And George Galloway is a straight commie.
George Galloway is in his seventies, and for as long as I can remember he was the leading voice and face of the radical left of the British labour party, and was organising protests against the western side in every war that I can remember. (In 2003 he was purged from labour for being too far left.) He is now self exiled from Britain, from his house, his home and the circle of his friends, due to a well founded fear that should he show his face in a British airport, he will be subject to state violence because he thinks that women are not men, because he thinks that it is probably not a good idea for Britain to pick a fight with a state that has three thousand nuclear weapons, and similarly shocking and unthinkable thoughts.
In the Iraq war, George Galloway was a guest on the BBC every day ranting about American imperialism. For the last decade or so, he has been persona non grata in the European legacy media, and, predictably, cancellation, demonetization, and deplatforming has now escalated to state violence.
Nick Fuentes hyperbolically claims to be the most cancelled man in America. Elon Musk thinks that Nick Fuentes is on the fed payroll. And I agree.
Nick Fuentes was invited onto “Piers Morgan Uncensored”, and much hilarity ensued as Piers Morgan was completely discombobulated to find he was debating someone who was actually uncensored.
Piers Morgan would show a Nick Fuentes clip, and complain that the clip was ism and phobia, and accuse Nick of being an ist and a phobe. Nick would smile like the cat that got the cream, and cheerfully say the unsayable all over again. Nick effortlessly won every argument, because Nick has thought all these things through while Piers Morgan has never heard these thoughts nor seen this evidence and still cannot hear these thoughts nor see this evidence.
But Nick is still a gay commie. The reason they are platforming Nick Fuentes while they are still trying to put Andrew Tate in jail is that though Nick Fuentes is right about women and the holocaust, Andrew Tate is a lot more right about women than Nick Fuentes.
The difference between Fuentes and Tate on women is that though they both say that women need to be conquered and subdued, Tate also says that they want to be conquered and subdued, and are bitter and unhappy because they cannot find anyone capable of conquering and subduing them.
Nick Fuentes is a limited hangout. He is the left deciding to open the Overton window substantially, but by no means all the way — not to anyone who actually frightens them.
It was entertaining to see Nick slice and dice Piers, it was good to see the mainstream encounter someone saying the unsayable, but every answer Nick gave was a soft wobbly retreat from the full thought crime. We have better and more important things to say that he was willing to say.
It is great that the British left is now willing to hear what Nick Fuentes is saying. But they still cannot hear what George Galloway is saying, and still less can they hear what Andrew Tate is saying.
Piers “You’re not gay”
Fuentes [pauses, looks away] “No”
LOL
P.S. A terribly belated Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, lads. Was offline for a low-tech family holiday.
I don’t think Nick is gay, or a commie, or a fed. I’m certainly not his greatest fan but he is definitely in the right place at the right time politically, and I think it’s entirely coincidental.
Gay is a weird take. Should he just be fucking random women? To show he likes them? I don’t get it. It’s inevitable given our hypersexualised culture that a proportion of men enculturated into it just don’t react to the signal anymore. “Give insta thots attention!!” .. no.
I think Nick is fairly redpilled on women in general, but it’s just not really his area of interest. Whether Nick is more strategic, as talking shit about women is guaranteed social death, or he doesn’t see that managing women is number one priority, I can’t tell.
I think his position on social welfare is simply “If we have to allow that in order to have closed borders so be it”. I’ve not watched 100% of his content obviously but in general it seems like his opinion is not that welfare is morally good or something to strive for, but something that, in normie politics, is necessary to consider.
Fed is too readily thrown around as well. I don’t see it. Places I do see fed are, for example, Thomas Massey in Aus.
Regardless, you raise a very interesting point about Galloway. He is unironically a commie, and yet fully against what amount to fairly communist governments in the west.
Hope you had a good Christmas mate.
>I don’t think Nick is gay
Nick looks at other men the same way an open, flamboyant faggot would.
Nick Fuentes Catboy Kami GIFfrom Nick Fuentes GIFs
That’s not even the most damning evidence. During a stream in 2022 from his phone, his browser windows were briefly in view. One of them, “Tgirl sucking a femboy’s dick and then he jerks until cum.” It’s not even his first run in with “I was hacked” gay porn. Then you look at his social circle. A lot of gays.
It’s been an open secret for years now and the subject of parody.
https://www.murdochmurdoch.net/murdoch/in-the-court-of-the-optics-king/
Seems obvious to me he was installed by the FBI in the right place at right time politically.
It still a win for us, I am not complaining. I just say its less of win than advertised and more dangerous to us than advertised — the enemy is not defeated, merely making a tactical retreat to more defensible positions.
Greetings,
Interesting that we pivot to Nick at this time, but he is flooding the country with groypers and I’m sure some of them are very fine people.
Based on his Carlson interview, he would pass the WQ though. He took a traditional patriarchal stance.
I am much more interested in how the Venezuelan situation will impact BitCoin.
Fuentes agreed enthusiastically with Cucker Tarlson that America is a ‘patriarchy’. They were quite sure, and pleased with one another.
Cucker doesn’t even run his own household of princesses, much less preside over a patriarchy with his fellow rich and connected friends. And this priviledged dweeb is the anointed Edgy Conservative who tackles the tough topics. It is to puke.
Again, I am more interested in money than the latest controlled opposition assets, but I don’t disagree with what you wrote. Both their mannerisms strike me as effeminate.
I find this very hard to believe. Link and time please.
Humungus claimed Nick could pass the WQ based on Carlson interview.
At 1:30:40
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=efBB0D4tf1Y
He makes the statement, “your body my choice.” Which was a sufficient thought crime. He later discusses women being subordinate to their husband.
I’m not here to defend Fuentes, but if he was presented with the WQ, he would commit the thought crime.
Why is he a concern?
Tucker Carlson has four preppy white kids by his first and only wife. The wife and kids so far have stayed out of the spotlight, which is a good start on well behaved in this day and age. So he passes Pauline criteria for an elder.
Polygamous harem of princesses is a tall ask in current year, and you may never get it at all.
And I’m a guy who’s said before now that Tucker pretty clearly was and still is WASP wing of the CIA. So still a kind of limited hangout, seeing what the restless native stock will settle for. But still less hostile to his co-ethnics than a gay or a jew will be.
Tucker is a WASP?
The Venezuala raid was impressive and gives Trump and the reputation of American arms some much needed mojo but l hope the aftermath is not a foreverwar.
At least it was done competently. Under Bush, Biden or Obama (or either Clinton), we would have woken up to see captured US soldiers being paraded on VZ state television.
Apropos of nothing, thought I would share these two articles:
https://substack.com/@cremieux/p-180067645 (Paywall)
https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/the-baby-boom
TL;DR: Feminism is not compatible with biological continuation.
Of course, this is not news to anyone here – some of the charts have been floating around this blog for over a decade – but it’s a good explanation of the anti-feminist argument. Naturally Jim will probably complain that they failed to recommend coverture or include the evopsych explanation for just why this is the case, but the fact that these articles have even been published is enormous. These guys are not nobodies and they’re a lot closer to informing “elite consensus” than you think (or at least a certain part of the elite).
I liked the latter author’s review of JD Unwin and also when he quantifies marriage rates vs male female income ratio.
The Unwin review states gender norms change every 3 generations.
Similar to how Putin ended Covid in 2022, Trump just ended Global Warming in Canada. No longer are leftists chanting “Leave It In The Ground” because of muh carbon, now we need to pump as much oil as possible and build pipelines to make our economy strong enough to resist evil orange man. Kinda funny since all of the oil is about to leave anyway. The Alberta/Saskatchewan independence referenda will happen later this year, and it’s looking like they will vote to leave.
Speaking of which, there are a lot of people with Ukrainian and Canadian flags in their twitter names clamouring for the federal government to use military force to attack the separatist provinces. Canadian provinces seceding and becoming independent, being attacked by the Canadian military for doing so, and America stepping in to help is exactly analogous to the Donbas situation. They dream of grabbing Canadians off of the street and throwing us in trenches to die needlessly just like their neo-nazi heroes in the Ukraine. I don’t fear any such conflict lasting nearly as long as the Special Military Operation for obvious reasons, but it is still something that the Trump Administration needs to be prepared for.
>The Alberta/Saskatchewan independence referenda will happen later this year, and it’s looking like they will vote to leave.
Sorry, a judge said the vote’s not valid. It can’t be done now and it’s out of my hands. You can try again in four years, but make sure you get all your legal/procedural ducks in a row first.
They going to vote anyway? If so and independence wins, especially if by a large margin, I think it’s likely Alberta will say FU to the judge. How many divisions does he have?
No divisions are needed. A few dozen mounties arresting the ringleaders will be more than enough if anyone is stupid enough to threaten Our Democracy.
One good thing about the flawless success of the Maduro operation is it should strengthen the hand of Christian Nationalist Hegseth over the leftist in the military and politics in the future is increasingly going to come down to the military (since Trump doesn’t have the guts to use ICE to take over even when he probably could have after Kirk). The narrative that Hegseth is a drunk mentally disturbed incompetent washout soldier capatulted way over his head by Trump is no longer sustainable after hes had I think this was his 3rd flawless operation.