The wicked flee when no man pursueth

Trump’s final ads say “The political establishment has bled this country dry”, and Jews hear “Jews have bled this country dry”

That said, the political establishment are the people in the Podesta emails, who are disproportionately Jewish, but are not mostly Jewish, and most Jews don’t get to email Podesta.

Most of the the screen time in Trump’s recent ad is occupied by non Jewish figures representing the political establishment, in roughly similar proportion as Jews and non Jews are represented in the Podesta emails. Jews doing bad things are overrepresented in the Trump ads to roughly the same extent as in the Podesta emails, in real life, Jews doing bad things are over represented in the political establishment.

There are three Jewish villains and considerably more than three non Jewish villains in Trump’s ad, roughly the same proportion as appear in the Podesta emails.

One of the figures who briefly flash up in his ad is (((George Soros))), whose business model consists of buying worthless debt from insolvent third world governments, and then having the World Bank, also known as the US tax payer, restore the debt to its face value. If that is not bleeding this country, what is?

Trump could have used Jon Corzine instead of George Soros, but Soros is better known, perhaps because he is Jewish, but mostly because he has stolen more money and done more bad things than Jon Corzine, not only stolen much more money, but also overthrown various governments in the service of the state department, for example the government of the Ukraine, and attempted to overthrow of several more, for example the government of Hong Kong. For all his many faults, Jon Corzine has not overthrown any governments, though maybe he helped keep a government in power that should have been overthrown.

Trump uses the (((CEO of Goldman Sachs))) to illustrate “pockets of a handful of large corporation”. Goldman Sachs was the biggest unpunished recipient of bailout money in the recent financial crisis. Other institutions received more bailout money, but were punished by re-orgs that removed the worst offenders from power. Trump could have used Angelo Mozilo, who cost ordinary Americans far more than Goldman Sachs, but Mozilo was removed from power and had some of his ill gotten gains confiscated. Blankfein, Soros and Clinton are in each other’s pockets today, while no one admits that they used to be friends of Angelo not so very long ago. Maybe Goldman Sachs is notorious in substantial part because they are Jewish recipients of bailout money – but also because demonstrably more powerful than any of the other recipients of large amounts of bailout money.

If Jews are overrepresented among the readily identifiable people in the Trump ad, that is because a few Jews made themselves readily identifiable by committing enormous crimes with the blessing of the political establishment, and possessing vast power and wealth despite vast unpunished crimes. If you want an image to illustrate “Those who control the levers of power in Washington”, who would be a better image than George Soros? If you want an image to illustrate money going into the “pockets of a handful of large corporation”, who would be a better image than the CEO Goldman Sachs? Yes more money was spent to bail out Countrywide bank than to bail out Goldman Sachs, but the (((CEO of Goldman Sachs))) is still in the Clinton circle, whereas the former CEO of Countrywide, while still rich, has been unpersoned.

I suppose that Trump could have left out (((the Federal Reserve Chairwoman))), and arguably should have, but it is notorious that the Fed is intentionally causing asset inflation and blowing asset bubbles, which is an economic policy that favors the very rich at the expense of the middle class.


86 Responses to “The wicked flee when no man pursueth”

  1. Wagner says:

    Hey Jim I think what people want you to admit is there’s something not quite right with Moldbug’s puritan thesis. You’re 49.9% less of a Jew than Moldbug so it will probably come a lot easier to you to pull off, but I believe that a substantial revision of his caste-analysis is in order: BDHK-OVS sounds about right – adding “kikes” and “shitlords” to the sordid mix.

    There has so far been an evasion of this via the scapegoating of that licentious queen but it always begs the question of how the situation came about where a licentious queen was even possible. You yourself have claimed that Christianity has a disturbing tendency to veer leftward. Well–where did Christianity come from? If you want to keep with cladistic and genealogical analysis, why stop at the queen, why not go ALL the way back? To Judaism and Homerism. It seems that the destiny of the West was condensed in its origin and beginning so far ahead in history is arbitrary and misses where the seeds of occidental corruption were sown. And where they have flowered most rancidly.

  2. Pseudo-chrysostom says:

    If skypes are consistent and disproportionate vectors of leftism, the rational choice is consistent and disproportionate pre-judice wrt skypes.

    • jim says:

      But they are not consistent vectors of leftism. Some are, some are not. Many of our most influential and effective opponents of leftism were Skypes.

      • Pseudo-chrysostom says:

        >But they are not consistent vectors of leftism.

        Yeah they are.

        >Many of our most influential and effective opponents of leftism were Skypes.

        Their greatest effectiveness is as a rhetorical tactic of saying, ‘see, im not a proud Aryan Nazi, some jews say such and such too!’, which is a rather dubious strategy in the long run anyways.

        Skype niggerdeath is often consistently cucked on certain fundamental levels because they intuitively and instinctively often try to leave ‘escape hatches’ for themselves, open ports in the ideological firewall that they can insert themselves.

