And George Galloway is a straight commie.
George Galloway is in his seventies, and for as long as I can remember he was the leading voice and face of the radical left of the British labour party, and was organising protests against the western side in every war that I can remember. (In 2003 he was purged from labour for being too far left.) He is now self exiled from Britain, from his house, his home and the circle of his friends, due to a well founded fear that should he show his face in a British airport, he will be subject to state violence because he thinks that women are not men, because he thinks that it is probably not a good idea for Britain to pick a fight with a state that has three thousand nuclear weapons, and similarly shocking and unthinkable thoughts.
In the Iraq war, George Galloway was a guest on the BBC every day ranting about American imperialism. For the last decade or so, he has been persona non grata in the European legacy media, and, predictably, cancellation, demonetization, and deplatforming has now escalated to state violence.
Nick Fuentes hyperbolically claims to be the most cancelled man in America. Elon Musk thinks that Nick Fuentes is on the fed payroll. And I agree.
Nick Fuentes was invited onto “Piers Morgan Uncensored”, and much hilarity ensued as Piers Morgan was completely discombobulated to find he was debating someone who was actually uncensored.
Piers Morgan would show a Nick Fuentes clip, and complain that the clip was ism and phobia, and accuse Nick of being an ist and a phobe. Nick would smile like the cat that got the cream, and cheerfully say the unsayable all over again. Nick effortlessly won every argument, because Nick has thought all these things through while Piers Morgan has never heard these thoughts nor seen this evidence and still cannot hear these thoughts nor see this evidence.
But Nick is still a gay commie. The reason they are platforming Nick Fuentes while they are still trying to put Andrew Tate in jail is that though Nick Fuentes is right about women and the holocaust, Andrew Tate is a lot more right about women than Nick Fuentes.
The difference between Fuentes and Tate on women is that though they both say that women need to be conquered and subdued, Tate also says that they want to be conquered and subdued, and are bitter and unhappy because they cannot find anyone capable of conquering and subduing them.
Nick Fuentes is a limited hangout. He is the left deciding to open the Overton window substantially, but by no means all the way — not to anyone who actually frightens them.
It was entertaining to see Nick slice and dice Piers, it was good to see the mainstream encounter someone saying the unsayable, but every answer Nick gave was a soft wobbly retreat from the full thought crime. We have better and more important things to say that he was willing to say.
It is great that the British left is now willing to hear what Nick Fuentes is saying. But they still cannot hear what George Galloway is saying, and still less can they hear what Andrew Tate is saying.
Piers “You’re not gay”
Fuentes [pauses, looks away] “No”
LOL
P.S. A terribly belated Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, lads. Was offline for a low-tech family holiday.
I don’t think Nick is gay, or a commie, or a fed. I’m certainly not his greatest fan but he is definitely in the right place at the right time politically, and I think it’s entirely coincidental.
Gay is a weird take. Should he just be fucking random women? To show he likes them? I don’t get it. It’s inevitable given our hypersexualised culture that a proportion of men enculturated into it just don’t react to the signal anymore. “Give insta thots attention!!” .. no.
I think Nick is fairly redpilled on women in general, but it’s just not really his area of interest. Whether Nick is more strategic, as talking shit about women is guaranteed social death, or he doesn’t see that managing women is number one priority, I can’t tell.
I think his position on social welfare is simply “If we have to allow that in order to have closed borders so be it”. I’ve not watched 100% of his content obviously but in general it seems like his opinion is not that welfare is morally good or something to strive for, but something that, in normie politics, is necessary to consider.
Fed is too readily thrown around as well. I don’t see it. Places I do see fed are, for example, Thomas Massey in Aus.
Regardless, you raise a very interesting point about Galloway. He is unironically a commie, and yet fully against what amount to fairly communist governments in the west.
Hope you had a good Christmas mate.
>I don’t think Nick is gay
Nick looks at other men the same way an open, flamboyant faggot would.
Nick Fuentes Catboy Kami GIFfrom Nick Fuentes GIFs
That’s not even the most damning evidence. During a stream in 2022 from his phone, his browser windows were briefly in view. One of them, “Tgirl sucking a femboy’s dick and then he jerks until cum.” It’s not even his first run in with “I was hacked” gay porn. Then you look at his social circle. A lot of gays.
It’s been an open secret for years now and the subject of parody.
https://www.murdochmurdoch.net/murdoch/in-the-court-of-the-optics-king/
Acting like that isn’t terribly out of character from males in his age cohort, particularly those whose ideology coalesced in the anime/4chan/pol/early Twitter environment.
Shill test: Because the art of courtship has been reconfigured into a grotesque straight-male humiliation ritual/eligible bride whore-production-plant by childless, demon-worshipping cat ladies, lesbians, and faggots, the environment for family building is currently untenable
Seems obvious to me he was installed by the FBI in the right place at right time politically.
It still a win for us, I am not complaining. I just say its less of win than advertised and more dangerous to us than advertised — the enemy is not defeated, merely making a tactical retreat to more defensible positions.
The Cathedral has long mastered the art of herding its own wolves. But if one’s call is loud enough to gather others who demand to be led, maybe the right chad wolf could be found.
It’s hard to trust someone with skinny arms, but maybe he will be an Aristotle to an Alexander.
Gay.
Women are always every straight man’s area of interest.
Greetings,
Interesting that we pivot to Nick at this time, but he is flooding the country with groypers and I’m sure some of them are very fine people.
Based on his Carlson interview, he would pass the WQ though. He took a traditional patriarchal stance.
I am much more interested in how the Venezuelan situation will impact BitCoin.
Fuentes agreed enthusiastically with Cucker Tarlson that America is a ‘patriarchy’. They were quite sure, and pleased with one another.
Cucker doesn’t even run his own household of princesses, much less preside over a patriarchy with his fellow rich and connected friends. And this priviledged dweeb is the anointed Edgy Conservative who tackles the tough topics. It is to puke.
Again, I am more interested in money than the latest controlled opposition assets, but I don’t disagree with what you wrote. Both their mannerisms strike me as effeminate.
Cucker is as soft as the Pillsbury Dough Boy. Like the Cuckservatives that follow him.
He and his church’s satanic ‘Happy Wife, Happy Life’ doctrine is an inversion of real Christianity, with its father-led household as pillar of God’s Holy Patriarchy. America is a recapitulation of the ancient mother-goddess cults, which is why the U.S. exports feminism around the world. And why its ruling district is named ‘Columbia’.
You scratch the surface of a nation enough, you will always discover spiritual warfare beneath.
Has Tucker endorsed that doctrine? I don’t think so, and he frequently makes unkind references to Episcopalian leadership.
I often say I am the last Anglican. This is of course, hyperbole, Gafcon are the last Anglicans — and the last Episcopalians. And Tucker’s unkind references to Episcopalianism aligns him with Gafcon Episcopalians.
I find this very hard to believe. Link and time please.
Humungus claimed Nick could pass the WQ based on Carlson interview.
At 1:30:40
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=efBB0D4tf1Y
He makes the statement, “your body my choice.” Which was a sufficient thought crime. He later discusses women being subordinate to their husband.
I’m not here to defend Fuentes, but if he was presented with the WQ, he would commit the thought crime.
Why is he a concern?
Humungus has considered your opinions on Fuentes and observed interviews of said subject. Most of his dialog is not original thought and are the product of other media figures. He is aware what he says is provocative, yet he is profiting financially from the attention. He’s accustomed to a comfortable living yet limited his opportunities with his infamy and now is trapped in this character he created.
Notably, he is permitted to commit multiple thoughtcrimes across platforms that previously censored much less.
He has a producer which could be connected to the feds influencing his content. He claims he is not gay but his behavior is suspicious.
My opinion is: He is being put forward as an example of why conservative speech must end, an unwitting agent provocateur for the left.
Nick is doing what our enemies call “pre bunking”.
The cannot debunk their opponents positions, because they cannot acknowledge their opponents say what they say. So they create a cruel and silly version of their opponents ideas, so that people will dismiss the actual ideas when they do hear them.
By proposing the solution — by proposing that we should unemancipate women — without dwelling on the nature of women, Nick pre-bunks the solution.
The woman problem cannot be fixed unless one realises that it is just a shit test — that when women faced with the strong hand that women hunger for, women will cooperate.
Just look at “literature”. These days it is all female oriented porn all the time. Few actual books are written any more. And almost all the porn is set in a universe where either women in general or the main female character in particular are unemancipated. Women never wanted emancipation. It was always a shit test. Everyone hungers for the ancestral environment of successful reproduction, and in the ancestral environment of successful reproduction, women were property, and an unowned woman was likely to perish and unlikely to successfully reproduce.
Nick proposes the solution, but without explaining the problem and the likely effect of the solution. Tate does the reverse. If you propose the solution without explaining the problem, and explaining why the solution is going to have the effects that it will have, then you are pre-bunking the solution.
Even if the feminists are right, and women truly desire freedom, they can’t have it because their nations desperately need babies. Why then must we argue about what women want?
Tucker Carlson has four preppy white kids by his first and only wife. The wife and kids so far have stayed out of the spotlight, which is a good start on well behaved in this day and age. So he passes Pauline criteria for an elder.
Polygamous harem of princesses is a tall ask in current year, and you may never get it at all.
And I’m a guy who’s said before now that Tucker pretty clearly was and still is WASP wing of the CIA. So still a kind of limited hangout, seeing what the restless native stock will settle for. But still less hostile to his co-ethnics than a gay or a jew will be.
Tucker is a WASP?
The Venezuala raid was impressive and gives Trump and the reputation of American arms some much needed mojo but l hope the aftermath is not a foreverwar.
At least it was done competently. Under Bush, Biden or Obama (or either Clinton), we would have woken up to see captured US soldiers being paraded on VZ state television.
Apropos of nothing, thought I would share these two articles:
https://substack.com/@cremieux/p-180067645 (Paywall)
https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/the-baby-boom
TL;DR: Feminism is not compatible with biological continuation.
Of course, this is not news to anyone here – some of the charts have been floating around this blog for over a decade – but it’s a good explanation of the anti-feminist argument. Naturally Jim will probably complain that they failed to recommend coverture or include the evopsych explanation for just why this is the case, but the fact that these articles have even been published is enormous. These guys are not nobodies and they’re a lot closer to informing “elite consensus” than you think (or at least a certain part of the elite).
