And George Galloway is a straight commie.
George Galloway is in his seventies, and for as long as I can remember he was the leading voice and face of the radical left of the British labour party, and was organising protests against the western side in every war that I can remember. (In 2003 he was purged from labour for being too far left.) He is now self exiled from Britain, from his house, his home and the circle of his friends, due to a well founded fear that should he show his face in a British airport, he will be subject to state violence because he thinks that women are not men, because he thinks that it is probably not a good idea for Britain to pick a fight with a state that has three thousand nuclear weapons, and similarly shocking and unthinkable thoughts.
In the Iraq war, George Galloway was a guest on the BBC every day ranting about American imperialism. For the last decade or so, he has been persona non grata in the European legacy media, and, predictably, cancellation, demonetization, and deplatforming has now escalated to state violence.
Nick Fuentes hyperbolically claims to be the most cancelled man in America. Elon Musk thinks that Nick Fuentes is on the fed payroll. And I agree.
Nick Fuentes was invited onto “Piers Morgan Uncensored”, and much hilarity ensued as Piers Morgan was completely discombobulated to find he was debating someone who was actually uncensored.
Piers Morgan would show a Nick Fuentes clip, and complain that the clip was ism and phobia, and accuse Nick of being an ist and a phobe. Nick would smile like the cat that got the cream, and cheerfully say the unsayable all over again. Nick effortlessly won every argument, because Nick has thought all these things through while Piers Morgan has never heard these thoughts nor seen this evidence and still cannot hear these thoughts nor see this evidence.
But Nick is still a gay commie. The reason they are platforming Nick Fuentes while they are still trying to put Andrew Tate in jail is that though Nick Fuentes is right about women and the holocaust, Andrew Tate is a lot more right about women than Nick Fuentes.
The difference between Fuentes and Tate on women is that though they both say that women need to be conquered and subdued, Tate also says that they want to be conquered and subdued, and are bitter and unhappy because they cannot find anyone capable of conquering and subduing them.
Nick Fuentes is a limited hangout. He is the left deciding to open the Overton window substantially, but by no means all the way — not to anyone who actually frightens them.
It was entertaining to see Nick slice and dice Piers, it was good to see the mainstream encounter someone saying the unsayable, but every answer Nick gave was a soft wobbly retreat from the full thought crime. We have better and more important things to say that he was willing to say.
It is great that the British left is now willing to hear what Nick Fuentes is saying. But they still cannot hear what George Galloway is saying, and still less can they hear what Andrew Tate is saying.
Piers “You’re not gay”
Fuentes [pauses, looks away] “No”
LOL
P.S. A terribly belated Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, lads. Was offline for a low-tech family holiday.
I don’t think Nick is gay, or a commie, or a fed. I’m certainly not his greatest fan but he is definitely in the right place at the right time politically, and I think it’s entirely coincidental.
Gay is a weird take. Should he just be fucking random women? To show he likes them? I don’t get it. It’s inevitable given our hypersexualised culture that a proportion of men enculturated into it just don’t react to the signal anymore. “Give insta thots attention!!” .. no.
I think Nick is fairly redpilled on women in general, but it’s just not really his area of interest. Whether Nick is more strategic, as talking shit about women is guaranteed social death, or he doesn’t see that managing women is number one priority, I can’t tell.
I think his position on social welfare is simply “If we have to allow that in order to have closed borders so be it”. I’ve not watched 100% of his content obviously but in general it seems like his opinion is not that welfare is morally good or something to strive for, but something that, in normie politics, is necessary to consider.
Fed is too readily thrown around as well. I don’t see it. Places I do see fed are, for example, Thomas Massey in Aus.
Regardless, you raise a very interesting point about Galloway. He is unironically a commie, and yet fully against what amount to fairly communist governments in the west.
Hope you had a good Christmas mate.
>I don’t think Nick is gay
Nick looks at other men the same way an open, flamboyant faggot would.
Nick Fuentes Catboy Kami GIFfrom Nick Fuentes GIFs
That’s not even the most damning evidence. During a stream in 2022 from his phone, his browser windows were briefly in view. One of them, “Tgirl sucking a femboy’s dick and then he jerks until cum.” It’s not even his first run in with “I was hacked” gay porn. Then you look at his social circle. A lot of gays.
It’s been an open secret for years now and the subject of parody.
https://www.murdochmurdoch.net/murdoch/in-the-court-of-the-optics-king/
Acting like that isn’t terribly out of character from males in his age cohort, particularly those whose ideology coalesced in the anime/4chan/pol/early Twitter environment.
Shill test: Because the art of courtship has been reconfigured into a grotesque straight-male humiliation ritual/eligible bride whore-production-plant by childless, demon-worshipping cat ladies, lesbians, and faggots, the environment for family building is currently untenable
https://www.murdochmurdoch.net/murdoch/in-the-court-of-the-optics-king/
@2:12
>no girls allowed
This reflects my experience of his Groypers on Twitter. As to what the rest of the video says about Nick, I cannot say, as I got out long before I saw that particular side.
Seems obvious to me he was installed by the FBI in the right place at right time politically.
It still a win for us, I am not complaining. I just say its less of win than advertised and more dangerous to us than advertised — the enemy is not defeated, merely making a tactical retreat to more defensible positions.
The Cathedral has long mastered the art of herding its own wolves. But if one’s call is loud enough to gather others who demand to be led, maybe the right chad wolf could be found.
It’s hard to trust someone with skinny arms, but maybe he will be an Aristotle to an Alexander.
Jim:
That’s a drive-by comment. “Area of interest” refers to priority of purpose, not general attraction. Nick says he’s “married to the mission,” and that women are too dangerous in his life right now because they would likely be honeypots or otherwise inclined to destroy him.
Ah yes, he’s “married” to the mission like the Pope is “married” to God.
Or like Paul, who simply had more important things to do. Unlike Paul, Nick said he’d like to marry when he’s about 35. Elon Musk has avoided the danger of marriage by keeping concubines.
St. Paul did not surround himself with twinks, catboys and suspected groomers. And as for Elon: where are Nick’s concubines and/or groupies?
Give us a break already. He’s a known poofter. If you think he’s “our poofter”, like Milo, or like BAP, then fine, but the constant denial makes the whole affair a hundred times more suspicious.
Gay.
Women are always every straight man’s area of interest.
The real limited hangout is DT.
Thiel, Milo, Grenell, Bessent to name a few in very prominent positions. I would not be surprised if the real blackmail is not underage girls, but kompromat in the form of gay proof. Maybe he likes women and tries to play both ways, but I think it’s absurd to pay $350k to Daniels in any scenario with Trump’s PR positioning. I also think it’s weird he’s divorced three times and they all gush/ed about him, but the current contract doesn’t have it in her eyes for him and his son looks awkward AF with him. Clearly, junior is his genetic offspring, but there appears to be no bond as I can readily observe with between children and parents in a normal (non-engineered) family.
Lastly, I ways come back to the rule of never trust a man that changes his surname. Unless you are in witness protection, I give no allowances.
Nuts.
The nature of Trump’s sexual preference is a plain as the nose on your face.
> Trump who has been a semi womanizer most of his life is suddenly gay
Oh dear God at least post semi plausible shill lines. It was more plausible when you people were saying he was into being pissed on women.
Performative.
You may be confusing Donald Trump with Norm Macdonald:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CYE6H3uDFo
You know, it’s real common for powerful gays to invest their time in straight boys. Roy Cohn is one such example. It’s very common; somewhere. I’m sure of it.
As a rule, extreme anything is the result of the opposite. A deficit or inversion of the drives the other behavior. This is why I say, performative.
>Thiel, Milo, Grenell, Bessent to name a few in very prominent positions.
You forgot the anti-human neocon faggot lindsey graham – very close friend of trump’s, very anti-human entity.
So regardless of trump being a faggot himself or not, it’s “interesting” to see that key accomplices of trump’s neocon empire are faggots.
And let’s not forget Roger Stone. Most straight men have historically gone to great lengths to put a lot of distance between themselves and gay men. In the past two decades, the temple has forced everyone to close the distance, but straight men wanting distance from the phallusphiles is still a thing.
Celebrating the big W
> I don’t think Nick is gay, or a commie, or a fed.
He is almost certainly a gay and a fed, but underlying ontology doesn’t matter if the behavior perfectly matches the accusation:
If his actions are identical to what a gay fed commie would do then for almost all purposes it amounts to an actual gay fed commie. (Maybe there are some triple-bankshot double agent scenarios where the distinction matters, and an Apparent Gay Fed Commie is just out there to discredit the Real Gay Fed Commies, like the old CIA-funded Marxist parties, but Nick doesn’t at all resemble that. Whereas it’s entirely credible that he is LARPing as right wing to discredit actual right wing.)
Similarly, I don’t think it’s productive to dwell on unanswerable (on current evidence or anything that is likely to be obtainable) questions of whether or not a high percentage of globalist elites are literal Satanist child sacrifice cultists, when if you just look at Globohomo’s actions the regime is effectively at 500 percent on that scale regardless of how the operators spend their free time.
Greetings,
Interesting that we pivot to Nick at this time, but he is flooding the country with groypers and I’m sure some of them are very fine people.
Based on his Carlson interview, he would pass the WQ though. He took a traditional patriarchal stance.
I am much more interested in how the Venezuelan situation will impact BitCoin.
Fuentes agreed enthusiastically with Cucker Tarlson that America is a ‘patriarchy’. They were quite sure, and pleased with one another.
Cucker doesn’t even run his own household of princesses, much less preside over a patriarchy with his fellow rich and connected friends. And this priviledged dweeb is the anointed Edgy Conservative who tackles the tough topics. It is to puke.
Again, I am more interested in money than the latest controlled opposition assets, but I don’t disagree with what you wrote. Both their mannerisms strike me as effeminate.
Cucker is as soft as the Pillsbury Dough Boy. Like the Cuckservatives that follow him.
He and his church’s satanic ‘Happy Wife, Happy Life’ doctrine is an inversion of real Christianity, with its father-led household as pillar of God’s Holy Patriarchy. America is a recapitulation of the ancient mother-goddess cults, which is why the U.S. exports feminism around the world. And why its ruling district is named ‘Columbia’.
You scratch the surface of a nation enough, you will always discover spiritual warfare beneath.
Has Tucker endorsed that doctrine? I don’t think so, and he frequently makes unkind references to Episcopalian leadership.
I often say I am the last Anglican. This is of course, hyperbole, Gafcon are the last Anglicans — and the last Episcopalians. And Tucker’s unkind references to Episcopalianism aligns him with Gafcon Episcopalians.
I find this very hard to believe. Link and time please.
Humungus claimed Nick could pass the WQ based on Carlson interview.
At 1:30:40
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=efBB0D4tf1Y
He makes the statement, “your body my choice.” Which was a sufficient thought crime. He later discusses women being subordinate to their husband.
I’m not here to defend Fuentes, but if he was presented with the WQ, he would commit the thought crime.
Why is he a concern?
Humungus has considered your opinions on Fuentes and observed interviews of said subject. Most of his dialog is not original thought and are the product of other media figures. He is aware what he says is provocative, yet he is profiting financially from the attention. He’s accustomed to a comfortable living yet limited his opportunities with his infamy and now is trapped in this character he created.
Notably, he is permitted to commit multiple thoughtcrimes across platforms that previously censored much less.
He has a producer which could be connected to the feds influencing his content. He claims he is not gay but his behavior is suspicious.
My opinion is: He is being put forward as an example of why conservative speech must end, an unwitting agent provocateur for the left.
Nick is doing what our enemies call “pre bunking”.
The cannot debunk their opponents positions, because they cannot acknowledge their opponents say what they say. So they create a cruel and silly version of their opponents ideas, so that people will dismiss the actual ideas when they do hear them.
By proposing the solution — by proposing that we should unemancipate women — without dwelling on the nature of women, Nick pre-bunks the solution.
The woman problem cannot be fixed unless one realises that it is just a shit test — that when women faced with the strong hand that women hunger for, women will cooperate.
Just look at “literature”. These days it is all female oriented porn all the time. Few actual books are written any more. And almost all the porn is set in a universe where either women in general or the main female character in particular are unemancipated. Women never wanted emancipation. It was always a shit test. Everyone hungers for the ancestral environment of successful reproduction, and in the ancestral environment of successful reproduction, women were property, and an unowned woman was likely to perish and unlikely to successfully reproduce.
Nick proposes the solution, but without explaining the problem and the likely effect of the solution. Tate does the reverse. If you propose the solution without explaining the problem, and explaining why the solution is going to have the effects that it will have, then you are pre-bunking the solution.
Even if the feminists are right, and women truly desire freedom, they can’t have it because their nations desperately need babies. Why then must we argue about what women want?
We need to discuss what women really want, because we want to know if coercion against unrestrained female sexual choice will produce tranquil marriages.
Unrestrained sexual choice means Miss Average gets to fuck Mister One-in-thirty. Trouble ensues, and babies do not ensure, due to abortion and infanticide among the lower classes, and due to contraception in the better classes.
Miss Average has to be compelled to marry Mister Average as soon as she starts getting horny, which is in some cases alarmingly early, and restrained from adultery. Historical reality, and the nature of women, tells us that when faced by a strong hand, they will accept it happily enough.
A lot of men and woman have sexual fantasies about a woman chained to the bed, but you would be surprised how quickly tying a naked woman up gets tedious. Women don’t exactly want sex, but they want to be desired by a man who can make them submit to sex. Men desire women, but women desire to be desired by a strong man. A man who scares them a little bit. It is not so much that they want sex, as they want to be in a situation that results in sex. If you look at female fantasies, there is page after page after page of her being in a situation where the man could have his way with her, but does not. The fantasy eventually gets to the sex, but the focus is on her being endlessly in a situation where sex is endlessly imminent.
Love is war, love is a battlefield, all is fair in love and war. But a happy marriage is to resolve the battle of the sexes in male victory and female surrender. The question then is, will a strong hand against unrestrained female sexual choice produce a happy surrender.
Tucker Carlson has four preppy white kids by his first and only wife. The wife and kids so far have stayed out of the spotlight, which is a good start on well behaved in this day and age. So he passes Pauline criteria for an elder.
Polygamous harem of princesses is a tall ask in current year, and you may never get it at all.
And I’m a guy who’s said before now that Tucker pretty clearly was and still is WASP wing of the CIA. So still a kind of limited hangout, seeing what the restless native stock will settle for. But still less hostile to his co-ethnics than a gay or a jew will be.
Tucker is a WASP?
The Venezuala raid was impressive and gives Trump and the reputation of American arms some much needed mojo but l hope the aftermath is not a foreverwar.
At least it was done competently. Under Bush, Biden or Obama (or either Clinton), we would have woken up to see captured US soldiers being paraded on VZ state television.
Apropos of nothing, thought I would share these two articles:
https://substack.com/@cremieux/p-180067645 (Paywall)
https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/the-baby-boom
TL;DR: Feminism is not compatible with biological continuation.
Of course, this is not news to anyone here – some of the charts have been floating around this blog for over a decade – but it’s a good explanation of the anti-feminist argument. Naturally Jim will probably complain that they failed to recommend coverture or include the evopsych explanation for just why this is the case, but the fact that these articles have even been published is enormous. These guys are not nobodies and they’re a lot closer to informing “elite consensus” than you think (or at least a certain part of the elite).
I liked the latter author’s review of JD Unwin and also when he quantifies marriage rates vs male female income ratio.
The Unwin review states gender norms change every 3 generations.
Similar to how Putin ended Covid in 2022, Trump just ended Global Warming in Canada. No longer are leftists chanting “Leave It In The Ground” because of muh carbon, now we need to pump as much oil as possible and build pipelines to make our economy strong enough to resist evil orange man. Kinda funny since all of the oil is about to leave anyway. The Alberta/Saskatchewan independence referenda will happen later this year, and it’s looking like they will vote to leave.
Speaking of which, there are a lot of people with Ukrainian and Canadian flags in their twitter names clamouring for the federal government to use military force to attack the separatist provinces. Canadian provinces seceding and becoming independent, being attacked by the Canadian military for doing so, and America stepping in to help is exactly analogous to the Donbas situation. They dream of grabbing Canadians off of the street and throwing us in trenches to die needlessly just like their neo-nazi heroes in the Ukraine. I don’t fear any such conflict lasting nearly as long as the Special Military Operation for obvious reasons, but it is still something that the Trump Administration needs to be prepared for.
>The Alberta/Saskatchewan independence referenda will happen later this year, and it’s looking like they will vote to leave.
Sorry, a judge said the vote’s not valid. It can’t be done now and it’s out of my hands. You can try again in four years, but make sure you get all your legal/procedural ducks in a row first.
They going to vote anyway? If so and independence wins, especially if by a large margin, I think it’s likely Alberta will say FU to the judge. How many divisions does he have?
No divisions are needed. A few dozen mounties arresting the ringleaders will be more than enough if anyone is stupid enough to threaten Our Democracy.
This kind of sort of looked like it was going to work in Crimea and Donbas, until it stopped looking like it would work.
In Crimea and Donbas, globohomo is up against a sovereign nation with a serious military, its own industrial base, and a huge nuclear arsenal. In Alberta, it’s up against its own pathetic subjects: homeschoolers and local politicians with social media accounts. Rule followers and chumbalones to a man.
It was quite a while before Ukrainians of Russian ethnicity got aid from the Russian government, and in that period, they proved able to successfully put up a fight against a nation state.
It looked at first that they were going to fold, but then a handful of people escalated, then a whole lot of officers and soldiers of Russian ethnicity deserted to the rebels.
The moment someone got serious about resisting the authorities, it rapidly escalated to a full military engagement.
It is not obvious to me. Please explain.
There’s just nothing here. The Ukraine relies on arms and munitions from other countries, who would be giving us stuff? The EU? How would they get anything past the US Navy? All of the oil would be in the separatist provinces too.
Despite being technically the second largest country on Earth, Canada has all of its meaningful development along the US border, which stretches for thousands of miles. And has thousands of miles of coastline to the west, east, and north.
The people are in general way softer than Ukrainians. We’re one of the gayest countries on Earth. They could create “Canadian Nationalism” in the same way the Ukrainian Nazis did, but that would take a very long time and might be impossible with all of the Indians they have flooding in. If they tried it right now, half of the White men would be too gay to do anything, and the other half would welcome American intervention.
One good thing about the flawless success of the Maduro operation is it should strengthen the hand of Christian Nationalist Hegseth over the leftist in the military and politics in the future is increasingly going to come down to the military (since Trump doesn’t have the guts to use ICE to take over even when he probably could have after Kirk). The narrative that Hegseth is a drunk mentally disturbed incompetent washout soldier capatulted way over his head by Trump is no longer sustainable after hes had I think this was his 3rd flawless operation.
This gave Trump and Hegseth an enormous shot of legitimacy and prestige. It is great that he is doing projects like this and executing them competently. But I’m still afraid he’s acting like he has all the time in the world. These are nice projects to work on but he’s still ignoring the elephant in the center of the room. If Trump were president for life followed by his son, then he could tackle these various issues at his convenience. But we only get a few more years of Don and I’m afraid we will be looking back on these days fondly.
Maybe. Or maybe Trump is finding out who among the men with guns is competent and will obey orders.
Notice that Trump situation room was at Mar a Lago , in a hastily made “room” with black sheets hanging from the ceiling.
Trump met and had photo with the men who made the raid.
The disinformation was done also from Mar a Lago , as a screen with X site on it.
The whole operation was done outside the regular loop, White House, pentagon , DoD, DoJ , FBI etc , which explain why no leakage, no mainstream media the New York Times , Washington post etc , not even intel , people say CIA , maybe when gathering information but no direct involvement. Everyone was caught with their pants down including the Deep state which explain the unusual success.
What seem to happen is that a new chain of command being formed and as it succeed more and more it will replace the old one .
Maybe Mar a Lago is the new Washington
I noticed what you noticed, but you actually understood it. If you’re correct, Mar-a-Lago is becoming something of a Versailles, something like an Imperial Palace.
If the snatch had been planned in the Whitehouse, the Deepstate would have leaked it to Venezuela to ensure failure and high American casualties.
The Deep State attitude to the snatch is presumably the same as the Canadian and EU attitude to the snatch, and the Canadian and EU governments are horrified and outraged. It upsets them almost as much as the crackdown on Somali welfare fraud.
Best case scenario is Trump retires in the Spring of 2027 and makes Vance president. Vance could then run as a seasoned incumbent and serve a total of 10 years.
What have those zizians been up to? “The Delirious, Violent, Impossible True Story of the Zizians” by Evan Ratliff in Wired.
https://archive.ph/74pfk
The article begins with a prostration before trans, and really doesn’t examine the rationalistes –an examination which is past due — but is still a good summary of what has been going on. Some of it might be seen as taking sides:
“The Homeland Security agents had determined—wrongly, as it turned out—that Bauckholt, a German citizen, had an expired visa.”
Lol, that was the least thing “wrong” in the whole story. The soi-disant justice system seemed fairly uninterested in keeping them locked up. I wonder what the police thought about it.
Being a murderous cult leader just doesn’t rank that high. So, the whole thing is like a drawn-out low-budget slasher movie. However, there were also the occasional moment of levity, reminiscent of 1970s plane hijacker demands.
Again, why are free range madmen at all permitted?
Because, as you noted earlier, our so-called “justice system” prefers it this way.
Which (to fold in another topic of discussion) Trump bringing Maduro and his wife here to stand trial in a US court might be a bad move. To quote a comment I saw elsewhere on the web:
Sorry Jim, I messed up closing the blockquote tags on that one.
[*fixed*]
A decade ago I called out the effective altruists as evil
Evil people tend to do evil things to those close to them. Killing people is just one of those things. Effective altruist organisations were complicit in the murder of millions. The Zizians are not a cult led by Zis, they are just that wing of effective altruism that takes Timeless Decision Theory seriously in actual practice, and is therefore more likely to murder people up close and personal.
Are you sick and tired of AI gods constantly making perplexing, paradoxical offers to you? We’ve all been there! TDT is the answer!*
*Unless the AI god is evil. In which case, uh…
Utilitarianism is always a rationale and justification for maliciously doing evil to near, because no one genuinely cares about far. So utilitarians are always evil.
Effective Altruism is a particularly elaborate, effective and useful rationale for evil, so Effective Altruists are more evil than other utilitarians.
Trannies are insane. If someone is evil and insane, he is apt to imprudently do evil in ways that bring him to the attention of police. So, inevitably, the tranny wing of the rationalists manifested as the Zizians.
The way the Ziz murders started is that some of the rationalists believed you should care about all sentient beings, and others believed you should care about all living beings. (Of course in both cases this was just an excuse for not caring about those closest to them, and not caring about those whom they owed a duty of care.)
The care-for-all-sentients wing got sick of the care-for-all-life wing out holying them, and tried to exclude them. The care-for-all-life wing crashed the meeting, the care-for-all-sentients wing made a swat call to the cops to get the care-for-all-life wing removed.
When the cops showed up, the trannies of the care-for-all-life wing proceeded to escalate the conflict with the cops.
The cops show up, fearing that some of the crashers may be armed with deadly weapons. The trannies among the crashers then demand that the cops make proper worship and respect of their sexual identity. Cops are disinclined to go through the required trannie rituals when it could get them killed.
And the Ziz saga is stuff just going downhill from there.
Dealing with cops 101: Whenever cops show up, they suspect you might kill them. Your number one priority is to calm this suspicion. Be mindful that admitting to guilt is unlikely to calm this suspicion, even if you are obviously guilty. Admitting to guilt is congruent with intent to fight your way out of it, while not admitting to guilt is congruent with intent to get out of it peaceably. Having the card of an expensive lawyer is also a strong signal of intent to get out of it peaceably, and also a signal that if they pursue this case they are likely to have a whole lot of boring work, followed by a judge collecting a bribe.
The consequences of police suspecting you might harm them are apt to be considerably worse than the consequences of police suspecting you of a crime.
The “legal observer” put down by ICE earlier today received this maternal epitaph, “She was extremely compassionate. She’s taken care of people all her life. She was loving, forgiving and affectionate. She was an amazing human being.” Currently on track to receive George Floyd-style beatification, the dearly departed was a dyke poetess, no doubt the spawn of some women studies department. Quite the sapphic martyr tailored for modern audience preferences.
Did Trump learn anything from the Summer of Floyd, or is his brain a solid mineralized lump? We shall see.
With the “worst flu season in 25 years” bringing masks back in style to boot. As the Church Lady says, well how convenient.
The thing with Floyd was they had him being choked out on video this white shitlib woman was shot presumably trying to run over ICE, making this white shitlib girl a Floyd is going to be a bridge too far.
You are assuming that there is some relationship between the level of violence, and the credibility of the martyr.
Im assuming that there is a difference between what normiecons and middling voters see and the credibility of the martyr and i think I’m right. Normals thought the Floyd video was horrible I don’t see it with this.
True, but normies are ceasing to matter, as events move into higher gear.
Oh the left will make a martyr out of her but it wont gain any traction outside.
Seems like bad optics to me. A pretty (or at least not ugly) White mother of three trumps an ICE agent, even if she’s guilty as sin and the ICE agent was fully justified (some are more equal that others). One wonders if it will provoke any ICE agents getting sniped after the Leftist media gins this up. Lots of “ginning up” on Facebook right now. If shooting a guilty gets 10 buddies killed, is it justified? Fun times ahead.
People hate leftist white karens they might feel bad for the kids but the attitude will be she fucked around and find out.