        Their consistent historical status (and self conception) as an Alien and Other minority within a host organism is almost fundamental to their psychology, and hence, their philosophical output always warrants suspicion, prone as it is for exploits and other vulnerabilities.

        tl;dr, spiritual security; a people do not let outsiders formulate their values, such cannot be trusted to be in their best interests.

        • jim says:

          >Many of our most influential and effective opponents of leftism were Skypes.

          Their greatest effectiveness is as a rhetorical tactic of saying, ‘see, im not a proud Aryan Nazi, some jews say such and such too!’, which is a rather dubious strategy in the long run anyways.

          Without Marx, we might not have had communism.

          Without Mises, we might not have defeated it.

          Because of Ayn Rand, every politician claims to be business friendly.

          Ayn Rand’s attack on the pious claims of socialists and regulators to be well intentioned and doing good was devastatingly effective, and is probably a major part of the reason why our current elite is doing transgender bathrooms, rather than one big union.

          • Cavalier says:

            Without Jews, there would be no Federal Reserve, no Immigration Act of 1965, Russia would still have a Czar, and Germany would still have a Kaiser.

            • jim says:

              Britain went to something very like the Federal reserve without a whole lot of Jewish influence.

              The fall of the Czar was, like the fall of Louis XVI, self inflicted. The Czar lost intellectual sovereignty to British intellectuals. When Alexander the liberator “freed” the serfs, it became apparent that instead of the Czar being the fount of all honors, mortal and divine, the British chattering classes were the fount of all honors mortal, and divine honors were rather silly.

              The Czar did not fall to (((communists))). He fell to moderate social democrats, who were then immediately outflanked on the left by (((communists))).

              The fall of the Czars was baked into the cake when Alexander the liberator gave the serfs the land collectively rather than individually. Jews joined the bandwagon when it had already been rolling quite some distance.

              • Cavalier says:

                “Britain went to something very like the Federal reserve without a whole lot of Jewish influence.”

                Is this a joke?

                “Jews joined the bandwagon when it had already been rolling quite some distance.”

                Yeah, they joined just in time to liquidate their ancient uhpressors, those filthy antisemitic Russkis.

  3. anon says:

    “You must understand, the leading (((Bolsheviks))) who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.”

    Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

    “With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews.

    Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and — as chairman of the Central Executive Committee — head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev (Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Moisei Uritsky

    (for sources, see footnote #6 in link below)

    “In Russophobia (by Russian mathematician Igor Shafarevich), a book written ten years before the collapse of Communist rule, Shafarevich noted that Jews were “amazingly” numerous among the personnel of the Bolshevik secret police. The characteristic Jewishness of the Bolshevik executioners, Shafarevich went on, is most conspicuous in the execution of Nicholas II:

    “This ritual action symbolized the end of centuries of Russian history, so that it can be compared only to the execution of Charles I in England or Louis XVI in France.

    It would seem that representatives of an insignificant ethnic minority should keep as far as possible from this painful action, which would reverberate in all history. Yet what names do we meet? The execution was personally overseen by (((Yakov Yurovsky))) who shot the Tsar; the president of the local Soviet was Beloborodov (((Vaisbart))); the person responsible for the general administration in Ekaterinburg was (((Shaya Goloshchekin))).

    To round out the picture, on the wall of the room where the execution took place was a distich from a poem by Heine (written in German) about King Balthazar, who offended Jehovah and was killed for the offense.” (for the source, see footnote #23 in link below)

    • jim says:

      The Bolsheviks purged not the Russians, but each other. The Jewish old Bolsheviks rendered the party free from Jews.

      And to this day no one is more anti semitic than the almost entirely Jewish Trotskyists. So the problem is not a cohesive minority advancing its interests against that of the host society.

      Its more that Jews are foci of craziness and tend to be the chief victims of that craziness.

      • Cavalier says:

        Tell that to the kulaks, the victims of the Katyn massacre, the Holodomor, and the gulags, and everybody killed in WWII after June 1940.

        • jim says:

          By June 1940, the Bolsheviks were almost completely Judenrein.

          You cannot blame World War II and the Katyn massacre on the Jews – except in the sense that Jews are often the focus of a memetic infection and the first victims of that infection.

          • Cavalier says:

            I blame WWII on the establishment of the Federal Reserve.

            • jim says:

              With high trade barriers, it became necessary to seize resources. So I blame World War Two on Smoot Hawley and the socialism part of National Socialism.

              • Cavalier says:

                WWII was part two of the Great War. It happened because for some mysterious, totally inexplicable reason the Germans laid down their arms with not a foreign soldier on German soil and only 50 miles from Paris. And, oh yeah, Marxist labor unions, Wilson’s infamous 14 point plan, and a literal commie Jew uprising that overthrew the Kaiser and established Weimar.

                WWII happened because an authoritarian state had the gall to declare, “You do not plunder our people any longer, neither from the inside or outside.” Because the Germans seceded from international finance, because the Germans guaranteed their money with the value of their labor, and because this so flagrantly insolent, anti-liberal people needed to be re-educated by Georgetown.

                A certain man reportedly said of his life’s struggle: “It was a fight, especially against the people who seemed to have omnipotent power in our nation – the struggle against the Jews; a Satanic power had taken over our whole country that had been able to grip key positions of intellectual and spiritual life, but also of the political and economic life. And from these key positions they were able to control and monitor the whole nation. This power had, at the same time, the influence to persecute, even with the law, those who fought against this power, and those who were willing to oppose the advance of it.”

                A Satanic power…. Hmm, perhaps they sipped blood and semen cocktails, raped children, and sacrificed chickens to Moloch.

                • jim says:

                  As Hitler noticed, towards the end of World War I the home front was collapsing. The Germans were losing the capability to feed and arm an army fifty miles from Paris.

                • Cavalier says:

                  Please return to (((Marxist union))) labor strikes noticed by Hitler, demoralizing (((agitation and propaganda))) noticed by Hitler, and literal commie revolution as Jewish as a Yeshiva yearbook, also noticed by Hitler.

  4. Pseudo-chrysostom says:

    Subversion always comes home to roost; civilizations competing in arms races elevate each other; competing through de-moralization is a two edged sword that chops down both target and wielder.

  5. anon says:

    “[David] Brooks is clearly saying that White identity politics is driving the Trump campaign (“going with their gene pool”), and I (along with Jonathan Chait, as quoted above) wholeheartedly agree.

    The problem for Jews is that the forces unleashed by Jewish activism in favor of immigration and multiculturalism have inevitably unleashed a rise in White identity politics, either implicitly, as among most Trump supporters, or explicitly, as among the Alt Right (which has been the only intellectual movement supporting Trump).

    And once this process starts gaining momentum, it’s only a matter of time before there is a critical mass of Whites who are dialed into the Jewish role in White dispossession. Psychologically, we expect that racial identity and a sense of racial interests will be increasingly important as Whites become a minority.”

    Excerpt from

    “Trump and the Jews, #6: Ramping up the hate (and paranoia) as we approach the finish line” by Kevin MacDonald (Nov 7, 2016)

    • jim says:

      It is politically useful to blame anti white activism entirely on people who do not think of themselves as white, to identify it as anti goy activism. However, though politically convenient, if one believes it is literally true, this inaccurate belief leads to tactical errors.

  6. bro says:

    “The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.”

    this concept kind of describe the entire 2016 election.

    Trump, though not a particularly moral or Christian man, is positively Holy in comparison to the competition, and as such has the balls of one who knows he’s right.

  7. Achmed the terrorist says:

    Cozine isn’t Jewish, you idiot.

    • bob k. mando says:

      Jim never said that he was, you fucking moron.

      Jim’s whole point was that non-Jew Corzine COULD have been substituted for ((( George Soros ))) and was not.

      this is what happens when you let Sand Niggers have computer access.

      you can give a Camel Jockey a keyboard
      but you can’t teach him to type reason.

      • Achmed the terrorist says:

        He sure did suggest Corzine is Jewish.

        “JIm” also suggested Goldman Sachs received non-punitive bailout money. Wrong again.

        “Jim” also suggested Soros only made money by gaming the international system. Wrong again.

        I know you want to believe this crap Mandingo, but it’s all wrong.

        • viking says:

          no he didnt the entire point of bringing corzine up was the point that trump could have used a non jew that did some similar things but the non jews didnt actually do as bad things

          I cant at this time longer remember details but Goldman certainly did benefit from the QE and all the rest

          btw we know youre a jew you neednt hide we actually encourage jews its leftys we are going to send to the camps

          • jim says:


            Goldman Sachs received thirteen billion dollars in government bailout for dud mortgages.

            • Achmed the terrorist says:

              You specifically said, Goldman made out well from the bailout. Goldman’s shareholders were diluted like every other bank that received bailout funds.

              You bring up AIG. AIG was also bailed out by the US government. By definition that means that AIG creditors would have gotten their money back from loans or transactions etc. You don’t seem to even understand what the bailout was about. Stop talking about this stuff as you don’t understand it one bit.

              • jim says:

                Goldman’s shareholders were diluted like every other bank that received bailout funds.

                No they were not.

                And all Soros’ money is favors from acquiescent governments, primarily the US government.

                AIG went broke by acquiescently issuing guarantees to dud mortgages. Thus the bailout of AIG was a bailout of everyone who diddled in dud mortgages. And towards the end, Goldman Sach were knowingly diddling in dud mortgages.

                AIG should have been allowed to fail, with the effect that everyone who was diddling in dud mortgages would have failed also, and then those people should have been bailed out, their assets diluted, and their management purged.

                • Achmed the terrorist says:

                  “No they were not.”

