The early headlines are extremely interesting.
Trump removed from stage by Secret Service after loud noises startles former president, crowd – USA today
Donald Trump is escorted from stage after pops heard during pennsylvania rally
NBC News:
Secret Service rushes Trump offstage after popping noises heard at his rallyAssociated press:
Trump has been escorted off the stage by secret service after loud noises ring out in the crowd.CNN Politics
Secret Service rushes Trump off state after he falls at rally.
That the press and the government immediately applied uniform messaging indicates the messaging had been prepared in advance for the possibility that the assassination would fail — but was not prepared in advance for the possibility that the attempted assassination would lightly injure Trump.
The prepared messaging was appropriate for a complete fail, but hilariously inappropriate for Trump lightly injured.
The headlines look like they were prepared in advance of the attempted assassination for the case that the assassin missed. But the assassin did not entirely miss — he got a grazing hit on the president’s head. The early headlines were strangely bloodless, resulting in the headlines being strikingly inappropriate for the event, a tell tale sign of being prepared in advance. Particularly “falls at rally”. Trump ducked as the firing continued. He did not fall.
The assassin shot from a rooftop. Why did the secret service not have a man on each of the rooftops? There were not very many of them.
The secret service killed the assassin, but this was after Trump had been hustled away. Why kill the assassin, except to shut his mouth permanently?
Inside job?
https://x.com/SharpFootball/status/1812265909727396107
Obvious inside job. Looks like they had two sets of headlines prepared in advance.
Observe the headlines appearing that were prepared for the case the assassination failed and no bullets came anywhere near Trump and the podium, and then very shortly thereafter hastily modified for the actual case that Trump was hit, but not seriously injured.
This guy, which I’m sure you’ve all seen already, claims their group of friends were telling police and SS about a man with a rifle climbing to a rooftop, but the rally continued. Another confirmation of a sloppy operation.
Fixed link: “This BBC interview with a guy outside the security perimeter who claims he saw the shooter before he fired is absolutely wild”
Why kill the assassin?
Imagine you’re just a grunt on the ground, you hear shots fired. You see the shooter. Obviously you shoot him.
Of course that doesn’t remove the potential that was part of the planing if there was any. They certainly didn’t seem to consider the shooter’s get away plan.
Like with oswald the plotters didnt want him to talk…
Hey, I’m just trying to point out the typical grunt is all too happy to return fire, he has spent his entire life training for this moment and now he gets to get some. No need to brief him or convince him to kill the assassin or be a part of any plot. It’s even probably safer that way, less loose ends.
Incompetent CIA plot they killed the shooter and made sure he had an open rooftop but picked some antifa idiot drug addict rather than an ex marine sharpshooter like Oswald who knew what he was doing.
Anyway total leftist death now. If you’re not part of the final solution (to leftism) you’re part of the problem.
Leftism selects for 3 things: stupidity (low IQ), insanity (low reality testing), and evil (low virtue). Now it’s dumb soyjaks, increasingly trashy and demon-possessed ones, who work in the media, work in the spy agencies, and (most obviously) participate in Antifa terrorism. So the media reporting was dumb, the assassination plot was dumb, and the shooter was dumb. Just horribly botched from beginning to end. Leftism is its own punishment.
I assume it is the radical faction attempting to stop Thermidor, attempting to stop defection within the ruling class by assassinating the defectors’ presidential candidate, signaling escalation and willingness to fight holy civil war immediately. First they convicted him so they can Epstein him, then opted to speed things up and assassinate him the old fashioned way – but with everyone involved being an idiot and a failure.
Leftism selects for 3 things: stupidity (low IQ), insanity (low reality testing), and evil… So the media reporting was dumb, the assassination plot was dumb, and the shooter was dumb. Just horribly botched from beginning to end. Leftism is its own punishment.
It’s so hard to hire good help these days!
“Incompetent CIA plot they killed the shooter and made sure he had an open rooftop but picked some antifa idiot drug addict rather than an ex marine sharpshooter like Oswald who knew what he was doing.”
My exact thought except “chose” -> “best they could get”. At least it wasn’t an Indian trigger-puller!
[*deleted because I do not approve of jumping the gun on facts not yet in unless clearly presented as speculation, or speculation based on evidence that is not yet all in*]
When the facts came in on the people who attempted to murder Kyle Rittenhouse, they were so exactly the people that the alt right expected, that it was as if God was writing the script to prove to everyone what the alt right already knew.
I expect that when the facts come in on the people who attempted to murder Trump, they will tell the same story as the attempted murder of Kyle Rittenhouse told, only even more so. We shall see.
Here is the photo of the perp, from a well-known rightoid: https://x.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1812311139986166210
Like I said, white male. There are millions more like him.
The photos of the people who attempted to murder Kyle looked roughly as white and male as this man — who in any case may well be the patsy, not the assassin.
But, supposing he is the assassin, when his bio actually comes out, it will likely have a marked resemblance to that of those who attempted to murder Kyle.
We finally got some photos of Thomas Matthew Crooks, the 20-yo alleged assassin with a seriously deformed face. When I see a photo gallery of such hideous cretins, I have to read the accompanying article to find out if they’re Antifa or pedophiles. Did their mothers drink paint thinner while pregnant?
Info on the shooter:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/7/14/what-we-know-about-thomas-matthew-crooks-the-suspected-trump-rally-shooter
God be with us all.
Amen. Thank you, Heavenly Father.
That picture harkens back to iconic WW2 photos. Team Baldrick’s Cunning Plan B to Epstein Trump in the open gave Trump heroic tier publicity.
God confounds the wicked with their own sin.
Hot takes:
Was 2/3 through a cup of coffee when I saw the story. Threw out the rest of the cup, the adrenalin surge was more than enough. Had to go for a walk to let it run off. As someone at FQ said, we’re in an era in which we’re living through decades of normal historical time in weeks.
Why does the left care this much about Trump? They largely thwarted him in his first term; what stops them from just doing that again if he gets a second term?
This suggests that they actually have to an extent started to believe their own propaganda: TrUmp iS a DanGeRoUs Nazi fAscisT nAzi!!! Seriously, what specific outcomes do they fear if he gets back to the White House?
Maybe they’ve realized that their politicized persecution of him gives him carte blanche to go after them if he’s re-elected. In a 2016 debate he told Hillary Clinton “You’d be in jail” if he won the White House, but it was just rhetoric. He never went after her or any other Dems; it would have crossed a dangerous line in US politics and it would have given the left a huge propaganda win in terms of “He’s a dangerous dictator!” agitprop. But now that line has been crossed. And since they crossed it first they can’t (convincingly) use that propaganda if he starts prosecuting them.
This hit attempt suggests that there actually is a “margin of fraud” in elections, much to my surprise. If establishment leftists knew they could just fraud their way to the White House, they wouldn’t need to bother with this.
Trump’s bloodied cheek is for all to see. The Bible, as Jim reminds us, is pretty clear on his further obligations.
Speaking of too much coffee and adrenalin, that did not come out as I’d hope. Forgive me, lads, young and old, for the potential poetic fumble.
Yeah, got you. When someone slaps you on the cheek, turn the other (you have only one other cheek; you don’t have endless cheeks). But when the shooting starts or is about to start, when the bullets are flying or are about to fly, then you go Old Testament – eye for an eye, bullet for a bullet. You can forgive a little humiliation, though you need not do so endlessly; but you must not forgive someone spilling your blood. Retribution is sanctified and demanded by GNON.
Anyone who thinks seriously about it can understand the difference between an insult and an attempt on your life.
Jesus did not say not to defend yourself if someone is trying to kill you.
This save is much appreciated, Brother.
A bloodied cheek is pretty poetic, really.
My error was not going further and potentially leaving the reader dwelling exclusively on “turn the other cheek”, which the MSM in full Hippy Jesus mode today explained means bend over and spread both cheeks.
Trump’s bloodied cheek symbolizes he has done his duty as a Christian to seek the peaceful resolution if possible and practical. I was taught the meek as in the meek shall inherit the earth are those who own weapons and know how to use them well, but endeavor to be peaceful neighbors.
Trump can now fire at will and only the perfidious can criticize him for doing so.
I suspect disagreement between factions that wants Trump in to simultaneously stall the decline and take the blame for it, and factions that want to immanetize the eschaton today rather than tomorrow – and that the chain of command for settling such disagreements has broken down, so everyone starting to settle them in their own ways.
To wit; as the default ‘placeholder’ figurehead for party unity it’s fair to say most of the establishment gerontocrats were hitched to the wagon of Biden’s handlers; but since the Biden Wagon has just spectacularly ditched itself (been spectacularly ditched) and is currently flipping end over end down the hill into the gully, all the nomeklatura involved have also taken huge hits to their status by association with the devalidation.
Which in the viper pits that is a leftist organization can be fatal, but more importantly, it means the organization of the inner party is cracking up – the ‘respected voices’ kaint git no respek no mo – and so nothing to keep the herd of young and dumber and browner cats on track.
Everyone now feels the license to faithfully observe the articles of faith even more faithful than their neighbor.
It certainly indicates Thermidor doesn’t have its hands on the reins.
I’ve been saying it since I first saw the term used here: Thermidor never had a chance.
That’s always the problem with propaganda – you end up believing your own bullshit.
>Why did the secret service not have a man on each of the rooftops?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kimberly_Cheatle
SS director since ’22.
Nah not her there was a more immediate SS security chief in charge of deploying the SS agents. That person is the most immediate and obvious traitor.
Well, reading Kimberly_Cheatle’s career, looks like she was appointed to not protect Trump. But we probably will not know what really went down until Trump is president, assuming he survives to be president.
Kimberly Cheadle ordered stand down and cooperation with FBI on Mar a Lago raid, closed investigation into erased SS Jan 6 texts, and couldn’t find who dropped the coke.
Inside job.
So much for the question of whether soft power is still adequate.
Check the race of the shooter: https://x.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1812311139986166210
You already posted that photo. I don’t allow excessive repetition. Letting it through twice.
As I said, unconvinced. When his bio comes out, if it comes out, and if he is the killer rather than the patsy, I expect it will have a marked resemblance to that of the men who tried to murder Kyle Rittenhouse.
photo was memory holed dead link
You missed the point. Soft power is no longer effective, so the left has to move to hard power.
In fact, here’s Jim yesterday:
“We now see soft power fail internally… When it [the left] burned the credibility of the mythmakers, there very shortly followed the necessity to use hard power externally. When it burned the credibility of the journalists, there very shortly followed the necessity to use hard power internally. What is up next?”
A prescient remark, in light of the last few hours.
[*deleted for insanity*]
I am not going to allow you to call up down and black white, because that is just trolling intended to waste space by provoking a reaction.
When the government attempts to arrange for the murder of its political opponents, this is not soft power.
It is completely obvious that the media, the white house, and Kimberly Cheadle intended that Trump’s head would explode live on video in high resolution. Their goal was to physically destroy his head on live TV, to shatter his skull and plaster the internet with celebratory 4K videos. Don’t forget that. That is not soft power, that is as hard as it gets.
And here is Barron watching it, whom I now dub Augustus Caesar Barron Trump.
I think Trump’s normality bias has likely been cured, but if it has not, Barron is definitely awake to the new normal.
By what means was the shooter, assuming identity is correct, motivated to act against his own genetic and ethnic interests?
I presume the shooter was told by staff at the White House, the Open Society Foundation, and the New York times that he would get ten million dollars and a private island in the Bahamas, and was not told he would get a bullet in the brain. If someone is doing this on his own initiative he is not going to conveniently find a convenient ladder going up a building conveniently overlooking Trump’s podium, and conveniently unoccupied by the secret service.
I also presume that his ethnic interests are the destruction of the white race, and that he has no genetic interests, being one sort of sexual deviant or another. As I said, probably similar bio as the subhumans who tried to murder Kyle.
My guess is the shooter was either very stupid or estimated that he didn’t have much time left to live. Stage 4 diagnosis maybe? It would seem that anyone paying attention knows that presidential assassins die before anyone can question them.
My bet is very stupid. The left is falling apart.
Antifags don’t grow on trees, they are selected from people who fit the profile and managed thereafter. His ‘community organizer’ was given orders to give him orders. “We need to act to save democracy and stop orange hitler”. Like any other state employee, they don’t do anything without committee approval first.
Why has mega cheeto hitler not had *literally anyone* take shots at him at any point in all of time up to now, in spite of the fact that he is mega cheeto hitler and regularly appears in public in front of massive crowds in wide open spaces innumerable times over the years? Because the only people who own guns who *would* want to take a shot are all people who work for the state.
It was as much an act of ‘soft power’ as a captain overseeing crew on a boat is ‘soft power’.
They’re all stochastically “working towards the Fuhrer”, if you will, like planets orbiting the sun while themselves feeling weightless.
I’ve had some exposure lately to mainstream TV news and print media, after years of blissful isolation. It’s like a psychotic break. A parallel universe. The average person — especially boomers who grew up trusting The Machine with their whole hearts — gets sucked into the Orange Hitler frame forever, like a Toyota Tercel with three wheels and no gas in it getting sucked into a black hole. No natural resistance at all.
Media control. Narrative control. Once again, we’re getting nuclear war if we can’t get anonymity, freedom of speech, freedom of censorship and freedom of transaction via crypto wizardry.
If your guy is so smart, why is he dead?
Elite Human Capital aren’t sending their best
The concept of sacrificing a pawn eludes you? He was always going to die, he just happened to get unlucky with his shot first.
Rittenhouse did fine. Skill issue.
Trump happened to get lucky in that he turned his head at the exact right moment. Otherwise his skull would have been splattered on live tv.
[*trolling deleted*] leftists are in such total command that Trump’s own security team will gleefully betray him to his death [*trolling deleted*]
The Republican convention at which Trump chose his VP had additional (non secret service) security, indicating that Trump no longer trusts the secret service, and is not forced to trust them. So even if the Secret Service is one hundred percent full of people who intend to kill him, they will now not be able to survive doing so.
On the available evidence, my interpretation of events is that Kimberly Cheatle is, under instructions from the White House staff and elements of the media, trying to kill Trump and his family, but does not have too many assets in the rest of the secret service. That if the rest of the secret service catch her, they will kill her, so she has to arrange it cautiously and deniably — that this attempt exposed her hand, and she will find it very difficult to pull it off again.
If they were in total command killing him wouldn’t even be necessary.
“Trump happened to get lucky in that he turned his head at the exact right moment. Otherwise his skull would have been splattered on live tv.”
The shooter fired five or eight (reports seem to disagree) shots from a prone position directly in front of a standing target at a distance of about 150 yards and missed all of them.
Plenty of amateur marksmen are better shots than that. Plenty of random gun-toting right wingers have taken out perps in harder situations than that with no preparation at all.
Skill issue. EHC doesn’t have the best.
Modi expresses deep concern over the attack on his friend Trump.
Also didn’t miss the chance to lecture back at the GAE: violence has no place in politics:
https://archive.ph/msecv
Modi should have added that he was worried about the state of “America’s democracy.â€
Some astute commentary.
https://x.com/Maarblek/status/1812292121099194578
Trump is not a warrior, he is a merchant. But here in this picture, he definitely looks like a warrior. Warriors see this, and would follow him, if he would but lead. What was it that Gibson put into the mouth of William Wallace—men don’t follow titles, they follow courage. Has God arranged for Trump to be baptized in blood? Damn I don’t know. God’s ways are far beyond my own, but I am getting more familiar with His sense of humor.
If someone’s hastily writing a headline, and is anti-Trump, they might hesitate to report on apparent blood, until receiving further confirmation, as they don’t want to jump to hasty conclusions that if reported on might benefit Trump politically.
The sounds and Trump being whisked away are the most obvious observable facts, which they don’t need any further confirmation to confidently report.
So, the headlines are weak evidence at best. That being said, some investigation into how the security hole came to exist and how the would-be assassin was able to find it while the secret service apparently did not would be appropriate.
The sound was considerably less observable than the blood. Omitting the blood has to be headlines prepared in advance.
I watched a video after the fact (so, might have been manipulated I suppose, but if so make the case), sounds were obvious in the video (as you might expect, gunshots are notoriously loud), might have been unsure about the blood if not specifically looking for it.
But, in fact, I wasn’t specifically proposing that the headline writer, or whoever the headline writer was getting information from, didn’t see the blood. What I was suggesting is that, even if they did see the blood, they
a) wouldn’t be 100% sure that he did get hit and was bloody as a result, instead of some other reason for red stuff
and
b) would be very reluctant to dramatize the event in a way would benefit Trump.
And, honestly, I’m backing off from the first claim (a) here, as the second (b) is the most important.
These are likely the same sort of people as the one starting “Let’s go Brandon”.
This isn’t a matter of them doing rational calculation, but reflexively shading everything they say in a way that would be anti-Trump in the moment, even if it will obviously backfire. So they downplay what happened in the hasty initial report and fix it later when it becomes obviously embarrassing.
You are saying that there is a universal instinctive soft power bias, that everyone says the same thing because they all agree.
But to get this kind of uniformity, there has to be some advance discussion on what they are agreeing. And this is revealed by sudden back peddling.
They went with the headline they had prepared for the event the assassination failed, and then checked with higher authority “this is going to backfire?”. And higher authority said “oops, we have to do a limited hangout”. If they had been acting on their own initiative and own bias, they would have come up with the second headline first.
I made no specific claim about the motivations for this behaviour. It might be that they think they are going to get cancelled if they say something that in the moment appears to benefit Trump, and ends up actually doing so, but not if they say something that in the moment appears anti-Trump, even if it does benefit Trump, so act according to those incentives.
Uniformity of headlines is a good point provided that they are independent rather than copying from each other. Even if so, two could could be coincidence.
DC Draino https://x.com/DC_Draino/status/1812276295448891466 reports instructions were given to the media to play down the assassination. “Don’t say assassination” “Don’t say targeting Trump” “Don’t say gunshots” “No need for a serious face”
But the interesting question is when were these instructions given? Trump was shot and wounded live on television, and these instructions were followed from the beginning. So they had to have been prepared and distributed before he was shot. Notice that these instructions completely fail to mention blood. So they have to have been prepared before the incident — presumably two sets of instructions, one for a successful assassination, one for an unsuccessful assassination, and the case that Trump was lightly injured was not considered. The instant the assassination attempt happened, every journalist everywhere got his marching orders that had been prepared for the failed assassination case. Which marching orders naturally neglected to mention blood.
I mentioned it before in the comments of the last post, but I doubt that that media creatures watch Trump live, even the ones who are supposed to be writing stories on the event in question. They might even not be allowed to do so for fear they might hear something true. If they are allowed, it probably scares and enrages them to watch a rally like that with all the bravado and cheering crowds. Besides, it’s not really important that they hear what he says, they’re just gonna make up some bullshit anyway.
So they really would not have known there was blood or gunshots. To them, it would all be rumours floating on the internet until they saw a clip of the event, which would take a while to reach them. The assassination attempt wasn’t front page news on most of the sites until they started calling it that, as an “incident at the rally” wasn’t that big of a deal.
I doubt the veracity of that post you linked and don’t think it’s necessary in order for the newsjews to all converge on a single line that doesn’t make Trump look good, as Tech Priest said. Certainly nobody would want to risk being the first to call it an assassination attempt, even if they knew it was.
We know they coordinate. We see it all the time, and from time to time, coordination messages leak.
How can it be “rumors floating on the internet”, “incident at the rally” when it was livestreamed. They were trying to gaslight us into not believing our eyes.
And notice how long it took for the holdouts to call it an assassination attempt — what we saw was a power struggle taking place over a considerable time as to whether to gaslight us, or do a limited hang out.
A power struggle implies a coordination process.
Coordination yes, premeditation no. Speaking of the media, not the secret service, who clearly left open enough of a gap in security for a guy to stroll up with a ladder and rifle and take a shot from 500 ft.
I just don’t think that the level of preparedness you speak of is required for us to see what we saw. The journalist class is so uniform that they would act like that even with no centralized direction. I think it’s clear they didn’t know it was going to happen, as it took them a long time to even see the clips of it happening which they would need in order to realize that there’s no point gaslighting.
I watched it live, and checked the legacy media repeatedly afterward to see how they’d spin it. It took them 20 minutes to even mention it.
And yet their gaslighting attempt could only have been attempted by someone who had not seen the clip.
I know they prepare these lies considerably in advance, discuss internally which of many possible lies to roll with, and when the decision is made to roll with one particular lie then that lie is broadcast to all the journalists, as in Journo-List.
So yes, ordinary journalists did not get instructions on what message to carry until after the attempt failed, but the message was prepared for each possible outcome, well in advance, probably weeks in advance, of the attempt.
I hit submit too early, but my point was that their response time was so slow, especially considering how obvious it was to anybody who saw the footage, that they couldn’t have known ahead of time. They wouldn’t have taken 20-30 minutes to put out their “Trump is scared of loud noises and leaves rally” article, and wouldn’t have taken an hour to publish that somebody shot him.
I assume that those leaked “instructions”, if real at all, were posted after the fact to one of the group chats “Me” mentioned by someone with no actual authority, just “helping” by uselessly reminding the group chat of their well established norms (see “Again all this is just a reminder, I know we all know”). The point would be, not to provide information, but increase their own status by the implicit threat to try to cancel anyone stepping out of line.
It’s hard to have consequentialist norms in a low-forgiveness community (“don’t do what will actually benefit Trump”), because consequences are hard to predict, which is why such groups end up with deontological norms (“don’t do what seems pro-Trump in the moment, regardless of actual consequences”).
Everything is shaded towards immediate anti-Trump sentiment, even private conversation, since that’s what the norm is. So, no mentioning blood even privately.
I suggest new rules:
(1) All deaths of Democrats shall henceforth be reported as suicides regardless of circumstances.
(2) All deaths of reporters who violate this rule shall also be reported as suicides.
Perhaps I’m too strict, and Democrats should also be allowed to die of accidents, the more bizarre and implausible the better, and of Covid.
Covid as the cause works best. We can be magnanimous about it too by declaring “gee, looks like Covid was very deadly, after all.”
They get instructions from a central source immediately after the event, they don’t need to know in advance.
The source says to downplay it and under no circumstances say assassination attempt, so they make up some random BS like “loud noises” or “trump…falls at rally” (real headline). Sec def condemns “violence” and calls it an “incident”, never assassination attempt, clearly coordinated messaging.
But the instructions were prepared at the central source before the incident, because they don’t say “blood”. In fact the instructions are very generic — the people preparing these instructions had no idea how the assassination would go down, they just knew there would be an attempted assassination. Presumably they prepared instructions for several outcomes, but light injuries and a fist pump was not one of the outcomes that they had prepared instructions for.
We are seeing coordinated messaging that was obviously coordinated before the attempted assassination. The coordination failed to anticipate the case that Trump was lightly injured. The coordination was caught completely flat footed by a bleeding Trump pumping his fist.
The prepared messaging was appropriate for a complete fail, but hilariously inappropriate for Trump being lightly injured.
I have to say , the instructions sent seem like a generic media boilerplate and could have been sent while the event happing, but the blood is a critical key that show it was coordibated before, because the instruction would say something about the blood if sent during the event.
Man this whole thing seem like divine intervention.
When the goal is to downplay it, they’re not going to say blood, for the same reason they aren’t saying assassination, the lack of it isn’t the dog that didn’t bark.
The messaging is inappropriate even for a complete fail – trying to sell an assassination attempt as him falling on stage is patently ridiculous, but they are, in fact, sending their best.
After all, who do you believe, them or your lying eyes? No mention of blood means there was no blood, no mention of assassination attempt means there was no assassination attempt, only double hitler would say otherwise! In fact, why are you talking about this, when you should be talking about j6 where orange man killed 6 million police officers! Also, ACAB.
It’s patently obvious they want him dead and a leftist faction “taking matters into its own hands” is their goal in the first place, so it can’t be traced back to them in any way, because they are extremely paranoid.
It’s astounding. I see leftists on twitter currently falling into two camps: 1) there was no assassination attempt, or 2) it’s a shame the shooter missed.
https://x.com/nicksortor/status/1812552266941083678
Biden urges us to not speculate and let the government tell us all we need to know.
spoiler alert to the investigation: he was definitely a lone gunsman and there’s no point whatsover to speculate about connections with powerful people.
Who could possibly call CNN, BBC, MSNBC, NYT, AP, Reuters, all within 15min and explain to them how to write their stories, all before any of them press “publish”, which they did very shortly after the event. There is simply no time for the orders to happen before the event.
I see what you are saying: the media themselves connect to some place to get their orders, instead of someone telling them all within a few minutes, all successfully before they hit “publish”. That’s possible.
They coordinate in group chats. This was revealed during gamergate.
It’s not like they were all in person at the rally, so someone has to tell them what to publish, thus the “information gathering” and the marching orders come from the same place, it’s not something separate they have to do.
They coordinate in group chats. This was revealed during gamergate.
Also, going back further in time, the “Journo-list” revelations.
Well, the Ministry of Truth could just send a group email to CNN, BBC, MSNBC, NYT, AP, Reuters, all at the same time, right after the event. The talking points get delivered and talking-point-compliant stories are written.
Perhaps it’s as simple as that. Seems a bit risky and error-prone, whereas advance talking points gets the job done without fail. However, what Me suggests seems possible.
They’re now starting to use the phrase “assassination attempt.”
How CNN Reported On 7 Famous Assassinations
Caesar injured in group hug.
You didn’t show my comment about abortion. [*deleted*]
state rights.
Standard shill operation to create right holiness spiral. Social justice warriors always project. The right is precisely those people resistant to holiness spirals
Vermont is 0.2% of the population. There is absolutely no way for there to be any meaningful restrictions on abortion when tiny liberal states can clearly set the standard for everyone else. Claiming “states’ rights” here is snarky and fake and gay and intended to be a mockery of actual respect for states’ rights. It is beneath me.
Holiness spiraling doesn’t apply to abortion because it is a “yes or no” issue with no gray areas. Unborn babies are either protected or they are not. The correct way to end any stupid attempt at “holiness spiraling” abortion is to simply take the Christian view of abortion as always intrinsically disordered, but Trump was such a dumb cuck he wouldn’t do that. And for some reason the left just revived his watered down campaign with this murder attempt.
Shills never push the right closer to the Church.
Our enemies are in the position to shred the rules whenever they find them momentarily inconvenient. We are not. If we attack state rights on abortion, the result will not be abortion prohibited, but sexual transition mandatory.
Shills routinely and regularly push the right closer to the cucked faggot globohomo converged Church.
States’ rights are a temporal issue and abortion is a moral issue. Always put moral issues first and you’ll have God on your side. But in this clownish case, we’re not even talking about states’ rights, but a caricature of them with liberal fake states that wouldn’t even exist without imperial influence. And we would be liars to play along with this “point deer make horse” game. We will win power by standing with truth.
The Church does not teach error. Priests do, but no one is perfect. This is a case where it is always best to aim for a “possibly something” over a “definitely nothing”. Evil requires intent and free will.
The question is “Who is Caesar? Who has rightful jurisdiction?”
If every Caesar is entitled to right every wrong everywhere, then it is war. We are commanded “Peace on Earth to all men of goodwill” You guys want the right at war with the right. This is the US government fostering “frozen conflicts” everywhere.
Frozen conflicts and holiness spirals are made by putting the good against the perfect [*deleted*]
No they are not. They are demonic evil at work. Hatred of all that is good, all that is beautiful, hatred of life itself, and love of death. In the Dark Enlightenment, and genuine Christianity, we do not give credence to the rhetoric of demons, be they real or metaphorical.
That best is enemy of the good enough is an unrelated problem. Good people can genuinely differ about what is reasonably achievable and how it should be achieved, but this is not what we see in holiness spirals and frozen conflicts.
> The Catholic Church does not teach error
1. Perpetual virginity of Mary
2. Papal infallibility
3. Clerical celibacy
4. Literal transubstantiation
5. That the Papacy went back to St. Peter
6. Covenant of works
Need I go on…
Nobody here likes women voting and we know voting is only sporadically relevant to the outcome but on the occasions when voting is relevant to the outcome the abortion issue has proven to be a massive loser if there is any attempt to restrict it before around 15 weeks. You just want leftists to win even fair elections.
The Catholic Church and the Jesuits are behind and within the leftist cult. Within the exoteric outer doctrines of both leftism and catholicism is the inner doctrine mystery babylonian religion of snake and ishtar worship of the Jesuits. Even if that wasn’t true America was originally supposed to be a protestant country. America’s original sins were the following
1. Not picking our own cotton
2. Becoming a republic instead of a monarchy
3. Allowing the immigration of large numbers of Roman Catholics and people other than Anglo Saxons (German Protestants were okay and could have fit in eventually all the others should have been told to fuckoff)
About your last point, it reminds me of the Amerika blogger, who always says that the Irish doomed the US.
If you expand so much as the US, that kind of massive migration problems are always going to be there, because you need a steady influx of new settlers, and your favourite ones might not always be available. Note how the famous migration quotas were passed in the 1920s, when the expansion period had ended.
Regarding the idea of a virtuous protestantism vs a supposedly leftist Catholic Church, I think that considering the sorry state of Anglicans, Lutherans etc (at least here in Europe), I don’t think that assumption can hold anymore.
If we had the fertility rate we had during the 1950s, would double every generation. If we had the fertility rate we had when had coverture, would triple every generation. No immigration required. Instead colonialism and space settlement will be required.
The Irish were brought over to:
– politically bully those not progressive enough by swarming them with foreigners in their neighborhood
– weaken the middle class by diluting the labor pool as industrialization and the modern wage-labor system was starting off
– serve as grunts in the civil war
Massive success.
The Irish still think they’re part of the great coalition of oppressed peoples finally rising up and sticking it to the White man. They cherish the idea that they were colonized, discriminated against, and only recently re-classified as “White,” and they burn for revenge. They won’t see that their alliance is one-way and they’re just another kind of blue-eyed devil until it’s far too late for them. And us.
Observe what is currently happening in Ireland. Irish in Ireland are now starting to realise that their one way alliance is about to kill them all.
Irish in America are still a bit slow on the uptake.
There have been some heartening incidents in Ireland recently, but it’s just a few powerless losers acting out before inevitably losing even harder. They’ll just get taxed more to pay to repair the damage they’ve done, and then even more Africans will be brought in to punish them for resisting. The bureaucracy, the education system, the courts, the media are all extremely pro-immigration and anti-White. Sinn Fein, the terrorist-supporting extremist champions of Irish nationalism, go on and on about how Ireland owes everything it has to random Africans because they’re fellow victims of colonialism.
Sin Fein will perish with those whose genocide it is organising. Those who wake up from normality bias will survive — At some point things bottom out with us alive and our enemies dead, because the left always devours itself.
Albeit in Szechuan province, only sixteen thousand survived of three million.
In the worst case outcome, the population of the Global American Empire declines to less than a million or so by famine and mass murder, the economy goes back to hunter gatherer, and expats reconquer it.
I lean less towards “inside job” and more towards “the secret service is another dei branch being hit with a competency crisis”. If you watch the videos you can visibly see Trump’s female bodyguards fumbling around and generally being useless.
There’s nothing preventing both to be true, in fact most evidence points to it.
On the DEI side.
On the inside job.
A stochastically inside job, how about.
Maybe he was a democrat.. his aim “too far left” wingwing!”
https://files.catbox.moe/08v1fp.mp4
Victoria Nuland one of the people involved in the assassination attempt, “nasty surprise”.
Surprised no one finds this interesting…
Humungus found it interesting and reposted it on another forum.
Humungus is a man of few words, but thank you.
Just not much to comment on. I don’t mean to assume consensus, but I believe most here understand this was an assassination plot, and if so, of course a critter like icky vicky would have caught wind.
I think knowing who is involved is potentially important…
I’m grateful you shared, and not downplaying anything. I’m just expressing that there isn’t much further to comment on with this specific thread, as an explanation for why there wasn’t discussion generated.
The video shows SS agents confirming shooter’s down before standing Trump up, it wasn’t after he was hustled away.
Andrew Anglin thinks this is a fake assassination attempt set up by Mossad to make Trump “the Jewish choice candidate†popular and win the election and support Israel in its war in Gaza and against Iran.
https://dailystormer.in/the-trump-shooting-means-he-wins-the-election-and-it-means-america-is-going-to-war-for-israel/
lol
Another “Grand Jewish planâ€.
Yeah, read this over on Unz earlier. Anglin may be giving Trump the mean-girl treatment because this means Kanye West won’t be president.
https://dailystormer.in/ye24-is-over-im-officially-withdrawing-my-endorsement/
The bullet hit him and just miraculously didn’t kill him. How can people believe it’s fake?
Part of reality bias is believing that the globohomos (and those under their spell) in 2024 are omnipotent and can successfully engineer whatever event they like, however they like it. And part of sobering up is the recognition that leftists just aren’t competent anymore, haven’t quite been competent for a while, have been self-selecting for stupidity (among other things), and can no longer even pull off successful psyops. Some people imagine the string pullers as all-powerful geniuses, when the stark reality is that they’re a bunch of idiots, each generation thereof more stupid than the preceding ones, and increasingly possessed by demons, leading to erratic and irrational behavior, and total incompetence. Nothing about this event — planning or outcome — is even remotely surprising. “Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.” They aren’t O’Briens; they are total trash, and thinking otherwise usually stems from normality bias and from falling for GAE’s delusional self-aggrandizement.
Err, meant normality bias in the first sentence. But now that I think about it, “reality bias” is a good phrase. It’s like the counter to normality bias, where official normality doesn’t match observable reality.
I could imagine fake blood being applied – perhaps even an actual wound – between when Trump ducks and when he gets up again. Not high probability, but does not require supreme capability, only unlikely collusion between Trump and secret service.
> Would any federal agency at a higher level play along with a hoax to help Trump out politically
Not in any possible universe.
That’s why it’s low probability.
That being said, I find Miles Mathis’ theory that the left’s actions are part of a plot to get popular support for a fascist takeover looking less insane all the time. “Sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice”.
We have a photograph of the bullet, taken, I believe, by a media photographer. Theoretically possible to fake, but in that case the media would be both pretending Trump was shot and acting like he wasn’t shot and just fell down because there was a loud noise, which is obviously insane.
He seems to be struggling to come up with some theory whereby they aren’t just dumb and falling apart, and basically conceding that there is no comprehensible narrative, and also that many of them appear to be dumb, and their organization falling apart, but he doesn’t want to draw the ultimate conclusion.
The header photograph above speaks of divine intervention! A bloodied trump, defiantly shaking his fist, with the American flag in the background. It’s right up there with the Iwo Jima image.
Could be very lucky, but it really does have the hallmarks of divine intervention doesn’t it.
It’s like a video game or a movie. Don Wick.
The media coordination absolutely shows behind the scene coordination. It also show that coordination has become exponentially stupid. Planning doesn’t extend to what ifs, anything beyond the next day, or anything obviously matching reality. This must be among the quickest the narrative has collapsed. Faster than even ‘Fiery But Mostly Peaceful’. The rate of narrative collapse has been accelerating, and as others have pointed out the regime’s soft power has been replaced by attempts at hard power.
I disagree with Jim about “shills”, 70 years ago they were all powerful controllers of nearly all non-official information channels. 40 years ago they were still able to infiltrate nearly every perceivable right (and left) wing group in the US. Now they are obvious Fed glowies that get called out on nearly every mostly free platform. Even mentally retired boomers on facebook can recognize Fedposting these days.
Jim contends that they are still able to pass off as the ‘stupid right’. They don’t. They use decades old caricatures of the right that have long since passed on into memes no one takes seriously anymore. FBI attempts to entrap the right produces nearly nothing. All they do is produce noise in an attempt to drown out signal. That’s no longer shilling anymore, that’s practically jamming and signal warfare.
The shift to attempts at hard power has been a long ways coming, and it’s precisely because of narrative (and shilling) collapse that the regime has resorted to it. Shilling, much like propaganda, still sees the target as some form of regime subject if unruly and needing to be shackled back into the the proper regime. Signal warfare, de-platforming, and cancel culture are all on the spectrum of seeing the target more as the enemy rather than subjects.
There’s no end of democrats claiming the assassination attempt has “no place” in the US and is “shocking” and “horrific”. No one believes the lip service. The leftist masses openly wanted to see Trump’s brains fly out, and the “elite” left has been for years trying to strip Trump of all his resources and security. There’s no sincerity in their denials, and it reeks of going through the motions. The narrative is collapsing because everyone is moving to a war footing, and war is less about convincing the enemy about anything and more about convincing your people to fight.
The late Soviet Union’s official narrative collapse led to war, tanks on the streets and shooting. The more the official narrative collapses, the closer the situation is to war. The question is, how much war?
I could see Barron thinking. “We have to kill them, or they are going to kill us”.
What is Trump thinking?
He realised he was under fire sooner than anyone else, except for one chick that realised at the same instant he did. He and a chick behind him hit the dirt at the same moment, while everyone around them continued to be placid and confused.
When I next see his face he is scared and distressed, though this may be more a result of secret service piling on him than being shot at. Then he masters himself, masters the secret service, tells the secret service to let him communicate with his supporters, and puts on his warrior face.
Does he know it is war? I am not sure. But more and more people do know it is war. First mover advantage ensues. When war is coming, it is advantageous to strike hard and fast. We are crippled by lack of a war leader. But so are our enemies. Sooner or later, one side or the other is going to have a leader who says “war it is”.
Interestingly, the Ukrainians all seem to assume that this is a government operation — one that they are in favour of. War cures normality bias.
What kind of Ukrainians?
Obvously all Ukrainians posting on social media are pro Zelensky and pro war, or about to become dead.
They called Trump “Romanov” on live TV during his inauguration parade in 2016 (or I’ve lost my mind and merely dreamed it).
Trump has ~10 years left anyway, but if he can’t figure out a way to (both actually and) “officially” win this thing, and then actually enforce the law somehow, his kids and grandkids are obviously next.
All obvious now, and now we know he gets it. What on earth to do next?
but does he get it?
Honestly asking and not knowing the answer. Obviously more and more people are getting it. But let him prove he gets it before we put words in his mouth.
I read Barrons face during the attempted assassination as showing he gets it.
Trump’s fist pump would suggest he gets it, but he could just be playing to the crowd
Of course Trump doesn’t get it. He’s too old and too rich to change his worldview dramatically. He’s a good showman and he’s quick on his feet, but he is the quintessential Boomer.
Barron is an autistic blank canvas. It’s easy to project what you want to see onto his neutral expression. The Paul Altreides memes are fun, but he’s obviously nothing and he will never amount to anything.
We will drown, and nobody will save us.
“Barron is an autistic blank canvas. It’s easy to project what you want to see onto his neutral expression. The Paul Altreides memes are fun, but he’s obviously nothing and he will never amount to anything.”
With autism you can develop SOME social skills but you hit a plateau eventually where you can progress no further. Baron has a near genius IQ though so perhaps his autism social skills plateau is much higher than my mere high midwit autist plateau. A genius autist social plateau may go all the way up to being at least somewhat charismatic.
Cometh the hour, cometh the man.
This is looking likely.
I’m calling it. Contaminated NEET is not one of us, but a (paid or freelance) black pill/demoralization shill.
Slink away, you sad little cunt.
C NEET is one of the best commenters on here. I think his analysis of the situation is spot on. Where do you disagree with him and why?
Where do you disagree with him and why?
I demand that you come up with a counterargument to “GGGAAAAAHHHH, WE’RE DOOOOOOOMED!!!”
Oh, okay.
Contaminated NEET is one of us*. His failures are the same as some of my failures, and I suspect similar to many of the failures of those on the right.
It is easy to give into despair. There are no easy solutions to our predicament, and a great deal of regime energy is spent ensuring that. Even if we turn back the tide, restoring civilization is a momentousness task that can make any normal man feel small and insignificant. The rational mind says this is true.
Great men of history are great because their force of personality magnetically draws in men, makes huge problems seemingly inconsequential, and finds there’s no ‘tide’ to turn back, that all resistance is suddenly and mysteriously gone… that’s if the great man knows where to go. Trump didn’t the first time, and by sheer luck he’ll be alive for a potential second time. This naturally creates doubts, and doubts without hope led to despair.
We should recognize that historically, great men can arise more frequently, and more readily as the social structures which keep men in line break down. That is happening with rapidity as the regime has attacked and demeaned the good, the beautiful, and the just. We can expect more great men to arise should Trump not make it… most poetic would be a particular son who would have millions of loyal followers. This should be a source of hope, and one that those on the C NEET (intellectual) right overlook, because after all what are intellectuals? They are not Great men, they are priests, and so Great men are mysterious and distant.
*Obviously not all of ‘us’ have given into despair, even if we can feel it from time to time, nor have ‘we’ made it central to our online personas, but such reality is true to such wide swaths of the smart right it would be mistaken to dismiss it as not part of ‘us’. I’m not saying it’s right, not even saying it shouldn’t be suppressed, but it’s hard to disown it all the same (even if it should be).
Of course this all comes off as very sympathetic to Contaminated NEET, because it is, and I can’t help but suspect I’m projecting my own situation onto his pseudonym of despair. With my current legal predicament, I’m practically ‘Contaminated’ according to the DEI bureaucracy, yet I remain on government payroll for the foreseeable future doing nothing like a “NEET’. It’s hilarious in a way, multiple officers have said I’d never be in this situation had a war been going on. Is this what Monck experienced during his two year imprisonment? I can only wonder.
Pax, here’s the difference. We all have our down moments, I’m sure.
But NEET is “the sinner who loves his sin.” He doesn’t regret it, he doesn’t try to do better, backslide, and try again.
He fucking WALLOWS in it.
In contrast to NEET, there’s Karl, who has emerged from the bog of despair over the last year or two. He’s more clear-pilled now. Yes, Karl, that has been noticed!
Far be it from me to deny the threat of the left. (The one thing NEET ever said that I liked was his observations on what a well-adapted memeplex it is, in its strongest form.) It is The Enemy of human life. But it’s not invincible. That’s just ridiculous.
We must focus on all four relevant factors: Our strengths, our weaknesses, our enemy’s strengths, our enemy’s weaknesses.
It’s reasonable to be gloomy if you’re absolutely certain that you’re doomed, that “we will drown, and nobody will save us,” but how can one be so certain of such a thing? Black Swan events do happen, they’re becoming increasingly frequent, and as Jim says: expect the unexpected. Total blackpilling doesn’t make much sense on an epistemological level, and is usually more of an emotional state.
Warriors follow courage. Trump now has an army he can summon in an instant. Will he realise this?
I’ll add to my previous comment: the Kali Yuga is not forever. Whether you call leftism “a biological failure mode hijacked and weaponized by parasitic and ultimately fatal memes,” or call it “demonic evil,” it is not a stable condition – it either leads to the Great Filter (everything is dead and destroyed) or it is defeated. Looking at the empty universe, one might conclude that we stand no better chance at passing the filter than everybody else out there, but there’s a first time for everything, and the prospect of failure shouldn’t deter one from at least trying, for the alternative is death and destruction.
It all depends on who “us” is. If it’s believers in Trump, then of course I’m not. The man is a proven loser who, at his core, believes in the system and craves its approval more than anything.
I know White American Boomers – TV hit them like smallpox hit the Indians, and Trump is a typical case. They believe that they personally ended segregation and liberated women from domestic slavery because they watched it on TV, and these are among their proudest achievements.
It’s depressing to see people here, at the bleeding edge of far-right weirdo thought, still put any faith at all in the Orange Man. I see the best and freest minds on the Right falling for the same con game twice in a row. A Trump win is entirely possible; if the deep state can get its shit together, putting him in is the smartest thing they could do. It’ll help with the idiotic wars they have planned, it’ll tag the Right with responsibility for the accelerating and increasingly obvious decline and fall of the GAE, and it won’t threaten them or their plans at all because Trump is old, lazy, easily controlled, and has a terminal case of normality bias. Thankfully they’re probably not disciplined enough to pull it off.
Victoria Nuland is the deep state, and she does not think so. The thought of Trump throws her into demented frothing at the mouth homicidal screaming rage.
Trump is the peacemaker. No new wars on his watch, and old wars were wound down or ended.
His big error was trying to make a deal with those with whom no deal can be made. It becomes obvious that he must kill them, or they will kill him and his family. Has he figured that out? Pretty sure Barron has figured that out.
>Trump is the peacemaker.
Easy. Just start the wars without him. Give him a fait accompli, and tell him he can either be strong or weak. Hell, a lot of the wars they want have already started, they just don’t have as much direct American involvement as the “adults in the room” would like. It will be child’s play to arrange a false flag attack or Pearl-Harbor-style LIHOP to show Trump a lure he can’t help but bite. From there, nature takes its course, things escalate as they always do, and within a year we march into Moscow and try Putler for warcrimes, Israel finally solves the PQ, Iran holds its first Pride Parade, and China signs treaties for a new Century of Humiliation. Obviously none of these are going to happen, but our rulers think they’re all doable. And necessary.
>Victoria Nuland is the deep state, and she does not think so.
Yep. ‘Cause Vicky Noodleman is dumb. Well, she’s world-class at bureaucratic maneuvering, favor-banking, schmoozing, resume-building, nepotism, etc. War, strategy, geopolitics? Not so impressive. It’s the Great Game played by Peggy Hill. Anyway, a second Trump Presidency would be a godsend to her, but she can’t see it, and even if she can, she can’t restrain her farther-Left moral superiors. So I doubt it’ll happen.
They were working on that his entire first term. Failed, and failed worse and worse as he got wise to them. It is these failures that reduce Nuland to hysterical rage.
Dumb or not, she knows a lot more about the deep state than you do. And she says that Trump was an intolerable catastrophe for the deep state last time around. It seems improbable that he will be better for the deep state this time around.
When these guys talk about RussiaRussiaRussia, they mean they were upset because they wanted war with Russia and Trump would not let them. When they talk about escalation dominance, they mean they want nuclear war with Russia and Trump definitely would not let them.
Trump’s term wasn’t an intolerable catastrophe for the deep state, it felt like an intolerable catastrophe to them because it was the clearest possible announcement by large numbers of their adoring slaves and subjects that we don’t actually adore or respect them nearly as much as they deserve to be adored and respected. It also meant that a crass low-class braggart was theoretically in charge of them. It all felt very very bad, but what actually happened? Were any of them tried for their crimes? Did any of them even lose their positions? Were any major policies actually implemented that they vehemently opposed? Trump talked about fighting the deep state, and then he gave them cabinet posts, listened to their wormtongue advice, and was perennially shocked when they betrayed him.
Vicky is confusing her feelings with objective reality and making poor judgments because she racks disciprine. Or maybe she has so much disciprine that she can lie convincingly to an interviewer about her true opinions.
What upsets Victoria Nuland is what did not happen. They did not get their way. The president “interfered” with foreign policy, which she views as outrageous and treasonous meddling.
Wars were wound down in ways that they vehemently opposed. A number of policies, starting new wars and escalating old ones, were not implemented. They want escalation dominance — meaning that they think if the US goes hard and fast towards nuclear war, Russia will capitulate. They are not getting their way right now, even though they are getting their way a whole lot more than they did under Trump.
Happy 2021.
I am not in the camp that they can fully genocide the paleskins, and a sincere attempt will — in the long run, as generations turn — probably do the Amerikaaner some good. Bring on the fractal chaos of total breakdown, let the best win.
Here’s my take on the “will he step up or not” question, both for Trump and those public figures following in his wake.
Warriors need priests, priests need warriors. But as Rollo Tomassi used to say in his saner days, central to the power dynamic is who needs who more.
Who needs who more?
Trump needs us more than we need him. Which is not to say we don’t need him if we want to avoid a possible dark age / world war 3 / whatnot, just that I am much more positive about my chances of survival without him than I am about his chances of survival without us. We are anonymous. If we have learnt one thing about the left, it is that they always go after the lowest hanging fruit. We have made ourselves very high hanging fruit.
I’ve been preparing for shit to hit the fan for years now, am still preparing. I’ll be fine, my family will be fine. Will Trump be fine? Will his family be fine? Will the public warror figures following in his footsteps be fine? I don’t know. I strongly suspect they are walking on far thinner ice than me.
So my general attitude is that I am just not that interested in hypothesizing whether or not Trump (or Barron or Musk) is stepping up his game. I want him to prove it first.
Musk tonight pledged 45M per month to Trump’s war chest. Curious to see what further alliances come to light in the next few days and weeks.
CNN’s smarty aunt nigger Van Jones tonight opined Vance as VP signals Trump is not negotiation-friendly “to the world”, an interesting phrase which I took to mean the globalist elite.
Last but not least I saw tonight Melania bow her head and cross herself when the announcer said Trump will be the next president as he took the stage at the convention. ’bout brought a tear to my eye, I’m such an old softie.
This event looks like a divine “warning shot.” Suggesting that the next shot, or the shot after that, will not be a warning.
If he believes in God, he should see where this is going.
I remember it too.
Chris Matthews was one person who did so.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/04/12/chris_matthews_repeatedly_compares_trump_family_to_the_romanovs_references_their_murder_by_communists.html
Of course the video is gone
Chris Matthews. Right. Yes that was him. Thank you. I’m not crazy.
BTW: [Wikipedia… early life…] Huh. OK. I presumed not but had to check anyway. Can’t be too careful these days.
Your argument for pre-prepared headlines is that they don’t mention blood. They also don’t mention bullets, gunshots, assassins, Trump’s defiant bravery or the two spectator casualties. They minimize *everything.* If you saw nothing but those headlines, you would think Trump panicked at an unexpected loud noise. The CNN headline’s phrasing implies he feebly fell over in a Biden senior citizen moment.
The media has been begging a lone wolf to assassinate the orange menace for years. One of the big rags (I forget which) just ran another Trump-as-Hitler photoshop as its cover. The editors and writers of the media have 100% percent discussed what headlines they’d run in the event of an assassination or an attempted assassination. Since they’re hostile, they must have decided in advance to downplay any failed attacks as much as possible, to prevent sympathy.
Stupid as it is, they were literally pretending he wasn’t shot. How could they say “He wasn’t shot but suddenly he started bleeding all over his face. No reason. Just another random event in a random universe.”?
NBC News:
Secret Service rushes Trump offstage after popping noises heard at his rally. Visible blood on his face.
At that point, they’d have to admit he was shot and they were trying to paper over that. They’ve already pivoted to “Actually, this is Trump’s fault for letting the genie of extremism out of the bottle,” which, come to think of it, is probably also a line premeditated for use in the event of an assassination. The important thing is that they skipped directly from “something happened” to “Trump at fault” without a news cycle of “public enemy #1 victim of assassination attempt.”
The difference is that almost every American saw blood immediately. And, seeing blood, made the denial and gaslighting absurd and outrageous. Thus the order to deny and gaslight would not have been given had it been decided on after they attempted to kill him. The denial had to be prepared in advance for the possibility of a failure less spectacular and dramatic..
I do think this absurd lockstep narrative was prepared in advance. It’s just that the media, which has been begging for assassination for years, has naturally also been pondering what headlines to run. There’s nothing that necessitates an outside element preparing the headlines for the media, as opposed to the media preparing the headlines in-house.
“Hey, Don Lemon, what should we do if a gunman fails to take out Trump?”
“Ummm… run a Harvey Milk special?”
As an aside, if Biden was involved in the assassination, his inner circle must be sweating over the possibility of him unwittingly spilling the beans, like the time he boasted about building the most extensive voter fraud organization in history. This isn’t intended to dismiss the possibility. For some reason, he really is involved in the decision loop.
Also, Biden continued to stick to the same narrative even after retreat and limited hangout was under way. So same authority making the decision for all.
And Biden was perceived as threatening that Trump would be assassinated a week ago.
https://x.com/paulsperry_/status/1809422091466289646
For various reasons I do not think Biden is directly involved. Biden himself is non compos mentis and Lady Macbeth and Hunter’s immediate concern is fighting their own party grandees who want them out.
This was the upper level’s of the Democratic party (minus Biden who they want out) working through their glownigger pets. Victoria Nuland was aware of it which means Hillary was involved.
It would seem crazy to involve Biden, but lady MacBeth needs his signature on something from time to time. Plus, they are crazy.
The rules for the secret service are that every tall building in the vicinity should be sealed and secured, and ever line of sight roof has a secret service man on top of it.
Instead of being sealed and secured, a strangely convenient ladder was placed.
It is absolutely obvious that the shooter had help from an inside hand.
I’m just saying Lady Macbeth and Hunter’s immediate concern now is not Trump Trump is a further out concern.
Interestingly, “Biden” (the faction currently in the WH) now said, “It’s time to cool it down.” He seems to be pathetically begging for the flames to not spread so quickly.
They are afraid – probably from someone to their left. If your leftism is of the BLM-Antifa-Hamas type, you might want to assassinate Biden for similar reasons as to assassinating Trump, if not even more so, and for other reasons too.
Leftist singularity.
Just watched the Oval Office speech. The narrative is the assassination attempt on Trump was the right finally getting a bit of political violence aimed at them after spending years terrorizing the country themselves. Examples: J6, Whitmer kidnapping plot, Pelosi’s husband being attacked by his not-rentboy, and some others.
Biden stated differences have to be settled at the ballot box, or battle box as he said several times, which I read as let us steal the election and we might let you live. I may be wrong because translating authentic frontier gibberish can be difficult.
It could be that. In that case, Biden is not just threatening Trump, but also the Thermidorean faction that appears to support him. If I were them, I’d start watching my back tenfold.
Holy shit a ladder too?
When the assassin showed up, a remarkably convenient ladder was waiting for him.
So far, we have no information about what this ladder was doing there. Whose ladder is it? Who placed it there? When was it placed there?
I’ve seen multiple videos now of people testifying that they alerted the police and nearby SS agents of the gunman. Loudly and frantically, and he was left alone. I’ve also seen camera footage of the gunman taken from the crowd, before and while the shots were fired.
This was not mere incompetence, zero doubt. Probably what happened was like Uvalde, some grunts notice gunman, radio in, told to stand down, told to ignore it, ‘not a problem’.
An interesting question is, if SS is compromised, who is keeping Trump and his family alive from here on out. Does he hire private security? If so, who? If he does, will they attempt to kill his security and him together?
Now that we have hit ‘and then they kill each other’, one must wonder at what speed this escalates. Was this a plot in the works for days, or weeks? What timespan will the next plot be on?
The country of America is full of men who would zealously serve Trump and kill in his name, if he would but bid them to his side.
If Trump were cunning, he would organize cadres of ‘personal assistants’ drawn from the Republican Guard Clubs formed in every state, who all just coincidentally happened to armed, and coincidentally all happen to have fun on weekends shooting at the range and practicing other combat sports together. And coincidentally, such men can also be used to fill innumerable vacancies in staff positions that just coincidentally happened to have opened up in all sorts of state organs.
If he were wise, he would have been doing this nine years ago.
“Give me a call. I’ll do it for free.”
https://twitter.com/Squawk55/status/1812651095287865834
Hey there, silently lurking members of the Rationalist community and Musk folks. Are you listening?
With all due respect to recent AI developments, the only “singularity” I am afraid of… is the leftist singularity. And you should too, guys. You should too.
Current AIs are neither particularly smart nor particularly agentic. But, both aspects are being worked on and if/when a very smart and very agentic AI is developed we are in trouble.
Meanwhile politics is getting a little crazy but the worst likely outcome of that is a nuclear war which probably kills like 90% of humanity at most. Still less bad.
Not enough nukes to kill 90% of humanity. Estimates of worst case nuclear war during peak stockpiles, a series of exchanges of tens of thousands of nukes, kills around 1.7 billion if my memory serves me correctly. Stockpiles have been drastically reduced to the few thousands, of which there are serious concerns about functionality.
If this nuclear war stops global welfare spending for a few years, three billion niggers could starve to death. But I don’t exactly regard them as “humanity” — same genus, different species.
If the nukes themselves fail for lack of maintenance, much of their effect can still be achieved by bombing the infrastructure that serves the big cities where half the world’s hominids live.
The greatest reduction of nukes happened under the reign of evil tyrant Putin https://www.statista.com/statistics/752508/number-of-nuclear-warheads-worldwide-overtime/
Lower than in 1965 now, not to mention the 1985 peak.
The secret Service by all accounts were rather incompetent. The videos are quite damaging, showing middle aged females bumbling clueless around. The SS is DEI-infected,and the (female) director has a target of 30% women.
There was a screw up, but is there any reason to assume malice, when incompetence seems to be quite sufficient explanation?
It’s the competence crisis people have been speaking of.
>but is there any reason to assume malice
Besides how the democrats have been trying to strip Trump of SS, deny resources and personnel, constantly pump out completely untrue propaganda about how Trump is worse than Hitler and suggesting someone should do something. On top of the lawfare and espionage and trying to put him in jail where he’d likely be murdered. On top of them reportedly having their own plan to coup him in 2020 as a contingency plan. What could all this possibly be except malice.
Yes, this is all at the same time as the competency crisis.
The competency crisis was itself born out of malice… a hatred for ‘whiteness’ that quickly took form of a hatred for anything beautiful, good, and just.
‘Competence crisis’ is a euphemism that is deliberately toothless, *for* states of affairs that result from actions that arise out of malice.
Come on. Everyone knows that you don’t allow an uncontrolled rooftop with a line of sight to a potential target. I’m not in security and I know that. Your freakin’ grandmother knows that.
The “mere incompetence” notion relies on no one in Trump’s Secret Service detail knowing that. No, it was an inside job. At a minimum, several key people in Trump’s Secret Service detail were in on a plot to kill him. Trump has to figure out who they were and get rid of them.
I am better than some at sensing lies, and sensing truths unspoken.
Cheatle, the DEI head of the secret service was asked “what was your reaction to these events. She replied “Shock …”
And instantly I knew that she was not shocked, that she had been expecting these events.
When someone says they were shocked, and they actually were shocked, there is body language and micro flashes of facial expressions that say “well I was caught off guard, and was momentarily confused, and slow to react appropriately, but then I figured it out and then I was fine, and acted wisely and rightly, if a little bit slower than I should have.” There is certain amount of non verbal apology for being blindsided.
Her body language and micro expressions were different. They were try hard saying “No I was not expecting this. Really definitely not expecting it. Trust me. Honest Injun. Cross my heart and hope to die. Really Really. Would I lie? Of course you should believe what a senior civil servant tells you, and if you fail to believe I am going to have you deplatformed, cancelled, and demonetized. Believe me. Believe me. You had better believe me or else something bad is going to happen to you.”
If someone says shocked, and they actually were shocked, it is an apology for screwing up and being surprised. This was a denial of guilt, indicating mens rea. If you are not guilty, you would not answer a neutral question with a not guilty plea. The interviewer did not ask her whether she was guilty or not, but she heard his question as “How do you plea”.
She was shocked ala the casa blanca police chief that gambling was allowed in this establishment
If this Cheatle bitch hasn’t committed suicide yet just to escape the bone-crushing guilt and shame of this, or at the very least just quit and moved into contrite self-seclusion for the time being, then that’s all I need to fucking know. Give me fucking break.
I noticed that most, if not all, the SS people at the Trump assassination attempt wore sunglasses (one of the women spent a remarkable time adjusting hers), whereas none of the SS agents in the 1981 assassination attempt on Reagan wore sunglasses.
https://a.l3n.co/i/SifcKc.jpeg
https://c.l3n.co/i/Sifw0Z.jpeg
Not sure what to make of that, just something i fell over.
Now that Musk is a high profile political figure and firmly on “the wrong side of history”, looks like we’re due for some major Musk Derangement Syndrome. Fascinating how detachment from visible reality can be so strong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCUceQzCh-Q
Musk really should consider investing in a lot more personal security.
Interestingly, out-of-wedlock birthrates in East Asia are so low that if you calculated fertility only by legitimate births, Japan would be ahead of most of Europe and South Korea wouldn’t look that bad either
https://www.richardhanania.com/p/why-asians-dont-breed
Enemy article, but still interesting factoid.
https://blog.reaction.la/science/the-cervix-and-rape/
Emancipating women means treating female consent as more meaningful than women treat female consent.
Still gold.
ਅਕਾਲ
How is your comment related to Pax Imperialis’ comment?
The poo totally missed the loo and landed elsewhere.
Slightly related: I read this fascinating piece on David Gerard. What struck me in the article as well as in your link is that both men have ‘hater’ as very prominent part of their personality. At one point in the David Gerard article the author posts a pie chart of Gerard’s favorite subreddits, and literally 80% of his comments are posted in hate- subreddits (‘buttcoin’, ‘sneerclub’ etc). It fascinates me how some men obsess over things they hate to the point where it becomes their entire personality.
Kobe Bryant along with a snake puppet teach kids to give into sin:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ab7znwmU5LQ
“Dark musings” give you strength and power, you see.
Hah, me going through the video thinking ‘surely they’ll balance this out with positive thinking?’
Of course the snake isn’t just any snake, it’s a Mamba, a highly highly venomous snake from Africa. The symbolism is just too much to pretend it’s unintentional.
Niggers act like animals: “Quelle racism!”
Grah, we finna go inna Beas’ Mow’: “Aha, a role model for kids!”
[…] inevitable, because I do think that Trump’s death was at least on the table yesterday (which Jim’s Blog demonstrated by the strange headlines immediately after the shooting), even if actual death wasn’t the […]
Sitting from thousands of miles away, I will say the obvious again. For all his faults, his normality bias, boomerism etc, no other leader other than Trump has energized and united the Amerikaner in the manner he has done and I don’t see any other option but Trump to take on the role of Caesar if he wants to survive. In 2020 he failed, but another chance has presented itself in 2024.
Back in 2019/20 Jim predicted that events would overtake Trump and he would either be forced to don the role of Caesar and cross the Rubicon or he would be Epsteined. All those predictions were on spot, but the image of 2024 Trump pumping his fists in defiance at the attempt on his life is a clear sign that Providence has provided another chance to the man. It is also a sign that the Left has faltered and failed to stop him in his tracks despite their best efforts.
Let’s hope we have seen the Left’s best efforts to stop him. I fear we have not. Why should the Left give up now? If they don’t give up, they’ll try again and keep escalating.
The left’s competency seems to be eroding by the day as they have failed to stop Trump by constant intense propaganda, lawfare and now attempted assassination.
I just want to to say to these people, “Why not consider the option of just not being floridly evil?” Seriously. Do they even realize that that actually is one of their options?
Their left-brains are just rationalizing as they go along, while their right-brains are dysfunctional, evil, and demon possessed. Calling them out on their hypocrisy for crying out in pain as they furiously collapse civilization is pointless, because in their minds they have already rationalized their evil as “good intentions” and “good behavior.”
If you want to look deep deep down into the minds of leftists (and a few other non-leftist minds, but mostly it’s leftist minds), read this. Dare to stare into the abyss, just don’t get sucked in.
That looks interesting. I fondly recall trying to get through some Stirner when I was in my 20s. Having been told what a superhardcoreultraradical anarchist individualist he was, I found him disappointingly boring and never got through much of The Ego and His Own.
Long ago I attempted to read Stirner also. Boring. Regime approved dissent, just as regime approved comedians are not funny.
Because they sincerely believe that they are the virtuous ones and not floridly evil and that Trump is floridly evil and that they are saving democracy and ensuring world peace by eliminating him.
Sounds highly cynical to anyone without a damaged brain, but Leftists are sincerely cynical in their beliefs.
“The secret service killed the assassin, but this was after Trump had been hustled away.”
That is false — they evidently waited for clearance:
“Are we good? Shooter is down… Are we good to move? We’re clear… Let’s move”
https://youtu.be/xrhXn07naoc?t=198
Trump wins again this time a judge had thrown out the classified documents cases against him
Off-topic question: Why are Israel’s Orthodox Jews so determined not to join the IDF? Do they not see the State of Israel as their country? Do they think Hamas will give them a better deal? Do they not want their sons deflowered by army sluts? Do they think that if they hand over their sons, their daughters will be next?
If there’s something about the IDF that bothers them, let the Orthodox create their own army and show the world what great warriors they are.
In theory it’s a religious disagreement with the state of Israel. In practice it’s probably because they’ve gotten too use to being welfare leeches.
They are, literally, inbred parasites and they don’t want to work or fight. It’s that simple.
There is something called an ‘American Shtetl’ which is basically the poorest american cities populated almost entirely by Hasedic people, who do not work, do not do any jobs, and subsist entirely on welfare and medicaid. The wives in these towns remain unmarried but keep having kids to up the welfare payments, while the men are doing their usual hasedic stuff.
These guys vote for Trump, they have nice architectural buildings, they have strong community bonds and positive TFR, but are they based and redpilled? When the going gets tough, will they rally and fight for the Amerikaner cause? Doesn’t seem like it to me. But it is interesting how they managed to keep their communities majority Hasedic, I remember Jim saying that when child services come after jewish families, the jew naturally cries out anuddah shoah, maybe its the same case here, because I don’t see any warrior spirit emanating from these people at all.
Maybe just like how many plain apes exist from the buckets of free food given to them, probably these ultra orthodox cannot survive in an isolated environment by themselves.
Heh, seems like I got moderated.
This is a bug that is afflicting lots of people. I am struggling to fix it.
They want nothing to do with the outside world. Israel is the outside world.
Haredi Judaism is a holiness spiraled version of Orthodox Judaism, which is a holiness spiraled version of Rabbinic Judaism, which is a holiness spiraled version of Talmudic Judaism, which is a holiness spiraled version of Pharisaic Judaism.
Pharisee means “set apart, separated.” This, plus 2,000 years of holiness spiraling.
Talmudic prophecy that “six million jews must vanish” before God allows them to reclaim Israel.
Those of them who believe that God judges reality in the human realm uses humans as sense organs, thus think that if enough people believe the six million have vanished, God will be OK with them reclaiming Israel.
They’ve been trying to pull the six million victims thing for over a hundred years.
https://holocausthandbooks.com/book/the-first-holocaust/
The modern Zionist is, from the POV of some orthodox jews, trying to swindle God, by building today’s Israel before the divine deal has really come to pass. The modern state of Israel is thus illegitimate from a religious perspective, because the six gorillion did not in fact happen, and the prophecy has not been in fact fulfilled.
Of course, lots of other layers on top of this, with them getting used to leading a welfare lifestyle etc. But the deeper doctrine conflict which no one discusses out loud is mainly this. They know the six gorillion didn’t happen, and thus the time has not come for a divinely legitimate new Israel.
Whereas the zionists believe they’ve pulled it off. The six gorillion is dogma, thus millions believe it, thus God believes it, thus today’s Israel is legit.
Orthodox jews also believe they are superhumans way above the simian goy, and meant to lead the world and use its natural and human resources how they see fit, but the time has not come. Whereas the modern non-orthodox Ashkenazi has impatiently jumped the gun, and believes it’s already time for an Israel state and for them to tikkun olam the fuck out of everybody.
Let’s unpack this a little.
It’s one thing to question whether the total number of Jews killed by the Nazis was anywhere near the Official Big Round Number. Quite another thing to assume that not only is the Official Number fake, but that all of those Orthodox Jews in their holiness-spiralled bubble are fully “in on” the real facts.
And why would the secular-nationalist Zionist Jews give a hoot about some Talmudic “prophecy” anyway? Wanting people to believe in The Six Million is about manipulating people, not about anything to do with God.
Six million is a magic number to talmudics and they’ve been rerunning the ‘six million jews have been killed in XYZ’ talking point for centuries.
The point is that the secularists are also fetishizing six million. But by and large, most secularist intellectuals, whether Jewish or not, are not secularists, but demon worshippers.
Quite so. Hence the obvious answer to “why would the secular-nationalist Zionist Jews give a hoot about some Talmudic “prophecy†anyway” is that none of the secular are all that ‘secular’ either. These are deep atavistic currents, and it’s the water they all swim in and feel, even in posing as swimming against them.
Ultraorthodox jews don’t join the Israeli national army since in their eyes it’s not actually their nation – they just happen to find it a convenient place to live while awaiting their true New Israel; and in a way the administration agrees with them by deferring to their superior holiness in this matter – or are at least punting the issue for the indefinite time being due to inability to definitively settle it.
As far as the holohoax goes, it’s the Current Year, that’s not something one needs to be ‘in on’ in anything at this point to get a grip on. Everyone in the world, to the extent they even think about it anymore, acts like the ‘official’ narrative is indefensible, and that includes the people taking charge of defending it. You can quibble about whether the mass deaths from starvation and disease were in the hundreds of thousands on the low end to the ones or twos of millions on the upper end, but no matter what the conclusions is, both the magic number and anointment of the events as a ‘uniquely special’ evil (and thus parlayable into an indefinite source of indulgence) rather than historically generic evil do not survive in any case.
Maybe so, but why would the non-religious Jews care about that?
I answered that already. “Non religious” is often code for “worshipping Satan”
State of Israel is not a Jewish state according to a strict interpretation of Jewish law (I mean a reasonable strict interpretation not a holiness spiralled interpretation) just as Pakistan is not the Islamic Caliphate. State of Israel is a compromise between Jewish law and 19th century European ideas that have proven functional.
And Pakistan is far closer to a Caliphate than Israel is to an Orthodox Jewish state; you don’t have faggot parades and third wave feminism in Pakistan.
Vance is the VP. Opinions?
Young, energetic, fresh-faced turbo zionist, China hater, married to a dot indian.
What more could one want? Maybe if he had a gay brother who converts to judaism and poses with black boyfriends in star and stripes underwear.
JD Vance is assassination insurance. He is also a bridge to thermidor – stop complaining.
I don’t care about his Israel policy. I care about his American policy: JD Vance proposes that the president should directly confront and smash the presidency. He is a civil war VP, which suggests that Trump has decided to become a civil war president.
I don’t understand how any VP can be assassination insurance. If they can murder a President Trump, they can also murder his VP.
I see the VP more as the signaling of an alliance.
Many of the other things are at least understandable, but a high performance white man (USMC and Yale Law) marrying a 4/10 Indian woman is very strange.
It is the most understandable in a way.
She’s two years younger, they met in Yale as students, she was torn between a trad wife trajectory and a globohomo trajectory, the slit-eyed “tiger mom” professor Amy Chua told the swarthy girl to not be stupid and hitch her wagon to an obvious rising star, which she did, giving him three kids.
One asian woman telling another asian woman to choose a rising white man. During this time he was obviously ripe for this and accepted the deal of “supportive wife to have my back while I go forth and conquer”.
In this sense, what happened makes 100% mid-20th century sense, or even Jane Austin era sense.
Marrying because you’re thirsty is not aristocratic behavior.
Haven’t you noticed that hotness in women is inversely correlated with sexual/ marital loyalty?
No not really. If anything, hot women make their choice and stick with it because they can. It’s mid women going through a carousel of mid men hoping to stick with someone out of her league.
Pictures of when they were younger shows she was better looking than him. She aged like milk and he like wine (he still needs to lose weight). I wouldn’t go so far as call her a 4. Maybe it’s my location in the DMV, but the average woman is not great…
In such cases of “turbo-zionism”, as you say, I always wonder is it actually honest, or just a camouflage for the sake of taking the power as easy as possible.
He is a convert to Catholicism, and despite current Argentinian idiot in the charge of the Catholic Church, I can not really imagine any honest Catholic being any kind of zionist, let alone “turbo-zionist”. And he is probably an honest Catholic for the simple reason that there’s absolutely no status gain in modern world for converting to Catholicism.
The real character-test is: Are his children Christian?
“He is a convert to Catholicism”
This is the other cause for suspicion of him besides having a poojeeta wife. I mean… why convert to the vile homosexual conspiracy fraud babylonian serpent religion church?
Well, you, and me, and commentariat on this blog can discuss supposed vile homosexual conspiracy fraud Babylonian serpent religion church.
For the rest of the world, believe it or not, Catholic Church equals dark über-reaction, misogyny, fuj-bekino patriarchy, and All Bad.
So, being a convert to Catholicism (or the Orthodoxy, for that matter) is not a cause for suspicion for 99.98% percent of the mankind.
Agreed it’s weird. His demographic is the most deep protestant in the country; it has no logic other than desire to be part of a bigger, perhaps better funded group.
He also wrote a book demanding fiscal responsibility for the working class but, you know, only white people, under the direction of his Filipino law prof.
The guy just seems to be buffeted around easily. No particular loyalty to his origins despite presently marketing himself to people who wish to see him that way. Seemingly no instinctual in-group preference whatsoever. Of course he must feel he has been more than adequately rewarded, which someone who was born upper middle class may not.
https://dailystormer.in/if-my-father-raped-killed-and-ate-a-baby-i-would-not-change-my-last-name/
Anglin arranged my thoughts better than I did. He is a “man without a basic identity”. He appears to be a man who is easily groomed. He also appears to have been groomed by people like Amy Chua, who are not friends. Maybe if he had been groomed only by Musk and Thiel, it would be a different story.
This guy gives me a weird feeling. I do not trust him. I don’t wish to blackpill, and I hope it works out.
Trump’s VP pick appears to be a very good sign.
So what does everything think of Vance, on one hand he is very close to one of us otoh he has a pajeeta wife and thus will be against firm action to solve the pajeet problem.
VP counts for nothing until Trump is murdered or serves four more years. The world is likely to be very different in four years.
They likely won’t kill Trump to make Vance president…
As I said, assassination insurance.
He probably changed to Vance as a result of this… before it was likely Youngkin but Youngkin is not assassination insurance being a squishy RINO (which he has to be in Virginia to be fair) and a Ukraine supporter.
BTW speaking of the assassination it appears hell has frozen over and TYT is admitting that the security failures were so catastrophically incompetent sounding that it at least sounds like a plot. This is a leftist Bernie bro channel lol…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxXFk7iI7VM
https://modernity.news/2024/07/15/police-officer-reported-suspicious-behavior-of-gunman-30-nearly-30-minutes-before-shooting/
‘A police officer noticed gunman Thomas Crooks acting suspiciously on a roof and reported him nearly 30 minutes before he shot at Donald Trump, according to a new report.
…
“Channel 11’s Nicole Ford confirmed that Beaver County’s ESU team had eight members at the rally, including snipers and spotters. According to Ford’s sources, one of them noticed a suspicious man on a roof near the rally at 5:45 p.m., called it in and took a picture of the person,†states the report.
…
Another law enforcement officer saw Crooks on the ground and called in the report with a picture prior to 5:45pm, according to the report.
The grounds were checked for the suspect but he could not be found.’
According to Vox Day the building the sniper fired from was a police watch post for snipers.
—
This is either going to have a stonewalled investigated or we are going to find out incompetence that makes the Epstein assassination look professional.
A good VP can run around the administration doing things the president needs doing but doesn’t really want to be seen doing. It also signals to the base what the president is thinking and what he values. Vance runs with the Theil crowd, so good chance he’s NRx friendly.
Well, they’ve got Biden now well trained to say J6 when someone mentions the assassination attempt on Trump:
https://x.com/RNCResearch/status/1813017397198266752
This fits into the larger MSM narrative brewing today that the failed assassination is just a case of one of the Right’s own going nuts and backfiring instead of the usual case of real people like Pelosi’s husband suffering because we won’t let ourselves be disarmed for the greater good.
[*deleted for unexplained and unsupported claims*]
I have been watching the RNC, and I see the opposite of what you say you see.
So, to defend your perception of the RNC as owned by our enemies, you need to give more concrete specifics and more specific arguments, rather than confidently telling us it is obvious. What I see is owned by Trump, Vance, Tucker, Donald Trump Junior, and Musk. Warriors all and smart people all — or at least as of the attempted assassination, Trump has been projecting a warrior image, making people forget his previous fishing expedition to the bank of the Rubicon.
What I see is total disunion in the Democrats, and total unity and discipline among the Republicans.
What I also see is as of the attempted assassination, the stop Trump movement is collapsing. I interpret this as Thermidor realising “Hey, if the White House staff and the Journo List are going to murder Trump, they are going to murder me.”
No one who matters dares say the obvious under his own name, but I can smell them thinking that a Trump presidency is their best chance at staying alive.
I seriously need to explain to you why putting a literal black whore with a tattoo on her head on stage to ramble about how the people most hurt by illegal immigration are legal immigrants is not something one would do on the basis of her personal merit or skills as a speaker? That there is one and only one reason one would do such a thing, and that doing such a thing is a symbol of loyalty to the elite? What do you think diversity hires are for in the first? Loyalty tests.
Or, to sum it up with a Chinese aphorism you’re familiar with: “Point whore make speaker.”
Who? These people have no power and no influence.
They are just there to neutralise the claims that we are going to liquidate gays, force whores to get married, and put the blacks back to picking cotton. They are just there to help a bunch of straight white males get into power.
And once we fix the electoral system, they will be discarded.
I see a whole lot of engineers who started wearing a dress in order to get jobs. And suddenly, right now, no one is confident that wearing a dress is going to get him a job. I can smell change in the air, right now.
>They are just there to help a bunch of straight white males get into power.
Nah, L’s right. These are loser moves. Even if undertaken cynically, they rely on most of the audience failing to “get the joke.” Then sooner or later, the cynics face the true believers, and the latter trounce them because their hearts are pure and they each fight with the strength of ten.
You suffer from presentism bias. Monck did a whole lot of similar “loser moves”. Which when the dust settled, were proven to have been undertaken cynically.
First you do whatever it takes to prevent the enemy from uniting against one. Then one does whatever it takes to get power. Then, having power, then one reveals what one is going to do with it.
Putting nigger faggot whores on stage is not an indicator of what Trump is going to do with power.
We see the mainstream right united around Trumpism, while the mainstream left is in disarray and fighting each other. But, on the other hand, Trumpism is, as L would point out if he had half a brain, just 1980s leftism, as Putinism is 1990s leftism.
But leftism must get ever lefter, or die. If 1990s leftism wins in Russia, shortly thereafter it will lose. If 1980s leftism wins in America, shortly thereafter it will lose. Deng restored capitalism, and Monck restored throne and Altar. Putin, a 1990s leftist, is two years ahead of us on the path back to throne and altar. I pray he will head back to throne, altar, and freehold, which is needful to restore Russian fertility.
To restore fertility, the King must bow to Christ, the peasant must eat Christ, and the peasant must be King under his small and leaky roof.
The elephant in the room is Thiel is a fudge packer. Palantir is an intelligence fusion entity and at least nominally outside of the FOIA and streamlined congressional oversight. Thiel sat next to Trump at the tech CEO sit-down in early 2017. Even Metaberg, also handled by Thiel, is celebrating Trump’s fist-pump.
Thiel holds the sword of Damocles and he is gaaaayyyyy.
Not seeing that he holds the sword of Damocles.
Power is that warriors will follow you. Thiel has information. Which is useful if someone wants to sent warriors to whack one target and not another.
Nothing truly of the right can stand for winning power through means of deception. Being silent and speaking truth when the time is ready is one thing, but lying is absolutely unacceptable. [*deleted*]
Trump et al are not lying. They are sincere 1980s leftists.
But 1980s leftism is an unsustainable position. It must become 2025 leftism, or throne and altar. L predicts it will become 2025 leftism, but I doubt this, and so do 2025 leftists.
Did 1930s leftism not last until the ’90s in Russia? I understand that it is not inherently stable, but after a purge the dead faith floats along for quite a long time if left alone. In Rome’s case some centuries. Throne and altar only seems inevitable if you allot for outside armies imposing it on you at swordpoint, or simply replacing you.
Yes, 1930s leftism was stabilised by Thermidor murdering Beria, and so lasted until 1990. But 1930s leftism was walking dead at the time of Brezhnev
Unless you count War Communism, the USSR reached peak leftism in the 1920s. It was considerably more leftist under Lenin and his menagerie of committee-successors (before Stalin put the boot in) than it would ever be again.
America is still fundamentally WASPy in spirit. Hopefully that translates into Monck restoration and not Beria murder.
If the time scales are near the length of a human lifetime, or longer in some cases, the assertion carries little weight. As history spans the only survivors are those that maintain throne and altar, yes I agree. I don’t agree that means we only have left singularity or restoration, we could end up with a living dead 1980s leftism, especially since there’s no other power as was the case for the USSR; well I suppose it depends on how Russia and China manage their succession problems.
There is no one, literally no one, who seriously believes that the RNC has such intentions whose opinion was moved a single inch by this display.
My opinion was definitely moved by several miles on this display.
So, prior to this moment, you were convinced that they were planning to “liquidate gays, force whores to get married, and put the blacks back to picking cotton”? Because that is a rather important qualifier.
They don’t consciously intend to liquidate gays, force whores to get married, and put the blacks back to picking cotton, but they are setting in process a situation that will inevitably lead to this result, even though they sincerely deny it. As I said, Trump is a 1980s leftist, but leftism must become ever lefter, or die. There is no stable position but ever lefter, or all the way right.
The options, always and forever, are order, or ever escalating disorder. And as soon as one attempts to reduce intolerable disorder, one is on a path that leads all the way to order.
Are you following this conversation? Because what I said was that this grotesque creature’s presence [*deleted for lack of specifics and concrete evidence*]
Which grotesque creature was that? Because I failed to notice any grotesque creatures.
I am sure that they exist, but I failed to take them seriously, and so just did not see them. Please be more specific and concrete about the evidence that you see that Trump, Musk, Trump Junior, and Tucker are in the pocket of our enemies, because I simply failed to notice. Give me links, and if you are going to give me a tediously lengthy YouTube video, give me a time in that video.
Nitpicking here, but I don’t think anyone who would have to manage the workers wants to put the blacks back to work. Really just want them out of the way and gone. Still, they were born here, and there’s some obligation. Ought to appoint some as tribal leaders, assign them Indian like reservations (or Russia’s autonomous zones), carve out a few special economic monopolies, and leave them be so long as they don’t cause trouble.
No need to search, I am referring to this thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jETH851tzgM
It’s very presence is all the evidence one could ever require. It is very obviously not a consequence of that thing’s merit, nor will it move any minds already set against Trump.
“Thing”? Amber Rose is a normal weight mother of two, who looks to be about seven eighths white and one eighth black. The only thing that is very wrong with her is that she campaigns against slut shaming and in favour of typical female omnisexuality. (And, as you point out, she shaved her head)
She is there because she is an influencer, thus there on merit — they gave her five minutes, because they wanted her influence over her (mostly black) followers. Since she is an influencer with a lot of followers, she will probably move a lot of minds previously set against Trump.
Since she is a “black” woman (actually high yellow) good for getting black voters, thus complicating Democratic efforts to vote for them. This is part of the Musk vote harvesting plan. The primary value of legitimate vote harvesting is not that you get any significant number of legitimate votes, but that you make it hard for illegitimate vote harvesting to pretend to be legitimate vote harvesting.
Sticking an oar into vote harvesting is not actually an effort to get votes — it is only going to get an absolutely insignificant number of votes, because every black who votes for Trump shows up at the voting booth and votes in person. It is an effort to prep the decks for civil war by making sure that if Democrats steal the election again, it will be obvious to everyone.
Harvesting will only get a few dozen Trump votes, but it will prevent, or render blatantly fraudulent, eighty million Biden votes, thus improving our prospects in Civil War II. And that is why a normal weight mother of two is on stage at the RNC convention.
As I often point out sluts (actual sluts) are better than the catlady dyke nuns of progressivism as the former have no superior virtue in any way in fact they are just too proud to fuck any man they can get. The slut at least has a certain amount of humility.
“Nitpicking here, but I don’t think anyone who would have to manage the workers wants to put the blacks back to work. Really just want them out of the way and gone. Still, they were born here, and there’s some obligation. Ought to appoint some as tribal leaders, assign them Indian like reservations (or Russia’s autonomous zones), carve out a few special economic monopolies, and leave them be so long as they don’t cause trouble.”
There should be something like the millet system with segregation and a few trade “free cities” where the races are allowed to meet together freely without a lot of special approvals (Florida would probably end up with at least one of theem as central Florida has extremely well behaved blacks who seem to like Trump and who I’m not typically afraid even if see groups of them around).
[*deleted for disinformation*]
That is a grotesquely false account of Amber Rose, and a grotesquely false account of Musk’s ballot harvesting program, which ballot harvest is expected to harvest an insignificant handful of Trump votes, and disrupt the harvest of sixty million Biden votes.
The claim that no blacks are likely to vote for Trump is obviously silly. As a result of lawfare, Trump has had to show up in a bunch of black neighbourhoods, and whenever he does so, he gets the usual huge and enthusiastic turnout, while Biden only ever gets a handful showing up.
Since showing up to vote in person is comparable to showing up to see the candidate in person, it seems likely that in an honest election, the black vote would be in favor of Trump at something like ten to one.
> Ought to appoint some as tribal leaders, assign them Indian like reservations (or Russia’s autonomous zones)
Stalin created a Jewish autonomous oblast in far Siberia back in the day, never got to really fill it with Jews.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Autonomous_Oblast
Maybe it can be rented out to be filled with other types.
The worst thing that can be said about Amber Rose is she adopted a grotesque globohomo style (no doubt in order to get promoted by globohomo initially but she never went back) when naturally her pre globohomo style she was a far better looking girl.
L, what you miss is this.
Overt displays of hard right wing power makes the left double down.
This is the way the slow march works. Your want for purity in signallers is leftist!!!
There is NO swift justice mate. Get some popcorn. The RNC is doing it right, for once.
Jim: If you’re just going to imagine reasons for diversity hires that exist purely in your head, knock yourself out.
Doom: I am of the left, and I have made exactly zero pretense about that fact since the very first post I made here.
And all over the internet. If you search “Amber Rose”, up come no end of pages explaining why this slightly black slut with two kids by two absent fathers gets five minutes at an RNC event running for days. She earned that gig fair and square. She is an influencer with considerable influence. She is not a DEI hire. She gets hits. Trump needs black voters, though the internet will not explain why. The actual reason being that Trump and Musk’s plan for countering ballot harvesting needs black voters. Every real black Trump voter can be used to prevent many fake Biden voters.
>Every real black Trump voter can be used to prevent many fake Biden voters.
How exactly does this work?
Is your theory that ballot harvesters just cast ballots for every Black person in a district without contacting them, and thus every Black Trump vote risks creating some kind of double vote situation that will be detected? If that’s really how things work, then why aren’t these double-votes detected when Blacks show up to vote Dem and find they’ve already voted?
What do you think is going to happen when black voter who has already been voted for shows up in person to actually vote?
You think the ever vigilant Democrats running the district are going to leap into action to detect voting fraud?
“Is your theory that ballot harvesters just cast ballots for every Black person in a district without contacting them, and thus every Black Trump vote risks creating some kind of double vote situation that will be detected? If that’s really how things work, then why aren’t these double-votes detected when Blacks show up to vote Dem and find they’ve already voted?”
Who says they aren’t but if blacks vote early for Republicans then their names can’t be used.
“…planning to “liquidate gays, force whores to get married, and put the blacks back to picking cottonâ€?” etc…
L, which of these groups do you fall into?
Humungus finds this whole back and forth very odd and is confused why your posts continue to plaque his screen.
Also, your writing style is oddly familiar other than taking the opposing view. Humungus suspects you are posting under another name also on this blog.
Humungus liked the Muslim poster better, there was something to learn at least. With L, I feel I’m in some idocracy play.
Humungus cannot be defied!
>You think the ever vigilant Democrats running the district are going to leap into action to detect voting fraud?
I do not.
I know when I go to vote (total cuck behavior, but it’s hard to break old habits), the election judge (generally some sweet old Boomer lady volunteer who votes Republican and believes wholeheartedly in the system) looks up my name on a list of the registered voters in the precinct, checks it off so I can’t vote twice. I sign a paper that says I super-duper promise that I am who I say I am but I don’t don’t have to give ID and definitely shouldn’t offer. Then the grandma gives me a ballot which is anonymous and cannot be traced back to me.
I don’t know how things work in corrupt Black big city machine precincts. I assume ballot harvesters cast a whole bunch of votes on behalf of “their” voters and the judges (likely a mix of 92 IQ tribalist Shaniquas and 20-something White commie fanatics) check off the names on their registered voter lists. If one of those voters shows up in person, the judges probably shrug, hand them a ballot, and check off someone else’s name from their roll. I can’t stress enough that this is mere surmise, but it makes sense to me. It’s almost the perfect crime. If that is indeed what happens, then getting Blacks to vote Repub doesn’t do anything to stop nor prove fraud.
If one black voter makes a fuss about one vote, it gets ignored because just one vote. If a Maga organiser makes a fuss about suitcase full of votes, well, it is more than just one vote, and the Maga organiser has more resources and incentive to make trouble than some random black man.
I think it’s prudent to point out Trump is not the RNC, and he and his people more likely than not did not pick these speakers. This was the RINOs making a show that they want race communism too, please don’t liquidate us.
> If a Maga organiser makes a fuss about suitcase full of votes
How does the MAGA organizer even know that his MAGA Blacks got double-voted? The election judge ticked a list and gave the MAGA Black a ballot; if xhe does it even slightly passably, the MAGA Black doesn’t even notice that anything is amiss. And if he does suspect something is wrong, the paper trail proves he got one ballot and cast one vote.
I don’t think I understand the mechanism you’re proposing by which legitimate Black Trump votes either deter or expose fraudulent Black Biden votes. I’ve proposed my theory of how it might work and why it wouldn’t actually work, but it’s just a guess. Heck, I’ve just now thought of a way to make it smoother and more foolproof: you don’t tick the harvested ballots off the voter roll until the in-person voting is over, and then just tick an appropriate number of no-shows. What’s your scenario where legitimate Black Trump votes stop this, Jim?
If Thermidor is indeed realising that we should soon see some secret service personal resigning, being arrested, vanishing or dying. If there is no retaliation against a failed assasination attempt, Thermidor’s chances of survival are poor.
If Thermidor cannot investigate the failed attempt (or simply remove people reasonably suspected of wrongdoing), they have lost and are out of power.
Thermidor can’t officially investigate the assassination attempt because that would spread mis-, dis-, and malinformation and get the deplorable cattle all riled up. They are invested in “normalcy”: that’s what defines them; they absolutely cannot break kayfabe. They’re much more afraid of the Amerikaaner awaking than they are of the lefter-than-thou, and so they will lose and be devoured by the lefter-than-thou. It’ll be fun to watch.
Some kind of secret shadow war of disappearances and assassinations is an outside possibility, but I’d be shocked if Thermidor had the balls for it. They’re happy enough to use such tactics sparingly and against the Right, but at a larger scale and against their self-admitted moral superiors? Probably not until it’s far too late for them.
Historically what happens is Thermidor catches a rough ride from the lefter-than-thou, and then hires someone far to their right to take care of the problem.
Sulla is an example of Thermidorian who was not to the right of his fellow Thermidorians
Sulla was a very unusual case and I’m not sure you can easily define where he was politically (its not quite correct to call him an Optimates because he proscribed some optimates he percieved as crooks and some of the things he did were very popular)… and while he failed to get the Republic to function again in a stable way by merely killing those he saw in the elites as traitors it can be said in his defense that he had no historical data to go on to show it wasn’t possible and it can also be said that he did solve the elite elite corruption problem for a fairly long time (the elite after Sulla were not as blatantly corrupt as they were in the time of the Gracchi brothers even during the civil wars).
My point is that Sulla used dictatorial powers to restore the constitution. I see this as a Thermidorian act.
He then resigned from his dictatorship. Someone to the right of Thermidor would not have resigned and handed power to elected officials.
That’s why I cited him as Thermidorian who did not use someone to right of himself to crush his enemies.
Why did other Themidorians hire someone to the right to kill their enemies to the left?
My guess is that Sulla’s faith differed from later Thermidorians. Later Thermidorian wanted to stop further move to the left because they found further movement presently impractical, inconvenient or costly, but did not consider more progressive positions evil. Sulla judged those to the left of him as evil. He truly believed that the order he had recreated was right and proper for ever.
I think Sulla was probably aware it might not work (I hate that his autobiography was lost) but in his opinion (and once again sulla did not have so much historical data to go on as us) trying to restore the republic was probably worth a try (Sulla figured Rome beat everyone else around them so there had to be something good about it).
If the amount of DEI in the speaker lineup tonight was present in a Disney film or at a Democratic convention, any conservative worth his salt would jeer, sneer, and react with manually-propelled tomatoes. Yet because the spectacle nominally has a (R) slapped on it, suddenly we’re supposed to pretend that inegalitarian nativist Christian values are being upheld.
That’s not even getting into the satanic Sikh prayer to the OnE trUe gOd Wagadoodoo consisting of uppity wailing . The contrast of the humble Lutheran prayer to Christ the King with her cringe wailing immediately reminded me of Yoko Ono mogging Lennon and Chuck Berry. “My god is mightier than your god.”
What in the fuck kind of reactionary party is this?
These are the visuals of a happy flexible meritocratic color-blind free and exciting America as presented by Hollywood between Beverly Hills Cop (1984) and Bad Boys (1995).
Basically the classical Reagan – early Bill Clinton period.
For many people alive today this is peak sane America and this is what they want to “bring back”.
For the modern liberast this is peak nazism and the end of the world.
Demonstrably false. The top 5 highest domestic grossing films in the late 80s and top 5 in the early 90s: Back to the Future, IJ and the Last Crusade, Top Gun, Batman ’89, Crocodile Dundee, Jurassic Park, Lion King, Forrest Gump, Sixth Sense, and Home Alone. They did not have casts that were nearly this S H I T T E D and V A J J E D.
Our memories of the past may be compromised, but unvandalized archaeological artifacts are not.
This is valid info, the underlying premise somewhat shaky. Blurred by anger maybe.
What was super popular back in the day is not necessarily what is used today to weave a vision of sanity for normies to pine for.
2024 is not 1984 or 1994. It may use visuals harking back to elements from real or imagined 1984 and 1994 to create a needed vision for itself today, but 2024 is not 1984 or 1994.
No, your original premise had merit, and its message is being lost under knee jerk reaction to specific casting choices (the lack of diversity hires) rather than overall theme.
The highest domestic grossing films of the late 80s and early 90s did have predominately white casts, and the occasional non-white was usually picked for good reason, but that’s besides the point. The spirit of the times and films were a celebrating the concept of 1980’s liberalism.
Forrest Gump is so strongly progressive I don’t understand how it’s being overlooked as some kind of evidence against your argument. That’s not even getting into how massive Star Wars was in that period.
Yep. These were still films with ~all male casts apart from maybe a love interest or a Princess Leia. No Indians or Orientals at all. Often only white people (first Star Wars movie has aliens but no black people). Black/white buddy cop movies were the DEI of their day. RNC visually looks like the leftism of… 5, 10 years ago? Not that you can easily run a political movement excluding entire demographics full of rich and connected people.
True, but the second one, “The Empire Strikes Back”(1980) had Lando Calrissian (Billy Dee Williams).
At least Billy Dee had charisma. Eddie Murphy was genuinely entertaining as well on SNL and his comedy records before becoming a big-time movie star. Those of us who grew up through that were already primed via TV with shows such as Different Strokes, The Jeffersons, Sanford and Son, etc.
Then there was Conan and Subotai in Conan the Barbarian. Perhaps Carpenter was influenced by that duo when he pared Jack Burton with Wang Chi in Big Trouble in Little China.
Eddie Murphy on getting an “African Bush Bitch” is a classic.
https://youtu.be/GIwpypavI4o?si=UApwT71sXwgbc6gY
Everyone is way too caught up in casting choices when what’s even more important are the themes. For examples, the Jedi are a priestly caste that have transcended human wants and desires. No longer feel hate or fear. Both anti-human and anti-material. This is leftist gnostic utopian delusion.
What else is from the 80s and 90s? Action warrior women as seen in Aliens and Terminator. Race blind meritocracy in Forrest Gump and Beverly Hills Cop. An anyone can make it optimism, “neurodivergents” included, as seen in Rain Man and Gump. Independent career women in Fatal Attraction and Crocodile Dundee.
There’s nothing demonstrably false about Varna’s initial claim. Today’s progressivism is just so poignant that yesterday’s progressiveness doesn’t register if you don’t know what to look for.
>Everyone is way too caught up in casting choices when what’s even more important are the themes.
Excellent observation. We were bombarded on TV with “we are all the same on the inside” constantly. Yeah, a lot of comedy was still based on racial differences, but that perhaps helped the theme that differences were superficial.
When Moldbug on his blog mentioned his parents forbade him TV and gave the reasons why, a chill struck me because TV was my prime babysitter growing up. First thing you do after waking up? Turn on the TV. Last thing before going to sleep? Turn it off.
The Jedi being a priestly caste is from the Phantom Menace (1999). The video ‘What If… The Phantom Menace came out in 1987?’ highlights the changes over those 12 years; leftist acceleration (14 year old girl flirting with 25 year old) and writing ability (No Qi Gon or Jar Jar).
>The Jedi being a priestly caste is from the Phantom Menace
No, it was like that in the original trilogy. Leftism must swim left, which is why it’s more obvious in the prequel trilogy and morbid in the sequel trilogy.
Check out Yoda calling anger, fear, and aggression the dark side of the force. The force is only used for knowledge and defense, never for attack. This is a priestly inversion of the warrior.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gONQCIevSN0
Here they invert victory and defeat. It’s similar to that certain leftist mindset that ‘when you kill the enemy they win’.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVBX7l2zgRw
Sure, the priestly aspect isn’t that strong in the original trilogy, and you have to really know what to look for to recognize it, but at the same time you can easily notice how the Jedi got increasingly priestly with each movie because of the thematic groundwork that got laid down.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZGfGJvY2Dg
Between the time Lucas made the OG Star Wars and the rise of Empire, that money Lucas left lying around got sucked up by the original Battlestar Galactica and Buck Rogers, both of which had pilot episodes released to the theater before the TV shows launched. Indeed, action figures from all three got mixed up when we lads played.
Recently watched both pilots and was struck most by Buck Rogers, a direct influence on Star Wars. Not only does it have the evil space princess Ardala in a costume that makes the Slave Leia one look Muslim, in the opening credits, we see our hero Buck spending his centuries in suspended animation dreaming about a great variety of pussy.
The BG pilot is better quality in terms of effects, pretty much identical to the original Star Wars before Lucas started editing. But Buck Rogers was more fun and more fitting for an MST3K treatment.
The pre Disney Star Wars was based and redpilled, the Jedi in the late Republic are a gay priesthood serving corrupt politicians and that was the point.
Palps and Plagueis actually have a discussion where Plagueis says he actually has tremendous respect for the ancient Jedi which actually ruled the republic as warriors but zero respect for the modern Jedi who serve a corrupt Senate which was the most contemptible thing about them of all. That they were also kind of Zen monks was bad but not as bad as that.
The early Jedi are warrior monks. The first thing we learn about Obi Wan and “Anakin” (as he becomes) is that they fought together in a war.
In the prequels, they become even more warrior-like, the extent of self-parody, charging into battle without even a formation as, essentially, super-tanks with laser swords that are immune the bullets. They are old, as Cominator points out, now organized as some kind of bureaucratic government intel agency, rather than a bunch of wandering mystics as they were in the original movies (which was itself a riip-off of 50s and 60s Japanese samurai movies).
I’m not sure there’s a big point to be made here except that George Lucas isn’t that smart. Lucas is a regime man, married to a black woman, but not a very thoughtful one. Probably just attaching to power and money. Could he have made it as a director, even an “independent” director, otherwise?
>Demonstrably false.
>Forrest Gump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1nA1wanH2s
https://youtube.com/shorts/1rHWGwa9YCc?si=QilgT0-hFQpRFEKl
Not meant to be done by a woman, but she’s been Trump’s lawyer for a decade so w/e
Starting with a ritual is high church, even if wrong church, it boils the frog.
We high church now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVTqnt_Rxo0
7:55
Apparently the snipers were prevented by DHS lawyers from killing the shooter before he fired.
Prince has made a living providing security. He, in this video, claims a DHS lawyer told an SS sniper that he was not allowed to shoot a man with a rifle pointed at the president.
If so, we may conclude, unsurprisingly, that SS gunmen were loyalists, but DHS lawyers intended and set up the murder of president Trump.
It is not very loyalist for an SS sniper to wait until the man with the rifle has fired some bullets at the president. If so, we may conclude that SS gunmen were loyal to the DHS lawyers
We don’t know what he was being told. Prince is saying that he thinks it was a lawyer worried about rules of engagement, but I thought it was way more sinister. His boss could have been in his ear telling him that the would-be assassin was a friendly, don’t mind him at all. Cheatle herself has said that the “sniper hotel” was turned into a staging area for local police for the purposes of the rally, which would make that much more believable. How could the bad guy possibly be on the roof of the copshop itself?
Every Freemason, gangster and genocidal psycho knows how to conspire out loud towards deeply sinister shit, but in plausibly deniable code.
“Take care of it.â€
“Liquidated as a class.â€
“The legacy of white privilege.â€
“A map that seems pizza related.â€
My favorite: “abolish” the “social construct”
And yet the gunman prioritized obedience to the lawyers over their supposed charge’s life. Lol.
On loyalty, here’s a question. Say the SS gunman shot the assassin on sight knowing he was not one of the security detail. The DHS lawyers go after the SS gunman. What would trump then do? Protect the SS gunman? Or let him rot to die? Or make some ineffectual noises?
Trump will not get loyalty from anyone unless he is ready to treat the entire DHS legal team as if they tried to personally murder him. Loyalty is a two way street.
Thermiador is happening Microsoft just cut its DEI team and said it is no longer integral to its business. https://x.com/MacroEdgeRes/status/1813204919697932658
Articles like this in a mainstream paper seemed unthinkable in previous year: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2024/07/15/secret-service-chief-blamed-trump-shoot-security-failings/ and I noticed the absence of five feet tall female agents at his next public appearance (RNC)
Thermidor stands a good chance. It appears that the mainstream media, while sticking to Orange Man Bad, is no longer treating him as Literally Hitler. Either the left is altogether getting cold feed (“guys, are we really in ideal conditions to win a civil war?”), or Muskidor errr Thermidor now has influence on the mainstream media. Their scripts have taken on a different tune. Also watch out for Netanyahu’s speech on July 24 – if he goes nuclear on the Democrats (in lieu of impartiality), sign that Thermidor might be ascendant.
A lot of popular discourse about the attempted assassination is phrased in terms of it getting support for Trump because “It makes him a martyr” or whatever.
I agree that the murder attempt is politically important, but not (mainly) for that reason.
The main reason is that it shows the nature of the Left. You can’t unsee the fact that they tried to kill him.
Yes, and notice how Elon could immediately and publicly fall into line after this was wordlessly communicated by the assassination attempt.
“These people will kill him, and then they’ll kill me, and then my kids, and now Trump gets it and I know he gets it. And you plebes out there can get it too, without having to say anything to each other, if you want.â€
The game theory of all this is just fascinating. Less censorship on Twitter doesn’t just mean there’s more for me to see, but more importantly, more Shelling points for me to presume that others have seen as well. Because Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself, etc.
>game theory, Shelling points
Yes, hugely important. It’s not just that we know that the left are a bunch of murderous psychotics. And it’s not just that a lot of other people now know it. It’s the fact that (basically) everyone now knows that everyone else knows it; it’s game-theoretic common knowledge.
Kill his kids? Groomers would never pass up the opportunity to trans his kids. Elon is now leaving California for that reason.
Bullet track analysis/simulation graphic slowmo with Trump speaking.
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1813314243434856885
More simulation analysis.
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1813626264957440282
Criticism please:
What I “feel” MUST be different about this particular leftward runaway crisis is that, internet censorship aside (paging Dr. Vaughn) there’s STILL 100X more information about it, in real time as it’s actually happening, than there must have been during any other such crisis in history.
From this blog here, to Covfefe Anon, to whoever, did any such crisis before enjoy such blow-by-blow perspective and clarity, at this level?
I’m not saying we’re in the clear — there’s plenty more bullets with Trump’s name on them, and eventually perhaps one or two with mine — but it doesn’t take a historical genius anymore to connect the dots and map-fit the present day to 10-20 past left singularities. There’s a lot of smart people out here who understand what’s happening. They may be scared shitless of talking about it publicly, but still, there are ways of communicating the basics of this subject with plausible deniability (paging Dr. Carlson, etc).
Can you even imagine the original Thermidorians, or Mensheviks, or etcetera, with a Jim’s blog to help them comprehend what’s happening, and therefore what they have to do, just to survive?
Yes, totally, absolutely. A leftist singularity needs to build up pressure, and it seems very much like places such as these act as pressure release valves.
To what extent (and with which speed!) mere ideas such as the ones presented by Jim can change the course of society remains to be seen. But something is definitely happening. One cannot publicly make ten out of ten correct predictions and not expect it to have any effect.
Alright my thoughts on the Vance pick in context of elite splitting up
There are three main factions in the elite
1. Leftists (the ruling faction)
2. MAGA reactionaries who want to return to 1980s leftism (the few who genuinely and totally support Trump)
3. The neoreactionary (more of Yarvin’s kind than Jims) futurists
The leftist have furthermore split into the radical and thermidorians over the utter catastrophe of the war and Ukraine and just how ruinous Biden’s radical policies have been.
Vance was picked because it brought with it the full financial backing of Musk and Thiel and because the leftists will be terrified to kill Trump to put neoreactionaries who are much enamoured of Yarvin and BAP’s ideas in power. The fact that Musk and Thiel are now fully supporting Trump in exchange for putting a NRx type in power means that Musk and Thiel have decided that leftism and leftists just have to go and that they are divided and weak right now and that by acting decisively they can get into power and do it.
So the guy who was a never-Trumper in 2016 is connected to the silicon/futurists in 2024? That’s quite a development.
I do not entirely trust Vance because past Nevertrumpism, poojeeta wife and papist conversion but I do like what he represents.
I also like that he recommended that Trump should just fire every federal employee in a management position and if the courts ruled against it he should Andrew Jackson them (since his people would be the ones controlling the guns until he complied).
It’s a big red flag that [*deleted because non sequitur*]
Explain why it is a big red flag.
The comment was intended as a general opinion on the choice of JD Vance as Trump’s VP. I thought that was relevant to the thread but apologies if not.
JD Vance’s policy views on the middle east line up with those of the neocons (i.e., more support for Israel especially as relates to Gaza, and more US pushback and agitation toward Iran.)
I’m not saying Iran should be our next “greatest allyâ€, just expressing that the neocon agenda (i.e., forever wars for Israel) is not good for America. Therefore Vance’s hawkish stance toward Iran is a worrisome datapoint regarding Vance as VP.
We’ve spent enough blood and treasure on wars for Israel. And war with Iran—for which Vance seems to be agitating–will not serve the interests of ordinary Americans.
Do they?
Let us have a link to something he actually said, rather than something the usual Soros shills have said that he said.
The only thing I know that he has said on Iran is that if Iran strikes at Us forces in the Middle East, the US should not strike Iran within its own territory.
What the only thing I know that he has said on China is that the US cannot win a war with China because our military industrial complex is dependent on Chinese dual use technologies.
Vance opposes a war with Russia and Iran is currently something close to an ally of Russia do you think the Russians would tolerate America doing full scale invasion of Iran even if we were capable of such a thing now… which we probably aren’t.
JD Vance’s points on foreign policy always circle back to the fact that the elite have destroyed our capability to fight a war, because they thought it was more important to destroy the white working class. He says America lives in a very threatening world, needs to be strong, and America is weak, because it systematically destroyed white working class jobs.
So the usual shills quote him saying that nation X is a threat, and leave out the context that there is not much we can do about nation X until we restore the white working class.
I can summarise everything he has said on foreign policy as “Nation X is a threat, China is a bigger threat, and we cannot afford a conflict with China because our military industrial complex depends on Chinese dual use technologies.”
Trump 2024 is a lock because of his organic popularity + Jewish billionaire money behind him + Democratic incohesion. His presidency will get us 4 years of escalation in the Middle East (but minimal progress on immigration and no change to the administrative state). Orange Hitler’s disastrous hyperzionism will lead to a realignment in which support for genocidal interventionism in the Middle East will become extremely unpopular among Democrats. Vance 2028 will lose for two reasons: 1. he is a chubby charisma vacuum, 2. woke will essentially not exist anymore, so no more wind in the sails of the “dissident right”. In that same election I will vote blue.
“In that same election I will vote blue.”
That might be Ye’s big year after all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k8craCGpgs
Lmao, “I will vote blue.” You are faggot.
That isn’t possible. The US is losing to Yemen, a country in the middle of a civil war.
For the US to be able to project power, there has to be internal change. Thermidor requires Trump to collide with the administrative state- otherwise there are no soldiers or material for the military.
>Jewish billionaire money behind him
More like Silicon billionaire money behind him. Musk and Thiel carry on the spirit of a resurgent Anglo American elite.
Ok, the rest of what you say is so disconnected from reality… are you trolling us?
Yes, and the left has been having nightmares about it ever since. From a 2022 Vanity Fair article:
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/04/inside-the-new-right-where-peter-thiel-is-placing-his-biggest-bets
Big if true!
I had made some previous comments about Vance being NRx friendly that didn’t seem to register until I posted the link. I was sort of scratching my head at why there was so much negativity.
I’m sort of surprised this wasn’t known. The article was sort of a big deal among the Yarvin crowd, and Yarvin has more or less confirmed the validity. It would appear his strategy at seducing the elites has paid off more than any of us could’ve imagined, yet at the same time all the early indicators were there.
Remember when Fox News pundits started to use the term the Cathedral? I don’t believe they ever explained to their general audience where that term came from. I don’t even think the Fox News higher ups exactly knew what they were talking about. It was definitely a signal to those in the know. And what are news pundits if anything but the more public facing elites? Yarvin and wider NRx clearly seduced them, so it’s logical to conclude elites behind closed doors have been seduced as well.
Wickipedia calls him a neoreactionary, and when I hear him speak at the RNC, seems about right. Hard to tell, because he was plugging Trumpism, not neoreaction, and Trump, with one bloodied cheek, has instructed Republicans to turn the other, but somehow think I hear the sound of a marine looking forward to the next cheek.
>Wickipedia calls him a neoreactionary
Huh, so it does. It didn’t in the recent past, and a quick look at both Wayback Machine and the edit history shows it was added probably on July 16. The day right after being selected by Trump. It looks like leftists are in panic mode based on the edit history.
The man truly is assassination insurance.
I totally missed it. Honestly too early to blow the trumpets, but having a neoreactionary-sympathetic vice-president in the white house…. That would be amazing. Very interesting.
Oh wow: Good stuff:
Fire federal employees, and seize university endowments.
Trump wants to make a deal with the enemy, and is immensely saddened that no deal is possible. He has finally realised that the regime will murder him if it can. JD Vance never thought the enemy was agreement capable, concludes war is inevitable, and to win it, we must destroy the enemy.
Trump is a 1980s leftist. If he gets his way, he will be Cromwell, Napoleon, and Stalin. If JD Vance gets his way, he will be Monck, Deng, and Beria.
Trump is a merchant, and wants to make a deal, but sees no deal on offer. Vance is a warrior, and sees the inevitable drift to war internal and external.
Dissolution of the monasteries part 2. That’s definitely over the correct target. I hear that Mitt Romney hates him too, which is a good sign.
Ashamed I knew very little about Vance leading up to the announcement, but as you allude, he appears to upset all the right people. Saw some REEE-ing over the pick on The Donald which is perhaps due to the place being a shill magnet.
Thank you, Jim and frens, for the excellent analysis as events unfold. Our Heavenly Father certainly blesses me with this online fellowship, and I pray He blesses you all in return. In Jesus Christ’s Name, amen.
To win the coming civil war, and to fix fertility, need Jim’s variety of NRx. You (Cominator) are right about the the Final Solution to the Leftist Problem. You write:
Yarvin, however, believes that they are good people, and that bloodshed should be avoided and will be avoided. He misunderstands human nature, he relies too heavily on magic technology to magically restore order, and he only likes BAP’s aesthetics rather than his actual ideas.
Correct me if I’m missing something.
Correct.
War is easy, peace is hard, as falling off a cliff is easy, and climbing a cliff is hard. Extended cooperation requires continual effort and good social technology, which must be continually maintained. Social entropy has to be continually expelled. Ghettos, prisons, slavery, and the noose are a society’s sewers, and a palace without a sewer will soon smell bad.
To recover, need to restore elite virtue. This is going to require radical measures. A wicked, corrupt, and demon worshipping elite is unlikely to go quietly. Or even stay in place quietly, for struggles within the evil elite over the loot are going to get out of hand.
Why is this “L” treated as a genuine commenter?
So obvious that he is trolling, roleplaying a comic-book supervillian that he fondly imagines to be a Leftist elite: “har har har, our goal is to genocide all you white folk and replace you with slaves/robots” not something a real Leftist would ever say out explicitly even if that would be the result of further spiralling Leftism.
Certainly a genuine Leftist would genuinely think he is doing whites a favour by genociding them (again not a word a Leftist would explicitly use) and crying in pain and despair as he “forced to” do so for the “greater common Good” and for the sake of ‘democracy, equality, inclusivity and our values’. Also robots and AI are racist and proof of white supremacy (taken from stolen tech from Shaniqua in Africa), so whites should be purged from STEM and robots and AI should be handed over to engineerette Shaniqua and Engineer Jamal to make them more inclusive, accessible and humane.
I know true Leftists from real life. True Leftists from 2024 would not engage on this blog. They would deem it irredeemably foul/unclean even to engage with the evil racist Christian white supremacists here. If any Leftist has genuinely engaged on this blog, he would be deemed unclean/contaminated and on a list.
Because, like with all shills and trolls, it’s fun and informative. When it stops being either, he will no doubt be treated accordingly.
No doubt Jim will grow weary of his repetitiveness eventually.
Jim’s patience is legendary and is whispered about in dark alleys during the late hours of the night. I’m getting pretty sick of our resident Sikh transwarrior.
You’re literally a Delhi brahmin or something lmfao.
You would never say this to a Sardar Irl.
You’re angry at me because protesters in the West treat your flag like a cloth.
You treat it like a rock/dick/idol/object of worship.
Why’s that my problem?
Our problem is that you posture as a warrior, when you are not, and your Khalsa is not a holy army because not an army. Big hats and small medieval weapons.
SomeDude is not posturing as a warrior. And neither am I though I am pretty sure my weapons are bigger than your weapons.
Imagine a world in which the Sikh “Khalsa” was an actual serious militia which the Indian government did not try to disarm, because attempting to do that would be to start a fight that they (the Indian government) could not be sure of actually winning.
Sher Singh might mentally live in that world, but physically, he’s in our world, where the Indian government leaves the Sikhs alone for the opposite reason: they are no real threat at all.
The Indian government does not leave the Sikhs alone. Like the rest of us serfs, they too are not allowed to be armed in any meaningful way, i.e. with guns and pistols.
They are allowed to carry around rusted daggers called Kirpans which is the source of our trans-warrior’s boasting. Still, our trans-warrior is most likely not a Sikh. Possibly a New York Jew as Jim calls it, possibly born to Sikh immigrant parents in the west and never set foot outside of western lands. Definitely a shill
Gandhi also called the Kirpan a rusted dagger before being shot.
The brahmin is the spiritual sickness.
His tendencies were described in the Ambatta sutra as well.
A tendency to lie, cheat, and subvert Dharma towards nigger worship.
The brahmin is an enemy of Dharma.
ਅਕਾਲ
Gaand Maraa, Madarchod!
He calls you a brahmin like it’s some sort of insult.
Brahmins are rumoured to be soft, weak and cowardly and he’s playing to that.
Brahmin holiness spiraling about vegetables is why Endia sucks.
Nearly all the alternatives are visibly worse. Brahmin holiness spiraling is a spiritual sickness which can be fixed with a king. Modi could be a king. Subhumans with congenital defects, not so much.
[*empty boasting deleted again*]
I often say that I live as far from power as I can get without treading water, but the social distance between you and power is even larger than the physical distance between me and power.
The reason power has been &#@&!^* up worse and worse is that it is further and further out of contact with reality.
So much for non-censorship, lol.
Anyway, since apparently passing your shill test isn’t actually enough to talk around here, I’ll just leave you to your coping. Bye.
I allowed your trolling. I did not allow content free trolling.
You are further from power than I am. If our rulers could identify you, they would crush you like a bug.
By definition no leftist ever passes a shill test let alone acknowledge it.
Your leftist role playing was unconvincing. Try again, this time with more moral frothing at the mouth outrage and a tinge of batshit-crazy along with a dash of holier-than-thou posturing while religiously avoiding thought crime.
Not sure why you would bring up wood joinery but good riddance faggot. You made a nice ammo dump for some guys who were bored enough to humor your pretenses. Like a disheveled whore leaving an army camp, announcing your exit at this point isn’t going to save any face.
I agree with what you wrote, and you wrote it well.
Have you considered that “L” is someone’s evil doppleganger and this is just a thought exercise?
“L’s” writing style is familiar, but just the opposite viewpoint of another commenter here. I wont spoil the surprise.
Thought about the fact that it was a bullet instead of an FPV drone. Were they scared of copy cats from drone bombings? Or there wasn’t even a drone training department because doodle ops is stuck ever since getting DEI’d in the wools with shit?
Their M.O. Is pretty set in stone. Find a retard online, claim to be a big figure in whatever his ideology is and you need him to do a shooting, give him about $1,500 for a gun and approximate instructions.
The Christchurch guy claimed to have been contacted by the new order of knights templar or similar, a copycat not long after even called out his forum glowie. I think there were reports of the Russian theater shooters being promised bitcoin, and of this being a general problem in islamic eastern europe, where the village idiot gets convinced by the internet to go jihad.
Even after giving the retard exact instructions to buy and set up a big prebuilt drone, there’s still binding it to your controller and goggles, making the payload, training to use it, replacing parts lost in the process. There is likely not much overlap between people capable of doing that and people who can be swayed by glowies online.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bain_(surname)
Found out Bain, Baines & Vance are the same.
W Punjabi Jatts Latinize it Vance
East does Bains
Fucking hell lol.
What’re they known for?
Among Punjab it’s money oriented Barons.
[*transwarrior posturing deleted*]
Vance was a marine who served in Iraq. What have you done? Worn a big hat and a small medieval weapon?
Fuck Yarvin and Vance.
I want General Mattis as President.
General Mattis is a neocon and color revolutionary. General Mattis resigned from the Trump administration because he wanted to conquer Syria and eradicate the Alawites, and Trump did not.
Mattis was fired for making war without presidential permission.
Neocon!? He might be a little too red even for them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRWKSqafojA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESBP-OD0Zzo
There was so much conflict between Trump and Mattis that I don’t think his resignation can solely be put on Syria. He was trying to undermine the president on just about everything and rumor has it that he was an insubordinate jerk.
It’s also rumored he’s a closet case, I think.
https://x.com/JoshWalkos/status/1813697562609623396
https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1813743565828194397
Well well well
If a Soros hit, then a Blinken hit.
“Vanguard (Soros)”
Can you explain this? Vanguard is owned by the investors in its products and it provides mainly (exclusively?) passive index trackers. Word “Vanguard” doesn’t appear on Soros wiki nor “Soros” on Vanguard wiki.
Vanguard and Blackrock are among the largest holders of every company because they are the largest providers of passive index trackers to pension funds. This, however, is completely non-discretionary investment.
Vanguard and Blackrock are not passive index trackers, in that their supposed index funds actively involve themselves in management.
https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2023/10/26/what-would-happen-to-esg-proposals-if-vanguard-blackrock-and-state-street-didnt-vote/
This article suggests they tend to vote against ESG proposals more often than active investors do, and that their voting patterns have significantly reduced the number of ESG resolutions passed.
While Vanguard isn’t immune from social trends, I don’t see any evidence for the claim that it is controled by Soros, or a weaker version of that claim that it’s a particularly ‘converged’ institution. The Vanguard model and theory, at least, is one of the least amenable to political manipulations (turning investment into a machine with little/no discretionary input – of course this has other potential problems).
I find it strange how index funds are lumped in with hedge funds (which can be fully opaque and surely do have political motives, at least sometimes). Soros is a hedge fund manager.
Blackrock is a front for the US government probably the leftist CIA faction… trillions of dollars after the bailouts. We have stealth government ownership of most (almost all) major corporations ie stealth communism. Am not so sure what Vanguard is but I’m quite sure Blackrock=government.
Humungus is perplexed at you bringing up Blackrock when it is run by three people, the tribe of which you are partial to. This is bordering on a canard Cominator.
Off topic, but what are your thoughts on Barabbas?
Would you say you are an Anti-Barabbas-ite or something else?
I think blackrock is only managed by them but the people who run it (ie mandate that it impose DEI on companies and such) are hidden probably glowniggers though the Jews in it are probably all in favor of this too… but like Soros their money and power is not really their own.
Cut the hypocritical bullshit.
You know who runs Blackrock and you know what you’ve wrote.
Not sure how I have offended the lord of the waste but we’ve been over the JQ before and my view and Jim’s view is jewish power is a mirage that is meant to obscure the real power and jews are really the same middlemen to the truly powerful they have been since the middle ages.
Blackrock is the major shareholder in every corporation not because of its jewish managers but because they represent people higher up in the government. You are welcome to disagree but I’m not sure why my view on this offends you. I mention blackrock because it is a way of obscuring that our government is practicing communism…
BlackRock and Vanguard are major shareholders *primarily* because of the popularity of index/passive investing which *does not give discretion which companies to boost to the asset manager*. It also yields very little fees to the asset manager. Also Vanguard, unlike BlackRock, does not make a profit – when it gains new customers all increased management revenue above actual management expenses is returned as reduced fees.
I am not saying that finance is never used for political ends but this particular vector is not one of them. BlackRock, unlike Vanguard, also does prop trading (e.g. their famous buying up of single family homes to rent) but this is not why they are such a large holder in most companies.
Blackrock suddenly had trillions after the bailouts and they aren’t passive investors given that they press DEI and other political ends… obvious government front is obvious.
BlackRock manages trillions, but these are deposits owed to clients. The company’s own assets are reported by wiki as $100bn, so BlackRock’s proprietary trading arm is about 1% the size of its (principally index fund) asset management arm.
I am not doubting that $100bn is a lot of money and that it can be used to influence things, but the real scale of that influence is not quite what many seem to believe.
Considering one of the larger catalysts of Thermidor seems to be the realization that jews are just as pale as the Appalachian chuds that die for Israel, and therefore on the same chopping block, there is an implication that they are not just middle managers. The zio bros are a major contender and in fact are more likely than not the main bulk of what we are calling Thermidor.
This is not incompatible with Jews being servants and middle managers. Historically what happens when the $#!% hits the fan and things go pear shaped is that the Jews get thrown to the wolves by their masters. So if I was in their shoes, would be looking around for options.
Neither BlackRock nor State Street has any “ideological” commitment to passive investment, so they should be regarded with greater suspicion. That is one reason I blinked at the claim that Vanguard specifically is run by Soros.
However, in practice, a lot of the BlackRock and State Street AUM is invested in passive funds where the investment manager has little or no discretion where to put the money. It’s true they have some discretion to vote (although increasingly investors in such funds are demanding pass-through voting). If BlackRock and State Street did not offer these products, they would be much smaller companies.
Vanguard is to some extent a terminal Faustian financial concept whereby capital is supposed to somehow optimize itself; nonetheless, I think Vangaurd is conceptually a friend. Certainly a world in which most money is invested by opaque funds charging large fees that go to insiders whether the fund performs or not – the world that used to exist – would have been much easier to Converge.
The polygon using converged ‘private’ companies as a deniable wrapper for enforcing the state religion and other aspects of regime policy is standard operating procedure. Everything down to your local dogcatcher is on the agenda, let alone anything within spitting distance of powersources (preaching men, fighting men, monetary men).
This sudden bout of running interference for the good name of tools for the incumbent underlordship is puzzling, especially for someone supposedly more disposed against eurasian tribesmen than most. Perhaps, like our good friend Pooch before, personages who doth luminesce quite brightly in the dark payed you a personal visit?
Jim has written before that they can lie because in power, we cannot lie because out of power. I am not suggesting Fidelis is intentionally lying, but to believe that Vanguard and BlackRock holdings reflect primarily or at all discretionary choices by their managers is to state an ignorance of how financial markets work.
Furthermore, if he had simply written “BlackRock (Fink)” then I could see where he is coming from, even if he is not correct. BlackRock manages a lot of assets via passive trackers because this is what the market demands, but it is an activist investor by nature and Fink is a bad man who has done bad things. Also, Fink is actually substantially in control of BlackRock.
As far as I can tell, Vanguard has no association with George Soros, and the philosophy of passive investing substantially created and promoted by Vanguard has enormously frustrated the plans of activist investors. The founder of Vanguard appears to be a gentile white man, and it has no profit-making shareholders. To claim that Vanguard is a tool of Soros is an extaordinary claim, that seems to be based on nothing but lumping together a variety of famous names that happen to be associated with markets.
>the philosophy of passive investing substantially created and promoted by Vanguard has enormously frustrated the plans of activist investors. The founder of Vanguard appears to be a gentile white man, and it has no profit-making shareholders.
Fair enough. But: the founder of vanguard retired nearly three decades ago, so, that is a somewhat inane point. Organizations created to ostensibly accomplish some valuable purpose dying of cancer as the tumorous corpses spasm in a parody of life from the movements of parasites writhing under the skin as they feast on the decrepit remains of its flesh is exactly the matter at hand. On that note, The Vanguard Group, Inc.’s new CEO is Salim Ramji, a polygon seminary produced jeet, who, just coincidentally, worked at Blackrock before walking through the revolving door to this job. Their chief investment officer is a mulatto literally working for the federal government at the same time he works at the fund, and not even in the euphemistic sense of beings a catspaw from the same social class as everyone else in Georgetown, but literally working in the regulatory state and federal reserve system, which is also just typical. Their corporate website literally has a diversity index on their management, they put this on their own pages in pride of place. ‘Who We Are’ and ‘What We Do’ is pretty unambiguous here.
Good find. Can we get the list of board members and major shareholders?
I’m getting a 404 error from their site on board members.
News articles are claiming it was a “clerical error” and also say Bush is involved in this company.
Multi-million dollar clerical errors…?
Yeah the arguments above about the details of investment funds are a distraction. What specific individual wanted that put option?
Austin Private Wealth LLC now says, at the top of its home page, that this was a mistake – not that there wasn’t a put option, but that its size was accidentally misreported by a factor of 10,000:
“The correct holding amount was 12 contracts, or 1,200 shares — not 12 million shares, as was filed in error.”
Has anyone brought up bullet streak picture yet?
Discus.
I say it is fake. That it is Photoshopped.
Any Physics experts in here that can explain how to capture a random bullet flying at high speed without a synchronized shutter can produce a photo with this much color clarity and why a photographer would set their shutter speed that fast just to photograph a guy standing in place.
Link to photo…
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/14/politics/video/doug-mills-trump-rally-photo-src-digvid
No one wants to take on this challenge? Such an obviously fake photograph.
Aren’t we here to expose fakery? We’ve said elections are fake. Are we going to vote for Trump now because of these photos? Are we that easy to manipulate? Like a little child?
Humungus will not be manipulated! Vote however it pleases you.
What do you suppose is the purpose of faking such a picture?
I mean, we already had the wounded but defiant Trump image. Are you saying this other pic is taking things too over-the-top?
I writing that the photo is fake. The white line is a modification of the photo done later. I base this on bullet velocity, shutter speed required to capture said bullet, standard photography practices for subject in place, synchronizing methods for high speed filming, and source of photo.
We have a photo that many are accepting as real simply because they see it. Photos like this can easily be faked. I could modify this photo myself and put in as many lines as you would like.
You know who else is saying the photo or even the entire situation is fake? Certain members of Conservative Inc who are balls-deep state.
Forgive me if I err in this caution, but someone who gives similar arguments around the same time he accuses a long-standing member of this community of practicing joojoo needs to do a bit better.
“…Certain members of Conservative Inc who are balls-deep state…” etc
Humungus is part of deep state? Here to track down your hidden guzzoline perhaps?
Interesting theory. Please continue…
Humungus has looked at ballistics table, and reviewed photography practices, and the simple math needed to solve this. But, he wants all of you to check for yourselves.
I say it was done with a photo editor on a computer. Much easier to do that way.
Humungus finds it interesting you let “L” shit all over this blog and the Muslim before him, yet you seem to be thunderstruck by the possibility this photo is a fake.
There are pretty good arguments being made that it was a fake, perhaps a photographer just wants to cash in, so pulled up Gimp.
I am not thunderstruck. I am open minded.
As for the argument that a professional hit would have succeeded. Our enemies are idiots. Remember how badly the Obama birth certificate was photoshopped. I have done a whole lot of documents in Gimp, and each of them was done way better than that.
As for the argument that such a conspiracy involves far too many, our enemies are prone to involving far too many people, because power is distributed in far too many small bite sized pieces, and as a result, their conspiracies leak. They are unworried by leaky conspiracies, because they have the press, the FBI, and the DOJ. If we get actually useful replacements for the TLAs, a huge number of people are going to jail.
A financialized economy is a lie. What really happens in a financialized economy is that wealth does not come from creating value, like fracking, the cybertruck, and Musk’s rockets, but from politics. The wealthy are judges, senior civil servants such as Fauci, and politicians like Biden. If I was in the shoes of Trump and Vance, I would ask for some advice and manpower from a clean economy like Singapore, and then put our entire financialized elite in prison for life plus four hundred years. Since this would require putting ninety percent of our judges in prison for life plus four hundred years, this will require military tribunals. Our rulers are not only corrupt, they are carelessly and incompetently corrupt, because backed by the FBI and DOJ.
Again, what is your ultimate point? Let’s assume for the sake of discussion that it has been photoshopped. What now? What comes next?
As to your actual allegiance, I have not a clue. Seemed rather odd to see someone here singing the same tune as the deep state, though.
@Hesiod
“…what is your ultimate point?”
Already stated above.
“…What comes next?”
Not Humungus’ problem yet. Not until the complete collapse of civilization. Already made my plans clear.
I would like you to understand the stakes of what is about to unfold. For that, you need to see truth. When Trump/Vance gets installed, this country may go to war in the Middle East. Some of you will be drafted and maybe 10 years from now, sit in a VA hospital waiting for your physical therapy session for a missing leg.
Don’t take it personal.
@Jim
A very detailed response, thank you. I will take some time to think about your point of view.
We have been around this before. They told us Trump would take us to war, instead, he brought peace and prosperity. Back when Vance was a shitlib, he criticized Trump on the grounds that Trump would take us to war.
The faction that wants war is the imperial faction, that gets rich shaking down the provinces: The keptocrats.
The peace faction are those, like Musk, Vance, and Trump, who acquired their wealth honestly.
Trump believes in peace through strength. Peace through strength goes down a whole lot smoother if you are not interested in resuming the 1990s looting of Russia.
Ok, let’s see if I understand:
The picture of the passing bullet is fake, which means people are being tricked into voting for the Bad Orange Man who, at the bidding of his j00 masters, will send Anglin’s audience to limb-loss doom, much like the tragic protagonist in the commie propaganda movie Johnny Got His Gun.
Am I doing it right?
@Hesiod
That sounds plausible. It’s what I would do if I were a sinister shadowy puppet-master.
You’re jumping ahead. At this point, I want to establish if the photo is real.
This picture could be easily created with Photoshop more easily than catching a random bullet on film.
The motive for creating fake photos can be speculated on by someone else later. I’m only interested in a Physics and Probability explanation of this.
https://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-115.png
Just saw this over on AC’s site. Alleges some photographers knew ahead of time to be prepped for the moment.
I read that. If we assume the photographer was in on it, he would set the shutter fast, 1/8000 but would still need to synchronize it with the rifle being fired. And a lot of practice.
Making this type of assumption would require a skilled photographer experienced in taking bullet pictures because there was only one chance to get it right. But on the other hand, they hired an incompetent marksman?
He is not trying to take a picture of the bullet, but rather Trump getting his brains blown out. They wanted a trophy. “See what we did to your leader you filthy MAGAts? You’re next!” It doesn’t matter if he gets it exactly when the bullet hits Trump, he just has to get him as he is falling down but before SS jumps on the body.
But God is on our side, not there’s. Trump’s emphatic style of speaking saved his life.
Yes and by Tuesday morning latest, all shitlibs would have been posting pictures of themselves wearing T-shirts with a pic of Trump’s head going “back and to the left,” or drinking coffee out of mugs showing Trump’s head exploding.
And they would have big, smug, triumphant shit-eating grins on their faces while doing it. Which is why I don’t care if some of them are getting fired now.
Given obvious indications of strangely setup ladder, why not a strangely setup camera?
Your future depends on firings becoming rather more literal.
Yes let the streets run red with the blood of the scribes.
If that photo is for real then I’m terrified. If that streak in the picture is about a foot long, and an AR’s muzzle speed is 3300 ft/sec, then that would imply a frame exposure time of 1/3000th if a second, and a frame rate even faster than that.
So 99% it’s fake, or 1% someone actually had a super-speed slow-motion camera out there, with a zillion gigabytes of disk space in it, for one singular and obvious reason. I’m as conspiratorial as hell and even I can’t buy that.
Why not? Ladder was setup for this event, why not a camera?
“Why not?”
Because you would have to include the cameraman in the conspiratorial plot. Something we can’t prove yet.
The more people involved in the conspiracy, the more likely someone will talk later.
A conspiracy this deep as suggested would hire a professional sniper to do the job.
It would be very easy to just use a computer to edit the photograph. Much cheaper. A photo like this has monetary value.
The kinds of people who take pictures for state newspapers are much more ‘politically reliable’ – but also unlikely to be any good in a gunfight. And vice versa; which is our so-called “EHC’s” whole problem.
“A conspiracy this deep as suggested would hire a professional sniper to do the job.”
Hang on, Mungus. I posit that the dead White patsy with the pre-blanked social media is actually a requirement. If no one ever figured out who did it, then more people would suspect the government.
Likewise, if some FBI people wanted to kidnap the governor of Michigan, they could just go out and do that, but that wasn’t the point. The point is get some enemies to do it, or to almost do it, and then “catch” THEM.
This also helps to explain why it was a rifle attack and not a drone attack.
Finally, note how an AR was used for this. A hunting rifle would have worked so much better, but no, they wanted to “catch” an AR in the act instead.
It’s all so crazy. They can’t just kill somebody and sneak off into the night. They also have to take a selfie and publicly cry out in pain while doing it.
Super-slow-motion cameras are very big, expensive and weird looking. Very conspicuous. They don’t look like regular cameras at all. There are YouTube channels about them, which is why I think I know anything about them at all.
OK, that is convincing evidence it is a photoshop — in that we should have photos of the camera that took the bullet photo, as we have photos of the photographer who took the iconic photo of trump rallying the crowd under the flag.
I’m dubious all round. If I had done such a photo-edit, I think I’d have made the streak from the bullet look more obviously in line with Trump’s ear.
3300 ft/second is muzzle velocity. At 150 yards it’s down to about 2600 ft/sec.
1/2000 sec shutter speed does not seem unheard of on a bright sunny day. A consumer Canon EOS 5D has a max shutter speed of 1/8000 of a second. Frame rate is irrelevant. It’s a probabilistic event, like Trump turning his head at just the right moment.
The photo didn’t show the bullet, right? It showed the air displacement from the supersonic bullet, right? So that air displacement will hang around for longer than the 2600fps object.
“…It’s a probabilistic event…”
Your math looks right.
This is the answer I was waiting for.
Can anyone calculate the probability of this without using a strobe to synchronize the camera shutter to the rifle firing? Just blind luck.
The probability of a bullet being in the frame is the shutter period, say 0.5 ms, divided by the frame period (say 1/120) = 8.333 ms.
0.5/8.333 = 6% chance.
007 or the Smarter Every Day goy from Alabama might pull this off after a week of dry run’s, but not the Fupa Karen Krew, no. Not a fucking chance.
Greetings,
Thank you for the discussion.
Humungus has read all your replies and will meditate on them for a time.
Shill Test: Women are are happiest when they are property of alpha males
Who’s reading for President Camel Toe!
Some leftoid faction (I don’t know who) is really trying to run the failing… failing… failed script on Biden. It’s hilarious because we get repeated “leaks” to the media that “doddering Biden faces inevitably of stepping down–he’ll be gone soon!” and then an hour later the old man or one of his cronies will vehemently deny it. The absolute best result would be if we ended up with the Left running two candidates against each other in the general but that’s too optimistic.
It has accelerated in the last two or three days.
Washington Post today:
Obama tells allies Biden’s path to winning reelection has greatly diminished
The former president, hugely influential in the party, has told associates that Biden’s path to victory has significantly shrunk.
Former president Barack Obama has told allies in recent days that President Biden’s path to victory has greatly diminished and he thinks the president needs to seriously consider the viability of his candidacy, according to multiple people briefed on his thinking.
Sounds like he’s really going to be out soon. The DNC is basically refusing to hold the convention until he drops out. President Camel Toe awaits us.
Another item: In the last 36 hours or so we’ve gotten more rumors from inside the Dem camp that Biden is going to drop out of the race by the end of this Sunday. The Biden camp denies this. So here’s my read: The predictions/rumors that he’ll drop out by Sunday are actually a threat to him (actually his wife) that if he doesn’t drop out by Sunday, something bad will happen. Old crimes of his will suddenly be discovered by the media, or there will be a tragic accident with the dosage of one of his medications, etc.
The “rumors” about Sunday are actually a deadline.
The specific date also makes this hypothesis easily falsifiable. If Biden hasn’t dropped out of the race by Sunday night, and if there isn’t some startling piece of bad news for him by say Tuesday, then my guess is wrong.
Yeah, I am guessing that “Covid†will do its job if Biden doesn’t step down.
If Biden dies of “Covid” in that hospital, watch them cremate his ass and scatter the ashes over Chesapeake Bay from a black helicopter 30 minutes later.
Epstein didn’t kill himself, and Biden didn’t have Covid.
I’m 98% sure that Trump was supposed to die, obviously, but only SO THAT they could use another thinly-red-hat-adjacent patsy with wiped social media to “kill” Biden next, or at least get shot to death 30 times right next to it happening. (Sirhan Sirhan all over again, etc. Just ask RFK Junior!)
Jim’s right. It’s not that assassinating public figures is that hard, especially with all the drone stuff today, but rather that anyone smart enough to not get lost on the way, show up on time and pull it off is automatically suspicious to them of being disbelieving or disloyal.
Compare this to South Africa today. All Afrikaners should have been dead as fried chicken by now, but their enemies with absolute power just can’t get anyone with some brains to show up IRL and finish the job. It’s just psychos and dumbasses sending emails to each other.
Neurotoxin’s guessing was right.
“President Biden is failing… failing… anyway, as I was saying, President Harris is…”
“Wait. Say that again. I think I missed a step.”
The media is strangely incurious about Biden making the announcement only on his personal account (which he doesn’t personally run) and not on his officials. The media hasn’t noticed that the announcement didn’t sync with official White House website or campaign website. The media has been indifferent to the lack of a Biden video or even a photograph.
They seem to have skipped the “failed” stage of “failing… failing… failed” and that’s odd. Whoever ran the coup seems to have done a rushed and botched job, like the incompetent headsmen who can’t quite get the head off its spine.
Neuro, Neuro, Neuro!
All hail the Oracle
Biden “drops out” by suddenly disappearing at Neurotoxin’s deadline.
The time between “falling falling falling” and actual violence is getting shorter.
Man, I step away from the Net for a few days and eventful stuff happens!
“All hail the Oracle”
Aw, shucks! Now subscribe to my newsletter and I’ll tell you what hot stocks to buy! Just $12.95/month!
Don’t forget that the analysis regarding the stock picks comes with sophisticated political humor
Thanks. God knows, Clown World provides plenty of comedic material.
For the unsophisticated plebs, yes. But the bourgeoisie demands sophisticated and subtle humor that will pass right over the heads of the plebs.
The Oracle section of 2112 is now in your honor.
Some interesting conjecture here (I’m not Sundance either):
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/07/24/biden-gives-exit-speech-showing-clear-signs-of-injury/
Rush reference, sweet!
The link is interesting. It’s implied that they hit him in the face with a lead pipe and told him, “You’re dead unless you confirm that you’re not campaigning.” Hmm.
Exactly on the schedule predicted by Neurotoxin, Biden suffers “undisclosed medical emergency”
Which doubtless much resembles Trumps disclosed medical emergency.
I would guess that they planned to murder Trump and “retire” Biden, and the murder of Trump having missed, are going right along with the Biden retirement, and will very shortly attempt to do something about Trump.
What they want is a uniparty Republican and a uniparty Democrat, and the uniparty Democrat can win the election without the fraud reaching hilarious and embarrassing levels.
It’s obvious that they’re covering up his severe incapacitation or even death. I’m trying to figure out what they have to gain by covering it up. The only thing I can think of is this: They want “Biden” to do some politically unpopular stuff – pardons of criminal Dems, Executive Order that makes saying the word “border” a capital crime, whatever – so they can have those things without politically damaging Harris. But if that’s true, why haven’t they been doing that? (Or have they, and I just haven’t noticed?)
Watching Donald Trump Junior discuss the assassination. He suggested that the results of the investigation of secret service failure have not only already been written up, but were written up before the attempted assassination. (Lone assassin fall guy, local cop fall guy.)
He suggests that after an eighteen month, fifty million dollar investigation, a report will be issued that was written hours before the bullet was fired. https://rumble.com/v57hb1h-hulk-hogan-live-from-the-rnc.html
His guest then implies the media were and are in on it — which is what in the above post I concluded from the news headlines.
This whole incident was so inconspicuously planned, it makes me wonder if the intention was to not just remove Trump, but make it clear that it was people — with names and addresses, *ahem* — that have pull over various alphabet agencies are willing and able to kill opposition in broad daylight.
Did you mean to write “conspicuously planned”?
I’ve been thinking about this, and unless they’re unfathomably stupid, I don’t believe Crooks was the real shooter. The guy who took the shot that barely missed Trump (or even all of the shots) could have just as easily been in the building beneath Crooks. I have no proof of this but it just seems much more likely. Why would they go to all this trouble/risk of setting up the assassination then rely on that kid to land the shot instead of a professional? They can’t be that dumb.
Maybe I just don’t want to accept how dumb they are.
It was an easy shot, and the shooter would have nailed Trump had he not moved his head at exactly the wrong moment. So, likely Crooks was the real shooter. A professional shooting at that exact moment would have missed for exactly that reason.
It is also the same pattern as the fall guy for the attempted assassination of Robert Fico, Prime Minister of Slovakia, so likely organised by the same people for the same reasons.
If they keep getting away with more and more blatant stuff, then what’s the problem with getting dumber and dumber? Being subtle requires effort and consumes resources.
So in that case the Schoolbook Repository and the Grassy Knoll would have been the rooftop and the interior of the same fucking building, respectively. I’m some kind of speechless, but I’m not sure which kind. It’s the dumbest evil plan I’ve ever heard of.
“Why would they go to all this trouble/risk of setting up the assassination then rely on that kid to land the shot instead of a professional?”
The problem with using a professional shooter is not the absence of professional shooters but finding someone reliable and what to do with the shooter before/after.
A professional shooter is usually someone smart with plenty to lose and many armed friends. What is in it for him to get involved in a plot like this? Also, how do you identify a reliable such shooter without risking him reporting your plot – a report that is likely to be taken much more serious than a report from a groomed 18 year old patsy.
They are using disposable people who suck, because that is the best they can get given their other constraints.
Only a complete loser with nothing going on in his life or very mentally ill would take the job.
Because he either understands he won’t live through it, or he’s dumb/crazy enough to believe his FBI handler when the handler says “I’ll help you escape afterwards.”
Some leftist dork who happens to have practice with guns is really the best -reliable- talent they could get. The mob hitmen who shoot people like Seth Rich aren’t going to pull off a high profile political assassination because they know they aren’t going to get away with it. These hits rely on a strange disinterest from police investigators to work- you can’t headshot the president on live tv and expect to walk away. And they don’t trust an exmil sniper to not be a fan of Trump. Like Jim said, a hundred yards isn’t a hard shot.
The shooter may have been suicidal or just young and dumb enough to believe that if access was granted to him, egress would be granted as well and he’d be up fifty bitcoin and a plane ticket to the tropics.
A professional would know better than to take a job to kill Trump. Even if foolish enough to accept, would have put a round center mass rather than going for the risky but spectacular headshot. Probably also would have been running at least a 30 caliber round to make sure that body armor would not be an issue. This reeks of amateur looking to make a statement. Using an AR-15 to headshot Trump was the goal so they could rub it in our faces. Oft evil will, will evil mar.
Trump probably has a bullet proof vest so they were instructed to go for the head.
It would not matter if he was using a more serious cartridge. A standard FMJ .308, for example, will make even Level IV plates an iffy proposition, and that’s before you get the good stuff like AP rounds. Trump would have been wearing Level III soft armor at most, and .308 would have gone through it like tissue paper. They did not choose an AR-10, because they wanted the AR-15 to be the murder weapon. They wanted the optics of his head exploding after being shot with an AR-15. That is also why they had the high-speed camera set up that caught the bullet in flight.