As you know, the left is melting down over Trump allowing in white South African refugees because the refugees are “fleeing accountability for historical injustices”.
Well, boys and girls, who else is “accountable for historical injustices”?
What is the common factor in the Covid lab virus weaponisation, war in the Ukraine, and mass migration?
That it might kill you.
If we look at the mass illegal immigration sponsored by the deep state and Democratic party (but I repeat myself) we notice they are not just potential voters. They are disproportionately young male and military age. A lot of them were flown in by Biden and Obama. A lot of them were self selected, by crossing the border under their own power, and its natural for young men to be more mobile and adventurous than young women, so that disproportion among border crossers is not indicative of hostile intent, but a lot of them were flown in, and the regime had a lot of control over the sourcing. And they were rather tightly focused on young male military age black Muslims, which is indicative of hostile intent.
We observe deep state aid going disproportionately to gangs, organised militias, as for example Judge Joel Cano providing accommodation and gun practice for a Tren de Aragua member. Similarly, the Democrats are focusing on and obstructing Trump’s deportation of gang members, when a more politically palatable strategy would be to focus on his deportation of less objectionable illegals, who are likely the overwhelming majority of their potential voters, and who do not much like the gangs and black Muslims either.
The Democrats are the deep state. So are not exactly out of power. But they are not exactly in power either. Disputes over sovereign authority will escalate until decisively resolved. Which is likely to be resolved by civil war, the ultimate escalation.
Recently we saw some Democratic party members of congress getting physical with some cops. The leader of the House Democrats says that if they are prosecuted, that is a red line, and Democrats will escalate. Maybe he is bluffing. Probably he is bluffing. But once things get physical, people tend to escalate to forms of violence more effective than an obese woman body slamming a cop. He may think he is bluffing, he may intend to bluff, but like Germany’s war rhetoric a month or so ago, which was intended to be mere empty rhetoric, a gesture, not a real declaration of war, events are a tide that carries men along.
Most leftist don’t consciously intend genocide, but they are awfully comfortable with a tide heading in that direction, and a slippery slope into that abyss. They are double thinking it.
When the Democrat speaker of the House promised escalation, he probably did not know or much care if he was lying or speaking the truth. But he was mighty comfortable with the likelihood that force of events might make his words truth, as the German government was mighty comfortable with the likelihood that when future historians look back at the radioactive ashes of Berlin, they will write that the war started early in 2025, but nothing much happened for a while. When Hitler declared war on America, absolutely nothing happened. Until it did.
War is easy, peace is hard, as falling off a cliff is easy, climbing a cliff is hard.
Let us recollect the Covid virus, and the jab. The intent of weaponising the Covid virus in the lab was to kill you. The intent of the jab is to sterilise your daughters. These people seriously hate everyone. Including themselves. They don’t intend war, but they don’t not intend war either. They are preparing for war, and taking actions likely to lead to war internal and external.
And I say we should reciprocate.
Excuse me what. Gun practice?
The gang member is being felony charged for gun possession — he was in possession of a Joel Cano family gun.
Yeah that scared the SHIT out of me. There are no limits or brakes on that line of logic at all. If anyone could point us to a screen-grab of this, please do.
There’s “bad things sometimes happen to good people”, but then there’s “and it’s good and right that they do, in the name of ‘historical justice'”, which is something else entirely.
It’s clear that the leftist mind-virus has brought them to the point where they are willing to say out loud what has been the internal monologue for a long time now. Why they believe that saying this publicly is going to help them, I don’t know.
Normalcy bias isn’t going to evaporate over night, unfortunately, but this just demonstrates that any ideas people on the right had that the left could be reasoned with are out the window.
But these statements absolutely provide us with a gorgeous precedent and tool. “Accountability for historical injustices” can do anything we want it to do.
“I’m sorry, but because of the need for there to be accountability for historical injustices, we need to have you people move en masse to this location here. I’d rather not, but accountability for historical injustices being what it is, I have no choice. I am sure you understand.”
Now you just have to build the injustice “paper trail” and let the games begin.
“I am sorry we have to put you all in a work camp, but as you can see, the historical injustice of your demographic killing your neighbors at rates far in excess of the majority of the population ties my hands.”
“I apologize but as you can see, the murders women committed against the unborn have demonstrated conclusively that if they have a say in politics it leads to genocide. Sadly, because we must ensure accountability for historical injustices we can no longer be bound by the 19th Amendment.”
Lather, rinse, and repeat.
Not that I expect the right, as currently constituted, to pick up and use such a tool, but it is one that the left has handed us if we want it.
Lovely phrase. Happens all the time doesn’t it. We say dumb stuff, do stupid stuff, think nothing off it, but then down the road: consequences!