stop indiscriminately posting links. None of these are links I want in my blog.
Example: The Charlie Kirk effect link makes Charlie not merely normie, which he was, but positively Rino adjacent, which he was not, rewriting a Christian martyr and free speech martyr as a regular old type Republican martyr.
The UFO links are QAnon type shilling — distracting nonsense.
The crime link was thought crime adjacent, but evaded the actual relevant thought crimes. Asserts the democrats are pro crime, which obviously they are. Fair enough, and says that their objective is disruption in pursuit of despotic power, which it is, but neglects the underlying rationale — that all men are created equal, therefore we cannot judge the likelihood that further crimes will be committed merely because the criminal has already committed a whole lot of previous crimes — that the rationale is just self consistent liberalism with unprincipled exceptions removed. Evades the implication that liberalism is a suicide pact, that all men are not created equal. Says the Democrats are communists. No they are not. They are liberals taking liberalism to its logical conclusion.
Please stop linking. These are hostile links.