The left wants to kill you. Wants all normies gone.

Charlie Kirk was a normiecon. A normie. About half of democrats support killing him, and the other half are probably lying.

I have been saying this for years, but this is a watershed moment, as the normies finally realise it.

Leftism is spite mobilised and organised for political purposes. Most leftists are just nasty people. Most leftists have something wrong with them. The great majority have dysfunctional families, or no families. If you encounter a leftist who with a normal family and friends, chances are he has a painful chronic ailment or a physical disability. Or he just looks off.

There is usually something. Something not normal.

Back when they were weaponizing simple envy and covetousness over money and goods, economic leftism, the leftism of the distribution of other people’s money and the destruction of other people’s wealth, well, back then there were a lot of hungry people. And hungry people get cranky and difficult. That is normal so those were largely normies. Today, the main problem of the poor is chronic obesity, and overweight people are too lethargic to bother making trouble, greed and gluttony being rather peaceable sins, so leftism went cultural. And cultural leftism is abnormality weaponized as organised opposition to normal people and normal families, so, leftists are mostly abnormal. And mostly people who externalised their internal problems as hostility to people who do not have those problems. As Edward Dutton argues “spiteful mutants”. Spite of the abnormal directed at the normal.

The left opposes reproduction because they want the world to die with them.

Let us consider the recent murder of a beautiful white woman, Iryna Zarutska, by a fatherless knife wielding black lunatic, Decarlos Brown Jr, The Mayor piously says, “we need more police on the beat”. Lack of cops was not the problem, since the black lunatic had fourteen previous interactions with the justice system, Releasing deranged black people back onto the streets was the problem. The loony bin manager says “lack of resources”. Seems there are plenty of resources to abduct children from fathers and lock up political opponents, but not enough resources to lock up violent deranged black street people. We are seeing crime redefined so that normies are criminals, and criminality is decriminalised. Trump has complained about the criminalisation of the normal conflicts of husbands and wives. You will get shit tests from your wife or live in girlfriend that you are unlikely to be able to pass without doing something illegal, and you just have to pass your shit tests or you will not have a wife or girlfriend. The states intervention in business and its intrusive methods of taxation make it impossible to do business without illegal acts. Child protective services has issued a standard of care for children that no one can or should adhere to. But street crazies? The mayor of Charlotte has no problem with lots of dangerous people like Decarlos Brown wandering loose. The left is a coalition of the damaged and destructive against normals and normality.

Normality has been criminalized, and crime has been decriminalized.

The plains ape that murdered Iryna Zarutska is currently “being assessed to see whether he is fit to stand trial”. Obviously he is not fit to stand trial. And most plains apes are not either. They lack the necessary time orientation. To them, their selves ten minutes in the past or ten minutes in the future is another person.

And similarly, recall the outlandishly weird looking non binary senior Department of Energy official who was always stealing other people’s luggage at airports while flying around on the taxpayer dime in order to have sex with other people’s underwear. (Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Department of Energy’s Office of Spent Fuel and [Nuclear] Waste Disposition) People like him should not be allowed to wander loose. We need to kill the worst of them in a public and amusing manner in order to deter the others, and ship the rest off to re-education camp in Alaska. The fertile age females need to be shotgun married to someone responsible and competent who will keep them in line. The left is mostly composed of single women who are going to die bitter and childless, and be eaten by their cats. It would be a waste to ship them to Alaska, and they are likely to respond far more positively to male authority and children. Indeed, leftism is largely driven by childless single women and people who would like to have sex with children who have not yet developed secondary sexual characteristics. That is the second most widespread form of dysfunction — the most widepread is obesity, but obese people are not particularly motivated to cause problems for other people, while childless women and perverts are motivated to make trouble.

The left voting block is a coalition of people that cause problems, and what they vote for is problems. The reason the big blue megalopoli have lack of shops and a lot of street people is that shoplifters and street people are the extreme fringe of the left coalition, while the leadership is, like the deputy Assistant Secretary of the Department of Energy, functional enough to disrupt other people from functioning.

The left hates puppies, kittens, and pretty women with big boobs. The left hates beautiful buildings, but it hates beautiful women more.

73 comments The left wants to kill you. Wants all normies gone.

Humungus says:

The left also hates White people. But more importantly, they hate themselves.

Agree with everything you wrote Jim. Now what to do. I’ve had my .44 in arms reach at all times since the first antifa riots. They have declared war on White society and have been getting away with organized violence for too long.

Suggest all keep themselves well armed, and have a well maintained vehicle with full tank.

Alf says:

Leftism is the party of vice and sin, dressed in a skinsuit of virtue.

Oskar says:

> The left is mostly composed of single women who are going to die bitter and childless, and be eaten by their cats.

Lololol, stealing that.

Hesiod says:

https://babylonbee.com/news/universities-quietly-cancel-kill-conservatives-101-courses

Several universities quietly confirmed that the course will be coming back next year under the more sensitively titled “Decolonizing An Oppressor’s Face With A Gun 101.”

Riffing on Jim’s tanks in Harvard, we need more than professors fired, however much satisfying seeing reports of that happening to those celebrating Kirk’s assassination might be in the moment. The Left has a history of lying low for a while to rebrand. Their networks will just shuffle them around.

Pete says:

The word Demons is going around twitter, used to describe those who are celebrating Kirk’s death. “Demons” is becoming mainstream discourse. Can other tenets of Jimism be far behind?

Anonymous Fake says:

I read an interesting theory that the left loudly complains about “racism and sexism and theocracy” because [*yet another rationale why the right should not be racist, sexist, and theocratic deleted*]

Jim says:

I would have allowed it through and debated it, if you had shown any willingness to debate, or even notice the existence of, the arguments made in this blog for racism (biological differences between races and species are large and important), sexism (we cannot successfully reproduce without state, church, social, and family enforcement of cooperation between men and women, which requires severely unequal enforcement of severely unequal roles), theocracy (we always have a state religion, and old type Christianity is the least obnoxious state religion), and monarchy (without a virtuous elite, a Republic is severely dysfunctional, and a republic undermines the elite virtue that it requires for its existence. One King three thousand miles away is better than a thousand Kings three miles away).

Anonymous Fake says:

I absolutely did not say that. We SHOULD be racist and sexist and theocrats etc, because the left either doesn’t care or doesn’t see it coming. They legitimately hate the nice moderate government program cutters the most. And to add insult to injury, the nice guy conservatives lose all their ethnic and religious identity politics muscle too, which is a bad thing when you’re facing the enemy from the worst possible position.

Race is superficial. [*usual nonsense deleted. We had that debate a very long time ago. You are not disputing our account of the races, but a stupid straw man account made up by the left and attributed to their supposedly stupid and ignorant enemies.*]

Jim says:

Superior races arise from patriarchal groups with high fertility in a harsh environment where technology and forethought is needed to survive and flourish.

The racial genesis of whites, the most recent of all the races, was the harsh northern inland of the Eurasian supercontinent, with fair skinned, but dark haired and brown eyed crop farmers running into darker skinned, but blond haired, red haired, blue eyed, and green eyed nomadic herders, on the outer limits of where crop farming was possible, or the cattle herders abducting the farmer’s women from the outer edge of where crop farming was possible. The extreme winters of inland Eurasia required capital intensive preparation and a fair bit of skill intensive equipment for both groups to survive.

yewotm8 says:

I do not think the Kirk assassination was GAE-sponsored. I think it was a spiteful mutant who wanted to score points with his online friends, who are all Discord trannies. If it was state-sponsored, legacy news media would have came out with a cohesive message. Instead, some talking heads condemned the shooter, others cheered it on, with the latter being fired. If they knew in advance, none of them would have come out in favour of it, only to have to be fired later. This is nothing like the first Trump assassination attempt, where they all had lockstep stories ready before it happened. When the news came out that it was an antifa-adjacent leftist who saw himself as just shitposting irl, they were completely blindsided. They are stumbling in the dark with no clear counter narrative, insisting that “we don’t know anything yet” when everything is known. There is so much more information available on Robinson than there was on Crooks, because Crooks was a carefully curated asset whose tracks were covered.

They’ve also completely lost control of the more radical left, many of whom are calling for more assassinations on right-wing public figures and calling the legacy media cucks for condemning political violence. Many other radicals are claiming that the shell casings had groyper memes, and that Robinson was actually a Nick Fuentes follower (now that would have been a good psyop). It’s not being repeated by the establishment left, despite them having no better narrative. They aren’t stupid enough to think it will work.

This is all very whitepilling. The people who cheered his death on social media are being doxxed and fired from their jobs, even ones at universities. They’re being put on lists tens of thousands long. There are many Karens on our side, and they want blood. An Office Depot employee who refused to print Charlie Kirk vigil signs was fired by the corporate office. Instead of Christian bakeries being forced to bake the cake, leftists are being forced to print the sign. Many on the right are calling for leftists to be arrested or for outright civil war, and getting little pushback. It used to be illegal to punch left, suddenly it’s illegal to punch right.

Jim says:

Yes, I immediately assumed state sponsored, because most stuff is state sponsored, and the attempted Trump assassinations obviously had the inside with now fired secret service directorette. But the way things have gone down indicates a random spiteful mutant or small random group of random spiteful mutants doing their own thing on their own initiative.

notglowing says:

The reaction to the assassin’s reveal has been really amazing. The same people who were cheering on the murder for the previous two days and went on about how much he deserved to get shot, and how much they’d love for one of them to do it again, were coming up with the most dishonest and delusional grasping at straws in order to try and frame the guy as anything but a leftist.

He had “Catch this, fascist” on one of his bullet casings, which along with him murdering a right-wing figure should make this an open and shut case.

The three main lines of deflection have been:
– He’s from an entirely right wing family, therefore he’s a MAGA republican who didn’t think Trump went far enough
– He’s a groyper who loves Nick Fuentes and killed Charlie because Kirk is Fuentes’ main rival
– He’s just an irony poisoned gamer, and since some of the statements on the bullet casings are “jokes” and “memes” they all are, and it’s all just random. This is just a “nihilistic” gamer who was radicalized into being generally violent and just happened to ironically kill Charlie Kirk for fun. Blame “discord” and “social media” (and young men, by extension).

Unfortunately the latter of the three has had some level of acceptance by some of the dumber people on our side, although that immediately got a lot of pushback in turn from everyone who wasn’t retarded. I noticed the same types of people supporting this idea to some extent or another were the same ones to become panicans any time things looked difficult for Trump. Low conviction, emotional people.

What amazed me the most were all the arguments in favour of the guy being a groyper, which thread the line between ignorance, callous dishonesty, and downright delusion.

The funniest was probably them saying that “OwO notices bulge” written on the shell casing is a “transphobic” remark (because of ‘noticing a bulge’ on a troon)

They even argued that Nick Fuentes and groypers habitually called those on the right they hate (for being insufficiently right wing) “Fascists” to justify the “Catch this, Fascist” writing on the casing. This is the most openly dishonest and downright insane of the accusations. I’d say leftists like to project but this is on another level.

Another one was finding a picture of the shooter in an adidas tracksuit slavsquatting.
Then finding a picture on the internet where pepe the frog is slavsquatting with the same tracksuit on, and declaring this to be a connection with the groypers. Because he wore the same clothes.
Nevermind the fact that slavsquatting has nothing to do with anything, and that the pepe is not a “groyper”.
https://x.com/YourAnonCentral/status/1966568929763225859

There were also just downright lies and fabrications, such as stating that the shooter’s family had confirmed he was right wing, or that he was found to have right wing connections. All stated without the “sources” the left loves to otherwise flaunt, but we’re not dealing with the brightest either.

As noted, none of these theories or points were repeated by mainstream outlets. Even Hasan admitted it was more likely he was a lefty. Still, if you were on X, you’d see how hard they were trying to make this a thing, all day, constantly. Tons of xeets boldly affirming lies, that he was one of us, and even stating that right wingers were now scrambling to delete all the incendiary comments they made towards the left. Of course, not true.
They mostly got destroyed by our site, but it was a constant effort pushing back against them. They wanted it to be true really badly. No doubt many of them actually believe it, and will continue to believe it.

Mossadnik says:

Since groypers are either feds, brown, or both, and their purpose is to ensure that the Uniparty always wins electorally and otherwise and remains in power (and that Real Americans always lose and stay out of power; or if in power, do not wield it effectively), obviously not a groyper.

The groypers have just been severely devastated, because the Democrats — their handlers — are about to be severely devastated.

V. K. Ovelund says:

I doubt that the groypers are feds.

No one is acquainted with me here, though, so I could be a fed for all you know, couldn’t I?

* * *

I gather that Jim wishes me to commit a thought crime. I doubt that I can commit it with elan and am probably less of a thought criminal than Jim is, anyway (and also happen unironically to like Hitler, of whom Jim and, I assume, Mossadnik disapprove), but here goes: civilization is inherently masculine. Only the male sex is capable of cohering in groups large enough to hold and expand a territory at the expense of neighboring tribes. Normal, heterosexual men can simultaneously compete with and cooperate with one another, a feat most women find not only impossible to replicate but difficult even to comprehend. Women in the United States Congress afford an instructive example, for most of them obviously, viscerally hate congresswomen of the party opposite—which makes stable republican government with women in Congress hard to sustain.

Even a minimal appreciation of traits (such as a love of the sting of battle) that, in the male, enhance reproductive fitness but, in the female, impede reproductive fitness, should make the foregoing easy for anyone to grasp. For some reason normiedom nevertheless fails to grasp it or, at any rate, refuses to follow it to necessary conclusions.

Jim, I can go on if you like, whether on this topic or on whatever thought-criminal topic you might nominate, but having been happily married 29 years to a girl who was 19 when I married her, and having married off my eldest daughter at the age of 18, I have not observed the defect-defect hypergamy of which you speak closely enough to comment intelligently on it in the abstract. At any rate, if the foregoing suffices for whitelisting then, in the interest of brevity, I shall leave it there.

Jim says:

> I doubt that the groypers are feds.

Nick Fuentes is not Fed. He is Open Society — which before Trump was indistinguishable, but now the Open Society is part of the GAE in exile, and is in conflict with the feds, so has become obvious who his actual master is, particularly in recent weeks. During the lead up to Jan 6, it seemed to me obvious he was a fed, but I guess that Open Society and the feds were on the same page back then.

Nick Fuentes is an obvious enemy agent. He is strangely unable to speak the truth about (((Victoria Nuland))) and (((George Soros))), therefore one of the innumerable Open Society shills trying to drown out reactionary ideas and dangerous hate facts with meaningless noise and irrelevant distractions. He is theoretically vehemently opposed to Soros, Blinken, and Nuland, but is strangely unable to mention any of their actual misdeeds.

When the left murdered Charlie Kirk, Nick Fuentes immediately joined the Democratic party frontlash, implying left and right are symmetrically dangerous to normies. He has never mentioned the Zizians, who are the major terrorist organisation now operating in the US.

Like Anonymous Fake, all his policy proposals are leftism packaged as rightism.

Jim says:

Whitelisted.

Kevin C. says:

A fourth line of deflection I’ve been seeing (mostly out of Tumblr) is to claim it’s not him at all. Things like “Does anyone actually believe it was Tyler Robinson?” About how he’s “obviously” just some random kid the FBI grabbed and are framing because they need somebody, anybody, to pin the crime on so they don’t look incompetent because the real shooter got away clean. (A bunch of them tried this same thing previously with Mangione.)

Daddy Scarebucks says:

Blame “discord” and “social media” (and young men, by extension).

Don’t discount this too quickly. As is often the case with the apparat, the facts may be true, and it is merely the implied conclusions that are false or inverted.

Two very important things happened this year with the “online left” (i.e. almost all the left):

First, after Elon Musk took over Twitter, and started letting some of the right-wing(ish) people back on, the truest believers, who were already unable to countenance the idea of normie conservatives being allowed to speak their minds, all fled to BlueSky, where they promptly floored the accelerator on holiness spiraling. They began purging each other many months ago, meaning purging not only anyone who was plausibly on the right but anyone who was insufficiently left.

Second, after the great corporate de-trooning following Trump’s election, battle lines were formed, reluctantly on the right/Thermidor side (represented by Facebook and Google) and quite fervently on the left/Jacobin side. Aside from the obvious (BlueSky), the biggest holdout on the left was and is Discord. Troons have been running rampant there for a long time, deploying the usual suite of SJW tactics to cajole or bully their way into moderator and admin positions and then purging all dissent, but of course this could not happen without the passive and sometimes active support of Discord staff.

In other words, Discord and BlueSky are not just full of troons and other mutants, they are full of the most radical, perverted and power-hungry troons and mutants, driving each other ever more insane in an alternate reality they invented (and ruthlessly police the boundaries of) where there is no external pressure or stabilizing influence.

Remember that the left always projects; the “radicalizing” they are so quick to accuse “right-wingers” of never really existed on the right, but has always been prevalent within their own ranks and is currently in full throttle. If you wanted to roll up their networks, so to speak, then the Discord servers they frequent would be an excellent place to start the search.

Neurotoxin says:

“Instead of Christian bakeries being forced to bake the cake, leftists are being forced to print the sign.”

Beautiful.

Beow says:

I posted about this before but everyone in my family and their circle are white democrats with reasonably normal lives and families. I don’t really know what to make of this besides comparing them to old ladies who still go to the churches of their youth and never quite noticed it changing enough to alert them and it slow boiled until it’s a gay female priest talking about gender dysphoria or something. Anyways. I don’t have a point I just am still trying to grapple with it. These people are either far more retarded or else more evil than I want to admit. But none of them would be mistaken for antifas or spiteful mutants on first glance.

Tyrone says:

I wish the left were strictly spiteful mutants, that would make everything easier.

It probably depends where you live. I’m sure there are places where everyone normal is a Republican and only outcasts are Dems. But in cities everyone is a Dem and they aren’t all ugly, they just aren’t. Neither are the Dems or even socialists in my family.

I’ve only been to one rally Trump rally, and a few evangelical churches. I hate to say it but people were slobs.

There’s bio-Leninism on the one hand yes but on the other there’s Yarvin’s thing that Leftism is thirst for power, or proximity to power. The desire to feel powerful is pretty universal, it isn’t just mutants.

Jim says:

> everyone is a Dem and they aren’t all ugly, they just aren’t.

The ugliness is mostly inside. They don’t have functional families. For an insider view of the ugliness, see Based Camp’s “Effective Altruism to Sex Work pipeline”

You may love your leftist family members, but you will find that when push comes to shove, they don’t love you. When it is time for the family assets to be inherited, watch the mayhem unfold.

Your Uncle Bob says:

I’ve known union democrats, white collar job democrats, and government job democrats. All three can pull off wives and children, and don’t necessarily have a spiteful mutant phenotype. (Divorce is a real danger, though I’ve known a surprising number to avoid the legal divorce at the cost of dead bedroom.)

Union democrats are obvious, it’s self interest and their own unprincipled exception. I find their blind spot around what time it is and where things go from here inexplicable, but if it were still the Before Times I’d understand them.

White collar democrats are easily explained as Havel’s greengrocers. But I now see that screening out crimethought has been going on longer than I would have assumed pre-redpill, so they’ve been selected for in two ways. Amerikaners with any hint of red tribe loyalty are shunted into engineering or useful field middle management at the very best, but really many are also dropped down into trades, sales or simple labor. The left has controlled spoils and advancement for generations now, even outside of government and NGOs.

White collar job democrats of the upper class can pull off not obese. Usually they’re skinny-weak though, or at most fit from running or biking. Lifting, or obvious strength in general, is déclassé.

Government job democrats I should say could pull off looking normal. The boomers had some non-mutants with children, but their replacements are already browns, deviants or obvious defectives.

Trump rally slobs

Yeah that happens.

Familiarity breeding contempt, I’ve acquired a particular annoyance with football republicans. They watch football, may have played once, but have given up on even flag football, and don’t lift. They’re roughly on our side culturally, but still send their daughters to whore school and act surprised. They vote Trump, but in a Holden Bloodfeast’s constituent sense, and haven’t heard of Harvard, the Cathedral or the Longhouse. In fairness I get a sense football is their tribal signifier, intended as a middle finger to the blue tribe, but it looks more like a pressure release valve than a rallying point.

With heavy overlap but also distinct from football republicans, as you move down the scale of class and success, a lot of rightists get too much sugar and too much television and end up fat. It does indeed reveal a lack of self discipline.

What football republicans and outright fat slobs have in common is they both just need a Caesar. Without being anywhere near speaking about reality themselves, you could yet rally them against fags, or trannies, or blacks, or jews (the latter two especially being what the establishment has feared and worked to prevent for decades already). And while a fat, weak conservative does not impress, I can turn my back on him in a way I can’t turn my back on a leftist or a black. He’s not after me, and he’s roughly on my side. (And, “roughly on my side” might not have been true until very recently, but the power of the slurs racist, fascist, nazi is rapidly disappearing. This is good news whether you’re literally any of those or not; the accusation was the danger.)

All that aside, when dealing with normal-presenting democrats, watch for the smirk sometimes. Or the happiness when some rightist gets killed – Charlie Kirk the obvious one now, but I’ve also known a not-terribly-mutant democrat who smiled when talking about the death of Margaret Thatcher. Or the Che bumper sticker or t-shirt. Democrats with a smirk are the people who will dox you, call the covid tip line or CPS on you, or worse if things get hot. Or they may got their whole lives without doing you an ill turn, but it’s only lack of opportunity not out of principle.

i says:

Regard evil as not that different from cancer. Some people still look quite healthy even with the beginnings of cancer. But the rot is going on inside.

Evil by its definition is the privation of Good. And will always feed on Good to sustain itself. Often the men who do great evil are able to do so precisely because of the Virtues that they possess.

For example the recent killer is quite competent at shooting and escaping. One shot and its done. If he is a spiteful mutant he is one without the crippling that the more mutated people has.

A slut is only able to be one because she is healthy and agentic enough to do so. And whatever demons feed off lust requires such a young woman with said vitality in order to generate such sexuality.

Tyrone says:

It’s true that the ones most likely to make the inheritance a nightmare are the most extreme leftists, and that’s quite predictable. Depressingly it might even mean that in a certain way they don’t love me. Thank God it will be easy for me to turn the other cheek, should it get ugly.

I was going to quibble with the hot girl thing too, even though the Sydney Sweeney thing was just a few weeks ago.

But I closed my eyes and imagined the reaction if a squad of cheerleaders had passed through the crowd at the Trump rally I attended.
Then I imagined similar group of girls at a leftist music festival I went to. Think off brand Burning Man.

I see what you mean, because to get enthusiastic cheers from leftists, the girls would have to dirty themselves up or at least include a few fats or nons.

On the other hand, the actual festival had tons of hot girls– just not flaunting it as a squad– and the Trump rally was pretty homely I have to say. To be fair, at any political rally the average age is 20 years older than this festival.

Mossadnik says:

Did Tyler Robinson ever have a girlfriend or is he a virgin?

Mossadnik says:

People ask, “Why would someone from a perfectly healthy background go cray-cray like that?” And the answer is that when you have a blue balls inceldom epidemic, some young men will invariably snap, not always in predictable directions. Faggots and puritans (they are on the same side) don’t want you to know that sex with biological females — ideally not prostitutes, but with a girlfriend or wife — is the cure to many spiritual diseases, including certain forms of homicidal and suicidal leftism.

If Tyler were smashing PINK PUSSY on a regular or semi-regular basis, none of this would have happened. Expect both faggots and puritans to countersignal that message.

It’s always about sex.

Mossadnik says:

A society dying of terminal inceldom shall never be politically stable. That also (partially) explains the avid propensity for Jihad among Muslims. You generally don’t seek 72 virgins in heaven when you get to rawdog and creampie your girlfriend every week.

More reason to solve the Woman Problem.

Mossadnik says:

Of course, there are always misfits. Thing is, when 15% of men are incels, your “shooters” are unlikely to be particularly successful. When 40% of men are incels, though, you’re going to have some competent ones too. Someone like Tyler should not have been made an incel. The leftism here was simply a way to rationalize status-maximization, in response to lifelong friendzone; leftism is very often a strategy (generally a subconscious one) to maximize status within a real or imagined community.

People will ignore this explanation because it’s not “immediately politically useful,” yet that is the root cause, and in fact it has significant political implications, just outside the Overton Window.

Pax Imperialis says:

>Someone like Tyler should not have been made an incel

His physiology screams spiteful faggotry. You can lead a faggot to pussy, but can’t make them fuck it.

He looks much like a gay kid I knew growing up who would always raise his legs vertically and lean in a way that put his bulge on display in front of the other boys. No one liked him, and eventually he killed himself, but I can’t help but wonder if he were alive in the current culture if he would’ve shot us all up.

Mossadnik says:

Yeah, you’re right, looking at his deformed freak face, he is clearly not ordinary straight. Still not sure he is ordinary gay either (looks more like the pederast variety of gay, common among teachers), but poofs off roofs anyway.

This phenotype needs to be biologically eliminated.

Milosevic says:

Miller knows exactly what has to be done. We can assume Trump knows as well. Only excuse is lack of will.

https://x.com/Geiger_Capital/status/1966696304186138854

Jim says:

Stephen Miller is homeland security adviser.

And his advice is that doxing and all that is “domestic terrorism”. That calling people fascists is putting them on a kill list. Or it is when you try to dox them and call them a threat to the Republic.

But to his very sound advice I would add that you need to take a gun to gunfight and a faith to a holy war. That you need Christian men of good character to carry out the purge. Stephen Miller is Jewish. He is not the man for the job of carrying out this purge — but then he is an adviser on homeland security, not in charge of homeland security.

Kristi Noem is in charge of homeland security. She is a woman, and this is no job for a woman, but she is, or purports to be Christian, and seems to be some kind of Christian Nationalist, which is what is needed for the purge.

Now if we had a married male head of homeland security with beliefs similar to those of Kristi Noem, and he was saying what Stephen Miller is saying, then we would be in fine shape to carry out the urgently needed purge. But I am not sure that our current personnel is likely to be able or willing to do what needs to be done.

On the other hand, Kristi Noem is married with children, a strong cohesive family, and resisted Coviditarianism, so maybe she is up for the job of carrying out the necessary purge. I would attribute her resistance to worship of the Covid Demon to her faith in Christ. A female headed purge, however, does not seem like a good idea, but maybe she has the balls to appoint a Beria to carry out the job.

The Cominator says:

I think the most crucial initiative right now is Hegseth’s checking into any negative posts about Charlie Kirk within the armed forces. If a loyalist MAGA military can be obtained not much else matters.

Mossadnik says:

EXCLUSIVE: Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson lived with his transgender partner, sources tell me.

The individual, who is a male transitioning to a female, is fully cooperating with the FBI.

Sources tell me the FBI had texts and other communications between Robinson and the individual that helped FBI authorities solidify that Robinson was indeed the shooter.

https://x.com/BrookeSingman/status/1966889202412347602

As I said – sex with biological females cures spiritual diseases.

Tyler is involuntarily celibate.

Pax Imperialis says:

There’s a difference between incel and faggot. Tyler is a voluntary faggot.

Mossadnik says:

Men who resort to fucking trannies are incels. He is not gay by predisposition.

The Cominator says:

No they are faggots. Any man who voluntarily does anything sexual with another man without the involvement of extreme amounts of money relative to his current standing in life being offered is gay.

Pax Imperialis says:

>who is a male transitioning to a female

i.e. he was fucking an overt man before they started trying to look more like a female. Sounds gay and not some sort of desperate incel looking for a fake facsimile of pussy. Tyler Robinson was, from accounts, always different from the rest of his family, being the only leftist in a strongly conservative family. In pictures of the family, his physical appearance is the odd one out.

I don’t think he was an incel. I think he was a spiteful gay.

Mossadnik says:

There’s certainly something very off and perverted about his physiognomy, so obviously a spiteful mutant of some kind. Not sure exactly what kind of mutant, though. If you told me that he’s into prepubescent boys, dead or alive, I could easily believe it.

Hesiod says:

Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their…um…er…Otherkin?

https://patriots.win/p/1AR0LWFXkZ/and-here-he-is-the-tranny-boyfri/c

Mossadnik says:

LANCE TWIGGS HAHAHAHAHA

Seriously though, scientists should be working on discovering what is causing these perverts to emerge, and find a way to prevent it biologically. Meanwhile, poofs off roofs.

Hesiod says:

Brother White Bread’s recent lecture on The Abolition of Man inspired me to revisit C.S. Lewis. In addition to that tome, That Hideous Strength received a refresher. So, forgive me for being pessimistic concerning the scientific eradication of faggotry as that smacks of something NICE would champion. My musings place its existence firmly within that nebulous but obvious category of human sin.

Not accusing you personally of such allegiance but my faith in Muh Science is low these days.

Mossadnik says:

Alright, but I won’t be entirely surprised if the Chinese or Russians figure it out, considering they are allowed to conduct some “politically incorrect” experiments which in the West are forbidden.

Hesiod says:

On the other hand, many a discovery has been made tangential to a charted goal, so perhaps we can insist the less penitent donate themselves to scientific experiment rather than receive free flying lessons. The laboratory cannot hold anything more demeaning or inhumane that what they already do to each other.

Mossadnik says:

For that to be possible, need tanks in Harvard. As long as academia is Prog-dominated, it’s more likely there will be experiments to eliminate heterosexuality.

Then again, the assassination of Charlie Kirk provides an opportunity to purge the Cathedral, which is holy war. Looks to me like Thermidor is about to break right – Thermidor viscerally identifies more with Kirk than with his assassin.

Jim’s 2026 prophesy may materialize after all. If you purge the Cathedral, suddenly many unthinkable things will become perfectly thinkabe.

Jim says:

> Looks to me like Thermidor is about to break right – Thermidor viscerally identifies more with Kirk than with his assassin.

Charlie Kirk is a normie, Thermidor are normies. The left wants to kill normies. The alt right rather likes normies and rather likes Thermidor, or at least is cheerfully willing to put up with them until matters are settled with their, and our, enemies.

We have always known that this is the left. Now Thermidor is coming around to the alt right view of the left.

Old Guy says:

Mossadnik re this “Science” thing…

LANCE was born with a dick, so shooter was both gay, and a cd/troon boofer, “voluntarily”, not a straight incel.

However fags and especially troons emit fucked up pheromones effective in getting past the defenses of less-than-straights.

Whereas the defense reaction of straights is to simply reject it and kill the emitter on the spot of approach.
That is the Law Of Nature, and is exactly why it was the Old Law too.
Then some Prog came along and PsyOp’d everyone into believing that was not both the Law of Nature and Old.
So now the proper civ-defense reaction to such biological invasion now gets imprisoned by the Progs illegitimate Creation of the State… via the “Muh Democracy / Gay Rights” scam.

This week we were gifted with this quote…
“There will be no Palestinian state – this land belongs to us. — Bibi. (His audience burst into loud applause.)”

You see Bibi has simply rediscovered the Science embedded in the Old Law and the Law Of Nature, just purge them out and kill them, and your Civ will be Happy, Ordered,, Clean, and Successful once again.

At least that way you’re not trying to fuck with and alter the Law Of Nature (DNA), that you have no fucking idea what you are messing with, and are thus 100% more likely to suicide your own civ with after a few generations of combinatric mutations your haughty science set loose. Ahem, mRNA (eg: COVAX), in the reproductive line. You are nowhere near being able to sim the entire protein interaction-set in-Repro (including shedding ex-Repro) of all Life on Earth. So until then you have both no business doing so, and far bigger civ problems to fix.

The Laws of Nature and Old that you were encoded with and given, are sufficient, correct, and proper.

Follow them.

Hesiod says:

Dude winds up being Gay Chuevara.

Pax Imperialis says:

40,000 years of human evolution favored the strong and disciplined to suppress the weak and spiteful. I love guns, but the fact is that technology has allowed random sub-human mutants to easily dispatch the strong. I think it’s time for a reinterpretation of the 2nd Amendment as a means to permanently disarm the left but still retain the rights of the strong.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The modern interpretation has purely focused on the “right of the people” as an individual right, but the “people” is a collective organization in the context of a militia. Rights have always come with duties and responsibilities. The rights of even kings came with obedience to Gnon and duties of the kingdom. The lowliest individual is no different. Historically, militia’s were communal and self regulatory, and if they got out of line, it’s a lot easier to regulate an overt group than random individuals no one has eyes on. Gun ownership needs to be retied to good standing with Church, town, clan, and state militias. Ownership outside militia tied to military service as a means to weed out incapable.

Make gun ownership high status in the same way sword ownership of knights was high status.

Hesiod says:

Make gun ownership high status in the same way sword ownership of knights was high status.

When I was a wee lad, reruns on broadcast TV channels of the Lone Ranger and other Western shows made six-shooters sexy. Fortunately, the spiteful mutants in education at that time weren’t as tyrannically in control as more recent current years, so my violent artwork and crafts only received cursory concern. I loved any story about a law man, the older the better.

Fidelis says:

Make gun ownership high status in the same way sword ownership of knights was high status.

This is very simple to do. Allow gun owning men to actually defend themselves and their property.

Just have Don declare any man that shoots someone while defending himself and his property will get a pardon and presidential support. Make sure it’s made clear that your car counts as your property.

Instead we have a bunch of retarded goons marching up and down the streets. That’s going to be real nice when Don’s coalition breaks, imagine a bunch of obese latinx in bulletproof vests and camo running cover for the next kill whitey mobs. All it would take is a dollar crisis that could plausibly or not so plausibly be pinned on Don, and he’s out.

Jim says:

Obviously we want the right to keep and bear arms for gentlemen, not for hordes on welfare, which welfare hordes are likely to strongly object to losing their welfare.

A small start in that direction would be defining gay and tranny as mental illness, and denying the mentally ill the right to keep and bear arms.

Note that much of the EA crowd were on grants, most of which is just welfare for unemployable useless Harvard grads. Taking care of that welfare class will be part of tanks in Harvard.

Once their welfare ends, will probably do something that brings them to the attention of the justice system, which is another grounds for denying the right to keep and bear arms.

Fidelis says:

The troons are high profile, but ultimately a fraction of a fraction. It would do more to condition normie men to enforce the states rules on violence and property by killing the ferals and room temp IQ gangbangers on occasion with impunity from punishment by the left that wants us dead. There are thousands upon thousands of deaths from ferals and retarded gangbangers, and a tiny handful from troons.

It’s easy to get normie men to enforce rule and law in concordance with GNON, and hard if not impossible to get them to go against such without a central command. Putting troops in the streets before solidifying power for the right is a terrible gamble. We’re not going to have large groups of armed men fighting in the lower forty-eight for a long time, because the left inspires a bunch of useless crazies and the right doesn’t know what it is. However, the uselsss crazies at least know their team, and are proven at capturing centralized organizations. Lets not hand them a central command on violence in every city.

Jim says:

> The troons are high profile, but ultimately a fraction of a fraction.

They and the gays committed most of the murders committed by the left in America after they lost the president and the house. The lavender Mafia is a key node in power structure of the left. Gays and trannies exercise grossly disproportionate power within the left, because the lavender mafia generates cohesion by committing blackmailable crimes together while naked in a great big pile. Politically well connected gays get hot and cold boy small deliveries from child protective services and from the cartels, so they can come to cohesion faster and more solidly than the rest of the left.

Bix Nudelmann says:

And the trannies have no way out. They’ve already sterilized themselves and/or cut their own dicks off (or had it done to them as impressionable children). They’re already cornered. No greengrocering for them. No going back. Nothing to lose.

A2 says:

Re-open the mental hospitals and do some serious reclassification in DSM-VI or VII or wherever they are by now. There are huge numbers of free range lunatics these days, lunatics who should be in asylums and away from society.

(Related to this, I’d also suggest that earlier reasons for criminal clemency such as low IQ or insanity instead should amplify the sentence.)

Fidelis says:

Are we talking about controlling violence on the streets or purging the state? I’m talking about controlling violence on the street, and expressing my preference that once-America doesn’t carcinize into a new Chinese dynasty. Oriental despotism begins with good itentions, I’m sure, and ends with one man commanding a brittle hierarchy of troops that stand on everyone else’s faces.

If we’re purging the state, need a different recipe. Are we going to purge the state through fast means, or are we going to tiptoe around what we’re doing until the thing explodes and we get a tranny Pol pot? It looks like we’re doing the second, starting with centralizing the violence hierarchy. We could be doing the first, starting by deputizing and promoting organizations of normie men willing to shoot criminals, and snowballing from there.

c4ssidy says:

Two attacks within a handful of weeks. These men are high iq. They run Reddit and Discord. Trump needs a Tranny Guantánamo. Relabel it as a War on Terror, and use the old ‘domestic terrorism’ label. In the sweltering jungle encampment, disease and suicide can finish the job, and paperwork can go missing

alf says:

Look at the recent school shootings. Overwhelmingly, if not exclusively, committed transmen.

There is a biological explanation for this, telling us that once a man irreversibly damages himself in the arena most important to his survival — reproduction — the resulting outfall will make him hate all the living.

There is a spiritual parallel explanation. Namely, that for the past decades, leftists have been trying, and for the past decade or so, succeeding, at summoning demons. Because think about it — are trans people not quite literally possessed by demonic entities? Well maybe literally, maybe metaphorically. But model it as such, and recent events not only make sense, they are inevitable, and inevitable that they escalate as well.

We should not treat this lightly.

Bix Nudelmann says:

Turbo-Bioleninism. Janissaries to the crumbling crown. No way out but through.

Fidelis says:

Before the tranny times it was carried out by freaky mutants of other stripes. Ishtar worship attracts freaks and outcasts with nothing to lose, and freaks and outcasts with nothing to lose are prone to lone gun aggression. This is not a phenomenon unique to troons, the unique thing is that current year freaks and outcasts are into Ishtar worship. Pretending we didn’t have a problem with spiteful mutants and incels before is like pretending Joe Biden was sharp as a tack before the second half of 2024. It’s leftists trying to do a tactical retreat and leaving their troons out as bait.

Troons aren’t just mushrooming up in a vacuum, they are cultivated. You need to attack the roots, but ‘we’ are not ready to do that. So I propose deputizing well-formed ordinary men with good instinct, as a huge yeoman army is incapable of being an asset to trannie Pol pot and a direct impediment to his plans of murdering everyone.

Bix Nudelmann says:

If you’re taking requests for post topics, especially this month, may I humbly suggest:

“How to intellectually and emotionally process the JQ without getting used, doing anything stupid or otherwise ruining your life”

Bix Nudelmann says:

and then a follow-up, same format, for the GQ (gay question)

Jim says:

I have already addressed the gay question. There is not enough room in the social space for gays and straights to coexist. If their sexual preference is tolerated, ours is not tolerated.

Jim says:

I am bored by the Jewish question. Jews matter a lot to Jews, which is fair enough, but I don’t see why they should matter so much to anyone else. Why are Jews living rent free in the brains of so many people?

Obviously Jewish perverts played a grossly disproportionate role in the movement to trans your children — but it was perverts, a lot of whom happened to be Jews. Not Jews, a lot whom happened to be perverts. It was a pervert conspiracy, not a Jewish conspiracy.

And turning Christianity against marriage and family was a one hundred percent pervert conspiracy. Not a Jew in sight.

Similarly, usury and fiat was a banker conspiracy, in which Jewish bankers played a grossly disproportionate role — but it was bankers, a lot of who happened to be Jews, not Jews, a lot whom happened to be bankers.

In any conspiracy, Jews are usually grossly over represented. But that does not make them all one big Jewish conspiracy. Two Jews, three factions.

Fidelis says:

Why are Jews living rent free in the brains of so many people?

Riling the peasants up to stampede at a middleman minority instead of at the group actively working to diminish their living standards is a working political formula. Jews are useful in a European context, in other civilizations you would choose a different group. So in this case it’s less Jew as historical reality and more Jew as archetype of the ‘other’ with too much power.

It was a useful political formula in late 19th century France, and remains a useful political formula today. So it would be useful to reveal the trick in a way that shows what the trick is actually doing. Usually the trick is revealed by giving the audience a lecture about being nice and then a heterogenous collection of facts hastily strung together about how the ‘other’, Jews in our case, are not uniquely guilty, and the politician going against them is uniquely guilty. Put simply, they don’t reveal the trick of scapegoating, because it delegitimizes the Democratic notion, and hand out a lecture and talking points.

It would be useful to reveal the actual trick — which you have done here already, just scattered throughout dozens of posts — in a way that guides a reader to a better understanding of where the Jew brain is actually coming from, without giving him an incoherent lecture that would merely cement his suspicions that those dastardly yids are just running an apologist campaign.

Yul Bornhold says:

Jews are everywhere. So if you, for example, want to cut support from Donald Trump, you can say “the Jews control him!” You can point to Stephen Miller and other Jews Trump has appointed. You can point to his relatively friendly relationship with Israel. By this point, those people whose brains have been friend by “every single time” will take all these Jews and interactions with Israel as proof that Drumpf is a creature of international Jewry. This will effectively neutralize those people.

Never mind that Trump demonstrably does not act as a puppet of Israel would act. He did not get involved in Gaza. He dropped a token bomb on Iran and then declared peace, whereas the Israelis would have much preferred him to invade. He is the first American major politician to explicitly speak against anti-Christian hatred, rather than antisemitism or “dems are the real racists.”

But if you bring up any of these evidences, the jews-on-the-brain people will airily dismiss them with “he was forced to say these things because people are waking up,” usually a day after angrily swearing that Trump would never say or do these things.

Anonymous Fake says:

Jewish power on the supreme court is what matters most in our time. And for some strange reason, the Republicans aren’t packing the court and reversing over a century of bad decisions, usually supported by Jews.

Jim says:

> Jewish power on the supreme court i

Allowing this through, because a rebuttal is on the subthread topic.

None of the supreme court justices appointed by Trump have been Jewish. There is now only one Jewish supreme court justice remaining, Elena Kagan, who predictably always votes against Trump. Trump has been de Jewing the federal judiciary in both terms.

Old Guy says:

Cominator practicing for his run at the Zizian TransArmy…
https://x.com/NobodyMrRobert/status/1966945773876322800

Old Guy says:

Humungus practicing for his run at the Zizian TransArmy…
https://x.com/NobodyMrRobert/status/1966945773876322800

(I don’t know how to edit/delete a post yet, dont see a login)

Humungus says:

Humungus is amused.

But, we are here for a purpose. To offer each other advice on what is and what is to come. There is a storm on the horizon. You must avoid becoming trapped inside your home. So you will need a way to become mobile very quickly. Keep in your vehicle all you will need for the next day, food water, etc…

Ready your physical body, increase your strength. Practice fasting one day on one day off so that you are able to go without food for 24 hours.

The need to arm yourself is obvious. Choose whatever works best for you.

Life is no longer normal. Be aware of those around you at all times when you are out in public. It is gravely important that you take this serious.

Leave a Reply to i Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *