Source: Igor Chudov, data
Countries with a low jab rate have low excess mortality, countries with a high jab rate have high excess mortality. That the mortality keeps going up with boosts indicates that they damage is cumulative. You don’t heal up – or the time required to heal up is considerably longer than the time between boosts. Since the jab modifies DNA, and was, contrary to what was claimed, designed to modify your dna, to the extent that it modifies your dna, the damage is permanent.
Death, however, is only the tip of the iceberg. Each jab gives everyone some circulatory damage, some heart damage, some reproductive system damage, some immune system damage, and some brain damage. If someone already has a problem, for example diabetics typically have heart and circulatory damage, they are likely to die of heart attack. If gay, already have a lot of immune system damage, likely to die of aids like cancer or opportunistic infection. And everyone gets a bit stupider, some of them a lot stupider.
Deaths up ten or twenty percent, fertility down thirty or forty percent. The effect of widespread stupidity is not yet obvious. Well, it is becoming obvious to me, but there is no statistical evidence, only my subjective impression. Suddenly programmers cannot program. Instead of debugging their programs, they are deprogramming their bugs. I was listening in on a video conference, and people were announcing that stuff just could not be done.
Over time, programmers tend to wind up working on tasks that are at the edge of their ability, dumb programmers produce simple solutions to simple problems, smart programmers produce clever solutions to hard problems. Suddenly a whole lot of programmers are finding that what they are working on is beyond their ability.
No refunds.
hahaha, this wins the comments section
I’ve never heard the phrase deproggramming bugs before. Could you explain further?
So, Polonius… Born Stupid, achieved Stupidity, or did you have Stupidity vaxed upon you?
Imagine you’re in an RPG, and you have a coding skill, that is added to some random roll and compared to the target difficulty of what you’re working on. Beat the target difficulty and you’re adding useful code and functionality with only minimal bugs. Fail to beat it and you’re adding bloat, more bugs and generally degrading the system you’re working on.
Jim’s saying that many programmers work out at their limits, because sometimes the reward for good work is harder work (or sometimes just more work). Accordingly if they degrade their ability just a little (or a lot), they jump from reliably producing net good code to net bad code plus bugs. He’s also making a play on words, which is probably his main intent, but this is my parsing of his metaphor.
I get all that, it’s the Deprogramming I’m not sure of.
The only time I hear that Deprogramming is pop culture mumbo jumbo about cults. Does it mean Removing/Rewriting features because they can’t debug it? I’ve seen that happen with dumb programmers, IE they re-write blocks of code because they’re too dumb to actually understand how the code works or they bipass the system they don’t understand. This happens a lot when a dumb programmer debugs code that includes a cleaver solution written by someone else. They assume the bug is caused by the cleaver solution and it must be wrong because they can’t understand it, so re-writing it (and generally breaking it) is the solution.
play on words: Instead of debugging their programs, they are deprogramming their bugs. The changes they are making just cause the program to fail worse. And eventually they announce in the review or video conference that the issue they were supposed to fix is unfixable, the functionality or added feature they were supposed to provide is impossible. Just cannot be done. Often there is an obvious way of addressing the issue, obvious at least to me, and they are just not walking that path, just not taking the path that they would need to take to accomplish the needed functionality, instead just kind of farting around with the code at random. Less program, more bugs, thus “deprogramming”. The code is being replaced by noise. The problem is in one place, or the functionality needs to be added in one place, and they are making changes in other places, many other places at kind of random, that address particular manifestations of the bug or particular manifestations of the absence of the feature. Which just degrades functionality in those other places.
That’s some scary shit.
Feel bad for the people living in the cities to be honest.
Next stop is poisoning the water supply (they already do this of course, just push it to the next limit). No one will be allowed to escape 100 million world population plan.
I did a check up on my nearby city to check the quality of a public area water fountain, it looked very rusted and dirty, and the water was rather brownish. I knew I didn’t even need to bother taking a reading because it was obvious that its not drinkable.
So at first the water quality issues will be down to negligence and incompetence, but will soon turn to active malice and hatred when they realize they can assign a whole ton of water inspectors whose job it is to make sure everyone who drinks it eventually mysteriously passes away. I can already picture the plan in my head, ‘New minerals added into the water to ensure good health and safety’ and it will be just a nice little quip in some site and it will take a while for everyone to realize what is happening to them.
That’s why I am keeping an eye about what is going on with the water treatment facilities because it really isn’t hard for any of them to mess with that stuff and nobody really seems to keeping track of this area.
I know opinions vary on the Canadian Lobster Appreciator, but I think his observations on how the National Socialists started from a place of ostensible compassion through the lens of cultural disgust are instructive. So too with the international marxists in Russia; it was compassion that was used to argue for the initiation of methods that transformed into their genocidal operations. Obviously, the true sentiment is hatred, for oneself and the whole of existence, but they use compassion, awareness, and tolerance as a costume.
We may soon enter a situation wherein the next step is something like “millions of children are being forced into a gender binary and due to cultural repression and systemic bias, they are unable to realize their true sense of self. In order to address this, it is necessary to put all children through a chemical regimen that will unlock their true selves. Even one unwitting non-binary is too many.” So, out of an abundance of compassion and under the cover of tolerance, it will become a situation wherein all children are put on puberty blockers. Obviously, there will be resistance to this, and those evil, backwards people will need to be educated on the True Science until they are sufficiently compassionate.
We should expect the children of conservatives first then everyone after to be rounded up and “mass medicated ” while resisting parents are interred or executed.
Just a few wrinkles:
There have certainly been mass persecutions that were never publicly described or justified as class-action phenomena. Like feminism and child support law busting up families. That’s always been described in media/law as a case-by-case kind of thing, but the sum effect has obviously been “class scale”, as in “liquidating the traditional father as a class”. It was just never officially described that way.
At another corner of the graph there’s “white flight”, which was certainly caused by general conditions and policy, but only described as a mass phenomenon intended and inflicted… by its victims.
Someone smarter can better synopsize what I’m trying to comprehend and get at here.
>That’s always been described in media/law as a case-by-case kind of thing
But in lecture halls, salons, and boardrooms it has been known to be a class thing. Single motherhood and abortion at scale where always a goal, they just portrayed them as case by case issues.
You’re helping me think. Thank you.
When “we” do it, it’s about the individual. “Protecting each person’s sacred human right to -whatever-“.
When “they” do it, it’s some kind of faceless inhuman en-masse “backlash”, “cleansing”, “denial” or “supremacy”.
I think that’s it.
Ok, but match the truth (terms you used) with their jargon (terms they use): backlash==justice, cleansing==sacrifice/reparation, denial==positivity, supremacy==equality. My couplings may be less than perfect, but building a “prosetta stone” makes meme construction easier. Like how Jim taught me to always interpret “anti-racist /-bias /-discrimination” as Anti-White. Or Diversity==Domination by foreigners, Equity==Domination by incompetents, Inclusion==Domination by inferiors.
Water quality in cities is bad because the Dems allow white people to be ethnically cleansed from cities. The white men who would be dutifully keeping the water system running have all moved away, so their wives don’t get raped and kids don’t get shot in school for stepping on a nigger’s shoe by accident.
The nigs placed in charge of the water treatment system just steal the public funding, don’t give a shit so they sit around jerking off to porn in their offices, or else just can’t figure out how to fix it.
The Donald has been keeping a long list of shitlibs slowly dying from the vax from archived twitter posts:
https://patriots.win/p/15HbbQFDqY/my-vaccine-posts–part-4/
That format is so tedious, which sucks because there’s a lot of hilarious/horrifying/cringe gold in there.
Igor Chudov has some good data on total death rate, but, anecdotally, looks like some forms of death and disability among the jabbed are up way more than others.
Shingles, aggressive fast acting cancer, and perinatal mortality in children of the jabbed.
Of course the biggest killer of the jabbed is heart failure and circulatory failures such as stroke, but that does not stand out so much because there was plenty of heart and circulatory failure before the vax. But that used to be primarily in older people. Anecdotally, looks like heart and circulatory failure in young people has risen tenfold or a hundredfold, but I cannot find recent data breaking it down by age group.
As for the two graphs, thank you, but what would really help would be a third where the X-axis is “how many people got sick with Covid.â€
Confession: How to actually gather that data, such that it would mean anything, I have no clue.
Igor Chudov has been gathering that data, and there is a great deal of evidence that the more jabs, the more Covid, that the jabbed are more likely to get it and more likely to spread it. On the other hand, hard to disentangle more jabbing from more testing.
The first jab gives some slight protection against catching Covid for about four months, but the covid tends to last longer and so they are more likely to spread it. It gives considerable protection, for the first two or three months, against the Covid being severe. But both protections fade with time, and with each boost, the protection is less, so about six to eight months down the line the fully vaccinated and fully boosted are more likely to catch it, more likely to spread it, are sicker when they get it, and more likely to be suffer consequences requiring hospitalization from it than the purebloods. But, because of the confounding effect of testing, a simple graph of countries would not be meaningful.
He has the data you are after, but not in the form of a simple catchy graphic compellingly making the obvious obvious.
If those programmers are anything like me, they’re demoralized by lack of agency on big civilization level concerns and find it hard to care about paycheck programming.
That is a general problem all men of vision in clownworld have… Musk may be the sole exception right now.
Ted Kaczynski calls this “The Power Process”.
I’m in the same boat. I’ve been considering the idea of looking for a job Telsa or SpaceX.
I’m not living in america until we get a reasonable shot at Caesar. Do not feel like dying to some african nigger or alphabet nigger only for someone left of Stalin to cement a powerbase anyway. So I can’t work for our favorite Muskrat.
Ideally I would work for some newer crypto tech company, but the majority glow bright, and a plurality are being built for a world in which the hegemon is friendly and not going to attempt to destroy your network. I don’t see anyone building BTC/XMR level tolerance to internet hardware based attacks but with the protocol efficiency bought by new cryptography. Instead everyone just wants to build stupid highly transparent highly fragile systems BUT WITH 10X THE TRANSACTIONS PER SECOND OF THE LAST SYSTEM OMG.
I would have to spend a fuckton of time doing it myself, meaning recruiting likeminded and protocol design and implementation, since no one else is and the XMR and BTC people do not seem interested in massive protocol overhauls. I would also have to do it for free because fundraising at the moment seems fucked, especially for a project that would need me to be anonymous to prevent unwilling suicide.
Just an enormous pain in the ass while I have a huge set of other life problems to solve as well. I’m not nearly prepared enough for what is coming to devote the energy this project would need, and it’s frustrating and demoralizing to continue working on paycheck programming while knowing this.
Maybe poke around in the Urbit crowd?
https://urbit.org/overview/urbit-id
“The Urbit ID registry is live and deployed to the Ethereum blockchain.”
They’re either glowing or stupid. Eth is a terrible choice for both technical and ideological reasons. We’re not in 2015 anymore, and while they claim
>”Urbit ID isn’t specifically wedded to Ethereum – someday we’d like it to be hosted by Urbit OS itself”
Well, plenty of alternatives that are cheaper, glow less bright, and are just as secure have existed for years now.
>someday we’d like it to be hosted by Urbit OS itselfâ€
It looked like they are asking for solutions and they also have developer meetups for those creating add-ons to Urbit without working for Urbit on the edge of GAE influence. Seems like if you were recruiting you might find some like minded people there.
But I’m mostly a hardware guy and know little about software.
Urbit is insufficiently troubled by the problem of Cathedral domination.
It was always intended to be fundamentally a communications and publishing protocol – everyone gets the equivalent of their own server supporting the equivalent of email, a blog, dns, and a website.
Heard any interesting stuff first published on Urbit?
It was intended to be the antiuniversity. Not seeing it. An anti university needs to curate empirical truth and reveal genuine consensus. Not seeing such curation.
In a world where truth and reality is massively suppressed, forbidden truth should migrate to a platform resistant to Global American Empire domination. Not seeing forbidden truthers setting up shop on Urbit.
Spandrel was an important and valuable source back in the day. Set up shop on Urbit. Have not heard any interesting new data and analysis from him, which is what Urbit was supposed to enable.
Moldbug was revolutionary and immensely important. Namefag Yarvin too boring to read. Urbit stuff seems, by and large, to be Namefag Yarvin tier.
The Global American Empire is at war with truth and reality. A communications platform should support truth and reality, thus must be at war with the Global American Empire. Namefag Yarvin wanted Urbit to duck that war, which is why he went with Ether. It was a bad choice, but that choice of ether is more a symptom than a cause. It is a symptom of him ducking the war that the purpose of Urbit required it to fight.
We have a bajillion zillion shitcoin crypto currencies. But even the very best crypto currencies, such as bitcoin and monero, rely on the transaction metadata passing through Global American Empire owned communications infrastructure, which is an inherent huge security flaw and vulnerability. A crypto currency needs what Urbit was supposed to be, its own communications and publishing protocol, and thus needs its own truth and reality system. And thus it needs to be willing to be at war with the Global American Empire. Its developers need to figure on a significant probability of being murdered or forced to flee, as Satoshi figured. Namefag Yarvin should have pulled a vanishing act, and continued work under a new identity, or several new identities.
Thank you. That was informative.
Some clean room engineers I know have been talking. Looks like the big industry players are going to completely shift away from X86 to ARM by 2030. Integrated Circuits for everything. Allegedly security vulnerabilities at the hardware level are purposely not being dealt with. Thoughts?
The big reveal of evil was Intel and AMD’s on chip source of randomness, which is enemy owned.
NIST SP 800-90A is a standard designed to make it impossible to determine if the on chip random numbers are in unpredictable to an adversary. Not a standard designed to be useful or cheap or easy to implement in hardware. It requires large amounts of complicated on chip circuitry whose only apparent purpose is to protect against people knowing what is actually going on the with randomness generator.
It is possible in principle to build an ARM chip that is knowably secure. I am not aware of any sixty four bit arm chips that are knowably secure.
Dharmabros should be proud, the only person I see on the public internet pushing for actually workable Anti-versity and off-central-platform communications is Balaji Srinivasan.
Ledger of Record aka how to prevent history rewrites
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Cwbbxb987vE
“What’s holding back scientific progress? The US government establishment”
https://youtu.be/QI315Cx8mdM
Advocating anti-coercible social media
https://twitter.com/balajis/status/1589711141324091392
I’m sure there’s others, but his messaging is consistently extremely on point and amazingly effective for normie conversion despite being a facefag. He also acknowledges the limits of facefaggery itself and advocates building a reputation under a pseudonym.
BTC and XMR were built for a hostile world.
And we are in a world rapidly getting more hostile.
And we now have cryptographic tools appropriate for a more hostile world.
Needs a system with the metadata surrounding the transaction encrypted (chat capability, somewhat like WeChat support for inapp sales)
And, for your liquidity event, need to be able to exchange with BTC and XMR inapp.
Then just wait for the heat to come down on BTC and XMR
That’s something like Penumbra, but I don’t want to work closely with that team. They also need to make their network consensus more robust, PoS alone is too vulnerable to internet splintering attacks due to liveness needs.
It’s the market for pussy. Too many men have lost hope. By the time girls graduate high school most have been alpha widowed.
You can overcome alpha widowhood by being a bigger alpha, and you should if you can, but girls never return to what they were like as virgins.
Someone pls explain where pureblood girls are most likely to be found.
Upper Midwest, rural town with one stoplight in 50 square miles. 8 churches serving 1000 people. No off sale of alcohol on Sundays. The colder the climate the better.
There are still places where 3 kids represent a small family, and it’s common for a woman to have a child and a grandchild the same age.
Fast paced high population density lifestyles produce the most options thus the most temptation for both men and women. Everything moves slow in the cold, especially out in the country.
Good conditions for making a man out of yourself too, and any sons.
The most respectable group of girls you could find where very very many didn’t take it is new ager/yoga type girl groups.
Also once again strip clubs… whores are often very redpilled as far as women go (not that drug habits aren’t common but many many refused the vax and thought covid was bullshit).
As for Adam’s advice… Upper Midwest snow niggers are not especially redpilled or right wing generally just the opposite (Swedes have as much of an innate tendency to leftism AT LEAST as jews) and you’re a fool to expect their normie women to be. Rural women are less likely vaxxed than urban women of course but probably more purebloods in the South than the North. If you want cold and rural I’d go to Northern New Hampshire…
“There are still places where 3 kids represent a small family, and it’s common for a woman to have a child and a grandchild the same age.”
Maybe Mormon fundamentalist compounds but you aren’t getting anywhere near their women not without buying in for a lot of money.
Scandinavian libbery is not like khazarian leftism. The former has more to do with thoughtless trust in the good intentions of authority and neighbors, which overlaps with an easily manipulable altruistic impulse, and what i can only describe as ‘niceitude’; id est, ‘isnt it nice if everything is nice? someone feeling bad about something is not nice, so we should all be nice, so noone feels bad about anything’.
The latter of course has more to do with lack of de facto identification with nominally de jure neighbors altogether.
“Scandinavian libbery is not like khazarian leftism. The former has more to do with thoughtless trust in the good intentions of authority and neighbors”
How does anyone fucking carry this attitude past second grade. There is no excuse for this stupidity. As a sperg I learned that normies lie and you can’t trust them early in school (which is like prison I thought) and that also you can’t trust the authorities or your neighbors.
Niceitude Ned Flanders style is good to be around ideally but one should never translate it to clear enemies or to politics.
I can sort of understand the desire for niceitude but I can’t understand how anyone remains a trusting person in clownworld into adulthood. I’ve been an outright paranoid since probably 11…
Probably because your normies are not their normies.
You live in a country overrun by niggers, niggerism, faggots, faggotry, wahmen, whamenism, Jews, Jewry, and thousands of other social illnesses and dysfunctional apes, home-bred and strongly promoted and supported by the State Department.
Danish people live in a country where if you’re European, decent looking and carry yourself respectable, beautiful blonde women openly approach you for sex on the street and friendly guys invite you to join their group and go drink together because they think you’re cool. I’m talking about personal experiences here.
Copenhagen has apartments on the second floor (I believe Americans call the first level as such instead of ground floor, for Europeans it’s the first floor) where the exterior has more crystal than paint and no one looks inside without permission, at least no one native. You hear honking? That was one of the few niggers around, natives don’t do that shit. They don’t even jaywalk a 6 foot street at 12am even if not a single car passes in hours.
You cannot understand Scandinavia unless you visit Scandinavia, do not try. We Europeans can somewhat understand America because “we are all living in Amerika”, but Americans cannot understand 90% of Europe. You don’t have the material or the point of reference.
Remember, in Sweden the government authorities didn’t try to murder their citizens offering donuts and lotteries, they didn’t even locked them up. You just can’t compare to living in Weimerica. The closest you’d get I guess is some giga red rural town where everyone knows the sheriff and niggers and beggars are silently guided outside of town if they appear.
Im talking about American Minnesotta snowniggers…
Well, you were referencing someone talking about Scandinavian behavior. My answer is to your question right after that.
But yes, I get your perspective.
How are random “Minnesotta” amerimutts swedes lmao
> Maybe Mormon fundamentalist compounds but you aren’t getting anywhere near their women not without buying in for a lot of money.
True that, for an urban yuppie such as myself based religious groups are subject to the Groucho Marx rule: the ones worth getting into are the ones that won’t have you.
I am unaware of any Mormons in the upper Midwest. Nearly all are Lutheran or otherwise Protestant. It’s not so much that people are red pilled. Rural life is different. Resources are scarce. Nearly all property is private property. There is a sort of crab bucket effect especially among the women which keeps them in line.
If your average or below average in SMV, still way better odds at finding a decent looking chick to wife up compared to a bigger town or city. Lots of beautiful women married to short guys who pay their bills on time.
Buy a truck and a cool snowmobile and start going to church. If you can fit in with average family oriented people finding a girl won’t be too hard. Odds are good she will find you.
That particular problem is not as bad outside the anglo dominated world. Still plenty more problems you cannot really do much about.
Why is the total fertility rate in the Faroe Islands so high by European standards? Yes, this is a village. But in Danish and Norwegian villages, women do not give birth to 2.3 children.
Small islands, cold weather, far from anywhere, hard for women to avoid scrutiny of their families. Less defection, more cooperation. Makes reproduction a lot easier.
My niece just recently visited there, asked her a bunch of questions. From what I gathered they are still very traditional, very Christian, much more so than mainland europe. Also she told me they have a bunch of tunnels connecting all the islands which was pretty impressive to her. The whale is a big part of their culture too, kids take off school to go with family to hunt whales, niece told me whale meat is salty.
Lots of videos on YouTube about Faroese men importing Filipina wives because young Faroese women “go abroad to study”.
Another tragic victim of the jab: Magnus Carlsen, who abruptly withdrew from a chess tournament in St. Louis after losing a game to a low-rated opponent. I’m far less intelligent than him, but I enjoy nerdy hobbies, and would be absolutely devastated if my brain suddenly became unable to perform them.
We know he’s jabbed because he came to the US as a foreign national to play in this tournament.
A programmer Friend of mine whom I’ve worked with 15+ years suddenly seems slow after 3 jabs.
Possible but…
No mention of Niemann being a self admitted cheater and likely a prolific one at that? No mention that Niemann has supposedly improved at such an unprecedentedly high rate that it is statistically so improbable that it defies belief? Really?
Chess is also not just about skill. It requires discipline and a subsequent mind game as well. Carlsen has a bit of an ego. It’s quite possible that Niemann got in his mind and he under performed. Wouldn’t be the first time it has happened to chess players.
Moreover, computer analysis of Carlsen’s games show little change in overall skill.
That was about Niemann cheating.
I obviously didn’t get the jab, I also talked my pregnant wife out it and have a healthy vax-free baby girl now.
My question is, we have gotten COVID twice now, are we at risk to become an excess mortality stat?
My experience of Covid is moderate flu. But then I took Ivermectin.
Looks to me that most of the effect of Covid is a nocebo if you are a strict materialist, or demon worship if you are not.
Long before the great Covid drama, I looked into having a flu vaccination. Concluded that the flu vaccination is not very effective, and is far from safe. The Covid vaccine is even less effective, and is enormously more dangerous.
I posted a study a earlier that showed that only people with the Jab got heart problems from COVID based on UK data. You’re fine.
Milquetoast election results so far. Looks Like Republicans will or may narrowly take back the House, but Senate is going to be about the same, either a narrow Democrat victory of 50-50 or better or a narrow Republican victory of 51 or so
Sounds like a victory for the normalcy faction.
Don’t you think victory for normalcy would have been a red wave, just like was predicted and expected and wanted? if that had happened, a 2024 steal would have been far easier to justify. I think I called it accurately: there were definitely some steels perpetrated by the more zealous and radical, but there was not a full and unified attempt to retain and expand the status quo of blue control. as well, the mainstream rate didn’t do anything more than the bare minimum, and the extreme right was foolishly convinced that if they played ball they would get to play ball. I’m not saying I was perfectly correct, but I do think I had the rough picture correct.
The victory for the normalcy faction is that there are way too many pussies not yelling fraud.
Exactly. They’ve muddied the waters quite effectively. Dems are still stealing races as we type, but the cohesive movement required to call out election theft isn’t happening.
let’s not be to hasty. while I have no expectation of the RNC suddenly growing balls and learning that they have principles, I think we might be surprised by the social media tribes that have formed around the right wing. wing meme generators. I know this is not historically where one would expect any kind of cohesive dissent movement, but those meme communities have a way of taking a given sentiment and amplifying and modifying it. Right now, they are super pissed at all. the people who didn’t go out and vote. This suggests that they still believe we can vote our way out of the mess we are in. only in this way are they anything like the RNC types. They are, very unlike the RNC types, incredibly susceptible to our memes, anglins, memes, and other thought viruses from the evil corners of the censored internet. we should be thinking about how to start getting a more sophisticated interpretation of our message into that stream of thought. I know this may seem like a long shot, but God gives us burdens we can only bear but just. just food for thought.
They’re currently over run by shills and being betrayed by propaganda agents who spent years signalling that they were on their side. I’m sure they’ll resist later, but the schelling point has already passed. Elite leadership is desperately needed.
This the shilling since 2016 makes it pretty impossible to have a memetically sovereign right wing online kingdom the way the old chans used to be.
Moderation is essential. And moderation has to be arbitrary, autocratic, subjective, capricious, and unfair, because if there are consistent stated rules that can be enforced mechanically in a predictable way, enemies will game them.
On the other hand, shill tests seem extraordinarily effective, and can be imposed mechanically and predictably. Why do our enemies not just lie their way through the shill test the way they lie about everything else?
The devil, they say, is the father of lies, but it seems that there are some lies he cannot speak without catching on fire.
What happened during the holy wars is that one side would concoct some overly clever theology so that they could speak the words of the enemy’s creed without exactly lying, because in their overly clever theology the words of the enemy creed were given some overly complicated meaning that would come as a big surprise for those that they intended to destroy. With the result that the creeds got longer and longer and more and more complicated, but they never seemed to face a problem with enemies just flat out lying barefaced on the creed. Rather the enemy would turn intellectual somersaults in order to cleverly sound as if they were saying one thing, while actually saying a very different thing.
You might almost think that a Divine lie detector was standing over them.
A red wave would have been a blow to the idea that democracy is over. A blue wave would’ve decisively confirmed to all that democracy is over. A mixed bag gives some plausible deniability that democracy is over.
TES has been all over this. Don’t forget part 1:
https://theethicalskeptic.com/2022/10/24/houston-the-cdc-has-a-problem-part-2-of-3/
In Portugal with our 95+% of vaccinated we have to go back a century to find a month with the number of deaths we are having now.
What’s the excess death rate increase in Portugal?
Apparently quite high
Depending on the month 20% to 25% and slowly increasing.
Off topic but important:
https://youtu.be/ry7j-DaabpQ
Col. McGregor is strongly indicating that Jim was right, and the GAE is preparing to engage in Ukraine, and they are quite possibly going to start in Moldova.
The whole thing is worth watching, but here are the key points, starting at 11:15:
– US troops from multiple divisions are in Poland doing heavy conditioning training, preparing for combat tempo operations
– Hungary blocked a support column that went through Moldova instead “coincidentally
I just don’t understand the motivation a soldier (who is forced to salute a female superior officer) has to risk his life? It can’t be the pay check.
How man of these soldiers are being divorce/alimony/child support raped right now? Whats going on?
Expect a shitload of sandbagging, that’s for sure, which I understand to have been a significant “problem” during the Syria thing.
Honestly if I was with those guys (though I’d have certainly been kicked out by now), I’d be highly suspicious that they were putting me there just to get killed for a bloody cover photo for Time Magazine.
