The white race is the youngest and newest of the races, originating about ten thousand years ago.
Blacks are in fact a very diverse set of races, some of them considerably superior to other black races – same skin color, different physical and psychological features.
About sixty or seventy thousand years ago, a very small black tribe or large family with the outward urge characteristic of modern whites left subsaharan Africa, and headed out into Europe, expanded, eventually exterminating previous races in the region. Sea levels were lower then, and they had impressive seagoing ability, they island hopped all the way to Australia, where they failed to exterminate a different race with which they could not interbreed, but replaced them over most of Australia. Small and diminishing populations of older races remained here and there throughout the world.
They were, however, still black. Probably a better quality of black, but still black. Pretty much everyone still around was black or brown.
About twelve thousand years, the climate started getting nicer, and northern Africa, now a desert, became wet. Agriculture started in Northern Africa, consisting of patriarchal groups united by descent in the male line owning property. There was also a people focused on fishing, sea travel, and shellfish gathering, but they disappeared and the survivors were assimilated into the grain farmers when the oceans rose ten thousand years ago. To establish security of property over larger groups, more capable of defending that land, priesthoods developed. These people were brown, dark eyed, and dark haired. More or less the same people as modern middle easterners. In Europe, brown skinned largely blue eyed people, with a various hair colors hunted and gathered.
The middle eastern agriculturists rolled into Europe, displacing, replacing, and exterminating the hunter gatherers.
Inland of Europe, Eastern Europe, the pontic steppes, the hunter gatherers were advancing their technology of clothing, housing, and food storage to deal with very harsh winters. Which means that being nomadic they needed to transport more stuff, which was a problem. They were becoming herders, rather than hunters, and they made their domesticated horses, still too small to carry men, pull wagons, which enabled them to create and keep more stuff.
And in Eastern Europe, the farmers ran into nomadic herders that were too technologically advanced to exterminate and replace. So, to make peace, they traded hostages and women, an event recorded in the Norse legends of the Æsir and the Vanir. These guys were ancestor worshipers, and at least some of the Norse Gods were remembered as originally human ancestors all the way to the beginning of recorded history. The conflict is also remembered as Cain murdering Abel.
The mingled race evolved into whites, among them the Aryan race. The Aryan race, organized patriarchally and aristocratically, equipped with copper weapons and horse drawn chariots, expanded westwards into Europe, killing the men and marrying the women, replacing and mingling with middle eastern grain farmers, and South East into India, where they failed to do such a thorough job of upgrading the locals. The locals in Europe and India had priestly organization, rather than aristocratic. The Aryans in Europe rubbed out that priestly organization, and mostly replaced their demon Gods with the Aryan ancestor Gods. In the middle east, Aryans ruled, but failed to have large biological impact. Nomadic patriarchalists, probably originally Aryan, also worshipped the one God. Hard to know if this was part of the original Aryan faith, or they picked it up somewhere along the way. “The ancient city” plausibly speculates that it was original, and presents suggestive evidence supporting that thesis. Organizing under Kings and priests, the descendants of the Aryans created Bronze Age civilization. In the middle east, failed however to have a very large biological impact, though they ruled the place. In India, the demon gods of the locals survived more successfully, and entered the Aryan religion more extensively.
In Europe and the Middle East, and to a lesser extent India, Bronze Age civilization went decadent, failing to reproduce, with high levels of infanticide, demon worship, and human sacrifice. Without Kings, property rights in land and cattle was only practical under patriarchal organization, but with Kings, emancipation becomes all too possible, and in the latter days of Bronze Age civilization we see Kingship running in the female line, which suggests that the male line had become uncertain. In the collapse of Bronze Age civilization was overrun by peoples who preserved the original precivilized Aryan ways, though some of those peoples may have mingled extensively with lesser races in their travels, perhaps largely as a result of abducting women.
Because of the collapse of trade, they had to use iron, and did not have furnaces hot enough to melt it. So they made bloom iron from very high grade iron ore, which no longer exists anywhere except in very tiny amounts. Bloom iron you have to heat and hammer, and heat and hammer some more, like kneading bread dough, for a very long time before it becomes a useful material. And if you use the kind of iron ore that still exists today, no amount of heating and hammering is going to produce a useful material, because there are too many non metallic impurities in the bloom. To get useful iron from the kind of iron ore that still exists today, have to heat it hot enough for the iron to melt, and thus separate from the non metallic impurities.
Indra is the same ancestor as Zeus, Thor,and Jupiter, whom at least some of the Saga period icelanders recalled as an originally human ancestor living somewhere near the Pontic steppes.
So it is fair to say that the white race started with Thor.
European energy prices are reaching absolutely insane levels.
I cannot fathom how we tolerate this. How are people not going nuts?
Europeans are going broke. Why should they be going nuts?
Meanwhile, in father Russia***:
https://t.me/topwar_official/55203
***I don’t into Slavic, this could be Ohio for all I know. For all you 3000 and Late boomers out there who don’t Telegram, it’s some band doing a show outside a prison/refugee camp, and a KA-52 Alligator does the coolest little flyby. Russia is lit af fr fr no cap gas the bikes, race more now.***
This blog often has predictions regarding major events so I’d be interested if Jim makes one regarding the big freeze. Will grandma die shivering? Will negroes be rioting and eating whitey? I’ve already decided to visit Asia over the winter and to watch these events from afar
Yes to both. The left causing shortages the kill people is a universal, migrants already have annual car burnings and American occupation troops insure that the puppet states will follow this until the end.
I outline my thoughts on how the “conflict” might go, and I stand by it, but I also wonder at how willing and able regional elites will be to forestall real, systemic collapses. We could see a strange duality, wherein some states and regions are in a no-shit collapse while others continue to keep scrolling through life, watching it breakdown but not actively participating in it or suffering from it. I do think Europe is in for very rough times, but I am not so sure about America. I vacillate almost daily, depending on my physical environs and the media. Sometimes, it feels like we’re one habbening away from a shooting war, and the next day, it seems as if we’ll do nothing and like it. The wild card is East Asia; the population pressure has a staggering fragility given the density and geographic reality. In Australia, there’s nowhere to flee to. China is largely a desert, with something like 20+ megacities. Singapore is completely reliant on the “world outside” being stable, Indonesia is incapable of autarky. The bigger concern there, IMO, would be climatic or geological cataclysm. I don’t think there are that many realistic bolt holes out there, but I could be way off on my assessment of EA.
Fuel and power in Europe is in radical crisis. Cannot operate modern western civilization without lots of power. They are going to go backwards fast and lie about, as we have been going backwards slowly and lying about it. The short term solution is switching to oil and liquified natural gas. The real long term solution is nuclear, but we have no nuclear Musk, nor would one be allowed because Musk can get away with his rockets exploding, but no one is going to get away with his nuclear power plants exploding.
I think that to have good nuclear reactors, we are going to need to run them on drone ships, or better, drone subs, and accept the occasional catastrophe with early models at sea. The ocean is vast, and a nuclear reactor melting down and dumping hot fresh radioactive waste is going to imperceptible. To get good, cheap, safe nuclear reactors, We need a Musk or a Wernher von Braun, and a Musk or a Wernher von Braun is going to blow stuff up.
OK, that makes sense in terms of rapid development, but why not just aim at cutting enviro-bullshit and focus on Gen03 reactors to carry baseload while literally offshoring Thorium-Salt research? The days of the USA being the only place to do cutting edge stuff are over. I know there’s still a lot of resources, but the US market and intellectual infrastructure are no longer exceptional.
I feel like it is almost entirely political in nature. A handful of billionaires could put together an endowment and aim it at rising engineers. If/when enviro-niggers start nogging, just say “K thx bye” and go to Russia.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYcMUdmtJe6tet8c1wLzLjW8-PN1HkNtL
If you gave me the budget for a good editor, I could cut you a promo from that playlist alone (I *might* dig up some footage from /pol/ for flavor as well) that could start building a movement around a theme like “cut the shit, solve the problem, no excuses.” I am not minimizing the complexity of the actual issue, that being Gen04+ reactors (cheap, portable, scalable), but all the pieces are in existence, this wouldn’t be a moonshot.
I know it isn’t going to happen, but it is more like IEW in that as soon as someone makes a move, it will be off to the races. Nuclear energy is as close to a magic bullet as you can get.
Tangent: anyone want to make a wager that ITER postpones their 2025 “””deadline”””? lol
Of course it is entirely political in nature. The problem is that you if you are trying to make a good cheap efficient reactor, you will get a horde of moron bureaucrats breathing down your neck. Not to mention a political environment where atoms are evil, and the slightest trace of radioactivity is deemed an enormous catastrophe. (Chernobyl killed approximately nine people outside the reactor fence. In a sane society, would not have made page one.) If we had smart bureaucrats who actually understood what was going on, it would be easier, but still quite difficult. The only way to make it substantially less difficult is to allow the developer to blow stuff up.
ITER could not make a pizza oven. But there are some good solutions that have been found in theory, the field reversed configuration, and people are attempting to implement them in practice with private money. With type two superconductors, and the field reversed configuration, a fusion reactor of reasonable size and cost is in theory practical.
with the Tokamak type reactor, and type one superconductors, a fusion reactor is impractically huge, requiring enormous expenditures, and the resulting army of moronic science bureaucrats with transdisplinary degrees in science administration.
How does allowing the developer to blow stuff up make it less difficult? I am not disagreeing, I don’t understand.
Is the Gen04+ endeavor conducive to a “secret project” style approach? AQ Khan just smuggled plans IIRC, but the bombs still had to be built, ditto for Best Korea. Theoretically, could a cabal of wealthy men with a power patron make substantial leaps under secrecy, or is the footprint just too big? David Hahn* comes to mind, though I know he wasn’t trying to build a thorium salt pocket reactor.
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hahn
A breeder reactor is a controlled nuclear bomb, as a space rocket is a very big missile. The developer needs to be able to make potential nuclear bombs without needing to explain to an army of moron bureaucrats.
A reactor is not really much like a nuclear bomb (usually), and it shouldn’t be all that hard to prevent them from actually blowing up, but there is plenty of opportunity for small amounts of radiation to escape, and proving that none of it will escape to a bureaucrat’s satisfaction is very hard. Plus, if even a harmless amount does escape you’ll likely be forced to shut down. If they didn’t have to preemptively prove things to bureaucrats and were only shut down for leaks large enough to likely be actually harmful, making a reactor would be much easier and cheaper.
On the other hand, a breeder reactor can also produce materials for a bomb. This is an actual real danger, unlike the leaks/waste issue. Some of the new designs may allow online reprocessing, or even include online reprocessing by default, where some of the liquid core material is drawn out to chemically extract certain elements (e.g. Protactinium, Neptunium) before they decay into the final fissile material (e.g. Uranium-233, Plutonium-239). This can enable acquiring the fissile isotope in higher purity than usual and without the need for isotopic separation.
Recently there were news articles about Lawrence Livermore achieving fusion “ignition”. It was not until further in the article that they said this was achieved with “Tritium”! I was like “WTF?” Everybody knows you can achieve ignition with Tritium. But this is not a viable fuel.
Molten salt reactors are already “melted down”. The reactor operates at atmospheric pressure and runs much hotter than today’s pressurized water reactors, allowing for much more efficient steam turbines. If it overheats it drains into a big heat sinked container in the ground, which can be pumped back later. The fuel can be dynamically refreshed (like the chemicals in photoprocessing machines) without having to shutdown the reactor. Early prototypes were demonstrated. Nixon kill the program because the technology was not conducive to producing bomb fuel.
Running fertile Thorium in molten salt reactors provides for thousands of years of fuel supply.
Actually effectively infinite times, since with breeder reactors, we mine lower grade ores all the way down to ordinary rock. There is also uranium and thorium in oceans, at concentrations that are very low, but high enough to be extracted at very high return on energy expended, and the fissionables in the oceans are continually being replenished by erosion from land, and continually being depleted by burial in the mud of the ocean floor, at a rate that is very high compared to our current energy production and consumption.
No need to even use the oceans any time in the next 1000 years. US has literal mountains of already mined rare earths that have been piled up as ‘waste byproduct’ of other mining operations. Those rare earths contain huge amounts of thorium and uranium. Due to EPA and nuclear regulations we can’t use those readily available rare earths or nuclear fuels.
