As you know, the left is melting down over Trump allowing in white South African refugees because the refugees are “fleeing accountability for historical injustices”.
Well, boys and girls, who else is “accountable for historical injustices”?
What is the common factor in the Covid lab virus weaponisation, war in the Ukraine, and mass migration?
That it might kill you.
If we look at the mass illegal immigration sponsored by the deep state and Democratic party (but I repeat myself) we notice they are not just potential voters. They are disproportionately young male and military age. A lot of them were flown in by Biden and Obama. A lot of them were self selected, by crossing the border under their own power, and its natural for young men to be more mobile and adventurous than young women, so that disproportion among border crossers is not indicative of hostile intent, but a lot of them were flown in, and the regime had a lot of control over the sourcing. And they were rather tightly focused on young male military age black Muslims, which is indicative of hostile intent.
We observe deep state aid going disproportionately to gangs, organised militias, as for example Judge Joel Cano providing accommodation and gun practice for a Tren de Aragua member. Similarly, the Democrats are focusing on and obstructing Trump’s deportation of gang members, when a more politically palatable strategy would be to focus on his deportation of less objectionable illegals, who are likely the overwhelming majority of their potential voters, and who do not much like the gangs and black Muslims either.
The Democrats are the deep state. So are not exactly out of power. But they are not exactly in power either. Disputes over sovereign authority will escalate until decisively resolved. Which is likely to be resolved by civil war, the ultimate escalation.
Recently we saw some Democratic party members of congress getting physical with some cops. The leader of the House Democrats says that if they are prosecuted, that is a red line, and Democrats will escalate. Maybe he is bluffing. Probably he is bluffing. But once things get physical, people tend to escalate to forms of violence more effective than an obese woman body slamming a cop. He may think he is bluffing, he may intend to bluff, but like Germany’s war rhetoric a month or so ago, which was intended to be mere empty rhetoric, a gesture, not a real declaration of war, events are a tide that carries men along.
Most leftist don’t consciously intend genocide, but they are awfully comfortable with a tide heading in that direction, and a slippery slope into that abyss. They are double thinking it.
When the Democrat speaker of the House promised escalation, he probably did not know or much care if he was lying or speaking the truth. But he was mighty comfortable with the likelihood that force of events might make his words truth, as the German government was mighty comfortable with the likelihood that when future historians look back at the radioactive ashes of Berlin, they will write that the war started early in 2025, but nothing much happened for a while. When Hitler declared war on America, absolutely nothing happened. Until it did.
War is easy, peace is hard, as falling off a cliff is easy, climbing a cliff is hard.
Let us recollect the Covid virus, and the jab. The intent of weaponising the Covid virus in the lab was to kill you. The intent of the jab is to sterilise your daughters. These people seriously hate everyone. Including themselves. They don’t intend war, but they don’t not intend war either. They are preparing for war, and taking actions likely to lead to war internal and external.
And I say we should reciprocate.
“The intent of the jab is to sterilise your daughters”
You mean, take THEIR daughters? If blue-pilled ethics lead to 99.999999% of all White people being sterilized or even castrated by The Vaxx because blue-pilled ethics do not allow you to prevent Jesuit infiltration, then adopting blue-pilled ethics to zerg the enemy with large families is not exactly a bright idea.
Мне надоели люди, которые терпят слабость и идиотизм, распространяемые евангельскими уродами.
100%.
Excuse me what. Gun practice?
The gang member is being felony charged for gun possession — he was in possession of a Joel Cano family gun.
Yeah that scared the SHIT out of me. There are no limits or brakes on that line of logic at all. If anyone could point us to a screen-grab of this, please do.
There’s “bad things sometimes happen to good people”, but then there’s “and it’s good and right that they do, in the name of ‘historical justice'”, which is something else entirely.
It’s clear that the leftist mind-virus has brought them to the point where they are willing to say out loud what has been the internal monologue for a long time now. Why they believe that saying this publicly is going to help them, I don’t know.
Normalcy bias isn’t going to evaporate over night, unfortunately, but this just demonstrates that any ideas people on the right had that the left could be reasoned with are out the window.
But these statements absolutely provide us with a gorgeous precedent and tool. “Accountability for historical injustices” can do anything we want it to do.
“I’m sorry, but because of the need for there to be accountability for historical injustices, we need to have you people move en masse to this location here. I’d rather not, but accountability for historical injustices being what it is, I have no choice. I am sure you understand.”
Now you just have to build the injustice “paper trail” and let the games begin.
“I am sorry we have to put you all in a work camp, but as you can see, the historical injustice of your demographic killing your neighbors at rates far in excess of the majority of the population ties my hands.”
“I apologize but as you can see, the murders women committed against the unborn have demonstrated conclusively that if they have a say in politics it leads to genocide. Sadly, because we must ensure accountability for historical injustices we can no longer be bound by the 19th Amendment.”
Lather, rinse, and repeat.
Not that I expect the right, as currently constituted, to pick up and use such a tool, but it is one that the left has handed us if we want it.
Just 50 sad sack down and out Afrikaaners on a chartered plane was all it took to bring their hatred even further out of the woodwork like that. DJT has a gift for getting his enemies to make his points for him. The memewar president. He may be getting a little daffy, but on that point he knows exactly what he’s doing.
Lovely phrase. Happens all the time doesn’t it. We say dumb stuff, do stupid stuff, think nothing off it, but then down the road: consequences!
Re: the cultural debate.
To my mind culture is a product of several factors including:
1. Race,
2. Faith
3. Faith of ancestors
4. Region
When all four factors match, you get people who are culturally similar. Take even one of the factors away and you start getting a cultural distinction, sometimes even a separate sub-culture.
Example: A Hindu born in India and living in India, despite having same race and faith/faith of ancestors, is culturally distinct from a Hindu born and brought up in America. The American Hindu will still be a brown Hindu, but cannot understand Bharat in the same way a Hindu born and brought up in India can. However, common faith and faith of ancestors go a long way in maintaining closeness.
Race \/
Faith \/
Faith of ancestors \/
Region x
Another example: A black Christian living in America has a distinct cultural difference to a white Christian, even though they may live in the same neighbourhood. However, when common faith is challenged they can form a coalition which may be uncomfortable in racial issues become prominent especially because there is a question mark over the faith of one’s ancesors.
Race x
Faith \/
Faith of ancestors ?
Region \/
Another example where common race and region cannot stand a chance when faith is an issue. Subcontinental Hindus and Mohemmadans.
Race \/
Faith x
Faith of ancestors ?
Region \/
This shows that when present faith and/or faith of ancestors differ (or there is a question mark), even common race cannot be a factor in preventing conflict. Thus culturally distinct. Plus, another factor is the Universalists faiths often break the barrier of race and region to form synthetic tribes.
Final example of faith can be a synthetic tribe that goes past cultural and other differences. The prime example is that of Universalist faiths like Mohammedanism. This is complicated by sub-sects and such, but in general, we can see how Turkey and Pakistan can form an alliance despite racial, regional and cultural differences. But such alliances cannot be permanent or long lasting, because Gnon shows that racial similarity, living in the same region and faith of ancestors is a much bigger factor than present faith alone.
Race x
Faith \/
Faith of ancestors ?
Region x
Even synthetic tribes have limitations that come to the fore, when racial identity, and regional/cultural differences come to the forefront.
My verdict. Can a black Christian be culturally “European”? Not very attainable, though if he has lived in Europe for long enough since childhood and his descendants are also born and brought up in Europe, maybe they can become culturally “European-adjacent” in some generations though in the same manner of Black Christians in America, they will always have a distinct sub-culture.
Obviously not. But they can be on our side, when demon worshipping and postChristian whites are enemies.
And when Liberia was founded by freed American slaves, it became obvious that they were not African either.
My exact point. Allies need not be culturally similar or even close when other factors are at play.
Your point about American blacks not being culturally close to African blacks is a good point. But if they spend a couple of generations in Africa, they are likely to become indistinguishable from fellow Africans.
The other point I want to make is that, culture is a very malleable thing and often people on the borders of two distinct cultural regions say A and B tend to take on aspects of both A and B cultures/languages and sometimes form a distinct sub-culture that is neither A nor B but C.
That’s basically what the points being raised boil down too; different nations can be allies to each other.
Certainly true. Does not follow that they should be colocated with each other too. Is good for different nations to not be colocated with each other.
That’s true. But unfortunately due to the existence of Empires, often different ethnic, racial and religious groups are forced to live in the same countries, and even the same neighbourhood.
GAE has been the biggest modern day offender against natural national identity.
GAE is the enemy of all sane people everywhere. Gene-culture co-evolution gradually removes them from the gene pool, and will eventually remove their parasitical sin-exploiting thought-forms from the meme pool; in the meanwhile we are dealing with a Gnostic death cult that’s vehemently despised by everyone not immersed in its gargantuan propaganda machine. Their bubble will eventually burst, and then hilarity shall surely ensue.
Exactly that.
S E P A R A T I O N
It is not possible to hold red-pilled discussions in English.
En ik ga niet uitleggen waarom. Engels is in dit opzicht volkomen waardeloos.
The red-pill that can be spoken is not the enduring red-pill.
.כן, אתה צודק
Dude, you do know we can just use Google Translate, right? 😀
Truly I tell you, I am the vinegar.
“הוי כל צמא לכו לחומץ”
Hahahahaha
О, все жаждущие, идите к уксусу.
Rate this translation.
Je vangt meer vliegen met … maar je doodt meer vliegen met gootontstopper.
Well, not bad. Isaiah 55:1 (the text I’m paraphrasing) in Russian has it:
1 Жаждущие! идите все к водам; даже и вы, у которых нет серебра, идите, покупайте и ешьте; идите, покупайте без серебра и без платы вино и молоко.
Yours isn’t all that far off, in fact.