They are planning another summer of Saint Floyd of Fentanyl.
But there is one important difference. USAID and the Learing Center has been raided.
Further intelligence released on the deceased shows The Cominator is probably right in this case. She had a “wife” who was charged with child abuse (cigarette burns). Was not local to the area, and an obvious agitator.
I am right but the other dyke abusing the dead woman’s kids specifically by putting out cigarettes on their arms is unconfirmed at this point. I saw it on twatter/4chan but I went looking for it and couldn’t find it. Chatgpt/Grok says its unconfirmed.
It wouldn’t surprise me though.
The “social justice first” Learing Center the deceased’s six-year-old son attends apparently trained and coordinated her and others to impede ICE.
What is the lesson of the summer of Saint Floyd of Fentanyl?
It is that hostile state sponsored violence needs to be met by state violence. Need to apply Asmongold’s solution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPKj1KijpoY
Asmongold: “Obstructing the cops is illegal. Round them all up and put them a stadium or something”
Commenter: “A judge will just let them out”
Asmongold: “Then he is an activist, not a judge. Put him in the stadium also.”
What I am seeing on Youtube is that the credibility of the judiciary is down there with the legacy media.
We are at the point where rounding up the entire court system and stuffing them into stadium with the protesters would probably win votes, to judge by the popularity of influencers. Influencers who would probably be fine with rounding up the judiciary are getting more hits than influencers who would probably not be fine with it.
I get that. What I fail to understand is why Trump brought Maduro to a court in New York.
Apperently, Trump thinks he controls the court in New York or that the court will at least not embarass him. That does not seem wise, but so far Maduro has not been released on bail.
Maybe to make them let him go. Then what?
From a foreign policy perspective, then nothing, although in this scenario Florida’s talk about prosecuting Maduro would be viewed as a backup.
There’s a small window in which a freed by the US courts Maduro can return to Venezuela as its strongman. We’re not trying for immediate regime change, but “tweaking” the current one as someone put it, having gotten the mule’s attention with the 2×4 of Maduro’s capture and the collateral damage it did to various part of the regime, from his mostly Cuban guards to their air defense systems.
Yes, but the judge is already set. Alvin Hellerstein, a 92 year old orthodox jew, a Clinton appointee who has once ruled against the Trump admin on an unrelated matter, but also known for overseeing the civil suit by families of the 9-11 victims (got them a half billion dollar payout split however many ways after lawyer fees, also made sure no untoward questions or theories were raised).
In other words, probably liberal, but probably old guard, semi-sane, establishment liberal.
In other, other words, the fix is in. Or at least, the Trump team thinks and hopes so.
As anti-semitic as I might be (300,000, mostly typhus and starvation), it’s like the parody laser eye surgery commercial from Family Guy. Narrator voice, speaking of the doctor: “Jewish!“. Sometimes even a rightwinger wants a jew in the right position. Provided you can find one who’s agreement-capable.
Bullseye comment on X.
Self-righteous indignation will shriek forth from wizened bosoms behind Episcopal pulpits this coming Sunday. Not a pleasant thought.
Vance’s response to the whole thing has once again been amazing.
He gets the part where you don’t abandon your base for leftist virtue signaling.
One reason globohomo likes Indians rather than Eastasians is as bad as the Indians are they aren’t spies. India isn’t competent enough to have their own tech industry capable of anything so they cant spy for India and the Chinese don’t trust them enough to recruit them. If the Chinese want an Indians information enough they’ll just send them a hot Chinese woman.
Theoretically we are importing the best Indian techs to run our tech industry, but they are as incapable of operating a tech industry in America as they are in India.
I was in a company that died of an infestation of dot Indians. The top management was trying to figure out why stuff was not working, and the Indians were actively conspiring to prevent them from finding out. People who were trying to make the system worked got fired because they were making trouble. The problem was not that Indian engineers were not smart enough. They frequently are not smart enough due to massive fraud in the H1B system, but that was not the problem. The primary problem was lack of virtue, not lack of smarts. It just hard to make large scale cooperation work when your business is infested with bad people.
The problem of large businesses, illustrated by Dilbert, is that it is hard to scale cooperation. It gets harder if you have individually bad behavior.
Chinese engineers are excessively compliant — they have a tendency to follow the letter of a specification, rather than the spirit and intent of a specification. Indian engineers are furtively and conspiratorially non compliant. They are always plotting against each other and every Indian team is plotting against all the other teams. They lie like they breath. Chinese and Indians are both weak in creativity. Chinese can improve an existing thing. and do so very impressively, but they cannot create a new thing. But the Indians are worse in creativity. Chinese are prosocial, Indians are anti social, and this chronic antisocial behavior disrupts organisations, and disrupts worse the larger the organisation.
On the other hand, if you employ Chinese engineers, you will very shortly find a Chinese company making a better version of what you are making. But an environment containing a lot of Chinese engineers is way more pleasant than an environment containing a lot of Indian engineers. You don’t need to be watching for a knife in your back.
Yes, I just saw their own videos of themselves. They are totally entitled. They believe they are entitled to act aggressively, and their adversaries are just not allowed to act aggressively.
As soon as that couple started interacting with those they viewed as their moral inferiors, something deadly was likely to happen, one way or another way.
They absolutely believe they are entitled to refuse to be arrested, and to run their car into a cop. They believe they are entitled to act like that, and it is just outrageous if they get shot doing it.
She drove the car at the cop, probably not with the intent of killing him, but to hurt him and scare him. Of course, did hurt him and scare him. Don’t scare people. When something scares me, instincts kick in before rational thought — can I move faster than this can move. No? Well can I incapacitate this? And then if the calculus says “incapacitate” I act on it before any conscious thought, faster the 0.3 second required for conscious reaction.
I am full of pride and wrath. People get scared of me rather easily. But there is just no way I would act towards a cop, or indeed anyone, the way they were behaving, and if I behaved towards cops like that, I would expect lethal violence. If I behaved towards anyone like that, I would expect a high likelihood of violence in which I might well get seriously hurt, and possibly killed.
If you are in a conflict situation, don’t make sudden moves except the move is likely to impair the adversaries capacity to respond. Because if you make a sudden move, the adversary is likely to make a countermove intended to incapacitate you.
If you do aggressive and obnoxious stuff, other people are apt to respond in kind, and then one thing leads to another, and people get hurt or killed. I don’t do that. I don’t do things to other people that might have damaging or possibly lethal consequences if someone did it to me. Both because it is wrong, and because I scare myself.
They lived in a bubble of protection that entitled them to be obnoxious karens, but they were not aware of this bubble, and then they strayed outside their protective bubble.
They thought, the entire left thinks, that they can do stuff like that, and no one else can do stuff like that. That is how individual deadly violence, and how collective deadly violence, civil war, starts.
They’ll probably just point to this. https://x.com/ArtTakingBack_/status/2009750483557069188
This reflects a confident belief that police are not allowed to harm them. Unfortunately, they also confidently believe that they are allowed to harm police. So a protester driving into a cop is far more threatening than a cop driving into a protester. If slowly pushing into police, obviously no lethal intent, but the karen who got shot had gunned her engines, and the car was moving fast.
If I ever drove a car into someone, I would be trying to kill him, because I would assume that if I failed to kill or seriously injure, I would be killed or seriously injured. They live in a bubble where the rules protect them, but not us.
The karen gunned her motor so hard the rear wheels spun. When the cop heard the motor gun, he would instinctively pull his gun and fire faster than his conscious mind could form the thought.
I don’t think kids get in fights anymore. As a millennial, fights were uncommon at my liberal schools, but not completely impossible. Do zoomer and Gen A kids ever fight? Immediate instinctual physical reaction to grossly inappropriate behavior, as Jim mentions, could teach kids lessons before they enter the adult world and those repercussions become worse.
“The karen gunned her motor so hard the rear wheels spun.”
They didn’t. The visible front one did, very briefly.
[*deleted because link to wrong video*]
That short is a waste of time.
>They thought, the entire left thinks, that they can do stuff like that, and no one else can do stuff like that.
But are they wrong? It depends on what you mean by “can do stuff like that.” Physically, people on our side “can do” aggression and violence. Obviously. As the Leftist garbage learned. Legally and socially though, every judge, every bureaucrat, every politician, and every journalist in the country agrees with them. Leftists can legally escalate much much farther non-Leftists, because their cause is just and they are morally superior to us (and even to the judges and bureaucrats!). The entire apparatus of the state is on their side, and that’s what determines what you “can do,” at least in one important sense of the words.
The Left clearly believes this whole incident is a huge win for them. They sacrifice one expendable agitator and they remind the entire world that they can do as they please even to law enforcement personnel and resisting them is forbidden. Maybe they’ll be proven wrong about that, but they obviously think the courts and the media will vindicate them, because that’s what always happens. Even the Rittenhouse case was at worst a draw.
Obviously they were right. But now she is dead.
The president, the vice president, and the presidential spokeschick Caroline Leavit have said this is going to change, that this changes now, and the left is having a meltdown over the threat.
Because they expected that the cop would be railroaded the way the cop who killed the martyred Saint Floyd of Fentanyl was railroaded. When the president, the vice president, and the presidential spokeschick signalled otherwise, they melted down.
Watch the left reaction videos to the press conference given by the spokeschick and the vice president. The left is saying “We are going to lose this country if we don’t do something now.” Right they are. They are having hysterics over that press conference. They see it as the existential threat that it is.
Recall what happened to the Zizians. The even-more-left crashed a meeting held by the not-quite-leftist-enough and proceeded to give them the grief that leftmost believes it is entitled to do. The slightly less-left called the cops. The cops showed up; The leftmost proceeded to give the cops the grief that the leftmost always give them, and this time the usual utter impunity did not happen. The cops threw the book at them, and, oh the horror 🙃, deadnamed them. They fled to other jurisdictions, where their normal immunity was respected, but in that one jurisdiction, cops got away with it. Because the slightly less left has a lot of pull in California, and were sick of the antics of the leftmost. That was beginnings of Thermidor.
Now Thermidor is in power, and Thermidor is backing the president. What happened to the Zizians is now happening to the Democrats in Minneapolis.
Minneapolis is now planning another Floyd summer of love. Trump is going to react by throwing in troops if they try it.
When Tampon Tim announced he is not going to run again, that was the equivalent of the Zizians fleeing the local jurisdiction. The left just blinked.
Somali welfare fraud has been a major source of left wing funding since the left started flying in Somalis. They all have their fingers in that pie. If the feds follow that money, they are going to rip out the network by its roots.
They obviously thought that. After the press conference, a lot of them have come to doubt that what always happens will happen this time. Watch the left reaction videos to the press conference. They are afraid. The left is afraid.
As usual, we see some encouraging signs and get vague promises of effective action in the nebulous future, but right now, it’s business as usual. Nothing’s been ripped out by the roots; nobody’s been prosecuted. Nobody knows what the future will bring, but I’ve gone around this merry-go-round enough times to make a good guess.
If Jonathan remains free, and Renee remains dead, that is effective action.
The left have to get the cop who killed Renee. If they cannot get him, that is effective action, because it stiffens the spine of every cop and every soldier. On the day of the press conference, it suddenly became dangerous to throw a rock at a cop.
When the cops deadnamed the Zizians, and nothing happened to the cops, that was effective action. From that moment, the Zizians were on the run, and have not stopped running. Now the Democrats are on the run.
Watch the reaction videos to the press conference. Our enemy is afraid.
When the cops deadnamed the Zizians, the left launched a pile of lawsuits alleging police misconduct, most of which had a substantial grain of truth, in that the warriors had grossly disrespected the priests in multitude of gross ways. The priests had gone over the top in being obnoxious to the warriors, so the warriors reacted as it is the nature of warriors to react. Those lawsuits dead ended, revealing the judges had gotten the word to throw the Zizians to the wolves, because the well connected left was sick of them. The leftmost then broke and ran. Now Tampon Tim is the leader of the leftmost, and he just broke and ran.
The left might well come back — but they are first going to have to retreat into the wilderness and regroup. Which they have successfully done many times before, but back then they less obviously evil and insane.
Thermidor is fragile, it is going to break left or break right. Trump is trying to ride two horses, the Thermidor that wants to break left, and the Thermidor that wants to break right. But the Thermidor that wants to break right has leaders JD Vance and Pete Hegseth. The Thermidor that wants to break left is leaderless. As you correctly point out, it is quite successfully stalling. As you correctly point out, it is deeply entrenched. But we have the warriors, and the priests are discredited.
As you correctly point out, they have the judiciary and the bureaucracy. But we have the warriors, and a warrior has just acted, backed by his chain of command all the way to the top. When warriors act, stalling does not suffice.
The anti ICE riots are a shit test, and the president just passed that shit test. A warrior, with the backing of his chain of command, just killed a priestess, who has the backing of her chain of command. The pussy of every woman everywhere just got a little bit damp.
[*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
Come up with anything that Reaction ever did that made any difference any long lasting impact today whatsoever.
That is a fair question.
We act in the realm of ideas. How do ideas get translated into concrete actions?
Groups of men coordinate under a strong leader and on ideas. Which means that to have his team all working together, the leader needs some ideas, which he and his team get from what the Chinese call knowledge factions. We are a knowledge faction — which is to say, a rival priesthood to the one in Harvard. So we do not act as you define acting. We cause such actions.
Moldbug’s big idea was that the rule of law was a pretence covering the rule of priests, and that the leadership should blow off the priests. President Trump just sank “the rules based order”, which has governed international relations since 1948. Would he have done that, could he have done that, without Moldbug?
Of course, it is far more important to deep six the American judiciary, and as yet nothing much has been done about that. But fourteen months ago, who could have imagined that “the rules based order” would be deep sixed?
Of course we have gone beyond Moldbug in several important ways, the big ideas being that the state priesthood is demonic, and that the woman problem needs to be addressed.
And another big idea in which we have gone beyond Moldbug is that a regime does need priests. It needs, however, a friendly and supportive priesthood. The Christian Nationalist faction of Maga stands in the wings, and the Maga movement looks to it.
Trump has taken some small steps against the state priesthood (attend to the screams of pain coming from Academia) though these steps are far, far short, of what is needed. What is needed is tanks in Harvard, and the president appointing virtuous married Christian men with well behaved children in charge. But he has at least taken a few feeble steps in the right direction.
Moldbugs big idea was to blow off the priesthood and rule without them, and now Trump has blown off the “rules based order” priesthood. But the Harvard priesthood needs replacement, and as yet, no actions have been taken in that direction — at least with regard to Harvard.
But Pete Hegseth just took decisive action to install a friendly priesthood within the military.
The woman problem remains unaddressed, and no one in power, certainly not Trump, can speak of it. But the influencers are now speaking of it. Now we hear people saying “repeal the nineteenth”
There is a whole lot of talk about young men becoming radicalised — of course they are not becoming radicalised. Their political position is, like Trump, much the same as it has been since the 1980s. It is young women who are becoming radicalised, as society fails their shit tests collectively and individually. If leftist women are not fit to marry, not fit for long term relationships, are they fit to vote? This is not an idea whose time has come, but it is coming.
What just happened in Minneapolis was a decisive step towards warrior rule. A warrior, with the backing of his chain of command, just shot a priestess, who had the backing of her chain of command. Once warrior rule becomes real, the warriors will feel the need for a friendly priesthood, and this issue is clearly on the mind of Pete Hegseth. Would he have thought that without this blog?
Well, Pete is attempting to act on it. Whether his actions are successful will depend on how far the ideas promoted in this blog have penetrated.
>President Trump just sank “the rules based order”, which has governed international relations since 1948.
The US has pretended to defend a liberal system based on property rights, and trump admited that the pretense is a retarded lie. And the propaganda is way older than 1948 obviously, regardless of what we call it : “rules based”, “democracy” or whatever.
But as far as the practical criminal actions of the US go, nothing changed at all. The US remains the same lawless entity, waging war on the whole world. That’s your beloved empire.
So the question is, what does trump achieve by acknowledging that the “department of defense” is actualy the “department of war of aggression”? That is a honest confesion from criminals who otherwise have no moral code. I candidly admit it makes little sense to me,
You appear to assert that the Venezuelan regime has a liberal property right in Venezuela. That is not a “liberal system based on property rights”
Trump disempowers the pious priesthood of the “rules based order” who get to decide, moment to moment, what the rules are and what they mean. He disempowers what Mike Benz calls the blob.
Every army needs a priesthood. Currently that priesthood is lawyers unmovably hostile to Trump, Maga, Americans, and America. Their hatred of American fighting men is apparent. Pete Hegseth, having dumped the lawyers, is now attempting to install clergy that are actually Christian — which he is going to find difficult, as all the regular mainstream Churches have gone post Christian.
>You appear to assert that the Venezuelan regime has a liberal property right in Venezuela.
I don’t think I “appear” to assert that, let alone actually said it.
>That is not a “liberal system based on property rights”
I never said otherwise. And I said nothing about Venezuela anyway. But since you mention it, Venezuela being a dictatorship doesn’t change the fact that the US dictatorship is attacking it, just like the US attacks the rest of the world.
> He disempowers what Mike Benz calls the blob.
No he doesn’t. His actual actions are those of the blob. He simply removed some of the propaganda and isn’t replacing it with any better propaganda. But that’s fine I guess. The sooner you self-destruct, the better.
The BBC is the voice of the blob, and it does not think so.
You accuse the great showman Trump of not replacing blog propaganda? You are entirely detached from reality. Just watch him speaking on Venezuela.
>The BBC is the voice of the blob, and it does not think so.
The BBC and the rest of the “western democratic” media are of course lying. They fault trump for allegedly not attacking Russia enough because “trump is a kremlin puppet”.
If on the other hand you listen to all the countries you are attacking, Russia included, they will tell you what the blob is actually doing.
>Just watch him speaking on Venezuela.
Trump said he wants to loot Venezuela in order to “make america great again”. He needs the oil and all the other stuff because the US is bankrupt. Trump also declared he owns the western hemisphere but I missed his justification for the claim…
But I guess I have to regard any nonsense he spouts as propaganda and so I have to correct myself. Trump’s propaganda is slightly more honest and more unhinged. So he changed the propaganda somewhat while the actions of the blob/neocons/war party get more and more unhinged and closer to world war.
Plainly the blob wants to overthrow Trump. For many reasons — failure to attack Russia sufficiently being the least of them. They are deeply threatened by him supporting freedom of speech and free elections in Europe.
Therefore Trump is not obeying the blob, nor the blob obeying Trump. The action is not even in Venezuela, it is in Europe.
Oh and by the way :
BBC
“Trump warns US will intervene if Iran kills protesters – BBC”
Faux news
“IRAN: Trump pledges support for protesters as demonstrations hit 2-week mark”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vs2s79qOrfE
Why should MAGA care about “poor oppressed iranians”? Oh wait. The CIA is trying to overthrow the Iranian govt yet again, and those “protestors” are assholes on the CIA payroll. And trump is of course worried about his regime-changing assets in Iran…
Because a Kingly regime in Iran is unlikely to build nuclear weapons.
>a Kingly regime in Iran is unlikely to build nuclear weapons
Oh? I thought a king, who owns the country, would want to protect his property from unhinged predators like you and your jews, and so the first thing he would do is build nuclear weapons.
Did I mention that little game is over Jim?
Iran has excellent natural borders, and is not in danger of someone coming after its oil, of which it has a rather limited supply. Saudi Arabia has vastly more oil than Iran, and lacks Iran’s very strong natural borders and large supply of cannon fodder.
Iran wants nukes because conflict with Israel. A King has no reason to pick a fight with Israel. A Muslim priest does have reason to pick a fight.
Good fences make good neighbours, and there are some impressive natural fences between Iran and Israel.
>Plainly the blob wants to overthrow Trump. For many reasons —
I agreed that yes they hate trump, they stole the 2020 elections, yes they want to overthrow trump. All that is true but your conclusions here do not follow.
>failure to attack Russia sufficiently being the least of them.
Maybe I wasn’t clear. The BBC lies and whines about trump being a kremlin asset even though trump is anything but a kremlin asset. The BBC lies in order to push trump to be even more hostile to Russia even though he is in practice pretty hostile already. And that kind of tactic on the part of the “liberal democratic” media shouldn’t be surprising.
So, you want to prove that trump isn’t a member of the war party because some sub-faction within the war party doesn’t like trump. Sorry, the conclusion doesn’t follow.
The democrats are US imperialists who love trannies and “democracy”. The republicans are US imperialists who in general don’t care about trannies and might oppose trannysm somewhat since the republicans pretend to be “conservatives” or something but it’s mostly for show.
At the end of the day US imperialists have a common objective, use the same anti-human means, and might just disagree about some details regarding propaganda.
>They are deeply threatened by him supporting freedom of speech and free elections in Europe.
And yet the pro Russia candidate in Romania was suppresed.
You define war party so broadly that anyone who puts America’s interests first is part of the war party. Just listen to what Trump says. It just obviously is his true objectives.
Trump’s grand strategy is the “pivot to China”. (Meaning pivot against China.) War is primarily a matter of logistics, and obviously China’s logistics are vastly superior to America’s, something that Trump well knows, and that the war party that you keep ranting about is obstinately oblivious to. So, to deal with China as an equal, America has to
1. Avoid dependence on China for critical resources and the processing of raw materials. In trade negotiations, China has repeatedly withheld critical resources to bring Trump the heel, and he came to heel but did not like it.
2. Get Russia on side, because China’s one vulnerability is imports of food, energy, and raw materials, which Russia has in abundance.
3. Fix American manufacturing.
This is all directly good for America, and is also rational for the objective of world domination. The war party stupidly wants Russia merely so that they can resume the looting of the 1990s, which enriched them personally, but did America no good at all.
The obsession with Russia Russia Russia is the anti Trump faction. Trump wants to cut a deal with Russia on the Ukraine. If he could force Zelensky to cede the disputed provinces for peace he would, but he cannot force Zelensky when Zelensky has EU backing.
When Trump explains his objectives in Venezuela, it is simply obvious that he is telling the plain truth. And his objectives with regard to Russia and China are similarly obvious. Your theory of Trump’s motivations and actions are just nutty and make no sense. The war party that you are obsessed by personally benefited from the looting of Russia in the 1990s. Trump did not.
>Get Russia on side
Yes! That’s the infinitely hilarious part. And I frankly admit I finally figured it out only a few days ago when Carlson, who seems desperate, blurted out the whole genius “plan”.
Carlson said that trump increased military spending by 500,000 millions of fake dollars because a “big war” is coming. And then said this
“Russia is essential to the United States. We cannot survive a global conflict if Russia and China are aligned against us.”
Duh. And the great news is that yes, so far they are aligned, and everything trump has done has only antagonized the Russians more.
Tough luck for you Jim.
> Your theory of Trump’s motivations and actions are just nutty and make no sense.
Feel free to believe whatever you want to believe. Anyway, to your credit you have allowed me to make my points freely.
You, jaggard, live in your own universe, seriously detached from the reality in front of your nose
I like Trump’s national security strategy because it is just sensible and practical, while you fantasize that he follows a destructive and self destructive strategy for no reason at all.
I recommend that you watch based camp’s summary of the cool parts of the recent security paper, since if you read it yourself, it will all go over your head.
In your version of reality, the US is the anchor. No, the anchor is Europe, and that is why the blob are calling Trump a Putin puppet, because he is disengaging from the chain — among other things, disengaging from Ukraine and pressuring them to accept Russia’s terms.
Based Camp also supply lovely ridicule of leftist criticisms of Trump’s policy, the leftist fantasy of your absurd delusions.
A major implication of the security paper is that it is fine with America if the Ukraine sinks or swims, while the China strategy, which the security paper does not address, is that it is better if it sinks. Which is what the Europeans are complaining about, and what the war hawks who think that America can not only win a war with China, but with China allied with Russia, are horrified and outraged by.
While the left, including the American left, just wants America to sink, because of the original sin of whiteness.
You refuse to hear what Trump is saying, but as Based Camp says:
You refuse to believe what you can in fact see, you are drowning in the delusions of those that hate America for its whiteness.
My objections to your jew-western shithole-empire have nothing to do with race and everything to do with morality. Yet you are trying to play the race card, like lefties do. Pretty amusing.
At the same time you Jim regularly admit that race is irrelevant when you say “whites are wolf to whites”
But your deluded accounts of what this empire is in fact doing come, in substantial part, from those that hate America for its whiteness, and your “morality” is that of the Global “rules based order” — where the rules are whatever a demonic priesthood decides moment to moment.
Trump is not trying to dissolve the American empire, which I suppose is what you demand, but he is trying to pull it back to its natural borders, aiming at a multipolar world where there is a comfortable distance between the hegemonies of America and the other major nuclear powers. The world has been drifting towards nuclear war because of the Globohomo empire’s Russia project, to subjugate Russia as it was subjugated in the 1990s, and then dissolve Russia altogether.
If the Holy Empire of the ocean lands withdraws to a safe distance, while China and Russia remain uncomfortably close to each other, there is inevitably going to be conflict between the Chinese hegemony and Russia, sooner or later, one way or another way. They are only united because Globohomo hegemony is so threatening. Good fences make good neighbours, and Russia and China do not have good fences.
Trump’s project has resulted in a split between Globohomo and Trump. Unfortunately a large part of the presidency remains in the pocket of Globohomo, but the president has been purging the presidency. His Venezuela project is aimed at expelling China and Russia where they are too close to America, and at aligning big oil’s interests in favor of the Holy Empire of the Ocean Lands, and not the Globohomo Empire.
He just held a meeting with big oil, and told them that looting Russia is off the table, and looting the Ukraine is unlikely to end well. Americans should do their looting closer to home. The interests of America and Americans have been sacrificed to the ambitions of those who wish to dominate far off lands.
Latin American states are falling into line. You probably don’t like that either.
>But your deluded accounts of what this empire is in fact doing come, in substantial part, from those that hate America for its whiteness.
You can repeat that tale as many times as you want.
>…aiming at a multipolar world where there is a comfortable distance between the hegemonies of America and the other major nuclear powers.
Except that is another lie. At this very moment trump and your jews are trying to regime-change Persia. Of course Persia shares a border with the US, like Canada, right?
>The world has been drifting towards nuclear war because of the Globohomo empire’s Russia project
which is trump’s project as well, as all his actions so far prove.
>If the Holy Empire of the ocean lands withdraws to a safe distance,
…something you will never do until finally defeated.
>while China and Russia remain uncomfortably close to each other, there is inevitably going to be conflict between the Chinese hegemony and Russia
Hilarious wishful thinking on your part. But unlike you, Russia and China can cooperate. And thanks to trump and the rest of the “deep state” China and Russia are as close as ever.
Anyway, I meant only to comment on your race baiting.
Israel is trying to regime change Iran for obvious reasons, and Trump is trying to regime change Iran because he does not want another nuclear power. Iran has repeatedly attacked American troops and commercial ships through its proxies. Trump does not want such attacks backed by a nuclear power.
Iran attacks Israel because it is the duty of Muslims to go to war with Jews, and it attacks America because it is the duty of Muslims to go to war with Christians. A kingly regime in Iran is unlikely to care about such matters, so it is very important for Americans and America to have a kingly regime in Iran.
Israel has done a lot of bad things, and Muslims have a lot of excuses to attack it. But it would make no difference even if it had not done bad things.
Iran has been attacking us for Islamic reasons. With nukes, that would be a considerably worse problem.
Nuts.
If you want to know who is responsible for what, follow the money.
All your buddies in the Globohomo Empire in Exile, previously known as Europe, are complaining vehemently that it is not Trump’s project, because Trump has entirely defunded the Ukraine project.
The Ukraine government is now entirely funded by European money, which means Europe tells its employees what to do, and Trump does not. If Trump was telling them what to do, he would tell them to make peace at any price, for the price is only going to get higher as the Ukraine’s manpower continues to shrink.
>All your buddies in the Globohomo Empire in Exile
You are at the end of your rope Jim. You know it. I know it. I have no connection to any government. You on the other hand are a pathetic, robotic mouthpiece for the “trump administration”.
>The Ukraine government is now entirely funded by European money
That is – a lie. But even if it were true, your emperor is still providing his proxy army with :
1) weapons
2) targeting information
3) mercenaries operating those weapons
Meaning, trump is continuing the war while allegedly getting the euro scum to pay for it (which is half a lie).
The Trump-Is-A-Populist farce is over.
Whoever draws a salary in the Ukrainian army or government, that is now one hundred percent European money. There are a bunch of entanglements with America that are still continuing though they are being wound down, but who writes the cheques is where the power to make decisions is. Some American weapons deliveries, of weapons already paid for, continue, but they are now down to twenty percent of the Ukrainian arsenal.
Your line is that the Europeans are doing what Trump tells them to do. He told them to allow free speech and free elections. Have they done so?
Blaming Trump for the continuation of the Ukraine war is as transparently absurd as the Europeans calling Elon Musk and X an enemy of democracy.
The war continues because Zelensky is getting paid to continue it. Who made the decision to pay him to continue it?
article in “foreign policy”
https://archive.ph/gpleF
>More than $50 billion in Ukraine-related PDA, USAI, and FMF funding has been appropriated but not actually spent yet, according to the State Department.
>the United States continues to spend money on humanitarian aid. Ukraine funding was broadly spared the massive cuts to global aid programs made early in the second Trump administration
I’d also point out that the US has a massive “black budget” so it’s impossible to know what they are actually doing.
That said I was expecting to find more evidence of US involvment. But let’s pretend for argument’s sake that now all funding comes from Europe. So during 2025 trump failed to stop the war by cutting the funds, and now he has switched funding to europe, which keeps the war going on.
>Your line is that the Europeans are doing what Trump tells them to do.
More precicely, european traitors like macron-ex-rotschild and merz-ex-blackrock are accomplices of the US war party, led by trump.
Then you have 30% to 20% of european retards who vote for those scumbags. Which means that at least 70% of people in europe are hostages to US imperial schemes.
>He told them to allow free speech and free elections. Have they done so?
There are no free elections in europe because europe is under US rule. As to “free speech”, europeans have access to all the NSA garbage like twatter, starlink, fedbook, jewtube, tor etc. Hell, half of tor nodes are in germany.
So regardless of more pro-censorship rhetoric and even laws in europe, the level of “free speech” isn’t too different from that of the US. And this is a side topic anyway.
> Who made the decision to pay him to continue it?
The US war party and its european accomplices(who play a lesser role).
The real question is, why didn’t trump actually stop the war.
The current conflict between Trump and Europe over free speech and free elections, Greenland, etcetera, show he is no more in charge of Europe than he is of Iran.
Trump did not switch funding to Europe. Europe decided to fund the the Ukrainian regime and the war. Trump does not get to tell them their budgets.
Your theory is that Globohomo governs nothing, Trump governs everything, there is no deep state, Europe has free elections and free speech. You are nuts.
There are more political prisoners in Europe than there were in the latter days of the Soviet Union.
You are a fake. You are pushing the globohomo agenda.
Globohomo is global. Back in the Biden days, Europe was running America a lot more than America was running Europe. The World Economic Forum (WEF) meets, in secret in Europe, not America, and when Trump and Maga showed up, became tense, because Trump was advocating not just American independence, but independence of other nation states.
>Your theory is that Globohomo governs nothing, Trump governs everything,
Except, that is not my theory at all.
Trump and globohomo are accomplices. So if I say that trump is responsible for the war, then I’m also saying that globohomo is responsible for the war.
I’m constantly saying the whole world is under attack by your war party, “war party” being just another name for “globohomo”. So I’m saying globohomo is pretty powerful. Now, why would you try to completely misrepresent my position, I wonder…
>there is no deep state,
What? There is a “permanent bureaucracy”, a war party, a MIC, a countless number of TLAs — you can call it “the swamp”. And guess what, trump isn’t draining the swamp, he’s purging people like greene, massie, paul. Furthermore, I am a libertarian so you might guess that I am well aware of what the state is. Calling it “deep state” is just distraction.
>Europe has free elections and free speech.
Lol. I said “There are no free elections in europe” and you pretend I said the opposite. You are mocking me.
>You are a fake. You are pushing the globohomo agenda
Yes, that’s why my personal hero is the faggot warmonger lindsey graham.
The why do you keep saying TrumpTrumpTrump the way Dolfin says JooJooJoo, on issues where conflict between Globohomo and Trump is loud, obvious, and turning lethal?
Obviously he is draining the swamp. You can hear their loud screams of pain about firings and layoffs. A bunch of prosecutors just got fired for refusing to look into anti Ice activities, and the outrage on the left is thunderous. Every few weeks we get more outrage about purges of the Deep State.
Quite obviously Trump is draining the swamp. The FBI just arrested some Zizians for murdering straight people, something I could not have imagined would be possible a couple few months ago. Don’t you know that trannies have a constitutional right to kill straight people. It is found the penumbra of the umbra of the fourth amendment — somewhere near female emancipation, abortion, and gay marriage. You libertarians found female emancipation, abortion and gay marriage there. Surely the right of trannies to murder straights is right beside it.
You surely have to admit that if FBI is able to arrest trannies for murdering straights, something fundamental, important, and radical has changed. I totally did not expect to see this. I expected DoJ forces, or Ice, or some local jurisdiction would arrest them. Ziz is screaming “trans genocide”. He is genuinely outraged and shocked. The left is entitled. They see Ziz as a minor embarrassment, the way they see abortion as a minor embarrassment.
“Just bake the cake, why don’t you”
The Libertarian party is catering to the left’s sense of entitlement. “Just bake the cake.” If you piss off a tranny, you have it coming. You should have baked the cake.
Faggot commie liar. If no deep state, then state is as it officially appears to be, which means that the political parties govern America and Britain as depicted in Civics 101.
The Deep State is deep, because we see orders going out, and being acted on uniformly over multiple institutions at once, and we do not know who issued that order, revealing an invisible, hidden, and secretive government.
The phrase “deep state” implies that power is hidden, furtive, illegitimate, illegal, and improper. Which is to say, power is not TrumpTrumpTrump Orange Man Bad.
You are pushing the globohomo agenda. If no deep state, then there is nothing wrong with European elections that could not be fixed by murdering Orange man bad. If no deep state, then the hundred thousand people in the UK who got arrested for thought crime totally had it coming. Should have baked the cake.
If no deep state, then any leftist act by the American government is totally Trump’s fault and we should vote for Mamdami.
You are a real libertarian you say? Well then, you have to disown the Libertarian party the way Tucker, a real Episcopalian, disowns the post Christian Episcopalian Church.
> Well then, you have to disown the Libertarian party the way Tucker
I’ll disown it my own way. The libertarian party is a joke and has been a joke since the day it was created, when the “anarchists” agreed to cooperate with the advocates of “limited” tyranny and agreed to never talk about anarchism. Apart from that the LP has achieved exactly nothing in more than 50 years. And it’s probably owned by the kochs, so you should love it.
>You are pushing the globohomo agenda.
Yes, that’s why I want to see you defeated on all fronts and especially on the Russian front.
A couple of weeks ago you were honest enough to admit that
“If you are outside America, Globohomo imperialism, “The International Rules Based Order”, looks like almost the same thing as American imperialism, and it is hard to see any difference. But if you are an Amerikaner, looks like the opposite of American imperialism.”
Of course your conclusion is just insane propaganda, but this particular piece of propaganda has a lot of truth in it : “globohomo”, GAE and trumpist neocons all “look the same” because they are the same.
I’ll just sit back and watch how you self-destruct.
Your way somehow neglects to disown “Just bake the cake, why don’t you”
The obvious problem with anarcho capitalism is that it is helpless against the collective use of force by organised cohesive groups.
So, in practice, used as a convenient excuse for criticising the collective use of force by some organised cohesive groups but not others. Gays being among those “not others”.
Back when holy war was more distant, one could honestly and genuinely be an anarcho capitalist. These days, holy war is upon us, and it is time to sign up with a King.
>Your way somehow neglects to disown “Just bake the cake, why don’t you”
I don’t bake cake for faggots and I don’t have any faggot friends. Unlike, you know, trump.
Yet you fail to notice those who would force us to bake the cake. Among them, the libertarians.
And, opposing them, Trump.
All of which is very libertarian.
There are only two sexes. Trump said it, the libertarians conspicuously failed to say it. What say you?
This, not US imperialism, is what threatens our freedom. The Venezuelans are more free under the American Empire, and the Greenlanders would be no less free. Why then are you so agitated about US imperialism?
Trump has cut both intelligence support and funding for Ukraine. They now rely on the French for targeting data. Thus he is not complicit in the Ukraine war, and any libertarian who opposes him wants to sacrifice small girls to Moloch.
The opposition to Trump has three issues. They are for the war in the Ukraine, and or for open borders, and or for sacrificing children to Moloch, and anyone who says he opposes Trump because he opposes the war in the Ukraine is just quite obviously lying.
>There are only two sexes. Trump said it, the libertarians conspicuously failed to say it. What say you?
What a retarded question. There are only two sexes – that’s one of the most basic facts of biology.
Now, trump has lots of faggot accomplices. What say you? Oh wait you say nothing, like every time you get caught red handed.
>This, not US imperialism, is what threatens our freedom.
You are just a thieving, murdering animal. That’s what your “philosophy” boils down to.
https://youtu.be/6bV1xS4Sarg?si=GwCGbwJRnfcidql_&t=489
According the Defence Politics Asia, America has cut off intelligence support for the Ukraine. Which means it is no longer the US doing the targeting for Ukrainian weapons, but France.
Defense Politics Asia depicts this as a rebellion by Europe against America, as the schism between the US and Europe starting to go military.
This makes Jaggard’s TrumpTrumpTrump Orange Man Bad narrative absurd.
With money and intel cut off, the US is no longer an accomplice in the Ukraine war, which proves that Trump was never an accomplice.
> We cause actions.
you have caused no actions.
every action publicly quotes from, references, recites, endorses, operates according to, supports, declares themselves in fellowship with, etc… their priests.
this is undeniable way human organization works.
we see no group[s] of actors doing that in re moldbug or any other “alt-right” priesthood.
therefore you have thus far failed to cause any action.
not least evidenced by fact that you would be first to trumpet any such evidence that such actions were so caused.
lacking such citation by actors, you have nothing, certainly no more than happenstance correlation.
the day alt-right memes appear responsively quoted on formerly normie news, even from an anti-position, then you will have accomplished something.
moldbug on tucker, fuentes on Morgan… these do not count, because they are ‘priests’ advertising, not adherants.
until public adherants, no actions caused.
Does Tampon Tim quote from Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals”?
Does the tranny movement quote Magnus Hirschfeld? Every child castrated by the perverts in the education system is giving effect to the idea system of the notorious demonic pervert Magnus Hirschfeld.
They will be quoting from us when Alf becomes archbishop of the reformed Episcopalian church, which is unlikely to happen until well after full effect has been given to most of our ideas.
Babylonbee
https://babylonbee.com/news/liberals-now-living-in-fear-of-being-senselessly-shot-by-ice-agents-theyre-trying-to-run-over
Is that the order of operations, then? Charlemagne or Lord Humungus find that he needs a church to (grant divine right of kings and) keep his knights working together within a cooperate-cooperate environment?
Curiously, this was the final-act plot twist of that movie Book of Eli:
Post-apocalyptic dead-shot Denzel Washington is employed by this reclusive top-dog warlord to bring back the last known Holy Bible, so that he could use it to organize his underlings and rebuild civilization.
In 2010 the idea was dipped in Hollywood cynicism, but now? The people will take whatever order they can fucking get.
Charles the Hammer instituted direct warrior rule. His grandson, Charles the Great, installed his pet pope in the Vatican, and then had his pet pope crown him Charlemagne.
Calling us “alt-right” indicates you have no idea who we are, or what our memes are.
Calling Moldbug “alt-right” indicates you have no understanding of dissident thought or political dynamics since roughly the Bush administration.
Insisting that the only indicator of success is having one’s opinions aired on “normie news” indicates you have no understanding of how power and influence has been structured in America since before the FDR administration.
I find your display of ignorance hard to take seriously. No one who could actually find their way to this blog would be that oblivious. Sounds more like feigned ignorance to push your own agenda, or rather that of your paymasters.
I don’t particularly care about him, but just to cite one example, Joe Rogan has 20 million subscribers; that is subscribers, not just drive-by viewers. Whereas CNN is lucky to break 500,000 viewers during prime time, and Fox News reportedly has some 1.7 million viewers and more than 90% of them are over age 55. So even using the terrible yardstick of normie spread and normie acceptance, who really matters here?
You spotted the payload: The payload being that we have to cut the testicles off our ideas and give ourselves an axe wound between our legs so that they will get past the gatekeepers, and if we don’t get a nod from the gate keepers, the way Nick Fuentes gets the nod, we have failed.
This. One cannot over-rely on the shit-test/pussy-dampness analysis of political events.
It’s just fantasy historical fiction at this point, but try to imagine how Covid19/BLM could have been averted by Trump flying the airplane of state by THIS instrument, rather than the others. What the historical break-point might have looked like, and when and how and why.
“Nothing ever happens”
“OK, something happened, but it’s not interesting”
“OK, maybe it was interesting, but it won’t have any impact”
“OK, there was a tiny impact but most people won’t notice”
“OK people are noticing and reacting but it’s too weak/not enough”
“Pbbt, that was like, last week, who cares, why are we still talking about it?”
“Nothing ever happens”
The only interesting thing about this is that you always crank up the volume on your “nothing ever happens” script precisely when something interesting, unusual or even unprecedented has happened. I wonder why that is? Whom are you really trying to convince?
Remember when the Charlie Kirk assassination changed everything? And then nothing changed? Hell, remember the first Trump administration, which presided over the biggest leftward lurch the USA has made in my lifetime? When I predict this current kerfuffle is going to amount to nothing or worse than nothing, it’s based on history. Could I be wrong? Sure, and I hope I am, but the smart money is on our side cucking out as always. Why do I say it when things seem to be happening? Because that’s when everyone is counting their pre-hatched chickens and making mountains out of their molehills.
You, Contaminated NEET, have long argued that we are doomed because the enemy has the army and police. Do you still want to argue the enemy has the army and the police?
Starting with Twitter, the left has lost one instrument of power after another. Is this “nothing ever changes”?
That has been true since 1832. Every few years, the west has a biggest leftward lurch ever. A shark must swim or drown, and left must go ever lefter, ever faster, until the left is decisively ended, or until everyone tortures everyone to death for insufficient leftism.
You keep predicting a stable, stationary state of permanent leftism. This has never happened, cannot happen. When leftism is no longer able to go lefter, faster, it starts to die, and now, manifestly, it is dying.
Have you done anything for our side recently?
>Do you still want to argue the enemy has the army and the police?
Yes of course I do.
1) ICE is pretty good, but arguable. They’re still treating Lefties with kid gloves. In the last couple days, following the Good incident, the Lefties are more aggressive than ever and ICE is more timid. They routinely tolerate behavior from their moral superiors that would get you or me shot.
2) ICE (and maybe US Marshals, although they’re pretty quiet right now) is the only agency where there’s even a question. FBI is sitting tight, eagerly anticipating authorization to arrest anyone who ever voted for Trump. NSA, IRS, and all the rest of the alphabet soup, too.
3) Local and State police have openly chosen the other side in MN.
>Have you done anything for our side recently?
Nah. But if I had, I sure wouldn’t brag about it for e-cred. The NSA has all our names and addresses.
The police chief has openly chosen the left in MN. However, he is encountering serious non compliance from within his police force.
The left is creating an anarcho communist zone in MN — meaning they are aggressing against state police, who lack the support of their chain of command, not ICE. The mob just threatened the Minneapolis police chief for insufficient leftism. Their attempt to storm the ICE facility was shut down, so they went after the soft targets.
We are not seeing similar confrontations between ICE and protesters.
The Minneapolis police chief has promised that Minneapolis police will prevent ICE arrests and arrest the ICE agent who shot the protester who aimed a car at him and gunned the car at him. Have they intervened, have they obtained a warrant for the arrest of the ICE agent? The police chief does not have control of the rioters, and he does not have control of his own instruments of organised violence. The left has the mob, but the mob is afraid. The left has the Minneapolis police chief, but it does not have the Minneapolis police. It can prevent Minneapolis police from acting, but it cannot make them act.
Tampon Tim and the Police Chief promised insurrection by the state against the federal government. No insurrection has ensued. The leftmost are attacking the left, because the right is no longer impressed by their moral superiority.
The rioting you are now seeing in Minneapolis is the leftmost attacking the left, not the leftmost attacking ICE. When ICE shot the Karen, that the cooled things considerably. The left continues to move ever leftwards, ever faster, but has ever less capability for organised violence.
Yes, things are heating up in Minneapolis considerably. But they are heating up for the not-quite-radical-enough-left. ICE shot the Karen, and the color revolution turned upon its own.
Oh the warlord in the Book of Eli (masterfully played by Gary Oldman) was a cynic but he certainly had the Jimian understanding toward social order, which to me made me think he wasn’t really the bad guy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqHxOQWW_Nw
The post apocalyptic warlord correctly says “It has been done before, we can do it again.” What the cynical writers were reluctant to notice is that if the warlord exercises power through the “Words of the Book”, this acts to constrain his power in ways that make his conduct, and the conduct of his officers and men, prosocial, thus making him more than a mere warlord. And also attains better cooperation within his military force.
If you look at the wars between the pagans and the Christian in England, Christians won because the pagan warlords kept killing each other, while the Christians assembled England with treaties cemented by royal marriage.
Similarly the British conquest of India, where brother would fight brother, and one of them, or both of them, would invite the British in. The Sikh’s were conquered because the Sikh army would lawless pillage its own territory, resulting in a failure of logistics.
The warlord says that if he rules through “the words of the book … people will come from all over”. He is right, because loyalty to a King ruling through the words of that book is more likely to secure one’s safety than loyalty to a king who rules by mere force.
When the Romans left Britain, Britain fell into chaos. And stayed in chaos. The words of that book made England. And the warlord intends to do the same again. Sounds like a plan.
The Blob cannot survive very long without its propaganda. All power (at least all open power, that of secret societies and conspiracies is different) at scale is based on myth as much as force. Back when Game of Thrones was good they had this scene…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2W0nVisWla4
@Contaminated NEET
I do not know why Jim has not banned you yet.
>I do not know why Jim has not banned you yet.
I’ll leave that as an exercise for the reader.
Because he needs a token poofter on his blog, and Milo was unavailable?
🙂
Which is exactly the same point Augustine makes about Romans: because their Gods were petty and vindictive, the Romans kept killing each other, fratricide even being a literal part of their founding myth.
No; I remember clearly stating how important it was for the administration to enact a severely violent crackdown, which they would probably be reluctant to do, and if they failed to do it, we would see escalation from the left. I can even dig up those posts if you need to see the proof. No one was saying “this changes everything”, that is a strawman you made up. We were saying that it was an opportunity, and a test, which the Trump government was likely going to miss and to fail.
That said, some things did change. Antifa and the Zizians both took hits, albeit far from death blows. And some things changed, but for the worse, as predicted; specifically, the organized left has become increasingly kinetic, veering closer to a hot civil war.
No; I remember hitting Peak SJW in 2015, after the long dark age of Obama’s gay nigger communism, when the Woke religion (formerly “intersectionality”) became ascendant in corporate America, mild “sexual harassment” programs gave way to “allyship”, and there was a long string of high-profile incidents where some talented and successful white man was harassed and drummed out of his profession for being insufficiently woke.
I clearly remember the “biggest leftward lurch” happening before Trump 1.0, and slowing significantly under Trump 1.0, though of course it did not stop, for the same reason a truck going 70 miles an hour does not stop after hitting the rear end of a Honda Civic that cut it off. Some people, no doubt, hoped that it would be permanent; they “trusted the plan”; but rather few of us expected a titanic shift, and even fewer would accept your framing that it was the biggest leftward lurch. It was the smallest leftward lurch in a 4-year period that we’d seen since roughly the Clinton era.
And speaking of the Clintons, I remember that Trump was the change. The very fact that Hillary Clinton, queen of the establishment, did not get to be President, and will never get to be President, was and still is a significant development. It marked an obvious change in the rules of the game, proved that the regime was much weaker than previously thought; and while the left showed us in 2020 that it could still cheat its way to victory, it expended significant energy and social capital and political legitimacy in doing so, which it has not really been able to recover since.
Most importantly, I can remember that throughout most of 2023-2024, most of us thought it was a bad joke that Trump was running for a second term at all, that he had no chance of winning now that votes didn’t matter, and that he’d be better off fleeing the country otherwise he and his family would all wind up committing “suicide” in some dingy cell. It was only rather late into 2024 that people started noticing and talking about a Thermidorean reaction. That was another massive change that relatively few people even theorized might happen, and even fewer expected to happen, until it was already obviously happening.
Only because you keep revising the definition of “something happening” upward to mean “something happening other than all the unexpected and unpredictable things that have already happened”.
The Good incident is something. In this case, the “nothing” is the “something” because the left wanted to turn it into another Summer of St. Floyd, and that has clearly failed. The dyke is dead, the ICE officer is still employed, and ICE has not apologized or fled the scene or stopped doing their jobs. That is a major change to the status quo. If it were true that nothing ever changes, then we would be having another Summer of St. Floyd.
Yes. This.
That the dyke is dead and the ICE officer is still employed is a colossal shift to the right from the status quo. We are winning. We could still lose, but our enemies are leaderless, we have leaders, we have the army and the police, our enemies do not, and most importantly, we know our enemies and ourselves, while the enemy knows neither us nor themselves.
The supremes just issued an emergency injunction that wholesale blocks the authority of black robed tyrants to issue nationwide injunctions, throwing the ball to the legislature (which is still full of Rinos and Democrats, but way to the right of the black robed tyrants) and the president. This is another colossal victory, though that the Dyke is dead and the Ice officer free is a bigger victory. (I conjecture that with things ratcheting up in Minneapolis, someone gave the supremes a gentle reminder about President Jackson.)
These are very big changes.
The left must get ever lefter, ever faster or die. When Trump 1.0 stalled them a little bit, they started to die, or at least became ill. Now we have Trump 2.0. What we see in the streets of Minneapolis foreshadows their death spasms — albeit a leftist death spasm can still lead to enormous casualties.
It is not over till its over, but we have the wind at our backs.
OK then do me a favor, please, rewind this pattern, remix it to 2020, and describe what it would look like. George Floyd is dead, Derek Chauvin is in big trouble because that head-on-neck video of him was still taken, but THEN what happens?
Or rather, can the 2020 story still not play out any other way, even in this fantasy historical fiction scenario, because there weren’t enough cell phones and body cams then to capture the 2-3 minutes before Floyd died?
Or, could it just have been the matter of the right few words, spoken by the right people at the right time? (This exact same question goes for Covid19, too, by the way.)
