Duterte has been arrested by the ICC.
Duterte was Mayor of Davao in the Philippines. He was Trump 1.0 before Trump came down the escalator, and I supported him back when he was Mayor of Davao. Every decent person in Davao supported him. Only very wicked people opposed him. He made Davao from a third word hell hole to safe and prosperous, and then went on to become President of the Philippines, in which he had limited success for the same reasons and in the same way as Trump 1.0 had limited success as president of America.
The ICC has wanted to arrest him ever since he was Mayor of Davao. And now it has.
I normally ignore the news of the day, because its meaning seldom becomes apparent for years or centuries after the event. But this event indicates that the Global American Empire in Exile has rather more power than I thought. And at the same time in Syria, the long running Global American Empire effort to genocide the Alawites and the Syrian Christians has finally started to be implemented.
Right now everyone, including Trump, is wholly focused on events in the Ukraine and Romania, which are still in play. But the Philippines just got taken off the board. Which is not good news for the Ukraine and Romania. Nor is the Syrian genocide.
Elements of the Global American Empire have been trying to expend the Philippines against China the way the Ukraine has been expended against Russia, and trying to genocide the Alawites, ever since Obama was elected. And now it begins. The push to expend the Filipinos against China comes from the same people who have long been pushing to arrest Duterte and exterminate the Alawites.
The US has been sponsoring terror groups to obstruct China’s efforts to create trade routes to resources that are secure from US interdiction.
Trump is on board with confronting China, and breaking its efforts to create trade routes to resources that are secure from interdiction, but he wants a deal with China, not a war. The Global American Empire in Exile wants a war, and he who controls the Philippines, controls whether there will be war.
I have been relocating my assets to locations less likely to be nuked in the event of World War Three. Philippines not looking so good. The ICC is much the same as USAID — a power center of the Global American Empire dangerously autonomous from Washington.
The big split in Davao, back when Duterte was Mayor, was personally evil people versus personally good people. The demographic that opposed Duterte were people who had no real family or friends because they would do the dirty on everyone. You see the same split in the US today. The people who oppose Trump are single or have broken families. They are the people you cannot invite to Thanksgiving dinner, because they would disrupt it. This is consistent with the “Spiteful Mutants hypothesis” of Edward Dutton, Michael A. Woodley, and Matthew Sarraf.
Global American Empire in Exile control of the Philippines will disrupt Trump’s efforts to cut a deal with China in the same way that Global American Empire in Exile control of the Ukraine is disrupting his efforts to cut a deal with Russia. And they will not act rationally, will not worry about World War Three, because spiteful. They will start World War Three in the same way, and for the same reasons, as they will disrupt Thanksgiving dinner.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/esg/harvard-freezes-hiring-as-trump-threatens-to-pull-funding-1
In good news the process of the dissolution of the monasteries begins.
Does Duterte and Bolsonaro, Imran Khan from Pakistan, and Georgescu all suffer from normalcy Bias? There is a lot of money and power at stake.
Trump we know has learned. Milei should have his head on a swivel. Meantime Infowars reporters are being murdered.
So the longer term outlook hasn’t changed at all, trump or not trump. The US is just a cancer whose objective is to conquer and destroy the world. The whole world will either embrace coca-cola, brawndo, disney and trannyism or be destroyed.
I also think its unlikely the GAE in exile can hold power in the Phillipines against the interest of both an in power Trump AND the government in China now at the same time. They can pull little stunts like this when Trump and Xi are focused on other things but they can’t hold it against both powers. However Xi has been quite willing to back globohomo against MAGA for his own advantage before so…
I know this is just a clever pretext, but holy s**t this is cucked and effeminate. America will be finally liberated, or more precisely exorcised, when you can simply do what’s right — such as ripping asunder satanic priesthoods and expelling hostile foreigners — without having to employ such gay rhetoric to justify your actions. Perhaps if FELLOW BAGELS had thicker skins, or thicker crusts as it were, there would be significantly less “antisemitism” to “tackle.”
Anyway, excellent news. This is a cool timeline.
Gotta come up with a pious progressive sounding reason to attack them initially and one that divides the left and even certain bad actors on the right… makes it look good. Just like Henry VIII’s royal commission on the monasteries were to look into corruption and irreligious living in the monasteries initially.
If it follows the pattern of Henry VIII Harvard will not be till later in the process (though it will be under disciplinary measures) many smaller colleges will be dissolved first. I expect MIT and Caltech to survive the whole process in some form
The universities are also facing the demographic Enrollment Cliff in addition to their many current and impending Trump problems. Many will close, the survivors will have to behave themselves.
It is golden.
The Harvardian priesthood has become so satanic that anything to the spiritual right of progressive atheism might as well be Christianity, yes, that includes “reformed” Jews (but curiously not Muslims). Perhaps it’s because you are an Israeli Jew and detached from American academic discourse, but they hate Jews these days often for the same principled reasons they hate Christians. Yes, it is cucked that the administration uses Jews as a proxy to deal with the enemies of Christians, but for now it is working. When it stops working, likely to change strategy to ensue it keeps working which means explicitly protecting Christians.
>Invading Syria to help a persecuted minority sounds to me like breaking the peace of Westphalia.
The more I think about this, the more it pisses me off. That peace was broken long ago in ‘our’ attempt to overthrow the rightful ruler of Syria, Assad. These murderous gangs going house to house murdering Christians are ‘our’ thugs. This mess is ‘ours’ whether we like it or not. ‘We’ own it, and the new administration must recognize that since we own it, we must do the only decent thing we can do. Disband the genocidal militias ‘we’ created and send them to hell. Restore Assad either directly or by his spiritual successor. ‘We’ owe it to the Syrian Christians, the few that remain, much in the same way ‘we’ owe it to Derek Chauvin and every American who stood against crime and was ruined for it.
The reality is that the new regime is cucking on both for similar reasons. It is pragmatically afraid to taking on too many battles against the deep state at once, but I’d point out timidity at this stage of the game leads to no where good. We are at war both at home and abroad, and it is a total war. This isn’t a fight that can be waged only on one front. It must be fought everywhere, and the Trump teams seems to realize this with how they are dealing with EU and NATO, but again, they do so with timidity.
Just because one owes a debt, does not mean one can pay it.
And you can’t put out a fire by dousing it with gasoline, no matter how much gas is in the can.
These latest stunts in Syria and the Philippines should be demonstrating rather decisively that any attempts to intervene are likely to not only fail, but backfire spectacularly, since the GAE-IE is in control of the territory and that means logistics and communications.
Well, yes, but how? You seem to be advocating some sort of Leroy Jenkins maneuver and that is not going to solve anything.
Our people are only going to be able to fix this by cutting off their C3I and logistics. Which may be difficult – although not necessarily impossible – if their C3I and logistics are not actually located in the USA. That said, I will bet they rely heavily on some sort of resources that are in the USA or controlled by its legitimate government, so if Musk’s boys can find the connections, maybe there is a sliver of hope.
I don’t think it is a question of courage, I think it is a question of knowledge. If you don’t know precisely where the enemy’s infrastructure is, or if you know where it is but don’t know how to get to it, then the only alternative is a brutal war of attrition, which we would almost certainly lose because their supply lines are much closer and more secure. If our people knew exactly which arteries to cut to cripple the Empire In Exile, they probably would, and perhaps eventually will. But in the meantime, no sense in demanding action before anyone is ready to act.
The pentagon overthrew Assad and now Syria is under control of “al qaeda” or “isis” or whatever is the current name for those arabs on the pentagon’s payroll. On the other hand, Trump is supposed to have authority over the pentagon, so all he needs to do is give the proper orders. Same thing with regards to ukraine. Trump said he would end the war in one day, and he can do something like that by giving the proper orders to the pentagon and getting all arms supplies to the ukronazis cut, to begin with.
Of course I’m oversimplifying things a bit, but I think the general idea is correct.
Rather than talking about what ‘we’ (i.e. USG) ought to do, it would be better if Trump sanctioned or at least condoned young men forming barbarian warbands to occupy bloody chunks of the third world. Indigenous Muslim populations to be brutally driven out, like their Palestinian cousins. Erik Prince could organize the first expedition and inspire those who come after. I know this sounds like a really far-out fantasy but we have a sickness of the soul in the first world, a feebleness, a learned helplessness, a long groaning under the longhouse. Send out the young men–not to teach brown girls how to put the condom on the banana–but to conquer and rule. Don’t trust Syria to the ossified organs of the GAE. Let the youth win it with their own blood and remember that they are strong.
So is the world calling bullshit on me or not? Last post I was ackshully-posting about how low-trust power structures require centralization, because these people don’t trust each other to not fuck them over if they can’t show up in each others’ faces at odd times and make sure things are going according to plan.
So what the heck is this, then? How is GAE In Exile organizing itself? Is the brain center in DC-Boston still, but it somehow keeps the Embassies accountable? How? What might this be?
Good question, to which the answer is not apparent. What is apparent is that it is not all that organised, but far from being entirely helpless.
In the post I suggested Davos and Vancouver, but it is noticeable that when the Global American Empire installs a ruler in Africa and South East Asia, the new ruler usually has a strong physical association with locations near Harvard University. But this may merely mean that a power center in Davos has Harvard vet the people it installs.
If this thing goes nuclear, as well it may, I would advise nuking Harvard, Massachussets, Davos, and Vancouver, just to be sure. But I am sure that better targeting information than my guesses is available.
In Russia conspiracy theories often point to England as source of, among other things, moder western left. I thought it might be just a Russian thing, but recently I found a few things like this in English-language Internet:
https://x.com/ProjectVirginia/status/1896227815135268961
I wonder if there is at least some truth to this.
London is home to the City of London Corporation, a sovereign territory, among other things, independent of Great Britain and not part of the European Union. Coincidence?
https://x.com/Telegraph/status/1899653401522127299
Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University student facing deportation from the US over allegations he “led activities aligned with Hamas”, held a senior position at the British embassy in Beirut
Jim, this is a comment from your previous post, which I am replying to.
You had stated that, Hindus are very reluctant to address the problem of demon worship within Hinduism. But having thought about it over time, it will be a highly tedious, fruitless as well as unproductive task to try to check each and every deity/tradition in Hinduism for demons, literal or metaphorica and weed them out. It will also piss off a lot of otherwise good Hindus which will play right into the hands of our enemies who want us divided and weak, which Hindu society already is anyway. And our present problems are far more urgent. Besides, most of the old demons are not really relevant any more, since mainstream Hinduism has anyway been converged towards Harvard Progressivism. Now that is the major internal problem at hand apart from our external foes.
My roadmap for the revival of Dharmic religion would simply be to make vedic tradition and Manu Dharma as the basis for society. Restore patriarchy as it was practised by our ancestors and restore the principles of Varnashrama. For that, we need Monarchy – Kshatriya rule – with Brahmins only in an advisory role and each varna following their assigned roles. The Priesthood has to be proactive in keeping out literal and metaphorical demon worshippers out. Science and technology will follow.
How do you think many Christians perceive Jim’s ideas? If you don’t dare enter the temple and call out the strayed, you’re not going to accomplish anything.
Your problems go much further than Harvard Progressivism. Harvard does not force Hindus to defecate publicly. You have demon worshippers. Extensively. And the eternal reluctance of Hindu commenters here to address that demon worship tells me very little is going to change in the near future.
@alf no one is shitting in the streets to propitiate a God or a Demon
He’s saying that based on the shameless disgusting behavior ongoing you have some serious spiritual rot that is not being addressed. What about the current incarnation of your faith leads people to ignore the world around them like this?
You are talking of a downstream problem whose core cannot be tackled without a wholesale restoration of the Vedic religion and tradition, Manu’s laws and headed by a virtuous Monarch.
Under a Vedic Monarch, with appropriate reward/punishment for good and bad behaviour the problem of proles shitting on streets will solve itself.
They are however, celebrating cow shit, cow pee, and a holy river with an alarming resemblance to an open sewer for religious reasons. Which encourages them to shit in the streets.
This is related to the problem that ritual cleanliness is disconnected from actual cleanliness. Legalist religions tend to demon infestation, because ritual virtue is disconnected from actual virtue. Ritual virtue being defined in a way that is maximally convenient for priests, and maximally inconvenient for everyone else.
Which problem goes back a mighty long way. To long before you suffered external defeat.
This is an important point. How and why do priesthoods tend to become more legalistic and detached from physical reality over time? This is too common a failure pattern to blame exclusively on lack of patriarchy, otherwise how would the patriarchy within the priests disintegrate? Where does this weird urge to celebrate sexual ascetics, and eventually worse deviants, come from? This pattern of decay transcends time, space and civilization.
The biggest failure of Hinduism at least was the excessive importance of priests at the expense of warriors, which I conjecture was a result of external defeat leading to the reduction in the status of ruling warriors over an extended period of time vis a vis priests.
A society tolerating mystics and eccentrics within reason is doing this as an investment into itself, because sooner or later issues arise which only non-standard minds may hope to understand and propose workable solutions to.
(concise formulation of this concept credited to Edward Dutton)
Rather it’s when any cretin and his aunt declare themselves mystics or eccentrics, and/or when these social roles become institutionalized and people within specific institutions/groups are *expected* to play outward roles that are bureaucratic interpretations of pervious successful actual mystics and eccentrics, that things tend to get out of hand dangerously and depressingly.
The mystic and eccentric, instead of being authentic mediators between the group social bubble and empirical reality, or deeper reality, become instead roles *within* the social bubble, imitating connections with reality which are make-belief connections with a make-belief reality.
Like we see with The Science of late, The Artist, The Therapist, The Thinker, The Priest and so on. Roles which properly belong to the outer reaches of the social bubble, attempting to interact with glimpses of reality at the borderlands of banal human existence, but which have been coopted by the bubble and who are instead encouraged to go through the motions of socially approved contact with a socially approved simulacrum of reality, getting socially approved results every time.
Generic systemic entropy, which over time overwhelms any structure. On the political level, there have been various experiments to prevent this from reaching lethal levels, which includes the framework devised by the US founding fathers. On a more broadly institutional level, and existential and spiritual level — this is a mystery which we either find ways to at least partially deal with, or this civilizational cycle also ends. This time with the potential of ending life on the planet above the bacterial level.
There’s even no need for nukes as such to fly. The nuclear reactors, the biological and chemical factories, storage facilities etc., all it takes is for civilization to suffer a teeny-weeny mini-collapse, to wink out for a generation, or even half a generation, and once the crucial infrastructures around the various factories and facilities stop working properly — a sudden plague of terrifying dead zones across the globe.
Jim’s blog is one of the very few places where actual dialogue generates actual concepts which may or may not help us all figure something out, in a world of solipsistic narcissists, hysterics, and psychopaths, who refuse to even admit what the game is and what the stakes are.
Varna said :
“The Science of late, The Artist, The Therapist, The Thinker, The Priest….have been coopted by the bubble and are instead encouraged to go through the motions of socially approved contact with a socially approved simulacrum of reality, getting socially approved results every time.”
Yes. That’s an amazing description.
“On the political level, there have been various experiments to prevent this from reaching lethal levels, which includes the framework devised by the US founding fathers.”
Here I disagree. The so called founding fathers didn’t devise much. I’m not sure what you mean by framework exactly, but the political philosophy of the “founding fathers” was just liberalism, something they didn’t invent. And implementation details like “division of power” were even older.
Furthermore, although the founders of the US government paid lip servive to liberalism they hardly put it in practice. You can take a look at the “powers of congress” section of the constitution. And I think they had some kind of problem with slavery too…
In the same way that women’s capacity for judging inner male character is wholly superficial (and often enough inverse to a man’s actual worth, at least for civilization), normies — including the normie intelligentsia — have trouble telling the one authentic mystic from the other 99 bad actors (and would mostly prefer the bad actors even knowing exactly what they are); with equivalent results.
Leftism thrives on just that state of affairs.
Indeed, leftism is and must necessarily be spiritually effeminate – it follows after the appearance of things, rather than the real substance of things, which, being spiritually Gnostic and temperamentally spiteful, it naturally seeks to destroy; just like the Longhouse and its simps viscerally despise red-blooded men. Ultimately, they hate Truth, for Truth cares absolutely nothing about their colossal egos. Leftism is the Pretty Lies cognitive edifice.
I’ve become an Aesoposter:
A Peacock taunted a Crane with the dullness of her plumage. “Look at my brilliant colours,” said she, “and see how much finer they are than your poor feathers.” “I am not denying,” replied the Crane, “that yours are far gayer than mine; but when it comes to flying I can soar into the clouds, whereas you are confined to the earth like any dunghill cock.”
Open entry.
Same logic as my other reply re: how neighborhoods disintegrate. It is (generally) not individual priests who “go bad”, but rather, some priests are too eager to bring in outsiders, or the institution was designed to be overly inclusive from the get-go.
