Republics are great. The greatest wealth, the best heights of civilisation, come from Republics. Unfortunately Republics require rather special conditions, as used to be well known. Republics tend to destroy the conditions that make them possible, and these conditions have been destroyed.
For a Republic to actually work:
- The voters, the enfranchised, own property. Without this, elections degenerate into advance auctions of stolen goods.
- The voting class is intelligent, educated, and literate, or else you are going to get rule by demagogues, by those best at conning and manipulating.
- The voting class are virtuous, upright, and God fearing. The founders of the American Republic repeated emphasised that without faith and virtue, the Republic could not survive.
- The voting class are all or nearly all of the same or sufficiently similar religion.
- The voting class are homogeneous, they are all or nearly all of the same race. Differences in race or religion result in tribal politics. Notice that the jury system no longer works since minority voters feel that members of their own minority are entitled to do bad things to whites.
- Warlike. Power comes from the barrel of a gun. The class that votes is roughly the same class as fights. The typical voter serves militarily. And we now see that to serve militarily, the typical voter needs a property right in his wife and children. Those without family or reasonable prospects of family are unlikely to volunteer to defend their nation.
Since these conditions no longer apply, a Republic is no longer viable. It is time for Kings again.
Kings are a regrettable remedy for a sinful people. The book of Samuel vehemently points out the problems with Kings. But how bad are kings compared to what we have now?
There are more than ten countries today in which Kings exercise actual power.
You will notice that only one of these countries is all that tyrannical. They are mostly nice countries to live in, unless you want to engage in leftism, or street preach a religion contrary to the state religion, and even nicer countries to be a citizen of, albeit not quite as nice if you do not subscribe to the state religion. But still very nice to be a citizen if you do not. All of them that are oil rich (which is most of them) have escaped the resource curse, where resources are dissipated in destructive elite conflicts. Most resource rich countries where a disproportionate amount of wealth comes from resources are worse off for being resource rich. The greatest benefit of monarchy is that it avoids the resource curse. People in resource rich monarchies are better off because of the resources, rather than worse off.
The Seven emirates of the UAE, Al Maktoum family since 1833. While each emirate maintains internal autonomy, the UAE operates as a union where the ruler of Abu Dhabi serves as President and Head of State, and the ruler of Dubai serves as Prime Minister and Head of Government. Provides impressively good governance. Dubai is an excape hatch for white elites from around the world.
1. Brunei , ruled by Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah, Absolute ruler; also serves as Prime Minister, Minister of Defense, and Minister of Finance. Controls all branches of government and enforces strict Sharia law. Nice place.
2. Liechtenstein: Prince Hans-Adam II (de facto: Prince Alois)
Power: Retains strong constitutional powers, including vetoing legislation, dissolving parliament, and initiating constitutional referendums. Used to be a little Dubai, but now Dubai outcompetes it.
3. Saudi Arabia, ruled by King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, : Absolute monarch with supreme executive, legislative, and judicial authority. Appoints all key ministers and judges; royal family dominates all state institutions. Pretty nice if you are a native — kind of sucks to be a foreigner.
4. Oman, ruled Sultan Haitham bin Tarik: Absolute ruler; holds full executive and legislative powers. Directly controls defense, foreign affairs, and the military. Again, pretty nice if you are a native.
5. Eswatini: King Mswati III. Unlike the other countries on this list, it is typical of poorly run African countries. It is thoroughly reactionary, and makes reaction look rather bad. It is as repressive as people fear monarchies might be. But then most of Africa is quite repressive. The best that can be said of it is that it is far from being the worst country in Africa, which is a very low bar.
6. Bahrain: King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa
Power: Semi-constitutional but retains significant power: appoints the entire upper house of parliament, key ministers, and can veto laws. Again, very nice if you are a native.
7. Jordan
Monarch: King Abdullah II
Power: Appoints the prime minister and cabinet, dissolves parliament, and controls the military and intelligence services. Parliament has limited oversight. It is biggest problem is that when there is trouble in the Middle East, as there frequently is, everyone wants to flee to Jordan. It has no oil, nor much of any resources, but still does OK economically, because you can invest and do business safely. And, unlike most of the middle east, you can be member of a racial or religious minority safely. People in the middle east are voting for monarchy with their feet.