All I can say for sure is that this had absolutely nothing to do with evidence, or trials, or guilty or not-guilty. All that came way too late for 2020. Floyd was high as fuck, had a heart attack, and it didn’t matter.
What tipped the “Good” (not her real last name I hear) story this new way, firstly, was all that video and audio evidence of her girlfriend being a crazy, insufferable and sanctimonious BITCH. That came out right away, before the news could run too far with only half of it. (And that they were both White.)
We still have instinctual sympathy for George Floyd because, like a retarded child, he just couldn’t understand what was happening or why he was in trouble. He was the simian Old Yeller.
But not Karen. Fuck Karen. We can’t stand Karen. Not anymore.
But it wasn’t just that it was Karen this time. Those ICE guys were Federal — not State, City or County — and Trump and the gang did NOT cuck on this like Tampon Tim and Mayor Frey did on Derek Chauvin. There’s that too.
The facts in the Saint Floyd of Fentanyl case rapidly became widely known, yet had no effect.
The facts in the Good case were far less incriminating for Good, yet did have effect. This is a huge change.
The story the left is pushing is that she was “just a frightened woman trying to escape” — which could well be true, we will never know what was in her mind. But we can be sure of what was in the cops mind. What is going to be in your mind when angry obnoxious Karen turns her car towards you, looks at you, and guns the motor?
And this time, the facts have had effect. This time around, no one is buying the left’s story. Last time around, they probably did not buy it either, but they all had to pretend they did buy it.
Given her demeanour and behaviour, it seems plausible in retrospect that she intended to eradicate the ice officers attempting to arrest her. We will never know if that was her intent. But that is how it would have looked to the cop she hit.
If she had turned a little further while backing up to turn her car, if she had backed up a foot further while turning, her car would no longer be pointed at an ice officer, and if it was her intent to escape, then that was the obvious course of action — turn your car till you have a clean run for it. Obviously she deliberately chose to hit the cop, which is incongruent with an attempt to escape, with intent to leave the scene with the cops still alive.
We have plenty of legal precedent in similar cases, that second guessing the cop on the spot does not turn self defence into murder. All that matters is that he has a reasonable belief that someone with a lethal weapon intends to use it, based on the facts known to him at that moment.
We will never know her intent, but given that she deliberately chose to hit the cop, and that her lesbian lover was still outside the car, the most plausible intent was to kill the cops trying to arrest her, pick up her lesbian lover, and then make like Bonnie and Clyde. That is an absurd plan, but making a getaway was absurd whether she killed the cops or not. If, in the moment, she thought she could make a getaway, then would also think she could make a getaway with dead cops.
knee-on-neck video
> The level of free speech is not much different in Europe
Absurd statement at least if you take Germany and especially the UK into account. The UK especially is a totalitarian surveillance state which criminalizes all dissent. The UK has over 10000 arrests for speech crimes a year. So its level of speech supression is probably less than say Russia before Stalin’s death or China after Mao but its probably more totalitarian about speech than the Soviet Union under Khruschev/Beria/the Gerontocrats (when almost all arrests for speech and thought crimes were people who wanted to put dissent into widespread distribution and the state stopped arresting people for casual grumbling about the regime at all, though in some cases people lost their jobs).
Are you a libertarian or a national socialist because they are very much mutually exclusive.
Furthermore libertarianism is an ideology that while its right about some economic questions is horribly wrong about the nature of politics, power and how man acts as a collective. Its an ideology that works in well functioning high trust Anglo Saxon Protestant societies that have unprincipled exceptions to keep out foreigners and deny rights to women and it fails under almost any circumstance.
Largely unremarked is the ban on third-world immigrant visas effective next week. I’m sure some are disappointed that Mexico and India aren’t on the list, but every other shithole is: no more immigration from Guatemala, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Uganda, Pakistan, the Congo and a couple dozen more.
Is banning immigration from these countries part of the Globohomo agenda? If not, then why is Trump doing it?
As I so often say, there’s plenty of room for critique that “it’s not enough”, but it beggars belief to suggest that Trump is a Eurofag or sympathizer himself.
Trump will get no points for the visa ban if it doesn’t include India.
“Trump will get no points for the visa ban if it doesn’t include India.”
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
The longer Trump waits to cross the Rubicon, or to act according to having found himself on the other side of the Rubicon, the more likely it is that someone else will do it instead.
Banning immigration from India is literally more important than banning it from the entire rest of the world put together.
Bitching because Trump did something good (and something that was unthinkable 12 years ago) is rather silly.
As Scarebucks said, there’s valid room for saying it’s not enough – indeed, it isn’t enough – but Cominator didn’t just say that; he said Trump gets no points at all for this move. Come on, Comie.
> Banning immigration from India is literally more important than banning it from the entire rest of the world put together.
I can see a case being made for this, but you (The Cominator) isn’t making it here.
I see both being country/society ending, for the US dilution unless and until we work up the will for an “when whites riots, _continents_ burn” tens of millions strong ethnic cleansing. The Indians for how they’re being used as a middle to lower upper class or so replacement population, while imposing a massive competency loss, one reason Intel is in a doubtful saving throw posture today (10 nm debacle).
For our people though, the latter’s damage is largely done, or is anyone hearing about a reversal of university and corporate hiring patterns that have largely locked white men out of these higher talent (in theory) jobs? Not much of a pipeline makes this somewhat irrelevant, see Raytheon whining about how hard they’re finding it to hire after they did the usual trick of tying executive competition to hitting DEI targets. Because there’s only so much non-citizen H-1B etc. hiring they can do since their business is weapons.
Another example is how the proposed wealth tax in California is in the process of destroying its high tech industry including the creation of new companies. That culture is almost entirely irredeemably Leftist and we need not apply, so again it’s our enemies being damaged or destroyed (without changes, the latter will happen to a bunch of founders who hold private stock, and this really seems to be the intent).
All this requires some general fixes as well as making the country jeeten-frei.
My view is that Dravidians are a bioweapon, they are like the Skaven from warrior fantasy except the Skaven are actually good engineers.
We absolutely must chimpout about India even if you don’t agree there are going to be huge number of Trump voters who stay home if India is not included no matter what we do. All Trump and the white house should hear for a long time is that they must add India to the list ad naseum from every direction. This must be a chimpout of epic proportions.
Furthermore we should (though this is less important) also demand that any noncitizen Indians here have their visas revoked (priority tech industry I don’t hate the ones outside the tech industry nearly as much but American tech must be made jeet free) and all naturalized citizenships be given a full cavity search on their background and revoked at the slightest discrepancy.
Unless Trump can fortify the elections himself from now on the Indian issue in addition to having the potential to contanimate American genetics worse than spics or niggers ever could its a big deal to a huge chunk of his voters.
> American tech must be made jeet free
Not only is the import programme purging out the White babymaking middle-class which is necessary for the white-type civ to survive, including the subliminal function of providing aspiration and drive to the people.
But all these import worker programs (H1-B etc) are MASSIVE spy programs intended by the GloboHomo Elites to flatten and erase the Natural Genetic and Technical lead the White [Christian] type Civ has developed over ten-thousands of years. In order for the ComSoc Elites to more easily average out and dumb down the last pockets of free resistance (US-West) so they can rape the entirety of the world as non-free slaves.
Ever been to a US University? Watched their traffic? Every single one of these Chinese, Indian, whatever… they’re all online talking and shuffling files back overseas. How the fuck you think China went from Rice Paddies to Shenzen in 30y? Outright blatant Theft from infiltrating USA Universities and Govt and Corps that’s how. Sure, the Chinese education system is brutally effective, but non-free in human sense.
And even worse than letting them in, the USA lets them GO BACK with laptops/usb and brains full of proprietary data.
Look at SpaceX… now all of a sudden China has Raptor3 and Starship level tech… they didn’t get that from watching the SpaceX YouTube channel. Same as China didn’t get Nukes in 1964 from watching mushroom clouds over Japan. Now India and DPRK and Iran and…
You’re fucking committing Suicide-by-Import, Suicide-by-Foreign-Hacker, and Suicide-by-Internal-LeftSocCom-University-Defector-from-USA.
If Import Workers are so fucking important, worth so much pay, then you must also be required to pay to put them in the equivalent of a SCIF where they cannot move anything in/out without supervision. Hire White unemployed Coal Miners to be the inbound-side internet-gopher for them if you’re too cheap to do that half yourself, they won’t screw their country over, let them bring their kids to hang out as techies too, within five years they’ll be better than the Imports.
Every fucking “Foreign Worker/Student” program should be shut the fuck down, all of them deported, and every single dime saved from those programs sent directly to multigenerational euro-white-descendant now heritage-born families so they can raise and educate their own kids… not to all these foreigns who still (and still insist on) speaking foreign language and praying to foreign gods, not least the ones that tell them to conquer and kill you.
Flatten Yale and Harvard, replace them with Tech Camps for White Children.
> all naturalized citizenships be given a full cavity search on their background and revoked at the slightest discrepancy.
Revoked and ejected, never to return.
The USA never needed any imports, does not, and will not ever.
No foreigner should ever not be immune from and subject to de-naturalization de-benefit de-permanency de-visa and ejection, certainly not before the 4th generation.
Foreign has nothing to do with papers, everything to do with if they have become behaviorally culturally religiously languagely intermixedly assimilated adopted and indistinguishable from the pre-existing multigenerational heritage stock, other than external appearance.
Only a very small percent ever achieves that, and ONLY when you keep their overall population percentage very low, say under 0.01%, otherwise instead of themselves being forced to adapt, they simply seek each other out from among the excess percent and form ever-growing enclaves against you.
So in short, Imports are simply not worth it.
Focusing on [re]developing yourselves is better.
> contanimate American genetics worse than spics or niggers ever could
People should have more pride than to interbreed.
Or at least self-regulate self-license yourselves to the at most say under 0.01% supposedly needed for good/random/opportunistic/diverse genetics.
Normally a King would handle all decisions about Foreigners.
That Natural self-protective interest in maintaining integral and orderly Nations actually worked rather well until the Leftism ideologies of “Democracy” were allowed to intentionally wreck things, ever since say the Magna Carta.
And why the fuck are you Importing and feeding welfare to all these foreign baby factories in your land and everywhere else. Patent Suicide.
Hell, if you’re that Empathetic, give me that money stream, I’ll go make White baby mommas and lots of little techies 🙂
Chimp all you like, but the point is, these are not the actions of a man (or regime) that is aligned with Globohomo.
I would obviously like to see Indian immigration ended as well, but I can understand why India (and Mexico) are complicated. When Joe Normie hears about Somalian welfare fraud or Congolese murders and rapes, he is naturally inclined to ask: “What in the hell are millions of Somalians and Congolese even doing in the USA?” But everyone knows why the Mexicans and Indians are here; that doesn’t mean the reasons are good, but the reasons are understood; we have formal diplomacy and entanglements, and a not-so-small percentage of Trump’s own voters/backers want them here, even though normie Americans largely want them gone even more than we do.
Personally, I would rather see an end to the H-type visas, full stop, and strong disincentives or administrative obstacles for outsourcing and offshoring, because shipping work off to jeets in India was a big problem even before we started bringing them all home with us, and is still a widespread practice. Excluding India from the H-1B wouldn’t fix that, but an explicit “Hire American or do business elsewhere” policy would.
When asked by morgan if the holohoax was real fuentes says hell yes of course it was real. He goes so far as to offer that “probably more than 6 millions” were killed. And morgan takes that laughable bullshit at face value. Bottom line, fuentes doesn’t have the balls to play his “antisemitic” government-scripted role. Or alternatively, the feds will never go against their jew masters.
I then saw morgan claiming that after the interview he came to think that maybe fuentes was mocking him by pretending to believe in the holohoax, but the entertaining fact remains, fuentes never called the holohoax bullshit out.
The holocaust did happen and the numbers were above 4 million and below 7 million though the use of gas chambers was probably extremely exageratted. Mostly the jews were just left to starve or die of exposure (or not ideally for the Germans of disease, not ideal because disease could spread to non Jews and Jews they still wanted to work) if they couldn’t work. Anne Frank the poster girl of western jewish children (in Russia jews were just generally shot regardless of any other distinction) killed by the Nazis was not in fact immediately gassed because as a young girl she was not strong enough to work (which was the supposed fate of Jewish children sent to camps), Anne Frank was shoved into horribly overcrowded conditions with no food and quickly died of disease.
So did the holocaust happen and in comparable numbers to what they said, yes it did. But for some reason they exageratted the use of gas chambers and deemphasized the role of just confining people at extreme densities and not letting them leave and not feeding them.
LMAO
International Criminal Court
Basically an instrument of Globo-Leftism, spawned from a long-preceding line of such influence groups.
LeftoPedia has added a LGBT/Women section to most History_of_ pages.
62% of the Judges are WOMEN.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judges_of_the_International_Criminal_Court
It’s currently headed by a Gay Male, a Muslim Rapist, a Feminist/Lez Negro Woman, a Jap Woman, among others.
It’s Judges are a laundry list of weird, including Third-World Subspecies, Second World Whiners and Aspiring Globo-Homos, and First World Leftists.
It’s explicitly against all Gods and Nature, because Nature and all Gods have committed their list of “crimes” which they claim purview over.
The only reasonable answer to the Jewish Question, for those affected by the Jewish Question, is surely the same answer as to the Question about Leftists, about Islam, and about Commies, and about everything else that has consistently ordained, wished, and exacted against you, Very Ill Will for tens of centuries. The question as to all the ways in which you accomplish the necessary and even final defense against such permanent Ill Will… doesn’t really matter.
For example, the Jews are doing a pretty good job against their Question of Islam in Gaza and West Bank and Temple Mount, which has been fucking them over for 1400 years… but unfortunately for them, they might not actually completely resolve the question. According to them they should, but they might pussy out, especially if they get scared of the ICC.
Certainly the Hindus and Christians wouldn’t mind the Jews keeping the MidEast Islam de-nuked.
And the Hindus and Jews probably wouldn’t mind joining up to de-nuke Pakistan, which the Christians wouldn’t mind either.
The world is in a Turning.
Hopefully the White World continues to exist.
Where are the mass graves of Jews outside of the Russian Federation where too many of them would be from Stalin and before? There should be a bunch that can be found in formerly occupied Eastern Europe, unless the Germans used wood to cremate the bodies, their being too energy poor for any other option I can think of.
Ann Frank likely dying from typhus planted the first seed of doubt in my mind about the official story when I read her fabled diary in the 1970s. So while I don’t doubt a lot of Jews died in concentration camps, before the war the Germans liked to remind the British of who recreated this concept in the Boer War, numbers in the millions from the west lack sufficient evidence as far as I know.
On the other hand, don’t obsess over “wooden doors,” as if the right sort of paint couldn’t make them gas tight, if they weren’t already inherently dense enough.
The decisive figure for me is the 70% decline of the Jewish population of the Netherlands. Holland was a nice relatively wealthy white country and it never was occupied by the Soviets. There was no reason for the Jews to flee en masse to Israel or the US after the war and yet 70% of them were gone. Also there is the fact that both Hans Frank and Goebbels mentioned in diaries that Hitler had decided something final and terrible for all Jews under German control at the Reich Chancellery meeting of December 12 1941 (immediately after he declared war on the US), that the Germans just couldn’t feed everyone in Europe after Barbarossa (which probably helped make Hitler’s decision about his least favorite group rather easy), that Himmler talked about it very explicitly at Posen and that Hitler himself talked about it pretty explicitly at a meeting with Horthy and Ribbentrop (though stopping short of saying all jews must die merely saying all jews who couldn’t work must die).
So I’m satisfied that the death figures are somewhat accurate and that it was a Reich policy, what I do find questionable is I think the use of gas chambers was exageratted for whatever reason. We don’t need endless discussion of this topic (Jim largely agrees with my view fyi) because its like fucking crack cocaine for shills.
The gas chambers are invention. The point of this invention is to make the Nazi mass murders as different as possible from the vastly larger mass murders committed by the rest of the left.
Millions of Jews is probably about right, but it was hunger, disease, and exposure the elements that killed them, not poison gas.
The point of the gas chambers myth is to hide the connection between universal state guarantees, and mass murder.
Hitler figured he could not feed everyone, and put Germans at the top of the list to be fed, and Jews at the bottom. The standard mass murder of socialism.
Currently Britain National Health Service and its Canadian equivalent are discovering they cannot provide medical treatment for everyone, so are systematically murdering middle class people and pensioners as their hospitals are overrun by illegal immigrants, the homeless, the insane, and criminals, who show up for free food and a bed.
Euthanasia, assisted “suicide”: except that they are apt to drug someone to the eyeballs, and he is not aware he volunteered for euthanasia.
In all cases, today’s Britain and Canada, the Soviet Union, and Hitler’s Germany, the unwanted are starved, but in Britain and Canada, they are kept so heavily drugged they do not notice that they are being starved. The most compliant and cooperative patients, the middle class and the elderly, the ones that it is easiest and most convenient to murder, get murdered first, the criminal and demented get murdered last, so pretty soon all the surviving patients are people you would cross the street to avoid if you encountered them while out shopping.
A state guarantee to provide for everyone can never be fulfilled, so always turns into a state policy of mass murder. “Universal Human rights” unavoidably and necessarily becomes genocide and democide.
Hitler’s holocaust is Britain’s National Health Service.
It is, however, very hard to make a wooden door human tight.
No one makes a prison cell with a wooden door, and no one is going to make a gas chamber with a wooden door.
Prisoners have a long time to think about how to break open the door; gasees do not.
Wooden doors are a very bad idea if you’re using cyanide or VX nerve gas. If your “gas” is just bathroom disinfectant, it’s not a problem.
The gas chambers are the Holocaust. It was the efficient, scientific, industrial, bureaucratic system of modernity applied to the destruction of human life, and we all need to think about it for at least an hour every day to ensure that we never do it again. If it was starvation and disease, then it’s just another atrocity.
It’s a tricky subject and I’ve always meant to visit Auschwitz or similar camps with the knowledge I’ve gained here. But generally, in retrospect, doesn’t the whole thing smell a little bit like a neurotic death fantasy? Not saying the gassing couldn’t have possibly happened, but realistically, the gassing would’ve taken much more effort than simply working and starving everyone to death.
The whole operation would’ve included airtight rooms, people manning and operating gas showers, people dragging bodies out, a pile of 24/7 burning clothes… Much more a facility, a rolling band factory almost, than a gulag like concentration camp. How strong is the evidence for this, compared to say the evidence for the Jews’ tendency for neurotic persecution fantasies?
They admit they lied to us about the soap, the lampshades, and the showers. The gas chambers were only in Soviet-occupied territory. Chemists and execution experts who make seemingly solid arguments against it and are met with repression and vigorous lawfare rather than counterargument. It was the biggest war of all time and deceptive propaganda was par for the course. I’d be shocked if the gas chambers were real.
Oh nvm we are in agreement, I misunderstood your earlier comment.
Not that hard to make gas chambers work sometimes say to kill some jews when you get too many trains in at once, but it sounds like its a bitch to keep them in continous use. My view is that they were probably real to a limited extent but the holocaust narrative for some reason decided to exagerate their use 10 fold and ignored that most were killed by starvation, exposure and disease.
> It was the biggest war of all time
WWII, “was”, past tense, and “big”.
But on percentage scales, WWII was certainly not accomplishing full purges, not even close to the ones that happened much earlier in human history.
I believe two far bigger, nastier, and more complete wars are coming.
One will be a Political War.
The other will be Holy.
Recorded time hasn’t been long enough to derive data, so I don’t know which will be first, but the latter is usually last, carving out a general peace for quite some eons.
When…
Optimist says an Exclusive Ladder-Blowing Self-Sustainable Ex-Earth Civ must be made to happen first… godspeed.
Pessimist of current environment says the Rocketeers might not make it in time. Rocketeers will need very good messaging to survive unscathed, and need a legion of protectors.
When you visit “Auschwitz” you are not visiting Auschwitz because the most embarassing things about the camps were demolished which if gas chambers were used (and I think they were to a limited extent in certain time periods but I don’t think they were the main cause of death). You are visiting a replica of what the narrative said existed. Now to get a better idea of the camps as Jim has pointed out Madjanek was taken in a very rapid Soviet advance after Bagration (the Soviet offensive which was a disaster for the Germans worse than anyone thought it would be as it just essentially annihilated army group center) and the Germans really didn’t get to clean up or demolish anything. Madjanek also had no gas chamber, but it was quite clear that almost all jews sent to Madjanek died very quickly of exposure or starvation. Mass graves and crematoria were taken intact and the Soviets for propaganda reasons quickly invited western observers to see it.
The main evidence for the gas chambers rest on the testimony of Hoss, Eichmann and some other witnesses against Kaltenbrunner saying they exist not physical evidence as supposedly all gas chambers were demolished before they could be taken by the Soviets. My view is that they were used to a limited extent mainly when the camps got flooded with too many people at once which would sometimes happen with ghetto liquidations and such. But I’ve read that there were a lot of problems with keeping the gas chambers going consistently. Maintenence was a big problem, also I remember one SS guy saying that no they couldn’t keep so called Sonderkommandos they would maybe clean out one gas chamber load of dead jews but after that they would tell the SS fuck you shoot us. I’m not sure why the allies were interested in their witnesses embellishing their gas chamber testimony.
I don’t know. Why’d they invent the soap, the lampshades, and the showers?
To make what happened to the Jews as different as possible to all the other mass murders of socialism.
They invented the soap to justify the British National Health Service.
The root cause of a whole lot of Jews dying under Nazi rule is the same root cause as Canadian Health Care and the British NHS, the same ideology leading to the same consequences. Also the same root cause as the Holodomor and the Great Leap Forward. Hence it was necessary to deny that Jews died in the same way as people did in all the other socialist mass murders, since this would draw attention to uniformity of evil beliefs leading to evil acts.
>Why’d they invent the soap, the lampshades, and the showers?
Because they know that the people who believe their propaganda are completely retarded.
So agent fuentes fails to affirm the holohoax and fails to “deny the holocaust”. And so do the rest of agents here.
This is the sort of non answer, nothing statement typical of shills. It means nothing and contributes nothing and has that typical shill obnoxious attitude.
I think more than anything else making pointless garbage comments that say nothing, but take up space and mental bandwidth is the shill’s best tool for shitting up discussion. 4chan has become borderline unusable in places just from pointless noise and worthless posts.
Jim appears to have infinite cheeks to turn for White Bread/Jaggard and the many alts he no doubt had before those. I don’t understand it, personally. It is one thing if an anon wants to make a new account in order to start fresh and adopt a new persona; it is quite another when he does it solely to try to evade moderation, does not make the slightest attempt to cover his tracks, and repeats exactly the same patterns with each new sock puppet.
When he first started joo-joo-jooing, I identified him as a leftoid shill, and now here he is quite literally saying “orange man bad”. No matter what topic he’s on about–not that he has a wide repertoire–he consistently manages to suck all the air out of the room. I don’t even want to read the comments on any day he’s been posting, which seems to be just about every day.
Similar deal with Rod/SkipRamen/Randall and so on, although he’s got more of an off-his-meds schizo energy than an angry rabid leftoid shill energy, so in that case I can semi-understand.
is that why you haven’t been here? I was wondering about you and Chrysostom
This is a feature I noticed of Fuentes. He always ends up attacking Trump. Usually from the “right.” If not Trump then another right winger. He makes intelligent and plausible arguments, especially when he can shut up about Israel for one second, but always inevitably culminates him attacking the right.
Humungus Did This
https://x.com/JonCovering/status/2008362754953056410
So very tragic, they say.
Indeed,
When Humungus assaults the compound it is governed by a strictly utilitarian rationality, in which all lives and resources are assessed according to their instrumental value.
Military losses are treated as an inevitable variable within this calculus and are offset through periodic replenishment of personnel. We must replenish the ranks. Those deemed surplus to strategic requirements may be permitted to just walk away, provided their withdrawal occurs voluntarily and without resistance.
All woman and gasoline therein become property of Humungus.
Admit it – a year or two ago you bought long-dated oil futures and you hang out at this blog to try to pump up demand. 😂
WTI CRUDE
59.12 +2.35%
BRENT CRUDE
63.34 +2.18%
MURBAN CRUDE
63.50 +1.89%
NATURAL GAS
3.169 -6.99%
BTC $90,476.97
AI can be fun. Let the beatings begin!
x.com/miguelifornia/status/2008352199726846242
x.com/WarlordDilley/status/2008700592122671142
x.com/miguelifornia/status/2008687011356397818
x.com/JonCovering/status/2006528432386269208
x.com/JonCovering/status/2000694699930026136
x.com/JonCovering/status/2006920439701057576
x.com/JonCovering/status/1883959304245629075
x.com/JonCovering/status/2007487712668877227
x.com/JonCovering/status/2005426244683526451
x.com/JonCovering/status/2007231966056419414
x.com/JonCovering/status/2007265006577160408
x.com/JonCovering/status/2007539349341294986
x.com/MustangMedicX/status/1969110029367128152
However reality is rare
x.com/WarlordDilley/status/1980664195982213625
The first two were good, Too many of these were garbage. Please don’t flood the comments with garbage from X.
What is going on with Venezuela? Why did Trump actually nab Maduro? Is it a distraction? Because the tiny hats in Israel hated Maduro? Because of his drugs? Another invade the world, invite the world scenario? All of the above? What is actually going on? I am confused on whether or not I should even give a shit what is happening down in a third world South American country.
