As you know, the left is melting down over Trump allowing in white South African refugees because the refugees are “fleeing accountability for historical injustices”.
Well, boys and girls, who else is “accountable for historical injustices”?
What is the common factor in the Covid lab virus weaponisation, war in the Ukraine, and mass migration?
That it might kill you.
If we look at the mass illegal immigration sponsored by the deep state and Democratic party (but I repeat myself) we notice they are not just potential voters. They are disproportionately young male and military age. A lot of them were flown in by Biden and Obama. A lot of them were self selected, by crossing the border under their own power, and its natural for young men to be more mobile and adventurous than young women, so that disproportion among border crossers is not indicative of hostile intent, but a lot of them were flown in, and the regime had a lot of control over the sourcing. And they were rather tightly focused on young male military age black Muslims, which is indicative of hostile intent.
We observe deep state aid going disproportionately to gangs, organised militias, as for example Judge Joel Cano providing accommodation and gun practice for a Tren de Aragua member. Similarly, the Democrats are focusing on and obstructing Trump’s deportation of gang members, when a more politically palatable strategy would be to focus on his deportation of less objectionable illegals, who are likely the overwhelming majority of their potential voters, and who do not much like the gangs and black Muslims either.
The Democrats are the deep state. So are not exactly out of power. But they are not exactly in power either. Disputes over sovereign authority will escalate until decisively resolved. Which is likely to be resolved by civil war, the ultimate escalation.
Recently we saw some Democratic party members of congress getting physical with some cops. The leader of the House Democrats says that if they are prosecuted, that is a red line, and Democrats will escalate. Maybe he is bluffing. Probably he is bluffing. But once things get physical, people tend to escalate to forms of violence more effective than an obese woman body slamming a cop. He may think he is bluffing, he may intend to bluff, but like Germany’s war rhetoric a month or so ago, which was intended to be mere empty rhetoric, a gesture, not a real declaration of war, events are a tide that carries men along.
Most leftist don’t consciously intend genocide, but they are awfully comfortable with a tide heading in that direction, and a slippery slope into that abyss. They are double thinking it.
When the Democrat speaker of the House promised escalation, he probably did not know or much care if he was lying or speaking the truth. But he was mighty comfortable with the likelihood that force of events might make his words truth, as the German government was mighty comfortable with the likelihood that when future historians look back at the radioactive ashes of Berlin, they will write that the war started early in 2025, but nothing much happened for a while. When Hitler declared war on America, absolutely nothing happened. Until it did.
War is easy, peace is hard, as falling off a cliff is easy, climbing a cliff is hard.
Let us recollect the Covid virus, and the jab. The intent of weaponising the Covid virus in the lab was to kill you. The intent of the jab is to sterilise your daughters. These people seriously hate everyone. Including themselves. They don’t intend war, but they don’t not intend war either. They are preparing for war, and taking actions likely to lead to war internal and external.
And I say we should reciprocate.
“The intent of the jab is to sterilise your daughters”
You mean, take THEIR daughters? If blue-pilled ethics lead to 99.999999% of all White people being sterilized or even castrated by The Vaxx because blue-pilled ethics do not allow you to prevent Jesuit infiltration, then adopting blue-pilled ethics to zerg the enemy with large families is not exactly a bright idea.
Мне надоели люди, которые терпят слабость и идиотизм, распространяемые евангельскими уродами.
100%.
Excuse me what. Gun practice?
The gang member is being felony charged for gun possession — he was in possession of a Joel Cano family gun.
Yeah that scared the SHIT out of me. There are no limits or brakes on that line of logic at all. If anyone could point us to a screen-grab of this, please do.
There’s “bad things sometimes happen to good people”, but then there’s “and it’s good and right that they do, in the name of ‘historical justice'”, which is something else entirely.
For the record that letter was written in Washington not in South Africa.
It’s clear that the leftist mind-virus has brought them to the point where they are willing to say out loud what has been the internal monologue for a long time now. Why they believe that saying this publicly is going to help them, I don’t know.
Normalcy bias isn’t going to evaporate over night, unfortunately, but this just demonstrates that any ideas people on the right had that the left could be reasoned with are out the window.
But these statements absolutely provide us with a gorgeous precedent and tool. “Accountability for historical injustices” can do anything we want it to do.
“I’m sorry, but because of the need for there to be accountability for historical injustices, we need to have you people move en masse to this location here. I’d rather not, but accountability for historical injustices being what it is, I have no choice. I am sure you understand.”
Now you just have to build the injustice “paper trail” and let the games begin.
“I am sorry we have to put you all in a work camp, but as you can see, the historical injustice of your demographic killing your neighbors at rates far in excess of the majority of the population ties my hands.”
“I apologize but as you can see, the murders women committed against the unborn have demonstrated conclusively that if they have a say in politics it leads to genocide. Sadly, because we must ensure accountability for historical injustices we can no longer be bound by the 19th Amendment.”
Lather, rinse, and repeat.
Not that I expect the right, as currently constituted, to pick up and use such a tool, but it is one that the left has handed us if we want it.
Just 50 sad sack down and out Afrikaaners on a chartered plane was all it took to bring their hatred even further out of the woodwork like that. DJT has a gift for getting his enemies to make his points for him. The memewar president. He may be getting a little daffy, but on that point he knows exactly what he’s doing.
Trump’s ability to induce these hilarious and disturbing announcements is uncanny. It really is the vampire-film demon’s reaction to truth or sunlight.
Rewind your memory a little, and try to imagine doing the Covid Spring and Floyd Summer of 2020 again, but with Twitter and the Executive Branch in their present forms (because that’s what I’m anticipating myself).
This may well become interesting.
As in the Chinese curse: “May you live in interesting times.”
Thing is, in their self image the left is the masses fighting the power, and the reason for their unfailing victories over the “chuds” and “nazis” is that we are a tiny toxic minority who are afraid to fight, unlike their bold courageous selves.
This resembles the self image of the west that led to the Ukraine war — that the west was rich, and Russia was a gas station masquerading as a great power.
Just how many of us tiny toxic minority are there?
This, I think, was revealed when the usual suspects attempted to cancel, demonetize, and deplatform Kirsche, a middle of the road, not very political Vtuber, who covers gossip, games, popular memes, that kind of stuff. She is an influencer and gets paid for talking about some games and other products more than they deserve.
She covered the meme about the woman who said “nigger”, and the usual suspects were enraged.
A company that was paying her cancelled the deal, and play of its game on steam immediately fell to fourteen percent of its previous level — massive boycott. Because they cancelled Kirsche, the vast majority of their player base cancelled them. They were not enraged by Kirsche collecting kickbacks, they were enraged by cancel culture.
We have numbers, we have leadership. Humungus expects collapse. But probably no collapse this time around unless the nukes fly. Which they well might.
“We have numbers, we have leadership. Humungus expects collapse. But probably no collapse this time around unless the nukes fly. Which they well might.”
Collapse will come in due time. Nukes will hasten it.
In any eventuality we must be prepared. Anger is a useful emotion that can be focused on your enemy. Rage even more useful. Despair can be turned into rage quite easily by knowing your enemy who denies you what is rightfully yours.
We will have what is rightfully ours when the old system is swept away. The false enforcers of fake justice will be gone. Then true order can be restored.
We might get a Summer of Floyd Redux if Trump pardons Chauvin. If he does it when the heat index is particularly high, we’ll know Trump intended for some shit to happen.
I do not understand people who think Trump should expend a penny’s worth of political capital on Chauvin. Chauvin was a thug for Tim Walz who got burned when he failed to chuck the wrong bad nigger in the car. Our proper stance on his fate is indifference. Also cops need to go to jail once in a while so “crawl towards me” shit doesn’t happen.
You know pardoning Chauvin is a bad idea because the big push in the right wing Media ecosystem for it came from Ben Shapiro. Ben Shapiro is not our friend or Trumps friend.
It’s called law and justice. We cannot have a man thrown in prison because the media decided to celebrate a piece of shit that should have been executed by the state years ago. I don’t care that you don’t like cops, I don’t either, this is a bigger deal psychologically and spiritually than you give credit.
Is Ben Shapiro our friend… he pushed this. Chauvin for better or worse is not an 80/20 issue.
I beg you… don’t sperg out on this again.
Ben Shapiro is a shill, but the idea was not his, and a broken watch is still right twice a day. A good idea doesn’t become a bad idea because one shill came out in favor of it; that would be genetic fallacy.
This is an 80/20 issue, you’re just having trouble accepting that you’re in the 20%. To the average Joe Griller, most cops are just regular guys doing regular jobs. Lots of folks have run into bad cops or had bad experiences with cops, but then lots of folks have had bad experiences with plumbers and cashiers and don’t develop paranoid theories that all plumbers and cashiers are the scum of the earth.
With lawyers, bureaucrats, politicians, journalists, etc., yeah, they’re all or mostly shit people. Because those are heavily gatekept “elite” (priestly) professions dedicated to the prog religion. Policeman is not an elite profession, it is a blue collar profession, and in the minds of most normies, policemen may be fat and lazy and imbecilic and sometimes crooked, but they are not murderers and they do basically try to maintain order to an extent befitting their limited ability. Think Hank from Breaking Bad, or Danny from Hot Fuzz. Or Nicholas from the latter as an example of one with a stick up his ass – but still not a bad guy.
Whether this normie image is entirely accurate is irrelevant; it is the image they have, and that makes it very much an 80/20 issue.