Get rid of EPA/nuclear regulations and US becomes top exporter of both.
Welcome to the 21st century, where the big problems are solved and the small problems will kill us all.
https://youtu.be/tyDbq5HRs0o
Fs in the chat for white boi century, bros.
You are teaching your grandmother to suck eggs.
Yes, we know in theory how to make the reactor completely safe. That and it actually being completely safe becomes complex when it is operated at high power and fast breed times. The salt is already molten, but we do not want its containment and controls to melt. Musk’s rocket engines are always on the verge of melting, and frequently do melt. We want the reactor to run on the verge of melting.
… you don’t know anything about nuclear reactors. At ALL.
They are dead bang simple. The designs are public. There’s probably minor iterative improvements that could be made but all the key problems (for fission) are solved. The problem is regulatory approval and supplying/handling the radioactives. That’s what raises the costs and timeframes out of plausibility.
Thorium reactors are the only non-fusion generator technology that requires research and experimentation. Thorium cannot explode. Which is why that technology was put aside back in the 1950s for a focus on dual-use uranium and/or plutonium.
Making smaller bombs with smaller amounts of nuclear material is also an avenue of possible research. They had gotten them surprisingly small already in the 1970s. For obvious terrorist-potential reasons, there is zero chance of this getting government approval outside of a carefully controlled military environment.
No Musk is needed. Government action – or removal of government restriction – is the only thing needed and the only thing that will make any dfference.
Putting experimental nuclear reactors on ships is the stupidest idea I have ever seen on this blog. The last thing you want is to put potential radioactive contamination into ocean currents. On The Beach was bad fiction and bad science but that’s one of the few things that might manage a 1% echo of that plotline.
Please recognize that you have your limitations and knowledge gaps and you should respect them.
You fail to grasp the vastness of the ocean and the relative smallness of anything humans can make.
We could detonate ten thousand nukes in the ocean, and if deep enough that radioactives did not enter the atmosphere, the effect would be utterly insignificant. Not withstanding all the bullshit you have heard about radioactive fish.
The Russians, for a very long time, dumped most of their radioactive waste in liquid form in Vladivostok harbor. This had no noticeable consequences, though today it would be deemed an unimaginably horrific nuclear catastrophe.
They did have nuclear waste catastrophes, the big one being when an explosion blasted nuclear waste into the atmosphere, and it rained down on the surrounding villages. But when waste gets into the ocean, most of it winds up far enough down that the radiation cannot reach anything anyone cares about, because water is a pretty good radiation shield. Vladivostok harbor is deep, and is connected to the ocean, which is considerably deeper. On the other hand, when it gets into air, no shielding, and winds up on surfaces close to people, and food that people eat.
Vladivostok harbor, let alone the oceans, is big enough to hold the products of a few major reactor meltdowns without anyone noticing any harmful effects.
Two thoughts come to mind:
You get less radiation swimming in the containment pool (top ~10 feet) than you do from background radiation and flying @ 35K feet; the oceans are mostly empty, with the vast majority of life on the fringes and centered on hot spots in trenches.
It’s fascinating to see how deeply the enviro-nigger propaganda campaign has twisted the minds of my fellow midwits. The paper straw phenomenon; I saw a picture/video clip, and now I must whiteknight the oceans from muh toxic waste. Fucking pathetic. Scroll through the comments on any Sea Dragon video on YT to get a feel for how abysmally stupid common knowledge is on the subject of sea life.
The more important issue with the drone sub reactor idea is how to get the power to land, right? And where do you put the steam turbines?
I figured that you would do testing in submarine drones, and just dump the power and heat in the oceans, and when you had a reactor that operated in practice the way you expected it to do in theory, then you would build the same reactors on land. When the time came around that you had to deal with the army of meddlesome bureaucrats, you would have some subs that had been tootling around in the ocean for a long time without any drama.
The confidence of ignorance and stupidity. Dunning Kruger effect.
Reactors are only simple in the sense that the sense that rocket engines are dead bang simple. Anyone can build a rocket that will fly up a few hundred meters, and anyone with a few million dollars can build a reactor capable of running his hot water system for a few years.
For a reactor to be a useful source of power, you want it to operate for a very long time at very high temperatures and very high power levels.
Building stuff that can operate for a long time in a high temperature, intensely radioactive environment is not at all simple. Most materials fall apart quickly, and all materials undergo substantial change, which the design has to allow for.
For the reactor to be economic, you want the temperature to be as high as possible, and the radioactivity as intense as possible, just as Musk wants his rocket engines to operate at the highest possible pressures and temperatures. Which means an efficient rocket engine is always on the edge of melting down or blowing up, and an economical reactor is always on the edge of suffering disintegration of its internal structures.
It is indeed easy to build a reactor if you operate it only for a short time at low temperatures and low power levels. But for the reactor to be an economic source of power, you want the highest possible temperature, and the highest possible power density, which means the highest possible radiation experienced by its internal components. Which means that everything inside the reactor is being transformed by radiation right to the edge of failing.
This may be a dumb question, but can you “zerg rush” the issue and build many low temp/low level IF they are cheap and small (say, shipping container size)?
The world climate has been getting milder and more pleasant for two centuries. It will likely continue to do so. Arctic ice is currently tracking its 2007-2018 average, which warm period, and is likely to continue to do so. We had a bit of a cool period from 2019 to 2021, looks like we are back on trend. Expect announcements that the glaciers will be gone and the Northwest passage open real soon now. (The glaciers will not be gone, and the Northwest passage will remain a chancy passage that you can sometimes get through at the right time of year, but is likely to leave you stuck in ice impassable to icebreakers.)
Hmm. I am in the other camp, I think cooling is the larger trend, and I think WW03 will kick it off. But I base this on nothing more than my overwhelming sense of impending doom. Actually, global cooling is rampant optimism, isn’t it? A mini-Ice Age would be a godsend for Whites and Perennialists.
My source regarding the coming deep freeze is that Western Europe celebrates LGBT and attempts to expand this deeply-held value onto Russia, and God in response will allow a bit of temperature variation at the opportune moment
Sounds right.
They should run a MSTR (molten salt thorium reactor) pipeline 100 meters underwater along the northwest passage, creating a shipping canal in the ice from the heat generated.
Well known group of right-wing conservatives, Joseph Biden’s handlers, implement policy plan of well known right wing conservative, Anonymous Fake; extract infinity money from taxpayers and reportion it to the whig priesthood, so called ‘student loan debt forgiveness’.
As soon as we get a social credit system that [As usual, Anonymous fake attributes right wing consequences to radical left programs.]
Government loans aren’t created from taxes. They’re created from nothing. The money from the loan did not exist prior to the loan.
Yeah but the debt is in the taxpayers name the govt debited us credited them and since those loans were govt backed they also un debited themselves in as much as they won’t have to take blame for defaults soon they can just take credit for the forgiveness
Sure, it’s in the taxpayer’s name…
But who is the taxpayer?
Think about it.
You think they’re ‘forgiving’ the loans by nullifying them? Lol. Lmao.
They’re ‘forgiving’ them taking your money to pay them off.
[*nonsense shill economics deleted*]
Your masters think we are stupid.
[Moronic disinformation about money deleted yet again*]
Your bullshit is an effort to distract us from the fact that the fed continues to create quite a lot of money, though it is attempting to slow down.
Moronic disinformation, huh?
Interesting. Because I’m pretty sure all I wrote was some leading questions.
[•moronic leading questions leading to enemy disinformation deleted yet again•]
Your leading questions lead to the Real Bills doctine, and the answer you are fishing for is that the fed is honestly following the real bills doctrine – that we have debt based money.
We do not debt based money. We have fiat money. The government just prints up some more money for itself, its friends and relations, and their friends and relations whenever the fancy takes it.
The fed has never obeyed the the real bills doctrine, and the 1920’s pretence that it was debt based money, was an enormous Jewish scam in which a bunch of Jewish bankers scammed a whole lot of goys for a whole lot of money and land.
And, ever since then, ever since 1930, if someone is shilling the Real Bills doctrine, aka “debt based money”, it’s always a Jew shilling it. No one else ever shills that one.
We do not have debt based money. We have fiat money and every so often a bunch of Jews who are ahead of us in the lineup for freshly printed sacks of fresh government money tell us goys that it’s debt based money.
[*talmudism deleted on sight*]
Talmudic discourse does not work on us. Instead of us having to explain your own ingeniously over complicated doctrines to you, you have to respond to our clear and simple explanation of where money comes from.
We say fiat money is conjured out of thin air by the state, to give to its buddies. That is what the “fiat” in fiat money means.
If you don’t like that answer, you have to explain what is wrong with our answer. We do not have to explain your answer, let alone explain what is right with your answer.
I do not have to explain what is wrong with your answer, because you did not give your answer. Instead you asked a pile of leading questions that are intended to lead to the person answering those questions into giving a theory of debt and money that enabled a bunch of nineteen twenties Jewish bankers to swindle a big bunch of nineteen twenties Goy businessmen and workers.
I don’t have to explain what is wrong with those answers, the answers your leading questions lead to, because I did not give those answers and you did not give those answers, but that they were very very wrong answers became devastatingly obvious in 1930.
Those answers are a pile of overcomplicated shifty and shifting lies that was conjured up in the 1920s by Jews to scam goys, and no one will ever be able to explain it to your satisfaction because it slips and shifts under pressure, and because each complication is connected to several additional complications.
Talmudism is not smart and learned. It is stupid and ignorant, and when I see it in the comments, I feel the same way as I do when a guest misses the toilet.
I repeatedly try to help you with knowledge you could use right now and you repeatedly spit in my face.
Did you at least look into the marital estate statutory trust, you absolute blithering faggot?
Did not need to look it up. I already know what it is, and already know that you are using legal language in an incoherent, incorrect and nonsensical way.
You are a shill and an entryist, but you are not an enemy political entryist from the government – you are here to sell entirely worthless legal services. You guys used to be big business on the internet a very long time ago, but I had not heard from you in a very long time, and I forgot that you existed.
Some commenter reminded me, and I recollected, and then I forgot all over again.
And that is why shill tests designed to detect glowies fail. You are not a glowie, not a government entryist. Yet you are also pushing government scripts. Maybe you are moonlighting, and unable to pass glowie tests when doing your day job for the government, and able to pass them when doing your night job for the legal scammers.
>I already know that you are using legal language in an incoherent, incorrect and nonsensical way.
Lol. Lmao, even.
How many thousands of hours have you spent reading American Jurisprudence?
One does not have to read for very long to know that you have read it even less.
Jim knows the law in practice better than many lawyers since by his own admission he regularly commits stuff (blue collar crime only with women though) that is blatantly illegal or on the edge of the law.
I’m forever seeking learning so you’re welcome to point out my errors of legal reasoning.
There is no legal reasoning for there to be any errors. Just word salad of unrelated legal terms. You are going through the motions of communicating, with no actual intent to communicate anything.
Really Stupid is that pseudo-lawyer Trex Sex from awhile back.
Maybe we should institute some hazing policies for newfags, something demeaning and tedious. If they want to stay and talk, they have to earn it. Newfucks should also be forced to give an explicit reason for commenting, and this reason will be held against them at a later date if it is shown to be false.
>There is no legal reasoning for there to be any errors. Just word salad of unrelated legal terms. You are going through the motions of communicating, with no actual intent to communicate anything.
Describe the word salad, then.
A juxtaposition of “cheque” and “draft” and “bill”?
Do you claim that those are not related terms in law, or are you just retarded?
The word salad was marital estate etc.
The juxtaposition of cheque, draft, and bill, was an ignorant and stupid reference to the real bills doctrine, which was itself rather random the reference was random, but the juxtaposition was not.
Thing is, you use random legalisms to impress, not to convey information – but to the extent that those random legalisms make any sense, what they reveal is to me is that I, who know very little about the law, know immensely more than you do.
[*impressive sounding legal word salad explained with more word salad*]
When you are in a hole, stop digging.
Lol.
Jim: “I erred. Sorry.”
https://blog.reaction.la/economics/sanctions-and-crypto-currency/#comment-2826638
And as soon as I said that you enthusiasticly resumed selling sovereign citizen scams, revealing that I didn’t err, I was right the first time.
Sovereign citizens are midwit proles who barely read and can barely read.
