Marc Andreessen does not get it

The progs believe that Marc Andreessen is the primary ideologist of the tech oligarch wing of the Trump coalition. This is an odd delusion.

Under the New York Times new policy of listening to their enemies for a change, the New York Times interviewed Mark Andreessen.

Andreessen is a natural born Havel’s Greengrocer. There is not a political thought in his head. Political thoughts continually explode out of Musk, who not merely very good at tech priesting, but is a natural prophet.

Believing Andreessen to be an important ideologist, the New York Times asked him ideological questions, and he responded with what he no doubt thought, and the New York Times probably thought, were ideological answers. They were not.

Being a good little Havel’s Green Grocer, he was reading the New York Times every day, and watching MSNBC news every night, to hear his betters tell him how to be a good person, so utterly immersed in madness, delusion, malice, hatred, evil, destructiveness, and self destructiveness, and seeing it as normal and right. He was a good Havel’s Greengrocer, and the NYT Interviewer was kind of shocked to discover that Marc Andreessen had very recently been watching MSNBC and the New York Times in order to receive the very latest instructions on what to say and what to think in order to be a good person.

He is told that to be a good person he must hate himself and harm himself, and hate everyone around him and harm everyone around him, but in 2018 he starts to feel a little uneasy about being a good person. But he cannot actually put words to this feeling. Still cannot.

Mark Andreessen sees, starting around 2012 or so, that about twenty percent of new hires are woke communists who want to destroy the company because white, male, straight, and capitalist. (But fails to see that this he because he is hiring from elite universities) and that sixty percent of his staff go along with them (but fails to see that this additional sixty percent are going along with the twenty percent because he and Human Resources are telling everyone that they must conform to superior holiness, or else they will suffer devastating career consequence) so that a total of eighty percent of his staff want to destroy the company, destroy him, and destroy capitalism. (But fails to see that he and Human Resources are terrorizing his staff into seeking the destruction of the company and the destruction of Marc Andreesen, fails to see that mandatory sensitivity training courses are training everyone “Smash capitalism, starting with this company, and smash the company starting with Marc Andreessen”.)

And then in 2020, full on terror campaign from the Biden gestalt.

in 2023 or so, he saw that the Biden Gestalt intended to destroy him and everyone like him, and he and everyone in Big Tech like him decided that they had enough of being a good person. From 2012 onwards, reality was punching him in the face, and he felt the punches, but could not see reality punching him. Still cannot.

He is still full of the same ideology as he always was. He has just decided to be a sinner.

At 2745 in the video, he finally disagrees with the virtue and moral superiority of the New York times on the question of taxation and deficit spending. He tells the interviewer that the interviewer is “dripping with contempt for the American taxpayer”. Did not notice all the other evil and malice, but this part has been getting on his nerves. OK, that is a political thought, but he has not one political thought about the campaign of destruction he complains about being waged against him and his companies from within for thirteen years.

“The last decade has been very educational” His education, however, is seriously lacking.

“Equity” is defined by its theologians as state managed redistribution of assets from white males to everyone else — Marxism, except of course that they are focused on cultural assets, hence what happened to video games and Star Wars, rather than the means of production. The ideology of Equity is cultural Marxism, but of course part of Marc Andreesan’s straight white male privilege is the company and his material assets, so that naturally has to go as well. Hence sensitivity training and all that, where one is forced to attend self righteous fire and brimstone sermons by the priesthood of Woke, are sermons in destroying the company and destroying Mark Andreesen. To which Marc Andreesan was remains utterly oblivious. And still is.

The faith that threatened him and his businesses was accepted within his businesses because backed by intimidating power. Employees were terrified. Woke created an environment of omnipresent fear and hatred in every business. In his discussion with the New York Times, he says how he felt bad. But neglected to mention, or perhaps notice, how unpleasant and frightening it was for his employees.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion divides the room into “oppressors” and “oppressed”, and then unleashes the “oppressed” to wreak vengeance upon the “oppressors”. Trotsky tells the peasant with one cow “hail follow peasant, you are oppressed by the kulak with two cows, fellow peasant. Fellow peasant, you should kill the cows of the kulak with two cows, fellow peasant”, and in the end Trotsky has the land and the wheat, and the former owner of one cow, and the former owner of two cows, starve. This is terrifying and extremely unpleasant if you are one of the oppressor class, if you are male, if you are straight, or if you are white. Hence the curiously large number of cross dressing engineers.

Leftism uses people’s wickedness and sinfulness to turn people against each other, so that leftists can destroy them all, both “oppressors”, and “oppressed”.

Marc Andreessen could not see that, still cannot see that, perhaps because it would be too disturbing to see the woke as demonic, rather that excessively and unwisely benevolent and caring. Thermidor is lapsed woke, not actually reactionary.

Mark Andreessen has noticed the free speech retcon, the net neutrality retcon, and the money in politics retcon. I am a fair bit older than he is, and have lived through retcons far more radical, as parodied by Orwell, and after Moldbug got me reading history, I discovered a pile of leftist radical shift going back all the way to Cromwell. Leftism has no essence, every left wing position is merely tactical, and is likely to be reversed in an instant, and every good Havel’s Greengrocer instantly forgets the old position, as in Orwell’s depiction of a reversal in the middle of Hate Week. From 2012 onwards, Marc Andreessen was a bad Havel’s Greengrocer, but he still fails to remember all the retcons from before 2012.