I liked the latter author’s review of JD Unwin and also when he quantifies marriage rates vs male female income ratio.
The Unwin review states gender norms change every 3 generations.
Similar to how Putin ended Covid in 2022, Trump just ended Global Warming in Canada. No longer are leftists chanting “Leave It In The Ground” because of muh carbon, now we need to pump as much oil as possible and build pipelines to make our economy strong enough to resist evil orange man. Kinda funny since all of the oil is about to leave anyway. The Alberta/Saskatchewan independence referenda will happen later this year, and it’s looking like they will vote to leave.
Speaking of which, there are a lot of people with Ukrainian and Canadian flags in their twitter names clamouring for the federal government to use military force to attack the separatist provinces. Canadian provinces seceding and becoming independent, being attacked by the Canadian military for doing so, and America stepping in to help is exactly analogous to the Donbas situation. They dream of grabbing Canadians off of the street and throwing us in trenches to die needlessly just like their neo-nazi heroes in the Ukraine. I don’t fear any such conflict lasting nearly as long as the Special Military Operation for obvious reasons, but it is still something that the Trump Administration needs to be prepared for.
>The Alberta/Saskatchewan independence referenda will happen later this year, and it’s looking like they will vote to leave.
Sorry, a judge said the vote’s not valid. It can’t be done now and it’s out of my hands. You can try again in four years, but make sure you get all your legal/procedural ducks in a row first.
They going to vote anyway? If so and independence wins, especially if by a large margin, I think it’s likely Alberta will say FU to the judge. How many divisions does he have?
No divisions are needed. A few dozen mounties arresting the ringleaders will be more than enough if anyone is stupid enough to threaten Our Democracy.
This kind of sort of looked like it was going to work in Crimea and Donbas, until it stopped looking like it would work.
In Crimea and Donbas, globohomo is up against a sovereign nation with a serious military, its own industrial base, and a huge nuclear arsenal. In Alberta, it’s up against its own pathetic subjects: homeschoolers and local politicians with social media accounts. Rule followers and chumbalones to a man.
It was quite a while before Ukrainians of Russian ethnicity got aid from the Russian government, and in that period, they proved able to successfully put up a fight against a nation state.
It looked at first that they were going to fold, but then a handful of people escalated, then a whole lot of officers and soldiers of Russian ethnicity deserted to the rebels.
The moment someone got serious about resisting the authorities, it rapidly escalated to a full military engagement.
It is not obvious to me. Please explain.
There’s just nothing here. The Ukraine relies on arms and munitions from other countries, who would be giving us stuff? The EU? How would they get anything past the US Navy? All of the oil would be in the separatist provinces too.
Despite being technically the second largest country on Earth, Canada has all of its meaningful development along the US border, which stretches for thousands of miles. And has thousands of miles of coastline to the west, east, and north.
The people are in general way softer than Ukrainians. We’re one of the gayest countries on Earth. They could create “Canadian Nationalism” in the same way the Ukrainian Nazis did, but that would take a very long time and might be impossible with all of the Indians they have flooding in. If they tried it right now, half of the White men would be too gay to do anything, and the other half would welcome American intervention.
One good thing about the flawless success of the Maduro operation is it should strengthen the hand of Christian Nationalist Hegseth over the leftist in the military and politics in the future is increasingly going to come down to the military (since Trump doesn’t have the guts to use ICE to take over even when he probably could have after Kirk). The narrative that Hegseth is a drunk mentally disturbed incompetent washout soldier capatulted way over his head by Trump is no longer sustainable after hes had I think this was his 3rd flawless operation.
This gave Trump and Hegseth an enormous shot of legitimacy and prestige. It is great that he is doing projects like this and executing them competently. But I’m still afraid he’s acting like he has all the time in the world. These are nice projects to work on but he’s still ignoring the elephant in the center of the room. If Trump were president for life followed by his son, then he could tackle these various issues at his convenience. But we only get a few more years of Don and I’m afraid we will be looking back on these days fondly.
Maybe. Or maybe Trump is finding out who among the men with guns is competent and will obey orders.
Notice that Trump situation room was at Mar a Lago , in a hastily made “room” with black sheets hanging from the ceiling.
Trump met and had photo with the men who made the raid.
The disinformation was done also from Mar a Lago , as a screen with X site on it.
The whole operation was done outside the regular loop, White House, pentagon , DoD, DoJ , FBI etc , which explain why no leakage, no mainstream media the New York Times , Washington post etc , not even intel , people say CIA , maybe when gathering information but no direct involvement. Everyone was caught with their pants down including the Deep state which explain the unusual success.
What seem to happen is that a new chain of command being formed and as it succeed more and more it will replace the old one .
Maybe Mar a Lago is the new Washington
I noticed what you noticed, but you actually understood it. If you’re correct, Mar-a-Lago is becoming something of a Versailles, something like an Imperial Palace.
If the snatch had been planned in the Whitehouse, the Deepstate would have leaked it to Venezuela to ensure failure and high American casualties.
The Deep State attitude to the snatch is presumably the same as the Canadian and EU attitude to the snatch, and the Canadian and EU governments are horrified and outraged. It upsets them almost as much as the crackdown on Somali welfare fraud.
