We have received two huge benefits from the Ukraine war. One is that when Putin intervened in the Ukraine conflict, the Global American Empire everywhere overnight stopped enforcing worship of the awesome and mighty covid demon. The public announcements that masking and jabs were compulsory continued for a while, but everyone ignored them, and gradually they are stopping. Kind of like everyone started ignoring female emancipation when they tossed it in the lead up to World War II, even though it officially remained in force.

Putin cured Covid.

And the other big benefit is Yandex search.

Type a thought crime into a search engine, any search engine in your browser’s list. For example “gay needs to be suppressed”.

You will likely get slim pickings. Similarly, search for information on the war in the Ukraine, or the jab.

Type it into, you get a reasonably balanced collection of links from both sides of the debate.

Replacing your default browser search with yandex is likely to be difficult. You will have to find some little used and obscure ui for adding unlisted search engines, and will have to supply the search url, which for yandex is (Your browser will replace %s with the actual search string.

Next up, I hope for a Russian reply to GPT3

I had hoped for SWIFT replacement, but nothing good yet that I know of. El Salvador is fighting the good fight there. Meanwhile the Afghans continue to cheerfully demonstrate how easily and smoothly one can erase female emancipation.

478 Responses to “Yandex”

  1. Search ThisYouCucks says:

    Protecting Our Aryan Women: Man Up and Marry a Single Mother for the White Race

    Andrew Anglin April 1, 2023
    Our Viking ancestors fought side-by-side with single Aryan mothers

    I’ve been pretty hard on men who choose to marry single mothers. In fact, I’ve called them “the lowest scum on earth” and “a disease that is rotting out the soul of society.” I have also forwarded various scenarios in which men who marry single mothers could be responsible for the destruction of the universe itself.

    However, today, I would like to walk all that back, and apologize to the brave men who have married single mothers – especially those who have married White single mothers in order to continue the Aryan Race.

    Instead of asking “does she have a kid from another man?” men should be asking “is the kid a member of the White Aryan race?” If you’re raising someone else’s kid and the kid is a member of the true Aryan race from our Viking ancestors, you are doing your duty to save the White race.

    What’s more, if you are able to marry a White Aryan woman, you are saving her from being left to the nonwhites. After all, it’s not her fault she’s a single mother – some man abused her and took advantage of her, and by marrying her and raising her children, you are doing your duty as a man and as an Aryan.
    Only a beta male would reject a beautiful White Aryan woman like this simply because a man abused her and left her with his children

    If an Aryan woman has non-Aryan children, you may want to reject her. However, you should understand that she is a victim of the non-Whites who took advantage and abused her and left her with their mongrels. There is nothing wrong with marrying an Aryan woman with non-Aryan children, because you can produce Aryan children with her, and promote the Aryan race. You can also feed her non-Aryan children unhealthy, processed foods and give them dangerous vaccines to try to give them diabetes and cancer.

    The important thing to remember is that as an Aryan man, you have a duty to Aryan women. You have to man up, and that means marrying a single mother and using your energy and resources to raise another man’s children. Real men who are not cucks, the true alpha male Aryan men, put their duty to the race before all else, and in this time when women are being more abused and taken advantage of than ever before, it is our Aryan duty to lay down our lives for single mothers.

    I apologize for my mistakes in the past. I realize now that I was a beta cuck for rejecting the need to care for our Aryan women, and to take their children under our wings. A true Aryan man is strong enough to raise another man’s children, and to birth children of his own and raise them in the traditions of the Vikings.
    Because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth.

    If you don’t do your duty and marry, regardless of how many men a woman has had sex with or how many children she has from other men, you are betraying the Aryan race. There is no weaker man than one who refuses to fight for his race.

    Aryan men who marry Aryan single mothers and raise their children are soldiers of the White race, just like their viking ancestors. Every true Aryan knows that men must protect women and lay down their lives for them, and sometimes that means raising another man’s children.

    Just as JFK deserved to die for cheating on his beautiful White Aryan princess Jackie, if you refuse to man-up and marry a single mother to protect her from the men who want to take advantage of her, you deserve to die like a dog, because you are not a true Aryan.

    Heil Hitler!

    • jim says:

      Note that this was originally posted on April the first.

      Also note that Hitler was pretty keen on German women conceiving white children regardless of marital status, so Andrew Anglin is also taking the Mickey out of Hitler for being blue pilled on the Woman Question.

      Like me, he is attacking Hitler from the right. Or rather ridiculing Hitler from the right.

  2. Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

    You guys are working yourselves into a shoot lol.

    • Hesiod says:

      Jim always books the best acts for his club.

      • Kunning Drueger says:

        Honestly, it’s been a nice distraction. TN got me thinking dangerous thoughts, this debacle has given me an unexpected reprieve. For now. ha ha a joke of course.

        • Red says:

          Pretty sure Ghost is a glownigger. Trevor Goodchild is seeing an eruption of people making nonse sense drama to muddy the waters over Nashville. They’re pushing anything and everything to distract. Ghost schizo posting fits that pattern.

          • Hesiod says:

            Was wondering about that myself. Sucking up all the oxygen in the room deal.

            Either that or Ghost is working on xir’s Banned-from-Jim’s-blog merit badge for the Transscouts.

            • Red says:

              I don’t think it’s going to work. People are really angry. The Jews mocking Christians on twitter was also pretty eye opening for a lot of people.

              • Hesiod says:

                Every man must lay in the bed he makes. As a fellow son of Adam, I wince at what I see coming for the scapegoats and how it may very well impact us all.

                But Faith and Hope in our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ will see us through. Let’s pray that those who can still repent do and extend Charity when due.

                Peace on earth to all men of good will.

  3. Ghost says:

    Ghost says:
    2023-03-29 at 15:36
    Here is the post where Ghost informed you that Covid is fake and gay because the hospitals were closed under the name Yisrael.

    Read through the comments and you will see that Com and Jim still thought Covid was a real thing.

    Yisrael was then lampshaded for speaking the truth and later came Ghost.

    Ghost says:
    2023-03-29 at 15:40
    Yisrael ben Goyim says:
    2020-04-06 at 21:45
    You goys still don’t have a clue.

    Climb up out of you grandmother’s basement, get on your bicycle, ride over to your local hospital and see with your own eyes that it is a ghost town. No patients, no cars, nothing.

    • Ghost says:

      I’ve demonstrated knowledge of Florida where I lived providing proof I was there.

      And provided a link timestamp on this blog that I knew Covid was a scam before Com.

      Got any smartass comments now?

      • The Cominator says:

        When some newb shill comes here and claims he beat me in denouncing Covid…

        Red has already told you I was the original “Covid is fake and gay” poster. Also I didn’t make two posts on it, I kept screaming it from the rooftops way before it was cool.

        • Ghost says:

          Com’s comment following mine was:

          The Cominator says:
          2020-04-06 at 23:25
          Not 10k deaths per day 10k deaths total.

          Note timestamp. This indicated he believed 10,000 people died of Covid and that he hadn’t caught on to the scam.

          There were no deaths from Covid. They renamed the cold and flu to Covid to create a panic. I knew this from the start and tried to warn you.

      • jim says:

        > provided a link timestamp

        A link timestamp proves nothing without an actual link.

        I find this timestamp hard to believe.

        If you do not produce information that allows me to verify this alleged comment, going to ban you.

        • Ghost says:

          This is the fourth time I’ve posted this link, yet you claim to not see it.

          I’ve proved everything I typed so now you have to block me. Oy vey shut it down.


          • jim says:

            This is the first time you posted the actual link – you posted it thrice in rapid succession, but I am not at my computer 24/7

            And in the thread, The Cominator endorses your correct position that Covid is fake and gay. So, evidence you caught onto the Covid scam before I did. Not evidence you caught onto the Covid scam before the Cominator did.

            Steve Johnson pushes back on you, but no one endorses him.

            And I take an agnostic position – I am not pushing back, I am saying we do not yet know if Covid is fake and gay. Steve gets pushback from The Cominator for believing the Covid scam. You don’t get pushback, you get support from a well known commenter, the Cominator, doubt from me, and pushback from a little known commenter.

            This is evidence you caught onto the Covid scam very early. But you were using it as ammunition against the Cominator, which is a falsehood.

            • Ghost says:

              Not how I took it. When Com typed 10,000 people died it was implied of Covid as that was the topic in question.

              Com was at best on the fence.

              • The Cominator says:

                You’re omitting context when I said 10000 people died, there were a lot of debates over a lot of mostly bad, misleading and outright fraudulent data at the time “covid” started.

                At the time there was some virus going around people were vaguely claiming as Covid, some very old and sick people died of it roughly around flu numbers and many many more were essentially murdered or at best subject to deliberate medical malpractice contributing to their deaths which were preventable.

                • jim says:

                  Ten thousand old, frail people with one foot in the grave and wobbling on the edge getting a little push from flu is very mild flu season.

                • jim says:

                  At the time, there were a whole lot of deaths from medical malpractice – stuffing people on ventilators. Stuffing anyone on a ventilator is dangerous – should only be used in truly dire emergency when the patient is struggling to breath on his own. Stuffing old frail people on a ventilator is very dangerous. If the patient can draw breath, and is low in oxygen regardless, needs an oxygen mask, which any nurse, and any private citizen on his own, can apply. I bought one when the “panic now, submit to a total medical dictatorship that governs your every move” propaganda first appeared.

                  If you stuff even a young strong healthy patient on ventilator, there is substantial risk of death or dire and permanent consequences.

                  Earlier there had been a whole lot of reports of people turning blue (which is reason for an oxygen mask, not reason for a ventilator) If these reports are true, it was the deadliness gene mods to attack the lungs, which gene mods were not in the interest of the virus, and it very quickly evolved away from them as soon as it was seeded from the lab. Covid is yet another flu, and it is not in the interest of the flu/cold/sniffle type viruses to harm the host too seriously. At the very first propaganda, I was instantly suspicious – I believed that a dangerous disease was loose, but I was suspicious of the enthusiasm for drastic medical procedures and medical dictatorship.

                • The Cominator says:


                • Hesiod says:

                  The only person who died in ’20 whose death was not attributed to the Great and Powerful Coof was George Floyd.

            • Ghost says:

              In 2018 (pre covid) media claimed 80,000 deaths of simple cold and flu.

              On that thread, the topic was covid. Com claimed 10,000 people died in response to that thread.

              No one has bothered to ask me how I knew it was fake. Not because I figured it out.

              I got part of my information from a medical doctor who was in the military. The other part I got from snooping on three local hospitals.

              • Kunning Druegger says:

                You sure picked a protracted, cantankerous, and hamfisted way to tell us you had insider information 3 years ago. Thanks for the waltz down memory lane.

                • Ghost says:

                  I would have sited my sources three years ago but poor Yisrael met with an untimely end because that is his only post. He was blocked after that without so much as the Leo Frank shill test.

                • jim says:

                  No, Yisrael was never blocked.

                  I have in front of me a list of everyone who is blocked or on perma moderation.

                  There is precisely one comment from the Yisrael ben Goyim and that email address, and neither the name nor the email address appears on the block list or moderation list.

                  And are you Yisrael ben Goyim? So you say, but do you know the corresponding email address? To jog your memory, it is a very short, and therefore very obviously fake, gmail address.

                  Yisrael was a drive by commenter. You are sticky as glue. His style is not your style.

                  Several people gave thoughtful responses to Yisrael, one of them angry and stupid. He did not respond. You would have responded. Your fake email address is oddly verbose, while his was trivially short, to save time and bother.

                • Kunning Druegger says:

                  You’ve posted since then though, and IIRC you aren’t always indignant. I actually agree with your read in general, though you are dramatizing the reaction. I read big chunks of that thread, back then and now ( I was lurking due to IRL stuff), and I have also been (wrongly) accused of being a butthurt Corona Karen. It’s all water under the bridge, and I deride *anyone* that gets petty about the “good ol’ days.” Your angst does not, to me, seem justified.

                • Ghost says:

                  I’m willing to forgetaboutit.

                  But, Yisrael still has trouble letting go. He feels like he was shoahed.

                • Kunning Druegger says:

                  Genuinely lol’d. Tell that kike to take a chill pill before I give him a gas shower.

                  be easy bro.

                • Ghost says:


                  And are you Yisrael ben Goyim?

                  Yes, that was me. I recall not being able to respond with that name. Besides, how would I know of that post if it wasn’t me? You said you couldn’t even find it.

                  So you say, but do you know the corresponding email address?

                  Maybe, it would be or then a name before that which I don’t want to type here.

                • jim says:

                  > Yes, that was me.

                  And yet you do not know the real Yisrael ben Goyim’s email address. And I already told you it was a gmail address.

                  Which does not prove you are not him, but does mean you cannot prove you are him.

                  I may also have Yisrael ben Goyim’s IP, though I purge them at frequent intervals and would have to dig up very old local records which may not exist any more. Do you know the approximate geographic area of that IP?

                • Ghost says:

                  My IP is dynamic. It changes every time I turn off my phone. And does not always show my exact location.

    • jim says:

      I cannot find this post.

      If it exists, give us a link.

    • Yisrael ben Goyim says:

      > Yisrael was then lampshaded for speaking the truth

      This is a lie, for I, Jim, can post under that name email address, accessing the blog from your identity under a different browser.

      Can you?

      I suspect you do not know the email address.

      • Ghost says:

        Looks like I’ve forgotten it. It’s been three years and I didn’t write it down.

        You saying you never forgot a password? I worked IT Admin and had to reset passwords all the time. I forget the Ghost password sometimes.

        You know you are so eager to call me a lier all the time you and Com. I posted that. That’s what I say. And I can’t post using that name now. When I originally made the post, you had to approve it.

        • jim says:

          If you are genuinely Yisrael ben Goyim, you quite likely forgot it. But that means you cannot prove you are Yisrael ben Goyim. And your and his styles are different. On the other hand, you both parody Jewishness, which is a strong point of similarity. Your fake email address parodies Jewishness, and his username parodied Jewishness.

        • jim says:

          Yisrael ben Goyim is now moderated unless posting under the original email address.

          He was never moderated until a few minutes ago.

        • jim says:

          > When I originally made the post, you had to approve it.

          That was because Yisrael ben Goyim was a drive by poster – who tend to be low effort shills and spammers. He only ever posted one comment.

          Had Yisrael replied to the people who replied to him (which is your nature, you are sticky) the blog software would have automatically approved it, absent human instructions to the contrary. If a drive by comment gets approved by a human, that email address is no longer automatically treated as a drive by address.

          Every comment with a new email address automatically goes into the moderation queue or worse. When a comment is approved, its email address is also automatically approved, and subsequent comments from that email address appear automatically without human intervention, unless I intervene to the contrary. Had Yisrael replied to the people replying to him (one of whom was inflammatory) those replies would have appeared instantly.

          Yisrael’s email address would have been on the approved list the instant the comment was approved, and I just tested it. It is still on the approved list, for a comment by me pretending to be him appeared immediately.

          Each cat avatar is generated from the email address. Sometimes different email addresses will result in the same cat avatar, but if you look at the page source, you will see a different and unique file, different files that sometimes contain the same image. I could replace any avatar for any given email address with a different custom avatar, but do not do so.

          If anyone wants to know if two posters have the same email address, just look at the cat avatar.

          • Ghost says:

            So are we done here.

            I made the post, you say I can’t prove it. But, before the argument was covid and before that it was about Florida.

            It just never ends. Every comment is jealously scrutinized. You think you are building a group of Christian men. You are not. You’re building a group of antisocial skeptics that call everyone that tries to talk with you a shill, fed, faggot, lier.

            Nobody talks that way in real life.

            • Kunning Drueger says:

              Speak for yourself you shill fed faggot. 🙂

              Seriously though, there’s no need to be surly. We were all skeptical before we got here, and each of us has some measure of social misfit or antipathy. How could anyone sane trust a man who blossoms comfortably in the a world that emulates Sodom and Gomorrah more every day? But you’re aggrieved because you were deprived of total victory. I empathize. It’s only tolerable up to a point, friendo. You snatched defeat from the jaws of victory with your affect. I’ve done the same myself. Let it go, my nigger.

            • jim says:

              > But, before the argument was covid and before that it was about Florida.

              No regular poster disagreed with you about Covid. Yisrael ben Goyim claimed the hospitals were empty, and no one doubted him. Everyone knew or suspected the hospitals were empty. It was not news.

              And your comment on Florida sounds very like it was made by a blue stater inside the Washington, New York, or Harvard bubble.

              Hence the disagreement. I rub shoulders with good country people whom I like who are apt to kill wrongdoers and bury them in the swamp. My bubble contains quite a lot of such people. From your comment on Floridans and pit bulls it seems likely that you doubt such people exist. On the contrary, there is a clear correlation in my circle between being a good, upright, virtuous, productive, respectable, affluent, and likeable person, and a willingness to take out the trash, and to the extent that this is an orderly and safe community, I do not give the police and judiciary any credit.

              • Ghost says:


                You don’t scare me. If you think you can bury me in a swamp, you’re welcomed to try.

                Plenty of lowlifes in Florida. Male and female. Most didn’t have decent jobs. Not many good paying jobs for the locals. I was there on the militaries’ dime. Was paid well and lived well.

                I don’t see what being poor has to do with politics or character.

                Most republicans have money and jobs. Dems are the welfare queens.

                And why is my name still able to post. Shut me down.

                • Adam says:

                  >Not many good paying jobs for the locals.

                  >I don’t see what being poor has to do with politics or character.


                • Ghost says:


                  NGMI? Are you saying, “I’m not going to make it?”

                  I’m already there and then some. Older than you’re going to live because you got the shot.

                  Retired, 2 homes, 4 vehicles, more money than I can even spend.

                  I’m doing fine, thanks.

                  Why aren’t I shut down?

                • jim says:

                  I shut down enemy shills who pump out tedious repetition without regard for rebuttals or their interlocutor’s position.

                  I shut down people who argue in bad faith. I don’t shut down people for being an asshole unless they become boring.

                  You are attacking regulars, hence get attacked by regulars, and though you make bad faith arguments against your interlocutor, you drop it when it gets shot down. You are responsive.

                  Though the use of bad faith arguments got close to the line where you would be shut down, the comment to which I reply is not a bad faith argument.

                  I read The Cominator’s response to Yisrael ben Goyim as an endorsement, that both The Cominator and Yisrael ben Goyim were saying the Covid panic was fake, and it was unreasonable and hypersensitive to read it otherwise.

                • Kunning Drueger says:

                  We are reaching levels of Glenfilthie that shouldn’t technically be possible.

                • jim says:

                  Nobody threatened you, and falsely implying a threat is dishonest and objectionable.

                  I was arguing you do not know the people the regulars in this thread are talking about, that you live in a bubble that resembles a bubble in a blue state megalopolis. And your reply again reveals you do not.

                  This dispute arose when you claimed to know what rural people in Florida are like. I do not know what they are like, but some regulars here do, and they sound to me very like the good country people that I do know, and not much like the people you imagine them to be.

                • Ghost says:

                  You should shut me down then.

                • Ghost says:

                  I knew plenty of locals in Florida. They’re poor, have low paying jobs. Most of the White women were single parents. The rest acted like sluts on PC Beach. I was there for years and had dozens of friends. I know them. They were Dems too, most of them. Had a few on facebook all pulling for Hillary. Made me sick.

                  I’m in a red state, voted Trump twice and will do it again if I need to write him in.

          • Ghost says:

            You’ve shown, Jim, that you could post as anyone on here.

            You could post as Yisrael ben Goyim, or Ghost or Com, or KD Red anyone.

            You could ban me right now then start posting as Ghost a few days later.

            Isn’t it true that you can post here using anyone’s name?

            • Guy says:

              It’s his website fool, he can obviously post as anyone he wants, edit anything he wants. You’re hysterical.

              • Ghost says:

                Careful, he may choose to post as Guy while you’re away.

                He could say anything. Things that might cause unwanted guests at your residence.

                One of the rules of Admin rights is never use some else’s password or username. It is an ethics violation.

                Jim has no ethics and no honor. He calls others a lier when he himself is the lier.

                • Adam says:

                  You were the one that first challenged my credibility in this thread and then immediately challenged The Cominators even though we are both regulars. This drama is all of your making and you are acting like a literal faggot.

              • jim says:

                Anyone who knows Yisrael ben Goyim’s fake email address can post as Yisrael ben Goyim

                The only difference is that I and one other person can see everyone’s fake email address and (usually vpned) IP. However, in the public files linked on the main page, these email addresses are replaced with randomly generated email addresses and the IPs are always scrubbed.

                An implication of this is that you should always use a fake email address, because if you use a real email address, anyone you have emailed could pretend to be you. It looks to me that no one except obvious deep state employees ever uses a real email address.

                • Ghost says:

                  Block this name Jim. I’m out!

                • Mike in Boston says:

                  (usually vpned) IP

                  no one except obvious deep state employees ever uses a real email address

                  Hmph. Here I am posting from my work computer using a webmail address that I do indeed have the ability to check. As you can verify from my pink cat, I’ve been doing so for over ten years.

                  Originally I thought that knowing where I work might help Jim gauge when I’m at least somewhat qualified to shoot my mouth off on a given subject, and the webmail was to give Jim a way to contact me if desired.

                  Today I wouldn’t trust anything coming by webmail not to be forged, and although the question of how to communicate securely is far from solved IMHO, at least there is Bitmessage. But I keep using the same webmail and posting from non-VPN IPs to establish at least some continuity that I am the same Mike in Boston that has posted before. In a community where we regretfully don’t get to see each other face to face, that seems like it has some value, however small.

              • Ghost says:

                Anyway, Ghost is done with you fags.

  4. Kunning Drueger says:

    I was going to say this was an annoyance, but on reflection, there’s so little drama here for the high IQs, diversity of weirdness, and calcified cliques. The Great Florida Pitbull Kerfuffle of ’23 is actually kinda sweet, kinda humanizing, like Brother Com’s soft spot for feisty little brunettes.

    Here’s what happened as far as I can tell. At a particular digital saloon that only serves the meanest shooters in the World Wide West, a pointless comment kicked off a heartfelt debate that escalated into a Mexican standoff with everyone being super serious about a very silly topic. As is often the case with smart, straight shooters, one dumb sonuvabitch ended up being the easiest target by bing an ornery cuss (Ghost). That’s all, that’s it, nothing more.

    Ghost, quit being an ass. We aren’t kike cucks, every real brother here can dismantle the whole of Jewry in 2 comments flat. We just know they aren’t anywhere near to power as the Jesuits are (I have my doubts, but I always do). Maybe you lived in Florida, maybe Com gets a bit too touchy sometimes, and maybe I act like a faggot sometimes. None of that shit matters. Com, this doesn’t need to escalate to a bullycide because it doesn’t, it’s a dumb debate and you know it. Ghost, chill the fuck out, dude. you’re one of us, stop being a contrarian. Any white man can have whatever dog he can keep, just as any property owner can kill said dog if it violates his property. There’s at least 3 more important things going on at this moment than arguing about dogs like a bunch of Tevas wearing suburban cucks at the dog park.

    We can all agree on one thing, I am certain: we are getting excitingly close to Total Trannie Death being pushed into the Overton Window.

    Love you guys, and your stupid fucking dogs. Not you Oog, you suck.

    • Red says:

      The problem with Ghost is his endless lies. You can’t have debates and fellowship with an unrepentant serial liar.

    • zero says:

      I should disclose I got a dog in the fight 🙂 my brother want to get a couple for hogs and I think it’s a bad Idea, I been trying to sus out the jimmian position, gotta find out what the stats are and if they can be rock solid under the right circumstances. these guys getting mutts for hunting from the pound that sleep with their children are crazy to me. it’s like adopting a nigger.

      • Kunning Drueger says:

        Mutts get a bad rap. unlike humans, where you have a bunch of political bullshit infecting everything to do with breeding, race, and raising. with dogs you actually have good genetics and bad genetics and these things are known and discussed even if people are stupidly emotional about them. If you get a pit crossed with some retard mystery meat, yeah, that’s just chum for the bucket. but if you get a labradoodle, which is technically a mutt, That’s a very different story. Those are excellent dogs, if somewhat psychotic or frenetic. point I’m trying to make is that a mutt dog is not the same as a mutt from Cleveland. lots of really good ad mixtures out there because, with the exception of certain breeds, like pitbulls or teacup size dogs or those smashed face abortions, all dogs are mostly bread for companionship, personality, or utility. if you get a good mix between a hound dog and a lab, very good chance it’s going to be an awesome dog. If you get lab and German Shepherd, also awesome but be ready for a smart asshole who will never take anything seriously. The point I’m trying to make is that pitbulls and a few other breeds need to be culled, but otherwise most dogs are actually… dogs. some are better, others less so.

        I apologize for the reddit tier gayness, but if you aren’t going to a breeder, or getting from a hunting dog pack litter, the dog that finds you is the best dog you’ll ever have.

        • zero says:

          I should have been clearer, I think many mutts make great dogs and don’t think most purebred dogs are all that well bred. the collie black and tan hound crosses are adorable and great dogs. but pit blood in a mutt found at a pound makes me nervous about where it came from. awesome hunting dogs many times but not something I want around my family as much as a labradoodle. it seems like we are short in America on big game hunting catch dogs which aren’t trigger happy. it’s a bit unusual to have something as mean, fecund and big as a pig. black bear are easy to keep in check with a rifle when the government isn’t outlawing hunting them, pigs are tearing things up pretty good especially where there isn’t a critical mass of rednecks doing God’s work.

    • Nikolai says:

      “We just know they aren’t anywhere near to power as the Jesuits are”.

      Just completely bonkers to think the Jesuit order has any semblance of power in 2023, especially in the historically protestant United States. The average 22 year old intern at CNN has more institutional power than the average Jesuit priest.

      Hell even 200 years ago Jesuit conspiracies were basically the equivalent of Russiagate.

      Hillary Clinton: “What, I lost the 2016 election!? Could it be due to my awful policies and general unlikeability? No, it must be, uh… the Russians!”

      Abraham Lincoln: “What, the South wants to secede!? Could it be due to my insanely divisive tyrannical leadership? No, it must be, uh… the Jesuits!”

      • jim says:

        Two hundred years ago Jesuit conspiracies were not the equivalent of Russiagate.

        The Jesuits were evil, dangerous, conspiratorial, and powerful back then.

        The original sin of the Roman Catholic Church was to covet that which was Caesar’s, which led to the great schism.

        They lost that which was Caesar’s in the sack of Rome, and have been plotting to get it back ever since. They are still plotting. It is indeed surprising if their plots are effective today, but it is not suprising, or even news, that they are still plotting.

        • Kunning Druegger says:

          While I don’t think the Jesuits are the puppet masters, they are ever present at all significant American governance happenings. They are always in the background, standing just off to the left of whatever is happening. Sinister as all hell, really. I have briefly interacted with some Jesuits, and every single one was faggy & daemonic in a very particular way that if you’ve never experienced it seems fanciful. Just weirdly off putting while giving every appearance of kindness, wisdom, and good will.

          • notglowing says:

            > They are always in the background, standing just off to the left of whatever is happening

            Could say the same thing about the jews. Both are groups of subversive people, and quite a few types of subversive people are around whenever stuff like that happens. The fact they aren’t front and center gives me a different message compared to what you are getting from it.

            From my perspective, it rather seems like they are mostly on the periphery of power, stooges representing the equivalent of yet another NGO just a very big one, which is global; perhaps they were instrumental in propagating leftism when being a progressive Catholic was the frontier, but that was over a century ago.

            They might believe in a demon worship version of Christianity, but to leftists, even that is not enough. The clearly Jesuit controlled Vatican is led by evil people according to us, yet is still evil according to leftists.

            I just do not see the amount of status that would be expected if they were held in high regard by Harvard/CNN/Hollywood type people. Very easy to attach the church and get away with it. Hard to attack universities and professors. Also hard to attack jews. The ideas they (Church & their orgs) spout are downstream from somewhere else. Being physically close to it, that is what I see (I do not have insider knowledge).

            Everything people cite about Jesuits seems to me compatible with them being part of rather then somehow the pinnacle of, the current system.
            There is an old underlying anti-Catholic sentiment behind people in protestant countries accusing the Church of spreading leftism in general; Which does seem true, to be fair.
            Catholics in America are very left-aligned, though they are hardly the spearhead of it, part of it is the amount of mexicans who are catholic, part of it is the aspect of not being the state religion and never having been. Trying to push another religion necessarily makes you subversive to begin with. I can’t entirely blame protestants in such countries for thinking of Catholics this way.

            Every conservative aligned person here is catholic, obviously; even if they don’t endorse what the Pope says.
            So the perspective simply isn’t the same. Leftism is mostly pushed by atheists. Not to say catholic institutions don’t do it all the time too, just they are always a little late to it. And the atheist sees them like they see the Republican party in the US. It’s an apt comparison since it also works in terms of the RP not really doing anything useful.
            This reminds me of an anecdote: my teacher of Catholic Religion in high school (public school), who was also a priest. He wasn’t very based but I remember him telling the class how Ratzinger was probably pushed into resignation because he couldn’t deal with threats by “freemasons” within the Church. It was his opinion that he was just too “weak” to resist them. As I said he wasn’t redpilled overall, probably more of a subversive himself really, though at least he openly denied trannies and taught us it was nonsense in school, in the second half of the 2010s. Probably wouldn’t fly in the US.

          • The Cominator says:

            They aren’t the executive force of the system they are its agents and operatives, they were spies when they were created and they are spies now.

            Jews are not nearly the organized group most online anti-semites think they are.

      • The Cominator says:

        “Hell even 200 years ago Jesuit conspiracies were basically the equivalent of Russiagate.”

        If we go back to the 19th century Samuel Morse probably had an IQ of about 200 and he was COMPLETELY convinced of a grand Jesuit conspiracy. Otto Von Bismarck as well and he probably understood politics as well as about anyone in history.

  5. Mister Grumpus says:

    If anyone has any takes on how GPT spamfarms will somehow force people to create and adopt Jim-Compliant Social Networking… I’d love to read them.

  6. Oog en Hand says:

    A: Kemalists want to kill all Christians.
    B: No, we don’t.
    A: But Nihal Atsiz said…
    B: Mistranslated. You do not know the language.

    • Kunning Druegger says:

      I guess every tribe has to have a pet retard. Must be a law of the universe or something. CR left some awful big clown shoes to fill, but by Odin’s red rubber nose, boy you are trying oooooee.

  7. Zack says:

    What do you think about setting up AI as a scientific research tool?

    Automatically creating and testing hypotheses in order to advance applied and general science?

    Could this prove another fundamental boost in discovery, through sheer speed of hypothesis creation+testing or through discovering things that are almost inaccessible to human minds because they’re counter-intuitive to our evolved brain wiring?

    What if such AI-driven research and discovery yields powerful new physics, chemistry etc., scientific breakthroughs in rapid succession, giving huge power to people that operate such AIs?

    • jim says:

      This hits another barrier for AI even worse comprehended and more difficult to discuss than recognizing a natural kind.

  8. Kunning Drueger says:

    Here’s a thing that bubbled up, called FreedomGPT. It’s under a lot of click pressure so no idea if it works. Apologies Jim if this is just noise with no signal.

    • Kunning Drueger says:

      Heat of formation moment; dangerous to make any predictions. When the shooting was first announced, the gungrabber memeplex started firing up (pro- && anti-) but then the trannie revelation dropped, and there was a further stutter step because the MSM called it a “she” which is biologically accurate but ideologically incorrect, which has sewn a fair amount of confusion for all sides.

      Food for thought (and only fools & shills pay attention to KD predictions lol): trannies as a clade are incredibly susceptible to trends. If one hangs itself, it can set off a chain reaction. Lots of fascinating elements to this, why it happens and how it works and how it could be exploited, but the pressing concern, for me and mine, is what happens if the MSM, representing both Voice & Brain, idealizes this freak. One aspect of Trannie Dynamics is attention (obviously) and I wonder if there’s some measurable or somewhat predictable threshold that indicates a wave of trannie activity along a theme will develop. Probably crazy, but I wouldn’t be shocked if we see copycats if this freak pervert gets enough screen time.

      • jim says:

        > Heat of formation moment; dangerous to make any predictions.

        I did a search on an enemy search engine. It was instantly apparent that our enemy is discombobulated, and the official line has not come down.

        Russians sources are simply saying trannie terrorism, which is a straight up reporting of the actual facts. Our official sources are massaging it every which way, but reporting facts that speak for themselves.

        “Motive is not known”, say official sources, which is of course entirely true, except she issued a manifesto, which presumably explains the motive in copious detail. This makes it difficult to produce an official narrative, since the manifesto might well leak.

        The official narrative for the genocide of the Tutsis is that the Tutsis caused it, and that international forces were benevolently trying to prevent it by sowing understanding and the milk of human kindness. They would like to generate a similar narrative for this shooting, but at the moment are discombobulated.

        What probably happened is roid rage. Testosterone has a large effect on the mind, and the female brain reacts very badly to testosterone. Thus the manifesto is likely to be nothing but empty political correctness, which the official media would ordinarily love, but does not sound too good coming from a school shooter.

        Chances are the manifesto says that the motive for the killings was political correctness, their own words echoed back to them by a school shooter. Which words they love to hear, but not from her.

        Chances are that the shooter went off the rails once taking testosterone. This will not be what they want to hear either. What they will want to find is that shooter was going off the rails before transition, and their benevolent transition motivated by understanding and the milk of human kindess came, alas, too late.

        • Hesiod says:

          Seeing the Narrative move towards this being yet another mass school shooting where the motive is irrelevant. Useful as a statistical addition for disarming badwhites, but probably will be dropped from the radar like other multiple murders that involve a pet/minion minority perp. Cuckservative media will continue to milk the story but only to maintain its own motte-n-bailey mendacity.

    • jim says:

      “sign in to google”.

      Odd that.

      And a curious lack of explanation of its training set and AI architecture. Smells like an enemy operation.

      • Kunning Drueger says:

        Oh man, is it a honey trap?? Feel free to delete if it’s a bad link, my apologies Jim.

        • jim says:

          Looks like a honey trap, but leaving the link with this comment.

          Signing in with Google means signing in with an ID that they have gone to great lengths to connect to your government registered name. I imagine therefore that if you don’t connect with something easily traceable, they cannot be bothered to find out who you are. It is not a particularly incriminating honey pot, so relatively harmless.

          The abundance of low hanging fruit overwhelms them, and they fail to focus on the high hanging fruit. They have too much data.

          • someDude says:

            “They have too much data”

            Thank Goodness for small mercies.

            May evil forever be overwhelmed by Data.
            May evil drown in data.
            May the noise in their data overwhelm the signal in their data

            • Pax Imperialis says:

              You too can contribute by making hundreds of gmail accounts in McDonald’s parking lots with second hand computers.

          • c4ssidy says:

            I am making a tool. A basic version is available to guests who can store their creation in browser cache and export, but the user would have to log-in to save and load and share what they make. I notice a lack of any innovation towards universal logins other than the design you have shared in the past. The best I can do with my tool in the meantime is include sign-ins done by email address alone without mandating Google or Facebook or Microsoft or Apple accounts. At the same time, these things currently have such a convenient way of saving clicks, and I personally use them all over the place

    • Kunning Drueger says:

      Above was intended to respond to Hesiod.

      • Hesiod says:

        Talibros slap a bignose upside the head:

        “ACTION: He laughed when Christian children were gunned down inside a Christian SCHOOL

        REACTION: The crowd protested his immoral behaviour

        CARD: He did not apologize for his immorality, but played the #antisemitism CARD. These gangsters are playing games with us

        • The Cominator says:

          This kind of convinces me pretty firmly hes not really a Talibro.

          • Hesiod says:

            This next one left me perplexed:

            “Our magnificent department did some digging and this is not the first time this far right Jewish extremist disguised as a liberal agitator has made disgusting remarks about our Christian brothers being killed inside a school or a church.”

            I don’t know Talibro propaganda, so any significance of right or left designation by a purported one is lost on me.

  9. Hesiod says:

    Tranny shoots up private Christian school in Tennessee. Cue MSM articles about how LBGWTF are most negatively impacted by this. Will Christians not give up their bronze age goatherder beliefs and profess Love+Lube is God so everyone can be free?

    Stay tuned.

  10. Cloudswrest says:


    Any comment on this so-called proposed “TikTok” ban? It’s really looking like TikTok is only a pretense to place Americans inside an “Iron Curtain” firewall. TikTok is only the nose of the camel under the tent. Seems like they’re really interested in things like uncontrolled crypto, and/or software and entities they don’t have direct control over.

    Richard “Dick” Whitman (🌎/21M) @GhostofWhitman
    The RESTRICT Act makes it illegal to access a “banned” technology or website by VPN.

    If they ban your favorite site and you try to go around it, that’s $250k in fines for a click & asset forfeiture is included

    This is insane and must be stopped

    2:31 PM · Mar 26, 2023

    • Contaminated NEET says:

      They may not be as impressive as they were a generation or two ago, but I keep saying the megalomaniacal filth that rule us are not stupid. This is a clever move.

    • jim says:

      And yandex will very quickly join the ever growing ban list – it is already strangely difficult to get packets to and from Russia in many countries.

      The internet is becoming splinternet. In the end we are likely to be communicating by sending videos of approved things, such sacrificing children at drag queen story hour, or postbirth abortion, with our actual communications steganographically hidden inside the video.

      This is inconvenient, but we can work around it. And it means that large numbers of ordinary people will need secure technologies, which we can provide. Repression creates demand. The Global American Empire overplayed its hand with color revolutions. Now everyone is wise to them. A similar situation will occur with splinternet. Albeit getting there is going to be unpleasant. The Ukraine war is the answer to color revolution. Most Ukrainians are going to die, and people are slowly waking up the fact that while resisting color revolution is apt to get your country devastated like Libya or Syria, and certain ethnic groups exterminated, like the Tutsi in the Congo, going along with color revolution is likely to get you expended by people who have no concern with your survival.

      Splinternet will also be unpleasant, and dealing with also costly. But they are already overplaying their hand, and the RESTRICT act is them doubling down, as the endless shelling of Donbass was them doubling down, as the destruction of Libya and the attempt to genocide the Alawites was them doubling down.

      • Contaminated NEET says:

        When you double down and then draw the card you need, you win big.

        • Starman says:

          @Contaminated NEET

          ”but I keep saying the megalomaniacal filth that rule us are not stupid.”

          Your social class is hilariously ignorant on space travel.

          • Contaminated NEET says:

            >Your social class
            I wish, brah. Downward mobility is my middle name.

    • unz says:

      For now, the GAE (gonna borrow this term as shorthand from whoever invented it) is content to crucify certain high profile targets – Assange, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Mackey, what have you – and let the “chilling effect” do the rest. Yes, things are accelerating (e.g. Rand Paul’s staffer getting stabbed, that kinda thing) but they run a real risk of letting the mask slip too much if “they” ( the ones with any real executive control) allow things to accelerate too fast. The domestic cost is Exit, the global cost is a weakening of Voice.
      They still need to manufacture consent to avoid chaotic and unpredictable outcomes. Which is only possible because even though they’re getting worse at it, the target populations they are operating on are also lower in quality than those of a generation past, let alone two. When acceleration produces chaos, the current executives (those who pretend to believe) could win, they could very well lose. Only true believers in Satan want chaos.

      • unz says:

        And yet the mask keeps slipping. There was no reason to prosecute Trump. They already have the DeSantis card. The whole thing is idiotic, something only true believers could conjure up. Not enough to tear off the mask but a real dumb fucking move.

    • Wulfgar Thundercock III says:

      In an even more hilarious twist, it is also censored on seasoning. The seasoning police meme seems to have bit deep.

    • Adam says:

      This reads like it was written by a socialist priest. No mention of authority or responsibility. As if dogs are blank slates, and only need the proper progressive social conditioning to reach their potential.

      The 4Chan position on pittbulls is not the red pill though. The red pill on pittbulls is that they are magnificent animals, and when they were game bred by white patriarchs they were among the finest breeds and made wonderful family companions, and would function as a true nanny dog for the masters family.

      • Kunning Drueger says:

        There is nothing present in the pitbull breed that isn’t better expressed or easier trained in other breeds. They really do need to be culled and/or bred out. Pitbull simping is a white libchick thing. I just don’t buy the nanny breed story, particularly because dog breeds change very quickly in relatively short periods of time. take for example the Saint John’s water dog. It is a breed that is no longer with us, but you can see the shape of what it was in the labrador retriever. stories about the St. John’s are fascinating, and it’s really sad that I can’t get one, because Labradors, though. adorable and lovable and even if effective at some things, are not at all what the Saint John’s was. Breeds can go bad, and maybe they can get better, but I don’t see the value add with pitbulls.

        • jim says:

          Pitbulls were originally fighting dogs, bred for savage violence. A dog is naturally inclined to loyalty, love, and obedience. Pitbulls are naturally inclined to loyalty, love, obedience, and savage violence. It is like having a loaded gun around. With care and due caution a loaded gun is safe, because it is not going to go off by itself, still less take aim by itself, but a pitbull is supposed to go off by itself, which makes it a lot chancier than a loaded gun, even with care and due caution.

          Being loyal and obedient, not likely to aggress against their master’s pack, provided it is clear to them that they are at the bottom of the hierarchy. Modern people find it hard to make that clear to them, and of course, still dangerous to everything else in the vicinity.

          • Hesiod says:

            My only experience with a pitbull was helplessly witnessing a daddy pit torture a stray dog that came onto his owner’s property. He slowly and methodically broke one leg then the next, twisting this way and that. And then left the stray suffering to die.

            Granted, the daddy had his female and litter relatively nearby, but his action wasn’t a “teachable moment” like a cat bringing a still living mouse to her kittens.

            Or maybe it was. Some say something human has rubbed off on dogs after all these ages being together.

            • Red says:

              When I was 10 a Pitbull chased me down on my bike and grabbed me by the leg. It was only the bike falling over (the shadow of the bike scared it) that caused it to let go. I was smart enough by then not to try and run from the dog and I backed away slowly with my leg bleeding keeping the bike between me and the dog. I finally found help and ended up in the emergency room for stitches.

              The owner of the dog claimed all sorts of crap about me attacking the dog or opening it’s gate, but I had never even seen the house where it lived. I was just riding my bike. Later when he learned the dog was going to be euthanized he transported it out of town to prevent animal control from seizing it.

              I have nothing good to say about the breed or it’s owners. The pitts should be euthanized and their owners along with them.

              • Pax Imperialis says:

                My granddad got to see pitbull fights and occasionally bet on them. He seemed nostalgic about them. Wish I could have seen it, but yeah, I get your point. Ownership as pets and not for sport is stupid.

              • Hesiod says:

                Am reminded of a Forrest Gump moment as a wee lad when a hellhound (all I can remember is the dog was black and had red eyes) chased me and bit me on my buttocks while I biked between relatives’ houses. Its owner, a first cousin, claimed I shouldn’t have ridden my bike on the road in the first place.

                Oddly enough, that dog soon after grew ill and died. Whether an elder relative poisoned it or my mutant blood did remains a mystery.

                • Red says:

                  Oddly enough, that dog soon after grew ill and died. Whether an elder relative poisoned it or my mutant blood did remains a mystery.

                  Funny, I suggested to my father that he do that to the dog. I wasn’t the first kid the dog had attacked. He rejected the idea as evil and was very upset that I brought up the idea. It just seemed logical to me.

              • ray says:

                I was in Golden Gate Park one day walking my buddy’s male black lab, Big. Some fat woman came around the corner with two pitbulls.

                The pits attacked and my gentle labbie went right to it, God bless his massive heart. The goblin bitch just stood there smirking so I had to intervene personally to settle the matter.

                After that I restricted Big’s outings to Mt. Tam where we wouldn’t be aggressed against by a type of dog and owner that should be put down. Together if possible and I would be glad to help.

          • Ghost says:

            Neighbor had two. Even left furniture on the fence to help them jump over. Began mowing yard with machete on hip. Neighbor quickly moved furniture and put barking pits in house anytime I was out. Problem solved. Neighbor now gone.

        • Red says:

          Breeds can go bad, and maybe they can get better, but I don’t see the value add with pitbulls.

          Pitbulls love is about blank slatism. Leftist reject that dog breeds result in different behavior and it’s only how they were raised and conditioned that matters.

        • Adam says:

          >There is nothing present in the pitbull breed that isn’t better expressed or easier trained in other breeds.

          I’m not sure this is true. I am not a dog expert but I do have a lot of experience my own dogs and as far as I have seen there is no other dog that is as affectionate as pittbulls. Good lovers make good fighters and vice versa. They are a uniquely American breed and suitable for nearly any task. They have a high tolerance for pain and discomfort, are durable, quiet, and low maintenance.

          No they are not good dogs for the rootless cosmopolitan elite but for the Amerikaner they certainly have a place.

          • Kunning Druegger says:

            The Boerbel is better if you want a dog that can kill anything. Ditto with the Cane Courso and a number of other dogs that pitbull faggots use to breed up fighting dogs. Because pitbulls are actually not that good.

            This “affection” argument holds no water. Every dog that pair bonds to a master is 100% the most affectionate dog that master will ever know. This phenomenon is endlessly repeatable. Nature’s God gave wolves and Homo Sapiens to each other to make our species better. The most fierce and loyal and heartbroken defense by a canine I’ve ever seen was this tiny, little chihuahua guarding his OD’d master, trying to fight off a bunch of heavily armed dudes while defending the hearth and rousing his master. The way it would go from whining to growling, I could see the soul of that little guy. Every dog is the best dog if it’s your dog.

            Pitbulls are as impulsive as Labradors, compulsive as Border Collies, violent as Boerbels, and as emotional as the little dogs, but are inferior to each in any given category. I am a woman hearted faggot when it comes to animals, and I think every gelded pitbull should by euthanized, and any viable should be bred out completely, but it’s probably not worth it. The only people that ever make claims of the value of pitbulls as working dogs are people that A) have and love pitbulls and B) have 0 experience with working dogs. As usual, Jim nailed it: you keep a pitbull mean, hungry, and low in the hierarchy with a muzzle on, and then you throw it into a pit to make some money off of the tragedy of its existence. The pitbull is the nigger of dogs in every possible way.

            • Adam says:

              If you wanted to breed a dog specifically to attack and kill people you would be better served by a dozen other breeds than pittbulls.

              Dogs are man’s best friend, and incidences of maulings or fatalities from dangerous breeds while the male owner is present is next to zero, especially if the dog is female. Viscous dog attacks are overwhelmingly due to female owner, or dog left unattended with children or elderly.

              Pittbulls are enormously fun and tremendously affectionate in ways that a Labrador or a retriever are not. You should have one for the same reasons you should have a decked out AR-15, or a lifted F150. Great fun, very useful, and not a great risk in the hands of a responsible owner.

              • Ghost says:

                Pit bull, AR, monster-truck. Do you own any of that? I don’t.

                No dog, 870, regular truck and car.

                Your list seems how the left views whitey, as if to say hail fellow…

                So do you own any of what you say I should own?

                • Adam says:

                  Yes on the AR, no truck and my pitt is long gone. In Florida ARs, trucks and pitts are pretty common among Magabros… we are not all limp dick faggots here. We still dare enjoy ourselves.

                • Kunning Druegger says:

                  I want a F-150… from the 1980s lol. I’d love a -250 superduty diesel with a king cab, but alas.

                  At this point, any man that doesn’t have an AR-15 has some ‘splainin to do ( i know there are some viable excuses, but very few). You should have put AR-10 on that list; very fun, if somewhat excessive and image-status based. But I am a quarter Fudd on my father’s side and I stupidly maintain that God’s Caliber (.308) belongs in a bolt action or a trad BR. I know, I know lol.

                • Ghost says:

                  Florida is it? I lived there for 6 years in the panhandle. Had one regular truck, fishing boat, and one 30-06.

                  In fact, I don’t recall any neighbors or coworkers owning pit-bulls or monster-trucks.

                • The Cominator says:

                  LOL every other Florida redneck owns a pitbull, thats a bit of an exagerration but they are well liked as security dogs (rightly or wrongly) by Florida man.

                  I’m neutral on the pit vs anti pit question personally, never been attacked by one and I had a roommate who had one once and it was a nice dog (I was kinda scared at 1st).