He told us. How can you doubt him?
Control the oil, deny China control of the oil, exclude enemies of America from having a base in the Americas.
Venezuela is full of Cubans who answer to the Cuban government, Iranians who answer to the Iranian government, and Russians who answer the Russian government. He intends to send them packing, and replace them with Americans who answer to the American government.
China’s great vulnerability is its dependence on energy imports. Venezuela is sitting on the largest oil reserves on the planet. If America gets control of Venzuela’s oil, then China depends on Russia. The Deep State intended to reconquer Russia, they intended Yeltzin 2.0. This plan has failed. So, if Venezuela is in America’s pocket, then, next step, buddying up to Putin. Which, if successful, puts a leash on China.
>next step, buddying up to Putin.
Thankfully orange emperor-monkey trump tried to drone-murder Putin last week. So hopefully Putin finally got the message and will stop trying to sell Russia to wall street. And if Putin didn’t get the message then he needs to be hanged from a lamp pole in Petersburg.
If Trump had tried to murder Putin, he would have given the Ukraine Tomahawk missiles.
Your reply makes no sense. The US, hiding behind its ukrainian proxy, has carried all kinds of attacks inside Russia using “long range” weapons.
A week ago the US tried to kill Putin with some 90 drones. The news is all over the western, pro-Russian media. And here’s a headline from the french government “news” agency
“Kyiv calls footage of alleged drone attack on Putin’s residence ‘laughable'”
war street journal
“U.S. Finds Ukraine Didn’t Target Putin in Drone Strike”
Of course, the US/ukraine mafia is denying exactly what they did.
The people who want to kill Putin (imagining he will be replaced by Yeltzin 2.0) also are trying to overthrow Trump.
Just look at the body language when Zelensky meets Trump. Obviously not everything Zelensky does is done at the direction of Trump.
The voice of the blob is the legacy media, and particularly and especially the legacy media in Europe. And it is obvious that they hate Trump, they stole the 2020 elections, and are lethally opposed to Trump’s policy on the Ukraine, and the fact that he is talking to Putin. They want to kill Putin, and they want to overthrow Trump.
In Europe, you are not allowed to discuss Russia’s security concerns. Anyone who does so gets sanctioned. In the US, you are.
>they hate Trump,
True
>they stole the 2020 elections,
Likely True
>are lethally opposed to Trump’s policy on the Ukraine,
False. Turmp’s policy is the blob’s policy and viceversa.
>he is talking to Putin.
Irrelevant. Putin shouldn’t be taking to trump anyway. Most if not all of trump’s action are aligned with the blob and most of what trump says is anti-russian propaganda. Once in a while trump tells the truth about his war against Russia, because good propaganda has to have a bit of truth in it.
>In Europe, you are not allowed to discuss Russia’s security concerns. Anyone who does so gets sanctioned. In the US, you are.
There’s somewhat less censorship in the US but in the grand scheme of things it’s mostly irrelevant. Pretending to allow a bit of “dissent” is just a means to more efficient totalitarianism.
Anyway, seems to me that the die is cast so I’ll shut up for a bit and see what happens.
Oh come on. Listen to the screams of pain coming from the BBC.
The blob wanted to cut off US military aid to Ukraine? I don’t think so.
https://www.kielinstitut.de/publications/news/ukraine-support-tracker-europe-fails-to-offset-us-aid-drop/
“U.S. seizes Russian-flagged tanker that fled Venezuela blockade”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/01/07/us-intercept-oil-tanker-russia-venezuela/
So the trump farce is over. The piece of shit, orange emperor-monkey is at war with Russia. Russians need to get rid of Putin and put a real man in place.
Please do not link directly to mainstream media articles. Use an archive link.
Under the Monroe doctrine, seizing oil tankers in the Caribbean is different from seizing oil tankers elsewhere, because the action was directed at blocking Venezuelan oil, not Russian oil.
Your doctrine is meaningless gibberish for the Russians though. Your game is over Jim.
The US blockaded and threatened to fire upon Soviet ships during the Cuban missile crisis. Blockading Venezuela is less an escalation.
Simplicus reports that the tanker was sized in the North Atlantic and was empty.
I was expecting Starmer or some EU government to size ships flying the Russian flag in the North Atlantic. Trump doing so was a surprise and I don’t understand why he did it. The whole thing would look much better if the ship had been sized in Venezuelan waters or least in the Carribean.
Sizing an empty tanker in the North Atlantik doesn’t look like a blockade of Venezuela. It looks like another provocation.
“It was a fake Russian oil tanker,” U.S. Vice President JD Vance said in an interview on Fox News. “They basically tried to pretend to be a Russian oil tanker in an effort to avoid the sanctions regime [against Venezuela].”
The likely truth it was a real Russian tanker that was pretending to not be a Russian tanker, and when that did not work, tried being Russian again.
But, whatever it was, and wherever it was seized, it was seized for attempting to ship Venezuelan oil, not Russian oil.
What makes a ship a Russian ship? Is it not sufficient that if it is Russian-flagged with permission of Russia?
Anyway, sizing a ship for attempting to break a blockade is business as usual, but apparently that is not the offical reason. RT reports that the vessel was seized in the North Atlantic pursuant to a warrant issued by a U.S. federal court.
If that’s true, there is simply a US court order to size a foreign ship. Even if US courts had a good reputation, there’d still be the point that a Russian-flagged ship was sized in international waters for something that had been done, not for something that is about to be done (ie breaking a blockade).
If Nato takes that stance seriouly, there will be no end of court orders to size Russian ships anywhere, and of course other ships as well. If the Russian flag raised with permission of Russia, doesn’t make a ship Russian, than raising a different flag with permission of a different country (e.g. India) would not make a difference. The ship might still be Russian in the opinion of courts anywhere in globohomo.
You are arguing as if there was an international rules based order and anyone cared about the rules.
No, that was not my intent at all. I was trying to figure out who did what and why.
As to who – did Trump order the seizure or was it done by elements of his coalition he did not control?
As to what – was it a Russian ship? What do you, Jim, mean when you call a ship Russian?
As to why – what was the point? To me it looks like a provocation of the sort that Starmer and the EU are doing all that time, but Trump has not.
Your interpretation of the invents that the tanker was sized for attempting to break a blockade does not fit the points I raised. I do not think that the tanker was sized for that reason.
Starmer and the EU are threatening, and to some extent taking, military action against Russian oil. The US is taking military action against Russia, Iran, and China, sticking their noses into the Holy American Empire of the Ocean Lands.
The news reports say: “The U.S. seized two Venezuela-linked oil tankers in the Atlantic Ocean on Wednesday, one sailing under Russia’s flag, as part of President Donald Trump’s aggressive push to dictate oil flows in the Americas”
I heard something about Ukraine and what do you know. The following seems rather foolish.
https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/vazhlivo-sho-sogodni-ye-gruntovni-dokumenti-koaliciyi-ohochi-102317
So when there is a ceasefire, Western forces will move into Ukraine (the US will serve as a ‘backstop’). But, as we recall, such encroachment was a key reason for Russia invading. Ergo: there will be no peace or ceasefire on those terms.
Not a concern, for Putin will never agree to a ceasefire. He demands a peace settlement.
Which was the original demand that started this war.
Trump’s actions only make sense if his strategy is to achieve a peace deal between superpowers where all powers agree to leave plenty of room between them so that they do not get on each other’s nerves.
The problem is that the Europeans intend to continue funding the Ukraine indefinitely, and the Ukrainian government intends to continue fighting till they run out of Ukrainians. However, Putin is most of the way to eradicating the Ukrainian army, and if no peace, will simply finish the job.
THE Question
https://x.com/GPAIndiana/status/2008251512221294878
Yes, women are always going to push on you until smacked into line, because they rather like being smacked into line while men cannot stand it.
> smacked
Ferality parading, female desire for discipline ownership and reproduction… is also proven out by continued existance porn… 50% of the planet is women… cucked media men say porn is all just ‘male chauvinist piggery and profit’… but not even the ProgFeminist Women and Dykes are ever truly whining about it… simple fact is their biology craves submission and wants the dominant Man depicted in porn.
So instead of whining about porn, which might have been legit in the 1950’s as being distractive of their Men… we now have situation where Leftism and Jewism has decimated [White] Male Led Society to the point that Women now see themselves having to turn into ProgFem Leftists and Burning Down Cities as their only viable option in the hopes that some Warlords will rise from the chaos and start grabbing them off the streets and throwing them in their compounds as permanent fuck slaves.
Women are also now painting their hair purple and out in the streets destroying the Civ because they fucking hate working when their biology tells them to be at home cooking, cleaning, and raising kids.
But the Globalist Elite wants all humans to be digitally-enslaved and working for them.
You will own nothing, and be happy.
When both sexes are forced by the Globalists to work 7 days with no money for even Globo-Daycare system, let alone any free time to fuck and have children… they are not happy.
They should be revolting and executing Globalists, SocComDem Politicians, Jewfluence, Media.
The only solution is for the Right, globally, to rise up and crush the Left back out, permanently. Just go hard, declare it, and do it. Adopt their tactics, or get uber-based, or ultra-Faithed, or whatever is needed… you can just do things.
Else you die, and the entire planet turns into a Digi-Globo-SocCom shithole and gulag, for a very long time.
This is catching on big time. Even my normie coworkers are talking about the content of women’s romance novels and posts like this: https://x.com/buggirl/status/2010474296955556325
Yes, consistent with my claim that every pussy in the nation dampened when the cop shot the lesbo Karen, suddenly women are requesting Ice officers in their AI generated sex fantasies.
The Karens are shit testing society, when they have hit the wall and can no longer find individual males willing to put up with their shit tests.
Meanwhile, JD Vance got his windows broken by … a tranny! Surprise, everyone. A chubby young man who changed his name to Julia.
https://nypost.com/2026/01/05/us-news/alleged-jd-vance-home-vandal-is-child-of-wealthy-local-doctor-who-recently-changed-name/
https://nypost.com/2026/01/05/us-news/one-person-arrested-after-windows-broken-at-jd-vance-cincinnati-home/
Seems somewhat out of it from the photos but not full sanpaku eyes. Previously in “mental health facility” and deemed “unable to stand trial”. A history of vandalism. Again, why are we allowing free range madmen?
>deemed “unable to stand trial”
So an armed man tried to break into the VP’s home and did not get mag dumped. This isn’t just a failure of the legal system, but of Secret Service. You’d think after SS tried to get Trump killed twice, they’d be replaced by military guards by now.
If you can throw a brick through the VP’s window, you can fire a bullet through his window. This should not be possible, and as Pax said, anyone who tries it should have been absolutely aerated. The Secret Service is apparently still full of traitors who are trying to get Trump and his lieutenants killed. Trump needs to Do Something about the Secret Service, in a big, serious way, and fast.
> If you can throw a brick through the VP’s window, you can fire a bullet through his window.
This was his Ohio home, he and his family weren’t there.
But if the SS is so oblivious they let a tranny break multiple windows before detaining him, someone who’s actually dangerous could have left a lethal command activated device as long as it wasn’t too obvious.
I too do not understand the insouciance of Trump about the very lethal threats he and his people are facing.
Yeah, you shouldn’t be able to just roll up to the place just because he’s not actually there at the moment.
Isn’t the current USSS chief the former deputy of the wine aunt who presided over the first assassination attempt? Doesn’t seem like there was much house cleaning
Jim:
Yes, Tucker endorsed that doctrine in his interview with Nick:
https://youtu.be/efBB0D4tf1Y?t=7435
“But he [God] also instilled in men this desire to please your wife. Like, that’s a very natural thing. You want your wife to be happy. And the whole happy wife, happy life thing is completely real. It’s like you can’t get away from it.”
Here’s what Tucker may not fully appreciate. “Happy wife, happy life” is teletubby speak for “Cater to your wife’s every emotional whim or she will make your life a living hell.” When a man focuses on keeping a woman “happy,” she loses respect for him, becomes unhappy, punishes the man, and longs for a different man with a more admirable and exciting frame.
I do not regard this as some inherently “bad” aspect of female nature. It is an unpleasant outcome for sure, but it arises from something that is necessary for maximum creativity, joy, health, and survival in the human race. The problem is that when men and women are not aligned with Logos, everything goes from bad to worse. It is a very narrow path that leads from bad to better.
Kowtowing to your wife isn’t the way to make her happy. Neither is excess deference. Both of those make almost any woman unhappy, even if they say they want it. Wives seem to be happiest when they’re frequently playfully teased.
A wife needs attention and love from her husband like a delicate flower needs water. Both wilter without. In this sense, Tucker is right.
But this aspect of a happy marriage is similar to a velvet glove. The velvet glove goes inside the steel armor. The steel armor means you steer her, tease her, command her, put her in her place when she acts like a child.
A marriage without the velvet will be lacking. A marriage without the steel will straight up fail.
You are absolutively right that a wife needs attentionality, cherishing, affection, love etc from her husband and that this is the Primordially proper God-[*deleted for making up your own language*]
Your comment clearly contains lots of thought crimes, and may well contain interesting and important facts in which my readers would be interested.
But they are going to get rather tired and irritated trying to decipher your language.
You are using language as an art form rather than a medium of communication.
‘“Happy wife, happy life” is teletubby speak for “Cater to your wife’s every emotional whim or she will make your life a living hell.” When a man focuses on keeping a woman “happy,” she loses respect for him, becomes unhappy, punishes the man, and longs for a different man with a more admirable and exciting frame.’
Exactly. Females happily will use gyno-grovelers, but they won’t respect them, obey them, or boink them.
This pathetic White Leftism dances on stage with Somali’s, waves the Somali flag, corrupts with the Somalis, soils his own Heritage, and swears to all things Somali and Red-Green Left.
https://x.com/DrewPavlou/status/2009173155898855868
Minneapolis hasn’t had two back-to-back Republican mayors since 1945. And hasn’t had a single Republican since 1961. Its first Nigger mayor was in 1994 (Church of Rodney). First Woman mayor in 1994. Frey is a Jew.
The patent destruction of America has been by Democrats in its cities since post WWII, just research their election history, everything went full Democrat since then…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mayors_of_the_50_largest_cities_in_the_United_States
Only 4 White Men, none in cities that matter (23,35,37,43), 3 of them old, and only 1 of them remotely based.
What’s the Jimian take on the Iranian unrest/color revolution? It feels like we see this sort of thing every few years, and it typically peters out after a week or so despite everyone and their mother hailing the end of the Republic.
This time it seems more violent and Trump has, unusually, made explicit belligerent statements re: the situation. All that said, divisive/malign actors like the Crown Prince and Mossad of all things have openly and proudly voiced their support. I can’t fathom what either hope this would accomplish other than cause fractures in the protests since neither of them are particularly popular on the Iranian street and their endorsement functionally discredits whatever the protestors are trying to accomplish. Very weird situation.
Converged Islam cannot hold power.
> Crown prince bad actor
Where do you think you are buddy this is a monarchist neighborhood. While unfortunately the Persians are unlikely to restore the monarchy (with real power) if the mullahs fall it would certainly be best if they did.
I tell you one thing the opposition certainly picked a great poster girl with that sexy Monica Belucci lookalike girl lighting a cigarette off the supreme mullahs burning picture…
In fact for the midterms Trumps people ought to recruit a few zoomer models to do Instagram pics and TikToks of them lighting ciggies off of Tim Walzs and Newsoms burning picture.
Do the same with Keir Starmer’s pic. (I suppose that will make the police shut down X, or the internet, if that’s what it takes to defeat the far right. Worth it.)
Yeah in general the having super hot chick light cigarette off the burning picture of x unpopular leader is very good propaganda (people can say smokings bad and with cigs it kind of is though mostly because of additives, and moralfags even wrapping themselves in the flag of basedness can say women smoking is bad; but don’t care it still looks cool. Old Hollywood couldn’t glamorize something that didn’t naturally look good). Best I’ve seen in a long time.
You ever make out with a chick who smokes? You will only do it once.
Take a drag or two before you start.
Having done it more than once I disagree. Also before 2015 or so attractive women of prime fuckable ages, prettymuch all of them smoked at least in any sort of party or nightlife situation even if they didnt do it regularly. So it was something you got used to.
The advent of vapes has made slightly-buzzed outside the bar-door chatter a thing of the past. Not too long ago, asking for a smoke or a light was a great ice breaker
Vapes fucking ruined nightlife until very recently in one respect society is healing as zoomer girls are starting to switch over to the traditional cancer sticks in social settings again (maybe the popularity of the Persian girl will accelerate this trend the way Lauren Bacall asking for a match in a hit noir movie did). Now Im not saying its the way it was pre covid or certainly not pre 2015 but they are definitely smoking a lot more than a year ago. I go out to the zoomette bar in my town and I actually get to talk to them a little lately…
There are few places in the world today where women smoke as much as men, these are the Balkan countries and France. Hard to imagine a more badass-yet-not-entirely-insane chick to have fun with than southern Slavic ones and heritage froggettes.
North Slav women tend to have very robust tendencies into the psychopathic turbo-harpy direction. South Slav ones have that crucial drop of Turkic blood and crucial difference in climate to mellow them out. Picture Latinas without the mongoloid and negro elements; without the global south cultural baggage; tighter figures; mild tomboy traits.
To an extent the same goes for Greek women. Old-school Mediterranean smoker society too.
https://x.com/martianwyrdlord/status/2009830139643978204/photo/1
I wouldn’t have her hair dyed an unnatural color but still good propaganda. We need to make a lot of these. Ideally we could get Sydney Sweeney to do it for reaL…
I have no interest one way or another in the Shah, but my point was that it feels like openly throwing his weight behind the protests seems counterproductive for their cohesiveness/legitimacy. Ditto for the Mossad uncharacteristically talking very candidly about support not just in word but on the ground. Unless monarchism is a serious current in Iran that I’m not aware of, it seems to be fragmented and what little there is violently suppressed at most times. And I can’t imagine the Mossad fandom is very widespread either, even among those who’d like to see the Mullahs hanged.
Cannot do anything unless you have a leader. So, what do the revolutionaries have?
Shah is the only alternative.
Yes that’s true to overthrow a government you need to declare an alternative government and what alternative do they have right now but to declare for the king.
I presume it’s a colour revolution.
Absolutely a colour revolution. Israeli involvement is guaranteed, involvement of ‘activist organizations’ and other more diffuse tentacles of the GAE-in-exile is guaranteed, and more direct involvement of more ‘official’ state department assets in support of the foregoing is all but guaranteed.
That being said, the persians have also partly brought it on themselves with how badly they’ve dealt with their water engineering, ‘black swans of common knowledge’ as spandrel used to say. A stronger more forward thinking state would not have had such a moment of vulnerability to begin with.
Iran is obvious color revolution, but I am more sympathetic to colour revolution when the Altar is Islamic, and the Throne is absent.
Plus, they postIslam Islamic, which is why they originally got western backing against the Shah. Their Islam has been converged.
Women make up the majority of academia in Iran, including the large majority of stem students. The usual mystery ensues. “Why are women underperforming in stem. It is very strange. Obviously we have to bias the system in their favor even more. Obviously invisible misogyny must be dripping off the trees holding them back.”
Off topic: These two articles seem like something the readers of this blog would be interested in.
https://movingtorussia.substack.com/p/serbian-orthodox-warrior-priests
https://movingtorussia.substack.com/p/when-monks-and-priests-wore-swords
Lol, is Roko Mijic (the basilisk man) lurking here?
“I honestly think that America needs 20-50 years of a right wing authoritarian regime, Latin America style, with no real elections and suspension of habeas corpus to fix this.
100 million people need to be deported and entire networks of woke activists need to be put in jail permanently. Leftist media needs to be permanently dismantled. A non-woke Church or something like it needs to regain control over morality, shut down onlyf🐱ns, shut down the leftist universities, etc.
Full year zero transformation of society into something that’s actually functional, healthy, white and growing again.”
https://xcancel.com/RokoMijic/status/2009251051967324310#m
(It’s a comment on how Minnesota’s anti-ICE organization operates, which is also interesting. I would guess what is described there is heavily funded by taxpayers and manned by activist government officials and the jobless.)
Either that or convergent evolution. Neither would surprise me. Roko is and always has been a champ, ever since he annihilated Big Yud.
Accused murderer Nick Reiner doesn’t understand why he’s in jail, believes arrest is a ‘conspiracy’: report
CALIFORNIA LET HIM GO, HE’S JUST A KID.
https://pagesix.com/2026/01/09/celebrity-news/accused-murderer-nick-reiner-doesnt-understand-why-hes-in-jail-believes-arrest-is-a-conspiracy-report/
Another angle of the two rich woke commie socialist pedo dykes from canada
https://x.com/mattvanswol/status/2009695108611092611
Leftists, please erupt this into chaos, the USA wants an even better reason to finally purge you out.
As for Iran, Venezuela, Minneapolis and pretty soon the whole damn world, I’ll need a Jimmist Analysis take (or two or twenty) on how this nuclear crazy train cocktail of:
* fake AI video *
+ women
+ boomers
+ social media
+ algorithmic filtering
+ smuggled in “dark Starlink” to wifi/4G bridges
= color revolution GOD MODE
Because I don’t know anything or anyone special, but holy fucking SHIT.
“He is falling, he is falling, he is falling…”
You all know I can get hysterical, but all I can think about this now is “Censor or Die”. I just can’t get around it.
Is “Repeal 19” even enough, against this?
(How’s Kabul doing?)
Antifa apparently attacking ICE hotel sounds like an ironclad pretext for the insurrection act.
https://x.com/EuroRabbit/status/2007559049651658883
I admit that White Nationalism [*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
[*deleted*] don’t go around censoring [*deleted*]
No one is censored on this blog.
If you were actually the white nationalist you claim to be, rather than a USAID employee trying to manufacture quarrels within the right, you would have committed a white racist thought crime in your initial post and your post would have gone through.
Censorship is silencing certain ideas. Your ideas are not being censored. If you can commit a thought crime, or respond to a thought crime in a way that reveals what the thought crime actually is, you can post whatever your like on this blog.
No one is silenced for what they say on this blog — they are silenced for what they are strangely unable to say.
But if you cannot commit a thought crime, or make a relevant response to thought crime, then what you say is going to be just a waste of space.
Jim, the content of his video reference (and presumably of what may have been any second link) was itself the thought crime, no text needed.[*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
White nationalism is not a thought crime. Racial differences that make it impractical for some races to live together under the same legal code applying to both equally are a thought crime. The reasons why integration has failed catastrophically are a thought crime.
Nick Fuentes is fake right, and you are fake right.
You cannot give an explanation of why one would desire a white nation without committing a thought crime, so you don’t.
White nationalism is not a thought crime. The reasons for white nationalism are the thought crime, and I am the only person in this thread who has presented a reason for white nationalism.
Interesting article: https://www.startribune.com/inside-the-organized-resistance-to-ice-in-minnesota/601551413
Lots of effort. Next question: who pays?
State sponsored insurrection by the big blue megalopoli, also by USAID-in-exile funded by Europe, and substantial part operating from Brussels.
JD Vance has promised investigation and crackdown.
Last year, Vance had some EU bureaucrats crying during a conference. Was reminded of that watching this Portland police chief, by all appearances a grown ass man, weeping over having to divulge publicly illegal alien membership in demonic gangs:
https://patriots.win/p/1ARwPxivPM/portland-police-chief-bob-day-cr/c
Bastard wears more stars than most generals.
I started noticing that a few years ago. Even for fairly small cities, it’s standard for police chiefs to wear the four stars that in the military only a full US admiral or general gets.
I just read this
Destruction of country houses in 20th-century Britain
what a sad sad hidden history.
buggy blog software?
why are tons of posts missing ‘reply’ buttons?
Yes, buggy blog software. I need a different theme, this theme has bugs. But I am reluctant to muck around with themes on a live blog. I should create a test blog on which I can debug.
thought themes were just skins.
noticed it was causing some out-threaded replies and misinterpretation.
‘Has Tucker endorsed that doctrine? I don’t think so, and he frequently makes unkind references to Episcopalian leadership.’
It is poor form to assume, without any evidence, that I am a liar or would make such a thing up. You want a real Christian brotherhood? giving more credence to that sellout shithead than to me ain’t the way to do it.
A couple weeks ago Cucker the Suck indeed endorsed Happy Wife, Happy Life, the fundamental creed of the Churchian Simp. They are Legion. It was a podcast with somebody named Nick Fuentes, who I gather is some sort of white-nat online personality. I am not impressed.
Also, as I wrote above, they both (smarmily) agreed that the United Sisterhood of Amerika was . . . a patriarchy! :O) I dunno if they’re controlled opposition or just pliable, weak dupes.
p.s. this comment does not appear as a direct reply as I couldn’t get the button to work.
I’ve heard second hand that Tucker is simping for the antifa dyke bitch who got her face exploded by ICE. If true that kind of seals him as a bad actor who should not be trusted.
TYT allegedly quotes Tucker:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aS14KrtA2u0
“Did we disagree with her views on immigration? Probably. But that shouldn’t matter. Her death is a tragedy, regardless of her partisan affiliations, ideological beliefs, or who pulled the trigger.”
“How come so few conservatives are viewing this story through a human lens?”
“And why, when something similar, like the killing of Charlie Kirk, happens on the other side, did many on the left celebrate because they thought his political positions were wrong?”
Each of these are different quotes, all attributed to TCN. Nothing too egregious, but still tad milquetoast.
Messed up replying to Com, my bad.
He is doing the work of the cuck faction of thermidor.
I suddenly miss Rush.
What Tucker should have said about her was
1. I feel bad for the kids but why kind of mother does this shit.
2. Im glad the dog was okay.
3. They should have smoked that crazy bitch riding shotgun too
Extremely based!
If Tucker did indeed say those things, then he an enemy, period, full stop, end of discussion.
This one is particularly revealing:
“And why, when something similar, like the killing of Charlie Kirk, happens on the other side, did many on the left celebrate because they thought his political positions were wrong?”
The antifa Karen was not killed because she disagreed with the ICE agent’s political opinions; she was killed because she tried to run him over. Tucker pretending he does not know this is conscious, deliberate, intellectual dishonesty.
“And why, when something similar, like the killing of Charlie Kirk”
WTF? The killing of Charlie Kirk was a straight up premeditated murder/assassination!
The death of the driver, while perhaps regrettable, was a straight up, mano a mano, spur of the moment conflict involving lethal force on both sides.
I’ll give the left that she probably wasn’t trying to kill him (if only because everyone kind of knows that federal cop killers get life or the death penalty, and even a far left president is reluctant to pardon them lest they encourage those who would kill their enforcers) but she probably intended to ram him out of the way which has a serious risk of injury, and in any case she wasn’t driving with the typical caution of how you try to move in a parking lot when there are people in front of you. She floored it when surrounded by cops, what the fuck did the antifa dyke cunt think would happen.
I’m glad the dog was okay.
It was unlikely she was trying to kill the cop, because she is a Karen, and Karens find lethal violence unimaginable. But she was using potentially lethal force to make a getaway and in charge of a lethal weapon, and in that split second a cop does not have time to make fine judgements about character and intent.
Cops often use force that might well be grossly excessive, because they are afraid, because they so often have to contend with people who will use force. If you threaten a cop, he is going to take you down. If you threaten a cop while in possession of a lethal weapon, he is going to shoot you and keep on shooting till he is sure you are dead. She threatened a cop. He was afraid. You would be afraid if you were in his shoes.
There’s details we can add to both your observations.
In her last repositioning of her vehicle, she moved from no one in front of it but it’s perpendicular to the street so not in a getaway posture, the ICE officer was to the right of it, then he’s right in front of her. She even had more room to move to her right and avoid him:
You can see this in both CNN promoted security cam video: https://x.com/megbasham/status/2009502260603310146
And the AlphaNews release of the officer’s cellphone: https://x.com/megbasham/status/2009502260603310146
There’s quite a lot you can surmise from this close up high quality video, starting with her initial expressions and tone of speech before the ICE agents on her right get out of their vehicle, and make loud demands as one goes up to the open driver’s side window.
Indeed. Ten years ago some rogue disgruntled ex-cop was shooting and killing cops. Cops mistook some newspaper delivery woman’s truck for the killer’s and shot up the truck. It’s amazing the woman and her mother survived.
https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-no-charges-lapd-shooting-newspaper-delivery-women-dorner-manhunt-20160127-story.html
If anyone can provide the full text of this alleged letter to TCN members that contained these quotes, that would be mighty helpful in putting them into context. Yesterday’s search yielded many MSM articles providing the same quotes as the TYT video I linked above, but none saw fit to give a complete picture. Everyone’s points are noted and appreciated, but before Tucker becomes persona non grata around this neck of the woods, let’s do a bit more homework.
Feel free, I’ve been extremely suspicious of Tucker since Covid (but still very few people acted completely right during covid IMHO, Andrew Tate and strangely David Icke the shapeshifting lizard guy and thats about it).
1) I was telling people COVID/COVAX was a massive PsyOp the day the Western Media started spewing it. Same for telling people Climate, and every other recent fraud and coverup.
2) And that COVID/COVAX were the first ever engineered BioWeapons deployed… COVID against China, COVAX against the West.
3) I’ve also been calling Tucker a willing plant for ages.
I get bashed for all of it but IDGAF.
2 ranks up there with CIA/NSA Jewels, JFK, the UFO PsyOp, and the rest of the Black Budget TS/SCI stuff… it’ll take a real Patriot to get any COVID weapon docs out. Snowden scared them into fixing most of their secrecy holes, both analog and digital.
Have a nice day.
1) I haven’t heard you before
2) It can be a psyop or a bioweapon, it cannot be both. It can be a failed bioweapon they did plan B as a psyop though when it failed.
3) I was talking about public figures.
Were you? Link please.
The earliest cynicism that I see “it’s just a bad cold, bro, we always have yet another flu”, was the Cominator, 2020-03-03, which was quite a while after the media and medical establishment started spewing psyops.
It was in fact a bad cold that had been deliberately weaponized for lethality, and on initial release was quite lethal, but from the point of view of the virus, the lethality mods were useless baggage, and it rapidly discarded the most important of these mods, turning into its own vaccine.
Because flu type viruses are extremely fragile, they need close rapid contact to spread, so they want you walking around and doing your usual things. Cholera does not worry about killing its host, because it can survive for years in dead bodies, in the ground, and in ground water, but flu type viruses want you sick enough to be infectious, they want you to cough and have a runny nose, but no sicker than that. The flu does not kill anyone who is not already on the edge of cascading organ failure. No one dies of the flu, they die of morbid obesity, heart failure, cancer, sheer old age, diabetes, plus the flu on top of all that.
Yes indeed. While I’ve become extremely suspicious of Tucker of late, even more so than during Trump 1.0, I am not going to take The Young Turks’ word for anything at all. Tucker might be a bad actor, it’s still up in the air, but TYT are definitely the enemy.
If he said these things in an interview, then it will surely be up on YouTube, so let’s see a link. A proper timestamped link that takes us directly to the quote in question and its surrounding context.
He didn’t say those things in an interview, per the sources, he wrote it in his newsletter.
On the one hand, no one is showing a screenshot of this newsletter, which is weird, but on the other hand, neither Carlson nor anyone who subscribes to this newsletter is denying the quotes. As far as I can tell with a quick search. So for now it seems legit.
I can’t really fault Tucker for not promptly issuing a denial of some random claim made by TYT. He may not care, may not even know.
Written in a newsletter is even more definitive than speaking in an interview; it’s literally a screen grab or copy/paste, which takes a matter of seconds.
Does Tucker Carlson even have a newsletter? I’ve never heard of it, and he is a TV personality, not a writer, so if there is a newsletter, it might not be him that writes it. But all I’m able to find about a TC newsletter using some search engines is some sort of fan-written affair.
I’m not trying to say it isn’t real/didn’t happen, but the lack of confirmatory evidence has me in raised-eyebrow mode.
My nonchalance over these quotes is due to knowing Tucker, if he wrote them, may very well have followed up with something along these lines, “and with that obligatory schoolmarming out of the way, this really is a textbook case of FAFO, folks”.
Perhaps instead we’re dealing with the Tucker’s failure to disavow what the grandmother who runs a popular fan newsletter wrote. Where’s Father Brown when we need him?
Tucker does not have a newsletter, which instantly discredits the source. If there are newsletters using his name to promote themselves, it is unlikely that he reads them.
“Tucker does not have a newsletter.”
Sure he does. Rather, it’s a feature called the Morning Note at his web site. Here’s the link to it:
https://tuckercarlson.com/january-8-2026-morning-note
Thanks, Neuro. Tucker takes a swipe at Lindsey Graham right before the subscription break, so it can’t be all bad.
Yes, that seems pretty cut and dry, and certainly one of the worst takes I’ve read in a very long time. And even if Tucker didn’t write it, he would have had to approve it.
I see two enemy payloads, the first being “all deaths are equally tragic” which is simply “all people are equal” wearing a wig. All deaths are tragic to someone, but the suicide-by-cop of some Canuck dyke is not very tragic to me, nor are the deaths of a few Hamas terrorists and other sand people at the hands of other sand people a million miles away. And the only thing I find tragic about the Maduro incident is that he exited the helicopter after it landed.
We tried “all lives matter” back in 2015-2016 and I think everyone remembers how that worked out. It may appeal rhetorically to cucks, but it will elicit no sympathy from the other side.
The other payload is never stated explicitly, because they are not that clumsy, but very strongly implied by the article’s structure and whaddaboutism tone, which is the much older academic leftist payload of: “they [commie insurrectionists, troon assassins, kebab exploders and welfare fraudsters, etc.] are only aggressing against us because we aggressed against them first [and therefore we should accede to their demands]” which has always been sophistry of the basest sort.
Maybe Tucker just had an off day, but he has been having quite a lot of off days lately.
What a bunch of babies. Here, I’ll do your research for you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gm2A01WCHrc&t=1154s
1:40 After 50 years of Total Feminism in the U.S., Cucker just cannot believe that women in America are feminists. He is shocked. SHOCKED, I tell you! (insert eyeroll here)
10:30 ‘Maybe the job (of men) is to make the girl happy and all this nonsense (gender war) ends’ — note that even the podcast host rolls her eyes at this astonishingly simpified utterance. Nauseating.
13:15 Cucker and Fuentes agree that because men are physically stonger and pose a violent threat, their wives automatically obey them — this is just an outright lie, any force used by a male can result in immediate incarceration, if the wife wishes — this is Cucker living in his East Coast Fratboy Elite fantasy world that bears no resemblance to actual America
13:25 ‘the whole happy wife happy life’ thing is completely real’ — Cucker at his cuckiest, parroting the mantra of the Christian emasculate the past 4 decades
16:24 ‘men who stay unmarried for too long become kind of fragile’ — so if you want to be a rugged, masculine man in America, the only recourse is . . . yep, to get married, just like Cucker. Otherwise you’re doomed to ‘fragility’ which is Cucker’s way of saying you ain’t a real man. Well, saying it from a safe distance, that is.
I just want to slap him. Wouldn’t help him any, but might make me feel better.
He has a sort of shitty smarmy sarcastic pandering that is always a leftist tell. Fuck that guy he hangs with the rest.
Karen’s Everywhere, lol
https://x.com/Bubblebathgirl/status/2010122838553047251
Reagan !
https://x.com/0hour1/status/2010530586385953036
A Great War is coming. Get ready.
Pray for aversion.
And should those efforts fail, Honour your Lord, and Fight Well.
Probably already old news, but the ICE agent who shot that bitch has been extensively doxxed by mainstream media. I even saw a post on socials where the journalist asks “what do you think should happen?”
Also, Yarvin reported that judges are doing their priestly thing and letting rioters free as expected.
I am optimistic though. They still have the priests, but we are getting the warriors.
Daddy Scarebucks:
Several years ago I watched Roosh interview Milo back when Milo was first professing Christ. Milo was painfully homo in all his mannerisms: flighty, dramatic, self-absorbed, verbose, and rolling his eyes back while manifesting gay O-face. God bless Milo but it was so hard to watch. Roosh did his best but you could tell he was contending with the writhing demons still oppressing Milo.
Then a few weeks ago I started to watch Tucker interview Milo, but I just had to stop. The homo vibe was just too much. I can usually get through just about anything if the info is worth it. Not this. I don’t have a problem with an Oscar Wilde witty vibe, but Milo is just too much. God please grant him wisdom and self-control.
In contrast, Nick thinks and speaks like a man. He’s a master of political rhetoric, extemporaneous speech, and comedic timing. That’s true whether he’s right or wrong on any particular subject. I concur with him on this: 1. Zionists wield far too much power over politics and culture. 2. Mass immigration is destroying American culture. 3. Feminism is destroying life itself.
Nick was once on board with Austrian economics, economic freedom, and limited government, but he jettisoned all that as naïve. Now he wants American empire dominating the entire Western hemisphere and a strong government which uses its power and tax receipts for the “right” purposes. For me though he veers too much into communism, or at least Lincoln-style “public works” style fascism. So yeah, he’s a bit too commie.
Nick has groupies. Many women squirm thinking about him. He would not take concubines because he regards that as sin, a snare, and just plain annoying. Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines, and the problem wasn’t that he was swimming in snatch but that his “heart was led astray.” (see Deuteronomy 17)
I don’t know anything about the twinks, catboys, and suspected groomers. All I know is from watching his Rumble shows. Someone posted a GIF here on this blog of Nick making a suspicious facial expression, but I don’t know the context and it might just be exaggerated for comic effect. Someone mentioned the suspicious browser tab and yes that’s troubling. Who knows, maybe Nick is struggling with a thorn in the flesh. I’ve seen a few clips of Nick hanging with Sneako or Ye or some such, and the only vibe I get there is Gen Z Bro.
If he does actually prefer penis, I would not discern it just from his podcast material. In fact one time he explicitly called out “gay adoption” as an abomination, citing the case of Dave Rubin, and described it in hilariously graphic and disgusting terms. Yes, even some homosexuals agree with that. But I don’t see a homo vibe on his Rumble show, just baby-faced little rascal.
Yes. Male groupies.
And your basis for this assertion is…?
We don’t care whether or not you personally get a homo vibe from Nick. We know what we know, and we see what we see, and you telling us to ignore our lying eyes, shut our brains off and consume his carefully-edited content uncritically isn’t going to make that happen.
> the case of Dave Rubin
Someone needs to make a database tracking all these newborns/babies/toddlers/children the Globo Lefto-State keeps giving to the Gay Multi-Letters to turn into wreck-spawn. Also the recent glut that got trannified. See where they all end up when they’re 21/32/48/62. I suspect we’re going to be facing a very sad picture of victims, abusers, devolution, and debauchery there… the younger when given, the worse. Many will suicide or suicide-by-action before reaching 24.
There’s even something wrong with the average teenage store clerks these days. This isn’t a culture thing. They’re dumb, miswired, maladjusted, and zombified. It’s really bad.
If you have kids, try to get with other families in your neighborhood/area, create your own homeschool. Keep away from public school and Govt/retail jobs. Teach internet as a tool not a social life. Learn to stay out-of-system and off-grid. Valuable skills.
Your gaydar is grossly defective — Nick sure sounds and looks gay to me. Bronze Age pervert, though still giving off gay vibes seems to me like more of a man, and even Milo just does not seem quite as gay. Or maybe Milo is gayer, but I can tolerate it because he makes a joke of it.
He sets off my gaydar too, enough to raise my suspicions.
But Nick denies being gay, and similar to the BAP discussion, there seems to be no trail of gay sex evidence.
However as for the commie stuff, that seems pretty on the nose. Nick ‘I admire Hitler and Stalin’ Fuentes.
he admires hitler because he was effective at promoting white and demoting jews.
[*deleted for failure to comply with the moderation policy*]
1: White Hitler attacked Russian whites, who were Germany’s last remaining source of food, raw materials, and energy, while he was already up to his neck in alligators. Even if he had won a quick victory, he could not spare the troops or the army of occupation, and it would have taken years to get production of materials going again.
Rightly discrediting white nationalism, for whites are wolf to whites.
2: Nazis are commies. Hitler destroyed agriculture in Germany, then in the conquered territories, as commies always do. When he destroyed agriculture, that was not promoting whites. White socialism is, in practice, destructive white on white conflict. All the nazis and white nationalists find clever reasons for hating Elon Musk, and if they had power, they would screw over rural America in the same way and for the same reasons that the urban American left has been screwing over rural America.
Mamdani in New York wants to “change white people’s relationship with their houses”, and the white nationalists want to change rural people’s relationship to their land. Commies.
I wanna hear Jim call this WhiteNat a Commie!
Come on lil jimmie, I fucking dare you!
You can’t do it, because you’re FULL OF SHIT!
https://x.com/V_Lady2024/status/2011160156231418214
[*you are on moderations not conforming to the moderation policy, and I believe you to be a Jew or dot Indian in the employ of our criminal and treasonous white elite.*]
First you should link to evidence that she is a WhiteNat. I see no references to Jews etcetera on her timeline. Or even blacks, asians, etc. She talks about “welfare fraud”, not “Somali fraud”, “illegal immigrants”, not browns. I rant on blacks and so on and so forth all the time, and for me, it is always “Somali fraud” — I earlier remarked out the Democrats brought in Somalis in part to enrich themselves by having their Somalis do the criminal work that white Americans would not do. So I am ten thousand times the white nationalist than she is. You would never catch me erasing the role of race in welfare fraud and Democratic party criminal conspiracies.
Somali fraud is yet another example of a criminal and treasonous native elites bringing in foreigners to do the dirty on their native subjects. Chances are that you, ruwan, are yet another example.
I don’t trust the author, but a major thesis of Adam Tooze’s The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy is that the economy’s production was food limited. For example, coal miners in the Low Countries didn’t get enough calories for France to produce enough aluminum to make very many airplanes to help the war effort.
And that a key goal of Operation Barbarossa was to eliminate enough Soviet city dwellers so that an agricultural surplus could be sent back West. Which of course did not work out in practice.
It’s good support for your claim National _Socialism_ was as we’d expect bad at producing food, although I’d really like to find more sources on this.
Tik – Hitler’s Socialism: The Evidence is Overwhelming
He also has a 5 hour version of the same video if you want even more information.
Thanks! And both versions come with extensively footnoted scripts of the video and bibliographies, so you can quickly see what he has to say on this topic.
But by itself this only gets us part way, for the author’s intent is per their titles to prove “Hitler’s Socialism.”
The only specific food facts he mentions is a massive reduction in grain reserves as the same time the country was at war, but also as the central planners tried to shift production from animals to grain. That’s kind of a tossup because we don’t know from what he provides things like how much grain had to be sent to occupied countries where starving the people wasn’t part of the agenda.
So I’ve got some books to buy and examine, without having to read all of them.
As I mentioned above, it’s likely a generational thing. Those of us who are older than, say late millennials, would be instinctively repulsed by the anime-driven “ironic faggotry” that the overall online right milieu seeps itself in (LARPing as cute girls, entertaining mentally ill trans entryism). The way I see it is it’s Gen Z’s version of being a “metrosexual”.
I am older than the millenials, and I enjoy and approve the anime aesthetic of the alt-right. The significant right wing Vtubers, Kirsche, Nux, “Lack Of Entertainment”, powdur, and SmugAlana are the same sex as their avatar, and give a gender appropriate spin and flavor to their commentary.
An AI voice changer is not going to transform the content from a male talking to a female talking, even though it can change the voice from a male voice to a female voice.
I sat through the entire Milo interview on Tucker without issue, and usually I cannot tolerate any trace of the gay “accent”. I think what made the difference is that Milo is legitimately repentant (towards the end he mentions he has been completely celibate for the last five years) and that he has become self-aware, almost laughing at his own flamboyance and how ridiculous he is.
Fuentes, while less in-your-face, still has a distinct effeminacy about him. I don’t know why the younger generation doesn’t see it; they aren’t like that. They tend to have a fake insincerity to them where they try very hard to act like they don’t care while it’s obvious that they do, and that comes across as feminine, but they don’t sound like him, don’t gesticulate like him.
This post is titled “Nick Fuentes is a gay commie fed” but the content doesn’t match the post.
Is Nick gay? Yeah, maybe. If so, he stays in the closet, doesn’t push faggotry, and is moderately based on the WQ, so I don’t see why it should matter all that much.
Is he a commie? Only if you think antisemite = Nazi (which nobody on the right thinks) and Nazi = commie (which nobody outside the right thinks).
Is he a fed? The most compelling evidence is the fact that he wasn’t prosecuted for January 6- except you didn’t mention that in your post.
Is he a fed because he’s being platformed? Then Moldbug must be a fed too.
Is he a fed because he’s not as extreme as Tate on the WQ? Then 99% of influencers must be feds too.
The entire post just reads like an incoherent whine about a non-neoreactionary right-winger whose internet influence has eclipsed yours.
The battle for online visibility against competitors is of course absolutely a core motivation for anything in the mind of any cunt, and jealous tantrums if this assumed battle for visibility does not go well is the only reasonable explanation for consequent behavior in the mind of any cunt.
In the mind of a cunt, who lives, thinks, and feels like a cunt, everyone else in the world is also obviously either a cunt, or a cunt pretending to not be a cunt. Thus good behavior can only ever be of a ‘good, gracious cunt’, and if the behavior is not that of an obvious good cunt, the only conceivable alternative is that what we have is a bad cunt.
The good cunt tries to apply peer pressure “don’t be a bad cunt, cunt, be a good cunt, a gracious cunt, like moi’.
Oh no it’s the cunt decorum police, quick, smooth out your labia and quiver graciously
Why else would he be so eager to denounce a fellow right-winger with Nick’s relevance and potential? And why else would he host a blog, if not for visibility?
Nick being halfway between normies and Jim on the WQ makes him a stepping stone, not an enemy, in the same way that this blog could be a stepping stone for being redpilled on the JQ.
From an ideological perspective, Jim has many more threatening enemies, many of which are *actual* gay commie feds, yet few of them are important enough to warrant top-level blog posts. You really can’t sense an ulterior motive?
I can’t believe he actually used the phrase “fellow right-winger”. Talk about a tell.
Nick is (a) not right wing, (b) not particularly relevant politically, and (c) a predatory faggot who is intentionally bringing naive young rightists into the orbit of groomers and other obviously bad actors.
He is not a stepping stone to dissident right and certainly not a stepping stone to reaction, he is a stepping stone to gay race communism in both theory and practice. The small percentage of his regular audience that is actually real is largely nonwhite and nonproductive, which is why they fall for the act. The whole scene is astroturf, and I lament the fact that we are discussing it at all, but Jim no doubt felt it warranted a few comments because other people keep bringing him up.
Yes–from you, because you somehow manage to find yourself on the wrong side of every issue, yet each time assure is it’s only because you are purer and holier than the rest of us.
Please explain how he’s not right wing and how he leads people to gay race communism, because almost anyone outside this blog would disagree with you.
Or, I largely only feel the need to post when someone says something I disagree with, which would be apparent to someone with a more developed theory of mind. Do you need me to affirm your beliefs more often to prove that I’m not your enemy? I thought that’s what shill tests were for?
Nick is being used to by the Deep State to prebunk the very positions he advocates.
People like Based Camp who point at the problems caused by Jews, female emancipation, and gay liberation while piously endorsing female emancipation, gay liberation, and all that, are the stepping stones.
Based Camp has a lot viewers, and you don’t see me attacking them they way I attack Nick Fuentes. I think, and say, they are great and worth watching, and post links to them in the comments.
You guys have done the same trick with fed influencers propped up by paid shills for decades now. Getting old.
I suppose they keep doing it because it keeps working.
I think it is working less than usual out in the wild, and has never worked on this blog, but there is still a large element of “the right” (for rhetorical convenience) that is defined more by parasocial relationships with influencers than by genuine and often semi-autistic political and cultural skepticism.
That’s why elitism is crucial, even if it rubs some people the wrong way.
Repeating: The two payloads are:
1 “prebunking”: Nick Fuentes and the rest are generating content consistent with the left’s image of the right “We just hate members of group X for no reason at all, or for absurd tinfoil hat reasons”,.
2. White leftists are totally innocent, and capitalists such as Elon Musk are evil
This is essentially the reverse of “Based Camp” which theoretically just loves Jews, trannies, poofters, female emancipation, blacks, and so on and so forth, but keeps covering all the problems that they cause, with lots of evidence and deep dives into the data. The fake right does not dare go anywhere near the actual data and actual evidence.
Make Based camp is just pretending to theoretically love all those groups. The alternative is to be de-platformed. It’s sort of how in conversations with leftie friends, I pretend to theoretically be a leftist while subtly mocking them and exposing them to right wing memes
The leftie friends are really Havel’s greengrocer.
Hail fellow left winger, I hate right wingers even more than you do because they are so physically strong, get laid with hot chicks and appear so-so cool with their edgy memes. It’s us physically anemic lefties who can’t meme who should be banging hot chicks.
And the whitenats are just pretending to theoretically hate all those groups, because if they actually hated them, would bring up the facts and the evidence, instead of presenting either tinfoil hat accusations, or no accusations at all.
“Prebunking” is a term of the art among leftists. They tell each other to never attempt to refute the right’s arguments, because you are likely to convince the audience that the right’s arguments are true. So instead of debunking, “prebunk”, convince your audience to not hear what the right is saying.
Which is what Nick Fuentes and the white nationalists are doing. Prebunking the actual right’s position on race, sex, sexual preference, and so forth.
So, you’re not going to explain why Nick isn’t right wing, you’re just going to put scare quotes around it and imply that I have a parasocial relationship with him. Nice.
In fact, I don’t watch Nick as often as you may think, which is why I’m asking (and still waiting) for evidence of these accusations.
Nick might indeed be a communist, or a fed, but those are serious accusations that require commensurate levels of proof.
The worst I’ve seen from him is needless infighting/accusations against other right wingers- kind of like what you did with this blog post, and I assume for the same reasons.
I have no problem with genuine elites that can prove themselves to be elite. You have thus far failed to do so.
You might think so, judging by people’s reaction to the Tucker interview (for instance), but his statements in the interview were far from the “gas the kikes” wignat rhetoric that I was expecting.
Again, some examples would be appreciated.
I don’t believe they’re innocent, I believe they’re (mostly) redeemable.
They are capable of great evil. Do you disagree?
What makes Nick’s words prebunking of his purported positions is that he is against certain groups for no reason at all, or for absurd tinfoil hat reasons. I and Based Camp give way better reasons than he does.
What makes him not genuinely right wing, is that he will not speak the crimethought reasons for his purported positions. I am particularly irritated by his position on women, which supports the left’s narrative that people who hold his purported position are just faggots or bitter incels.
Because constrained by competition, capitalists cannot do great evil. Microsoft does a merely irritating amount of evil. But they can do great good, as the wealthiest and most powerful capitalist of them all, Elon Musk has done.
