Real men eat red meat

The left wants you to be fat, ugly, and sick. Which is why all the official advice on diet and dieting is designed to make you fat and emasculated.

This is a continuation of my articles on keeping a healthy weight.

The left wants you fat, ugly, and sick, because they are spiteful and ugly, so they want everyone and everything ugly. Compare the Trump cabinet with the weird looking Biden cabinet. Compare the people who are showing up for Democrat protests with normal people. OK, some of them look OK, but most of them look off. The leftist Rachel Zeigler looks hot, but she has an extraordinarily obnoxious personality. Disney should never have allowed her loose without a script and a handler. Every time she opened her mouth, she caused people to boycott her movies. You would not want to bang her without a ball gag. The reason she hates everyone is that everyone hates her.

Recapping briefly the diet advice given repeatedly in the past posts: Keto works great, but is socially unsustainable unless you are a hermit, or unless husband and wife go on it together. Paleo works great, and is a lot easier, but the biggest thing is no snacking. East only within a six to eight hour window, with sixteen or eighteen hour fasts between eating windows. Drink lots of zero calorie fluids, get plenty of electrolytes (salted coffee). Stay off zero calorie artificially sweetened drinks — they will not only make you sick, but by causing insulin resistance mess up your hormones and make you fat. Every now and then, do a forty hour or sixty hour fast, but not very often.

But this post is about meat. Red meat.

I love eggs, chicken, and pork, but it contains too much omega six polyunsaturated fats. So though I eat quite a lot of eggs and stuff, I try to get the great majority of my protein from red meat. Eggs have may have too much omega six unsaturated fats, but they are good source of healthy fats, such as cholesterol, from which your body makes testosterone, which is why the medical profession hates cholesterol so much.

When you break your fast, chances are there are a lot of snacks in your fridge. If you are on the paleo diet, these are low carb, high saturated fat foods, like cheese and boiled eggs. But when you are breaking your fast, your body wants protein, and you are likely to keep on eating until you have eaten about one gram of protein per kilogram of body weight, which is roughly four grams of meat per kilogram of body weight, at least you are likely to if you have substantial Aryan ancestry — Asians and people of Mediterranean origin seem to get by fine on substantially less protein, but people with substantially Aryan ancestry are apt to go on eating till they get sufficient protein.

So, to reduce the risk of pigging out when breaking your fast, start off with a good solid slab of meat. Preferably red meat.

And get the bulk of your calories from saturated fat. I make my own dewatered butter. and fry mushrooms, eggs, and suchlike in it. Lots of butters, so that everything is thoroughly sloshed with butter. I eat a lot of cheese, and did I mention I anoint everything, particular eggs, with lots and lots of butter. Well, I will mention it again. Also, I eat my fruit with lots of home made high fat unsweetened yoghurt, made from cream and milk.

When I tried the calories in calories out diets, I lost five to fifteen pounds, my metabolism slowed, I would eat less and less and get fat again, and fatter. On this diet dropped almost a hundred pounds. I reached a healthy weight, and have remained at a healthy weight for many years.

149 comments Real men eat red meat

The Cominator says:

What do you recommend if you really really really don’t like the taste of red meat?

Neurotoxin says:

Therapy and medications.

Seriously, you don’t like the taste of red meat? Try a flank steak, cooked medium to medium rare. It doesn’t really need any seasoning other than salt. And not much of that.

Oskar says:

Even better, if you have access to grass fed beef, try it uncooked, cut thinly against the grain.

Fidelis says:

Low fat cuts of chicken and pork, with lots of saturated fat added back.

Fry in clarified butter, lots of it, and particularly vegetables, as they help deliver it to you off your plate. Make sauces with so much butter the sauce breaks. Add heavy cream to everything. A good snack is refridgerated sliced chicken breast with cream cheese and fresh chives, vinegar based hot sauce to taste.

Get one of those pork half loins they sell at all the big grocers in Florida, slow cook it until it falls apart when you look at it with a fork in your hand. Use the juices to make a sauce, I make a brown gravy with flour and lots of butter if I expect to feed others, but if its just me I use beef gelatin and egg yolks to thicken, cook yolks until viscous over top of boiling water then mix in, maybe add some heavy cream.

Unless you’re doing a lot of high intensity exercise, usually better to have low starch high fat. If you’re doing high fat, saturated fat is necessary. I like coconut oil and cream, but only on occasion. Dairy fats are cheap, plentiful, digest very well for most people, even lactose intolerant do okay.

The Cominator says:

I can do chicken and certainly milk (would be interested for Jim’s recommenation of skim vs whole milk or 2 %etc) pork is red meat and I don’t like it.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

No one should go anywhere near skim milk. Either drink whole milk or don’t drink milk at all.

Even whole milk is far too low in fat compared to heavy cream or even half-and-half cream, but you can’t really “drink” those, only make sauces and bases (or yogurt) with them.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

Can confirm that half and half is totally drinkable.

Varna says:

If someone wants to puke from fish, or asparagus, or what have you, there is no need to force oneself to consume fish or asparagus. The same goes for “red meat”. All things being equal it can be very good for you, but when it makes you puke it is obviously only good as preparation for filming some German porn.

If you mimic what’s good about red meat from a combination of different sources – super.
Continental Europe is for example more of pork country, and sausage/ham/schnitzel country. Russians traditionally eat dumplings and salami and sausages. In theory, a valid vegetarian diet can also be constructed, but one needs to actually keep to its elements.

Fat dairy products vs skimmed dairy. If one is doing a week or fortnight cleanse of the pancreas then skimmed dairy is your friend. The rest of the time fat dairy is your friend. Especially if you’re fat adapted.

What is “fat adapted metabolism”. The body gets its energy either from a) sugar and carbs or b) from fat. Sugar and carbs give easier, faster energy, and the body instantly “forgets” how to turn fat into energy, preferring the path of least resistance.

Sugar and carb energy has two main negatives, tooth rot aside: 1) it produces insulin spikes and then crashes, which gradually screws over the endocrine system, and 2) it hits the liver like alcohol, producing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

To get the body off this energy, it needs to re-learn how to turn fat into energy, which generally takes about three days of no sugar and carbs. The body protests, it pretends that it’s the end of the world, OMG I’m starving, then suddenly remembers its original power level and starts turning fat into energy again. No insulin spikes, no fatty liver, no diabetes type 2 etc, back to normal functioning.

However. Fat eaten gets turned to energy if the metabolism is fat-adapted. If it’s still sugar/carb-adapted instead, then the fat, instead of being turned into energy, gets turned into artery-clogger.

In other words, if it’s a low sugar, low carb, high fat diet, it’s healthy. If it’s a high sugar, high carb, high fat diet, it can be pretty lethal. In a sense dietician Shlomo isn’t lying per se when saying “if you eat lots of eggs and bacon it’s bad for you”, what he isn’t saying is “but only if it regularly interacts with everything else I recommend”.

Modest amounts of sugar and carbs, when ingested, are best mixed with fat/protein/fiber. A spoon of jam by itself is an insulin spike, if placed on toast is a sugar-carb combo, but if placed into real yoghurt, it gets “slowed down” in digestion and does not produce such a huge sugar spike.
The more fat, protein, and fiber in a sandwich, the less of a sugar spike the bread produces. It still adds to the pressure on the liver, but at least has less immediate impact on blood sugar.

A slice of bread by itself is a carb-bomb, but if it’s drowning in butter and cheese and tuna – it is smothered by fat and protein and again the insulin spike diminishes. Long-term effect on the liver still kind of like you just had a shot of tequila, but the immediate endocrine disruption is lessened.

Animal protein and to a lesser extent plant protein builds the body. Fat gives “clean energy” when not mixed with regular high doses of sugar and carbs. If mixed, turns into dirty sludgy energy. Fiber is important for gut health and making good German porn. Modest amounts of complex carbs (pasta, potato, veggies) is mostly fine. Simple carbs (bread, bakery stuff, snacks) should be a special treat once in a blue testicle.

Again, if one is doing a pancreas or other inner filter cleanse, then small portions of bland pasta with some olive oil is what the doctor ordered. But for like a week or two at most. As a regular part of one’s diet, it should be a) not a daily occurrence, and b) smothered in fat, protein, and fiber, to muffle the insulin spike.

Sugars and carbs should be a) taken in modest amounts, and b) smothered in fat/protein/fiber.
Read meat, when cooked well and from a good source, is amazing. But it’s OK to not stuff it down one’s throat unless very well paid by Japanese porn producers. Other foods do exist, just maybe making life a bit more complicated.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

Continental Europe is for example more of pork country, and sausage/ham/schnitzel country. Russians traditionally eat dumplings and salami and sausages.

These are all examples of red meat, unless you mean chicken sausages.

Constructing a vegan diet that tries to mimic the nutritional profile of pork, beef or other red meat sounds like an exercise in futility, and probably a category error since vegans don’t care about nutrition anyway. It is perhaps more feasible for the “lacto-ovo vegetarian” who eats fish, eggs and dairy but just not flesh, although I’ve never understood that to even be a real diet as opposed to an extra-cheap and horribly outdated form of prog virtue signaling. Maybe the Hindoos do something like that but who cares.

You can get reasonably close to the macros of ruminant meat with poultry if you are very choosy about which parts to eat, but the aminos will still be wrong, and it will probably lower testosterone relative to the genuine article.

Jim says:

The important thing is a metabolism adapted to deriving energy from fat — and to train one’s metabolism to derive energy from fat, you have to regularly stress it with long periods of very low, or zero, carbs.

If your metabolism has forgotten how to run on nothing by fat and protein, it is out of shape.

A strictly keto diet is socially difficult, also boring. But your diet should be paleo enough that some of the time you are in keto.

Mossadnik says:

You can ask one of the whore to let you practice cunnilinngus – that way your mind will learn to associate the texture of beef with the aroma of fish. Problem: solved.

Mossadnik says:

For a slightly more serious answer than the previous shitpost, do you dig lemon? If you do, just drench the red meat in lemon until you can only taste the latter, and there ya have it.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

In my experience, the relatively few guys who claim to not actually like red meat are those who either aren’t clear on what red meat actually is, or have had a string of bad experiences involving red meat that is too lean, overcooked, and/or simply prepared in a way that is inappropriate for the cut.

To the first possibility, and contra what Jim seemed to imply in the original post, pork is red meat. Yes, the pork producers ran a very silly “the other white meat” marketing campaign 50+ years ago, back when America was hitting Peak Retard over red meat and saturated fat. It is true that over those 50+ years, hogs have been bred to be leaner, far too lean in fact, so that what’s labelled as a “pork chop” is a lot like a boneless skinless chicken breast, macro-wise. But if it comes from a good hog, typically labeled as “Heritage Pork” by specialty producers, then a pork chop can be equal to a lamb chop or a mid-range beef steak, and even when restricted to modern ultra-lean hogs, bacon and sausages and spare ribs and back ribs are all delicious and are all very much “red meat”.

There is some (not very conclusive) evidence that pork fat can be more estrogenic and/or carcinogenic than beef or lamb fat over a long period of time. However, this needs to be taken in context; it is still far less estrogenic than grains, and far less carcinogenic than seed oils. So if you like bacon and BBQ ribs, then you like red meat. Work with that. Fry your eggs in bacon fat and your veggies in lard. Just don’t eat the “healthy” sides like cole slaw at BBQ joints unless you can verify that they aren’t full of sugar.

To the second point, some might develop an aversion to red meat out of bad experiences, similar to how kids think they hate vegetables because Mom can’t cook and tries to feed them awful things like boiled celery or those disgusting canned green beans and string beans. Overcooked steak is probably the most common ailment; inexperienced or incompetent cooks treat it like a chicken breast and try to cook all the juice and color out of it, but pathogens are only ever found on the surface of a steak, and while most people I know prefer the texture of at least medium-rare doneness, the fact is that no “internal temperature” whatsoever is required, you only need to sear the outside.

Improper cooking methods, or improper choice of cut, can also be a problem. A beef roast needs to be roasted and it needs to be roasted slowly (or at high pressure). Trying to speed up the process with higher temperatures will give you results that are dry, chewy and barely edible. Many types of steak aren’t really good for grilling, either; Fidelis suggested flank steak for some reason but I’d definitely put that in the “don’t grill” category. If your #1 priority is taste and you don’t care about macros, then try a Filet Mignon. If macros are important, go Ribeye or Porterhouse.

If you are trying to get into steak, then my advice for an inexperienced cook would be to not attempt this on your own immediately, and instead go to a good steakhouse (Longhorn is my favorite when I’m on the road, and I know they are in your state, but Outback and Texas Roadhouse are also fair choices) and get either a filet or a ribeye and make sure to request medium rare. Do not ask for well done, do not even ask for medium, that is what leads to people thinking they don’t like steak. Once you have at least tried the above, then you can make adjustments for doneness based on personal preference. And then once you know what you actually like, you can start to prepare it for yourself.

Or, if you simply can’t deal with steak, and there are maybe 1 in 100 men who can’t, then there are endless things you can do with burger patties. Almost everyone adds cheese and you can experiment with the different kinds of cheese, and other veggies/condiments. Though I’d suggest learning to cut down on the sugary ketchup and/or BBQ sauce, or substituting paleo/sugar-free versions.

There are a zillion gourmet burger and craft burger joints near every major population hub, and they are all pretentious and overpriced, but visiting them once in a while is a good way to experiment with different flavors and figure out what (for you) works well together and works well on a burger. One of the most important things with burgers, though, is again to make sure it is not too lean. “Lean” ground beef is 80% lean and that is “normal/OK” for burgers. “Medium” is about 70% lean and that is better. You may have had experience with burgers made from “extra lean” chuck, which can be up to 93-95% lean and is basically shoe leather. Again, this trend came out of the anti-fat disaster of the 1970s and unfortunately, too many moms picked up on it and inflicted it on their kids.

Another point about burgers is that they’re best when made from steer or heifer meat, not cow. This can be hard to find out when eating out (i.e. when not sourcing the meat yourself), but to the best of my knowledge, Five Guys uses such a source, and are pretty well known, or at least used to be well known, for having quality patties.

If you can find a combination of flavors that you love on burgers, then it won’t be too hard to eventually ditch the bun (and “bunless” is a mundane request these days, even at fast food joints in the ass end of nowhere), and without the bun it’s a keto meal, or paleo with sides.

If none of the above suits you, try lamb. It has similar macros to beef but a totally different flavor. Lamb loin chops and leg of lamb roast are both pretty inexpensive if you can source them locally. The former should be prepared similar to a steak, and the latter similar to roast beef. Again, try them at a restaurant if you’re inexperienced, and make sure to order medium rare if it’s going to be grilled.

And if you still can’t find anything you like – hell, if you’re not getting hungry just reading this – then you’re a freak and I don’t know what else to tell you.

Mossadnik says:

To the first possibility, and contra what Jim seemed to imply in the original post, pork is red meat. Yes, the pork producers ran a very silly “the other white meat” marketing campaign 50+ years ago, back when America was hitting Peak Retard over red meat and saturated fat.

Interestingly, Israel also uses “white meat” for pork (and exclusively for it; like it’s a euphemism), and most locals would be surprised to learn that it’s in fact red meat.

Anyway, Cominator claims to be a sperg and a supertaster with le extra sensitive taste buds on the tongue, so whatever non-trollish dietary advice anyone gives him should have that calculated into the formula.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

Cominator claims to be a sperg and a supertaster with le extra sensitive taste buds on the tongue

Could be, but not how I interpreted the claim. I know a tiny minority of people, including one girl, who don’t like chocolate, and while there is always “the problem of other minds”, I don’t think that they’re lying, nor are they extra-sensitive or anything like that. They just have an aversion to that particular food.

Sometimes the aversion is biological and there’s simply nothing you can do. With a sperg, a mutant, that’s definitely a possibility. But more often than not, food aversions are the result of some specific experience or set of experiences, especially when it comes to animal products which are the primary source of nutrition we were designed to eat.

I believe that excessive amounts of lean, burnt or nearly-burnt meat and other abnormally lean foods actually cause a kind of trauma, and I’ve seen people who’ve been brought up on that diet become literally sick after eating a very high fat meal. Almost similar to the infamous “keto flu”. But it is simply a negative adaptation, learned behavior that can be overcome and cured with careful culinary selection.

Neurotoxin says:

Many types of steak aren’t really good for grilling, either; Fidelis suggested flank steak for some reason but I’d definitely put that in the “don’t grill” category.

Wut? I did a couple of word searches in this thread. I’m the only one who has mentioned flank steak as of this writing and you’re the only one who has used any variation of the word “grill.”

You hallucinatin’, boy.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

Yes, I got the two of you confused for a brief moment. Rest assured that it was a simple error of short-term memory and not the result of eating unidentified mushrooms growing under the air conditioner out back.

As far as the grilling thing, it is what I naturally assumed based on using limited seasoning, since other cooking methods almost always use more ingredients. In any case, while an appreciation of the cheaper cuts and knowledge of how to cook them properly is a very good thing–I myself enjoy tongues, hearts and even the occasional flap steak (bottom sirloin) in something like a beef-and-broccoli stir fry–these are things I wouldn’t recommend to someone who is trying to work around a food aversion. Best to start at the top, in my opinion, and work one’s way down.

Neurotoxin says:

“If none of the above suits you, try lamb.”

I had lamb tongue at a restaurant once as an experiment. It was very tender and quite good.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

Lamb is a wonderful meat, though it can be hard to source in the US, and hard to prepare correctly aside from the few cuts that everyone is most familiar with (primarily loin chops, leg roast and rack).

If you want to get into Denver ribs, shoulder/arm chops, shanks and so on, you’ll have to learn a totally different set of recipes, seasonings and timings than what most people are familiar with for pork and beef. I had to get them wrong several times and end up with barely-edible dinners before I started to grok it more intuitively.

I’d describe lamb as being gamier and having a more complex flavor than beef, which might not be what Com is after; on the other hand, bison is normally described as being milder than beef in every respect. I find bison to be a little too lean and bland, personally, but in this instance it might be just the ticket.

Neurotoxin says:

“I’d describe lamb as being gamier and having a more complex flavor than beef, which might not be what Com is after…”

Agreed, not the best entry point.

Karl says:

Cominator, try different red meats. If you don’t like beef, try mutton, horse, deer, hare, etc. These are all red meat, but taste very differently. I know some people who dislike the taste of one or two of the meats, I have listed above, but like some other red meats.

clovis says:

Does salted coffee mean you’re putting butter in the coffee, or actual salt? How does that taste?

