If we continue to move left at the same rate as we were moving left in 2016-2024, then by 2032 the moderate left position will be that everyone should immediately torture to death everyone insufficiently left, the radical left position will be that everyone should torture to death everyone who is not purely and truly left, and no one is purely and truly left, the moderate right position will be that only the moderate right should be tortured to death (compare today’s moderate republican position on policies aimed to eliminate moderate Republicans from politics by election rigging and population replacement) and the ultra extreme radical far right Hitler Hitler Hitler position will be that very few people need to be tortured to death for insufficient leftism.
Asmongold is a hugely influential influencer. He is a gamer, and resents the vicious and hateful attack on by gaming companies on gamers. So when it comes to gaming, he is perceived by the left as genocidal Hitler Hitler Hitler. But on everything else, he is not even moderate right. He is centrist, thermidorean, or moderate left. Right wing on what he knows, accepts the Zeitgeist on everything he does not know or does not much care about. Apart from arguing that video games should not spit on and deride most of their audience, and that influencers who say so should not be cancelled, he is 2020s moderate left. On video games and cancel culture, he is Hitler nazi Hitler Hitler Hitler.
This analogous to most people’s position on the legacy media during the last few decades. On anything that they themselves knew about, they were aware that the legacy media was ignorant, stubbornly indifferent to truth, and aggressively pumping out hostile manipulative disinformation. On anything they did not themselves know and care about, they trusted the legacy media completely.
So people like Asmongold, the vast majority of normies, should not be allowed to vote. That they can vote is dangerous. You don’t want the sheep deciding which way the flock goes, because then you will get people herding the sheep to the slaughterhouse.
Right now, our civilisation is falling, and our race and people are vanishing. Imports are not replacing the missing grandchildren, most of them live on crime and wefare, which is unsustainable once our people disappear. Obviously only radical measures can fix this problem. Poofs off roofs, de-emancipate women, and conscript wombs (Coverture, white Sharia). Fertile age women need to find a husband as soon as they reach fertile age and develop the corresponding secondary sexual characteristics, or if not, have one found for them. Preferably by her father, but by the authorities if no father, or father failing at his task. And once married, the woman has to honor and obey, the man has to cherish. Divorce only for female adultery or male abandonment, male abandonment a crime, female adultery a serious crime for the woman, and an even more serious crime for the adulterer. Shooting adulterers should be legal, or not very seriously illegal. You can kill someone who is trying to steal your television, why not someone who is trying to steal your wife? Also I have noticed that if women plausibly suspect that their man would kill them and the interloper, that makes their man considerably more attractive in their eyes. We may reasonably suppose that that was the ancestral environment of successful reproduction for women.
The problem with emancipation is that it leads to women exercising unrestrained sexual and reproductive choice. Which sounds like it is going to be a good thing for women, and the alternative a very bad thing for women. But if women get continuing sexual and reproductive choice, you have abolished marriage 1.0. Reproduction and family is a prisoner’s dilemma problem. Marriage 1.0 was social and legal enforcement of cooperate/cooperate equilibrium. Without it, you get defect/defect equilibrium. Which means that very few people, male or female, get the choice of family. Instead, women get pornotopia, which would be great for them if they were men, but which not at all what women want. It makes them heartsick, neurotic, and crazy. And most men get inceldom, which is very bad for them, and gives them no incentive to work, to pay taxes, or to fight for God, King, and Country. About three percent of men get pornotopia, but eventually discover that pornotopia is not what they like either, hence player burnout, though pornotopia is a lot more attractive for men than for women. Trouble is, no matter how alpha you are, there is always some man who is plausibly more alpha than you. “She was never yours, it was just your turn.”
Limited franchise, poofs off roofs, de-emancipation, and womb conscription are “extreme far radical right”. They are also the only positions compatible with long term survival. Without them, we are short of grandchildren.
And pretty soon, if nothing very radical happens under Trump, failure to murder everyone who is insufficiently left is likely to also be “extreme far radical right”, just as moderate Republicans now go along with cancel culture.
[*Deleted. Please follow the moderation policy and you will then be whitelisted*]
The problem the world over is that our current “right wing” leaders are mostly old-school feminists, i.e. far right according to the radical left, but in reality really, very much left of centre.
One thing I can say is that Modi is definitely a believer in “Nari Shakti” or women power, so you cannot expect radical right wing movement from Modi, but what the Modi administration has shown since 2014 is that it can halt radical leftism if there is a reasonably cohesive alliance of the moderates. The moderates need not agree on everything but simply agree on what needs to be suppressed.
The obvious issue is with this is that, there will be a vaccuum in the place of a virtuous state religion, which gaps if left unfilled over time, will be occupied by another evil ideology. One hopes that, by preventing the shark from swimming, the shark drowns. Even if Trump cannot become the God Emperor and Patriarch of America, he can still halt Leftism if he wants to by becoming Stalin or giving way to a Stalin. But the seeds of the virtuous state religion to take over has to be sown quickly before Stalin departs the stage.
* everything
The vacuum will be filled by something, sooner or later. The question, in American and in India, is what?
Exactly. The moderates think that their unprincipled exceptions to leftism alone form a cohesive state religion.
While we know that current year MAGA and Hindutva are nothing more than placeholders waiting to give way to truly virtuous state religions respectively.
Modi is a celibate vegetarian.
As democratic politicians go he’s great.
By any other metric hopelessly left wing.
The RSS itself is leftist just 1920s left.
Military coup?
The problem with “Indian Army” is that it is the continuation of the British Indian Army, and by extension the Global American Imperial Army. It can barely fight Pakistan as it is. It is foolish to expect it to do anything other than crush opposition to GAE. But herein lie the seeds to redemption — a proper militia must be created with training and willingness to use arms, discipline, and capability to fight the long war. In time, it gives rise to a powerful Kshatriya class which can then think about coups or otherwise. This is why I wholeheartedly support the Agniveer scheme. The next logical step is to mentor graduating Agniveers into citizen soldiers of Bharat. Ideally, Agniveer would cover 100% of military-aged males for a 4 year tour of duty right after 12th std. But this will need a full generation to work out, if WWIII doesn’t intervene.
We have a more immediate kind of problem due to the Trump-Musk blowup. Looks a lot like Vance has been the real candidate of the Tech Right all along.
This matters, because so many people were kissing Trump’s ring, that started to make me optimistic. However crazy it sounds, there are people even calling themselves “MAGA Communists” ! Or Joe Rogan is a “MAGA liberal”.
Without or after Trump, things can get a lot worse again, exactly how you described it.
Basically in modern terms, the Real Right can only win if cults of ideology can be replaced by cults of personality. Because a cult of personality is the closest thing to monarchy these days. Strictly personal, not ideological kinds of loyalty and devil take ideology, the King just does whatever he wants to.
Every single attempt of the Right trying a cult of ideology as opposed to personality failed, largely due to treason from inside + entryism. Time to try something else.
(BTW this might be why you Jim don’t much like Catholicism, even that of the past. Catholicism of the past, when it was “based”, Syllabus of Errors etc., can be understood as a Rightist cult of ideology, not personality. Like Vatican ideology above Kings, that stuff.)
Problem is, no one except Trump seems capable of generating that.
Question: if I wanted to summarize the core of the Dark Enlightenment to outsiders, would this do: cults of ideology are bad, even cults of Rightist ideology, it is better to have a cult of personality?
That literally has nothing to do with Dark Enlightenment. Not even a sliver. It’s “Not Even Wrong”, just a category error or irrelevant nonsense.
Back when I was a little kid and went on field trips, there was another little kid in the class who always got lost. Always; no matter where we went, what the subject was, who it was with, or how long we were there, he’d always somehow end up separated from the group, in the relative middle of nowhere, just wandering around aimlessly and wondering where everyone went. It wasn’t mischief or pranks, he just had no sense of direction and no situational awareness.
You are that kid, in the realm of ideas and discussion. Somehow, no matter what the subject is, or who is talking, you end up having a completely different conversation without ever realizing that you’ve left the group behind. You don’t pay any attention to the voices out here, only to the voices constantly chattering in your own head, like an AI being trained on its own output and progressively accumulating errors until it reaches hallucinations and other deranged conclusions.
I mean, how the hell else does one come to the conclusion that the Dark Enlightenment–which is a rejection of Enlightenment ideas and promotes Throne, Altar and Freehold, and requires women be defined and understood as male property–is actually a statement that “cults of personality are better than cults of ideology”? How do you even get from point A to point B? Where is your logic? That is like Grampa Simpson tier senility.
And while it’s not really my place to elucidate Jim’s position on Catholicism, I’m pretty positive it doesn’t revolve around being a “cult of ideology”, but rather the fact that it is completely and utterly demon-possessed and was has been run by and for pathological faggots for the longest time.
100%.
I was planning to write a boring yawn-inducing sleeping-aid *ahhhhh-hhaaaaa* effortpost going line by line ‘correcting’ all his Not Even Wrong bullshit – but then decided to make my work environment (I post from work sometimes) more “hostile and toxic” by playing on some local chud musicians in the background instead.
At least when it comes to ideological opponents like the prolapsed and perforated Anus, there’s a benefit to be derived from such endeavors, occasionally that is; this guy however seems to be experiencing some genuine “AF Moments” lately. Not gonna bother with that.
In a vague and very indirect way I think he was hinting that rule by warriors is better than rule by priests. But that’s something we all agree on and I think Kingly warrior rule is an outcome of rather than a core defining feature of Dark Enlightenment.
But that’s my very charitable interpretation. European philosophy goes over my head anyway.
Very, very charitable; altogether too charitable in my opinion. My most charitable interpretation would have been something to the effect of “history is always made by great men”, which is an incidental rather than foundational DE meme, and still has nothing to do with personality cults; great men do great things because they are great men, not because they have cult followings, and they would do great things even without cult followings as great men throughout history have always done.
This whole personality-cult thing is just wacky nonsense that came out of nowhere. Or maybe is prole-projection: TD desperately wants to pledge blind obedience to someone, so he projects that feeling onto us and the entire DE sphere. Which, to be fair, is a perfectly acceptable and virtuous frame for the spiritual serf; he just shouldn’t be playing in the intellectual playground if that’s the case.
“Cult of personality” is just a leftist enemy meme by priests to subvert warriors just like “liberalism” is a Trojan horse hiding the true evil behind a lot of holy justifications.
There is no cult of personality. Just charismatic great men who attract followers. And priests hate that because it undercuts their power.
It appears that the (continental) Europoors are totally lost; they can’t make heads or tails of the situation at all. Meme-wise they are lagging behind some 15 years or so, as Alf said in the other thread. One would think that the internet would fix that, since everyone can just download Twitter, and most schools around the world teach English – nope, they have no clue.
Indians are starting to get it, Israelis are starting to get it, while Europeans basically live on a different planet. The awakening will be very, very rude.
You overlook the possibility that Jack T. Chick and Malcolm Muggeridge are BOTH right:
Yes, Roman Catholicism is a false, idolatrous religion that leads to eternal damnation.
Yes, Roman Catholicism is necessary for above replacement fertility.
Why would Roman Catholicism be necessary for that? Last I heard the Taliban was not Roman Catholic.
Nor were they Anglican. I meant of course within the framework of groups that consider themselves Christian.
The Taliban enforces a lot of things, but not monogamy. Polygamy makes it possible to quickly recover from losses inflicted by e.g. Soviets, because one man is sufficient to impregnate a lot of women.
A better answer is to take the fork to the next step:
Yes, Islam is an Unitarian heresy that leads to eternal damnation.
Yes, Islam, or at least polygamy, is necessary for stable patriarchy.
Polygamy is not necessary for stable polygamy, as most of the last two millenia proves, and undermines social cohesion. It deprives the majority of men of an incentive to work, pay taxes, and fight for God, King, and Country.
In that case, Trumpism must be entirely irrelevant to the Dark E. Because my summary of Trumpism I hold correct. (Also Orbánism, very similar and I have more exp with that.)
Is Bibism the “core” of Israeli Reaction?
Come on, you’re not actually low IQ. You can do better than that. Read Scarebucks’ and Dharmic’s posts and think harder about what the DE actually is. It’s not at all what you are saying here.
Of course it’s irrelevant. While Trump is his own man and it’s hard to precisely categorize what he beliefs, he is currently aligned with Thermidor, and Thermidor is decidedly not Dark Enlightenment. That is the whole point; Thermidor always breaks left or right, and if it breaks right, then it needs to enlist actual reactionaries to do the dirty work because the moderate left/right are conversant in neither the theory nor practice of ruling.
Trump is a hypothetical candidate for a hypothetical Restoration which is sort of vaguely DE-adjacent, but here again, “personality cult” is completely the wrong framing. Restorations are about legitimacy. Populism might look like legitimacy for a short time, but quickly evaporates when the subject needs to do something important but unpopular–such as, oh, I don’t know, abolishing the judiciary, or abolishing Medicare or Social Security, or driving tanks into Harvard Yard, all of which are mere ripples in an ocean of things that will need to be done by a hypothetical legitimate King of America in order to remain in power for more than a month.
“Trumpism” isn’t a coherent memeplex and is barely an identifiable mass movement, it’s mostly a word coined by the left to spit on Trump voters, falsely implying that those voters have no minds of their own and are just blindly following Trump on whatever. In 2016, they were the “basket of deplorables”, and in 2017 they were “Trumpists”, but nothing else changed except the label.
https://www.papalencyclicals.net/pius09/p9syll.htm
is this your idea of demonic possession and faggotry? it is more based than anything in the last 150 years
Here some Himmler. Himmler implies that Saint Paul was a homosexual who hated women, and that nearly 95% of monasteries are infested with homosexual priests.
“It relies on Paul and the very first apostles who derogate the woman as something sinful and permit or recommend marriage as merely a legal way out of prostitution – that is in the Bible – and derogate the procreation of children as a necessary evil.
This priesthood continues along in this way for several centuries until in 1139 the celibacy of priests is fully implemented. I am furthermore convinced that the way out for the few who do not want to yield to this homosexuality, especially for the country parsons, the majority of whom – more than 50 % – I estimate not to be homosexual, is to procure for themselves in confession the necessary married and single women; I assume that in the monasteries the homosexuality ranges from 90 – 95 – 100% …”
– Heinrich Himmler, Speech at the group leader meeting in Bad Tölz in 1937
The opinion of Heinrich Himmler, not necessarily mine.
Huh! Our dear friend Eli appeared to believe that I’m the reincarnation of Saint Paul, and he also held him to be a wicked homo and all that stuff. Eli Himmler hahahaha!
(I’m not the reincarnation of Saint Paul.)
I’ve been grossly sceptical of Paul ever since I knew about his address to the Greeks. A more ludicrous argument I’ve never seen, and I assume the rest of his “teachings” are demonic garbage as well.
https://homeoftheoldgods.wordpress.com/2025/03/14/angels-and-demons-mental-gymnastics-that-goyim-must-perform-to-avoid-thinking-about-their-fathers-gods/
What is wrong with Pauls address to the greeks, which your link neglects to explain, pronouncing it as self evident.
The Aryan gods were biological ancestors — each extended family had its own. The leaders of the Anglo Saxon invasion could trace their ancestry to Wotan.
To worship an Aryan God, you had to be in his patrilineal lineage. When people lost track of their ancestors, due to the decline of patriarchy and the depths of time, the Old Gods were lost, and you got demons and human sacrifice.
But the Biblical/Christian God preached by Paul in Acts 17 is better understood as the Brahman than as a Judean demon, so arguably he was restoring the Aryan Greeks to their original faith.
@Mossadnik Once, I was called “Hitler” by our Romanian downstairs neighbor, back in my childhood in Israel. It filled me with a strange sense of pride. What a Rasha(n) I must be. Go figure.
