In order for people to live together in peace, you have to understand your adversary. You don’t have to agree but you have to understand why he says what he says and does what he does. You have to understand how he see the world and how he sees you. The left refuses to know their enemy, thus must be destroyed, or all normies will be destroyed
If people will not discuss, war it is.
The left, all of it, even moderates such as the Young Turks, systematically encourages the murder of its opponents. They have no alternative but to do this, because the left cannot acknowledge, nor meaningfully respond to, their opponents reasoning and position, so must project their own demonic objectives onto their hated enemies. Being incapable of debate, they must exterminate. The end point of leftism is the Seven Kill Stele. There cannot be peace except with those that can criticise the positions we actually hold, instead of condemning us for the voices of their demons. We must conquer them, for if they conquer us, they will kill us.
The Young Turks continued to inspire people to murder political opponents. They piously declare that violence is a both sides problem, while continuing to promote rationales for murder
Cenk Uygur:
“I agreed with Charlie Kirk on some things. I disagreed with him on others, such as race”.
And their audience then fills in the blanks on what Charlie Kirk supposedly says about race.
This was of course a lie, a lie intended to eliminate opposition in order to evade discussion. Charlie Kirk was a normiecon. He agreed with the evil, destructive, dangerous, and deluded left position on race. He agreed with the evil madness pushed by the Young Turks on race. What he disagreed with was affirmative action.
The Young Turks has directly caused the murder of quite a few people. And they are the least bad faction of the left. We can trace some murders explicitly to Young Turks merely because they are an influential platform, and thus connections are traceable, but they were and are saying the same things as the entire rest of the left on exterminate-the-right topics, saying it less, and in a more moderate fashion, with vastly greater willingness to talk to the enemies that they seek to exterminate.
I am not ranting on the Young Turks because exceptionally bad. On the contrary, they are exceptionally good.
I am ranting on them because being major highly influential Youtube platform, they left a trail of blood, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvIjonr5hOs, while with other influencers the trail is less clear, each one’s evil being mingled with the evil of so many others that no one particular leftist is identifiably culpable.
By uttering the lie “race”, when he should have spoken the truth “affirmative action”, Cenk Uygur endorsed and supported the murder of Charlie Kirk that he was piously condemning.
This is inherent in the nature of the left. Because they are unable to respond to the reasons, evidence and arguments presented by those who disagree with them, they have no alternative but demonisation.
And demonisation leads to extermination. To avoid war, no leftist who presents demonisation in place of rational argument, which is to say no currently existing leftist, can be permitted. Freedom of speech is for people who can use it to engage in rational discussion. If discussion is impossible, war it is.
The Democrats are afraid. You have a unique opportunity and momentum to crush the Left for decades, if not permanently. Expect them to pull out the Controlled Opposition in full force to prevent that. Beware the CIA plants.
The Hostile Regime hinges on your distraction.
based
https://x.com/StephenM/status/1967940333309923754 says :
“The path forward is not to mimic the ACLU of the mid 90’s.
It is to take all necessary and rational steps to save Western Civilization.”
Seems like people around Trump get it.
Erecting a loyal military force under the ICE budget expansion was an important step. Clearing out FBI, DOJ, Defense etc will take years if it is even possible. Circumvention using ICE at the size it will be in 2026, is a more plausible route.
I’m seeing all these accusatory adjectives thrown at Charlie Kirk (thus justifying his murder for religious reasons), but no actual film of him behaving or speaking in such a manner.
Here the thoughtcrime model works very well. It’s not only a thoughtcrime to speak a thoughtcrime, but also to understand what someone else’s thoughtcrime even is or means. So every thoughtcrime will “ricochet” off a leftist in a wild religious direction, “demonization”.
They can’t just return the serve.
I’m sad but shouldn’t be. Charlie wasn’t stupid and knew this was coming. They had to silence him somehow.
So this post here is timely and much needed. There’s no more wondering whether the left speaks only in bullets. The inquiry and discussion now is WHY, and how to describe this terrible mechanism that is now blatantly and undeniably at work.
But given all of this, is there an IRL “interface layer” to normiedom left? Because that’s what Charlie was doing — interfacing with normiedom — and better than anyone else was to boot. Is it nothing but anonymous shitlord blogs from now on?
And a nasty position it is to be in. The irony is that in a way the left is correct, in that far far behind Charlie Kirk stand people like me, who absolutely think black women tend to be dumb as rocks. Women are barely able to think an abstract thought. And black average IQ is, what, 75? So it is easy to add up 1 and 1, unless of course you are a black woman.
> he died for the ability to hold a conversation…
… one based on Truth, and Faith.
> The assault on USAID
Was full of win. But no gov critter ever imprisoned yet, only riffed. USAID isn’t even completely shutdown, but was subsumed into the office of a guy who just went to Israel, kissed the ring, stuffed paper in the wall, and wailed.
So much more to assault.
RICO on the Soros, Foundations, and NGO… patently obvious, but who will do time? Who will actually be shutdown vs shifted to new entity and tactics.
> unable to respond
This behaviour pattern.
I see it in both the Left, and Islam.
When presented with sound evidence and/or counter proposal,
they both manifest rage and murder, and/or dodge redirect and flee.
In the hierarchy of races, this behavioural trait (presumably inherited, but perhaps susceptibly learned in sordid communes) must lie somewhere between that of the reasonable NorthWest White-types, and that of the incomprehension of the “Plains Apes”.
There should be research studies on
– What caused them to do that
– What enabled the few of them to leave that
On the other hand perhaps we are at the point of looking at history…
Any side’s “Thermidor” has a relatively small capability for correcting its side’s things, once that capacity is exceeded by the breadth times distance-of-excursion sum, and your civ has already bifurcated along lines…
Well, history shows bloody reboot is all that’s left.
It’s not a happy acknowledgement, nor preferred, nor proferred.
But what’s left, really, at such a point, but the unstoppable fall into that?
How much more tolerance of blood spilled by the Left will there be? One more clearly political attempt or success? 10? 100?
How much more mechanical encroachment by Leftism upon the Liberty enjoyed for say ~100 years post-1776?
Genocide of the 2000+ year prevailing Civ-type?
In the spirit of Charlie, I’d be inclined to give peace a chance at the 2026 election, for the Right to completely eject the Left from office. Maybe the Libertarians can fill their seats.
Given the Left must know their odds at 2026 are approaching zero, I doubt the Left will wait that long before breaching the peace in a major way.
The war won’t be pretty, but the Right will win in the end.