The nature of the left

The Maga right is a big tent that welcomes outsiders. The left vigorously polices purity. The left is forever holiness spiraling to ever greater evil, malice, viciousness, and depravity, and has been doing so since the late eighteenth, early nineteenth, century.

What Maga is doing is politics as one would expect politics to function in a democracy or a republic, if democracy or republicanism was actually working as advertised. You try to build a coalition that is big enough to take power. What the Maga right is doing is politics, politics as theory describes republics and democracies as function. What the left is doing is the opposite of what theory says politics is. And it has been doing the opposite of what politics is supposed to be for more than two centuries, with immense success.

When the holiness spiral runs fast, the state self destructs, so the survivor is the one that holiness spirals the slowest, which was England and America. But inevitably the holiness spiral runs faster and faster.

Democracy became popular among elites following the failed revolutions of 1848 — “the springtime of nations”. Back then leftism was nationalist, and rightism was anti nationalist. And leftism continued to be nationalist all the way to the end of World War I, and has not entirely ceased to be nationalist, as for example Ukrainian Nazism.

Democracy became popular among elites because the mass media emerged, and elites have always managed the mass media. From the beginning, democracy was fake. It was uniparty democracy. Two parties disputing a fake issue, and whichever party gets elected, no matter what issues it campaigned on, it always winds up implementing the leftism of the inner party. The left party is the inner party, and the right party is the outer party. Sometimes the outer party is permitted to implement right policy on some matter, but only when the left is abandoning that leftist program to focus on some new shinier program. Thus for example in the Reagan/Thatcher era, redistribution had gone far, far, far beyond the Laffer limit, and the elite, recognising this, decided to back off from redistribution, and focus on the much shinier program of the destruction of marriage and family, which had already been under way since the late sixties. So Reagan and Thatcher were permitted to win, and permitted to back off from destructive redistribution towards the Laffer limit — conditional on the destruction of marriage and family going full speed ahead, and mass migration going full speed ahead.

Back in the 1930s, when Hitler was elected, the inner party in America decided to abandon the destruction of marriage and family in favor of the destruction of capitalism, for the destruction of marriage and family makes a nation militarily weak, while socialism, by making it able to temporarily tax far above the Laffer limit, makes it temporarily strong. Then in the 1960s, the destruction of marriage and family resumed. Which has now hit its limit, with most men incel and all women whores, so the young and energetic left are now refocusing back on the destruction of capitalism, while the older gerontocratic left are still focused on antinationalism (except for the Ukraine), mass illegal immigration, the destruction of beauty and art, stamping out the faint echoes of family and marriage, and men in women’s sports.

When the internet emerged it was a new mass medium, and because of its newness, the elite had no means of controlling it. It was dominated by hackers and the hacker ethic, and what later became known as the alt right emerged, a version of rightism that was no longer under the thumb of the inner party.

Very soon, a big effort to bring it under control emerged, with a storm of shills and shilling. Since Usenet had no moderation mechanism, by 2010 or so, shilling destroyed Usenet.

From then on, the left owned the internet, and set about destroying open source, systematically cancelling and deplatforming anyone attempting to resist this. As they destroyed open source, various voices defending open source cried out, and were then silenced, the only major namefag surviving being Lunduke.

However the destruction of gaming and movies met with more resistance, because of the huge base of passionate fans, and now that the iron hand of censorship has been somewhat eased in you tube, we see an explosion of “rightist” content — the “rightists” being leftists who breathed in leftism in school and from the media, but did not like it when they saw their beloved games and movies being destroyed. Asmongold was and is a gaming journalist. He has no real interest in politics, but politics is interested in his beloved games, and so became interested in him.

“Rightists”, non uniparty rightists, now dominate the internet, the overwhelming majority of them having no right wing ideology at all, just incoherent fragments of left wing ideology. They became “rightists” because marked for destruction by the holiness spiraling left, and so wound up as part of the big tent Maga coalition.

The vast majority of those in the Maga coalition have not a thought in their head, except thoughts planted there by leftism. But always, the ideas of men with ideas are filling the vacuum. That is the alt right. And the alt right itself is incoherent and overrun with enemy shills. Within the alt right, there is the Dark Enlightenment.

Nature abhors a vaccuum. Hot radioactive power is falling into the street for someone to pick it up. The left has an organised centralised state funded program to pick it up under the banner of socialism and opposition to “oligarchs” — the greatest and most powerful oligarch of them all being the tech prophet Elon Musk.

The “oligarchs” don’t like that, but don’t have a coherent belief system to oppose the enemy belief system.

Calling them “oligarchs” is true in the sense that they have a lot of power and a far too intimate connection to the state — but grossly deceptive and false in that before 2024 they followed a policy of humble acquiescence to official leftism, which acquiescence nearly led to their destruction, as they acquiesced to the whims of those who hated them and wished them gone, and after 2024 a policy of humble acquiescence to Trump.

Trump is facing enemies without and enemies within. Is an FBI director who looks us straight in the eye and tells us Epstein killed himself — safe to have in charge of men with guns? If Trump is to win, if the “oligarchs” are to keep what they have, they need men of a counter faith to leftism. As Putin finally realised, you have to bring a gun to gunfight, and a faith to a holy war.

If you have a big tent that welcomes outsiders, you are going to get hostile enemy entryists inside the tent. You cannot and should not enforce a test of good character and true faith in general, for that would be small tent. But hostile entryists are magnetically attracted to key posts where they can potentially stab you in the back. For these posts, the military, the cops, and the spooks, you have to appoint men of good character and true faith.

45 comments The nature of the left

Pax Imperialis says:

>Unfortunately it might be necessary to stuff Trump in sack and throw him across the Rubicon

Who in our elite sociopolitical culture is even capable of doing that let alone think that? Rome didn’t go from failed republic to Augustus in one day, and the American system was largely based on the Roman republic’s. It took a generation and a half after Sulla to get there. Man’s brain works in slow chemical analog with normality bias seared into neural pathways.

The Cominator says:

And nobody stuff Lucius Cornelius in a sack. Sulla got the message he (as sitting Consul and a great hero and successful commander in the social war) was being relieved of command and told his troops (who loved him for saving the army at Nola) that it meant they were planning to exile him and cut them out of the loot of an eastern campaign (Eastern campaigns tended to be more loot heavy) and send them back to the slums (most of his troops were from the Roman “head count” class). Sulla very quickly and decisively reacted to the message that he was relieved of command by convincing his army to march on Rome.

The Cominator says:

Sulla also had an extremely unusual upbringing for a Roman who ended up Consul, he was from a Roman noble house and nominally an optimate in politics but until he was around 30 he grew up in the slums and probably experienced lots of Roman slum things… gang brawls, knife fights etc. So the 1st guy to march on Rome had likely a very very unusual mentality for a Roman commander.

Pax Imperialis says:

And yet, for as unusual Sulla was, he was guided by normality bias and tried to restore the dead Republic rather than take the crown. No one was willing to fully toss him across the Rubicon and he only went so far as to fish in it. Like Trump in many ways. Caesar would later mock Sulla for resigning the dictatorship. Who will come to mock Trump for doing the same?

My guess, there’s over a 50% chance Trump retires from the presidency into comfort, the zombie Republic continues to stumble along for another decade. Then we might see a King either seize the or forced into the White House.

The Cominator says:

Sulla absolutely did not fish in the Rubicon he decisively decided to take the unprecedented step of marching on Rome and to take power by force that he tried to restore the republic was normalcy bias though.

Pax Imperialis says:

Sure, Sulla got his feet wet, but if the end result is as if he never did, did he really cross the Rubicon? There’s a reason why crossing the proverbial river is memetically associated with Caesar and merely a historical fact with Sulla.