Jim says:

Butter and salt.

ayyylmao says:

I’m the whitest man alive and U.S. dairy upsets me enormously, and the more “condensed” it is the worst it is, butter being worst of all. It may be worthwhile to try swapping butter out with coconut oil (in most contexts) and seeing how you feel. This is a general comment although I’d like to hear Jim’s results in particular.

Varna says:

US cows are genetically defective.

> The difference between American cows and European cows has to do with amino acid 67 — in European cows, it’s a proline. Because of a genetic mutation in American cows, amino acid 67 is a histidine.

Thus it is not uncommon for an American with “dairy sensitivity” to have it vanish once he sets foot in Europe.

Cloudswrest says:

Are you referring to the A2 version of Beta Casein? The A2 version is the same as the human version, so is less immunologically stimulating.

There are several types of casein in milk. Beta-casein is the second most prevalent and exists in at least 13 different forms.

The two most common forms are:

A1 beta-casein. Milk from breeds of cows that originated in northern Europe is generally high in A1 beta-casein. These breeds include Holstein, Friesian, Ayrshire, and British Shorthorn.
A2 beta-casein. Milk that is high in A2 beta-casein is mainly found in breeds that originated in the Channel Islands and southern France. These include Guernsey, Jersey, Charolais, and Limousin cows (1Trusted Source, 2Trusted Source).
Regular milk contains both A1 and A2 beta-casein, but A2 milk contains only A2 beta-casein.

Some studies suggest that A1 beta-casein may be harmful and that A2 beta-casein is a safer choice.

Thus, there is some public and scientific debate over these two types of milk.

A2 milk is produced and marketed by the A2 Milk Company and contains no A1 beta-casein.

SUMMARY
A1 and A2 milk contain different types of beta-casein protein. Some studies indicate that A2 milk may be the healthier of the two.

Varna says:

This is also very important information yes. Additionally, most of today’s US cows, due to weird corporate market dynamics, are descendants of two bulls from the 1960s, with fancy names “Round Oak Rag Apple Elevation” and “Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief”.

Beside the way they may be raised, fed, and medicated; besides how the meat or dairy may be doctored; besides the amino acid mutation; beside all that, we have this additional factor, which is fairly new, just four decades.

There’s some mention of a third bull in the mix: “Penstate Ivanhoe Star”.

ayyylmao says:

I never investigated why, I just know that when I stopped drinking milk and eating cheese and minimized butter intake my inflammation collapsed and my weight sank like a stone. It could be due to the retinol content for all I know.

I also noticed that a higher-end lemonade like Calypso didn’t affect me nearly as much as a “basic” fruit juice. And anything with HFCS was much worse even than that.

I can have a scoop of Häagen-Dazs occasionally now but I know it isn’t the sugar itself that’s the worst part because the lemonade has as much or more and it doesn’t give me a negative feeling after.

Fake says:

When you say inflammation, does that include something like joint pain? I’ve found anything in the US with whey makes my joints susceptible to strains. I wonder if it has something to do with the A1 vs A2 cows in other comments.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

I’ve experienced similar effects after drinking american milk, and this was even after cooking it (for any GOMAD bros out there, baked milk with rosemary and garlic is great). My first though was excess calcium deposition in joints from lack of acidity, but aggravating factors that trigger an inflammatory response (arthritis) could also be a factor. Like others have experienced the fermented products anecdotally avoid most if not all of these problems.

Varna says:

Sometimes inflammation can be reduced lightning fast by taking a week off from all histamine-containing foods and histamine-activating fruits. Emptying the so-called “histamine bucket”. Super boring, but also super efficient if there’s joint pain or skin rashes or itchy scalps or random tissue swellings etc.

Not sustainable long-term, but a simple quick hack to stop whatever acute shit is flaring up, and then, once the situation is stabilized, calmly approach metabolic rewiring on a deeper level.

ayyylmao says:

Fake: “When you say inflammation, does that include something like joint pain? I’ve found anything in the US with whey makes my joints susceptible to strains. I wonder if it has something to do with the A1 vs A2 cows in other comments.”

No, I’ve never experienced any joint paint at any time in my life. Instead I really, really started paying attention to how I felt after eating various foods. Some foods are mostly neutral, like rice or potatoes (excluding sweet potatoes). Most (U.S.) foods are inflammatory or strongly inflammatory, including almost anything at a restaurant. And a few foods, like a good ribeye or N.Y. strip, are strongly disinflammatory. (Lesser cuts of beef are usually mildly disinflammatory.) Once you start paying attention to the sense of tension you feel after eating you’ll gain the ability to reasonably accurately gauge your inflammation at any given time. The most noticeable acute system in my experience is nose stuffiness: after eating pizza, even a “good” pizza from a “good” restaurant, my nose will almost always clam up like I have a mild or moderate cold. This is also true after Häagen-Dazs. Most interestingly I think that you can get addicted to having chronically high inflammation, and I think that most people in America are in fact addicted to having chronically high inflammation. If you do a 3-day fast and then eat a pizza it will probably shock you into understanding what I mean.

ayyylmao says:

*acute symptom

Oskar says:

A handy guide to nutrients for pasture raised beef & lamb, including the organ meats.

https://beeflambnz.com/sites/default/files/interactive-guide-to-the-nutrient-composition-of-NZ-beef-and-lamb.pdf

Karl says:

What is your opinion on fish?

Jim says:

I eat a lot of fish. Salmon and barramundi. Good stuff.

Fido says:

Look at the beef grade of “select”, compared to “prime” or “choice”.

Cows these days are “finished” fattened fed on other than their natural grass (corn, meal, antibiotics, etc). Select is leaner. Though perhaps not as natural lean as a plain old cow roaming around, which is expensive, which is why fattened.
Point being, our gut was built on ancient cow, not 1980’s fois-grois fat cow tech.

Most 100% natural meat farms are now expensive advertised operations, they know their product, few “locals” don’t already know what you’re after and the demand, so they charge handsomely for it now.

But maybe you can offer to buy/support some newborns and stuff on the farm in exchange for a better line of access.

Fix their internet. Hack their proprietary John Deere firmware. Be fucking useful at the co-op. Burn calories stacking hay.

Jim says:

Paraphrasing, ZCash is a leader in hot technologies that do not actually quite work yet, and they think they can make them work.

I also think they can make them work. We have seen some revolutionary breakthroughs. But this stuff is bleeding edge, and it is still bleeding.

Peter V says:

Any thoughts on psoriasis? My inflammations have recently started worsening (I’ll be soon hitting 30) and it seems I’ve tried everything except eating within this 6-to-8 hour window. Will try that as well.

Fidelis says:

I get eczema if I do too many starches and sweets. The whey portion of milk available at US grocery stores is also particularly inflammatory, but the fat and strained yoghurt products don’t seem to cause the same reaction. Milk from smaller local farms, and milk abroad seems fine.

From internet anecdote, the foods that particularly aggrevate autoimmune symptoms are plant derived oils, starches, milk, and fibrous vegetables.

Jim says:

Auto immune symptoms are often caused by leaky gut. If milk gives you an autoimmune reaction, you definitely have a leaky gut.

Insoluble fibre is the major cause of leaky gut.

Fidelis says:

I have a very low fiber diet already, eliminating more would be cumbersome, and it does not seem to be leaky gut related. I am pretty sure its the inflammation system going into overdrive, as it gets triggered when I gluttonously overeat highly insulinergic foods.

In regards to milk, the milk in question is specifically the milk found on American shelves in an ordinary grocery store, and I’m certain it has way more to do with whatever industrial process it’s subjected to, and whatever hormone, peptide and chemical treatment the dairy cows and their diets get, than peculiarities of my gut. I don’t have reactions when drinking milk in various European and even Asian countries, and I have overnight reaction to the milk in America. It’s another case of leftists successfully poisoning the food in the name of your good health and nutrition, if cows milk is bad just drink the soy milk, I’m sure that will help hyuckhyuck.

Peter V says:

I have problems digesting milk. No problems with cream, yogurt, cheese, etc. What definitely seems to worsen the condition is stress, sugar, beer, and wine in large amounts. Couldn’t figure out any direct connections with any food, though. Will try cutting down on insoluble fibers.
Milk here in Russia is processed, but most of it has a shelf life of about 6 days, so not heavily processed. Still can’t digest it.

The Cominator says:

Have you tried the lactose free milk sometimes you build up a lactose intolerance…

Daddy Scarebucks says:

I agree that this sounds like a textbook case of lactose intolerance. Higher-fat milk, cream, cheese and so on all have much less lactose. And lactose is literally sugar, so it stands to reason that having a lot of other sugar in your diet would exacerbate the problem.

Fortunately, the enzyme responsible for digesting lactose (lactase) is readily available OTC. I don’t think dairy is really a necessary part of anyone’s diet–in fact, “Orthodox Paleo” frowns upon all dairy–but if you’re intolerant and want to have dairy anyway, just take the enzyme with dairy meals. Problem solved.

Mossadnik says:

Excessive chocolate gives me acne like a teenage virgin who just fapped to his/her teacher for the first time [abolish the schools]; I don’t care about the face, but I save the upper back for a tattoo of Lord Shiva the Destroyer meditating, and the acne in that location precludes it. Well, good thing I prefer garlic to chocolate.

Sher Singh says:

For me, just cutting out processed sugar was enough to get the ball rolling.
Diet mostly pork, dairy, honey – I’ll eat something sweet if it’s part of the food.