The priesthood goes bad, not because priests go bad, because it brings in bad priests. The more power and/or influence the church has, the stronger the attraction for bad actors (defectors, demons) and the more likely it becomes that anything other than a completely hermetically sealed system will eventually break down.
The same entropy might also creep in over many generations even with a sealed system, if the apple falls far enough from the tree; but it is a much slower process and theoretically easier to correct if the priesthood is fertile. (Very hard to correct if the particular failure mode is celibacy, and should be obvious why that becomes a negative feedback loop for a closed priesthood.)
If being holy gets one gravy, and it is not that hard to get into the priesthood, you will get no end of priests with clever ways of being extra holy at no personal cost or inconvenience. The doctrine of Maya allows unlimited holiness points in the higher reality, at zero cost in actual reality.
Similarly, the Karen can obtain enormous virtue points by being nasty to whites, males, straights, and the like, and the effective altruist can purchase virtue points at low, low cost, making him much more virtuous than the client whose money he stole, and his family whose thanksgiving he distrupted.
For an example of such cheap virtue, recall the Miss Incredible Hulk Actress gloating that she was going to make fans of the Incredible Hulk IP cry. Similarly, the frequently announced enormously superior virtue of the developers of “Dragon Age, the Vanguard”
This reflects massive over-production of priests, and the infestation of jobs-for-the-priests into every part of the economy. But nothing that libs have come up with provide virtue as cheap as the doctrine of Maya. It seems likely that the doctrine of Maya was preceded by a innumerable now forgotten doctrines that supplied ever greater superior virtue at ever lower cost.
Why doesn’t celebrating cow shit and cow pee encourage them to shit in the living room of their own homes?
Jim wrote:
It’s both a shibboleth and a means of driving away cucks, semites, and philosemites such as yourself. The Hindu version of blodpudding or dogmeat or raw poison fish. Won’t be needed so much beyond ritual use once mlechchas have been completely driven out. Also, stop eating cow meat, like a dirty mlechcha.
I’ve been to that holy river[3] multiple times in multiple places and this is complete bullshit. Where it enters the plains the water is fit to drink. Even at the point where more than twice the population of the USA has bathed in it, it was still fit to take a dip in with no skin infections or diarrhoea. Anyone with an Indian visa could come and see for himself, and more than 5 million of them did so[4]. Clean up your shitfilled[2] rivers first. At least our priests[1] are having sex with great big piles of nubile girls rather than yours who are fucking your sons.
[1] Even the philosemitic ones haha: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Booked-for-sexual-harassment-in-Punjab-self-styled-Christian-preacher-Bajinder-Singh-cries-conspiracies/articleshow/118666782.cms
[2] https://riveractionuk.com/findings-of-high-thames-e-coli-levels-discovered-as-new-guidance-issued-to-rowers/
[3] https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00284-008-9260-3.pdf
[4] https://www.msn.com/en-in/travel/news/our-father-lord-shiva-foreign-tourists-embrace-hindu-culture-at-mahakumbh-2025-in-prayagraj/ar-AA1y7hR7
Psalm 79:6:
Amen.
Mossadnik wrote:
Nice try trying to provoke a fight between the Sons of Yahweh and the Sons of Manu (to the merriment of Pauline cordycepts). Not gonna work. The Judaeans are the rightful heirs to Judaea. The Temple of Solomon is the rightful Temple in Jerusalem. YHWH is the God of Moses, and of Abraham, and is the Father of all Judaeans, who made them “long of nose” in his image, and being a jealous god, commanded them to follow him (only) always. Which is all perfectly fine. If Judaeans stick to the Torah, and the Talmud, and Tehilim, and Judaea, there is and never will be any quarrel between them and Aryans anywhere.
The Psalm you take out of context[1] refers to the Non-sons of Yahweh who destroyed Jerusalem and defiled the Temple. Wrath should be poured upon them. Which is actually in the process of being done by brave Netanyahu. Never should a son of Yahweh rest while the Temple of Solomon lies buried under the filth of Arabia. For the edification of our readers, let me quote the entirety of the relevant passage of Asaph:
Tell me, do you support the rebuilding and re-consecration of the Temple of Solomon to the god your father? Do you not eat kosher food? Are you even a Jew?
[1] https://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/16300/jewish/Chapter-79.htm
I’m ambivalent. Politically, yeah, screw the Muslims. But I suspect the Temple will be far more trouble than it’s worth.
I absolutely do not keep kosher, or any other commandment of the false faith. And my ex-wife (who has sole custody, and I pay no child support) would never, ever dream about circumcising our son.
No. I’m an Ashkenazi Christian.
Alf, for some reason I am unable to click “Reply” to your comment.
There is no reluctance on our part, just that the task is so enormous and not worth the trouble because of more urgent, important existential issues at hand.
Further, restoring the status of Vedic tradition and Manu’s laws by itself is likely to remove a whole lot of demon worship in one fell swoop without necessarily dealing with each and every single issue independently. We cannot afford do extensive surgery at the moment as the patient is already weak.
The “spiritual rot” you speak of was caused by the external defeat which led to demoralization of Hindus over centuries, the Hindu priesthood becoming lethargic and the present Harvard Progressivism has led to further decline.
The spiritual rot set in long before external defeat
Whatever the cause of the rot, the answer does not lie in performing surgery at the moment but by restoring the Vedic religion and tradition along with Manu’s laws.
Doing the surgery you suggest without a Monarchy and Vedic restoration will end up dividing Hindu society into a thousand little sects and ultimately lead to our genocide/destruction by the desert cult.
I think you are a genuinely good poster but I think the amount of violence that would be needed to get Indians to make good conduct would be beyond Hitlerian. The first Vedic monarch would not be able to be virtuous he would have to be an absolute monster to fix India if its even possible…
Its not just the street shitting its that Indians have very subtle forms of antisocial behavior that with any normal people don’t rise to the level of illegality or even if they are crimes don’t normally need to be treated with extreme harshness (most rich people do a little stuff that borders on white collar crime at some point, only Indians as a group systemically seek out dementia patients and try to scare them into giving up personal details by posing as authority figures and such you fuckers call my father multiple times a day it really pisses me off)… thats why I’ve always said that in the hypothetical I was a total autocrat (I’m too autistic but lets say my security forces were so loyal it didn’t matter how impolitic I was) the one race I would just have to expel en masse that I could not make a decent country with them living in it in any way is Indians. Even niggers can be rendered amiable and docile if you execute the troublemakers and make it plain that no such conduct will be tolerated but what the fuck can you do with people who quite legally get in the management of other peoples companies and fire everyone who isn’t Indian. Its not like its nepotism for a couple close friends or nepotism in companies they owned and founded everyone does that nobody has a big problem with it. But coming to a foreign country in a company you didn’t create and weaseling your way in and firing everybody. NOBODY else including jews does that shit.
And as for imposing good conduct, here is a story of an Indian who offered to even pay for his fellows to act with good conduct and they came back with a mod and beat him to death for it.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/delhi-news/delhi-he-offered-to-pay-if-they-used-public-toilet-they-beat-him-to-death-instead/story-qicMfDJFG4RGbhshyK6JVO.html
If the evil priesthood is reined in and good Monarch takes over the reigns, the proles will naturally fall into line with the good behaviour expected of them. I don’t think the Indian race is exceptional in this regard and asking me to admit it is basically asking me to admit that we are beyond redemption, which I cannot admit.
The reason Hitler couldn’t fully rein in the priesthood is because he didn’t have an alternative State Religion. National Socialism is not a State Religion.
The scamming and other anti-social behaviour of Indians is a result of evil priests ruling over us for far too long. The state you describe is not the natural state of a traditional Vedic civilization but of a highly dysfunctional modern one.
I absolutely agree its no natural state but I’m famous here for believing there is no real alternative to really eradicating the left for more than a generation beyond not just destroying their institutions but you then need to eradicate the remaining believers physically.
The absolutely monstorous atrocities I think it would take to fix India I think would make Pol Pot look like a philanthropist… I exagerrate there a bit but not too much. To fix it successfully I imagine the first monarch would have to be considered a monster for the ages the virtuous rule as anyone would understand it would have to be for his successor.
I don’t think so. Indians are apt to comply with social pressure. The trouble is that the social pressures they are experience are in the wrong directions. It is whites that are the most stubborn and intransigent race. Every other race is considerably more malleable and easily shaped.
As an Indian, I have personally been scammed by my fellow Indians, and been helpless to prevent it even when I knew I was being scammed (it does happen in certain circumstances). I know the feeling and it enrages me as much as it does you. The kind of behaviour you speak of is extremely problematic, especially because it kills social cohesion and trust.
I think a true Monarchy with a warrior king solves these social issues, first by removing the evil priests who justify all kinds of prole “activism” to challenge the ruling warriors, and then when the Monarch starts applying the law as it should be. Reducing the evil-doers to an extremely low status also helps. Eradicating bad behaviour with punishment and rewarding good behaviour. No priestly interference allowed, except to grant divine authority to the Monarch’s command.
The problem presently is that, all kinds of bad behaviour is not only unpunished, but practically encouraged by the evil priesthood.
Bad behaviour of proles is always a problem that arises out of an evil priesthood and the bad behaviour, however obnoxious, can be eradicated by eliminating the evil priesthood, root and branch.
@cominator, Perhaps even a Dharmic monarch is no solution for us. But we won’t know until we try it. It certainly ain’t happening in a democracy. I’m with Dharmic here. A few fines here and there, a few jail terms, a few hundred hours of community service, bit of violence, and the rest will all fall in line.
You shoot one bird out of a 100 birds sitting in a tree, the tree will have no birds sitting on it.
Perhaps, as a race, we are incapable of escaping the democracy trap and we are stuck in this defect-defect trap for ever. But that’s another topic.
@cominator, the point is not that the urinating Pajeets beat the pro-social Driver to death. The point is that nothing happened to the Pajeets. I’d have those fuckers stepped on by an elephant or shot off a cannon on pay per view.
The point is not that they fired everyone in the company that wasn’t Indian. The point is nobody imposed a cost on them for that sort of anti-social ingroup behavior. Go to a place where such things are imposed, i.e Dubai and the Pajeets just fall in line.
India has gone too long in its history without a purge of it’s traitors. Maybe the guy who fixes this will have to be a monster. But seeing the Indians in Dubai, I don’t think so.
Knowing how legalism develops, it seems likely your problems started with creative and overly elaborate interpretation of phrases snatched from the Law of Manu in much the same way as the rabbis replaced the ten commandments with an enormous structure based on a single phrase whose meaning became irrelevant not long after it was written.
Legalism and detachment from reality become issues when priests start making and interpreting laws affecting society as a whole. Which tells me that something went wrong somewhere with warrior rule long ago in India which greatly diminished the status of warriors and put priests above them in the pecking order.
My conjecture is that external defeat could certainly have triggered this spiritual rot. Kali Yuga certainty began with the decline of Kshatriyas and Brahmins seeking the worldly power wielded hitherto by warriors.
Priest on top and scientific decline sets in shortly after fragmentation of the Gupta empire. External defeat did not ensue for centuries.
With the decline of central power, kings, kinglets, and warlords become more dependent on the consensus of right conduct to avoid Hobbes’ state of war against all. Priests mediate this consensus, and are apt to game it to put priests on top, coveting that which is Caesar’s.
The core tenets of Advaita Vedanta are priests on top, and reality is not real. There is the rot.
It conveniently detaches holiness from being a good person in one’s conduct to friends, family, kin, allies, employers, employees, and customers. Sounds familiar. It sounds like “effective altruism”. The “effective altruist” is a good person because he is doing good to people he does not know, whose language he does not speak, in lands he could not find on a map. That the most efficient way of doing good, the effective altruist rationally deduces. Which spares Sam Bankman-Fried the inconvenience of managing his clients money as agreed, and allows him to manage it in his interests, at the expense of their interests. Honoring agreements being ineffective altruism.
@dharmic @jim , it possible that the rot set in during the gupta period. There is at least one Hindu nationalist commentator (now banned from all social media and the internet) who had the same view. The seeds of decline are sowed during the peak.
The same commentator also pointed out that Hinduism used to be a proselytising religion before the time of the Guptas. Something happened during that time that it ceased to proselytise.
Good point on the Guptas, Jim
Proselytisation is not a direct indicator of religious decadence. Detachment of holiness from ordinary everyday virtue is a direct indicator.
The sovereign needs to recruit the priesthood on the Pauline criteria.
The most important job of the Sovereign is to be the fount of all honors, mortal and divine — to set the rules for status competition such that prosocial conduct elevates one’s status. And to quell people who game the status competition. Religious theories that relieve the holy man of the inconvenience of actually being holy are one way of gaming the status competition.
@dharmicreality
It is the block quote. It makes it so only the far left side of the reply button works (about half way between the capital R and the side).
Thanks for pointing that out. Yes, the click spot for reply is off, in some comments.
The click spot is not off; the Reply button is exactly where it’s supposed to be, but is mostly covered by an invisible dead zone that extends a certain distance above and below the blockquote.
If you edit the HTML locally and remove the blockquote, the dead zone goes away and the Reply button works normally.
Had to ask Grok what was going on as the news is all incoherent and uninformative.
So it would seem anti-Duterte factions are in control in the Philippines right now.
Personally, I think any government that turns over a national to a foreign agency, for domestic actions/activityis committing treason against the nation.
Nah not always. If I were Trump I would be planning to hand over Victoria Nuland and a lot of people around her to the Russians as a token that we are serious about making up for the past and establishing an alliance and I would be planning to setup a Nuremberg 2.0 type thing for Fauci and those around him in order to circumvent his pardon.
Indeed, which is why I said “domestic activity”. Fucking around with another country is not domestic activity, and it’s certainly reasonable for them to request an extradition.
Two examples:
Hitler – not domestic activity
Franco – domestic activity
Strong GAE control in the most catholic country in Asia does give credence to the jesuit thesis.
Staempfle wrote Mein Kampf.
Oh. I see.
Cominator vindicated once again, re: origins of Nazism. Jim said it’s mutated Lutheranism; Com said it’s mutated Catholicism. (I’m oversimplifying their respective positions, obviously.) Initially, I tended to side with Jim, because Nazism was indeed more popular in Protestant areas than in Catholic areas.
But this explains it on a deep level.
Nazism = Catholicism + early 20th century Teutonic Race Science.
My position on Nazism was a bit more complex than that but I think the Jesuits did much to shepard Hitler into power and were behind organizations like the Thule society and to some degree even later the SS (Himmler openly said the SS was modeled in part on the Jesuits and Hitler called Himmler our Ignatius of Loyola). To make it look good though the Nazis mildly persecuted the Jesuits but it was the kind of persecution where they all survived the war.
The Nazis got their start in Catholic areas, they were more popular in Protestant areas (which were more right wing) after all the other parties to the right of the commies had collapsed even though the Nazis were only right wing relative to the communists.
I grew up liberal. All my friends, neighbors, etc. To me these seem like normal people. Mom cooks dinner dad mows the lawn etc. Very few tattoos or drug problems. They don’t seem evil or perverse. I have been trying to make sense of this for a long time.
Shitlib historian and turbo-fedoraist Richard Carrier sought really hard to prove that Jesus Christ was a myth all along and nothing else. Okay, interesting proposition, might be worth debating. But what could be even more interesting, for our ponerological discussion here, is Carrier’s latest political musings, and what they may end up revealing about the individual conveying them. Epistemology is often born of temperament, after all.
Here’s an example.
https://archive.is/Z5ECk
Well, what do you think?
Beow – was this written by a good person?
Nobody ever accomplishes anything significant by themselves. Let’s do an experiment. We drop some talented person, naked and alone, into a virgin wilderness (and let’s assume benign), with plenty of natural resources. Do you think they’d ever even make suitable window glass, let alone Starship, or an automobile. Heck, I think 99%+ would be hard pressed to get a fire going.
Do you think Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, Howard Hughes, … make their contributions to civilization by themselves? All of them had whole organizations working for them.
Yeah, definitely.
My point is that you can have 150+ IQ leftist intellectuals, who may well have some interesting ideas about their fields of expertise – and who are fundamentally spiteful, envious, “whaaa whaaa whaaa why is someone else rich and famous and popular and not ME, life is just so unfair, abloo abloo whaaaaa whaaaaaaaaa!” type people, i.e., wicked people.
High-IQ people with authentic [Great Man] Derangement Syndrome are absolutely never good people.
Cloudswrest, this comment smells leftist to me, at least purple pilled. Great Men can absolutely make a difference. I am a Euro, so my go to example would be Napoleon. Yes he was a leftist. But he really did make a difference on his own.
Humanoids don’t accomplish things alone… and the greatest accomplishers are those who can organize a band of men for accomplishing things.
The lack of appreciation for this seems to a wagecuck problem. People who have never done anything other than take orders – especially for pay – are accustomed to some sort of hierarchy just “being there” and don’t appreciate what it takes to get an organization up and running.
Try starting any kind of business, group, club, or association of any kind and it will become very apparent, very quickly, that it is a unique and difficult-to-acquire skill. Capital helps, but you can’t just throw money at the problem and expect success.
Whether you want to start a sports team, or an open-source project, gaming group, book club, even a simple get-together for lunch or for drinks – anything at all that requires voluntary participation – you’ll discover, in order, that:
1. It’s hard to get other people interested enough to join.
2. Once they’re interested, it’s hard to get them to actually show up.
3. Once they show up, it’s hard to get them to really contribute anything.
4. Once they contribute something, it’s excruciatingly hard to get everyone on the same page and not fighting with each other or thinking/acting like they own it all because they made a few tiny contributions.
5. Once you’ve got some baseline of useful and cooperative contributors, it’s even more painfully difficult to cull the dead weight without sinking morale, and/or come up with incentives for the best ones to stay without inadvertently pissing off the “just OK” ones.
It’s just not easy. If you’re a “natural elite” meaning exceptionally good at some particular thing, and you have an exciting project, you may attract a few people into your orbit from that fact alone; but growing it any larger requires a lot of unrelated talent and hard work to coordinate.
And if anyone thinks this is all very easy and that the founder isn’t doing any real work, then either they are themselves brilliantly talented and have what it takes to be the next Trump or Musk, or they are delusional and envious. And when it’s coming from a journo, my bets are strongly on the latter.
They are Havel’s green grocer, especially if they flipped from “don’t worry about COVID” to “wear the mask, bigot” overnight without any memory of the former. When the tv stations run specials like “how to spank your wife properly” they won’t remember anything from before except with great difficulty and some embarrassment.
It’s what Lawrence Auster used to call the unprincipled exception. The problem is, sooner or later, the principles must win out and the unprincipled exception will be rectified.
When? These people live in white neighborhoods and have decent families. What will it take to make them follow their supposed principles and put that aside?
I know they are Havel’s greengrocer but they also have a lifetime of indoctrination and see the whole world that way. I can’t judge objectively how bad or morally culpable they are and that is what I’m hung up on.
JewPed, does the author of that article have a nice family? Do people who have those feel like he does?
Nope, he’s a “polyamorist.” Not the cuck type, though; rather, IIRC, he ended up divorced over his serial and self-righteous womanizing. Well, to his credit, and I mean it in all seriousness – at least he is not a faggot.
Sometimes, yes. There is a spectrum with shitlibs (whatever their degree of functionality), from generally innocent Havel’s Greengrocers who can be redeemed, to spiteful mutants who absolutely can’t. If high IQ and suffers [Great Man] Derangement Syndrome, then it’s the latter.
That’s not how the social decay operates. It is an evolutionary (de-evolutionary) ratchet, and trying to conceptualize it on an individual level leads to the same absurd conclusions as it would for any other evolutionary process, like superheroes and supervillains spontaneously gaining telekinetic powers.
The Flanders are “Good Christians” and welcome the Simpsons to the neighborhood and bend over backward to help them at every opportunity. The Simpsons are shiftless losers who don’t maintain their home and cause neighborhood and school disturbances, driving away the best neighbors and making it difficult for others to sell. Eventually the only people the community can attract are single moms, degenerate drunks and assorted drifters, and Springfield is voted as America’s Crud Bucket.
Of course, the Simpsons are a vicious caricature of heritage America written by demented shitlibs, but as with so much left-wing creative output, it can be quite insightful as to their own mentality, their own lifestyles, the things they know about themselves but cannot bring themselves to admit out loud, and cope by projecting it on others.
In reality, Ned isn’t a devout Christian, he’s a secular Jew or mainline Protestant obsessed with virtue-signaling his tolerance and general wonderfulness. The Simpsons are probably some black, mestizo or pajeet family who in and of themselves manage to just barely skate above the minimum standard, but quickly attract others who fall far short. The single moms and degenerate drunks are… well, still single moms and degenerate drunks, or other white shitlibs and bugmen who are even less virtuous in reality and even more obsessed with virtue-signaling than Ned. This continues until the Detroitification is complete and the only decent people left are the ones too stupid to leave, or too poor and atomized and powerless to afford to move.
Depending on what raw material you start with, this process can be as short as a few years, or as long as a century; and its speed depends on many other factors like proximity to high-density urban areas, accessibility by public/cheap transit, climate, infrastructure, local and state governments, local customs and dialects, and so on.
But all it takes is one Ned. Once that happens, the entropy has started and will not halt on its own. What you are witnessing is simply counties and neighborhoods in earlier stages of decline. Visit a place like San Francisco or Portland to see what it looks like in between, when unprincipled exceptions start to disappear but the shit has not yet completely hit the fan.
>When?
Right now. Billionaire heiresses are being murdered by vagrants while out jogging, fer chrissakes. The shitlib’s “nice family?” The daughter is on hormone blockers waiting to be surgically mutilated and the son has no hope of replicating Dad’s success because he’s a fucking white male, and it’s time for us to step aside. The neighborhood was all-White not too long ago, but now it’s 25% pajeet, and the upscale shopping center is crawling with ghetto nigs. Look around. It’s all rotting under Elua’s false beatific smile.
If you want to save the white race and its civilization, need to make white babies; to make white babies, you need white shariah, though you may choose to call it by an infinity different names. And anyone who countersignals the solution (which there is only one, and there only ever was one) is pussy-faggot with zero testosterone who deserves to be castrated and force-fed his own testicles on live television while we all watch and laugh.
Come the Restoration, dads who won’t let go and marry off their daughters (“b-b-b-b-b-but I could not find her a suitable husband, ablooooo” – yeah, right) will be thrown to the sharks, not before being urinated and shat on by heavily-tattooed hook-nosed stoner incels like me, to emphasize the humiliation and the cosmic justice. You abolish female mate choice or you die; you abolish female mate choice or there is no more aryan civilization; you abolish female mate choice or former christendom is fairly and squarely inherited by muslim niggers – plain and simple.
I see the deeply religious fathers of 7-8 children occasionally. You think their wives and daughters fuck around? They marry them off as young as the zio-feminist regime allows them. But no, the “cultured” “civilized” “nice” white man will not embrace such barbaric semitic solutions – oh, I’m sure you have it all figured out in a different fashion. Well, I’m all ears; let’s hear just how the white man is going to solve his dire and worsening reproduction problem without “semitic solutions.” Go ahead; let’s see what solutions other than white shariah (under whatever name) are there. I say: there are none, and if you don’t heed my message, you will indeed drown and nobody will save you, nor will anyone honor your dead and putrid civilization’s memory.
Literal/metaphorical cucks shall cheerfully swim with the sharks.
The key is marrying them young, not allowing divorce, and severely restricting their career paths. Any girl not married by 20 goes to a bridal auction or brothel.
You don’t need dumb shit like Burkhas or total purdah though.
Well sure, I don’t advocate copying Islam (or Orthodox Judaism) “as is.” Needless to say, white Christians will come up with something more spiritually and aesthetically Occidental. But the social technology itself — a religiously mandated mechanism for an orderly transfer of ownership over a foid from her father unto her husband; call it “Pauline Patriarchy” or “Christian Coverture” if you like — has to be rather similar.
Female sexual liberation is Lucifer the Light Bearer, the killer of all civilizations.
White people should implement white Sharia the way we did, not the way Muslims did. Coverture, plus state force dealing with fatherless women as in Australia at the beginning of the eighteenth century. They, amazingly, attained 100% compliance. The authorities collectively passed a collective shit test, and every woman just settled down.
It worked, it worked perfectly while a lot of Muslim countries go through the motions but it does not work.
Some girls need to be married off a lot sooner than 20. Others you have a bit more leeway with. But the Apostle Paul has it right. It is better to be married than to burn with passion. If she burns with passion, you should marry her off, pronto. Note that the passion she burns with isn’t necessarily directed at any particular man.
Rules should be built around the norm, not exceptions. The risks of waiting too long to marry her off are much worse than the inverse.
Calvin, the thing is, MOST women need to be married off before 20. I’d say a majority need before 18, and quite a few before 16. Some women would be way happier if they were married right after their quinceañera, with the coming out dance used as a way to give her a little choice between a pre-vetted list that appears on her dance card. The suggestion of a formal sanction at 20 is probably a good one, but the father should be judicious about weighing when any particular daughter is ‘burning with passion’.
Nah. Hypocrisy is pretty much indefinitely sustainable as long as authority isn’t actively captured by the holier than thou. A certain amount is both necessary and good, I would venture to say. Just keep the levers of power in the hands of men who are healthy and sane and trust them to make judgment calls.
I too grew up liberal. Still know plenty of liberals.
As long as you keep things superficial, all is fine. They are friendly people. But whenever you dig deeper, or discuss politics, madness always surfaces. Some people instinctively keep the madness somewhat at bay. Others will froth at the mouth. To the extent they froth at the mouth, they will display sin in other facets of their life, which tends not to manifest in unmowed lawns, because keeping up appearances is always important.
People frequently voice slogans that they don’t actually implement in their daily lives or have any intention to.
Those people were like that then. Are they still like that now?
Well holy shit 3rd wave feminism is to be rolled back bigly. Candance Owens is a bit nuts but she’s right here… she’s campaigning to get Weinstein (who under me would have probably been shot for leftism but not for fucking actresses, though it would be a hard decision as he did make True Romance) freed.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/candace-owens-harvey-weinstein-exculpation-series-1236153385/
Speculation by me is that Lana Del Rey in particular (who for whatever perverse reason seemed to genuinely love the fat Jew and I suspect never forgave the blue hollywood tribe for what happened, hence she married some low status zealously MAGA swamp dweller in Louisana) is going to be on fire to provide as much exculpatory evidence as she can.
OT: Footage of troon threatening a street preacher with a gun.
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1899855430794297781
This along with the Tesla arsons and the Zizian murders show the trannies are feisty. Even without federal mandate, Easter probably remains a target for more sodomy-inspired blasphemy this year.
Note that that creature felt completely secure committing a violent crime in broad daylight on camera. It knows that there will be no punishment for it, because it is acting as an unofficial enforcer of the state religion (and it is 100% correct – it will never see the inside of a jail cell for that act). These “people” are far from beaten, here, abroad, or anywhere else.
Being a state crime in a blue state jurisdiction, he will have no problems. Indeed the protected classes never go to jail — notice that some of the illegal immigrants deported by Trump’s men have been arrested over and over again for serious crimes, and were shortly thereafter released to commit some more.
But Trump has just federalised “fiery but mostly peaceful” protests against Tesla, and our attorney general has promised to follow the money. You think they will never see the inside of a jail cell?
>blue state jurisdiction
Even in a red state, he’d be a cause celebre, and the press and the NGOs would rally to his defense. Meanwhile, if the reverse were to happen and a Christian pointed a firearm at a holy eunuch on video, the authorities, blue or red, would move heaven and earth to bring the perpetrator to justice.
>You think they will never see the inside of a jail cell?
I do think that. But I’m open to being surprised.
Nuts.
Is anyone in any state making cause celebre of the Effective Altruism trans terror group?
People don’t pull that stuff in red states, because they know they might die, and if they live, go to prison. Times have changed. They don’t even pull that stuff in blue states any more if it can be construed as federal crime. (Which the trans terror operation is regardless of what state they are in and what state the crime was committed in.)
They let them get away with no end of blue state murders until they nailed a federal officer, and then not a dog barked in their defence.
The Zizians are too weird and out-there. Their Leftism is so advanced it doesn’t read as “friend” to Left-wing normies, but Cthulu only swims in one direction. In 50 years there may well be statues of Ziz and plaques commemorating his visionary heroism.
Reddit reports a Calfornia woman being prosecuted for vandalising a Tesla. Not getting any support. The Tesla videoed her.
Christian love is sometimes misplaced.
Your theory of the international left moving its C2 from DC to England or Canada seems plausibly vindicated by recent events. The Palestinian activist detained by Trump was a British spook on the MI6 payroll. It is a lot easier legally to crush the left when it is a foreign intelligence operation, and can be rolled up as a foreign intelligence operation without saying it’s a political purge against leftists.
This also gives us plausible cause for invasions of Canada and the UK, invasions which will force us to reindustrialize without existential risk. I hope the administration realizes this
Massie is the only fighting to actually *CUT* the swamp budget, [*deleted for failure to comply with the moderation policy*]
This is fund raising spam. (but I will allow it through if you are willing to follow the moderation policy.) Massie is selling the sizzle of red meat to the libertarian right, but has never uttered a word about government funding of the left. Doge has just made cuts where it matters the most, defunding the left, a gigantic victory beyond the wildest dreams of the libertarians. Holy war approaches, and it is time for all good men to obey our the leader, be he right or wrong, for victory is in the air.
Doge is delivering results that libertarians have not been interested in for nearly half a century.
Where’s the evidence for a holy war? So far all we’ve seen is consolidation of the left’s victories and the megaphone is being cut because it is no longer needed. There is no mention from MAGA of moving to the right at all, just retrenching the center. And no diplomacy with conservative Russia, China, and Iran.
A left on left war isn’t really holy, of course. And the far left basically always wins.
We have been around this merrygoround many times before. The far left always wins, and leftism gets lefter, faster and faster, towards infinite leftism in finite time, until everyone is killed for insufficient leftism, or one strong man, seeing where this is headed, grabs power and shuts the process down, whereupon leftism quietly dies, for leftism must get ever lefter, ever faster, or die, as a shark must swim or drown.
Leftism is a belief system that enables its adherents to cohere to knock over some applecarts and grab some apples — entropy as a belief system. So requires ever newer beliefs and ever newer applecarts. When no more applecarts, because one strong man has grabbed it all, dies.
The Ultimate Applecart is the world itself; the further to the left a person is, the more oriented they are toward entropy-maximization, their “Final Boss” being existence itself – they seek to commit deicide by destroying the world which God created.
Thus, for example, if you should avoid war at a given moment, the phenotypically leftist will manifest as a militarist; conversely, if you must conduct war at a given moment, the phenotypically leftist will manifest as a pacifist. It is often the very same person telling you to go to war when you absolutely shouldn’t, and to avoid going to war when you absolutely should. The telos of the weltanschauung is always maximizing harm.
They are, as Spandrell says, psychopathic status maximizers – holier than thou virtue signallers, or hypocrites as our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ called them. There is plenty of non-leftist evil in the world, but leftist evil, specifically, is that evil which calls itself good; demonic inversion, often due to a certain phenotype that possesses a bifurcated brain, as is (unfortunately, but unsurprisingly) far too common among Ashkenazim.
In the Israeli civil war, which may or may not actually happen, I’m with the right-wing 95 IQ tanned Jews against the left-wing 105 IQ pale Jews, even though I’m not Mizrahi myself, and even though the Mizrahim are far from perfect, because it looks like the Devil urinated “profusely” into the Ashkenazi bloodstream (i.e., Ashkenazim underwent selection for bifurcated brains and phenotypic leftism); while Mizrahim are simply typically Middle-Eastern (for better and for worse), Ashkenazim are, for the most part, the Synagogue of Satan.
Isaiah 5:
20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
21 Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!
By reproductively preferring the most Talmudic of Talmudic scholars on the one hand, and sleazy merchants on the other hand, Judaism, particularly the Yeshiva Judaism of Ashkenazim (Mizrahim, in contrast, were historically craftsmen, by and large), selected for high verbal acumen and low regard for Truth or Virtue. Thus, when all is said and done, most Ashkenazim are bad people. It’s not that the philosemites are entirely wrong: those few Jews who are based, are really based. And there are plenty of simple, regular, perfectly nice Jews, whom I’d like to protect, and whose enemies I’ll do whatever I can to obliterate. But alas, the average Ashkenazi is phenotypically prone to leftism. I don’t want this objective fact of reality to be true – but it is true, and I despise self-serving liars, or any other type of liars, who would falsely claim otherwise.
What we need is radical pruning. Zionism has been far too “inclusive.” Some specimens should be removed from the gene pool; some thought-forms should be removed from the meme pool. Should, and shall.
We want Gates and Soros to get what ought to be coming to them, just like the Duke of Orleans. [*deleted yet again for all the usual reasons*]
All the tech oligarchs are smart people. Which makes Bill Gates dangerous. Soros the younger is not stupid, but he cannot fill his father’s shoes, and the left will not allow him to fill his father’s shoes.
The Tech oligarchs who have kissed the ring are all very smart hard working people, the smartest, wealthiest, hardest working, and most powerful being of course Musk. But even the duplicitous Zuck is immensely valuable, for as long as he remains loyal, which may not be very long.
Trump knows that Maga needs those people more than anyone.
For being far too smart, Bill Gates got relentlessly bullied by the leftists he was and still is sucking up to. He still has not kissed the ring. So he is now between a rock and a hard place, and he needs to be crushed. His crimes are too many and too grave for him to switch sides as easily as Zuckerberg “They made me do it”. On the other hand, simply confiscating his wealth would scare the stuffing out of the tech oligarch wing of Maga. Bill Gates’ capacity for evil needs to be neutralised in some more delicate way.
On the plus side, the corollary to all of this is that if you can select a population for phenotypic leftism, then you can also — by inverting the selective pressures — select a population against phenotypic leftism. If the Jews selected themselves for leftism by reproductively rewarding a wicked elite, then people can select themselves for basedness by reproductively rewarding a virtuous elite. In other words, BEHEAD those who countersignal eugenics – the most vital (not to say urgent) form thereof is cominating the leftist phenotype — the phenotype of solipsistic narcissists — out of the gene pool.
If you will it, it is no dream.
So what do you suggest, besides removing all the bad ones? What about something like Karaitism that rejects the Talmud? Otherwise how do you expect to organize and rebuild around a fundamentally rotten religion?
It is highly unlikely that whatever I suggest will be adopted by Israeli Jewry. I’d like Jimian, Protestant Christianity as the state religion. “Haha,” the reader familiar with modern Israeli society will say, “that is never happening.” Indeed, and for the very same reason, pseudo-Karaism is also not happening. The Jews are going with Orthodox Judaism all the way into the grave; for one, the exponentially growing Ultra-Orthodox egregore is economically unsustainable and socially undesirable, and is likely to collapse the state. Our best hope, in the long run, is to be ruled by Based Christians.
You can, but it is harder, because the genetic diversity in the Ashkenazi race is gone; it’s a tiny and very inbred population.
The only hope of salvation in Israel appears to be from the Mizrahim, who are unfortunately very brown and not especially talented. Interbreeding will pull in the required diversity (small “d”) to start over again, but it’s going to be like a “New Game +” where you only get to keep a small portion of what you had and have to grind through the rest all over again.
I wish you luck, of course, but I don’t envy your position. At least in America this is one of the few advantages afforded by the Euro-diversity; while leftism has selected, or is in the process of selecting for a small inbred caste of suicidal fanatics, it is only 10-20% of the population, while “non-leftism”, which is not rightism, just normie-ism, comprises at least a hundred million fundamentally decent and moderately intelligent people from which a new elite can be skimmed, trained and bred.
Israel, I think, will have to get worse (in some ways) before it gets better. America need only prune the dead and dying branches and change the memeplex.
>the genetic diversity in the Ashkenazi race is gone
Ashkenazi miscegenation rate is >50% in America. It might not be coincidental that Yarvin, BAP, Claremont Institute, among others belong to the first major wave of mixed American Jews. The genetic problem they’re facing is the average of 0.5 children they’re having. They’re going to die out before obtaining genetic diversity.
I thought I was being clearer, but apparently muddled the message. I was referring specifically to the Ashkenazim in Israel, i.e. Mossadnik’s race and the extant ruling caste. They also have a low fertility rate, but the Mizrahim are much higher; thus, interbreeding likely the only way to preserve both in the long term.
I’m not overly concerned with the fate of Mischlings or their purebred ancestors in the USA. They mostly came here in the 20th century as “refugees” from this or that, were never very fertile, and part of the reason I don’t think it’s very important to go after them (except the virulent leftists) is precisely because they’re going to melt away in a few generations anyway.
The USA isn’t their country; if they feel it’s important to preserve their heritage, as opposed to adding whatever useful traits they possess to the gene pool here, then they can go to Israel and participate in whatever eugenic experiment is happening there.
>specifically to the Ashkenazim in Israel
Many are duel citizen, estimates are that 200,000 hold American citizenship and 344,000 hold EU citizenship. It’s likely why Israeli politics mirror American politics to an extent and why they too have had problems with attempted woke color revolution. Many of the American Jews I’ve been getting frustrated knowing personally have extended family in Israel. There is likely a lot more genetic flux than you’re accounting for. Both countries would likely be better off if they forced citizens to choose one citizenship.
I feel as though we’ve gotten off-point. Mossadnik made the assertion that if a trait or cluster of traits (leftism, legalism, etc.) can be bred into a population, then it can also be bred out of that population. And I stated that, while true in the abstract, the genetic diversity was much greater when it was being bred in, and therefore breeding it out may prove to be considerably more complicated.
I don’t know how much to trust official numbers, but official numbers say Israel has 7 million Jews and about 1/3 are Ashkenazi – i.e. about 2.3 million. If you took every single dual citizen Ashkenazi Jew and repatriated them back to Israel, it would barely make a dent in either their overall Ashkenazi genetic diversity, or the balance of Ashkenazi to other ethnicities, or the balance of Jews to other races in Israel.
Let’s say you got that number up to 3.3 million; it’s still less than half of all Jews, less than 1/3 of Israel’s total population, and only about 40% more genetic diversity within the regional Ashkenazi ethnicity; and a whole lot of that excess, at least 50%, is going to consist of the kinds of phenotypes that both our countries would prefer to repatriate to the bottom of the Pacific ocean.
I’m simply stating that the Ashkenazi Jews, who are Israel’s “elite” Jews, are standing at the edge of a demographic cliff already, and don’t have a lot of room to maneuver when it comes to selective breeding, and may therefore have to turn to some unpleasant trade-offs. Euro-Aryan-Americans are, fortunately, not in nearly such a precarious position, and could easily return to glory through selective breeding alone, but many other sovereignties hoping to reclaim their birthrights do not have that luxury.
I probably should have articulated my point differently, or elaborated further; I meant that just as a given population can select itself for more leftism, a given population can also selects itself for less leftism – I did not, however, intend to imply that Ashkenazim, without exogenous admixture, can (just as easily) reverse their gene pool to a healthy state. My comment was meant as a whitepill for non-Jews, who have not undergone strong selection for phenotypic leftism, more so than as a whitepill for Jews, who (unfortunately) have.
Anyway, race in this context is entirely secondary to religion. I don’t worry too much about our genes. It’s the lack of a truly healthy memeplex (and having no foreseeable path towards one) that really bothers me. As I wrote in a previous thread:
Biologically, Nature > Nurture.
But civilizationally, Memes > Genes.
We probably have enough “okay” genetic material to work with. It’s our religion that is fundamentally flawed, which is a source of sobering pessimism. But who knows: I’m willing to be pleasantly surprised by Orthodox-Judaism-as-a-State-Religion. I suspect, however, that we might run into some very serious problems, and quite rapidly at that.
>Bill Gates’ capacity for evil needs to be neutralised in some more delicate way.
In many cases, simply killing someone is a lot cleaner than the knock-on effects of trying to take their things or ruin their life. Sadism is a luxury that costs to indulge in.
I hope Trump realizes this Duterte thing is a dry run for him. The left will want to ICC him for deporting migrants “without due process.”
I see the kikes/satanists are at it again, so:
CHRIST IS KING!
Referring to this?
https://x.com/RealCandaceO/status/1900220726075875518
Stop being so antisemitic; it’s not my fault that the wicked 99.99% of us give the other innocent 0.01% a bad a name. (Very generous estimate.)
I will be thrown 17 different times into wooden gas chambers from which one can escape by walking away backwards after the worldwide 23andme-fication, and it’s all because fellow bagels are not crusty enough and refuse to behave themselves. I say, if you can’t take the heat, just get out of the oven!
But in seriousness, Zionism is the solution – just kick the f**kers out of your countries and into mine, we’ll deal with them. Or go full Cominator on the Left.
If worse comes to worst, you can always hide beside Geddy Lee and Don Fagan in my attic.
Baruch Hashem!
Jim, have you finally been hacked by usual or unusual suspects, or did you do some maintenance of your own?
Might have been just a hardware upset.
My initial suspicion was that the Shin Bet took it down in preparation for the Israeli civil war, since I form a sort of channel between the Israeli Right and the American Right, and our tyrannical and illegitimate oligarchy sought to silence me.
My message for the Shin Bet troons is that your rebellion against God will get you Cominated.
But anyway, it could well be something else entirely.
I hope it was innocent and Jim updates us soon. There’s always that risk…
I’m a little worried the site went back up but Jim is silent.
I have been busy addressing my infrastructure — which is still massively and alarmingly broken. I don’t know what data has been corrupted.
Surprisingly, no corruption that mattered, and everything is up to date. But the failure revealed some gross flaws in my recovery preparations.
I’m a lot less worried now that it’s back up. For a moment I wondered whether we were done for good.
Vanning Jim would be bold, but not unprecedented. But let’s not freak out just yet.
Switching from Agent Smith to Agent Shaniqua surely made assassinations a bit more challenging; but then if you’re hiding in some third world hellhole or whatever, they’ll obviously just hire some local criminals to whack you – plausible deniability is best policy.
Think GAE attacked the blog.
What happened?
As far as I know, just an innocent hardware failure and ensuing data corruption and all that.
What I do is make a copy of backups on a wide variety of physical devices.
Thank God you’re with us, Jim. As a reminder to all here, it might be wise to use the ‘Full Backup’ protocols on the homepage in order to preserve the records of this blog. Based on the instructions, we will need some kind of preexisting host, whether that be a “target website and target blog” or a lemp server. I don’t know very familiar each of us is with software (I know I’m not), but it may be good to at least get the instructions down and go from there. Perhaps some here have already done so – in that case, good preparation.
But if the spooks really do get you at some point, Jim, I wonder if it might be good to have an ‘appointed successor’ in that case – someone to take over the admin role and ban bad faith actors/shills, even without your specific and prodigious knowledge of history and human affairs? It might likewise be a good idea to have a trusted ‘co-admin’ or ‘sub-admin’ to be able to hold this power if you yourself were to disappear, as we were concerned about right now. There could perhaps be a timer associated with the function – something like “If Jim does not do Thing X within 5 days, start timer; if timer ends, Admin Power transfers to Successor Account Y”. Again, as I know little about the processes required to run this blog, I would not know the precise implementation of all of this. These are just some ideas I had to increase the “opsec”, so to speak, of our thing here. God be with all of you here.
Recreating the blog is significant work. I need to create an ansible playbook, so that people, starting with myself, can duplicate it more easily.
Greetings once again…
It is a righteous act to slay dealers of poisonous drugs. The Filipino acted boldly with just cause. But Filipinos generally are not worthy of trust. They lie. If it can be said we are descended of killer apes, Filipinos are descended from tamarin monkeys, always thieving.
When Humungus comes into power, drug dealers shall be burned alive for all to see.
I’m starting to believe Trump will not do as he should and ignore judges.
They’re litigating it, every single ridiculous ruling, the judges don’t care about pretending they’re following the law and simply rule on their own opinions, and the administration loses in the supreme court, thanks to the woman judge they appointed last time around.
I don’t like blackpilling, and things aren’t looking *bad* at the moment, but the momentum from the initial storm of executive orders and actions is slowing down after being attacked from all directions.
And the more the enemy gains momentum, the worse it is going to get. This outcome was predictable, hence they should’ve ignored the orders and powered through. Now they’re even challenging his order to remove troons from the military. This shouldn’t have even been in question. And that’s far from removing women which is far more important, unfortunately probably beyond this admin to do directly.
Moreover, Pam Bondi and Kash Patel are both looking quite ineffectual at best, especially with the whole Epstein documents fiasco. So far, I’m not seeing them using their power to really go after the left either aside from posturing and saying big words. We had enough problems with bad personnel last time around, and at least this time *most* of the cabinet are not traitors and are clearly on Trump’s side, so there is that. Not so sure about Bondi.
The American Empire in Exile is dangerous, and represents another front that’s opened against Trump and especially Musk’s companies. They’re pretty open about being on a warpath with the US and Trump. Physically, these countries have no way of fighting the US, but in practice, Trump is not in control of the US, and this represents another point of pressure ultimately from his domestic enemies.
The Ukraine war continues, and an agreement with Russia still seems difficult after the failure of the latest round of negotiations. I’m not too pessimistic on this matter because I think one way or another it is going to end relatively soon. The possibility of a world war coming directly from Ukraine seems quite remote now.
Like a hydra with a thousand heads, the GAE keeps opening its attacks despite having a few of its heads cut off.
The priestly core is mostly Harvard and the legacy media that acts as supporting pillars. Focus on the nerve center and heart of the GAE and not its operational limbs.
Demolishing Harvard building by building and brick by brick and placing tanks over the ruins of all the major universities of the GAE is what is needed.
https://x.com/SecRubio/status/1900655283380146267
A whitepill.
I think at the very least this administration has the heart in the right place. But the hydra is very much still alive, and they’re being dragged down slowly. It’s death by a million cuts.
The Great Orange Boomer booms orangely. How surprising.
Blah blah blah, wah wah wah, the sky is falling because I haven’t gotten everything I wanted by the second month of a four-year term.
That’s what I’m hearing. Jim goes on vacation/work trip for a whole 48 hours and you fall into melancholy and despair.
This black-pilling doesn’t help anyone. It’s not going to shame Trump into action. It’s not providing any new insights into the regime or novel solutions for a restoration. It’s not even providing a good belly laugh. It’s just “I’m miserable and I want everyone else to be miserable too.”
Well get over it. Take a walk, lift some weights, get liquored up and fuck some whores, whatever it takes to get your head screwed on straight, because people who only know how to moan and complain when things don’t go their way are going to be of no use to anyone when the shit really hits the fan.
We can still black-pill on the woman problem, which remains unsolved in all countries whose names don’t end in “-stan”, but the ideological spiral into ever-greater leftism has been decisively crushed. Progressive Liberalism is dead and gone forever, like Naziism and Bolshevism before it. Other leftist heresies will arise in the centuries to come, long after we’re all dead, but the few who bother to study the early 21st century will regard it as a time of abject idiocy.
It’s too late to van Jim; the damage has already been done.
The good news is Nothing Ever Happens is in line for shock therapy. Defeat in Ukraine and the collapse of the American Empire and the LLM boom either busting or working are crisis’s social reality can’t paper over.
Still whitepilled, hard to see everything from our vantage point. while trump is allowing the judges to preserve normalcy bias there has been a notable shift in his direction from everyone but the most hard left judges. I believe they are working toward a broad ruling about the limits of district judicial power over exec branch from the Supremes. that request just went live this week.
In the meantime, for the vast majority of payments, the NGOs and leftists are not getting paid, feds are not getting their access restored, and more agencies are being taken down.
also hard to tell what Bondi and Kash are up to, in some ways they have the toughest job with the worst snakepit. Gaetz would have been better. im willing to wait and see. but I am getting damn tired of being lucy and the footballed about Epstein, Kennedy files, J6 pipebomb and whatever. Either publish it or shut up about it.
Indeed, I am quite sick of it.
Moreover the Epstein stuff is largely a holdover from the #MeeToo era.
Before #MeToo, it was hard for regular guys to get decent pussy. #MeToo made it so that even rich and powerful men couldn’t get decent pussy, which might actually motivate them to solve the problem.
The courts are being selectively ignored already. USAid and the department of education clearly aren’t getting their money back no matter what any judge rules. Also further movement towards dissolution of the monasteries.
https://apnews.com/article/trump-dei-universities-investigated-f89dc9ec2a98897577ed0a6c446fae7b
Also the Pelosi Schumer split shows that there left’s command and control is broken (it could be a ruse but given that it will cause the lower ranks to start fighting each other I don’t think so) even if the gay American empire in exile still manages to pay shills for certain topics (though not others, sign tapping on 4chan largely vanished the day after USAid was cut).
With the collapse of central command and controll, the secondary nodes of London and Vancouver are feeling their oats. They are the Global American Empire in exile, while the Global American Empire in Washington fights it out.
We will not resolve this until tanks in Harvard. After Harvard, the secondary power centers in London and Vancouver will fall like ripe fruit.
So do you think Trump 2.0 is serious about dissolution of the monasteries or not.
That Trump’s inauguration speech reflected Cromwell’s speech when he dissolved the long parliament, and that he subsequently Napoleon posted, indicates he is familiar with the theory of history that is pushed on this blog. I have long hoped that Trump would become Cromwell and Napoleon, and now he is conscious of stepping into those very big shoes. The plan is that Trump will be Cromwell. Will JD Vance and/or Pete Hegseth be General Monck?
Whether he is up for the solution advocated on this blog — install men in Harvard selected on the Pauline criteria for recruitment of priests — remains to be seen. Right now the Thermidorean coalition is far too fragile to carry that weight. A managed retreat of the Global American Empire without splitting the coalition is hard enough, and that is the problem he is focused on for now.
Isis is directed through the Global American Empire vertex in Vancouver. So right now hot proxy war has begun between Maga and the Global American Empire in Exile.
https://x.com/_johnnymaga/status/1901271822709972993
This was the most ridiculous order yet, and the easiest to ignore with some plausible deniability that they’re actually openly defying the courts.
Let’s see if this is just the beginning.
Trump doesn’t want to announce he is selectively ignoring the courts, the courts and the left don’t want to announce it openly either. Its a strange situation…
Whitehouse publicized that they did not comply with this order, claiming that as the plane was over international waters the judge had no juristiction to change the flight plan.
Yeah they seem to be lawyering around judge orders and dragging their feet in complying, or complying maliciously, trying to manipulate procedural outcomes. But this is still not going to be sufficient, because they’re still playing their game.
Jim said some time ago:
What are some of these old romance novels that were burned or are now inaccessible? They can be from any epochal timeframe, Jim said that millions were burned, did they depict the mating dance & female nature correctly?
What are some old romance novels that were burned? I’m curious as to whether I can find them somewhere on the internet and whether as being considerably older and published in more Patriarchialist times comparatively in comparandum atleast (1930s-1960s) to current globohomo conceptuophysiological emasculation they were atleast redpilled on female nature and how they depicted the mating dance, what women of the past were magnetized by and what the infimum & supremum of their Phantasmagoria is.
Can you recommend some old romance novels, especially the ones that were burned, pulped or are inaccessible, you said that the old romance novels in public libraries get burned every so often to adjust romance to the latest levels of political correctness, so what are some of the older politically incorrect romance novels with thoughtcrimes & depictions of mating dance in cotonality & congruence with nature, evolutionary psychology & evomathematical game-theory that were purged?
I don’t follow Romance literature, except as the occasional painful spelunking of the female mind.
Female romance literature has always been under centralised political control. It simply was not allowed, did not exist until the 1800s. The first stuff for women was 1800s. It is ever changing, and if you read old romance target novels, you are just reading forgotten and no longer important versions of leftism. Book burning of romance novels has accelerated, because leftism changes faster and faster. They are not burning anything that matters.
Anne Rice’s Mayfair Witches is especially painful for it combines the female mind with schizophrenic platitudes to Woke.
I should spare you the pain. Female lead is a strong independent surgeon who is being held back by the old white man surgeon form being recognized and put in charge. She loses her temper and gives him a brain bleed using her witch powers. Totally accidental of course.
She seduces the bartender who initially rejects her because he has a date with a woman who isn’t going to just leave in the morning. She manages to get him in her bed after hitting on random men in front of him. So here we learn female lead is a slut. Scene jumps to bartender and her having sex in her boat house. Here we learn from him that she has been having sex with a long line of random strangers. He asks what she’s looking for. She replies with paraphrasing here, her demon lover. Bartender leaves and we never see him again.
Her mother gets cancer, evil rich white man offers experimental treatment to her mother in exchange for implied ownership of her. She rejects him on woke moral reasons and kills him by brain bleed. Schizophrenically this evil rich white man is more of a demon lover than the actual demon later in the episode.
She discovers her biological mother is in New Orleans. A mother who literally has a demon lover that appears to have been her own mother’s demon lover. While traveling there, demon lover has sex with her mother and she experiences it by proxy in a dream.
This is all in episode one. I’m leaving out many of the annoying woke details to keep this short. I gave up watching the rest and read the wiki. Demon lover somehow gets impregnated in her, she gives birth to him and raises him as some kind of demon child. A child that starts going around killing people.
What’s really surprising about these novels and perhaps a glimpse into the female mind is that all the prominent male characters & especially the male lead are really alpha, they’re cruel, ferocious assholes with almost Illimitable amounts of assholery & cruelty even when they’re dying, especially to each other, they don’t co-operate like normal males at all, they treat each other worse than even the worst caricature of how an Hyperabsolutist Monarch would treat a plebeian under absoluto-legitimatist autocratic Monarchy, surprisingly they’re omnicompetent, they’re mysterious, alpha, cruel, bloodthirsty, low time preference, potent, ruling, dominating, tyrannical, commanding, Undiminishable, Unshakeable, Immovable, Insuperable, Pitiless, Mercyless, Cooperationless, Savage, Demonality, Devilry, Grotesquery, Counterpunctilious, Overamatory hetairists and the Universe itself is Infinitivally open-ended with indefinable mysteries of life, death, and torment in Everydayness (Alltäglichkeit).
We know, but that isn’t the point I’m trying to get across. In the past it used to be:
>Bad man takes woman and she likes it.
Now it’s:
>Evil rich bossy white man is suppressing strong and independent woman and then she kills him or gets even some other way and everyone cheers. Then she goes on to have a string of anonymous sex with a long line of men who might as well be faceless wimps with no character.
This is why I call it schizophrenic. You can tell they find the ‘evil’ rich bossy white man attractive, but woke sensibilities also demand such men get “abolished” as the “social constructs” they are. “Abolished” tends to have genocidal levels of hatred behind it.
This may have found new forms of expression in the woke milieu, but the meme is older than dirt and can be summed up in a mere two words: “Daddy Issues”.
>Daddy issues
I can’t get over the addition of “she kills him and everyone cheers” part. It’s being depicted with such cruelty, arrogance, and vile hatred that the “bad guy” increasingly looks more and more like Mr. Average in relative comparison.
These are not women with daddy issues, these are witches that need to be stoned.
A distinction without a difference. Where do witches come from?
I have had women with Daddy issues. They are fine.
I’m sure you have. Being with a man she perceives as alpha makes the daddy issues vanish in an instant.
I guess I’d better be clear on the definition: “daddy issues” isn’t the watered-down pop-culture idea of a girl who simply didn’t get along with Dad or didn’t get enough attention. It’s the specific case of being in the care of a male guardian – usually a father, but sometimes a brother or frigid husband – who tries to keep her on the shelf long past her sell-by date.
In the same way we have red pill and black pill interpretations of reality, women seem to have a similar set of red pill and black pill fantasies.
The red pill female fantasy is being abducted by a male who out-alphas the overprotective guardian, which we roleplay in the traditional wedding ceremony. See also: Pirates of the Carribean, or any romance novel ever written.
The black pill female fantasy is that all the men immediately available to her are losers, or at least incapable of “rescuing” her, so she has to resort to drastic measures, which could be anything from simply running away up to flat-out patricide. Example: Lady In Waiting (Columbo S1.E5), in which the female protagonist has but one realistic prospect and her brother won’t allow it, so she murders the brother.
I’m not saying reality tracks either of the fantasies. The ones inclined to red-pill sneak out at night and get “raped”. The ones inclined to black-pill turn to self-harm, cutting themselves or even suicide. Female reality is grimmer than either of the female fantasies, but the root cause is always the same: sexually mature girl/woman whom Daddy won’t/can’t marry off and won’t let out to play, and all the drama that ultimately ensues.
If you play the role of abductor, and do it successfully, then she will be absolutely fine. Until then, she will be a nuisance or a danger to herself and every other man she comes across, including the male guardian in question, and the murder/suicide outcome has been in the public consciousness for a long time. That episode of Columbo aired in 1971, more than 50 years ago.
Pax’s example is a straightforward retelling of the black-pill escape narrative, just filtered through the woke lens that glorifies and valorizes it instead of revealing it as the depressing, destructive and generally awful outcome that everyone understood it to be in 1971.
>Pax’s example is a straightforward retelling of the black-pill escape narrative, just filtered through the woke lens
That woke lens has so distorted it, it’s something else. This is, kill the kids to spite the husband levels of depravity to the chorus of ‘and it’s a good thing’. It often feels like it goes beyond even that. The direction is reversed, I see a suicidal woke cultism filtered through the female black pill. Female sexuality remains present, but is almost treated as some sort of vestigial feature to be hated. Enough eye candy for her to slick to, but hollow enough for her to stew in not having any hope, dreams, or desires. After all, all men (and humanity) are to be condemned, castrated, and killed ‘and that’s a good thing’. Strong independent women to remain childless and unmarried ‘and that’s a good thing’. All male fraternity and anything that brings joy to men to be ridiculed, dismantled, and destroyed ‘and that’s a good thing’.
There is crazy, which can be a boatload of fun and pain. There is daddy issues, which can be fun and kinda cute and a boatload of pain. There is black pilled, and maybe ‘you can fix her’… and then there is outright satanic and demon possessed. Even if you could exorcise these women, is it even worth it at this point?
Daddy issues can mean a lot of different things.
Certainly, wokeness is jumping up and down to welcome and celebrate the demons, while previous-generation leftists merely preferred “balance” and “nuance” in their narrative fiction.
Yet the continuity is clearly there. These are old themes and old stories being retold by increasingly deranged and incompetent storytellers.
It seems like a more interesting exercise to me to take that finely-tuned radar and point it back at the past in order to discern exactly where the rot started and how to avoid such mistakes in the future. Taking your ultra-sensitive shit-detector, dropping it in a pile of shit and confirming “yep, that’s shit” might be an amusing way to kill time, but, like Bob, it leaves me a little perplexed as to the “why”.
This all is intuitively true.
As you said in that post, we’re under some of the largest book-burnings of all time, what are some important ancient or older books that you know for sure has been burned or rendered inaccessible by the cathedralites?
Bomb the Houthis! Get circumcised by the judiciary (again!)
I can’t believe that of all the fed gatekeepers, Nick Fuentes called it closest of all.
It is a coalition. There are some dreadful people who are essential for the coalition.
Once the radical left is quelled, which is going to take a while, there will be a sorting out in the coalition.
We cannot yet afford to antagonise any of the multitudinous and cacophonous groups who have become pissed at the great enemy, the radical left.
Honestly are the Hourhis attacking American ships or not in violation of classical international law. So why wouldnt Trump attack them in a limited way?
Bomb them and then deport those who complain under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. You know what would even be more cost effective? Prevent Israel from resuming the bombing Gaza, we can do it ourselves for max outrage. Then use that as a mechanism for identifying priority targets for deportation.
Deporting the American born ones is challenging, but their foreign born parents and relatives can be targeted, and then strongly encourage them (i.e. Hasan and Cenk Uygur types) to leave as well. If it was possible to take Alex Jones off the air through lawfare, with the amount of actionable shit many other media figures have uttered, should be possible to financially ruin them as well. The court system is already a joke, so might as well rig it in our favor for once as well.
Unfortunately Jews, many of them alarmingly hostile to Amerikaners, form a major component of the fragile and shaky Thermidor coalition, which is about to run into rocky ground as Trump sells capitulation in the Ukraine.
Trump wants to settle, for the alternative is ruinously costly for America, and even more ruinously costly for Ukrainians, and complete military defeat, as the Ukraine runs out of Ukrainians, is likely soon. If he fails to make a deal, it is going to look very bad, and Putin holds all the cards.
The Ukrainian army that is actually still fighting is fifteen percent of the Ukrainian army that has been conscripted, and shrinking fast. The rest are crippled, dead, or fled. That is Putin’s big card. He is getting close to eliminating the enemy.
>Prevent Israel from resuming the bombing Gaza, we can do it ourselves for max outrage.
So how would that sort of insane neocon GAE crime be part of an alleged plan to reduce the scope of the GAE?
A large part of Thermidor is Jews who are horrified that all the weapons were blown up in the Ukraine. They want them to be blown up in the Middle East.
Some Zionist objectives are at complete odds with Harvard at the moment. By using Gaza as a wedge issue, can splinter enough of the left from Harvard just enough to defang them one at a time. The universities are already starting to be defunded using anti-antisemitic protests as a pretext. The arrest of international pro-Palestinian students and their scheduled deportation has created further outraged demonstrations, which again, create easy targeting for more arrests and deportations.
> The universities are already starting to be defunded using anti-antisemitic protests as a pretext
I do not think that is the case. The joos who rule the “global american empire” are simply tightening their censorship regime. Absolutely nothing bad, that is to say, no truth about the joos can be told.
By the way, anti-anti-semitic is pro-semitic. No pro-joo protests in universities are being used as pretext for anything as far as I can tell (and no doubt the neocons are quite pleased with them.)
The universities are also being defunded in a wide variety of ways. All up, the ivies get 160 billion dollars a year. This is a huge juicy target. Suppressing campus protests is just the noisy, and least significant, part of it.
>anti-antisemitic protests as a pretext
Typo on my part.
Antisemitic protests are being used as a pretext to deal with the universities. Columbia got defunded 400 million in federal grants and contracts because of that, and the students who are getting arrested and scheduled for deportation are coincidentally all rather dark skin.
Look, wars can create some very unusual bedfellows and we’re still in a cold civil war. For now, on this very limited issue, Zionists/Neocons/MAGA/NRx interests align temporarily. Retiring the Neocons and Zionists needs to happen, but Harvard is top priority. Neutralize them and all of a sudden dealing with everyone else becomes much easier.
> on this very limited issue, Zionists/Neocons/MAGA/NRx interests align temporarily.
I have especial contempt for government schools including of course universities and if this were about defunding them I would be pretty pleased. But it isn’t. Here’s another datapoint for you :
“Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, opted not to name a critic of Israel’s war in Gaza to a top post managing briefings for the president, after the proposed appointment upset some members of President Trump’s coalition”
“Daniel Davis, a senior fellow at a Washington think tank who is skeptical of American intervention overseas etc”
You know Davis don’t you.
No end of Maga actions have been about defunding the Universities, with absolutely no connection to Palestine and such.
Johns Hopkins University is laying off 2000 workers after being defunded 800 million dollars. If top universities are getting hit this hard, I must wonder what the picture is at the national scale. This is very good for us, very bad for Harvard, and in the long term bad for the Jews White Bread keeps harping on and on about.
Prominent university lays off 2,200 employees due to Trump funding cuts; black pillers on suicide watch.
Com – well, naturally my answer would be to disentangle the USA from the stink of the zionist entity, whereupon the Houthi would have no more reason to target burger ships than russians or chinese. At any rate we’ve spent almost 30 years bombing stone age people back into the stone age to no avail. If it were possible to wage a proper war – kill, or castrate and enslave all the men – kill the hags and fuglies – distribute surviving girls as sex slaves – then I would be willing to entertain the pros and cons. Getting into a boxing match with the houthis is retarded, it’s an infinite money sink and there won’t be fewer houthis.
But it makes sense from the point of view of the joos who run the GAE doesn’t it.
Trump needs the cuckservatives and the defector big jews for now and he also probably needs Israeli intelligence to kill Zelensky for him (since he cannot trust American intelligence) so its not the time. Nor should America if it wants to preserve any kind of status as a great power make terms with pirates.
>needs Israeli intelligence to kill Zelensky for him (since he cannot trust American intelligence)
I’m not sure I’m following. That blob of evil called zelensky is, oh surprise, yet another joo. And a very high ranking accomplice of the GAE. Why would the isreal/GAE joos kill one of their top commanders?
>Nor should America if it wants to preserve any kind of status as a great power make terms with pirates.
Pirates? If the houthis are pirates, how do you classify all the criminals of the US empire? The few people who aren’t parroting US propaganda, correctly see the US as the biggest threat to humanity on the planet. The US is, you know, the criminal entity that wants to nuke Russia and China. I’ll take pirates over the US any day.
“Zionist entity?” You may as well hang a neon sign around your neck that says “Raghead taking Poli-Sci at State U.”
At least admit what you are (most likely a Canuck-educated sandnigger) like our resident Mossadnik was willing to do, and drop the “Totally White Right-Wing Nazi” act.
Jews are not a monolith and Israel has its own reasons to not much like Zelesnky or Ukraine.
Be careful with this frame. A man who sells out his own family for the purported benefit of foreigners he’s never met is wicked and evil.
“The US” is obviously not a cohesive family and includes many very wicked people whom we should feed to pirates. But that is, by and large, not who the pirates are attacking. They are mostly attacking the normal, decent people who are working to keep the lights on. For that, they should be killed.
If Russian or Chinese mercenaries broke into a BlackRock office and started looting and pillaging, I too would be “conflicted” on whom to root for, but the Houthi pirates are just parasites trying to suck up what little lifeblood we have left.
(Insert standard disclaimer about trust in the media, whom the pirates are ack-shully pirating, what those vessels were really transporting, if the pirates even exist at all, and so on. I’m just working with the facts I have access to, such as they are.)
>“The US” is obviously not a cohesive family
Yes, agreed. But since the Cominator was speaking in general terms about America(the US of) I replied along those lines.
As to the houthis my understanding is that they attack ships that belong to isreal, or attack western ships in retaliation for what the jews and their western accomplices are doing in palestine. So calling them pirates isn’t even accurate.
And if people here are actually serious about restraining what they called the “global american empire”, then support for isreal joos has to stop.
Also, the argument that a great power like the US shouldn’t “make terms” can be applied everywhere. It’s a favorite of the neocons. The US shouldn’t “make terms” with the soviet leader putin and his soviet empire. Doing so would invite more “aggression”. The US shouldn’t “make terms” with China and should help Taiwan, which is the seat of the true Chinese government, liberate mainland China. Et cetera.
The US will hopefully be ruled by far less insane people if Trump succeeds. The far less insane US cannot afford to be seen to be making terms with pirates either. Even in the early days of the American republic our prestige skyrocketed when Jefferson (and yes there are many bad things you can say about Jefferson) refused to make terms with pirates under similar circumstances.
