Why Trump is Hitler

You have doubtless seen lots of people arguing that Trump is Hitler. Often “Trump is literally Hitler!”

Of course people who read my blog know what “literally” means, and though Trump is obviously not literally Hitler, there is in fact a good argument that Trump is Hitler.

But for some strange reason, Democrats never make the argument out loud in plain words. I wonder why.

The argument, said outright in plain words, is:

Hillary’s nomination speech was in large part urging black people to murder white people, and promising to use the justice department to prevent police from enforcing law on black people. If police, for some mysterious inexplicable reason, wind up arresting and killing a disproportionate number of black people – well that is disparate impact, which illegal. You don’t have to prove racist motivation. Disparate impact is racist. Treating people according to the content of their character is racist regardless of motivation if the outcome is bad for non asian minorities.

This has been the law and practice for a very long time, and failure to apply this law to school discipline and law enforcement is an unprincipled exception. Unprincipled exceptions always go away sooner or later, and Hillary, truthfully or untruthfully, is promising to remove this unprincipled exception for policing and school discipline. I hope she is being untruthful, but sooner or later it will be the truth. Unprincipled exceptions are always removed sooner or later.

Hillary also promised to take away the guns of law abiding people (law abiding gun owners being almost entirely white Republicans) so that colored criminals can kill them (Criminal gun owners being mostly black Democrat voters. In other words, she promises to take away the guns of white Republicans so that black Democrats can kill them once she has appointed enough anti gun supreme court judges.

Hillary also promised to keep the borders open, and in particular open to poor suffering Muslim refugees, who are generally brown or black, male, military age, and always vote Democrat. Every few weeks we read of some outrage where black male military age Muslims murder large numbers of people, usually large numbers of white people. It is unclear how many black male military age Muslims we will get under this policy, but there are several hundred million such in the world, and they would all be much better off coming to America to live on crime, welfare, and voting Democrat. So there is a good chance that Hillary will bring in a few hundred million black male military age Muslims screaming for infidel blood and white pussy, to permanently change the electoral landscape so that whites are permanently outvoted, and we end up with a brown republican party competing with a slightly darker brown Democrat party over who will burn the most white shops, murder the most whites and rape the most white women.

Trump’s nomination speech was law and order, and he proceeded do demonstrate his capacity to maintain law and order in a wide area around the convention center. Among his various law and order measures was that he was going to stop illegal immigration and Muslim immigration.

We all know that lawlessness and disorder is in very substantial part, non white criminals preying on whites, for example Kristallnacht in Ferguson, so this means Trump is the pro white candidate and Hillary is the anti white candidate.

And, of course, Hitler was the pro white candidate, therefore Trump is Hitler.

And I now raise another glass of moonshine, this time to 27. Februar 1933.

24 Responses to “Why Trump is Hitler”

  1. […] tells us, with tongue not quite firmly planted in cheek, Why Trump is Hitler. It isn’t literally February 1933, but sometimes ya kinda wish it […]

  2. KingOfChu says:

    Ban children of Russian officials from studying abroad, says business activist:


    Looks like at least some Russians are starting to understand the Cathedral.

  3. Taken literally, literally means literally, but taken figuratively, literally means figuratively.

  4. Alan J. Perrick says:

    The last step in the quest for Edge: romanticising past white (or more properly, white ethnic) failures.

    Doubly edgy, compare a successful Christian man to a, fortunately or unfortunately, failed heretick.


    • Salger says:

      Hitler was a Leftoid anyway. And Leftoids should be opposed even if White.

      • Alan J. Perrick says:

        It’s former Prussia’s fault for snuggling up to the mountain heretics so much, with which the linguistic bond was nearly the only tie, S. By the way, I saw something interesting posted on Twitter by a Christian Scandinavian man… He was suggestion a nation birthed out of a union between Germany and Denmark (as well as others which did follow similar regional jurisdictions).

        An expansion of monarchy, such as that of the Danes, is something that I can get behind, can’t you?

        Best regards,


      • Randy says:

        What was Hitler supposed to do, advocate for limited government in the midst of (((cosmopolitan))) blood feud against the German people? Fire has to be fought with fire even at the danger of becoming what you despise, although in blood feud becoming what you hate isn’t really possible. It’s either survive or die.

        • peppermint says:

          however, we should advocate for limited government as our top priority, asserting that limited government is the way to achieve law and order, and decrying the plague of crime and violence in our cities.

          Where limited government is code for getting rid of snivel rights, law and order is code for White supremacy, and crime and violence are code for mud people.

  5. R7_Rocket says:

    “to permanently change the electoral landscape so that whites are permanently outvoted”

    I don’t think that such a scenario will be permanent. This can be neutralized by Russian hackers hacking into voting machines. Apefirmative Action IT hires are no match against Russian hackers. The DNCLeaks is just the beginning.

  6. Chase says:

    Seig Heil!

  7. peppermint says:

    the biggest threat to Trump, and to our movement, is sabotage by christcucks.

    Pence announced the intention to eliminate abortion, which is a perfectly legitimate if not very significant tool of the patriarchy to control women’s reproduction and is at any rate not a big deal.

    Trump announced that he’s going to try to do something about porn, which is also not a big deal, though it would be good to enforce the existing law that porn can’t have copyright protection, which would destroy the paysites, but ending the exploitation of Aryan women by Jew pornographers isn’t enough for the christcucks.

    Christcucks want to return to a fundamentally cucked view of the human family in which ((Joseph))’s genealogy going back to ((David)) means anything to ((Jesus)).

    Christcucks want to return to a fundamentally cucked view of human sexuality in which expressions of sexual desire are regulated away, especially for more powerful White men, leaving women not knowing who they should be attracted to, and wishing for a violent savage to act sexy.

    The Crusades were not an accomplishment. By failing to bring women with them and not colonizing the ((Holy Land)), the Crusaders ensured that their blood was flushed down the toilet of history. Christcucks fail to recognize this for the same reason that they import mud people to their countries – they are cuckolds.

    • Father Thyme says:

      True. Christcucks can’t get past the first chapter of the first book of their New Testament without glorifying cuckoldry.

      “His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant.” Matthew 1:18

      Merry Cuckmas!

      A historical note on why:
      “Who’s your daddy? The Cuckold Carpenter in Myth, Ritual and Philosophy”
      SEX RITES: The Origins of Christianity

      • peppermint says:

        the Greek word for come together is synelthein and the Latin Vulgate word is convenirent, which may or may not be sexual innuendo, but christcucks believe that the theotokos was a permavirgin and Joseph’s marriage to her was an arrangement under which she was to provide domestic but not sexual services, which is similar to Scott Alexander’s domestic partnership

        • Brit says:

          People who ignore the word of God and worship Mary should not be considered Christians. Mary was not a permanent virgin.

        • Father Thyme says:

          “she was to provide domestic but not sexual services”

          Good observation. Cuckianity is chock full of anti-family POZversity, e.g.:

          (1) Jesus banned normal male-female relations in his perverted paradise, in favor of angelic androgyny. (Matt. 22:30)

          (2) Jesus considered normal male-female marriage and the ensuing normal activities of production to be worthy of drowning or roasting. (Luke 17:26-29)

          (3) Jesus discouraged marriage to the point his disciples concluded “it is better not to marry.” (Matthew 19:10)

          (4) A male “Bride of Christ” convert was encouraged to transition to a less manly physique by cutting off his balls. (Matthew 19.11-12) And if you still had too much testosterone, you were to gouge out your eyes. (Mark 9:47)

          (5) Jesus carried on with his Beloved in public like a pederastic San Francisco flamer. (John 13:23-25) In early Christian art, Jesus is to John the Beloved http://google.com/search?q=jesus+john+beloved&sa=X&tbm=isch&gbv=1&sei=fN2aVeCzCJfcoAThkYzgAg what Zeus was to Ganymede. http://google.com/search?q=zeus+ganymede&prmd=ivns&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=wt2aVYG7JpG0ogTU-ZfQDg&ved=0CAUQ_AU

          Ever wonder why so many marriage-rejecting priests think it’s ok to cornhole altar boys? More like Jesus they would ever be.

          • peppermint says:

            (1) is true. In general, heaven makes absolutely no sense, in exactly the same way that communism does: people are given free stuff just for existing, while in the real world humans and other animals create value for each other in mutually beneficial exchanges or simply kill and eat each other. No description of heaven will make any sense to us, so the most sane of christcucks say it’s a pure spirit world or whatever.

            (2) is about how God, in all His majestic power, needs to destroy the entire world including people who aren’t doing anything wrong in order to destroy people who are doing stuff wrong

            (3) and (4) are the same passage, in which Jesus bans divorce, presumably under influence from Greeks and Romans, and His disciples balk at White sexual practices being imposed on them

            (5) is less about the verse in question than the paintings you reference

            There is no need to lie about christcuckoldry, it’s bad enough in its best form simply by affirming that there are “souls” that come from ((Yahweh)).

            • Father Thyme says:

              Yours is an astute observation that the Christian FSA utopia is akin to the Communist FSA utopia, wanting to destroy the entire world. In the words of economist (((Ludwig von Mises))), “….Christianity is Bolshevism. The Bolshevists, too, wish to destroy everything that exists because they regard it as hopelessly bad.” (Socialism, p. 416) He is correct.

              (1.) Boshevists despise the successful:

              • “But woe unto you that are rich!” Luke 6:24
              • “Sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor.” Matthew 19:21, Mark 10:21, Luke 18:22
              • “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” Matthew 19:24, Mark 10:25, Luke 18:25
              “…guard against all kinds of greed, life does not consist in abundance…fool…” (Parable of the Rich Fool) Luke 12:13-21
              • “There was a rich man…in torment…agony…remember that in your lifetime you received your good things…” (The Rich Man and Lazarus) Luke 16:19-31

              (2.) Bolshevists are collectivists:

              • “…each according to his ability.” Matthew 25:15
              • “…not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them.” Acts 4:32
              • “…and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.” Acts 4:35
              • “…the daily distribution.” Acts 6:1
              • “…your liberal distribution…” 2 Corinthians 9:13

              I guess that’s what one can expect from a dear leader who teaches adherents to hate their life (John 12:25) and hate everybody else (Luke 14:26.)

              One thing I’m glad Trump is not: a Bible-thumper. Sure, he has to throw ’em a bone now and then, but it isn’t his ken. Trump loves his life, loves his family, and is successful — the exact opposite of a Christcuck.

              • Alan J. Perrick says:




                • Father Thyme says:




                  “Christianity, sprung from Jewish roots and comprehensible only as a growth on this soil, represents the counter-movement to any morality of breeding, of race, privilege: it is the anti-Aryan religion par excellence. Christianity—the revaluation of all Aryan values, the victory of chandala values, the gospel preached to the poor and base, the general revolt of all the downtrodden, the wretched, the failures, the less favored, against ‘race:’ the undying chandala hatred is disguised as a religion of love.”

                  -Friedrich Nietzsche
                  Twilight of the Idols (Chap. 6)

                • Alan J. Perrick says:



                  It’s humorous to see others use words that they do not understand. Keep that up and you may get on my good side after all… You are new here and you’ve done nothing but go off-topic, and that may be because you are re-orienting yourself and hardly know how to handle it, F.T.

                  With that being the case, and this being a relatively anonymous forum, you are free to re-invent yourself nearly endlessly. However, be forwarned-disruptive blasphemy is necessarily intolerable.

              • JRM says:

                @Father Thyme:

                For more Biblical Bolshevism, check out the Epistle of James.

                • Alan J. Perrick says:

                  Hm, for more oxymoronism, try J.R.M.!

                  Hell is forever!

                • JRM says:

                  There are oxymora, and there are coinages. The difference is, one is self-contradictory, and the other is intended to point outside itself.

                  Or are you claiming the Hebraic spirit of the Bible has no echo (pun intended) in Marx?

                  How you could have more coherently attacked is through the word “anachronistic”.

                  Although even there the anachronism was clearly intended to reflect the context of the above conversation, a kind of shorthand, if you will.

                  Hell is forever? According to one wit, hell is other people.

    • Dick Wagner says:

      Gulag all Christians.

Leave a Reply