Best case scenario is Trump retires in the Spring of 2027 and makes Vance president. Vance could then run as a seasoned incumbent and serve a total of 10 years.
What have those zizians been up to? “The Delirious, Violent, Impossible True Story of the Zizians” by Evan Ratliff in Wired.
https://archive.ph/74pfk
The article begins with a prostration before trans, and really doesn’t examine the rationalistes –an examination which is past due — but is still a good summary of what has been going on. Some of it might be seen as taking sides:
“The Homeland Security agents had determined—wrongly, as it turned out—that Bauckholt, a German citizen, had an expired visa.”
Lol, that was the least thing “wrong” in the whole story. The soi-disant justice system seemed fairly uninterested in keeping them locked up. I wonder what the police thought about it.
Being a murderous cult leader just doesn’t rank that high. So, the whole thing is like a drawn-out low-budget slasher movie. However, there were also the occasional moment of levity, reminiscent of 1970s plane hijacker demands.
Again, why are free range madmen at all permitted?
Because, as you noted earlier, our so-called “justice system” prefers it this way.
Which (to fold in another topic of discussion) Trump bringing Maduro and his wife here to stand trial in a US court might be a bad move. To quote a comment I saw elsewhere on the web:
Sorry Jim, I messed up closing the blockquote tags on that one.
[*fixed*]
A decade ago I called out the effective altruists as evil
Evil people tend to do evil things to those close to them. Killing people is just one of those things. Effective altruist organisations were complicit in the murder of millions. The Zizians are not a cult led by Zis, they are just that wing of effective altruism that takes Timeless Decision Theory seriously in actual practice, and is therefore more likely to murder people up close and personal.
Are you sick and tired of AI gods constantly making perplexing, paradoxical offers to you? We’ve all been there! TDT is the answer!*
*Unless the AI god is evil. In which case, uh…
Utilitarianism is always a rationale and justification for maliciously doing evil to near, because no one genuinely cares about far. So utilitarians are always evil.
Effective Altruism is a particularly elaborate, effective and useful rationale for evil, so Effective Altruists are more evil than other utilitarians.
Trannies are insane. If someone is evil and insane, he is apt to imprudently do evil in ways that bring him to the attention of police. So, inevitably, the tranny wing of the rationalists manifested as the Zizians.
The way the Ziz murders started is that some of the rationalists believed you should care about all sentient beings, and others believed you should care about all living beings. (Of course in both cases this was just an excuse for not caring about those closest to them, and not caring about those whom they owed a duty of care.)
The care-for-all-sentients wing got sick of the care-for-all-life wing out holying them, and tried to exclude them. The care-for-all-life wing crashed the meeting, the care-for-all-sentients wing made a swat call to the cops to get the care-for-all-life wing removed.
When the cops showed up, the trannies of the care-for-all-life wing proceeded to escalate the conflict with the cops.
The cops show up, fearing that some of the crashers may be armed with deadly weapons. The trannies among the crashers then demand that the cops make proper worship and respect of their sexual identity. Cops are disinclined to go through the required trannie rituals when it could get them killed.
And the Ziz saga is stuff just going downhill from there.
Dealing with cops 101: Whenever cops show up, they suspect you might kill them. Your number one priority is to calm this suspicion. Be mindful that admitting to guilt is unlikely to calm this suspicion, even if you are obviously guilty. Admitting to guilt is congruent with intent to fight your way out of it, while not admitting to guilt is congruent with intent to get out of it peaceably. Having the card of an expensive lawyer is also a strong signal of intent to get out of it peaceably, and also a signal that if they pursue this case they are likely to have a whole lot of boring work, followed by a judge collecting a bribe.
The consequences of police suspecting you might harm them are apt to be considerably worse than the consequences of police suspecting you of a crime.
The “legal observer” put down by ICE earlier today received this maternal epitaph, “She was extremely compassionate. She’s taken care of people all her life. She was loving, forgiving and affectionate. She was an amazing human being.” Currently on track to receive George Floyd-style beatification, the dearly departed was a dyke poetess, no doubt the spawn of some women studies department. Quite the sapphic martyr tailored for modern audience preferences.
Did Trump learn anything from the Summer of Floyd, or is his brain a solid mineralized lump? We shall see.
With the “worst flu season in 25 years” bringing masks back in style to boot. As the Church Lady says, well how convenient.
The thing with Floyd was they had him being choked out on video this white shitlib woman was shot presumably trying to run over ICE, making this white shitlib girl a Floyd is going to be a bridge too far.
You are assuming that there is some relationship between the level of violence, and the credibility of the martyr.
Im assuming that there is a difference between what normiecons and middling voters see and the credibility of the martyr and i think I’m right. Normals thought the Floyd video was horrible I don’t see it with this.
True, but normies are ceasing to matter, as events move into higher gear.
Oh the left will make a martyr out of her but it wont gain any traction outside.
Seems like bad optics to me. A pretty (or at least not ugly) White mother of three trumps an ICE agent, even if she’s guilty as sin and the ICE agent was fully justified (some are more equal that others). One wonders if it will provoke any ICE agents getting sniped after the Leftist media gins this up. Lots of “ginning up” on Facebook right now. If shooting a guilty gets 10 buddies killed, is it justified? Fun times ahead.
People hate leftist white karens they might feel bad for the kids but the attitude will be she fucked around and find out.
They are planning another summer of Saint Floyd of Fentanyl.
But there is one important difference. USAID and the Learing Center has been raided.
What is the lesson of the summer of Saint Floyd of Fentanyl?
It is that hostile state sponsored violence needs to be met by state violence. Need to apply Asmongold’s solution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPKj1KijpoY
Asmongold: “Obstructing the cops is illegal. Round them all up and put them a stadium or something”
Commenter: “A judge will just let them out”
Asmongold: “Then he is an activist, not a judge. Put him in the stadium also.”
What I am seeing on Youtube is that the credibility of the judiciary is down there with the legacy media.
We are at the point where rounding up the entire court system and stuffing them into stadium with the protesters would probably win votes, to judge by the popularity of influencers. Influencers who would probably be fine with rounding up the judiciary are getting more hits than influencers who would probably not be fine with it.
I get that. What I fail to understand is why Trump brought Maduro to a court in New York.
Apperently, Trump thinks he controls the court in New York or that the court will at least not embarass him. That does not seem wise, but so far Maduro has not been released on bail.
When asked by morgan if the holohoax was real fuentes says hell yes of course it was real. He goes so far as to offer that “probably more than 6 millions” were killed. And morgan takes that laughable bullshit at face value. Bottom line, fuentes doesn’t have the balls to play his “antisemitic” government-scripted role. Or alternatively, the feds will never go against their jew masters.
I then saw morgan claiming that after the interview he came to think that maybe fuentes was mocking him by pretending to believe in the holohoax, but the entertaining fact remains, fuentes never called the holohoax bullshit out.
The holocaust did happen and the numbers were above 4 million and below 7 million though the use of gas chambers was probably extremely exageratted. Mostly the jews were just left to starve or die of exposure (or not ideally for the Germans of disease, not ideal because disease could spread to non Jews and Jews they still wanted to work) if they couldn’t work. Anne Frank the poster girl of western jewish children (in Russia jews were just generally shot regardless of any other distinction) killed by the Nazis was not in fact immediately gassed because as a young girl she was not strong enough to work (which was the supposed fate of Jewish children sent to camps), Anne Frank was shoved into horribly overcrowded conditions with no food and quickly died of disease.
So did the holocaust happen and in comparable numbers to what they said, yes it did. But for some reason they exageratted the use of gas chambers and deemphasized the role of just confining people at extreme densities and not letting them leave and not feeding them.
LMAO
International Criminal Court
Basically an instrument of Globo-Leftism, spawned from a long-preceding line of such influence groups.
LeftoPedia has added a LGBT/Women section to most History_of_ pages.
62% of the Judges are WOMEN.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judges_of_the_International_Criminal_Court
It’s currently headed by a Gay Male, a Muslim Rapist, a Feminist/Lez Negro Woman, a Jap Woman, among others.
It’s Judges are a laundry list of weird, including Third-World Subspecies, Second World Whiners and Aspiring Globo-Homos, and First World Leftists.
It’s explicitly against all Gods and Nature, because Nature and all Gods have committed their list of “crimes” which they claim purview over.
The only reasonable answer to the Jewish Question, for those affected by the Jewish Question, is surely the same answer as to the Question about Leftists, about Islam, and about Commies, and about everything else that has consistently ordained, wished, and exacted against you, Very Ill Will for tens of centuries. The question as to all the ways in which you accomplish the necessary and even final defense against such permanent Ill Will… doesn’t really matter.
For example, the Jews are doing a pretty good job against their Question of Islam in Gaza and West Bank and Temple Mount, which has been fucking them over for 1400 years… but unfortunately for them, they might not actually completely resolve the question. According to them they should, but they might pussy out, especially if they get scared of the ICC.
Certainly the Hindus and Christians wouldn’t mind the Jews keeping the MidEast Islam de-nuked.
And the Hindus and Jews probably wouldn’t mind joining up to de-nuke Pakistan, which the Christians wouldn’t mind either.
The world is in a Turning.
Hopefully the White World continues to exist.
Where are the mass graves of Jews outside of the Russian Federation where too many of them would be from Stalin and before? There should be a bunch that can be found in formerly occupied Eastern Europe, unless the Germans used wood to cremate the bodies, their being too energy poor for any other option I can think of.
Ann Frank likely dying from typhus planted the first seed of doubt in my mind about the official story when I read her fabled diary in the 1970s. So while I don’t doubt a lot of Jews died in concentration camps, before the war the Germans liked to remind the British of who recreated this concept in the Boer War, numbers in the millions from the west lack sufficient evidence as far as I know.
On the other hand, don’t obsess over “wooden doors,” as if the right sort of paint couldn’t make them gas tight, if they weren’t already inherently dense enough.
The decisive figure for me is the 70% decline of the Jewish population of the Netherlands. Holland was a nice relatively wealthy white country and it never was occupied by the Soviets. There was no reason for the Jews to flee en masse to Israel or the US after the war and yet 70% of them were gone. Also there is the fact that both Hans Frank and Goebbels mentioned in diaries that Hitler had decided something final and terrible for all Jews under German control at the Reich Chancellery meeting of December 12 1941 (immediately after he declared war on the US), that the Germans just couldn’t feed everyone in Europe after Barbarossa (which probably helped make Hitler’s decision about his least favorite group rather easy), that Himmler talked about it very explicitly at Posen and that Hitler himself talked about it pretty explicitly at a meeting with Horthy and Ribbentrop (though stopping short of saying all jews must die merely saying all jews who couldn’t work must die).
So I’m satisfied that the death figures are somewhat accurate and that it was a Reich policy, what I do find questionable is I think the use of gas chambers was exageratted for whatever reason. We don’t need endless discussion of this topic (Jim largely agrees with my view fyi) because its like fucking crack cocaine for shills.
The gas chambers are invention. The point of this invention is to make the Nazi mass murders as different as possible from the vastly larger mass murders committed by the rest of the left.
Millions of Jews is probably about right, but it was hunger, disease, and exposure the elements that killed them, not poison gas.
The point of the gas chambers myth is to hide the connection between universal state guarantees, and mass murder.
Hitler figured he could not feed everyone, and put Germans at the top of the list to be fed, and Jews at the bottom. The standard mass murder of socialism.
Currently Britain National Health Service and its Canadian equivalent are discovering they cannot provide medical treatment for everyone, so are systematically murdering middle class people and pensioners as their hospitals are overrun by illegal immigrants, the homeless, the insane, and criminals, who show up for free food and a bed.
Euthanasia, assisted “suicide”: except that they are apt to drug someone to the eyeballs, and he is not aware he volunteered for euthanasia.
In all cases, today’s Britain and Canada, the Soviet Union, and Hitler’s Germany, the unwanted are starved, but in Britain and Canada, they are kept so heavily drugged they do not notice that they are being starved. The most compliant and cooperative patients, the middle class and the elderly, the ones that it is easiest and most convenient to murder, get murdered first, the criminal and demented get murdered last, so pretty soon all the surviving patients are people you would cross the street to avoid if you encountered them while out shopping.
A state guarantee to provide for everyone can never be fulfilled, so always turns into a state policy of mass murder. “Universal Human rights” unavoidably and necessarily becomes genocide and democide.
Hitler’s holocaust is Britain’s National Health Service.
It is, however, very hard to make a wooden door human tight.
No one makes a prison cell with a wooden door, and no one is going to make a gas chamber with a wooden door.
Prisoners have a long time to think about how to break open the door; gasees do not.
Wooden doors are a very bad idea if you’re using cyanide or VX nerve gas. If your “gas” is just bathroom disinfectant, it’s not a problem.
The gas chambers are the Holocaust. It was the efficient, scientific, industrial, bureaucratic system of modernity applied to the destruction of human life, and we all need to think about it for at least an hour every day to ensure that we never do it again. If it was starvation and disease, then it’s just another atrocity.
It’s a tricky subject and I’ve always meant to visit Auschwitz or similar camps with the knowledge I’ve gained here. But generally, in retrospect, doesn’t the whole thing smell a little bit like a neurotic death fantasy? Not saying the gassing couldn’t have possibly happened, but realistically, the gassing would’ve taken much more effort than simply working and starving everyone to death.
The whole operation would’ve included airtight rooms, people manning and operating gas showers, people dragging bodies out, a pile of 24/7 burning clothes… Much more a facility, a rolling band factory almost, than a gulag like concentration camp. How strong is the evidence for this, compared to say the evidence for the Jews’ tendency for neurotic persecution fantasies?
They admit they lied to us about the soap, the lampshades, and the showers. The gas chambers were only in Soviet-occupied territory. Chemists and execution experts who make seemingly solid arguments against it and are met with repression and vigorous lawfare rather than counterargument. It was the biggest war of all time and deceptive propaganda was par for the course. I’d be shocked if the gas chambers were real.
Oh nvm we are in agreement, I misunderstood your earlier comment.
Not that hard to make gas chambers work sometimes say to kill some jews when you get too many trains in at once, but it sounds like its a bitch to keep them in continous use. My view is that they were probably real to a limited extent but the holocaust narrative for some reason decided to exagerate their use 10 fold and ignored that most were killed by starvation, exposure and disease.
When you visit “Auschwitz” you are not visiting Auschwitz because the most embarassing things about the camps were demolished which if gas chambers were used (and I think they were to a limited extent in certain time periods but I don’t think they were the main cause of death). You are visiting a replica of what the narrative said existed. Now to get a better idea of the camps as Jim has pointed out Madjanek was taken in a very rapid Soviet advance after Bagration (the Soviet offensive which was a disaster for the Germans worse than anyone thought it would be as it just essentially annihilated army group center) and the Germans really didn’t get to clean up or demolish anything. Madjanek also had no gas chamber, but it was quite clear that almost all jews sent to Madjanek died very quickly of exposure or starvation. Mass graves and crematoria were taken intact and the Soviets for propaganda reasons quickly invited western observers to see it.
The main evidence for the gas chambers rest on the testimony of Hoss, Eichmann and some other witnesses against Kaltenbrunner saying they exist not physical evidence as supposedly all gas chambers were demolished before they could be taken by the Soviets. My view is that they were used to a limited extent mainly when the camps got flooded with too many people at once which would sometimes happen with ghetto liquidations and such. But I’ve read that there were a lot of problems with keeping the gas chambers going consistently. Maintenence was a big problem, also I remember one SS guy saying that no they couldn’t keep so called Sonderkommandos they would maybe clean out one gas chamber load of dead jews but after that they would tell the SS fuck you shoot us. I’m not sure why the allies were interested in their witnesses embellishing their gas chamber testimony.
I don’t know. Why’d they invent the soap, the lampshades, and the showers?
To make what happened to the Jews as different as possible to all the other mass murders of socialism.
They invented the soap to justify the British National Health Service.
The root cause of a whole lot of Jews dying under Nazi rule is the same root cause as Canadian Health Care and the British NHS, the same ideology leading to the same consequences. Also the same root cause as the Holodomor and the Great Leap Forward. Hence it was necessary to deny that Jews died in the same way as people did in all the other socialist mass murders, since this would draw attention to uniformity of evil beliefs leading to evil acts.
>Why’d they invent the soap, the lampshades, and the showers?
Because they know that the people who believe their propaganda are completely retarded.
So agent fuentes fails to affirm the holohoax and fails to “deny the holocaust”. And so do the rest of agents here.
Humungus Did This
https://x.com/JonCovering/status/2008362754953056410
So very tragic, they say.
Indeed,
When Humungus assaults the compound it is governed by a strictly utilitarian rationality, in which all lives and resources are assessed according to their instrumental value.
Military losses are treated as an inevitable variable within this calculus and are offset through periodic replenishment of personnel. We must replenish the ranks. Those deemed surplus to strategic requirements may be permitted to just walk away, provided their withdrawal occurs voluntarily and without resistance.
All woman and gasoline therein become property of Humungus.
Admit it – a year or two ago you bought long-dated oil futures and you hang out at this blog to try to pump up demand. 😂
AI can be fun. Let the beatings begin!
x.com/miguelifornia/status/2008352199726846242
x.com/WarlordDilley/status/2008700592122671142
x.com/miguelifornia/status/2008687011356397818
x.com/JonCovering/status/2006528432386269208
x.com/JonCovering/status/2000694699930026136
x.com/JonCovering/status/2006920439701057576
x.com/JonCovering/status/1883959304245629075
x.com/JonCovering/status/2007487712668877227
x.com/JonCovering/status/2005426244683526451
x.com/JonCovering/status/2007231966056419414
x.com/JonCovering/status/2007265006577160408
x.com/JonCovering/status/2007539349341294986
x.com/MustangMedicX/status/1969110029367128152
However reality is rare
x.com/WarlordDilley/status/1980664195982213625
The first two were good, Too many of these were garbage. Please don’t flood the comments with garbage from X.
What is going on with Venezuela? Why did Trump actually nab Maduro? Is it a distraction? Because the tiny hats in Israel hated Maduro? Because of his drugs? Another invade the world, invite the world scenario? All of the above? What is actually going on? I am confused on whether or not I should even give a shit what is happening down in a third world South American country.
He told us. How can you doubt him?
Control the oil, deny China control of the oil, exclude enemies of America from having a base in the Americas.
Venezuela is full of Cubans who answer to the Cuban government, Iranians who answer to the Iranian government, and Russians who answer the Russian government. He intends to send them packing, and replace them with Americans who answer to the American government.
China’s great vulnerability is its dependence on energy imports. Venezuela is sitting on the largest oil reserves on the planet. If America gets control of Venzuela’s oil, then China depends on Russia. The Deep State intended to reconquer Russia, they intended Yeltzin 2.0. This plan has failed. So, if Venezuela is in America’s pocket, then, next step, buddying up to Putin. Which, if successful, puts a leash on China.
>next step, buddying up to Putin.
Thankfully orange emperor-monkey trump tried to drone-murder Putin last week. So hopefully Putin finally got the message and will stop trying to sell Russia to wall street. And if Putin didn’t get the message then he needs to be hanged from a lamp pole in Petersburg.
If Trump had tried to murder Putin, he would have given the Ukraine Tomahawk missiles.
Your reply makes no sense. The US, hiding behind its ukrainian proxy, has carried all kinds of attacks inside Russia using “long range” weapons.
A week ago the US tried to kill Putin with some 90 drones. The news is all over the western, pro-Russian media. And here’s a headline from the french government “news” agency
“Kyiv calls footage of alleged drone attack on Putin’s residence ‘laughable'”
war street journal
“U.S. Finds Ukraine Didn’t Target Putin in Drone Strike”
Of course, the US/ukraine mafia is denying exactly what they did.
The people who want to kill Putin (imagining he will be replaced by Yeltzin 2.0) also are trying to overthrow Trump.
Just look at the body language when Zelensky meets Trump. Obviously not everything Zelensky does is done at the direction of Trump.
The voice of the blob is the legacy media, and particularly and especially the legacy media in Europe. And it is obvious that they hate Trump, they stole the 2020 elections, and are lethally opposed to Trump’s policy on the Ukraine, and the fact that he is talking to Putin. They want to kill Putin, and they want to overthrow Trump.
In Europe, you are not allowed to discuss Russia’s security concerns. Anyone who does so gets sanctioned. In the US, you are.
>they hate Trump,
True
>they stole the 2020 elections,
Likely True
>are lethally opposed to Trump’s policy on the Ukraine,
False. Turmp’s policy is the blob’s policy and viceversa.
>he is talking to Putin.
Irrelevant. Putin shouldn’t be taking to trump anyway. Most if not all of trump’s action are aligned with the blob and most of what trump says is anti-russian propaganda. Once in a while trump tells the truth about his war against Russia, because good propaganda has to have a bit of truth in it.
>In Europe, you are not allowed to discuss Russia’s security concerns. Anyone who does so gets sanctioned. In the US, you are.
There’s somewhat less censorship in the US but in the grand scheme of things it’s mostly irrelevant. Pretending to allow a bit of “dissent” is just a means to more efficient totalitarianism.
Anyway, seems to me that the die is cast so I’ll shut up for a bit and see what happens.
Oh come on. Listen to the screams of pain coming from the BBC.
“U.S. seizes Russian-flagged tanker that fled Venezuela blockade”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/01/07/us-intercept-oil-tanker-russia-venezuela/
So the trump farce is over. The piece of shit, orange emperor-monkey is at war with Russia. Russians need to get rid of Putin and put a real man in place.
Please do not link directly to mainstream media articles. Use an archive link.
Under the Monroe doctrine, seizing oil tankers in the Caribbean is different from seizing oil tankers elsewhere, because the action was directed at blocking Venezuelan oil, not Russian oil.
Your doctrine is meaningless gibberish for the Russians though. Your game is over Jim.
The US blockaded and threatened to fire upon Soviet ships during the Cuban missile crisis. Blockading Venezuela is less an escalation.
Simplicus reports that the tanker was sized in the North Atlantic and was empty.
I was expecting Starmer or some EU government to size ships flying the Russian flag in the North Atlantic. Trump doing so was a surprise and I don’t understand why he did it. The whole thing would look much better if the ship had been sized in Venezuelan waters or least in the Carribean.
Sizing an empty tanker in the North Atlantik doesn’t look like a blockade of Venezuela. It looks like another provocation.
“It was a fake Russian oil tanker,” U.S. Vice President JD Vance said in an interview on Fox News. “They basically tried to pretend to be a Russian oil tanker in an effort to avoid the sanctions regime [against Venezuela].”
The likely truth it was a real Russian tanker that was pretending to not be a Russian tanker, and when that did not work, tried being Russian again.
But, whatever it was, and wherever it was seized, it was seized for attempting to ship Venezuelan oil, not Russian oil.
What makes a ship a Russian ship? Is it not sufficient that if it is Russian-flagged with permission of Russia?
Anyway, sizing a ship for attempting to break a blockade is business as usual, but apparently that is not the offical reason. RT reports that the vessel was seized in the North Atlantic pursuant to a warrant issued by a U.S. federal court.
If that’s true, there is simply a US court order to size a foreign ship. Even if US courts had a good reputation, there’d still be the point that a Russian-flagged ship was sized in international waters for something that had been done, not for something that is about to be done (ie breaking a blockade).
If Nato takes that stance seriouly, there will be no end of court orders to size Russian ships anywhere, and of course other ships as well. If the Russian flag raised with permission of Russia, doesn’t make a ship Russian, than raising a different flag with permission of a different country (e.g. India) would not make a difference. The ship might still be Russian in the opinion of courts anywhere in globohomo.
You are arguing as if there was an international rules based order and anyone cared about the rules.
No, that was not my intent at all. I was trying to figure out who did what and why.
As to who – did Trump order the seizure or was it done by elements of his coalition he did not control?
As to what – was it a Russian ship? What do you, Jim, mean when you call a ship Russian?
As to why – what was the point? To me it looks like a provocation of the sort that Starmer and the EU are doing all that time, but Trump has not.
Your interpretation of the invents that the tanker was sized for attempting to break a blockade does not fit the points I raised. I do not think that the tanker was sized for that reason.
Starmer and the EU are threatening, and to some extent taking, military action against Russian oil. The US is taking military action against Russia, Iran, and China, sticking their noses into the Holy American Empire of the Ocean Lands.
I heard something about Ukraine and what do you know. The following seems rather foolish.
https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/vazhlivo-sho-sogodni-ye-gruntovni-dokumenti-koaliciyi-ohochi-102317
So when there is a ceasefire, Western forces will move into Ukraine (the US will serve as a ‘backstop’). But, as we recall, such encroachment was a key reason for Russia invading. Ergo: there will be no peace or ceasefire on those terms.
Not a concern, for Putin will never agree to a ceasefire. He demands a peace settlement.
Which was the original demand that started this war.
Trump’s actions only make sense if his strategy is to achieve a peace deal between superpowers where all powers agree to leave plenty of room between them so that they do not get on each other’s nerves.
The problem is that the Europeans intend to continue funding the Ukraine indefinitely, and the Ukrainian government intends to continue fighting till they run out of Ukrainians. However, Putin is most of the way to eradicating the Ukrainian army, and if no peace, will simply finish the job.
THE Question
https://x.com/GPAIndiana/status/2008251512221294878
Yes, women are always going to push on you until smacked into line, because they rather like being smacked into line while men cannot stand it.