8. Morocco
Monarch: King Mohammed VI
Power: Holds supreme executive authority, including control over the military, religious affairs, and judiciary. Can dismiss governments and issue decrees. Not really a great advertisement for Monarchy, but not bad at all by Middle Eastern standards. Provides better government than most of the middle east, but that is a low bar to clear. Not a good place for foreigners to do business in.
10. Qatar
Monarch: Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani
Power: Absolute authority in practice; appoints the prime minister and cabinet, controls defense and foreign policy, and dissolves legislative bodies. Again, very nice for natives, and rather popular among foreigners, though Dubai outcompets it.
Where are Americans fleeing to today? They are fleeing to Dubai and Quatar, which are monarchies, and fleeing to Russia, where Putin has been acting rather monarchical since he built the magnificent Resurrection of Christ Cathedral. White men are once again building Cathedrals, and we will not be great again till we bulldoze the post modernist eyesores that have scarred Havard and build a triumphant Cathedral over them. But Russia will have problems when Putin dies, having no clear line of hereditary succession, which is likely to result in the usual destructive competition between elites over the loot.
I think it’s generally not worth it for your civilization to get a few generations of insane bonuses and a couple more of good bonuses if you thereafter burn your social capital and are left with a treasonous political class and civil war. Its a devil’s deal…
Rome arguably won the devils deal as it allowed them to beat oowerful surroundinn enemies but America being surrounded mainly by Indians and weak colonial powers never needed to take the devils deal..
Machievelli came up with sort of a rock paper scissors version of this. Monarchies are the default. But occasionally under monarchy an elite forms that is superior to the king and thus is born an oligarchy. But the franchise always expands and you wind up in democracy. And the only way out of the endless mess of democracy is the will and command of a single man, so back to monarchy.
Democracy is fake and gay lol.
The formula makes sense. The oligarchy phase is an elite that still mostly cooperates with each other. The democracy phase is an elite comprised of competing members, that compete for the most clients, in order to not be destroyed and cast down. The monarchy phase occurs after the destructive democratic phase, where one member of the elite has consolidated power such that the remaining members do not think to actively oppose him.
It doesn’t make sense because it implies democracy is ever real… never forget your elite theory.
Did you even read my comment? It was very short.
Democracy is real, because elites will compete for masses of clients when they start intra-elite competition. No, hoi polloi are not ruling themselves, but they do back elite factions that go for mass-appeal in order to consolidate their power over other elite factions.
It’s just entropy. The life cycle of individuals mirrors that of organizations and civilizations.
Young wolf defeats old alpha, becomes the alpha, forms social bonds, ages, gets weaker, is eventually defeated by a new younger wolf.
https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/2021617995387203645
We’re getting close to the “let them eat cake” point, and the elites are betting they’ll make it out fine because this time there really is cake. [*There is no cake. Men would be happier as a serf with a virgin bride, and to be King under his small and leaky roof, than to be a cubicle drone. I have been in very poor areas of very poor countries, with very strong families, and seen it up close. Men are happier achieving their telos than failing at their telos.*]
A king is a guy randomly born to be king, though many strongmen and tyrants like to call themselves kings, but if they aren’t going to pass on the title to their son they’re just flexing. A politician, who is hungry for power rather than born into it, is much the same as the strongman, and dictatorships and democracies easily switch forms to one another. But they only very rarely become monarchies.
[*They routinely become monarchies if men have strong families — A high fertility elite produces Kings from dictators. If we solve the sex, family, and reproduction problem, the governance problem will solve itself. If we don’t we perish anyway. Trump has a strong family. With luck, one of his sons will succeed him. Everyone has their eyes on Baron. They think he might be Gaius Octavius.*]
But in between these characters is the doge. A merchant rich enough to demonstrate ambition, but not unlimited ambition that would see him all the way into the ruling class, unless he is selected by lottery for this role. Elon Musk, in his humorous ways, has hinted that he likes the idea of this government form, like Venice, a compromise between republicanism and monarchy. And most people don’t get the joke. But they will see it in retrospect, even if we only end up with a plain old dictator. The truth will come out and the wolves and sheep will be separated.
Republics are ideal for small nations. [*Nuts, small or large, makes no difference. What makes a difference is the points listed in this post*]
A Great Man of History who seizes power and Saves Us From Ourselves will not relegate himself to being a term-limited President of a Republic.
Monarchy is the natural way out of wickedness because that’s what the man who picks up the crown will make of himself.
In a republic, what is the property requirement? Substantial acreage? A house on 5,000 square feet? Just curious?
I don’t care. Enough that the vast majority of voters are not going to vote for theft.
Does such a vague line doom Republics?
‘Upstanding gentlemen of 10,000 acres of land shall have the right to vote’
‘The upstanding gentlemen with only 9,999 acre of land is clearly deserving of the vote too’
‘9,998’
[Sometime later]
‘What about the upstanding gentlemen with only virtue’
[later]
‘What about the gentlemen?’
‘Men?
[…]
‘Women’
All republics expanded voting rights. At the end, elections were simply an advanced auction of goods to be stolen by the government.
Why are you so confident that the vast majority of voters are not going to vote for theft? History suggests the opposite.
The conditions for a Republic are listed in the post to which you respond. Obviously today it is impossible to meet those requirements, so the time of Kings has returned.
A little while back here, I argued that Pam Bondi was incompetent, damaging, and had to go. Admittedly this was based mostly on deductions and speculation. Watching her shit, female brained performance in the committee hearing is hard damning evidence. I have no idea how she could’ve gotten the Attorney General position via Trump.
I speculate it wasn’t via Trump. Trump has been in clear physical decline since the beginning of the second administration. Hegseth was clearly an all Trump decision and you can tell by how he talked about him prior and during the administration. It’s a pick that was likely made informally during the 2020-2024 years when Trump was still high energy. Well before the rush of political jockeying to sort out other cabinet positions post election. Notice Hegseth was the only pick that was really considered “controversial” and required direct executive pressure to get confirmation.
The other picks were not Kingly appointments, but rather decided by an oligarchic regency surrounding Trump, hence you see a smattering of political factions trying to go in two different directions. Some mostly helpful and aligned like Project 2025, others not so helpful like the Thermidor. Had Trump been in his 2023 post arrest prime and appointing his cabinet like a ruling King, likely all other cabinet picks would’ve been equally “controversial”.
The King we’d hope to take the throne no longer exists. It’s an illusion held together by a regency behind the curtains that only remain relatively cohesive due to a charismatic legacy. The best we can likely hope from Trump 2, is that it will set the stage for a kingmaker to thrust someone hopefully virtuous in command.
“Hegseth was the only pick that was really considered “controversial” and required direct executive pressure to get confirmation.“
His speech about Harvard was like it came from this blog, not in letters but in spirit , clearly he is or the circle around him are very aware what time it is .
@ Jim
What about X China , DPRK ?
I alway wonder what Kim has to do to make The North functional, opening would be suicidal like how Gorbachev glasnost policy was. So he keep it steady.
Thailand , is another true monarchy that are well run.
Thailand has an absentee king who lives in Germany, it’s unclear whether he is just incredibly irresponsible or was forced into exile.
What are you talking about ?
Thai king had a history of degeneracy, I remember a photo of him when his father died and has to return , but since then he was remarkably disciplined and did his duties. Last November he was in china
Relative to what Thailand is known for, he’s quite virtuous. More masculine looking than average Thai male. Thailand views on gender is pretty fucked.
There’s a preference cascade going in Britain. Lots of people are coming out against the genocide and politics that enabled it. Things may get interesting, as the state will want to squash this, but the regime in the US would not like that.
I wonder why it took so long. No country (well maybe certain former colonies like Rhodesia) has really seen as catastrophic a decline in everything + an increasingly dystopian government as Britain. Was the purple haired art hoe that great a mascot?
I think the fact that the Trump faction has taken a lot of power signalled to the elites in Britain that dissent may have a friend just over the pond. I keep seeing higher status people voicing concerns, such as Jim Ratcliffe. I suspect that this is going to spill out and more and more elites and normies will form a faction.
On this topic, the new and emerging party to the right of Farage and Reform is called Restore.
I take high odds this is a direct reference to The Restoration; active politics is starting to digest NRx memes and historical narratives.
Based.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZTH6j_lK_o
We are seeing the uniparty being voted out in America, though the senate is still solidly uniparty. In Britain, if an election were held today, the uniparty is going to lose, though Reform is starting to look suspiciously uniparty. In Australia, going to have a tight race.
Now that Reform in Britain has Restore to its right, it is going to have to keep its promise to not be the uniparty, or face the same electoral consequences that the rest of the uniparty now faces in Britain.
The independent businessman founding Restore named his dog after Oliver Cromwell, which is a pretty good hint as to which restoration he has in mind.
