Starting, of course, with Don Lemon.
If an individual disrupts a church service, is individually asked to leave, and fails to leave, he is individually guilty of trespass.
If a group of people conspire together to disrupt a church service, you cannot individually ask them to leave, you cannot individually prove individual trespass, because too many of them and too much chaos. The state has to perform its primary function — as the sole group whose job is organised violence and coercion, it has to coerce other organised groups using organised violence and coercion. Such as the one Don Lemon was part of. In which case the state charges them not with individual trespass, but with collective conspiracy to disrupt and threaten other people to prevent them from exercising their rights, the Face act and the KKK act.
Don Lemon conspired, probably with a substantial part of the rest of the legacy media and the Democrat party (but I repeat myself) to shut down a Church service in order to pressure and intimidate the Church to fire a part time pastor whose full time job was working for Ice.
Don Lemon did not commit any crime at the Church that is practical to prosecute. The crime that is feasible to prosecute was the actions that led to him and many others being in the Church in the first place. The crime that Pam Bondi can prosecute was committed far away from the Church, and involved large numbers of people who did not show up, but funded and directed the out-of-state renta-mob that did show up, and sent Don Lemon to cover their renta-mob, in order to intimidate people into cancelling and deplatforming other people associated with Ice, thus creating and maintaining by fear the illusion of broad consensus that Ice are bad people doing bad things.
The fundamental theory of the case against the Legacy Media should be that, when the public stopped listening to them, they set about using organised collective violence such as the BLM to shut down competing voices — not by striking directly at opposing voices, many of whom were hardened targets, but striking at soft targets who had connections with those voices. Such as the Church in Minnesota.
A comment elsewhere online from someone currently living in Minnesota (and strongly considering leaving):
And in reply, someone did bring up, as you did here, the FACE act.
To borrow some phrasing from a comment at YouTube, if you’re expecting Pam “Non Stick” Bondi to so much as charge any of people involved, let alone Don Lemon; for her to do anything at all but “tweet and appear on FOX News,” well… don’t hold your breath.
As far as I can tell, the only question is whether ICE pulls out of Minnesota before or after the Democrats win the midterm later this year.
Granted, it’s still early days but:
https://archive.ph/u9bqs
We shall see…
“grand jury subpoenas”
And how often have those gone anywhere against Dem politicians, versus all the times they haven’t?
There has just been a purge at the Department of Justice, of prosecutors who were determined to make sure they went nowhere.
A lot of us have been complaining that Pam Bondi talks a big fight, but her department just does nothing, or continues to actively menace Trump supporters with weaponized political prosecution. Well, of course. She is just a women. Women are inherently incapable of the necessary kind of leadership. However, with Trump standing over her, and some capable male assistants, stuff is likely to get done, and at least some stuff has just been done.
You try this in a black church or a mosque and you get hammered with various civil rights violations.
Trump has to put these people on the dock, now, or this spirals out of control.
Ellison needs to be charged with Federsl Civil Rights violations, immediately.
Perp walk them all, or it’s to the law of the jungle we go.
“All” not being the low rent renta-mob that the legacy media and Democratic party politicians sent in, but the people that paid the renta-mob and sent them in.