Compare the evil done by Microsoft with evil done by Fauci. Now consider the good done by Musk.
If this is your standard, then there are no right-wing namefags, as namefags cannot commit crimethought without being deplatformed.
Has Yarvin committed such thoughtcrimes? Is he not genuinely right-wing?
Theoretically. But what happens when they stomp out the competition? What happens when they control the government?
Come on now, I’d say more than “merely irritating”:
– Turning the supermajority desktop OS into bloated spyware
– Sponsoring and developing globohomo AI
– Helping flood America with jeets
Would you really prefer a feudal technocracy run by companies like Microsoft to our current government? Because that’s what Yarvin, Thiel, etc. have in mind.
Yes, certainly. However evil Microsoft is, it is far less evil than Fauci, the federal reserve, etcetera — but far better will be a feudal technocracy with in which both evil businesses like Microsoft and virtuous businesses like X and SpaceX compete for influence.
When Facebook was at maximum evil, it was being puppeted by the Deep State. Look at it now. It is not too bad at all. Similarly Google. In a feudal technocracy, we are going to see a major improvement in big business behavior because Fauci will not be telling them what to do.
Suppose entities like Facebook, Google, X, and Microsoft run things. Well if they were all like Microsoft, that would be bad, but probably less bad than what we have now. But by no means all of them are like Microsoft.
Feudal technocracy has never really been tried, so we can’t know for sure whether you are right or wrong.
The problem is that there is an inherently adversarial relationship between corporation and consumer/employee. We want to give them as little as possible, and they want to extract as much as possible from us. Both parties may benefit, but it’s still a zero-sum game.
This is fine in a market where participation is optional, and one party can exit the relationship if they deem it non-beneficial. It’s not fine when participation is mandatory- i.e. the government.
A government should not have an adversarial, zero-sum relationship with its citizens. There should not be a winner and a loser, the way there is with markets. Rather, government should represent its citizens’ collective will- hence fascism/NatSoc.
This is somewhat limited by competition. You don’t like Microsoft? You should not like them, because they hate you. OK, don’t use Windows. Apple is slightly less evil than Microsoft, and Linux does not hate you, though Ubuntu recently switched to hating you.
If big corporations became the government, competition less effective, but they are not magically going to all agree. They would still be jockeying to gain power and influence by persuading consumers and employees to buy in. The insiders would rig the game against outsiders, but is still the nature of corporations to compete, even though they hate it, and try to avoid it with varying degrees of success.
Consider the history of leftists big villain. Standard Oil. Despite all those anti competitive practices, its number one strategy was to make fuel cheaper and readily available, in which it achieved enormous success. Competition worked, and they won fair and square. Even though they were doing everything they could to win unfair and unsquare, it really did not make all that much difference.
Did Hitler represent the citizens collective will? Initially he certainly did, but once securely entrenched, utterly disregarded it. We do not actually have any effective mechanisms for representing the collective will of large numbers of people. Democracy only became popular because a centralised mass media allowed elites to game the system.
His decisions were disastrous, because motivated by socialist ideology — even his catastrophic invasion of Russia was motivated by ideology, because he disregarded the complexity of extracting resources. Even if the war had worked out great, and he had won an easy victory, he still would have created a disastrous shortage of food, energy, and raw materials that would have taken many many years to remedy.
When Germany had already clearly lost the war with Russia, but was still in possession of much of Russia and all of Eastern Europe, Stalin, not liking the enormous cost of reconquering all that, then conquering Germany, offered him a fair deal: Return to the pre-invasion status quo ante, thus splitting the anti Germany alliance. Russia would resume supply of food and raw materials. Hitler refused. This was stupid and wicked. And it certainly did not represent the will of Germans, for by that time they were getting very hungry.
A corporate technocracy would not have done that, because it is the nature of corporations to do a cost benefit analysis on a troubled project, and cut their losses if the project is not doing well. A business exists because its books exist, and it inherently pays attention to what the books are telling it.
The idea that the government should represent is a stupid enlightenment idea that in reality made governments less representative because “representative” governments obscure their real rulers and use divide and conquer tactics in a way pre enlightenment governments did not.
What are cartels? And who said anything about buying in? It’s the government, you don’t have a choice aside from physically uprooting yourself. Governments are monopolies on the active use of force- that is what defines them. The only thing keeping them in check is the *threat* of organized opposition.
Example: the unsolved question posed by the 2nd Amendment (of whether American citizens could successfully overthrow their own government) is the currest guarantor against tyranny in America and (given America’s role as world police) a good chunk of the world.
Private gun ownership is the Linux of government- the decentralized, open-source, non-corporate alternative that prevents complete organizational tyranny.
Democracy was initially a good idea because it gave people control of their governments. After people learned how to game democracy, it became the worst form of government, because the citizens’ false belief in their own control of the system made them less likely to want to change it.
Much like how Christianity was initially a good idea because it gave people a path to virtue, but now that Jews and other psychopaths have learned how to exploit Christian guilt/empathy/charity, it is becoming one of the worst options, due to most modern Christians’ false belief in their own virtue.
Never heard this before. What are you referring to?
You are using “representative” in the specific sense of “elected representative”.
I am using it to mean “any governing body that represents the national will”.
Who or what do you think a government should represent?
Empirically, cartels always fail. Their effects are limited. Cartel members cheat on each other, and new competitors pop up to take advantage of cartel prices.
My error, I was misinformed, or misremembered.
I think there was a deal with concessions available after Barbarossa (when it was looking like the Germans won) and there was a much worse deal available in part of 1942 but certainly no deal available at any point that I know of after Casablanca.
> I think there was a … deal available in part of 1942
It turns out there were many rumours of such a deal in the wind, but we don’t actually have any concrete evidence. If Stalin was trying to make such a deal, he did not want his allies to find out.
Of course, the party that most urgently needed to make such a deal was Germany, and on this we can be very sure there was not the slightest interest or intention, regardless of whether the deal was or was not available. Hitler should have offered a return to the status quo ante as soon as it became obvious that operation Barbarossa was at best going to cost vastly more, and take vastly longer. Without access to Russian food, energy, and raw materials, Germany could not afford a long war, and both sides knew it. Once the Russians halted, or drastically slowed the German advance, the war with Russia was lost. It had to be quick, or not at all.
“I am using it to mean “any governing body that represents the national will”.
How can this be achieved, it can’t really… iron law of oligarchy, principle agent problem and all that. Monarchies do it probably better than any post enlightenment government. Oh sometimes they absolutely do not but lets take what the left claims to want and what appeals to normies about the left, vague promises of full luxury communism.
Now lets look at what governments actually offer something like full luxury communism for citizens. Of the ones I know of Liechenstein, Norway, Monaco, Dubai, Abu Dubai, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Brunei. All monarchies, all but Norway the monarch actually governs as head of state. Yes most of those have oil but not all. But lets look at non monarchies with oil, the citizens don’t get shit from the oil money.
Empirically, we see “the resource curse” A government that lucks onto a huge source of money usually makes things worse for its citizens, not better. Except, of course, for hereditary monarchies where the King has actual power.
The struggle for power within a democracy leads to an elite which is actively hostile to its subjects. The resource curse exacerbates this power struggle.
I wouldn’t call any of those Communist, and rather few of them luxury. Dubai is associated with luxury but also an extreme up-or-out grindset culture. People there can be ridiculously wealthy but also work ridiculously hard for that wealth.
The more successful Arab oil nations, in addition to being all monarchies, are usually governed with a confusing hybrid of Sharia Law and English Common Law. They tend to be more capitalistic than America is today, but with the Sharia Law adding some important restrictions around e.g. debt which, along with the oil monopolies, make them highly resistant to U.S. style financialization and cultural takeover.
The Arabs’ success can’t really be used as a model for European people because, well, we aren’t the same. Also, they aren’t all that luxurious for the commoners. But we already have our own model, i.e. Christian nationalism and the original English Common Law that the successful Arab states adapted to their quirks. Collectively they are National Capitalism, which is almost but not quite diametrically opposite from notions of “luxury communism”.
The commoners in the UAE have it pretty good. It is a grind culture for the foreigners. For foreigners, it is up or out.
Its a grindset culture for foreigners not for the natives.
That paragraph of my post was about the other Arab countries he mentioned like Kuwait and Qatar. I could be wrong, but I don’t think they live in such luxury, aside from the royal families. The UAE in general and Dubai in particular are odd outliers, sort of like the Hong Kong of the Arab world in my mind, unusually tolerant of foreigners and primarily so for profit.
It’s their Special Economic Zone in all but name, funding the natives who comprise a nobility or aristocratic class in all but name. Which, unlike Communism, is actually a perfectly serviceable arrangement, as long as the economic incentives remain in place and the foreigners aren’t allowed to get too uppity.
Correct. There have already been several examples and explanations in this thread, and in many previous threads, and I have no intention of playing the game of “explaining obvious things to leftists who only pretend not to understand.” That game got boring in 2014, and was a dead horse by 2024.
Were I speaking with someone who seemed genuinely curious, and merely on the fence about him, I would make the effort, but from your openly holier-than-thou posture it is clear that you only want us to keep posting further examples and explanations so that you can ignore most, nit-pick the rest to death, and attempt to gradually wear us down. So no, I will not explain or attempt to prove anything to you.
I have no idea what scare quotes you’re referring to, but as to the second part of that sentence, the world does not revolve around you. I made a general observation in response to Alf, who actually does have interesting things to say. It is clear as day that deeply-flawed spokespeople for the right such as Tucker Carlson, Jordan Peterson or Vox Day, or even outright grifters like Mike Cernovich or Candace Owens, are able to attract audiences of adoring fans who insist they can do no wrong. And hardly unreasonable to characterize the Groypers’ relationship to Nick Fuentes as exactly this.
And this is the case in point: you unhesitatingly adopt the position that I am required to prove myself to you, despite the obvious disparities in reputation and my own track record of predictions and shill-identification.
But this is no surprise to me; leftists always project. The high-and-mighty affect alternating with smug flippancy can never truly conceal the underlying boorishness and spiteful rage.
George Galloway is a communist, who is allied with Islamists (Respect Party), this is why he is not into tranny/gay stuff.
‘What is needed is tanks in Harvard, and the president appointing virtuous married Christian men with well behaved children in charge.’
Yes, but if those virtuous Christian men are ruled over by their wives and daughters, as the vast majority are . . . the status quo, which is oligarchic gynarchy, will continue.
It’ll take warriors in Christ who rule over their wives and families, and those are about as rare in America as saints at a pussyhat rally.
Empirically, all happy families are quietly and furtively eighteenth century. If they have intact marriages with well behaved children, they are unlikely to be ruled by their wife and daughters. If ruled by their wives and daughters, the marriage and family winds up broken even if they continue living in the same house.
If they wind up setting the norms, will cease to be furtive.
Scott Adams just passed on to the happy hunting grounds. May he rest in peace; end of a specific era.
Way way before everything, his Dilbert comics were a sanity-saver in certain periods.
Amen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7j-BUiVHCM
“Does anybody know how to read a manual?”
White collar corporation conservatives are dinosaurs. Big business is leftist now, [*deleted for all the usual reasons*]
Hollywood, Disney and the big video game companies are solidly woke, but Google and Facebook abruptly changed course when the wind blew. It is the nature of merchants to line up with the prevailing wind.
And who is the biggest big businessman of them all? Elon Musk, who is solidly based, and probably single handedly saved the world from the Wokepocalypse.
By spending forty four billion for X, he made possible everything that has happened since.
The core of Thermidor, the men who started it, are the big tech oligarchs, who decided that they could no longer go the way wind was blowing, for it was blowing towards the seven kill stele.
During the Bush years, big business was highly aggressively in favor of gay marriage, and it’s obvious that they were in favor of it because [*deleted again for all the usual reasons*]
Nuts.
The gay marriage campaign only got traction, became the left’s new big thing, during the Obama years.
The state was pushing gay marriage during the Obama years, and big business went along with it. Some enthusiastically, most under state pressure.
It was the weirdest fucking thing. Everyone mocked and was against gay marriage including in leftist Massachussetts where I lived and then it was like someone flipped a switch in Obama’s second term…
His final statement begins with
I don’t know if salvation works like that, but at the very least we know he wasn’t demon-ridden. Some people truly can’t say the words, in real life as much as in this comment section. Or, perhaps the Catholics are right about purgatory after all.
I recall he took the mrna vax (itself a risk factor for cancer), but he also had the integrity to wrestle with reality and come to the conclusion he’d been wrong. That’s a rare virtue; too many people I know in real life are dug in on whatever side they started on.
And AF, what the fuck is wrong with you? You can’t keep your bit in your pants even on the occasion of a good man’s death?
My full posts keep getting deleted. But once again, RIP Scott Adams.
You have never attempted the shill test. You have a limited number of payloads. Every payload has been allowed through several times. Every payload has been replied to several times. And you ignore the replies and just sail along.
Your main payload is that the right should adopt leftist policies — among those policies, that leftism comes from capitalism, therefore we should support socialism.
jim hasn’t posted his economic model for civilization. [*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
Sure I have. It is in the rho files. Eighteenth century corporate capitalism, driven by eighteenth century book keeping, except that shares and business names should be on the blockchain, rather than issued by the state.
Eighteenth century corporate capitalism is also known as Manchesterism, the Manchester system or Manchester capitalism, for its earliest great flowering was in Manchester. It survived in Hong Kong to the twentieth century, and was an important influence and model for Deng’s immensely successful economic reforms in China. The reason Russian economic reforms were such a catastrophe was that they were importing postmodern capitalism.
Eighteenth century corporate capitalism is also known as “modern capitalism”, to distinguish it from Roman and Medieval capitalism, and to distinguish it from postmodern capitalism.
I would prefer the term “modern capitalism”, except that in this decadent era where the past gets abruptly rewritten every few years, no one would know what I was talking about.
“ Manchester system or Manchester capitalism,”
A cursory look at Wokepedia entry, it the usual progs reinterpretation.
But generally it is “free trade”
the history shows Manchestrism took hold in 1840s and 50s , during the beginning of imperial age with nationalization of east India company , the repeal of the corn act.
I am a huge favor of mercantilism and Fredrick list National economy.
It the natural system of monarchy. And the system of Henry viii and Elizabeth I in the past , and Japan , South Korea and china in the present.
Manchesterism and free trade are imperial economic system. It work great as long as the empire work great , which never last long
Wikipedia does not like the idea that the current economic system is radically different from the previous iteration of capitalism.
All words referencing any aspect of economics that disagree with any part of Marxist history get erased. Or that part of their meaning erased.
Google ngrams will tell you there are zero references to Manchesterism in the entire corpus of books, which tells you it is a concept that some people are trying to erase.
However, there is a fair bit of truth in their depiction of Manchesterism, in that Cobden and Bright were massively influential in the corn law reform, and the main reason Academia wants to erase the term is that they don’t like businessmen like Cobden and Bright sticking their oar into economic theory.
So I should not use the term Manchesterism. It is legitimately confusing and misleading.
“Your main payload is that the right should adopt leftist policies — among those policies, that leftism comes from capitalism, therefore we should support socialism.”
Capitalist elite workaholic sodomites (and I’m going to include Elon “IVF” Musk in here too) are stronger than traditionalist Christians who don’t have time to make their employment into an idol. But stronger doesn’t mean better, and the strongest merchants cannot beat even the weakest warriors. Calling for the warriors to redistribute wealth from the elite merchants to the rank and file family man is not “socialism”, but simply distributism.
The idolatrous managerial class is hostile towards the working class that is divided between the marketplace, the home, and the church. And if it is not the duty of a warrior to protect these innocent, then what is it? To serve globohomo?
You are not calling for Swedish style redistribution. You are calling for massive government intervention in the economy that would have the effect of advancing globohomo cultural and social objectives.
And you don’t want to redistribute to the common man, the Maga voter, the plumber, the farmer, the man who runs a pizza shop. You want to redistribute away from them to the degreed urban elite.
I actually just want the world of Dilbert back. [*deleted for all the usual reasons*]
Your post contained an enormous pile of untruths, most of which were not so much flat out direct false hoods, but were rather spinning true facts that tend to serve the right into untruths that tend to serve the left: That the big bureaucratic corporate capitalism rightly ridiculed and condemned by Dilbert was supposedly rightist and Christian, and that real capitalism, the farmer, the plumber, the electrician, the entrepreneur big or small is supposedly somehow leftism, that the state should crush.
And it would have been just too tedious and lengthy to address each falsehood individually. But, your basic payload is, as ever, that big bureaucracy is the real reactionary position, and that the managerial class needs to crush those filthy plebs, including such filthy plebs as Elon Musk.
Not to shit too much on the guy but as far as I could see he kept insisting he was wrong, for the right reasons, and that the information at the time said it was a good idea. People kept telling him no and he made some apology that still avoided admitting it fully. Anyways. He was a nerd and a smart guy but maybe too high on his own smartness. I can see how smart people stuck among normies can develop these strange ideas about the power of persuasion, or rationalist types thinking they are borderline telepathic or what have you. Anyways.
That being said he did a lot of good, major credit for someone in his position to do anything at all, most do nothing or bend the knee.
Now is not the time to discuss Scott Adam’s errors, but his important truths.
Daddy Scarebucks:
I never said any of that. You imagined all of it.
Looks like Trump is on board with regime changing Iran, and he posted Make Israel Great Again on Twitter.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/1ARwUdG3CF/the-left-narrative-of-inciting-p/c/
C’mon man–question Trump’s sincerity or speculate on ulterior motives if you must, but it’s plainly obvious that the “I” stood for “Iran” and not “Israel”.
Trump is unreliable, in that he is a showman and he bluffs a lot. But he is reliable in that when he speaks, you are getting the real Trump, not a synthetic product generated by focus groups and consultants.
You cannot trust everything Trump says, but you always know where he is coming from. No one can doubt that when he speaks on Venezuela, he is telling you his real motives and intentions. He may be exaggerating, probably is exaggerating, the effectiveness and swiftness of the coming changes, but no one can doubt he intends those changes, and intends them for the reasons he told us.
And, back to Nick Fuentes. If you were getting the real Nick Fuentes, he would be telling us the crimethought reasons for his purported positions. What he is doing is prebunking the positions, by presenting them as unmotivated and unexplained hostility to the target groups, Like our “white nationalist” commenter, Dolfin, who wants to eradicate all Jews, but is strangely uninterested in what certain Jews got up to in the Ukraine. He blames Jews for woke, which arguably has substantial truth, in that Woke ideology originates in the Frankfurt school, but he will not mention the Frankfurt school. And even if it was substantially true, extermination is an absurd conclusion. Even if it really was all Jews all the time, which it obviously is not, far less drastic solutions are likely to be effective. If he was really all that pissed at Jews, he would be giving us better reasons and evidence for being pissed at Jews, of which there are a plentiful supply.
The obvious solution to woke is nothing to do with Jews, even if the ideology came from the Frankfurt school. Purge academia. Married Christian men with well behaved children. Its the faggots, not the Jews, that are core of woke.
The hubbub was over Trump posting “MIGA”, which the usual suspects seized on to say “OMG he actually said it, he wants to Make Israel Great Again!” because what else could that possibly refer to?
I won’t pretend to be informed enough, or interested enough to become informed enough, to know whether this is an authentic movement in Iran or more color-revolution fuckery; given the history of these things, it is probably the latter. But in any case it’s got nothing to do with Israel, not directly anyway, and I’m pretty sure Trump has also posted “MIGA” in reference to India and Modi.
The letter “I” can stand for a lot of things, but if you’re a Groyper or have Jews on the brain, it can only ever stand for one thing.
These people (the Jew-obsessed) have been using MIGA to mock MAGA for years, even calling normies who voted for Trump “miggers”. When Israel and Iran were launching missiles each at other in July, Trump used the term Make Iran Great Again (https://x.com/kaitlancollins/status/1936891925459575002), which these people shortened to MIGA and laughed at the similarity to the obscure acronym they invented.
Now Trump has said MIGA, which everybody knows means Make Iran Great Again because he’s already said that and never once said Make Israel Great Again, but these people still try to convince themselves that he’s talking about Israel. OMG did you see how he pushed Net and Yahoo’s chair in for him?!
The fact that nobody outside of /pol/ users has ever heard of any of the terms they’ve created doesn’t seem to give them any pause for some odd reason. Good memes catch on very quickly, and “MIGA” has had zero traction outside of their own circles.
I don’t see how bombing Iran while shouting MIGA is any better. Another regime change in the desert, one that the the tiny hats out there have openly wanted for a while. Another country being turned to shit. Not our circus not our monkeys.
I agree, it would be an obnoxious and tone-deaf move for the President in that combination. As far as I know, there have not been any bombs, and aren’t any plans for bombs, which means the “MIGA” and “cancelled diplomacy” bits amount to little more than a Strongly Worded Letter.
While there is obvious enmity between the two states, I’m not sure that color revolution fits the Heeb’s MO–or their capabilities. They want Iran’s technological and manufacturing capability crippled, tend to take a rather direct approach to it, and don’t really care who’s in charge, and in fact it is probably to their benefit to preserve Iran’s current ineffectual leadership. Color revolution tends to be a U.S. State Department affair and the State Department is Bluegov, thus hostile to Israel.
But there are factions within factions within factions, as always, so who knows. I don’t think either of us do.
Indeed, and if we were expending American blood and treasure on it then I would protest. (I mean rhetorically, not as part of some gay demonstration.)
But hatechan is jumping the gun, and looking for any excuse to wail about Trump, as always; don’t get caught up in their drama. If the bombs start to drop, if we start to see American troops being shipped over, then we’ll have something to discuss. Right now it’s just a tweet cheering on some dissidents who may or may not be astroturf.
Soros, Nuland, et al. are trying to kill as many Ukrainians as they can.
When did I ever neglect to mention them?
I’d be happy to, so long as you stop pigeonholing me as a wignat.
You blamed the Jews for woke, without mentioning the evidence and arguments for that position, which prebunks the position. Hence my belief that nearly all wignats are run by Soros or similar.
You are blaming the victims of slander (those that tell the truth about Jewish cultural influence) for our own artificially negative reputation.
If Nick shaved his head, displayed swastikas everywhere, and acted cartoonishly evil, you might have a point.
How is he, or I, supposed to succinctly state our position in a way that you approve of?
If you tell the truth about Jewish cultural influence, you need to present the facts and the evidence, such as the role of the Frankfurt school in woke, the role of Jews in communist revolutions, and the relationship between Marxism and Judaism, which I do and you and Nick Fuentes fail to do. Thereby prebunking your own positions as a conspiracy theory and thus prebunking my positions as a conspiracy theory.
You have an artificially negative reputation because you are systematically presenting our ideas in a frame that gives them a negative reputation. You, not the Jews, are manufacturing this slander — well actually it is the Jews manufacturing this slander, in the sense that most of the Wignats doing this are run by Soros, though Nick Fuentes appears to be run by the FBI.
You, and the rest of the wignats, are presenting our ideas on various groups in a way that fits them comfortably into the Leftist frame that our positions are motivated by hatred, we just hate people different from ourselves for no good reason, and that given half a chance, we would just kill them all for no sane reason.
If you and Nick actually held the position, rather than attempting to prebunk it, you would imply it by stating the evidence and arguments for that position. You instead present these ideas as a baseless conspiracy theory that is merely rationalisation for exterminating various groups.
>>How is he, or I, supposed to succinctly state our position in a way that you approve of?
By giving actual reasons for an intelligent person to consider your position, rather than stating it without evidence, as if you are trying to make it look like a thing that some people just somehow believe without any evidence at all.
So, what the fuck do you want Jim? Do I need to publish a manifesto before posting here?
How about this: I challenge you to create a shill test affirming the things you listed here.
If you do so, then I will pass it, and my position on all those topics will be clear.
If you can’t, or won’t, then you are not justified in questioning my “frame”.
“Our ideas” LMAO. White nationalists have been talking about this stuff since long before neoreaction even existed.
So how exactly should Nick and I improve our “frame”? Neither of us are particularly hateful or violent. Is it the lack of intellectual posturing? Or perhaps we aren’t autistic enough?
Also, I’m going to ask you one more time: what evidence do you have that Nick is managed by the FBI, or any federal agency?
liar.
You present the policy prescriptions that follow from our ideas as irrational unmotivated hatred. It is the reasons behind our policy prescriptions that our enemies want to censor and that we want to communicate. This is what white nationalists are mysteriously unable to talk about.
There are two big problems with your Joo Joo Jooing:
One: You are denying that white leftists are a problem. What race is Tim Waltz?
Two: you make concern about the problems that result from racial differences sound like tinfoil hattery.
The Joo Joo Joo brigade says “you don’t hate Joos enough Trump is a Joo, Musk is a Joo, Jim is a Joo,”, but neglect to provide any real concrete examples of Jews doing bad things.
Unless you can provide a single example of anything I’ve said that matches anything you just posted, I’m not going to waste any more time defending against these false, nebulous accusations.
I am not accusing you of saying things. I am accusing you of not saying things.
The appropriate response would have been to say those things.
Isn’t that the exact purpose of a shill test?
Seems like the answer is for you to create a JQ shill test for me to take.
If you yourself are willing to commit crimethink about Jews, then it shouldn’t be too difficult, right?
I don’t think you, dolfin, are a shill exactly, because you can commit thought crimes if pushed. But you will not commit them unless pushed.
You are doing what obvious shills are doing, laundering the white left, including globohomo in Europe, defending socialism (has true socialism been tried yet 🙃) and being strangely vague about the Jewish misbehaviour you are so incensed by.
Supposedly, were it not for the nefarious influence of the JOOs, white people would not be causing any problems for white people.
The problem with what you have been saying about Jews is that, absent any plausible explanation for not liking Jews, what you say about Jews sounds like tinfoil hattery, and thus makes what we say about Jews sound like tinfoil hattery. Tampon Tim is not international Jewry. And if you are fine with Starmer and company, then why do you have a problem with Jews? What have they been up to which is even worse?
If the Jews caused Starmer, without any plausible argument or evidence, the claim sounds like evil Jewish mind rays.
It is reasonable to conclude that Starmer is taking orders from someone, but I see no reason to suppose that that someone is “international Jewry”
You were not.
The women question was originally dealt with in Christianity. Paul:
With the advent of post-Christianity, such truths were forgotten.
These truths were inadvertently rediscovered when men who found themselves locked out of pussy in a post-Christian society tried to get some pussy. They found that they had to pretend to be bad men in order to get laid, and they called these techniques: game.
From game grew the manosphere, which asked the logical question: if getting laid in a ‘free ‘society’ requires men to be violent criminals, what does that tell us about the state of such a society? What does that tell us about women?
Jordan Peterson became the spokesman for the left who would prebunk these positions by ostensibly representing them. Remember him?
Around the time of the manosphere, it was neoreaction which took the ideas of game and the manosphere to their logical conclusion: full circle, back to Pauline Christianity. That getting laid in a free society require men to be violent criminals tells us that society ought not to be ‘free’ in that way. Women must be controlled, must be put back under ownership by men. That is the Christian position.
Today, Nick Fuentes is the spokesman of the left who prebunks this position by ostensible representing them.
If Nick really represents our position, let him tell us the reasons why women are annoying, instead of just asserting it. Let him tell us how women can be wonderful in their right position, how feminism has made them deeply unhappy, and how we can fix things by explaining the ‘why’ behind ‘your body, my choice’.
Which, of course, is exactly what the shills want, and serves exactly the opposite purpose of a shill test.
There is only one shill test, and that is the Woman Question. It is the ability to commit that thoughtcrime, or at least acknowledge that thoughtcrime, that proves a suspected shill actually knows where he is, knows what we believe, why we are here, and isn’t just reading from a script. It is not perfect, a pass does not conclusively prove non-shill intent, but it is mostly effective.
All the other “shill tests” were created by shills, or agitated for by shills, who want to talk and spam about their ideas ad nauseum without acknowledging ours. Commenters who introduce themselves with something merely vaguely thoughcrime-adjacent almost invariably turn out to be shills after Jim makes the mistake of whitelisting them.
There have always been differences of opinion in the group about Jews, blacks, Christianity, economics, state power, etc., albeit these are within a range and some shill positions (like the MMT bro) fall comically outside the entire range. The one non-negotiable condition of “Jimian” neoreaction is female de-emancipation for clearly stated reasons of evolutionary psychology and evolutionary game theory.
(An individual sufficiently devoted to Throne, Altar and Freehold/Property but soft on the woman question might qualify as a “non-Jimian” reactionary, i.e. someone who’s been reading the archives of Moldbug or Nick Land or Radish but hasn’t been here in particular before. They are usually fine after a crash course or two.)
The perennial entryist always seeks to expand the franchise, and make the rules more permissive, thus: more shill tests, different shill tests, a special test just for meeeee! One which would not only allow me unfettered access to the institution, but also give me a weapon to deploy against its members! (The last part is, obviously, not said out loud.)
Adding a “JQ shill test” would be the end of the blog, or at least its comment section, by giving official license for a million Sieg-Heilers everywhere to blast their retarded message by just tweaking a few parameters to fit the stated policy, which the shills always eventually succeed in doing when given the opportunity, c.f. “Jesus the Jewish Community Organizer”.
It was possible to create a test that separates the Christians from the postChristians, because the postChristians have been at this for sixteen centuries, Christians have been trying to exclude them for sixteen centuries, and I was able to draw upon sixteen centuries of work against postChristians, and two centuries of work against the most recent brand of postChristianity.
Trying to create a Jewish Question shill test would be far more difficult, because the difference between rational observation of problems caused by Jews, and “seige heil” is subtle. It is much like jaggard saying he does not have to oppose the deep state, because he opposes the state.
Here is Nuxanor addressing the Jewish Question — you can see a glaringly obvious difference between Nuxanor and the Heil Seig crowd, but reducing this to an effective shill test is non trivial.
The difference between the Deep State and the state is similar to the difference between rule by Chinese emperors, which was good, and rule by women and eunuchs of the imperial court, which was appallingly bad.
I have been accused of the same thing (regarding Jews), so let me ask: what are these things that I am not saying about Jews, that I should be saying?
If nobody can tell me what they are, then you all have no basis for calling me a leftist or a shill.
https://blog.reaction.la/uncategorized/moderation-policy/
Jim regularly links to his own shill tests about Soros and blacks.
And what if they still disagree after your crash course? Does that make them a shill?
In the past, Jim has banned good-faith commenters that he deemed “non-responsive” (i.e. not being sufficiently persuaded by this blog’s arguments).
You guys need to decide whether you want forum, or a cult. If you want ideological conformity, make a profession of faith instead of a shill test, and stop pretending to be open to criticism.
They already have such a license, since almost all of those sieg-heilers could pass the WQ shill test as well.
Shill tests have one purpose- to ensure that the poster is not a shill, by making them commit thoughtcrimes that shills are unable to commit. And, since there are different types of shills, you need to create different tests to weed them out. Adding shill tests is subtractive, not additive.
I’ve already pointed out a couple commenters here that have pro-Jewish or pro-Israel agendas. I don’t know if they are paid or not, but the existence of Israeli shill farms is undeniable, and I see no reason why a WQ test would weed out an Israeli shill.
The only real difference is that “Sieg Heil” also includes solutions to the observed problems- solutions that are usually prebunked, as you note, by being maliciously divorced from their intellectual foundation, e.g. “that crazy Hitler wanted to put all the Jews in camps for no good reason”.
It’s the same difference between a WQ test that looks like it was made by incels because it only has the solution (women all want Chad, and we have to force then to breed with beta males) vs. Jim’s WQ test which also includes the reasoning (women have prehistoric sexual psychology because monogamous societies forcibly ignored female selection, so as to give beta males an incentive to contribute).
So, a JQ test would also include reasons for the solutions to the JQ. For example:
Modern Jews are the result of two millennia of cultural and biological selection against Christianity, making them fundamentally incompatible with any society such as Western Civilization that has major Christian influences.
If someone disagree with my solutions, that’s understandable, but if they disagree with the above sentence then they ought to explain why.
You tell us Jews cause everything bad, and eradicating them would solve everything bad. Well, what are some concrete instances of Jews causing problems? How do they do all this? Are they causing all this by evil Jewish mind rays?
(((Hollyweird))), and in particular (((Bob Iger))), is a major cultural factor stuffing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion down the throats of Americans. Orthodox Jews are welfare parasites, but they are not welfare fraudsters and drug traffickers. Tampon Tim is causing problems but he is not Jewish. Leftist Jews in the State Department overthrew the Ukrainian government, which caused the Ukraine war, but the major entities egging (((Zelensky))) into war were European, in particular Boris Johnson. The suppression of Christianity in the Easter and Christmas celebrations is obviously Jewish. Israel is always influencing and bribing American politicians to get into far away wars that are none of our business, but the programs that the US attempted to implement in Iraq and Afghanistan were Globohomo’s bright idea, and the core of Globohomo is Harvard. Which is disproportionately Jewish but far from majority Jewish and rapidly becoming less Jewish.
But, while pushing for the most extreme claims possible and the most extreme solution possible, you did not mention any of this.
All of these are things I regularly mention, and which you never mention. So, you are prebunking any discussion of the Jewish problem as mere bitter unmotivated hate. Much as Nick Fuentes prebunks discussion of the Women Question as unmotivated hate by bitter incels or gay hatred of women.
To “respond” is to explain why you disagree with your intelocutor’s arguments, or to agree with them but argue that they don’t make a big difference. It does not mean agreeing with your interlocutor’s arguments.
As I explain in the moderation policy: “Responsive” means responding to the interlocutor’s arguments, acknowledging the existence of the interlocutor’s arguments.
If you just repeat your original argument after it has been shot full of holes as if no holes were shot, or continue pushing your straw man after it has been called out, that is non responsive and leads to endless repetition, threads that go on forever saying the same thing over and over and over. And when this happens I terminate the thread by putting the unresponsive commenter on moderation.
Whereupon the unresponsive commenter never gets through, because he still never responds. If he responded by presenting counter arguments, they would get through.
Check this out!!
https://x.com/Babygravy9/status/2011175268388651202
The troon getting so close to the Vance manse makes more sense now.
If a king had been through the close calls Trump has I’m pretty sure all his guards would have been tortured for information then perhaps killed. What happened instead, the main woman got reassigned? Stop fucking around you guys, purge SS and replace them with ICE or retired specops, do something at least. Make a praetorian of maga vets. There’s no shortage of capable men who would take a bullet for them. Don’t just rely on the pre existing group of bureaucrats and DEIs
Cea Weaver, like Mamdani, is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America. She has since deleted her account. Some choice quotes: — “Impoverish the *white* middle class” — “Homeownership is racist” — “Private property including any kind of ESPECIALLY homeownership is a weapon of white supremacy” — “We’re going to transition from treating property as an individual good to a collective good” — “ Families, especially white families, but some POC families who are homeowners as well, are going to have a different relationship to property than the one that we currently have” The state of things: A first-of-its-kind private asset seizure tax is on the ballot in California. NYC’s socialist mayor just appointed a new tenant advocate who believes owning a home is “racist” and wants to change the nature of property from an “individual good to a collective good.”
The strange thing is that lately from what I hear about Fuentes on 4chan he hasn’t been subversive lately, hes breaking from the 3rd worldist line. Hes been supportive of Trump again… he apparently said the truth that Epstein was a honeypot using plausibly of age girls that were slightly underage. Maybe the office in the feds that was in control of him got purged successfully and was replaced with MAGA people. IDK.
Pretty sure Nick Fuentes is being operated by the FBI. And while the FBI are still our enemies and Trump’s enemies, there have been big efforts and major progress in getting it into line.
Then why did they need to rush ship 2 big concrete mixing trucks to epstein island? Even the underage girls of plausible age is a hangout, they don’t want you looking into the spirit cooking; the pizzagate; or the haitian children that hillary and co. kept kidnapping.
Wow you actually said something sensible…
Perhaps relevant: Milo saying he regrets “giving birth to gay Republican demons like Nick Fuentes” https://youtu.be/NiTILBSU8tM?t=4477
This is painfully gay.
Yes, but what Milo describes regarding the extent of the painfully gay, especially in the D.C. regime, is much much worse than most strident poofs off roofs ever imagined.
closer: https://youtu.be/NiTILBSU8tM?t=4619
Verizon down for hours now. This is almost certainly due to retarded jeets being left in charge of the system.
What do mean with “except that shares and business names should be on the blockchain, rather than issued by the state”? The part that shares and business names should be on the blockchain is clear, but shares and business names are not issued by the state. Shares are issued by the business and the business founders chooses a name for their business.
The blockchain enables the share owners to be secret. This is an improtant advantage as the government then cannot tax dividends and cannot confiscate shares.
A business name cannot be secret. What good does it do to have it on a blockchain? If the state doesn’t like a business name, it can force the business to change the name. In case of non-compliance, the state can confiscate property of the business. Most businesses need property, e.g. production facilities, which cannot be hidden.
This should be a response to Jim’s post of 2026-01-14 at 21:54. Sorry.
In order to have a business name, and in order to issue shares, you have to apply to the state, and property rights in those shares are enforced by the state. The shares and the name exist because the state deems them to exist, and because of quasi state institutions such as the stock exchange.
This puts business under the thumb of the state, and the bureaucracy cannot resist the urge to meddle ever more extensively.
The physical humans who have authority speak in the name of the business can be secret.
No it cannot, if the business name is part of data on the blockchain mapping names to public keys, and we have social network for communication between people holding secret keys corresponding to public keys corresponding a strings in the blockchain map of names to public keys.
Increasingly, the value of a business is intangibles, the network, and it outsources the actual production to a large number of small franchisees. Thus, for example Dominoes does not own any pizza ovens nor bake any pizzas. Trucking companies similarly, chip design companies.
Most of the value of a profitable business is intangibles. Stocks of profitable businesses have been selling for multiples of book value, 50 years ago, 100 years ago, etc. Why do you think that is increasingly so?
Anyway, of course there are some businesses that do not need to own production facilities and these business can largely do whatever they want, but there are businesses that need production facilities. Some business has to own land to produce food, some one has to own machines to produce trucks and pizza ovens and someone has to own the trucks and the pizza ovens. These businesses are vulnerable to the state. The state will tax them, has always taxed them and if they don’t comply with whatever the state demands their tangible property can be sized.
The business owners of any business can use any business name in internal communications they like, but if the state doesn’t like the business name they use in public with customers the state can confiscate their tangible assets.
Blockchain is nice, it keeps things secret, but a factory or a farm is not secret, cannot be secret . The farm, the mine and the factory need a name linked to a physical location. That is then a business name. If the state does not like the name, the farm, mine or factory is confiscated. The state does not need to know who owns the farm or factory. The state sends men with guns and they take the tangible assets because the king does not like the business name stated on the entrance.
Do you want to try telling the men with guns that the tangibles they are carrying away or the land they take does belong to a secret third party that has nothing to with the business name on the entrance? The state need not care.
States, especially evil ones, are lazy and ineffective. When all you have is a big, slow sledgehammer, you automatically seek to use it on the biggest, lowest hanging targets. Hence the target on the backs of big tech and other big companies.
If I understand Jim’s idea correctly, the idea is that each of these companies can move their accounting to the rhocoin chain, which effectively removes the big target. Yes, plenty of subsidiaries to go after if you really want to, but it’s a lot of effort, and states hate lots of effort.
The state can and will collect taxes. This is not an anarcho capitalist plan. But the state is going to find it vastly harder to regulate them, to stick its nose into their business.
Human Resources, accounting, and legal are government bureaucracies inserted into the business. Dominoes has the government inside. The man who runs a Dominoes does not.
The business name on the entrance will be the secretive third party, and that third party does not own the tangibles. The trucking company seldom owns the trucks, Dominoes does not own the pizzeria. And, as I said, this not a tax evasion plan, it is a deregulation plan.
Playing with the chinese Kimi LLM and I’m not sure if I lucked into a context window, but it seems profoundly based. Selected chunks from a conversation about capturing the culture if we live in a timeline where woke dies on its own sword but we never got a proper replacement installed at the state level. I hardly nudged it, I just said something to the effect of “we got here through distributed evolution of ideas, we need to enforce virtue on the common man”
I poked it a bit about diminished virtue and our decentralized power being incapable of fixing it, mentioned marriage collapse as the most pressing concern, and suddenly we get ideas that have been tossed around in the comments here. I did not use any ‘Dark Enlightenment’ shibboleths, nor try and guide it there. I was more interested in probing the idea that LLMs and short form video could at least attenuate the worst of the virtue collapse, and found myself shocked at how quickly it spat out the conclusions we so often go over here.
Oh please, JIM just censored and deleted more economic posts that he did not LIKE[*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
If you want to post on economics, or any topic, first pass the shill test
Nothing is censored on this blog. Posts get deleted for what the poster is strangely unable to say, not what he does say.
> shill test
You don’t even have an economics shill test copypasta.
[*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
Any thought crime will do. Discuss the woman question. The point and purpose of the shill test is to detect whether you are sitting behind an office desk in the office of a Soros ngo, with a supervisor standing over you telling you to infiltrate the right, a computer supplied by the ngo IT department in front of you, and your bonus depends on getting engagement for memes cooked up by ngo headquarters.
Isn’t that the exact purpose of a shill test?
Seems like the answer is for you to create a JQ shill test for me to take.
If you yourself are willing to commit crimethink about Jews, then it shouldn’t be too difficult, right?
Whoops, forgot to reply.
Trial and error has taught that the most effective shill test is the women question. Sure, some versions of the race question, jew question and faith question work, some of the time, but the women question has by far the best track record.
Covid was a biological weapon deployed by the CIA against China.
That virus wasn’t strong and long enough to work.
I accept that women being in positions of authority over men does not work, but why exactly is this?
Women seem to be allergic to taking responsibility for their decisions, or being held accountable. Is this because they are naturally risk averse, not getting reproductive advantages from sticking out?
Unowned women misbehaving to try and get stopped by a strong man is easy enough to understand, and causes trouble in organizations where they are managers.
What about all-women groups? They don’t have the acting out problem, and various traditional groups like sewing clubs or whatever can seem to function ok aside from occasional interpersonal drama. I guess these groups don’t need actual leadership, as their existence just requires some routine procedures. Female groups do seem to establish a pecking order based around subtle political factors, but they seem to sabotage each other more than male groups, who perhaps depend on each other to take on the world together, as opposed to the women who only benefit from sabotaging rivals.
They attract and are attracted to anti-social men. And they will gate keep against good husbands and fathers. Sewing circles are great, providing the men responsible for the roof are also guarding the gate.
It is because they evolved for millions of years in an environment where they weren’t responsible for their decisions, and could not be held accountable. Security of woman and children derived solely from the capacity (note, capacity does not necessarily mean predilection) of the husband/father to commit violence against other men.
Asking “why” is a little like asking why a dog cannot comprehend the anger of its master yelling at it after coming home to find a mess on the rug. The dog has no memory of the act itself, nor the circumstances leading up to it, and merely acted on instinct in the first place, and the yelling only serves to terrorize the animal while serving no training purpose.
For women to act responsibly, it must be a conditioned behavior, and the only people who can condition them are men they look up to, almost always a husband or sometimes a father, exercising careful discipline.
They are far worse than you imagine, full of drama and infighting. Exceptions can sometimes be made if, as Adam says, there is a virtuous man guarding the gate, and/or if all the women in the group are happily married outside of the group.
But an all female group of single teenagers or twenty-somethings? Turns into “mean girls” instantly, or just goes cruising for cock, preferably the kind that won’t take no for an answer. And older, less-fertile groups go all-out Karen, which you can observe by going to an HOA meeting or signing into Nextdoor.
I spend too much time watching Taylor the Fiend and similar YouTube channels where a male cartoon avatar plays and comments on videos of women saying retarded shit on TikTok.
My only disagreement is that they expect women to be responsible and accountable, which is as unrealistic and unnatural as women expecting men to exhibit “emotional intelligence”.
I’m re-reading an old interview of Khomeini by Oriana Fallaci. Lol, shocking and backwards in an earlier time, now he seems pretty based. Here is the WQ:
https://archive.ph/MAvva
Basedness does not somehow make a False (and frankly bastardly dark and evil) Religion, a True and Good Faith based in Light and Good Will.
If people want to borrow elements of basedness, fine, but don’t be quoting where it came from because 95% of people are weak and aren’t knowledgeable enough to protect themselves from the Lying Dawahganda of the Islamic Apologists, let alone able to hold frame and defeat their BS with polemic facts.
As the great sage has told us, “La religion la plus con, c’est quand même l’islam”. Iran is furthermore unsuitable as a paragon because they have Altar but no Throne. (Then again, we have neither, or, here in Europe, almost only empty Thrones and mostly desecrated Altars.)
Even so, I think we can appreciate basedness, whatever its source. Khomeini is one more example, like Qutb, of someone Islamic who was sheep dipped in the Post-WW2 Liberal Order (as a long-time exile in Paris, if memory serves) but rejected it.
What does everyone make of the blackmailed/bribe/secret democrat but definitely traitorous GOP congresscritters funding the National Endowment for Democracy and the Justice Departments Community Relations Service?
They should be hung, same as white parents who put their children in nigger/muslim/jew/hindu daycares.
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/2011884747488968711
They love faggots and niggers, and not even the cominator noticed the proof… maybe someone will stop the insanity, but I doubt it.
https://x.com/amuse/status/2011913141328728141
I think you put it pretty well!
But the 2026 timing strongly suggests another 2017 throw the midterm election effort. We didn’t send them to the Congress with a mandate to do almost nothing, as happened in 2025, so formally being out of power 2027-8 puts less heat on those who manage to keep their seats.
I mean, it’s largely performative, it’s not like the post-Watergate normal order legislative process is going to determine the next spending bill, which is hinted to be “shutdown the government to stop ICE.” Which _is_ an existential issue for the Democrats.
In general that process has more and more been an abject failure, although now there’s the wild card of AI to help analyze thousand page bills in hours, as we saw after the 2024 election but before the handover. The sort of thing that might have caught Moynihan’s Section 1706 destruction and more of the existing technical independent contractor arrangement at the time. Well, if we’d had a way to publicize it back in 1986:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Reform_Act_of_1986#Tax_treatment_of_technical_service_firms_employing_certain_professionals
In 1942 there were effectively ZERO of these foresworn conquerors in your country, things were good… then somehow you allowed both Leftists to takeover, and Conquerors in…
But what’s even more unclear to me is what anyone will actually do to shove them all back out.
People better start growing some guts to do the nasty, because history shows that’s what’s required if you want your grandchildren to still play outside and look and pray like you.
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/2012316909778415842
People have to stand up together in public and start speaking the Real Talk. Church Militant, anti-heritage incompatibles commies and ill-willers out… type talk.
Chinese? CIA is hiring.
https://x.com/CIA/status/2011802282589835414
此视频提供安全联系中央情报局的全套步骤。以下有几个在进行安全联系之前及在过程中务必考量的事项。中情局想知道中国的真相，我们正在寻找知道并能告知真相的人。
Maybe some Chinese are having second thoughts about what their Govt is doing.
China has a large Internet PsyOp army, Great Firewall, etc.
The old “Xi-The-Pooh” memes evolved into AI movie trailers 🙂
Remember the “Chinese Dissidents” spreading Hunter Biden’s Laptop around… whatever happened to that side of the story.
Would be much better if CIA would run implosion ops against the GloboHomo Left and Corrupt types… say Soros Gates Schwab etc (schemers at the top), Vonderleyen Omar Starmer Cenk etc (bitplayers), their “Foundations/NGOs”, the WEF, the US DNC… but if getting some OPLAN’s and Lefterizing the ChiCom’s against each other is all they can muster, so be it. At the very least that would give reason to implode Newsom, who shoved the homeless out to paint the streets Hammer-Sickle Commie Red Star for Xi’s invite to CA.
Supporting the refugee-industrial complex, of course.
https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th/id/OIP.6HOk6UFUA-As5o-fo_8t-QHaFI
WTF, Bhutan? The others are fourth-world shitholes, but why are refugees fleeing the Happiest Country on Earth? Because Bhutan’s population was 20% ethnic Nepali, the majority Bhutanese felt they’d be happier without them, and the US agreed to take them. These Nepali-Bhutanese-Americans now have the highest welfare dependency (81.4% according to DJT) of any immigrant group.
America has become a dumping ground for the world’s unwanted diversity!
It’s more than ethnicity driving the split
Buddhism/Hinduism % Bhutan 75/22 Nepal 9/82
Would it be improper to hang the Importers if they were importing over 85% eligible women, but now they’re importing 80% men and effectively 0% eligible women.
In part because if the below WQ trends continue, there may be no other option.
https://x.com/IterIntellectus/status/2012220254504530043
https://x.com/zarathustra5150/status/2011851505834352809
Men need to bring back Finishing Schools to send their daughters to, no cell phones allowed.
Not to pick nits, but the word “gay” must be retired as an anticoncept. Same for “homosexual” , though with different reasons why it’s an anticoncept.
Buggerer, pederast, invert, epicene, pervert etc are better as terms.
Homosexual is a clinical term its fine.
Gay is an evil rebranding of language. If you are a fan of music from the 1950s and early 1960s as I am you will note that gay is very often used to mean very happy. Rebranding faggots or “homosexuals” as gay was an attempt to improve their image while messing up the lyrics of a lot of old really great songs. So yes homosexuals/faggots should never be referred to as “gay”.
It makes older cinema a bit awkward as well:
https://youtu.be/pJ-2V1aHhds?t=1039
That it is used clinically is part of the anticonceptuality of it.
“Sex” is an anticoncept shorthand for the real concept, “sexual intercourse”, that is, something that occurs between the two (that is, two different) sexes. “Homosexual intercourse” and “homosexuality” were terminological steps on the way to replacing the ancient concept of sexual intercourse with the fake modern surrogate, “sex” as a form of erotic friction — masturbation — with the particulars of the SEXes involved as something merely accidental.
The modern mind has many things to unlearn and this is easy terminology to stop using.
Maybe you’re right I hadn’t thought that far but homosexual was used way before there was any tolerance of them.
But definitely the priority is to nuke using “gay” for faggots first.
“Homosexual” also shares with “gay” the problem that having a label that sounds like a category, instead of a label for a behavior (buggerer, pederast) or a term of derision (pervert, faggot, sissy, nancy-boy), creates from thin air the impression that it is an actual Type Of Person rather than simply a disorder that some people happen to have. Which is foundational for prog LGBT-ism.
As someone here (Aidan?) said, it is imperative to deny attention to poofs, and denying them the category status suggested by “homosexual” is part of that.
Valid point, but ‘gay and fake’ just rolls of the tongue so nicely.