Pirates attacking ships from some nations but not others is not new. They cannot claim to be lawful privateers because there is no sovereign government in open war with us that they operate with a letter of marque from.
@The Cominator
Wouldn’t the Houthi’s count as a sovereign government in open war with Israel/the United States for that criteria?
The Houthi’s are not pirates, and not terrorists. They are the government of Yemen. They are competent, effective, secure, and popular government. Which is legitimately at war with Israel. Declaration of war, all legalities observed. In pursuit of this war they opened fire on US flagged shipping. The US flag is supposed to protect ships from being fired upon. So, the legitimate government of the US is legitimately at war with the legitimate government of Yemen. But, for political reasons, the US does not want to recognise them as the government that they are, and have long been. Also the constitution says that only congress can declare war, but it seldom does. So convenient to define it as an anti piracy operation.
Since they have at no point held their own country or have formed a governing structure of any kind beyond their army I would say no. They also have no declared open war on the United States only that they will attack American vessels around Yemen. For all these reasons I see them only as pirates.
The Houthis have long had one of the better governing structures in the middle east. It keeps the sewers running, the parks watered, the roads paved. All the usual boring complicated uncontroversial stuff of governance.
I mean at no point have they held the whole of their country uncontested.
Have they ever controlled the whole of Yemen?
The Houthi’s hold the same territory North Yemen did.
Scarebucks – I’m not even brown passing, I stick out like a sore thumb with how white I am. I’ve been protesting the Entity for longer than some people commenting here have been alive I suspect. I will have to fess up to a ludicrously expensive university education, which has availed me naught.
“How do you do, fellow right-wingers? No, Qatar is not paying me to shill for its proxies and weltanschauung; I’m totally, totally unlike that Jackson Hinkle guy who works for Russia.”
For the past decade I haven’t kept up with popular culture. The last TV show I watched was The Young Pope (2016), a show that for all its problems nonetheless provocatively stood out against a sea of soyslop. It also was perhaps the most distant a TV show could be from ‘popular culture’ in the last few decades.
I’m currently forcing myself to review the culture output I’ve ignored. I’m right now watching Wednesday (2022) among other supposedly top TV shows of the last couple years. It is a massive struggle. Besides the constant blatant political messaging, the terrible character and plot writing, the eyesore visuals, and the multitude of the other problems with the shows, the main hang up I keep coming across, and the thing that keeps causing me to pause frequently to process what I’m viewing, is thinking, ‘who in the world is capable of creating such slop’ and ‘how in the world are hundreds of millions being entertained by this’?
Someday, historians might look back at the cultural output of peak Woke America, I’m not sure. It is so shameful and painful to watch I doubt many will be willing to actively think about the sordid past. Easier to pretend it doesn’t exist and eventually forget such things ever existed. Similar to how many of the most lurid and perverse details of the Wiemar Republic are now largely forgotten myths buried deep in the dark corners of the internet, only kept alive by a few intellectual hermits.
There is a huge amount of content on Youtube complaining about the deterioration in quality.
It is not just “the message”. The left is unable to do stuff like special effects in movies, or pathing in video games. The problem is just stupid people. Back in the seventies, the left was primarily composed of smarties. Today, anyone with an IQ above room temperature is going to be suspected of heresy and is just not going to get these jobs, even if he is gay and black.
The left was functional when the gerontocrats were in charge, because Hillary Clinton was only ordinarily stupid, and Nancy Pelosi was quite smart. But they had no young people of even normal average talent and intelligence lined up to replace them. Nancy Pelosi was holding everything together, but now her health problems make her ineffectual. Young Soros is not stupid, but because not stupid, not trusted to do much other than pipe the money around as directed by morons.
The neocons, Blinken, Nuland, and Kagan were of ordinary intelligence, but though they are not morons, they are merely normies. But, being normies and being Jews, the left never trusted them, and now they have been purged by Maga, and are about to be purged by the radical left.
It’s more than just a major deterioration in quality. I feel sickened and dirtied watching this stuff. Like I’m handling something more than just gross, but also desecrated and violated. It’s taking me up to 4 hours to make it through a single ~40 minute episode of some of these shows between all the pauses I’m taking. This is painful. This isn’t just about the talent issues, or the poor special effects, or stupidity, it’s all of that on top of the festering vile evilness radiating from these shows that I can feel in every design aspect.
Yes, there are no end of YouTube videos decrying the end of quality entertainment, but that’s really sort of a topical complaint in comparison to the underlying rotting degeneracy, and what I’m trying to get at with hypothetical future historians, is that a lot of this stuff is so bad and grotesque that I’m starting to think the vast majority of them will prefer to not think about just how bad things got. It would not be the first time forgetfulness has happened. Charleston’s fence often gets taken down for a reason. People forget unpleasant things, then they forget what it takes to prevent unpleasant things.
After all, there is much classical Greek and Roman texts about similar degeneracy and the consequences, and yet such disconcerting texts today are mostly regarded as largely forgotten curiosities at best. So ‘out there’ that they are deemed unintelligible. Of course commenters here know different, but we are too few in numbers.
The evil makes everything ugly and jarring, even stuff that should be neutral, such as character clothing. For example man jaws on every video game female, even when they are not deliberately making her ugly. You do not consciously notice the man jaw, but it gives the female characters a subtle demonic and uncanny appearance. Every character is subtly rendered demonic — sometimes rendered demonic in a dramatically obvious way with obvious conscious intent to present as a demon, as for example Taash in “Dragon Age: the Veilguard”. Usually they just subtly give them some subtle demonic characteristics rather than going all in horns and cloven feet, but with Taash, they just went all in with the big horns and all that. And when the character opens his mouth, very often you can hear that it is a demon, not a person. I am pretty sure that the voice actors are for the most part literally or metaphorically demons wearing the bodies of the possessed as skin suits. I really have not done a survey to hear how common it is, but when I see clips from the shows by based people reporting the shows, the voice actor always sounds like a demon wearing a skin suit. Obviously these clips were selected to be particularly bad, so I do not know how universal this
is, but the man jaw epidemic in female video game characters is nigh universal, it is not just characters that were selected by critics for their egregious ugliness. Even when they are trying to make an attractive female character, man jaw.
Last time I tried watching something from netflix was the Sandman. It wasn’t even the DEI stuff that got to me (although it did). It was the insistence that the universe is dark and evil and demonic.
I have no problem with a dark universe in media (I love well done noir movies and I wish that genre would come back once writing becomes great again) demonic universe not really my thing.
The universe is rather dark. Demonic, however is different and just nastier. Original 40K universe, extremely dark good guys fight demonic bad guys. And there was a big difference. As Warhammer became more woke, the good guys simultaneously suffered emasculation and increasingly demonic characteristics. The human protagonist in the current Warhammer trailer looks like a fag with some mental aberration. That does not really fit — he needs to be a supermasculine warrior.
Current day media has gone much further than strange jaw lines. Now it’s castration by piranha and everyone cheers, look at the comments. Yes, the boy losses a testicle in the show and they mock him for never being able to have children.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lSXxbaCGq4
Piranhas used to be the domain of evil bond villains to demonstrate how evil they are. If the woke had any self awareness they’d be asking ‘are we the bad guys?’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbTuutqZkWI
Athletic types are often portrayed in TV these days as those who ‘had it coming’. The stereotype of the ‘jock’ is so massively inverted from observable reality that there must be a lot of demonic spite. Wiki gives a good summary of what I’ve been seeing in TV shows. I’ve bolded the elements that have been dramatized completely beyond anything resembling reality or reason.
In reality:
Bad attitude/character is a very quick method to get one kicked out of team sports.
They are not afraid to hug after victory, they are comfortable with physical contact. Look at all those butt slaps.
There’s nothing ‘performative’ about adrenaline high joy. Crying isn’t typical, but you can definitely tell they are emotional after crushing defeats, they are not unemotional robots.
Personally I’ve never seen any bullying of those lacking athletic ability. As long as one is trying, people are most likely to be encouraging.
They don’t get “privileges” (as depicted) either. They get a shit ton of tiring, draining practice. Anything they do get is earned. Nothing is easy.
Access to social and sexual environments is worked for and not ‘given’. I’d even argue that they mostly built those environments themselves (with adult supervision). It’s the fruit of their own labor and they rightfully get to enjoy it.
As for undeserved passing grades… that’s a common feature of most students these days. That said, research shows that the the fittest on average get better grades.
I always got along fairly well with the “jock” types (though they are different here compared to the US, because we don’t have student athletes or school sports teams or anything similar), and I always found it interesting how different they seemed from US propaganda (which constituted almost the entirety of media I consumed as a child, being born in the west).
You would think of them arrogant, narcissistic, and picking on people, but I found that they were very sociable people, and liked by most for good reason.
I have to wonder who would have such a bitter view of them.
The typical “bully” was some fat loser with no father and low status.
No actual geek ever got bullied by an actual jock. If you’re getting bullied by an actual jock you’re a lot higher on the social ladder than a geek and he’s probably doing you a favor in the long term. If you’re a geek being bullied its by someone way lower on the social ladder than that. You might well envy that jock or cheerleader, but if they notice you at all, they’re probably fairly nice to you and nearly always civil. They’re probably also of somewhat to significantly above average intelligence, despite what you want to believe.
Jehu, do those low on the social ladder feel as if they did got bullied because they were never noticed by those higher up on it? Are these caricatures of ‘evil mean stupid [insert pejorative] jocks’ really just wet-dream-esque fantasies of being popular enough to get noticed? If would make a certain amount of sense if it were just females consuming this media… but ratings suggest plenty of males do as well.
People low on the social ladder get bullied plenty—maybe they just fantasize about a better class of bully? But stuff like Revenge of the Nerds is the height of such delusion. They resent the top of the ladder and often think they should be on top, but the Jock/Cheerleader archetype is usually a much better person (and a whole lot better to work for).
A dark universe can still be very cool. Batman watching in the shadows, biker men roaring over the roads, rugged ultramarines etc. A demonic universe has nothing cool.
In the Sandman episode that made me stop watching, the antagonist has some kind of magic trinket that gives him power over reality. He uses it in a diner to get rid of people’s inhibitions, so that they say what they really mean, his intent being to prove that the world is evil. In which he is totally proven correct: all humans in that diner say evil things, pick fights and it ends up in a murderous orgy complete with red hellish camera filter.
Final five minutes, protagonist swoops in, takes the magic trinket. Antagonist goes: “but don’t you see, I’ve proven this world is evil.” Protagonist: “Yes, but not only had you taken away their inhibitions… You’ve taken away their hope.” No explanation ever given.
Somehow that single line is supposed to undo the preceding 40 minutes of carnage. Like how a romance novel will be filled with rape and demon kings, but because on the final page it says “this is just a fantasy!” it somehow negates everything before it.
Women fantasize about rape, evil people fantasize about evil winning over good. Evil people are making mainstream media, so that’s what we get.
Not a big horror fan, if there are any out there maybe they can comment on the following.
Horror is the obvious genre for a demonic universe setting. HP Lovecraft’s universes are unapologetically demonic in nature. I always wonder what specifically appeals to horror fans. If we reason that evil people make evil media, can you reason the other way around, that evil horror is liked by evil people? Kinda mean to horror fans, but that’s just what I wonder.
Like, I can see how someone can enjoy the excorcist. It’s scary, but the plot makes sense. But a series like Saw just makes no sense. The antagonist supposedly punishes sin, but really he’ll murder you in a gruesome way because you picked your nose 5 years ago.
But in horror, the demonic is the adversary. We are expected to look at the demonic from the human perspective. The problem with modern stuff is that to the want us to view the world from the demonic perspective, to identify with and support, the demonic. There is systematic rejection of the human perspective. You just have blatantly demonic characters, like Taash, and subtly demonic characters, like the demented coward faggot atheist protagonist of the latest Warhammer trailer. Or the manjawed action girl of almost every video game. Taash gets an amazingly obnoxious cut piece where he lectures you to identify with transexuals, while presenting as a transexual who is a skinsuit worn by a demon with the horns showing through his skinsuit, the skin mask slipping a little off the demon face, and the voice slipping between human and demon.
The normie watching this is irritated, disgusted, and disturbed, but cannot put into words why he is so deeply reluctant to identify as requested. The normie just says he cannot identify with Taash’s predicament. He can’t identify, because Taash is not just presenting as a transexual, but as a demon. The normie recognises he is expected to identify, does not identify, and says the creators have done a poor job of getting identification.
Even if the heroine is perfectly OK except for the manjaw, there is something wrong with a manjawed heroine. It is just weird and off. Tash is fully androgynous, has horns, a face and facial expressions that are way off, and a voice that is way off.
You know how the woke want “representation”. They want the movies to be about themselves. Hence the Mary Sue plots, And they are demonic, so the self insert character is demonic. With horns.
This is an all too common reaction for anybody who doesn’t habitually watch TV, or hasn’t in awhile. My wife will be watching David Muir on ABC news giving his usual daily, breathless, retarded presentation of the news and I’ll mention, “How can you watch this stuff?” Her usual reaction is, “I just use it to unwind at the end of the day.” It’s like being the TV version of a pothead.
I am gross and perverted
I’m obsessed ‘n deranged
I have existed for years
But very little has changed
I’m the tool of the government
And industry too
For I am destined to rule
And regulate you
I may be vile and pernicious
But you can’t look away
I make you think I’m delicious
With the stuff that I say
I’m the best you can get
Have you guessed me, yet?
I’m the slime oozin’ out
From your TV set
You will obey me while I lead you
And eat the garbage that I feed you
Until the day that we don’t need you
Don’t go for help, no one will heed you
Your mind is totally controlled
It has been stuffed into my mold
And you will do as you are told
Until the rights to you are sold
That’s right, folks
Don’t touch that dial
Well, I am the slime from your video
Oozin’ along on your livin’ room floor
I am the slime from your video
Can’t stop the slime, people, lookit me go
I am the slime from your video
Oozin’ along on your livin’ room floor
I am the slime from your video
Can’t stop the slime, people, lookit me go
They aren’t. A lot of this stuff is funded by means like USAID and/or the rest of the leftist funding apparatus, precisely so that it can survive without any actual popularity. Part of the motive is to corrupt the few people who do watch it, and the other part of the motive is to convince people that, even if they don’t like it, there are lots of people who do.
You say there aren’t, and yet I observe a disturbing number of people mindlessly consuming what ever is put in front of them. The masses have shit tastes, or it might be more accurate to say they have no sense of taste whatsoever explaining why they don’t notice what they’re eating. Bugmen really do number in the hundreds of millions, living in giant termite like hives in the big cities. Ever notice that the more ‘democratized’ anything becomes the shittier it is? And that’s before progressive regimes start meddling in what gets pushed.
Good men tend to surround themselves with good men. Maybe you don’t see the overwhelming hoards of shit eaters because you are not around them. Maybe I’ve been black pilled by experiencing the DC hellhole and surrounding urban populations. Perhaps it’s somewhere in the middle, but I can’t help but fear there has been a massive accumulation of genetic load so to speak.
I think you have.
Neurotoxin and Jim exaggerate when they say “no one” watches the slop or endorses wokeness. If you enter the Matrix (be sure to wear protection) and do some basic geolocation you’ll find that it does have quite a spread, and that there are a vast number of “lesser leftists” who hardly ever leave their homes – whom normies and based ones existing in the real world thus never meet and rarely see.
But breadth is not depth nor scale; it is almost all concentrated in the metros, and the true bugmen, the ones who really enjoy their lifestyle and would refuse to give it up if pressed, number maybe a few million, or at most in the tens of millions. Not a majority, barely even an outsized minority.
There are many more who are living the bugman lifestyle, but it’s important to distinguish between the Small-Souled Bugmen who prompted the coinage of that term, and the “striver bugmen” who dream of a Victorian home, garden, obedient wife and 4-5 kids but who are terrorized, defeated and suffering from learned helplessness. There are easily a hundred million of them, but they only need to be offered a meaningful alternative.
It’s OK to be disgusted but most of these people deserve sympathy, not contempt; they have never known anything else in their lives.
“Bugmen really do number in the hundreds of millions…”
Nah. Agreeing with Scarebucks here. Remember the US population is around 333 million. If there were hundreds of millions of bugmen, they’d be the majority of the US population. Obviously not the case.
In literature before 1800, everyone takes if for granted that the better off people are, by today’s standards, astonishingly intelligent, virtuous and good people. Because if you were not smart you fell out of off the better people, and if not virtuous, thrown out.
The mindless consumers are just modern peasants, with vastly improved material quality of life and rather degraded spiritual and social quality.
17th-century royalty and aristocrats were generally neither contemptuous nor fetishistic of the peasants. They were sympathetic in the sense of keeping public order, providing spiritual leadership, avoiding excessive taxation and so on, but weren’t particularly worried about their individual vices or manners.
To hate and torment the peasants is tyrannical, but to fetishize and try to purposefully uplift them is Progressive. Both are failure modes of an elite class, who need to understand what it is that makes them elite if they want to remain that way.
Signal boosting this.
‘how in the world are hundreds of millions being entertained by this’?
There are technical tricks that are profound. Laugh tracks make the unfunny funny. And deeper than that they social proof the designated heroes and villains. A fast rate of jump cuts is hypnotic. The flickering screen itself may be hypnotic; I’ve seen that assertion in print in books dating back decades.
As you’re finding out, it’s most jarring after you’ve had a break from it. Most normies are raised in it, swim in it. “Television hit the boomers like alcohol hit the Indians,” and the boomers raised their children and grandchildren with it. By emergence or design, producers have been ratcheting up the jump cut rate and other technical tricks for six decades. For those who never take a break it’s a slow boil, not as jarring.
I’m currently forcing myself to review the culture output I’ve ignored.
Why, though? If you’ve got some specific strategic goal in mind, trying to get in to memeing or conversion I guess carry on, but if its only for its own sake I don’t see the payoff. “You cannot draw sweet water from a poisoned well.” At the very least, be reading the Bible and in prayer at the same time.
Tl;dr I can feel my back against the wall and I’d really like to know what exactly I’m dealing with.
I got into legal trouble for (alleged) speech crime. Thankfully, I’m not in too much trouble and I can feel the winds changing in my favor, but I’d like to avoid future trouble while still being able to discretely network with based individuals irl (there are quite a few of them in the officer corps, but there are also enough enemies one must be cautious), and for that I need to know and understand who I’m dealing with, and knowing the media they are consuming helps with that.
If anything, my radar for woke degeneracy has improved massively. This has saved me more than one headache already. Just asking people what they’re watching, and vaguely recognizing the titles helps massively with quickly judging the person.
Escaping sin and pretending what one left behind doesn’t exist is what my grandfather did. He moved from the East Coast to a small community in the West. When progressivism crept into that community, now much larger, my father cut off from the community and we lived largely in social isolation, I did not grow up with a TV subscription, only VHS of selected titles. I found myself isolated without much of a social network. For instance, I did not know my school had a gay pride demonstration at the football game the year I graduated. I found that out years later. I suppose that’s the reason why I got lots of weird looks when I said in civics class ‘homosexuals are genetically defective’.
Ignoring and escaping evil is not a long term winning strategy. It works in the short term on the individual level, but like that one family of Old Believers, Lykov family, running away is ultimately a failing strategy. You have to stand, resist, and fight, and if fighting at a disadvantage, best to choice your fights wisely, therefore best to know the enemy.
The GAE is still trying to cargo cult a colour revolution in Serbia. They were able to call hundreds of thousands of people into the streets in Belgrade, but with no real backing of bombs being dropped by the US military, there is no reason for Vucic to care. He can just wait for them to get bored and go home.
Evidence of the globos plan is always visible in effect, at home and abroad:
https://thenationalpulse.com/2025/03/15/kassam-vindicated-as-corporates-call-for-eight-million-migrants-to-replace-dead-ukrainians/
https://x.com/Basil_TGMD/status/1900848449530069020
Please take the shill test described in the moderation policy and get white listed. Further comments from this email address are likely to be silently deleted or snarkily edited if you do not.
Why are they (the Human overlords & Imperators of Dysgenesicism that be) so afraid of God the Omnitemporal?
Solipsistic narcissists perceive Existence (God’s simulacrum) as a rival ape, whom they seek to one up by absolutely destroying it. Satan’s sin is Pride. They hate the world not because the world is ugly, but because the world is infinitely beautiful (hence, crucially, infinitely more beautiful than they are), and they envy its beauty, being spiteful losers temperamentally and epistemologically.
Good response.
Why are the globohomo GAE globodysgenesis denatalization Parasitic Castration powers that be so afraid of Manliness?
They clearly do everything to Eternally censure Manliness and Sempiternally Damnatio memoriae it’s Memory from the consciousness of all Men alive, they wish to Omniannihilate it’s congeniality and Potence Irreclaimably to the extent that they go as far as to attempt to demonize and pathologize Manliness as a ens condemnatum causalitatum of Carbon based life itself.
Why do they love lower insecta, verminous phylum of hemipteran as well as vegetable organisms and inorganic life so much?
Why are they so afraid and anxious?
They (correctly) perceive masculinity as in line with the Reality Principle – masculinity is a manifestation of the Real, hence the Logos, hence God. The “Dark Enlightenment” is inherently spiritually masculine, because it shuns the soothing and deceiving False Light that is detached from the Real. Masculinity represents the liberty — the Divine Liberty, that is — to Act (Man is he who Acts, in the real world); it is the world manifesting itself, i.e., God manifesting Himself. They are allergic to God’s Liberty, because all exertions of divine power, Natural and Artificial (civilizational) alike, are anathema for them – the effete GAE Gnostics follow the “light” of the other guy, the one downstairs, who possesses not Divine Liberty; who cannot Act; who is not a Man.
What are your thoughts on Māra from Esoteric Buddhism and Mok Gyeongwoon/Larisha/Māra/Jeong/Zheng/Supernal Heavenly Demon Archpatriarchialist Paterfamilias from the Korean Novel Myst Might Mayhem, why is All-annihilating cruelty and ferocity so cool to Asiatics? Why do Koreans write so many novels on Heavenly Demon/Māra?
Why is cruelty so cool?
What are your thoughts on Esoteric Demons of Antiquity, as well as their Demonality, their incomprehensible behaviour in how they wish to harm humanity and deanthropomorphicize this earth, despite them claiming Transtemporal Imperishability, Immortality, Epanabainein Theosophos and Transcendence over death.
what are your thoughts on cruelty? How can a human being be Transcendental to the Mortal coil and become an Imperishable Demon of Eternities (Dämonität Ewigeskeiten) I don’t think it’s possible through any known or unknown conferment or rituals, obviously it’s an Unknowable, undecidable, ungraspsable & unlogicalizable question but I’m curious nonetheless.
Is it really wrong to have contempt for death, mortals and mortality? is it really wrong to seek to become an Imperishable Entity (Entitas Ens Imperishabilitatem), I’m not talking about some teleologisticomoralistic Paracelesian-Valentinian Faustian Bargain, I’m talking about something else (I’m not sure what I’m talking about myself as All-accomplishing & All-subjugating Omnisubjugarem Transcendence with no counterposing downside seems unattainable) do you really not feel enraged and Infinitivally saddened knowing you’re a mere mortal and that a mortal however Supremum his achievements might be Immortalized is a trifle who can’t be self-existently aeternorum et increata or Imperishable by himself (what’s called “anādinidhanaṁ” in Buddhism).
Also what are your thoughts on the Esoteric Āgamic Vaishnavite Deity Mahānārasiṃha in Hinduism who is considered the Hypertranscendental and Hyperimmanent Ānantāparabrahmasvarupesvara (Infinitival Embodimentation of Transcendental Brahman God)
I know that these are Unknowable and perhaps undialectologizable questions and since you’re a mortal yourself but I’m curious about your perspective on all this nonetheless, I feel spiritually lost and Undiminishably saddened by the truth about mortality
Promises issued by the father of lies. We have a better promise — the resurrection of the body.
The promise issued by the father of lies is that you will cease to be yourself — which could well be true in some sense, but probably not the sense that you hope for.
When a monkey sees another monkey slipping on a peel of banana, it laughs. Sadism is inborn, sin is inborn, for it is on some level gratifying to see others weakened, as that indicates that you are becoming stronger – evolution bred it into us, as risen killer apes. God imbued us with sinful nature to prompt us to overcome it; when we overcome it, we do God’s will and make His world a better place. Thesis-antithesis-synthesis on a cosmic scale. Isaiah 45:7. Now, the demon you mention, Mara, represents the ultimate antithesis – death. Life is good; death is bad; and the synthesis is the Omega Point. Asians, being socially evolved, instinctively get it, they understand Mara’s necessity, but cruelty (again, inborn) apparently makes some of them like Mara a bit too much.
Well, demons are liars, so their claims tend not to be truthful. Obviously, like modern leftists, they presented themselves as deities – that, indeed, was one of the original deceptions. (Thus, I don’t find them incomprehensible at all; if you understad leftists, you understand demons.) In Psalm 82:7, God explains to the demons/leftists that — as they say in the incelosphere — it’s over
I believe the previous two answers address this one, too. Sin/death lurks at the door, since GNON wants us to reach the Omega Point by eventually conquering and defeating it. That can only be done in this world, the real world, rather than in the deceptive matrix of the demons. To engage with sin requires not an escape from reality, as advocated by leftists/demons, but rather a full engagement with reality; the only way out – is through. Whatever happens, happens in this world.
There is nothing wrong with the desire for immortality, per se. It is the way people go about trying to achieve it that leads them astray. Left-Immortalism seeks to abolish the world, or at least disengage from it; Right-Immortalism is rather motivated by Agape for the world. The former satanic; the latter divine. But if you are truly possessed of Agape, should be willing to self-sacrifice for the world, if that means abolishing death/sin. Should be willing to fulfill Isaiah 53. Now, in typical demonic inversion, the Devil accuses the God of Life of being the Devil. But the real God, who is the God of Life, made it perfectly and abundantly clear in 2 Samuel 14:14, and Ezekiel 18:32, and Isaiah 25:8, that He desires Life, and that, as the extropians might say, He created the World for Life. So, I’m not too enraged about the prospect of my own mortality, because it is the world itself that I love, and I desire its immortality. (Having said that, I wouldn’t mind personal immortality as well – I’m totally cool with the idea, in fact. Nevertheless, ultimately, my ikigai derives from desire for the world’s immortality. I’d like to save existence itself. Surely, the Brahman is greater than any individual.)
My Ashkenazi ancestry gave me the superpower of bullshitting confidently about whatever subject I want, but “with great power comes great responsibility,” and so in this esteemed community I’d rather “poast responsibly.” So I’ll admit honestly that I don’t really know enough about it.
Enter the Flow Zone; stop thinking about yourself and start thinking about the world. Don’t look inward, with closed eyes. Look outward, with open eyes. Meditation/psychedelics/whatever should orient you outwards, not inwards. Agape, my brother, that’s all.
We have seen the left drift from heretical Christianity in 1640, to post trinitarianism in the seventeen hundreds, to unitarianism, and then to outright demonism today. Leftists see the will of God manifest as the world as a rival ape in the dominance hierarchy, whom they wish to destroy, wish to erase existence itself, hence postmodernism, and also, hence the much older faith that Kangyurwa Samten Luminiferous Omnisuperessentialiter Gyalpo is addressing.
It’s difficult not to be blaqpilled especially when one finds that he himself is the Manliest Man around with the Excelsis of Manliness in his bosom, if one is not even that Manly in particular compared to the very recent yet forgotten past, even as recently as the 60s based on pictophysiological evidence there existed Men Manlier than I (for example Men like Stan Hansen who was a professional wrestler I find Manlier than almost anyone else existentiating now) but now I find few if any that show Superordinate Eidetic-egological Egologistic Manliness to that Arrogating level.
One other amusing and somewhat related thing is how they’re afraid of God the Omnitemporal Father and public demonstrations of Manly Patristic Panegyrization of God as the Supremum, Supernal, Pantodynamos, superuniversaliter, superentelechic Alpha, you’ll notice that even normies will start trembling, sweating & fidgeting if you make a Manly speech publicly about how you’re backed by God the Omniimperator in phraseological-vernacular loquacity as well as in a loud Manly tonalization, progressivists start trembling like flyspeck inhabiting lice and mayfly in front of conflagration of fire, they’re also afraid of symmetrical anaesthesia, anything inhibiting beauty, the Transcendental Beauty of .Musica autoschediastike and musica universaliter or Musica Universalis, Hence the completely irrational behaviour and they’ll try to physically attack you if possible in a massified linkage of mob if you did this Manly demonstration publicly like festering verminous convulsive epileptoid donsonflies but only if they outnumber you of course.
It’s Unendurable to live without acting with Manliness, it’s worse than living irreligious, it’s worse than death, it’s like living aequivalentiae to corpses, it’s lowliest & infrahuman, it lowers your testosterone and worsens your health due to spiritual deandrogenization, your seminiferous Spermatogenesis which is the manifestation & reflecting pool, Garbhagṛha & Opisthodomos bassi-relievi of your Transcendental yet Immanent Unknowable Vital Essence becoming watery & lower testosterone levels in biophysiologically healthy young Men in the West is a direct casual-empirical linkage consequendum of this Omnicataclysmic crisis.
RE: Complying with judicial orders
Curtis Yarvin wrote a thread on the recent events:
https://x.com/curtis_yarvin/status/1901324636681576507
There’s also a response from this other guy:
https://x.com/xirtman/status/1901361889105396051
I think he makes the same mistake that many do, to assume that just because someone grifted off of collapse, that this is evidence they architected it. And thinking this way, you end up concluding that everything is about money, everything is a facade and no one really believes in anything, and there is one big conspiracy that moves the entire world, always.
And the bankers are infinitely smart and powerful and immune to any consequences, and have power over everyone.
But we know that power is power, and money is not power.
Hence he says:
I think this is a common failure mode in right-wing thinking. And it also leads to a completely cynical and materialist view of the world.
The French monarchs had undermined their own power by stripping it from nobles and giving it to the third estate over centuries – creating powerful bureaucrats. Those people quite literally did the french revolution. This wasn’t a peasant revolution, of course, but no one on the reactionary right believes that. No one at the time knew what the actual tyrannical regime coming out of the French revolution would look like, and I certainly doubt any banker would’ve wanted to invest in that outcome.
What kind of genius intellect would they need to have to know exactly what would come of that chaos?
As for the USSR, the reason why it was full of vultures with western sympathies is that the ruling class simply stopped *believing* in the soviet union and its ideals. 40 years after WWII, the generation of true believers that saw Stalin and the revolution was dying out. The new generation saw the prosperity of the liberal west, and had no reason not to defect. When your state religion dies out, everyone left at the top becomes a vulture. There is no reason for them except personal benefit.
Soros is mentioned too, as using his NGOs in order to subvert Soviet intelligentsia. This may be true, it is something he would do, but doesn’t really prove what he thinks it does.
Ultimately yes, people were trying to loot a rotting corpse – but no one had the ability to plan all of this ahead of time.
Soros became politically active in the 1990s, whereas the rot set in inside the Soviet structure in the 1970s, with things suddenly starting to collapse for real by the mid-1980s.
The nomenklatura started going solipsistic during the Brezhnev “golden stability”, and by the 1980s the contact with empirical reality was so far gone, that even the simplest products begun disappearing from shops, trains begun derailing en mass, nuclear reactors exploding, airplanes falling, and law and order institutions increasingly collaborating with organized criminal gangs.
Every institution begun turning into a separate fiefdom competing with the rest, and the various constituent republics also turned into fiefdoms for the local party leadership. Which, after the 1991 collapse, simply took over, especially in Asiatic places like Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan etc.
If, to maintain at least some contact with reality, institutions need constant pressure from below (grassroot), pressure horizontally (critical media and independent regulatory agencies), and pressure from above (the “king”), the Soviet system relied entirely on vertical pressure from the king to keep everyone from going solipsistic, and the moment the pressure from above eased off, that was that. The fat lady begun her final aria.
On the face of it, Trump DOJ is not complying with Judges orders, while at the same time, claiming that they are complying. Planes didnt turn around per the judges orders. but the original five plaintiffs didnt get on the plane, giving the judge partial compliance.
Makes sense if Thermador is a shaky coalition. some want open defiance of judges, others want to preserve sense of normalcy. All agree on essential elements of what should happen. no more money to NGOs. illegal aliens deported. Spin down of government agencies, all happening despite many many lawsuits.
Media reaction is also interesting. One would have expected major freakout about non-compliance with the planes not turning around but headlines were quite muted. Nobody wanted to point out defacto loss of power (Yarvin noted this)
Yarvin points out that this is incredibly dangerous for judicial system if they dont stop with the TROs and orders on Exec powers. Judges need to preserve sense of power, but must be careful of not being too openly defiant of what the public wants (deportation of criminals). Trump has picked a good issue as test case. Administration is being careful about preserving surface sense of normalcy and allowing SCOTUS to preserve that sense of power. But if it happens that way the tail wagged the dog here.
Yarvin is stupid. Trump is not complying with judicial orders. But, to protect the judiciary from embarrassment, always finds some post facto justification for doing so. Which post facto justification will always be accepted by the supreme court, no matter how contrived, because they suspect that if they fail to accept it, they will be Jacksoned.
That sounds exactly like what Yarvin is saying here, though?
That’s his point. The supreme court continues to save the Judiciary by (paradoxically) generally ruling in Trump’s favour, because if they don’t, then they will be delegitimized entirely.
https://x.com/JDVance/status/1901441626116870156
JD Vance, in response to Axios reporting that Trump ignored the court order.
Perhaps nothing much will come of this.
Or maybe we’ll remember it as the turning point.
It was certainly the most ridiculous of all the court orders.
https://x.com/BillMelugin_/status/1901388028742144200
We already knew this was the justification. But yeah it seems they’re avoiding open confrontation.
[*deleted for bizarre detachment from reality*]
Not what leftists are like, not what conservatives are like, not what Maga is like. Inverts reality on every point.
I appreciate Mossadnik’s response, rather than calling Me deranged he said some really fundamentally sound stuff, I can’t directly reply to his post for some reason but I really appreciate his substantial & pluralistic-agapistic Patristic Pauline Christian response which is intuitively correct and Fundamentally well-tuned, as overall I don’t have either any Intuitionistic or empirical counterfactual or disagreement, there is nothing contrariwise to him that can be said as it would be like ignoring evidence in front of one’s own nose.
“When a monkey sees another monkey slipping on a peel of banana, it laughs. Sadism is inborn, sin is inborn, for it is on some level gratifying to see others weakened, as that indicates that you are becoming stronger – evolution bred it into us, as risen killer apes. God imbued us with sinful nature to prompt us to overcome it; when we overcome it, we do God’s will and make His world a better place. Thesis-antithesis-synthesis on a cosmic scale. Isaiah 45:7. Now, the demon you mention, Mara, represents the ultimate antithesis – death. Life is good; death is bad; and the synthesis is the Omega Point. Asians, being socially evolved, instinctively get it, they understand Mara’s necessity, but cruelty (again, inborn) apparently makes some of them like Mara a bit too much.”
This is correct, there are alot of Heavenly Demon/Heavenly Devil/Primordial Devil Sovereign Chinese cultivation novels, among them a novel called “ I’m the fated villain” which seems somewhat redpilled on the women’s question, there’s another novel called Legend of Swordsman which is mostly unreadable but has a few redpills, Myst Might Mayhem is also a well-written novel for a pastime although it’s a overferocious and somewhat Gautierian & Romanticist, Parnassianistic, Symbolistic, Aestheticistic, Prescriptivistic in the regard of autotelic autoteleological cruelty, it doesn’t contain any redpills on the women’s question like some Chinese novels do, Korean Novels are bluepilled on the women’s question, for example that enfeebled effeminate faggot gook author Jee Gab Song who wrote Memoirs of the Returnee, A Villain’s Will to Survive, The Novel’s Extra which are all unreadable.
“I believe the previous two answers address this one, too. Sin/death lurks at the door, since GNON wants us to reach the Omega Point by eventually conquering and defeating it. That can only be done in this world, the real world, rather than in the deceptive matrix of the demons. To engage with sin requires not an escape from reality, as advocated by leftists/demons, but rather a full engagement with reality; the only way out – is through. Whatever happens, happens in this world. ”
I agree that Agapistic/Agapological/Agapofilial/Agapopatrimonalist/Agapoempirical/Agapopragmaticist approach might be Superiorem to the reverberations of Transcendentalist Idealisms and other such things, these things which are unattainable like Imperishability… As You said Sin and Death (I might add Darkness) does lurk at the door and in the arroyos, fissurations, curvatures…
I looked up the omega point and
Charles Sanders Peirce said:
”… in the beginning – infinitely remote – there was a chaos of unpersonalized feeling,
which being without connection or regularity would properly be without existence. This
feeling, sporting here and there in pure arbitrariness, would have started the germ of a
generalizing tendency. Its other sportings would be evanescent, but this would have a
growing virtue. Thus, the tendency to habit would be started; and from this, with the other
principles of evolution, all the regularities of the universe would be evolved. At any time,
however, an element of pure chance survivesand will remain until the world becomes an
absolutely perfect, rational, and symmetrical system, in which mind is at last crystallized
in the infinitely distant future.”
I will post more on Peirce later who is Indeclinably & Inarguably the best logician to existentiate until now and has influenced every Higher order logician on earth in the past present and perhaps the antecedent to alot of most fundamental theoretical theorematic, set-theoretic, category-theoretic, group-theoretic, game-theoretic, proof-theoretic, axiom-theoretic, topos-theoretic, type-theoretic, algebraico-theoretic mathematical ideas (founder of metamathematics too i.e. study of the axioms of mathematics & logic)
As Peirce says it, it settles the debate, his worldview of Pragmaticism, Pragmatism, Holism, Instrumentalism, Tychism, Synechism, Agapism is also congruent & concatenative to reality more so than any ancient mysticism however linguistically complexive said mysticism might be.
“There is nothing wrong with the desire for immortality, per se. It is the way people go about trying to achieve it that leads them astray. Left-Immortalism seeks to abolish the world, or at least disengage from it; Right-Immortalism is rather motivated by Agape for the world. The former satanic; the latter divine. But if you are truly possessed of Agape, should be willing to self-sacrifice for the world, if that means abolishing death/sin. Should be willing to fulfill Isaiah 53. Now, in typical demonic inversion, the Devil accuses the God of Life of being the Devil. But the real God, who is the God of Life, made it perfectly and abundantly clear in 2 Samuel 14:14, and Ezekiel 18:32, and Isaiah 25:8, that He desires Life, and that, as the extropians might say, He created the World for Life. So, I’m not too enraged about the prospect of my own mortality, because it is the world itself that I love, and I desire its immortality. (Having said that, I wouldn’t mind personal immortality as well – I’m totally cool with the idea, in fact. Nevertheless, ultimately, my ikigai derives from desire for the world’s immortality. I’d like to save existence itself. Surely, the Brahman is greater than any individual.)”
Agree with all that, great points on Immortality seeking & aga
As I said I Agree with all that Mossadnik said in the quoted text, great points on Immortality seeking as Truth Seeking Patristic Christian Patriarchialist GNON-congruent Gnonic Agapism, Christian Agapism seems similar to Peircean cosmological Agapism in that sense.
Mahānarasiṃha is a really Transcendentally Ferocious Deity, although it’s intuitively true that God being Infinitely Benignant and Omnibenevolentiae wouldn’t be cruel or Wrathful, but Mahānarasiṃha is really cool in that the descriptions according to some ancient texts I’ve read in Sanskrit (I can read Sanskrit philologically) the descriptions of his Cornerless massacres and His “Transcendental Prowess” are really Hyperimaginative, Hyperphantasmagoric, Hyperferocious, geometrically too.
“Enter the Flow Zone; stop thinking about yourself and start thinking about the world. Don’t look inward, with closed eyes. Look outward, with open eyes. Meditation/psychedelics/whatever should orient you outwards, not inwards. Agape, my brother, that’s all.”
I agree that psychedelic nootropics are a waste of time but meditation is very much real with a superpositioned element of elementalist superimpositionist Irreality, you can really summon demons with it, anyways correct post on all accounts, agree with Agapism and also agree that seeking Oblivescence or Oblivescence-seeking, Oblivion-seeking, Nihilation-seeking, Death-seeking, Annihilation-seeking, Negation-seeking, Non-existence-seeking is dumb, evil and harmful.”
Jim said:
“Promises issued by the father of lies. We have a better promise — the resurrection of the body.
The promise issued by the father of lies is that you will cease to be yourself — which could well be true in some sense, but probably not the sense that you hope for.”
I agree that empirically observed resurrection of the body as Immortality (Corporeaum Sarkosis Ensarkosis Immortalitatum) is true Incorruptibility and that Obscurum per Obscurius occultated Immortality or Imperishability just seems like a fundamentally aletheiological tautological oxymoronic unattainable wistful lie.
Also I do know that the promise of Mystical Immortality is that one will cease to be himself but probably not the sense that I hope for, one will equiprobably become undifferentiated massified delinkaged deindividuated, depersonalised, dedifferentiated and so on… One won’t gain Physical Immortality from such things that’s for sure as no one has ever seen to gain it as of yet.
Things that are Deempircized and tell you stop believing your organogenetic apparati, your eyes, your Intuitionism and so on seem to be aletheiologically untruthful, just seem to be lies on a fundamentally malicious level, just doesn’t seem trustworthy, also seems terrifying as presentistic wistful cries for the unattainable
There are different ways of summoning demons. The question is for what purpose. If you summon them so you can perform an exorcism – go ahead, provided you have the Wisdom to do it right. But if you summon them for any other purpose, that’s the work of Mara, or whatever the Villain is called these days.
I did choose the psychedelic method rather than the meditative one. But then, I had the confidence of having memorized vast portions of the Masoretic Text, to the point where I would watch the International Bible Contest on live Israeli television and know the correct answers which the contestants did not – but enough nerdflexing. Point is, before setting out to the Haunted Orchard (or Elysium, if one truly enjoys it), I had had my mental landscape filled to the brim with the Word. Had I not done so, it would probably not have availed me as much as it did.
Luke 17:33: “Whosoever shall seek to save his life shall lose it; and whosoever shall lose his life shall preserve it.”
Ketamine mimics NDE; and it’s not just mimicry. I died and resurrected innumerable times. And you can too! Ah, but it’s really not for everyone. Indeed, if you can summon demons with “mere” meditation, perhaps it would be advisable that you avoid the Substances.
I reject the idea that every form of occultism is demonic (or nonsense) because some of the most clearly brilliant men in history like Bacon, Newton, Kepler, Tesla and very likely Heisenberg (he was tight lipped about any interest in such but he hinted at it) all clearly were very interest in Hermetic “white” occultism and clearly they seemed to have gotten positive results from their practice of such. But I do think most practictioners who achieve anything with such studies beyond wasting their time do tend towards the demonic.
I agree.
I once communicated with the spirit of my grandfather. His message was, simply:
“Fear not. Love life.”
Of course, visions should always be taken with a grain of salt. Nevertheless, I do try my best to live by that philosophy, in my own way.
@mossadnik appreciate you slowing down with the switching identities so that we actually get to know the man behind the handles.
Thanks, Archbishop.
You know who else would really enjoy knowing the man behind the handles? Israel’s Orthodox Jewish Sanhedrin of 25-30 years from now or so. Whatever – bring it on, I say.
I mean look, it’s all fun and games and “larping on teh internetz” until the regime uses *beep boo beep* *tktktktktktktk* cyber technology to figure out who you are, then denominates you heretic number 1, then suicides you; which regime (in this case) can be either progressive or ortho-jewish. But who wants to die a coward? Truly I tell you, such a person never really lived in the first place. Gotta take some risks. But caution is still recommended.
Very true. Unless you happen to have an extensive background in cyber security, hard as a single man to keep out entire agencies devoted to cracking online identities.
Chestertonian addendum (Orthodoxy, chapter 8):
He did not get it entirely right, to be sure.
But he had a point.
He has no point, he doesn’t understand the tradition at all. This is equivalent to those claiming meditation is “just thinking about nothing” and therefore somehow evil. The man who says meditation is “thinking of nothing” has no idea what meditation is or what it is for. The buddha statues he’s talking about are essentially depicting a man in a state of prayer. Do you pray with your eyes open? Buddhist forms of meditation have been recreated multiple times in various Christian traditions, and even odd things like “incorruptible” corpses of saints appear in both traditions.
Buddhism and Christianity are incredibly similar. Let me give you two parables
It’s like the hippies that pick up Buddhism because it’s not straight white male patriarchal Christianity, then find out theres lots of patriarchy and sexism involved when you actually look into it, just now in reverse.
Yes.
and I find those versions of Christianity rather suspicious. It seems like a low effort, low cost, form of superior holiness which is most conveniently indulged in when one has eaten more than one should.
Buddhism is not an evil religion it probably in its moral philosophy is the closest of all religions to Christianity and Buddhism seems to be the only other religion that is capable of all aspects of high civilization. Also the original buddhism was extremely redpilled on the woman question (I think it did it better than Islam since it didn’t impose a gay dress code or seperation rules it merely imposed much lower status on women).
Now Tibetian buddhism (sort of the Roman Catholicism of buddhism with all sorts of extra doctrine and a god king priest) might well be evil.
I find myself closing my eyes to devote full attention to the prayer. It is not hard to imagine doing the same with my eyes open, it is hard to imagine paying any attention to the forms in my vision.
Hesychasm is very old, before the West/East split, back when Egypt was definitively Christian. Doesn’t seem like a suspicious heresy to me. Rosary beads to count recitations, an obvious analog to the mala beads used for the same purpose, also date back to the desert fathers.
>when the belly is full
They even have the same failure mode of veneration of asceticism until death, with stylite monks fasting and in prayer on top of pillars until death from starvation and exposure.
The Buddha’s point was about the misuse of teachings, both in the parable of the snake and in the parable of the raft. Grasp the snake the wrong way, it will bite you; use the raft to navigate Nirvana, that’s a counterproductive endeavor (but you still need the raft, makeshift as it is, to get there). The Dharma that doesn’t actually, successfully lead to detachment is not the real Dharma.
Christ says something else – when the seed is nourished by God, you need not worry about the “how”; this is similar to Matthew 6:25-34. Let God take care of the “how.” You just reap the rewards.
But where is the Kingdom? What is the destination? Do you close your eyes and dissociate from the world to reach the Kingdom? Or do you open your eyes widely, frantically?
Matthew 6:10:
And that is the crucial point: Christianity, properly understood, is Jimianity. Buddhism, with all due respect, is something a little bit different. They may prescribe similar social technologies; in fact, maybe Com is right, and it could well be that Buddhism is even more based on the WQ than Christianity. But the point here is not comparing social technologies, but comparing ideals.
The Buddhist ideal and Christian ideal, if not as incompatible as Chesterton envisaged them, are nevertheless dissimilar. To be clear, I’m not telling you to drop Buddhism (indeed, I close my eyes on ketamine); if you grasp that Samsara is Nirvana — the Near Shore and the Far Shore are one and the same, and always have been — you may well reconcile Buddhism with the Jimian interpretation of Christianity. But it’s still a different ideal, fundamentally.
I’ve been to some massive buddhist temples during the traveling period. Inside you’ve got variations like courtyards or interconnected rooms etc, but in the end there is always a central statue of the buddha, and instead of representations of saints you’ve got various “helper bodhisattvas”, as smaller statues and as drawings on the walls. Then there are tertiary characters, the folklore and adventure layer, represented as something out of a Zelazny/Moorcock world – warriors with Klingon types of weapons, fanged and clawed minstrels, monks with demonic dogs etc.
I don’t recall seeing Buddhist first-tier characters with their eyes shut. At most a half-closed “Snoop dog” extremely chill gaze.
People who come to the temple behave like people entering a church. Instead of candles, they light incense, and they look at the buddha (or avert their eyes while down on knees, as the case may be) and silently pray. For health, for a change in their fate, for the souls of recently deceased loved ones.
It is during these times that I reconsidered my views on Christianity’s taxonomy. Asiatic religions of the ancient type have explicit or implied avatars of God here in the world of mortals. This feels like a distant yet obviously related tenfold-removed cousin to our Son of God. Whereas Judaism and Islam have no messiah. They have Him in theory, but in practice they are “prophet-centric” religions. They do not have a divine figure striding across the land and performing miracles and saving souls. Whereas the ancient Asiatics do have such figures. They are, in their own muddled pagan way, “avatar-centric” and “savior-centric”.
Perhaps having an actual avatar of God making himself felt in the mortal reality is more of a high civilization-stage Indo-Aryan thing, while the prophet-centric teachings of the Mohammedans and Jews is a semitic trait.
>”They do not have a divine figure striding across the land and performing miracles and saving souls. ”
This was a lazy sentence on my part, the emphasis on “divine” is not instantly evident. Most if not all religions and mythologies have figures who do do some of the above. But these figures are not Sons of God, nor His avatars, but rather “good wizards” in a sense, or minor deities. The meaning and impact is very different.
The Jewish and Muslim view is vehemently Aniconic.
The best representation of that theology can be found in the deutercanonical Epistle of Jeremiah, aka Baruch 6.
When that’s the mentality, don’t expect all too many Icons in the Temple.
Good points, overall.
What are your thoughts on beings like Mahānarasiṃha, Narasiṃha, Saṅkarṣaṇa Narasiṃha, Mahāsaṅkarṣaṇa Narasiṃha, Shodashabhuja Narasiṃha, Amṛtavarṣaṇa Narasiṃha and so on, do you think they’re Christophanies or are they Demonic Incarnation, what about beings like Hiraṇyakaśipu? Can you provide some redpills on them through an outside perspective that those already overentrenched in Eastern Dharmic religions might not be able to point out, do you think all those entities like Hiraṇyakaśipu really existed once? What are your thoughts on them?
Knowing nothing about them other than scriptures you provide, regardless of what they are, the scriptures were witchcraft and an attempt to invoke demons, regardless of these beings character or if they exist.