If Trump said no, then Trump said no. I’m sure he has his reasons. But we don’t need to get the third degree from you every time someone brings it up because of whatever generic grudges you have against the police profession. Hating the popo is lefty and nigger shit. The fuzz don’t need to be put on a pedestal, I think we all basically agree that the “blue lives matter” meme is equally retarded, and cops are not the heroes they sometimes imagine themselves to be, but mostly whatever moral abominations you believe they’re collectively guilty of tends to be the result of corrupt/activist city and state officials and a horribly broken legal and judicial system, not individual cops being individual assholes.
And when Derek Chauvin did what had to be done, he wasn’t being fat and lazy and cruel and crooked, he was actually doing his job in spite of a system all around him encouraging him to be shitty. And for doing that, his life was ruined. No good deed goes unpunished when niggers are involved, that’s what 80% of non-leftists saw.
I have had quite a few encounters with cops that I would rather not have had. And despite that, and despite breaking laws a lot, my record remains spotless. And part of the reason that my record remains spotless is that cops are lazy and incompetent, but a big part of the reason is that they are generally decent and nice.
The main reason that they sometimes behave badly is that they are afraid. Don’t make cops afraid.
>> I do not understand people who think Trump should expend a penny’s worth of political capital on Chauvin.
It’s a major step on the ladder to full reconquest from DEI. People do need visible symbols that power and not just “the vibe” has shifted.
Further steps on the ladder would be removal of all Martin Luther King statues and removal or segregation of sub-Saharans and third-worlders because they are what they are and not on proxy grounds such as being “illegals”.
>Chauvin was a thug for Tim Walz
In the most superficial and vulgar sense, yes, but most policemen are good (yet simple) men who don’t really understand the reality of what they do. To serve and protect (their community) is normality bias, and it’s clear they (Chauvin types) truly believe that otherwise we wouldn’t have so many incidents of dead niggers after they chimp out. The politically correct course of action would be to just let niggers burn down everything, something which (actual) policemen need constant and direct orders to do. It’s just not in their nature to standby and watch needless destruction.
That’s the tragedy of the situation. In any other time, Chauvin would be the hero we want, not the (disposable) thug we get, and it really, really fucking burns to see such men wasted, back-stabbed, and lynched by an immoral evil political elite. This is a rare example of hate the leadership and not the man.
You are thinking very simplistically, at the superficial level. Pardon Chauvin when the heat index is 100+ and watch the chimps burn down some liberal real estate. If Trump wanted to he could then crush them and institute some sort of emergency measures that would be useful. I couldn’t care less about Chauvin personally, he isn’t important as an individual.
Also Trump apparently has had this idea brought to him and he said (correctly imho) no.
The judge is claiming judicial immunity. Which would be reasonable for actions taken inside her courtroom. If she had just whispered in the felons ear, and closed her eyes while he made himself scarce, she would have had a strong claim for immunity. But when she set foot outside her courtroom, her acts stopped being official acts, so, no immunity.
So chances are, a bunch of congresscritters and judges are going to jail. And then just after they are jailed, Chauvin gets pardoned. Ensuing events are likely to be glorious.
Chauvin got double-jeapordied; state and federal convictions. Walz is already stating Chauvin will stay in prison if he gets a federal pardon. In theory this blunts the chimp-out somewhat, though low information chimps will still do something.
But, I see that only proves your point, “if Trump does it when the heat index is high,” knowing Chauvin stays in prison, or better still arrogating himself a new power to pardon for state crimes, then yeah, we’ll know he or someone has decided it’s go time.
Also cops need to go to jail once in a while so “crawl towards me” shit doesn’t happen.
The crawl towards me incident needed a fair and honest trial followed by the death penalty. But notice that nailing cops for blaspheming against holy beautiful black bodies never translates into nailing cops for crawl towards me. It only elevates the holiness of beautiful black bodies and further legitimizes white males as a target.
If I could trade Chauvin for Brailford, and tell any other officer offended by that to police their own next time I would do so, but that deal is not on offer, nor even structurally possible.
Yeah I’d drink beer with the Chauvinist, whereas Brailsford looks like an Antifa faggot and I’d poke holes in his gas tank if we were diving together.
I mean oxygen tank. But who knows what an Antifa is using for (can’t) breathing.
(Too much evilmaxxing lately; guess it’s time for some ketamine refreshment for the soul, or else the sadism gets out of control.)
In fact I’m not such a tough guy.
As the leftist subversive American poet Charles Bukowski wrote in that Bluebird poem,
I’m a gentle soul underneath all the trolling, you see.
Bukowski wrote some pretty good stuff. The subversion was very subtle back then. How could people oppose it? Either make some hard line rule about how alcohol or sex or whatever was bad, which made them look foolish. Or else just use some sort of gut intuition. Without a Jimian style inquisitor who can articulate such things how are we to filter out subtle and high quality subversion?
It’s always a fine line between holiness-spiralling on the one hand, and letting subversion sneak through on the other hand. Ultimately, need to select for (and preserve) a red-pilled faithful priesthood owning Pauline families, and the judgement in each case will be theirs. With a virtuous priesthood, the fine line between holiness-spiralling and letting subversion in should be treaded, and so the task is keeping the priesthood virtuous. Leftism (or social entropy) always wears new and newer shapes, so it’s always a challenge, but when all is said and done, the judgement of good men is all there is to keep it at bay. Of course, some principles and guidelines will be formulated, though over time they are likely to be subject to change in accordance with the new shapes worn by the various heresies.
The creed was a formalisation of some principles to exclude the enemies of Christ — so the enemies of Christ adopted a multitude of new shapes.
The 37 articles was a formalisation of the principles to exclude these new shapes, but the protestants let that lapse, with disastrous consequences. Hence the 39 articles.
And now we have many of the shapes that the creed and the articles were formulated to exclude, plus some new shapes. Unitarianism and Jesus the Jewish community organiser are old shapes the creed was formulated exclude. The articles were largely to exclude various forms of Antinomianism, today manifest as female pastors, gay married pastors, and so on and so forth.
You need a Grand Inquisitor, for the line between harmless heretics who have their own beliefs on certain matters, but don’t get into drama about it, and dangerous heretics who amass a following to pursue power, is a grey line. You run into Sorites paradox. How many grains of sand amount to a heap, how many hairs on one’s chin are a beard and how long do they have to be? Which paradox can only be resolved if there is one man, the Grand Inquisitor, who has authority to arbitrarily make that determination.
If he leans too far in one direction or the other, he should catch flack and come under pressure. It should be possible to replace him if he gets too far up people’s noses, but it should be impossible to overrule him case by case. His decision must be final, unless he changes his mind, or is replaced by a new Grand Inquisitor with a different opinion. The buck has to stop with one man.
The sovereign and the Church (aka the universities) should define the rules, but he gets to decide what the rules mean. The only way to decide Sorites paradox is for one man to make the judgement call.
It may well happen that the collective decision on who was that one man is made retrospectively, in which case we collectively decide on who was the one decider, but there has to be one decider, or at least has been one decider, and his decision has to be the one decision. Otherwise people will game Sorites paradox, as Animus has been gaming shades of red to conclude that because we have eyes, we cannot see.
So what should have been done with Bukowski? What to do with future Bukowskis?
Did the original Bukowski successfully undermine healthy social technology? Will the future hypothetical Bukowski do so? That in my view is the ultimate test. A heretic can continue being a heretic as long as he is out of power and doesn’t cause any real damage. I’m not familiar enough with Bukowski’s anthology to tell if he actually undermined society or was just a heretic out of power. So again, it’s a case-by-case issue. If you tell me that his subversion ultimately had deleterious effects on society, then of course he should have received a “warning,” at the very least. A heretic out of power, however, can be allowed to remain a heretic, at least if his heresy isn’t determined (by a virtuous priesthood) to be excessively perilous.
What do you think should have been done with the original Bukowski, and what should be done with the future hypothetical ones? If you’re familiar with his oeuvre, then perhaps you can elaborate on that point.
I’m not that familiar with Bukowski specifically. I was reading Steinbeck recently who is a more blatant subversive and it is something I have been thinking about. What the authorities in the 1950s/60s etc should have done and what a theoretical regime in the future should do are different. In the past they had the problem of a subversive elite within the elite who rewarded this behavior. So purging Bukowski would just be more useless McCarthyism. In the future if there is no hostile elite and someone tries to put out subversive content then perhaps direct suppression is the answer. But yes it is tough to say where to draw the line. Steinbeck certainly yes, Bukowski I don’t know.
Possibly, but that really depends on whether the heresy is actually causing any serious damage, or is harmless. Consider thinkers like Alan Watts and Terence McKenna; their philosophies were not really Trad or Reactionary or anything of the sort, but also they were not responsible for unraveling the fabric of society, so personally I would not have suppressed them – excessive meddling turns the heretic into a saint, unnecessarily.
Some forms of heresy are worse than others, needless to say. Anything that “challenges heteronormativity” and attempts to stir the public away from God, for instance, should be rooted out. Bad/weird philosophy should not be meddled with, on the other hand.
To survive as a race/civilization you need to breed, to breed you need patriarchal family structures, and to have that you need a religion that sanctifies Biblical Marriage. The most dangerous heresies assault exactly that, and seek to persuade both the elite and the public to abandon God and Biblical Marriage, under various pretexts and rationalizations, though usually the real reason is there being a gay parasite within the heretic’s brain. Other types of heresies are generally less destructive, and thus less deserving of intervention.
All the nations that abandoned God also coincidentally stopped breeding, embraced feminism and faggotry, and will in a few decades no longer exist, replaced by browns and blacks from all over the planet. After those nations undergo reactionary regime changes or autocoups (if that actually happens) they will need to suppress any Prideful heretic who stirs the public against God and against Biblical Marriage. Perhaps there will be one Grand Inquisitor in America to root out all the heretics in the Empire, or maybe all these countries will have local Inquisitors to do that job (subject to the Grand Inquisitor in America, presumably). But a trustworthy man needs to do it, based on his judgement.