Have you seen the film Top Gun Maverick? It’s about Tom Cruise and the drummer from Whiplash bombing a nuclear reactor on behalf of NATO.
Wildly successful at the box office. Especially with normie R voters. I hate to say it but there’s still a solid contingent of flyover state whites who are ready to commit war crimes for ZOG.
“War crime” doesn’t exist. It’s a Cathedral meme. Killing people, burning things, and destroying stuff is a powerful motivator, always has been and always will be.
‘War crimes’ is just another way of saying ‘loser crimes’. Everything the winner did is harsh but understandable in light of the necessity of combatting the evil loser, while everything the loser did is unforgivable depravity that just further highlighted the necessity of destroying them by any means possible.
>I just don’t understand the motivation a soldier
The adrenaline rush of life and death situations are so great that it’s an altered state of mind. There is complete telos along with every sense dialed up so far beyond standard baseline that perception of reality becomes surreal.
>Expect a shitload of sandbagging
There will be some of that, but in a professional all volunteer military you tend to get men searching for telos ending up in combat arms. They will perform. Others are looking for a ‘good’ death. They too will perform. Some still think they will survive and are just there for a paycheck. For them either the adrenaline kicks in and they perform or they will die.
>‘War crimes’
They exists… sort of. The high of adrenaline erases fear and guilt. It feels great. Then your guys die, and you are still high and feeling great. Then the adrenaline wears off and the full horror sets in that it was your guys who died. Society says only psychopaths are supposed to feel great while your friends die and so you can’t talk about it out of shame and fear. And now you think about it all the time and the trauma never heals. Now the whole experience surrounding the war feels like a crime.
war crime==hate crime. It’s a trick or prose. St John fully explained it above. It’s the result of letting women dictate taxonomy and categorization. They want to be notable in their field, but aren’t willing to defeminize themselves and actually become specialists. So they always seem to discover a “new thin.” “No no no, that’s not this thing or that thing, it is actually a distinct thing with characteristics of both this and that. We need a new category for Other Things.” The literature expands, new specialists are needed, textbooks reprinted, and 2 distinct concepts are now Frankensteined into some different concept, forever muddying the waters.
What I was describing was the origin of what we call war crimes. It was largely the result of guilt from a mismatch between societal expectations of warriors and what adrenaline highs feel like. The mismatch results in deep trauma that then leaks out into a desire for catharsis. Without anyway to confess to such severe spiritual sins, men will confess to lesser material crimes to describe what they are feeling. End result is that Private White Boy from Fly Over America is so traumatized from a friendly fire incident that he is too ashamed to ever admit to that he confesses to stealing a chicken and destroying civilian property and goes to Fort Leavenworth.
>war crime==hate crime
A modern invention. History is full of men losing themselves in the heat of blood lust and inadvertently feeling great while their own men died, or even worse when they killed their own men through accident or rage. That was the original type of crime committed during war; however, it was mostly a spiritual crime that could be absolved by a priest. Fog of war is a bitch.
The modern trick was to change such spiritual crimes to material crimes and afterwards expand the definition to include killing the enemy.
My definition of War crime is killing people out of spite rather than necessity.
Since Man is made in God’s Image. Killing mustn’t be done lightly but must only be done to an proper objective.
(Deuteronomy 20:1-15, 20:19-20, 21:10-14) is a good guide to the Laws of War according to God.
Also in rare cases like when Elisha got God to blind the Arameans leading them into the city disarmed instead of killing them. Gave them a great feast which stopped them raiding Israelite territory for a long time(2 Kings 6:8-23).
Echoing the Book of Proverbs:
https://twitter.com/HarmlessYardDog/status/1590791109512695808
Even if the term is relatively modern, war crimes obviously exist. Unless you think it’s impossible to do anything illegal or immoral during wartime.
Ex. Azov kidnapping random civilians and using them as human shields so they can accuse Russia of murdering said civilians, acts of cannibalism, sadistic torture for no reason other than to inflict pain on enemy soldiers, tricking a truck driver into becoming a suicide bomber. etc etc.
Aren’t we fucking white here? The British would conduct war in such a gentlemanly fashion that they’d literally organize into lines and fire at each other from 30 yards away. I look at Liberia and think “what a bunch of contemptinle savages”, not “what heroic warriors”
If you have to ask if you’re white…
Your describing “crimes.” Prefacing crime with “war” is yielding memetic sovereignty and countenancing Cathedral meme speak. The Brits fired plenty of hits, exterminated vermin, and fought war to the inch. It is not what Azov does that makes them evil, it is who they are and what they fight for.
*fired plenty of huts, sheesh
Evil is defined by actions as much as by identity. As the Law of War in Deuteronomy implies.
Israelite Soldiers aren’t meant to be like the Sadists of the Assyrian, Babylonian Empire. If you read up on their practices.
The British shot at each from 30 yards because of shock tactics. The army with the greatest morale and training would win. Non European armies went down like bitches in a Tijuana whore house from the shock of massed musket fire.
They also had 2 modes of fighting civilization and war to the knife. If your foes failed to fight in a civilized manner, then it was time exterminate them until they stop acting like beasts.
Fighting in lines was about maneovure and control, not gentlemanliness. Everything who could train and discipline troops to do it would do it. The idea of “sniping from the bushes” is fine until the enemy just marches on your roads and blocks your food supply or your farmland and burns it. Sure you can exclude the enemy from backwoods land with low population density and little economic value but who cares?
With lines, you cannot just march past the enemy to his vital logistics and transport points. You have to march through him and cannot easily flank him. A more diffuse but still continuous line might have been preferable in theory but not when the battlefield fills up with smoke and nobody can see what is going on.
The British would enthusiastically burn farmland and otherwise destroy civilian infrastructure to force a reluctant enemy army to battle or to enforce compliance on unrecognized combatants/franc tireurs. This has been an acceptable and necessary part of warfare in all of history until the late 20th century.
A war crime has customarily been the infliction of pointless suffering in cold blood, pain and death for the sake of pain and death once the rush of battle is over. Even the Nazi Germans would sometimes punish their troops for this sort of crime.
Immorality != crime. Don’t conflate.
“illegal during wartime”
Pretty stupid concept. “Ok we can’t get along so we’ll send our mean tough guys to slaughter, ravage and reave until you do what we want you to do, BUT we will do so in strict adherence to an unspecified law that governs how to slaughter, ravage and reave in a gentlemanly fashion”.
Follow that pattern and you will end up dying to whoever defects first.
Sometimes soldiers inflict pointless suffering. Bad. Better to fight with honour. Fighting with honour does not mean doing things nicely despite it harming prospects of victory. The britbongs fought for victory, not to be gentlemanly.
If you abandon honour and victory, you get liberia, because defection wins. The concept war crime is holiness spiraled dishonour – “You recognize it is bad to torture toddlers to death and rape and scalp virgins in front of their parents to goad them to making a military mistake? That it leads to cycles of ever increasing savagery until we are liberia? Yes? Excellent, now i will drop thirty thousand tons of high explosives on your daughters if you kill the human shields my insurgents surround themselves with, because you commited a war crime”
The concept of war crime is a trap, and the reality you are talking about is called dishonour.
Anglin’s on board with that idea:
https://dailystormer.in/us-ignores-russian-ambassador-saying-ukraine-planning-to-do-false-flag-nuke-attack/
>”People voted for a mentally disabled vegitable to control the course of their lives and livelihoods because they felt sorry for him.”
Lol, lmao.
@Pseudo-Chrysostom
And they will be feeling those mRNA rubbery “tree branch” clots grow and grow in their arteries…
A major factor unlying the sheer scale of death and disablement is the novelty of the threat.
Normally, slow but progressive degredation of health and wellness to disablement and death comes about from chronic low level exposure to a stressor, spread out over a long time period. A lethal result from a single encounter is usually also imediately lethal. This can include things like elemental containants, more complex high molecular weight carbon-hydrogen molecues, and also most forms of hostile microscopic life, from prions to fungi. The only common phenomena with a remotely similar epidemeological progression would be something like a dormant protozoan or parasitic organism with multiple life-cycle stages, that don’t start ‘commig online’ until given periods of time.
Virii can be discreetly isolated, and most chemical contaminants can likewise be denatured or mobilized and extreted with compatible antidotive compounds, whether existing in nature or synthatically manufactured. But what do you do when a subect’s own cells have been mutated with alien DNA as the root of pathology? Will mitosis result in it becoming endeic throughout all cells in the body in toto? Could apoptosis remove the bad seed from play?
Theoretically, this could be treated if there was some means of targeting mutant cells for destruction. There is likely research from cancer studies to this effect that could be adapted for this purpose; but this is also one thing that the presently regnant institutions of medicine will never do, because it is the same institution that aided and abetted the very calamity it would be responsible for treating in the first place.
It is frankly almost impossible to conceive that something this evil has actually happened – that there are beings that exist that could actually countenance perpetrating such a thing.
Millions of people, through ignorance, impulse, or coercion from family, business, and rulership, have brought doom upon themselves by corruption of chaos, an accursed ritual spellwork, a literal mark of the beast.
https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
>68.2% of the world population has received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.
The bizarre contrast between the overheated rhetoric and threats of enslavement and ostracism vs. the reality of how limp and sissy by historical standards the persecution turned out to be against anyone who showed the slightest spine, strongly suggests a spiritual basis for the threat. Those who gave in were those who wanted to give in. Those who did not want to give in, did not give in.
I know of one guy who, at the time, thought the ‘vaccines’ were just literally injecting people with the effective equivalent of covid infection in the first place, thus explaining the morbidity. But by that same token, he twisted it into thinking he could ‘cheat the system’ by using prophylactic measures that are effective against wuflu, to get the jab (and thus the stamp of approval) without suffering for it. In effect, pitting his magic against theirs.
At the time he claimed he had no adverse effects beyond injection site pain in the first few weeks. That was about two or so years ago. But, last we spoke, prompted by some of these recent articles, i mentioned other common symptoms of the jab that people might not normally associate it with, like kidney pain, and he said that yes, he actually has noticed a persistency of twinges in this area, even years later; and once that was noticed, it was basically like a floodgate of other things he originally thought of as isolated or caused by other factors, that he now feared were all caused by the jab as well. The course was decided in ignorance of the true nature of the threat.
There has been so much imperial excess for so long that Americans are conditioned to try to cheat the system. Everything from college admissions to business regulations.
There is little push back to most government tyranny because of that. Most of the time all it requires is very small inconveniences to avoid much larger imposed inconveniences. Most* thought they could cheat the vaccine as well. Turns out they (me included) were wrong.
*In my experience in DoD and government circles
Of course, sample size is N=1; but as they say, all evidence is anecdotal evidence at the limit.
I suspect that a lot of it was really a way to rationalize giving in to the social pressure coming from living and working in a bluetribe community. This was someone who was normally based about a lot of things, and never at any time recommended anyone else get the jab – or any other vaccine for that matter – yet somehow, came up with a reason to take it themselves.
For what’s it’s worth you can make that N+1;
I thought I could cheat the vaccine requirement by getting J&J. I thought I could cheat J&J by taking prophylactic measures against clots and inflammation.
I think you know how that turned out.
Another angle to consider is, i wonder how many cases there are of people of people going to medical facilities for one reason, and being surreptitiously dosed under the pretense of some other kind of injection. That local anesthetic they’re shooting up for a toothache: whose to say they haven’t mixed in some fauciuice with the serum as well.
And why not? It’s safe, safe, safer than water, and it’s for the restive cattle’s own good anyways.
I honestly wouldn’t put any kind of skullduggery as unconscionable at this point.
They’re going to go after the kids that way.
A good friend of mine literally got jabbed after ending up intoxicated at the hospital.
Anyone remember Jim’s story of doctors literally trying to get him killed when they got him on the bed by trying to force him into some sort of trap?
Docs didn’t even bother asking my guy for permission or anything, they just straight up jabbed him after checking his records to see he was unvaxxed and gave him a note that he’s been successfully jabbed at so and so.
Any, and I mean ANY hospital stories I hear of these days confirms that I need to treat those places like death traps, like giant manslaughter machines made just to cause endless suffering and eventual death. If I can afford too, I’m never going to get into a hospital for any reason.
That’s certainly a counter example to my overall rule. But in most cases the situation has been as Francis Berger’s blog puts it, “they will do everything in their power to ensure the choice is yoursâ€.
This was obviously intended to be permanent systemic disablement that will be passed on to children as well through affected germline cells.
I can only pray for the sake of the innocent – however few there may be – that it is shaniquatech that will malfunction in some way with respect to this intended behavior.
If not, the unvaxed shall inherit the earth.
That was always the idea of course.
But then of course, the plan was for only the effendi to be unvaxxed.
That’s the irony isn’t it? The kind of people willing to do such a thing, would not capable of the kind structural competence to actually pull it off for real. And so instead, what we are looking at is, in the large majority of cases, a bluetribe genocide in every part of the atlantic empire.
“If not, the unvaxxed shall inherit the earth.”
“That was always the idea of course.”
Please elaborate a little on why and how you perceive intentionality here, that the vax was intended to harm people, as opposed to “simply” the result of cultural revolution moral panic, with Shaniquatech.
I’m not even arguing. Just asking.
Because so far, I just can’t “handle” the intentionality theory. What I CAN “handle” is that the vaxx IS harmful, there were plenty of reasons to predict and suspect as much at the beginning (ADE and Vox Day’s “case nightmare kitty”), but the anti-Trump anti-Kulak “mass formation” moral panic terror around Covid was so strong (plus some profit motive of course) that there was simply no one with any authority who could let himself be seen hitting the brakes on it.
But I sure as heck can’t disprove intentionality either.
For example, this is the one that really gets me: We have athletes in some sports, like European soccer mainly, who are having heart attacks on the field, but not one American pro athlete doing this. This certainly implies, to me, that SOME authorities knew that the vaxx was dangerous (plus unnecessary for healthy people), and that they therefore needed to give saline solution to the athletes who would be on live TV, so as not to “give people the wrong idea”.
I can see that, but I can’t quite make the jump — not yet — to the vaxx being intentionally harmful from the beginning. Rather, that it was known to be harmful, or at least unnecessary and potentially harmful, and some elites — who were unable to be seen refusing the vaxx themselves — found a way to dodge it with saline solution, but only as an emergency mid-stream work-around, rather than a master plan.
Oh and also, those Covid skeptic African leaders (Tanzania was it?) getting assassinated. That bolsters the intentionality theory too!
What “exhibits” pushed you over the edge?
Blacks in the US are very holy and thus got the saline solution in pro-sports. Father away from the heart of the empire, the lesser beings were not told that they should take the saline shot instead of the vax. Though I’ve heard french leaders took saline shots instead of the vax.
Nah, saline shots are only for those that need to be told they got the vaxx.
French leaders (or anyone else who could make a physician hand out a vaxx pass for a saline injection) didn’t bother with any injection all. They just took the pass that certified they were vaxxed.
Modern’s patenting of a good chunk of the COVID spike protean in 2016. COVID was built in a lab and the vaccine was built before COVID was released based on how quickly both mRNA jab makers were able to start testing their vaccine.
Good point. I don’t know if it was 2016 or what, or for what, but the fact that “Covid stuff” was already patented, and that they had thousands of “test kits” all ready to go like a week into this thing, I mean how does that happen exactly if they’re genuinely responding to something new and unexpected. So fishy.
Fauci the Jesuit in charge said that it was certain Trump would face a pandemic in 2016 I think. They knew well in advance.
Vaccine created first, thing it was supposed to vaccinate against created next.
“Vaccine created first, thing it was supposed to vaccinate against created next.”
To what are you referring here, though? To vaccines — or at least big elements of them? — having been patented before the pandemic even started?
The spike protean was the only particularly novel element of COVID19 and it was patented in 2016. IE they build the vaccines first, then the virus.
As I see it, Vaccine is not so much “Shaniqua tech” as “grant system science.”
The plan makes logical sense:
1. make a virus that depends on a very unusual protein you designed
2. make a vaccine that targets that very unusual protein
Nobody had ever deployed this on humans before. All other vaccines somehow train the immune system on an entire pathogen. But there is some logic to it.
Also, it worked in local trials.
And then, it proximally appeared to work in population trials.
What had they missed? Evolutionary dynamics. If you target a very specific part of the virus, you create massive selection pressure to change that part of the virus and that part only. Since the virus as a whole doesn’t have to change all that much, good chance it can evolve out of immunity and yet still be virulent. Also, original antigenic sin.
These things were known. But in the grant funding world, scientists are “experts” on one very narrow task and they work on it in 2-3 year increments. Nobody has cross-disciplinary knowledge. The people designing viruses and vaccines in labs knew a lot about their day job, but nothing about dynamical systems.
Also makes more sense to me on grounds the system knows Shanique is dumb, but does not “know” that the grant system/compartmentalized science is “dumb”.
Right from the beginning the heat came down and doctors to not diagnose morbidity symptoms of jab – for example D-Dimer tests were not to be given, and if given, had to be “confirmed” by MRI. (Because the MRI shows nothing, the stringy bits being long, thin, and about the density of blood, the D-Dimer test is then deemed a false positive)
Similarly, someone dies mysteriously, the coroners sees his arteries are full of strange stringy bits, turn a blind eye to those strange stringy bits.
This indicates mens rea – they knew from the beginning that the jab was killing people, and had a very good idea of some the major and most common symptoms of death by jab.
As the jab was rolled out, doctors and coroners were simultaneously told to that noticing certain things would be very bad for their careers.
Mens Rea.
@Skippy that doesn’t explain why they deep sixed the J&J vaccine when it wasn’t killing enough people or why they replace the Oxford-AstraZeneca with the mRNA ones as soon as they had the supplies.
It appears to be a concerted effort to kill people.
Obviously a concerted effort to kill people and destroy fertility, since they were issuing fake vaccinations to some people and groups.
Their goal may have been both to kill people with the vaccine and also to “stop the pandemic.”
I’m not totally sure why, but then I’m also not totally sure why they wouldn’t just kill people with a deadlier virus if their aim were to only kill people.
The initial release of the virus was deadly, but deadly means virus does not get transmitted, so it rapidly evolved back towards wild type, just another cold/flu/sniffle.
The virus was bioengineered to attack the lungs, and in the early days there were a whole lot of reports of those affected turning blue by oxygen deprivation.
Patients turning blue was the original deadly form as designed. By the time the virus spread beyond the old people’s homes in which it was initially seeded, those infected beyond the initial seeding no longer turned blue. From the point of view of the virus, the deadliness mods were just baggage. Attacking lung tissue was a dead end.
Attacking the lungs is only useful to virus to result in coughing. If the virus deprives its host of oxygen, less likely to be transmitted. The virus wants you walking around and doing your normal things.
When the truly deadly version of the virus was swiftly outcompeted by more infective versions, which spread far faster, they decided to engineer the “vaccine” to have the same effect, albeit primarily in the slower and gentler form of infertility, miscarriage, and perinatal mortality.
The cholera bacterium produces spores that can last for a very long time outside the body, so does not mind killing its host too much. Cold/flu/sniffle type viruses are extremely fragile. Soap and water kills them, dry air kills them, damp air kills them, warm air kills them. Would not surprise me if giving them a dirty look kills them. So they need close contact between the carrier and next victim, so do not want to incapacitate its host too severely.
Would have had better luck with a smallpox type virus. I thought that monkeypox was their second attempt, but it seems to be a natural disease opportunistically targeting populations with weakened immune systems. Typically gays who have been massively jabbed.
If you don’t want your disease to evolve away from lethality, you need something spore or mosquito transmitted. Rather than figuring out how to enable a common cold/flu to attack lung tissue, should have worked on enabling various mosquito borne diseases to attack new species of mosquito, and to kill their human hosts. Adapt breakbone fever or one of its many relatives to mosquitoes common in white countries, and once it can infect temperate zone mosquitoes, improve its lethality to humans.
There was a video from NIH Sept. 2019 iirc where you could pause and see in a refrigerator a box labelled: “covid-19 vaccine”. I’m looking but can’t find it at the moment. If interested I can dig it up, it should still be possible to find.
Found it:
Making a vaccine 6 months before the Pathogen appeared? Above is a short clip of a promo video made by NIH Jan 2020. […] the following screengrabs show the date of 7/23/2019 on this box of “2019 Novel Coronavirus vaccine”
Vaccine first, disease next.
Planned the jab, then planned the epidemic. So the jab was to serve some ulterior purpose.
If the purpose was as innocent as making money, would have been difficult to keep the lid on a the conspiracy. For something on this scale, you need a conspiracy of the faithful.
While we are discussing foreknowledge, one can look at FDA meeting Oct. 22, 2020 [2hr 33min 40sec]. Presenter quickly skips slide showing known adverse effects of injection (prior to rollout). FDA and Pfizer tried to have that information hidden for 75 years. They knew, wanted to keep it hidden, messed up showing the key slide for an instant during a public meeting.
Sasha Latypova’s (longtime pharma executive) argument is that if their motivation were money, they could’ve injected saline. Higher profit (since zero cost), and wouldn’t have raised suspicion (no adverse events), so uptake would’ve been higher.
It also would’ve more easily allowed for their vaxpass/digital ID introduction. As we discussed some time ago here, they may have miscalculated, they likely thought they could inject everyone:
@Simply Connected
It’s a stunning example of evil marring evil.
God will not be mocked.
Sterilization by vax to be followed by hormonal intersexualization.
Red wrote:
I fear this (and I avoid hospitals like the plague for this reason) but what can they do at this point? Recent booster uptake is everywhere below 50%, and vanishingly low for children. They had to close those awful child injection centers in NYC because no clientele.
Vaccine requirements to attend school. Someone leaked that NY is planning it after the midterms. All the blue states will probably do it.
I saw the first story about COVID on reddit in ages today concerning a cruise ship. Looks like they’re ramping up again.
Red wrote:
They always keep pushing, and maybe it works in blue cities, but I find it hard to imagine they can force people when possibly a majority is now skeptical of all vaccines. Looking at uncensored comment sections (in MSM, and until they realize and censor them), people seem to know what’s going on. We shall see I suppose.
Then school goes ahead and jabs them without telling the parents the same way they turn them tranny without telling their parents.
Red wrote:
I’m afraid you are right. What’s worse is that, as injections are shown to be increasingly harmful, they may become increasingly fanatical.
Red wrote:
I’m afraid you are right. What’s worse is that, as injections are shown to be increasingly harmful, they may become increasingly fanatical.
The flu is gone. Weak Covid replaced it. No more annual flu shot just means an annual Covid shot. When it is renamed so it’s not immediately associated with the original mRNA shots a good portion of people will return to getting their annual shot.
Thank you. You guys are awesome.
@Jim:
“When the truly deadly version of the virus was swiftly outcompeted by more infective versions, which spread far faster, they decided to engineer the “vaccine†to have the same effect, albeit primarily in the slower and gentler form of infertility, miscarriage, and perinatal mortality.â€
Hey wait. Didn’t you just reverse the time and logical order here, saying the vaccine came later?
I do remember how the J&J shot, in particular, was getting a bad rap in the media about “blood clotsâ€. What’s conspicuous to me now is how the J&J company didn’t fight back to rehabilitate their product and make a few more bucks. That would make more sense. I notice that dog not barking today. Maybe the idea was to let people believe that the bad vaccines were gone, so only the safe ones remained. Someone had to be the patsy.
And while we’re here, what do you guys make of the Sputnik 5 and Chinese vaccines?
Vax first, then disease engineered for massive lethality. Lethality failed, due to evolution back to wild type, plans adapted ad hoc on the fly.
The Satanic world system is a damnation machine. Now the Demons will have their harvest of souls who put themselves beyond redemption.
And they will all be dragged into hell with the Devil and his Angels.
Does anyone have predictions or thoughts on how mass Covid “vaccination†might affect the political scene in the next 10-20 years if heavily vaxxed and boosted blue tribesmen start dropping dead and fail to reproduce even more? Will the death/disability/infertility rate be small enough to not have much of an impact overall? I suspect it will be studiously ignored by msm in any case.
Anecdotally, the unvaxxed in my area have a much higher fertility rate. It makes me wonder what things will look like in 30 – 50 years if we aren’t annihilated in some sort of conflagration.
@Andy
There won’t be much of an MSM after this.
I don’t know bro. it’s just too effective to have a widespread megaphone for transmitting mind viruses to the Commons. I’m pretty sure something would rise to take its place quite quickly, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing, by the way. imagine if we let the Taliban run the mainstream media. based, red-pilled, and lit… as in the side of mites would be on fire as they fell from the rooftops.
>side of mites
This was a VTT transcription error and I love it. I humbly ask everyone to incorporate “side of mites” into your various meme operations.
@starman
From your keyboard to god’s ears
Off topic but I just found that march of dimes has a bunch of good info on fertility in america, down to county level, race, maternal age, bunch of stuff.
“…but I’m only linking it if you donate to my GoFundMe.” Or what bro? Post dat link, my son.
Take my hand, I’ll lead you there
https://www.marchofdimes.org/peristats/state-summaries/alabama?top=2&lev=1&stop=1®=99&sreg=01&obj=9&slev=4
And I was gonna ask everyone to subscribe to my only fans instead.
This does not contain information that would enable us to compare prejab and postjab fertility and perinatal mortality.
This resembles the situation that happened with the death rate when the jab was introduce. Data was delayed, and recording was changed that made pre jab and post jab records incomparable.
Also, there were and are massive internal discrepancies in the post jab mortality rate data indicating massive fraud, and discrepancies with insurance and funeral data.
What I see is not fertility data, but a suspicious absence of fertility data.
jfc I was going to say “only fans” but I was trying to be incrementally less gay for once.
Jew McJewFace is out at twitter:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/far-left-moderation-council-yoel-roth-called-trump-racist-tangerine-twitter/
Elon keeps taking out the trash. Let’s hope walks on that Twitter moderation council.
I agree with Yarvin on this. Twitter should be in the truth business, but not outsourcing it to the mainstream. The Community Fact check system is a good start.
I meant let’s hope he walks *BACK* on that twitter moderation council.
Long haul, my dude. Art of the Possible.
It seems likely to me that Musk will have to implement some sort of moderation. But note that the moderators don’t have to be activist LGBTs from India. (I’m guessing most of the moderation will be automatic btw.)
What if the human moderators instead are, say, straight white men from the balkans, or perhaps formerly suppressed Australian (cough) posters? Preferably such that are not defeated by lawgic traps and the like. I think I could live with that.
Sticking feathers up your butt doesn’t make you a chicken, and writing “moderator” on your namebadge doesn’t make you Cathedral.
That said, there are still some straight-face plausibly-deniable games that might remain playable, especially while Twitter is shut down for three months of Chapter 11 proceedings. I’ve always been a fan of publishable “blocklists”, so that someone could subscribe to the SPLC’s and ADL’s curated list of un-see-ables, if he wanted to.
But that too has a 1% chance of working out, because the point of moderation isn’t to make crimethinkers invisible to Cathedralites, but rather to make crimethinkers invisible to each other.
(Still though, if you’re reading this, Mr. Thiel, give Elon the good word anyway, OK?)
Elon, if you get turned into the next moderation bitch, at least make sure they turn on the ad spending again in return. And recruit the next moderator team in Nigeria.
The situation with Musk at Twitter is great: He’s doing to Twitter what the left has been doing to the western world for more than a century: Converge it or kill it. The left tries to take over an important institution. If it succeeds, great for the left. If not, it drive it into failure. Either way, normal people lose an important institution protecting them. Musk, whether intentionally or not, has done the same thing to Twitter now that there’s talk of Twitter going bankrupt.
Musk does that pretty regularly in order to induce employees to work hard. He did it with SpaceX last year over raptor 2 engines production issues. I don’t think he’s lying, he sold a bunch of Tesla stock to keep SpaceX afloat. My guess is he doesn’t try to save twitter if it fails.
Either way it’s good. Either Twitter stays afloat with Musk as CEO or it goes down in flames.
Zucc, like many skypes, feels attracted to priestly forms, but that does not by necessity mean competence at priestly forms.
Looks to me like much of it is leaning more on the side of thanklessly trying to buy his way into power, like many merchants, while his ‘clients’ are making the choices on how the money gets used, not him.
(Whoops, this should have gone here https://blog.reaction.la/science/excess-mortality-by-country/?replytocom=2856357#respond)
[…] # https://blog.reaction.la/science/excess-mortality-by-country/ # […]
A few thoughts/questions on setting up a wireguard vpn on a vps for opsec:
Assumptions:
– Use only on a machine/vm which is running linux and not associated with any real life accounts or info, ie don’t log in to Google on it
– Set up killswitch on machine, ie with firewall or iptables to only allow traffic through wireguard interface
– On both client and server, set ssh settings as recommended by Jim in section 4.1 here: https://reaction.la/security/setup/set_up_build_environments.html
– Pay for VPS with monero or washed btc
– VPS should be in country relatively outside GAE influence, ie nothing in US/Canada/EU. Probably best places are EE, Asia excluding China/Korea/Japan.
Am I missing anything?
Would it be a mistake to rent a VPS from a company which is based in the US or has a US presence, even if the VPS is offshore?
I know people probably don’t want to reveal their favorite countries or companies for hosting, but can you give me any clues on what to look for?
Exactly so.
Though I would recommend having several such machines, some of them in enemy jurisdictions, corresponding to one’s identities that have different exposures. They do not cost all that much.
This question may sound stupid but how would one get an email account without using another email account or phone number to set it up?
If you live in the US you buy a burner phone with cash. They’re still legal in the US because black criminals use them.
Burner phones and obscure webmail services with no KYC (you’ll have to do lots of trawling for this) can be used for boostrapping to desired accounts with no direct links.
Thanks guys I appreciate it.
Head up burner phones generally ask for an email address or exiting phone number during setup. They’re designed for black criminals so canceling the prompt or a fake email generally works. They don’t have a desire to verify that it’s your email address so anything works.
You don’t need a burner phone. Try tutantota or protonmail or something like that, if they ask for a confirmation email use a temporary email service like https://www.guerrillamail.com/. I don’t trust these email providers, but it’s ok since the only email you receive there should be for account signups to the same identity. Obviously if you need secure communication use GPG or bitmessage.
Protonmail does not allow anonymous signup. They want your personal details or a “donation” (credit card info).
Protonmail is probably a CIA front. Maybe they have to work harder to get info out of PM than out of google.
If you try to sign up to protonmail behind a VPN they require verification (working email, phone number, etc). If you use a regular ISP and browser you can get an email account anonymously. But yes very likely they’re handing everything over to the NSA or CIA, so using them isn’t good opsec.
If you sign up behind your real IP then how are you anonymous?
They are saying they require your fingerprint, but you can choose what fingerprint to give them, and you only need to give them one, not the whole hand.
Protonmail is a service that is designed to present as oriented towards privacy, but always leaves a hole.
>If you sign up behind your real IP then how are you anonymous?
Anonymous as in you don’t have hand over dirrectly identifying information. You could sign up a friend’s house or the public wifi to go around it.
VPNs are often used to create spam email accounts so the requirement of identifying information when signing up from a VPN is legitimate. But I wouldn’t trust them not to hand over your IP information to the Feds. Pretty much every corp in the west is compromised when it comes to federal spying.
Which is why I recommended a burner phone.
If you are going to use an internet cafe in another city or another country, and check it first for cameras, then OK.
Protonmail seems more like an op designed to scoop up data on people who believe they have some reason to need anonymity from the people that direct Protonmail, than a real privacy service.
Guerillamail appears legit, but also likely to be rejected as a legitimate email provider by many services (not all though).
Hey Basil, watch this video of a few Ukes finding a package of Russian soldier rations:
https://t.me/intelslava/40769
Looks like pretty decent food.
This video confirms my position that the war was not needed. These same half-starved men would not object to economic integration if Russia were East European Germany, but with normal legal norms and without queers and feminism in cultural life.
By the way, Kherson was just surrendered there and now you can see a yellow-blue flag over the city. And here is Lukashenko’s fresh quote “Minsk is committed to developing bilateral relations with Warsaw and is ready to” build bridges of friendship, not border walls with barbed wire. ”
Putin lost not only Ukraine, but also Belarus.
What makes you think that their opinion on economic integration matters?
What makes you think that their opinion on anything matters? They are cannon fodder under the control of authorities that hate them and want them dead.
Ukrainians face the choice of run or die. They just have not figured it out yet. So, in the end, probably will die.
The big weakness in Russian strategy has always been that they want to avoid killing Ukrainians and the Ukrainian government wants Ukrainians killed.
Ukrainian oligarchs who trade in coal/ore/grain/ (…) do not need borders with Belarus and Russia. Ukraine, at least until 2014, was a classic oligarchic state. People who come to state power are direct agents of certain oligarchs, or they themselves are such oligarchs. Ukraine is a weak state, and only the war made possible the consolidation of power in one hand.
And after 2014, a Soros Muppet state. The war did not consolidate power in one hand. Rather, the consolidation of power in one hand made it possible to make war.
[*social justice warrior projecting as usual*]
Putin’s just getting started in the Ukraine.
You’re looking at cannon fodder. NATO has spent years training a massive army of professional Ukrainian soldiers on Russia’s border, and ZOG is flooding the country with mercs.
The war is just.
I don’t get the Soros fixation. Soros is bad but overblown. He’s just one of the many money launderers of Harvard. Got a naked feminist protester problem in Russia? Pepper spray and some burly dudes. What about Soros funded university in Hungary? Close it down. A boat of a mere 230 migrants heading to Italy? Just say no…
What’s Soros going to do? Send in an army he doesn’t have? The power of Soros is an illusion. He’s no more powerful than the Church functionary that passes the donation basket down the pews and collects it at the end. True power has always resided with the state religion of Harvard.
Open Society has a paltry 32 billion to burn. That’s a lot of shills. Harvard has an endowment fund of 53 billion and growing. That’s a lot more shills and likely much smarter ones at that. Add in the rest of the Ivy League and it grow to around 100 billion. Add in the Harvard ecosystem where their graduates go to work like NPR, Radio Free Europe, CNN, NGOs, State Universities, etc etc and you’re definitely in the hundreds of billions if not trillions.
But I suppose that if one is a small European country surrounded by State Department controlled vassal states, that maybe it’s easier to blame Soros as a proxy of America without directly saying America and risk overtly pissing off all the neighbors. I may have answer my initial question.
Soros is a functionary but to some degree Harvard is just a functionary too… yes many powerful people go through Harvard but Harvard is just a metanym for power. I doubt the executive body of the media is the Kennedy School of Government Tenure Comittee or the Harvard board of trustees…
Check out CNN’s leadership. It’s dominated by the New England cohort. Awful lot of Harvard or affiliated Ivy League types with the odd Jesuit school alumni. The executive body of CNN might as well be the Kennedy School of Government.
Now repeat for all major left wing media outlets and you’ll see the same structure. Calling Harvard power is a little more than figurative.
Where are all the Stanford, MIT, and Caltec graduates in media? Aren’t they suppose to be just as smart as the Ivy League graduates if not smarter?
The Jesuits are probably the ones in charge they were in charge of covid… Tokugawa Ieyashu did literally nothing wrong.
Zuckerberg’s CZI (Harvard) is burning though billions in covid related funding. It’s clearly a distributed group effort of the New England system. Those Jesuit schools are all in both close physical and intellectual proximity to Harvard (Ivy League in general).
Might as well call it ‘Greater Harvard.’
Or greater Georgetown…
Well now you got me researching how many of those New England schools are Jesuit. Elite high schools included.
The important private schools on the East Coast are Protestant, not Roman Catholic.
The uber-wealthy are mostly Protestants, while the upper-middle-class is divided among Jews, Protestants and Catholics, each living in different areas.
The Jesuits are one of many factions within the Polygon. Catholic elites are wealthy and influential, but are not as wealthy or influential as the Protestant or the Jewish elites.
Faucis wasn’t.
He got his MD at Cornell, hardly a Catholic school.
But his high school and regular college was holy cross.
Redfield’s school were all Jesuit schools even the med school.
There’s no single entity “behind it all.” That’s Hollywood horseshit. I totally get the desire for a single enemy, it makes things simpler. But if you pushed a button and all the Jesuits disappeared, the Cathedral wouldn’t disappear as well. Same for the jews, same for the sodomites.
…now if you made a button that could push three buttons at once…
Zuckerberg attended Exeter, while the Bushes and others attended Andover. Both prep schools are feeders to the Ivy League, and were originally associated with Calvinists who fled Harvard when it turned Unitarian. Don’t think there was too much Jesuit influence there.
“There’s no single entity “behind it all.†That’s Hollywood horseshit.”
There is a unified command… maybe various factions fall under it but the Jesuits are the best link there is.
Adam Weishaupt was a Jesuit…
Humanism was the original leftism and more or less it came from the Jesuits.
And given that they seem to like to tip their hand in weird ways in the media and pop culture remember what the devil says in the Devil’s Advocate… he says I’m a Humanist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9jk5WLbzoM
Do you have any material to recommend on the Jesuit theory?
The paucity of modern literature on the very theory is quite honestly TCs biggest point in his favor in my opinion. As I’m sure he will no doubt tell you, many people of note used to be very leery of the Jesuits. With good reason, most Catholics are quite annoying, and Catholics that are part of a secret community with lots of money and power are magnitudes worse. I do not agree with him on this, though. I do think they are part of the overall cathedral hierarchy, but I will say that the ratio of tin foil to actual substance has been shifting in my mind over time. The hurdle that I will never be able to get over is that I just don’t believe in centralized control within the framework of what we see going on currently. This is not to say that there couldn’t be some centralized control mechanism for a society, or collection of societies, like ours, I just think it would be configured much differently.
“I just don’t believe in centralized control within the framework of what we see going on currently.”
Ditto. Factionalism has always been one of the left’s Achilles heels. E.g. Jim on Trotskyites: “Two Trots, three factions.”
As bad as our situation is right now, if the left could really do unity it would be so much worse. Thank God their genetically-encoded personality type is “Betray! Betray! Betray!”
If the “unitary actor” model turns out to be correct, though, that would be good if we ever find out the names of that small number of people: A small number of people to politically neutralize.
What is the Jesuits goals and mission?
https://newagora.ca/inside-popes-reptilian-audience-hall-vatican-city/
During the twenty first century, no other specific identifiable Jew has committed anything like as much specific identifiable harm.
So if someone says “Joo Joo Joo name the Joo Joo Joo”, but is strangely unable to notice any specific identifiable misdeeds by Soros, you know who that someone is working for.
Similarly, when someone says “9/11 was an inside job” I ask them about Mueller.
The anticapitalists are, for the most part, working for Soros, (“Joo Joo Joo” being a leadup to the theory that capitalism is recent and Jewish) The troofers are, for the most part, working for Mueller.
If someone says “Joo Joo Joo Joo name the Joo Joo Joo” he likely spends a vast amount of energy and effort trying to get you to Musk or people like Musk. If you don’t hate Musk you must be a tool of the Jews he tells you.
>no other specific identifiable Jew has committed anything like as much specific identifiable harm.
Zuckerberg (Harvard graduate) and his $45 billion CZI is the hot new thing. They are increasingly messing around in politics and based on the facebook feed I get from people who work there, it’s all for left wing causes. Zuckerberg also bankrolls Soros backed groups and talked about supporting an “open society.”
Soros is about to kick the bucket. His atrophied and gaunt faced son is a joke coasting off of his father’s legacy. Open Society is already becoming an extension of CZI.
How do you know they are strangely unable to notice Soros because of Soros? What if they are strangely unable to notice Soros because of Zuckerberg?
Do the “Joo Joo” people name Zuckerberg?
Zuck im pretty sure got extorted with threats they were going to nail him for tax evasion if he didnt cough up the money…
Zuckerberg is not overthrowing governments and burning white people out of their cities.
I am not aware of Zukerberg funding shills and entryists. He may well be doing so, but I have not noticed any, while Soros is funding huge numbers of shills and entryists, so even if Zuckerberg was burning white people out their homes like Soros, Soros would still be a more useful test against entryists.
Of course the most general and universal test is the women question, but when I see a shill who appears to be working off a Soros script, would rather hit him with the Soros test. Similarly, FBI script, Mueller test.
If Zuckerberg was funding as many “Joo Joo Joo” people as Soros, I would probably have a Zukerberg test
>Zuckerberg is not overthrowing governments and burning white people out of their cities.
State Department uses facebook to facilitate color revolutions. Taking Zuckerberg’s political sympathies into account, he was at the very least complacent in overthrowing governments if not outright facilitating it.
Zuckerberg founded FWD.us in 2013 for “criminal justice reform and immigration†policies and funds it through CZI. FWD advocates for a massive reduction in incarceration. In 2013 FWD was mainly concerned with Californian politics, but by 2020 has gone national with a specific focus on Arizona, New York, Mississippi, and Oklahoma.
CZI does not have to report the organizations it is funding due to LLC status, but in 2020 they announced $500 million over the next five years to support organizations and leaders to fight for racial equity in CZI focus areas. That sounds a lot like burning white people out of their cities to me.
Soros might be a bigger player than Zuckerberg right now. That is changing quickly.
Can you address:
1) The massive seeming boondoggle that is the Meta transition
2) Doesn’t your position rest on the assumption that Zuckerberg is in complete control of his company?
1) Zuckerberg in his IPO letter stated:
[blockquote]Facebook was not originally created to be a company. It was built to accomplish a social mission […] we don’t build services to make money; we make money to build better services.[/blockquote]
For him making money is secondary to a social mission. Since the primary point of all business is to make money. That’s a very odd thing to say prior to an IPO.
[blockquote]Facebook aspires to build the services that give people the power to share and help them once again transform many of our core institutions […] Facebook exists to make the world more open and connected[/blockquote]
This is open society talk. Then you look into the early days of Facebook and see that there was likely CIA funding and a crap ton of former CIA in the company. Is it a coincidence that all the facebook revolutions took place in target countries of GAE?
2) Facebook’s S-1 elects it to be a controlled company such that:
[blockquote]
-Has no need for independent directors – as other companies are.
-Not required to have a compensation committee.
-Not required to have an independent nominating committee for proposing new directors.
-CEO has effective control of the company forever through his 57% voting stake and the right to appoint his successor from the grave.
-A classified board.
-CEO selects jurisdiction for any shareholders who brings lawsuits against the company.
[/blockquote]
Pretty clear Zuckerberg likes having a high degree of control, but my positions don’t rely on high control. What is being built with CZI is an institution that largely hires based on ideology (reduces the need for control) and whose purpose is to funnel money to a wide range of left wing organizations (as long as money flows everyone’s happy). Black Voices for Black Justice Fund among other DEI fronts for example. Since these types of organizations can’t exist without outside funding for they produce nothing of value, the funding becomes the control. While that isn’t direct or complete control, it is delegated control. That is how Soros’s Open Society functions and why a nearly dead 92 year old can operated in 120 countries (that they admit to).
It was in 2020 that Zuckerberg really started to move into the traditional territory that Soros use to dominate. It was also 2020 that Soros started to call for the removal of Zuckerberg. Coincidence? Zuckerberg is still in control of META and CZI which should give a clue who’s more powerful inside GAE.
I hate switching between Typescript, C, and HTML
Ok that is all very compelling. it is not my particular area, so I will have to take your word on it. He does seem rather goofy to me, and given my beliefs that Donald Trump is actually a mirthless near sociopathic do gooder trying to save his country and putting up a fabulously constructed false front as some bombastic Long Island personality, it would be reasonable to believe that a dorky Jew with no social skills who larps to the level of the coder guy in the movie Grandma’s Boy is actually some kind of new world order leader.
You have a compelling argument that Zuckerberg has power.
Does, however, he have a large crew of shills and entryists?
>Does, however, he have a large crew of shills and entryists?
Don’t know. He’s burnt through $2.9 billion through CZI and $400 million through SVCF. His ‘Justice Accelerator Fund’ alone is getting $70 million a year. It’s full of all the classic progressive types that you typically see in a Soros operation and looks like it’s building up to become a long term project. How many shills that that buy?
He also controls Meta. If Twitter is any measure, there’s a lot of shills on Meta as well.
Soros overthrew the Ukrainian government, leading to the current war. What governments has Zuckerberg overthrown?
Shilling and color revolution are essentially the same operation, both being entryist operations. If Zuckerberg is shilling, probably overthrowing governments, and vice versa. Maybe he is shilling and overthrowing governments, but I am not yet aware of any Zuckerberg shills.
>What governments has Zuckerberg overthrown?
Overthrowing the Trump government was a group effort, but it appears he had a fairly large role in it. In NPR’s own words “Facebook’s CEO Saved The 2020 Election.”
@Pax, I think the Zuck bucks in 2020 was to pay for the vote rigging. This year it was the FTX scam from laundered US Government money sent to Urkirane, laundered again by a Jew.
I don’t see anything indicating the shills we’re seeing are anything other than the Dems, Soros, and FBI shill groups. There’s also a RINO shill group, but I haven’t seen them post here.
Yeah, there isn’t really a disagrement here. We have a Soros flavored shill test because Soros NGOs/nonprofits have been active here. If there are Zuck shills here, we either don’t know it or they aren’t a problem yet. But I think Pax’ hard work has demonstrated a causal link between Zuck’s efforts and steals. Hard to deny at this point.
I am grinding my teeth to powder on this “vote harder” meme. Because our side refuses to see the fakeness and fraud, (((their))) side has all these effective weapons. If conservatives just withdrew from electoral politics, easily half of the adversay’s efforts would suddenly become pointlessly burnt money, and probably much more.
My impression is Zuck was blackmailed into funding the 2020 steal since they were finding it hard to get government funding on the scale needed for the bribes (Trump was clamping down on a lot of that stuff). I haven’t heard yet how much he kicked in for this election, but my guess isn’t nearly as much as it was in 2020.
Merchants always roll over when the elite put pressure on them. Zuck strikes me as more of a Merchant than a player. Not that is matters, someday he’s going to end up mindcrafted for his roll in 2020, assuming the leftists don’t do him first, since that’s typically how holiness spirals play out.
Not like it maters since the US government is funding it. Sitting out an election just gives them cover to implement full communism like they did in Venezuela. However, you probably got your wish. I doubt most of the grass roots of the GOP are going to bother with 2024, they know it was stolen. Most of the voice you’re listening too are part of the RINO shill team, trying to get people to keep voting for the GOP when elections are fake and gay.
The winners in 2024 will be whoever bribes the most or is willing to use violence on the vote counters. Voters don’t matter.
Zucc, like many skypes, feels attracted to priestly forms, but that does not by necessity mean competence at priestly forms.
Looks to me like much of it is leaning more on the side of thanklessly trying to buy his way into power, like many merchants, while his ‘clients’ are the ones making choices on how the money he provides gets used, not him.
>Zuck bucks in 2020 was to pay for the vote rigging
To add on, rigging involved legal and physical infrastructure that once built gets reused for subsequent elections. Zuck bucks will haunt American elections for quite some time. Main difference between 2020 and 2022 was the the timing of mass ballot dumps mostly shifting to the beginning of the count, but the methodology remained the same.
>I don’t see anything indicating the shills we’re seeing […] post here
I mostly pay attention to irl shills and my initial post was about the Harvard/New England ecosystem and how it completely dwarfs Soros. Like all good discussions, things went off on tangents.
I’m speculating about the future in regards to Zuckerberg. Soros is a decrepit, near death, 92 year old. His son looks like a weak fag. He’s going to be replaced sooner rather than later, and I doubt his son will have the pull to keep operations running smoothly.
Zuckerberg is 38 and has stashed billions into an organization that is looking more and more like Open Society Foundations with each passing election cycle. He’s a convenient replacement. The hip young progressives who graduate from elite universities and want to ‘change the world’ and ‘make an impact’ don’t want to work at stale OSF or boring BMGF. They want to get hired at CZI (at least anecdotally in my social circle). That may be due to his history of saying things at elite universities like:
That was at Georgetown in 2019, and he has made similar statement stretching back to 2012.
Likely too early for a Zuck shill test, but it’s possibly needed on the horizon. Luckily this can be tested. All we need to do is ask the ‘JOO JOO’ shills about Zuck and see how they respond.
” What governments has Zuckerberg overthrown?”
Arab Spring. Just because it wasn’t a 100% success like Soros in Ukraine (because Zucc is a limp-wristed dweeb), doesn’t mean he didn’t try.
It is not so much I care about how big a player the player is.
I care about identifying who is running this particular shill, who issued this particular script.
Soros topped the megadonor list this election cycle, giving $129m to the Democrats.
He does this consistently. Chesterton’s Fence, Pax. Not idly do the Jimian Shill Tests fall.
On the surface level Soros made $129 million donations to Democrats compared to Zuckerberg’s $0. Does that seem right for someone so close to power? Look under the surface of direct donations to “charities/nonprofits/etc” and you see something else.
In 2020 Zuckerberg dumped $419.5 million into CTCL and CEIR (mostly) through SVCF. These are “nonpartisan” nonprofits which avoids landing Zucerberg onto megadoner lists.
CTCL was founded by Epps-Johnson, a former Obama fellow, who, along with her co-founders, had worked at the progressive New Organizing Institute.
CEIR was founded by David Becker. He was a former senior trial attorney for the voting section of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and was a senior staff attorney at the progressive advocacy group People for the American Way that was “founded to fight right-wing extremism.â€
Coincidentally, these “nonpartisan” organizations went on to fund and train “vote navigators†who “assist voters, potentially at their front doors, to answer questions, assist in ballot curing […] and witness absentee ballot signatures.†Moreover, CTCL specifically demanded the promotion of universal mail-in voting. CTCL drove the proliferation of unmonitored private dropboxes mostly in DNC run cities. CTCL greatly increased funding for temporary staffing and poll workers.
All these actions helped the left, maybe “nonpartisan” is really just a method to avoid showing up on the same lists Soros lands on. Now look at CZI and the fact that none of those grants are “political” and for the most part classified as donations to “charities.”
Since 2015, CZI has given $2.9 billion in grants. That’s roughly $414 million per year. Many of those grants go to
shilladvocacy groups like the ‘Justice Accelerator Fund’ (created by CZI in 2021 and lead by former ACLU Ana Zamora) which will receive $350 million over 5 years for criminal justice and immigration reform (reducing sentencing for black criminals and open borders). Another example, the ‘California Black Freedom Fund’ got $100 million for in their words “Black power-building” and for “confronting racism and anti-Blackness.”CZI has over 2100 grants listed. Over 600 are “Justice & Opportunity.” This is a machine may have already overtaken Soros in dollar spending within continental US and is still getting bigger.
It would appear then that Zuck is the other side of the Soros coin. An I’m sure it is just a complete coincidence that they are jews, right guys? The same kind of coincidence that has all the prominent child mutilating surgeons and tranny advocate lawyers sporting similar noses. But don’t worry y’all, the jews are just the fall guys for the real evil masterminds… white men!!!
lol, lmao even.
Jim, how much more does Pax need to do for us to all agree we need some kind of Zuck shill test? Although, looking through the orgs Pax mentions, they don’t seem like they are online pathfinders or sappers. Their ken seems to be brick & mortar institutions, a true High and Low targeted operation. They are connected to the elite donner class and the weaponized pet minorities. Man, as if our situation weren’t challenging enough; we spend years just trying to get slivers of a percent of white people to pay attention, and a bunch of rich kikes (complete coincidence, of course) can just hand money to negros with LibArts degrees. We get a handful a of Gab converts, they get stolen elections and foot soldiers.
The pills, like America’s idols, are black.
Why would we need a Zuck shill test? Zuck funds the Dems, and lets the feds spy on people using fagbook. The question is does he employee shills? So far no evidence of it.
>But don’t worry y’all, the jews are just the fall guys for the real evil masterminds… white men!!!
Is Dr. Fauci Jewish? Hillary Clinton? Pelosi? The elites are generally white with a sizable Jewish and now Dot Indian component.
Evil Jews are evil Jews. Then there’s Jews like Dr. Zelenko who told the truth about COVID while evil white men like Fauci where busy murdering Americans. Jews have no problems murder the goyim and the cathedral loves killing white Americans.
A match made in hell, but they’re not the masters pulling the strings. If they were there would be a Jewish doctor releasing COVID while telling the Jews to get Saline shots. As far as I know that didn’t happen.
Bro, you’re pissed that the fake and gay election, turned out to be fake and gay. It sucks, but it’s reality.
Jews and Whites have a way of bringing out the worst from each other. It’s like a weird mutual codependency. Hmm…
Might need to replace ‘abandoned or alone’ with ‘purged or kicked out,’ but otherwise looks like most of the list fits.
Soros money comes from the US government. Hence the US government funded the Democrats to the tune 129m and Soros was the bag man.
The big funds really came from the FTX crypto heist.
Looks like that was mostly money sent to the Ukraine. They laundered it back through FTX and then onto the Dems.
I wonder how much the vote rigging costs? Can’t be cheap.
Well they may steal the house (Jim was right) which means they had to make a lot of payoffs outside the demoshitty shit machines if any part was really expensive I would say it was that.
I hope they robbed some foreign gangster types in that… its about the only way we’ll see the kind of minecrafting the Dems deserve…
I’ve seen multiple reports that the upstate Rural NY numbers were just straight up faked but only for governor. So they only paid for the governor not the house seats there. They can basically rig everywhere, when the elites get corrupt eventually everyone gets corrupt and has their hand open for a bribe.
The vote manufacturing after the election is probably the most expensive and difficult operation to run. The Arizona faggots are probably making a bundle right now.
People need to give the head of a snake a name, even if it is more of a synecdoche than accurate.
Slightly old news, but nice to see Land back.
https://twitter.com/Outsideness/status/1585890591036305408?cxt=HHwWgMDTteLFm4IsAAAA
When I first encountered Land, I was not super impressed. As I’ve gone back over his work, though his inherent Marxism always shines through to me, I’ve grown to appreciate his contribution much more. I don’t like it, necessarily, and I do think it’s very easy to blackpill people with Accelerationism, but I genuinely appreciate his thought on the page.
I hadn’t heard this, fantastic. For those who don’t click through: Musk locks Twitter coders out of Twitter code, brings in Tesla coders to look at Twitter’s code.
Hey looks like the Blackmail Kompramat Operations didn’t stop. It just changed locations:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1591152036766445568.html
Jim was the recent (as in yesterday) music discussion deleted?
Not intentionally.
Still see lots of music discussion
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/the-poverty-of-the-billionaire-ruling-elite/#comment-2856121
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/the-poverty-of-the-billionaire-ruling-elite/#comment-2856425
Can you recollect an indentifying phrase from something you recollect as missing?
okay there it is… couldnt find it. even tried google advanced…
OT: The next play seems to be branding Christians as Nazis and using the tagline of Christofacist to justify violence against the faithful. Any thoughts on how it’s going to play out?
Fuck, I hope Christmas comes early and the answer to your question is “locally.”
Good old fashioned martyrdom works wonders for the faith. Whether the opposing powers have the wherewithal remains to be seen.
What lead you to this thought?
If you see the left mostly as an avenue to power then nothing is beyond the pale. In the last few months they pivoted on covid and war. Going further into the past the left was the most holy of racists. Corporations, bankers, the 1%, have all gone from the most evil evil to holy in their eyes.
Their current target is feminists. The head has signaled that tranny is the most holy now and 2010 feminism is bad think. The signals take time to reach the fringes but most will flip eventually. The remainder are the true believers and become the new extremists.
I view it as a wave ridden to power. Once the wave peaks it crashes and rolls back. Which ideas are ascendant and which are rolling back? Often we don’t notice until the wave is breaking, the period of greatest destruction, until afterwards.
Prediction is hard but I’ve not seen signs of the left moving against Christians. None more than normal. No signals from the top that the wave is ascending.
But the left created blacks into a monolith and have ridden that wave many, many times with great success. But bad think blacks have used their celebrity and status to break through against another leftist group: the Jews.
It might seem absurd but the future often is. If the left can’t contain the wave of black antisemitism they’ll either need to pivot on blacks or Jews. So my estimate is that there is about a 51% chance of a new leftist form of anti-semitism.
I’m reading enemy propaganda. Jews popping back up to the head of the victim hierarchy indicates changes to their current focus. Now that voting is over, they view the big danger target as christian nationalism. World War T is over.
Then there’s this:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/florida-high-school-employee-complains-bible-verse-coworkers-parking-space-its-attacking-me
Christian verse means 6 gazillion dead Jews according to this teacher. The only reason a teacher would feel comfortable saying this is Christians = Nazis idea coming down from above.
In addition to the explicit anti-Christian messaging (and there is a whole lot, and has been for some time), there’s also the coded messaging. “Pro Life” means “Christian with actual principles” and that has been who is being raided by the FBI. Their stance on abortion is secondary, it’s their standing on the promises of God that make them targets.
Something I always found funny is how pastors and ministers frequently hire armed security for themselves whenever there is some hint of a threat. So much for all the turn the other cheek stuff.
To be honest so many churches have bent the knee to feminism and generally progressivism at this point they all have it coming. They all support adultery, mass immigration, equality/equity etc.
If they are to save themselves they will have to turn and fight like the rest of us. If they can’t find the courage to turn and fight then they don’t have the courage to speak the truth and have no business selling whatever it is they sell with the name of Christ.
I have no pity whatsoever for those wearing the Christian church as a skin suit. I find it more offensive than almost anything else in clownworld.
The early Church Fathers tell us not to involve ourselves with such people.
https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0714.htm
Off topic post.
Here is a Pole discussing what is happening:
https://t.me/southfronteng/32486
It seems clear to me that the GAE has settled on a pretty dependable method for eradicating those that would most effectively oppose them: send them into an unwinnable war. This hearkens back to a previous conversation wherein some asserted that the Poles Are Cucks. There are definitely useful idiots and GAE zombies in Poland. But there are also plenty of good men in Poland, men with brains and hearts and minds. The GAE, particularly the war faction, wants these types of men gone.
What’s particularly insidious about this methodology is that you cannot name a single based group of men out there that don’t have some historical beef, some cultural axe to grind. The intellectual shock troops of the GAE will use these deeply held sentiments to burn populations to cinders. Even here in the US, they could very easily get based whites and blacks to go after each other, or whites and mestizos.
There’s really only one solution to this as I see it: precisely the least deserving of punishment on the side of the GAE leadership has to be the first on the list for 7 day free trials in the appropriate video game.
Accurate analysis of the situation: The goal is genocide of white people, Ukrainians and Poles as much as Russians.
What an evil situation. GAE wants to kill off Whites, Ukrainians and Russians, and Russia doesn’t.
When I first asked you about the Tet Offensive, years ago, you pointed out that one of the left’s super powers is that it’s willing to go genocidal, while their enemy typically isn’t.
Here’s a video of a Uke volunteer/conscript lamenting over his sudden realization that he is merely cannon fodder:
https://t.me/southfronteng/32502
If you are not into clicking links:
-he claims that he was part of a tank company/battalion that had 30+ tanks, now only 7 remain
-he claims that his whole grouping was liquidated
-he claims these losses were in an attempt to gain very little ground, and failed anyway
-he claims that the overwhelming messaging from the officers is that they (the men, him and his ‘brothers’) are worthless, “nameless,” “meat,” and “just soldiers” [the implication being a thing of no value to anyone]
There is a lot going on here. I had assumed that the rhetoric would be uber-patriotic, constant reaffirmation of holiness, rightness, messaging about the right side of history or whatever. This is suburban American fantasy on my part. It could be that Slavs just don’t work the same way, but it could just as likely be that the GAE handlers, the upper level commissars, are using messaging consistent with their actual, spiritual positions, those being that these useful idiots are trash, worthless bullet sponges with no need of faith or assurance.
This is a single data point, so one must assess whether it is representative or atypical for themselves. But I was struck by the emotive similarity between this selfie-vid and some of the messaging I’ve seen about all the fools dumb enough to take the vaxx. In both cases, I am completely miffed as to how and why it took so long to realize it. No American can claim ignorance of the Coronatarian regime and its mandates, and I likewise believe that no Ukrainian can pretend they are ignorant of the methods being used to fight this war. Nonetheless, it seems there is no end of ignorant and stupid fools ready to dump poison in their veins or march towards certain death, being peppered with insults and derision from “their side” the whole time.
I so rarely get to post on topic:
https://dailystormer.in/uk-10-year-old-girl-dies-suddenly/
Scroll down a bit. The literal vaxx poster child dies of unknown causes in Argentina.
https://t.me/CIG_telegram/24684
It is being reported that 2 missiles fired by Russia have landed in Poland, hitting agrarian equipment and purportedly killing 2 civilians. The Balts and other NAFO frens are all anouncing solidarity and saber rattling. Russian/Pro-Z TGram alleging it was missile parts from aerial defense or UKR false flag.
Who knows if this is real, but the war faction has been champing at the bit for a cassus belli.
At this turn i can only think, ‘good’.
The GAE is in an objectively weak and weakening position, and only Putin’s refusal to play the cards he needs too is keeping their puppet on the gameboard. The trotskyites actually succeeding in pushing the empire into the high intensity war they want would honestly be a positive development at this point.
Yeah that’s WWIII.
https://youtu.be/s4VlruVG81w
Very well may be the end of the beginning (or the beginning of the end…), but there is the distinct possibility that the flames of actual war jar a lot of fence-sitters into new positions. The War Faction wants a rapidly escalating chain of events that no one can interrupt, and they probably think it will flare up and die down quickly, reducing the excess whites and bringing them closer to their garden world utopia. But these guys are not as smart as they esteem themselves, or as our side portrays them to be. It would almost definitely spiral into a protracted multi-war*, at least at first, and the SMO has shown categorically that all the fancy dancy modern weapons systems, on all sides, do not perform as advertised. Shahed/Geran weapon system has thus far outclassed everything else in terms of paradigm shift, with all the amazing autoloading, multi-azimuth artillery from the brightest minds in Germany, Norway, France, and the US underperforming significantly. Big, expensive, multi-purpose weapons systems are not standing up to small, cheap, simple weapons systems.
A world war is not possible, in the sense that the only nations even remotely capable of fighting them (China, Russia, maybe India) are the least likely to prosecute them, and the most war rabid side (the core GAE) is the least able to perpetrate one. Even if Article 05 is invoked tomorrow, there would be a significant period of marshaling, mobilizing, and transporting. Another scenario, a GAE first strike, could be a spectacular display of hubris as rockets fail to lift off, payloads fail to deploy, and nuclear devices fail to trigger.
I think we will see instead a complexifying of the proxy wars, wherein Poland goes all in on “advisors and support” but the conflict stays in the Borderlands while core GAE looks for other suckers (Romania, Bulgaria, the Balts) to jump on the war wagon. We could also see a severe spike in localized conflicts (middle east, sub-saharan africa, central asia) as the GAE pivots away from their many, many “gay to get paid” scams and towards Eastern Europe. Both France and England have announced a sooner than scheduled withdrawal from Mali (ostensibly due to Wagner involvement… one must assume that the female “””soldiers””” are flocking to the Orchestra camps for that alpha-Slav dick). It isn’t being reported on, but the USM, primarily the USN but also strategic bombers of the USAF, is ramping up operations in the Pacific and East Asia. As well, much is occurring in the Arctic theater and, probably the most exciting, low earth orbit is absolutely going to be a battleground if/when the GAE fully drops the mask. Many, many moving parts.
All of this is wild conjecture from an armchair asshole, and we could be swimming in fallout this time tomorrow. But modern warfare is not Red Alert II, and the Core GAE has exported most if not all of their manufacturing capacity at the same time as they emasculated their populations. They won’t be able to build a new army overnight (https://treeofwoe.substack.com/p/world-war-next), so I honestly think it will be proxy action for a while (or first strikes…), if anything happens at all and cooler (read: straight white non-jew male) heads prevail.
*as opposed to a world war, wherein one side defends against everyone else gangbanging them, or two sides gather and combine everyone else into a clean dichotomy. WW02 began as a multi-war that the Allies forcefully transitioned to a World War, but at no point did Germany and Japan coordinate during the war; only one side had plans for world conquest and acted to suborn all elements in the single-minded pursuit.
“A world war is not possible…”
Cue the boss from Office Space:
Oooooh, I’m gonna go ahead and disagree.
Cur = Cue.
People whats happening I’m gonna need you to ah go ahead and be in a nuclear war yeahhhh Russia didn’t meet their quota for trannies in their TPS jobs (TPS = total priestly sinecures) and ah so we need to nuke them for Moloch yeahhh.
OK, fucking kek. Point taken. But there will be a substantial ramp up time necessary. Last I looked, replacing what we gifted Ukraine will take 2+ years. A full scale war would go through stocks like that in days or weeks.
Not enough trannies in Total Priestly Sinecures, LOL.
War is easy, peace is hard, in the sense that falling off a cliff is easy, climbing a cliff is hard.
When people forget how terrible war is, and how difficult peace is, war resumes.
The only way to not have a world war is if one hegemon is so absolutely dominant that anyone who gets difficult gets crushed.
But even if you have one absolutely dominant hegemon, as white America was, no man rules alone. The empire united must divide, the empire divided must unite. If one hegemon is absolutely dominant, it will suffer internal rot.
Presumably both sides have nuclear subs parked close off each other’s coasts right now.
I think the GAE’s war faction is betting that Russia essentially has no options between “do nothing” and “go nuclear.” So they think they (the GAE) can keep a forever war simmering away until Russia’s ability to defend itself is simply degraded to the point of ineffectiveness.
So far this has proven disappointingly close to the truth, close enough to encourage the war faction. For ex, the GAE can destroy Russia’s gas pipelines, a move between “do nothing” and “go nuclear.” Russia so far hasn’t shown an ability to retaliate with attacks of a similar nature. It’s also possible that Russia can do such but it choosing not to. I think that’s a mistake: Letting the pipeline attack slide without a retaliation tells the GAE that they can do things like the pipeline attack without suffering any retaliation. It doesn’t matter why that’s true; whether it’s Russian forbearance or impotence. The point is, the GAE can attack without retaliation. Therefore such attacks will continue.
Russia’s plan is to let the west implode on it’s own economic sanctions and the destruction of the dollar. In that regard, it’s not worth it to retaliate. Don’t get me wrong, it’s bad not to retaliate as it makes Nuclear war more likely but they’re betting the GAE doesn’t have a lot of gas left in the tank, so they’re waiting.
Note that the blowing up the gas pipeline hurt the US more than Russia. A lot of Europeans woke up to the fact that they’re subject states of the American Empire rather than allies to it. That’s likely to go the Delian League route when the US eventually invades one of it’s “allies” to prevent them from defecting to Russia.
“Russia’s plan is to let the west implode on it’s own economic sanctions and the destruction of the dollar. In that regard, it’s not worth it to retaliate. Don’t get me wrong, it’s bad not to retaliate as it makes Nuclear war more likely but they’re betting the GAE doesn’t have a lot of gas left in the tank, so they’re waiting.”
This is the way I see it, Putin doesn’t think he needs to worry about an internal revolt as Russians traditionally have a very strong stomach for long and ugly wars and as long as the West is ruining its economy while Russia’s economy is in fact getting stronger he perhaps doesn’t even want to defeat Ukraine entirely… as the West keeps supporting this gangrenous limb.
“A lot of Europeans woke up to the fact that they’re subject states of the American Empire rather than allies to it.”
I was shocked that they did it. They said to Europe, “Fuck you. We have the power to fuck you over and there’s nothing you can do about it.” This sort of thing makes people enraged and burn for revenge. The instant the GAE is in a position of vulnerability, Europe will fuck it over. Unless the actual European populations have been totally and permanently disempowered. But, to bet everything, unnecessarily, on them being totally and permanently neutralized… Unbeleivable that purportedly sane people would make enemies unnecessarily like that.
“perhaps doesn’t even want to defeat Ukraine entirely… as the West keeps supporting this gangrenous limb.”
Yeah, who’s scamming who here?
The GAE has been burning its bridges with everyone lately…
it means the end is likely near but that the end is likely to be ugly.
Question for the Europeans here: What exactly is the attitude in Europe toward the sabotage of the pipelines?
The usual: those who know, know. America the great Satan. But most don’t know and either blame Russia or are, like the media, memory-holing the entire thing. I’ve heard one hot take that it was China.
Oy vey.
Here is an interesting video of a cruise missile being shot down. This is not the missile in question, just an uncharacteristically good shot.
https://t.me/combatfootage/1013
And just like that I can retrospectively understand the Kherson pullout.
In Russian:
“Guys. Here come the false flags on the neighboring NATO countries like Poland and Romania. Pull back from the westward positions and wait, so that the fake-and-gay incongruity glows even brighter.”
Also just reported:
-Transnistria (Russian supported breakaway region of Eastern Moldova) is without power due to the wave of airstrikes that hit UKR today. This is relevant because massive protests (largely undocumented by MSM) have been ongoing against the GAE puppet presidentess of Moldova. NATO forces have been moving to/through the country, particularly after Hungary started blocking NATO supply convoys heading to UKR.
-a second alleged terrorist attack in a district of Istanbul, Turkey. The Turkish government announced today that they consider the US & frens partly responsible for the first attack, allegedly perpetrated by some skank in need of dick or some dishes to wash.
-Poland is considering invoking Article 04 (The Parties will consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened.) This would be a necessary step towards invoking Article 05 (Female run countries banding together, marching on Moscow, and demanding dick from Putin and Lavrov personally). Here is the NATO treaty: https://archive.ph/7M0Yk . Polish military is reportedly raising its military readiness, potentially prepping its diaphragm in expectation of massive Russian cock.
-Pentagon is slow rolling the idea that Russia hit Poland. In light of the Balts all banging the war drums, this comports with the theory outlined here at JB that significant membership in the Pentagon leadership is not onboard with Operation Eradicate Whitey. Situation is developing, but all the warmongers of NATO maintain it was Russian missile attack, and all the countries that matter are saying No Comment or soft skepticism
-The RF aerial bombing of UKR today is purported to be the “largest yet” with power systems flickering and failing, piecemeal, across the country. In a bold move, Zelensky has invoked Article 05 and declared war on Russia for the European governments, as they are quite busy robbing their populations to pay for the next round of funding and couldn’t be arsed to do it themselves.
>-Pentagon is slow rolling the idea that Russia hit Poland. In light of the Balts all banging the war drums, this comports with the theory outlined here at JB that significant membership in the Pentagon leadership is not onboard with Operation Eradicate Whitey. Situation is developing, but all the warmongers of NATO maintain it was Russian missile attack, and all the countries that matter are saying No Comment or soft skepticism
Based on the evidence it’s Ukrainian S300 Anti-air missiles. That’s going to be a hard sell.
If the Poles do kick off WW3, I hope all them pay the nuclear price for their stupidity and intransigence.
This article today:
https://dailystormer.in/brandon-says-the-ukraine-accidentally-fired-on-poland/
Uses some of the same terminology/memes. i.e. officially/unofficially. There was a chat called gamer that is down now. Could be standard Alt lingo or shared members. Good article on a failed false flag attempt.
This Potassium Iodine is as close to what shelters used to carry for treating radiation exposure:
https://www.puritan.com/potassium-159/potassium-plus-iodine-024412
Veterinary Ivermectin is available at any Tractor Supply. Just divide weight. Say a colt of 200 pounds would be about 1/6th dose. Weight of total dose is on the box.
Threadly reminder that we’re trying to create a compilation of Jim’s best posts turned into a book. post your candidates.
Here’s the round 01 list:
The Jim Says Reading List (JSRL)
https://blog.reaction.la/politics/make-women-property-again/
https://blog.reaction.la/war/how-to-genocide-inferior-kinds-in-a-properly-christian-manner/
https://blog.reaction.la/economics/throne-altar-and-freehold/
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/the-optics-of-noticing/
https://reaction.la/confess.htm
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/murray-on-the-decline-of-marriage/
https://blog.reaction.la/politics/left-political-singularity/
https://blog.reaction.la/science/leftism-as-cancer/
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/game-dark-enlightenment-and-reaction/
https://blog.reaction.la/economics/the-disastrous-effects-of-females-in-power/
https://blog.reaction.la/faith/the-resurrection-of-god/
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/lancelot-guinevere-romance-and-the-red-blue-purple-black-and-white-pills/
https://blog.reaction.la/party-politics/the-real-election-platform/
https://blog.reaction.la/uncategorized/the-ruling-underclass/
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/guns-ideas-fashion-and-military-parades/
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/gay-needs-to-be-suppressed/
Kindly requesting to add
https://blog.reaction.la/economics/capitalism/
to the JSRL.
Kindly request to add:
https://blog.reaction.la/uncategorized/the-cathedral-and-the-holiness-spiral/
The holiness spiral is one of the central concepts needed to understand what is happening and what we are facing.
Jim, I really do want to do this with the Tribe and keep more work off your desk, but you aren’t trapped in an unreachable history, so by all means please add any of your posts that stick out in your mind; you fairly often seem to drop links of previous works when someone asks an answered question. Just covering bases, this is still something I will be doing.
Karl and Alf, entries added to the list. I am hoping Jim can take a look at this list and make some recommendations.
As a refresher…
The goal of the project is to create a reading list that effectively summarizes the core concepts of Jimian Christianity, including theories and analysis.
There are two general formats I am deciding between: Neurotoxin’s 7 points or KD’s 3 of 3s structure.
Neuro-‘s 7 points:
1. Democracy is not a long-run tenable system. People have been making this point for centuries if not millennia, but the “Jimian†description of the problem is more modern than someone commenting on ancient Rome or whatever.
2. The analytical perspective of evolutionary psychology-cum-game theory.
3. The application of this perspective to all the sex stuff. Female psych, etc.
4. The phrase “social technology.†Certain laws and customs regarding marriage, for example. Property rights are another example. This is one of those phrases that just clicks when you first encounter it and makes you wonder why someone didn’t coin it a long time ago.
5. In the last couple of years there was a post on the social effects of widespread acceptance of homosexuality. A poster (I forget who) originally wrote it and Jim turned it into a post, IIRC.
6. Holiness spirals/signaling spirals/purity spirals. I don’t think Jim originated the term, but this blog is probably one of the key nodes for spreading the concept.
7. The insistence on modeling the left for what it is – a bunch of evil people, briefly – and only paying attention to the left’s “ideas†as is necessary for practical purposes. The comments thread from the last year in which we all tried to define the damned thing has some great stuff. [I NEED A LINK TO THIS THREAD OR THREADS PLS]
KD’s 3 of 3s: 3 movements of 3 parts each with 3 subsections per part.
Both of these would be summarizations of Jim’s work with links embedded in each point/section and/or a reading list of linked posts at the end. The purpose of this project is to create a tool that facilitates sharing the voluminous work that has been done here. Instead of link bombing someone, or expecting them to RTFM as Nature intended, you can give them a single link that lays everything out brief enough to get through in a single sitting, expansive enough to cover the key concepts, and have the needed links if they are Worthy types who want to go deeper.
To be clear, my list wasn’t intended as complete. Just the stuff that occurred to me.
As to structure, I have no position on that. The ideal to aim for is that the material itself dictates the structure. E.g. if there were only two main points then there would be two main parts.
Your request that’s all in caps: I’m 99% sure I archived that and can find it in the next couple of minutes.
Here it is:
https://blog.reaction.la/party-politics/end-of-pretence-of-democracy-rescheduled-to-2024/
There was an extensive discussion in that post. I have a note that after a while HerbR (remember him?) summed up the discussion up to that point. Extended HerbR quote:
– De Jouvenel AKA HLvM [high and low vs. the middle]: Elites weaponizing underclass (collectively “leftâ€) against middle class (“rightâ€).
– Cladistic: Leftist ideologies all share common memes and derive from common ancestor(s).
– Social-network: Leftism inferred from personal/institutional ties, parties attended, etc.
– Antinomian: Christian definition, elevating “divine grace†over established law, usually to describe Puritan/Quaker movements.
– Revolutionary: Actual etymology of “Left/Rightâ€, the revolutionaries vs. royalists – more generally, hatred of non “consensual†authority.
– Economic: Leftism as destruction/â€redistribution†of capital, rightism as capital creation.
– R/K: Leftism/rightism as manifestations of different reproductive strategies (r and K, like rabbit vs. wolf).
– Status-maximizing: Leftists as “sociopathic status maximizersâ€, best to just google it.
– Warrior/priest: Jim Lite, leftism as priestly rule, rightism as warrior rule.
– Game-theoretical: Leftism as defect/defect, rightism as cooperate/cooperate.
– Thermodynamic: Leftism as social entropy, that which creates disorder and regresses us to a more primitive state without constant energy input.
But this list isn’t supposed to be a “pick any one you want†buffet, the reason the list exists is that all of the models have some predictive power (some more so than others) and none of them are complete.
[End extended quote.]
I am pretty gung-ho about this project. Right now we’re a bunch of long-haired hermits howling in the wilderness, but what if we do win? After we nuke Harvard (twice), the first thing we do is make it a requirement that to teach Political Philosophy or Political Science you have to be a member in VERY good standing of the new state religion. So it’s necessary to have a well-defined state religion.
– – – – – – – –
By the way, I really feel like this community is making intellectual progress. While the raving loons in the universities get ever more evil and insane, we’re actually assembling a better study of human politics. Concepts like holiness spiral, the inevitability of a state religion, etc. constitute a significant step forward.
We always have a state religion because an elite or would-be elite without one can’t coordinate and therefore can’t fight (on a collective scale). Therefore, in the very unlikely event that an elite without a state religion were to ever be in power, they wouldn’t be in power long: They’d be supplanted by a new elite with a state religion. Note this totally nukes the libertarian fantasy, that we can have a government whose ideology is not effectively compulsory. Nice fantasy, but no, we can’t. So we need the best state religion possible.
I feel the same, on many of the subjects you covered. How can we/should we go about working with each other, and anyone else that is willing or able to collaborate? There isn’t going to be a perfect answer to this question, we just need a Good Enough option.
Hmm. We can’t ask Jim because he’s too busy. We can’t ask me because I’m too busy (I could do it via my blog, but not right now. Also, I’d have to get my ass off WordPress first.)
Can we establish a community blog to do it? Is that OpSec-compliant?
Is there anyone here who has a web site and feels they have too much time on their hands? Alf? Arkiduka? The no-doubt dozen people I’m not thinking of?
We could also ask Jim to create a one-sentence post dedicated to this particular topic, with a no-OT rule. That would take like zero of Jim’s time. If we do it that way we’re going to need a dictator or this will quickly devolve into a too-many-cooks situation. (“Volunteering” someone for extra work is not cool, but if it were I’d nominate alf, since Jim trusts him with moderation privileges.)
HARVARD DELENDA EST.
If lots of people can moderate and can add articles, lots of people can see email addresses (which should all be fake.) This allows any of those people to forge a post from any other of those people (Obviously I am working on software to address this issue, but it is a long way from readiness.) It also allows any of those people to see anyone’s IP (which should be vpn)
That is not terrible for OpSec if the community is trusted and not very large.
We don’t need a bunch of moderators. We just need a place to post things and discuss them, really. And at this point, it is me, Neuro-, and Alf (potentially). Is it possible to have a blogpost + comments section where only he and I can comment?
Alternatively, if Alf is willing, we can just tag (as in reply to) any posts that are off topic or irrelevant and they can be silently deleted.
Neuro-, does that cover everything? I usually work out of an editor than copy/paste it into the comment box anyways. And I just highlight and C/V stuff in if needed.
“Neuro-, does that cover everything?”
You’re asking the wrong guy; I know the bare minimum about this stuff to get by.
Let’s see what Alf has to say.
Meanwhile I am going to start thinking about the actual content more.
Something to note while I’m thinking of it: Jimian theory is not a system-building kind of political philosophy of the sort that everyone from Locke to Marx to Ayn Rand used to do. And this is a good thing, obviously. It’s not an attempt to start with like three basic principles and build up an 800-page political philosophy from that. This is because it’s based in empirical reality, which doesn’t give a fuck about system-building. This has implications for structure.
I was more asking if there’s anything else we needed to “work” on the document.
Yeah, we’re actually doing the opposite: synthesizing a decade of political theory and analysis into a single essay/document.
I am barely keeping up with the comments on this blog as is, so best not to count me in on extra projects.
What is the FTX crypto heist?
I was going to mock you for being out of the loop, then I realized that’s pretty gay. Here’s the investopedia breakdown:
https://archive.ph/AkR3K
I have no idea if it’s accurate, but it should give a good basic familiarization. The only thing I would add (being a midwit humanities biased analyst) is that some black crypto dude called out the FTX leadership was 100% joo-flavored, and was subsequently fired 2 hours and 50 minutes later.
Wow. Collapse of cryptocurrency-related institution has the same basic structure as every other traditional financial collapse EV-AR.
Leveraged (i.e. highly indebted) financial institution (FI). Check.
Internal accounting that at best was sloppy, at worst criminal. Check.
One or two key players publicly saying or doing things that reveal a lack of confidence in the FI’s viability. Check.
A spreading panic caused by previous item. Check.
(This one is similar to a bank run or a run on the shadow banking system: People suddenly say, “I want out; liquidate me to cash RIGHT NOW.†Apropos of nothing, Robert Heinlein: “It’s not good to try to regulate a system by positive feedback.â€)
Executive of wobbly FI makes public announcement that EVERYTHING IS FINE. No one believes him. Check.
(A guy who worked at Lehman Brothers during its failure said a few years later that one of the things they learned was that if you trot out the CEO to say “We don’t have a problem,†the entire world goes, “They’ve got a problem!â€)
Rumors of a bailout by some more solvent entity, whether the government or another FI. Check.
Sweet leaping cats; it’s actually rote at this point.
Forgot to add (and the article doesn’t address this): the supposed “hack” that drained the actual -coins held has been alleged to be Bankman-Kike or some of his cronies or patrons stealing what value was left via insider access/information. I have only heard this, I have not seen it substantiated. But given that FTX was heavily involved in both funding Zelensky Regime as well as funding the DNC Midterm Operations.
Rereading the article, this whole thing could have been covering tracks and enabling more crypto legislation down the road.
https://dailystormer.in/bankman-fried-now-accused-of-money-laundering-democrats-funds-through-ukraine-charity/
Off topic:
SLS launches into space. Link should take you to T-1:00 :
https://youtu.be/CMLD0Lp0JBg?t=11763
A bit of egg on my face, as I said that SLS would never launch.
I watched the launch last night. They said fuck it and despite the red flags, it worked. Kind of what happened with James Webb Telescope. Don’t worry KD, I’m sure one of the later ones will blow up.
lmao. I have been and remain a stellar civilization primacist. SLS getting off the ground just makes our job a bit harder in terms of acknowledging tech decline, I don’t think it disproves it. Even with a successful (thus far) Artemis I, it remains the case that SLS is not an example of technological advancement, rather it is a case of entropy delayed.
Elon acknowledges tech decline-
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cQHcN76OfiY
I told you guys two years ago that you don’t know shit about aerospace that isn’t musk PR and it still shows.
oh, and ((FTX)).
Looks like a bunch of the satellites on the SLS failed to launch properly and now the thing might miss gravity capture by the moon. Oops. But what do we know? NASA! NASA! NASA!
@Wulfgar, I can’t find the news about Orion missing the moon.
A successful SLS launch (decades behind schedule, one might add) does not ameliorate the myriad other failings of NASA and its pet minorities. They can’t build anything new, and they have to contract out to build anything old.
I said the same.
That it did launch puts it ahead of the starship.
I’ve speculated they’ve been slow walking Musk in order to give Artemis a first launch. Now that Artemis has successfully launched, SpaceX will start moving again.
They still haven not granted the launch license. Though Elon has become less risky with the possibility of losing stage zero(the launch tower/catcher complex). That’s not a cheap item to replace if Starship blows up on the launch pad.
That sort of disaster was the ultimate cause of the 2 year delay and thus canalization of the N1 project in the USSR.
Cancellation*
I think generally economic decline proceeds tech decline. As things get more expensive then simpler and lower tech solutions are used.
Off topic: Jay Dyer interviews Col. Macgregor
https://youtu.be/j6i0GqT1QvI
The latter third is specifically interesting as Macgregor hits a lot of points that are Jim-lite, regarding the uniparty, the importance of faith and identity, and other things. Worth a listen.
Extremely low effort post but lol Chudov. Sometimes the littlest coincidences.
Woman policy of nsdap: https://arplan.org/2022/01/08/woman-in-the-national-socialist-state-sofia-rabe/#more-8558
not that purple even if the rhetoric is purple
Some elements of Nazis were purple pilled, even somewhat red pilled.
But this document hastily backs away from purple towards blue.
Nazism is a branch of leftism, and it shows.
Women need to be property, and they need to be the property of their husbands, not their fathers, not the state, and not quasi state entities.
That pamphlet was written in 1932, when the Nazis needed to pull a large percentage of the female vote to seize power in the “one person, one vote, one time” election of 1933, so it had to pander to the feminist sensibilities of the day. How did Nazis handle the WQ once they held absolute power?
Worse.
I don’t think emancipation, abortion and all that appeals to women voters.
Off topic:
2 incidents occurred in the realm of the Border War that in truth is decades old but appears to be bubbling up into the social consciousness.
A truck of peace plowed into a bunch of police recruits in LA:
https://t.me/CIG_telegram/24779
Maritime unit of CBP got tinto a gun fight with smugglers off the coast of Puerto Rico:
https://t.me/CIG_telegram/24783
This has been a quiet war, ongoing and ignored, both for political reasons in Washington DC.
In 1989, the Soviet leadership realized that communism was a lost cause, and decided to try liberal democracy instead. Now that liberal democracy is dying, what system comes next?
Your links support my hypothesis that the answer is “Mexican narco-cartelism”. We’ll have the same official government in 2040, but decapitated bodies of police, soldiers, journalists, and politicians turning up by the roadside will be as common and unremarkable as children dropping dead of heart attacks is today.
Since the police, soldiers, journalists and politicians are (by assumption) already owned by the cartels, there will be no need to decapitate them. There might be a well-funded but sedate War on Drugs, I guess, to pay off various interests? Whatever opposition can be detected will be ironically put in J6 prison or something. No big difference compared to today.
On the bright side: fewer wars in the Middle East.
Fewer wars in the Middle East, at least fewer wars that involve us, and more wars at home. Piles of headless bodies of people who either refused to work for a cartel, or worked for the wrong cartel and got kidnapped, tortured, and killed by a rival cartel. Still the pretense of liberal democracy, but to any impartial observer, a third-world failed state.
Coordinating as dissident intellectuals is useless the only thing one of us could potentially do is start a wildly successful mercenary company or a religion…
You have to coordinate as dissident intellectuals to start a new religion.
The Invisible College is real.
Nah you just need one that has charisma…
Charisma alone is nothing but a liability in a leader.
This just seems like blackpill defeatism. Leaders, coalitions, organizations, cadres, regiments, communities… these things don’t fall from the sky whole. They have to be formed, developed, and defended. The seed crystal of any entity is the principle(s), ethos, creed, or rhetorical framework that justifies its genesis.
A while back, I pitched the idea of starting a security company. IIRC you said that was impossible. Now I see you have come around a bit. That’s progress!
I believe I said it was impossible to start explicitly redpilled security companies within the US.
What you would want to do is start a mercenary company in say Africa…
I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding about how these things work. If your idea of a mercenary company in Africa is a few guys with black market guns, that is just not a real thing. I have not personally done either, but setting up an international business that provides security services in a shithole like sub-Saharan Africa seems wildly more complicated than setting up a legitimate business in the US. Certain states make it very complicated, other states substantially less so.
The key issue is finding and retaining talent, both on the labor/officer side as well as management. A while back, I linked an interview with Eric Prince. In it, he discusses, albeit briefly, why OG Blackwater was so good: 80% management and 20% top tier training, pay, and gear. The management portion requires money, connections, and reputation.
I still think a security company is well within our collective “grasp” to accomplish; it wouldn’t require international travel, international business wrangling, and international patronage. Instead, these things could be restricted to a single state. The looming challenge would be talent acquisition. You have to pay enough to be attractive, but the high value operators don’t just care a bout a paycheck, they care about the company culture and the reputation of those involved.
It is far, far easier for us, vagabond, dissident priests, to build a synthesis of our great and good and voluminous work here and work to spread that than it would be to fund, stand up, and operate a security firm. I know that isn’t as sexy, but it is actually grounded in fact, as opposed to fiction.
It’d be more complicated for ordinary businessmen types, it would not be more complicated for an ex army/marine/specops officer with combat veterans who knew him who say reached out to some African warlord who was interested in hiring some veteran white soldiers…
And this is just to get your start.
As priests, our duty is to take the ineffable mysteries of our God and structure their interpretation such that our Warrior and Merchant brothers can launch both military campaigns and business ventures under precepts that edify our tribe, nation, and race while complying with the will of GNON. This is our burden to carry. It is not “useless.”
i think as priests our job is to find a priest among us with real charisma… get him some other charismatic writers and apostles and persuade him to start a christian nationalist (and HARDCORE anti churchianity) religion… which will seem like a new religion…
I agree, and I am pretty miffed how it appears that you are reading from my offline notes ;). That’s a capital idea you got there… And putting together the JSRL is an integral part of that operation.
What should the Branch Davidians done differently? They weren’t destroyed because their priests were not well read. If Koresh would have been Jimian, same outcome.
This is an astute question. I’ll give it a go.
Don’t go live in some weird commune all together out in the countryside. Don’t form an official organization with membership rolls. When they come after us, physically or legally, make them do it one at a time. Organization is important, but all the formal tools of organization are de facto illegal for us, so we must do without, find alternate methods, or have extremely good information security.
We don’t have the strength to resist our enemies in open battle, either physically or legally, so concentrating our forces is a mistake. The guerilla avoids battle unless it’s on his terms, at a time and place of his choosing; he does not hold territory. The BDs thought they controlled their little territory, and Uncle Sam was happy to show them how wrong they were. This is not to say we should form a literal guerilla army, but we must see ourselves as cultural, moral, social, and legal guerillas.
The Branch Davidians should have been an eccentric church. They should have purchased individual homes in the same general area and just spent a lot of time socializing and studying together, favoring fellow members in business and marriage and minimizing dealings with outsiders. The Beast might have eventually come for Koresh anyway, but he’d probably still be alive even then, and likely out of prison by now. They didn’t have much on him that could hold up in court. In any event, the community would have survived.
Guerillas tend to concentrate their organization within friendly foreign states… if only we had one.
We do! Aim small, miss small is a wonderful concept. As converged as constitutional process is, there are more than a few states with law and policy very conducive to our ends. If you set out to change the world, you’re just going to be a tool for better financed operations. If you set out to take over the neighborhood watch, or a town council, or some other small government apparatus, I think you’ll find that determination and iron, simple principles are enough to beat most opponents. Hearts & Minds campaigns actually can work when you’re the little guy.
One of the features of the cathedral is how it is designed to protect those inside from those outside. It’s in the language of progressivism, it’s in the institutions, and it’s even in the architecture.
So many of our solutions are coup complete as it’s illegal to resist entryists. Even if you establish patriarchy and marriage 1.0, how do you keep it white? Easiest would be to stay very rural and more or less poor and low status (from the cathedral’s perspective). The Amish seem to do well this way. How far could a Jimian community like that go? Probably pretty far as far as Gnon is concerned, and a good life for many, better than they would have otherwise.
Much of what we talk about is coup complete because we want to take over the world. Or at least we are solving problem’s as if we were to. This makes it seem like Jimian Christianity is a harder problem than it is.
Reproduction is the only issue until it is no longer an issue. If we start there and build off of that things look more doable.
Branch Davidians got a lot of attention if I recall locally because they used lots of welfare and social services. Having white people do that really really pisses off the Cathedral and draws the Eye.
I’d have to do a deep dive, but my gut says the things you mentioned are probably correct. Being almost ignorant of the whole thing, I would hazard a fair amount on the assertion that, like most cults and extremists in the US of A, they get greedy and stupid after they begin to exert power in a small area. They isolate and dominate, and they forget just how big the USG is. They are able to throw their weight around in some county, and forget that they cannot compete with the Stationary Bandit. That’s the stupid part. The greedy part is denoted by hideous policies like abandoning sons and hoarding daughters, a charge laid out by Pax in a different thread, and one that is disgusting in the extreme. I have a deep well of dislike and mistrust for anyone who labels themselves a conservative but collects unemployment, disability, or other mommy government gibbs. Let me be clear: using loop holes and taking cash left on the table by low IQ fedgov bureaucrats is absolutely a useful methodology. But making your “living” by collecting checks from government while loudly proclaiming your independence is the same order of stupid as flying a Thin Blue Line flag and a Gadsden flag.
Koresh didn’t make just one mistake, he probably made many. I don’t think theology or family were those mistakes.
I don’t know if they went as far as the abandoning sons and hoarding daughters, but I understand they did have tons collecting welfare and AFDC. Basically if you had 4 wives, at least 3 were collecting social assistance as unwed mothers. That’s from talking to relatives that lived in Texas at the time a few counties away.
It was a few years ago, so I don’t have any links to substantiate it, but I distinctly remember reading an article about a bunch of Hasidic Jews, being “caught” collecting benefits for children and other things while claiming they had little to no income. They did in fact have income, but it was hidden under religious exemptions and other tribal bullshit. when caught out in their scheme, they of course stated that everyone who thought they were doing anything wrong was anti-Semitic. If I recall correctly, we were talking about millions of dollars. The fraud extended to multiple families, it wasn’t just one guy and his enterprising house frau pulling a scheme. They were covered by legal representation from the Orthodox and atheist Jew community. In a separate incident, some Hasidic or orthodox Jew owner of a industrial scale meat processing operation had been violating a ton of regulations regarding the goyslops He was bringing to market. when questioned about the violations and cheating, he made some kind of comment that if it wasn’t kosher related, it wasn’t any of his concern.
I’m not just trying to hate on those with tiny hats, I wanted to illustrate that you are perfectly allowed to violate any and all rules if you are the right phenotype or tribe. that being said, it is a terrible strategic decision to rely on fedgov gibbs If you are going to act like you are anti-establishment.
White collar crimes in reality are only sporadically prosecuted, tiny hats couldnt get away with covid regulations all that much.
Well for 1, hoarding automatic weapons and having explosives delivered by USPS is surely going to attract the attention of the state.
The working model is the Amish/Orthodox Jewish strategy. You maintain a separate minoritarian ethno-religion and don’t assimilate to the majority culture but you’re still loyal to the state.
Here’s the issue with that model: what do when the pretense of civility drops? Hasidic jews are awful. The are terrible neighbors, rude people, and a backwards culture. No one likes them, normal jews most of all. They exist in their current numbers as a by product of their more palatable cousins’ efforts.
I genuinely love and respect the Amish, though I like Mennonites more. With no entity to guarantee their Special Case status, they are merely a poorly armed, poorly equipped bunch of carpenters and farmers. They’d probably make great slaves.
Over a placid long term, both models are quite viable. Any general turbulence thrown in, they are literally the first targets in their respective haunts.
Do Hasidic Jews or the Amish care what you or the mainstream culture at large thinks of them? What they have is a community that insulates them from the rot around them.
When a Hasidic Jew’s wife shit tests him, he has a group of men who will back him in a religious structure and communal framework. When a man in the mainstream culture’s wife shit tests him, he has only his own competence which is bound to fail eventually. Just look at Tom Brady, Brad Pitt, etc. It’s communal pressure that women respond to.
Ultimately, a religion is a test of who you are willing to work with and who are you not. If you are a self-proclaimed Christian yet you are willing to work with atheists, pagans, etc to further the aims of the white race, well your religion isn’t Christianity, it’s white racialism.
Can’t resist slipping in a few poison pills in between the pink ones, eh?
And will the modern Amish be ready to resist when everything collapses? Or will they calmly look at how guys from Mexican cartels and gangs of nigers rob them and rape their daughters?
It doesn’t matter how cohesive you are if you’re not ready to kill your enemies. The Hasidim have no chance at all to survive in the event of a collapse, they are too urban and they do not have any weapons in their hands. In addition, antifa militants simply hate them. If I were an American living in the Northeast, I would remember what God said to do in Numbers 31:14-18 to save those who can be saved.
The Amish are armed; they started after a couple of Amish girls were attacked and the Amish realized they couldn’t rely on the US government to protect themselves.
Celebrities exist in a sort of anti-religion of constant surveillance by people well funded to destroy them and eager to do so to get famous themselves. It is incredible to me that any celebrity manages to reproduce.
You could be like the Amish or the Hasidic Jews while also being normal, kind, and polite.
You don’t have to be a weirdo to be a moral person.
My family and I do our thing at our church. We are different from most of the congregation, and to be quite honest I do not like most of them, but we remain civil with each other.
The early Christians were regarded as bizarre weirdos to the “normal†hedonistic Romans around them. They employed the minoritarian strategy then that the Amish, Orthodox Jews, etc employ today.
That’s a silly comparison.
That is a long tough road.
Might be the only road.
Consider: what is the most defensible house?
A fortress with 20 foot thick bulkheads?
A bunker 100 meters underground?
A layered trench system 5 miles deep? Well now you’re getting warmer…
The most defensible house is one that is surrounded by a community of like-minded men who will band together to fight.
Much kibbitzing by the chattering classes over Musk firing people for not showing up to work.
This is the same way Musk has run all his companies of course, so it should come as no surprise, but this is a society of The Eternal Current Year; noone notices anything, noone remembers anything, and noone connects between what they remember.
Of course it has long been extensively demonstrated by experience in practice and studies alike that longer work hours doesn’t actually mean more productivity (for any meaningful sense of productive); that for pretty much everyone there are a few hours each day where they can be dynamic and get quality work done, and everything else beyond that is more or less good only for scut work.
But the more meta-level dynamic is that demanding excessive working hours from employees, is essentially a hackjob proxy for serving as a plausibly deniable form of loyalty test: filtering out people who don’t feel personal dedication to the mission in general, and deference to the boss in particular.
Almost all twatter employees were useless because it was essentially a government front…
And the few useful ones were probably hounded out or cruelly suppressed. I would not be surprised at all if Twitter the company was more like some bureau of government than a tech company, with all the attendant black, gay, and female foolishness so replete in the civil service.
The media megaphone is loud, but it is forgetful. I wonder if based and utilitypilled guys will come out of the woodwork and join up with the new Twitter. This could be a good test case for our own Project (that being the Restoration) in terms of how to de-skinsuit and reanimate a converged institution.
>This could be a good test case for our own Project (that being the Restoration) in terms of how to de-skinsuit and reanimate a converged institution.
Easy: fire everyone, and say anyone who cares can reapply through your ‘hiring process’.
How about switching the roles, at least if you have a friendly presence above you? But can’t just fire them all.
For a university: Put the onus of performance on the skinsuiters so they won’t have so much time to make mischief, and meanwhile make sure you appoint hardcore political infighters tasked to hire only right and clear out the leftists (e.g., for non-performance).
Make conditions intolerable every now and then (require oath of loyalty to Trump? close enemy student associations?) to encourage the remaining leftists to flounce off.
This is not hard, it has been done before. Everyone in a state or quasi state position gets invited to re-apply for his job. Part of that interview is an affirmation of faith and a promise of conformity.
The only problem is what do you do with the nonconformists.
We send Cominator and his wife to Alaska to build a compound. We send all the nonconformists to Cominator’s Alaskan Spiritual Retreat and they love it so much that they never come back and are never heard from again. Eventually, Cominator and his family return to society, and no one is allowed to ask questions about what happened in Alaska. Small video clips and blurry pictures are released onto places like 4chan and are quickly pulled down and the posts censored. That will spread the rumor that maybe, just maybe, the Alaskan complex was something much more sinister.
Nonconformists dont get sent unless they attempt entryism into the government, demon worshippers do.
And I’d be more like Heydrich… the equivalent roles of camp commandants and einstatzgruppen commanders (and for any normies here we arent talking about jews but leftists and such) are carried out by cuckservatives in order to bind them to the regime. All our “atrocities” will be carried out by cuckservatives for this reason.
And when it is done we will be very public about what we did to them and why… secrecy only before they arrive in Alaska…
At least in my opinion.
https://warroom.org/2022/11/20/brazilians-resist-as-child-services-moves-to-take-children-away-from-election-protesters/
And to anyone who doesnt think this needs to be done…
Full fire/rehire is totally doable, barely even an inconvenience. Just put your core leadership team together and have them build their own departments/branches. The only hard and fast rule, as I see it, is no HR; hiring, benefits, and corporate culture is part of the job for leadership. The moment you shovel off the minutia is the moment you surrender sovereignty.
Of course you can fire everyone: you have your own people, don’t you?
Here’s how I have been going about JSRL:
-I collect the recommended posts into a list of hyperlinks
-I ask how it should be organized
I know, I know, super advanced, Restoration when. I have a good list going, so I am ready to move on to the next step:
-Take the recommended articles, read through them, and begin reducing them as much as possible. Take a paragraph, read it a few times, then reduce it to a single sentence. Sometimes this easy, many times it is not. The goal here is to summarize, not to prove categorically. Basically, we are taking oranges and making orange concentrate.
-Take the concentrated posts and order them conceptually and/or thematically
As I see it, the goal is to make a single essay that asserts then supports Throne, Altar, Freehold. I know this leaves a lot out, stuff that we priests deem essential. But we are not trying to engage with priests. Priests are easy to find, you can’t throw a sodomite off a building without bumping at least 3 of them on the way to impact. We are aiming at normies generally, and warriors specifically. Also, we aren’t trying to convince normies/warriors as they are and act now, we are targeting normies/warriors when bread costs $10 a loaf and street violence is the rule, not the exception.
Very, very, criminally even, briefly, we are writing a pamphlet that states (sort of): things are bad, but they don’t have to be; here is why they are bad, and here is how we can make them better. Alf did amazing work, and I am trying to condense that even further.
Does this make sense? Does anyone have any worthwhile critique or suggestions? If your critggestion is that all is lost, it’s impossible, urgay, or anything like that, silence is more convincing than wit. I’m not afraid of friction, I am just too busy being a crab in a pot and reminders aren’t helpful.
For further reference:
https://blog.reaction.la/science/excess-mortality-by-country/#comment-2856700
https://blog.reaction.la/economics/national-capitalism-and-sanctions-on-russia/#comment-2852976
Great. Can you save the whole thing in a single .pdf so I can download it and save it in case the site goes down. Thanks!
When it’s done, yes.
Sounds good. I’ve summarized things in my way, looking forward to reading your way
Arright, biznatches, a stab at item #1 on my list. It quickly expanded, as such things will to the inevitability of a state religion, etc. Everyone can chime in, but especially alf, Kunning, and of course Jim. Too long? Too short? Too wrong?
1. Democracy is not a long-run tenable system. It cannot defend itself against attacks such as electoral fraud and hostile infiltration of governmental institutions.
In general, political orders that are broadly “liberal†– that is, in which there is no official ideology to which citizens must affirm allegiance – are unable to defend themselves. This is because collective defense, including collective violence, requires an intellectual and ethical coordinating mechanism. (Collective action cannot occur without coordination.) That is, defense requires a shared faith. A shared faith – among many other functions – plays the role of identifying enemies, facilitating decisions about which enemies to attack, etc.
When a shared faith is officially part of a government – when affirmations of allegiance to that faith are necessary at least to hold certain positions of power – we call it a state religion.
State religions are inevitable in human politics because an elite or would-be elite without a state religion can’t coordinate and therefore can’t fight (on a collective scale). Therefore, in the unlikely event that an elite without a state religion were to ever be in power, they wouldn’t be in power long: They’d be attacked, defeated, and replaced by a new elite with a state religion.
Thus the classical liberal vision – of a government whose ideology is not effectively compulsory – is not viable in the long run. It is unstable in the cold logic of war.
Summarizing these ideas:
We always have a state religion.
2. But the state religion is not always official. The need for effective defense presses for it to be official. That is, it should be implemented by means such as explicit affirmations of faith which are legally mandatory in at least some cases. This helps to make it clear who is an enemy. (It does not solve the problem entirely; see “entryism/infiltration†elsewhere in this document. [Note November 19, 2022: Obviously this hasn’t been written yet.])
Unofficial state religions have another problem: they cannot control their own evolution over time. By assumption, an unofficial state religion has no state institutions responsible for identifying correct doctrine, identifying heresies and uprooting them, etc. (If it had such – if it had a State Inquisitor – it would be the official state religion.)
Unofficial state religions are uncontrolled because any person can contribute to the religion. Their evolution over time is decentralized. This makes them vulnerable to holiness spirals. [See entry, etc.]
The western democracies of the early 21st century have a state religion but it is not official. Officially they still claim to be liberal in the eighteenth-century sense. In fact they have a state religion, but since it is unofficial it is “a game that anyone can play.†This is one reason for its accelerating extremism: There is no state inquisitor who could stop it.
“Thus the classical liberal vision – of a government whose ideology is not effectively compulsory – is not viable in the long run. It is unstable in the cold logic of war.”
Great post in general my quibble is with this part.
The government faith is only necessarily compulsory for those holding government office or state or quasi state office. Its not a proper job of the Inquisition/State security to look for every nonbeliever rather they are to look for certain evil demon worshipping counter religions.
Leftism of all kinds, hardcore Sunni Islam (I would be content to let this one slide in the current year but if Muslims start getting devout again like they were in the early 2000s it would be active), whatever the fuck the Jesuits believe… making everyone believe almost guarantees entryists its more important to identify demon worshipping religions and wipe them out. There is really no reason to go after Cynics Buddhists or New Agers unless they are also leftists.
“1. Democracy is not a long-run tenable system. It cannot defend itself against attacks such as electoral fraud and hostile infiltration of governmental institutions.”
You should either skip or elaborate this.
Democracy is prone to unofficial state religions because the institutions of democracy are designed not to exercise power; made up of large numbers of people, in positions for limited time and with (officially) disparate goals. So power moves to small groups, with long time horizons and unified goals that operate either inside or outside the government.
While it is possible to design a democracy less vulnerable to this (eliminate the Supreme Court and presidency, make Congress 101 people who serve for life) it doesn’t happen- high trust groups establish monarchies.
“Unofficial state religions have another problem: they cannot control their own evolution over time. By assumption, an unofficial state religion has no state institutions responsible for identifying correct doctrine, identifying heresies and uprooting them, etc. (If it had such – if it had a State Inquisitor – it would be the official state religion.)”
I’d go further, religions have a purpose- ‘peace among men of good will’, ‘honor ones parents who honored their parents who honored…’, ‘what is good for the Jews?’, etc. The purpose of unofficial state religions is ‘seize power’, so they can’t be fixed and renewed- they devour societies to reward followers or die.
Cominator: “The government faith is only necessarily compulsory for those holding government office or state or quasi state office. Its not a proper job of the Inquisition/State security to look for every nonbeliever.â€
Yes, absolutely. I intended that, but I guess I didn’t say it.
S: “the institutions of democracy are designed not to exercise powerâ€
Not following. Explain?
“I’d go further, religions have a purpose- ‘peace among men of good will’, ‘honor ones parents who honored their parents who honored…’, ‘what is good for the Jews?’, etc.â€
Of course. I tried to delay that discussion by writing “A shared faith – among many other functions –†But of course that discussion, of a state religion’s necessary and sufficient functions, must be part of this document. E.g., hatching, matching, and dispatching, as Jim says, etc.
“The purpose of unofficial state religions is ‘seize power’, so they can’t be fixed and renewed- they devour societies to reward followers or die.â€
Indeed. Marxism is the example par excellence here.
“Not following. Explain?”
I was thinking separation of powers and term limits. They are explicitly designed to prevent the exercise of power.
I did have a bit of Americanitis and forgot unitary parliamentary governments, but they still diffuse official power. The more members parliament holds, the shorter the terms, the less it is able to exercise and the more it ends up in the hands of political parties and civil servants.
I don’t know the exact number before things become unworkable, but the Taliban operate with about 30 people in their Leadership Council.
Civil service wasn’t really a power until FDR. Before that they were political loyalty pay off jobs but it was still the actual elite who ruled.
>I was thinking separation of powers and term limits. They are explicitly designed to prevent the exercise of power.
It’s designed to prevent kings, not the exercise of power. Republics and Democracies only really stick around if they create a system and civic religion that’s highly anti king. Otherwise as soon as the Democratic leaders shit the bed and things are going to hell the average man is going to demand a real king gets back in charge.
Generally with bodies too large to self govern like the house, powerful members tend to tell the others how to vote. Democracy works well when you have virtuous near dictators directing it and poorly when it’s functioning as it’s suppose to work, IE Mob rule.
“Civil service wasn’t really a power until FDR. Before that they were political loyalty pay off jobs but it was still the actual elite who ruled.”
Yes, as long as civil servants are hired and fired with their representatives, they are subject to the same barriers to accumulating power. Once you get a ‘professional’ civil service is when they act independently.
“It’s designed to prevent kings, not the exercise of power. Republics and Democracies only really stick around if they create a system and civic religion that’s highly anti king. Otherwise as soon as the Democratic leaders shit the bed and things are going to hell the average man is going to demand a real king gets back in charge.
Generally with bodies too large to self govern like the house, powerful members tend to tell the others how to vote. Democracy works well when you have virtuous near dictators directing it and poorly when it’s functioning as it’s suppose to work, IE Mob rule.”
=So power moves to small groups, with long time horizons and unified goals that operate either inside or outside the government.=
Fear of power and fear of responsibility – which is effectively the same thing – is an animating impulse of demotism and bureaucratism alike.
Typical Pax Rossica news:
A handyman from Uzbekistan, Shokhrubek Karimov, stabbed to death the saleswoman Yulia Tkacheva, whom he had been caring.
In Russia, which wants to survive, all owners of such Wahhabi beards must be destroyed on the spot as terrorists. Both migrants and “citizens of the Russian Federationâ€. The state, the army, the police, the militia, caring uncles – anyone. Not? Some people don’t want to live.
By the way, Yulia Tkacheva was originally from Horlivka, and three years ago she moved from the Donbass to Moscow…
https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5678754
Going Nowhere: The Basil Story.
I’m sure he’s getting plenty of action in his local bathhouse.
Per reports I’ve seen on TGram, More than 80,000 illegals have crossed into the United States since October 1st.
https://t.me/CIG_telegram/24823
Jim, what is the likelihood that the cartel will start operating in earnest in the border region on the American side? might this be a part of the 2024 plans?
is it possible that certain factions in the cathedral have realized that the foot soldiers they have to hand, like antifa and others, will not be up to the task of facing down armed and angry citizen groups? If this is indeed happening as I portray it, what should we expect to see in terms of actual operationalization?
What do you mean with “operating in earnest”? My understanding is that the cartels are a criminal business organisations that earn most of their money with drugs. I assume that is always serious business and they are earnestly doing it.
Anyway, I don’t think the government needs cartels. They have an army, several armies in fact considering how many branches of the government have their own armed troops.
By operating in earnest I mean acting with the same level of brashness and openness north of the border as they do south of the border. while violence definitely leaks over the border, it is nowhere near the magnitude of the cartel war violence in Mexico. off the top of my head, more than 50,000 people a year can be murdered, /killed in the violence between the various cartel groups. while this is substantial, most Americans are completely oblivious to it. If they start operating north of the border in the same fashion, it is going to be much harder to ignore.
I know there is lots of information out there online that talks about how big and expensive and capable the United States military is. in reality, something like 80% of the military is bureaucratic or support only in nature. This means people that sit in offices, or drive trucks, or do any of the other millions of things. the US military has decided it must do. The US military is not very effective at all, particularly when it is trying to actually fight wars. look at what happened in Afghanistan over a period of 20 years. If the US military has to go up against the cartel, it could be a lot worse. another aspect of this is, if the cartel is doing the violence, the political factions in the US can decry it and make laws about it but never have to actually own up to it or do anything about it, just as they do with black violence in the inner city.
20,000+ Americans were murdered last year in the US. I expect numbers to be even higher this year. We’re already approaching Cartel levels violence.
The real question is: is 20,000 high, low, or average? whatever the case, most murders are interpersonal violence and negro crime in the cities. If we start to see cartel style violence, and it should be noted that this will look a lot more like South Africa than Mexico, that may move the needle in many respects.
It was 14,249 in 2014. It’s been increasing around 2,000 a year since 2018. Numbers are being under counted now too. If the victim doesn’t have a family that cares about them(huge chunk of official murders are worthless shits that no one gives a fuck about), they’re being ruled natural causes or suicide to try and keep numbers down(started in 2019). Real numbers might be in the 25-28k range this year.
The point is crime is approaching Mexican levels and will be there in another 3 or 4 years. In city near where I live a woman was out at 10am scraping off the frost from her car and a group of niggers drove by in a uhaul truck, stole her car and tried to kidnapp her. Broad daylight in a nice area of town.
It takes criminals a while to move from small crime to major ones, but we’re at the stage where the criminals who got started with the soft on crime approach starting in 2014 have fully graduated to major crimes.
Its hard for me to grasp this aspect of clownworld because this is one thing that so far just isnt happening in Florida… I can walk down the streets of nigger and spic neighborhoods here in Florida and be perfectly safe.
Are the streets of most cities outside the hotspots of Camden Memphis Detroit (and i mean the nigger areas) that bad now…
Chiraq and Detoilet have been this bad for decades, and only getting worse. NYC vacilates between just as bad as its ‘sister cities’ and interregnums with semblances of order as the segment of ruling class bluetribespeople occupying the place made unprincipled exceptions for their own backyard, but any contemplation of exceptions was likewise completely evaporated by the ascendant cult of negrolatry from 2019 onwards, and coupled with the autophagy of covidianism has largely become a no-man’s land as well.
I can’t say for all states, but crime is rising fast in most areas. DeSantos land might be the exception to the rule. My extended family just moved to Southern Red State to get away from the crime and I’ll be following as soon as I get a job lined up, but the area they picked already has me worried. They’ve got drag queen kiddy shows going on and the local supposedly “Republican” authorities are ignoring it despite it being a straight up violation of state law.
They’re seeing a large increase in crime as well, but it’s loads safer than the blue state they moved from. I live in a purplish area where’s it’s pretty safe but it’s trending towards dangerous. No Mexican cartels in sight.
What state, Texas Georgia and believe it or not Alabama GOP are totally infested with cucks.
For some reason Florida GOP (perhaps because its dominated by people who lived in areas ruined by leftists and possess a real passionate hatred of leftists) has gotten very hardcore…
I know very little about Florida so correct me if I’m wrong, but the GOP in that state seem to speak with one voice and act with great cohesion. I think that voice is Ron DeSantis. He’s built a strong personal following it’s effects are quite telling in pushing back against today’s leftism, even if Ron is just 10 years behind the current thing.
It does now…
I expect state failure.
But I don’t expect any one specific form and process of state failure. There are an enormous number of ways for a state to fail, and very few ways for it to function successfully. And, similarly I do not have any specific date for state failure, though infinite leftism, which I expect imminently, is likely to trigger it.
I guess the million dollar question is if you expect state failure when does the US go from anarcho tyranny to just anarcho… 10 years? 20?
I expect the unexpected.
But I expected a lot more drama by now, and it has not yet been happening.
There was a vast apparatus of enforcement, which was primarily targeted at the affluent and smart, to force the jab on them – a jab that significantly and substantially reduces IQ, and appears designed to destroy fertility in both males and females.
And now this apparatus of enforcement has softly and silently vanished away, though I still see numerous notices announcing it is still in force.
What is happening now I do not understand. There was power that has murdered tens of millions, and when that power was checked, one would expect to see some drama. Why the absence of drama? How can they be checked, without winding up hanging for their crimes?
This does not fit my world model. It is clearly war related, as I said, Putin cured Covid. Somebody decided that mass murder, sterility, and stupidity was probably a poor move in the log term struggle with Russia. But not seeing a someone who could make that stick, without halting the holiness spiral.
My theory is that the halting of Coronatarianism is that the Jesuits have largely met their objectives, most women got jabbed ergo they have their sterility plague. Women are the bottleneck not men.
Trump out of power and votes firmly rigged for the forseeable future perhaps until the system collapses. Hence no need to potentially start open civil war (especially with Texas and Florida close to open rebellion if they tried to enforce vax mandates here) especially with them now focusing on destroying Russia…
“My theory is that the halting of Coronatarianism is that the Jesuits have largely met their objectives, most women got jabbed ergo they have their sterility plague. Women are the bottleneck not men.”
True. But the sterility gene is recessive. So, if they are all impregnated by unvaxxed men…
Or your Holiness spiral model has been proven to be false. Maybe time for some humility.
Belief in such a thing as ‘slippery slope fallacy’ is a classic midwit trap; beaten only by all time great thought-terminating cliches like ‘correlation is not causation’.
The slippery slope is not a fallacy its almost always true, while correlation is very often NOT causation.
Correlation is always causation – it is just that it does not reveal what is causing what. If C and D correlate, D could be causing C, or C could be causing D, or B could be causing both C and D.
But something is always causing the correlation, and if someone has a plausible candidate for that something, then disregarding that candidate is self induced stupidity and self induced ignorance unless one has a better candidate in mind.
Low average tests scores in the South are caused by niggers, leftists say it was caused by Republicans..
Now you could argue that niggers eventually caused southern whites to vote more right wing (i mean back when voting was semi honest) but whites never voted as right wing in say Michigan which was also full of niggers.
Have you checked the correlation of test scores by numbers of different species vs the correlation by number of R voters?
I would wager the former is likely much stronger than the later.
So correlation always implies causality, and the challenge is to isolate and understand the causal force.
Slippery Slope needs more research. It isn’t a fallacy, and anyone who maintains that it is is either ignorant or malevolent. But I think there needs to be a more formal treatment of the process.
Both concepts are essential to building and maintaining societies, which is probably why the Matists put so much effort into muddying their waters.
The empirical record on slippery slopes is that all slopes are slippery.
For example, a kingdom shifted to a parliament of lords, and an ochlocracy shifted to a parliament of lords, is not the same situation, because the cardinalities are different.
I suspect the “slippery slope is a fallacy” thing was started by leftists during the Cold War. It was an attempt to make us let down our guard against communism. “Slippery slope” often came up in that context. (It was like the domino theory in geopolitics, or the idea that each concession to socialist economics only facilitates the next move toward socialist economics.)
The whole notion that it’s a fallacy is monstrously idiotic. Consider a literal slope that is literally slippery. if someone steps onto it, he’ll fall down a steep slope and break his arm. Suppose that happens. Leftists: “That didn’t just happen. Are you going to believe our claim that that’s impossible or your own lying eyes?”
No essence means no pattern means no prediction.
Solipsistic nominalism strikes again. Life if nothing but an Eternal Current Year.
If everyone dies in 2030 rather than 2026, that would not prove my holiness spiral model to be false. It would prove I was on Musk time.
As retrodiction, it fits. Things have been getting holier faster. Normality has not returned. They have backed off from forcing everyone to be jabbed, but are sailing right along on transitioning your children, war with Russia, and collapsing the economy as a holy sacrifice to Gaia the global warming demon.
Is this CR’s new handle?
I’m noticing that you strangely don’t respond to my good faith rebuttals and responses.
Can you clarify, explicitly, how the Coronatarian saga negates the Holiness Spiral model?
The frankenjab situation left the theocracy caught between a rock and a hard place; they could not simply *stop* pushing covidianism, but at the same rate, covidianism required them to make life intolerable for literally everyone to a degree that ump way past the ‘normal’ rate of boiling the frog, on the grounds of pretenses that likewise literally everyone could see as false with their own two eyes. Everyone was being pushed away, the perception of legitimacy collapsing battle lines were being drawn. It is not an exaggeration to say that civil war or soviet style implosion was immanent, in a historical sense, if the course of things stayed as they were.
But pushing Putin into a war gave them the out they needed; an excuse to just quietly turn off the burners boiling up mania and pretend they never tried and why don’t we just let bygones be bygones.
This sounds right. I was seeing a lot of very upset middle ranking blue people upset at the lock downs and very upset the vaccines were not doing jack shit to stop covid. It felt like something had to break, and then the moment the war got started in the Ukraine, almost all the restrictions where removed all at once. They’ve even been allowing official talk of the lab leak and the some of the dangers of the vaccine. An Iseriali study showing that the vax not covid caused myocarditis was very surprising. Not so much that it showed it, rather that it was published without it’s researchers being canceled or killed.
State failure will be perceived most acutely when people refuse to send their children to any school at all, state or otherwise (the “ideal” state schools might be New England preppy Jesuit schools for all I know). Since 2008 they already do not honor school based meritocracy, and the underclass that only sends its children to school because they don’t like them is killing itself off with opioids and abortion. And the best doctors are now foreigners, since COVID exposed American medicine as a conspiracy of snake oil salesmen.
If doctors lack respect and prestige and a meritocracy tradition, then lawyers certainly do too, and from there all the turtles on the way down can just collapse.
Poor old AF, your straight A grades and 85th percentile standardized test scores didn’t make you a millionaire, and it’s the the greatest injustice ever done to man.
Accept that they lied to you and move on. It sucks that they screwed you; they screwed me too. We’re not getting our money back though. The time, the effort, the fraudulent self esteem – that’s all gone, and there will be no compensation. Come up with a new plan, and for god’s sake, find something new to complain about.
Here’s a video that will be infuriating:
https://youtu.be/uM8-_6_I4LI
To cuckservatives discuss gun crime, statistics, and the FBI.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/desantis-team-distances-itself-ron-rescue-pac-2024-speculation-intensifies
DeSantis imho will not leave Florida to try to win an election he knows will be rigged against him, he is no fool.
That would be wise of him. He really does seem to know the score. If he starts building his own security forces up that might be a good sign for the future.
Ill put one proviso if someone like Musk plays Crassus to his Caesar and gives him 20 billion and he gets another 20 billion from various other billionaires… enough to buy the vote counters off then he might.
That might not be possible once the feds have those 80k armed IRS agents. I think that’s the federal security force they’re intending to use to ensure only members of the party can rig elections.
Though thinking it over, it was the personal loyalty of Caesar’s and Pompey’s men that allowed them to used danger men to allow for fair voting. I rather doubt anyone hired by the Feds have a lot of loyalty to it and they’ll all being willing to take bribes.
Its a kleptocracy now of course theyll take bribes.
Absolutely. It’s still just hard for me to wrap my head around it. Normal is taking bribes these days.
It’s normal to take the Left’s bribes to do good, proper, legal, and appropriate things you were going to do anyway, probably, just maybe not so enthusiastically. You could call it “doing well by doing good.” It’s certainly not normal to take bribes from the other side. That would be criminal, and wrong, and you wouldn’t be able to sleep at night.
The thing when societies get really low trust and corrupt it eventually doesnt matter…
We’re not anywhere near there, Com. In the enemy’s minds, they’re really not doing anything corrupt. They don’t think their bribery is low trust behavior, and in a perverse way it really is kind of high-trust, at least within their circle of insiders.
The average member of the political/bureaucratic/expert class really and truly believes he is a moral and ethical paragon, even as he takes a bribe. The game is nobody ever admits it’s a bribe. There’s a quid, and there’s a quo, but there’s no explicit pro connecting the two. He’s doing something good and right, and he’s receiving well-earned compensation for expertise in an unrelated area, thus it’s not criminal, and it’s not even unethical. They truly believe this. This is why the Right can’t pull the same trick. At best, the Rightist pays the quid and never gets the quo. After all, nobody ever actually said it’s an exchange. At worst, the Rightist makes it clear and explicit and ends up in jail.
Nah were at the point where almost all the leftist true believers are white women from coastal suburbs who are also incompetent and useless… the rest of them can be bought.
Sloppy google search results:
Total Federal (civilian) Workforce Count – 2,167,192
Male – 55.64%
Female – 44.36%
Black/African American – 18.35%
White – 61.45%
States with the most FedGov employees:
CA – 180,397
VA – 160,774
TX – 157,232
MD – 152,643
FL – 105,288
Total fed workforce (civilian and uniformed): 4,253,133
These numbers are wonky. All pulled from single source[1]. The assertion that all “true believers are white women” doesn’t stand up IMO. What defines a true believer is worthy of debate, but we need to establish what’s more relevant, true belief or ability to act on beliefs? I am of the opinion that fedgov employees matter far more than “voters.” We then would have to look at state governments demograqphics as well. The fact that governance in the US has not imploded basically proves that white males are still the majority, though it’s a thin one and growing thinner all the time. The assertion that it’s “coastal suburbanites” is spot on IMO.
We are not at the point where one can just bribe whomever needed successfully and consistently. The race of the briber matters a good deal, as does the race of the bribed. Alphachads are at an advantage with attractive women, but so are degenerates and minorities in certain circumstances. Think about the legions of Karens in both fed and sate gov; being a cat person may be enough to get that envelope full of cash and/or sex toy coupons accepted.
[1] **PDF** https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ap_5_strengthening_fy22.pdf
Not all but most of them…
nah
https://ibb.co/kXhfzyM
I think we’re pretty close to there. The priesthood has a complete stranglehold on construction by way of zoning, permitting, inspections etc. Not to mention insurance. Those are all bribes. It’s formalized but it equates to the same thing.
attempting to play the lefts game, which is to say faking elections with Astro turf and fraud, is a fool’s errand for the right. Core principles and cultural patterns are precisely what makes the right wing so bad at our current style of politics. these are not failings, and they should not be treated as such. DeSantis would be much better off biting his time and being the change he’d like to see locally while slowly building up his personal retinue and providing a primer for other elites in positions of power.
“Core principles and cultural patterns are precisely what makes the right wing so bad at our current style of politics. these are not failings”
Bah muh principles cuckservatism.
So you are spitting on having principles and abiding by them now? Or is that when I write “conservative” or “right wing” you only think of Mitt Romney or David French?
My principles when it comes to leftists are anything that can beat leftists…
Puerile and pointless, further reaffirming my conviction that leadership must be limited to men with submissive wives and obedient children. The politics of vendetta are leftist politics.
Moral BS has lost the right everything since the McCarthy era… if the right had been united behind the idea of killing 3 million communist traitors in the McCarthy era eventually the Republic would still have fallen but there would be no accompanying cancerous leftist problem.
I hate moral arguments when it comes to limiting actions in the war against the left…
>Moral BS has lost the right everything since the McCarthy era…
This isn’t meant to be a blackpill, but 1950s McCarthy era was all a puppet show. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover provided much of the information McCarthy used. Entire purpose was to clean house of the pro-soviet communists after the war while keeping anti-soviet communists in charge.
The communist problem was around prior to WW1 and became dominant by the 1920s.
https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1667/87/1667878190326894.jpg
like it or not, principles and values are a core aspect of everyone in our society who is actually conservative. you are side stepping my point completely by pretending I somehow brought into the discussion a moral argument against violence being applied to the demon worshipers and their vassals. playing stupid democracy games in an attempt to beat the left is political masturbation. Even if the RNC tries to play that game, the principles and values of their voter base will not allow for it to be done as effectively as needed.
If there is ever to be a violent reckoning for the managerial class in this country, those pulling the triggers will be men who stand on principles and their morals, regardless of what cowards and quislings say or do. The issue here is neither the principles nor the morals of actual conservatives, it is the hand waving and negotiating and cowardice of the pseudo-conservatives who are ostensibly in charge of the RNC and the various conservative institutions. McCarthy could have had a leftist purge if not for all of the fence sitters and turncoats.
“like it or not, principles and values are a core aspect of everyone in our society who is actually conservative.”
And we’re reactionaries here we’re not conservatives, there is very little about clownworld society we want to conserve.
“Even if the RNC tries to play that game, the principles and values of their voter base will not allow for it to be done as effectively as needed.”
With enough money it would actually succeed and nothing succeeds like success…
That’s probably the best take I’ve ever seen on McCarthy. Fits all the know facts, and shows how a weak alcoholic could gain so much insider knowledge.
Com is right, conservatism is a strategy the way leftism is a strategy, and a losing one at that. As a strategy it resides entirely inside the territory of gay anal democracy.
Patriarchy is creative and reactionary. “I don’t believe in divorce†is conservative.
Big fish eat the little fish. It’s a red pill truth. As men of creation we have every right under the banner of Christ to convert or kill every leftist by sword point. Because either we eat them, or they eat us. And every time we fail to do so, they get bigger and we get smaller.
>like it or not, principles and values are a core aspect of everyone in our society who is actually conservative.
Who replaced KD with a cuckservitive reply boy?
Conservationism is and always has been bullshit. People either have virtue or they do not. Values are virtue signaling rather than real virtue and when the people signaling see some sort of gains by dumping those values they do so in a heart beat.
I’ve practiced real virtue in my life as informed by natural law. Areas where I fail in virtue, bother me and I am unable to describe myself as a good man in such areas. Cuckservtives on the other hand are always good men because as long as they signal the right values, that makes them good. There’s no virtue in a cuckservitive.
The Roman Republic crumbled because the Cuckservitives endless signaled good Roman Virtue, while abandoning the practicing it.
The fundamental misunderstanding seems to be twofold: celebrity ideation and common v. proper nouns.
Due to media inundation, people become overwhelmed with the requisite mental modeling needed to keep track of “what’s going on” in their incorporated reality. Out of necessity (or, less charitably, laziness or intellectual incapacity), people find placeholder personalities to represent segments, or factions or groups, of a population and thereby avoid the need to factor in nuance. This is a natural proclivity typically expressed as discrimination or categorization, and it is an essential tool for successfully navigating life when Dunbar Limits are overwhelmed. The problem arises when this proclivity gets hacked by another proclivity, that being the tendency to start believing in something after a sufficient number of repetitions. Thus, seeing the term “conservative ” repeatedly and consistently attached to the likeness of a particular celebrity, like John McCain or Ben Shapiro, creates the illusion of a fixed association.
Conservatism is a fake and gay ideology espoused by the outer segment of the uniparty to reinforce gains maid by the uniparty. A conservative is a person who lives by Chesterton’s Fence Concept as a matter of course.
We need an army. Armies are comprised of commoners attached to elites, and elites attached to leaders. This is not an RTS game where we can build a Barracks, research the Monarchy upgrade, then pump out ideologically sound gigachads so we can wave assault the AI before it does the same to us with NPC hordes. It is essential to build the whole path from There (the place where natural conservatives are) to Here (knowing the proper friend/enemy distinction and acting on it by reflex). Natural conservatives are currently enthralled to pseudo conservatives, or Conservatists. These outer party cucks need to be eliminated, conceptually first, then minecraftually most of all.
Placing Morals and Principles into the category of Accessory is just ideological relativism, and I’m not into gay shit. There is truth, there are bodies of fact based on truth, there is correct morality, and there are vital principles. Moral Relativists are at best useful idiots; I’m happy to have them march in front of the guys I actually care about.
A conservative today is busy conserving Women’s sports. I’m old enough to have grown up during the early days of Women’s sports where they insisted that women were just as good as men and it was unfair to exclude them. I got to experience integrated sports first hand. What a fucking joke girls were past age 10. They simply where not built to compete and didn’t the mentality to compete effectively. So instead of continuing that nonsense, separate sports leagues were pushed where they could pretend women were just as good as men. That’s what conservatives are trying to preserve.
I realized early on that sports was training for warfare and group hunting. Women have no ability in such areas and they should never play sports. Generally they naturally don’t want to play sports, but it’s pushed on them so they do it. It’s just pointless behavior aping men. Now girls spend a good chunk of their youth playing sports when they should be developing useful skills like cooking and child rearing. But hey, your fucking worthless cuckservtives want to preserve that nonsense and fuck up women’s general worth with it.
Conserving last year’s progressism isn’t saving anyone.
Chesterton’s Fence is useful tool, but if the fence was put up to protect the failures of the previous generation of progressive bullshit then you’re not doing any good. We need to return to behavior and virtue that works.
Today on /r/Consrevitism rank and file conservatives defend the rights of anal fisters to marry each other and adopt children that they’ll molest, but they oppose Trannies grooming children in gay bars. 5 years form now they’ll defend Trannies molesting children in gay bars, but open sodomy of young boys in public by pederasts will be too much! On and on it goes.
Now I get it, your trying to use “conservatism” as the religious to build on army on. Won’t work. You need a real working religion for army. Conservatism was just the slot dissidents got shoved into while the progressives continued to subvert them.
Now Christian Nationalism on the other hand has real potential as a religious force. It scares the crap out of the left.
You are either deliberately ignoring what I am writing, or incapable of following what I am saying. The combined comment chain spells out my position sufficiently enough for me. Time will tell if I am on target or off base.
>I say Conservatism [capital C and -ism suffix critical] is fake, gay, and needs to be eliminated, along with its leaders
> You bring up r/Conservatism [hey look, capital C and -ism suffix!] and then insinuate that I want to use these people to build an army.
I attempted to elaborate on my position in detail. The test results indicate this was ineffective.
Revenge fantasy is gay and retarded.
Playing pretend is for children.
Moral relativism is a couple steps away from child anal advocacy.
Men with no land, no children, no principles are at best in the way and at worst future enemies.
Grab some Nikes, race to war now.
Stop looking for ways to outgroup me (this is not the first fucking time you’ve done this) and stop looking for reasons why in the event of victory that shitlibs should receive mercy. This is a mere message board and here in this obscure corner of the internet I’ll always have the prestige of being the guy who was both right about covid and the guy who boldly charged the machine gun nests of those who were wrong about covid (and also predicted very dire consequences that the right didn’t solidly oppose the hoax at the time… the dire consequences have come to pass).
Its a revenge fantasy because we aren’t in power right now but its very important if we get into power we don’t repeat the mistakes of the past in sparing them. If we win we will have one chance to get rid of them… its not something we’re going to be able to do later even with an autocratic government. To spare them we will end up like Chile and Spain did for sparing them. I’ll admit I do want revenge but my logic is still sound.
Cuckservatives can potentially be useful sometimes but there should be zero concessions to their preferences and memeplexes. Cuckservatives are an engineered memeplex and they are engineered to be fighting a losing war.
Also if you are going to call childless men a liability I think men with only daughters are worse than childless men, as they tend to simp for the interest of women never met a guy in the West with only daughters who wasn’t at best a tradcuck feminist.
Leftism is entropy, social entropy. Cannot get rid of leftism once and for all, have to endlessly pump entropy out of society. A palace has to have a sewer. Organisms have to eat and excrete.
However, if leftists are organized into a conspiracy, which is to say organized into a priesthood, one can get rid of that one particular priesthood once and for all, and we certainly would be a lot better off if Charles the Second had done so rather than allowing them to self exile to New England.
This is the my precious pumpkin syndrome, which syndrome destroyed the Roman Republic. Hence my position that we should allow marriage by seduction, elopement, and abduction, piously pretending that all such cases are marriage by abduction, with the father’s property right in the daughter being entirely extinguished, and the abductor receiving a complete property right (provided he is able and willing to keep her forever and look after her)
You can’t rid of envy but I want to reduce future leftism to what it was in the days before the idea of Humanism ever existed…
It would become to paraphrase Tolkien a malignant spirit in the wilderness.
TC, your positions vis a vis morals and principles are enemy positions. You chose that, not me. Further, my position on men of substance v. men of words is not based on you, you’re just a handy example in this specific place.
You have decided to associate with strippers to the exclusion of all other females, and honestly you’ve made an excellent case for why you do so. But it doesn’t change the fact that you are, at the end of it all, childless and family-less, which is exactly what the Cathedral wants for all white males. You can extol upon the Why’s of it all, and you can line up an endless list of reasons, but nature is the purest judge. If God takes away from me my family and land, I’ll be in the same situation. I’ll have arrived there by circumstance not choice, but there I will be.
Further still, you continue to personalize all disagreements and opposition, claiming that the only reason anyone would oppose you is because you were right on Covid. You chose to take that position, and you choose to maintain it. I have explicitly defended you when some shill asshole (Bill) attacked you for no reason, and I will oppose you when I find your positions incorrect, untenable, or reprehensible.
If you are feeling out grouped because of your decision to give up on procreating… good, that means it is working. Shame is the most reliable motivator for correcting incorrect cultural and social behavior.
There is no other way for me to put this: barren men with relative morals and no held principles are bad men, either potentially or actually. As I’ve said before, I genuinely hope you come around, and I consider you a bro, even if I think you are too single minded and too black & white.
As I see it, the core issue, when all personal stuff is stripped away, is precisely this: you are in the Sprinting Camp, and I am in the Marathon Camp. We both have good points and blind spots, but I remain convinced that Marathon is the correct strategic approach. This is a holy war, need a religion to fight a holy war, can’t have a good religion based on moral relativism.
Yes, he deserves pressure over his unwise decision to give up, but I don’t think we should be too severe on him. Things just are mighty tough, and I know how tough they are as well as anyone. It is tough for me, and it is tough for famous movie stars.
If the opportunity for holy war comes in a timely way, we will assign him a conquered woman, and he will heal up.
In the meantime, he should try putting out the necessary effort. I have advised him often enough on what he should try.
>Moral relativism is a couple steps away from child anal advocacy.
That’s a fake and gay term that covers for people committing evil. Natural law is easy to understand, as is tradition. People who spout off about Moral Relativism are either covering for evil people or are useful idiots.
When a leftist tells me that morality is different in different places explain away child rape or human sacrifice I know they’re evil and intend me harm and they should die for it. When a Cuckservitive comes along and tells that leftist is just using moral relativism and they’re just deluded for believing that concept, I laugh in their faces. They’re men without chests who are unable to call out evil, so they make excuses for evil people.
>Men with no land, no children, no principles are at best in the way and at worst future enemies.
Such men are the basis of an army. Men need a tribe, you provide them that tribe, women, and land and they’ll kill for you. Worked for the founders of Rome and it could work again today. Instead it pisses you off that a such a man has a decent standing in this group due to his contributions to the group.
You’re consumed with envy over it. That’s a bad place to be. Envy is a deadly sin, let it go.
This formula works. Has worked over and over again.
To which, however, I need to add my much repeated observation that an army needs a faith. The faith of the US army was the republic, and the republic is no more.
Define what you mean by principle. It sounds like faggy Cuckservitive talk, but lets see what you mean. Keep it simple and short, not your normal pages of crap. Also define why you think Com has relative morals. Most people who prattle on about relative morality don’t understand the differences between out group and in group morality.
Finally, what’s your evidence that Com is a bad man? You shall know them by their fruit and Com continues to produce good fruit for Jim’s blog.
Making moralfag arguments for not pursuing effective if distatesful enemy tactics is the enemy position. I’m not saying morality is wrong I’m saying that applying morality to leftists is wrong, leftists have no scruples and no honor.
If you want to make an amoral matter of fact argument for why certain leftists tactics can’t work for the right (and there are tactics like mass protests that either cannot work for the right or can only work for the right in moments of sudden anger if 30 million people join) that is another issue but do not make it a moral argument when you make it a moral argument the problem is YOU ARE ARGUING THAT MORALITY APPLIES TO LEFTISTS when my position is that MORALITY DOES NOT APPLY TO LEFTIST OR ANY OTHER DEMON WORSHIPPER. The moral thing with such people is to do WHATEVER IT TAKES to beat them and to show them absolutely no mercy in victory. Cuckservatives are very strongly against the idea of whatever it takes they argue muh principles no matter what you are up against… and I don’t think any reactionary should agree with that kind of thinking.
“You have decided to associate with strippers to the exclusion of all other females”
I said I prefer them to typical clown world women… that is a personal flaw and I certainly don’t argue it for everyone. I mostly pointed it out because I suspect there is far more inceldom than is self reported and that there is one real solution to that…
“Further still, you continue to personalize all disagreements and opposition, claiming that the only reason anyone would oppose you is because you were right on Covid. You chose to take that position, and you choose to maintain it. I have explicitly defended you when some shill asshole (Bill) attacked you for no reason, and I will oppose you when I find your positions incorrect, untenable, or reprehensible.”
When you immediately do this a week later it does not foster trust.
“If you are feeling out grouped because of your decision to give up on procreating… good, that means it is working. Shame is the most reliable motivator for correcting incorrect cultural and social behavior.”
I’m not I’m feeling that you are trying to do this.
As for relative principles… my principles are relative to peace and war and to whether I’m against normal men or demon worshippers. Peace on earth is towards ALL MEN OF GOODWILL… entirely different principles apply to enemies and in particular to enemies who have no honor themselves.
You are right about that.
That is not a real solution.
You need to make an effort where it might produce a real solution. Even if you rationally conclude your chances are mighty bad, there is a lot you can do to make your chances considerably better.
Things are tough, but you are competing with broken men. Things are not hopelessly tough for those who will boldly do what it takes.
I’ve outlined at length my positions in regards to the OG subject, that being the Right taking up the tactics of voter fraud espoused and deployed by the left. I’m not going to explain it like you’re five, Red. Not my pigs, not my farm.
If explanation at length is something you don’t like, no one is making you read my comments, bro. I prefer arguments at length, as any competent, occidental priest class member should, in my opinion.
You continue to put words in my mouth and do that feminized bullshit “So what you’re saying is…” I did not call TC “bad.” You are pot stirring like some DMV negress. Cut it out.
I maintain that the inherent characteristics of the rightward volk and the rightward elites make the adoption of many, maybe most, leftward tactics poor strategy. Time may prove me wrong.
TC says: “My principles when it comes to leftists are anything that can beat leftists…”
Fine. Defensible. I disagree. I think there are depths to which we should decline to sink. I am not talking about minecraft, force, or brutality, not at all. But I am talking about policy and procedure, because these things are put of the “2-way sewage pipeline” outlined by Yarvin in his earlier works. He asserted that the intelligentsia thought it could lay down with dogs, run with dogs, play dog games, and rise up flea-less. This is not about courtesy, politeness, or refinement. It’s more about choices regarding political tactics. I think there are spiritual ramifications for policy and process decisions.
As for short, sweet principles I espouse:
>no females in leadership
>no childless, family-less, landless males in leadership
>no negotiating with daemon worshippers
This is not everything, obviously, and I am still constructing the principles on which I choose to stand.
“depths to which we should decline to sink.”
Jesus descended into the depths of hell there is nothing we shouldn’t do if we don’t have to do.
I would not be eager to say go after people’s families if the family members did nothing that should be avoided if we can avoid it… but even that there are probably situations where its unavoidable (its probably the only way to discourage active extreme Islamic terrorists if there were still all that many around) I greatly dislike hurting the innocent to cause terror for the guilty.
Everything besides that we should be fully willing to do to the extent we can do it.
Now of course the right is not suited to certain tactics… I see why the right is not suitable for protesting and full time “activism” I do NOT see why we can’t theoretically steal elections too and in the Late Roman Republic all sides sometimes stole elections. Most of the people involved in crooked elections are more crooked than they are ideological. Fat black Shaniquas want envelops of money way way more than they want tranny rights.
“no childless, family-less, landless males in leadership”
You don’t want males who are bad at patriarchy priesting to the flock sure and I certainly have never argued against Jim on this point in fact I enthusiastically agreed with him that this was one of the many many flaws with the Roman Catholic Church*.
But the weird reactionary revolutionary situations are different, families etc are a lever the regime can use against men… so there are some advantages to having men with less attachments who run on a sort of pure hatred for the existing order in leadership.
* Given the early discussion it should probably be required they have a son… no men with only daughters either. They just can’t help turning into feminists and we can’t have that its like having someone who was based morph into an entryist by weird biological daughter simping processes.
You did indeed call him bad. You’ve made this same argument several times about him.
KD, I’m not a priest, I’m an engineer. I reduce complex systems into simple steps and functions that work together logically. Your overly long arguments with many superfluous points are boring. So I skim your arguments and look for the points that actually matter.
The point you keep coming back to is Com is bad for wanting to kill evil leftists. Everything else is fluff around that point. Sometimes you attack him on family status, sometimes you attack him on the basis that he shouldn’t be in leadership, despite Com not being in leadership. Today you’re attacking him over not being a Cuckservitive talking “muh Principles”.
You attack over his stripper stuff which everyone here dunks on him for. Com doesn’t get any traction trying to turn his vice into a virtue. But I will say again, Com is a good man. Not a man who is currently fit to lead other men, but good man never the less.
If you can’t debate him on the points of his Final Solution to the Leftist problem then drop the issue.
Thank you Red btw I also never quite claimed that whoremongering was a virtue… merely that for some men its a lot better than inceldom to do… at least for a while… at least so you know you can and as such you can kill your inner simp.
Obviously a good man wants a good wife (as good as women can get) a house and a garden and a legacy.
NP Com.
Fucking a whore for money is much better than inceldom and something I do when I can’t find a date. But talking about a stripper pill is trying to talk vice into virtue. People often do that sort of stuff when they’re stuck with a vice that feels good. It’s easy to pay for sex and I recommended if a man can’t get anything but using it as a crutch to avoid trying to find a harmful for you. Vice at it’s root is things that feel good, but are long term bad for you.
Use that spergy brain of yours and try. You may fail but you in so doing so you are attempting what is good and that is virtue.
So say we all.
There are no such things as conservatives, KD. There are elites and normies, and the normies follow elites. The normies flocked to Trump because behind all the bluster and insults was the assurance that he was going to stick up for them. It will not matter much what we say, because what we will be assuring them is that we will protect their kids. If we start throwing fags off roofs because they were lurking near kids, soon enough everyone will just assume that fags deserve to go of the roof as a matter of course.
The only moral principle that applies to leftists after the one-two punch of the vaxx and “nuke the straights, tranny war now!” is that everyone needs to be put to the sword. If they were a janitor for the Democratic Party, they get to go into the woodchipper headfirst. If they actually mattered, it will be feet first. Jericho, Sodom, and Gomorrah are the model we follow, now. If they will not follow, they had better get out of our way. If the “conservative” tries to stand in our way, we ride him down and rape his women.
They escalated to genocide. If we get a chance, we escalate just as far, if not farther. Them. their kids. Their friends. Their pets. Mass human sacrifice and trying to start a nuclear war for more sacrifice has one punishment, and that punishment is death. I said at the start of the vaxx thing that if it turned into human sacrifice we were doing it Cominator’s way. Well, it turned into human sacrifice, so we do it Cominator’s way. What would Cortez do? What would Scipio African Africanus do? What would Joshua do? Kill them all.
“If the “conservative†tries to stand in our way”
As I’ve said the men of conservatism inc should be made to atone for their failures by carrying out the distasteful dirty work. Ben Shapiro can perhaps avoid being shot but hes going to need to personally shot a lot of leftists and then run a camp.
I’m not certain we need to kill the janitors (I’ve personally known people who ended up hating Democrats who had call center jobs for them in the past) but anyone who mattered or volunteered or had a high position… or who believed yeah. Basically the priesthood…
Attractive women (most Dem women are not particularly attractive but SoCal is probably full of them) can perhaps look forward to a life of slavery. They probably can’t reproduce now or have diminished ability (vaxxed). Its a tricky question because the past few years have made it such that most of the remaining true believers are women…
Reproductive success and fitness should be the foundation of what defines good and evil, or at least right and left.
Leftism does not lead to good it leads to evil and hell. It does not reproduce life it consumes it.
To truly live your life as a servant to God and to obey his commands you must be willing to kill and you must be willing to die. If you are not willing to kill and not willing to die, you are not willing to live. Both are intimately woven into the fabric of all life on earth.
Jim as well as others has gone over this many times. Leader -> faith -> army. Only then can the holiness spiral be stopped, and faith be restored. We are not priesting our way out of what lies ahead.
Principles matter; and principles that entail clemency for the damned are children of their father, the devil.
A Lex Talonis Restitutional Justice system serves this role.
Executions for example flush entropic humans into the afterlife. Executions is necessary in every society that wants to be functional.
I’m convinced that civilization is evolved intentional by executing people who can’t act in a civilized manner and it dies when that civilization stops executing it’s criminals.
That’s the reason the penalty is death for every major crime in the Old Testament.
https://flsg.myflorida.com/
That’s apparently the website for the Florida state guard, created this year. I recall the Babylon bee story alluding to it, that said DeSantis is breeding his own army of Uruk Hai.
“…and is at all times under the final command and control of the Governor as commander in chief of all military and guard forces of the state.â€
Ages 18-60. Going to have to look into this.
https://babylonbee.com/news/desantis-introduces-controversial-proposal-to-grow-personal-army-of-uruk-hai/
“REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!” screamed every CNN anchor while breaking the story and running in circles with their hair on fire.
Hope springs eternal, Baldrick.
The girl who scolded her late father at the funeral for being a white heterosexual supporter of Trump turned out to be the 19-year-old daughter of billionaire Donald Foss. The late Donald pays Samantha’s tuition at Oglethorpe University $57,350 a year — $347 more than the average white American earns.
Samantha Foss (using “they/them” pronouns) didn’t give up on the “racist money” and “racist mindset” she inherited from her father. But she took advantage of family grief to spit in the coffin at the funeral of the person to whom she owes everything in her life.
A typical biography of a socialist. And this man is not sorry. He himself sent his daughter to a college for whores, to remain a respectable progressive male pro-feminist, not a cave retrogad.
The father, like any father, is deeply ashamed that his daughter hates him. Yet he does bear the blame for what has become of her. Evil religion brings out the ugliest sides of men.
an interesting example of what could be called the kapernick effect. Colin Kapernick is a bastard mulatto, unwanted by both parents, then raised by a loving white family. in the end he sides with his absent black dad, probably the least caring person to him, not even a part of his life!
don’t know the full story here but it’s pathetic when a billionaire white guy has to go oil drilling for a wife only to end up with an ungrateful negress daughter who abandons the tribe. essentially the one drop rule is correct, and miscengenation should be viewed as willing cuckoldry at best.
Looks like Elon put the engineers back in charge:
https://twitter.com/TheLaurenChen/status/1594101861564534784?cxt=HHwWgMC-pc_MsZ8sAAAA
Might just be the angle or lighting, but Musk looks bad. Might be working himself half to death.
I expected something like that might happen; the polygon acting to wear down Musk by a thousand cuts through heaping distractions on his plate from every angle; choruses of shrieking banshees and sibilant sussurations of wormtongues alike.
Wormtongue dragged him into the Ukraine war.
Really bad idea. With communications being critical, Russia may well decide to eliminate satellites passing over Ukraine. Just put a cloud of buckshot into the opposite orbit.
Elon and his shareholders know it too. Remember that very blatant anti-satellite demonstration caper that Russia pulled not long before February 2022.
https://heavens-above.com/Starlink.aspx
Every satellite with an orbital inclination greater than 44 degrees passes over Ukraine once or twice a day. Starlink satellites are all in 60-degree orbits except a few are 90 degrees to cover the poles. So you’re talking about the complete elimination of the Starlink system.
The best place to launch this buckshot is anywhere along or south of the 60th parallel, which runs from St. Petersburg to Magadan, though if possible, frying the satellites with some sort of electromagnetic radiation weapon would be a lot quicker, cheaper, and less likely to set off a Kessler cascade.
@Mayflower Sperg
Cassini passed through Saturn’s rings with no problems.
I don’t think that buckshot (or any other currently available technique) can take out Starlink satellites cost effectively, given that they are launched in groups of 60 per relatively cheap Falcon-9 launch, space is big, and they’re low enough altitude that debris will re-enter in about a decade (and be at Starlink altitude for much less time).
If there is a way to fry them from the ground, that would obviously likely be cost-effective, but I don’t know of a viable means of doing that either (though it depends on how fragile they are). For the electromagnetic frying bear in mind that anything at 550 km altitude is going to be at least about 550 km from any ground equipment at the closest, and the wavelengths that you’d likely use to fry them are going to be hard to focus down to a spot less than than hundreds of meters across at that distance unless you make a huge antenna. (rule of thumb (diffraction limit): minimum focus point diameter / distance from antenna ~ antenna diameter / wavelength of electromagnetic wave used) (might be some O(1) factor there as well, not working it out right now).
err, obviously I inverted one of the ratios there.
@Tech Priest
Exactly.
With the buckshot, it’s not enough energy, and too much space.
With just the reusable Falcon 9 first stage, Elon can put more metal in orbit than every single country combined.
With Starship, no one can challenge Elon in space.
Okay, that claridies it for me. i was going to ask above if your Cassini comparison was apt, as it was 1 satellite and the rings are not anywhere near as dense as they seem, but the very same principle applies to Operation Buckshot, right?
From my admittedly limited point of view, the options are a big, expensive fleet of big, expensive hunter/killer satellites, or some ground based laser weapon, is this correct? Hasn’t Russia hinted at some sort oof ground based system?
Regardless, as you point out, Musk’s lift capacity puts space warfare in a very lopsided pre-WWI place, wherein Musk has far more “little soldiers” and everyone else has too few cavalry and no ability to build trenches or effective artillery. So Musk’s failure point remains throttling his lift capacity.
Russia has been doing some stuff with a ground based laser system. What its capabilities are are not yet known, and probably it does not yet quite work.
Big free electron optical frequency lasers should, in principle, be able to take out satellites. No one has done that yet. It should be quite doable.
It is billed as an anti drone weapon, but they have been testing it by firing it straight upwards.
Russia has hunter killer satellites, but it would be foolish to attempt to use them against someone with Musk’s lift capability.
@Kunning Druegger
Saturn’s rings are dense enough to cast a shadow on Saturn, and the ring debris travel at higher orbital velocities than anything in low Earth orbit.
Earth orbit debris doesn’t cast such a shadow on Earth, even if Starship were to do daily launches right now putting junk into Earth orbit.
One is not necessarily limited to just ONE ground based laser on target. Nor just ONE microwave beam on target. Nor just a laser OR microwave beam.
In theory a large and powerful optical frequency laser could work against satellites. In practice, I expect difficulties achieving the necessary focus.
Also, permanently disabling a satellite with an energy weapon should be much harder than doing the same to a drone, due mainly to much greater distance. Not only does the distance likely cause most of the energy to miss unless the focus is extremely tight, but also the energy that hits being more spread out over the target reduces its ability to do damage to any one point.
Russia seems to be in need of shooting down drones, so I’d expect them to use such a weapon on drones before it was developed to the point of being able to disable satellites. “Testing it by firing it straight upwards” sounds like they just haven’t figured out how to aim it yet. Unless you can cram a lot of energy into an extremely brief pulse, you would need to track a satellite while firing, so firing straight upwards would not be sufficient.
Clarification on “cram a lot of energy into an extremely brief pulse”:
I should have emphasized the “lot of energy” part and not so much the duration of the pulse (laser pulses can be really short, but to do significant damage with a single such short pulse would be hard).
A free electron laser does not do extremely brief pulses. It does a high intensity beam. In the tests, the beam seemed to be on for quite a while, and they were not tracking a target.
A free electron laser, like any laser, can achieve perfect focus, though atmospheric distortions are a hard problem – a problem with, however, a known solution. You can detect that atmospheric distortion from the backscatter, and compensate.
Assuming your laser is firing through a telescope with one meter aperture, and is aiming at a target two meters wide, and your wavelength is 600 nanometers, then most of the energy is still going to be hitting the target at three thousand kilometers.
Free electron laser beam weapons can hit anything in near earth orbit.
Every state actor probably is also reluctant to go after other nations’ satellites for the same reason they’re reluctant to start using nukes. If satellites become fair game it would literally change the world. We’d be back to the pre-Clarke era, or take a significant step in that direction.
That’s right, isn’t it? Without satellites, either you have cable, or all communication is line-of-sight. Maybe I’ll have giant mirror mounted on my roof so I can be part of the all-new AT&T network.
I hadn’t been thinking of free electron lasers specifically when I remarked on brief pulses, but I don’t see why a free electron laser could not make a fairly short pulse (as long as you don’t also need it to be strong). The length of the pulse is basically going to be (1) the duration of the electron beam plus (2) the time it takes the electrons to traverse the electromagnetic fields triggering the light emission plus (3) the distance between mirrors times number of bounces divided by speed of light if using mirrors instead of single pass, and AFAICT all of those could be pretty brief if you wanted (at least not worrying about whether the pulse could also be strong).
Lasers can obtain better focus than other light sources due to their collimation, but when you set a high enough standard (like focusing onto a satellite) all sorts of little issues that wouldn’t have been problems at an easier task will need to be dealt with. Like, your components will wiggle a bit, or not be perfectly homogenous, etc.
Also, depending on the power level, simply hitting the target might not be good enough. Current laser weapons focus to a small point on the target to get enough heating to actually do damage. A spread out beam, even if all of the energy hits the target, will likely do a lot less damage.
@Neurotoxin
Nah. It will be pre-Clarke era for those who only have expendable rockets.
Hitting satellites is not a very easy thing… it takes very very precise calcs to even get a rocket or sattelite to even launch into the right orbital plane but to hit one directly very very hard…
Hitting a satellite is way worse than trying to hit a sniper shot at 3+ miles I think tech will get there eventually but it isn’t there yet.
@Cominator
Any orbital collision is “hitting very very hard.” While using a Starlink to hit another satellite with 3000s Isp propulsion would be hard, there are vastly more Starlinks than there are enemy satellites with 3000s Isp propulsion, plenty of chances to make a hit.
Satellites with chemical hypergolics as the main propulsion, have an Isp in the 200-300s range. Very weak deltaV, so they are in fixed predictable orbits.
And a man who can land rockets on barges in rocking seas, is going to have no trouble taking those out.
“Nah. It will be pre-Clarke era for those who only have expendable rockets.”
Huh? You mean, for those who don’t have expendable rockets? (A nation that doesn’t have expendable rockets can’t fight back or credibly threaten to fight back.)
pre-Clark for the handful of countries with domestic rocketry, nascent stone age for everyone else, I believe. Right Starman?
[*off topic*]
The USA would consider that an act of war and everybody knows it, including you. You just lie about the fact that you know it.
And blowing up the pipelines was not an act of war?
Sending an American “Private” Military Company full of American soldiers onto the front lines of Ukraine Russia war was not an act of war? Ukraine’s recent advances on the Donbass front were not Ukrainian advances but American advances.
Bombarding nuclear waste storage facilities with American himars in areas full of Russians was not an act of war?
Shelling Donbass since 2014 was not an act of war?
This is the sort of floridly insane thinking that will lead you guys to nuke Russia, and say there is no way Russia could respond, because responding would be an act of war.
We are ruled by lunatics, and you are echoing their madness.
Jim, what is the likelihood, from your perspective, that the GAE has already crossed a “first strike” red line for the Kremlin? I feel like the Nord Stream attack was a sufficient casus belli and we may have entered the Preparation Stage. The RF does not have the density of population to get it “wrong,” so any first strike has to be very coordinated to handle the possible (though possibly fantastical) Response.
My feeling is that this is a long way down the road.
But our GAE shill evidently feels that nothing the Global American Empire could ever do could ever constitute an act of war, so presumably his masters think that, or find it politically convenient to think that, in which case they are going to engage in ever more dreadful acts of war against the Russian federation.
Personally, were I Vlad, I’d probably have already attempted a disarming and decapitating first strike against NATO.
My basis would be primarily mathematically. I estimate a high probability that it ends in nukes, and the expected damage is way way lower if you destroy most of NATO’s assets on the ground and then threaten hardcore ‘countervalue’ strikes if NATO retaliates in any way. I think that Russia’s expected survival is maximized that way.
I suspect Jim’s estimate differs from mine in that he estimates a higher probability that the West’s leadership collapses of its own accord prior to edging over the nuclear precipice.
I think that the GAE is trying to play Kahn’s game of
One of us has to be reasonable, and it isn’t going to be me
To which I think the only reasonable response is to set the game board on fire. Otherwise you’re screwed as they take concession after concession. Conservatives on the domestic front have been in this sort of a game since at least the 1960s, although with somewhat lower stakes (give in to us or we’ll riot and otherwise destroy your social peace). The only way out is to be willing to destroy it yourself, at a time and manner that best advantages your side. Once you hear Kahn’s game, you should be thinking of the cheapest method of annihilation. Reasonable discourse and peace really aren’t possible anymore. Imagine a Neo-Aztec world power that threatened the world with cobalt jacketed bombs unless a yearly tribute of millions of sacrifices and tons of gold was provided. Because, of course, the Sun wouldn’t rise unless sacrifices were made.
Exactly so, but I do not think this is a result of rational game playing strategy.
Rather, like our shill splatterblaster, it is unimaginably politically incorrect to think yourself into the other player’s shoes.
Of course, whatever the internal mental state of your opponent, it does not matter, your only recourse is to grab an axe and set the board on fire. Nuclear fire.
The winning strategy in a game of chicken is to down a bottle of vodka and throw the steering wheel out the window.
On the other hand, one also wants to postpone the final game for as long as possible and hope that something turns up in the meantime.
I’m following the logic from both of you, but I wonder if the consideration of internal collapse is playing a bigger roll. Xi’s righthand man wrote a book about the inevitable collapse of the US due to societal configuration (back in the 1990s IIRC), and it is obvious to every sober analyst that some kind of collapse is inevitable, though the US financial zombie has unparalleled endurance (thus far…).
So, from the outside looking in, why run the risk of nuclear catastrophe (and this takes many forms, not just nuclear exchange, but accidents/faults during launch, unpredictable black swans, unpredictable 3rd party responses and actions, and cultural guilt*) if forbearance and patience can yield a much cheaper and cleaner result? We have discussed at length here how much of a paper tiger the USM is, and the GAE trying to actually go to war would have, based on what we say here, disastrous results for the GAE. As long as the progressives retain control and continue trying to keep every stupid passion ball up in the air simultaneously, it would be in Russia’s best interest to keep the conflict localized, continued, and costly. Should a strongman arise, should a decisive purge occur and the Core GAE start speaking AND acting in one voice, then a first strike becomes a necessity. If there’s any validity to this assertion, it could be the case that the only thing keeping the missiles in their silos and tubes is the cold civil war in the US.
*I know it’s very popular on this site for many of us to post with a cold brutality about things we consider black & white, but this is a luxury of those firmly ensconced in the realm of theory and conjecture; in reality, there’s a very wide range of legitimately and/or honestly held morals and principles, however illusory they may be deemed.
Putin is desperately trying to avoid the mistake Hitler made. Hitler declared war on the US when he was in no position to destroy or even harm the US. There’s no upside to Putin declaring war on NATO until it’s viable to destroy NATO. Until total economic/social collapse in the west Putin is very unlikely to declare war. That’s assume the conflict doesn’t go nuclear, because once that match is lit, the only real choice is a full strike.
The problem with trying to delay is that it increases your expected damage—let’s call it nuke equivalent damages—should it turn into a nuclear exchange.
Assume there’s some probability P that Russia gets out of this with no nuke equivalent damage. Maybe the GAE folds, maybe Globohomo collapses. Hey, I can dream too.
But there’s also 1-P, which i think is considerably over 50% where nukes do wind up flying. Delaying vastly increases the probability of subcases like;
Idiotic escalation, where both sides ratchet up the nukes over time or
GAE strikes first
Russia strikes first is way better, and Russia does a planned strike first with proper preparation far better still.
I’ve not seen any indication of the kind of Information Age Warfare from Russia of the kind I’d do if I was preparing for this contingency. I’d be working like hell to subvert GAE’s ‘second strike’ capabilities, but I’ve seen no evidence of this so far. How hard can it be, for instance, to identify the addresses, family centers, hometowns, and so forth of the men actually entrusted to deliver the second strike? In the 80s, pretty hard. Right now, pretty easy. Owing to certain familial connections and associations, I suspect I’d know if this was being done in a manner similar to how the Taliban did this with the ANA.
>I’d be working like hell to subvert GAE’s ‘second strike’ capabilities, but I’ve seen no evidence of this so far.
I mean, why would you, unless you have some really intense insider info from China, Russia, Qatar, and Israel? (these are the countries that spend the most/do the most to infiltrate USG)
If you look through the last 20 years of open source reporting on the US nuclear arsenal, it becomes pretty obvious that it is not operating anything near optimal. Add to this that for every article you find that addresses three or so significant issues, assume there are scores more problems that are hidden.
It’s hard to know what’s true in current era, but in the last few months I’ve seen a number of posts/articles that USAF is really struggling to keep planes flying, USA and USMC barely retain, barely train, and cannot hit minimum quotas for entry. USN can barely keep from colliding and crashing. And added into this, trannies, minorities, and females are being hoovered up and promoted at lightspeed while competent males are being ejected just as quickly.
Maybe this is all BS put out by Russia, conservatives, and bitter retired USM officers who are pissed because bio-leninists are actually amazing technicians, pilots, and operators. But if that was the case, why would recruiters be quietly begging anti-vaxxers and domestic shmerrorists to reenlist?
It was memory-holed very quickly, but in the last (1 year? 2 years?) it came out that the Kremlin has been funding and supporting every major green/anti-energy group in Europe. This was, supposedly, to get nuclear cancelled and get EU addicted to natgas. That was a pretty successful operation, no? Soviet era KGB was integral in initiating and perpetuating Cultural Marxism throughout the cold war, and they did it by subverting education and entertainment. Maybe those things evolved into lovecraftian horrors that operate on their own, but it’s quite the coincidence that edutainment industrial complex is also at the center of feminizing and diversifying the USM.
I’ve never checked if this was true, but it makes sense for Putin to do it and it makes sense for the Cathedral to allow it for their own goals. However the pressure to get nuclear cancelled was always driven from above by the Cathedral. Activist groups were just cover for the elites to do what they already planned to do.
The way you’d subvert would be by telling people on boomer subs and other second strike capabilities something like this:
Hey, your family lives mostly in areas that aren’t target zones. And as long as your submarine never launches, they’ll stay that way. But if it does, your bloodline will be terminated with extreme prejudice. Most of your comrades will get this communication too. Do what you need to do to protect your family should the nukes fly.
Because of the necessity with such an approach in contacting substantial numbers of people, I suspect I’d know about it, because I know several people who’d likely get contacted.
“The USA would consider that an act of war and everybody knows it, including you.â€
Oh no! We couldn’t possibly do anything that the US would regard as an act of war! That’s unthinkable! Why, it might start doing stuff like blowing up our pipelines, sending demolition teams into our country, etc.!
HOW DARE YOU FIGHT BACK WHEN WE TRY TO DESTROY YOU!
The US is destroying gas pipelines and Russian oil refineries/depots… all the while screeching about how Russia attacking Ukrainian energy infrastructure is an Act of War.
I have a feeling the rest of the world is getting pretty fucking sick of this shit.
Elon just put someone else in charge of Star ship management recently. Twitter and everything else is taking a toll on him. I still don’t know why he bought twitter.
Elon has apparently decided he needs to go to war with the Biden regime and that they will destroy any hope of going into space… lets wish him luck.
You might be right. That launch License for Starship has still not been issued.
Two reasons, at lest: it’s fun for him to “do what can’t be done” and, far more critically, Twitter is an IEW super weapon.
All the ideals about love and family that have been hammered into you since childhood are fairy tales that have very little to do with reality. A woman will never love a man the way he loves her. And for the existence of a stable happy family with a strong wise husband and a faithful caring wife, a huge complex social construct of patriarchal monogamy is needed, which no longer exists outside the third world, and even there it is on its last breath.
A woman is capable of giving birth at the most to one child a year, and the main task dictated by her instincts is to occupy this slot with the best genes available, and at the same time provide herself with food and security during pregnancy and feeding. In other words, the challenge is: for each gestation cycle, find a male that provides enough resources and that has the most attractive genes. And, generally speaking, it is not necessary that it be the same male. And certainly it does not have to be the same male for two different pregnancies: there is only one slot, and it is foolish not to take it with the best male available at that particular moment. Well, if it’s hard to choose, then you can always push such males with their foreheads, make your beloved fight for yourself and surrender to the winner.
Alas, this is not at all how society portrays female love to boys and young people who are eager to build relationships and a family with a girl – a pure and gentle creature, who will certainly remain faithful, striving to support her husband in sickness and health, and loving her husband just like he does. her, and even stronger. And if this is how you imagine a woman’s love, then I have bad news: she will never love you. At least, she will not fall in love in this understanding of love, because not only does it not correspond to female instincts (also known as the “call of the heartâ€, which women love to follow so much), it directly contradicts them.
Of course, there are examples where women demonstrate the behavior of a “correct wife” – fidelity and care for her husband. After all, not all marriages end in divorce. But you need to understand that such a wife follows, first of all, the rigid cultural attitudes hammered into her from early childhood. She does not act according to the will of her female heart, but contrary to it. That is why such behavior can be observed in third world countries. Do not expect such attitudes from young girls from “civilized” countries. Remember: a woman only acts within the framework that society sets for her. In a society that does not set limits for her, a woman will no longer be in them.
If children are important to you, then move to the country of the Philippines and stay there. Other requests, fortunately, are also quietly covered by paid services. People may argue that this is a “transactional” relationship, while they want a “real” relationship. I want the girl to truly love them, and not exchange a good attitude and sex for resources. Alas, as I have already painted, such female love does not exist. Absolutely any voluntary sexual relationship between a real living man and woman is transactional. Pure, sincere, selfless, unconditional love of a woman for a man exists only in anime. If you want it, then it is there that you should look for it.
Actually it is necessary that it be the same male. A woman cannot raise multiple children without substantial assistance, so the correct thing for her latest boyfriend to do, if he intends to stick around, which is to say marry her, is to kill her child by her previous lover.
Each additional child is a huge burden on the father, and he is not going to stick around for that burden if it is someone else’s child. He is going to dispose of that child, or else he is going to leave, in which case in the ancestral environment mother and both her children starve and/or get eaten by lions, or both her children get killed by her third lover.
The correct behavior is get rid of the previous lover’s child one way or another, and provide safety, food and shelter, for one’s own children and for the women who are bearing them.
Stable isotope levels in the bones indicate that up to twelve thousand years ago, all humans lived on an all meat diet, and as recently as three thousand years ago, Aryans still lived on an all meat and milk diet. Meaning that children were entirely dependent on the support of their fathers to survive. No father, then pretty soon no child.
Your explanation of why marriage is unstable is simply wrong.
Marriage is unstable because cooperate/cooperate is unstable to defect/cooperate, which is unstable to defect/defect, which is stable.
It is not in the individual interests of women and men to act in a way that is optimal for their joint interests. External coercion is required to impose cooperation on women. If women are forced into cooperation, then men will cooperate without much external coercion because the woman has their children as hostages.
The optimal behavior for a woman is to fuck the most alpha male around. But since all the other women will be fucking the same male, she is not going to get marriage and support from him.
So she has to be compelled, against her will to marry someone more appropriate, and to fuck him and only him whether she likes it or not. State, Church, society, and family have to back the authority of the husband, conditional on his willingness and ability to stick around and look after his wife and children. Which means that if the bride runs off with the wedding singer, the wedding singer has to be beaten to death in a public and humiliating fashion, and she has to be punished according to her husband’s will, and forced to stick around, assuming she survives the punishment.
If a woman is forever free to fuck someone more alpha than you, not much incentive to invest in her. So a woman cannot predict or control whether a man will invest in her, so might as well fuck the most alpha male around, without regard to the likelihood that she will receive investment. Which of course reduces the incentive for any man to invest.
Under these conditions, love is war, and all is fair in love and war. We get the game of players and bitches. Hard to reproduce under these conditions.
This is for those who want the group to survive, not for the woman herself. Women don’t care about the group they belong to. The woman stayed with only one man when she was forced to do so. This means that from an evolutionary point of view, there is no such thing as devotion and loyalty to a husband. And when power does not force her to be faithful, she will not be faithful.
A woman can create the appearance of loyalty, when society and the state forces her to pretend that she is a devotee, this does not follow from her inner motivation. If women’s “loyalty” ever had an internal character, we would not need a complex scheme of social engineering that forces a woman to be “loyal”. We don’t need a complex system of social engineering to make dogs loyal to us, because through the process of selection, mankind has chosen those dogs that have an inner drive to be loyal.
As for hostage children, a modern woman knows perfectly well that her children are protected by law and, in which case, she will be able to rely on social security from the pope-state, and the media gives her the false impression that she will also be able to find herself a two-meter anti-social guy on named Chad, who has just returned from a successful pirate raid and who will not be embarrassed by her thirty years and the presence of children from another man. Rather, now children are hostages for their fathers.
Given the stats also if not ending up physically attacking and killing her children. If female. Then he will be more apt to take the daughters of the single mother for himself.
Chad and Tyrone can father many children by many women, but they cannot feed and protect those children who, when EBT cards stop working, will be killed and eaten unless they’re female and old enough to fuck.
This implied threat of hunger and cannibalism is why laws against underage sex are weakly enforced in second-world countries and pretty much ignored in third-world countries. In the USA, many black and Latina women are in prison because she kept a man around by letting him fuck her daughter.
This is an incredibly gay post, full of blue pill and black pill landmines. Jim very comprehensively rebutted it, so I know I’m not really adding, but, just for gits and shiggles, I want to practice condensing Jimian Logic.
Marriage is a conspiracy by men against women to create optimal circumstances for successive generations more able to successfully capitalize on the trial and error of previous generations and avoid the need to reinvent the wheel every 20 years.
Monogamy is a social evolutionary adaptation that suppresses biological evolutionary tendencies to establish, maintain, and enhance cooperation between the full stack of male IQ and capability with a wide array of downstream consequences that make stable advanced society possible.
Monogamy is an attribute of patriarchy in effect while being a causal predicate of patriarchy. The system is circular, not linear, thus monogamy is simultaneously upstream and downstream from patriarchy.
Men that want “female love” have mommy issues and are looking for approval, literal pat by pseudo-mom. They are effeminate, weak and one step away removed from faggotry.
Any man who believes marriage is about love is gay, and also probably retarded. Marriage and virginity have always been about securing yourself an heir, a son, or several, to continue your legacy. Historically this is why men have sacrificed the most, their children are their better selves that project them into the future, the more time passes and the more the child demonstrates his potential the less the father cares about himself and ultimately will sacrifice just about anything for his son. And then his grandson.
That is how it usually was for the successful men that built our civilizations. The FF don’t get the best rep from Jim, but they were like this too, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLUbQRC07SA, the words come from actual records, notice the emphasis on the future and children.
The boomers are faggots, degenerates and get the pillow precisely because they’re the opposite and the reason why western civilization is collapsing at hyperspeed. This cucked garbage about marriage comes from them, just like the insane obsession with infertile sex. Do the Henry VIII and bog the barren whore.
A society that doesn’t care the most about its children has no future, it’s absolute garbage, that’s how clown world comes to be.
Agreed. I would like to add “fuck”, “yes”, and “this is the way.” hashtagforeverpillows
The husband wants his wife to invest herself in his children. The husband does not know if the wife will invest herself in children. Given the banal common sense and what kind of women men want to see as their wives (what men who want to invest in children want to see), we can conclude that women who show loyalty, modesty, caring and show what they love their husband and are faithful to their husband, are willing to invest more in children than women who do not. A wife who loves her husband will babysit his children instead of going to make new children with a neighbor while the husband is at work. Also, if the woman does not show it, the man, in turn, will have more energy to make sure that the woman does not sleep with a neighbor, or to make a spare child with that woman over there, instead of investing his energy in resources for children. Marriage will be much more fruitful for children when women love their husbands. Submission out of fear of hunger/shame/… is unstable and can collapse at any moment and be buried under it along with it.
Women are just not turned on unless they fear a man.
If a man fears another man, he will avoid him, or flee him, or drive him away, or kill him. The weakest man can kill the strongest, and if push comes to shove, is apt to do so. If a woman fears a man she will fuck him, serve him, and love him.
The Bible commands wives to obey and fear their husbands.
It commands husbands to cherish their wives. It nowhere commands wives to love their husbands.
Yes fear predicates tingles and a woman will love a man that she fears even more than the man’s own mother.
The love a wife will give a man is not different than the love a mother will give a son other than the sexual component, which is driven by fear.
Troubling study about permanent DNA damage from the jab. Reading the article, which describes the features the vax was provided with, gives the strong feeling that the jab was designed with to harm intentionally, and not accidentally. I felt a sense of dread reading the line below:
–
“It is therefore conceivable that such a
process could take place following mRNA vaccination, which would result in an infant whose cells would have the capability of synthesizing spike protein and whose immune system would view the spike protein as a self-protein, with unknown consequences.”
–
It perfectly fits with Jim’s theory that the main goal was child sacrifice rather than reducing the population.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365000462_Journal_of_Neurological_Disorders_Potential_Mechanisms_for_Human_Genome_Integration_of_Genetic_Code_from_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccination_Implications_for_Disease?_sg=cVWL5DXgtNrUl4CqWdIL5AdflRl3zO_xg_1O2w1YQLuITL-25wXofSaisLXZ93iuE2VE0N7UBOgjkqWWcgUOuzLDfqc
That would explain why those clots continue to develop long after the vaccine was injected. They continue to produce spike proteins causing the body to go insane trying to protect the arterial system. If babies start dying form these same sort of clots… then we’ll know.
Col. Macgregor doing an interview with some Polish journo/podcaster.
https://youtu.be/fAO4leg_-78
Interesting enough, but I share this specifically because Macgregor uses the term “uniparty,” making that the 3rd time in 10 days I’ve encountered it from a non-NRx/dissident right source/space. Haters and cowards can prattle at length; our intellectual frame is our greatest strength.
I believe Uniparty is a Conservative Treehouse/AceOfSpadesHQ thing originally going all the way back to the GW Bush years. The NRx is take Inner/Outer party which is closer to the truth, but hasn’t been memed much so far, probably because very few people actually read 1984.
The Uniparty take allowed for the conquest of the Right half of the Uniparty via primary voting, which really hasn’t been possible since they rigged it against Pat Buchanan. They rigged it against Trump as well, but he simply overwhelmed the limited rigging.
The primaries were odd this year as they tried to push fake MAGA candidates like Oz and then tossed on the breaks when real MAGA candidates started sweeping the primaries. They needed some MAGA people in order to show that they would always lose when they rigged the general election, but it going to be all MAGA candidates winning the primaries which freaked them out and turned on the fraud taps against them.
They didn’t need to rig it against Buchanan he just wasn’t that popular with Republicans at the time… Buchanan turned off the disaffected cynics he needed to win the primary with the moralfagging talk. But the rigging was limited at the time in any case as you said. Ron Paul had the same problem with lacking sufficient popularity. Ross Perot was genuinely popular when he ran but he should have run in the Republican primary he would have won.
The Trump of 2015 otoh (and I don’t consider Trump 7 years later to be the same man) knew how to work a crowd… but hes old now and the rigging is unlimited.
I’ve read pretty good evidence they switched votes to make sure Buchanan didn’t win because they were sure he’d lose the general election. Never again Goldwater was the idea. A more obvious case was McCain’s selection.
I’ve never been on the left in my life I agree that installing McCain as the nominee was just weird… nobody liked him. But I stand by my assertion that when Buchanan ran he just wasn’t that popular. The arguments of the Paleoconservatives was too much moral arguments and not enough about cost and benefit, profit and loss.
Perot could have won if he ran as a Republican Perot WAS genuinely very popular.
McCain winning screamed fraud. So much so that they tossed in Sarah Palin as a balm after McCain’s anal raping of the primary voters.
The FBI/CIA pulled out some blackmail on Perot. That’s the only way I can way I can explain his actions at the end.
The problem is he probably still wouldn’t have won as he was winning 3rd party sure he was threatened but he should have run in the Republican primary he would have been Trump 20 years earlier… at a time when maybe something of America could still be saved.
“Buchanan unpopular”
Was he, or were we just told he was, and without the full development of the internet we had no way of connecting and getting an accurate head count?
“Ross Perot’s actions at the end”
Very possible he was manic-depressive. Early success would coincide with a manic swing, mid-campaign dropout the depressive, then back into manic to try to win it but it wasn’t enough.
If there is anything to that it’s a shame, because if he’d had the ability to pick personnel I wouldn’t even have cared. Better timing and he might have got in. Or, they might have had to fraud hard earlier.
But then there’s his charge that the Bush campaign was planning to sabotage his daughter’s wedding. Which sounds like a strange hill to die on for either party, but could be the cover story for something else someone was threatening, or just hinting at. Bush was CIA, this was right on the cusp of the Clinton era (and bodycount)… things are weirder now, but I wonder now just how long assassination has been a tool of American politics.
I just dont remember any popular enthusiasm for Buchanan the way Trump and Perot had.
Here’s a quick rundown of the brush fires that have kicked off in the last few days. I am not posting this to idly chatter about news of the day (though I do find this stuff interesting), rather I hope others here point their radar in the direction of these conflicts so we can collectively add to, subtract from, and correct Jim’s thesis regarding Info Epoch Warfare.
-Turkey has initiated strikes against Kurdish bases and control nodes in Turkey and Syria
-Iran has initiated strikes against Kurdish bases and control nodes in Iran and Iraq
-Clashes between Afghanistan’s Taliban and Pakistan broke out along the border between the two nations
-Iran continues to face armed uprisings and attacks internally, mostly from Azeris (per media)
-US assets are in the line of fire, incidentally it appears, in both Syria and Iraq. For those less versed in the relevant International Relations field, the CIA and State Department has been instrumental in supporting the Peshmerga (a self defense entity) and the YPG (a sort of mercenary force for both offense and defense). These Kurdish entities are rhetorically leftist and often used as Yay Woman Strong Warrior propaganda.
-Malaysia is experiencing political turmoil due to their first hung parliament, and there is fear from the establishment regulars that supposedly pro-Taliban parties might gain the upper hand [I know it slips under the radar, but historically things done by the Cathedral in the US trickle out into regions where the NGO/nonprofit leviathan is most active; could be some “fortification” of elections in lots of places, so may be good to keep an eye out]
And in patriarchy whitepills news, watch this father of 7 return home in Russia after fighting for ~8 months: https://t.me/BrokenNews1/6454
Based
Normal levels of conflict escalating a bit as the hegemon’s grip weakens.
Iran and Turkey are the leading experts in drone warfare. As war continues, they will doubtless get better at it. Russia is buying Iranian drone expertise and technology – Russian drones built to Iranian designs.
Some elements of the Global American Empire want to fight and win. But, to actually fight and win, need to go all in on support for Elon Musk and purge women and coloreds from the tech teams. Which measures other elements of the Global American Empire are not keen on.
The Global American Empire is seeing increasing military disregard for its hegemony, and is reluctant to pitch in and fight directly. Prefers proxy war. Which as long as the provinces of the Global American Empire continue to import American inflation, it can continue to do.
Half of this (and you left out Armenia/Azeri) is the Turkey vs Iran matchup, with Ukraine lined up with Turkey and Russia lined up with Iran, and everybody on the anti-Iran side having seen that Russia cannot impose its will and therefore figuring now’s the time to act.
Failing hegemon indeed.
Nuts
Turkey is mending fences with Iran, and Iran/Turkey are jointly attacking US created and backed “Kurdish” militias.
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-722970
It is not that the enemies of Iran have been emboldened by Russia being bogged down in an unsuccessful war in the Ukraine, it is that the reluctant “allies” of America such as Turkey are feeling a weak hand on their reins, and are unworried about pissing off the Global American Empire.
Escalating violence in Iraq, similarly, since today’s Iraq is an American creation, a creation that is getting divided between Turkey and Iran.
splatterblaster [I think this guy is our DoD/DIA shill, btw… he is fond of handles based on a current topic], do you actually view any of the “other side’s” reportage on UKR and elsewhere? I notice that you GAE shills are always very up to date on the GAE side of things, but you have a strange blindness to anything else.
For instance, why is the AFU not fully occupying Kherson on the right bank? Wouldn’t a confident, capable, fully provisioned, and aggressive force on the offensive be quickly and merrily occupying and fortifying a recently vacated point of defense? Or is Kherson only important defensive node when the RF needs it, and is otherwise worthless for anyone else?
Why is the RF still using the Black Sea Fleet for missile strikes against Ruthenia? They lost the crown jewel of the fleet, then were disgraced by autonomous sea drones, so shouldn’t they be incapable of this tactical option?
How is it that Russia fires 90 missiles, Ukraine intercepts 70 missiles, and 35 targets get hit by missiles? Does the RF have some magic missile capable of hitting 2 targets separated by many kilometers?
If the RF is failing, why has the AFU stopped taking territory? As well, how is it that the RF can fire roughly 3x as many shells per day as the AFU and not deplete its stocks?
Why are the superior and unstoppable HIMARS not used in conjunction with each other, instead of being used for snapshots on individual targets before being rapidly moved to a different location?
When is the RF goin to run out of cruise missiles?
If Iran is opposed to Turkey, why aren’t their airstrikes overlapping, much less pointed at each other? Why are their fire missions jointly supportive?
Here in the real world, I still cannot use crypto to buy my groceries or fill my gas tank or pay my property taxes or settle a debt with a neighbor. A couple of jars of honey, sure, they’ll take that. Crypto? Haha, that’s funny. That was the reaction.
Crypto is still not money.
Not “here in the real world”
In your (and my) parts of the real world you cannot use crypto currency to buy gas or groceries. But in other parts of the real world, you can.
And right now I can, and do, use crypto currency to lease servers in data centers, buy and sell domain names, and buy computer hardware to build servers to run inhouse.
I can buy stuff with crypto currency that would be difficult or dangerous to buy with fiat money.
The legal hazards and difficulties of moving money between countries grow ever more complex, with the result that we are increasingly seeing big transactions performed by couriers flying around with small but strangely heavy carryon bags chained to their wrists. Moving fiat money between countries grows ever more dangerous, which is why international sales are moving to crypto currency. (As well as those strangely heavy carryon bags)