                  Fucking A they were, just like every other shareholder of a bank that took bailout money. The government’s bailout came in the form of convertible bonds struck at very low prices.

                  This is dilution.

                  You should really stop talking about stuff you don’t understand. Silence.

                • jim says:

                  You are simply wrong. Part of their bailout was laundered through AIG, so that they could be bailed out with no strings attached.

                  There was some stock dilution, (bailout with strings attached) but this was subsequently reversed. Easy money issued by the Federal Reserve was applied to undo the dilution.

                  Pro forma things were done the way you describe. But in fact, in substance, they worked around the form.

        • jim says:

          I explicitly stated that Jon Corzine was not Jewish. Goldman Sachs received 13 billion dollars in bailout money, no strings attached, no penalties.

          All Soros’s wealth comes from making bets that governments will take the financial measures that he asks them to take.

          • Achmed the terrorist says:

            This is pure hogwash.

            Soros is an arsehole of the first order. But to suggest that he made all his money from acquiescent governments is errant nonsense. Just total crap.

  8. Daniel says:

    “the Fed is intentionally causing asset inflation and blowing asset bubbles”

    See, this is the part where you open your mouth and bullshit comes out.

    For someone who prides himself on a realistic worldview, you’re suspiciously eager to swallow unfalsifiable crap spewed by paranoid fringe nuts.

    • pdimov says:

      What is your non-paranoid fringe nut theory about the cause of the housing bubble?

      • bro says:

        it is difficult to prove intentions. The effects of Fed actions might very well be asset inflation, and yet the members who compose the Fed may piously, honestly have other intentions.

      • pedanticmoron says:

        The overvaluation of CDOs and various other mortgage packages was the main cause. This was mainly caused by the promotion of home ownership and by incentivizing people to finance things via second mortgages, home equity lines of credit, etc as opposed to other methods. Supply limitations with a fast growing population also caused prices to rise a large amount.

        Low interest rates played a part, but the housing bubble had far more causes than that. It’s not like the fed set out to jack up house prices, that wasn’t the goal of their low rate policy.

      • Pseudo-chrysostom says:

        Status whores in power signaling their pseudosanctimonia in a way which can conveniently make them a lot of money by demanding/abetting the procurement of loans to untermenschen who have little to no ability to actually pay them off (like George Bush’s plan to given every invading mestizo a house) as long as the end of the line for the ponzi scheme ultimately stops at Real Americans who are actually producing capital (ie, middle class whites).

        So yeah, pretty much a conspiracy.

  9. Steve Johnson says:

    Ok, take it as given that the problem isn’t Jews – it’s progressivism.

    This post and the reaction to the Trump ads and speeches show why that approach doesn’t work. Trump talks about bankers and insiders running the Cathedral in bust out mode. Ezra Klein and Matt Yglesias hear that and immediately point out that it’s anti-semetic because lots of bankers and insiders are Jews. Jews are ethnocentric and neurotic enough that, for the most part, they react to all accusations of anti-sematism as true.

    If you wage war on progressivism then you’ll wage war on lots of Jews and lots of non-progressive Jews will react as if you’re at war with Jews.

    • jim says:

      If you wage war on progressivism then you’ll wage war on lots of Jews and lots of non-progressive Jews will react as if you’re at war with Jews.

      Yes, damn near all of them. As I have said, Jews are irritatingly paranoid. I think this is a result of exile, and Israel seems to be gradually curing Israeli Jews of paranoia, but it is still damned irritating.

    • Theshadowedknight says:

      Thus giving us a great reason to expel the non-progressive Jews. Take the progressive Jews to the ocean and box up the rest and drop them off on a container ship on Israel’s shore. Give Israel some guns and other arms as recompense for confiscated property, then tell them that the USA is no longer concerned with the peace process in the Middle East. The Arabs will be too preoccupied with dealing with the Israeli expansion to bother Christensen for a few generations, and we will not have Jews sabotaging Amerikaner nationalism.

      The Shadowed Knight

      • Eli says:

        Theshadownigga, presumably, you think us Jews don’t know how to make weapons and such. I have to enlighten you: we do. We don’t need to be “recompensed” with new arms, as we’re not your welfare queens like the Egyptians or Pakis or whatever. We have have our own, some of which is sold internationally and competes (favorably to us) with yours. While some of it is not as good as American-made (but, then again, some is better, at least in the context of its actual use), it’s plenty good enough against the asswipes we are up against. However, when you rob our property from us, you will need to truly compensate us each individually for the loss of our hard-earned valuables. To do so, in this day and age, means giving something truly valuable back. That includes (but is not limited to) intellectual property and/or preferred shares in established companies that sustain the American industrial and agricultural base. Otherwise, you truly are a nigger (just like your other “fellow” Nazis) and will deserve what will come to you (to be more precise: dick into your ass, among other such wholesome things; certainly, some of those coming from said “Americuners”).