The Cominator says:

Its hard to know if he could have gone farther successfully if he tried, Sulla did not have a living son (at least not a legitimate one) and he did not really have a faction (he was only sort of an Optimate but not because he had much affection for the ruling class his favorite people to hang around were his soldiers and his old buddies from the slums which included people from the lowest level of roman society more because he wouldn’t make as a military hero being a populares because Marius was the populares military hero) in the Roman ruling class either and Romans probably weren’t totally willing to giveup on the Republic yet in Sulla’s time it took a few more civil wars before people decided we’re done with this shit. Sullas political ascent (after getting into the senate when he became rich enough around 30 because his very high end prostitute psuedo girlfriend left everything to him, and yes from the few sources we have that is the documented reason he came into enough wealth to make the senatorial property requirements) was based even more than Marius purely on military success but his sole power base was really his worshipful soldiers.

Its a real tragedy that Sulla’s autobiography was lost to history I would have loved to read it.

Mossadnik says:

My guess, there’s over a 50% chance Trump retires from the presidency into comfort, the zombie Republic continues to stumble along for another decade. Then we might see a King either seize the or forced into the White House.

I tend to concur with that assessment.

Hope it will be Donald Trump Jr., or Eric Trump, or Peter Hegseth.

And I expect the shills to try and discredit all three of them very soon, employing the usual shill talking points, similar to those employed against the Bad Orange Man.

Right now on Twitter, the non-shill Right Wing accounts are discovering what it feels like when the shill brigades are after you. Oh, it’s going to be a very sobering experience for them.

The Cathedral is… concerned.

The Cominator says:

The only person in the Trump family who I’m pretty sure knows what time it is Baron “Octavian Caesar Augustus” Trump.

Mossadnik says:

What I’m certain about is that the King, if indeed there is to be one, will be neither a Catholic nor a Jew. I like Vance and Miller, but “no Bishop, no King,” and as the next state religion will be Protestant (ideally of the Jimian variety), the King will also be a Protestant, and an Aryan too.

Jim says:

He never speaks a word in public on politics, or indeed anything — which silence, and reading his face, leads me to also assess him as Baron Trump Augustus.

Reading silent faces is chancy. But I also believe he knows what time it is.

The Cominator says:

Octavian had a reputation for not saying very much and being pretty unreadable (even to non spergs) as well.

The Cominator says:

And also coincidently they even look a lot alike…

Mossadnik says:

“There are no coincidences.”

The Cominator says:

I mean I guess maybe if you believe in reincarnation maybe God liked the actor who played the role of Augustus on the world stage again so much he hired him to play a similar part.

Hesiod says:

Crafted from the same mold, perhaps.

Anon says:

Is white separatism a solution?
To establish an enclave and break the US (if trump fail and thing went south).
Is this a workable solution , I have been reading about Rhodesia and now Orania.
It seem that Rhodesia failed because the left was competent at that time, but now seem the ability to wage violence and tech decline make it very hard to stamp an attempt. So the prospect of places like Orania is better today.

The Cominator says:

Whites in Rhodesia were mostly united American whites are no such thing.

Fidelis says:

By the time you get enough white men working together under the banner of something like white separatism, with enough wit and resource to not get themselves picked off and killed or arrested, you have something that doesn’t need to be separatist.

The problem is the enemy controls the microphone now, though less so than last generation, and has controlled the microphone for many generations. So, as Jim is pointing out in his post here, nearly impossible to get a coalition going on rightwing principles when the majory of the people who nominally should be on-side are full of leftist brainparasites making them totally ineffective at recognizing and then following a right wing leader capable of doing right wing things.

A man in a position like Trump, whom was made king whether he or anyone else acknowledges it or not, can create such a coalition. We are not in a position to, because this is something that has to be done by men and not ideas, and men who organize without assent from friends high up in the state find themselves in bad positions. Though, with the decay of the state apparatus, and the increasingly distracted left, the bad positions one finds himself in of today are less hopeless than ones of last generation. If we had a Branch Davidian situation today, and they consciously armed themselves and used the latest and greatest civilian origin-military modded materiel, including of course drones but also encrypted comms and much more besides, I doubt the state would take them on. The state has become increasingly fearful of difficult fights, such fights that would reveal further the amount of rot it has suffered.

It’s looking increasingly likely to me that we need Jim’s sovcorps to bootstrap such a thing, as the cult energy has evaporated with the collapse in human capital. They just don’t make believers like they used to. So instead you organize men seeking paychecks, and radicalize them through corporate policy. You need small tent for this. Strongly purge anyone that smells slightly of leftism from any control. The working together under secure comms builds cohesion, and the expulsion of brainrotten leftists that distract you builds piety. Eventually the corporation has enough men and enough resources that it can resist destruction from a weak and dying or weak and frantically insane state religion. At that point you organize more in meatspace, cleverly so and with your wits about you, and become too stubbornly strong for eradication.

The key point being here that you need the few and fewer men of high energy and high agency united with the fewer and fewer men with capacity for right wing priesthood together in one place, and you need this organization to not be immediately broken up, and all the members killed and or imprisoned, so that they might gather resources and the means of controlling said resources.

Anon says:

“Jim’s sovcorps”
“So instead you organize men seeking paychecks, and radicalize them through corporate policy.“

But dose not this result in merchant personality men coming and joining, building as a corporation have to have a merchant mindset, even if you radicalizes them later , it will not change why they first attracted and joined the corporation. Take this blog for example we are here for the truth , it will be very different blog if you are here to make a couple of bucks.
The reason you first come and joined will always influence everything that come after it. Even if it change later it will not become what you want exactly.

“because this is something that has to be done by men and not ideas,“

I believe the ideas is first , then the type of men to organize later . You first develop the ideas with strong memetic security and shills detection this will insure spiritual and moral health , then you bootstrap it using sovcorps. The problem is how to make this transition, even a single individual who weak or compromise will destroy the organization. The movements of past that successfully made the change was a group of people who know each other either from community or school/university, meet each other in bars or clubs or social gatherings.
Today society is so broken and people is isolated , the gathering is usually online among anonymous individuals, such as us, which a huge advantage for the left. It is a problem of chicken and egg .

Fidelis says:

>But dose not this result in merchant personality men coming and joining, building as a corporation have to have a merchant mindset,

Not necessarily. In radical new technology, it is often that high agency men that fit no particular category are gathered. Consider Elon, is he a merchant? If he is, he is not comparable to most other merchants. Crypto and free internet is already an ideological filter, anyone wanting to work on these things is a potential ally. Potential.

>You first develop the ideas with strong memetic security and shills detection this will insure spiritual and moral health , then you bootstrap it using sovcorps.

Yes this is the case I am making. The ideas here are mature, but not fully tested. We need to apply the shill test to a meaningful organization capable of organizing resources and human capital. We need to do this first in a medium that isn’t going to get everyone involved rounded up and thrown into a forgotten cell before it can grow. It’s time to bring Jimianity into practice, and the first step for us whom enjoy coordination, property, and technology, is to employ technology to facilitate coordination and property.

>The movements of past that successfully made the change was a group of people who know each other either from community or school/university, meet each other in bars or clubs or social gatherings.

Well, yes, of course. The mass internet wasn’t a phenomenon until the 90s, however even in the past you had people organize through letters and pamphlets. I don’t think you can make an organization like this and have it forever be pseudonymous, but I do think it can be started pseudonymously, have core operations bootstrapped through pseudonym, and have entryist firewalls made extraordinarily strong while coordinating through pseudonym.

Further, consider that we have been living in what amounts to a worst case scenario of a leftist spiral while civilizational capital is high. The crooks had a lot of resources to burn, and a lot of coordination remaining. Both of which are disappearing. The lukewarm, ‘Thermidor’, elites are likely to defect if given a real opportunity. Provide a venue, they might use it. Take BTC. I’m damn sure it wasn’t killed in infancy because the glowniggers liked it. They had great uses for pseudonymous internet cash.

If we can organize ideas, capital, men on a network with working property rights, we might start getting men interested in these things to cross over to our ship.

Mossadnik says:

The way to restore fertility is to fully replace the Progressive state religion with a based state religion, i.e., Jimian Christianity.

People who don’t want Jimian Christianity to be the state religion — perhaps, dare I suggest, because a gay parasite occupies their brain — will try to minimize and dismiss both the problem (collapsing fertility, increasingly old population, and their inevitable long-term ramifications) and, of course, the solution to said problem.

Poofs off roofs.

Mossadnik says:

Anyone who disagrees is welcome to suggest how fertility can be raised otherwise. That’s the thing – it can’t. You either reinstitute social technologies that allow for stable marriage and above replacement reproduction, or your society will keep declining, and will perish.

Look at the East-Asian countries: they now import third-world foreigners, all kinds of mystery meats, for the simple reason that they have no choice. (Except, that is, to restore native fertility; but then it will take a while until your new native children grow up to be adults.) Obviously that’s not the situation currently unfolding in many white countries, which are outright being invaded by hostile conquerors who dream about slaughtering all of you DEVIL CRACKERS (which hostile conquerors of course should all be expelled, if not eliminated); but the point is that if you don’t reproduce and your local, indigenous “age pyramid” continues growing older, if your young bracket continues shrinking in relative and absolute terms, then eventually — one way or another — you will be replaced by foreigners.

Faggots will say, write, and do everything possible to prevent that realization from being realized by the cognitive elite, because they abhor the solution – they abhor the recognition that the objectively correct telos of libido is heterosexual, and that reproduction hinges on the fulfillment thereof, and on the suppression of gay subversion.

That’s why they hate Based Christianity so much.

Ethnic homogeneity just cannot be maintained for long if the ethnicity in question fails to reproduce; this is basic cause and effect. Some distractions from this vital issue may undoubtedly be worth one’s attention, but ultimately, if you don’t solve the WQ, you will cease to exist, even if all of those distractions go away. That’s precisely what Japan and Korea, homogeneous and relatively ethno-nationalist countries, teach us. You cannot avoid the WQ forever; at some point you either solve it, or you will be left with no choice but to import endless foreigners to replace the grandchildren you never had. Or they’ll just invade regardless, because old people won’t be able to ward them off. Also, sexlessness just plain sucks.

And the way to solve the WQ runs through the restoration of a based state religion, which is precisely what buttworms and their enablers dread the most.

People can counter-signal all that day and night, but somehow the counter-signallers have never bothered to disprove this point – because it is simply correct.

Mossadnik says:

I go on and on about this issue because you need to wake up before it’s too late.

Faggots seek to distract you from this reality (and from the solution), and tell you that you can just solve the problem “later,” in some indefinite future. But there is such a thing as too late – when your society is primarily composed of old people, when your age pyramid contains very few (in relative and absolute terms) young people, you’re simply not going to make it. That which cannot continue will necessarily stop, and the civilized races’ demographic trends — independent of the migration/invason factor — keep getting worse. No, this can not continue forever.

The false prophets deceive you with vain prophesies about technological developments that will obviate the problem – they are marching you off the cliff. If you don’t solve the WQ by restoring the social technologies that make it possible for men and women to marry young, stay married, and make them babies, then your society will keep growing older and decline and will inevitably perish. It’s happened in the past many times before and it will surely happen again.

And so they tell you that you don’t need a Jimian State Religion because blah blah blah, yet they never explain what other ways there are to raise fertility. They want you to avoid extrapolating from current trends into the future, so they tell you, “Fertility has been low for a long time, yet society goes on.” But it will not go on forever. The chickens are now coming home to roost – the inevitable consequences always manifest, whether your society is highly homogeneous (as in Japan, Korea, some Eastern-European countries, etc.) or otherwise. Homogeneity is great, but it’s not per se the solution to the decline; dysgenic breeding and reproductive failure will inevitably destroy any society.

Faggots tell you either “Go back to sleep, nothing ever happens,” or “Look at those other problems, forget about this one.” It’s because they instinctively (and Pridefully) abhor the solution. But if you don’t enact the solution soon, there might well not be “later” – collapses have happened before, and a collapse will happen again if you don’t wake up and solve the problem before your native demography is already unsalvageable.

Don’t people understand exponential functions and their application to demographic trends? Faggots want you to think about anything in the world, except about that; but your very eyes — and your very blue balls — tell you that this is a civilization-annihilating problem, which requires exactly the solution which Reaction advocates, and the adoption of said solution before it’s too late.

Jimianity or civilizational death.

Mossadnik says:

Long-term, AI should be (and will be) used to figure out what is causing all of these sicknesses, mutations, perversions, and such, and to permanently neutralize it on a biological level. Some phenotypes should cease to exist, and once the tools are available to make it so, it will be made so.

Hesiod says:

According to the Sagas, the hero usually had to wade bloodily through her trollspawn before ending the Hagmother’s terror.

Daddy Scarebucks says:

Lesbians aren’t biologically real, like FTM troons aren’t biologically real; they’re both manifestations of intrinsic female sexual fluidity in a malevolent social environment of feminism and gender ideology. Solve the woman problem and they simply disappear.

Sodomy has a biological element and we need poofs off roofs until it can be identified and eliminated, but the female equivalent is a mirage created by progressive academics and should be disregarded in both personal interactions and sociopolitical analysis.

Epimetheus says:

Did you guys see Andor Season 2 Episode 8? They had a white man seriously manhandle and mortally threaten his white woman mate for her dishonesty toward him. I’ve never seen anything like it. Hands crushing her shoulders like a movie from the old days, then hands around neck. All within the post-WW2 liberal framework, but damn

Jim says:

Not post world War II.

Post 1963. Check out McLintock

Misbehaving wives severely beaten, shit test passed, they glow.

Main character repeatedly fails ever escalating shit test, then passes it the only way it can be passed.

From 1933 to 1963 feminism fell mysteriously silent.

Epimetheus says:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ptj41RH7iI

You misunderstand me. This man’s actions toward this woman are scripted to be motivated by his post WW2 liberal world order concerns for the downtrodden leftist Rebels against the evil Galactic Empire etc. – that’s what I was referring to.

The striking thing is that he is depicted being utterly humiliated and emasculated by his horrible Jewish harridan mother in previous episodes, but in this scene he has his Imperial officer girlfriend half-lifted off the ground and halfway to climax – and the actress looks like she’s enjoying every millisecond of it. We are meant to sympathize with him and excuse his misogyny in this moment because he sympathizes with the Ghormans (the local rebels), but it’s still a little shocking.

One of the more interesting aspects of Andor is that the series creator takes the WW2-era aerial combat and primitive technology of the original Star Wars and translates that era into a Galactic Empire that has the fashion style, architecture, and even sexual norms of the mid-20th century. It’s not a perfect show and certainly not a right-wing show, but it has its moments of inspiration.

The Cominator says:

Syril was 100% pro empire before that though…

The Cominator says:

Yep lol he totally had a Jewish mother even if the chosen people dont exist in the galaxy far far away. Despite some leftist crap it was a damn good show.

Epimetheus says:

They didn’t even bother to hide it lol, it’s about as well-disguised as that flapping mosquito Jew from Phantom Menace. Those horrible scenes of Syril’s mother were probably greenlit by literal Hollywood jews who had mothers just like her, poor sadsack bastards

The Cominator says:

Actually she’s tame compared to some of my Jewish friends mothers I’ve seen.

Epimetheus says:

I can’t even imagine. God help them, no wonder they’re nuts.

Whatever clever and wise man who can solve or even just ease the Mommy and Daddy issues of America will become Emperor by sheer popular acclamation. Probably what we call “the Left” are just a lot of heartbroken orphans, bastards, widows, and whores who, secretly, deep down, want Daddy to finally come home, but in their bereft stupidity & malicious resentment they insist on following false prophets into hell.

The Cominator says:

The worst case ive seen was a right wing jew who came from Russia..

Bix Nudelmann says:

Andor is fascinating. It’s also the first TV series ever, as far as I can tell, that has a Maidan in it, where the government secretly shoots its own cops during a staged controlled-opposition Charlottesville type event to blame it on the rebels.

Getting close to the bone in many ways here. And it’s the bits of truth like this, mixed into the narrative, that really grab people’s attention.

Take the labor prison. It’s silly that they’d need slave labor to make Death Star parts when droids and CNC machines would do just fine, but through them they can address the panopticon and mass surveillance.

So anyway. When fiction tells the naughty truth, it grabs people. The WQ may be lost to us now, but there are other areas where doing this is still possible.

Hesiod says:

Related to Charlottesville, the US Justice Dept. has made as a condition for settling its civil rights investigation into UVA’s adversity to ridding itself of diversity the resignation of its president Jim Ryan. Allegedly, Ryan will step down no later than August 15th. This follows the VA Republicant governor earlier in the year axing an overt MAGA member of the university’s board of trustees after the Washington Post ran a hit-piece on him.

The Cominator says:

His girlfriend (not wife) being a high ranking secret police official who could just easily have him killed too. But Syril Karn was clearly not in a good state of mind in that incident when he swore he would throw her out the window if she kept lying. Syril Karn 100% thought he was the good guy before that…

Epimetheus says:

I haven’t watched the rest of the season yet. It’s just that the white male romantic aggression of this scene seems a little striking, especially because it isn’t presented as being out-of-order. It’s not unlike the recent & widely-noticed instance of the Pentagon putting out ads depicting badass white male soldiers.

Maybe I’m making a mountain out of molehill, but in any case, Jim’s blog is all about trying to pick up clues and signs and portents from the ether, so there it is…

Anonymous Fake says:

Why do you not post my last post? What exactly is wrong with the idea of using random people as a solution to entryism in the examples I posted?

Jim says:

Because the wagon you were pulling is that ICE is wicked, on the side of the enemy, and corrupt. As always, your ostensible argument was not your argument — but to smuggle in assumptions as taken for granted and already accepted.

Observe that when Trump untied the hands of ICE, and they started deporting illegal aliens, suddenly Fentanyl overdoses diminished dramatically. It was not corrupt cops bringing or allowing Fentanyl into the country — it was a corrupt presidency, that wanted the gangs to invade America, because they fancied them a soldiers for leftism in the coming civil war, so they brought in gangs, and ordered the cops to turn a blind eye to the activities of those gangs.

I have had quite a few unpleasant encounters with cops, but cops don’t want unpleasantness. In addition to being lazy, and preferring to avoid danger, they are also nice people — trouble is you are apt to encounter them under circumstances where this is not apparent. The cops are not corrupt. The judges are corrupt, and the politicians are corrupt, but cops merely lazy and overly cautious.

Time and time again, we see that cops, when they get an order through their state or city chain of command, to screw up the actions of cops working under presidential chain of command, will run dead on their orders and cooperate with the cops working under presidential chain of command. The cops are overwhelmingly Maga.

Obviously the Fentanyl epidemic was corruption. And equally obviously it was ended by ICE, therefore ICE is not corrupt.

Anonymous Fake says:

The more cynical explanation, just to say it, is that drug epidemics come and go based on [*another wagon non one cares about deleted*]

Jim says:

And by amazing coincidence this one ended just as Trump reassigned everyone from war on drugs to war on illegals.

Leave a Reply to Jim Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *