The Maga right is a big tent that welcomes outsiders. The left vigorously polices purity. The left is forever holiness spiraling to ever greater evil, malice, viciousness, and depravity, and has been doing so since the late eighteenth, early nineteenth, century.
What Maga is doing is politics as one would expect politics to function in a democracy or a republic, if democracy or republicanism was actually working as advertised. You try to build a coalition that is big enough to take power. What the Maga right is doing is politics, politics as theory describes republics and democracies as function. What the left is doing is the opposite of what theory says politics is. And it has been doing the opposite of what politics is supposed to be for more than two centuries, with immense success.
When the holiness spiral runs fast, the state self destructs, so the survivor is the one that holiness spirals the slowest, which was England and America. But inevitably the holiness spiral runs faster and faster.
Democracy became popular among elites following the failed revolutions of 1848 — “the springtime of nations”. Back then leftism was nationalist, and rightism was anti nationalist. And leftism continued to be nationalist all the way to the end of World War I, and has not entirely ceased to be nationalist, as for example Ukrainian Nazism.
Democracy became popular among elites because the mass media emerged, and elites have always managed the mass media. From the beginning, democracy was fake. It was uniparty democracy. Two parties disputing a fake issue, and whichever party gets elected, no matter what issues it campaigned on, it always winds up implementing the leftism of the inner party. The left party is the inner party, and the right party is the outer party. Sometimes the outer party is permitted to implement right policy on some matter, but only when the left is abandoning that leftist program to focus on some new shinier program. Thus for example in the Reagan/Thatcher era, redistribution had gone far, far, far beyond the Laffer limit, and the elite, recognising this, decided to back off from redistribution, and focus on the much shinier program of the destruction of marriage and family, which had already been under way since the late sixties. So Reagan and Thatcher were permitted to win, and permitted to back off from destructive redistribution towards the Laffer limit — conditional on the destruction of marriage and family going full speed ahead, and mass migration going full speed ahead.
Back in the 1930s, when Hitler was elected, the inner party in America decided to abandon the destruction of marriage and family in favor of the destruction of capitalism, for the destruction of marriage and family makes a nation militarily weak, while socialism, by making it able to temporarily tax far above the Laffer limit, makes it temporarily strong. Then in the 1960s, the destruction of marriage and family resumed. Which has now hit its limit, with most men incel and all women whores, so the young and energetic left are now refocusing back on the destruction of capitalism, while the older gerontocratic left are still focused on antinationalism (except for the Ukraine), mass illegal immigration, the destruction of beauty and art, stamping out the faint echoes of family and marriage, and men in women’s sports.
When the internet emerged it was a new mass medium, and because of its newness, the elite had no means of controlling it. It was dominated by hackers and the hacker ethic, and what later became known as the alt right emerged, a version of rightism that was no longer under the thumb of the inner party.
Very soon, a big effort to bring it under control emerged, with a storm of shills and shilling. Since Usenet had no moderation mechanism, by 2010 or so, shilling destroyed Usenet.
From then on, the left owned the internet, and set about destroying open source, systematically cancelling and deplatforming anyone attempting to resist this. As they destroyed open source, various voices defending open source cried out, and were then silenced, the only major namefag surviving being Lunduke.
However the destruction of gaming and movies met with more resistance, because of the huge base of passionate fans, and now that the iron hand of censorship has been somewhat eased in you tube, we see an explosion of “rightist” content — the “rightists” being leftists who breathed in leftism in school and from the media, but did not like it when they saw their beloved games and movies being destroyed. Asmongold was and is a gaming journalist. He has no real interest in politics, but politics is interested in his beloved games, and so became interested in him.
“Rightists”, non uniparty rightists, now dominate the internet, the overwhelming majority of them having no right wing ideology at all, just incoherent fragments of left wing ideology. They became “rightists” because marked for destruction by the holiness spiraling left, and so wound up as part of the big tent Maga coalition.
The vast majority of those in the Maga coalition have not a thought in their head, except thoughts planted there by leftism. But always, the ideas of men with ideas are filling the vacuum. That is the alt right. And the alt right itself is incoherent and overrun with enemy shills. Within the alt right, there is the Dark Enlightenment.
Nature abhors a vaccuum. Hot radioactive power is falling into the street for someone to pick it up. The left has an organised centralised state funded program to pick it up under the banner of socialism and opposition to “oligarchs” — the greatest and most powerful oligarch of them all being the tech prophet Elon Musk.
The “oligarchs” don’t like that, but don’t have a coherent belief system to oppose the enemy belief system.
Calling them “oligarchs” is true in the sense that they have a lot of power and a far too intimate connection to the state — but grossly deceptive and false in that before 2024 they followed a policy of humble acquiescence to official leftism, which acquiescence nearly led to their destruction, as they acquiesced to the whims of those who hated them and wished them gone, and after 2024 a policy of humble acquiescence to Trump.
Trump is facing enemies without and enemies within. Is an FBI director who looks us straight in the eye and tells us Epstein killed himself — safe to have in charge of men with guns? If Trump is to win, if the “oligarchs” are to keep what they have, they need men of a counter faith to leftism. As Putin finally realised, you have to bring a gun to gunfight, and a faith to a holy war.
If you have a big tent that welcomes outsiders, you are going to get hostile enemy entryists inside the tent. You cannot and should not enforce a test of good character and true faith in general, for that would be small tent. But hostile entryists are magnetically attracted to key posts where they can potentially stab you in the back. For these posts, the military, the cops, and the spooks, you have to appoint men of good character and true faith.
>Unfortunately it might be necessary to stuff Trump in sack and throw him across the Rubicon
Who in our elite sociopolitical culture is even capable of doing that let alone think that? Rome didn’t go from failed republic to Augustus in one day, and the American system was largely based on the Roman republic’s. It took a generation and a half after Sulla to get there. Man’s brain works in slow chemical analog with normality bias seared into neural pathways.
And nobody stuff Lucius Cornelius in a sack. Sulla got the message he (as sitting Consul and a great hero and successful commander in the social war) was being relieved of command and told his troops (who loved him for saving the army at Nola) that it meant they were planning to exile him and cut them out of the loot of an eastern campaign (Eastern campaigns tended to be more loot heavy) and send them back to the slums (most of his troops were from the Roman “head count” class). Sulla very quickly and decisively reacted to the message that he was relieved of command by convincing his army to march on Rome.
Sulla also had an extremely unusual upbringing for a Roman who ended up Consul, he was from a Roman noble house and nominally an optimate in politics but until he was around 30 he grew up in the slums and probably experienced lots of Roman slum things… gang brawls, knife fights etc. So the 1st guy to march on Rome had likely a very very unusual mentality for a Roman commander.
And yet, for as unusual Sulla was, he was guided by normality bias and tried to restore the dead Republic rather than take the crown. No one was willing to fully toss him across the Rubicon and he only went so far as to fish in it. Like Trump in many ways. Caesar would later mock Sulla for resigning the dictatorship. Who will come to mock Trump for doing the same?
My guess, there’s over a 50% chance Trump retires from the presidency into comfort, the zombie Republic continues to stumble along for another decade. Then we might see a King either seize the or forced into the White House.
Sulla absolutely did not fish in the Rubicon he decisively decided to take the unprecedented step of marching on Rome and to take power by force that he tried to restore the republic was normalcy bias though.
Sure, Sulla got his feet wet, but if the end result is as if he never did, did he really cross the Rubicon? There’s a reason why crossing the proverbial river is memetically associated with Caesar and merely a historical fact with Sulla.
Its hard to know if he could have gone farther successfully if he tried, Sulla did not have a living son (at least not a legitimate one) and he did not really have a faction (he was only sort of an Optimate but not because he had much affection for the ruling class his favorite people to hang around were his soldiers and his old buddies from the slums which included people from the lowest level of roman society more because he wouldn’t make as a military hero being a populares because Marius was the populares military hero) in the Roman ruling class either and Romans probably weren’t totally willing to giveup on the Republic yet in Sulla’s time it took a few more civil wars before people decided we’re done with this shit. Sullas political ascent (after getting into the senate when he became rich enough around 30 because his very high end prostitute psuedo girlfriend left everything to him, and yes from the few sources we have that is the documented reason he came into enough wealth to make the senatorial property requirements) was based even more than Marius purely on military success but his sole power base was really his worshipful soldiers.
Its a real tragedy that Sulla’s autobiography was lost to history I would have loved to read it.
I tend to concur with that assessment.
Hope it will be Donald Trump Jr., or Eric Trump, or Peter Hegseth.
And I expect the shills to try and discredit all three of them very soon, employing the usual shill talking points, similar to those employed against the Bad Orange Man.
Right now on Twitter, the non-shill Right Wing accounts are discovering what it feels like when the shill brigades are after you. Oh, it’s going to be a very sobering experience for them.
The Cathedral is… concerned.
The only person in the Trump family who I’m pretty sure knows what time it is Baron “Octavian Caesar Augustus” Trump.
What I’m certain about is that the King, if indeed there is to be one, will be neither a Catholic nor a Jew. I like Vance and Miller, but “no Bishop, no King,” and as the next state religion will be Protestant (ideally of the Jimian variety), the King will also be a Protestant, and an Aryan too.
He never speaks a word in public on politics, or indeed anything — which silence, and reading his face, leads me to also assess him as Baron Trump Augustus.
Reading silent faces is chancy. But I also believe he knows what time it is.
Octavian had a reputation for not saying very much and being pretty unreadable (even to non spergs) as well.
And also coincidently they even look a lot alike…
“There are no coincidences.”
I mean I guess maybe if you believe in reincarnation maybe God liked the actor who played the role of Augustus on the world stage again so much he hired him to play a similar part.
Crafted from the same mold, perhaps.
Is white separatism a solution?
To establish an enclave and break the US (if trump fail and thing went south).
Is this a workable solution , I have been reading about Rhodesia and now Orania.
It seem that Rhodesia failed because the left was competent at that time, but now seem the ability to wage violence and tech decline make it very hard to stamp an attempt. So the prospect of places like Orania is better today.
Whites in Rhodesia were mostly united American whites are no such thing.
By the time you get enough white men working together under the banner of something like white separatism, with enough wit and resource to not get themselves picked off and killed or arrested, you have something that doesn’t need to be separatist.
The problem is the enemy controls the microphone now, though less so than last generation, and has controlled the microphone for many generations. So, as Jim is pointing out in his post here, nearly impossible to get a coalition going on rightwing principles when the majory of the people who nominally should be on-side are full of leftist brainparasites making them totally ineffective at recognizing and then following a right wing leader capable of doing right wing things.
A man in a position like Trump, whom was made king whether he or anyone else acknowledges it or not, can create such a coalition. We are not in a position to, because this is something that has to be done by men and not ideas, and men who organize without assent from friends high up in the state find themselves in bad positions. Though, with the decay of the state apparatus, and the increasingly distracted left, the bad positions one finds himself in of today are less hopeless than ones of last generation. If we had a Branch Davidian situation today, and they consciously armed themselves and used the latest and greatest civilian origin-military modded materiel, including of course drones but also encrypted comms and much more besides, I doubt the state would take them on. The state has become increasingly fearful of difficult fights, such fights that would reveal further the amount of rot it has suffered.
It’s looking increasingly likely to me that we need Jim’s sovcorps to bootstrap such a thing, as the cult energy has evaporated with the collapse in human capital. They just don’t make believers like they used to. So instead you organize men seeking paychecks, and radicalize them through corporate policy. You need small tent for this. Strongly purge anyone that smells slightly of leftism from any control. The working together under secure comms builds cohesion, and the expulsion of brainrotten leftists that distract you builds piety. Eventually the corporation has enough men and enough resources that it can resist destruction from a weak and dying or weak and frantically insane state religion. At that point you organize more in meatspace, cleverly so and with your wits about you, and become too stubbornly strong for eradication.
The key point being here that you need the few and fewer men of high energy and high agency united with the fewer and fewer men with capacity for right wing priesthood together in one place, and you need this organization to not be immediately broken up, and all the members killed and or imprisoned, so that they might gather resources and the means of controlling said resources.
The way to restore fertility is to fully replace the Progressive state religion with a based state religion, i.e., Jimian Christianity.
People who don’t want Jimian Christianity to be the state religion — perhaps, dare I suggest, because a gay parasite occupies their brain — will try to minimize and dismiss both the problem (collapsing fertility, increasingly old population, and their inevitable long-term ramifications) and, of course, the solution to said problem.
Poofs off roofs.
Anyone who disagrees is welcome to suggest how fertility can be raised otherwise. That’s the thing – it can’t. You either reinstitute social technologies that allow for stable marriage and above replacement reproduction, or your society will keep declining, and will perish.
Look at the East-Asian countries: they now import third-world foreigners, all kinds of mystery meats, for the simple reason that they have no choice. (Except, that is, to restore native fertility; but then it will take a while until your new native children grow up to be adults.) Obviously that’s not the situation currently unfolding in many white countries, which are outright being invaded by hostile conquerors who dream about slaughtering all of you DEVIL CRACKERS (which hostile conquerors of course should all be expelled, if not eliminated); but the point is that if you don’t reproduce and your local, indigenous “age pyramid” continues growing older, if your young bracket continues shrinking in relative and absolute terms, then eventually — one way or another — you will be replaced by foreigners.
Faggots will say, write, and do everything possible to prevent that realization from being realized by the cognitive elite, because they abhor the solution – they abhor the recognition that the objectively correct telos of libido is heterosexual, and that reproduction hinges on the fulfillment thereof, and on the suppression of gay subversion.
That’s why they hate Based Christianity so much.
Ethnic homogeneity just cannot be maintained for long if the ethnicity in question fails to reproduce; this is basic cause and effect. Some distractions from this vital issue may undoubtedly be worth one’s attention, but ultimately, if you don’t solve the WQ, you will cease to exist, even if all of those distractions go away. That’s precisely what Japan and Korea, homogeneous and relatively ethno-nationalist countries, teach us. You cannot avoid the WQ forever; at some point you either solve it, or you will be left with no choice but to import endless foreigners to replace the grandchildren you never had. Or they’ll just invade regardless, because old people won’t be able to ward them off. Also, sexlessness just plain sucks.
And the way to solve the WQ runs through the restoration of a based state religion, which is precisely what buttworms and their enablers dread the most.
People can counter-signal all that day and night, but somehow the counter-signallers have never bothered to disprove this point – because it is simply correct.
Did you guys see Andor Season 2 Episode 8? They had a white man seriously manhandle and mortally threaten his white woman mate for her dishonesty toward him. I’ve never seen anything like it. Hands crushing her shoulders like a movie from the old days, then hands around neck. All within the post-WW2 liberal framework, but damn
Not post world War II.
Post 1963. Check out McLintock
Misbehaving wives severely beaten, shit test passed, they glow.
Main character repeatedly fails ever escalating shit test, then passes it the only way it can be passed.
From 1933 to 1963 feminism fell mysteriously silent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ptj41RH7iI
You misunderstand me. This man’s actions toward this woman are scripted to be motivated by his post WW2 liberal world order concerns for the downtrodden leftist Rebels against the evil Galactic Empire etc. – that’s what I was referring to.
The striking thing is that he is depicted being utterly humiliated and emasculated by his horrible Jewish harridan mother in previous episodes, but in this scene he has his Imperial officer girlfriend half-lifted off the ground and halfway to climax – and the actress looks like she’s enjoying every millisecond of it. We are meant to sympathize with him and excuse his misogyny in this moment because he sympathizes with the Ghormans (the local rebels), but it’s still a little shocking.
One of the more interesting aspects of Andor is that the series creator takes the WW2-era aerial combat and primitive technology of the original Star Wars and translates that era into a Galactic Empire that has the fashion style, architecture, and even sexual norms of the mid-20th century. It’s not a perfect show and certainly not a right-wing show, but it has its moments of inspiration.
Syril was 100% pro empire before that though…
His girlfriend (not wife) being a high ranking secret police official who could just easily have him killed too. But Syril Karn was clearly not in a good state of mind in that incident when he swore he would throw her out the window if she kept lying. Syril Karn 100% thought he was the good guy before that…