        As to killing our people for explicit “Jewish” reasons… whatever : you better get that ice cold dick into your ass right now, to wake yourself up from your depraved dreams.

        • Theshadowedknight says:

          You foreign aid receipts put the lie to your welfare queen protest. As the title of the post says, you flee when no one chases. Such a perfect demonstration of the concept with so little self awareness. Thank you.

          For the rest, considering how your people have repaid our hospitality, you are entitled to your lives and what you can liquidate and carry with you. Given the damage your tribe has done to the American manufacturing base, you have no right to any of it. The arms are the last you will receive from us. A severing of the parasitic relationship between America and Israel.

          Though I have to say, I admire the chutzpah. Demanding more after all that you have taken? That is pretty ballsy. The kind of balls it will take to claim your land from the Arabs. Good luck with that.

          The Shadowed Knight

          • Eli says:

            Israel, indeed, got very substantial economic aid from 1970s to mid2000s. All of the aid now comes as military packages, as pork to the US contractors, with (as of last year) absolutely nothing going to Israeli companies. It is debatable whether it was the US that was (and actually still is) benefitting or (certainly, past 2007) Israel. On top of that, the US secured itself a very useful ability to meddle in internal Israeli affairs — something that’s been quite harmful to Israel, vis-a-vis its cohesion and ability to be truly autonomous. You can explore those topics on your own, if it’s truth that you are after, as opposed to finding scapegoats for your loserdom.

            Also, there is a difference between aid, to help an important strategic ally to get on their feet (like helping a temporarily unemployed or sick relative, or a child) vs keeping someone who is deeply hostile to you on an indefinite life support with the latter being incapable of ever sustaining themselves without your help. If you can’t distinguish between the two scenarios, you’re also not bright.

            I don’t owe you shit. I’ve earned my own stuff, paid my taxes, and didn’t take anything from your silly ass. You taking stuff from me under duress is robbing. It’s what niggers do.

            • Theshadowedknight says:

              Meddling in another nation’s affairs, especially vis-a-vis it’s cohesion. Sustaining a deeply hostile nation. You are sounding more and more like Vox’s Second Law. Jim was right. You flee because you are guilty, and every protest reveals your guilt.

              We will not be robbing you. We will be exiling you to your homeland. If you have to leave something behind, too bad. Should have thought about that before giving moral cover to the backers of the invasion of the West.

              The Shadowed Knight

              • Eli says:

                Yep. Like I said: nigger. You can likewise get exiled to your home country of Ireland and return this land back to Amerindians and Mexicans, to whom it rightfully belongs. You can take your mom’s PC with you, it should be ok w me.

                • Theshadowedknight says:

                  This country is mine by right of conquest, just as the Amerindians that took it before me. If you wish to contest my claim to this land in that manner, you might first compare the relative sizes of our populations. You would find that you will not be much of a challenge. The American Tribes were a worthy foe, and a warrior people. You are a people of bankers and effetes. Their destruction took place when our hold was not yet stable. You do not have that advantage.

                  I would prefer to simply move your people home. If it comes to a fight, however, then you chose your side. The Germans are pretty good, but the English are even better. We built an empire the likes of which has never been seen before. We are old hands at stomping out the more troublesome inhabitants of our lands.

                  The Shadowed Knight

                • peppermint says:

                  By the way, Jews have an inflated sense of numbers from all the second degree mischlinge and even more diluted Jews, and converts to Judaism, who currently identify as Jews because it advantages them to.

                  If there isn’t a race war, I expect a lot more Jews than the young Jews I know with obvious Jewish features to side with Whites and take their chances as our dhimmis. If there is a race war, they’ll have to leave, but a lot of people who currently identify as Jews will quietly switch to identifying as Whites.

                  And, of course, in a race war situation the Orthodox Jews are soft targets and the other Jews are surrounded by enemies. If one in a hundred Whites decided to slaughter the Jews within arms reach it would cover the entire Jewish population, so starting that race war would be inadvisable.

                • Eli says:

                  This country belongs to descendants of those who conquered this land, let’s go along. I don’t have the exact numbers now, but most of the whites arrived here after the bulk of the job had been done. Ashkenazi Jews started arriving no later than the Irish trash, with many coming before other groups, e.g. the South Italian peasantry.

                  Sephardi Jews lived in the States even earlier, coming before most groups, living alongside the English and participating in said conquest, in 17th and 18th century (though it’s useful to keep in mind that something like 90% of Amerindian fatalities were due to non-native disease, not to bravery of shadowed niggers on the battlefield):


                  If you deport Jews, deport the Irish, the Germans, the Italians, etc. Either way, I don’t expect any true race war. At most, a bunch of pogroms from dirty apes and trash like yourself, but ultimately anything that hurts my people will hurt yours tenfold.

                  You can’t be English, homedog. My paternal grandmother is of English (and kulak) stock, both in maiden name and spirit: she always worked to get her stuff done, and never complained, taking care of her family, despite all the hardships of post-WW2 Soviet Union. But you? You are a nigger. Get a job, a mail-order bride, and stop demanding my goods and my money while accusing me and my people of witchcraft.

                • Theshadowedknight says:

                  My paternal line arrived on the Mayflower. My family has been in this country since before it was this country. My family has fought for this country for generations. The non-native bloodlines simply made me a stringer shitlord.

                  Now you talk about witchcraft. I never said anything about witchcraft. You brought that up on your own. Guilty conscience? Most interesting.

                  The Shadowed Knight

                • peppermint says:

                  Yes, the final argument of the Jew is that he is hwite. I can live with that, we can have total assimilation with bagels being as important as pizza and Yom Kippur as important as St. Patrick’s Day. We will add your biological and cultural distinctiveness to our own. Or you can go back to Israel.

                • Cavalier says:

                  Whoops, looks like a malfunction. Allow me to restate.

                  I want so badly to pardon to pardon the Jews of their heinous crimes and move on, but kikes like you make me want to give you all first-class tickets on the Holocoaster Express.

                  There, I think I got it right this time.

                • Eli says:

                  As I’ve said earlier, accusing of voodoo evil mind rays is accusing of witchcraft. It is what is done on frequent basis by easily swayed children, women, and imbeciles who cannot think for themselves and seek charismatic authority figures and their ideas. When those ideas mislead them, they start pointing fingers.

                  Cav: the only express you are queued up for is a car of dirty nukes down your orifices.

                • Cavalier says:

                  “the only express you are queued up for is a car of dirty nukes down your orifices”

                  When the Romans razed your temple their fatal mistake was not finishing the job.

                • peppermint says:

                  Eli, America is going to be a nation-state soon, and your choices will be your biological and technological distictiveness being added to your own and your culture adapted to service us, or repatriation to Israel, and one of those is going to happen regardless of how many times you say the word nigger.

                • Eli says:

                  Peppermint, I am doubtful that the US is going to be a nation state in the sense that you’re envisioning it. Not soon anyhow.

                  I have not decided completely, but repatriation looks to be the correct choice in the mid to long term. I still plan on staying in the immediate near term, and do at least one serious road trip to explore more of the land’s grandeur.

                  If I do end up completely repatriating, I will miss parts of the American nature, along with a few other things and some dear people.

              • Ron says:


                Except you meddle in our affairs constantly.

                Most of our problems from the leftist traitors and the #{%{* arabs exist because you directly bankroll them, threaten our government if we dont comply with suicidal policy demands, and send in your foreign NGO’s to wreck havoc with our elections and culture.

                Yes, you give us money. You also give the Arabs even more, I never hear [[you people]] bitching and whining about them.

                It doesnt matter, once we get the oil fields running we wont need that cash. But knowing you, thats exactly why you’ll probably do everything you can to destroy it.

                • Theshadowedknight says:

                  No, if you exterminate the Arabs after we repatriate the Jews in America, I could care less. The payments to Israel stop, and the same to the Saudis, Egypt, Pakistan, etc. I wish Israel well, but in the sense that good fences make good neighbors.

                  If you have never heard me bitching about Arabs, you have not been paying attention. My answer to the Jewish Question is fuck off and have a nice life. My answer to the Arab Question is Make Constantinople Great Again, The Last Crusade, Deus Vult, and more in that line. You get your own country, they have their people enslaved and their religion exterminated.

                  The Shadowed Knight

            • peppermint says:

              Yeah, the US is supposed to have sold Israel top-tech US jets in exchange for Israel canceling its plans to build its own jets.

              Is that kind of arrangement really good for Israel? Time to break it off.

            • jim says:

              Eli is right that American “assistance” is increasingly of dubious or negative value to Israel.

              Further, entirely Jewish progressives, in particular Israel’s supreme court, are screwing over Israel in pretty much the same way that America’s disproportionately Jewish progressives are screwing over America.

              I think that when European Jews vote for the Islamification of Europe, they are thinking that socially conservative and religious Jews will keep them a safe space in Israel. And then when they go to Israel, will likely vote for the Islamification of Israel, much as Californians fleeing diversity then vote for diversifying the white states they flee to.

              • EH says:

                Well said. Also, the porn, miscegenation propaganda, over-education of women and resulting imploding population and all the rest of the culture war tactics affect Jews even more than Gentiles.

              • Greg says:

                What Ashkenazic Jews in Israel eventually realize is that not every Jew over there is a cousin, unlike back in the Shtetl. That’s why they’ll eventually apply full Diaspora Tactics in Israel as well.

                Our descendants may witness the day when Israel will pogrom the Ashkenazim out of the country.

        • viking says:

          now now no ones confiscating your property but euros are waking up to the JQ and non-liberal jews had better get on the record as whites first jews incidentally and defenders of westciv always , the remaining refusniks had better get on the record as well either as jews first seeking shelter in the west with the understanding they can hold no sensitive positions, or as enemy jews who request time to get their affairs in order before emmigrating

          • jim says:

            Going after Jews is a distraction from going after progressives.

            If you think that Jews are hostile to whites because they internally do not think of themselves as white, then regardless of whether that is true or false, you are apt to assume that non Jewish whites are pro white – an enormous error, which leads you to conclude that 1930s leftism is just fine.

            Thinking too much about Jews sends people crazy. Trump’s ad has roughly the correct focus. He is obviously aware of the Jewish question, but not obsessed and distracted by it. When he says “The political elite has bled this country dry” he actually means “the political elite”, not “the Jews”, neither forgetting that the political elite is disproportionately Jewish, nor distracted by that fact into thinking that Jews and the political elite are one and the same.

          • Eli says:

            The ones who you should be after (if you are sane and have some wits about you) are those co-citizens of yours for whom the universalist religion comes first — before any other identity — and who act on such beliefs with an actual effect, an effect describable not as a result of voodoo-like “evil mind rays” (for if you believe that, you are a nigger). Among them, a chunk is Jewish. Of those who are nominally Jewish, many identify with values that are not Jewish or are barely so, and a portion of that chunk leans anti-Israel, even anti-Jewish. A few of those individuals actually act on those beliefs, with actual detrimental effects. Either way, concrete people should be judged under non-arbitrary, race-blind laws, convicted and punished for their concrete (individual crime) deeds and not for their viewpoints. Running around with a blowtorch, seeing witches everywhere, is exactly the moronic thing to do.

            As to me, I am pro-civilization: whether it comes from the East (as it used to be) or from the West (like since around the time of the Greeks, with a few notable exceptions) is immaterial. What concerns me is what keeps civilization going. Which means I am pro-Judaism and Jews-come-first, as is dictated by the Torah, because it is by following the Law that civilization has any hope of continuing. If you wish me to care for your ass, then you too need to either follow the Law or at least a portion thereof (Noahide laws) — as it is the only way for your descendants to stay human and not turn into monkeys.

            I don’t plan on moving/running anywhere, at least not in the nearterm future. I am productively employed, have a comfortable life. I certainly don’t have much for patriotism about this country, certainly not like before, because I no longer believe that American nation is a reality, unless you count some special communities, which are tribes/nations onto themselves. I used to believe America was a nation. Now I see it’s not.

            The other day I was walking in my city’s shopping street and passed a huge line: people were waiting to get an autograph from some sports player, who was signing t-shirts. A few days earlier I passed a white, well-dressed family with father, mother, a young (late 20s) woman and teenage sister, just coming from a restaurant. The young woman was cussing, apparently unhappy about something, completely disregarding her own father, who certainly was the one who paid for that lovely family dinner and who, I’m sure, imagined that his daughter would be blessing him with grandchildren. When the only religion/tribe you have is sports teams and the oafs who play them are celebrities, and when fathers are treated as pieces of shit who get no respect, is that still Jews’ fault? If it is, you’re a nigger-fag.

            • jim says:

              Even though second wave feminism is overwhelmingly Jewish, it is obvious that wives and daughters treating their husbands and fathers like shit was baked into the cake by first wave feminism, as for example Marie Curie getting not one but two Noble prizes for a discovery that was made by her husband, and would have been entirely forgettable had a woman not been given credit for it, due to her husband’s convenient traffic accident, and Amelia Earhart getting a ticker tape parade for being carried across the Atlantic by a man like a sack of potatoes.

    • guest says:

      They are the tip of the spear, pushing every degenerate progressive idea they can find, and you can’t oppose one without locking horns with the other. It’s like the dual alliance of Germany and Austria-Hungary before WW1, attacking one will drag the other along, they are intertwined.

  10. Anon says:

    Jim, what do you think about this whole spirit cooking thing. It seems most of the children involved are undoucumented migrants stolen from countries by “charities” and troubles children from troubled families. Is this thing imevitable, or do you think that Trump would stop it? It seems to me that this type of thibg has been done in western nations for atleast 50, 60 plus years, if not since the beginming of time. What do you think?

    • Cavalier says:

      Seconding. I’m a cynic to the bone, and I knew they were psychopathic, infinitely corrupt, traitorous swine, but I never really put much stock in any Satanist stuff. Yet there are definitely pictures of simulated human sacrifices and other weird, creepy shit, the Epstein child rapes seem a lot more probable, and the possibility of actual human sacrifice is becoming more plausible by the minute.

      Basically, Alex Jones is becoming frighteningly credible frighteningly quickly.

    • Alfred says:

      The elite being into new age antics is not new, Blair did rebirthing ceremonies with crystals. Though that’s definitely a step down from child trafficking and satanism. Not sure I believe its that bad though.

    • jim says:

      Elite needs a religion to bind them together. Satan worship has the advantage of providing unspeakable acts and blackmail material.

      All societies necessarily have a state religion, or perhaps rather all white societies necessarily have a state religion. This is our state religion.

      Regular people have to declare that transexuals are stunning and brave. The elite has to take things a little further.

      You know my prescription: Have an Archbishop and and Grand Inquisitor. The Archbishop proclaims what beliefs you have to believe, or at least piously pretend to believe, in order to be a member of the ruling elite. The Grand Inquisitor monitors the elite for heresy and apostacy, and in particular and especially claims to be holier than the King, the Archbishop, and the Grand Inquisitor.

      That way we don’t get our elite eating sexual secretions.

      • Cavalier says:

        If some of our ruling elite are Satanists, I guess our entire ruling elite is Satanist. And if not themselves Satanist, tacitly approving of Satanism, or why hasn’t anyone spoken out? Wine in sewage, sewage in wine.

        So is Satanism part of Progressivism, descended from Progressivism, a Progressive heresy, or is it the ruling elite’s heresy of Christianity while the commoners get Progressivism?

      • Ron says:

        No, you will still have that.

        The only difference is that the satan worshipping baby killers will realize that the best way to be able to terrorize and hurt people will be to get the job of grand inquisitor and the best way to be above suspicion is the get the job of archbishop.

        Power concentrated is power that can be used by bad men against good man.

        • Cavalier says:

          Power seems to be pretty concentrated already, or is the world not owned and operated by child-raping, blood-and-semen cocktail-sipping satanists?

    • Pseudo-chrysostom says:

      Sick shit is a coordinating mechanism for hostile or parasitic overlords: once you get someone to participate in the childfucking orgy, you’ve now got primo blackmail you can bury them with if they ever think about going off the reservation.

    • viking says:

      you have some evidence of this child thing? and please not the alex jones cited email by the kids mother about the pool party

      • Cavalier says:

        It’s all over /pol/. Here are a couple of pics I saved into a folder entitled “flay them alive”.

        Oh, and the Podesta brothers…well, just look:


      • EH says:

        See and be sure to look at the whole thread linked in the second link. Looks very much like an underground dungeon site, chemical/lye body disposal residue.

        • jim says:

          Yes, it is clear that Comet Ping Pong Pizza had enormous connections to the rich and powerful, in particular the Clinton circle,, that they imported third world children that no one would miss due to war and natural disaster, keep these children in dungeons, use them for sexual purposes, and from time to time killed them and disposed of the bodies

          Hence Trump’s joke: Hillary told us it takes a village, and she has taken several villages.

          This was an insider joke – and now, thanks to people industriously stealing the emails of the Clinton circle, it is now becoming a joke on all of us.

          I don’t think Hillary herself stole those children, but it is clear she ran cover for those that did.

        • Anon says:

          Sorry, but one more t,hing. Might be posted in one of the other links but worth mentioning. Funny thing, the day Madeline was Abducted Podesta had some sort of crisis and was emailing back and forth about deleting emails and files and stuff, very agitated. Also emails from 2014 showed he traveled to Portugal that year, not same year but interesting. Lots of sleuth work going on.

          True Detective Season 2 was going to have a dark underworld story based on creepy history of underground subway areas used for….. Things. Comet Pizza, Besta Pizza, others located above old underground networks. for some reason season 2 never got around to doing that.

          Also noteworthy from 8ch sleuths that pizzerias very commonly have hidden areas, trap doors, and weird names like Orgasmica pizza SF, he quit job after finding one of them, realized what a naive idiot he was working as a janitor there. Also noted how shitty art is a good way of laundering money fit, Uhhhhh, pizza parties and connections with the chosen especially but all good progressives.

          Tony Podesta has some really weird art collections. Podestas also have self-described torture chamber in email. it’s all a joke though, upstanding guys.

          • jim says:

            For ordinary mortals, it suffices to piously proclaim that transexuals are stunning and brave, but at the highest levels of progressivism, more extreme measures are needed to prove and enforce loyalty.

      • Anon says:

        Eyes wide shut by Kubrick, big theme is people renting out their daughters. At the end little girl of main character wanders off with two old men seen earlier in ultra rich parties. in a fictional world in which Podesta brothers aren’t completely celibate and good as they Are in real life, sounds like that might be what parents of Madeleine McCann did.

        Also, interestingly Kubrick was said to be in good health, but died before he could finish and release the film. of course this is coincidence. Some say that the following film had many cuts and scenes deleted and important things left out, nothing but silly rumors though

      • Anon says:

        oh, that reminds me, the main character, originally a relatively naive, innocent, moral man who becomes a pawn of the elites has some details changed from the novel it was somewhat based on.

        in original novel set in ~1900 Vienna main character is middle class Jew ans slightly less innocent and faithful to his wife. Kubrick absolutely insisted in his version that the character would be a goy, he made it very much a point.

Leave a Reply