                • Ghost says:

                  Well oy vey, every Floridian owns a pit-bull because Com says it’s so. Let’s make it every White man. Maybe I didn’t see any because I wasn’t living in a trailer park or working with lowlifes.


                • Adam says:

                  Pittbulls are all over here at least in south Florida among whites, blacks spics whatever. I’ve never met a mean one they are always very sweet. Even had a friend that used his for hunting boar, one of his older dogs got gored bad, missing one eye scars all over the place, very nice dog. They are all big babies as far as I know.

                • The Cominator says:

                  You are a government glownigger contractor who lives somewhere in the beltway, you basically never talk to working class people and you never lived in Florida.

                • The Cominator says:


                  Thank you, I’m in central Florida but can confirm pitbulls are popular here and Ghost is a liar and a shill.

                • Ghost says:

                  And what I’m saying is a pit is a junkyard dog that is unpredictable.

                  A proper dog for a White man is either a doberman or shepherd. Or hunting with lab.

                  That’s my opinion.

                  Pits are for wiggers.

                • Ghost says:

                  [*deleted for barefaced blatant lying about your, and our, past on this blog*]

                • The Cominator says:

                  You also claimed that pits weren’t common in Florida, two Florida residents with better reputations then you have contradicted you and you’ve responded to being caught in your lie by doing a Motte and bailey…

                • Ghost says:



                • The Cominator says:





                • Ghost says:

                  So the entire state of Florida is teeming with pit-bulls. And, if you sling a dead cat, you’ll hit dozens. Because that’s what Com says. And if you don’t agree with Com, you’re a fed, shill, glow nigger, etc… Because Com owns this blog. So he thinks.

                  Com is just a pathetic, friendless, fat-body who can’t even fish or dress out a dear.

                • Contaminated NEET says:

                  Shitbulls are vastly, vastly over-represented in fatal attacks on people, even relative to other attack/guard/fighting breeds; it’s not even close. And that is why people love them. Aging libtard dog moms love to show how their compassion and care redeem the violent beast. Nigs and spics love the machismo of having a pet that can kill you. Charitably, white men like Ghost love to show their skill and confidence by turning a dangerous killer into a pleasant and useful companion through proper training and leadership. For all of them, the appeal is the danger and the violence, and the ability to control it.

                  >Pibbles are so loving and sweet! They’re just li’l goofballs!
                  I’m sure they are. Until they decide not to be one day. Roy’s tigers loved to play and were just the friendliest things, but all it took was one bad day. If you want a fun, playful, companion, there a thousand other breeds will do as well or better, and have a 0% chance of ripping off your four-year-old’s arm. Don’t bullshit me. You want the wicked reputation. You want the look of fear on your friends’ and other pedestrians’ faces. You want the smug knowledge that your dog could kill anybody else’s dog, and probably most owners. You think being the man with the baddest dog means you have the biggest balls.

                • Ghost says:

                  Drive carefully if you go to Florida folks. There’s pit-bulls everywhere. They outnumber the birds in the air. Running across the highways, hiding in the woods, on the beaches. Rabbi Com says it’s so.

                  shalom alechaim brothers!

                • Contaminated NEET says:

                  I’m sorry, Ghost, I thought you were the pro-pit guy. I meant that for Adam, not you.

                • The Cominator says:

                  Jim clearly this guy has earned moderation.

                • Ghost says:



                • Ghost says:

                  I’m anti-pit. Shepherds, doberman, labs ok with.

                  I did lived in Florida and didn’t see any pits. Com butted in and turned this conversation south.

                  When I lived there, I had one regular truck, a fishing boat, and a dear rifle. That’s what I’m saying. If Com doesn’t want to believe that, who cares.

                  Don’t respond to me Com. Just ignore me.

                • The Cominator says:

                  You claimed that pitbulls were unknown or virtually unknown to you living in Florida, me and Adam note they are VERY popular in Florida (for better or worse) the most popular breed of dog here by far. I dont think you lived in Florida…

                • Ghost says:

                  The Com cries out in pain as he strikes you.

                • Kunning Drueger says:

                  Pitbull popularity is a very recent thing. What’s more, Florida is a relatively large state with a massive population, making it entirely conceivable that one could live there, say, in a community with an HOA, and never see a single pitbull, while someone else within a half hour’s drive could see three before noon. Honestly, it’s a very shallow topic and everything that needs to be said about it has been said twice (when we discussed this last year).

                  Ghost, you are clearly trying to pick a fight. Do you want to talk about something? Something gotcha down sport?

                • Ghost says:


                  It’s all good bro. Chillaxed to the max.


                • The Cominator says:

                  Ghost lost the fight already. He didn’t claim he lived in an HOA. He did make a remark about trailer parks but not being from Florida he seems unaware that other than a few very rich gated towns like Wellington there isn’t much zoning in Florida and there isn’t all that much social separation between rich and poor here…

                • Ghost says:

                  Because Com is the arbiter of truth. Com decides who wins arguments, if you lived where you lived, owned what you owned. Com is able to tell this by text on the internet.

                  Despite all these powers, Com is unable to get a woman without laying down mad shekels. And he still can’t fish or skin a deer.

                • jim says:

                  Because, in the message I deleted, you rewrote history. I don’t like that.

                • The Cominator says:

                  1. Never claimed to be an outdoorsman but given that you lied about living in Florida nothing else you say is believable…

                  2. Jim is going to agree with my assessment that you aren’t being truthful.

                  3. No a long time ago I wrote a very long post about how to bang strippers for very minimal shekels. Anyone can do it for mad shekels…

                • Ghost says:

                  I warned about covid being fake under a different name. I also wrote I visited 3 hospitals that were empty. I was blocked after that.

                  Com, you cannot prove I didn’t live in Florida. I say I did. I fished for speckled trout in winter and bass in summer. I worked at Tyndall in the panhandle. I hunted white tail deer at Tyndall and played golf there too.

                  You guys are a bunch of pussies. Anytime you don’t like what someone writes, you block them like a bitch. Fuck you!

                • jim says:

                  You were not blocked for that. You were blocked for shill like behavior. Which continues, though these are not standard shill memes, don’t look like any of the standard shilling operations. Perhaps just your style.

                • The Cominator says:

                  Lol you’re attacking me for the wrong thing… my reputation here is mostly based on being the earliest hard-core covid denier…

                • Ghost says:

                  I wrote covid was fake and was blocked for it.

                  More Florida info: The cruse street on PC Beach was called Miracle Strip or redneck riviera as the locals would say. You could buy a year pass at the two main clubs Spinnakers and La Vila for $5 if you were a local. That’s were the college chicks hung out on spring break who would be charged $10 for one day. There was a BBQ joint ran by negros right next to the paper mill that served the hottest food around.

                  How could I know this if I didn’t live there?

                • Red says:

                  >I wrote covid was fake and was blocked for it.

                  You’re so full of shit. I can’t decide if you’re the world’s gayest glownigger or the glowist faggot.

                  At this point your just wasting bandwidth with your lies.

                • Ghost says:


                  I did. Besides, you’re the one claiming pit-bull are cute and cuddly. Which everyone here knows as a lie. Faggot!

                • Ghost says:

                  Anyone here that thinks pit-bulls are cute, cuddly, and manageable is either a lier or stupid. You choose.

                  That dog can kill your child and maim you in the blink of an eye. Or your neighbor.

                  If you need one to play the big man, you’re a pathetic wigger!

                • Adam says:

                  > Shitbulls are vastly, vastly over-represented in fatal attacks on people, even relative to other attack/guard/fighting breeds

                  There is an average of 30 fatalities per year in the United States due to dogs. This is not some huge problem. And before pittbulls became popular it was all Rottweilers and German Shepherds. This is a retarded argument.

                • Red says:

                  You were not blocked for that. You were blocked for shill like behavior. Which continues, though these are not standard shill memes, don’t look like any of the standard shilling operations. Perhaps just your style.

                  He may just be a troll. Though I haven’t seen an actual troll since 2016 when they were replaced by shills and censorship.

                • Adam says:

                  > Anyone here that thinks pit-bulls are cute, cuddly, and manageable is either a lier or stupid. You choose.

                  That dog can kill your child and maim you in the blink of an eye. Or your neighbor.

                  Pittbulls are potentially lethal dogs and require the same level of care and attention that you would give any of many large potentially lethal dog breeds. I do not think they are inherently more dangerous than German Shepherds. I have not seen data that suggests that and have seen some that suggests German Shepherds are more dangerous.

                  Karen and Thug Life should not own dogs. The fact that so many own pittbulls, and attacks are so infrequent would suggest the hysteria is overblown and the breeds temperament is remarkably stable, despite being handled by ignorant fools and undisciplined women.

                  Look at the data. Dog bites, maulings and fatal attacks are not a significant problem in the United States.

                • jim says:

                  > Pittbulls are potentially lethal dogs and require the same level of care and attention that you would give any of many large potentially lethal dog breeds

                  No, they require considerably more care and attention. Guard dogs have the capability to kill also, but their nature is to guard and kill in defense of what is being guarded. A pitbull’s nature is just to kill and maim. Which does not stop it from being a loving and loyal member of the family, but does make it a hazard for everyone else’s family, and your own family if your family does not look like a pack with a strong alpha at the top.

                • Red says:

                  >You now call me troll because I don’t share your love for pit-bulls. That’s not an argument.

                  I called you a troll because you’re lying about my statements and Com’s. Com’s is the “COVID is fake and gay” ground zero poster. I stated that I think that all pitts and their owners should be euthanized.

                  Lying directly about what other posters have said and continue to say in order to spread confusion is typical troll behavior.

                • jim says:

                  Shills spread mud and trolls spread mud. Some trolls are unpaid and unsupervised. But I do not recall him taking a direct shill test for something we know shills cannot say. Maybe he is paid and supervised.

                • Ghost says:


                  You know what, this conversation is pointless just like when I warned you, Adam, not to get the shot.

                  But you just don’t fuckin’ listen. Like all you millennial soys.

                  Go ahead, do what you want. You do you.

                • Kunning Drueger says:

                  Ghost may be a very skilled, or rogue, ProShill, but I doubt it. Nor is he a troll, anymore than every single one of us is a troll. Ghost is trolling because he feels attacked. That’s why he was signaturing with Jew speak, and going after Com specifically (and Red, and Me; low hanging fruit). He needs a cool down period, just like each of us when we get triggered by some dumb shit we take too seriously.

                  Personally, I appreciate Ghost’s Silly Goose/Amerikaner style poasting. Most the time lel.

                • Contaminated NEET says:


                  >And before pittbulls became popular it was all Rottweilers and German Shepherds. This is a retarded argument.

                  >pit bulls were responsible for 72% of fatal dog attacks involving humans in 2018 in the US.
                  >pit bull accounts for 7% of all dogs in the United States.
                  So, shitbulls are 1000% over-represented in human fatalities.

                  That same year, Rotts were 6% of fatalities, and German Shepards 3%. German shepherds are about 5% of the US dog population and Rottweilers are about 2%. So Rottweilers are 3 times more likely to kill than the average dog and German sheps are actually under-represented. They are in a totally different ballpark from pits. It’s not simply that pibbles got popular, so they’re more common; per capita they are much, much more dangerous.

                  >There is an average of 30 fatalities per year in the United States due to dogs. This is not some huge problem.
                  OK, this is actually a fair point. Still, if they’re astronomically over-represented in fatalities, you can be sure the same holds true for bites, serious injuries, and full-on maimings, all of which are a lot more common.

                • Adam says:

                  >That same year, Rotts were 6% of fatalities, and German Shepards 3%. German shepherds are about 5% of the US dog population and Rottweilers are about 2%. So Rottweilers are 3 times more likely to kill than the average dog and German sheps are actually under-represented.

                  These are recent statistics, what would be the most telling is statistics from say prior to 1990 or even 1980. It is hard to find good data on the subject though and lots of data is spotty and contradictory.

                  The solution to the Pitbull problem is not to get rid of the breed, it is to decriminalize dog fighting. The breed was developed for gameness meaning the dogs would fight to determine temperament. These dogs were handled before during and after the fight by their handlers without muzzles. They are not wolverines or badgers. The dogs with the most game had the most stable temperament in the fight, while being able to be handled by the owners. Those dogs were bred. The dogs that were unstable or not as courageous, or would not respond to their owners were either put down or not bread. These were not fights to the death and often dogs would only be fought one time to determine if they were game. The breed itself was the purpose of the fight, the fight was not the purpose of the breed.

                  Getting rid of pittbulls is a Karen move so that we can all stay safe in our new normal. Pittbulls make for excellent pets, they are very very fun, and they bring their owners and families enormous amounts of joy. The world is a better place with them even if a little more dangerous.

                  Honestly it is surprising how many on here want to Nerf this breed.

                • ten says:

                  Contaminated NEET:

                  >pit bulls were responsible for 72% of fatal dog attacks involving humans in 2018 in the US.
                  >pit bull accounts for 7% of all dogs in the United States.
                  So, shitbulls are 1000% over-represented in human fatalities.

                  That’s some shady ass statistics; not the data, but its presentation.

                  If shitbulls are 7% and commit 72% of the crimes, the so called “face eating quotient” of shitbulls is 72/7, roughly 10, your 1000%.
                  It must however be compared to the FEQ of grandmas labradoodle and stacys chihuahua, 28/93, roughly 0.3, to get to the overrepresentation.

                  (72/7)/(28/93) ~=34.

                  34000% overrepresentation.

                • Contaminated NEET says:


                  Holy shit, you are right; that makes sense. Shitbulls are way worse than I thought. And I thought they were worthless canine refuse that should be rapidly and humanely removed from the planet.

              • Ghost says:

                And I still wouldn’t own a pit. They crap all over creation then track it into your house. Will bite your neighbor and get you sued or kill their kids. Don’t need a dog to protect me. I can do that myself!

                • zero says:

                  Any old dog is the best home burglar alarm money can buy, I like to sleep. dogs are useful and take the bullets when someone comes through the door. thankfully never had a dog hurt but I don’t live around nogs. did get woken up by my dog because a tramp was sneaking around the property.

              • Oog en Hand says:

                “Viscous dog attacks are overwhelmingly due to female owner”

                The bitches know…

              • Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

                They don’t call it white savior complex for nuttin’.

              • zero says:

                Ill have to look into the stats on owner precence but that makes a lot of sense

              • Ghost says:


                You now call me troll because I don’t share your love for pit-bulls. That’s not an argument.

                Why don’t you lay out why I should like pit-bulls? Give me the pros and cons. Tell me how many pit-bulls you own and for how long.

                That’s if you’re not full of shit, which you are.

          • Your Uncle Bob says:

            The problem with pit bulls is their bite-latch-shake-kill instinct is unlike most other dogs. They don’t let go. So a bite from a pit and a bite from almost anything else aren’t the same thing at all. It’s why pit bull attacks cause more serious injuries and fatalities on humans than all other breeds combined. They’re the 13/50 of canines, truly the “nigger of dogs” as already stated.

            Then tattooed coalburning single moms and retarded males say “oh, but mine’s a sweetheart” – well, nobody said it wasn’t. Until it isn’t. It just takes getting set off once, and you’re looking at a savaged toddler or elderly.

            Then, if you look up the news reports, after every single attack the coalburners and retards still make excuses, still defend their animal, still defend themselves. “Who could have known?” Everyone, all the rest of us knew, and tried to tell you.

            Ideal solution: euthanize an animal for attacking an innocent human, put down the owner at the same. Clear things right up, and anyone left owning a pit bull would be the man Adam thinks he is.

            Pre-coup solution, phase out the breed. Everything gets snipped, no new puppies, start putting down younger animals after a few years.

            • Adam says:

              The breed is already being phased out. Pittbulls are being breed with English bulldogs and other bully breeds to produce mini pittbulls with less terrier temperament. They are called pocket pittbulls and I’ve also seen them called other things.

              • Your Uncle Bob says:

                You have educated me. I did not know this.

                >making pits smaller

                But… if they weren’t the niggers of dogs I’d feel sorry for them. How’s their breathing? I’d assume squashed nose still, but is the snout coming back somehow? If they do come out temperamentally sound I’d feel sorry for them. If they’re only less lethal due to smaller size then screw em.

                • Adam says:

                  It looks to me as if kennels are doing their own thing as far as breeding what to what, some look like they would have breathing problems and obviously drool a lot, others look like really small pittbulls except kind of fat. I assume they are trying to breed out the terrier temperament as that is the prey drive in pittbulls.

                  I don’t really get the point other than looks, if you want a mini pittbull, the miniature and standard bull terrier already exist but some people think they look ugly.

      • Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

        Everything you say about pits here more properly applies to breeds of guard dog like rottweilers. A guard dog is something that is protective and knows who the master is.

        Pitbulls are not guard dogs. One is discriminate, and the other is indiscriminate. What a pitbull is is right there in the name; something that fights to the death in a pit, and is kept on a muzzle in between fighting to the death in a pit. It has no use otherwise.

        • jim says:

          > Everything you say about pits here more properly applies to breeds of guard dog like rottweilers

          Rotweilers were originally bred to guard and protect, pit bulls to kill and maim. They will refrain from killing and maiming members of their own pack if they perceive their rank as low. A rotweiller will refrain from killing and maiming if it does not perceive you as an aggressor against its pack’s property rights.

          • zero says:

            Pits were originally bred to hunt european aurochs, then to pin down wild cattle in brititsh butcher pens, then they started toward blood sport, I have known southern guys who were kids in the 30s and 40s who used them as a family gaurd dog against strays and used a bite breaking stick get the dogs off, problem with stray menacing children was solved, didnt say anything about them killing randomly but I think people used to have less tolerance for that in the family dog.

        • Adam says:

          When pittbulls where bread for fighting by whites they were never kept with a muzzle, and all fighting dogs were family companions as well. These dogs were expensive, the bloodlines were protected and the breeding deliberate. Richard Stratton wrote some excellent books on the subject of game bred pitts as companions, and much of it suggests that the breed began to deteriorate quickly once dog fighting was criminalized. Desirable temperament in a fight goes hand in hand with desirable temperament as companion. Likewise for undesirable and unpredictable temperament. Once criminalized the breed could no longer be judged for anything other than superficial qualities. Gay liberal propaganda ruined the breed, turning it into the very thing that gay liberals feared.

        • zero says:

          that’s not why they are called pits they are hunting dogs then abattoir dogs, the modern pit is fucked up because of niggers breeding blood from the Caribbean fighting dogs into American lines on mass and dumb fuck white’s not having the brains god gave a pigeon, a little bit of true dog fighting blood destabilizes the aggression control of the dog and they are bred to kill high pitched noise makers. because of all of this you can hardly tell a true American pitbull with one that has dog fighting blood in it. and american pitbulls were kept for a very different type of dogfighting traditionally then what goes on now, the old dogs would get a bite and hold it once the other dog was subdued. if people lock up the dog book and only breed from dogs owned by people who are not delusional and actually pay attention to temperament, the bad blood that ends in a toddler with no face can be kept out but I don’t trust my fellow Americans to keep a non violent breed standard. you can find the actual genetics that have fucked them up and they come from the Caribbean and Brazil no one tests pits as far as I know for the genes tho because some of the them are the same low impulse violence gene in niggers. I don’t know how to be sure about the bloodline and temperament with a pit to the point I’d trust one to live with a child, it’s to hard for me to tell the good from the bad but I don’t have much hands on experience with the breed as it’s not real popular here but id trust a hunting line much more then whatever garbage genetics the pleb fancier scene is churning out. I am aware that there were true dog fighting lines In the US for centuries but the average population of pits became popular in the south when it became uncouth to shoot your neighbors dog in the street for menacing a child, the pits from the 30s were not bred to kill and the negro dog fighting scene has been pouring the bloodsport genetics into the general population. There are a few genes that come directly from Brazil with the records to show the bloodlines entering the American fighting dog scene. it’s a pain in the ass because we need good hog dogs and my family just doesn’t have enough knowledge to commit to it yet but if anyone has tips on any specific tells of bad temperament I’d appreciate it. I know there’s gotta be a way especially with how phenotype and temperament are linked genetically but I got nothing for the specific breed to work with.

          • Kunning Druegger says:

            Cattle dogs, Gran Marino, “homestead” dogs, Boerbels, are all better options. When you say “hog dogs,” do you mean hunting feral pigs? If so, you’re going to have a high attrition rate as pig beats dog one on one, so you have to stack the deck. You should breed up a pack of dogs, that’s the method I see them use in my area, but it’s is super annoying because they are permanently outside, get fed twice in 24 hours, and their baying lights up the whole area. Pretty sure you have to drown the excess puppies to because a hunting dog is a liability when you aren’t rich.

            I’ve read these accounts in a number of places of the pitbull being the “nanny dog,” but I just don’t buy it. Every dog can be doting, or violent, or faithful, or protective. Singling out pits is so similar to the way negros get idolized, I think it is just negrolatry for canids.

            • zero says:

              I think there is some historical evidence of it being a good nanny dog but I don’t think it’s possible to say what’s available in America is anything close to what gentile family’s in England and America used to own. the good hunting pits I’ve had the pleasure of being around are specifically bred never to get cut by a pig. but they aren’t the same stocky mutated dog as the usual pet. I agree with they baying problem, unfortunately strikes of a lot of dogs that are good at hunting like beagles. I don’t like kennels although I’m not gonna nock em. I don’t need a pack of more then 3 or 4 for what we’re working with. and my family is planning on splitting them up, I just don’t trust pits in general even the well bred ones around kids because I’ve seen to many people fall for that. I do think pits had a good purpose once as catch dogs for holding down cattle and pigs but the dog fighting and fascination with weird morphology is a nasty influence. i got more pressing concerns with bird dogs. it would be cool if we still had the dogs germanics used for hunting wild cattle but unfortunately we got the Pitts. lot of potential, lot of schizophrenic violence. most of the dog breeds I’ve looked into just don’t have enough to pin a big hog if it wants to run. easy to get pound pits that will crump hogs but the cost of a toddler mauling just ain’t worth it for me.

              • Kunning Druegger says:

                If I were going to breed war dogs, here’s the founding stocks I’d try to blend:







                Each has their strengths and weaknesses, and each is quite useful and beautiful on their own. I don’t know how official/professional dog breeders operate, but my minimal contact with their like left me with an impression of dull, unimaginative, hidebound, and knowledgeable. They know a few things very well and seem to treasure what they love, but absolutely refuse to be exploratory or inventive. That’s probably the effect of Dog Shows and trends in working dogs.

                • zero says:

                  I agree with most breeders even hunting lines are a little boring, the fanciers are just monsters toward dogs. there are a handful of good ones that make great hunting dogs and the older police gsd guys are wicked good.

                • zero says:

                  I dont know what the hell happened here but I hope I havent ticked anyone off that much, Ive been working in rural Florida for a while now and dont know anyone personnally that has Pits, I think its a little crazy how people get working or hunting dogs with no experience training them alongside and experienced owner before getting there own, I made that mistake with my first birddog and it took me untill the second to realize most dog training advice can be a bit useless if your dog or breed doesnt match. Im gonna have to look into those Kunning, it be awsome to find a catch dog that doesnt have the kiddie killer problem. My brother and I joke that they should hunt runaway prisoners with Cane Corsos and if any liberals got a problem with the results their just dog racists lol.

                • The Cominator says:

                  Its possible they are more rare on actual farms (they are not really herding or farm guard dogs) but they are popular where I am…

                • zero says:

                  there is one in my neighborhood I see, but that doesn’t teach you any thing about a dog except that it’s a stumpy one and looks dumb, also owned by a white midleage coalburner lol, can confirm pickup trucks with lifts are at healthy population levels in my neck of the woods. see a lot of gps collared hounds which is cool, they even wait for traffic.

      • Aidan says:

        “Pit Bull” is a bit of an anticoncept. The breed “American Bully”, which was bred from a bulldog by whites into a companion dog, is lumped together with the bulldogs bred by niggers in rusty iron sheds for illegal dogfighting. Oftentimes, someone looking for a companion dog will buy one for 200 bucks off a nigger they find on craigslist instead of shelling out thousands at a breeder. Then the dog bred for savage darkie dogfighting rips a child’s face off.

        • The Cominator says:

          I think this is mostly the problem.

          The vast majority of Pit Bulls (given the breed’s popularity) are owned without incident but the problem is its not one breed and within the breed of breeds considered pit bulls are dogs which are

          1) Prone to sudden unpredictable hyperaggression

          2) That once locked on with a grip often will not let go until they are satisfied whatever they are attacking is dead.

          • Kunning Druegger says:

            Not even death sates the nigger dog. Plenty of footage of pitbulls dragging around corpses, limbs, etc.

            This is the strangest simile to the 13/50 memeplex and I am flabbergasted at who is on the “not all pitbulls” side TBQHflamalamadingdong.

            • The Cominator says:

              If you truly get one of the nigger dogs, Aidan is right that the breed is not unitary as the vast majority of pit bulls are owned without incident and they are actually “cute and cuddly” in the vast majority of circumstances when they aren’t in the 13/52 breed subbreed chimpout.

  11. Red says:

    Off topic, update on the war:

    Sounds like the Russians are taking working very hard to get up to par with the US in Sat intelligence.

    (hat tip Trevor Goodchild).

    • Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

      >And Russia has created a Defense Innovation Support Center at the level of the State Duma to help facilitate new technologies to Russian troops. This is partly in response to all the complaints about how inefficient and bureaucratic the Russian military system has been in the first year of the SMO in terms of allowing Russian troops to procure the latest needed items like drones etc.

      >There has been much talk about how civilian crowd-funded efforts had to get drones to Russian troops because the byzantine bureaucratic process of the Russian military simply held everything up and didn’t allow for the timely ‘authorizations’ and various red-tape / paperwork to smoothly conduct these procurements.

      The multiplication of ‘oversight’, ‘double-checking’, and or ‘regulatory’ entities in a process is a perennial problem of all organizations beyond trivial size.

      In reality, all that is ever actually needed is to just give your procurement budget over to the commanders, let them go shopping, and you will have the finest equipped military you can possibly get.

      If a functionary knows better than the general what things he needs to fight the war, then make him the general. Either way, one of them is extraneous.

    • Starman says:


      If the Russians are really working hard on space dominance, they should be doing what China is doing… copying SpaceX.

      They aren’t doing it.

      • Dharmicreality says:

        India launched 36 satellites into space for OneWeb recently.

        OneWeb is mentioned as a UK based company but seems majority owned by Indian telecom giant Bharti.

        • someDude says:

          Seeing the shit Adani is having to take from his own countrymen, I despair for an Indian Musk. They’ll throttle him in the cradle.

          • jim says:

            Adani is not radically advancing technology – he is bringing existing technology to India. Which is not all that easy, but it is probably considerably easier than creating new technologies.

            • someDude says:

              The point I was trying to make is that opposition to both these gentlemen is based on envy. If there was an Indian Musk, that would amplify the envy 10x

      • Kunning Druegger says:

        I think the RF has rightfully figured out they cannot use the Musk method while countering GAE soft power internally and GAE hard power externally while building a coalition of nations for multipolarity. If SpaceX is #1 in space (and they undeniably are) the RF is #2 with the PRC and the US tied at #3. You can dance around the #2-4 any way you like, it all comes to one obvious conclusion: no one can out-lift SpaceX, not at this time. Musk has tied himself to CONUS in terms of logistics, and the US can act like that means he is theirs, but there’s no cohesive elite in the US, so he is a bargaining chip, pawn, and powerbroker depending on topic and circumstance. With all the plates the US is spinning (and dropping) and all the plates the RF is spinning, and the pretty obvious indication that the PRC is going to worry about the Middle Kingdom first and not worry overmuch about what language they will need to butcher to coordinate overseas, “space” as a domain, as a battlefield, as a market is very reminiscent to the Americas (as colonial projects) in the 1600-1800s.

        So, as this midwit sees it, there are 2 real strategies: zerg rush and/or area denial. Zerg rush is appealing on paper because if you get to certain point of coverage, you just keep everyone else Terra-bound. But to truly do this, to have Space Supremacy, you need orbital platforms with rods-from-god, lasers, sat-drone production & maintenance. I don’t think Musk has these resources, nor does the US have the solidarity to pull of another space race. To me, the cheapest, “easiest” solution is Area Denial, which means being able to comfortable splash satellites and deploy “chaff” or “de-orbiting” defenses (like giant frag grenades that pepper cube sats and/or create non-kinetic minefields). This is short term thinking and would require a massive, potentially impossible, clean up effort afterwards. But choices get made in desperate times and not before, usually, so…

        I think orbital platforms are the elementary next step for dominating Terra, but I don’t think any single country has the juice or infrastructure to pull it off.

        • Starman says:

          @ Kunning Druegger

          A cheap 7m Starlink with a rack of cheap tungsten rods can destroy an aircraft carrier battle group.

          • Kunning Drueger says:

            >7m Starlink
            wat means

            Regardless, I take your point, space warfare is going to completely destabilize the status quo in terms of order of battle, but just like the Ukraine War has put paid to Air Supremacy as Trump Card memeplex, so too will the First China Sea War/First Battle of Taiwan put paid to Carrier Groups, and that’s without Starlink: Goodnight Moon Edition.

            Here’s a question for you: how long will Musk/SpaceX retain their Payload To Orbit gap? Does he have a short window of time to become King of Terra, or will it be generations before anyone catches up?

            • jim says:

              > Here’s a question for you: how long will Musk/SpaceX retain their Payload To Orbit gap? Does he have a short window of time to become King of Terra, or will it be generations before anyone catches up?

              Relativity space is trying to do one better in fast prototyping, and hopes to produce a re-usable rocket.

              Russia and China are trying to copy his stuff. But they do not have a Musk. Does Relativity Space have a Musk? We shall see.

              The idea of reusable rockets and full-flow staged-combustion-cycle rocket engines has been out there for a very long time. Reusable rockets appeared on the cover of old pulp magazines, and the Nazi scientists were thinking about full-flow staged-combustion-cycle rocket engines as the war was ending. And now that Musk is actually doing them, everyone wants to do them. Can they? They have wanted to do them for a very long time.

              • Kunning Drueger says:

                It’s more than just methods and practice though, isn’t it? Being a Great Man of History means that he attracts the best & brightest. So an Eron Musk or a Elon Errollovich has to be a full spectrum Great Man, if they want to emulate the model. I think there are other ways to do it, brute forcing the method. Instead of a Great Man, just wave assault with as many Good Men as you can. This ties back to actual Great Man Dynamics, as opposed to Great Man Theory. Musk’s occidental competitors fail on two counts: they aren’t Great Men, and they cannot attract/marshall enough Good Men because the societies from whence they emerge lack both the spawning pool of the former and the production of the latter. I posit that China is in the same predicament, as their system does not create Great Men, and their Good Men lack the ingenuity, singularity, and ego required. They are a race of copycats, which is very powerful for some things, but not This Thing. Russia… well, Russia is a black box to me. I think the have both Great and Good Men. But the Greats are limited by brutal and excessive competition, and the Goods are fighting and dying in Donbas. But my perspective is constrained. They are ramping up a level of production similar to the US in the 1940s. Much power and competence was cultivated in America under the FDR regime, almost wholly unintentionally, granted, but there was born the vacuum tube→microprocessor leap, and the children of the atom, and the refinement of the subatomic school. Who can say what dark magics are being borne on the factory floors of the Russian Federation as they fight their third Great War.

                Drunken Thought of the Night: maybe you, Jim, should look into getting your thoughts (IEW specifically, but also Zk snarks ((sp?))) into Russia in a more concerted way? Your profundity may be lost on the Occident.

                Whatever the case, cheers to the rebirth of the space race. We may confound the niggers yet, eh wot

                • Red says:

                  I posit that China is in the same predicament, as their system does not create Great Men, and their Good Men lack the ingenuity, singularity, and ego required. They are a race of copycats, which is very powerful for some things, but not This Thing.

                  Thinking of the Chinese as copycats is very stupid. The US copied and stole Great Britain’s tech until we started producing better shit than they had around 1900. First you copy, then you steal, then when you have enough high quality workers built from up the networking effect then you create new better tech.

                  Chinese Rockets continue to improve. They have their own space station solo now. Don’t doubt their ability. Remember we lucked the fuck into Musk. He’s not an American. He’s from fucking South Africa. Our previous rocket guy was a German.

                • Kunning Drueger says:

                  Excellent points. I was operating off of assumptions established on this blog regarding oriental capacities for replication v. iteration v. innovation, under a framework of a general slide back into Maoist thought. If you look at the era in which the US copied then surpassed the UK, London was beginning its downward trajectory after the “Stuart Peak,” which was gradual enough to seem like a plateau, while concurrently the US was about to hit a “hockey stick” incline. While I would personally prefer China to be on the cusp of a rediscovery on Confucian forms and therefore a good enough parallel to a rising US, I don’t think that’s the case.

                  Look at where Von Braun and Musk grew up, the cultural substrate from which they came; both where nations on the rise, in relative terms definitely but absolute terms arguably. Both had to flee from catastrophic and sudden collapses to a nation ready, willing, and able to meet their needs and demands. Musk is American stock that transplanted to South Africa, but he white so I don’t know how much that matters. Again, I have no problem being wrong on this, but I don’t think the “Han” are going to churn out a Musk or a Von Braun, even though they have a “the Space Program,” by which I mean the technology and expertise that supports luminaries from underneath. China is an army with no general, in a sense, and further still they are slipping back into a religio-culture that is not amenable to Great Man formulation.

                • Mayflower Sperg says:

                  Thinking of the Chinese as copycats is very stupid.

                  The Chinese are copycats until they prove they aren’t by developing a mass-produceable fail-safe liquid-fuel thorium reactor. The US built a working prototype in the 1960s; only regulatory decisions kept it from becoming a finished product.

        • Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

          Orbital clutter can be issues but only temporarily. Even very good orbits still require occasional input energy to maintain course. It all either falls into the atmosphere or flies off into space eventually.

          • Kunning Druegger says:

            How much can be done from the L Points? L1 and L2 seem obvious for orbital platrforms, but L3 could be a really tricky one to deal with, leaving “stellar minefields” or other nasty surprises. Long latency for coms, but could you get precision targeting that far out?

            • Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

              Targeting isn’t as much of an issue when the expert systems are onboard. Then it’s just a question of command, rather than data stream.

              Which technically means some more mass to lift until you get your bootstrapping power/fabrication infrastructure up and running on the moon and asteroid belt, but if you’re going that far anyways, the extra cost is not much of an object.

              Something else to consider; the usefulness of a method as a form of propulsion is often in a direct ratio with its usefulness as a weapon. HK sats maneuvering to a target and lasing them with their ion engines while decelerating is a mood.

          • Cloudswrest says:

            Anything metallic or conductive will suffer slight drag via interaction with the Earth’s magnetic field. Anything in low earth orbit suffers residual atmospheric drag. Very light and/or low density objects actually experience measurable drag due to sunlight.

      • Red says:


        The Russian’s don’t have a Elon Musk so they’re not even trying. They’re just competing with existing American launch tech. China on the other hand is trying.

        The US government still hasn’t given Starship clearance to launch. They may still strangle their last chance at space dominance in the cradle.

        • Pax Imperialis says:

          Almost like what Musk did was hard, very hard. I don’t get why people take these things for granted. If it were easy everyone would be doing it.

          • Kunning Drueger says:

            This observable fact is lost on nearly everyone. I’ve tried it with a wide range of ideologies and personalities in a number of different media, and *everyone* seems to believe that it’s luck, capitalist machinations, central state favor, excess capital, literally anything except the possibility that Musk is a Great Man of History. Particularly odd is that even Musk fanboys balk at the singularity of the achievements. Labor Theory of Value is the only pernicious memeplex that comes close to the WQ as a Lone Causal Factor.

            • Red says:

              Labor Theory of Value is the only pernicious memeplex that comes close to the WQ as a Lone Causal Factor.

              That’s an astute observation.

              • Wulfgar Thundercock III says:

                I see it over and over on Gab. There are a lot of our guys on there that just cannot shake the idea that hard work produces value, and that anyone can be a rocket scientist. If anyone could be Elon Musk, then I would already be in Russia helping create CosmoSlav and the US would have a more palatable face for SpaceX.

            • Hesiod says:

              Musk on Twitter displays a humor and humility akin to Trump (Trump is vain, not arrogant). How much of that is genuine versus PR remains to be seen. For now, though, it’s satisfying to see such as Musk adventuring. Oh, how the dream of space exploration has floundered and dwindled since I played at being an astronaut an eon ago. Those who seek to restrict us to Earth would also have us forever in Hell.

            • alf says:

              Had a very similar argument, brought up that Jeff Bezos has also tried his hand at space travel with very little success. Response: ‘Jeff Bezos has a spaceflight company?’

              • notglowing says:

                The world is indeed littered with dead or dying private space faring companies.
                Bezos isn’t the first nor the least competent to attempt it.

                But it’s all luck or regulatory favour.

          • Jehu says:

            It’s funny. If nobody else seems to be able to do it, it should be manifestly obvious that it is very very hard.

          • someDude says:

            It’s not that they take Musk for granted. They are just envious of him and want to pull him down. Easier to be envious of someone closer than someone far away.

            In India, they take Adani for granted even though he is critical to the infrastructure and he has tied his fortunes to India’s economic growth via infrastructure development.

            Envy, a very deadly sin

            • notglowing says:

              > It’s not that they take Musk for granted

              They do though. That is the universal response. Of course the *reason* why they believe that is envy for the most part.

              It is as many here have said; and once the importance of SpaceX was pointed out to me, I realized how much most people discount Musk everywhere. And it really does apply to his fans as well.
              They don’t understand the part that *actually* matters. People simply take it for granted. At best they think he is a “cool billionaire” who is virtuous simply because he allocates his money to more virtuous causes than most. Because that’s all there is to capitalism, of course.
              I’ve heard some say he was clearly always an idiot in response to some article making fun of whatever he last posted on twitter.
              It’s certainly true that the public is always very quick to devalue someone one day, who they were worshipping a short time ago.

              However, many will say things like, the reason why Amazon won over the competition is that they dodged taxes more effectively. And that’s all there is to it. Amazon exposed. Have they *ever* used one of their competitors?

              I simply cannot accept that this is the most common way of thinking. It’s inconceivable to me; but also unfalsifiable. You can always make up rationalizations as to why someone was successful at something without admitting they are capable at anything.

        • Starman says:


          ”The US government still hasn’t given Starship clearance to launch. They may still strangle their last chance at space dominance in the cradle.”

          China is already building 10.6 meter diameter barrel sections for its version of Starship, Long March 9. 150mT to low Earth orbit with a reusable first stage and an expendable upper stage. Which means a fully reusable version with a reusable upper stage can put 50-70 mT to LEO.

          Good enough for hundreds of thousands of cheap aircraft carrier killing rods-from-god.

  12. Oog en Hand says:

    A: According to Orthodox Christianity, Evangelicals should be drawn and quartered.
    B: No, Orthodox Christianity is peaceful and tolerant.
    A: But the Homilies of St. Balaam clearly teach…
    B: No, they don’t. You are using a bad translation. You do not know Old Church Slavonic.

    • The Cominator says:

      The Orthodox Church doesn’t have a history of killing Protestants though (despite them being rare in traditionally Orthodox lands) lower level discrimination yes but not murder. Its the Catholic Church which has historically murdered Protestants.

      • Hesiod says:

        During Current Year, Christian brethren should not sow discord between themselves. I fly the Protestant flag because that’s my heritage, but the entirety of Christendom should be treasured and polished for display. Mere Christianity is the Way. Let us reinstate the patriarchs of Rome *and* Constantinople.

        • The Cominator says:

          The Catholic Church is just too consistent a political enemy for me to ever ease up on them. Fauci is a Jesuit, the Covid scam was done by the Jesuits. If we come to power the final destruction of the Catholic Church should be the consequence of this.

          Its not only Covid but mass immigration used to be opposed even by the far left (to the extent 1965 had to be sold as a minor almost inconsequential reform) because everyone knew how bad it was… and the Cathedral didn’t dare embrace it openly. John Paul II and the Catholic Church was the driving force behind changing that not Harvard.

          • Hesiod says:

            I did say the patriarch of Rome needs to be reinstated along with his brother across the pond. Sometimes a lot of burning is needed to clean things up. Let’s be extra careful around the books and artwork.

            • The Cominator says:

              Not going to burn books or art (I’m very very curious what is kept secret in the Vatican archives) just demon priests…

          • Oog en Hand says:

            According to John Paul II, migration control was a Sin against Life, on the same level as abortion. Lawrence Auster told that about a decade ago.

            If a group of Traditional Catholics (Latin Mass e.a.) would start a militia to seek out and hunt down Othalists (followers of Varg Vikernes), what would happen to Wiccas?

            • Hesiod says:

              As long as the Wiccans mind which spells to memorize and have all proper material components on hand, they might be able to hold their own. However, there are enough TradCaths out there to expect some high-level clerics and paladins in their ranks. So, best to avoid any animating undead or demon summoning. Fireball, lightning bolt, and even magic-missile should be the go-to spells.

          • Kunning Drueger says:

            That’s too far. The Vatican has to go, and the whole of church leadership should be interdicted. 100% agree we need every scrap of paper, every bit on every hard drive, to be analyzed by our tech-priests. After a 3rd inquisition, Mother Church must be allowed to renew itself. I’m not partial to Catholics, but my personal sentiments are besides the point. Strategically, it makes no sense to turn good men into enemies.

            • The Cominator says:

              The Catholic Churches all need to be rolled into the Orthodox church… the Papacy is to never exist again…

  13. pinochet's ghost says:

    I used to enjoy the twitter poster “josiahreborn777” until Musk banned him.

    Anyone know where to find?

    • Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

      Twitter incorporated is full of glowniggers with golden handcuffs. ‘Moderation’ is still being done by sovereign HR departments that answer to noone in the merely official corporate hierarchy.

  14. ray says:

    ‘One last factor for consideration, is that she has 2 kids from a precious marriage.’

    So . . . a female of another race, with two kids of another male.

    You should run. You do not sound very old, nor very experienced in either human nature or the ways of this world.

    • SJ says:

      I’ve seen and experienced single mothers and they behave like epiphany phase women. They ‘know their worth’ and they will behave more like a man. They will ask the man out, they will move the sex forward, they will initiate sex, and they will basically be in charge. Also minimal shit tests. At first.

      It’s a very precarious situation as after a few years their feminine nature starts to come out. Meanwhile the man can’t pass shit tests, doesn’t lead or know how to lead, and doesn’t initiate and dominate sexually. The woman then ups her shit tests until she goes nuclear. They cheat a lot as well because of the above and usually think that something is wrong with them because they don’t want to have sex when their husband asks. After a year or two in a dead bedroom they are mentally having sex with every man they see and are super easy to same day lay.

      I would bail now and limit the financial damage myself.

      • jim says:

        If no kids on the horizon, no alternative but to bail. It is going to be mighty tough to make it work. If you are an impressive alpha to your wife, could work, but he does not sound like he is been a very impressive alpha so far, and it is hard to be an adequately impressive alpha without backing from your tribe.

        • falseconvert says:

          SJ, I don’t care about financial damage. I only care about my spirit and my legacy.

          The issue is, I don’t have the actual ability to successfully leave her in the first place. I tried three times before.

          The first time she said “Are you giving up on me?” and I couldn’t just say “Yes.”
          Third time she said “I still love you.” and again, I couldn’t do it.

          When no woman has ever been very affectionate to you before, it’s very hard to let go. I’m also quite bad at saying no to people in general.

          If I could leave her without suffering a major emotional and spiritual blow, then I probably would. But as it is, I am trapped.

          • alf says:

            If I could leave her without suffering a major emotional and spiritual blow, then I probably would. But as it is, I am trapped.

            It is never pleasant to amputate a hand. But it is much preferable in the eyes of God and GNON to do so, as opposed to letting it spread to the rest of your body.

            • falseconvert says:

              Hard to envision life without the “hand” of pure innocent love and affection

              Guess you’re right though

              But what do you base your life on after that? Just rational self-interest? I mean, how do you motivate yourself to get out of bed in the morning?

              “I divorced a woman that loved me very much and gave me near infinite affection. Now I live for rational self-interest and the future of the white race”?

              • alf says:

                But what do you base your life on after that? Just rational self-interest? I mean, how do you motivate yourself to get out of bed in the morning?

                From what I understand is that although you got into this relation with good intentions, you in reflection feel you were naive and did not understand the scope of what you were getting yourself into.

                Sin and naivity often go hand in hand. God punishes the sinful behavior that goes with naivity. That at least, is how I read your predicament.

                So now, when you are less naive and very understandably have cold feet, you are confronted by the consequences of your own sins.

                Should you choose to divorce her, you can motivate yourself by knowing that you had the courage to correct your mistakes, that you were willing to make a tough decision in the face of adversity.

                Acting in your best interest is an act that can bring you closer to God, and may well ultimately lead to you act in the best interests of others as well.

                • falseconvert says:

                  Basically, I would say I got into the relationship not necessarily with good intentions, but out of desperation. I was lonely (this was also covid time) and girls in my country weren’t very impressed with me on the whole. I chose the route of looking for an Asian woman online because I thought I’d have a better chance of getting someone.

                  The escalation to marriage was pushed and prompted by her, and then subsequently by her village. In hindsight agreeing to this after 1 month of meeting her was not very smart.

                  It was definitely partly naivete, a combination of naivete and denial.

                  Were I to try and end things a 4th time…would you have any advice on how to go about it?

                • Red says:

                  My Grandfather married a woman who had 4 kids with a man who abandoned her. She gave up her kids to adoption before my Grandfather would marry her. She never saw them again but had 2 new children with my Grandfather. It wasn’t the happiest marriage for her(I think she continued to pine for the man who left her), but my Grandfather was quite happy with his children.

                  This is the best way to do new family formation after a previous marriage with children. If she refuses consider divorcing and moving on.

              • jim says:

                You, and we, are focused on what you should do and what you want. What should she and the father of her children do?

                The willingness of the father of her children to allow her to return makes a huge difference. Why is she not returning.

                I was assuming you had picked up the leavings that had fallen off the bottom of some other man’s booty call list, but it seems that you are aiding and abetting a runaway, which is not the correct Christian thing to do, though that depends on why she is running away.

                Your self interest is best served by her staying with you, and her children staying with their father.

                The self interest of her and her children, best served by her and her children staying with their father, which is also the morally correct and virtuous behavior for her.

                Why is that not happening? What is stopping her? You have told us he will allow her back (which I would not)

                Are you mere a shit test for the father of her children?

                By giving her the opportunity to return, he is failing her shit test. That is why he seemed weak and non alpha to you. And probably to her. By not returning, she is acting self destructively, as women tend to do.

                • falseconvert says:

                  Well, she divorced this man 4 years before she met me. As a result of him cheating, although you might consider her leaving to just be a shit test, regardless of the official reason.

                  As I understand it, he would ask her to come back every 3-4 months, to which she would always say no. I don’t think he has continued this since she got me with me and she plastered my picture all over her social media (a weird behaviour now that I think about it, consistent with me being a shit test). Though, she probably wouldn’t tell me if she was actively considering his offer.

                  Worth noting that in the first year of our relationship, she would describe him as a ‘friend’, which annoyed me.

                  Why is she not going back? Her father is poor and lazy, doesn’t do much work, and cheated. Those are the official reasons. But perhaps you are saying those are not instinctually probable reasons. Me having more money doesn’t make instinctual sense if he is more alpha. So perhaps it’s because, as you say, he failed her nuclear-level shit test, of taking the kids and leaving on a motorbike.

                  To pass he would have had to come and physically seize her and make her return. For whatever reason his alpha level didn’t go that far, or he didn’t want her badly enough. So I guess she is currently alpha-widowed. I would have to become more alpha than him to remove the “alpha-widowedness”, which would mean I’d have to cheat on her even more than he did, and even worse than he did. He may be meanwhile thinking about how he can steal her back, though I don’t know if he has the desire at this point, now 6 years after the divorce.

                • jim says:

                  > I would have to become more alpha than him to remove the “alpha-widowedness”, which would mean I’d have to cheat on her even more than he did,

                  There are other ways of being alpha. Though cheating is highly effective.

                  Probably he failed her nuclear level shit test by begging her to return rather than tossing her over his shoulders and taking her back. In which cases, if she believes you are capable of tossing her over your shoulders and taking her back, you will probably do OK. Her existing children are still a huge problem however. And getting rid of them, possibly by returning them to dad, would be a huge pass also – though it might well be difficult to do that until she gives you a child. Once she gives you a child, there are going to be problems with her existing children that you can resolve in favor of your child by hauling them off somewhere.

                • falseconvert says:

                  She knows with certainty I would haul her over my shoulders and bring her back, without having to give it a second thought. Her ex was effective at cheating, but in terms of directing her behaviour and laying down the law of the land, he was not very competent. In fact, I don’t think he even tried very much. By contrast, stuff like laying down the law of the land comes very naturally to me, whereas cheating feels more like a moral failure.

                  This is also why I’m loathe to throw away the relationship, despite how unfavourable circumstances are. I’m like a teacher with a retarded student. I don’t want to give up on them, partly because of sympathy for their condition, but largely because I’m so confident in my teaching skills. When somebody says “You can’t teach a retarded student.” I hear “Nobody has worked out how to teach a retarded student yet. This is therefore the frontier of teaching.”

        • falseconvert says:

          I think I have been an impressive alpha to her Jim, or at least can be when I want to be. She is generally respectful and obedient with me, assuming I am being reasonable. If I ask her to stop doing something, and I ask in a reasonable tone of voice, she will stop. The question I’m more concerned with is, what is better for my spirit, for the size and strength of my heart, being the big alpha here, or bailing and finding someone else?

          What is more selfless, staying with her for the sake of her and her love, or leaving her for the sake of my legacy and the stronger love I might be able to give to someone else?

          There is nothing inspiring or brave about leaving someone just because you want white kids, for example. But leaving someone because you NEED to have white kids for the sake of some grand legacy or mission for humanity, would be a bit more inspiring. But it would also be unlikely. At the moment the most inspiring and realistic thing I can think of is staying with her for the sake of our love. Not ideal when I look a bit like a cuck from the outside, but it’s the best narrative I can think of.

          That could just be a failure of my imagination though, and perhaps I need to read more.

          • Adam says:

            Mate you are in a co-dependent relationship with your wife. You need her to need you and she needs you to need her. You have no way of making decisions, no moral compass other than what is best for your wife (and females in general). I am not sure how much red pill material is left on the internet but you should start there.

            • falseconvert says:

              This comment hit hard. Before I met my wife, I was hard-working, principled, had a sense of responsibility and duty, and was sociable with others. I didn’t have a girlfriend but at least I had some morals. After being with her for 2 years, I’m much more lazy, less sociable, and mostly only care about her and her kids.

              I would previously work for 10 hours and then practice piano for 1-2 hours at home. Now I do about 4 hours of online work per day and lounge around.

              The relationship is largely propped up by mutual validation and comfort-giving. We make a fool out of each other but I think it’s basically a cope for having given up on a lot of goals and standards.

              Even she has stopped meeting with friends, does less work.

              It’s basically a two-person cult of love and validation. Obviously love being important, but I shouldn’t have thrown 80% of my life standards out of the window for a cuddle and a kiss.

              I’ve already read a lot of red-pill stuff. Since being with her, I’ve learned a lot of stuff about how women work. I guess the issue is the co-dependency.

              Were I to break it off, do you have any practical suggestions for how to go about doing this? As I said in another comment we are living together in her mother’s house…

              • Guy says:

                You just slip out the back, Jack
                Make a new plan, Stan
                You don’t need to be coy, Roy
                Just get yourself free
                Hop on the bus, Gus
                You don’t need to discuss much
                Just drop off the key, Lee
                And get yourself free

              • Adam says:

                To some extent every man should attempt to conquer the world. Separate from your wife obviously and live somewhere else and start creating the world you want to live in. Study the word discipline for the first year, and the word sacrifice for the second. Extend your goals much further than your lifespan. Find a white girl and have kids until you have sons.

                Don’t worry about your wife if you live in the west she will have a line of beta bucks a mile long willing to obey her. She won’t want that, but that is her problem.

                • falseconvert says:

                  Okay, I take your point. It’s a reasonable game plan which has a lot to recommend it. And forgive me for going back and forth between different positions, but I must pose further questions.

                  What about the principle of “not giving up on something you have started”?

                  I know I started something stupid. But I still started it. Isn’t it “manly” to plough forward until you finally succeed? Isn’t the classic “gritty success story” about someone who started in poverty and then made themselves rich? Well, am I not in the “relationship” version of that?

                  Now obviously you can’t start with a woman with 2 kids of a different race and then turn her into a white virgin. But you can take a bad situation and make it into a good one.

                  Consider this:

                  -I take complete control, make her look nice, behave well, and follow my rules. She supports me in everything, cooks nice meals for me, takes care of the house.
                  -Her kid is obedient and well-behaved, respects and loves me, and is grateful for me to being the needed father figure in her life.
                  -We later have mixed race kids. Despite being mixed race, they are extremely intelligent, well-educated, good at sports, and socially skilled.
                  -I get a good job and play an active part inn many community projects.

                  Now if I achieve all that, which of course would be very hard, would I still be considered a “cuck” by everyone around me? Would I not be respected for making the best of what I had?

                  Would I not respect myself for making the best of what I had?

                  Of course, there would probably still be that nagging voice “you didn’t need to do this…you could have been happier…you settled when you didn’t need to”

                  That’s the issue I suppose. I would every so often see a white couple walk past me and start to regret everything. I don’t think, no matter how well I played this situation, that that nagging voice would ever go away. “You didn’t need to do this”

                  Anyway, sorry for taking up so much of your time. I really appreciate your help and advice. I think I’m scared to leave her, fundamentally. I need to build up the courage and resolve somehow, need to motivate myself somehow. That’s the task in front of me I think

                • Adam says:

                  You are suffering from a cognitive bias called “sunk cost fallacy”. You can read about it here-


                • Adam says:

                  In other words cut your losses. Once that bad investment is behind you, you will be free to invest in something more profitable.

                • The Cominator says:

                  I would not put TOO MUCH stock in internet advice do you have any trusted friends who have observed this…

                  I would sound them out.

                • Western Taliban says:

                  Yes, he shouldn’t put too much stock in internet advice, but he shouldn’t put too much stock in anyone else’s advice to begin with.

                  He keeps thinking and thinking and overthinking and overthinking based on this opinion, that other opinion, never listening to himself.


                  You said before you broke your own code, I don’t think you did. I don’t think you have at any time in the last few years listened to yourself by the manner in which you speak, and you are so confused with strange opinion and influence you’ve forgotten yourself. A man only feels regretful of the results when he didn’t follow his own heart, otherwise even death is good.

                  You knew what you wanted to do in an instant, but unfortunately the next instant your indoctrination, education, social influences and every other thing implanted in your head from the outside jumped into attention, bouncing off the real intention until something grotesque came out.

                  Do not think that I am giving you any advice, in truth I am only telling you to listen to your own, but the real one. If you knew it, you’d knew, if you doubt, you don’t.

                  Kill the mind, save the soul. Do not think, just choose, you know your choice, nothing new you will think will change anything, you’ve already thought and thought and thought, more thinking will not change a thing. Take action.

                • jim says:

                  Listen to your instincts. They know what to do. Our culture and social order is deluded and destructive, so listening to it will lead you astray. If it was sane, it would be helpful, but it is not.

                  Of course your instincts are apt to say “smash and kill”, and you need to keep a rein on those instincts. But the Old Testament says there is a place for them, and the New Testament does not entirely prohibit that, merely says you have to exercise appropriate restraint, one tit for two tats. Your instincts are also likely to be subject to excessively short term thinking, high time preference. It is necessary to be mindful of the longer term, to focus on longer term outcomes. Spend time imagining the longer term future to keep your instincts appropriately focused.

                • The Cominator says:

                  Some people’s instincts are better than others, also as I said I personally NEVER have the urge to kill after smashing… after rejection yes but never after smashing.

                • falseconvert says:

                  Re instincts, listening to your instincts doesn’t work when your instincts have been Pavlovianally retrained to respond to unhelpful things.

                  Train a dog to salivate when it hears a bell, now it’s “instincts” make him excited about bells.
                  Train a man to get scared of being called racist, now his “instincts” make him feel comfortable around and admiring of black people.

                  I seem to remember a good CS Lewis analogy, where he said that instincts are the keys on the piano, and morality is the sheet music that tells you which instincts to encourage and suppress at different times.

                • jim says:

                  > listening to your instincts doesn’t work when your instincts have been Pavlovianally retrained to respond to unhelpful things.

                  My instincts seem to have been mighty resistant to such retraining. Possibly because I am stubborn, suspicious, and smarter than the men retraining me or possibly because they just refuse to be retrained. It feels like the latter.

                • falseconvert says:

                  Also, almost by definition, instincts can’t be a guide. They can only be data points. “Ah, my instincts are saying this. Interesting.”

                  By deciding to “follow my instincts”, I would be obeying a moral code that said “in this instance, following your instincts is the right course of action”. It would be that moral code, not the instincts themselves, that made the decision.

                  Now obviously, a world where we didn’t let our instincts influence us significantly, would be a crazy world. The question is, which instincts, how much of them, and at what times. The answer can only be provided by morality.

                  The next question is, what morality, and where does it come from.

                • falseconvert says:

                  In my case, I have the “instinct” that I am very attracted to my wife, feel very comfortable with her, and love her. I feel sympathy for her.

                  I also have the “instinct” that I’m slightly repulsed by the idea of having mixed race children, and feel slightly apprehensive about this morally, worrying it might be reckless.

                  The question is, according to the correct morality, according to the sheet music, which of these instincts am I meant to encourage the most, and which am I meant to suppress?

                  Jim is, I think, suggesting that according to Christian morality, the correct thing to do is to try to proceed with the marriage, but try to minimise my involvement with her kids. Which I am leaning towards thinking is correct, but still slightly apprehensive about the mixed race kids. The reason I am debating, and going back and forth so much here, is because of the closely matched conflict of instincts and the absence of a clear-cut moral answer.

                • falseconvert says:

                  Though I guess on some level, morality is just “predicted instincts”.

                  You don’t sleep with that woman because it would upset your wife, but that’s just because your wife would shout at you and potentially leave you, so then IN THE LONG RUN, your lust would be less well satisfied, because you would have no wife. Then you claim it was a moral decision, when in reality you were just being smarter about how to fulfil your lust long-term.

                • jim says:

                  Nah. Morality is partly instinctive. We innately know good and evil when we see it.

                  There are also socially constructed rules for playing the game, but we do not get enraged because the referee tells us to be. We get enraged because of an implied promise to play by the rules was broken. The other guy expected us to play by the rules, and took advantage of us expecting him to play by the rules.

                  In the case of the Old Testamen rules on sex and family, the problem that they address is that nature gives women far more power than men, which gets in the way of family and reproduction. A man can merely kill you, while a woman can make you immortal. So state, religion, society, and family constructs rules to restrain it. (Or in our case, state and religion constructs rules to amplify it.) I imagine that men were pissed in Old Testament times by women taking power that was rightly men’s by social rules and expectations.

                  A corollary to this is that if you tell a woman you are playing by God’s rules, she will feel an expectation to play by those rules, and fear your wrath should she fail to do so.

                • Mayflower Sperg says:

                  I once saw two cute young Japanese women in a restaurant and was instantly overwhelmed with lust. Had I the chance to fuck one, it would have been very hard to resist. Instinct failed to protect me and falseconvert from a temptation that our ancestors never faced.

                  But when evaluating women of your own race, listen to the little head. Your horny dick knows far better than your rational brain which female is most capable of giving you healthy offspring. I rationally chose to marry a fellow white sperg, and our children all turned out spergtards.

                  Also, once you have any sort of physical contact with a woman, you start bonding with her, and a mediocre match starts to feel like a good one.

                • falseconvert says:

                  Makes sense. And your point about nature giving women more power than men, is extremely powerful. This should be taught in schools. We’re taught that we exist in a vacuum of nothingness and social construction is responsible for all power imbalances, instead of the reality that power imbalances exist in nature for many species. JBP’s lobsters come to mind.

                  So given that morality comes down to, essentially, honesty and deception when it comes to the rules of the game, how would you describe the situation where

                  a) I started the relationship knowing I probably wouldn’t want to continue it long term (though tried to force myself, to see if it could work)
                  b) early on, she used emotional manipulation and trickery to get me into situations I didn’t want to be in. For example, “I don’t mind if you want to take a break from talking to me.” — okay, then I tell her I’m going to take a 1 day break. After I come back, she’s infuriated. Another example: she tells me she lives with family. Then later “you know I have kids right?” — No, I didn’t know that. “I told you I’m living with my family”

                  Stuff like that. She sort of revealed key pieces of information at exactly the point when I had got in too deep to do anything about it. For example, after I quit my job, abandon my rental in my country, and basically give up everything to be with her, I find out that we are not allowed to live together unless we are married. Then the neighbours start pressuring us to get married.

                  I don’t know if she TECHNICALLY told me this stuff at some point, in subtle words, that I should have paid attention to, or not. But it kind of FELT LIKE I was trapped, with no choice but to get married and convert to Islam.

                  Is that immoral? Or am I just stupid?

                • jim says:

                  a) I started the relationship knowing I probably wouldn’t want to continue it long term (though tried to force myself, to see if it could work)

                  This is consistent with our existing wicked rules. We are in a state of sexual anarchy.

                  Imagine a social order where the government was disinclined to enforce property rights in land, or aggressively hostile to them, or too busy with internal struggles over power to worry about enforcing private property rights. Then it would be necessary to plow with a sword in one hand, and the horse’s bridle in the other.

                  You always start out with a woman in defect/defect and then you face the hard task of moving from defect/defect to cooperate/cooperate, unless your patriarch is acquiring a wife for his son from another patriarch.

                  She started out defecting on you, and you started out defecting on her. This is normal, expected and unavoidable. In a state of sexual anarchy, Under these conditions, love is war, and all is fair in love and war. We get the game of players and bitches. Hard to reproduce under these conditions.

                  See my comment which is highly relevant to your situation and condition.

                  In a Christian society there are severe consequences for defection, and in Old Testament times exceedingly severe consequences. Under these conditions, expectations are different.

                • SJ says:

                  Inexperienced, weak, lacking confidence, and you don’t put yourself first. I don’t, however, know how much of this can be fixed. Should a woman have lied to me in such ways and somehow I find that she’s in my bed I would have to punish her for such gross misbehavior. I also would never have married a single mother. Also I never would have traveled to a woman she would have to travel to me.

                  If I woke up in your situation somehow and I wanted to keep the woman I would tell her I’m moving somewhere away from her family. Then I would tell her that she is an evil and wicked woman who needs a severe beating. That she has stolen a child from her rightful place, with her father, and has not repented for this. I would tell her that I might allow her to move with me but she would have to obey and from this point on she must call me my lord or master. Once away from her family she can finally begin to join your family which you can now finally start to create.

                • falseconvert says:

                  Re SJ:

                  If she has stolen a child from her father, surely the rationale would be to divorce her and tell her to go back to her ex-husband, reuniting the kids.

                  What is the moral logic that would recommend me “aiding and abetting”, as Jim put it, the current situation?

                  The evil of the current situation is:

                  -her kids are each living separately with separate parents
                  -she got divorced (even though he cheated, her divorcing still made things worse)
                  -I am now being emasculated by living with a woman with kids from another man

                  Surely the only solution to all three problems is:

                  -divorce her (emasculation fixed)
                  -her to go back to her husband (divorce fixed)
                  -her kids to be reunited with both parents (separation fixed)

                  Obviously, the only one of those three that I can control is divorcing her. The others, I could only encourage and hope for.

                  But what is the rationale that I should stay with her? I’m perpetuating, aiding and abetting, as Jim said, the current state of affairs which has at least 3 moral problems with it.

                • jim says:

                  As this conversation has proceeded, you have revealed more and more red flags and problems.

                  One problem that has not been discussed is that she is your first woman and you are in love, but since she is a single mother who has been away from the father of her children for four years, her count is probably enormous.

                  Women are like sticky tape. Every time sticky tape is peeled off and reapplied, gets less sticky. All the problems we discuss are soluble if one is mighty alpha, but you do not sound mighty alpha. If you attempt to solve them, you are in for a very hard ride. Success is not impossible, but it is likely to be very difficult.

                  Initially you did not tell us she had kids. I then assumed she came directly to you from her husband, likely using you as a shit test on him. But for the past four years, she has been busy. Single mothers are notorious.

                • The Cominator says:

                  On paper the situation sounds bad, yet in real life clearly you have some sort of weird attraction…

                • Hesiod says:

                  “On paper the situation sounds bad, yet in real life clearly you have some sort of weird attraction…”

                  Some men, particularly young men lose their bloody minds when they get pussy and they fear losing that pussy more than losing life or soul. Rationalizing retaining said pussy becomes the entirety of the cosmos. Not good in any sense.

                  Now is a time for the heart, not the head (either the big or little one). Pray, then act.

                • The Cominator says:

                  “Some men, particularly young men lose their bloody minds when they get pussy and they fear losing that pussy more than losing life or soul. Rationalizing retaining said pussy becomes the entirety of the cosmos. Not good in any sense.”

                  If thats the case go to the brothel (you’re like in Indonesia right, I assume there is one) a few times and bang a few sluts and see whether he still likes her after…

                • falseconvert says:

                  The Cominator, your response tells me that you have never considered sexual morality seriously, in detail, before in your life.

                  Hesiod, thank you. Prayer is a very good suggestion.

                • The Cominator says:

                  I’m not saying do it in front of her (though Jim and SJ probably would tell you to do that to make yourself look more alpha). I’m saying do it to clear your head about the situation as to whether you actually like her or your desperate to avoid losing her as a source of pussy. Going to whores permanently cures you of scarcity mentality when it comes to pussy.

                • Hesiod says:

                  “The Cominator, your response tells me that you have never considered sexual morality seriously, in detail, before in your life.”

                  Our Cominator may very well be too much of a satyr, but your sin may be taking sexual morality too seriously. You’re a son of Adam; you will make mistakes, sometimes ghastly ones.

                  Most would agree self-mutilation is a sin, yet our Savior said to pluck an eye to prevent another sin.

                  It’s in such seeming paradoxes a Christian must venture. I say all this in charity and pray to our Heavenly Father to bless you.

                • The Cominator says:

                  Not lately because of the worst bear market since the 1930s…

                  But while whores may be a poor substitute for family life and I will not argue otherwise against the good patriarchs of this board, going to whores does permanently cure of you simping and scarcity mentality.

                • jim says:

                  It is a substitute of despair, and despair is a sin because self fullfilling

                • falseconvert says:

                  I take your point. But, I’m aware sex can be purchased. There is no scarcity mentality there. Going to see whores now is not going to change anything.

                • SJ says:

                  After an appropriate age where the mother has successful prevented early death of the child it is good for the child to go to his father. That this woman is not giving this daughter back to her father where she belongs is wicked and evil. It is both wicked and evil to the daughter and to you as now you are not starting your own family and bringing the wife in to your family. If you are not going to leave this wicked and evil woman then you need to begin to correct her misbehavior. She needs to give the daughter back to her father where she belongs and she needs to start acting in accordance with your wishes and your goals.

                  Right now you are acting in accordance with her wishes and her goals because she wears the pants. As I said earlier this is an unstable arrangement that is only possible because she is a single mother. If you do not correct this situation post haste she will begin to correct it for you. She will stop leading you. She will stop fking you. She will begin to shit test you in an increasingly extreme manner.

                  You are living a life from the devil, inverted, where you are playing the part of the woman and she is playing the part of the man. This is your great sin right now.

                  Embrace your instincts as a man, as you have already been advised. Your inner masculine energy still exists inside of you. Don’t give us bullshit prog satanic inverted morality here and tell us that you are somehow being the righteous man as you live the life lucifer the devil wants for you.

                • SJ says:


                  By their fruits ye shall know them. What fruit is born from you acting the cuckold living an inverted life with a wicked woman? You are planting a barren tree that will produce no fruit at all.

                • falseconvert says:

                  I’m not sure I even CAN make it work, even if I’m “mighty alpha”.

                  At the end of the day, her kids are still alive, and her ex-husband is still alive, and her ex-husband probably would still accept her back.

                  Yes, they have all shown absolutely zero desire of reunting and making things work. But that doesn’t justify me putting an ADDITIONAL obstacle in the place of that, in the form of me being married to her.

                  If I divorce her, at least she has the option to reunite. As of now, my presence is preventing that. And it’s also not clear it’s benefiting me that much, except for the fact that I have a fertile woman. Who I could probably replace.

                • falseconvert says:

                  The only other situation possible, giving the kids back to her ex, seems like a bigger win for her ex than anybody else.

                  Huge win for him:
                  -he has both his original kids
                  -he can start a second family and have more kids with another woman
                  -not encumbered by previous wife

                  Debatable win for me:
                  -have a clean slate with my wife, can start afresh with our own kids
                  -still have an uphill battle with being respected, though, and stlil starting on backfoot

                  Debatable win for her:
                  -doesn’t have to worry about old kids anymore, that she doesn’t care much about anyway
                  -can start new family

          • Doom says:

            If you’re raising another mans children, you’re not an alpha to her.

            She just prefers being nice to you over her baby daddy. You pay more for her good behaviour.

            Like you said above, you’ve both gotten lazy, which means, she is lazy. It’s easier to submit to you than find another meal ticket.

            Sorry buddy. You’re expecting women to love and admire you in the way you love and admire them. They can’t.

            Honestly, you should suggest she goes back to him. Her kids need their father. THAT would be the most selfless thing to do – abandon your desire for “love” from women for the sake of children and a family.

            • falseconvert says:

              Pros of me divorcing her

              -I’m freed from a nightmare situation
              -She’s freed from an unsatisfactory situation, has the ability to go back to her husband and reunite her two kids (though she might not choose to use it)

              Cons of me divorcing her
              -I now have to find a new woman

              I would put “It’s a divorce” on the cons list, but she already has 1 divorce to her name, one more won’t really change anything. And for me personally, it’s worth it.

  15. Beliefnetmanman says:

    Prigozhin admits defeat at Bakhmut:

    Kunning Druger’s prediction accuracy remains a perfect score.

    Remember, guys: in #CurrentYear a thousand armed men could march from the Bosporus to the Channel without meeting meaningful opposition. You know this because Jim says it is so.

    • jim says:

      No he does not admit defeat at Bakhmut. And is still winning, last time I checked the military summary channel, which was yesterday. The setback is that the Russian army does not like being outshone by Wagner. Wagner continues to win in Bakhmut.

      Currently the Ukraine has assembled eighty thousand troops to roll back a vastly smaller number of Wagnerians, and yet Bakhmut is still falling. Or it was still falling yesterday.

      There are ten thousand or so Ukrainian troops in Bakhmut, and eighty thousand or so trying to keep the roads open – and the roads remain extremely dangerous and ruinously costly to traverse.

    • Kunning Druegger says:

      In all of our focus group testing, we found that consumers of KD content prefer consistency over all else, though reckless faggotry and unwarranted niggory diggory scored quite high as well. Getting predictions correct would be off brand for us here at KD Media and Media Accessories Inc. Ltd. Int., and if there’s one thing we are on besides turbo-meth, it’s our brand.

      That’s a cute yahoo link you got there, Boomer. Be a shame if someone…

      archived it:

      As to the article itself, it’s explicitly hearsay.

      > people familiar with the matter said.

      > the people said

      > people close to the Kremlin and intelligence services said

      > people familiar with the situation

      > according to UK intelligence estimates [UK intel has been stunningly accurate throughout this debacle, nearly as good as KDMMA I,L,I]

      > one of the people with knowledge of the issue said

      > said two people close to the Kremlin and intelligence services

      > said one of them

      Oh look, here’s an attributed quote!

      “Prigozhin is getting in everyone’s way,” said Tatiana Stanovaya, founder of R.Politik political consultancy. “His only protection now is his personal relationship with Putin, who still considers him useful in a certain way.”

      I wonder who Tatiana is…

      Hmm, that’s odd. What is the center for Political Technologies? Says they are Moscow based…

      I wonder what “Devex” is…

      Huh. I’m not seeing a consistent theme here. I wonder who the journalist is that put together all this wonderfully sourced information… oh wait, it’s Bloomberg News, that’s who wrote it. I guess they must have a crack team of investigative journalists who forgo any credit to keep the morale high and the ego low lmao.

      Hey Beliefnetmaman, quick question:

      Complete the following sentence:
      Women misbehave because –

      [A] Capitalism makes them misbehave, by economically incentivizing reckless high time-reference behavior over long-term planning. The capitalist class benefits from one night stands and sterility, as it benefits from third world immigration of spendthrift cheap labor to replace frugal Whites. If it weren’t for capitali$m, women would totally be completely sinless angels.

      [B] The (((jews))) make these totally innocent angels misbehave, since the jews own the media and the entire entertainment industry from Hollywood down to the tiniest pornography studio, and use them to direct propaganda at women, telling them to fuck Blacks and lowlifes. There’s no way that pure White women desire to be on OnlyFans to whore for money. The jews forced these angels on that website.

      [C] Sorry, but this is a misleading question. Women don’t misbehave at all. All misbehavior is done by men, who are vile pigs.

      [D] Lecherous men make them misbehave, since men are ultimately responsible for all female behavior (including misbehavior), and unlike women, men have self-control and moral agency. Thus it logically follows that any female misbehavior would merely reflect bad decisions taken by irresponsible and lustful men. It is men’s fault entirely, so men must be forced to pay for every bad decision done by any random women.

      [E] They are feral, blindly following ancient instincts from prehistoric times, which instincts tell them to cruise for rape by alpha male Chads, and to resist kicking-and-screaming all attempts to restrain them from pursuing alpha male Chads. Stable monogamy has always been a way to allow each man to own a woman so each man can start a family and raise a future generation for civilization’s survival.

      • jim says:

        It is completely obvious that Beliefnetmanman is a shill – his username and fake email address are in the style of a major shilling group. But I allowed the comments through anyway. His shilling group tends to be smarter and to bring more relevant data table the table than most.

      • someDude says:

        Hahahahaha, That was hilariously Brilliant. Your writing has really hit a high note, KD. In a sane world you would have made an insane amount of money as a copywriter or a script writer or a standup comedian.

        You are what the Onion pretends to be and the Babylon bee cannot be, face faggotry and all that.

      • someDude says:

        Time for you to get your own blog, my dude

        I can’t stop laughing.

      • ArkyShrugger says:

        Hilarious riposte, and I do know the answer. It’s elementary.

  16. Ghost says:

    You mention Jesuits are conspiring against you.

    Can you break this down to potato head so even a low grade moron can understand it please. Cause I was thinking another group was trying to wipe out whitey. You know, the group of extremely moral and honest people that run the media, banks, big pharma, Biden admin, AIPAC, ADL, etc… But it’s just a coincidence and I got it all wrong. So enlighten me.

    • The Cominator says:

      Lurk more.

      • Ghost says:


        • The Cominator says:

          No u.

          • Kunning Druegger says:

            Decisive victory.

            • The Cominator says:
              • The Cominator says:

                Nevermind can’t post images directly anymore


                • Ghost says:

                  Your bar mitzvah pics?

                • jim says:

                  The jesuits have been conspiring against states for longer than the Jews, and have been expelled from a whole lot countries for so doing. We have ample evidence of old Jesuit conspiracies. Why not another one.

                  It was not the Jews that did the Covid scam.

                • Ghost says:

                  So Al Bourla is an undercover Jesuit?

                • Wulfgar Thundercock III says:

                  Well, the Israelis were some of the first and hardest on the vaxx, then they were one of the first to show a spike in excess deaths and cardiac events, and then one of the first to start hiding their data. Based on what we know about fatalities and sterility, if the Jews were behind the vaxx then their plan looks to be killing themselves. Not that asinine suicide is unprecedented for Jews(Masada) but it seems a little silly that the big Jewish plan would involve killing all of the Jews and replacing them with Arabs.

                • Wulfgar Thundercock III says:

                  In other words:

                  “In Hitler’s name, we finish what he started! Unleash the vaxx! Mazel tov, brothers!”
                  “Mazel tov!”

                • Ghost says:

                  Perhaps they believed they were less susceptible as stated in this article:


                  ACE2-K26R; which is most frequent in Ashkenazi Jewish population decreased the SARS-CoV-2/ACE2 electrostatic attraction. On the contrary, ACE2-I468V, R219C, K341R, D206G, G211R increased the electrostatic attraction; ordered by binding strength from weakest to strongest. The aforementioned variants are most frequent in East Asian, South Asian, African and African American, European, European and South Asian populations, respectively.

                  Then there’s the video of a rabbi telling his people that Covid is for gentiles.

                • Ghost says:

                  Here’s the “Covid is for gentiles” vid. Kinda hard to find now, inet scrubbing.


                  Then there’s Fauci being awarded $1mil prize from Israel, Israeli bio lab who coincidentally was working on the mRNA shot for the exact virus. And a 1998 article reporting the Israelis commissioned research on DNA based bioweapons.

                  A lot of coincidences and circumstantial evidence going on. If the Jesuits were doing all this, I’d be all over it. But, why does the same tribe always have their hands in the well of controversy?

                • Wulfgar Thundercock III says:

                  If they thought covid was not going to affect them and they made the vaxx, why did they give it to their own people? The virus was not the weapon; the vaxx was. Covid is not causing people to drop of heart failure and clotting, but the vaxx is. Why use the weapon on their own people if they were behind it?

                • Ghost says:

                  Can we be sure Israelis took the shot and are dying off because of it or was it fake news? I’ve seen vids of Israelis going to the clinic and faking it.

                  If they did get the juice, maybe they thought it wouldn’t harm them due their genes not binding to spike protein.

                  I’m not aware of a mass Israeli die off. But, I do see reports Americans dying of myocarditis every day.

                  We are assuming here that Israelis took the shot in mass and some have died based on Israeli news which could be falsified. How can I verify these claims?

                • jim says:

                  > We are assuming here that Israelis took the shot in mass and some have died based on Israeli news which could be falsified. How can I verify these claims?


                  Israel went all in on the jab. Worse than anyone. More coercion, which coercion ran into more resistance than most, and quietly evaporated on the same day as it quietly evaporated everywhere in the US hegemony.

                  Obviously the sudden silent disappearance of coercion (which was at first not reflected in the signs and the speaker announcements, but everyone discovered that these could simply be ignored now) was decided in America on the basis of its struggle with Russia – the Dod faction suddenly got the upper hand. But Israel has absolutely no interest in a struggle with Russia, so they were just following orders.

                  From the fact that everyone moved in lockstep, we know this was a centralized conspiracy, with the top small enough to meet aroud a coffee table and feel the warmth of each other’s breath. And the fact that it backed off because of American concerns shows that the coffee table was in Washington.

                  If it was Jews in Washington, Soros would have his fingers in it. So, not Jews.

                • S says:


                  Israel-people fully vaccinated-percent of population

                  Israel takes 3 months to vaccinate 50% its population. It takes 13 months to vaccinate the next 15%.


                  ‘ A media campaign, led by well-known, senior health professionals and celebrities, called on the public to vaccinate. e MOH designed a “green pass” incentive, aimed to “compensate” for the months of social restric-tions. is certificate came into effect from February 21, 2021 and allows access to social, cultural and sports events, as well as gyms, hotels and restaurants for those with immunity – whether recovered from COVID-19 or 1 week following the second vaccine dose [7]’

                  ‘ Despite being hit harder especially in the second and third waves of the pandemic, vaccination uptake was low, which could be partly explained by a lower level of trust in gov-ernmental institutions, compared with the general popu-lation [19]. is pattern contrasts with routine childhood vaccinations in Israel, where rates are higher in the Arab compared to the Jewish population [20],’

                  ‘Several factors may explain why lower SES groups were even less likely to complete vaccination with the sec-ond dose. Side effects, like headache, fever and flu-like symptoms, were reported more frequently after the second, compared with the first dose ‘

                  Israel looks exactly like the rest of the world. Coercion, media campaigns, religious and stupid minorities smelling something was off or observing the results of the first dose.

                • Ghost says:


                  I’d forgot about the green pass. Well, I guess that clears that up.


                • Wulfgar Thundercock III says:

                  The problem with comparing Israel to the rest of the world is that most of the rest of the world doesn’t have so many Arabs all shot through their country. Significantly overrepresented in the vaccine refusers are Orthodox Jews and Palestinians. If the vaxx does the demographic damage I expect, then the Jews are living on borrowed time. Orthodox Jews do not fight in the military, and the Palestinians are who the military gets used on. America faces a similar problem if any of the foreigner populations(Blacks, Arabs, Asians, etc.) has a similarly low uptake of the vaxx.

                • S says:

                  Its worse then that. The arab world allowed Chinese and Russian vaccines (except Saudi Arabia). I don’t know the relative amounts compared to the clot shot, but Syria and Iraq both had relatively low levels of total vaccine uptake.

                  Murdering the population of Europe and the United States and leaving Russia, China, India and the Arab world alive gets you driven into the sea.

                • FrankNorman says:

                  “Significantly overrepresented in the vaccine refusers are Orthodox Jews and Palestinians. ”

                  Interesting how the world over it seems to be the Seculars who cheerfully line up to be vaxterminated, while the God-fearing – of whatever religious persuasion – are giving it a big nope.

                • Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

                  In this regard, ‘secular’ is just another word for ‘faithful adherent of the whig theocracy’.

                  The mark of the beast is a sacrament, and they dutifully line up for their priesthood to anoint them.

                • Handi says:

                  In this and every regard. There are secular things, but no secular people. Everyone worships, even if the object of their worship is occulted.

                • Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

                  There is some inwardness to phrases like ‘secular society’, in the sense that there really are distinctifying elements of religions that are sometimes called ‘secular’, in comparison to many other kinds of religion, such that we can note identifiable differences in their substantive effect.

                  Chief amongst these of course being the fact that it is occulted in the first place. It acquires adherents who do not understand themselves as adherents; instantiates a church that does not call itself a church; imposes an orthodoxy that it does not call orthodoxy.

                  A ‘secular’ religion defines ‘religion’ in such ways that it overlaps with superficial characteristics of rival religions in its environment, while leaving open memetic backdoors for its own essential substance through the ideological firewall. It is like a pesticide, in other words, used to clear the field with a corrosive poison, leaving a vacuum open that certain forms adapted to it will rush in to occupy.

                  In this regard, all ‘secular’ religions are contingencies in certain respects; they are always adapted to a particular circumstance in history, to engage with the predominant modes of thought of that circumstance.

                  (Para exemple: an ‘atheist’ in the occident of 2009 would not simply be a atheist, they would be a *christian* atheist; and not just a christian atheist, but a *protestant* atheist; and not just protestant atheist, but a *methodist* atheist.)

                  At the same rate, because it needs to occupy a dominant position over popular consciousness in general, and elite networking in particular, there are also certain essential forms of behavior that ‘secular religions’ always trend towards across history. In particular, is a characteristically vampire-like quality to their relationships with discourse. Id est, rhetorical occupation of less specific epistemological concepts for use in more specific tactical manners; more generally, sophistical two-steps of new definitions of things while taking advantage of the connotations of previous definitions; hollowing-out of preexisting institutions for use as platforms for the broadcast of its sermons, irrespective of whatever purpose the institution may have nominally been intended to serve; and so along such lines.

                  In short, ‘secularization’, much like relation phenomena of ‘demotization’, creates (is used to create) environments where forms of life most given towards dissimulation, deception, and distortion of what is, can most predominate.

    • jim says:

      It was not those guys that did Covid.

  17. Isaac says:

    On 4chan anons are playing around with the leaked llama models to make their own chatbots running on their own hardware. Mostly they are using it for virtual gfs.
    Quantizing the models to 4 bits have helped reduce the hardware requirements, but there are still some problems getting long chats to work.

    • Redbible says:

      I recently learn about an open source chat bot call “virtual assistant”, if I recall correctly. It’s not as good as ChatGPT for normie friendly topics, but it will commit thought crimes and write anything you ask ti to, so I have hopes for it.

      Also, might be possible to feed it Jim’s Blog (all of the posts and comments). Then we will make JimBot a reality.

      • Kunning Druegger says:

        I think the learning set should be all Jim posts, then Jim posts + Jim comments, then Jim posts + Jim comments + St. John comments. At each interval we should see what comes out, and have the most hardheaded, resolute among us, like TC and Red, take runs at the proto-JimBot for QT. In parallel, we harvest the best commenters and comments to be added if needed. There are A LOT of basically worthless comments, plenty of which I am personally responsible for, and I think that might be unnecessary noise? But then again, maybe useful for grammar finishing and other aspects I’m not thinking of…

        • someDude says:

          What you call worthless comments were practice for you to get to where you are at now. Your writing now is consistently good and now and then touches the heights of Brilliance. Plenty of credit to our host Jim for encouraging this talent of yours. I think comments made in good faith are to be given a long leash.

          • Kunning Druegger says:

            You are too kind. My concer was in the training of JimBot, not validating the commenters themselves, but Jim already put paid to this impulse, because the goal is a full suit super-bot that can start conversations, maintain conversations, and end conversations with the same level of skill. I completely missed this because I consider Jim a prophet and, as excessive whites tend to do, lost sight of the bigger picture. While we want JimBot to drop heavy ass redpills on people, and speak hard, pointy truths, we also want JimBot to be *USEFUL*. Imagine brogrammers secretly using JimBot to test out both code and ideas for their next pitch or meetinig. Imagine bureaucrats using JimBot to perfect their little literary powerplays. The goal should be a Binary Oracle that would make Terry Davis proud, but the long term effect should be “this is how you do it right.”

            I make this mistake constantly: I see the world through the eyes of a guerilla, fighting a losing battle. The better tactic is to view the world as an elite biding his time before he takes a castle and begins conquering the undeserving charlatans ensconced in structures they never understood.

      • jim says:

        They are all called virtual assistant, the name is unhelpful.

        To get a good chatbot, you need a large model, the bigger the better, and its training set also big. This requires an expensive video card. When last I heard, NVIDIA had a laptop with a powerful video card, for less than the cost of the card itself, and that was just about the only way you could get a high powered card.

        The Jim database (purged of IP data and with email addresses scrambled) is available at the link indicated on the home page.

        I suspect it is not big enough to train a good chatbot. You will need to train it on a much larger training set, then retrain on Jim blog set.

        One huge advantage of training on comments is that you can have it predict a response, rather than merely a continuation of a stream of text, which is what they all do.

        So you can train it to respond rather than hack it to give a continuation styled as a response.

        A huge problem is that the opensource tensorflow has not been updated in quite a while. Google was frightened by what it let loose. The Chinese are attempting an upgrade, but are likely to keep it proprietary. Nvidia is up to something, and may make it available, probably for a fee. In fact it has made it available, sort of, NVIDIA CUDA-X AI complete deep learning software stack. I don’t know what the licensing terms are, but I see a reluctance to let deep learning loose.

        Nvidia is continually updating its offering, while Tensor flow is not receiving support. So, your best bet is to ignore tensorflow, and the huge pile of open source material around it, and go with Nvidia. Tensorflow is being allowed to wither on the vine.

        • Kunning Druegger says:

          How is the Jim database too small? How big are these learning sets they use? Let’s say you are right, where else would you suggest the JimBot engineering team pull training data? Are there other blogs that are close enough? Anglin has an extensive catalog. It might be fun to make JimBot a trinity, three Dark Lords rolled into one fun filled, advice spewing, seig heiling, woman beating, monarchy shilling chatbot.

        • Redbible says:

          I looked it up, and the actual name is OpenAssistant. I messed up by not taking the extra minutes before posting my original comment.

          “And this is why, dear children, you should not be lazy.”

          • jim says:

            This is a voice assistant. It would be useful as the front end for text engine like chatgpt, but its job is inferring text from voice, while the hard problem that so impressed everyone with the enormous GPT3 model is inferring related meaningful text from meaningful text.

            Google Tensorflow and its vast ecosystem of Jupiter notebooks is abandonware, which no one should invest work into unless he already has a large investment in it. What is happening with deep learning text engines in NVIDIA CUDA-X AI?

            How is the ecosystem going?

        • Isaac says:

          We are able to run the already-trained 30Billion, 4Bit model on cpu if you have 32GB of ram.

          • jim says:

            It is “already trained” that is the hard part. You cannot train a 30 billion model on top end consumer hardware.

            Also, “already trained” implies “cannot learn”. This is a crippling limitation on GPT3. It only has a bit less than 2K words and a bit more than 2K characters context. Decent short term memory but no long term memory.

  18. Red says:

    Off topic:

    I lived for a long time in the LA area and I’m back every once in a while. Last time I was there, I quickly decided it wasn’t safe to go out after dark unless I had a gun or was with my crew. There was just that feeling of danger in the air that had me walking and watching like I was a very shitty part of town, while I in a very wealthy area.

    I wasn’t exactly sure what I was worried, until I saw this video. Very little is as emasculating as being robbed when you can’t fight back. There’s zero worry that the locals will shoot back because the that’s the only sort of “crimes” the Soros DA punish.

    • Pax Imperialis says:

      Haven’t been back there in over 10 years now, but I hear the stories from Cali refugees all the time. It’s fucking savage. Stay safe out there. Better to avoid the state all together.

  19. Severian says:

    You would expect a Russian response to GPT before a Chinese one?

    • jim says:

      There is already a Chinese response, but it speaks Chinese, and is likely to be very China centric.

      Russia is more interested in the outside world than China. Thus Yandex has become interesting useful to non Russians. (And sometimes Yandex serves up so much western propaganda I cannot find the information I am looking for) I hope that the Russians do with GPT what they did with Yandex, step into the gap created by endless heavy handed unwatchable and unreadable western propaganda

      • Beliefnetmanman says:

        >There is already a Chinese response, but it speaks Chinese,

        Proof you don’t understand what you’re talking about. One of the most surprising aspects of these things is that you train them on one language and then they pick up others with hardly any effort. Train them in english, give them an english-chinese dictionary, a chinese grammar, and a sample of literature and internet chat, all of a sudden they’re fluent in colloquial Chinese. Similar experiments have been noted with all sorts of invented languages and substitution ciphers of various types. Once the LLM understands the concept of language, the particulars turn out to be trivial. This is not an obstacle and if you knew anything about it you would not have suggested it was.

        • jim says:

          What is an obstacle is that the Chinese don’t care. They are making a chatbot for China, not for the world.

  20. Cloudswrest says:

    Off topic. Looks like a shit test super failure! Woman showing playful IOI. Guy reacts like a butt hurt faggot! I would have chased her down and gave her a squeeze. Comments?

    • Western Taliban says:

      I’m with Anglin on this one, I’m so sick of the lies, the faggot and vaginal garbage is insufferable and cannot be tolerated anymore, I support anything against it, including this.

      Right wingers are total faggots and pussy-sniffers, and never would have had the nerve to end the feminist project.

      Trannies, on the other hand, are very brave and have no problem totally displacing women.

      Trannies are a net positive given that they are completely displacing women.


      You say butt hurt faggot, I say catharsis. When have you ever dared use physical violence against a fronthole? He is likely to pass more shit tests than you.

      • brutalize it says:

        Agreed. If all white men put cunts in their place for showing crude disrespect (“playful” or otherwise), and didn’t simp for such behavior, the WP would go a long way towards being solved. Of course such behavior doesn’t sit well with tradcucks and soyjaks who just want to play vidya and watch Netflix and get sloppy seconds after Tyrone, which is why we are where we are.

        • SJ says:

          Come on now let’s not act like a bunch of incels. That’s a fun playful girl who you should chase down and tickle then tell her she owes you a drink but you want it back in your room alone.

          • Cloudswrest says:

            My point exactly! The guy reacted like an incel sperg.

            • The Cominator says:

              I would not have reacted like that…

              • someDude says:

                You’re not an incel. Sperg maybe, but incel no. Aren’t you the guy that bangs strippers? How is that an incel?

                I had a landlord who was a Sperg as well and he banged strippers fine and had it down to a science. It was the non-stripper girls with whom he had to make conversation with or dance with that he had trouble getting anywhere.

                • The Cominator says:

                  Yes I’m kind of the same except I’m an okay dancer… I’ve hung out with some girls (most who I didn’t bang) who liked dancing and as far as doing anything with a girl dancing is about the most fun thing you can do besides banging.

                  Some girls just like beaters to an extreme degree so maybe what he did worked but to me it just seems rather savage and stupid… something I would like to do to the progressive feminists women of the world but not to a girl who is being playful. This would really be no different than a girl 12 years ago blowing smoke in your face…

          • Kunning Druegger says:

            I’m inclined to agree, but it’s a tiny video clip. The cunt could be getting the just reward for months or years of labial nonsense. This is a consistent issue in our sphere: everyone immediately assumes the pretty playful girl in the 10 second clip is a pretty and playful girl and falls in eLove with the image.

          • brutalize it says:

            An incel would do precisely that for a slim chance at some pussy; I get enough sex as it is that I don’t need to placate and grovel before grossly misbehaving cunts. Guess I’m just not into masochism and prefer rawdogging girls who actually respect me.

      • Kunning Druegger says:

        100% this. All arguments that she was flirting are noted, accepted, and discarded. Western women need a taste of the shoe for a few years before they can be trusted with the fun things in life. Spare the rod, spoil the broad. That which doesn’t kill her makes the tingles stronger.

        • The Cominator says:

          Generally agree but not sure this chick (not fat, no tats seemingly flirtatious and not a man hater) should be treated as especially a big part of the problem.

          And sending her to the hospital by hard kicking her to the gut… bit harsh a response imho.

      • SJ says:

        Back in my mid thirties I grew to really hate women. I set out to hate fck them all, painfully, to physically hurt them, to treat them like dirt, make fun of them, stand them up, call them names, slap them around, cheat on them, openly cheat on them, pick up other women in front of them, and just treat them like total shit. They all loved it and fell desperately in love with me. Never in my life could I have imagined what women are truly like.

        So give women what they want I say. Then take the one who behaves the best, who is young and pretty, and wife her up. The one I picked all those years ago just birthed my sixth son.

    • Red says:

      She was playing, but spilling a drink on a man will get you hit. Very likely he bangs her later.

      >I would have chased her down and gave her a squeeze.

      She needed to be slapped or spanked.

      >Guy reacts like a butt hurt faggot!

      How do you react when a someone toss a drink in your face?

      • Aidan says:

        I once had a girl pour a drink on me. I slapped her, then I fucked her. A girl pouring a drink on you is one of the horniest things she can do, but requires a big escalation.

        • The Cominator says:

          Slapping her would have been fine but she was clearly flirting and doing playful shit testing (with dilated fuck me eyes) beating the shit out of her like oldschool southern cops did to niggers who ran away from them… I think that is overreacting.

    • SJ says:

      Has nobody here ever flirted with a girl before?

      • Western Taliban says:

        Yes yes, she was giving him all the signals and giving him convenient grounds for sexual coercion, but instead of fucking her he beat her, I don’t care, I support. The video would be even better if he also lost it against the other screeching fronthole.

        • The Cominator says:

          I don’t like modern Western women either but this girl looks relatively good natured and fun.

          • Kunning Druegger says:

            You are a sucker for diminutive brunettes. I’m not attacking you at all, I think it’s awesome to see a different side of the Cominator Solutionist. I’m the same way with redheads. Blondes get the knob, brunettes get a jet, but redheads are the best you can get.

            • The Cominator says:

              Nah I like redheads too actually. I’m a sucker for that girls smile and eyes, she has the happy crazy look…

              The happy crazy chicks are with one exception the only chicks who ever really like me.

              • Kunning Druegger says:

                Totally empathize. That used to be my thing to, but God led me down a slightly different path. Not knocking it at all, but I’m glad I landed with the more taciturn and measured of the women I could have. Crazy girls are fun, but in my experience they really struggle with getting older and can go way off the deep end. To be fair, all women are like that lol.

                • Jehu says:

                  All girls are at least a little crazy—I think the least crazy girls, like the daughters of engineers frequently, have a level of craziness that would get a male described as pretty flakey. Most have a level of instability that would get a man described as nuts (unless he was rich and high status, in which case he’d be neurotic or eccentric). How crazy women are varies a fair bit. Most seem to have anxiety levels that for a man would be off the charts.

                • The Cominator says:

                  Well they overmedicate most of the crazy chicks today, and the medications tend to make them obese unpleasant shut ins. I hate clownworld…

                  The one non totally crazy chick who ever really liked me was the enginerette who liked old movies and literally did the Sandra Dee larp with putting on a leather jacket and suddenly starting to smoke thing from Grease because I think she was subconsciously horny and thought her too good girl image was getting in the way (ie suddenly , and no despite this she wasn’t all that nuts by female standards). I’ve mentioned her before. The craziest thing about her was she actually seemed to like me…

                  I would not have pursued her though, I would not have been a good long term mate at the time and she was too good to pump and dump even if she would have let me. Also it turned out later her father was in the same fraternal organization I joined at the time (helped me get a job when they were hard to get) and as such the oath would prohibit me causally pumping her without intent to keep… She is married (I hope happily) with kids now.

                • The Cominator says:

                  Yes they are all crazy but there are relative scales…

                  The enginerette was fairly emotionally stable and not prone to any really insane self destructive behavior (or even the normal female thing of suddenly burning bridges for no fucking reason) even still because she (being a wonderful old fashioned girl who was well loved by everyone) got treated as a lady rather than a bar slut (she would go out with friends of hers leave with them not drink much normally) which I think she was subconsciously tired of (her inner limbic slut wanted to get nailed AWALT) literally decided to do a self makeover very similar to the end of Grease.

                  Normally chicks who like me include such categories as girls with borderline personality disorder, alcoholic girls either had no dad or whos dad died or went to prison in early adolesence, and strippers… and combinations thereof.

                • jim says:

                  Suddenly burning bridges for no reason is an off the charts shit test you cannot pass without going General Buck Naked. Consider going General Buck Naked.

                • The Cominator says:

                  Sudden bridge burning is self destructive insane behavior that almost all women do at least almost all unowned women…

                  The girl I’m talking about the non crazy one did not do this though at all. I wasn’t trying to pass shit tests from her (she gave very little shit) because while I enjoyed her company, it made me look way cooler having lots of facebook pics with her in it, and we even danced sometimes…

                  She was too good for a pump and dump (and its rare I think this about women) and I was in no position to be a good husband at the time.

    • Redbible says:

      She has a big smile on her face, like she is in a playful mood. She then proceed to act out what Jim describes in the 2nd paragraph of this comment:

      That said, she probably deserved some spanking for what she did, but it still has to be done with some level of lightheartedness, or it would kill the mood. (Not necessarily kill your chances with her, but might set things back for a bit.)

      Kicking her makes no sense, unless you interrupt her actions as if she were a man. If a man Splashes me with his drink, or knocked over my drink, I’d see it as an act of violence, or at minimum, he’s trying to Ape that he’d better at Violence than me. And unless he seems clearly stronger, I’d likely go straight to a punching the fucker. If he fell to the floor, kicking him (just like the guy kicked the women in the video) would make a lot of sense.

      • The Cominator says:

        The difference between this being a playful provocation vs an offense deserving more severe violence is whether she splashed him in the eyes with her drink.

        I think she didn’t get his eyes because if she did he’d be temporarily blind and stunned (some libshit did that to me once, I could not react right away a local townie good ol boy however chased the guy down and beat him up for it lol… this was in New England too).

        So not getting his eye I would rate this as say slightly more severe than her say deliberately blowing smoke in his face (which used to be a more common form of this shit test even 10 years ago when most attractive young chicks smoked)…

      • Cloudswrest says:

        Treat her as your bratty little sister, thus passing as alpha

        Indeed. Decades ago, when I was a teen, my younger sister was doing her homework (with a sharp pencil). I was teasing her and goosing her with my index finger. She was defending herself with the pencil and got me on the web between digits. For many years I had a tiny involuntary “tattoo” from the graphite dust left under my skin. It never even occurred to me to kick the shit out of her right after that incident. Seeing thieving negros getting an end of rebar up their ass from a spiked bicycle is “cathartic”. They are enemy “other”. My sister was not “other”.

      • Sean says:

        didn’t look like he was kicking her very hard to me. still looked like play. he had to respond pretty hard to having a drink thrown on him. putting her on the ground and pretending to kick the shit out of her may have been enough. he wasn’t kicking hard with bare feet

    • Handi says:

      His reaction is correct by default, because he is the man. That’s what he felt like doing so it was the right thing to do.

      Maybe she would have wanted to fuck him if he had done something different, but it doesn’t matter. Men’s feelings always trump women, their pussies, and their pussies’ feelings.

      Your application of game analysis here is an example of exactly why women have pussy power. Even though you know what her pussy wants better than the Official Truth narrative of what her pussy wants, you are still automatically giving the frame to her pussy and demanding that her pussy be placated with whatever it wants.

      Patriarchy is more than giving women what they want, good and hard. Patriarchy also requires forcing women to accept what men want, and in this case the man wanted to not have his drink knocked all over him. They appear to have been playing some kind of game but he clearly did not consider a Pepsi shower to be a legitimate move. He, and not we, has the full context of the situation in his own amygdala.

      • Kunning Druegger says:

        Well put. Even if it is a pussy in chains, if you put it on a pedestal, you better have a really good reason for doing so, and even then you’re probably fucking up.

      • Red says:

        I think this is correct.

    • ten says:

      he obviously should have been balls deep in her behind that corner rather than kicking her skull to the floor. Quite likely to end up balls deep in her, after she goes alone to his room to demand an apology/banging, even after kicking her skull to the floor. Spergout.

    • notglowing says:

      Did none of us notice he was trying to do the same thing she did to him, just 5 seconds prior?

      That makes his actions seem fairly incomprehensible, and changes the context of the situation entirely.


    Trump: still not arrested.

    Alvin Bragg: loose-cannoning with no support.

    Dem leadership: WTF you doing, man?

    Jim: still wrong.

    Speaking of which
    >Meanwhile the Afghans continue to cheerfully demonstrate how easily and smoothly one can erase female emancipation.

    Man on the spot disagrees with you:

    Key passage:
    The Taliban won the war; but in the long run, the social modernity they so bitterly resisted is on its way. Even as my Afghan friends professed their conservatism and religiosity, they were yet to get married or have children—at ages long past when their parents were doing so. The direction of things to come seemed obvious. For decades, the age of first marriage has been inching upward, particularly in the cities; since the late 1990s the fertility rate has fallen drastically. The literacy rate among young women, just 11 percent in 1979, had grown to 42 percent by 2021.

    The more time I spent in Afghanistan, the more I doubted that the Taliban had an affirmative social vision to counteract this Westernization. The jagged conservatism of Akhundzada, spiritually situated in the Pashtun hinterlands of the twentieth century, was a purely negative answer. Beyond that, the Islamic Emirate seemed to offer nothing that could match Western culture for charisma. When they tried to emphasize normalcy and functionality, it was by showing that they, too, could meet Western norms.

    It hasn’t been enough to win long-run loyalty as people vote with their feet. Young Afghans see little future in the country: nearly anyone with a chance of getting out is trying to leave. Classes for English, German, and Turkish are full of young men and women trying to secure a foreign university scholarship; signs advertising help with asylum cases and visa applications are easy to spot throughout urban centers. Desperate Afghans will flood toward the airport at the slightest rumor that they can leave the country. Many educated Afghans will try to get political asylum in the West by claiming that the Taliban will kill them, often on dubious grounds. The poorest and most desperate, meanwhile, will simply be trafficked into Pakistan or Iran as cheap and expendable labor.

    • jim says:

      He is deluded. There’s none so deaf as those who will not hear

      And his delusion is that he refuses to hear and understand what the Taliban social vision is, though they have been telling us from the beginning, refuses to hear what the Afghans around him are saying, for when he writes what they are saying I hear what I have always heard the Taliban saying through the State Department and Harvard censor in his head.

      He hears and sees what I expected him to see, and the censor inside will not let him see.

      The Taliban are successfully doing what they said they would, repeatedly, and from the beginning, what I thought they would, what I hoped they would. He says they are culturally losing because they are not doing what the State Department and Harvard said they would.

      He says they are losing because western memes are penetrating. Our memes are penetrating. State Department and Harvard memes are not penetrating. Our memes were penetrating when the Taliban was formed. Our memes were in part the cause of it being formed. He goes there, hears our memes all over the place from loyal and enthusiastic supporters of the Taliban. Fails to put two and two together. We are the Christian alt right, they are the Muslim alt right. Of course he is going to hear our memes all over the place, and if he failed to hear them twenty years ago, he has cotton stuffed in his ears and his head up his ass. Our memes have been there from before the day the Taliban started shooting. They started shooting in substantial part because of our memes.

      Christians and Muslims do not get along, but we have a common enemy, and in our understanding of that common enemy a common ideology. We always did. The Taliban was with deadly weapons and a recollection of the old red pill, and when I was on I was there with deadly weapons and a recollection of the old red pill. They are the Muslim alt right. They always were. He hears memes referencing the decay in the streets of San Francisco, fails to put two and two together. Those memes he hears are our current memes, but our earliest memes were there long ago. It is called the alt right because its early seeds were on usenet, in various alt newsgroups, what is now the red pill being most visible in And the censor in his head does not let him see what was there, instead seeing only degenerates being degenerate (of which there were plenty on, but that was not what mattered, and not why the alt right is now called “alt“.) The taliban is in substantial part the fruit of the alt groups of usenet. The Taliban was born with the alt right. We are twins that grew up together from the beginning. The alt right is not called the alt right because was full of blue pilled degenerates, which is all that the State Department and the censor in his head can see.

      He hears, but fails to comprehend, our current memes from the lip of loyal and enthusiastic Taliban supporters today. If he had been listening and understanding in 1994, he would have heard our old memes back then. The alt right does not call itself alt because of people like Mystery, which are all that progressives allowed themselves to see, but because of people like me.

      He sees our memes winning, thinks Taliban memes losing. Because he cannot comprehend our memes and Taliban memes, because he will not hear us speak. The Taliban is our memes winning. In 1994, the Taliban was our memes with guns, the memes that are the reason the alt right is called alt, because back then the alt newsgroups were our stamping grouds.

      His blindness, and the blindness of our enemies, is that he refuses to hear what those he seeks to destroy are saying, have always been saying. And because the Taliban are successfully doing what they always said they would, he says they are failing, because they are not doing what their enemies said they would. Those are our memes today, and those were our memes when they picked up their guns.

      I could hear us speaking back in the usenet days when we were a quiet voice in the wilderness, being an insignificant minority in the little known wilderness of the alt newsgroups and what is now the alt.right being an insignificant minority on and a significant and influential minority on the cryptography mailing list. Today, the alt right has more readers than the legacy media, Taliban rules Afghanistan, and Bitcoin is having major impact on international financial flows, and he still cannot hear what we are saying.

      Your link says:

      When they tried to emphasize normalcy and functionality, it was by showing that they, too, could meet Western norms.

      Normalcy and functionality is not a western norm. Hello, did you notice Covid lockdowns, Global warmism, “peak oil”, and the gay parade? Normalcy and functionality is our norm. It was our norm back in the days when what is now the alt.right was an insignificant minority on, which was an insignificant minority in the alt groups, which were an insignificant minority in media impact. And that is what he heard his hosts telling him, but refused to understand.

      Back then we were insignificant, and he and his masters would not hear us on the grounds we were insignificant. Now we have major impact, and he and his masters still will not hear us.

      Our enemies think that willful blindness is their superpower. No it is not. Their willful blindness is our super power. If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle. Hello? The west has been succumbing in every battle.

      • Aidan says:

        Indeed. Noticeable meme similarities

        • Adam says:

          “We’re about to break our fast without fear of being attacked by a drone piloted by a homesexual gangster wielding a joystick somewhere in #Arizona. Our magnificent nation is now free & prosperous. The enemy has been soundly routed, and their tanks and pants captured


          • The Cominator says:

            So thats a real account, I thought it was a parody?

            • jim says:

              If he is not authentic taliban, he is doing a mighty good job of sounding like an authentic taliban.

              If you ran into a bunch of Christians who were busy restoring 1790-1800 patriarchy, and the 1790-1800 theocratic state at gunpoint, you probably would not be entirely surprised to find that they sounded more like the ideological descendants of a bunch of people on the 1990s alt usenet groups who decided to put the blue pill to proper scientific testing than they sounded like amish.

              If modernity does not work, reboot last working version from backup and start from there.

              • Jehu says:

                In an amusing convergence, Taliban literally means ‘Seekers after Truth’. I recall mentioning to some of my Moslem friends back in the early 90s that were I a Moslem, I’d probably be Taliban.

        • alf says:

          Talibro twitter resembles alt right twitter so much I always feel like I am reading an alt right shitpoaster posing as Taliban. But it’s real. Which proves exactly the point that our memes are spreading and have in fact already achieved sovereignty in some places in the world.

          • someDude says:

            I still say he is a Westerner who has contacts in Afghanistan with the Taliban, possibly a convert. Low probability for him to be a born and bred Afghan. The command of the language is too good

            • jim says:

              > The command of the language is too good

              Not an indicator. His job requires someone with excellent English skills.

              And the content of what he is saying is much the same as what any taliban is saying, regardless of English skills. The Taliban has always condemned the west for lack of utility and functionality.

              • someDude says:

                Jim, Are you sure? I know American humor when I see it. Look at this thread,

                If he is Afghan, he has spent plenty of time in the states and he has plenty of redneck/blue-collar friends. Get a load of this statement

                “You can shoot all day free of charge. As a US taxpayer, you earned that. It’s yours.”

                That Humor is a give-away. That reference to the US taxpayer is a give-away. That sympathy towards trump is a give-away. I still say he is either American or an Afghan who has lived in America for a while.

                • alf says:

                  It wouldn’t be uncommon for the international diplomacy representatives to have foreign experience. And stuff like this —
                  isn’t exactly pro red-state America.

                  You’re right though that it is good to be critical. But the fact that it is near indistinguishable from the real deal already tells us a lot.

                • someDude says:

                  @Alf, this blog is also not exactly pro-red America either though it sympathizes with them.

                  I’m not saying he is a red-stater. I’m just saying that it is too uncanny this gentleman is afghan and has never left Afghanistan. Here he claims that everything he knows about the west is from Social Media,

                  Somehow, I’m disinclined to believe him. Unless the Taliban has it’s own AI which I can’t believe either.

                  Yes, these memes come from JimBlog, just like Patriarch Kirill speech on gay parades and war also come from JimBlog.

                  Is the Taliban reading this blog?

                • jim says:

                  The Taliban is reading this blog or it was born in the same usenet culture as the alt right was born in. And very possibly both. Our enemies could hear the usenet “enjoy the decline from poolside” memes but could not hear the “cauterize the decline with fire and steel” memes, because those memes implied that the western social order was dysfunctional, irrational, superstitious, ignorant, and lacked utility. Global Warmism, Peak Oil, Covid worship and all that is the demon haunted dark. They still cannot hear them. So they could not hear the Taliban saying what they are saying in the same way they cannot hear us saying what we are saying.

                  If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.

                  The US military and the US government is forbidden to know the enemy, and forbidden to know itself. They think stubborn willful blindness is their superpower.

                • Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

                  Americans from america today get all their acculturation from the internet too.

  22. FrankNorman says:

    I’ve noticed for a while that Yandex will give you the info you are looking for, when the Western search engines will refuse to do so.

    Let’s not be naive – it no doubt has its own biases and censoring. But not the same as the Western ones.

    • jim says:

      Lets be naive. The censorship of western search engines is painfully obvious and in your face, and silences the truth on just about everything. If Yandex is censoring, what is it its censorship? Give me a search where a western search engine gives results better results than Yandex because you are searching for information that Russia might not want you to know.

      If you do a search on some point deployed in western propaganda against Russia, Yandex will deliver. If you do a search for just about anything on the ever growing disinformation list, western search engines will not deliver.

      • FrankNorman says:

        Want to the see the contrast very starkly? Look up something like “ivermectin cures homosexuality”

        Yandex gives results.
        Google blathers on about Covid and how everyone must accept gays for how they are.

    • Red says:

      Western search engines are basically broken from all the censorship. They started getting serous about mass censorship of search results when Snowden happened. That’s when I first noticed the problems with googles results. It doesn’t take a lot of censorship to render a search engine worthless. If Yandex starts doing it will be quite obvious.

      • zero says:

        Agreed, noticed the last two years no amount of work around will get any to work, most of the internet is now just non existent via google and it is a pain in the ass.

    • Karl says:

      Of course, Yandex does censor. It would illegal not censor in the EU, but Yandex does so openly with the following statement at the bottom of the first page of search results:

      “Certain links have been removed from the search results in order to comply with legal requirements. More”

      The “more” is a link to the legal reason for censoring, namely to EUR-Lex where you can then read “Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine”

  23. Jamesthe1st says:

    Brave seems pretty good, putting in the line gave some good results.

    • Upravda says:

      Yes, but no results when asking “war in ukraine”. Although I believe, for now, that Mr. Eich is not a bad man, the bane of Brave search and many other search engines is their almost total dependence on Google’s search. Results from many of those alternate search engines are mostly anonymized results from Google.

      • Upravda says:

        I must correct myself. On Brave, “war in ukraine” does give adequate result on top, and somewhat adequate on the rest of the first page.

        I swear it wasn’t so only a few weeks ago, and I hope this improvement is a result of targeted de-Googleization.

    • jim says:

      Brave good results had low page rank, and failed to find the most relevant results at all – precisely because they were the most relevant.

  24. Upravda says:

    Yandex is okay, but very “Cyrillic-oriented”. That is, search results tend to be relevant, and not burdened by political correctness, but those results are more relevant for Internet users from former Soviet Union.

    Of all the other search engines, Swisscows seems to be okay, with slight bias towards German speaking peoples. But, if I type “war in ukraine” I *will* actually get results from, which is impossible for any other search engine except Yandex.

    Similar thing with, say, “covid vaccine dangerous and ineffective”. Using Swisscows or Yandex I will actually get results from, say, “peer reviewed” articles that actually says that covid vaccine *is* dangerous and ineffective. With other search engines, I’ll get links to “fact checkers” and other demon worshipers.

    • Upravda says:

      And, yes, “gay needs to be suppressed” on Swisscows will get you Jim’s blog post on the bottom of first page. 🙂

      • jim says:

        This should be on the top, as it is in Yandex: clearly the most relevant. The Yandex results were in order of relevance. The Swisscow results, though less censored than others, were employing different criteria for page rank.

        When I checked it a few months back, the results were irritatingly Russia centric, and, except for the Ukraine war, as censored as the other engines. When I switched a short while ago, the results are not obviously Russia centric, and I just don’t see any censorship at all.

        • Upravda says:

          Is the glass half-full or half-empty? 🙂

          I’d say it is a marvel that search engine that shows your posts still exists at all in the so-called “West”.

  25. Fidelis says:

    Going through his sources, this all seems legitimate. Long predicted debt monetization is immanent:

    The FedCBDC was announced about a week ago for July. This looks all very planned. Run lockdown firedrill, manufacture cause for money printing and subsequent tightening, purposefully tighten enough to pop all the banks, pick your handful of favorites to consolidate control over.

    Feeling like all the events since 2020 were a prelude to what we are about to see unfold. They’re going to destroy the financial system as a preparation to nationalize everything, likely included is not just banks but most large public companies, in too-big-to-fail fashion, use the resulting massive depression as rationale for even stricter lockdowns and digital control.

    • jim says:

      That general outcome is a continuation of long running trends that everyone in the finance and insurance sector seems rather comfortable with.

  26. falseconvert says:

    Hi Jim, this is not directly relevant to this post, but is relevant to some of your other posts.

    If a man meets a woman, and he has no strict religion but was raised vaguely Christian, and he is pressured by her to convert to Islam and marry her, and does so — is the marriage good? Say for example he doesn’t understand the words of his conversion as they are in a foreign language, and doesn’t believe in Islam sincerely, but only converts for the required paperwork.

    It seems to me it is a very bad basis for a marriage, because the act that initiated the marriage was an act of the man being forced by the woman to assimilate to her culture and religion. He submitted to her, and the marriage is based on this act of submission.

    What should a man do in this situation, if he later realises his mistake? Divorce? Try to convert her to Christianity? Try to become a Muslim?

    Your opinion is respected on these matters. Thank you.

    • jim says:

      Women have no tribe and no religion. They have their man’s tribe and their man’s religion. If she wants her husband to convert, she is not willing to let go of her original family. Which in a world of no fault divorce is a rational choice – one of the many problems caused by no fault divorce. It is also a problem with Islam, because Islam allows men (and only men) no fault divorce, which sounds like a good deal for men, but is apt to result in the situation where the man fails to get full hold the woman, she remains attached to her original family. Which is sounds like a good deal for fathers at the expense of sons in law, but is likely to get in the way of having grandchildren. Inability and unwillingness to let go of daughters is a failure mode for reproduction, and leads to female emancipation.

      But a woman is never going to be comfortable with her husband unless she feels he fully owns her. Which if he insincerely converted to her family’s religion, he does not. Christianity, by forbidding divorce for both parties, except for very grave fault, and requiring the man to cherish as well as the woman to obey and submit, better facilitates marriage and comfortable and affectionate relationships between men and woman.

      Divorce reflects a loss of hope for ownership. Hope is a virtue and despair is a sin, because irrational optimism beats rational pessimism. If you believe you can take full possession, she will believe it also. Vices are sins that primarily harm oneself. Hope and despair are both self fulfilling.

      Paul’s first epistle to the Corinthians, Chapter seven verse twelve:

      But to the rest speak I, not the Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away.

      You are the high priest of your household, and if a Christian will impose Christian rules upon her. And she will display proper respect for you conducting Christian rituals such as grace. She does not need to believe, cannot be made to believe, but must be made to obey.

      Perhaps this will result in her departing, but I doubt it. Everything women do is a $#!% test. As men cannot help looking a women’s boobs, women cannot help $#!% testing men.

      • falseconvert says:

        Thank you Jim. This was very helpful.

        Do you have any suggestions about how one would go about the conversion process? The man and his wife are living with her mother, in her village, which is predominately Muslim. It is Ramadan now, of course, and the wife is taking part.

        Tangentially, do you have any advice about what a son ought to do with a large inheritance? Let’s imagine he is approximately thirty years old, has never earned a good income by himself, but has been kept afloat for many years by multiple large inheritances and gifts from relatives.

        Should he give this unearned money away, in order to stimulate himself to make his own money, and finally be independent? Or should he endeavour to pay some sort of respect his grandparents, and perhaps his wife, by attempting to use the money intelligently?

        • jim says:

          Obedience matters, conversion not so much.

          He should invest wisely. And should invest in things that require him to do some work on them.

        • Gilberto says:

          It seems this men is being taken advantage of by a dominant female who married him only for his money.

          This is specially likely because this man was willing to convert and live with his in laws just for the happiness of his wife, AKA, SIMP.

          That’s why we have dread game, the only option for this man to be respected is to become a real man.

          • Kunning Druegger says:

            OK, but what are you really implying here? That she should be marrying him because she loves him? Every woman only gets married because [enter monocausal element here]. Our position is that that element should be something on the order of “Father said so” or “baby inbound” or “wench on shoulder, seek priest + altar”. Her opinion is not only irrelevant, it doesn’t exist. She has her dad’s opinion, or the State’s opinion, or her tribe’s opinion, or, optimally, her Owner’s Opinion.

            Maybe this guy is in need of guidance, he’s probably doing things sub-optimally, but he has come to us (Jim) for guidance, and he is getting it. No need to hammer him without providing something constructive.

            Good luck, falseconvert. Make babies, own your space, protect and cherish your property, plant acorns.

            • falseconvert says:

              Thank you Kunning Druegger. Your kind words are appreciated.

              On the topic of babies, what is your opinion of mixed race families and their progeny? Is there any relevant wisdom I should know, before beginning to try to reproduce?

              • Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

                Miscegenation is child abuse, that puts sons (and daughters) in an extremely awkward existential position even past incidence of developmental problems.

                • falseconvert says:

                  I don’t think I agree, but assuming you are right: do you think divorcing or denying your spouse children is spouse-abuse? If so, what is worse: spouse abuse or child abuse?

                • The Cominator says:

                  RE Mixed children, daughters tend to be better off mixed than sons. If you’re in a mixed marriage you should try to find some way to make sure you have only daughters as much trouble as that is otherwise.

                  Males have enough trouble finding a tribe in clownworld, being mixed makes it much much harder. For every Tate brother there are 1000 castoffs.

              • Kunning Druegger says:

                St. John is right. Mixing is a dangerous game. Whites as we are understood are the product of “mixing,” technically, but the rise of the White Race is a bloody and heartbreaking story. To be honest, I can’t decisively say “it bad” or “it good” because I have brothers of mixed parentage, but that’s very typical for the white clade from which I hail. We are always making exceptions into rules. A drastic consequence of globalist domination is completely illogical admixture that would never occur at scale in a properly ordered and governed world.

                If a warrior band marches into a place, murders all the men and uggos, then carries off the women, the obliterated tribe takes revenge on the winning tribe through their invidious offspring. There are methods for mitigating this, but they are brutal and distasteful for Moderns. I think a properly framed and grounded society can tolerate a bit more diversity, but why would or should they? What precisely is the benefit to bringing in differences?

                I spiraled off. Good men should breed, God will give any society every possible opportunity to do good and reject evil. But if a man seeks to make plans instead of just firing for effect at every target of opportunity, he should seek out woman or women that bring something to the table for his children, and that’s never going to be a black woman, ever. They are so abhorrent that black men will go gay instead of dealing with Sheboons lel. I think it’s best to stick to your own kind, but I also think monogamy is a powerful tool for cooperation.

                If she black, please stay back.

                If she white, pound her right.

                If she yellow, be cautious, fellow.

                If she brown, leave on ground.

                • falseconvert says:

                  She is brown, Asian brown (not yellow). To be honest, this is what I have felt most deeply uneasy about I think, more so than the religious issue. I think I suffered an inferiority complex and went with brown because I thought it would be easier…and also wasn’t smart enough to find the good white girls in my country, though I more so am now.

                  What I’ve been wrestling with the past two years is, can I live with myself if I abandon her? I feel the love she has given me has helped me grow immensely. I think I would have remained single, if not for going brown. Sad, perhaps but true.

                  The bed I’ve made for myself is having to either painfully abandon a woman who truly loves me (despite the religion stuff, I think she really does. at least I feel that she does), or perhaps never have offspring I can truly be proud of, never having a proper legacy…

                  I really don’t know what is worse, betraying love or betraying my genes

                • falseconvert says:

                  Probably worth adding that I love her too, and obviously feel (and being her husband, am) responsible for her, and responsible for the entire situation

                  I just don’t see any valid reason to ever throw away love, nor am I sure it is even possible to actually abandon somebody you have truly loved.

                  so my answer has probably already been made for me.

                • falseconvert says:

                  Part of me also thinks this may be the challenge/burden God has chosen to give me, though I don’t know if that’s biblically feasible.

                  The bible has mixed race marriages but I think they were between pretty similar races, not races from thousands of miles away.

                • falseconvert says:

                  One last factor for consideration, is that she has 2 kids from a precious marriage.

                  Despite all this though, I still feel lucky I met her

                  Perhaps I’m naive, though as Jim said, irrational optimism beats rational pessimism.

                • falseconvert says:


                • falseconvert says:

                  (Apologies to you, Jim, if I’ve twisted or misapplied the meaning of that quote)

                • falseconvert says:

                  RE Cominator, I can see your logic, as women “have no tribe and no religion” — quote Jim. But to again quote Jim, “irrational optimism beats rational pessimism”, and I’d like to think I’d be the father who would make it work.

                  Also, sorry for the rambling replies. Thanks everyone for taking me seriously and giving me the time of day. I’ve been inconsistently lurking (and posting the very occasional question under a different name) since about 2018.

                • Ghost says:

                  You’ve made up your mind already.

                  So, I want you to remember what I write. Her kids will not respect you and say “you’re not my dad.” The three of them will play your for financial support and leave you when you get old.

                  Women don’t “love” in the way you’re thinking. They respect only strength. Being in the role of a cuck shows weakness.

                • Adam says:

                  >…went with brown because I thought it would be easier…

                  With respect this is not a wise move. I see this a lot with guys going after single mothers thinking it will be easier. It will not. There is no easy. Every woman is somewhat of a problem and a nuisance. So best go after the girl you are willing to go to great lengths for, because you will likely have to go to great lengths at some point. Buy the car you are happy to pay for.

                • falseconvert says:

                  I understand your point, though I think it’s a blackpill. You’re saying that I was weak when I converted to religion, and on more than one level, I agree. That’s why I came to Jim about it.

                  But at the same time, it was a sacrifice which was not permanent, which I am now correcting.

                  What ‘way’ do you think I’m thinking of when I say that she loves me?

                • jim says:

                  A woman will love her man, in that she will look after him before she looks after herself. That is female love.

                  But a woman will not love a man the way a man loves a woman.

                • falseconvert says:

                  >With respect this is not a wise move. I see this a lot with guys going after single mothers thinking it will be easier. It will not. There is no easy. Every woman is somewhat of a problem and a nuisance.

                  I agree with this. But I do think there are levels of “nuisance” which vary based on compatibility.

                  >So best go after the girl you are willing to go to great lengths for, because you will likely have to go to great lengths at some point. Buy the car you are happy to pay for.

                  Also agree. But I don’t think you necessarily know that you will be willing to go to great lengths when you start the relationship. You start the relationship, and then, before you know it, you’re in twenty miles deep.

                • jim says:

                  If someone else’s child, forever a cuck, never respected.

                  We were primarily predators for a very long time. When a new lion takes over the pride, he kills the cubs of the old lion. Seems likely that if he fails to do so, the lionesses will find him unimpressive.

                • Ghost says:

                  Men and women experience “love” differently. The man sees himself as protector of the woman who creates his legacy. This feeling keeps the man from choking the life out of her when she shit tests him.

                  The woman sees the man as a resource to sustain her life in a world she would otherwise starve to death. She can easily transfer these feelings to another man she sees as more chad and alpha.

                • falseconvert says:

                  Okay, I take your point. What would you do in my situation?

                  Abandon the naive, fairytale dreams you’ve built the last two years of your life on, and rebuild based on rational self-interest? Find poetry and romanticism in male achievement, as opposed to male-female love?

                  What would be your solution

                • Ghost says:

                  You’ve already set course under full sail.

                  Marriage is not a romance novel. I’ve been married 30 years. You get into a routine where you have some shared interests and some of your own.

                  If I were 20 again, I would find you most fertile unattached female I could find and be very aggressive about wanting to build a legacy.

                • falseconvert says:

                  >If someone else’s child, forever a cuck, never respected.

                  > We were primarily predators for a very long time. When a new lion takes over the pride, he kills the cubs of the old lion. Seems likely that if he fails to do so, the lionesses will find him unimpressive.

                  I know you’re right. Is there any way out of this or do I just resign myself to being a cuck forever?

                • Ghost says:

                  Where it me, and I wasn’t married to her, I would just walk.

                  A lot of younger guys today were overly close to their mothers and they tend to miss those feelings and seek that out in another woman.

                  One should let go of that. You only have the one mother.

                  A woman you take as your wife is a gift from God to be used to create your progeny. You may love her in your heart but she can never replace your mother’s love.

                • falseconvert says:

                  “You’ve already set course under full sail.”

                  I’m not sure about full sail. I’m still not in “full ownership” of her according to Jim. I’m married but the majority of the relationship has been long-distance, with about 8 months living together. We have no kids yet.

                • falseconvert says:

                  You are very right and I think that’s basically the nail on the head. A mother-son complex.

                  I’m wishfully thinking I can still walk with at least partially-clean conscience because the marriage was based on a false conversion and marriage vows that I didn’t understand + was pressured into. Though a false conversion is still a conversion and marriage documents are still marriage documents. Might be better off dropping any pretense of morality and just leaving.

                • Adam says:

                  I was married for over 20 years and now divorced, 3 kids. Of all the mistakes I made, over-thinking the marriage/wife thing is among the biggest. What a waste of time. If you really are on the red pilled reactionary Old Testament Christian path, you are going to have to get real comfortable being looked at as the bad guy. On the plus side, you will be showing respect to yourself which is not common today for men and your status definitely will rise in the eyes of those around you, including those who desperately want you to remain a cuck.

                  You are a man, and even if many depend on you, not many if any give a shit about you. So do what you need to do and don’t look back.

                • falseconvert says:

                  “I was married for over 20 years and now divorced, 3 kids.

                  So do what you need to do and don’t look back.”

                  Why did you get divorced in the end? And what did you do afterwards? Did you find someone else?

                • Adam says:

                  Many years prior to divorce my wife committed adultery that I was unaware of at the time, or something close enough to adultery that I could not tell the difference. I actually came to Jim’s blog like you are doing now and I asked about my situation as I was wondering if I should do something to repair things as we are still friendly and still bang from time to time.

                  The conversation touched on the topic of wife goggles and Jim correctly observed that once a woman betrays you like that, no more wife goggles. I do not know exactly what happened with my ex-wife and the other man, but I did not have wife goggles anymore, certainly not. So that kind of made the decision click and there was no turning back for me, even though we have known each other since teenagers.

                  To all those around me, I am the bad guy. I am comfortable with that. They are all blue and purple pilled turbo nigger faggots and their opinion of me is worth less than whatever is on the bottom of my boots. I have not dated much as I am close to starting my own business with my son which has had my full attention for a couple of years but soon I will find another wife.

                  If your ex-wife sees you as alpha she will still do quite a lot for you and I think on some level it is validation for them, especially if she has had your kids, to see you doing things she feels an alpha male would do (such as divorcing her, banging other chicks etc.).

                • Western Taliban says:

                  Since you’re willing to hear the opinions of other commenters and not just jim, I believe you are trapping yourself in “morality” and letting the exterior world define you, you’re not being honest with yourself and that is the truly worst and most immoral thing to do.

                  Do you not know it yourself already and have said so? You do not want to be a cuckold and you do not want mixed children, what else is there to say? You know what is true in your heart better than anyone. Tell her the truth and be done with it, take care of her as much as you think you own and move on to what you truly want. Better to die struggling for what you truly want and believe than to eternally betray yourself.

                  What is the point of fake social morality if you kill your soul? Ethical choices are those you find rationally good for yourself, everything else is fake and gay and not from you. Your life, your choice. Follow your own honest advice.

                  Whatever you choose I wish you good luck as long as it’s your own true choice.

                • jim says:

                  He is married. If Christian and using Christmemes on his wife, stuck with her. If she comes to perceive herself as owned by him, which is going to be uphill, things will be good enough.

                • falseconvert says:

                  Western Taliban, I oscillate between everything you said in your comment and what Jim said in his reply to you.

                  Much as I feel tempted to leave regularly, I am afraid I am stuck with her. And though I don’t know exactly what is meant by Christmemes, I probably am using them on some level.

                  What you said, though I say it to myself every other day, is basically “fuck you, mum and dad”, except mum and dad is morality. But in reality Jim is right. If I have already based the relationship somewhat on Christmemes, then I am logically prohibited from divorcing her. Would have to betray those principles and then attempt to “start again” with another woman, taking the principles back up again. Logically it doesn’t make sense. If I believe the principles now, ie the Old Testament marriage principles, which includes no chance for no fault divorce, I can’t temporarily abandon them and then pick them up again later once I’ve got rid of my inconvenient wife.

                  Correct me if I am wrong Jim, Christmemes are things like sacrifice, the golden rule, and general Christian morality. Including Old Testament marriage rules.

                • jim says:

                  What comes in mighty handy in a marriage is the Old and New Testament rules on marriage.

                • Western Taliban says:

                  Can you say they are your true principles if you feel like this about them? I don’t know for certain what is in your mind as only you know the truth, but what you are saying sounds like they are not your principles, they sound like chains punishing you. If they were truly yours, you’d be content with your choice, a man who follows his own true code never regrets what he did no matter the consequences.

                  As a preamble for what I’m going to say next, I will tell you I’m not a practicing Christian and I’m not going to pretend my position is the Christian position, I suppose jim is the appropriate opinion on that. I sympathize with the religion of my ancestors, but for me the Bible is a book full of wonderful wisdom but not really the word of God.

                  Logic and reason are not the end game, they are tools that help us reach an end game, and so are social principles. In my opinion the social principles described in the Bible are correct to a very high degree as history has proven, if it works in reality it is indeed God’s will, Christianity presents a wonderful social technology. But those social principles belong in a context too, they work when they are applied widely in a society, I don’t believe they apply or are good for your situation at all.

                  I understand your wife is Muslim? Is she a widow to have two children and marrying you? I doubt it, according to both religions she probably deserves death to begin with. Even if she is a widow, Christianity and Islam do not belong in the same marriage, so how does this work exactly? Did she marry by the Christian God? No? Marriage never happened according to Christian principles.

                  Those Christian principles belong with a Christian woman, in a Christian marriage, in a Christian society, then they are valid, true and functional and they lead to good things. You cannot obtusely apply Christian principles to gay society, weird marriage with cuckoldry and a Muslim woman, it just doesn’t make sense, they don’t work that way.

                  Look, I’m not saying you’re wrong or jim is wrong or anyone is wrong, I’m just saying you obviously know in your heart what you truly want to do and these so called “principles” are just acting like chains that do not seem to benefit you in any way and only make you miserable. What is the end game of these “principles”? You stay cuckolded with a Muslim woman with two bastards and if you have children they aren’t even your own race. What happens if you ignore this and follow your heart? You leave a woman that is cuckolding you, isn’t even of your faith or the faith of your ancestors, and you get the chance to look for a woman that will be both Christian and your race? Isn’t this like a no brainer considering what you want?

                  So that’s why my advice is that you do what you think is right and really want to do, it’s your life and you are going to spend like 50 years more living it bro, not me, not anyone else. If you don’t make the choice that you truly believe in your heart, what’s the point? Will you live your live for others in a war against yourself, kill your soul and be a slave? Why live then?

                • jim says:

                  > Can you say they are your true principles if you feel like this about them?

                  I understood him has asking me how to live those principles. One can be what one chooses to be. They can be his true principles, if he chooses with courage and prudence.

                  What are my true principles? I am frequently governed by wrath, lust, gluttony, and sloth, and my faith is as a mustard seed.

                  I have monsters inside. Am I those monsters? Sometimes I am, but only under dire necessity. They serve me, when the circumstances arrive. I do not serve them.

                  But if I had a woman with two demonspawn, monster time. Major obstacles can suffer unfortunate accidents. It is a very bad situation. Which I would not have gotten into in the first place.

                  If the father of her children ditched her, or is in prison, or got killed in some idiocy, she probably feels he is the higher alpha, and will carry the torch for him forever. If, on the other hand she ditched him, she probably feels her children to be an inconvenient encumbrance and will view them as a more inconvenient encumbrance if she comes to view her husband as the higher alpha. Lionesses don’t seem to try very hard to preserve their cubs when the male of the pride loses to a new male.

                • The Cominator says:

                  “But if I had a woman with two demonspawn, monster time”

                  If they are truly demonspawn like they like to torture small animals an such maybe…

                  Otherwise the monster’s will own you for having shed innocent blood for purely selfish reasons.

                • jim says:

                  > Otherwise the monster’s will own you

                  Yes, hence not getting into that situation. For that would indeed be the outcome.

                • Western Taliban says:

                  I understood him has asking me how to live those principles. One can be what one chooses to be. They can be his true principles, if he chooses with courage and prudence.

                  What are my true principles? I am frequently governed by wrath, lust, gluttony, and sloth, and my faith is as a mustard seed.

                  I have monsters inside. Am I those monsters? Sometimes I am, but only under dire necessity. They serve me, when the circumstances arrive. I do not serve them.

                  I agree with the sentiment, but I feel compelled to question the use of courage and prudence in this situation, to describe the act of killing two brown bastards to stay with a Muslim slut (no offense to the guy…) and never have children of his own race.

                  I personally can never agree that choice is courage and prudence, for he chooses self-destruction for slavish inclination to exterior opinion, even by his own judgement. If he was all gung-ho about having mixed children and Islam, I don’t know, maybe courage and prudence would dictate that he indeed takes this path at any cost, for that is what he truly wanted no matter what others would think. But it’s not the case.

                • jim says:

                  If he does not have children with her, unlikely to work out. After three or four years, both partners get itchy and are apt to play around.

                  If you intend to marry, you should intend children, or no end of grief and cost and possibly bloodshed will ensue.

                • Red says:

                  If they are truly demonspawn like they like to torture small animals an such maybe…

                  Having seen a lot bastards being raised by other men… most but not all are Demonspawn. They’re net negatives on everyone around them. There were a few who would be good men, but they were without direction because a step father is no real father and their mother predictably divorced him to play the field again.

                  Though my own family line comes from just such a situation.

                  My great great grandmother still held a flame for the man who knocked her up. She passed down the only item he ever gave her down the generations.

                • Adam says:

                  Based on my experience one thing I would never do is raise my own kids in a home with another man’s kids. Out of the question.

                  The only exception I would make to mixed families would be for a man raising his children from one wife along side his children from another wife.

                  If your home is not dedicated to raising your kids and only your kids, do not have kids.

                • The Cominator says:

                  One thing that is also odd about this story, didn’t think the Muslim world really tolerated single women who got knocked up either or at least that kind of thing was exceedingly rare in the Islamic world, even in the more loosely Islamic Asian countries ala Indonesia.

                • jim says:

                  A whole lot Islam is right under the Cathedral thumb. The Cathedral grossly exaggerates the extent to which they lag behind the current year, because the slightest footdragging outrages them. Real Islam is Afghanistan, and that is that. The rest are Cathedralized to greater or lesser degree.

                • falseconvert says:

                  Regarding the two kids and the “alphaness” of the ex-husband. The ex-husband cheated on her with at least two women, and at one point told his then-wife, now my wife, he was going to live with one of the mistresses instead of her, which she felt she had no choice but to accept. She was pregnant at a young age with his kids and married him according to his religion, not hers.

                  The alpha level would probably be considered high, maybe even extremely high, during the relationship. I don’t think it ended on a high. She eventually took both the kids on a motorbike, left, and later initiated the divorce.

                  Now one of the kids is living with him, one is living with my wife and me. The ex apparently still has women regularly coming to his house. I’m not sure if he’s sleeping with multiple women at the same time, but maybe. I don’t think he has produced any more kids. I’ve met him one time for about 10 seconds, with my wife present, and he was quite docile, effectively mute, and diminutive. My wife told him to shake my hand, which he did weakly. Before my wife met me, he would periodically ask her to come back to him, apparently never successfully. So, he’s not a big alpha in her life anymore, based on the signs I can observe. Though, this could be the beta in me speaking.

                  The kid living with her ex is quite pleasant whenever I see her, which isn’t that often. The one living with us, not so much.

                  Re Western Taliban:

                  Is staying with her according to my true principles?

                  Back at the start of the relationship, I betrayed my principles when I started talking to her. I betrayed the principle of honesty and I put lust ahead of decency. I knew I would have a problem with the relationship in the future, due to her being brown, but I still went forward with it.

                  About three or four times I “tried” to break up with her, though I never went through with it finally because it was clear she always really wanted me to stay. How can I throw away something that means so much to her? Even if it’s based on my lies and a betrayal of my principles, her feelings are real.

                  “A man who follows his own true code never regrets what he did no matter the consequences”

                  Yes but the question for me is what is the right way to proceed according to my code, from the position I’m in now. I’ve already fucked up and betrayed my code.

                • falseconvert says:

                  Jim, you said that the “monsters serve you”.

                  You then replied “Yes, hence not getting into that situation” to “Otherwise the monsters will own you”.

                  Are you saying that you, Jim specifically, would end up being owned by monsters in my situation, or are you saying that anybody in my situation, including myself, will end up being owned by monsters? Please can you explain this a bit more, whichever it is?

                • jim says:

                  I don’t see that everyone, or indeed most people, have monsters inside in the sense that I do. I am still a killer ape, as are we all, but I more than average. Most people’s wickedness is weakness and self damage. Mine is that I wear civilization and Christianity like a rather uncomfortably tight pair of jeans. I always feel strong impulses to do what would have promoted survival and reproduction in the ancestral environment. Most people are wicked because they are too civilized, rather than too little.

                • falseconvert says:

                  Re Western Taliban, one other issue is that I don’t think a code is always complete and accounts for every situation. So it’s not as simple as just “follow the code”

                  My previous code being too extreme regarding sex is perhaps partly what got me into this mess. I would do very weird things to avoid lust, eventually this backfired I guess

                • falseconvert says:

                  Fair enough, I think I got into this mess by being far too civilised, far too self-suppressing, for a long time. Which was in turn a reaction to being too uncivilized and causing too much chaos. I seem to live an episodic life of sorts.

                  Sexuality wise, though, I was way too much of an overthinker before I met my wife. Cognition inhibiting action rather than directing it

                • alf says:

                  The ex-husband cheated on her with at least two women

                  The more I read your story, the more I am inclined to ask you to think very very hard on whether this is the life you want to choose. But of course, that’s why you posted here in the first place.

                • Adam says:

                  This is one of those times in your life that will either make you or break you. It feels like you have a knife at your throat and you have to make a decision where both options seem bad on some level. You can let your fear get the best of you and stop you or you can step forward into the unknown. As others have said you only need to be honest with yourself to know what needs to be done.

                • i says:


                  Most people’s wickedness is weakness and self damage. Mine is that I wear civilization and Christianity like a rather uncomfortably tight pair of jeans.

                  Hebrews 10:15-16

                  The Holy Spirit also testifies to us about this. First He says:

                  16“This is the covenant I will make with them

                  after those days, declares the Lord.

                  I will put My laws in their hearts

                  and inscribe them on their minds.”

                  Galatians 5:22

                  22But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23gentleness, and self-control. Against such things there is no law

                  2 Corinthians 5:21

                  21God made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that in Him we might become the righteousness of God.

                  All such things are the result of the work of the Holy Spirit in the Christian. Righteousness should become more and more instinctive. Alongside said Righteousness’ conflict with the sinful flesh.

                  Unlike the Righteousness of the Law which is impossible for Men to keep.

                  The New Covenant involves the Baptism of the Holy Spirit which helps us to inherit more of the organic and instinctive Righteousness of Christ.

                  Thereby allowing us to be keep the Spirit of the Law without turning into Pharisees.

    • SJ says:

      Just a few other tips. Women want to serve a man but they can only serve if they are commanded. Women want to obey but they can only obey if you order. Women want to please but you have to tell them how to please you and then tell them that they are a good girl when they deserve it, and that you are disappointed when they need to hear it. You are above her and you become above her because you act it so.

      • jim says:

        It is not entirely command. My wife studies me intently to discover what pleases me, and what I think I need. But I will give her what I think she should have, while she will give me what I think I should have.

  27. steven says:

    FWIW I copy pasted ‘gay needs to be suppressed’ into Bing and this article was the fifth result.

    The top four results were the usual pozzed piffle.

    • jim says:

      Yandex gives this article as the first result, which is a lot more relevant than this article, and the top four results were all red pilled, which is to say, actually relevant to the search string.

    • Upravda says:

      Third, actually (when doing anonymous search from Croatia), but as a link to domain on empty reddit discussion.Other results are usual modern mumbo-jumbo about homosexualism.

      Yes, the glass might be half full, in the sense that whoever censors Bing, they are not particularly keen on that censoring – bit it is still censoring.

  28. Objects In Mirror says:

    All of these coalitions forming and agreements to pay in formats other than cash means WWIII is coming up fast.

  29. dave says:

    interesting. yandex is blocked by corporate policy on corporate laptop. thats a vote in yandex favor.

  30. johnson pylar says:

    I knew about Yandex before. And honestly I think Yandex was someone pozzed when it came back after the blackout of the Russian sites in the US for about 4 weeks at the start of the SMO. But if you’re finding based stuff on it, it only shows it was so based before that pozzing it isn’t entirely effective. Or maybe they’ve ramped it based-ness up recently and only pozzed it tenporarily rightafter the blackout.

    • jim says:

      I tried Yandex a few months back, and did not see any interesting improvement over the regular seach engines.

      And then the regular search engines seemed to get worse, so I gave it another try, and it seemed a whole lot better. When I searched for “vaccine sequelae” one of the top links was about a documentary being banned pretty much everywhere. Yandex is Streisanding what gets suppressed. A regular search engine is not going to turn up material on what is being suppressed.

Leave a Reply