Confirmed.
He apparently did an interview for Sargon’s new magazine, wherein he named Cromwell as his “favorite figure from British history”.
(Timestamp 7:43)
https://www.youtube.com/live/QF097W3hFyU?si=vJb9vPAZIx7dBTr-
I hate link-dumping myself, but in this case I feel it necessary to paint a larger picture:
Rubio’s speech at the Munich Security Conference received a standing ovation from the gathered European diplomats and military officials, and particularly received applause at two points when Rubio signaled both loyalty to and common ancestry with Europe:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlL3pwlO2rE
Rupert Lowe’s announcement comes after weeks of the State Department going after the British government:
https://x.com/UnderSecPD/status/2020885594180563324
The United States has made it clear they will protect the British Right:
https://x.com/SpeechUnion/status/2020147694610661483
Many in the Democratic party have realized that its actual policies are far too unpopular to work, so they have decided to pull back to something more palatable. It is more ground than they have given up in a very long time:
https://x.com/BasedTorba/status/2023036921342267530
Although perhaps they are just hiding their real views and will take radical measures to secure power once they’re in, taking after the recent success with that strategy in Virginia.
Meanwhile the radical left has decided to double down and accelerate towards global race communism. AOC also admits that we are “starting to see the ascent of The Right”:
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2023118510776291605
Something happened and everyone is reacting to it. Judging from the reaction to Rubio in Europe, I’d expect it to spread beyond just Britain.
The Democrats and the left aren’t pulling back on anything they’ve just decided to lie about it like they did in Virginia. Except in fact all the time the Democrats are getting crazier and more leftists and more radical. They just know what swing voters are really fucking stupid so they know they need to lie.
Rubio got applauded because he was playing good cop, Vance was bad cop.
She calls for “class based internationalism” — more plainly described as “you will own nothing and be happy”. In California, they are not only going after the entrepreneurial capitalists as oligarchs, they are going after the independent truckers, the independent gas station owners, owner builders, and all that.
That is the “class based” part of it. The “Internationalist” part of it is color revolutions, global censorship, cancelled elections, and war in the Ukraine.
Just understanding what the Restoration was and why it was necessary is a thought crime, and its clear the people directing and pushing all these political and diplomatic changes know and understand the Restoration. Incredible news.
Monarchy will be better off with what I’m going to call a theory of human value. In the classic monarchical structure, you have the king, the nobility and the commoners, in effect an alliance of king and commoners against the nobility. The king wants to dominate the nobles because they’re a viable threat and the nobles want to keep the king in check because who wants to be dominated.
Under globohomo, there aren’t any nobles. No powerful men exercise independent military authority. So what could externally threaten a globohomo bureaucracy? A republic, which is to say, a cohesive group of commoners with the ability to sufficiently cooperate. The Broederbond ran South Africa. The Nazi Party *took over* the German state. The Nazis were a real political party. Real political parties are not allowed under globohomo. Globohomo expends a lot of effort ensuring that you personally are gay, unhealthy and disloyal. The bureaucracy is safe as long as no viable alternative power structure can form.
Now suppose we get a king. The populace is still gay, unhealthy and disloyal but it’s better managed. You can run a business without the capricious tyranny of the bureaucracy interfering. Is this the best we can hope for?
I don’t think so. Most of the civilized world consisted of a king lording over listless fellahin. Europe, on the other hand, had a robust class of free men willing to independently strive for greatness. Pioneers and conquerors. I think this free and warlike class (not the same thing as a generic economic middle class) was an essential component in Western, in rising above the global favela.
All this to say, a modern king wielding the vast powers of a modern state should strive to cultivate this yeoman class, rather than to crush it. We don’t want just want a competent royal hand replacing the incompetent bureaucratic hand. We want a light royal hand that understands (some of) the people need a degree of independence to flourish. This is the path to greatness.
As I said, “Throne, Altar, and Freehold”
See also The anti-anti reactionary FAQ Part 3, Freedom and Monarchy.
>The voters, the enfranchised, own property. Without this, elections degenerate into advance auctions of stolen goods.
Wrong as always. Your own government claims the right to rob anyone they want to rob. They call it taxation. Your own government also claims the right to “regulate” property however they want. Look at your insane tariffs for instance.
So voting is just a side show. The problem is that your system has no respect for property rights and takes for granted that the government can “legally” rob people. Once you allow that, then “advance auctions of stolen goods” is just one logical consequence.
But by dishonestly prentending that voting is the problem you hide that you are the actual problem. And just in case, I’m not making any excuses for “democracy”. The idea that political decisions can be made by counting votes is absurd.
Carry on.
Bored now. You switch as convenient from anarcho capitalism to minarchism and back again to get whatever conclusion you want. Pretty much like a leftist transitioning someone else’s son on the basis of individual rights and absolute bodily autonomy.
And whatever your vague and pompous principles actually mean, and you refuse to be pinned down on that, they are always applied to conclude Republicans, legacy Amerikaners, and actually existent capitalists are the bad guys.
The original libertarians claimed that unlike the left, they were pro freedom on taxes and guns, and unlike the right, pro freedom on sexuality, abortion, and bodily autonomy. And then the left went covid, jab, “me too” and bake the cake, and libertarians could find no plausible excuse for opposing Republicans, no plausible excuse for a third position that gives qualified and partial support leftism, and condemns Republicans and Amerikaner males as uncouth, ignorant, and backward.
Strangely, this total lack of any plausible excuse completely failed to restrain them from supporting leftism and condemning Republicans and white Amerikaner males as uncouth, ignorant, and backward.
https://x.com/captive_dreamer/status/2022085229520073093
BTW as far as people endorsing Fishback he’s 100% a meme candidate and Democrat plant. The Democrats know they cant get back into Florida in a frontal assault so they want to put in a D&C ringer.
Hes right about credentials of course but he doesn’t believe a word of it.
Waiting to see how the Fishback platform develops and refines.
White Christian Men
https://x.com/tarapalmeri/status/2020878558604710230
Death
x.com/notsourced/status/2021659607329099948
x.com/j_fishback/status/2021279159897518358
x.com/850_Dominick/status/2021422603483873620
Teachers Unions, DEI, Imports, Apprentice
x.com/j_fishback/status/2021575416121643198
x.com/joanfromdc/status/2021020507940978799
Women
x.com/Fishback2026/status/2021805275250819518
In this short campaign stump moment, he didn’t yet say Women should aspire to be great moms, wives, helpers, homemakers, homebiz, etc and first before anything else like outside “careers” that do nothing but End the White Christian-type Civ… but, he didn’t exclude that possibile statement either.
All candidates have to manage Overton, what can/not be said, yet.
Does he have a longform on this topic?
Someone here said they were in FL, so why not go ask him that question and report back?
Yes… Self-assessing roles to be more reflective, resume embellishment to get ahead… everyone does this. So willing to let that slide, unless intent to ripoff clients. I admit tldr re those docs. But it’s public, so if there’s anything actually fatal there, then someone will make big waves over it to keep him from getting elected.
Trump still refuses to declassify Epstein, cancel the DeepState FBI/CIA/DOJ/BATF/Harvard/Judges, Deport the Jewfluence, apologize for his own fuckups, etc.
So who’s perfect?
And who’s better?
You’re not going to move Overton say “Rightward”, without getting more Right-sounding voices in play thus moving around and towards there, opening the window for the next-more Right voice to come from.
Single time-unit instances of magical Reaction in history are zero, except in cases of some Hard Event causing actual Revolution.
Even the Left’s Colour Revolution in the USA has taken at least 35-175 years to reach today’s point of them having Globalist modified Trannies blowing away innocent gun-grabbed Canucks and being declared innocent GunPerson’s for doing it.
If you can’t see Fishback is a Democrat ringer in fucking Florida you lack discernment. Florida is not a state to be running on the I’m a Catholic (almost all Catholics in Florida are nonpracticing or become Evangelical Protestants) who hates jews and th0ts schtick. Onlyfans should be banned sure but it won’t be effective at a state level. The guy is just trying to win the nomination and then mobilize as many Democrats and nonvoters to vote against him as possible.
The ages of Democracy have really fucked things up.
The World needs to return to Kings.
Things actually worked quite good back then, read History.
Democracy was not a feature, it was a bug, invented by gangs of wannabe, lesser, and failed usurpers, using cacophany psyop, to weasel in their distributed cabal, via the pliable ignorant masses, to take over their Nations forever.
Most recent stage of that has been their coordinated transformation into Globalists (formal: WEF/UN/IMF/BIS/WHO/etc), which have been intentionally unleashing Chaos, Destruction, War, Importing Incompatibles, Economic Ruin, etc… in order to now take over the World forever.
Democracy needs to be thrown out.
Heads of Democracy and Globalism need to Roll.
Create and Restore the concept of Kings / Monarchs / Absolutes.
Try all manner of old and new variations… Hereditary, Designated, Elected, and/or under Recall of the People… the Future of Humanity, not Oppression and Rape.
Democracy is where Republics go to die.
Democracy is an illusion maintained by oligarchs to dodge any actual accountability…
Hey Alf you leaving Holland? The unrealized gains tax is absolutely an intolerable policy even temporarily… Holland needs to be utterly broken and be turned into a meth town of a country for doing that so it serves as an example.
I know a guy planning exactly that for very similar reasons. Not like it hasn’t crossed my mind. But it’s a very big change, especially with young kids and all. Plus, inasmuch as the world is daily ending on the internet, I look at my irl and so far, I really can’t complain that much.
Take a look at the Youtube channel “Uncut Russia”. Eight years ago he moved to Russia for purely economic reasons. He reports very nice living conditions. However he reports the freedom of speech situation as comparable to his native Britain, which is not a ringing endorsement.
He, however, has, in addition to his Russian job, a business that he created to be able to move internationally. He tried various countries, wound up i n Russia, because the Russian local job was better, and his business was not bringing in a whole lot of money.
Since he moved, conditions in the West, and in particular his native Britain, have become markedly worse.
But Russia imprisons a lot less people for wrongspeech than Britain does? What can’t you say in Russia other than pro gay stuff, insulting Putin, or trying to stir up intercine ethnic tensions in Russia?
What do you think of restoring the rest of the feudal system as well, Jim? Barons, Lords, and Knights and all the rest of them? Despite the vestigial form they have in the modern UK, they are quite popular, even amongst the liberal elite.
You can’t really just restore the feudal hierarchy as Spandrell pointed out the feudal hierarchy was sort of the hierarchy of the conquering armies that overran the Western Roman Empire (it was a bit different in Japan but there were nominally only two feudal ranks regular Samurai and Daimyo).
To restore the feudal hiearchy, means restoring direct military rule.
AOC, the next post-Hillary Globo-Communist Witch, tries to erase Independent Republics
https://x.com/Acyn/status/2022363585452851495
She wants to revive USAID. Recall Mike Benz telling us what USAID was up to.
Her program is a program of Globohomo Empire world conquest that will inevitably lead to nuclear war. Russia and China are just not going to stand still for it.
Preference cascade among American Jewry?
Haven’t listened to Mark Levin in a very long time. Recently started listening to SiriusXM Patriot radio. Mark Levin is a psychotic neocon Jew. Not news by any means, but it’s surprising how he’s now a psychotic Jew speaking in terms that the left labels White Supremacist. He sounds like he hates the American left far more than Israel’s enemy’s by a wide margin.
The American left represents far greater a threat to jews abroad and in Israel than any other group, it makes sense they would go on the attack. It’s surprising how long it took them to realize the danger. What are you seeing that signals white identity? I still see most diaspora jews as pro-jew and pro-civnat; less obnoxiously hateful than the left but not signalling as an ally to Amerikaaners (whites) explicitly. Often supporting LEGAL immigrants, white atomization policy, etc. Has this changed?
Mark Levin is very self identifying as a Jew, not saying he or other Jews view themselves as white. To paraphrase his recent thoughts:
“The left/democrats/islamists/fascists/communists/progressives are all the same type of evil. There is no ‘replacement theory’, it’s replacement fact that the third world is being used to replace and destroy our people, culture, history, and government”
‘ICE did nothing wrong, those idiots deserved to be shot”
I looked up his views on replacement theory in the past. ~4 to 5 years ago it was more of a suspicion he voiced that the left wanted vote banks. 10 years ago it seems he was still pro immigration. His shift on this has been remarkable considering his tribal affiliation and age which makes me think it’s not just him.
Yes that is new. These types for the longest time were pro flood the country, pro anything that disempowered the Amerikaaner while keeping “GDP” type fake numbers up.
Another Jew Neocon is breaking right.
Florida Rep. Randy Fine:
“If they force us to choose, the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one.”
“what is disgusting is a major NYC Muslim leader saying we must give up our dogs because “NYC is coming to Islam” We will not be shamed into being conquered like the Europeans. I choose my dog.”
A Jew is now being called an islamophobe by Fox News. He has also come out against immigration as an attempt to redefine what is an American. He’s still a bomb bomb bomb Iran type, but I think we’re seeing Thermidor (at least the Jewish faction) break right on domestic issues.
I’m not sure this is new. Weren’t neocon jews always like this? It was FBI and the more buggy deepstate types that wanted Islam in the US, but in public broadcast channels you were allowed to be mostly unfriendly. It was outside of the Overton Window in Europe but I feel as if I’ve always heard hawkish rhetoric about this topic in the US. Intensity has picked up, sure, but that’s true across the board. Not seeing a realignment here.
Pretty sure that though Jews were always hostile to Muslims abroad, they were all in favor of unlimited Muslim migration to the west, and if any of them disagreed they kept their heads down and their mouths shut.
Over the past six months to a year, I have been seeing the line that Muslims in Amerca are a really bad thing, therefore we should go to war for Israel in the middle east while continuing to import the middle east to the US, but this is first time I have heard a Jewish namefag say, “deport”
The line I was hearing until now is “Muslims in America are really bad, therefore,
you cattlewe should blow stuff up in the middle east, because Israel isyourour greatest ally.”Lol. The Ashkenazim hate the Europeans. The Mizrahim hate the Arabs. The English hate the French. The Koreans hate the Japanese.
There is no way a few little skirmishes in the Mideast can overcome millennia of fear, hate, and resentment from being forced to live among us without ruling us. The Ashkenazim may pick dogs over Muslims, but they’ll still pick Muslims over Whites. Don’t let this little tactical juke fool you. You are Amalek.
@PC
I went back to some of my first comments on this blog. Some were early interactions with you about the Ukraine war. Boy did we underestimate just how much material the GAE was willing to donate to Russian target practice. We also massively misunderstood just how many Ukrainians GAE was willing to sacrifice.
It looks like the war ends with the last Ukrainian. However, the last Ukrainian is now in sight.
It is difficult to know the number of human casualties on both sides, but when self propelled artillery get destroyed, it is sufficiently obvious and important that we do have good data. And the number of self propelled artillery losses is likely to be indicative of the number of human losses, since in war of attrition the main role of humans is sandbags to protect artillery from artillery and drones
For a long time, losses of self propelled artillery were roughly comparable on both sides, which meant that Russia, having more men and more artillery, was massively winning the war of attrition. As war of attrition approaches its end, the side with ever fewer men and ever less artillery suffers greater and greater losses, while the winning side has fewer and fewer losses.
Over time, Russian losses of self propelled artillery became less and less, and Ukrianian losses greater and greater, and it is now overwhelmingly one sided. So this would indicate that the end is near.
Trump would like to make a realistic peace in the Ukraine. But any realistic peace is going to result in Zelensky and most of the Ukrainian elite going into exile in Europe, so Trump cannot make peace as long as Europe is willing to go on giving Zelensky large amounts of money. So the last Ukrianian it is.
I hope that this will stiffen nation’s spines against European domination and color revolution.
People tend to focus on territory gained and lost, because this is easy to know, but in war of attrition, territory gained and lost does not count. The Germans lost World War I in France, and lost World War II in Russia. If the Russians advance, this does not mean that they wanted to advance for the sake of advancing. It means Zelensky stopped sending them targets, and they advanced to find some new targets, and to needle Zelensky to send some more targets to them.
The front varies from 20x more Russian arty strikes to 50x. Ukrain only enjoys one zone on the front where they enjoy the relatively low Russian advantage of 20 to 1. Everywhere else is closer to 50 to 1. Implies their artillery systems have run out so they’re concentrated. Russian shell production is now so high they are refilling their strategic reserve which implies a lack of targets. Their barrel production/artillery systems production is also very large now.
Meanwhile I don’t hear anything anymore about expanded Western shell/artillery production. Likely cause it failed.
Russian advances are clearly not motivated by territorial acquisition. Rather, they are looking for more targets so that they can apply their artillery advantage to attriting Ukrainian capabilities.
So, when Ukrainians, as now, go on the offensive, the Russians halt their advances on that part of the front, because now targets are coming to them.
Why is Russia prosecuting the war this way? Is it really the only option? I thought they started off wanting to go easy on the Ukrainian population. Could they not have just siezed/ flattened Kiev, blown up infrastructure resources, and finished it sooner?
The Russians tried that, failed. After some bloody and expensive attempts to force a quick conclusion by storm and war of maneuver, just settled back into Russia’s traditional war of attrition.
From their point of view, worked great, by exhausting Western logistic capabilities.
When it became obvious that the Ukraine had already lost the war of attrition, the Ukraine attempted The Greatest Ukrainian Counter Offensive, intended at ending the war in the Ukraine’s favor by storm and maneuver. This failed, and they lost an army and most of the west’s logistic reserves in the process.
Thereafter they continued to lose the war of attition, only faster, so they tried Kursk, to grab the city of Kursk and the nuclear reactor as a bargaining chip. This failed also. The Ukrainians temporarily and at enormous cost gained some cow pastures, hayfields, cattle barns, and a couple of very tiny villages. Which was hailed as a mighty victory, but was in fact a catastrophic defeat.
And in the past couple of weeks, have been having another go at offensive warfare, starting with Pokrovsk, but all their offenses run out of puff very quickly. From the point of view of keeping the flow of money going for as long as possible, it is working, because the more targets Zelensky feeds the Russians, the less the Russians go forth looking for more targets, thus the shills can continue spinning the narrative the Ukraine is winning, winning, and Putin is falling, falling, falling.
As a result of this Ukrainian counter offensive, the Russian rate of advance has slowed down to fifteen square kilometers a day. The counter offensive will stop once the Ukraine uses up most of the remaining cannon fodder and logistics, where upon the Russians will start advancing considerably less slowly.
In the Middle East, we have seen storm and maneuver succeed repeatedly, even though everyone has drones these days, but in the Ukraine, both sides have failed catastrophically every time they attempted war of strategic maneuver.
Why the difference? I observe that every time war of strategic maneuver was brutally shut down, it was the result of local military initiative, quite low ranking military commanders reacting flexibly to the immediate and urgent events, while Arab militaries do not allow any local flexibility or initiative out of fear of coup. I conjecture that what happened in the middle east was that by the time the center realised what had happened and issued appropriate orders to deal with it, the situation had already changed further, rendering the orders impossible and irrelevant.
War of tactical maneuver still works in the Ukraine often enough, but you only grab a few square kilometers each time, and then it is back to attrition. Sometimes, however, you grab a strategically crucial square kilometers, as when White grabbed the Terrikon.
Tactical suprise works against the Ukrainian military, but strategic suprise fails catastrophically. Tactical suprise against the Russian military does not entirely or uniformly fail, often somewhat successful, but it is apt to costly and unproductive. Strategic surprise never gets off the ground. I don’t interpret the Kursk offensive as getting off the ground, in that it “succeeded” in grabbing an indefensible worthless salient where the Ukrainians were fighting at a considerable disadvantage. Looks to me that the Russians chose to allow them this much “success”.
A this female shit testing is giving Humungus high blood pressure. Nevertheless, Humungus will remain strong and steadfast.
No person shall be a citizen of the United States unless he is a non-Hispanic white of the European race [*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
[*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
Why is Hitler disliked or disavowed here?
[*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
Because he was a lefty and a socialist. This is a reactionary blog, most of the commenters are reactionaries and or neoreactionaries, and we are way to the right of Hitler.
Hitler was 1930s leftist — which means he was way to the right of 2025 leftism, just as 2008 Obama was also way to the right of 2025 leftism, but to us the difference does not matter much.
You are yet another (((Soros))) shill. It is always (((Soros))) shills. American neoNazis are in the pocket of (((Soros))) and were in the pocket of USAID, and Ukrainian Nazis were in the pocket of (((Blinken))) and (((Nuland))), and are now in the pocket of (((Zelensky))).
Hitler was essentially a heretic Marxist (if the modern ideology of the left is gay race communism you might be able to call Nazism based race communism, but given the sexual proclivities of so many early nazis also still somehow gay) and he started a war that he just couldn’t win (oil situation) that greatly weakened white people.
Its not that everything he did was stupid Hitler absolutely had many strokes of genius, doing international trade on the Barter system was somewhat brilliant given Germany’s situation of having no food (well a food deficit), no oil, and no gold but much of the Nazi socialist economics (even if you proceed with the understanding that a lot of it was preparation for total war) was self destructive in particular the Nazi agriculture policy was an epic disaster on part with Soviet collectivization.