Otherwise, plain greek yogurt + honey around 15g per 200g.
Been getting like 180-200g protein a day without sweating.

Gonna look into adding back some vegetables, maybe some beans or fish.
Testing 10g creatine a day vs 5.

I snack on dairy, and main meal is meat.
Every 10ish days I’ll carb back up for lifting reasons.

Atm, my avg seems to be 200g protein, 100g fat, 200g carb

Fk cow slaughter.

ਅਕਾਲ

Fidelis says:

If you’re eating dairy, need a pregnant cow. Pregnant cows give birth to bulls on occasion. What are you doing with the extra bulls? Are they just wandering around the pasture causing trouble? Are you using them to plow the fields and perform other such tasks? How do they compare to a horse or mule for this in endurance and personality?

Sher Singh says:

Jatts traditionally raise the Indus water buffalo, and killing the bull is fine.
I know ancient Hindus killed the male “cow” and only the female is banned.

Our languages have a different word for the male or female & cow only refers to the female.

Mossadnik says:

Superstitious food prohibitions are as valid a reason as any to recognize that Christ is Lord and all the other faiths are nonsense.

Fidelis says:

That’s fairly reasonable. How come you don’t eat the bull after the slaughter, then? Seems wasteful.

Sher Singh says:

Huh?

Eating whatever you kill is fine.

Mossadnik – Ok Mr. Wuhan

Mossadnik says:

Retard, the issue with Wuhan was the laboratory, not the market. The problem was in the experimenting, not in the eating.

The Day of Cominator can’t come soon enough.

Mossadnik says:

I’m amazed at the shittiness (street-shittiness) of your retort. An actual human could probably have come up with so many other, more compelling arguments in favor of religious food restrictions; and yet — of all things in the world — you actually went with “Wuhan.”

You will be reincarnated as a pangolin and slant-eyed gooks will cook you. With no attendant viruses.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

200g protein, 100g fat, 200g carb…

…are not very good macros. Better than the Standard American Diet but not by all that much.

No one needs that much protein (well, unless they weigh 200 kilos, which you don’t if you’re on a 2500-calorie diet), and the carbohydrates are extremely high even if you are physically active.

Percentage-wise, that’s 32% protein, 32% carbohydrates, 36% fat. A moderate-carb (not low-carb) paleo would keep the carbohydrates below 30% at all times and ideally below 25%, and fat should be above 50% on most days.

Dairy isn’t the problem here, albeit dairy products are still inferior to the red meat that they’re made from. You could probably make a significant improvement by simply dropping the honey and switching to full-fat (10%) yogurt, which doesn’t need sweetening, and/or creamy cheeses.

Even for someone of your… persuasion, there are plenty of non-cow options for red meat that can supplement the pig, including sheep, goat, deer and maybe bison. You should be thinking about how to add more meat, fattier meat and more diverse animal sources, not how to incorporate more vegetables or fish.

Fish are fine, mind you, as long as they are fatty fish, but they’re a B-tier option, like chicken. Pork and venison are the A-tier options and beef and lamb are the S-tier.

c4ssidy says:

Hydrating is hard without chilled Pepsi Max. Even with tea and coffee, one is tempted to add a spoon of sugar, and without that sugar it is easy to not drink enough. I was thinking of sampling non-alcoholic beer. It would be without artificial sweeteners while the carbs it does have would be more complex

Karl says:

No, that is just your temptation. Try different tee, eat more meat, more fat, less sugar. The temption will either go away or you’ll learn to resist it.

Fidelis says:

Add more salt to meals. You’re probably drinking enough fluids. I exercise hard enough to lose several pounds of weight in a session, through sweat and wet exhalation, and only on rare occasion feel the need to down a lot of water at once.

Fat and starch break down into CO2 and H2O. If your metabolism is functioning well, and you’re not outside in something like dry desert heat, you don’t need all that much to replenish. The people encouraging you to always drink another glass, drink a gallon of water a day even, most of them would cramp up if they started sweating hard.

Mossadnik says:

I always preferred classic red Coca Cola precisely because it is less sweet than Pepsi.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

>Hydrating is hard without chilled Pepsi Max

Madness. Artificial sweeteners are worse than useless. You will never meet a healthy person who drinks splenda.

My personal life hack for hydration is saving the big 30-60 ounce glass jars foodstuffs come in for use in brewing teas. Way larger than almost any kettle of course so you either need to use a cookpot to boil water or do what I do and brew it in the oven (low and slow is best). As far as leaf juice in general goes there’s a huge variation in brands and the qualities of the products thereof. One bellwether to look out for in quality is tea bags in paper wrappers rather than plastic. Loose leaf wholesale is of course best, doing your market research pays here. Silver needle white is peak. Leafy culinary spices like rosemary make good tisanes as well.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

chilled Pepsi Max

Yuk.

Just kick your sugar addiction and you’ll stop craving this junk. The problem is, instead of just cutting out the sugar, people think they’re going to be clever and use sugar substitutes like sucralose or sugar alcohols, which (a) have very similar metabolic effects, (b) continue to support the compulsive behavior, and bonus (c) wreak havoc on an otherwise healthy gut.

I guarantee you that once you’re off sugars and artificial sweeteners for a full month, you’ll not only have no particular desire to drink these products, you’ll find them so sickeningly sweet that you’ll wonder how you ever consumed a whole bottle of the stuff.

Cloudswrest says:

If you must have sweetness, the amino acid Glycine is plenty sweet. A half teaspoon in a cup of coffee is plenty for me.

Bwana Simba says:

How about stevia, as in the kind in Zevia cola, rather than the fake sugar used for coffee?

Daddy Scarebucks says:

It is my understanding that, at least according to current research, and to the extent that one is willing to trust that bleeding-edge research, stevia is “safe” for the gut compared to sugar alcohols and other artificial sweeteners. Supposedly it also does not lower insulin sensitivity, but I am far more doubtful of that claim because they made that exact same specific claim about the other artificial sweeteners before it ultimately disproven.

That aside, using stevia as a sweetener will still reinforce the addictive behavior. I have not known anyone to switch to stevia and then later on drop the stevia and consume unsweetened food and drinks. Either they keep using stevia forever (and are always lurching from one mini-crisis to the next, when the supermarket stops carrying their favorite brand, or they forget to bring packets to the coffee shop, and so on) or they backslide into sugar, often prompted by those aforementioned moments of “oh I forgot my stevia so I’ll use sugar this one time, it’s OK”.

At best, stevia seems like a band-aid for someone whose sugar intake is way out of control and they need to do something immediately, as in diabetic or prediabetic, just to be able to stay alive and continue functioning. If you’re not in such a medical crisis, don’t try to find a “better sweetener”, just taper off the constant sweetening until you don’t need it anymore.

Bwana Simba says:

My apologies, I should have been more specific. I meant the stevia leaf extract rather than stevia, which is the processed, concentrated sweetener that is made from those leaves. That is on me, not everyone has access to Zevia cola.

Oskar says:

>Hydrating is hard without chilled Pepsi Max. Even with tea and coffee…

If you’re trying to hydrate, keep coffee to a minimum, as caffeine is a diuretic.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

Coffee is not sea brine, it is net hydrating. It does not matter that caffeine is a diuretic, you still receive more fluid than you lose.

I limit caffeine because I don’t want to become dependent and end up like Tweek Tweak, but as far as hydration, one can (and should) drink as much coffee or tea as one wants.

Anonymous Fake says:

Real men [*depiction of our hunter gatherer ancestors as politically correct faggots deleted*]

Jim says:

Stable isotope levels in the bones indicate our ancestors ate at the same trophic level or higher than wolves and lions.

Meaning they ate aurochs, and sometimes they ate wolves and lions. They probably ate head to tail, lots of organ meats. But yes, they ate aurochs, and they ate wooly mammoths.

They recorded their hunting on the walls of caves, and the story told by their bones is consistent with the story they told on the cave walls.

white bread says:

Real men also drive cars with internal combustion engines and manual transmission.

Fidelis says:

Electric motors are just better. Higher torque, instant acceleration, less maintenance needs. Problem is battery tech still sucks. Add a diesel generator for recharging and you should be set.

Ideally we should be sliding in those coated uranium rods and get insane milage at very low weight. However, you, dear reader, are a cow to be milked. Why would anyone allow you to have something like that? Just get back to work, and let the palace court eunuchs decide your fate.

Cerpon says:

Unless have get-off-the-rock tech, like within sooner-than-expected timeframe, then not enough resources at current population and consumption levels.

[*deleted for failure to conform to the moderation policy*]

Cloudswrest says:

I can’t speak for other people, but I did not buy my Tesla to save the planet. And I don’t give a shit how many darkies die in the Lithium mines. I bought it to reduce the stress in my life. Except for the tires, it’s virtually maintenance free.

No oil to change.

No oil to leak on the driveway.

No high pressure radiator to rust out and leak on the driveway, or blow the system while driving, or overheat. No water pump to fail.

No transmission to break (e.g. “reverse” is just running the motor backwards). Just paid $4Gs to have the transfer case in my daughter’s Nissan replaced.

No catalytic converter to have stolen. Have you ever tried to get a cat replaced in California? Good luck with that. CA requires “special” CA rated (and registered) cats. You can’t replace it with a generic cat.

No combustion fouling to worry about. Just paid another $4G to have another daughter’s VW direct injection intake decarbonized.

No PCV system to clog up.

No head gasket to pop and fill the cylinders with coolant. One teenage daughter has trashed two engines/cars this way.

The AC system is hermetically sealed, like a home AC, so there’s no o-ring type seals for refrigerant to eventually leak out of, like with pully driven compressors.

No biennial smog inspections to worry about.

Sports car acceleration without the f*cking headache of a turbo, waste gate, plumbing and intercooler.

Time to charge? 99% of my charging takes effectively ZERO time to charge because it’s doing it overnight in my garage while I’m sleeping. Except for occasional cross country trips, stopping at a filling station is history for me.

Regarding cross country trips, as long as the battery range is greater than my bladder range, I’m fine with it. And it’s not 1hr. At a Tesla supercharger it’s about 30 minutes. Barely enough time to walk across the parking lot to the Starbucks, piss, and get a cup of coffee. Driving from Northern to Southern California I only have to stop once for a fill up. The main Tesla “truck stop” for his is Harris Ranch due to the food, but there are pretty much Tesla superchargers everywhere.

Of course, if you live in a place with harsh winters, your “mileage” may vary, but I grew up in wintry climes. That’s why I now live in California.

Since the majority of the braking is regenerative, the brake pads and rotors effectively last for the life of the car.

I spent the last 40 years fixing my own cars, or shelling out big bucks to mechanics. I’m f*cking tired of it. There are over 2000 moving parts in the drive train of an ICE vehicle. There’s only about ~200 in an EV (and no combustion temperatures involved). Electric motors last. The fridge in my garage has been in continuous operation for 40 years now (I bought it new) and the compressor still runs perfectly.

I might consider buying a special purpose ICE vehicle for things like hauling or towing (or maybe something old (pre-1960) for easy maintenance). But for daily driving I’m never buying another ICE vehicle again.

white bread says:

Yes, you make some valid points. IC engines have more mechanical complexity and so are more likely to fail.

However, in your advertising for electric toy cars you forgot to mention one little detail. You don’t own your electric toy car. The car is controlled by computers and firmware that you can’t touch. And just like your so called “smartphone” your “smartcar” is spying on you 24/7. Furthermore the car can be trivially instructed to only go to places selected by the manfucaturer, can be trivially instructed to not move at all if the authorities so decide. Et cetera.

Cloudswrest says:

Same with new ICE cars too. This is not something unique to EVs.

Fidelis says:

If his case was personal freedom, he would have taken care to mention vehicles amenable to terrain not covered in asphalt and full of obvious travel chokepoints. No one is safe from uncle sam in a normal consumer vehicle, proprietary firmware or not. Though I do agree the level of invasiveness is excessive. I should be able to swap out for whatever software/firmware I want, and easily deny over the air updates. It’s why I won’t be buying an EV until it gets commoditized to the point they cannot get away with controlling you after the sale.

Cloudswrest says:

The main complaint I’ve heard regarding Tesla is with salvage vehicles. If the car is reported as totaled by the insurance company Tesla turns off all support. The car is still drivable (after any necessary repairs) but there are no more updates, no FSD, and supercharging no longer works, even with 3rd parties. You’re limited to 240VAC “destination charging” which takes many hours. I’ve heard rumors that theoretically you can get the vehicle “recertified” by Tesla, but the scuttlebutt is people don’t seem to have much luck with this.

Hazbruner says:

[*deleted for failure to conform to the moderation policy*]

Hazbruner says:

[*deleted for failure to conform to the moderation policy*]

Cloudswrest says:

Ideally we should be sliding in those coated uranium rods

Ideally, PU-238 powered stirling engines, turning a small generator, keeping your batteries topped off 12/7, would be the way to go.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

Designers used electric transmission for getting power from the motor to the traction nearly a century ago in battleships and locomotives, because it simplified layout, was less sensitive to battle damage (disturbed prop shafts tearing through bulkhead glands has doomed more than a few men-o-war throughout history), and had other useful features for traction.

When Audi developed a vehicle for winning the Dakar overland rally, they named it after a battery electric suv they sell (E-Tron RS), and they called it ‘electrically powered’, but if you read through the fine print you’ll notice the primary power source is not a battery but a fuel oil engine. Manufacturers today sometimes euphemistically call these ‘power converters’, ‘range extenders’, or ‘serial hybrids’ in deference to the gaia daemon, but this is technically a misnomer since there is only one form of transmission between power source and traction, not two or more. It is the same concept in principle as all the diesel-electric and turbo-electric drive trains of yore.

Fuel oil is generally much more logistically efficient than batteries for power storage, and electric transmission is generally much more convenient for traction than mechanical transmission (hydraulic transmission is theoretically similar), so it just makes sense to use them together, and there are few to no good reasons we don’t see it used more often today.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

That is performative masculinity, not real masculinity. Red meat has real physiological effects on both the mind and body.

If you’re the sort of person who loves to brag to all your buddies about how well you can work the shaft, well, good for you. I’ll be walking in the other direction, thanks.

There are of course a thousand and one excellent arguments in favor of the internal combustion engine. The left wants to criminalize it because it is a cheap and efficient method of transportation, it represents innovation and productivity and upward mobility and these are things they hate. The ICE is good and great, but there is nothing especially “manly” about it aside from the fact that it was devised and produced by men, like every other technological innovation.

(OK, I guess we could argue that the roar of a powerful engine is also a literal pussy magnet, which makes it masculine in the very crudest and basest sense, but if that’s where you’re coming from, then the manual transmission adds nothing to the equation.)

Grizz says:

[*deleted for failure to conform to the moderation policy*]

Anonymous Fake says:

[*deleted*] a safe, walkable city where range isn’t a problem. [*deleted*]

Jim says:

The people who told us we should live in safe walkable cities infested those cities with racial minority, and if a brown illegal immigrant assaults or murders a white taxpayer, he will probably only spend a day or so in jail. As a result, walkable cities where range is not a problem are far too dangerous.

If we want safe walkable cities, we need public hangings, or, better still, suspend criminals on meat hooks to die slowly.

And walkable does not do you much good if there are no shops to walk to, because the shopkeepers stock walks. If you want a walkable city where you can walk to the shops, you have to deal with shoplifters Singapore style. Or better, Afghan style.

Varna says:

Once the 1990s passed, and most Slavs cut back on acting like niggers, many EE cities became quite livable and walkable. With some luck, especially in a town under half a million, 90% of necessary shops and clinics and dental offices are between 10 and 30 minutes of walking away. As would be at least one pleasant park.

Incredibly, all this happened without kid trannification or speech crackdowns or anti-car mandates. Someone needs to alert globohomo that the template already exists.

For some reason this reminds me of the ancient cold war 1 joke about an American, a Frenchman, and a Russian discussing their modes of transportation to work, out of town, and abroad. When it’s the Russian’s turn, he says “to work I take the bus, out of town I drive my Lada, and to go abroad I get inside a T-72.”

Jim says:

If you allow people to build what they want, where they want it, and efficiently punish criminals, people will spontaneously build walkable cities, because shops want to be near customers, and employers want to be near employees. If town planners start planning, they build prisons for animals with temples to demons.

Varna says:

Slavic towns to a large extent are a mix.

First, old-school commie planning with neighborhoods being like an imitation of a utopian Ford industrial compound: here the workers live and sleep, here is the clinic, here is the kindergarten, here is the school, here is the park, here is the shop, here is the eatery, here is the football field. All within walking distance. Nothing works properly, because communism, but the material foundation is there. It’s just ran like crap.

Then, after circa 1990, market forces and free movement kick in, and the inherited framework gets adapted to actual real human needs with a more flexible superstructure growing on top. More shops and cafes and eateries open, new buildings are built, drugstores and clinics compete with each other, a new layer of shifting infrastructure atop the old-school state-planned logistical scaffold.

Except the “old town” parts, of course, where they’ve survived. There it’s more spontaneous since forever.

Likewise in many parts of mainland China. No doubt other places in East Asia too, where either the old towns have been destroyed in war, or completely new cities arose after independence.

A working combination of a planned initial matrix, and then free growth on top can indeed work out pretty well. As long as neither the original planners, nor the new growers/adapters, are irredeemable psychopaths and diabolists.

Everyone loves red meat. Even vegetarians love it; they just don’t admit it.

Lots of protein and lots of iron. Make you strong like bull.

The Cominator says:

I swear truthfully I do not.

Karl says:

Most men have more iron than is good for them. Try to get rid of it and limit your intake, e.g. enjoy your red meat with some red wine

Neurotoxin says:

Hear, hear. A good juicy steak with a bold, robust red wine is wonderful.

Anonymous Fake says:

PD Mangan is right about iron, yes. “Dumping Iron”. Buy foods that haven’t been “enriched” and give blood. [*usual mininfo deleted yet again*]

Jim says:

Sound advice on iron. But you keep pushing the Tim Walz masculinity model “My masculinity intimidates Maga voters”.

Tim Walz is a court eunuch, and you keep attributing his androgynity to the manly men of our past.

Bwana Simba says:

Steak is amazing. Every bite is a gift from God. The sheer pleasure of even a bite of a less than stellar steak is pure dopamine.

Mossadnik says:

Wisdom of Solomon 16:

20 Instead of which things thou didst feed thy people with the food of angels, and gavest them bread from heaven prepared without labour; having in it all that is delicious, and the sweetness of every taste.

21 For thy sustenance shewed thy sweetness to thy children, and serving every man’s will, it was turned to what every man liked.

Entrecôte! Entrecôte! Entrecôte!

The Cominator says:

BTW as far as all the faggots who claimed Trump is going to start a war in the Middle East Trump apparently vetoed an attack on Iran with Vance and Tulsi also speaking strongly against it.

Sporadic Commenter says:

Between that, standing firm against the DC judge, and getting ever closer to taxing and defunding Harvard, it has been an encouraging last few days.

Jim says:

The breadtube hysterics about him standing firm against the judge are wonderful to behold.

Humungus says:

Greetings again,

Humungus likes to charcoal BBQ a delicious porterhouse or t-bone cut of angus steak frequently and whenever he can. The dessert is a perfect climate for outdoor cooking.

I also go a day or more without eating. You may refer to it as fasting. I call it going without.

Oog en Hand says:

The higher races, whites and Asians, need patriarchy to succesfully reproduce. That means that an even higher race, Ashkenazi Jews, needs patriarchy even more. Compare the birthrates of Lev Tahor to that of B’Tselem, Meretz and Avodah.

Mossadnik says:

I gave up on being the Second Coming partly upon realizing that “whites and Asians” just will not restore patriarchy (both will collapse; both are collapsing), no matter how many thoughtful and provocative comments I post on Jim’s blog. I’ll just be Messiah ben Joseph and spiritually inspire the building of the Temple. Clearly only Orthodox Jews take patriarchy seriously, so even though I don’t subscribe to their religion, I accept that none is currently closer to the Mandate of Heaven than they are,
by a very wide margin. Eli was right, and I was wrong.

Mossadnik says:

On the current timeline, restoration of healthy social technology among “whites and Asians” will take about 50 years at the earliest. You don’t have that much time; the collapse is within the next 20. Just look at the demography. I tried really hard not to be an Ashkenazi Supremacist, but then look around, even in the Based Community some apparently much prefer getting sodomized by BAP and his ilk than heeding my message. Well, let them have their sodomites and their below replacement TFR; Psalm 37:10 says:

For yet a little while and the wicked shall be no more; Indeed, you will look carefully for his place, But it shall be no more.

And so it is with entire societies that simply lost their survival instincts. I tried to awaken them, but all I get — in thread after thread — is endless comments by envious and spiteful retards whose bruised egos won’t permit the gospel to percolate, but “muh Jooooooooooos.” Then whatever! Enjoy getting sodomized by BAP. In a short while your civilization will be gone forever. I tried to prevent it, but apparently it’s the will of God.

Jim says:

> restoration of healthy social technology among “whites and Asians” will take about 50 years at the earliest.

Patriarchy among Japanese was ended overnight. It can be restored overnight.

The Australian experience is also somewhat relevant. They got a boatload of women who had been raised in a patriarchal society, but they were sent to Australia because rebel women and separated from their families, so behaved like spring break in Cancun on the shores of port Jackson. The authorities were initially paralysed and discombobulated, then they came down on them like a ton of bricks. They were then immediately hit with a massive shit test, passed it, and thereafter precisely zero female sexual misconduct.

Fidelis says:

It can be restored overnight.

Complex things like social pathways are delicate and can be destroyed far more quickly and easily than they can be developed. You can install the legal forms of patriarchy overnight, but the many folkways that have eroded and died since then will take at least another generation to become self sustaining. You’ll have to do it at gunpoint, such as in Australia, and that requires a lot of men with guns who understand what it is they are even enforcing.

Mossadnik says:

Patriarchy among Japanese was ended overnight. It can be restored overnight.

In an ethnically and religiously homogeneous country, that may be true. But as you pointed out previously, that is no longer the case in America. Now, I can hear the voice of Saint P-C saying, “You can just do things.” True enough. But then it begs the question: just what ethnic and religious composition American society should have? To answer that is to know how and where to proceed forward with the Restoration. If, for instance, JD Vance were to assume the throne, then the Trad-Caths would undoubtedly cheer; but the WASP majority might have some reservations. Or, alternatively, you go with a plurality of healthy faiths — a coalition of the Trads, so to speak — but then you can’t really expect that to happen overnight and/or go smoothly. As Fidelis points out above, and likewise as Yarvin is fond of saying, you need to know exactly were you are headed if you earnestly intend to get there. What is America’s true religion? Do Based Christians still exist in the real world (in sufficient numbers), or have they been a figment of my fantasy all along? That may well be the quintessential question; the different faiths furnish varying social technologies.

Ironic that I, of all posters, should say that, but Europe at least has Islam. That, however, is irrelevant for America and the Western Hemisphere more broadly. Perhaps Contaminated NEET will get the last, sardonic laugh.

Jim says:

> If, for instance, JD Vance were to assume the throne, then the Trad-Caths would undoubtedly cheer; but the WASP majority might have some reservations.

The gap between those Christians that are supposedly Catholics, but are actually Christians, and those Christians that are supposedly Lutherans, but actually Christians, is insignificant.

The gap between postchristian Catholics and postChristian lutherans is also insignificant, because they are all woke.

The country is splitting on religious lines orthogonal to the existing Churches. Another great awakening is happening.

Do based Christians exist in significant numbers? Does not look like it yet. But based zoomers exist in significant numbers, and I am seeing an orthodoxy setting in that if you are based, it is a good idea to at least somewhat pass as a based Christian.

Trump understands he needs a state religion, hence the White House observance of Easter.

For a long time pastors figured that if they wanted to get ahead, and avoid having their Church burned down and their bank accounts frozen, it was a good idea to preach against husbands, marriage, masculinity, patriarchy, and in favor of transgenderism. Now they are thinking that if they want a White House invitation, it is a good idea to be based. I think we will see a whole lot of based Christians coming out of the woodwork.

Mossadnik says:

Likely the Restoration will require a lot of “fake it till you make it,” in that while many of those based zoomers are not authentically Christian, they should be willing to embrace and publicly adhere to Christianity. However, the problem with faking it till you make it is that it’s an unstable course of action (it truly helps to sincerely believe your own stuff), and just as importantly, it will take a generation or two to raise that one generation for whom it won’t be merely a LARP. The other problem for Americans is at least narrowing down this broad category called “Christianity” to — if not any specific church — then at least a “right type” of the faith, to wit: 1660 Anglicanism. That might actually require a Grand Inquisitor. At any rate, the silly and misleading notion of “separation between church and state” will have to be discarded for good. The public will need to be clear on the fact that there (always and everywhere) is a state religion, whatever it ends up being in Restoration America. This all might be a Herculean task, but then again, like Christ Himself, Christianity has a penchant for coming back from the dead. Deus Vult!

Jim says:

I was faking it and God intervened. Based pastors are claiming there is a whole lot of that going on.

But this blog is about reaction, not evangelism. If people sense that the admin is Christian, The churches will converge to based Christianity. The Churches are dying because converged to woke postChristianity. If based, will recover.

white bread says:

>an even higher race, Ashkenazi Jews

Fucking hilarious. In reality the ashke nazi joos are mongrels containing white and arab components, and who knows what other crap.

Mossadnik says:

Do consider reading the book “The 10,000 Year Explosion” by Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending.

Oog en Hand says:

Hybrid vigor. They were bred for intelligence, centuries long. I can know, because I am even more intelligent than the average Ashkenazi.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

Hybrid vigor is an enemy meme with negative evidential correlation in reality. There was selection for wordceldom, not world-formation capcity, which resulted in much fatuous sophistry but little substantive good by comparison.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

This take is doubly ironic also since ashkenazim are one of the few humanoid species that actually do have some problems with heterozygosity from limited breeding pools.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

Not to the point you can’t solve such issues by patriarchs having enough children they can afford to be selective about who they marry off or leave the inheritance to, but enough where you can see certain phenomena phenomena start to be noticeable. (Even the smallest major humanoid pop groups still number in the tens of thousands, and hence totally incommensurate situations from problems like someone trying to grow a rare dog breed that our later day mattoids like to ignorantly parrot.)

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

Incidentally, this touches on yet another vector by which gnostics are spiritually demented against inheritance; it is obviously a great advantage for the people of a society, and if one member of the clan proves to be a bad egg and is disinherited, this effectively cuts them out from running in the same circles as their previous peers and greatly reduces reproductive success; thus, is means by which fathers and husbands direct and distributively effect eugenic social policy in a polity; which makes the progroid policy of destroying social technology in the name of ‘meritocracy’ especially ironic, since of course the whole intention is to accomplish just the opposite; the gnostic hates it, because they personally identify as just the sort of person who would be rightfully disinherited.

Mossadnik says:

I’ve long suspected that there might be far greater phenotypic heterogeneity among Ashkenazim than most geneticists and/or ideologues would have one believe. That, rather than “hybrid vigor,” is the evolutionarily advantageous aspect; it allows for better adaptation to a changing environment. Ashkenazim are not a niche, but more like a collection of interrelated niches, which under the best circumstances should be working in symbiosis, though that is often not the case. This allows for multifarious types of intelligence. Perhaps, e.g., the rabbinic niche and the money-lender niche both select for wordceldom; but the variation is pronounced enough to be noticeable.

Regardless, high intermarriage rates with non-Jews in America and moderate intermarriage rates with colorful Jews in Israel have made the newest crops of (what passes for) Ashkenazim a true hodgepodge. Within certain limits, diversity is a strength; provided a common denominator allowing for successful cooperation persists.

Mossadnik says:

By the way White Bread, remember our previous exchange?

Ah oops what’s this?

The US is prepared to recognize Russian control of the Ukrainian region of Crimea as part of a broader peace agreement between Moscow and Kyiv, according to people familiar with the matter.

The potential concession is the latest signal that President Donald Trump is eager to cement a ceasefire deal, and comes as he and Secretary of State Marco Rubio suggested on Friday that the administration is prepared to move on from its peace-brokering efforts unless progress is made quickly.

Crimea was taken by the Kremlin in 2014 following an invasion and subsequent referendum held under occupation, and the international community has resisted recognizing the peninsula as Russian to avoid legitimizing the illegal annexation.

Doing so risks undermining international laws and treaties prohibiting the taking of land through use of force. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has repeatedly said he will not cede territory to Moscow.

But the move would be a boon for Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has long sought international recognition of Russian sovereignty in Crimea. Putin so far has refused to agree to Trump’s proposal for a broad peace deal.

The people said a final decision on the matter hadn’t yet been taken. The White House and State Department did not respond to a request for comment. A US official familiar with the negotiations, asked about the possibility of recognizing Crimea, declined to comment on the details of the talks.

https://archive.is/uAZQE

“Muh neocons.”

As I said: Middle East for Europe.

Jim says:

There can be no peace till we have internationally recognised borders in the Ukraine, and until the Russian speaking plurality is adequately represented in the government of Rump Ukraine.

Putin is not going to accept a peace in which only Crimea is recognised.

He has a better option. Turn rump ukraine into a desolate empty wilderness.

Mossadnik says:

Putin is not going to accept a peace in which only Crimea is recognised.

Well, I assume that if Trump is willing to recognize Crimea as Russian, then recognizing Donbass as Russian really goes without saying.

Not a single actual American supports the Azov Regime; it has always been a CIA meme forced down society’s collective throat. Trump can recognize all of Eastern Europe as Russian (and he should) and no one outside the GAE-in-Exile glownigger network will care one bit. The Eurocucks will keep crying from their chastity cages, but that’s about it.

There will not be WWIII versus Russia.

Animus says:

Jews are not only a matriarchy, they’re essentially a race of women:

-They survive by deception and manipulation instead of strength, honesty, and self-sufficiency.
-They are obsessed with wealth and material possessions, and are highly superficial.
-They spread communism, feminism, and other leftist slave ideologies.
-They abandoned their Father, ran off with an abusive drug dealer (Satan), and have spiritual daddy issues.
-They are whiny and provocative, never accepting blame for anything.
-They are very rule-oriented, yet love to play language games.
-They sexually mutilate their male infants.
-They determine Jewishness matrilineally.
-They steal the surnames of their provider society.
-They select for wealth, humor, and sociopathy like a woman would, instead of attractiveness, moral purity like a man would.
-They send their women to breed with outsiders, instead of sending men like other races do.
-They are eternal parasites, and everyone else inevitably gets sick of their shit.

Thus the JQ and WQ can be combined in a Unified Theory of Judeo-Feminism.
Satan is female.

Mossadnik says:

Great, I triggered you out of the chemsex-bdsm dungeon so I can deliver the following message regarding BAP:

What this despicable faggot does to prey on vulnerable young men is that he posts various roided up bodybuilders to impress the audience, since his audience, men in their late teens and early twenties, particularly if they are virgins insecure about their own physique (many such cases), have a physique-building and looksmaxxing phase wherein they look up to various roidmaxxing muscular men for “inspiration.” This is alas far too common in this diseased and collapsing globohomo world.

What is subversive is BAP’s attempt to sneak in faggotry, that is gay homosexual faggot non-platonic “eroticism,” into this appreciation, via putting a gay spin on the bodybuilder images (and they are indeed gay; normal men don’t look like that), and interspersing them with images of hot women, in which BAP is obviously entirety uninterested, but which he uses to inflame sexual desire among the young men, as he seeks to subversively redirect their pent-up frustrated incel sexual energy towards the gay bodybuilders. Of course, being a mischling on top of everything, he does so with typically Jewish “plausible deniability.”

But it’s absolutely obvious that he is, like all of you Satan’s spawn, attempting to groom the young and mostly virgin men into “shifting” their sexuality from its natural telos, which is heterosexual as God manifestly and universally intended, to its inverted and diseased form, which is faggotry.

BAP is a gay groomer who needs to be roof’d, and no amount of pro-Jewish or anti-Jewish or any other kind of failed and pathetic misdirection will change that.

Poofs off roofs.

The Cominator says:

Now now BAP is an old online friend of mine from forums long ago. BAP seemingly has cured himself of the perversion via use of (female) prostitution. BAP is alright this guy probably doesn’t have much to do with BAP. The poster goes too far but he makes a real point in that the real problem with reform jews is matriarchy. I’ve personally witnessed having known some Jewish guys well (my friend Spiro seemed an exception he didn’t get bothered by his mother to the extent a lot of them did) tolerate a level of crap from their mothers that would have caused me to snap and murder mine at a rather young age.

Mossadnik says:

I haven’t checked Twitter in a while.

Is BAP’s feed still full of endless photographs of almost naked juiced-up young men?

If the answer is affirmative – what, in your view, could be the actual purpose? Who actually wants that kind of content?

The Cominator says:

From what I remember he did that one day a week and I don’t know. He has been able to make a career out of being a right wing shitposter so attacking him on grounds of selling what people aint’ buying is not the right way to attack him if you’re going to do it.

Hesiod says:

Perhaps when unrepentant sodomites are either splats or ensconced in closets, the West can unironically appreciate Frank Miller’s 300 aesthetic again.

Mossadnik says:

If his feed is still brimming with almost nude gay bodybuilders, then not only has he not personally cured himself of the disease, but he is in fact trying to infect his audience with the disease. Of course, in this day and age people may well tolerate it as they enjoy his ‘other’ content (whatever it actually is); but do honestly ask yourself if — when push comes to shove — a gay groomer will support the restoration of patriarchy and all that’s actually necessary to avert the collapse and lead civilization towards a healthy future.

Fidelis says:

That’s easy to answer. It triggers the swamp bugs, them being misshapen hyperestrogenic lumps of fat and soft bone, and triggers more people besides. I don’t know what his deal is currently, but he doesn’t seem to be doing any grooming, doesn’t run defense for faggotry. He is a bit blackpill in messaging on women, but he’s not encouraging anything abominable in it’s stead. BAP is just an impish bard, he should never be put in charge of propaganda, but unless he demonstrates further actual faggotry there doesn’t seem to be a good reason to give him a fall.

Mossadnik says:

I don’t know what his deal is currently, but he doesn’t seem to be doing any grooming, doesn’t run defense for faggotry.

All that was true previously also, in that, as far as I know, he never explicitly advocated for faggotry. Welp, I delivered my warning; should it go unheeded – not my anus, not my problem.

***

A CERTAIN HOUSE was overrun with Mice. A Cat, discovering this, made her way into it and began to catch and eat them one by one. Fearing for their lives, the Mice kept themselves close in their holes. The Cat was no longer able to get at them and perceived that she must tempt them forth by some device. For this purpose she jumped upon a peg, and suspending herself from it, pretended to be dead. One of the Mice, peeping stealthily out, saw her and said, “Ah, my good madam, even though you should turn into a meal-bag, we will not come near you.”

Jim says:

> But it’s absolutely obvious that he is, like all of you Satan’s spawn, attempting to groom the young and mostly virgin men into “shifting” their sexuality from its natural telos, which is heterosexual as God manifestly and universally intended, to its inverted and diseased form, which is faggotry.

Bullshit.

This just set off my bullshit detector, so I finally took a look at Bronze Age Pervert’s output on X.

Looks fine to me. Straight reactionary promoting a new right wing aesthetic.

And looking at the cute girls and manly men depicted, it is completely obvious that he cured himself.

Bronze Age Pervert is artist rather than an ideologue. A long time ago, his art revealed he was a fag. Now it reveals he is cured.

Mossadnik says:

A long time ago, his art revealed he was a fag. Now it reveals he is cured.

Between the time his art revealed him as a fag, and the current time, has his artistic style undergone any significant change? What exactly is the nature of the change? I actually haven’t been following, so whoever has been following should certainly elaborate on that point; I’m sure everyone would like to know what signs and indicators are there that someone previously diseased is now cured.

Jim says:

> Between the time his art revealed him as a fag, and the current time, has his artistic style undergone any significant change?

Looked faggy, no longer looks faggy. That is a significant change.

Leftist artistic work is all normalising mediocrity, ugliness, and disgustingness — even children’s books illustrations. War on beauty. Leftist architecture is designed to crush and demoralise. The left wants to crush and demoralise. The new right artistic movement is fighting back against that, and Bronze Age Pervert is fighting back against that.

And part of fighting back is to depict handsome high achieving men. But there is an obvious difference between his depiction of handsome men and hot chicks. You see the women through the male gaze.

Alf says:

Not really an active follower, but my take on BAP is that while I can’t fault his political content – he calls out shills, protects Trump etc -, his spiritual content has always been off. He calls Christianity a fake trend, and whenever women are discussed he never makes more of them than breeding pods in a farm. And yes, too many naked men.

Each their own opinion of course, but I do get some ‘cat playing dead vibes’.

Jim says:

Yes, but Mossadnik’s criticism was over the top.

Yes, lot of things wrong Bronze Age Pervert. But he is not unconsciously selling faggotry, let alone intentionally selling it.

I think he was unintentionally and unconsciously selling faggotry, but he has not been doing that for a while.

Mossadnik says:

A person can, in theory, be privately gay without publicly posting an infinity of naked men to an audience of young right-wing incels. I believe that BAP is intelligent enough to understand the consequences of what he is doing, and yet he is still doing it, and has been for a long time. My take on him is that he is like the new Jack Donovan, only far more successful at feigning normalcy. And my take on his worldview, such as it is, is that its animating spirit is like that of the homosexuals who had taken over Counter-Currents, i.e., the now mostly dead White Nationalism blogosphere, and who then proceeded to turn WN into a gay and anti-Christian ideology (it absolutely need not be so, and prior to the hostile faggot takeover, it had not been so). Now, I generally try to spend as little mental energy as possible on men whose pride is in buggering the feces-filled crapholes of other men, but Analmus’ posts here always remind me of BAP, and of faggots I’ve had the misfortune of encountering IRL, since they all attempt the exact same “subtle” strategies to sneak in faggotry unto vulnerable young men.

A wolf in sheep’s clothing is still a wolf. He knows what he is doing, and I know what he is doing. So I fulfilled my duty and delivered the warning. Now my conscience is perfectly clear; I did my part for the community of people whom I value and appreciate. Beyond that, I really don’t care. If you guys believe that he is alright and perfectly innocent and totally devoid of subversive intentions, then by all means delight in his company, and see where that leads you.

Jim says:

> A person can, in theory, be privately gay without publicly posting an infinity of naked men to an audience of young right-wing incels. I

Bronze Age Pervert is not posting an infinity of naked men. I just checked his feed. Lots of hot chicks viewed through the male gaze.

Mossadnik says:

That’s great. I couldn’t care less about his private vices, such as they are/were, as long as they are indeed kept entirely private.

The true test, at any rate, will be after the tanks are in Harvard yard and the Christian American Right calls for investigating and finding an effective, permanent biological cure (or preventative measure) for the disease.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

You’d think the bugchasers would be all over ivermectin and or research into related compounds to deal with all the pathogens they pick up, but the fact that they are repelled by it like vampires from garlic engenders a suspicion that it deals shortly with the bug in the driver’s seat, too.

The hydra has many heads, a serpent that has been passing itself down from deep beyond written recollection.

Alf says:

I just checked his feed.

Of the 10 last ‘physique’ posts he has done, I count 9 almost naked men, 1 anime chick.

BAP is not exactly cutting off the right hand that caused him to sin.

Jim says:

I was counting his reposts, and counting his art generally.

Just checking the feed again:

Logo at top off feed. Faggot gaze. Implied male nudity, but no actual male nudity.
Wilderness repost
Manly man and hot anime chick in coastal scenery. Man appropriately dressed, chick sexily dressed, male gaze implied.
Hot anime chick and manly man engaging in implied male gaze. Man is in ordinary attire.
Nearly naked male, implied faggot gaze.
another the same
another the same
Hot anime chick, implied male gaze.
repost of appropriately dressed man in nature, hunting, fishing.
repost of appropriately dressed man subduing a criminal
Charles Darwin as saint and patriarch.
Underdressed male, faggot gaze.
Drawings and pictures of naked and underdressed women.
faggot ad
Hot near naked chick video
suggestively posed chick
Another anime chick.

OK, you are right. It is not nine out of ten, but it is far too many.

OK, I stand corrected.

Mossadnik says:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Hence sages of yore would say,

Not.

Even.

One.

niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeu ***kriiiiiikkkkkkk*

Daddy Scarebucks says:

Given the nearly equal mix of (attractive) women to (suspiciously sexualized) men, my conclusion would be that BAP’s current lifestyle is that of the anything-that-moves faggot or “bisexual”, as opposed to the pederastic faggot. Which is an incremental improvement, but not a full cure.

He might genuinely believe, in his own mind, that if the pictures/drawings of attractive women are sexualized, then why not the men as well? To which I would answer that his audience is men, not women, and even if there were women in his audience, women are not particularly visually-oriented in their sense of attraction. The primary audience for that type of content is fags.

Mossadnik says:

He might genuinely believe, in his own mind, that if the pictures/drawings of attractive women are sexualized, then why not the men as well?

Scarebucks, I did not expect you to be this naive. (Then again, you did not grow up in Tel Aviv, “the gay capital of the world.” Such pride!)

The gay groomer strategy, universally, is posing as “mostly straight, but with a slight fetish.” For that purpose, they might well post 90% heterosexual content (in which they will pretend, with varying degrees of success, to be interested; and in which they are absolutely not interested, not even a tiny little bit), and then interspersed between that, they will push gay stuff. And the gay stuff will not be too obvious; they always like to maintain plausible deniability and act “subtle.”

BAP knows that his followers are men; he tries to appeal to straight right-wing men; and he knows perfectly well that many of them are sexually frustrated, and possibly sexually confused. He understands it all perfectly good. In the first place, the erotic content is designed to inflame the viewer’s libido. This he achieves with the hot chicks. And then he sneaks in the gay stuff, under the guise of “hey, it is just physique to inspire you to body build. Hey, it is all platonic. But is it? Hehehe silly me, I’m so naughty, hehehe.” C’mon – is it not obvious? They all do that when seeking to subvert young, straight, sexually frustrated men.

The next step for the Alt-Right Gay Groomer is misdirection: they will shift your focus to any problem in the world (real or imaginary) so that you won’t notice, and thus won’t be inclined to discuss the fact, that they seek to infect you with their disease. After all, they are your “friend.” And what “friend” doesn’t inflame his friends’ inceldom-induced sexual frustration with straight content and then, when they are in a psychologically suggestible state and literally brain-washed, sneak in faggotry? Why, all friends behave like that; that’s what “friendship” is all about. Right?

He is not “cured” and he is not “bisexual.” He is a lying faggot looking to normalize his perversion by any and all means. Including appealing to the male gaze part of the time, and then shoving in the poopdick the other part of the time. It is absolutely intentional and deliberate and by design. They all do that, both online and IRL. It’s their classic modus operandi when seeking to “flip” young, straight, sexually inexperienced men. It’s just what they do.

The Cominator says:

He goes to female whores, he does not endorse faggotry quite the opposite I believe he made himself like pussy and at least mostly cured himself of faggotry that way. No man free of the perversion is “sexually confused” its not a thing with straight men. BAP suggest that gays can be reformed if the will is there. I don’t understand the gay bodybuilder posting so much myself but clearly BAP having been able to become a professional and successful shitposter knows more about selling his own brand of shitposting than you or I do.

Mossadnik says:

I choose to believe my own eyes. My eyes see a 44-year-old sexual deviant who is unabashedly flooding the feeds of young, often sexually frustrated men with endless softcore gay pornography, for usual gay grooming and induction purposes. On top of that, his form of blackpill-on-women is not the straight variety born of harsh real-life experiences, but rather obiously it is the poofter MGTOW variety. I couldn’t care less what spins he puts on this behavior. It is exactly what it looks like.

The Cominator says:

I agree the physique posting is a little much but its just purity spiraling to try to declare BAP a subversive enemy when hes been pretty steadfast for Trump and while the left still isn’t dead. Fuentes is what a subversive faggot looks like. BAP has achieved the Herculean labor (of which he would so admire) of having been basically a non subversive gay. BAP has never made me want to suck dick or take it up the ass. He is however one of the few people on the new right I find it worthwhile to listen to with Jim and yes I’ll admit (despite his disgracing himself on Covid) Yarvin.

Animus says:

I’m not BAP, or any of Thiel’s other zionist buttboys, but I’ll take the comparison as a compliment because his book is pretty good.

Have a nice Easter.

Mossadnik says:

Look, outside observers might get the impression that I’m needlessly bloodthirsty here. Not so. If, instead of endlessly attempting to subvert society to submit to your disease, your kind were capable of saying, “I am perverted, but I want to be cured. Please don’t kill me – please find a cure and make my sexuality healthy and functional. In the meanwhile, I promise not to do anything that might subvert the Natural Order of things,” then some leniency could be extended towards you. Alas, underneath the sin of Sodomy, lurks the even darker sin of Pride – your pride just will not let you accept that you are diseased, in need of a cure, and that the destructive and sef-destructive behavior that inevitably stems from your disease is apt to bring down whole societies, such as Sodom and Gomorrah and America. Which is why you will have to niiiiiiieeeeeu *splatttt*. Find a fag who sincerely wants to be cured, and who wants the rest of society to be cured as well (both biologically in the case of any and all other sexual deviants, and metaphorically when it comes to permanently excising the sodomic memes from the memetic water supply), and he might be spared, provided he is indeed willing to undergo effective treatment, and does not, in any way shape or form, attempt to subvert God’s Natural Order. But again, you are simply not willing to undergo the necessary treatment or to support the development thereof, whereas you do passionately and incessantly attempt to undermine civilization, and moreover you seek to prevent the rest of society from scientifically researching and discovering and implementing the cure. So off the roof you must go; and anyone who performs a miracle and turns a fruit into a vegetable commits no sin.

Leave a Reply to Mossadnik Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *