Charlie Kirk was a normiecon. A normie. About half of democrats support killing him, and the other half are probably lying.
I have been saying this for years, but this is a watershed moment, as the normies finally realise it.
Leftism is spite mobilised and organised for political purposes. Most leftists are just nasty people. Most leftists have something wrong with them. The great majority have dysfunctional families, or no families. If you encounter a leftist who with a normal family and friends, chances are he has a painful chronic ailment or a physical disability. Or he just looks off.
There is usually something. Something not normal.
Back when they were weaponizing simple envy and covetousness over money and goods, economic leftism, the leftism of the distribution of other people’s money and the destruction of other people’s wealth, well, back then there were a lot of hungry people. And hungry people get cranky and difficult. That is normal so those were largely normies. Today, the main problem of the poor is chronic obesity, and overweight people are too lethargic to bother making trouble, greed and gluttony being rather peaceable sins, so leftism went cultural. And cultural leftism is abnormality weaponized as organised opposition to normal people and normal families, so, leftists are mostly abnormal. And mostly people who externalised their internal problems as hostility to people who do not have those problems. As Edward Dutton argues “spiteful mutants”. Spite of the abnormal directed at the normal.
The left opposes reproduction because they want the world to die with them.
Let us consider the recent murder of a beautiful white woman, Iryna Zarutska, by a fatherless knife wielding black lunatic, Decarlos Brown Jr, The Mayor piously says, “we need more police on the beat”. Lack of cops was not the problem, since the black lunatic had fourteen previous interactions with the justice system, Releasing deranged black people back onto the streets was the problem. The loony bin manager says “lack of resources”. Seems there are plenty of resources to abduct children from fathers and lock up political opponents, but not enough resources to lock up violent deranged black street people. We are seeing crime redefined so that normies are criminals, and criminality is decriminalised. Trump has complained about the criminalisation of the normal conflicts husbands and wives. You will get shit tests from your wife or live in girlfriend that you are unlikely to be able to pass without doing something illegal, and you just have to pass your shit tests or you will not have a wife or girlfriend. The states intervention in business and its intrusive methods of taxation make it impossible to do business without illegal acts. Child protective services has issued a standard of care for children that no one can or should adhere to. But street crazies? The mayor of Charlotte has no problem with lots of dangerous people like Decarlos Brown wandering loose. The left is a coalition of the damaged and destructive against normals and normality.
Normality has been criminalized, and crime has been decriminalized.
The plains ape that murdered Iryna Zarutska is currently “being assessed to see whether he is fit to stand trial”. Obviously he is not fit to stand trial. And most plains apes are not either. They lack the necessary time orientation. To them, their selves ten minutes in the past or ten minutes in the future is another person.
And similarly, recall the outlandishly weird looking non binary senior Department of Energy official who was always stealing other people’s luggage at airports while flying around on the taxpayer dime in order to have sex with other people’s underwear. (Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Department of Energy’s Office of Spent Fuel and [Nuclear] Waste Disposition) People like him should not be allowed to wander loose. We need to kill the worst of them in a public and amusing manner in order to deter the others, and ship the rest off to re-education camp in Alaska. The fertile age females need to be shotgun married to someone responsible and competent who will keep them in line. The left is mostly composed of single women who are going to die bitter and childless, and be eaten by their cats. It would be a waste to ship them to Alaska, and they are likely to respond far more positively to male authority and children. Indeed, leftism is largely driven by childless single women and people who would like to have sex with children who have not yet developed secondary sexual characteristics. That is the second most widespread form of dysfunction — the most widepread is obesity, but obese people are not particularly motivated to cause problems for other people, while childless women and perverts are motivated to make trouble.
The left voting block is a coalition of people that cause problems, and what they vote for is problems. The reason the big blue megalopoli have lack of shops and a lot of street people is that shoplifters and street people are the extreme fringe of the left coalition, while the leadership is, like the deputy Assistant Secretary of the Department of Energy, functional enough to disrupt other people from functioning.
The left hates puppies, kittens, and pretty women with big boobs. The left hates beautiful buildings, but it hates beautiful women more.
The left also hates White people. But more importantly, they hate themselves.
Agree with everything you wrote Jim. Now what to do. I’ve had my .44 in arms reach at all times since the first antifa riots. They have declared war on White society and have been getting away with organized violence for too long.
Suggest all keep themselves well armed, and have a well maintained vehicle with full tank.
Leftism is the party of vice and sin, dressed in a skinsuit of virtue.
> The left is mostly composed of single women who are going to die bitter and childless, and be eaten by their cats.
Lololol, stealing that.
https://babylonbee.com/news/universities-quietly-cancel-kill-conservatives-101-courses
Riffing on Jim’s tanks in Harvard, we need more than professors fired, however much satisfying seeing reports of that happening to those celebrating Kirk’s assassination might be in the moment. The Left has a history of lying low for a while to rebrand. Their networks will just shuffle them around.
The word Demons is going around twitter, used to describe those who are celebrating Kirk’s death. “Demons” is becoming mainstream discourse. Can other tenets of Jimism be far behind?
I read an interesting theory that the left loudly complains about “racism and sexism and theocracy” because [*yet another rationale why the right should not be racist, sexist, and theocratic deleted*]
I would have allowed it through and debated it, if you had shown any willingness to debate, or even notice the existence of, the arguments made in this blog for racism (biological differences between races and species are large and important), sexism (we cannot successfully reproduce without state, church, social, and family enforcement of cooperation between men and women, which requires severely unequal enforcement of severely unequal roles), theocracy (we always have a state religion, and old type Christianity is the least obnoxious state religion), and monarchy (without a virtuous elite, a Republic is severely dysfunctional, and a republic undermines the elite virtue that it requires for its existence. One King three thousand miles away is better than a thousand Kings three miles away).
I absolutely did not say that. We SHOULD be racist and sexist and theocrats etc, because the left either doesn’t care or doesn’t see it coming. They legitimately hate the nice moderate government program cutters the most. And to add insult to injury, the nice guy conservatives lose all their ethnic and religious identity politics muscle too, which is a bad thing when you’re facing the enemy from the worst possible position.
Race is superficial. [*usual nonsense deleted. We had that debate a very long time ago. You are not disputing our account of the races, but a stupid straw man account made up by the left and attributed to their supposedly stupid and ignorant enemies.*]
Superior races arise from patriarchal groups with high fertility in a harsh environment where technology and forethought is needed to survive and flourish.
The racial genesis of whites, the most recent of all the races, was the harsh northern inland of the Eurasian supercontinent, with fair skinned, but dark haired and brown eyed crop farmers running into darker skinned, but blond haired, red haired, blue eyed, and green eyed nomadic herders, on the outer limits of where crop farming was possible, or the cattle herders abducting the farmer’s women from the outer edge of where crop farming was possible. The extreme winters of inland Eurasia required capital intensive preparation and a fair bit of skill intensive equipment for both groups to survive.
I do not think the Kirk assassination was GAE-sponsored. I think it was a spiteful mutant who wanted to score points with his online friends, who are all Discord trannies. If it was state-sponsored, legacy news media would have came out with a cohesive message. Instead, some talking heads condemned the shooter, others cheered it on, with the latter being fired. If they knew in advance, none of them would have come out in favour of it, only to have to be fired later. This is nothing like the first Trump assassination attempt, where they all had lockstep stories ready before it happened. When the news came out that it was an antifa-adjacent leftist who saw himself as just shitposting irl, they were completely blindsided. They are stumbling in the dark with no clear counter narrative, insisting that “we don’t know anything yet” when everything is known. There is so much more information available on Robinson than there was on Crooks, because Crooks was a carefully curated asset whose tracks were covered.
They’ve also completely lost control of the more radical left, many of whom are calling for more assassinations on right-wing public figures and calling the legacy media cucks for condemning political violence. Many other radicals are claiming that the shell casings had groyper memes, and that Robinson was actually a Nick Fuentes follower (now that would have been a good psyop). It’s not being repeated by the establishment left, despite them having no better narrative. They aren’t stupid enough to think it will work.
This is all very whitepilling. The people who cheered his death on social media are being doxxed and fired from their jobs, even ones at universities. They’re being put on lists tens of thousands long. There are many Karens on our side, and they want blood. An Office Depot employee who refused to print Charlie Kirk vigil signs was fired by the corporate office. Instead of Christian bakeries being forced to bake the cake, leftists are being forced to print the sign. Many on the right are calling for leftists to be arrested or for outright civil war, and getting little pushback. It used to be illegal to punch left, suddenly it’s illegal to punch right.
Yes, I immediately assumed state sponsored, because most stuff is state sponsored, and the attempted Trump assassinations obviously had the inside with now fired secret service directorette. But the way things have gone down indicates a random spiteful mutant or small random group of random spiteful mutants doing their own thing on their own initiative.
The reaction to the assassin’s reveal has been really amazing. The same people who were cheering on the murder for the previous two days and went on about how much he deserved to get shot, and how much they’d love for one of them to do it again, were coming up with the most dishonest and delusional grasping at straws in order to try and frame the guy as anything but a leftist.
He had “Catch this, fascist” on one of his bullet casings, which along with him murdering a right-wing figure should make this an open and shut case.
The three main lines of deflection have been:
– He’s from an entirely right wing family, therefore he’s a MAGA republican who didn’t think Trump went far enough
– He’s a groyper who loves Nick Fuentes and killed Charlie because Kirk is Fuentes’ main rival
– He’s just an irony poisoned gamer, and since some of the statements on the bullet casings are “jokes” and “memes” they all are, and it’s all just random. This is just a “nihilistic” gamer who was radicalized into being generally violent and just happened to ironically kill Charlie Kirk for fun. Blame “discord” and “social media” (and young men, by extension).
Unfortunately the latter of the three has had some level of acceptance by some of the dumber people on our side, although that immediately got a lot of pushback in turn from everyone who wasn’t retarded. I noticed the same types of people supporting this idea to some extent or another were the same ones to become panicans any time things looked difficult for Trump. Low conviction, emotional people.
What amazed me the most were all the arguments in favour of the guy being a groyper, which thread the line between ignorance, callous dishonesty, and downright delusion.
The funniest was probably them saying that “OwO notices bulge” written on the shell casing is a “transphobic” remark (because of ‘noticing a bulge’ on a troon)
They even argued that Nick Fuentes and groypers habitually called those on the right they hate (for being insufficiently right wing) “Fascists” to justify the “Catch this, Fascist” writing on the casing. This is the most openly dishonest and downright insane of the accusations. I’d say leftists like to project but this is on another level.
Another one was finding a picture of the shooter in an adidas tracksuit slavsquatting.
Then finding a picture on the internet where pepe the frog is slavsquatting with the same tracksuit on, and declaring this to be a connection with the groypers. Because he wore the same clothes.
Nevermind the fact that slavsquatting has nothing to do with anything, and that the pepe is not a “groyper”.
https://x.com/YourAnonCentral/status/1966568929763225859
There were also just downright lies and fabrications, such as stating that the shooter’s family had confirmed he was right wing, or that he was found to have right wing connections. All stated without the “sources” the left loves to otherwise flaunt, but we’re not dealing with the brightest either.
As noted, none of these theories or points were repeated by mainstream outlets. Even Hasan admitted it was more likely he was a lefty. Still, if you were on X, you’d see how hard they were trying to make this a thing, all day, constantly. Tons of xeets boldly affirming lies, that he was one of us, and even stating that right wingers were now scrambling to delete all the incendiary comments they made towards the left. Of course, not true.
They mostly got destroyed by our site, but it was a constant effort pushing back against them. They wanted it to be true really badly. No doubt many of them actually believe it, and will continue to believe it.
Since groypers are either feds, brown, or both, and their purpose is to ensure that the Uniparty always wins electorally and otherwise and remains in power (and that Real Americans always lose and stay out of power; or if in power, do not wield it effectively), obviously not a groyper.
The groypers have just been severely devastated, because the Democrats — their handlers — are about to be severely devastated.
“Instead of Christian bakeries being forced to bake the cake, leftists are being forced to print the sign.”
Beautiful.
I posted about this before but everyone in my family and their circle are white democrats with reasonably normal lives and families. I don’t really know what to make of this besides comparing them to old ladies who still go to the churches of their youth and never quite noticed it changing enough to alert them and it slow boiled until it’s a gay female priest talking about gender dysphoria or something. Anyways. I don’t have a point I just am still trying to grapple with it. These people are either far more retarded or else more evil than I want to admit. But none of them would be mistaken for antifas or spiteful mutants on first glance.
I wish the left were strictly spiteful mutants, that would make everything easier.
It probably depends where you live. I’m sure there are places where everyone normal is a Republican and only outcasts are Dems. But in cities everyone is a Dem and they aren’t all ugly, they just aren’t. Neither are the Dems or even socialists in my family.
I’ve only been to one rally Trump rally, and a few evangelical churches. I hate to say it but people were slobs.
There’s bio-Leninism on the one hand yes but on the other there’s Yarvin’s thing that Leftism is thirst for power, or proximity to power. The desire to feel powerful is pretty universal, it isn’t just mutants.
The ugliness is mostly inside. They don’t have functional families. For an insider view of the ugliness, see Based Camp’s “Effective Altruism to Sex Work pipeline”
You may love your leftist family members, but you will find that when push comes to shove, they don’t love you. When it is time for the family assets to be inherited, watch the mayhem unfold.
I’ve known union democrats, white collar job democrats, and government job democrats. All three can pull off wives and children, and don’t necessarily have a spiteful mutant phenotype. (Divorce is a real danger, though I’ve known a surprising number to avoid the legal divorce at the cost of dead bedroom.)
Union democrats are obvious, it’s self interest and their own unprincipled exception. I find their blind spot around what time it is and where things go from here inexplicable, but if it were still the Before Times I’d understand them.
White collar democrats are easily explained as Havel’s greengrocers. But I now see that screening out crimethought has been going on longer than I would have assumed pre-redpill, so they’ve been selected for in two ways. Amerikaners with any hint of red tribe loyalty are shunted into engineering or useful field middle management at the very best, but really many are also dropped down into trades, sales or simple labor. The left has controlled spoils and advancement for generations now, even outside of government and NGOs.
White collar job democrats of the upper class can pull off not obese. Usually they’re skinny-weak though, or at most fit from running or biking. Lifting, or obvious strength in general, is déclassé.
Government job democrats I should say could pull off looking normal. The boomers had some non-mutants with children, but their replacements are already browns, deviants or obvious defectives.
Yeah that happens.
Familiarity breeding contempt, I’ve acquired a particular annoyance with football republicans. They watch football, may have played once, but have given up on even flag football, and don’t lift. They’re roughly on our side culturally, but still send their daughters to whore school and act surprised. They vote Trump, but in a Holden Bloodfeast’s constituent sense, and haven’t heard of Harvard, the Cathedral or the Longhouse. In fairness I get a sense football is their tribal signifier, intended as a middle finger to the blue tribe, but it looks more like a pressure release valve than a rallying point.
With heavy overlap but also distinct from football republicans, as you move down the scale of class and success, a lot of rightists get too much sugar and too much television and end up fat. It does indeed reveal a lack of self discipline.
What football republicans and outright fat slobs have in common is they both just need a Caesar. Without being anywhere near speaking about reality themselves, you could yet rally them against fags, or trannies, or blacks, or jews (the latter two especially being what the establishment has feared and worked to prevent for decades already). And while a fat, weak conservative does not impress, I can turn my back on him in a way I can’t turn my back on a leftist or a black. He’s not after me, and he’s roughly on my side. (And, “roughly on my side” might not have been true until very recently, but the power of the slurs racist, fascist, nazi is rapidly disappearing. This is good news whether you’re literally any of those or not; the accusation was the danger.)
All that aside, when dealing with normal-presenting democrats, watch for the smirk sometimes. Or the happiness when some rightist gets killed – Charlie Kirk the obvious one now, but I’ve also known a not-terribly-mutant democrat who smiled when talking about the death of Margaret Thatcher. Or the Che bumper sticker or t-shirt. Democrats with a smirk are the people who will dox you, call the covid tip line or CPS on you, or worse if things get hot. Or they may got their whole lives without doing you an ill turn, but it’s only lack of opportunity not out of principle.
It’s true that the ones most likely to make the inheritance a nightmare are the most extreme leftists, and that’s quite predictable. Depressingly it might even mean that in a certain way they don’t love me. Thank God it will be easy for me to turn the other cheek, should it get ugly.
I was going to quibble with the hot girl thing too, even though the Sydney Sweeney thing was just a few weeks ago.
But I closed my eyes and imagined the reaction if a squad of cheerleaders had passed through the crowd at the Trump rally I attended.
Then I imagined similar group of girls at a leftist music festival I went to. Think off brand Burning Man.
I see what you mean, because to get enthusiastic cheers from leftists, the girls would have to dirty themselves up or at least include a few fats or nons.
On the other hand, the actual festival had tons of hot girls– just not flaunting it as a squad– and the Trump rally was pretty homely I have to say. To be fair, at any political rally the average age is 20 years older than this festival.
Did Tyler Robinson ever have a girlfriend or is he a virgin?
People ask, “Why would someone from a perfectly healthy background go cray-cray like that?” And the answer is that when you have a blue balls inceldom epidemic, some young men will invariably snap, not always in predictable directions. Faggots and puritans (they are on the same side) don’t want you to know that sex with biological females — ideally not prostitutes, but with a girlfriend or wife — is the cure to many spiritual diseases, including certain forms of homicidal and suicidal leftism.
If Tyler were smashing PINK PUSSY on a regular or semi-regular basis, none of this would have happened. Expect both faggots and puritans to countersignal that message.
It’s always about sex.
A society dying of terminal inceldom shall never be politically stable. That also (partially) explains the avid propensity for Jihad among Muslims. You generally don’t seek 72 virgins in heaven when you get to rawdog and creampie your girlfriend every week.
More reason to solve the Woman Problem.
Of course, there are always misfits. Thing is, when 15% of men are incels, your “shooters” are unlikely to be particularly successful. When 40% of men are incels, though, you’re going to have some competent ones too. Someone like Tyler should not have been made an incel. The leftism here was simply a way to rationalize status-maximization, in response to lifelong friendzone; leftism is very often a strategy (generally a subconscious one) to maximize status within a real or imagined community.
People will ignore this explanation because it’s not “immediately politically useful,” yet that is the root cause, and in fact it has significant political implications, just outside the Overton Window.
>Someone like Tyler should not have been made an incel
His physiology screams spiteful faggotry. You can lead a faggot to pussy, but can’t make them fuck it.
He looks much like a gay kid I knew growing up who would always raise his legs vertically and lean in a way that put his bulge on display in front of the other boys. No one liked him, and eventually he killed himself, but I can’t help but wonder if he were alive in the current culture if he would’ve shot us all up.
Yeah, you’re right, looking at his deformed freak face, he is clearly not ordinary straight. Still not sure he is ordinary gay either (looks more like the pederast variety of gay, common among teachers), but poofs off roofs anyway.
This phenotype needs to be biologically eliminated.
Miller knows exactly what has to be done. We can assume Trump knows as well. Only excuse is lack of will.
https://x.com/Geiger_Capital/status/1966696304186138854
Stephen Miller is homeland security adviser.
And his advice is that doxing and all that is “domestic terrorism”. That calling people fascists is putting them on a kill list. Or it is when you try to dox them and call them a threat to the Republic.
But to his very sound advice I would add that you need to take a gun to gunfight and a faith to a holy war. That you need Christian men of good character to carry out the purge. Stephen Miller is Jewish. He is not the man for the job of carrying out this purge — but then he is an adviser on homeland security, not in charge of homeland security.
Kristi Noem is in charge of homeland security. She is a woman, and this is no job for a woman, but she is, or purports to be Christian, and seems to be some kind of Christian Nationalist, which is what is needed for the purge.
Now if we had a married male head of homeland security with beliefs similar to those of Kristi Noem, and he was saying what Stephen Miller is saying, then we would be in fine shape to carry out the urgently needed purge. But I am not sure that our current personnel is likely to be able or willing to do what needs to be done.
On the other hand, Kristi Noem is married with children, a strong cohesive family, and resisted Coviditarianism, so maybe she is up for the job of carrying out the necessary purge. I would attribute her resistance to worship of the Covid Demon to her faith in Christ. A female headed purge, however, does not seem like a good idea, but maybe she has the balls to appoint a Beria to carry out the job.
I think the most crucial initiative right now is Hegseth’s checking into any negative posts about Charlie Kirk within the armed forces. If a loyalist MAGA military can be obtained not much else matters.
https://x.com/BrookeSingman/status/1966889202412347602
As I said – sex with biological females cures spiritual diseases.
Tyler is involuntarily celibate.
There’s a difference between incel and faggot. Tyler is a voluntary faggot.
Men who resort to fucking trannies are incels. He is not gay by predisposition.
No they are faggots. Any man who voluntarily does anything sexual with another man without the involvement of extreme amounts of money relative to his current standing in life being offered is gay.
>who is a male transitioning to a female
i.e. he was fucking an overt man before they started trying to look more like a female. Sounds gay and not some sort of desperate incel looking for a fake facsimile of pussy. Tyler Robinson was, from accounts, always different from the rest of his family, being the only leftist in a strongly conservative family. In pictures of the family, his physical appearance is the odd one out.
I don’t think he was an incel. I think he was a spiteful gay.
There’s certainly something very off and perverted about his physiognomy, so obviously a spiteful mutant of some kind. Not sure exactly what kind of mutant, though. If you told me that he’s into prepubescent boys, dead or alive, I could easily believe it.
Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their…um…er…Otherkin?
https://patriots.win/p/1AR0LWFXkZ/and-here-he-is-the-tranny-boyfri/c
LANCE TWIGGS HAHAHAHAHA
Seriously though, scientists should be working on discovering what is causing these perverts to emerge, and find a way to prevent it biologically. Meanwhile, poofs off roofs.
Brother White Bread’s recent lecture on The Abolition of Man inspired me to revisit C.S. Lewis. In addition to that tome, That Hideous Strength received a refresher. So, forgive me for being pessimistic concerning the scientific eradication of faggotry as that smacks of something NICE would champion. My musings place its existence firmly within that nebulous but obvious category of human sin.
Not accusing you personally of such allegiance but my faith in Muh Science is low these days.
Dude winds up being Gay Chuevara.