Breeding requires durable ownership of women, to provide the necessary incentives for men and women to cooperate in reproduction. Secure property rights requires cooperation between males. The ten commandments command that cooperation.
Absent the Christian God, one part of property rights gets abandoned, then another part, and another.
There has to be (to use Varna’s phrase) “a planetary coup” that will restore sanity and health to all those nations currently under the spell of Satan — or else those nations will disappear, replaced by cannibals — and given the ubiquity of heresy, some more subtle, some less subtle, there will need to be one Grand Inquisitor at the heart of the Empire to deal with cases of suspected heresy case by case, though I assume that local Inquisitors (speaking the local tongue and privy to local subtleties and nuance) entrusted with authority will also be active, or else the Grand Inquisitor will be strained for his job. The Grand Inquisitor will supervise the local Inquisitors to ensure they do the job right, and obviously in difficult cases they should bring the matter to him.
Lovely phrase. Happens all the time doesn’t it. We say dumb stuff, do stupid stuff, think nothing off it, but then down the road: consequences!
Re: the cultural debate.
To my mind culture is a product of several factors including:
1. Race,
2. Faith
3. Faith of ancestors
4. Region
When all four factors match, you get people who are culturally similar. Take even one of the factors away and you start getting a cultural distinction, sometimes even a separate sub-culture.
Example: A Hindu born in India and living in India, despite having same race and faith/faith of ancestors, is culturally distinct from a Hindu born and brought up in America. The American Hindu will still be a brown Hindu, but cannot understand Bharat in the same way a Hindu born and brought up in India can. However, common faith and faith of ancestors go a long way in maintaining closeness.
Race \/
Faith \/
Faith of ancestors \/
Region x
Another example: A black Christian living in America has a distinct cultural difference to a white Christian, even though they may live in the same neighbourhood. However, when common faith is challenged they can form a coalition which may be uncomfortable in racial issues become prominent especially because there is a question mark over the faith of one’s ancesors.
Race x
Faith \/
Faith of ancestors ?
Region \/
Another example where common race and region cannot stand a chance when faith is an issue. Subcontinental Hindus and Mohemmadans.
Race \/
Faith x
Faith of ancestors ?
Region \/
This shows that when present faith and/or faith of ancestors differ (or there is a question mark), even common race cannot be a factor in preventing conflict. Thus culturally distinct. Plus, another factor is the Universalists faiths often break the barrier of race and region to form synthetic tribes.
Final example of faith can be a synthetic tribe that goes past cultural and other differences. The prime example is that of Universalist faiths like Mohammedanism. This is complicated by sub-sects and such, but in general, we can see how Turkey and Pakistan can form an alliance despite racial, regional and cultural differences. But such alliances cannot be permanent or long lasting, because Gnon shows that racial similarity, living in the same region and faith of ancestors is a much bigger factor than present faith alone.
Race x
Faith \/
Faith of ancestors ?
Region x
Even synthetic tribes have limitations that come to the fore, when racial identity, and regional/cultural differences come to the forefront.
My verdict. Can a black Christian be culturally “European”? Not very attainable, though if he has lived in Europe for long enough since childhood and his descendants are also born and brought up in Europe, maybe they can become culturally “European-adjacent” in some generations though in the same manner of Black Christians in America, they will always have a distinct sub-culture.
Obviously not. But they can be on our side, when demon worshipping and postChristian whites are enemies.
And when Liberia was founded by freed American slaves, it became obvious that they were not African either.
My exact point. Allies need not be culturally similar or even close when other factors are at play.
Your point about American blacks not being culturally close to African blacks is a good point. But if they spend a couple of generations in Africa, they are likely to become indistinguishable from fellow Africans.
The other point I want to make is that, culture is a very malleable thing and often people on the borders of two distinct cultural regions say A and B tend to take on aspects of both A and B cultures/languages and sometimes form a distinct sub-culture that is neither A nor B but C.
That’s basically what the points being raised boil down too; different nations can be allies to each other.
Certainly true. Does not follow that they should be colocated with each other too. Is good for different nations to not be colocated with each other.
That’s true. But unfortunately due to the existence of Empires, often different ethnic, racial and religious groups are forced to live in the same countries, and even the same neighbourhood.
GAE has been the biggest modern day offender against natural national identity.
GAE is the enemy of all sane people everywhere. Gene-culture co-evolution gradually removes them from the gene pool, and will eventually remove their parasitical sin-exploiting thought-forms from the meme pool; in the meanwhile we are dealing with a Gnostic death cult that’s vehemently despised by everyone not immersed in its gargantuan propaganda machine. Their bubble will eventually burst, and then hilarity shall surely ensue.
Exactly that.
S E P A R A T I O N
It is not possible to hold red-pilled discussions in English.
En ik ga niet uitleggen waarom. Engels is in dit opzicht volkomen waardeloos.
The red-pill that can be spoken is not the enduring red-pill.
.כן, אתה צודק
Dude, you do know we can just use Google Translate, right? 😀
Truly I tell you, I am the vinegar.
“הוי כל צמא לכו לחומץ”
Hahahahaha
О, все жаждущие, идите к уксусу.
Rate this translation.
Je vangt meer vliegen met … maar je doodt meer vliegen met gootontstopper.
Well, not bad. Isaiah 55:1 (the text I’m paraphrasing) in Russian has it:
1 Жаждущие! идите все к водам; даже и вы, у которых нет серебра, идите, покупайте и ешьте; идите, покупайте без серебра и без платы вино и молоко.
Yours isn’t all that far off, in fact.
Dutch excels in nifty expressions that showcase the inventiveness of its speakers.
In its entirety however it it notably more primitive than English. English has had many more centuries to form. Books from the 17th century onwards, written in English, are readable for 21st century English speaker. Conversely books written in Dutch from that century are unintelligible. Dutch just wasn’t a thing back then. It was a mix of dialects that was still coalescing. Even into the 18th and 19th century, Dutch books are very hard to read, an added problem being that spoken language and written language were nothing alike. The elite had developed etiquette for writing, and the etiquette was rather convoluted.
The closest thing the Dutch had to Shakespeare was Multatuli, who pioneered writing as one speaks. And indeed, from late 19th century onwards, do Dutch books become readable for the 21st century audience.
Maybe our society would improve if English were the ONLY language taught in elementary school.
“There’s been extensive debate on the subject of Hindi imposition on South Indians. They do not want to forsake their culture and dive into homogeneity. But, would you all be with an “English Imposition”? Where schools will start teaching English, and only English? Where children will be taught English as their first language by the state.
I feel like this would be more preferable, as the main argument for people that agree with the “Hindi Imposition” is that it brings unity to our nation and allows for more opportunities. Wouldn’t this argument work even better for English?
What are your thoughts?”
https://www.reddit.com/r/IndiaSpeaks/comments/1jkcjwv/south_indians_would_you_prefer_an_english/
Now, 70-80% of the children in elementary are non-white. So why teach them Dutch?
Is that accurate? If so, then as they say on the incelosphere:
It’s over.
Any debate on what is taught in elementary school presupposes the state has authority over your children from young age. They do not, or as unfortunately all too often the case: they should not.
Let parents decide what language they teach.
And 70-80% sounds grossly inflated. Things are bad, but not that bad.
Yeah, 70%-80% strikes me as a bit much.
The important thing though is to think in terms of processes, i.e., if current trends continue, what will demography look like in X number of years. Of course, collapses usually start gradually, then whooops turn “suddenly.” Hence, there will likely be a point of no return, after which the original society will no longer be salvageable, as it will be constituted mostly by old people who can’t fight or do much else, and then it really is over; one day the black Mohammedans will decide to grill you all up in smokes!
That post where you wrote that your politics are about 10-15 years behind America is alarming, since your fertility, aging, and demographic composition trends are headed for doom and white genocide just as rapidly, if not in fact much more so, than ‘Murica. I’m afraid you won’t make it, unless based Americans and/or based Russians show up and lift you up from depths. (No guarantees that’ll happen, though.)
I really can’t believe that Europeans are so seemingly apathetic about the total demise of their civilization. (Or is censorship preventing you from speaking up more loudly?) I guess because it currently happens so sloooooowly, and for now you have electricity and water and TV shows and so on, you don’t feel it, but the end of Europe is fast approaching. White people don’t magically fall from the sky; they pop out of white pussies – unless simps and faggots within the elite cockblock the process by preventing the formation of families, as is the case right now.
This might be a case of, “Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad” (the madness is in not waking up when it’s still possible to avert the disaster), but it’s still sad to watch.
Or maybe people actually expect the black Mohammedans to step into the Europeans’ shoes or something, lol. Maybe they hope that genetic engineering will successfully turn all the gorillas into geniuses. This is insane.
Everything you say is absolutely right.
Elite theory vindicated yet again – there is almost no right-wing counter-elite in Europe. We have no European Musk or Trump. Instead our royal house spent the last decades handing out medals to radical leftists. Fun fact: Johan Vollenbroek, the man who is more than anyone responsible for destroying farmers and construction in the Netherlands, is knighted in the order of Orange-Nassau.
Talk about sawing off the branch you’re sitting on.
But hey, to add something positive. Can’t find the recent relevant comments on genetic heritage, but now is as good a time as any to confess my lack of 100% bavarian genotype. Supposedly I’m about 2% ashkenazi. @Shaman that makes us practically brothers!
Oh no! You’re practically a kike now. 🙃
I’ve said it many times, material biology is real and matters, but often spirit is a better proxy for constructing the biological material… for both good and bad. In a perverse sense (for the progressives) they got something right with social constructionism. Social and culture context determines reproductive selection, which over time creates the material reality of the population stock. So when they say everything is a social construct, what they’re really saying, by taking it to a logical conclusion, is social darwinism is right. Oh no!
Obviously we want a culture where men who conform, follow the rules, work hard, pay their taxes, and are loyal to God, King, and Country get good reproductive opportunity.
Unfortunately this runs up hard against female instincts, which are tuned for more chaotic and anarchic times, these being the only times in our ancestry where female choice mattered. Their instincts are tuned to get them into a warlord’s harem. This is apt to result in fierce resistance to the family marrying them off to a suitable husband, leading to dramas.
One solution to this is that men who men who conform, follow the rules, work hard, pay their taxes, and are loyal to God, King, and Country get to bear arms as a visible sign of their status and are socially encouraged to do so, and men who don’t, don’t. And in any conflict between one of the more respectable and one of the less respectable men, justice has its thumb on the scales.
Welcome ach sheli, but seriously Alf, looking with your mind’s eye into the future, say 50 years from now, don’t the people around you — neighbors, old friends, grocery clerks, customers if you run a business, etc. — feel that it’s a terrible loss that the Dutch disappear forever?
Maybe I should just give up on the “save Europe” thing. Can’t really save those who won’t save themselves.
Shaman or not, when I look into Europe’s fututre… it’s a bloodbath. It’s gory, nightmarish, infernal. It’s 10.7 magnified by 80 gorillion. Do you imagine BEEP BOOP robots showing up to protect you from the hostile, ravenous savages? This is la-la land thinking.
It will be Death Metal Lyrics in real life. Anyone telling you otherwise is deceiving you. You’re all getting savagely butchered! Apparently all those years of peace made Europeans unable to comprehend their fate. Dude, it will be worse than the 20th century. The sheer brutality, viciousness will be something else.
Don’t grow old in Europe.
Yes, there’s an energy in the US that seeps through on the internet that I identify with much more than anything that’s happening in Europe. And indeed, the few Dutch guys I know that realize what is happening are very much into US politics, and one is considering moving to the US. How serious he is, who knows, but that indeed is the way the wind is blowing.
As for me, well most people will probably consider the archbishop business a total larp, and perhaps rightly so. Nonetheless I am devoting a portion of my life preparing for that eventuality, so if duty ever calls, yes, I will cross the Atlantic.
But for the foreseeable future I believe God intends me to stay here. Things aren’t that bad… Yet. Who is going to conduct this bloodbath? Muslims? Islam has as little antidote to the industrial revolution as Christianity. You can see it happen to Islam immigrants. They either shut it all out, like the Amish or the Afghans, or they succumb to the temptations of smartphones, entryism and unrestricted carbs. A bloodbath requires organized violence, and so far no one has really solved that problem.
That is, except for the faith we propose. Jim’s ideas synthesize modern technology with ancient faith. We are in the best position for organized violence, as crazy as that sounds. Consider how modern warfare does not even require expensive factories. It requires laptops, 3d-printed drones, 3d-printed guns, and men united through faith. Sure, can’t fight the iron fist of the state, but in Europe the states no longer have iron fists. Down the road we’re likely looking at grassroot groups of men establishing control, be they crime syndicates, barbarians, Muslims, or… Jimchristians.
This is the outcome colourfully imagined by Humungus and the Mad Max movies. One hopes it will not be quite as colourful. Also, the villains of the Mad Max movies were men restoring order and recovering technology, so we will shoot Mad Max.
Europe and Australia are now in the environment envisaged at the beginning of the first Mad Max movie. The state is sort of limping along, largely because everyone is suffering from normality bias. Midway through the movie, Max discards normality bias.
Subsequent movies are set in the universe that existed by the end of the first Mad Max movie. Unless the nukes fly, the transition is likely to be less dramatic.
In the universe envisaged at the start of the first Mad Max movie, the nukes do not fly. Rather, rot in the rafter reaches the point where the state is falling down. California.
Thanks for the detailed response.
Are the fertility trends, in your observation, such that, let’s say in 50 years, there will be enough young military-age Jimchristians armed with the best tech — and the best faith 😉 — to ward off the barbarian hordes? Are there any Trad communities (even very small ones) in the Netherlands, of Christian and ethnic Dutch origin, that successfully reproduce regardless of the rest of society? I’m not really familiar with your society, so that’s valuable information.
Well, that’s what we’re going to find out…
Yes, there are still communities which are based to various degrees. Will they resist modernity successfully, hard to say. Fertility numbers have been dropping all across the board, I’m not aware of any exceptions even among bible belt communities, although personal observation is that the drop in such communities is not as steep as in the cities.
But all it takes is a mustard seed right. I am bucking the trend (and hoping to buck the trend even further), and I am not the only one. If a few can pull it off, why not many more.
Part of the “reality is real” gospel is that history is also real, including the future, and it’s always a good idea to extrapolate from current trends to envision what it might look like. Current trends are that white couples, if they are formed in the first place (due to female sexual liberation it is becoming increasingly more rare), bring into the world about one child and 4 cats/dogs. But the pets will not be able to maintain civilization or help out in the hour of need, alas. The society is growing older and older and older, and guess what happens in the end? Yeah, exactly – cannibalized by those other “pets.”
Always think in terms processes; understand that that which cannot continue will indeed stop, and while the Experts and Talking Heads may reassure you that everything is fine, nothing to worry about, go back to sleep, the reality is that you’ve been asleep for far too long, and those Experts are idiots, and in most cases passionately want you dead.
Do people actually expect someone other than whites to maintain civilization? One can point to the yellows, but even if they were just as Faustian as whites, they also fail to reproduce. All the high races are under satanic religions right now that prevent them from successfully reproducing. Civilization will not be maintained by anyone else if the high races vanish. It’s all fun and games – until it isn’t. WAKE UP MOTHERFUCKERS.
And anyone who tells you to worry about “overpopulation” wants you dead, since your people fail to reproduce, and it’s just an infinity of niggers who are the source of this overpopulation. So those satanists want to bring them all in, supposedly to step into your shoes… what they actually fantasize about in those deep, dark corners of their minds is white genocide. Niggers with average IQs of about 70, perhaps 85 if you feed them really really well, cannot and will not step into your shoes. They will slaughter you.
Leftists often have bifurcated brains, so they won’t admit even to themselves that their real, innermost motivation is white genocide (more broadly, deicide and cosmocide, also suicide) -but in reality, there is nothing “rational” about their behavior, they just hate their neighbors and hate civilization and want it destroyed, as they want the whole cosmos destroyed. But they generally do not admit it to others or to themselves — perhaps they are not biologically capable of recognizing what it is that they are doing — however, sometimes they do slip up and let the demons explicitly out, as recently happened.
As long as the Left is in control of all civilized societies, whilst a healthy religion (which mandates stable monogamous patriarchal marriage, and facilitates the enforcement thereof by state and society) is not restored, you are inexorably headed for the genocide of the high races and the collapse of civilization.
Then you have clinical retards like that commenter here, monsieur Le Mao, who believes that the robots are just about to do “everything” better than humans, so it’s okay if you don’t reproduce, because Glorified Google or Super Siri connected to speakers is just right about to make humans redundant, lol. I believe people like that actually want humanity to disappear, and everything they say is simply a clever rationalization they use to justify that desire.
Robotopia is not coming any time soon. Rather, niggerocalypse is coming. Glorified Google connected to speakers won’t save civilization when the lights all go out.
Coincidentally, the people who are most convinced that humans are replaceable by chatgpt, are also phenomenologically indistinguishable from chatgpt.
They see the large language model as intelligent because they were never capable of seeing anything beyond that to begin with.
I remember the “memorizers” from HS and college. Instead of being able to figure out an answer they just memorized everything and regurgitated it. Worked well for them in some classes. Was totally inadequate in others.
Agreed.
From what I’ve seen, AI is like a flea circus. It certainly has a lot of usefulness in certain applications, but outside of those limited instances it is a wonderment that people will eventually grow bored of.
“Oh look! I can ask an AI a question that would take me 4 hours of research on the internet and it only takes 30 seconds! Next stop, Mars!”
If Musk teaches Optimus to fold a sweater, then it will be next stop Mars.
It looks like AI summer is over — we now have great search, vtubers, and deep fakes, but that is all we have.
I would not have made the bet that Musk is making. Walking over uneven ground is a similar problem to washing the socks, and there has been no end of well funded work on walking over uneven ground, with results that work somewhat, but are kind of robotic. Similarly folding sweaters. Works, sort of, kind of, but not enough to be a great product.
These are hard problems for which no solution is known. On the other hand, the ability to do one art in the style of another art, and the ability to self drive, would hint that the problem is soluble.
Remember the nigger that got himself shitcanned from Google because he’d convinced himself that Gemini (or whatever they were calling it back then) was well and truly conscious and sentient and he’d started a crusade to try to convince everyone else?
That’s the type we’re dealing with. “If it can string together a few coherent sentences, or walk six steps without falling over, it must be just like us.” True if you strip away everything from humanity that is actually human.
In fact I’m 95% positive on the nigger ID now and should have realized it much sooner. The boastful tone, the quickness to anger, the complete lack of situational and social awareness, the reduction of intelligence to essentially “good juju”… it’s all there.
That fat retard did not believe there was any ghost in the machine, he recognized that he would get attention if he made a bunch of squealing noises about it. Perhaps he even thought, if he was early and persistent enough, he could get a nice prestigious position for protecting this little fledgling ghost, like all the other successful (im)moral crusades we’ve all been subjects of.
If you look at his face, body language, and writing, very clear he did not believe what he was saying and writing.
Maybe so, but I contend that the average nog is a lot like the average femoid in this particular regard. They lack a coherent, consistent internal narrative, so everything is performative and at the same time everything is also 100% sincere.
The foid generally wants attention and flattery while the groid wants to establish himself as the alpha chimp, and if their beliefs aren’t exactly sincerely held, they are nevertheless quite capable of pretending they are until their dying breath (or yours). The words are their reality and any inner monologue, if one exists at all, is irrelevant.
Honestly, I doubt Blake even really understood the claim he was making, just like I doubt El Mayo understands the claims he’s making. Belief or lack thereof is a category error.
I call it “the Biden” walk.
Well, things are so bad, the Turks worry about the Moroccans, not about the Dutch. Turkish women have 2-3 kids, Moroccans have 4-5 kids. Both populations understand exponential functions.
You lie.
Morrocan tfr, like the tfr of all immigrants, has dropped like a stone. Below replacement level at this point. The average Morrocan is far too busy becoming a rapper or gangster to form a functional family.
Even if every single Turk and Moroccan currently in the Netherlands undergoes a vasectomy, there is an enormous world outside the Netherlands and outside Europe, and that enormous world is full of infinity Muslims, niggers, and Muslim niggers, also cannibals (‘aboogah), and they would all very much like to get into Europe. Right now, you can still technically stop them, because you have militaries, although they are all run by trannies and such. In a few decades, you will no longer have militaries — whereas they will have militaries, formal or informal, because they are young and reproducing — and then you will see one European country after another conquered by third worlders. I think only Americans (and maybe Russians) can potentially prevent that from happening, so I’m glad that their nascent new elite is lurking in this comment section.
America is protected by the oceans, also it has some Based Christians in it who are somewhat fertile. When it comes to white Europeans, however, in the coming decades there will be fewer and fewer of them (they are already dying faster than they are being born), and they’ll be mostly old people, while Africans and Middle-Easterners will multiply and multiply, and these are young populations, and the oceans do not protect white Europeans from all those Africans and Middle-Easterners. Europe is already becoming gradually browner and blacker, but that’s nothing compared to what it will face in 2050, when there will be scarcely anyone to stop millions upon millions of Africans and Middle-Easterners from pouring into that continent and turning it into their continent.
I would assume that the realization that this is the future (at least if current trends continue) would be par for the course among politically conscious white Europeans, and am perpetually shocked to discover that it isn’t. Is worldwide demographic change (for the worse) not happening? Are holy war and conquest not constant features of history? But Europeans appear to have lost their basic common sense. So bizarre, lol.
“Pffffft, no one is going to butcher me!” bleats the sheep standing in line for the slaughterhouse.
If you think that I’m wrong and excessively blackpilled, then by all means, explain how so.
You’re not wrong, Europe is the sheep standing in line for the slaughterhouse.
We shall see how it goes.
Everyone in the Middle-East understands exponential functions, but apparently very few in the West understand that, which is why “Wait, we won’t actually be in the future?” is such a shocking, novel realization to so many Europeans.
Similarly, the understanding that physically and psychologically fit military-age men (rather than sophisticated televisions and so forth) are needed to keep militaries; that militaries are needed to stop the entire third world from making your home into their home; and that without militaries you will indeed be conquered by third worlders who will mercilessly slaughter your entire continent.
Streets full of gray-haired, overweight, 45-year-old Europeans, drinking their beers and cheering on some soccer teams, blissfully unaware of (or in denial about; hard to tell which it is, since they are living under brutal oppressive totalitarianisms) their own coming extinction.
“Sure, we have cats instead of grandchildren — meow meow! — but we’re not going to be cooked in the oven because **checks notes** muh robots will save us and also **again checks notes** some of the immigrants are assimilating rather nicely…”
Sheep to the slaughter.
The consequences of exponential functions, victory in holy war, are spoken of by the Muslim priesthood. The consequences of exponential functions are a thought crime in the West.
Time to conscript wombs.
Mainstream is still arguing about the “deficit”, meanwhile ICE is getting grief and little support deporting organized criminal cartels and Trump refuses to cut out the WWIII party that just attacked Russia’s nuclear-capable bombers, the ones left out only to play nice with nuclear treaties.
At this rate we wont have time for the next generation. We’re going to have to conscript wombs on the way out as the civilization implodes. Got any plans or advice for that?
This is a nuclear escalation, in that the US has double crossed Russia on the nuclear treaties by proxy.
The double cross is being celebrated as Zelensky still having cards, but once you play the double cross card, you cannot play it a second time.
Which makes any peace treaty on any issue more difficult, because the Putin will expect that any concessions where a double cross is possible, will lead to a double cross. As for example the proposed temporary ceasefire, which is obviously just intended as a break to allow more conscription and training for the Ukraine, and to allow Nato in the Ukraine — when Nato goes into the Ukraine, and Russia reacts “Oh the Russians are massively violating the ceasefire.” Why agree to a ceasefire just so that you will lose tempo and be depicted as the bad guy who breaks it?
The Doge cuts are all waste fraud and corruption, and the GOP leadership in the house is, as our resident Democratic party shill points out, blocking these very popular cuts. If you cannot cut waste fraud and corruption, cannot cut anything. If you cannot cut anything, US goes broke fast.
The war faction planned four triumphs against Russia to happen simultaneously with the talks: The START treaty nuclear double cross, the entirely legitimate attack on the Crimean bridge, an entirely legitimate invasion of Russia intended to outflank Russian troops on the Kursk Sumy and force surrender, and a massive attack on civilians and industry.
The Kursk outflanking failed with devastating Ukrainian casualties, which casualties appear to have led to devastating Ukrainian collapse on that front — they lost so many men that they are unable to defend their existing turf and are currently rushing fresh troops in from all over the place to replace the military forces that have been consumed on the Kursk Sumy front to create a new front line far behind the previously existing front line, abandoning many troops on the previously existing front line to die slowing the Russians down while the new line is created. In retrospect, that adventure was a catastrophic defeat.
The attack on the Crimean bridge appears to have destroyed not the structures holding up the bridge, but the fortifications protecting those structures, which fortifications seem to have fulfilled their job of forcing any submarine attack on those structures to come near the surface and be detected. There needed to be an immediate follow up attack, which seems to have quietly failed completely, if it was attempted, which it probably was.
The attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure caused enough harm to piss the Russians off, but not nearly enough harm to impact their war effort.
The double cross on the nuclear treaty was, of course, a gigantic enormous success, as unexpected double crosses tend to be, but no more will Russians enter treaties that make double crosses possible, which makes peaceful coexistence, or even containing war below the nuclear level, vastly more difficult.
Since these negotiations resulted in a gross US escalation in an attempt to extract concessions, obviously it is foolish to ever engage in negotiations again. The purely rational course of action is to launch nukes now, but instead Russia will follow a course of action likely to lead to launching nukes later.
Had all the attacks succeeded, especially the Kurks-Sumy outflanking maneuver, this might well have succeeded in extracting concessions. Since three of the four failed, they merely made future negotiations considerably less likely, and considerably less likely to lead to agreement. And if you cannot negotiate, the only remaining course of action is for one side to annihilate the other. If I was in Putin’s shoes, would just go directly to the end game. I have a perhaps regrettable tendency to go directly to the end game when the end game comes in sight, but Putin endlessly craves acceptance, so is unlikely to do so.
Christians are commanded to not go directly to the end game when it seems likely to be the final destination, but in a dire emergency my inner monsters are apt to take over. The last time this happened, I only grabbed short range weapons, and it fortunately ended with the opponent, seeing I was escalating to lethal force, retreating. In the ensuing conversation with police, I was saved by police laziness, timidity, and basic cop decency that leads them to ignore oppressive rules if you refrain from pissing them off.
In regards to simple demographic reality, Europeans aren’t so much ignorant as indifferent. Not having children means not having any reason to care about the future. Life is all about having fun. When you’re too old and feeble to protect yourself from the cannibal hordes, you might as well let them eat you, because you’ll have had all your fun by then.
Yes. That’s the mentality of drug addiction, “Have fun now, worry about the consequences later.” Well, “later” is soon approaching, and it carries a machete.
If Russia’s strategic bombers were being used to attack Ukraine, they were a legitimate military target, and if they weren’t being used to attack Ukraine, they were an open-air museum of obsolete military hardware.
Big, slow, expensive weapons are useless in this war, and likely in all future wars as well.
Breaking a nuclear arms treaty like that is some terminally low-trust low-down rabid-dog type shit.
And the R’s torpedo DOGE and the judges save USAID and Venezuelan bio weapons. Oh great.
So my pills are black today, without exception. Those of you NOT black pilling by now, please speak up!
Heads have to roll to stop any of this from going bankrupt-nuclear, and I mean this in the most helpless and impotent sense imaginable. Because who the hell can do it, besides Chinese agents?
Is everybody just planning to take Bitcoin to the airport someday and look for a teepee to hide in?
Well I not just planning to take Bitcoin to the airport someday and look for a teepee to hide in. Obviously I have better plans. But if they fail, or are not ready in time, going on the last flight out.
We are currently on course for nuclear war, and the idea is that Putin will duck it and concede, because the Global American Empire is not willing to concede.
We are also on course for civil war, and the question is, will Trump and company duck it and concede?
There is a belief on the left that externally and internally, escalation is always an automatic easy winning move, because it is just unimaginable that the other guy will escalate
And often it is an automatic easy win, because the other guy does not escalate. So you do it again. And again. Until it the time when it is not an automatic easy win.
One thing I guess I can be glad about is that the next-door short-range pop-out drone attack card has been played now, and everybody knows what it is.
The West has foreign agents, a hostile intel community, 4G and Starlink everywhere, so there’s nothing stationary that can’t be blown up this way, and like I said, everybody knows it now.
This “and now everybody knows, and knows that everybody else knows” factor must have serious and concrete game theory implications. My vague sense is that I should feel relieved, too.
In terms of good news, pride month is gone.
As for the rest- this is not something you vote your way out of. At some point the power struggle is going to be resolved via violence. I have no idea how much a relation the news of the day bears to that.
When the Republican leadership refused a vote on waste, fraud, and corruption, things are getting fraught.
Trump has not exactly been rolling over the courts, but neither has he been confronting them.
It is completely obvious that the courts are acting corruptly — the justices that issue these rulings have immediate family who are financial beneficiaries of these rulings, and are themselves indirect beneficiaries, which is a gross violation of the rules — the rules require them to recuse themselves from the case. In the early Roman Empire, judges would accept bribes, and then recuse themselves, shafting the briber, while not shafting Roman Justice. (Because Augustus would death squad them if they did not.)
We need death squads to fix the judicial system.
The whitepill is our enemies are rabidly suicidal instead of passively suicidal. Why a whitepill? Because slavery to Russia is a far better outcome in the long term, when facing the alternative of combined jihad by pakis et al and being roasted in the streets by pakis.
The younger generation in Amerika is extremely radicalized politically. In both directions. The right leaning all are interested in self improvement, patriarchy, holy war, and burning down the edifice of the old system. The left leaning are all interested in self castration, as many drugs as they can possibly stuff themselves with, and trying to make street blacks and eunuchs into political leaders.
If the alphabet soup is reasonably distracted with killing each other, because they cannot agree on the best way to auto-genocide, we spiral into a war that the right will win.
Yes. Good. Out with it. I mean it. As time passes, it takes fewer and fewer hard words to let people notice and comprehend what they’re seeing.
A bit of both for sure. There is the factor of absence of any closeby war, giving Europeans a false sense of security. But they definitely play up their ignorance to hide their indifference.
Interesting NYT article via Simplicius
https://archive.ph/9uqci
Modern wunderwaffen underperform once again.
“In those first 30 days, the Houthis shot down seven American MQ-9 drones (around $30 million each), hampering Central Command’s ability to track and strike the militant group. Several American F-16s and an F-35 fighter jet were nearly struck by Houthi air defenses, making real the possibility of American casualties, multiple U.S. officials said.
That possibility became reality when two pilots and a flight deck crew member were injured in the two episodes involving the F/A-18 Super Hornets, which fell into the Red Sea from the aircraft carrier Harry S. Truman within 10 days of each other.” ($67m each for the F/A-18s)
I wonder how close the carrier came to the coast?
Perhaps not a fresh new insight but can we summarize it as the Cold War paradigm for weaponry is over? Hugely expensive tanks, carriers and airplanes have all shown undeniable weakness against inexpensive weaponry with highly capable on-board software (and in Kashmir, cheap but functioning battlefield integration) .
We are currently in a period analogous to the last hundred days of World War One, when tanks appeared on the battlefield, but because they were not very good, and no one knew how to use them, people continued to fight in much the same way.
We now have cheap low power hardware that can support drone autonomy, but not the software, so our autonomous drones are not very useful.
We are now in a situation where the drones are not very good, and no one knows how to use them, so we are still fighting with grunts on grunts.
Greetings,
This country is on a crash course with doom. It is inevitable.
After the fall, Humungus will restore order very quickly. Humungus order.
Have your war trucks ready with plenty of gasoline and bring along a concubine or two.
We shall ride eternal, shiny and chrome!
Former FBI boss Comey posted a message earlier today on Instagram of seashells spelling out 8647. He’s now claiming he can’t conceive how anyone could take that as a call for assassination or violence of any kind. Given the two separate attempts on Trump last year, that sounds legit.🙃
Anyway, the SS are now involved with Kash standing by:
https://x.com/FBIDirectorKash/status/1923151715777356062
FFS. The guy could just… be retired and kick it, wherever he wants, doing whatever he wants, and just NOT do THAT.
“86 47” come the fuck on. “Calling all crazies with five cell phones…”
In other news, Trump wearing the purple tie to the Gulf states and being received as a King, by other Kings, sure is making a certain point without words. Whew lads.
The Associated Press weighs in on the issue:
https://archive.ph/wip/p4vFj
I found the MW entry for 86 had already been archived 13 hours ago:
https://archive.ph/QPWRK
See? That usage has only been around for at least three decades per the example given. How then could anyone think Comey had anything nefarious in mind with his post?🙃
MST3K’s very own Dr. Forrester demonstrates the proper usage of 86:
https://youtu.be/MO8mEF1AWhw?t=5736
Twitter really is amazing, or at least it is now. There’s so much “leakage” going on, so much “giving away the game”. They just can’t help themselves.
When everything was in print, the editors could gate-keep their own leftmost vanguard, at least for a decade or two. But now, they can’t shut their own people up.
I mean for fuck’s sake, how else, other than a death threat, is anyone with an IQ of 100+ supposed to take that? Do they not remember 2020 themselves?
I mean dammit. All I want, myself, is to relax back into normalcy bias, but then this. “Oh.” “Oh” indeed.
Useless orange nigger is a pressure release valve to try to keep things from blowing up in every neighborhood and every street syria style. Let’s screw him over and unleash the fucking apocalypse. Every day whites keep taking the L; africans still have a TFR of >4; and things are not objectively getting any better despite having your favorite actor/twitter personality in office.
Accelerationism has one basic problem: there’s no such thing as rock bottom.
Life doesn’t need your help to make problems. No matter how bad you think things may be – they can always get worse.
[nods in Khmer/Cambodian]
“Accelerationism has one basic problem: there’s no such thing as rock bottom.”
That’s the problem with assuming inevitability such that we don’t have to take any action. Every year people say, “this is as bad as it can get!” then it gets worse. Repeat for 60+ years. Where we are now, people 30 years ago would have sworn wouldn’t be possible w/o armed revolt. In 30 years, people will still be saying, “wow, it’s so bad now that I’m sure shit’s gonna get real if the government demands more than just our first born for public sacrifice and consumption!”
Remember the movie “The Live”? People paint that as a dystopia, but if you read the messages he sees when he puts the glasses on it seems like those aliens would actually be pretty good masters. Compared to our current ones, anyway.
“obey” : They valued law and order.
“marry and reproduce” : They wanted us to continue as a people.
“work 8 hours; sleep 8 hours; play 8 hours” : A much better balance than many of us have.
“Submit” : As opposed to ‘riot and burn shit for no fucking reason’, I’ll take it.
“Conform” : Yes, there should be a standard of culture that all should aspire to.
I’m half-joking, but not really. The fictional over-the-top evil alien controllers of 37 years ago look like good shepherds compared to the psychos that are running things today.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjw_DuNkOUw
menial white man: please go to work tomorrow to serve niggers who hate you and earn 1/3 of what it takes to makes a living
kicking troons out of the military didn’t improve the zionists’ calculus. Get fucked.
I’m not sure what your point is, or how it is relevant to my post.
I think he is arguing for unorganised race war now.
Which is always a bad idea.
When one side has a legitimate leader, its a removal, not a race war. When World War Two ended, much of the ethnic mixing sponsored by empires was swiftly cleaned up.
Was that perhaps the whole point of that Hollywood movie? Sending the message that marrying, reproducing and conforming to society was “dystopic” and that good, brave people should instead embracing degeneracy and breaking rules?
I haven’t seen the movie except in meme clips, so that’s just my guessing.
Yes, that was exactly the message of They Live.
What you replied to was a bit of “rightwashing”, as the squishier segment of the right lacking memetic sovereignty is wont to do. If “the message” in some film or other work is delivered with any subtlety at all and isn’t a butt-ugly barrage of shit-flinging nihilism, wholly unbelievable girlbosses, general wokeness and clown-world metaphors as subtle as a kick in the nuts, then it’s “surprisingly good”, or “diversity done right”, or something of that nature.
c.f. just about any highly rated comment on Critical Drinker’s YouTube channel.
The sunglasses meme from They Live is a pretty great one, visually speaking, but is the one and only great thing about that movie, which was in all other respects Straight Outta Marx. By way of example, one of its subtexts is that methane and carbon emissions are literally terraforming our planet into an alien atmosphere. As such, the film is not really our best argument when one peels back the facade; it is analogous to those leftists who love to quote that one particular verse of the bible. You know the one.
If you get good mileage out of using it to troll the left, then by all means, meme away; just don’t mistake it for one of our own.
There is a rock bottom, a stage in the historical cycle when “hard times create strong men”. But we won’t get there until people are literally starving to death and being murdered for the meat on their bones.
“Marry and reproduce” sounds a lot better than “shove your dick in a man’s anus, or chop it off.”
The Lego Movie was supposed to be communist propaganda, but its corporate fascist dystopia looks like a very nice place to live.
There is indeed a rock bottom in a manner of fashion; seven kill stele total autogenocide.
Survivorship bias. All the places where hard times failed to create strong men disappeared from history.
If our race and civilisation vanishes, who will remember?
There is no rock bottom. Those peoples who vanished utterly far outnumber the seeds from which our current civilisation comes.
Great point. I remember people often saying, “Whites always rise up in the end and remain White!”
Then ignore me when I ask what about the Chachapoyas, the Kalash, Brahmins (of northern india), the Tarim Basin people, and the many others who do not even leave a fading remnant.
Curtis Yarvin vs Professor Danielle Allen | Democracy Debate at the Harvard Faculty Club
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMMA0UzDaJA
The Harvard professor can only give banal platitudes, and is unresponsive to any of the arguments Yarvin advances. There is no debate. She can’t acknowledge or even look at Yarvin let alone shake his hand. She sounds like a broken record.
The low quality shill posters here might just be Harvard professors. Rule by prestige is very fucking dead, and only normality bias is keeping the ‘Ivy Tribe’ around. They are walking dead. They don’t even realize it. The laxity of the Trump administration in killing these institutions is especially frustrating when you realize actual resistance to closure may not be that far off from the dismantling of USAID.
Faith is easy to define. Race is not. Wars are fought over clear divisions. Hence the plethora of holy wars and the (relative) dearth of race wars. Hakan was right. High-quality racism is extraordinarily hard work.
Well that’s mainly because the race wars would be happening regardless of the participants consciously defining it as such or not. Conflict would happen, and it would just coincidentally always be along ethnic gradients as well.
The post-war peace in Europe was often chalked up by the victors to shared faith in the ruling harvardian demotism. In fact, the recurrently simmering conflict spots flamed out because in a real sense the conflicts were all concluded; in practically every location on the continent where there was friction from overlapping demographics, events of the 20th century would see one left while the others were all expelled, extirpated, or otherwise physically removed, by others or voluntarily or something of both, each to places more like in kind.
That is to say, they reaped the benefits of that which was most explicitly denied to begin with.
>Conflict would happen, and it would just coincidentally always be along ethnic gradients as well.
Sure, but that’s not by definition a ‘race war’ in the progressive genocidal sense. The idea of being at war with something as (heh) democratic as a ‘people’ is highly 20th century. The Viking invasion of Albion did not result in the destruction of the Anglo, nor did the thousands of various European conflicts (~700 AD to ~1800 AD) ever work to homogenize populations (if anything European diversity exploded in the time period). Elite factions (who just coincidentally were various gradient distances from each other) waged war amongst themselves, and took the conquered subjects as their newly obtained property. Over time those elite factions started to look more similar to each other than their ruled subjects, and in a sense were their own ethne.
Europe really only had two periods of ‘race war’. Classical antiquity and the progressive era. Both hold in common, and likely root cause in, democratic government. Proto-Europe also had ‘race war’ in a very loosely defined way (Aryan conquest), but the mechanism of which can far easier be seen as an outcome of tribal society rather than any form of governance we’re familiar with today.
The fuck are you talking about, gookbrain?
The idea of being at war with “a people” long predates the Old Testament. There’s evidence for that in Ancient Egypt! Consider just not posting about race; I like you, seriously, you’re not a bad person, you’re a good person, but whenever race is brought up you issue endless nonsensical subversion due to the noodle-shaped chip on your shoulder. Enough with this.
Is there evidence for the idea of being at war with a people in ancient Egypt?
Pretty sure that when the $#!% hit the fan in Exodus, they were at war with a faith.
What is the evidence?
The Assyrian habit of hauling the elite off to Assyria would suggest that the Assyrians did not think they were at war with a people.
Not ancient Egypt, but ‘Israel’ warring with ‘Amalek’ seems more aptly described as a war between people than as a war between faiths. Israel being tribes all descended from one man, and Amalekites presumably similar.
Yes.
For example, the Amarna Letters:
https://www.ub.edu/ipoa/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/20211AuOrMinarova.pdf
From what I gather, the references there are also to peoples (e.g., the Hittites, with whom relations were hostile), not just to rulers/faiths.
For example, the Shasu mentioned in the letters:
https://www.memphis.edu/hypostyle/tour_hall/seti_scenes.php
Another, possibly stronger example, would be the Merneptah Stele.
From Wik:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merneptah_Stele
It describes victories over various peoples.
Admittedly, the evidence from the Old Testament regarding identification of peoples (wholesale) as enemies is much stronger.
But this should suffice.
>The idea of being at war with “a people” long predates the Old Testament
Yes, in a completely literal sense what you said above is true, but I know, you know, ‘a/the people’, as colloquially used currently, has much additional social and political meanings which don’t exist in the OT. I said “something as democratic as a ‘people’”. I find your selective quoting, blatantly ignoring qualifying wording and context, tedious.
In the modern sense, being in a race war with ‘a people’ in the democratic sense means killing the small time Jewish baker because you (mistakenly believe) you’re at war with (Jewish) Global Capital. This belief system happens because in systems of mass political “enfranchisement”, entire population groups are viewed as mattering and holding power (regardless of whether that is true or not). Thus being at war with a power puts one at war with all those perceived as holding that power. For the most part in history, the majority of people did not have power and were thus considered non-combatants in conflicts involving organized armies of states more advanced than tribal. There just wasn’t any point (generally) in mass killing powerless people.
>There’s evidence for that in Ancient Egypt!
Are you seriously referencing the exodus for an example of race war? That’s a bad example. Exodus 2:18–21:
Oh no! Moses, full blooded kin of the Hebrew, is Egyptian passing… not just Egyptian raised. Quite possible the ancient Hebrews and Egyptians would be considered the same ‘people’ in the modern racial sense, and the conflict had more to do with socio-political factions and later religious differences. You may have been better off using the example of the Amalek of a proper OT race war… but even then, those people were more or less cousins of the ancient Hebrews and religious justification for wiping them out are highlighted more than anything else. The Egyptians received relatively very gentle treatment. Reminder that the plagues were design to convince the Pharaoh, not exterminate all the Egyptians in some sort of race war (even if there was escalating collateral damage).
Funnily enough, the current war your people have with the Palestinians looks like a repeat of the conflict with Amalek. Genetic studies find significant overlap between Jews and Palestinians. It’s a ‘brother’s war’ mainly over religious differences and not a ‘race war’.
Pax, with all due respect, take the time to read the whole Old Testament. It’s not just Amalek.
>Sure, but that’s not by definition a ‘race war’ in the progressive genocidal sense.
Well, then it sounds like you are being tendentious and have enemy thought-forms poisoning the brain.
Truly, genocidal warfare was the only warfare prior to the middle ages when clearly-defined nation-states emerged in Europe. Old testament wars tended to be about the complete expulsion or extermination of the “descendants of X”, where X = some patriarch, prophet and general all rolled into one.
Though, it’s a category error to debate whether or not it is “race war” because there was no analogous concept of “race” at that time. Wars were between tribes, or nations according to antiquity’s definition (i.e. not the modern geographical definition). The tribe or nation of the time was a nebulous amalgamation of heritage, religion and allegiance that wouldn’t and couldn’t be further dissected along finer lines. There was obviously nothing like blacks vs. whites (or negroids vs. caucasoids) at the time because those two groups hadn’t even met each other.
Hence, we just say “peoples”. But they knew who they were, and who their enemies were.
In some cases the Old Testament might just refer to generic “idolators” which would indicate generic holy war, but when the people are actually named, usually seems to describe a nation.
“Old testament wars tended to be about… the “descendants of X”, where X = some patriarch… Wars were between tribes, or nations according to antiquity’s definition”
Indeed, the words “nation” and natal” come from the same root.
War is a tide that sweeps men along, and that was true in the past as well as today.
In Ancient Greece, a lot of wars end in treaties that oppose unfavorable terms on the defeated, or with the disbandment of the enemy’s political elite. Sometimes, the wars end with total ethnic cleansing, removing every inhabitant of an enemy city into either slavery in the countryside or exile. There are plenty of wars that look explicitly genocidal in history, plenty that result in the killing or removal of the political elite (generally what is meant by ‘the people’), and plenty that respect the defeated enemy as a continuing entity. It’s hard to see through the fog of history why some wars turned out genocidal and some did not, but genocide was always an option that was sometimes employed.
“Being at war with a people” may have increased with demotic thinking, but it was not as if it was a politically unheard of option. When William I conquered England, the southern earls cooperated with him, but the northern earls rebelled. He captured their leaders and granted them full Christian forgiveness. They rebelled again. William sent them into exile. They came back from exile and rebelled a third time. Then William went Old Testament on Northern England, committing acts that well qualify as “war against a people”.
War is the supreme IQ test; race wars are uncommon because the various races are so grossly mismatched. Either the lower-IQ race sees its fellow apes getting slaughtered and quickly surrenders or flees (Myanmar), or the higher-IQ race is paralyzed by an anti-racist ideology, can’t deprogram itself fast enough, and gets wiped out (Haiti). Both happened in Rwanda.
>race wars are uncommon because the various races are so grossly mismatched.
Europe’s peripheries (Eastern Europe and Mongols, Balkans and Turks, Mediterranean and Barber raids, Iberia and Moors) saw massive and sustained conflicts between various races that were not gross mismatches, yet none of those conflicts ever entered the territory of what the progressive era would call a ‘race war’.
‘Race wars’ mainly seem to happen with tribal governance, hence Africa’s numerous genocidal conflicts and our own evolutionary prehistory (~10000 to ~40000 years ago), and during democratic governance (Classical Antiquity and the progressive era ~1800 to present)
Now, 70-80% of the children in elementary are non-white.
Mossadnik
Is that accurate? If so, then as they say on the incelosphere:
.
when i graduated high school in the 80s, there was a district near me that was +90% white midwestern farmer kids.
.
they have gone +50% hispanic. and they were +50% hispanic in the mid-2000s. overall population is +30% hispanic, reflecting the higher reproduction rate of the immigrants. white students are under 40%.
Goshen, Indiana.
[*deleted for failure to comply with the moderation policy*]
Christians have a far bigger and more urgent problem than Mohammedans. Or Jews for that matter.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. So right now old type Mohammedans are our friends, even though they will probably stab us in the back once the common enemy is on the ropes.
Bin Laden was progressive, and an enemy of the alt right. The Iranian theocracy is progressive, and enemy of the alt right. But the Taliban and the alt right were born in the same place on the internet, and have always been buddies. Probably will stop being buddies once we are near victory, and they start to see old type Christianity as a bigger threat than woke. But buddies now, and from their and our beginnings.
In the beginning, they went old type Mohammedan, or they claim, always were old type Mohammedan. The alt right is now, belatedly, going old type Christian. Which will probably lead to drama eventually but it is not leading to drama now.
The first Taliban conquest of Afghanistan had as its primary issue poofs off roofs. The lavender mafia had destroyed cohesion and order. Subsequently Globohomo took Afghanistan with little resistance, and proceeded to dismantle cooperation between men and women in reproduction, which met considerable resistance. These are issues dear to the alt right.
Muslims can afford to treat women like property, because they have polygamy. That is, women are available on a free market, no price controls, no item per customer. So, no incentive for female infanticide.
If we are to oppose Islam, we should so from the other side. Four wives is not enough.
If you’re conquered primarily by Africans, expect to be cooked in the oven. If you’re conquered primarily by Middle-Easterners, some of them might show mercy towards you and instead of cooking you, they will convert you to Islam. (Certainly, they will take the few young women still around as concubines.) Thus the white race in Europe might still have some biological continuity under that religion.
If you don’t like either of these scenarios, or any combination thereof, then you — or, rather, the Americans post autocoup — will need to change the European regimes and install Based Christian priesthoods instead of the current Prog priesthoods. Patriarchal monogamy works just fine for Europeans, if they actually stick to it. You guys conquered the whole planet back when you took Saint Paul seriously. Then in the 19th century you gradually stopped taking religion seriously (because subversive faggots memetically pozzed up your elite, as they always do), and now the whole planet is about to conquer you.
To conscript wombs, you need to stop listening to subversive faggots, and bring back pro-natalist religion. There is no “alternative.” There never was. That’s the only option to save the West.
The problem is that people (idiots) ask themselves, “Which vibe is most appealing to my preferences?” instead of asking themselves, “What actually works?”
If you ask the former question, you will fall for gay subversion time after time, because they always come up with all kinds of vibes that might be superficially appealing, but that don’t actually advance civilization and reproduction, but rather hinder them. Whereas, if you ask the latter question, then you realize that it’s adherence to Divine Law or racial-civilizational death, and that anyone who is trying to convince you (this way or that way) to “drop religion, bro, it’s just semitic bullshit” is not your ally, but your worst enemy, and usually a faggot pissed off at the Based Book of Leviticus.
(אם אתם מבינים למה אני מתכוון)
Happy Pride Month!
When pro-natalist religion is ditched in favor of some gay bullshit, the result is that instead of grandchildren, you have le robots, le cats, le robotic cats, dishwashers so technologically sophisticated that they are connected directly to your brain (at least until your skull gets smashed by vibrant practitioners of Voodoo), and all kinds of long-term unsustainable delusions.
What don’t have is civilizational continuity, since you fail to reproduce — you even fail to have non-reproductive sex, which is exactly the gay plan; what they seek is teleological inversion — and so after a few decades you are left with no warriors to defend against invasion by millions upon millions upon millions of Global Southerners. Such will be the fate of Europe in around 2050 or so, if the nukes don’t obliterate it beforehand.
You urgently need God. I’m not even telling you which specific religion – but you definitely need a Based Religion, and anyone telling you otherwise almost always “just so coincidentally happens to be” a subversive poof, with or without kike ancestry (disproportionately with, of course), who cares about covering his dick in other men’s shit — and exclusively about that — and doesn’t care about actually saving civilization.
As Lord Krishna informed us in the highly recommended Bhagavad Gita, the Song of God, in chapter 4, verses 7-8:
Get it?
Reestablish the principles of Dharma!
A worldview that doesn’t lead to successful reproduction is necessarily not in line with the principles of Dharma, even if some misguided souls — who might not have heard about exponential functions, or who are not allowed to reflect on their implications vis-a-vis differential fertility trends among different populations over the span of decennia — find that worldwide to be “appealing” for whatever reason.
When a race dies faster than it reproduces, and keeps growing older and weaker and sicker, that race is on its way out of history – “gradually, then suddenly.” Objectively healthy policies (pronatalism, in this context) rooted in an objectively healthy memeplex (Divine Law, or the principles of Dharma) are needed to fix that, or eventually you end-up viciously devoured by Uncivilization; anything else is necessarily subversive gay bullshit.
The moment of “eventually,” alas, is fast approaching. The Gods of the Copybook Headings are on their way, with terror and slaughter, as per usual. If the autocoup in America succeeds, urgently need to change the regimes in Europe — even if that means going to war against those regimes — or else Aryans will rapidly disappear from their own homelands, or become a beige Islamic hodgepodge.
The new regimes in Europe, or their state religions to be more precise, should be based on the principles of Dharma.
😉
Widespread normalised polygamy would result in a whole lot of young men who do not get a wife, do not have a prospect of getting a wife, and therefore have no reason to work, to pay taxes, or to fight for God, King, and country.
You also get higher fertility if almost everyone marries, that being the only way to get reasonable pussy reasonably regularly. If four wives, each wife is likely to have fewer children.
[*Deleted. Please follow the moderation policy*]
[*Deleted. Please follow the moderation policy*]
[*Deleted. Please follow the moderation policy*]
https://cultuurondervuur.nl/artikelen/staatscommissie-zet-struisvogelpolitiek-voort-wil-niet-meer-nederlandse-kinderen
“Gezinsbeleid interesseert ouderen niet
En hier schiet de democratie zichzelf in de voet. Want een gezinsbeleid is per definitie niet meer interessant voor oudere stemgerechtigden, die gewoon zijn voor het directe eigenbelang te kiezen. Goed beleid zal dus electoraal worden afgestraft, waardoor de krimp nog meer zal versnellen. Wat daarom dringend nodig is, is een visionaire bevolkingspolitiek, die zich weet te ontworstelen aan politiek-correcte denkkaders, en brede lagen aanspreekt. Voorlopig blijven echter, zoals Schooyans zegt, “de struisvogels aan de macht”. Helaas brengt daar ook het jongste rapport van de Staatscommissie Demografische Ontwikkelingen 2050 geen verandering in.”
tl;dr : Boomers don’t care whether everything goes down. Note: This organisation opposes euthanizing them because of religious objections.
Yeah, everything I’ve been ranting about, plus the fact that you need functional militaries (manned by military-age male ethnic Dutch) to keep millions of invaders out, which by 2050 you won’t have. The boomer-gerontocrat mentality is, “I probably won’t be alive by then, so screw civilization, give me my hedonism here and now.” It’s like watching a trainwreck in slow motion, while moreover some Trusted Experts, whose noses tend to look rather unusual, zombify the passengers into believing that they have absolutely nothing to worry about.
Under normalcy bias, The Netherlands will be a Sharia-state around 2030.
Lol. But Sharia is actually an immense improvement over niggerocalypse; and the moment it seems inevitable, might as well convert, if only temporarily until the American Crusaders liberate you from the occupation, if ever that happens.
Your descendants (the human ones, not the robotic cats connected to chat GPT) might be almost as brown as Aye Le Mao’s circumcision scar, but at least it’s not literally being salted and peppered by oogin’, boogin’, bixnoodin’ headhunters who haven’t yet shed off their furry tails.
It’s amazing to me that people fantasize about all kinds of sci-fi futures without taking into consideration that if white people are all replaced by Pakis, Afghanis, Congolese, etc., none of this s**t is happening. Apparently they haven’t considered the idea that 80 IQ sandniggers might not be particularly suited to running a space-colonizing project. I mean, if you imagine the future, and that future has white people in it, then surely they need to reproduce and not be genocided? And if they fail to reproduce and eventually are genocided, then it’s just thugs, Jihadists, cannibals, and so forth who will be in the future. Isn’t that crystal-clear obvious? Then who is going to colonize space – muh beep boop robots? They need maintenance, don’t they? I doubt goat-herders residing in the cave will successfully maintain them. The kikes told the boomers that they will all literally become computer programs, but it’s unbelievable bullshit. You’re not becoming a computer program; you’re becoming a Muslim or mincemeat or both. You’re becoming a shawarma!
That genre of sci fi is called post apocalyptic. Though following WWII I doubt you could get a sci fi published which blamed the apocalypse on feminism and racial+reproductive degeneracy.
Well, as the third most important Heeb in Israel after Benjamin Netanyahu and Yinon Magal, I declare that the fake and gay Religion of Holocaustianity is hereby and forevermore abolished, and that it’s time to just fucking let go of abloo abloo past traumas and seriously think about where civilization is headed, because it’s not in a positive direction, to say the least.
The silly thing about “become a computer program” is that even if they could “upload” the patterns of a human brain into a machine, (they can’t, of course) that still would not be “you won’t die”.
Rather, it’s quite obviously “you die, and a machine replaces you”.
Yep. And the rest of the AI Demonism is not much better. Right now, a bunch of gnostics, many of whom are gay, Jewish, or both, promise the public that the AI Demon will show up soon, so soon, and that it’s absolutely going to be super duper mega hyper intelligent and even conscious, and basically humanity is about to become obsolete within the coming decades. And none of this is even remotely true, it’s not even close, nothing of the sort will happen this millennium or the next, likely it will never happen because it cannot happen. It’s nutty nonsense. Sure, they’ll come up with some computer programs that will be somewhat more interesting (and hopefully more useful) than the currently existing computer programs – but that’s about it. No conscious AI Demon is coming, soon or ever.
False prophets.
Maybe an AI that’s as fake as the old Mechanical Turk, just with an actual demon at the controls, rather than a human.
Interesting podcast on the Paki-Indian fight. Episode 87.
https://www.manifold1.com/episodes