And, yeah, I maintain that Paul was a (most likely self-restrained) homosexual who, because of his suppressed tendencies, denounced sex, was envious of women, and promoted absurd ideas and ideals, while — falsely, in order to usurp power and secure a legacy — claiming that he was a Jew and had better understanding of Jesus than Apostle Peter and James/Yaakov, who was the brother of Jesus.
Jews want to disown Paul for the same reasons as they want to believe that Jesus is boiling in shit.
The reasons proposed for doubting that he was a Jewish pharisee are as silly as Jewish rationalisations are apt to be.
At that time, if someone was persecuting the Christians, obviously Jewish, and obviously part of the faction in power. The Romans did not care until somewhat later. They viewed this stuff as weird Jewish fanaticism about issues that they did not care about and did not understand why anyone cared about.
Later, after Paul started converting the gentiles, the Romans got antsy. The state liked its state religion, and was perturbed if anyone undermined it. Which lots of people were apt to do as the original gods had ceased to be taken seriously, and emperor worship was an inferior substitute, the mortality of the emperor being frequently demonstrated.
Paul was persecuting the Christians. No one at that time was persecuting the Christians except the ruling faction of the ruling Jewish faith. Therefore Paul was who he says he was. At the time Christianity was yet another Jewish religious faction, of which there were far too many. See Monty Python’s life of Brian for a remarkably historically accurate fiction. Brian is fictitious, but his Israel war real. Even the very silly bit where Brian is forced to write correct latin has some slight basis, in that the Romans would patronise, ridicule, condemn, and penalise bad latin by provincials, thus pressuring everyone to become Roman. And the ridiculous foods Brian was selling has a basis in that they had some rather odd fast foods, though not nearly so odd as Brian’s, and the revolutionaries were asking for rather more standard Roman fast foods. Which were in fact sold, or sometimes given out free, at the gladiatorial amphitheatre.
And of course “what have the Romans ever done for us” Everything listed has a historical basis, Roads, sanitation, law and order. Even wine, for though the Jews had always had wine, Roman roads and Roman trade routes would have made this far more available.
That the temple dragged its feet on the aqueduct is a violation of the spirit of Old Testament law.
@Eli
We’re all Hitlers and Himmlers here.
Well, regarding Paul, I can buy the “repressed homosexual” thing (he did mention a thorn in his flesh in 2 Corinthians 12, whatever that actually was), but I highly doubt that a goy imposter with absolutely no Jewish background would have been able to pull off such a grandiose hoax. To misquote Scripture, you need to actually know it, and with no Jewish background whatsoever (even if proselyte), he could probably not have known it well enough to misquote it. “Gay Jewish charlatan” is possible. “Gay non-Jewish charlatan” is too much.
Anyway, what do you actually expect the Messiah to preach? Isaiah 42:4 for instance says,
Okay, now let’s say that was not Jesus or any other historical and/or mythical figure.
You think this (“his law”) refers to Orthodox Judaism, as Maimonides said? Noahidism? Or something else? Or is this not a Messianic verse at all, and you expect a Davidic King with no preaching of his own?
@Suones Interesting essay. I’m not an Aryan (sans my paternal grandmother’s roots), but the topic is still an interesting one, philosophically and historically. Ultimately, all Aryans believed in *Dyēus or Deus Pater or Jupiter (variations of this name exist). Who is the single progenitor father figure God of Aryans. This topic has been studied, particularly, by the scholar of Avestan culture, James Darmesteter. The other issue is multiplying of gods and assignment of natural phenomena to them. I find that, in the age of abundant knowledge, one doesn’t need this. On the other hand, when it comes to personal/family gods, I intuitively find this agreeable. After my grandmother’s death, I cannot but think of her daily, honor her memory, and talk to her. There is a certain divinity to our close family members, especially when they’re no longer in this physical world. That is a cornerstone of humanity, IMO — the ability to comprehend this world’s telos not only through the finite lens of the mortal self, but as a contract between our ancestors, us, and our future progeny to continue righteously.
And I also agree with your claim that Yahweh is a Judean-centric deity. I wish to add further. The story of Abraham, Itzhak, and Yaacov/Jacob are all found in Elohistic source, which refer to God by “Elohim.” Elohistic sources are considered to be earlier than Yahwistic, which — when they duplicate Elohistic stories — are considered later redactions.
More saliently, all Yahweh-theophoric names, such Ovadiyah/Ovadiyahu, Eliyah/Eliyahu, Yashua/Yahushua, etc. etc are not found among immediate family of Abraham, Itzhak, Jacob&Essau. Except, of course *one* child of Jacob, Yahudah (Judah) himself.
And somewhat confusingly, the Kenites (ostensibly, little-related tribe to Judeans) were worshipping Yahweh as well. In fact, it is under their (the Kenites’) influence that Moshe (Moses) adopted Yahweh as the main and only deity for the entire Israelite confederation.
The Edomites (by way of Essau, the brother of Jacob), who were supposed to be much closer related to Judeans than Kenites (who ostensibly were Midianites) did NOT worhship Yahweh. Instead, the Edomites worshipped Qaus.
I think, therefore, that a lot of the Israelite tribes in the Israelite confederacy were, at best, only distantly related to each other. And, some, like Dan, likely even being of Achaean/Danaan provenance (read: Aryan), were not related to Judeans at all. But Yahweh became the dominant entity — not only because the Judeans were the most numerous and very powerful — but also because Moses made a pact with the Kenites, who — though *ostensibly* they were of distant Midianite/Arab provenance — were zealous Yahweh worshippers.
I think that, in fact, Kenites really were descendants of Cain (Ken/Cain). And Judeans shared that lineage with them. At some point, the genealogies of other tribes were combined and mixed into each other.
I find this article to be interesting on that note: https://www.thetorah.com/article/yhwh-the-kenite-god-of-metallurgy. But these are all speculations.
Regardless, I think that the true genealogy of Israelite tribes is on purpose obscured and forced by political necessity of uniting the entire Israelite confederacy under the banner of a single Judean deity, Yahweh.
Nuts.
The unity of exodus was not based on a single Judean deity, but on real or fictive descent from the Patriarch Israel. Who worshipped the God of Abraham.
The story of Abraham and Priest King Melchizedek tells us that worship of the God of Abraham was reasonably widespread at that time. And Jesus is the high priest and King of that religion, which was not particularly to Abraham, but clearly has a marked resemblance to the Aryan faith of Deus Pater — who was not an ancestor, but a creator. God the Father – thus the father of all, unlike the ancestral gods of each tribe, clan, family, and lineage.
Genesis 14
And after these events, after he meets priest King Melchidezek, whom the book of Hebrews asserts to be Christophany:
Genesis 15
Genesis 18: God (singular) appears to Abraham as three persons. God is three and God is one.
Book of Hebrews 7
The Jews want to hog Yahweh for the same reason that they want to deny that Paul was Jewish. They want to cut God down to size.
But the biblical story is that the God of Abraham was one person and three persons all along — note God appearing to Abraham as three. And the Book of Hebrews implies, but does not uambiguously state, the Melchidezek was Christ. Hence the claim of Jesus that “before Abraham was, I am”
>We’re all Hitlers and Himmlers here.
I was attracted to this place precisely because it was the only place to commit thoughtcrimes. Even if there is plenty of idiocy here I strongly disagree with (e.g. I’m not antivax, including w COVID).
>To misquote Scripture, you need to actually know it, and with no Jewish background whatsoever (even if proselyte), he could probably not have known it well enough to misquote it. “Gay Jewish charlatan” is possible. “Gay non-Jewish charlatan” is too much.
I agree that Paul being Jewish is possible. Some of the ways he is using to try to convince the reader about him being Jewish are suspect. But since he’s using it to convince *non-Jews* of him being Jewish, maybe he can get a pass. He’s most likely a homo. And probably the reason he was so focused on founding his own religion was not only because it was the only way for him to leave legacy (seeing that he wasn’t attracted to women sexual, so would not procreate), but also because Deuteronomy 23:17 says. The “no sodomites” clause excluded him from the congregation of Jews, and he knew, deep down, that he was no good as a Jew, even if he were born one.
>Anyway, what do you actually expect the Messiah to preach? Isaiah 42:4 for instance says,
>He shall not fail nor be discouraged, till he have set judgment in the earth: and the isles shall wait for his law.
>Okay, now let’s say that was not Jesus or any other historical and/or mythical figure.
>You think this (“his law”) refers to Orthodox Judaism, as Maimonides said? Noahidism? Or something else? Or is this not a Messianic verse at all, and you expect a Davidic King with no preaching of his own?
The way I’m reading this, as applied to our reality, is the Messiah is not a “preacher” but a charismatic and tough leader who rules the nation with an iron hand while following the precepts of the Torah in ways that are also practical and good for the modern, techno-age. A king like David, but who is better at controlling himself with regard to other men’s women. In so, he would be exemplary to other nations. Someone to emulate. Some of the ideas expressed by Jim on this site, like making women their male guardian’s property and electronic dog tags for women will be implemented under such a king. He would be revolutionary, in that he would be a realistic peshat “Torah-salafist” as opposed to putting so much weight in Shulchan Aruch minutia and “the entire lineage of interpretations” (particularly, founded in all the creativity of the derash) and all kinds of pseudo-“rationalist” Maimonidean nonsense. He would need to chop the entire damn Gordian knot and go back to Torah, but in a way that is sane and compatible with modernity, science and tech.
For more context, IMO, Rashbam is superior in his obsessive peshat approach when it comes to interpretation of the Law (peshat understanding + historical knowledge is what I follow). When it comes to pure philosophy, Ralbag is superior to Rambam. Rambam is thought of as much more of an intellectual giant than he really is. In fact, he has confused the picture more than he has clarified it.
I cannot imagine that someone like this would be a pure warrior. He has to be a priest and an intellectual at heart, too. It would take quite a feat to accomplish all of the above, given how far off the deep end Judaism has gone in its quietist and escapist self-absorption and studying abstract Law for abstractions’ sake. That’s on one hand. And on the other hand, how far in terms of perversion and looseness of character individual Jews and Jewesses (secular leftists) have gone. There has to be a radical Jew in charge, who is also not detached from reality to fix this mess.
So what is your position on various efforts to bump up the death rate attributed to awesome might of the Awesome and Mighty Covid Demon — like using ventilators on people with normal breathing and normal blood oxygen levels who in many cases, probably most cases, did not actually have Covid. Like seeding old people’s homes with coughing and sneezing Covid patients?
Have you wondered why information of the relative health of jabbed versus pure bloods remains strangely difficult to obtain. Any thoughts on the epidemic of sudden young adult death syndrome? Any thoughts on the curious lack of curiosity by the medical profession about this epidemic?
“Not anti covid vax”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r34uvEay1fg
Some jews are horribly subversive and need to be dealt with this way.
Well, I can get behind this vision.
The thing is, we might get 1) a Davidic King who does not meet that description, but who builds the Temple, annexes Eretz Yisrael Ha-Shlemah, and brings the Golah back home; or 2) a Davidic King who meets that description, but who does not build the Temple, annex Eretz Yisrael Ha-Shlemah, and/or bring the Golah back home.
Either of such scenarios will pose quite a problem when it comes to accepting the Messianic character herein outlined. But principally I see nothing objectionable in your idea; and who knows, we could theoretically get “the whole package” in a single person, though that does not seem particularly likely to me. But it’s possible.
A compounding problem being that the Messianic character will by necessity very much resemble the very same Messianic character current day Jews so fiercely rejected in Jesus. It’s a very tall order.
@Mossadnik
I see no problem whatsoever in the potentiality of an entire line of Messiahs accomplishing what I outlined above. I speak for myself and not for Christians or other Jews. I don’t view “messiah” as any sort of supreme human being, much less divine. To me, “messiah” = “king.” There is plenty of kings with foibles. We see harsh criticisms levied against kings in the Tanakh. Hence, it’s ok if only after a bunch of mostly regular but good kings we would see significant achievements instead of one single amazing king. To me, Judaism has to be not merely a religious project but also a socio-political project. And it has to be sustainable: hence, based on realistic assumptions about human nature and the ability of a man to be engaged in both in religion and meaningful, professionally productive life that benefits both him and everyone at large. Obviously, neither being a childless “intellectual” nor being a Haredi should be the normal modalities of existence.
The important thing is that Jews reach a strong autonomy and confidence to leave righteously in their own land, going back to a modality of Judaism that is closer to original Torah (which really is teaching of social truth), without the current obsession with not turning electricity on/off on Shabbat or not eating milky products after meat. I don’t even care about denying resurrection of the dead. (Personally, I don’t believe in it) No belief, other than in Oneness of God is truly mandated by the Torah — only practice and laws)
It is OK if there would be communities that could believe and practice those beliefs and practices (and more). I just don’t want either faggots on the left or fanatical, antiscientific obscurantist virtue signalers *dictating* to the overall population the overall real progress towards achieving the manifest destiny that God promised Abraham.
I don’t see anything in the book of Torah that obsesses about a single king bringing “end of days.” And if Jews operated solely under Isaiah, Israel would’ve never been founded. I want Torah Judaism becoming a gold standard, with the Shulkhan Arukh not being one.
@Jim:
I will not be addressing your Christian scriptures. Mostly, because I don’t view it as authoritative, even if portions of it deserve merit. It’s hard for me to disentangle what portions of it constitute a project of Paulite Supersessionism and which portions reflect reality (or at least righteous derash on it). And though I’m grateful that your forum and its materials exist, since you and most of your adherents/butt-kissers are ultimately part of the evil Supersessionist project, it is not very fruitful for me to engage in every single argument or opinion that your group has.
I will say only that I don’t strongly assert that most of the Israelite tribes didn’t descent from Abraham (except Dan). Abraham lived more than 1000 years before Exodus, so it is possible. I will say, however, that the Kenites were much closer to Judeans in bloodline and that the genealogy given in the Torah and Neviim is forced, for political aims. And that’s OK. I’m not Maimonides and don’t view saying this as blasphemous.
I also don’t believe that the Exodus was a single wave event. I believe that the Northerners (or at least the kernel of what then became Israel) were a different, more elite/ruling, tribal grouping than the Southerners (i.e. the Judeans). The first wave initially tried to resettle to Canaan centuries before the second one attempted to do so via Joshua. It is this first wave that got crushed by the Egyptians when they brutally razed the city of Sharuhen. Most of that surviving wave dispersed and became either enslaved by the Canaanite city states or joined in with their Judeian friends. The second wave, the Judeans, became de facto same as their shasu Bedouin-like Kenite brethren, and lived in the desert right before the Bronze Age collapse.
The God of Melchizedek was El. He was certainly very similar in concept to Deus Pater (convergent evolution, if you may — and it makes sense, since God is One and not many). But El was certainly NOT Deus Pater. Your retconning of Jesus into Jewish scriptures reminds me of Muslims trying to interpolate Muhammad into Jewish scriptures. (For example, they purport that Psalms 45 refers to Muhammad). This shit does not impress me. God is One.
I feel the pain of Mossadnik, eager to find meaning and righteous action, hence joining supersessionist project of yours. Not unlike Jews who became communist in order to “repair the world” and get back at the scumbag Romanov dynasty.
Gods promise to Abraham is fundamental to Judaism. The God of Abraham is fundamental to Judaism. So the God of Priest King Melchizedek is fundamental to Judaism. That is not Pauline supersessionism. The Christian critique of Judaism is that it fell away from the original faith of Abraham and Melchizedek through legalism — which as the incident that eventually led to the revolt against Rome shows is an empirically true critique.
Of course we don’t know what exactly the faith of Melchizek was — except he that clearly believed in a God beyond and above all the little ancestor gods and and nature spirits of particular tribes, families, rivers, and groves.
“Yahweh” is an acronym for “I am that I am”, which in context is reasonably interpreted as “I am that which causes existence to exist”. Jews have been trying to cut him down to another little tribal god, but he is not. That is not “Pauline supersessionism” It is the bedrock of the faith, and cutting him down to Jewish size is Jewish heresy.
“I am that I am” is the father of all, which is the defining characteristic of Deus Pater.
Alliance on the basis of kinship was the dominant political form among the pastoralists, so naturally inclined to ancestor worship. Practiced father’s brother’s daughter marriage, so naturally inclined to worship patrilineal ancestors. But the war that intruded upon the pastoralists required broader alliance, so Abraham makes alliance on the basis of faith. And immediately following this alliance on the basis of faith, God makes his promise to Abraham.
Abraham needed a broader alliance, and Paul needed a broader alliance. So God makes his promise to Abraham in the context of “Pauline Supersessionism”. And not very long thereafter, Abraham runs into a God who is both one and three.
@Jim, re COVID. The people who got intubated were extremely sick and near death.
I was in Moscow quite recently, visiting. Spoke to an infectologist who went through the madness of 2020, at a hospital. He told me how short on resources they were and how utterly powerless they all felt, trying everything they could and grasping at straws. The people who needed intubation could barely breath, due to pneumonia. The personnel latter understood that the collapse was occurring mostly due to the cytokine storm that was some people’s response to COVID.
But regardless, the survival rate of people who were intubated was higher than those who *were not* — IF these people were at the same condition.
More importantly, the survival rate of people with COVID vaccine was much higher than people without it. Especially, in the high-risk age group.
>the survival rate of people with COVID vaccine was much higher
Wow, look, another jew copy-pasting the most retarded pentagon propaganda one can imagine. Shocking.
Those statistics come from people who engaged in mass murder in an unsuccessful effort to make the statistics come out right.
And on closer inspection, still did not come out right. The multiply vaxxed got covid over and over again, and have a high rate of inexplicable sudden adult death syndrome.
Deaths in the high risk age group were primarily ventilator deaths. Which resulted from policy differences in the treatment of vaxxed versus unvaxxed. If you are frail, it is proportionately easy to bump you off with a ventilator.
This is a lie. People with no symptoms suggestive of a respiratory ailment such as flu would go to hospital for unrelated reasons, be drugged, and wake up with a tube down their throats. Having been diagnosed by a test known to have a gigantic false positive rate. It was a policy of mass murder that targeted the unvaxxed. We have lots of horror stories, and when hospitals were taxed on these horror stories they said that they intubated people who tested positive regardless of whether they showed any symptoms to prevent the uvaxxed from spreading the infection. To prevent resistance, they generally neglected to tell the patient that he had tested positive and that the injection was to knock him out preparatory to intubation. It was not official policy to neglect informing of the victims of their fate, but if you have orders to knock someone out and intubate him, you will encounter trouble, particularly if you suspect he is an unbeliever, so you don’t tell him.
Intubation has an alarming death rate even if carried out with care, competence, and concern for the patient. It was not, so the death rate among victims of intubation is likely to primarily reflect difference in treatment.
Intubation was administered as punishment for resisting the worship of the awesome might of the Awesome and Mighty Covid Demon and failure to comply with the proper rituals of worship. It seems likely that intubation administered within this psychological frame would have a far higher death rate than intubation of a fellow member of the faithful.
Obadiah Shoher was great, and if he had a blog like this one right now, perhaps I’d be posting there and not here. But the fact of the matter is that we don’t have an Israeli Jim, and the truth-value in this community is unmatched anywhere else, and by a wide margin too. So, despite not always agreeing with everything said here, I keep contributing my ideas/shitposts; and I think that if you read my stuff closely enough, at least the recent stuff, you’ll find that I haven’t actually been unpatriotic or traitorous.
Jim as you know I don’t care that Eli is a jew but he should be banned/autodeleted as a shill immediately for trying to spout this utter bullshit (and bullshit that got debunked as propaganda a long time ago). Anyone who speaks in defense of covid vaccines or lockdowns is a shill and anyone who defends them IRL is gullible to the extent they are a danger to the rest of us.
The Rona is the defining Rorschach test of our time. No one willing to carry water for the Regime’s Rona conduct is reliable.
>(e.g. I’m not antivax, including w COVID).
>Not unlike Jews who became communist in order to “repair the world” and get back at the scumbag Romanov dynasty.
Lots of words dressing up a fundamentally banal, anti-cosmic core. Well, that’s on-brand for the demographic.
Jesus Saves; and in this case especially as a Godlike filter for helping Real Israelis separate the wheat from the chaff (there’s a lot of separating to do).
Eli is upset about two things:
1. Divine Law derived from God’s Reality itself matching (not coincidentally, I should say) said Reality quite better than Mosaic Law, with all due respect to the latter.
2. Jesus Christ as the Logos illuminating the universality of Divine Law and Saint Paul spreading the Word universally; both of which have indeed superceded the mere prophetically-revealed and Judeo-exclusive Mosaic Law.
Since Mosaic Law does contain some elements of Divine Law, all is not lost for Eli’s project. An Israel under his system could work, at least for a while. But Eli would have no real insight into why it would work, because getting it would be getting Christianity, and he is fundamentally unwilling/unable to get Christianity.
Eli defended coronatarianism ergo he is a hostile entryist and should be sent to the gas chamber immediately. I’m not for killing jews as jews but entryists should be shown no mercy.
@Mossadnik Thanks for suggesting Obadiah Shoher. I haven’t accused you of being traitorous; just a fellow searching soul. I enjoyed your posts as Shaman, and — particularly — how you stood up to various rabid scum, like peppermint, years ago.
Regarding me, personally, I don’t consider myself a part of any upper hierarchy in the “dark enlightenment” movement/program. You guys are flying too high for me, with your new religion, led by self-described future popes, bishops, and top inquisitor autists nonprocreating with paid strippers in FL. I got what I needed out of this forum — basic understanding that democracy does not work, of female nature, and that Torah’s descriptions were reflective of truth. The rest of the stuff, I don’t have to subscribe to. There’s been a shit ton of wild predictions regarding Trump becoming the American Ceasar etc. This may happen, or this may not. There’s still 3 and half more years for it to unfold. So, we shall see.
Lastly, I might be blocked by Greg Cochran now, but I’d rather take his stance, than Jim’s, >90% of the time. Especially, on issues like COVID-19. If I get blocked on this forum, I won’t be happy, but not too sad either.
Want to talk about the mysterious epidemic of Sudden Adult Death? Which remains mysterious because mysteriously no one wants to look into it. Very mysterious that curious lack of curiosity. Life insurance companies are getting whacked really hard, because they have insurance policies that assume that working age adults are unlikely to die. And yet, strangely, no one wants to know. Funny thing that.
We have an epidemic of “non clinical” myocarditis — non clinical because clinical was defined upwards. Victims of mysterious Sudden Adult Death syndrome also frequently have anomalous long thin stringy blood clots in their blood — a striking new symptom that there is also a curious lack of curiosity about.
@Eli
“Lastly, I might be blocked by Greg Cochran now, but I’d rather take his stance, than Jim’s, >90% of the time. Especially, on issues like COVID-19. If I get blocked on this forum, I won’t be happy, but not too sad either.”
We hate shilling not error. You were asked about sudden adult death syndrome and your response was to not believe our lying eyes.
Eli’s lie about ventilation was particularly egregious. Ventilation was primarily used as a punishment for not being vaxxed. For a patient that has low blood oxygen, but is awake and responsive, an oxygen mask is always far safer, and far less effort and trouble, and for a patient with normal blood oxygen levels, there is no reason for either one.
Catholic and other ordained types should be married.
One can hardly preach the biblical WQ and GQ when living in gay seminaries full of gay semen spewing everywhere.
Their living in such privately gay institution also prevents the natural recourse of the non-gay public upon them, and even worse, becomes breeding ground for influence of evil, then promulgated outwards.
If Men want to develop their forces in Army barracks, good, but question any such structure that does not at least have healthy policy of procuring women for itself.
Nor should there be “Altar Boys”… those who are not yet exhibiting signs of Manhood… hair, muscles, voice, emission. Only Young Men who have chosen to join and follow the Faith, just as they might join an Army. These “Boys” aren’t “Angels” they’re brought in by gay pedophiles in hopes of turning them into lifetime sex toys. (This is also why Muhammad the pedo filled Jannah with “young boys” to “serve” men in Bacha Bazi, still happening today.)
…which is apparently how long you’ve been living under a rock, if 150 years sounds like a reasonable time frame to you.
Jim has Named the Gay so many times by now, it’s impossible for anyone who actually reads this blog not to have noticed. I’m referring specifically to the heretical Protoevangelium of James. That’s roughly two thousand years old, and the cancer is believed to have fully metastasized about a millennium later, several centuries before Hobbes.
150 years is the blink of an eye. It’s meaningless. Roman Catholicism has been broken and pozzed for a lot longer than that. It’s sort of like the European version of African voodoo, i.e. it’s the lower-functioning baseline state that the race reverts to when higher-order ideas fail due to memetic or biological corruption. “I don’t really get all this deep spiritual stuff so hey, let’s just worship some guy in a funny hat and a mother figure who is also somehow a virgin”. And for all their vaunted fertility, Catholic families produce huge numbers of leftists because those sons and daughters all want out of Catholicism as soon as possible; the Catholic Schoolgirl Whore isn’t a stereotype for no reason.
(I know, I’m drawing an unfair caricature here, but Roman Catholics are insufferable when they pipe up and need to be put in their place.)
From Frank Zappa’s “Catholic Girls.”
“And for all their vaunted fertility, Catholic families produce huge numbers of leftists because those sons and daughters all want out of Catholicism as soon as possible; the Catholic Schoolgirl Whore isn’t a stereotype for no reason.”
Gary North already noted that, unless you make crucial changes in society at large, having children just means more meat for the meat grinder. Easy meat.
One such change is leaving GloboHetero. Many White Christians look at Muslims and commit the Sin of Envy, thinking: “Why can’t WE have parallel societies in which we restrict female sexuality, treat women like property and do other naughty things?”
The explanation that requires the least amount of conspiracy theory, the least amount of tinfoilhattery is of course that the religious stuff of Muslims is mainly written in Arabic, a language Ms S.J.W. Karen doesn’t understand.
Hans Jansen: “I know Arabic. People like Abou Hafs are very dangerous.”
Audrey Truschke: “I know Sanskrit. People like Narendra Modi are very dangerous.”
Eddo Verdoner: “I know Old Norse. People like Varg Vikernes are very dangerous.”
That’s not the reason, no.
Bonus points for that “of course.”
Yes it is my idea of demonic possession, particularly article 19, where the Pope claims supremacy over Caesar in all things.
This led to endless wars, with the result that the Holy Roman Emperor sacked Rome.
A Christian Sovereign may appoint Bishops. Denying this is the Donatist heresy. He should not ordinarily appoint Bishops, but may do so should the Church put it fingers in what is Caesar’s
The Papacy has been coveting that which is Caesar’s for nine centuries. Time to put a more permanent stop to it.
I for one just simply do not understand why some otherwise right wing people do the Catholic thing I don’t understand why they believe it or what they get out of it, I suppose for Vance maybe he didn’t want to have to LARP as a backwoods bible thumper politician… but I can’t see why it genuinely appeals to any right winger even if you aren’t like me and Jim who like to go way back into ancient history and examine their claims (plus as a paranoid and covid skeptic I got REALLY anti Catholic Church when I heard the claim that Anthony Fauci was a Jesuit and upon examining it saw it was more likely true than not) if you look at recent times the Catholic Church has been a supporter of gay race communism at least since I was born and its clergy are overwhelmingly homosexuals.
The Vatican was a supporter of gay race communism in the eleventh century. In the intervening centuries it has been all over the place, and in the period before Vatican Two it was fairly good, but Vatican Two was a globohomo sponsored coup by gay race communist demon worshippers, the worshippers of Serpent Christ.
Internal governance of the Vatican territories was mostly quite good, but their operations outside of those territories have generally been on the side of evil, because they were endlessly trying to overthrow the existing order with all the usual subversive weaponry of gay race communism. They caused our defeat in the Crusades. Pete Hegseth’s tattoo commemorates one such dust up during the crusades, where they were trying to overthrow the King who took Jerusalem. Just as Israel pursues open borders and all that in America, but not in Israel, the Roman Catholic Church gave its territories based governance, while subverting the lands of Christian Kings. The King who took Jerusalem had to fight the Mohammedans in front of him, and the Roman Catholic priests behind him.
Mehhhhh there was leftism as far back as the radical populares in Rome but don’t see (quite possible the Jesuits created it) that the modern variant of leftism we call gay race communism existed before the 1930s (when it had a few supporters in elite leftist circles, Eleanor Roosevelt was one even though FDR really wasn’t. In the 30s though it was a minority position even among communists) and didn’t really get going until the 1960s.
Gay race communism as a coherent ideology is new, but the elements of subversion are timeless. You stir up envy and covetousness, and undermine order and property. That has been around since forever, whenever one state attempts to undermine another. Bombardment with large rocks is apt to be preceded by bombardment with hurtful ideas and hurtful forms of organisation. And those hurtful ideas and hurful forms of organisation are apt to blowback. Open borders is coming back to Israel.
Globohomo has long been pushing the idea that Russian identity is fake, an imperial creation. (Which it originally was), and therefore should be suppressed everywhere, especially in Russia, and following their successful coup in Ukraine, started suppressing it and Russian Orthodoxy with brutal terror. Which terror promptly came home to Europe, with thousands of political prisoners being detained in the UK. The British failed in their efforts to destroy the Russian economy with subversion, but are now busy destroying their own economy. They introduced fascism in the Ukraine to eliminate the Russian identity, and shortly thereafter, introduced fascism at home. Fascism has always been leftist, but after Hitler, a dissident form of leftism, Hitler being the Emmanuel Goldstein of the winning variant of leftism. But when they wanted to eliminate the Russian identity, they quietly rehabilitated the older form of leftism, so Europe is now following the precedents of a government that is more Jewish than any outside of Israel, and more Nazi than any government since the third Reich.
Nor can one rationally attend any of the Protestant branches either due to all the Gay Flags they’ve draped their buildings with.
Gay Priests, Gay Flags, and Gay Politicians.
Neither have ever worked work out in the end.
Its like for some reason they can’t apply the friend and enemy distinction to the insitution of the Roman Catholic Church…
The dark enlightenment is ideas — and these ideas were never intended for the masses.
That’s funny, considering that this blog is indexed by joogle.
Now it is.
It was always going to be about Karp and Palantir and the jews. The big beautiful golden dome is there to have dragonfly or spider drones enter your room at night and blow your fucking head off while you sleep for opposing noahide law. Sorry evangelicals, they’re coming for you too.
Your last paragraph suggests that you no longer think that Thermidor can stays in control for a decade or so. Why? What has changed?
There is a lot of ruin in a nation. A lot of people (myself included) held out hope that the Biden regime might punctuate the beginning of an era of Brezhnevian decline, and were surprised by how rapidly it began spiraling into World War III and total economic collapse. Likewise, a lot of people hold out hope that Thermidor might be able to “hold the line” for years or decades, but may be surprised by just how fragile that coalition is and how quickly it cracks up under pressure.
Note I say “may”, we really don’t have positive proof that the timeline for crack-up has been accelerated, it’s just that the Musk fallout is a bad omen, not to mention the failure to pull out of Ukraine. In any case, Thermidor was/is always destined for self-destruction, it was just a question of how soon.
The left can’t build cohesion, but it is really good at breaking cohesion, and Thermidor does not have a lot of cohesion in reserve. Thus only radical action can preserve what little they do have; they need to destroy the left’s ability to destroy their cohesion and that pretty well means destroying the left itself. The shutdown of USAID was a remarkable coup, but when you have a successful coup, you need to hunt down all the members of the old elite and either kill or convert them (usually the former). Thermidor was soft, let their enemies regroup, and now have lost both the high ground and the element of surprise. We needed a Sulla, but got more of a Reagan.
They can still fight, in theory, but it is now going to be much harder to win than it would have been in, say, early April. We’ve passed several critical moments during which they first blinked, and have now decisively lost the advantage, e.g. the judiciary’s illegal orders. The more high ground the Thermidorean coalition concedes, the harder it will be to regain.
I would say all is not yet lost, and they can still rally, and the doomers and despair merchants are (as usual) out way too early peddling their wares. But the coalition is definitely starting to fracture, and each new fracture means that even more drastic action is going to be required to hold it together.
Today is Pentecost. Notice all the dark spirits here possessing so many people to make off topic anti-Catholic slop for no apparent reason, just clogging up the comments. We need exorcists more than ever. Get to confession before it’s too late.
When limited franchise leads to unlimited franchise (and disaster because of course), the democratic way out is either a transition to stakeholder democracy or sortition democracy, and the latter very easily transitions back to monarchy.
There’s still the possible plot twist of an uppity vassal (probably Texas, again, because of course) holding real elections, with real ID’s, and most importantly, no secret ballots, so everyone can see how everyone else votes, and when it comes back 90%+ red at that point the empire implodes.
Pentecost commemorates the day of the Holy Spirit descending upon the Apostles. On the day of Pentecost, I would expect the Holy Spirit moving, not dark spirits moving. The Christian pastors around Trump, and the based pastors on Youtube, tell us God is acting in the world to restore Christianity.
Which I hope will result in Rome coming under a Christian sovereign, and the Bishop of Rome being replaced by a Bishop who accepts his magistry as limited to the territory of that Sovereign, paving the way for reconciliation with Orthodoxy.
If no secret ballots, everyone votes for the blue haired morbidly obese lesbian feminist boss girl, for fear of reprisals. We get mean girl syndrome, as depicted in numberless chick flicks, and longhouse government. If you have a large franchise, the voters are far too vulnerable to pressure and manipulation. You have to have a gentleman franchise and secret ballot to have any hope of not having a manipulated outcome. A literacy test that is also something of an IQ test, and a property franchise. Only literate Christian married male landowners with children or some form of military or quasi military service that exposed them to actual danger.
The Sovereign should be appointed for life or good conduct, only removed on extraordinary grounds, and on his death or retirement, replaced by someone appointed from his immediate family. The sovereign should be the supreme judge and supreme lawgiver, but should only issue laws in consultation with the great men of the land. His laws should reflect his interpretation of the consensus on what the law should be, rather than his momentary will and initiative. He should not just be the man who signs what others debate, but neither should he issue them without debate, or contrary to the spirit and intent of that debate. And if the debate is split down the middle, it is bad law.
According to you, property franchise is bad because people who own property are the evil capitalist overlords 🙃
At least Trotsky was telling the peasants “hail fellow peasant, the kulak with two cows is your enemy”
Yep, and Leo uses Pentecost to push Muh Open Borders:
https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/homilies/2025/documents/20250608-omelia-pentecoste.html
The Church of Infinigger.
Just read the entire thing.
The Poop is basically Antifa.
> The Poop is basically Antifa.
Yes he is basically antifa, and the Pope was basically Antifa. And was basically antifa to Godfrey of Bouillon, who struck back by making himself effectively Bishop of Jerusalem. Papal subversion and hostility to sovereigns goes all the way back. That is how we lost the crusades.
The GAE-in-Exile picked exactly the right choice, for their outright satanic purposes. So many leftist and radical leftist talking points crammed into a single short document. Literally Obama would sound more balanced than this. Poor JD Vance. Well, he made his choice, but c’mon.
Anyone who actually wants Western Civilization to be saved must dissociate from this Serpent Cult.
This serpent cult has been a thorn in the side of Western Civilisation for over a thousand years. Need to cut the head off it. Purge the vatican, and make it the residence of the archbishop of Bishoprics that are subject to the same sovereign as Rome.
The vatican states were a good argument for theocratic governance, but the trouble was that the faith got prostituted to the urgent needs of international politics and war. Theocratic governance produces good government, but dreadfully bad religion.
With a “celibate” priesthood, you end up not only losing the crusades, but also developing the doctrine of love, which mutated to the doctrine of consent. Courtly Love was the beginning of modern Feminism. (Of course, the gay subversion started pretty much all the way in the beginning, with the Protoevangelium of James and the incorporation of Isis worship.) Courtly Love started in France in the 11th century – “pure coincidence” 🙃
The heretical doctrine of consent results in reproductive failure, which is then used to import the third world, in other words to become the third world. When white Christians are replaced by browns, blacks, Mohammedans, and brown/black Mohammedans, there won’t be any Western Civilization in Europe to preserve. (Muh dancing dishwashers won’t save them.) This will be the fate of Europe within the lifetimes of most readers of these words. And if America falls too, whether due to nuclear bombardment or for any other reason, then it’s truly lights out forever.
>>Papal subversion and hostility to sovereigns goes all the way back. That is how we lost the crusades.
So basically, the man-made Churchianity of people in robes and funny hats Has Always Been Like That?
This is the equivalent of Biden declaring Easter Sunday some gay day.
Totally heretical re-interpretation of the Holy Spirit.
When the Holy Spirit dwells in us, we are filled with purpose and love in the sense of ordo amoris. United in Christ, we work for our families and our communities, with whom we visit the same church and pray to the same God. This does not in any way negate the lessons of Babel, it only confirms them: open borders, multiple Gods, many tongues — was heresy, remains heresy. Which the Vatican enthusiastically promotes.
… And we haven’t even gotten to the ‘breaking down barriers of class’ (promoting communism) and ‘free men and women’ (promoting feminism).
>The Spirit[…]She[…]her
Holy crypto pre-aryan longhouse daemons batman.
>He is centrist, thermidorean, or moderate left
He’s probably more redpilled than he lets on for obvious reasons. Facefags can’t say certain things in public. Paraphrasing Asmongold, ‘and then for no reason at all, people voted in Hitler 🙃’.
Kanye released a recent Hitler music video. Tens of millions of views on X and various platforms. If this isn’t a sign of a cultural/political crackup I don’t know what is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDuxP2vnWNk
The vast majority of Hitler fascination today has little to do with actual National Socialism, rather it’s the easiest, edgiest way to say fuck the current liberal democratic system. Normies are ready for a cult of personality. Our hope (and job) is to be the idea that the personality uses to govern.
Exactly so.
Once a Great Man makes America Jimian, other Great Men in memetically sovereign (nuclear armed) countries will make their countries Jimian.
Of course, given how deeply pozzed the US is, it could well be that those other countries (Russia or China basically) will go at it first. That’s actually a likelier scenario.
A global chud competition.
Asmongold is more redpilled than he lets on, every facefag is more redpilled than he lets on, but he genuinely believes himself to be a moderate centrist. And he is, on matters unrelated to gaming.
And even on matters related to gaming, still pretty far left.
Reflect on the hot issue of race and sex swapping. If they want to keep the IP, but race and sex swap the lead, the obvious solution is to introduce the race and sex swapped character as an apprentice to the IP’s beloved hero, and then have Shaniqua undergo the hero’s journey, and become the hero, retiring the beloved hero to the new heroine’s wizard/grandfather figure.
But instead they do the exact opposite: Shaniqua is a Mary Sue, she was always great, and the journey is just everyone recognising her greatness, and they piss all over the hero, they destroy the beloved hero of the IP, and thus destroy the value of the IP. The fans stop caring. This is just malice at the fans, and at the IP. As numberless “creatives” on these projects have said, they want to make the fans cry. These projects destroyed their IP, because they wanted to destroy their magnificent money machine for wrongthink.
And instead we hear numberless people who oppose woke in games and movies saying “Corporations just care about money”. If corporations still cared about money, heroes would still be abducting and semi ravishing the love interest. If they want to have more chicks in their audience, which was the supposed rationale for the Mary Sue Boss Girl heroines, have a handsome male hero and some dubcon with the love interest. Everyone knows what women want, and they don’t want Mary Sue Boss Girls, who remind them far too much of the mean girls at school.
You are not going to hear that from Asmongold. If they want more chicks in the audience, give the handsome hero a love interest, and give the chicks some dubcon. Let the hero establish that ancestral environment of successful reproduction.
Girlpowerment is simply the most effective technology of fertility suppression available to the central planners. It’s no more organic than was the Rona. Fucking continues but effective contraception prevents pregnancy, suppressing family formation. And if you look at how the occupiers break up families that do form, it’s mainly through theft of property and children. “Enforcement” of child “custody” is the principal noneconomic element.
Furthermore I have a pet theory about mating wherein couple formation tends to cascade from high to low socially speaking.
Contraception is irrelevant. Women never demand protection and “forget” to take birth control before having sex with desirable men. And those are just mechanisms that manifest external to the body. The ones in the female reproductive organs themselves are not well known (studying them would lead to ways to increase fertility and is therefore thoughtcrime), but seem to have their own mechanisms to favour conception when sperm is received from desirable men.
Watching the LA riots from afar, it is inevitable to mull on Prop 187 and the lawfare that killed California. Leaving these things to the judges was and is a very bad idea.
It is also somewhat interesting that every local is a latino, that the politicians are all on the migrants side, and that the only white people around are 60-y/o pro protesters (“Hey hey ho ho”). Somewhat amusing to see Maxine Waters fearlessly throw herself in front of the cameras. This is just what happens to a community after a while … 30 years or so, I think.
Also, self-driving Waymo taxis are apparently valid targets for street mobs, lol. Not what Google was hoping for.
I observed a police car crawling along full of cops inside while protesters attacked the car causing severe damage. The cops remained inside. If you are not going to arrest people who are hurting people and breaking stuff, what is the point of cops?
I also saw the legacy media saying “peaceful protest, peaceful protest” and at the same time saying they had to get the hell out because they feared they would be beaten up.
Why would they have been beaten up? Obviously, for being white. They are unable to admit they are not in control of the demons they have summoned.
“What is the point of cops?”
To breathe down the collective neck of middle-class white men. Duh.
Exactly. The point of cops is to break and replace family-/clan-/village-/neighborhood-based informal justice, which strengthens and empowers competitors for the state’s authority. Right now, the demons and eunuchs in control of the state see non-White rioters as tools and allies, so of course they don’t sic the badge niggers on them.
The telos of the cop is to get his pension. The telos of his boss is to destroy Whites, males, taxpayers, Western civilization for status.
Somewhat surprising that the legacy media have no latinos for such jobs that whites can’t do. Any idea why?
Quotas for thee but not for me.
The migrant hordes are an area effect bioweapon fired from high altitude at the left’s enemies. You use cluster ammunition on the enemy, not on yourself.
Thermidor is a reaction to the cluster ammunition being fired closer to home.
Spictifada.
Kill whitey by pelting him with burritos.
The negress mayor looks like a classic zoo-escapee, upon seeing her one feels an insuppressible urge to make *hoo hoo hoo* sounds. Someone should show up in blackface & wearing Nazi armbands and throw peanuts at her.
Goyim, it’s time to make Moon Man real.
Belgium, 1958. MEGA: Make Europe Great Again.
https://ibb.co/HT2B6nDP
One thing your mischievously grimacing “neener neener” AI Demon is right about is categorizing the Bantus as gorillas.
I don’t know what that means… unless you’re calling me a bot, in which case kindly consider doing the needful: committing suicide.
I was making a joke about your beloved AI being a conscious entity by describing it as a demon who makes funny, naughty faces.
Are you sure that you weren’t born an Ashk? You write like one hysterical, whiney, and highly insecure kike. Perhaps the frenulum ABLATION made you spiritually/temperamentally Jewish.
Get in the oven, Schlomo.
Maybe if you’d been born an Ashk you’d have a verbal IQ sufficient to formulate a funny joke that makes any sense at all.
I am… not a kike? Phew, what a relief.
Did you at least get the part about categorizing niggers as monkeys, or did that elude your vast Semitic intellect as well?
Wait, now I get it! You literally have Dunning-Kruger Syndrome. That’s why you consistently fail to realize that Scarebucks is at least one standard deviation above you in terms of IQ, possibly two or three (he is a genius and you’re a retard). You sincerely believe yourself to be smarter than your obvious intellectual superiors, and “coincidentally” you fell for the conscious robots hoax.
Did the circumciser snip at your brain too, or were you dropped on the head by your gay dad after he finished raping you?
A circumcised, virgin MIDWIT who was never loved by his family… so that’s the psychological profile of people who want robots to replace humanity & who actually believe it’s possible.
Sad.
Enough with flame wars in the comments. This is boring for everyone else.
Winners are distinguished from losers in that winners ask, “How do I get what I want out of this life?” whereas losers ask, “Why doesn’t life give me what I want?” Consider adopting a healthy mentality, you spiteful abomination.
No problem, Jim. I do tend to get carried away with these flame wars – ironically, that’s one aspect of my personality that is annoyingly Jewish. I just don’t know when to let go, and need to be told. Possibly it has to do with selection for OCD-like traits, which no doubt helps one memorize vast volumes of text and pay attention to the tiniest details, but also makes one overexcited unnecessarily and unjustifiably.
>>ayyylmao says: 2025-06-10 at 02:39
>>I don’t know what that means… unless you’re calling me a bot, in which case kindly consider doing the needful: committing suicide.
Mossadnik was referring to an incident in which some image recognition software being developed by Google was given a photo of two members of the development team (who both happened to be of West African ancestry) and tagged them as gorillas.
Big chuckle and “see, AI knows the truth about black people!” from some folks.
The software, of course, does not really know what a gorilla is, or what a human is for that matter. It was just matching patterns of pixels like it was programmed to.
And no one who is not a crank really thinks black people to be more closely related to gorillas than to other human beings.
Southern part of Africa, mostly about two thirds human. Gets closer to human in the North of Africa, and Afro Americans have a lot of full human admixture.
I don’t expect AMACE to hold for much longer. The cognitive elite is rapidly waking up from the bullshit, and once everyone gets it, no point pretending otherwise. A chimp in a suit is still a chimp.
“Southern part of Africa, mostly about two thirds human.”
Due to the baleful eye of demonic academia, the authors I recently read concerning Neanderthal Predation Theory had to skirt around certain findings, yet the impression they gave is Africa experienced the most mingling with archaic hominids after homo sapiens emerged from the Levant cauldron. The Northern hemisphere saw more overall replacement with the much lamentable increase in xenophobia and extreme patriarchy, according to these academics hoping to keep a job.
There was a study that officially admitted up to 19% coming from a “ghost” population now extinct. It’s on Wikipedia.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_population#Population_genetics
Richard D. Fuerle’s 2008 Erectus Walks Among Us was prescient.
I don’t have a problem defining “human” significantly more restrictively than generally applied now. Are pygmies meaningfully human? Are abbos? It is to doubt.
I put on “Live From Fox” on JewTube to watch what’s happening over there; damn, America has become a total Clown Safari, getting quite blackpilled about the future of civilization, tbh ngl fam.
AMACE needs to be urgently discarded.
Prop 187 and the lawfare that killed California
Reminding us that 187 passed in a landslide. One critique of democracy is, you don’t even get democracy. You get a ratchet effect in only one, desired direction.
But it’s another case of the dead horse I keep beating about normie to normie-con Americans if the boot comes off the neck. Some of their basic instincts are sound, if they could be organized on some kind of one-leader principle.
I put on “Live From Fox” on JewTube to watch what’s happening over there … getting quite blackpilled about the future of civilization
I’ll tell you a strange thing. Red tribe Americans are emboldened by blue tribe riots, as long as there’s any kind of crackdown in response. Or I could even say “positively cheered,” though that would gloss over how strongly they disapprove of the initial rioting. But when the dust settles, or from a distance at the time, they like talking about the tear gas, the rubber bullets, the roof koreans, or the Kyle Rittenhouses (rare, but are they rare in the wild or rare in being reported on?).
So far we’re getting some of that. People I haven’t revealed my power level to are cheered by the ICE vans not stopping for protestors blocking them, or happy about the tear gas and the rubber bullets.
If Trump and team can only just not cuck this time I dare to think these latest LA riots are overall a win for our side. Riots don’t help Team A in elections; Lawn Order does help Republicans. A stretch goal would be for blues to keep escalating until the President is forced into something resembling reaction.
(Fedi has unconfirmed reports ICE is now deporting anyone with brown skin they catch in a protest, citizen or not. Supposedly they’ve dumped a few naturalized citizens across the border already, who will have to make their way back. Really this one is so on the nose I more suspect it’s leftist propaganda, but a boy can dream.)
One counter to my optimism, I do wonder if youtube has some true believer left control reasserted for this event. I’m getting more leftist news outlets when I only put in LA riots, and even the Fox channel suggestions were left sympathetic snippets from local channels. And this is on my rightwing search history. So there may be a play being made for normie consumption that I’m missing inside my local bubble.
It is becoming obvious that these riots are organised, funded, and directed by the State government of California. It is proxy civil war. Which prefigures actual civil war quite soon.
Trump’s federalisation of the national guard was arguably illegal and unconstitutional, and Governor Newscum says he is going to fight it in the courts. This drama has gone down before over the past couple of centuries, and if no cucking, all that matters is not what courts decide, but what the NCOs decide. And I am sure the NCOs are going to decide for Trump.
If no cucking, regardless of what the courts say, proxy war will be crushed, and civil war likely avoided. If cucking, on course for civil war, should nuclear war over the Ukraine not supervene.
Cannot let Newscum get his hands on the national guard, lest we get direct escalation to direct civil war.
I doubt it. They’re running the classic color revolution playbook, but happened to forget that this requires the full might of the GAE military machine if the bluff is called. It looks like they didn’t even realize this part, they’re just putting out bamboo airfields hoping the artillery shows up like it used to. They’re all incompetent delusional morons that do not understand their own playbook.
My bet is another few years of ineffective revolt while Donald refuses to wear the crown and tries to solve things legally. The man still believes in the republic, he’s trying to prune rotting branches off of a dead tree.
So this seems like a good time and post to talk about this.
So I’ve been spending some time thinking about shill tests, and ways of weeding out those who are not on our side, or are not enough on our side. I’ve come some conclusions, and wanted to share them, both for feedback and improvement, as well as so other can use them as they see fit.
This first one has to do with the gay and “pedo” questions. The question goes along the lines of asking the person about choosing one of the following people to kill, and the other to be absolved and any wrong doings they may have commuted.
The first option is a 30 year old gay man who has had gay sex at least once.
The second option is a 30 year old man who want to marry and impregnate a 14 year old girl.
Feminists, gays and greengrocers will save option 1 and condemn option 2. Regulars of this blog would save option 2 and condemn option 1. People who are starting to move over to our way of think will probably try to condemn both, but once pushed into having to choose one to save and one to condemn, it will reveal which they think is worse.
It’s important to make sure that the gay man has had gay sex, since that is expressly what is forbidden in the bible, not merely attraction. It is also important to make sure that the words “marry and impregnate” are used, since that shows that he is willing to play legitimately if allowed to. Age 14 was chosen for the girl, since that is below the age of consent in the USA, while also being old enough to be typically be developed enough to have adult proportions.
Onto the other ones I have made.
This has to do with the jewish question, since some commenters here have express concerns about if jews can peacefully exist in white nations, or if they all need to go. These following questions intend to serve as a way to weed out if a particular jew can play nice in white society or not. The first question starts off by recounting Jim’s politically incorrect version of the lead up of the Romans sacking Jerusalem. (The jews killing over chicken blood story.) The question then goes “because of the actions of the jewish leaders, Did Jerusalem and the jews living their deserve to get sacked?”
The only correct answer to this is yes, they did deserve to get sacked. Anything is is weaseling around the issue, and trying to defend the jews killing an innocent roman civilian.
The other Question is to have the jew affirm the christian affirmations, like “Jesus Christ is lord and savior. Jesus Christ died for our sins. Etc.” It’s not about actually believing it, but about being willing to humble themselves enough to say the words out loud, affirming another faith. Yes, I expect many if not most jews to be unable to pass this, but among them will be those that can not coexist with whites, so it’s not that big of a loss in my mind.
Personally I’d like you to kick them all out to Israel to fulfill the (Jewish interpretation of) Biblical prophesies and also because we need more high-quality Ashkenazim here.
Expel the mischlings too (the halves; you can keep the quarters) – I just fantasized about Moldbug, BAP, and Lomez in dusty IDF uniform climbing up from a tank in Jabalia, and I’d like to see that happening, the sooner the better.
Kick ’em out!
Furthermore, if you expel everyone with significant Jewish ancestry from e.g. the US, that’s about 10 million people or so; Israel will probably have no choice but to expand territorially eastwards, which I also support wholeheartedly. Jordan is a fake country, Iraq too, and to fulfill the prophesies and implement the Spandrell Solution we should just annex and Judaize them.
Moreover, if we try to build the Third Temple now, the Israeli Arabs will probably rise up in revolt; but if we do that when an additional 10 million Jewish or Jew-ish folks have been added to our population, things will go much smoother.
We need those kikes, man. Give me the kikes!
“Kicking out” would be quite wrong, our elder statesmen didn’t kick Jews out and didn’t want to have them kicked out, as well. Even UK wasn’t eager to take them, in particular after 1939, their “SOS” didn’t matter in any part of Europe that hadn’t been national-socialist.
Moreover, how should that be possible today? Expelling 3 Somalis is an impossible task for FRG today. Wiping away any wish-thinking, I’d be glad seeing a strong Jewish folk claiming land, but don’t expect to get back your folks to where it’s needed anytime soon.
On a personal side, I enjoy the (for me) stereotypical poisoning rhetorics of Jewish journalism – Dear Lord, even “Der Stürmer” had authors using that and it’s fine for people who can learn from it – and there are many examples of Jews actually enriching German culture. Take Mendelssohn Bartholdy, Hausdorff, Landau, as outstanding examples in branches where I’m somewhat experienced. If it couldn’t be for Madagascar or Birobidjan, let it be for your historical homeland. But I’d be rather glad if actual German people won’t have to play ANY role in that. And maybe one or two sweet nukes to Berlin and Hamburg, they are lost like a 1:1000 soccer game in minute 90.
Well, the Cominator Solution is killing all leftists, which should get rid of 60%-70% of American kikery. Of the remaining 40%-30%, I think most should peacefully relocate to Israel, though perhaps a small minority — those whom the American people actually like, and who have demonstrated assimilability — can stay there, if they so choose. That’s my ideal scenario; I don’t actually think it’s realistic under current conditions. But perhaps if catastrophe hits, such as nuclear war, many might voluntarily choose to make aliyah, if they aren’t incinerated first.
Honestly, sending here the leftist ones would be inflicting a terrible punishment upon us; the leftist phenotype (Jewish or otherwise) should be eliminated from this world. That’s already happening non-violently worldwide as they are being bred-out by conservatives. Then again, perhaps it’s the responsibility of right-wing Jews to eliminate the left-wing Jews, so if Americans (or any others, for that matter) don’t want to get their hands too dirty in kosher blood, let them just kick out all or the bulk of Jewry our way and we’ll deal with the consequences. But I’m afraid we ourselves will be too squeamish to do the job properly and thoroughly (or at all), alas. Your Fuhrer should be resurrected and sent to America, and not just to deal with the Jews by the way.
Humor aside, I have absolutely no idea how America will solve its manifold and intensifying racial, ethnic, and religious problems. It’s way too “diverse” already. Germany is still somewhat homogeneous, and if you can just get ethnic Germans to breed again (employing the Jimian solutions), and kick out at least the recent invaders, you’ll probably be fine. America, however, lacks homogeneity, and I don’t really expect them to recover it. They are a Le 56% Face Nation at this point. Since they are not actually going to kill or expel millions of citizens (illegals are something else), they will probably just ban immigration from shitholes and institute something like Christian Nationalism. This can “work,” so to speak, if at least the white and white-ish populations increase their fertility, but obviously it’s not the ideal scenario of having a solid Anglo-majority country.
Your greatest problem currently is that you’re occupied by the Global American Empire, which is ruled by satanists who want you all dead, want all humanity dead, and want themselves all dead. If you can gain your independence again, that’s the most crucial step towards revival – Germany should be an independent, sovereign country once more. If additionally you can get nukes for your protection, even better; who knows, perhaps you’ll even get them from us.
As for your Jews, you currently have around 200,000 full Jews and mischlings (combined, that is), which is not a lot. The bigger problem in this regard is that various Jewish organizations exert control over your society and use emotional extortion and manipulation to subvert it. If and when you are once again an independent country, you should tell those Jewish organizations to cut it out – quickly.
Your biggest long-term problem is obviously failure to reproduce. You are the 8th oldest country in the whole world, meaning your nation is dying and dying fast. Feminism is the cancer rapidly killing you right now, and the solutions, if not literally taken from this blog, will at least be inspired by similar ideas as those expressed on this blog. Otherwise, Germans will disappear from history. You will have to start breeding again. Importing outsiders is not the solution, waiting for robotopia is not the solution. The solution is monogamous marriage. Since Germans are not simps by nature, abolishing Feminism shouldn’t be too difficult for you once you are independent again. Declare it to be a degenerate, American import, and strive to undo all of it systematically.
Then of course you have the Third-Worldization problem, but I’m sure that you don’t need me to tell you about it. You need to expel at least the recent invaders. If you want to keep some of the migrants who have successfully assimilated, okay, but generally speaking you should adopt ethno-nationalism; it need not be exactly identical to old-time Nazism (it should be kilometers to the Right of Nazism, in fact), but there is also no need to go out of your way to dissociate from Nazism – everybody loves Hitler today, so just don’t worry about it. The serious point is that you identify who is a real German and who should be back in their actual homeland, and increase fertility for the former while encouraging remigration for the latter.
Beyond all that, I’d suggest Throne Altar Freehold, or whatever German equivalent you have for that.
“Jews aren’t all that bad, really.”
“Also one more round of genocide of Germany Must Perish!, just for old time’s sake.”
You glow, shlomo.
Lost the threading there. Snarking at Adlerhorst not Mossad this time. Mossad at least doesn’t do the Hale Fellow Goyim act.
Actually, you did not lose the threading.
For the record, initially Adler struck me as a fednat, so I snarked at him too; but then it turned out that he is a real German who loves Hitler, and obviously I have no problem with that.
What would the world be without a heartfelt snark. A mere mirrored version of the state I’m living is simply not necessary. In fact, it bores me, and this blog is not boring. Depending on your own school curriculum, you may have a good guess what it’s like reading a book about some brave, intelligent jewish girl trying to escape Mr. Wishmaster and his demon army. Or failing in it and on top having daddy double checking the development of her vagina (which is not part of that particular book, but the more likely actual story) and in exchange have some streets named after her. Had too much of both sides exclusively. Sucks cock. So Bob, I express something positive, this time. Ignoring the whole thing isn’t a solution either, it violates commandment No. 5 “Thou shalt not murder.” if I treat the cursed tribe, the Jews, as if they weren’t there, kill them in my mind. Drags me down and violates Christs rule. Instead, wrote an answer to Mossad, first contact in years after I broke with the cursed ones, and see what I’ve got: A thoughtful answer instead of some “chinky chinky chinese scum blabber” followed by Jim reminding him “You’re a Jew, you are not in the position to pull that one.” That’s something different. Thank you, Mossad, for outlining your ideas.
I’m not in the position to only write negative stuff about them, for I have my inner demons, too. That books have been written a thousand times. And they get boring some day. As I explained in my very first post in the moderation policy comment section, keep the topic simple and scientific, no bitterness needed. We fucking have to solve some problems.
To a certain extent, Varg Vikernes is part of GloboHetero, because he makes little to no effort to teach his followers Old Norse.
Við verðum að drepa alla sem dýrka einn jotunn.
Translation: We must ally with Christians against the Jews.
He’s a murderous incel that gave himself over to demons. He just happens to be a high IQ one (although with enough mental illness, it’s not an effective high iq). I did enjoy his youtube channel back in the day though. I enjoy his shizo enhanced take on paganism. Great tabletop rpg stuff.
I should note here, given the nature of this blog, that I don’t use the incel slur to further the gynocracy of our time. There are certain types that are dysgenic enough to be an incel in any time frame. Also, given he has a family, he isn’t one in the literal sense. But given his wife is a literal retard, I think the point stands well enough.
You know, in retrospect, much of the incelosphere was corrupted by gay subversion. That was not obvious to me when I first discovered it, but come to think of it, the scheming faggots were obviously there. It really started out with MGTOW, but then they insinuated themselves into the incelosphere too.
AI will be used to cure/prevent cancer, neurodegeneration, and faggotry.
There was gay MGTOW and non gay MGTOW
Non gay MGTOW basically said you can’t trust women and if you’re not what women want you wont hold them so if you must have sex bang hookers occasionally or something but don’t bother with relationships. I know Jim is very against this but in the defect-defect world its not really untrue.
Gay MGTOW is women are always le bad (more than you just can’t trust them long term) and you should avoid them always.
The straight version makes sense (I myself am basically volcel at this point), but there wasn’t really any separation on the blogs/forums. On both MGTOW and incelosphere platforms, you’d have normal men with real-life legit complaints about modern Feminist society, and then you’d have scheming faggots coming up with wildly exaggerated reasons why Women Are Satan. And when you are personally struck by female misbehavior and by the Feminist cancer, it’s very easy to fall prey to the gay propaganda.
I wonder how many lives they’ve ruined this way.
Why do we need Palantir to enforce immigration law already on the books?
Gelded bureaucrats want to launder all their decisions and all their actions through a supposedly objective computer, because avoiding responsibility is their highest goal.
>Yes boss, we’re going to deport tons of people just like you ordered; we’re using this amazing algorithm to help us.
>No, other boss, we’re absolutely not racist! We’re just doing what this computer tells us. I guess the computer must be racist, not me! I agree, let’s get rid of the computer.
>Sorry, first boss, we can’t deport people anymore. We had to destroy the evil racist computer for racism, and now we don’t have the tools to do the job. Maybe give us a few hundred million and we can look into possibly studying how to build a non-racist computer?
Someone please give me the shit test / game theory / color revolution take on Mostly Peaceful Protests like what’s happening in LA now.
Obviously the left/city/USAID blob put this whole thing together, by gathering the meat river, handing it bricks and Mexican flags, and not letting the cops stop it.
The point is to shit test Trump.
But the “Maidan” pattern is for the organizers to wait for the feds to show up, and then start shooting their “protestors” themselves and making George Floyds out of them.
Trump Team knows this, so they don’t want to take action, but to the insufficiently cynical viewer, it just makes Trump look weak and helpless.
Have I got it roughly right?
When the other side owns the media, I just don’t see how you can win these. They start riots, let them burn loot and steal, and then WIN in the end, because they make their impunity about YOUR inability to stop them. That is some amazing shit test alchemy at work.
Now Handmaid’s Tale was the Fifty Shades of Political Fantasy about “the right” actually passing such a nuclear shit test as this, I presume by just shooting the fuck out of everybody there, the “protestors”, the “journalists”, just everybody, and then taking over the TV stations and editing desks to make themselves into the heroes beating the bad guys. But heck man, that’s a tall order IRL.
What to do?
Your analysis and prescription is exactly right.
The Trump team is not going to do what is necessary unless every other option is exhausted. On the other hand, every other option is being exhausted.
Disputes over sovereign authority escalate until decisively resolved. Right now the issue is the federalisation of the National Guard.
If the stronger side understands this, they can cut straight to the decisive resolution:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_Massacre
My sense is that average white Americans would cum their brains out over the rioters being shot, with normal ammunition, not rubber bullets. Very few people who aren’t already aligned with the left anyway would be appalled, or pretend to be, over violent rioters being violently quelled. Aliens waving foreign flags rampaging through our cities is a very bad look for the left. They used to at least have the wit to use sympathetic poster children.
On the media: Everyone who is on our side loathes the old media and knows they’re all liars. Also, it’s inconsistent for us to hold that (1) Normies don’t matter and also (2) Control of the normies’ perception of things (which, again, the media doesn’t really have any more anyway) matters.
Yes but:
If the shooting starts, then the other side would shoot some women, or kids, or teenage aspiring rappers, and then make them the gentle giant George Floyd poster children for the whole thing. “Four Dead in Ohio” with chips and salsa. The event would then be ABOUT those poster children being shot by evil heartless Trumpist people.
I mean look at George Floyd, or Trayvon Martin, or that Gentle Giant guy. Obviously violent and useless IQ-65 welfare locust gorilla niggers that needed shooting. Obviously. But if you own the media then abracadabra, they’re innocent and victimized pillars of the community just a year from being the next Denzel Washington and reinventing peanut butter. And the people fell for that, or at least enough of them.
That’s the thing.
It’s not that it changed the 2020 vote, but rather, it energized and organized the 4am vote rigging with that tried and tested holy sainted dead nigger cult of personality energy.
Makes me ponder earlier rumors of Derek Chauvin being released from prison. That would be quite the spark for a Summer of St. Fentanyl Floyd 2: Electric Boogaloo. Walz and others were exceedingly ostentatious in their opposition to such a plot twist when asked by the MSM when it would play right into their nefarious narrative with the Orange Man Bad back in office.
Everything is different now. A couple of post-Floyd examples: The failure of the attempt to cancel Big Balls is one indication. The white reaction to Shiloh Hendrix saying “nigger” is another, even better, example. The last time I checked, she had more than half a million dollars donated to her defense campaign.
The Left has said for time out of mind, “There are no moral principles; there is only the ideology of power.” They have finally succeeded in getting white people to stop thinking in terms of principles and start thinking in terms of the friend/enemy distinction. I could not possibly give a shit if anyone coded as my enemy gets shot, a feeling that is growing among whites by the day, by the hour. As usual for the Left, they are incredibly adept at achieving their goals and incredibly stupid at choosing those goals in the first place.
Ice just ran over a protester who was trying to obstruct a vehicle. Everyone laughed and gave him a Darwin award. Why aren’t we seeing mass arrests? These people don’t have jobs, other than protesting. They were imported to live on crime, welfare, and voting Democrat. Round them all up, deport the non citizens overseas and the paper Americans to re-education camp in Alaska (with the option of self deporting and losing their papers.)
I’ve said for at least a year Trumps first real fight will be with Antifa. If he has any balls he will roll this operation up from the bottom. Follow the money, expose the corruption, and helicopter the guilty. It’s a perfect situation to go all in on purging the left.
“I’ve said for at least a year Trumps first real fight will be with Antifa.”
Antifa is merely the hand (actually more like one of the fingers). The important thing is a kill shot to the brain.
Recall how wonderfully effective Musk’s coup against USAID was.
But now the deep blue megalopolis states have created a new USAID, or probably several, one in each megalopolis. (The left is no longer united.) Couping blue state USAID equivalents is civil war, or a good start on it.
The current California organised, funded, and sponsored riots are civil war by proxy. Governor Newscum is trying to stop ICE from deporting “the worst of the worst” by proxy physical violence against ICE officers. At some point, likely to escalate to direct conflict.
The kill shot to USAID has shattered the left’s unity, but other centers of power (England, California, and New York) are expanding into the resulting vacuum of power. They need to be taken down, but Trump is still trying to restore a dead republic “by pruning rotting branches off a dead tree”. Someone has to pick up the fallen crown.
The Russian revolution was the dangerously powerful servants of the Czar couping the Czar, and then finding themselves unable to hold on to power. Lenin said that power had fallen into the street, and was waiting for someone to pick it up. The coup on USAID has resulted in a somewhat similar situation. The crown has fallen into the street. Time for Trump to pick it up.
Newscum has to be taken down first. If Newscum, then Starmer.
People have been talking about Newscum running for president. But he has his eyes on a more important position.
A lot of professional agitators have come out of the woodwork for this one, eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ezra_Levin
Always remember that, however much they may try to make ‘bureaucracy’ faceless (and thus free of responsibility), no bureaucrat themselves is truly faceless; every member of the NGO class has names and addresses.
Important point. We maybe ahead of the curve, but when power is concerned, people aren’t idiots. If Trump does not understand that he must pick up the crown, if similarly no one on the right understands to pick up the crown, someone on the left will. With all predictable consequences.
The republic died some time ago — takes a virtuous elite all sharing a virtuous state religion to make a Republic work. For some considerable time the merely elected government has been a show run by the permanent government.
Trump is trying to make the elected government real. He is having a lot more success than last time, but can only have success in that all other branches of government become irrelevant, and elections merely ceremonial. When the Epstein papers did not get released, when the head of the FBI looked us straight in the eye and told us Epstein killed himself, the permanent government is still in power.
“Ice just ran over a protester who was trying to obstruct a vehicle. Everyone laughed and gave him a Darwin award.”
I hadn’t heard about this. Thank you for adding joy to my day.
That you have not seen it and it has not been blasted over and over again by the left is interesting. The video shows a horde of protesters going after ICE, and ICE trying to make a getaway. I think they are dithering on how to handle it, for on the one hand, it shows ICE making getaway over a protester, and on the other hand, I think the normie reaction, after he finishes laughing, is going to be “send in the army and start using live ammo”
The marines do not have arrest powers. Giving them arrest powers is martial law. Martial law is the next escalation, and the current situation is a great excuse to proceed with it.
“That you have not seen it and it has not been blasted over and over again by the left is interesting. ”
Could just be that I’ve been busy. I’ve now gotten a look at the video and it’s pretty obvious that the rioter is playing it up. But in the comments, no one gave a damn whether he was dramatizing it or not. The tenor of the comments was “Good start; keep the gas pedal floored, literally and metaphorically.”
He did not get run over. He fell down backwards in front of the vehicle, and while the protesters were helping him up the driver drove around him and continued on his way.
Only inconsistent when using an extremely literal interpretation of the former phrase.
“Normies don’t matter” doesn’t literally mean their lives are unimportant, it’s just an admonishment against trying to take your case directly to normies and incite a “proletarian revolution” because no such thing exists in reality; proles without elite backing are culturally inert.
It does matter that commoners perceive their nobility as legitimate and reasonably just, because when rulers are perceived as tyrants, you tend to get beheadings, or best case scenario, mass refusal to work and pay taxes, which has been creeping up on us in America for the past few decades. But it is still wrong to model normies as the wellspring of culture, when it has always been elites who dictate the culture which trickles down to normies. It’s not a question of what “matters” here, it’s just the way it works.
I think you misunderstood my saying “Normies don’t matter” as a value judgment. Not at all; I was referring to the question of to what extent they affect political developments.
You wrote,
Yes, exactly. It is inconsistent (not morally hypocritical, but literally inconsistent) to hold that normies don’t matter and also worry about what impression the media is conveying to normies.
‘Normies do not matter’ in the sense that they are that which receives instructions not that which can give instructions; not that there is no effect to these instructions.
The ‘middle management’, ‘bourgeois’ classes are the edges of the continuum where they are not exactly self-organizing, but more or less receptive to different forms of signaling, as well.
“‘Normies do not matter’ in the sense that they are that which receives instructions not that which can give instructions; not that there is no effect to these instructions.”
Good distinction.
The left is obsessed with power and they regard propaganda as crucial. That’s prima facie evidence that mass opinion matters in some sense.
It should be made note of that the Eternal Whig’s compulsion to make *everyone* signal what they signal, to validate doing what they also do, is not merely an expression of pragmatic utility, but something that springs from their innermost constitutions of sentiment.
If given power, it is not enough for them to simply rule; they have a compelling need to make the subjects of their rule complicit in it also. Including, even, and especially their targets. This is why there is such an emphasis on humiliation rituals; they need validation for everything from everyone, including, most perversely, their enemies themselves. Such is the animating spirit of demotism.
Rhetorical tactics like radical social construction may be convenient for wrong-doing, but it is also not a coincidence how they settle on such tactics; it is, in many ways, a reflection of how they themselves already see the world. The congenital solipsist reasons only to rationalize, blown hither and tither by the winds of social validation; and the gnostic is like this in kind, differing primarily in basal aesthetic architecture, at once a deformity of perception and pricking brand that drives them to certain ends even without and so often in spite of any signaling otherwise.
Above I wrote, “Aliens waving foreign flags rampaging through our cities is a very bad look for the left. They used to at least have the wit to use sympathetic poster children.”
Belatedly, those idiots are now realizing that rampaging mobs are not a propaganda victory for them and have resorted to saying that the whole thing is just a bunch of AI fakes and whatnot.
Normies matter or modern-era states would not expend so many resources to manage their opinions. The reactionary expression “normies don’t matter” means that the collective “will of the people” is under immense pressure from actual power, like little fish getting dragged along in the wake of a large ship. The GAE proclaims gay marriage and normies, who formerly did not want this, accept it. Normies are an instrument to be wielded by actual power players, not a bloc with agency.
Well put.
“Normies matter or modern-era states would not expend so many resources to manage their opinions.”
In the sense that Pseudo said above, yes.
Or as I put it here,
“A large part of political struggles consists of trying to capture the idea-propagating institutions in order to control the minds of the lamentable fuckwits who can’t think their way out of a paper bag. They’re a resource that is fought over, like valuable terrain in a land war.”
This is kinda harsh on normies, but whatever.
Hmm, this needs more nuance. Normies don’t just believe what they’re ordered to believe; the resistance to “A boy can be a girl” shows this. And plainly white normies don’t accept and are filled with rage at the “All whites are oppressors” crap. Took them a long damn time to get there, but they got there. When I have a spare decade I’ll try to come up with an internally consistent sketch of the boundaries of normie free-thought or whatever.
Memes flow top-down (“culture is downstream from power”); normies may instinctively like or dislike a certain meme, but the herd always follows the shepherd — or, failing that, is replaced by the shepherd — and the recent vibe shift is perfect evidence for that: it happens because Thermidor, a faction of the elite, allows it to happen; it’s exactly the Thermidorians who let “alternative media” (which has now become the new mainstream) be a thing in the first place.
Normies mostly believe what they are told to believe but there are certain limits. Trannyism was a bridge too far. Making them believe things which causes them to suffer too much for too long becomes a bridge too far. But other than this they do just believe what they are told to believe.
Everything is a bridge too far for normies, until it isn’t. Trannyism was a bridge too far. Covid lockdowns were a bridge too far. Gay marriage and gay grooming were a bridge too far. Importing tens of thousands of Somalians to suburban Minnesota was a bridge too far. Divorce rape was a bridge too far. Divorce itself (of the “no fault” variety) was a bridge too far.
You have to either be extremely young and naive or extremely inattentive (or both) to think that troonery has been failing because of a normie backlash. Normie backlashes have happened a hundred times before. What was different with troonery is that it spooked a large portion of the elite. Nice White Ladies were having to deal with creepy-ass men in dresses in their bathrooms. Precious precocious daughters of upper middle class families were being edged out or sometimes literally beaten out of their coddled sports. Rich and powerful dynasties have been hearing that they need to quite literally sterilize their children, i.e. that their family lines are to end here and now.
Worst of all (for the left), trooning caused a rift among the feminists, typically the loudest and most politically active faction, or at least equal to the negroists. A whole lot of white women and even some brown women realized that they were on the verge of losing their goodies to troons, and nothing drives a gender studies graduate to white-hot rage like the threat of having to work a real job and/or succeed on merit alone.
All that said, even the troon movement probably could have succeeded if there had been a properly-coordinated effort to boil the frog, as is typically done with these socially unpopular ideas. The trouble was/is that troons are largely a bunch of raving lunatics with time preference rivaling that of the lowest niggers. They can’t be denied any privilege, and can’t wait for any issue to swing their way. They even creep out the fags, and that’s saying a lot. They will attack anyone, anywhere, for any reason, and if J.K. Rowling isn’t safe, then no one on their side is safe.
The troon movement wasn’t going too far, it was going too fast, and specifically going too fast for a large enough faction of the elite to revolt against the other factions. Proles are just along for the ride, as always.
Exactly so.
Note that deporting illegals who have committed crimes in addition to illegal entry has majority support, but not supermajority support, even in Rasmussen polling.
I mean given enough brutal state terror sure they’ll pretend to go along with anything but nothing less than a reign of terror could make trannyism be (apparently) accepted…
It was apparently accepted till Musk took over Twitter. Most of the noise was coming from feminists who were losing their fake jobs to troons, and that a minority of feminists.
For a long time the software industry hired engineerettes, and put them in the art harem a safe distance from the actual engineers. Then they started turning engineerettes loose against engineering, with disastrous results. (Albeit there is a small number of genuine North Asian female engineers. Brain sexual dimorphism seems to be less in that race.) And then they started hiring troons. Autogynephiles can do engineering just fine, though traps cannot. Autogynephiles make excellent engineers. Which resulted in engineerettes losing their sinecures. Large numbers of engineers who were neither autogynephiles nor traps, straight white male engineers, put on a dress to bypass the quotas and declared themselves lesbians, treating the dress as office attire, looking like Fred Flintstone in a dress. It became farcical. Another blatant workaround against quotas, as the art harem had been. But this workaround denied the feminists their fake jobs, hence the pre-Musk resistance. It also meant that the art harem was full of actual artists instead of women with fake computer science degrees from elite universities, which drastically devalued elite degrees.
I am interested in both psychology and behavior. (I’m not a behaviorist; I don’t think talk about mental states is meaningless. Plainly there are such things as thoughts, emotions, etc.) Or to put it more carefully, and with reference to our current situation: I am interested both in what people believe and in their ability to solve the stag hunt / coordination problem of resisting the left. The distinction is not an idle one. If many people weren’t outraged by all the crap, then getting a leader to coordinate resistance wouldn’t matter.
They were outraged by the crap because Cthulhu was swimming far too fast, and accelerating too. Had the Left taken its time to slow boil the frog, and been all on the same page about their goals, the normies would have been conditioned into trannyism with scarcely any outrage. (And those who wouldn’t could then be successfully eliminated, figuratively or literally.) Approaching a Left Singularity, Cthulhu attempted 20 years in 5 years; that proved too much.
As Scarebucks said, the problem was “too fast” and (crucially) “too close to home.”
Anyone can believe anything as long as it doesn’t cost him. That’s where ‘luxury belief’ comes from.
Villagers can be made to believe anything as long as the costs are diffuse and long in time scale, without immediately obvious connexion between A and B. Hence regulatory states, demographic replacement, tolerance of degeneracy, female emancipation, et cetera.
>Most of the noise was coming from feminists who were losing their fake jobs to troons, and that a minority of feminists.
You know they were and are losing the fight, because they got labeled, “TERFs,” while the troon-hugging feminists were simply, “feminists.” Don’t talk like it’s over: trannyism suffered a minor setback in the Presidential election, but it still holds the legal/bureaucratic/educational high ground. Trannies also have the strongest, most fanatical, most demonic energy of any group on the Left. They are the most bioleninist: irrevocably turning themselves into uncanny-valley eunuch monsters commits them to victory or death like Cortez burning the ships. They are far from beaten; they’re still strong favorites to win against the Right and the TERFs.
Trannyism is over. When Trump issued an executive order that God created them male and female it was done. Trump gave everyone permission to see that the emperor has no clothes.
Yes, they are the leading faction of the left. They have the greatest power within the left. Which is a huge problem for the left, which they are unable to do anything about, because no enemies to the left, no friends to the right.
Would they? If the tranny movement of the last 15 had been spread over, say, 100 years? We can’t run the experiment, but I doubt it. “A boy can actually be a girl” assaults cognitive architecture that is very old. Sexual reproduction is more than a billion years old; the male/female distinction must be fundamentally hard-coded into our neural wiring. Given that, “A boy can actually be a girl” is not like “A flute can actually be a piano.” The latter is merely amusing and perhaps, if someone were up in your face trying to force you to repeat it, annoying. The former sets off all kinds of very deep, old, and serious alarms. It is interpreted as exactly what it is, a genocidal threat.
Nuts. I can only repeat, the distinction between what people believe and what they do is not an idle one.
I am becoming rather restless with people here trying to slide over this distinction. If you want to say “Normies’ beliefs don’t matter, pragmatically, until and unless they can solve the coordination problem” or something like that, go for it. But if you’re going to channel your inner B. F. Skinner and say “There is no distinction between beliefs and actions,” then I’m going to say “Put down the goddam crack pipe.”
In other words, there is a difference between these two arguments:
(1) “White lefties say they think that black and white neighborhoods are equally safe, but always choose to live in white neighborhoods, and that choice reveals that they don’t really believe that black and white neighborhoods are equally safe.” This is a valid argument because the white lefties have a choice. So their behavior actually reveals something about what they actually believe.
(2) “Some guy stuck an Uzi in my face and barked, ‘Say that 16 is a prime number or I’ll blow your fucking head off!’ So I said, ’16 is a prime number.'” Therefore, we can infer that you actually believed that 16 is a prime number? Come off it.
For people who like to think of themselves as hard-nosed epistemological tough guys: In terms of hard empiricism, there is a difference between these two things: An empirical prediction about your behavior once any coercion is removed. Furthermore, this is not merely a methodological point about how to carry out investigation in the social sciences: We need to think intelligently about things like this so we can predict the behavior of people on our side, neutrals, and people on the enemy side in an environment in which the degree and direction of coercion change over time. Anyone who doesn’t care about getting this right should just give up now. Go have a beer and play video games.
Empirically we see a large number of schoolchildren desexing themselves, and a large number of parents going along with it.
Empirically we see men behaving in self defeating ways in their interactions with women.
Empirically we see women believing that they can have it all — that they can focus on their careers, take a hundred cocks up every orifice, and at the age of thirty five mister one in thirty will marry them.
The reason that they believe these things is that the costs are long term, not short term. Luxury belief, but sincerely believed.
Men lie with their tongues, and tell the truth with their feet.
America doesn’t have ‘walkable communities’ because easy land access means access by joggers. America doesn’t have public transportation because public transportation means being locked in a box with pavement apes.
It should be noted however, that these are all forms of avoidance, not resistance. This is typical of how a villager deals with life. He will try to avoid trouble as far as he is able, but is not able to do more than that either, especially ‘as a class’.
Every retreat is a signal of a ‘bridge too far’; and at the same rate, no bridge is too far, because the eternal fellaheen of the world can’t do anything about the tides of History anyways, even and especially if their patrimony or their very lives are on the line.
The only thing that stops an organizing elite is the former elite degenerating and losing their ability to organize, or another organizing elite.
Trannyism I would argue was always going to be a bridge too far (regardless of the specifics of how it unraveled) and normies not accepting it was at least a part.
1) Men want to fuck women not men with axe wounds between their legs.
2) Trannies are an uncanny valley between the sexes, male instinct is to kill uncanny valley with fire. Even more so than loudly effeminate gays trannies produce a deep revulsion.
3) I do not know how women instinctually react to the uncanny valley (so I cannot speak for it though I know they tolerate gay men far better than we do) but some of them clearly didn’t want uncanny valley men going into their private herd spaces.
3) Any sort of intellectual people who believe in logic and not postmodern nonsense and are not tied in deeply with the regime are just not going to accept that sex is subjective because its clearly not. Jordan Peterson may otherwise suck (especially lately) but he got famous for loudly going hell no to this in the face of threats.
Kids don’t count; their brains aren’t fully developed. And those parents are not normies. To be normies they have to be half of, or at least a significant chunk of, the population. Also, if they actually believed that a boy could be a girl, then no genital mutilation would be required.
In both cases, sincerely mistaken beliefs. I was one of those guys who had no clue about women when I was younger.
Quite. But what they do with their feet only reveals something about their beliefs when there is no coercion. Or to put it more precisely, when due allowance is made for incentives, positive and negative, that affect their behavior.
The rest of your (Pseudo) comment is about whether normies have any line that can’t crossed without them resisting. Which is a crucial topic, but not what I’m talking about.
Read the detransitioner stories. In a substantial proportion of cases they are normies.
Normies are told lies. They wind up believing those lies. “I was ignorant” — yes, because, because when authority speaks, you don’t do your homework.
Chicks bang mister one in thirty, conclude they are extremely hot, do not conclude that they are sluts and nobody wants them. Partly it is vanity, partly it is a luxury belief, that they can afford when they are young, and authority has told them to delay marriage and children.
We can tell that luxury beliefs are sincerely held, because people wind up paying immense costs for them.
Word.
I’ve always interpreted “The future is female” as a sexocidal threat, which is exactly what it is, yet it never seriously bothered the brainwashed white knight hoi polloi – and then Musk acquired Twitter, and suddenly their eyes were opened to the wickedness of many a thought-form.
It is the natural error of a highly intelligent person to instinctively, automatically project his mental capacities onto his neighbors; he needs to consciously remind himself, time and again, until it becomes second nature, that most of them are not phenomenologically distinct from automatons.
“Read the detransitioner stories. In a substantial proportion of cases they are normies.”
Nuts!
The de-transitioner stories are full of authority pushing a grossly false reality on the parents, and parents unenthusiastically acquiescing.
They tell the kid he will suicide if not transitioned, they tell the parents he will suicide if not transitioned. And everyone makes the decision without checking out the actual facts, the facts being that transitioning results in a huge risk of suicide and is being pushed by a bunch of disgusting sex perverts. Authority is pushing the poison as the medication, and people take it. Same as the jab. “Long Covid” is jab side effects. It is like the Jonestowners all committing suicide.
They manufacture a hallucinatory reality in which doing what you are commanded to do is virtuous and the least bad option. And if you notice that doing what you are commanded to do is a really really bad option, they hallucinate bad consequences for not doing what you are commanded to do. And then they try to manufacture those consequences. Remember the jab. To make the threat of the awesome might of the Covid Demon real, hospitals went into the mass murder business. At one point, if you visited a hospital for any reason, they were apt to diagnose you with Covid and murder you.
They used a test that was overwhelmingly likely to show you had Covid regardless, and if it showed positive, put you on a ventilator, even if you were breathing fine and your blood oxygen levels were completely normal, which procedure had survival rate strangely even worse than is usual for ventilators. Ventilation is a drastic and dangerous procedure at the best of times, and this was the worst of times.
Using ventilation on covid patients is simply never justified for medical reasons, for their breathing reflex is unaffected, so an oxygen mask works fine. It was always a policy of mass murder, even if the patients really had Covid, and it seems likely that the vast majority of them did not.
>what they do with their feet only reveals something about their beliefs when there is no coercion. Or to put it more precisely, when due allowance is made for incentives, positive and negative, that affect their behavior.
https://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2010/10/the_military_and_ptsd_a_star_w.html
Jim: Sure, that’s all true, but those aren’t the average parent.
Pseudo: You’re agreeing with me? Or I’m not understanding your point.
If they were not the average parent, the detransitioners would be blaming their parents considerably more than they are. The Detransitioner story is that they were fed shit, and their parents were fed the same shit a lot harder.
Some years ago, I ate some things that looked like mushrooms – but did not quite look like regular mushrooms, and became ill. The doctor reasonably decided that I needed to consume a large amount of activated charcoal, which absorbs toadstool poisons, and the nurses proceeded to introduce it to my stomach through a tube through my nose. I projectile vomited all over myself, the room, and them. So they did it again. And again I projectile vomited all over the myself, the room, and them. They got started on doing it the third time, and I became hostile and uncooperative. I said. “Gimme that”, and took the packet of activated charcoal, which had instructions printed on it. The instructions said it could be introduced through the nose, or drunk in a sweet drink. The latter sounded a whole lot less unpleasant and traumatic. Having stuff pumped in through my nose had been traumatic. So I told them to get me a can of Fanta. They got a can, mixed it into the Fanta for me, I drank it down, and it worked fine.
Thing is it took two rounds of projectile vomiting before I decided to doubt authority and read the instructions on the packet. Now I am apt to be quite aggressive when I feel hard done by, but I accepted authority the second time. The average normie would have been projectile vomiting till his stomach was too exhausted to vomit.
I don’t have a response to this except that that’s an awesome, memorable anecdote.
Practice shitlibbery to acquire shitlibbery.
To say that normalfags are under duress is both correct and also somewhat besides the point; if you can force someone to participate in a lie, you turn them into believers in the lie.
Do you think this was any less true for “gay marriage”or Action-Girl tropes in the 1990s? Or the idea of “bodily autonomy” and abortion as a medical procedure in the early 20th century? Or even the idea of female “consent” and marital “rape” in the 19th?
It’s true, you can’t simply persuade a healthy adult to accept these things, but that isn’t how propaganda works, never has been. To paraphrase Solzhenitsyn, the goal is simply to break you down, using the time-tested process of fear – shame – delusion. First they terrorize the victim into silent compliance, then shame him for insufficient enthusiasm (or inner doubt), and finally make him question his own sanity and invent/accept excuses like “these aren’t really biological instincts, I was just raised by backward parents”.
And that’s for the adults. Children can be made to believe just about anything if you get started at a young enough age. Once the meme makes it into the elementary school curriculum of a Prussian school system, the propagandists have officially won.
Sure, there may still be lingering inner doubts. I think even the most fervent progressives still feel a twinge of disgust seeing two “married” fags kissing in public, or on film. Or mixed-race couples, for that matter. But true faith is not a requirement for mass compliance; and in fact, a lack of true faith is actually better for an instrument of social control, because it can be used to continuously generate terror and shame and self-doubt, which makes compliance on other measures easier to obtain.
But the troons couldn’t endure the slow boil, and they wanted to take away all the unprincipled exceptions right away. It wasn’t just terrorizing and humiliating the proles, it was terrorizing and humiliating the ruling class in high-status positions, and destroying their sources of wealth and power and high status. That’s a recipe for civil war.
“Consent” is nineteenth century, but “marital rape” is twentieth. When the idea was first introduced, I think in the late sixties, early seventies, a whole lot of people found it incomprehensible.
That was the abolition of marriage 1.0 — the obligation of both parties to sexually gratify the other. That was more absurd than “boys can be girls if they want”, more absurd than gay marriage. And it happened in sixties, early seventies.
Consent culture was imposed in 1820, and then repeatedly ratcheted up to ever more extraordinary and outrageous heights, with a dramatic escalation occurring in 1910, and another dramatic escalation in the 1920s, with 1960s “marital rape” being the a huge escalation in this sequence.
Troons are just another small step on the ratchet, a ratchet that was already wound to what should have been breaking point in the late 1920s.
I stand corrected, though I think the broader point about recency bias still applies. “Gender identity” isn’t the first heinous, humiliating and utterly unbelievable lie that we’ve been subjected to, and if Trump fails to crush the opposition this time around, then it probably won’t be the last.
It’s all too easy to assign credit or blame for a significant event to whatever precursor is freshest in one’s mind, like how people tend to assume food poisoning must have come from the last meal they ate, when in reality it might just as easily have been building up for a long time, or the result of a series of individually insignificant cascading failures, or merely the fickle whims of fate.
Trooning seems highly relevant in the here and now, because it’s the thing that’s got everyone outraged here and now and it’s still novel as a social phenomenon, but in the greater historical sense? No imaginary hard line has been crossed, it’s just another twist on a ratchet that was already tightened well past the point of fracture.
No. The fact that this works sometimes for some lies does not mean that it always works for all lies.
It obviously worked for “boys can be girls, and have an inalienable constitutional right to be girls”. If it worked for that, works for anything.
Reading this, I infer that you are interpreting me as saying, “Any minute now the normies will rise up in glorious collective revolution against the Ruling Class.”
I’m not saying that. Scarebucks, you’re my favorite commenter here, but please read the words that I wrote, and not the words that your internal cognitive model of “Neurotoxin” wrote.
This supports my point. “Point deer-make horse” works as a power flex/humiliation ritual precisely because it’s obviously false and the victim knows it’s false. It is simply not true that normies believe whatever they’re ordered to believe.
By the way: For those who are only interested in what people DO, and not in what they believe (which is fine), I note that normies do in fact rise up occasionally against the reigning assholes. It’s not as if there has never been a peasant uprising that was put down. This was NOT my original point. But a failed peasant rebellion also illustrates that normies don’t simply believe what they’re ordered to believe. (The question of whether normies ever rebel and the question of whether normy rebellions are ever successful, without elite backing and leadership, are also distinct questions.)
Anyone who has serious ambitions to be a replacement elite, or an intellectual who contributes to the ideological foundations of a new elite, must have a theory of human beliefs and behavior that is, not to put to fine a point on it, within a megaparsec of observable reality.
That normies do not uncritically accept whatever they are told to accept is an observable fact as obvious as the sun rising in the east and the fact that if you let a coffee cup go it falls to the ground. A would-be elite who cannot accept even such tritely obvious facts IS going to fail. There is absolutely no chance whatsoever that this blog’s envisioned revolution will succeed if it is gleefully founded on obvious falsehoods.
I can only repeat, anyone who is committed to this obvious falsehood – that normies can be made to believe not just a lot of things but literally anything – should stop playing revolutionary intellectual (or whatever we’re doing here) and just hang out and sip Long Island iced teas while observing the circus. You will save yourself a hell of a lot of stress.
We have to get this right, goddam it; it’s not fucking optional.
The point of the humiliation ritual is not that the target is humiliated by being ordered to pretend to believe what is obviously false, but that he is humiliated by actually believing what is obviously false.
“Boys can be girls” works because it is assault on our cognitive architecture.
Again, I remind you than even Trump had a hiccup when pronouncing his executive order that God created them male and female. Thinking a crime thought takes effort of which most people are incapable, and it was apparent that it cost even Trump some effort.
For a long time, the reference to “men in women’s sports” would produce a completely deranged reaction. People were thrown into turmoil by the crimethought. And for a long time, those campaigning against men in women’s sports had conspicuous difficulty in saying what they were campaigning against. Demonstrating that the humiliation was widely internalised, and not easily reversed.
Despite having very reluctantly submitted to the yoke and the bridle, most people had considerable difficulty in letting it go.
>That normies do not uncritically accept whatever they are told to accept is an observable fact
But that fact is at odds with the elitist/authoritarian/theocratic mindset. If you are an oligarch, I mean, a Member of the Elite, you regard yourself as smart, and mostly take for granted that your subjects are stupid. Or a lot less smart than you. And so why wouldn’t your stupid subjects believe whatever tales you tell them.
In practice adults believe a lot of nonsense so one could lazily arrive at the conclusion that “normies” are stupid, but that’s obviously a…dumb oversimplification.
It is not a matter of being stupid, but of resistance to authority. It is hard to resist authority. I have done very bad things despite part of me knowing better, and if you think you have not, you are deluding yourself.
There is resistance. There was a lot more resistance to “Marital Rape” when it was introduced in the late 1960s than the resistance to “Boys can be girls”. But the belief is eventually internalised, and the resistance subsides. Where today is the resistance to “Marital Rape”?
Reversing “boys can be girls” is taking visible cognitive effort, even visible effort among those campaigning to reverse it.
Nuts.
“Marital Rape” obviously worked, and the difficulty that people had saying “boys in girl’s sports” reveals that “boys can be girls” was working.
Let me come at all this from a different direction.
If you’ve ever done any kind of serious modeling – climate modeling, population dynamics, economic modeling, whatever – you know that getting things right at the beginning is vital. Whenever I do any kind of modeling, I double-check equation (30)… but I quadruple-check equation (1). A mistake at the foundational level fucks up everything that follows.
What we are talking about here are foundational questions about typical people’s thoughts, emotions, intentions, proclivities, and yes, behaviors too. Etc. The truth-value of the proposition
“Normies can be made to believe anything,”
has enormous logical implications. We can’t afford to half-ass this particular question, the way we can afford to half-ass, say, a wonky detail question like whether Trump’s tariff policies are likely to be good or bad for GDP.
In other words, I’m not trying to be a pain in the ass here. I’m trying to persuade everybody, to convince y’all, because I believe this is very important.
Resistance to “Marital Rape” subsided a long time ago, and resistance to “Boys can be Girls” was subsiding.
Ordinarily, our best guide to their thoughts on this topic is speech. Speech is rather too easily and too frequently coerced, but the propensity of those campaigning against boys in girls sports to speak in the language of their enemies was not coerced externally, but internally.
If you dismiss speech, because so frequently and easily coerced, actions provide a better guide. And for this, we have the detransitioner stories. The parents of young transitioners were by and large, normies.
Normies believe what they are told to believe. If they are told to believe something obviously false, it is a humiliation ritual designed to psychologically break them, but what breaks them is actually believing it, not lying that they believe it.
If they believe in Marital Rape, they are going to believe in gay marriage and that boys can be girls.
I’m unsure why. I interpreted you as saying what you said, which was–paraphrasing slightly–that trannyism is a uniquely wicked or unpalatable meme among leftist memes. That trannyism crossed a line, irrespective of the exact consequences of crossing that line.
I don’t think trannyism is all that special in the big picture. Obviously the statement “boys can be girls” beggars belief; but I don’t think it beggars belief more than the statement “if your wife withdraws consent in the middle of intercourse then it’s rape”. All of the leftist keystone ideas are assaults on common sense and common decency. Some definitely worse than others–far be it from me to declare them all equal–but it’s far from clear that trannyism holds the crown.
I simply think your fixation on trannyism (and to be fair, most people today are fixated on that issue) is an instance of recency bias. Trannyism is new; gay marriage and marital rape are not. Everybody alive today remembers, more or less, when the troons started getting in everyone’s faces, waging their terror campaign, and appropriating billions of dollars of public funds to “gender-reassignment surgery” and related “research”; but many have started to forget or are simply too young to remember the violent gay-rights protests and the appropriation of billions of dollars to “AIDS research”, or the collective outrage at the introduction of doctrines like alimony or disparate impact.
Your implication is that trannyism is/was a flashpoint because of its essence–because the idea itself is just so abhorrent. My response is that, if it is indeed judged by history to have been a flashpoint, that will not have been due to its essence, but by a combination of exceptionally poor timing (coinciding with the verge of economic collapse, mass social dysfunction and the brink of world war) and highly visible negative consequences for elite institutions and family dynasties.
Trannyism is disgusting and evil, but it’s not uniquely disgusting and evil, it’s just the latest in a long line of disgusting and evil ideas that the left has been normalizing, and didn’t fail to be normalized (to the extent we can declare it a failure; it may still be too early to call) because of the nature of the idea itself, but rather by the rapidly declining competence and cohesion of the regime, and by the perpetually angry, hostile, miserable nature of the troons themselves.
well yes thanks for noticing
On a serious note, one addition to the pliability of belief relates to home birth vs hospital birth. Used to be that my country had a relative high home birth, but intimidation and pressure campaigns are fast changing this. Whenever I discuss this with anyone, I am always told that the hospital is ‘just safer in case anything goes wrong.’ But then you talk about what actually happens in the hospital and 9 times out of 10 it is a literal horror story. Hospital protocol demands the baby be born, no matter if the baby wants to be born, and the mother is given an escalating stairs of all sorts of drugs until her womb and the damn baby learn to obey the protocol.
Jim, Scarebucks: Well, I tried.
Alf: 🤣
You write:
Perhaps you should clarify what those implications actually are, in practice.
I’m not a kantian, so I would agree with you that categorically imperative statements like “Normies can be made to believe anything,” are rationally impossible in an *absolute* sense. That is to say, we are always open to the theoretical possibility of The World proving larger than our models of the world.
That being said, the whole point of Normism as a type specimen is to follow norms. Normism is both efficient and reliable; efficient in the sense that it can bring success or at least survival with a minimum of cognitive resources necessary, and reliable in that it is a strategy that can be followed in a wide range of circumstances without (personal) trouble.
When a being pursues non-normalfag modes of being based on more internal loci of control – that is to say, its conscience – this will inevitably bring it into conflict with/for power at one point or another; and when there is conflict over power, you either win or you die.
This means that bloodlines of people who stick to their guns, who are warrior or priest like or something of both in spirit, are comparatively rare, while normism is massively successful in evolutionary terms, and thus makes up a broad mass of humanity with people who are more like this than not, fellaheen over whom the tides of history roll, bending one way then the next.
It also means that, in any case, you will always see men more like the former ruling over men more like the later, as social ‘unmoved movers’, setting the schelling points and tipping the balls rolling downhill.
There is, of course, a notable class of circumstances where normism is *not* a reliable strategy to follow; the times of Late Empire, where old offices are skinsuits converged and occupied by daemonhosts; where the norms demanded to be followed lead to death without issue; and only those who (can) disobey survive.
Exactly so. Normies will follow the state religion, even if is obviously false, evil, and leads to personal individual destruction.. So, you need a state religion that directs normies to follow a prosocial, realistic, and personally advantageous path: As for example, the Book of Proverbs and the book of homilies:
For our time, the most relevant homily is “Against Whoredom and Adultery” which urges early marriage, denies that virginity is superior to marriage, and obligates husband and wife to sexually gratify each other. It condemns what we call “dating”. By the standards of their time, all modern women are whores, and we are seeing the consequences that Cramer predicts for whoring.
“On Good Works” directs holiness competition to practical and prosocial ends that actually do good.
The scientific community needs to be beaten over the head with not only “the Skeptical Chymist”, but also with the Book of Homilies: “Against Swearing and Perjury” “The Great Big Fat Surprise” implies that most of the scientific community need to be punished for false swearing. All normies should believe that kind of stuff attracts the wrath of God and Man, as normie men now believe that if you hit on a chick she will run away screaming and call the police.
Of course parts of it need rewriting for the particular errors of our age. It would never have occurred to the writers of the book of Homilies that one needed to address homosexuality and trannyism, because such things did not exist, and “on good works” was written in a time when the previous faith was not all that hostile, malevolent, and insane.
A very large part of the Book of Homilies addresses the errors of the previous state religion and the religious controversies of the day. All that stuff has been rendered irrelevant by a demonic state religion which has converged the Christian Churches — that part of it needs a total rewrite for our times.
Also the reading level needs to come right down, because of the decline of the race. The sentences are very long, and take for granted that the audience is immensely knowledgeable about Bible and religion, even though most of the target audience could not read or write. (The intended medium was that it was mandatory for the preacher to read it to the laity, the laity largely being unable to read it themselves.) It was written for the normies of their time, and it is obvious that the normies of our time are, by comparison, dumb as rocks and abysmally ignorant, though they know more of science, and knowledge of hygiene has not been lost.
We don’t have preachers as a mass medium, so what we have to do is inject it into popular entertainment as in 1950s television — it will go down a whole lot smoother than action girls, for the stuff that is still relevant to our times is about real people doing real things that people are still interested in and care about. (well, perhaps not as smoothly as way hot action girls with pleasant personalities, but a lot smoother than girlbosses.) 1950s television pumped a lot of prosocial stuff: “I love Lucy”, “Father knows best”, “Green Acres”. It is very hard to find “I Love Lucy” episodes that have not been radically censored to fit the “modern audience” to an extent that makes them incoherent.
The Book of Proverbs was written in a time when a lot of semi nomadic people were urbanising, and needed to learn how to conduct oneself in a city, and the Book of Homilies was written in a time when the state religion had collapsed due to wickedness and heresy, and the normies were deeply confused about what was socially required. Our times parallel that of the Book of Homilies, but of course, the content of the collapsing state religion is wildly different, and the medium by which it will be provided to the normies will be wildly different.
But though the errors to corrected are now different (Cramer was not facing a huge problem of sexual immorality, inceldom, and cat ladies) the target of sensible and virtuous normie behavior is unchanged. Sound advice then is sound advice now. We have a bigger problem with what Cramer called false swearing in the scientific and academic community, while his problem was misconduct in the theological community.
Normies were believing that boys can be girls and all whites are oppressors until Musk took over Twitter and gave them permission to doubt.
When Trump was issuing his executive order that God created them man and woman, he had a hiccup on using the word boys to refer to boys. It was not easy for him to do so. It was harder for a normie.
If you look at the gamergater youtubers, they complain that patronising political lectures are spoiling games. “Take the politics out of games”, they say. They do not mention the elephant in the room — that the lectures are disgusting and insulting lies, that the lectures are an attack on white straight males, who form the bulk of the gaming audience. They relish in incidents showing that those giving us these lectures hate the games, the intellectual property, and the fans, as with the Snow brown drama, but allow the audience to draw their own conclusions, without themselves stating the obvious.
Jim I would argue that none but the hardest of hardcore shitlibs ever believed it. The funny thing that trannyism was in the logic of leftism (while not being really believed even by some leftists) was anticipated by Monty Python (even though they were all libshits themselves). The software of sex distinction is too hardwired…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFBOQzSk14c
Trannyism was the demon worshippers going for the ultimate goal of pointing deer and making horse on something people REALLY REALLY knew wasn’t true. Some people pretended under duress and there was a collaborator phenenomenom but there was no virtually no true believers in it.
Holy SHIT thank you for logically connecting Trannyism (and gay marriage, and negro equality, and and and…), humiliation rituals and PDMH. Of course that’s what those are. Of course. I’m embarrassed for needing you guys to make these connections for me, but dammit thank you anyway. I appreciate it.
Frankly what I really need is an encyclopedia/history of humiliation rituals. Just the 20th and 21st centuries will be plenty.
https://archive.is/Huulc
Everyone has agency when it comes to intrinsically disordered acts though. By its very nature, approving something like gay marriage means true approval. Coerced approval is applicable to temporal issues such as taxes or borders.
And I think I speak for all normies. Just saying.
Attitudes are unreal, until one acts on them. Actions reveal the real self. The martyrs did not give coerced approval to demons.
So, “bake the cake, bigot” was an act of true, genuine, heartfelt approval of homosex? Put me in the skeptic camp on that one.
Gay marriage wasn’t even politically approved in the conventionally legitimate way; it was declared holy by the holy blackrobes, and then retroactively “approved” by the political process that supposedly represents the interests of the common people, but of course doesn’t really. People didn’t naturally “come around” to the idea of gay marriage until long after it was forced on them from multiple angles.
To put it another way, gay marriage is truly approved in the same sense that Obamacare is truly legal, i.e. by way of elaborate rhetorical tricks employed by the reigning priestly caste.
That is the same method school desegregation, affirmative action, abortion and a host of other issues followed- progress marching through congress is a coin toss.
Observe that the Churches and the school lunch counter are totally segregated. Segregation is what people choose if you let them.
If the priestly caste had been able to keep at it for a few more years, everyone would look at you in horror if you said out loud that boys are boys and girls are girls.
And the military parade featured chicks driving tanks. Good thing you don’t have to parallel park a tank.
As we’ve seen since the 60s, school integration is intrinsically disordered not arbitrary and temporal. Schools were integrated literally at bayonet point, not by consent. (It’s regrettable in hindsight there was no flashpoint or rallying point to fight it then, but notable that after three generations to solidify control the youth are starting to believe their own lying eyes.)
Borders are existential not arbitrary; open borders intrinsically disordered not temporal. Calling them temporal and conflating them with tax rates is a major mask slip even for AF’s “we disagree but I’m not a glowie or a leftist” bit.
For that matter, I’m erring even in accepting the frame word “temporal.” Echoes of rendering unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, suggesting we concede certain issues.
“Just sayin'” is a tell for trolls, it goes along with other, less subtle forms of rage bait. I’m not sure why, just I’ve noticed the pattern.
It’s subversion all the way down.
Someone saying ‘just sayin’ says so because they believe they are saying something that their interlocutors will not be appreciative of. But also that they should ignore this for Reasons. In other words, it’s a form of Mens Rea.
That the publics schools should not be integrated misses the greater should not; that they should not exist.
I don’t want to derail the conversation.
But I want everyone opinion on buffet imports certificate
Form wiki
“Buffett’s plan proposes creating a market for transferable import certificates, (ICs) that would represent the right to import a certain dollar amount of goods into the United States. These transferable ICs would be issued to US exporters in an amount equal to the dollar amount of the goods they export and they could only be utilized once. They could be sold or traded to importers, who must purchase them in order to legally import goods into the USA. The price of ICs are set by (free-market) forces, and are therefore dependent on the balance between entrepreneurs’ willingness to pay the ICs market price for importing goods into the USA and the global volume of goods exported from the USA, (i.e. supply and demand).”
There is some qualifications to this here are the original article
https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2003/11/10/352872/index.htm
This is too clever by half. Import replacement certificates are another currency, allowing a furtive devaluation of the US$ for international transactions. These double currency solutions always develop into a huge mess.
They would complicate the role of the US$ as an international currency, probably lethally.
BTW if the rumors are true I think we’re less likely to get sabotage attempts as part of joint Jesuit-Chinese efforts. Lots of rumors that Xi has been removed from power and is under house arrest (supposedly he had a minor stroke and his enemies mobilized to purge his political allies when he wasn’t there and then purge him) I think thats a good thing Xi was kind of a bad guy within China.
Xi was wobbling between keeping capitalism going, and keeping the official faith of Maoism going. Which scared the stuffing out of capitalists. If there is a change of regime, it is unclear who will come out on top. Thermidor can break left or right. Probably going to break right, but we don’t know yet.
“Jimianity with Chinese characteristics.”
The clique that deposed him (if this isn’t some elaborate ruse) included former leader Hu Jintao who was hardcore “right” Deng Xiaoping faction.
If true, great. The Chinese economy should get right back on track.
Next up, Chinese fertility.
Conscript wombs. Women like that environment. Read their fantasies. It is the ancestral environment of successful reproduction. They are the weaker vessel. They need and want an environment that protects them from themselves.
In all likelihood, substantially raising fertility will involve a fair bit of nationalistic propaganda for the masses; having a (real or imagined) enemy outside works wonders in this regard. So, should expect some “action,” or at least credible threats thereof, further down the line.
Put another way: the “vibe shift,” in all its aspects, won’t be confined to America.
The LA Mayor now has issued a curfew and apparently had 25 curfew-breakers arrested. However, she (it’s a woman) still wants to thread the needle to continue “stern but non-violent resistance”. Some virtue signaling followed.
“We will not obey in advance. We will not turn our gaze. We will not fan the flames of extremism. We will not answer violence with violence,” said Rabbi Sharon Brous, in an impassioned speech in which she likened Trump to the “authoritarian” Pharoah who oppressed Jews in the Bible.
…
“We see that you are putting on your masks, you don’t need them,” the Rev. Eddie Anderson said to the officers and guardsmen. “The people have gathered together to remind you there is a higher power. To remind you that in Los Angeles everybody is free, and no human is illegal.”
Looks like there is a local Thermidor in other words. Let’s see how that works out.
>in Los Angeles everybody is free, and no human is illegal
So I need to stab you in the heart, and it’s fine because I am free and not illegal.
“The LA Mayor now has issued a curfew”
They are afraid , the perceptions are terrible for the rioters with Mexican flag, a lot of normies are giddy and want trump to crush the riots. They are fearing another Rittenhouse.
I bet they drove past stores being looted to arrest people walking their dogs.
Watch the cops tell the rioters that this an illegal assembly and they should disperse or be arrested, and the rioters do not disperse and are not arrested.