The Maga right is a big tent that welcomes outsiders. The left vigorously polices purity. The left is forever holiness spiraling to ever greater evil, malice, viciousness, and depravity, and has been doing so since the late eighteenth, early nineteenth, century.
What Maga is doing is politics as one would expect politics to function in a democracy or a republic, if democracy or republicanism was actually working as advertised. You try to build a coalition that is big enough to take power. What the Maga right is doing is politics, politics as theory describes republics and democracies as function. What the left is doing is the opposite of what theory says politics is. And it has been doing the opposite of what politics is supposed to be for more than two centuries, with immense success.
When the holiness spiral runs fast, the state self destructs, so the survivor is the one that holiness spirals the slowest, which was England and America. But inevitably the holiness spiral runs faster and faster.
Democracy became popular among elites following the failed revolutions of 1848 — “the springtime of nations”. Back then leftism was nationalist, and rightism was anti nationalist. And leftism continued to be nationalist all the way to the end of World War I, and has not entirely ceased to be nationalist, as for example Ukrainian Nazism.
Democracy became popular among elites because the mass media emerged, and elites have always managed the mass media. From the beginning, democracy was fake. It was uniparty democracy. Two parties disputing a fake issue, and whichever party gets elected, no matter what issues it campaigned on, it always winds up implementing the leftism of the inner party. The left party is the inner party, and the right party is the outer party. Sometimes the outer party is permitted to implement right policy on some matter, but only when the left is abandoning that leftist program to focus on some new shinier program. Thus for example in the Reagan/Thatcher era, redistribution had gone far, far, far beyond the Laffer limit, and the elite, recognising this, decided to back off from redistribution, and focus on the much shinier program of the destruction of marriage and family, which had already been under way since the late sixties. So Reagan and Thatcher were permitted to win, and permitted to back off from destructive redistribution towards the Laffer limit — conditional on the destruction of marriage and family going full speed ahead, and mass migration going full speed ahead.
Back in the 1930s, when Hitler was elected, the inner party in America decided to abandon the destruction of marriage and family in favor of the destruction of capitalism, for the destruction of marriage and family makes a nation militarily weak, while socialism, by making it able to temporarily tax far above the Laffer limit, makes it temporarily strong. Then in the 1960s, the destruction of marriage and family resumed. Which has now hit its limit, with most men incel and all women whores, so the young and energetic left are now refocusing back on the destruction of capitalism, while the older gerontocratic left are still focused on antinationalism (except for the Ukraine), mass illegal immigration, the destruction of beauty and art, stamping out the faint echoes of family and marriage, and men in women’s sports.
When the internet emerged it was a new mass medium, and because of its newness, the elite had no means of controlling it. It was dominated by hackers and the hacker ethic, and what later became known as the alt right emerged, a version of rightism that was no longer under the thumb of the inner party.
Very soon, a big effort to bring it under control emerged, with a storm of shills and shilling. Since Usenet had no moderation mechanism, by 2010 or so, shilling destroyed Usenet.
From then on, the left owned the internet, and set about destroying open source, systematically cancelling and deplatforming anyone attempting to resist this. As they destroyed open source, various voices defending open source cried out, and were then silenced, the only major namefag surviving being Lunduke.
However the destruction of gaming and movies met with more resistance, because of the huge base of passionate fans, and now that the iron hand of censorship has been somewhat eased in you tube, we see an explosion of “rightist” content — the “rightists” being leftists who breathed in leftism in school and from the media, but did not like it when they saw their beloved games and movies being destroyed. Asmongold was and is a gaming journalist. He has no real interest in politics, but politics is interested in his beloved games, and so became interested in him.
“Rightists”, non uniparty rightists, now dominate the internet, the overwhelming majority of them having no right wing ideology at all, just incoherent fragments of left wing ideology. They became “rightists” because marked for destruction by the holiness spiraling left, and so wound up as part of the big tent Maga coalition.
The vast majority of those in the Maga coalition have not a thought in their head, except thoughts planted there by leftism. But always, the ideas of men with ideas are filling the vacuum. That is the alt right. And the alt right itself is incoherent and overrun with enemy shills. Within the alt right, there is the Dark Enlightenment.
Nature abhors a vaccuum. Hot radioactive power is falling into the street for someone to pick it up. The left has an organised centralised state funded program to pick it up under the banner of socialism and opposition to “oligarchs” — the greatest and most powerful oligarch of them all being the tech prophet Elon Musk.
The “oligarchs” don’t like that, but don’t have a coherent belief system to oppose the enemy belief system.
Calling them “oligarchs” is true in the sense that they have a lot of power and a far too intimate connection to the state — but grossly deceptive and false in that before 2024 they followed a policy of humble acquiescence to official leftism, which acquiescence nearly led to their destruction, as they acquiesced to the whims of those who hated them and wished them gone, and after 2024 a policy of humble acquiescence to Trump.
Trump is facing enemies without and enemies within. Is an FBI director who looks us straight in the eye and tells us Epstein killed himself — safe to have in charge of men with guns? If Trump is to win, if the “oligarchs” are to keep what they have, they need men of a counter faith to leftism. As Putin finally realised, you have to bring a gun to gunfight, and a faith to a holy war.
If you have a big tent that welcomes outsiders, you are going to get hostile enemy entryists inside the tent. You cannot and should not enforce a test of good character and true faith in general, for that would be small tent. But hostile entryists are magnetically attracted to key posts where they can potentially stab you in the back. For these posts, the military, the cops, and the spooks, you have to appoint men of good character and true faith.
>Unfortunately it might be necessary to stuff Trump in sack and throw him across the Rubicon
Who in our elite sociopolitical culture is even capable of doing that let alone think that? Rome didn’t go from failed republic to Augustus in one day, and the American system was largely based on the Roman republic’s. It took a generation and a half after Sulla to get there. Man’s brain works in slow chemical analog with normality bias seared into neural pathways.
And nobody stuff Lucius Cornelius in a sack. Sulla got the message he (as sitting Consul and a great hero and successful commander in the social war) was being relieved of command and told his troops (who loved him for saving the army at Nola) that it meant they were planning to exile him and cut them out of the loot of an eastern campaign (Eastern campaigns tended to be more loot heavy) and send them back to the slums (most of his troops were from the Roman “head count” class). Sulla very quickly and decisively reacted to the message that he was relieved of command by convincing his army to march on Rome.
Sulla also had an extremely unusual upbringing for a Roman who ended up Consul, he was from a Roman noble house and nominally an optimate in politics but until he was around 30 he grew up in the slums and probably experienced lots of Roman slum things… gang brawls, knife fights etc. So the 1st guy to march on Rome had likely a very very unusual mentality for a Roman commander.
Is white separatism a solution?
To establish an enclave and break the US (if trump fail and thing went south).
Is this a workable solution , I have been reading about Rhodesia and now Orania.
It seem that Rhodesia failed because the left was competent at that time, but now seem the ability to wage violence and tech decline make it very hard to stamp an attempt. So the prospect of places like Orania is better today.
Whites in Rhodesia were mostly united American whites are no such thing.
By the time you get enough white men working together under the banner of something like white separatism, with enough wit and resource to not get themselves picked off and killed or arrested, you have something that doesn’t need to be separatist.
The problem is the enemy controls the microphone now, though less so than last generation, and has controlled the microphone for many generations. So, as Jim is pointing out in his post here, nearly impossible to get a coalition going on rightwing principles when the majory of the people who nominally should be on-side are full of leftist brainparasites making them totally ineffective at recognizing and then following a right wing leader capable of doing right wing things.
A man in a position like Trump, whom was made king whether he or anyone else acknowledges it or not, can create such a coalition. We are not in a position to, because this is something that has to be done by men and not ideas, and men who organize without assent from friends high up in the state find themselves in bad positions. Though, with the decay of the state apparatus, and the increasingly distracted left, the bad positions one finds himself in of today are less hopeless than ones of last generation. If we had a Branch Davidian situation today, and they consciously armed themselves and used the latest and greatest civilian origin-military modded materiel, including of course drones but also encrypted comms and much more besides, I doubt the state would take them on. The state has become increasingly fearful of difficult fights, such fights that would reveal further the amount of rot it has suffered.
It’s looking increasingly likely to me that we need Jim’s sovcorps to bootstrap such a thing, as the cult energy has evaporated with the collapse in human capital. They just don’t make believers like they used to. So instead you organize men seeking paychecks, and radicalize them through corporate policy. You need small tent for this. Strongly purge anyone that smells slightly of leftism from any control. The working together under secure comms builds cohesion, and the expulsion of brainrotten leftists that distract you builds piety. Eventually the corporation has enough men and enough resources that it can resist destruction from a weak and dying or weak and frantically insane state religion. At that point you organize more in meatspace, cleverly so and with your wits about you, and become too stubbornly strong for eradication.
The key point being here that you need the few and fewer men of high energy and high agency united with the fewer and fewer men with capacity for right wing priesthood together in one place, and you need this organization to not be immediately broken up, and all the members killed and or imprisoned, so that they might gather resources and the means of controlling said resources.