I only “sell” what I can cite in law books, judicial opinions, or acts.
Be honest: had you even heard of American Jurisprudence before I named it?
So far your cites have been curiously random, irrelevant, and meaningless.
“that we have debt based money.”
But is not that true? Yes the fed print money
But the banks will issue debt based money.
Yes, the banks in theory issue debt based money.
And if the fed’s money was debt based, or it was fixed amount, and the changes in the money supply were bank issue of debt based money, that would matter. But because they borrow largely from the fed, and lend largely to the fed, that the banks issue debt based money is merely a complicated accounting fiction.
Debt based money can only work with a sovereign who ensures that debts are paid, which we do not actually have, and ensures dire and immediate consequences for financiers whose term transformation fails, which we do not have.
To make debt based money work, the Sovereign needs to hang some bankers from time to time, but bankers are always well connected people, so it never happens. Even when you in theory have extremely harsh laws against term transformation defaults.
For debt based money to work, the Sovereign needs to monitor term transformation, and from time to time start a small liquidity crisis by letting it be known that he disapproves of some term transformation activity. If the financier cannot fulfil his term transformation promises in the resulting crisis, something dire needs to happen to him. This is like deliberately starting burnoff forest fires in winter to avoid gigantic forest fires in summer. Because if you do not keep term transformation in check, and you have debt based liquidity, there will eventually be a great big crisis, and it is harder to hang all the bankers than just one banker. They all cry “not our fault, all the respectable expert people were doing what we were doing, we were following the respectable crowd”. And they were. Irresponsible term transformation is irresistible, except by the Sovereign, and it is quite hard for the Sovereign to tell the difference between the kind of term transformation that he needs to hang a few bankers for from time to time, and the kind of term transformation that will make the economy function smoothly and pleasantly. He will face no end of clever financiers doing clever three card monte to obfuscate the difference, hide it from their customers, from the sovereign, and from themselves, and the only way to reveal the difference is to deliberately start small liquidity crisis from time to time by putting out the word and seeing what happens. If a great big disastrous liquidity crisis ensues, you had irresponsible term transformation.
You previously (months ago) censored me for my support of term transformation theory, you absolute nigger faggot.
I censored you to defend rectification of names. You were deliberately or inadvertently changing the meaning of important words in ways that make dangerous thoughts inexpressible.
Considering how rarely you have a sovereign who is able in economic and have the will and power to hang bankers
term transformation fails happened continuously in history.
Was the banning of usury an attempt at solving this problem?
Possibly, but that is not the theological justification.
The problem, rather is someone with short time preference enslaving himself by small degrees.
Manifest today in some kid not old enough to drink, vote, drive, or own a gun signing up for impossible debt for a worthless education.
That said, the traditional Christian and Muslim ban on usury is finely tuned to be economically efficient, more efficient than today’s system because it discourages bankers from lending to idiots in a housing bubble, while the Old Testament ban is so inefficient and poorly tuned that stuff kept going wrong and it was never actually followed.
>I censored you to defend rectification of names. You were deliberately or inadvertently changing the meaning of important words in ways that make dangerous thoughts inexpressible.
By Allah, you are such a vexatious homosexualist dog.
You don’t belong here. You should seek dialogue, kinship, a soapbox, or whatever you are chasing elsewhere.
“Tranny Lover Kike Slut” has a lot of problems that can be fixed with a knife slash across his cum-stained throat.
hmm… maybe I should have gone with “Troon Licker and Kike Shitstain”.
Inflation is a tax on everyone who has dollars; hence taxpayers since those reliant on government handouts don’t have savings.
Inflation is a tax on wage-earners, employees, “people” who trade their time, focus, energy and life-force for money (or “money”).
Inflation isn’t a tax on the property-owning class (investors, capitalists, entrepreneurs, etc.) because the depreciation of their cash-on-hand is compensated several times over by the appreciation of the value of their income-generating assets.
Those reliant on government handouts are irrelevant. They’re paid a pittance not to revolt, and their payments are spent immediately, and in support of the value of Walmart-class stocks.
This is what Vox Day is saying, that the student debt write off is deflationary. I don’t know enough to know whether he’s right, but I doubt he is.
I do know enough.
The idea that it is deflationary is idiotic.
It would be funny if you dabbed on him in his Gab thread. Funny for the peanut gallery, but probably ineffective at generating dialogue, since he’d ignore it.
Why is Vox so bad at math shit (this, evolution, the list goes on)? He must be incredibly verbally loaded if his own IQ claims are correct, and unable to identify his own blind spots as a result — maybe out of pride.
Vox is not all that smart. But he has artistic talent while I have none, he is one of the good guys, and his work on fighting the comicsgate battle, and his works on “social justice warriors” are a great contribution to the movement.
His sociosexual hierarchy, however is a painful effort to rationalize the purple pill. The heroes in his stories meet action girl and go beta.
For it to be deflationary
-the debt would have to be defaulted, not paid
-the debt would have to be currently used similar to fractional reserve banking
-everyone involved in this would have to be honest and not just go to the central bank when money disappeared.
None of those are true.
I dont understand how he has a blind spot to this, all the bad eggs will get payed and that will be inflationary, i disagree that the debt must be user like fractional reserve banking, 100 dollars exist, loans are made totaling 200 dollars, deflationary spiral plus bankruptcy happens as a result until insolvent business are destroyed and their debts forgotten cash supply shrinks prices go up then things normalize
I apologize if this comes off as pedantic faggotry, but I don’t understand what you are saying because you have no punctuation or capitalization.
I’m only saying this because I am trying to understand, and I am really bad with financial logic. Deflationary means reducing, or causing a reduction in the money supply per the internet. It is fair to say that one of the biggest impending issues for FedGov is the money supply on-shoring after years of the vast majority of dollary-doos being held overseas, right (I read somewhere it was ~90%… but I also read somewhere that something like 2/3rds of all money printed has been done so since 2020; I have no idea if these things are true)? The loan forgiveness isn’t deflationary because the loans were made from not-money handed out by the money printer, so they are just electing to not collect worthless paper they never really printed, right?
I have been on a roll with suggesting retarded things so, here goes: would there be any political or financial benefit to “some guy” pulling a Joker-from-Dark-Knight and just acquiring as much paper currency as possible, by any means, and destroying it? Like, offensive tactical deflation?
Sorry about the bad punctuation I was writing on a phone, I’m no expert on economics but I think the “experts” on economics are regime shills. All old economic theory makes good mathematical sense, the new stuff including some Chicago school material is shit, they get away with it because the economy has been growing and paper money and fractional reserve banking has not caused an implosion of the currencies, as goods have been getting less expensive. On your first several points the answer is yes and no, there is no one currency problem, but many, all of which are slightly different, there is the onshoring problem, there is also the usual inner party inflation hangover, banks and connected “investors” we’ll call the investor class have been getting massive inflation subsidies directly from the fed and from fractional reserve multiplication, which is why luxury goods like houses, old cars and watches have been absurdly expensive for at least the last decade, the wealthy don’t purchase consumer goods as a significant portion of their expenses, so it takes time for inflation to travel through several businesses and persons to hit the street, that is the big problem right now, the investor class inflation is hitting, the rest of the world uses US debt as a hedge because we are StableTM and so probably they won’t onshore their Oil-Cash, Trade-Cash, and dump US debt, until inflation bites here first. The inflation trickling down is bad, the onshoring will be worse, and the government… well we don’t talk about what the abyss will do in crisis. Deflation is when the value of currency goes up because of more goods at lower prices, or money supply shrinking. There are a bunch of different money supplies and financial markets, but that’s all bullshit, they bleed into each other, they are like different industries, they have unique trends but they all affect one another and are tied together. I have been trying to understand WTF vox is talking about, he’s usually good on economics but he hasn’t laid out a compelling case that the factors here are deflationary. I am working on my own analysis and will post it here tomorrow. If debts are paid(without printing) it is somewhat deflationary short term because the sum owed is larger than the sum lent, and theoretically the party paid won’t immediately put the money back in circulation including fractional reserve multiplication. But if the money to pay it is printed(either at the lending or to pay of the lenders) then it is not obvious to me it is deflationary, although there may be an argument that it’s less inflationary then leaving the loans unpaid and the banks getting the principle plus lots of usurious interest, and then doing their fractional reserve fuckery with the sums? It is irrelevant at the end of the day because the monetary affect will be a drop of water in the ocean of our DiverseTM ExpertTM regime’s financial incontinence. Vox’s bigger point is that global debt exceeds global money supply by an absurd margin, so if debts begin to default like dominos, the only way to stop a deflationary spiral will be to bail out the entire global financial system, for some reason he doesn’t consider the last part at all, let alone likely. I think it will happen if we have a financial market collapse and you will own nothing and be happy. On your last part, it would be an act of acceleration giving the regime an excuse to grow, the money will just be replaced by printer go brrrr, and politically idk, I suppose if it was regime money and not your own then it would be an accelerant. The regime has a wrecker mentality so all events will affect an increase in tyranny roughly proportional to their mass cultural significance, until the singularity or strongman. You can’t offensively tactically deflate shit because you would never have enough currency to do it, that is, if you were trying to possess the currency yourself, if you are just trying to deny the regime an instrument of power, sure destroy something important to global finance and watch the shit go thermonuclear.
The evolution debate mathematically is that using the same numbers the scientific community has put forward, it is statistically impossible for evolution to have occured, considering the scientific community doesn’t know its ass from a donkey it is not a great argument against evolution from a terrestrial soup, but it is not bad math, just that it is using the scientism numbers to dunk on their arrogant selves. If the scientific community is wrong about random mutation, taxonomically linear descent or any number of things then the math is irrelevant. There is a big ass hole in research papers that are not retarded where observed mutation rate is applied to evolution, which is just scientists not admitting they don’t know much, and pretending they are gods of knowledge, I don’t read research papers or peer reviewed journals anymore because they are so full of shit a twelve year old could shred logically they literally aren’t worth the paper they are printed on(some few exceptions.)
@Zero
Evolution by natural selection does fine explaining why niggers are dumber than Whites, and why women behave the way that they do.
I wasn’t talking to you, I was having a conversation with kunning, and obviously you missed the point, I didn’t deny evolution, I said that the math scientists tried to prove it with didn’t add up, so they stopped trying, and personally, I enjoy anyone who rubs ScienceTm’s face with its own arguments. I don’t know how genetics work but I know it’s more complicated then random mutations in bacteria. Personally I’m on the side of panspermia but who knows if it’s even possible to prove how long it would take for something so complicated to happen. Women are like cats, they scream the first time because they want some other Tom to come beat the shit out of the male breeding them. Go post on some other chain Starman.
I appreciate the elaboration Zero. I’m not financially inclined, and it all seems like a bullshit anyways.
lol I made some money in stocks but my idea of how things worked was so horribly wrong that I quit and have been trying to figure out what the heck is going on, and I too have come to the conclusion that it is all bullshit, and most of the people who maintain the financial machinery are useful idiots, or at least won’t admit what they really think publicly, paper money is bad. Love your posts here kunning always read em. Anyone got any advice on debt? God says to stay out of it but I am inclined to use it for my business, does God make a distinction between good debt and bad? It seems like rates are so good relative to inflation and the government wouldn’t allow a deflationary spiral without everything going to pot anyway, but I don’t want to cross the lord and get into debt to get ahead when I don’t need to.
It’s only deflationary if they actually are writing off the debts. They’re not. The use of the phrase ‘loan forgiveness’ is a tortuous linguistic abuse. What happened was they ‘approved’ for umpteen millions dollars to be given to technicolor gender and ethnic studies majors six figures in the hole to pay off the desserts of their status whoring; which is to say, umpteen millions dollars shaken down out of property holders and given to the whig priesthood.
It is not that the bluetribe untermenschen who fell for the scam are being let off the hook, but that people who avoided being scammed are being hung on the hook in their place; thus reiterating the sovereign privilege of the scammers to take their pound of flesh whatever the circumstances, and take two more pounds next time too.
I think what people like Vox Day are wanting would be actual loan cancellation. The government just bluntly telling the scammers “you will never get it back, Smeagol”.
You print one billion dollars and lend that money through student loans.
Now there is one billion dollars more into the system, and you have a credit of one billion, meaning that that amount of money should come back to you at a certain point.
But now you forgive the debt, that billion dollars stays in the system.
How can this be deflationary? It is clearly inflationary.
To be deflationary you should be burning the money you are getting as the loans are paid back along with the interests.
It’s even worse than that; not only were they inflating through the unbacked lending, they are inflating even more by simply conjuring more money to pay off those same conjured debits in the first place.
There comes a time when you just have to say to yourself, I don’t know it’s not fair, I can’t prove it’s not fair, but there’s a pea and three thimbles in front of me and my wallet is $100 lighter, so it’s likely I just got scammed.
[*Holding your comment till you pass the demon worshiper test.*]
My job finally dropped the vaccine mandate for business travel. All I had to do was wait. Is the tide beginning to turn? On the other hand, some of the faithful are grumbling at having to consort with the unclean, and no longer want to travel.
I think we can say the tide is turning when there is a legal backlash for the gross overreach committed by companies. Individual cases, class action lawsuits, rulings from the bench. When you start seeing wholly converged courts begin protecting companies from the consequences of said overreach, then the tide will have fully turned.
That is not how the tide will turn.
The tide will turn with judges being tarred and feathered, or sent to the pacific for long distance swimming lessons. The tide will turn with the existing judicial system being ignored, rather than repenting of its sins.
You’re on Musk Time again, Your Grace. there will be intermediary steps between The Steps, there will be reversals and feints and slowdowns. The Conservatives are converged, but there are still many conservatives who are living in artificial bubbles of serenity and safety.
Broadly, yes, the Tide of History will be marked by the Judiciary falling from its position over society, but there are many smaller steps that are going to make things seem very different from what they are. Barring social or geological cataclysm, there is going to be a gradual yet dramatic “revelation” in the public sphere about Coronatarianism, and there will be media and governance institutions seeking to exploit the revelation, for the will have no knowledge of complicity in the grand deception. After all, we have always been at war with Eastasia
These, however, will not take the form of judges restraining government overreach into the economy and private property. The trend line has been steady and unvarying. Socialism was reversed from time to time by legislatures with the judiciary kicking and screaming the whole way. Sometimes when the executive was moving into socialism, judges would slow things down a bit, but reversing it, never, even when the political situation was obviously favorable – Carter economics was about as popular as the Biden economy, and his measures were flatly illegal executive overreach, and the judges sat on their backsides.
Mass murder and attempted (they hoped for the virus to be as deadly as it was billed) genocide. No one will remember. At least no one who knows what is good for him.
Putin cured Covid.
This is like the left backing off from outright socialism in 1949, and a different form of socialism in 1980. They are just changing focus and direction, which the left does all the time.
Hilarious Twitter thread talking about understanding women’s fantasies by analyzing romance novels. Neurotoxin would approve.
https://mobile.twitter.com/EvilVizier/status/1471730149041213442
Part of a larger thread on beauty which is pretty decent. Surprising that it has not been taken down, but maybe the Enemy cannot see it to attack it; so much truth that they are blind to it.
Here is an article that describes the entirety of what makes a woman beautiful. Pretty interesting read. Almost could have been written by one of us, besides a few inherently leftist assumptions sprinkled throughout such age of consent.
https://www.jsanilac.com/dispelling-beauty-lies/
Age of consent is not a battle worth fighting with Normicons at the moment. They just shut down and resist everything else. this is a bad situation for us, for, as Jim just put it, “If you concede emancipation, you have conceded all.”
I think it is better to keep quiet on the AoC fallacy while the Right is finally acknowledging the groomer Epidemic. The necessity in the battle against degeneracy is to remove the shades of difference, the “spectrum” arguments that are deployed to say “well, there are good gays and bad gays” or “well, there are some OK feminists.” The normicon cannot fathom that “pedophilia” is an anticoncept that provides cover for sodomites to hunt children, but they can fathom the idea that predation of children by adults is something worth extirpating.
The problem is that the groomer problem is a direct result of the age of consent issue. Consent does not make it right, nonsense about how a child cannot consent aside. If that was true, we would be arresting every pair of 15 year old high school students that were fucking. That means there is a wedge where a child can consent. If a 15 year old girl can consent to fuck a 15 year old boy, why can she not consent to become a 15 year old boy? Consent is not what makes a thing wrong, but the wrongness of a thing in and of itself. That is what we have to get back to.
Normiecons cannot even conserve the women’s bathrooms. They are utterly irrelevant. If I was King Thundercock and decided that I would run a lottery every year to have a high school girl added to my harem, normiecons would be clapping as their daughters tried to figure out how to get multiple entries into the lottery, age of consent be damned. Their opinions do not matter, and their role in life is to be the NPCs in the game world that fill it out and offer challenges to actual players. You should not kick them around, any more than you would kick a dog, but you also do not give their opinions more weight than you would your dog’s.
Fair enough, m’lord, but I must point out that, as of now, you are Lone Warrior Thundercock, and to get you to the stage of “Wulfgar, Cock of Thunder, and His Merry BAPian Band” we need a core of true/pure followers and a crowd of ardent supporters. To do that, the fundamentals must remain intact, being distributed to the men as we build up the priestly class. Far more important is drawing in warriors, and as it stands right now, the majority of the American Warrior Class would be indifferent to the argument you are making, which is 100% correct. Stages consist of steps, and steps are composed of kinetic energy applied appropriately and elegantly. I think it would be better to have a huge chunk of all the nominal Christian + warrior segment of the population, and the Great Deprogramming is going to take a while.
We need a Program that is as close to impervious as possible, because the key target is the current enforcer in the Fed ranks. They need to feel like scum every time the follow orders from the managerial class, and they will cling to any shred of moral legitimacy, however thin or actually false. This is why the Cathedral makes sure that every real dissident they target gets called a pedophile; it works on their enforcers. We need to assiduously remove that tactic from their arsenal.
To reiterate, I am not talking about priests here, I am talking about Warriors. The Warriors can be Ardent, and the Priests must be Pure.
You get men on board by promising them pussy. When you give a starving man bread, he does not ask how it was made. Men are not starving for bread, but they are starving for pussy. The argument I make to them is not necessarily the argument I make here, but it will not matter what the argument is. Starving men do not turn up fresh meat.
Call them cucks and faggots because that’s what they are. One of the FBI agents got kicked off that fake governor kidnapping sting because he slapped his wife after going to a swinger party with her where she apearently got a little to worked up about cucking him. He wasn’t even man enough to kill her and then kill himself. They’re all either weak cucks or faggots, the higher ups are not going to let them in the club unless they debase themselves.
Swinger parties are weird. Why the fuck would anybody go to those? And why is it always the elite and well off who do it?
To be fair to the FBI agent, a good chunk of highly athletic and sociable men have blue pill bull shit beaten into them. Some of the whitest of white knights I have met are men that on first glance would be viewed as potential “alpha” males in older times. Their looks and talent gets them some pussy but down the road things go bad for them due to their blue pill brains.
Swinging is an interesting little parlor trick wherein the alpha of a given subset tricks members of his artificial tribe to provide their wives for his pleasure. Sometimes, other alphas of different tribes and their subordinates are associated, deepening the pool of mares. The husbands tag along, thinking they are also getting access to more females, but this is illusory. Certain “omegas with benefits” are included due to their status or access to drugs (I believe the movie Swingers is about a pair of Omegas, but I’ve never seen it). The whole Swing Lifestyle is a direct result of the inevitable boredom that ensues in a life given over wholly to hedonic pursuit.
It’s strange how noone really advancees politically without being a great big fag — almost as if that’s a requirement for admission into the GAE’s elite or something I dunno.
If you believe in emancipation, you believe that women are competent to consent. And you notice that women are not competent to consent. Hence, age of consent.
You cannot reject age of consent without first rejecting emancipation. Indeed, you cannot reject any of modernity on heterosexual activity, such as the abolition of marriage, unless you first reject emancipation. If women are emancipated, marriage is an oppressive anachronism.
If females are property then age of consent is whatever fathers say it is [*shill script on women (evil men make women misbehave) deleted.*]
You have put your finger on a valid problem, that if fathers have authority they are apt to want to keep their daughters around under their authority for far too long.
The remedy for this is to put them under pressure from society, state Church, and the state, to marry their daughters off in the event of the appearance of sexual activity, and that they lose all authority over their daughters in the event of the appearance of sexual activity. Which is apt to happen at a startlingly early age.
If there is the appearance of sexual activity, and the father is unable to kill the offenders or marry them off, or at least marry his daughter off to someone, then it is now open season on the daughter, and Roissy can do what he likes, subject to some risk of being shot. She is now insignificantly low status, and no one cares what happens to her.
To ensure cooperation between men and women, it is necessary that women be compelled to obey their husbands, mothers be highest status, wives and betrothed higher status than unbetrothed virgins, and unmarried, unbetrothed, non virgins have a social and legal status similar to that of a stray dog in the street. A society that cares what happens to them, protects them, and looks after them is going to have trouble reproducing. We cannot afford to protect them from Roissy, nor even from some guy who would chain them up in his basement.
In the early Australian settlement, when the authorities were horrified by sex parties on the beach, they did not punish the men, or even the women, for sexual activity. They shotgun married off the women, and punished them if they spoke back to their husbands.
In the early talkies, a standard plot contrivance was that due to some improbable chain of events, the hero wound up alone behind closed doors with the love interest, and was thereafter extremely worried about being forced to marry the love interest, or being shot. This only makes sense if a world in which there was a curious lack of curiosity about such killings was plausible to the viewer.
If his daughter engages in the appearance of sexual activity, and her father is unable to marry her off, he can protect her, but she is apt to strangely wander off into dangerous situations, and society and the state should not protect her. If society and the state protects her, we are going to get a shortage of grandchildren.
I believe a long time ago I may have quoted from this vintage Soviet semi-dissident adventure novel, but I’ll do it again because I can. Very on topic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Razor%27s_Edge_(novel)
https://flibusta.club/b/136131/download/?format=fb2.zip
Amazing what things may lurk in the vintage strata of unexpected places.
Человек рождаетÑÑ Ð°Ð±Ñолютно беÑпомощным и требует продолжительного ÐºÐ¾Ñ€Ð¼Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¼Ð°Ñ‚ÐµÑ€Ð¸Ð½Ñким молоком, дольше, чем вÑе животные. Из ÑÑ€Ð°Ð²Ð½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ñ€Ð°Ð·Ð²Ð¸Ñ‚Ð¸Ñ Ñ‡ÐµÐ»Ð¾Ð²ÐµÐºÐ° и Ñлона – животного, наиболее Ñходного Ñ Ð½Ð¸Ð¼ по долголетию и вÑем Ñтапам роÑта, можно думать, что человек родитÑÑ Ð½ÐµÐ´Ð¾Ð½Ð¾Ñком и что нормальный Ñрок Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð±ÐµÑ€ÐµÐ¼ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð¾Ñти у человека должен быть того же порÑдка, как у Ñлонихи, ноÑÑщей детеныша 22 меÑÑца. Очевидно, что за такой Ñрок ребенок Ñтал бы значительно больше и его Ð¾Ð³Ñ€Ð¾Ð¼Ð½Ð°Ñ Ð³Ð¾Ð»Ð¾Ð²Ð° обÑзательно погубила бы мать. И тут пришло на помощь оÑобое биологичеÑкое приÑпоÑобление – возвращение к Ñтадии низших млекопитающих – Ñумчатых, рождающих недоношенных детенышей. Только у человека вмеÑто Ñумки – интеллигентноÑÑ‚ÑŒ, ÑамоотверженноÑÑ‚ÑŒ и нежноÑÑ‚ÑŒ матери.
Ð Ð´Ð»Ñ Ñ‚Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ чтобы нанеÑти наименьшие Ð¿Ð¾Ð²Ñ€ÐµÐ¶Ð´ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¼Ð¾Ð·Ð³Ñƒ ребенка, так же как и Ð´Ð»Ñ Ñ‚Ð¾Ð³Ð¾, чтобы выноÑить его в наилучшем ÑоÑтоÑнии, мать должна быть широкобедрой. Ð’ то же Ð²Ñ€ÐµÐ¼Ñ Ñпутница жизни дикого человека, много бегающаÑ, ноÑÑÑ‰Ð°Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ð¾Ð»Ð³Ñƒ добычу, да и ребÑÑ‚ за Ñобой, в процеÑÑе отбора ÑтановитÑÑ ÑƒÐ·ÐºÐ¾Ð±ÐµÐ´Ñ€Ð¾Ð¹, чаÑто гибнет при родах, рождает ребÑÑ‚ менее жизнеÑпоÑобных. Живущие в наихудших уÑловиÑÑ… предÑтавители человечеÑтва – дикие охотники ÐвÑтралии, пигмеи, многие леÑные племена Южной Ðмерики – могут Ñлужить примером. Как только люди Ñтали жить более оÑедло – еще в пещерах Южной Европы, Северной Ðфрики, Ðзии, – началÑÑ Ð¾Ñ‚Ð±Ð¾Ñ€ могучих широкобедрых матерей, давших человечеÑтву тех его предÑтавителей, которые по праву заÑлужили название хомо ÑапиенÑ – человека мудрого. Ðто проиÑходило во вÑех чаÑÑ‚ÑÑ… Ñвета, от Японии до Ðнглии – в удобной Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð¶Ð¸Ð·Ð½Ð¸ ÑредиземноморÑкой полоÑе, когда обилие животной и раÑтительной пищи, а также изобретение ÐºÐ¾Ð¿ÑŒÑ Ð¸ дротика превратили человека из бездомного бродÑги в Ð¾Ð±Ð¸Ñ‚Ð°Ñ‚ÐµÐ»Ñ ÐºÑ€ÐµÐ¿ÐºÐ¾Ð³Ð¾ жильÑ.
Так, в инÑтинктивном понимании краÑоты запечатлелоÑÑŒ Ñто требование Ð¿Ñ€Ð¾Ð´Ð¾Ð»Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ñ€Ð¾Ð´Ð°, ÑлившееÑÑ, разумеетÑÑ, Ñ ÑротичеÑким воÑприÑтием подруги, ÐºÐ¾Ñ‚Ð¾Ñ€Ð°Ñ Ñильна и не будет иÑкалечена первыми же родами, ÐºÐ¾Ñ‚Ð¾Ñ€Ð°Ñ Ð´Ð°ÑÑ‚ потомÑтво победителей темного необозримого царÑтва зверей, как море – окружавшего наших предков. И что бы там ни говорили законодатели мод и выдумщики вÑÑчеÑких оригинальноÑтей, когда вам, художникам, надо напиÑать образ женщины-обольÑтительницы, покорительницы мужчин, в Ñерьезном или шутливом, бидÑтруповÑком, оформлении, – кого же вы риÑуете, как не крутобедрую, выÑокогрудую женщину Ñ Ð¾Ñиной талией? Заметим, кÑтати, что тонкаÑ, Ð³Ð¸Ð±ÐºÐ°Ñ Ñ‚Ð°Ð»Ð¸Ñ ÐµÑÑ‚ÑŒ анатомичеÑÐºÐ°Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ð¿ÐµÐ½ÑÐ°Ñ†Ð¸Ñ ÑˆÐ¸Ñ€Ð¾ÐºÐ¸Ñ… бедер Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ð²Ð¸Ð¶Ð½Ð¾Ñти и гибкоÑти вÑего тела.
Ð”Ð»Ñ Ð¼ÑƒÐ¶Ñ‡Ð¸Ð½ Ñ‚Ð¾Ð½ÐºÐ°Ñ Ñ‚Ð°Ð»Ð¸Ñ, увы, противопоказана, еÑли они хотÑÑ‚ быть дейÑтвительно мужчинами, могучими и выноÑливыми, как древние Ñллины. Я уже говорил, что тело человека не имеет Ñкелетной компенÑации позвоночнику Ñпереди. ПоÑтому, Ð´Ð»Ñ Ñ‚Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ чтобы ноÑить Ñ‚ÑжеÑти, поднимать их, быть выноÑливым (вÑпомните об оÑобенноÑÑ‚ÑÑ… мужÑкого дыханиÑ), на передней поверхноÑти тела, между ребрами и тазом, должна быть толÑÑ‚Ð°Ñ Ð¸ ÐºÑ€ÐµÐ¿ÐºÐ°Ñ Ð¼Ñ‹ÑˆÐµÑ‡Ð½Ð°Ñ Ñтенка, да что там, Ñ†ÐµÐ»Ð°Ñ Ñтена, Ñантиметров в пÑÑ‚ÑŒ толщиной, как на гречеÑких ÑтатуÑÑ…. Ðе меньшей мощноÑти плаÑтины нужны и на боковых Ñторонах – коÑые брюшные мышцы. Тут уж не до гибкой талии, в Ñтом меÑте мужчина ÑтановитÑÑ ÑˆÐ¸Ñ€Ðµ, чем в бедрах, зато приобретает великую мощь.
Ру женщин важнее ÑовÑем другие, не поверхноÑтные, а внутренние мышцы, ÑпоÑобные в прочной чаше удерживать внутренноÑти при огромной дополнительной нагрузке – ребенке. Помните, вÑе Ñто не Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð³Ð¾Ñ€Ð¾Ð´Ð° и даже не Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð´ÐµÑ€ÐµÐ²Ð½Ð¸. СоздавалоÑÑŒ оно в дикой жизни, полной огромного напрÑжениÑ. ПоÑтому широкий и крепкий лиÑÑ‚ поперечной брюшной мышцы ÑÑ‚Ñгивает талию глубже коÑÑ‹Ñ… мышц, до Ñамого лобка, низко Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ð´ÐµÑ€Ð¶Ð¸Ð²Ð°Ñ Ð¼Ñ‹ÑˆÐµÑ‡Ð½ÑƒÑŽ чашу живота Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð¼Ð¾Ñ‰ÑŒÑŽ еще и пирамидальной мышцы, котораÑ, будучи Ñильно развита, дает тот плоÑкий живот, о котором мечтают краÑавицы. Я думаю, что муÑÐºÑƒÐ»ÑŒÐ½Ð°Ñ Ð°Ð½Ð°Ñ‚Ð¾Ð¼Ð¸Ñ Ð²Ð°Ð¼ извеÑтна. УпомÑну еще, что у хорошо танцующих женщин наиболее Ñильно развиты ÑреднÑÑ Ð¸ Ð¼Ð°Ð»ÐµÐ½ÑŒÐºÐ°Ñ Ñгодичные мышцы, а в Ñамой глубине – Ð³Ñ€ÑƒÑˆÐµÐ²Ð¸Ð´Ð½Ð°Ñ Ð¸ подвздошно-поÑÑничнаÑ. Ð’Ñе они заполнÑÑŽÑ‚ впадину над вертлугом и дают выпуклую, «амфорную», линию крутых бедер. Можно прибавить развитие Ñамого верхнего конца портнÑжной мышцы и мышцы, натÑгивающей широкую фаÑцию. ЕÑли проанализировать муÑкулатуру превоÑходно развитых танцовщиц, конькобежек и гимнаÑток, то мы увидим неÑколько иное, чем у мужчин, уÑиление Ñамых верхних чаÑтей аддукторов бедренных мышц. ПоÑмотрите на фигуры здоровых, привычных к разнообразному труду деревенÑких девушек, и вы увидите, что и тут наше ÑÑтетичеÑкое чувÑтво безошибочно отмечает наивыÑшую целеÑообразноÑÑ‚ÑŒ.
– Рвот вопроÑ, который Ñтавит под Ñомнение вÑе ваши не лишенные оÑÑ‚Ñ€Ð¾ÑƒÐ¼Ð¸Ñ Ð´Ð¾Ð²Ð¾Ð´Ñ‹, – вызывающе Ñказала художница, вÑе Ð²Ñ€ÐµÐ¼Ñ ÑтаравшаÑÑÑ ÑƒÑзвить Гирина. С уверенноÑтью иÑпытанной обольÑтительницы она выÑтавила Ñтройную ногу, изÑщно обутую в боÑоножку на выÑокой шпильке. – Женщины вÑего мира, – продолжала она, – при вÑех модах и вкуÑах иÑправлÑÑŽÑ‚ вашу премудрую природу обувью на выÑоких каблуках. И попробуйте отрицать, что Ñто менее краÑиво, чем ходьба боÑиком!
– И не попробую, потому что в Ñамом деле краÑивее, – веÑело ответил Гирин. – Однако Ñледует понÑÑ‚ÑŒ: почему? Что вы можете Ñказать, кроме того, что каблуки удлинÑÑŽÑ‚ ногу и делают маленькую женщину выше? Ðо ведь и выÑокие выглÑдÑÑ‚ лучше на каблуках. Почему же так важно Ñто удлинение ног? Ðе проÑто удлинение, а изменение пропорции ноги – вот в чем Ñуть каблука. УдлинÑетÑÑ Ð³Ð¾Ð»ÐµÐ½ÑŒ, ÐºÐ¾Ñ‚Ð¾Ñ€Ð°Ñ ÑтановитÑÑ Ð·Ð½Ð°Ñ‡Ð¸Ñ‚ÐµÐ»ÑŒÐ½Ð¾ длиннее бедра. Такое Ñоотношение голени и бедра еÑÑ‚ÑŒ приÑпоÑобление к бегу, быÑтрому, легкому и долгому, то еÑÑ‚ÑŒ уÑпешной охоте. Оно было у древнейших предÑтавителей нашего вида кроманьонÑкой раÑÑ‹, оно ÑÐµÐ¹Ñ‡Ð°Ñ ÐµÑÑ‚ÑŒ у некоторых африканÑких племен. Ðаше ÑÑтетичеÑкое воÑприÑтие каблука доказывает, что мы проиÑходим от древних бегунов и охотников, обитателей Ñкал, – Ñто подÑознательное воÑпоминание о ÑовершенÑтве в беге. Добавлю, что каблуки придают вашей ноге крутой подъем. Тут ÑÑтетика прÑмо, а не коÑвенно ÑходитÑÑ Ñ Ð½ÐµÐ¾Ð±Ñ…Ð¾Ð´Ð¸Ð¼Ð¾Ñтью выÑокого подъема Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð»ÐµÐ³ÐºÐ¾Ð¹ походки и неутомимоÑти. Ð’Ñе обладатели крутых подъемов знают, наÑколько они Ñкономнее в ноÑке обуви, чем люди Ñ Ð¾Ð±Ñ‹Ñ‡Ð½Ð¾Ð¹ или плоÑковатой Ñтопой.
– Значит, мы иÑпортилиÑÑŒ Ñ Ð´Ñ€ÐµÐ²Ð½Ð¸Ñ… времен? – не унималаÑÑŒ Ð´Ð»Ð¸Ð½Ð½Ð¾Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð°Ñ Ñ…ÑƒÐ´Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¸Ñ†Ð°.
– Ðичуть, Ñ…Ð¾Ñ‚Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð»ÐµÐ±Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð² общих пропорциÑÑ… у разных народов довольно значительны. ЕÑли мы как Ñледует займемÑÑ Ñобой, то быÑтро превратимÑÑ Ð² кроманьонцев. Ðичего из той наÑледÑтвенноÑти, которую приобрели далекие предки, еще не утрачено.
– Рпочему краÑивее ÑчитаетÑÑ Ð¿Ñ€Ñмой ноÑ? Ðе вÑе ли равно?
– ПрÑмой ноÑ – прÑмой ход Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð²Ð´Ñ‹Ñ…Ð°ÐµÐ¼Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ воздуха. Ð”Ð»Ñ Ð½Ð°Ñ, европейцев, Ñеверных людей, характерна выÑÐ¾ÐºÐ°Ñ Ð¿ÐµÑ€ÐµÐ½Ð¾Ñица и выÑокое нёбо – воздух проходит в горло по крутой дуге и лучше обогреваетÑÑ. Ðо вÑе Ñто надо еще иÑÑледовать. ДейÑтвительно ли узкие глаза монголоидов – Ñто приÑпоÑобление к богатому ультрафиолетовыми лучами Ñвету в горах и выÑокогорных пуÑтынÑÑ…? Много еÑÑ‚ÑŒ подобных вопроÑов, которыми вмеÑто раÑовой демагогии давно должна бы заниматьÑÑ Ð°Ð½Ñ‚Ñ€Ð¾Ð¿Ð¾Ð»Ð¾Ð³Ð¸Ñ. Ðо функциональной антропологии пока еще нет, и мы можем лишь догадыватьÑÑ, какие важные причины Ñформировали раÑовые оÑобенноÑти. КÑтати, большинÑтво раÑовых признаков, отвечающих опÑÑ‚ÑŒ же анатомичеÑкой функциональной целеÑообразноÑти, не кажутÑÑ Ð½Ð°Ð¼ чуждыми и вызывают в общем те же ÑÑтетичеÑкие аÑÑоциации. Ð’Ñе дело в том, что мы, люди вида ÑапиенÑ, безуÑловные ÑеÑтры и Ð±Ñ€Ð°Ñ‚ÑŒÑ Ð¿Ð¾ Ñамому наÑтоÑщему родÑтву. Ð’Ñего пÑтьдеÑÑÑ‚ Ñ‚Ñ‹ÑÑчелетий назад Ð½Ð°Ñ Ð±Ñ‹Ð»Ð° лишь горÑточка, и Ñта горÑточка породила вÑе великое разнообразие народов, племен, Ñзыков, иногда воображавших ÑÐµÐ±Ñ ÐµÐ´Ð¸Ð½Ñтвенными, избранными предÑтавителÑми рода человечеÑкого.
– РвÑе-таки Ñто Ñтрашно, – вдруг Ñказала краÑÐ¸Ð²Ð°Ñ Ð±Ð»Ð¾Ð½Ð´Ð¸Ð½ÐºÐ° Ñ Ñ‡ÐµÑ€Ð½Ñ‹Ð¼Ð¸ бровÑми, ÑÐ¼Ð¾Ñ‚Ñ€ÐµÐ²ÑˆÐ°Ñ Ð½Ð° Гирина, как на злого веÑтника. – Ð’Ñе наши предÑÑ‚Ð°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¾ прекраÑном, мечты и ÑÐ¾Ð·Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¸ÑкуÑÑтва… и вдруг так проÑто – Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð´ÐµÑ‚ÐµÐ¹, Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð¿Ñ€Ð¾Ñтой жизни!
– ПроÑÑ‚Ð°Ñ Ð¶Ð¸Ð·Ð½ÑŒ? Ее нет, мы только по невежеÑтву думаем, что она проÑта, и поÑтоÑнно раÑплачиваемÑÑ Ð·Ð° Ñто. Очень Ñложна, трудна и интереÑна жизнь! Ðо не понимаю, отчего вам Ñтрашно? Оттого, что Ñтанет понÑтно, в чем Ñуть прелеÑти ваших краÑивых бровей? Брови, назначение которых отводить в Ñторону пот, Ñтекающий Ñо лба, и не давать ему заливать глаза, должны быть гуÑтыми. И при гуÑтоте они не должны быть череÑчур широкими, чтобы в них не ÑкапливалаÑÑŒ грÑзь, не заводилиÑÑŒ паразиты. Вот Ñекрет краÑоты ваших Ñоболиных, узких и гуÑÑ‚Ñ‹Ñ… бровей.
Под необидный Ñмех окружающих блондинка прикрыла лицо рукой. Гирин продолжал:
– ЕÑли можно – ÑейчаÑ. Я должен раÑÑказать Ñвоим ребÑтам ÑÐµÐ³Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ñ Ð¶Ðµâ€¦
– Хорошо, – уÑтупил Гирин. – Вертикальное положение тела человека целиком перенеÑло Ð²ÐµÑ ÐµÐ³Ð¾ передней чаÑти, Ñтавшей верхней, на позвоночный Ñтолб. Позвонки, оÑобенно поÑÑничные, Ñтали неÑти вертикальную нагрузку, очень Ñильную при ноÑке и подъеме Ñ‚ÑжеÑтей. Ð’ результате одно из наиболее характерных заболеваний человека – вÑÑкие болезненные Ð¸Ð·Ð¼ÐµÐ½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð² поÑÑничных позвонках, например, так называемый Ñпондилоз, не Ð³Ð¾Ð²Ð¾Ñ€Ñ ÑƒÐ¶Ðµ о болÑÑ… в поÑÑнице и радикулитах, одолевающих почти каждого человека к ÑтароÑти. ИнтереÑно, что такими же заболеваниÑми Ñтрадали вымершие Ñаблезубые тигры – они одни могли поÑочувÑтвовать человеку. У тех беда пришла в результате Ñ€Ð°Ð·Ð²Ð¸Ñ‚Ð¸Ñ Ð³Ñ€Ð¾Ð¼Ð°Ð´Ð½Ñ‹Ñ… Ñабельных клыков в верхней челюÑти, удары которых, очевидно, давали очень Ñильную нагрузку на позвоночный Ñтолб, в Ñтом Ñлучае не вертикальную, а горизонтальную, но дейÑтвовавшую также по оÑи позвоночника. И вот Ñреди Ñотен Ñкелетов Ñаблезубов, раÑкопанных в аÑфальтовых лужах Ранчо ла Бреа в Калифорнии, очень многие имеют признаки Ñпондилоза.
– Рчем же компенÑировалоÑÑŒ Ñто противоречие?
– Развитием мышц брюшного преÑÑа, вмеÑте Ñ Ð»ÐµÑтничными межреберными муÑкулами, дающими дополнительную поддержку туловищу. Ðаибольшим развитием Ñтих мышц, ÑÑƒÐ´Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ ÑтатуÑм, отличалиÑÑŒ древнегречеÑкие атлеты. Ð’Ñпомним Ñ…Ð¾Ñ‚Ñ Ð±Ñ‹ лиÑипповÑкого «ÐпокÑиомена» или оÑобенно поликлетовÑкого «КопьеноÑца». Человек обÑзательно должен развивать Ñти муÑкулы – они жизненно важны во вÑех ÑлучаÑÑ….
– ВрÑд ли возможно ÑопоÑтавлÑÑ‚ÑŒ древнего и Ñовременного человека, – Ñказал тот, ученого вида Ñтарик, который вÑпоминал Ðемилова. – Прежде вÑего у Ð½Ð°Ñ Ð³Ð¾Ñ€Ð°Ð·Ð´Ð¾ больше нервного напрÑжениÑ, ÑтреÑÑов, чем в первобытной жизни. ОтÑюда нужно думать, что прежние каноны физичеÑкой Ñилы и выноÑливоÑти ÑÐµÐ³Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ñ Ð½ÐµÐ¿Ñ€Ð¸Ð¼ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ð¼Ñ‹. Ðужна ÐºÑ€ÐµÐ¿ÐºÐ°Ñ Ð½ÐµÑ€Ð²Ð½Ð°Ñ Ð¾Ñ€Ð³Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ð·Ð°Ñ†Ð¸Ñ – Ñто главное.
– Вы Ñделали Ñразу две крупные ошибки. Ðачну Ñо второй, она проще, – возразил Гирин. – ÐšÑ€ÐµÐ¿ÐºÐ°Ñ Ð½ÐµÑ€Ð²Ð½Ð°Ñ Ð¾Ñ€Ð³Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ð·Ð°Ñ†Ð¸Ñ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÑ‚ быть только на оÑнове полного здоровьÑ, физичеÑкой крепоÑти и выноÑливоÑти вÑего тела. Хилое тело, подвергнутое нервному напрÑжению, Ñразу же даÑÑ‚ шизоидный ÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ð¿Ð»ÐµÐºÑ Ð¿Ñихики. Что каÑаетÑÑ Ð¿ÐµÑ€Ð²Ð¾Ð±Ñ‹Ñ‚Ð½Ñ‹Ñ… людей, живших в поÑтоÑнной и Ñмертельной опаÑноÑти, в длительном напрÑжении охоты и поиÑков пищи, то их организм выработал ÑпоÑобноÑÑ‚ÑŒ отдавать Ñразу огромное количеÑтво адреналина Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð¼Ð³Ð½Ð¾Ð²ÐµÐ½Ð½Ð¾Ð¹ форÑировки мышечно-двигательной ÑиÑтемы. Сильнейшие нервные ÑтреÑÑÑ‹, какие ÑлучаютÑÑ Ñƒ Ñовременных людей, кроме войны, вÑего неÑколько раз в жизни, заÑтавлÑли наших предков жить в алертноÑти, напрÑжении вÑего тела, раÑÑ…Ð¾Ð´ÑƒÑ Ð²ÑÑŽ пищу, какую только мог потребить организм. Ðикаких холеÑтериновых накоплений, Ñклероза или инфаркта. Мы унаÑледовали отличную боевую машину, приÑпоÑобленную Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð±Ð¸Ñ‚Ð² Ñ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³ÑƒÑ‡Ð¸Ð¼Ð¸ зверÑми, и Ñетуем, что она может Ñвоими ÑтреÑÑами погубить наши вÑлые, не тренированные как надо тела.
Golly, I hope there wasn’t anything in that Cyrrillic text that would be relevant or important to the monoglot member of this comment section lol. Prepare for the same level of annoyance and bantz as last time, you damn Slavic polymath.
Long walls of unreadable text irritate everyone. Give us the yandex translate version.
In future I will suppress long walls of text that are not in English.
Noted, Jim,
right you are, Kunning Druegger.
In the future what I’ll do is this:
1) Anything over 50-100 words gets online translated
2) Edited&compressed until only the meat remains
3) I go over the translation once to make sure linguistic entropy has not warped the message
Anyone who wants the original gets a link in the post
Its fairly impossible not to notice what women want if you actually read what women want. It’s the sort of question that answers itself by the very act of acknowledging it; so of course, they avoid acknowledging it.
I just clicked through and haven’t read much yet, but I love the fact that she calls herself Odalisque – in other words, Harem Slave. What do women want indeed!
(It’s actually “Undead Odalisque” i.e. Vampire Harem Slave, for that extra-female touch.)
On the feminine beauty one, my hot take: A woman is beautiful if she appears:
young, healthy, and feminine.
These are, of course, signs of fertility.
When a man says a woman is beautiful he’s verbalizing “Wow, she looks young, healthy, and female.” That plus some idiosyncratic features he likes, such as particular hair color, etc.
I clicked through on the thread for the first book considered, Midnight Princess.
The reader (Odalisque) notes – among many Game truths about what makes a man desirable to women, like preselection –
“So… the hero violates the heroine three times.
Each time she gets a little more enthusiastic.â€
From now on I won’t write any more red pill in fiction posts; I’ll just link to this Twitter thread every now and then, lol.
Also, the blasts of truth are so surprisingly clear and to the point, given the topic, that I’m starting to wonder whether “Undead Odalisque†is actually a woman.
Definitely a woman. The way in which she dismisses PUA gives it away.
The comment on the Lotus Eaters having a podcast about the article and her asking people to watch it because she is afraid of the mean words make me think woman, too, but I am not certain. She also notes that women like to sabotage each other, which is something women like to avoid mentioning, and the analysis of romance novels seems a little too detached to be a woman doing it. It is hard to tell, but it is true either way, and the books are written by women and read by women.
Been aware of him for a while. Definitely not a woman. Linking to his thread not practical. He periodically gets upset that his thirstposts get a hundred times the traction of his effortposts and freezes his account for a few weeks.
He’s not entirely clear on how things work. He noted one romance novel where the heroine “had to” deliver a message to the hero at a brothel, where he was a regular patron. After receiving the message, he grabs the heroine with the reasoning that “this is a whorehouse and you’re the whore I choose.” The same novel (iirc) had a villain who lets the heroine get under his skin, so he slaps her in a prissy, beta sort of way. Odalisque couldn’t get what it was that made that guy so repulsive to the female reader.
Mostly, he fails to understand that six foot six muscular giant isn’t the main element that makes these characters attractive. It’s their dominance. Physical features just hypergamic icing on the cake.
This excerpt from the thread on the Viking themed romance always good for a chuckle:
“Our heroine arrives in the hero’s household and refuses to do any women’s work. She won’t knit or sew or cook. She’s rather clean out the stables! Quite an assertion of feminist principle.
“So how does our hero react?
“Our hero decides the best way to tame the heroine is by sexually violating her repeatedly while also refusing to feed her if she doesn’t sew and cook for him.
“This works perfectly and she cooks, cleans, and falls in love with him.”
This tweet is beautiful:
https://mobile.twitter.com/EvilVizier/status/1469387750595960840
‘The virgin “Repeal the 19th†vs the chad “I want to be enslaved and ravished by a Viking warlord‒ is meme poetry.
Not a native English speaker, but seems interesting how ‘ravished’ and ‘raped’ mean the same action, but the older word has positive connotation, the newer one does not.
I think that was because rape was the actual property crime, as opposed to the act of ravishing a woman. You could ravish a woman without it being rape if she was already a fallen woman, similar to the distinction between killing and murder. And despite rape being quite wrong, women rather like it, hence ‘ravish’ gaining some of ‘consent’s’ positive connotations. Nowadays ravishment is just a rape she decided she rather liked. That makes it consensual and consent makes it okay!
That would make perfect sense. Sloppy on my part to think that just because ‘ravish’ sounds older it is older.
Not really such a bad assumption, because it has definitely fallen out of favor. Pointing out that women do not terribly mind being raped is a bit of a problem for the left. As a result, the word gets shoved behind the radiator.
“Rapture” and “rape” have the same root in Latin, it originally meant “carrying off,” implicitly by force. Then the first stage of rape acquiring its current meaning was of course they had sex, what else could happen without a chaperone. But at first it was still a crime against the father, husband or future husband, and if the woman objected too it was probably more about her internalizing her patriarch’s sense of honor than anything else.
Below that in that same thread is a pic of geek chick with Isaac Asimov. Check out Asimov’s ridiculous hoverhand.
His son was a faggot, so maybe he got it from his old man.
Now that you mention it, I have a vague recollection of Vox Day publishing a book about perverted behavior in the “science fiction community” a few years back. Can’t recall specifics.
Wulfgar’s link, and a few other comments, have necessitated a discussion about the potential uptake of Jimian Christianity on Women. The Andrew Tate event is clearly a critical factor, but he is not the only one saying things that, if you asked me a year ago, I would have said would never appear in the wild.
Many of the men here are too busy or too serious to track social media trends, and I barely get to see anything, but I think I have seen more than average (I am not proud of this, but here we are). If you watch many of Tate’s clips and videos, you will find unadulterated Redpill On Women memes. Everything from easily digestible comments about sex differences to “hardcore” comments on how the cock carousel makes them undesirable. I am not being hyperbolic when I say his whole schtick is on message. And he is not the only voice on clip media doing this. There are a range of “influencers” transmitting and amplifying the fundamental messages we discuss here. I have yet to hear anyone outright say “Women Are Property” or “Make Women Property Again,” but all the pieces are there. It feels like Tate and the others are broadcasting the equations with certain variables left out, leaving the consuuumer to look for more. Now, it must be said that Tate appears to be hyping some online course for Game, and this seems like the typical Grift-Wing game plan. But, and this is surprising to me, the females involved in this phenomenon are actually being more explicit with seriously on-point messaging. So my question is: what the fuck is going on?
Subjectively, of course, I don’t expect Tate to show up and lay out his battle/business plan, but his sound bites are just so very close to RPWQ stylization, I don’t think it would be shocking to find out he, or someone in his circle, lurks here. Per his own account, he and his brother were digital pimps on OnlyFans, recruiting sluts for their stable, and they holes were not able to perform on the intellectual side, rather communicate in the proper way, so he started doing the typing while they did the skin act. I imagine that one could land on a significant number of JC conclusions about women through that process.
What are the numbers on men not getting laid within the last year? On men who are still virgins at 20 or 25? When that number gets large enough, that is a massive source of instability. It is an opportunity for someone to come along and promise those men some women. It is a massive problem, and I think at some level the left understands that. That is one reason they work at preventing men from organizing, why Antifa and BLM are coed instead of all men. If part of the left organizes as men, then they are just a step away from redistribution of pussy and that would be it for the establishment.
Ironically, just saw a clip from some female saying it is like 1 in 3 Occidental males enter their 30s a virgin. Fertile grounds, in many senses of the word.
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/young-adults-especially-men-having-sex-less-frequently
“Between 2000-2002 and 2016-2018, past-year sexual inactivity rose from almost 19 percent to almost 31 percent among men ages 18 to 24.
…
Sexual inactivity among women of the same age remained relatively constant, rising from 15 percent to 19 percent over the same time period.”
LOL…No one is coming along giving virgin men pussy. It’s called nature. They are being selected against and their genes are being removed from the gene pool.
It is not called nature. It is called the state. The state forbids prosocial, well behaved men from acting manly, and the state Church fails to set guidelines distinguishing manly prosocial Christian violence from evil sinful violence, and the state allows women, including married women to fuck whomever they want at any time for any reason, and as a result prosocial men and good husbands are being selected against, and violent antisocial criminals are being selected for.
We are going to come along and give incel men pussy, because we are going to shotgun marry off all the whores. You will be able to get used goods on the auction block. Virgins who are under the control of their fathers, you are going to have to apply to the father.
If, however, you bang a virgin, then the dad is likely to insist on you marrying her, and can probably get away with shooting you, and possibly her, if you decline. He can also insist on her marrying someone, and if she declines and he allows it, and she persists in this sort of behavior, the state is likely to consider his authority over her terminated, his right to control her terminated, and the state is likely to insist on her marrying someone. Again I point to the early Australian authority’s 100% success rate at swiftly and abruptly turning whores into wives. Faced with a state cheerfully prepared to use violence upon her, and a husband backed by the authority of that state, the female Australian transportee fully internalized middle class wifely respectability. All of them without exception.
Cathedral Triumphalism deleted
Republics come in the time of Republics, in the time of elite virtue, and always self destruct, subverting the virtue on which their existence depends, and another age of Kings returns.
Adapting to the environment of emancipated women is a biological dead end. Those who are adapted to this environment are walking the road to extinction slightly slower.
Republics always self destruct relatively quickly. Female emancipation, however, is frequently only cured by complete disappearance of the emancipated population. I hope, and confidently expect, that the end of the Republic will be the end of female emancipation, because the winning Caesar is likely to be the Caesar that provides wives for his loyalists.
Peoples, empires, populations, faiths, and tribes are always emancipating women, and they either fix the problem, are conquered by those who can fix the problem or never had the problem, or vanish, being entirely replaced by outsiders who fixed or never had the problem, like the original Romans completely vanished. Women always become property once again, and everyone alive today is descended in the female line from women who were property all the way back for four million years, all other populations, faiths, tribes, and empires having fallen by wayside.
The female adaptation to emancipation is to behave in a manner that in the ancestral environment is likely to get her unemancipated by being kidnapped by hostile outsiders, the enemies of her tribe and people. Males have no adaptation to female emancipation, except to do what I do, which is dangerous and difficult.
In every happy family and happy marriage, all of them entirely without exception, the husband has successfully unemancipated his wife, which requires some degree of cheerful defiance of society, state, and state religion.
Haha, trannysemenbreath gets what he fucking deserves.
The idea that women select men eugenically left to their own devices is incredibly stupid and yet so persistent it needs to be repressed with really extreme violence. Even in real nature they don’t always, look at fucking Peacocks. Female mating choice would produce lots of violent dimwitted sociopaths with strong jaws. Yes the jawline genetics would improve, the intellect and social cohesion of mankind not so much.
If it were up to me arguing this idea would be punishable (and invariably punished without respect to persons) by immediate death.
The huge problem with female mate selection is Red Queen Spirals. If a large number of females are selecting for something stupid, natural selection selects for females who select for the same stupid thing, only even more so. In an environment of female selection, females want sexy sons, so females are selected to find sexy what other women find sexy, only even more so. So if for some almost accidental reason some male trait is selected for, it is likely to wind up being selected for in hideous and absurdly extreme degree, resulting in species extinction.
Not only do populations, faiths, tribes, and empires that allow female emancipation wind up vanishing from history, species that have female mate selection are apt to wind up extinct – though it is common in birds and bats, because mate control is harder with a flying creature, but it rather rare with mammals.
You are making excuses. It is not up to women who successfully reproduces. It is up to each individual man to put forth the will power and resolve to do what is necessary in the current environment. Some have it. Some don’t. Those who don’t will have their genes removed from gene pool. It’s a beautiful thing, really.
It is not merely an excuse when women have been given terrifying social superweapons that enable them to point the finger at any man and have him lose his job or go to prison. Makes it hard to maintain proper frame when a woman has terrifying powers that you do not have.
I have successfully ignored these terrifying and very real powers as if they do not exist, and by maintaining frame, got away with it. But it is mighty tough and extremely dangerous. Cops hauled me in once and I could well have been facing a rape and assault charge.
Also all media depict courtship in a manner that is guaranteed to result in permanent involuntary celibacy if you try it in real life. Media courtship is as unreal as media black female superscientists. So how is a young man supposed to know what to do? He suppresses his natural instincts to carry out the courtship dance correctly, because he has been taught that it is evil, foolish, terribly unkind and terribly hurtful to woman, and will get him sent to jail and destroy his career, and the smarter and more prosocial he is, the more he attends to such teachings.
He has been taught that the courtship dance, carried out correctly, will cause females to scream in fear, pain, and horror, and he will go to jail for a very long time and lose all prospects of gainful employment.
I think this rather nicely sums up the problem I, and other men, have been having. Not just the media, but when every adult role model in your life (like parents, teachers, preachers, etc.) told you this, it is hard to just go against it, without having the lie bluntly pointed out AND shown to be wrong (with things like the twitter thread that Wulfgar Thundercock III shared earlier.) Even then, it still takes some time to fully sink in that the blue-pilled morality you were raised with is both wrong and evil.
This post has helped me become more conscious of where these beliefs came from.
(I normally don’t like double posting, but I realised that I forgot a core part of what I wanted to say.)
Even all of the PUAs pretty much push the lie, if not more so than other people. The fact that PUAs dispel lots of lies, but reinforce other one can make it hard to dispel the last lies. I had the benefit of starting to study PUA material before leaving high school (though once I got a girlfriend* I stopped studying as much). My personal experience has been that getting through the lies that PUAs also reinforce is harder than the first ones, since it (on a certain level) feels like that even people who helped you see through lies, still lied to you.
*(never had sex with her, because “as a good christian”, having sex before marriage would be a “sin”. Also, I broke up with her because I didn’t want to “sin”, or make her “sin”.)
(PUA = Pick Up Artist)
@jim
So what is the “Media courtship”? What is the blue pill courtship that is taught and enforced?
action girl rescues and abducts lad in distress. They fall in love.
Leacherous lady invites handsome lad for a beer with friends, but the friends do not show. They have a beer. She then suggests they go home to her place, and he says “maybe next time”
Alan Alda in Mash.
Rollo and Gisla wedding night.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69b2EMXaygQ
– Rollo’s wife-to-be acts like a shrieking whore, yet doesn’t get a well deserved slap from her father or any of the men present to witness her histrionics.
– Rolla acts like a fag, rolls over to sleep, and doesn’t bang his wife.
Also, Morgane Polanski is/was just too old to play princess Gisela of France — should have chosen a younger whore to play the part.
What media do you recommend that properly depicts the mating dance?
I recently read a Jack London novel, The Sea-Wolf published in 1904, in which the love interest dynamic smelled of bluepill even to a zoomer like me. I can only think of perhaps Gunsmoke showing healthy male-female interaction that I’ve seen, but not much “mating dance” going on in that series.
This one is pure, unadulterated Mating dance:
https://gaxed.com/movie/flesh-blood-61881
When Anon asked, I was reluctant to respond, as we have thousands of examples of bluepill courtship everywhere. But making an alternative list, a list of redpilled mating dance, might actually be a worthwhile activity.
Watch this one up to the 4:00 mark:
https://youtu.be/Npdmwbloe6Q
What’s going on is so obvious you don’t even need the sound on. Most women won’t attack you with a sword, but they will shit test you in typically less dramatic ways. This is a beautiful example of amused mastery and a couple of other things.
(Note also that this would make feminists shriek in rage, which is generally a good sign.)
Obviously that sort of amused mastery is an option only for a master swordsman + a master of the Red pill
But most women won’t attack you with a sword.
There is quite a lot of alpha behavior in film, just do what the bad guys do.
Not the answer to your question though. Game of Thrones had some good patriarch characters, before they all got killed off.
Aside from the obvious and hilarious dumbfuckery on display from “Bob” here, what’s the deal with totalitarian shilloid creatures and their obsession with other people’s sex lives.
They, quite rightly, realize how much potential social energy is contained within Sexual Mores. As Wulfgar just wrote, and Jim has said many times, whichever side comes out with an explicit “Service Guarantees Pussyship” position will have millions of young men screaming “YES, I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW MORE!!!”
I’m thinking that “Service Guarantees Pussyship†could maybe be refined a little better.
Perhaps “Service Guarantees Pussy Ownership†or “Service Guarantees Female Ownershipâ€
“I’m doing my part!”
*Fellow reactionary legionnaires laugh approvingly*
@Redbible
You’re splitting hairs. Reminds me of Islamic discussions on whether crow meat is halal or haram
@someDude
When crafting memes, semantics and exact phrases matter. When you send a meme off into the great unknown of the internet, it is sure to mutate and change some as it goes. Setting up a meme well so that it is harder to distort, pervert, or corrupt the meaning is important, since we have many enemies who will seek to do just that once a meme is “sent out”.
Having thought a bit more on this meme, I think that a simple “Service Guarantees Ownership*†would work best. When asked ownership of what, the answer is “Property and Women, but I do repeat myself.”
I mention making sure men get virgin pussy assigned to them and the shills come out in force. That has to be one thing that has the Cathedral absolutely terrified. Nevermind Trump, the first man to start organizing real Christian marriages is going to be more powerful than we can imagine.
Wife market in contemporary big city China
https://thediplomat.com/2018/11/finding-love-in-chinas-marriage-markets/
https://www.cheng-tsui.com/blog/chinas-marriage-markets
Spontaneous attempts by the families to unwarp the modern dynamics of dating and marriage, and assign dicks and pussies to their progeny.
The problem is that they are still operating under a consent-based system. They are setting up men and women instead of picking a man and telling the women to get ready for the wedding. Even the old middle and upper class Western system was better than this. All the female choice was an illusion, where the women got to “choose” from men that were screened and approved of by fathers. I think the Western system is better because the illusion of choice makes people more satisfied with the outcome.
OK, but it is far better to at least have examples of intermediate steps being taken than none at all.
The problem is that it is not an intermediate step. It is parents and grandparents performing the same role as Tinder; giving a girl a bunch of men to swipe right or swipe left. The core problem is consent, and that has not been solved at all. It is the illusion of traditional systems, with the superficial characteristics of civilized systems but none of the essential character.
Disagree. Consider: all they have to do is reverse the scenario (give the man a bunch of women to swipe through from a list curated by parents and elders), and we’re coking with gasoline.
…you know, this could be an interesting memetic tool: build a “dating app” that lists females for men to look through, but the app scrapes info from the public internet and rank orders the females based on their social media offerings. It would crawl through profiles and generate a scores based on the content it finds. Lots of travel, skin showing pics, and dating site memberships reduce the score (as well as the various but hilariously homogenous words and phrases women put in their profiles and self-descriptions), and “modesty factors” (this would be something that would require a lot of work, I think, or it could literally be 5 boxes that must be checked, I don’t know) would increase the score.
As based as “wifeAuction App” would be, you could also just fake it up, with fabricated screenshots and fabricated reviews, and then meme it out to see what the response would be. My guess is that it would be praised and sought after intensely.
“WiFind”
“BestBoos”
“fertileFields”
What is the incentive for women to participate in this marriage app? Likewise for the Chinese marriage markets. There is no social force that tells women that they have no right to refuse once chosen. As Pax Imperialis pointed out, the CCP is shooting itself in the foot on this one. America and the West have just turned to using it for target practice. If you have female choice be anything more than an illusion to trick her into acceptance, the whole thing falls apart.
No Wulfgar, you misunderstand. The app scrapes data from female profiles already extant and gets curated by an operation put together by Andrew Tate. The women are neither consulted nor involved, the app just uses OSINT to build the profiles and rank order them for male selection or rejection. It would whitelist females that seem virginal or only slightly used with low mileage, and red flag roasties and whores. So users (males only) can use the app to find women or as a kind of carfax for potential mates.
“Check out this broad, bro, she’s right up your alley!”
“Hold up, let me check Bitchfax/Slutvana/Snatchdotcom and see her score… hmm, low mileage but she’s traveled to Europe twice…”
“they are still operating under a consent-based system.”
Some might. Most are not. When Asian parents tell you to go on that arraigned date, you go on that arraigned date.
The reason why arraigned marriages fell out of practice in East Asia is because there is too much fraud that came from anonymity of modern city life. Dating process is there suss out fraud.
There is also enough of an illusion of choice to make people satisfied.
Forgot to mention that the “marriage market” that the articles are about are really the secondary market that exists. Primary market is via familiar relations. You go to secondary market if the familiar relations don’t exist (low status family doesn’t isn’t given any face) or more likely no one in your extended family’s social circle wanted you kid (family has status but no one wants to give your kid face). Meaning open air marriage market is full of fraud.
If that was the case then they would not have needed a government campaign against leftover women. An old maid in a sex-balanced society is one thing. Being a leftover woman in a society where there are 6 men for every 5 women is another.
“If that was the case then they would not have needed a government campaign against leftover women.”
The Chinese government also promotes female education and work force participation as well. They are continuously shooting themselves in the foot and bandaging it as a stop gap. Maybe they should stop shooting themselves. Radical idea I know.
However compare China to the West. These are 2012 Stats.
38% of women in the United States, and more than 50% of women in Britain remained unmarried in their 30s.
7.4% of Chinese women between 30 and 34 were unmarried and the percentage falls to 4.6% between the ages 35–39.
Had the Chinese government been against female university education and work force participation you would see them marry even younger and at higher rates. There wouldn’t be a need to campaign against leftover women.
Now there are reasons why this happened. China wanted to prioritize economic development and to modernize its military as quickly as possible partly out of fear of US military might. The idea being to fully mobilize its full population. As population modernization is accomplished, and population decreases, we are seeing the Chinese unwind their anti family policies such as one child. Fertility is back to policy priority, but it will take a long time to fix.
> An old maid in a sex-balanced society is one thing. Being a leftover woman in a society where there are 6 men for every 5 women is another.
Indeed. And being a leftover woman in Russia, where there’s five women competing for every single non-alcoholic non-unemployed man is yet a third variation.
I have no idea why Beijing and Moscow have not yet married off the surplus Russian women to the surplus Chinese men. Gooks respect white skin and Russians are already half-gook across Siberia.
Hehe, imagine a Eurasian ruling dynasty. Half the time you get a Chinese ruler whose domain borders Poland, and half the time a Russian ruler whose domain borders Vietnam.
When it’s a Chinese ruler the world will be like “awesome, new trading opportunities” and when it’s a Russian ruler they’ll be “Christ, better beef up the army”.
“That has to be one thing that has the Cathedral absolutely terrified”
Are the Cathedral’s minions smart enough to be terrified of this?
Someone is, or was. I started mentioning it and shills started in. “Bob” showed up almost immediately to tell us all that the state is in no way interfering with reproduction and we deserve it.
In short, I triggered a response so quickly that it must have been high priority.
Not at all thunder stealing, but your posts plus the Tate namedrop initiated the faggot QRF in my opinion.
Couldn’t it have been simple religious fanaticism? I mean you’re violating a sacrament of their faith.
You might has well Draw paintings of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) in Drag and hold an art exhibition in an Islamic Enclave.
Jim does not think, and I don’t like to think, that they are smart enough to be scared of that.
…are you a mohammedan? I was under the impression that you were a Dharmabro…
I think someDude is Indonesian.
Nah, that’s Ducking Man. SD is a Dharmabro, but the “PBUH” is throwing me off…
Yes, I’m Indian. Personally a Buddhist, but politically a Hindu as in I support all political and social causes that benefit Hindus within the boundaries of India. The PBUH was my “failed” attempt to be Ironic.
I thought it was, but I was wrong footed for some reason. Sorry to ruin the joke, my dude.
Aside from this guy (obvious Muslim shilloid) —
https://blog.reaction.la/uncategorized/this-blog-is-going-down/#comment-2680969
— I don’t think there’s anyone here that believes in Islam or anything like that lol.
Tate said that a woman is “a property of her man” because she is in a sexual releashionship with him.
Cheating is women thing a man can’t cheat no matter how many women he sleep with.
Men do monogamy because they want/hope they get exclusivity from a woman
Monogamy is for women , but men natural instinct is polygamy
This was in a podcast with someone called dave portnoy
I noticed the jimian bases for this but i do not think he read or someone around him read the blog, you cant master the women question intellectually you have to live it.
He is a pimp and a pimp life require you to discover the reality of women if you want to be successful in pimping.
> I have yet to hear anyone outright say “Make Women Property Again”
I said that.
Legally, the concept is called “coverture”. And the American Republic was founded on it.
You’re welcome.
It is often commented here the disaster that the Obamacare website was (how much it cost and how it didn’t work).
Would it then follow that all the talk of globally interoperable biometric ID linked to bank accounts and social credit scores, is beyond their competence level?
TPTB seem to have a plan for total control, but is it possible that it won’t be so much of a concern because they don’t have the ability to implement it competently?
I suppose we will soon see in any case, but I would appreciate to know your views on this.
Could this be why the Cheka, nkvd, Bolsheviks were so Jewish? Maybe their superpower of invisibility let them get jobs done when the practical reality became verboten for goys? Tax collector’s and bag men are often minorities, in a decaying left singularity can the software guys for the things that really matter be a similar uncriticizable minority?
At some point, the banking system will be considered kaput, just like SWIFT.
Personally, I consider us already past that point since it operates for the advantage of government, not its putative customers.
Bitcoin and lightning network.
Or something better. No end of people, myself among them, are thinking about something better.
I have figured out no end of ways in which to efficiently implement a totalitarian highly centralized state using modern technology. Checking out enemy ideas for the same thing, they seem to be idiots. Which is fortunate, or else they would have already implemented them. They had a go at implementing them in the Covid panic.
That’s good to know. I hear two arguments lately that give me hope. One is that they are not competent enough to do what they want to do. Another is that they have already lost control of information distribution, so they can no longer rule with the public’s consent, only by force, and since the WEFfers are very few, their great reset won’t happen.
Fixed second link.
If Israel didn’t exist, all Covid vaccine enforcement worldwide would be via easily falsifiable paper documents. Nowhere but Israel can the government say, “We need software that does X”, and get it in ten weeks instead of ten years.
gas kikes now >:|
https://www.unz.com/article/why-californias-affirmative-action-ban-may-have-harmed-white-enrollment/
Whites are only 18.6% of UC college freshmen now, in theory now contributing to diversity but this is not fairly recognized. Whites who are actually Anglo might only be 10%. Anglo and Protestant, 5% or less…
This is fertile ground for a pro-white student movement as being a genuine minority increases social capital. On top of the benefits of fewer whites getting worthless degrees.
But the silence about what’s going on in elite high stress prep schools for K-12 students is most telling. What are they up to now?
That assumes going to college is good. Going to college tanks your TFR in exchange for status from a death cult. Observe the effect on secular Jews who climbed over the goy in their rush to get as much college as possible and the result is secular Jews are going extinct.
The degrees are worthless, yes, and it’s good to see few whites getting them for that reason alone, but the low white share of students also opens the door to in-group loyalty that was impossible in the 90% white boomer student era. More importantly, it has benefits for the whites who are not students at all.
As for secular Jews, their demise is much exaggerated by all sides who don’t want to think about how many crypto-Jews there are. It’s not ideal to pay too much attention to this kind of Jew, but ignoring them is fatal.
The same is true of whites sent to prison.
The major benefit being that they do not get educated in an ever more stupid, ignorant, hostile, and hateful faith
As if any pro-white student movement would not be immediately banned if not dispersed by state violence. Do you have neurological damage? Do you actually think that whites will gain social capital when a minority?
Also, “elite†K-12 prep schools are a joke among jokes. If you had trouble, probably not tall enough for this ride.
He is a shill, so you could say that he has neurological defects. He also whines that he could not hack it as a member of the priest class, so he should be given free shit. I was going to respond to him much the same way, but it is a waste of time.
I am not attempting to feed the troll, but I have actually encountered this refrain of “now that we are a minority, we can play minority games!” IRL more than once. I find it supremely deluded, and it has only come from normicons thus far. So we really should systematically address why this cannot work, and we should also take note of this new information as it pertains to the origination of this most obstinate entryist. The Left may have quit engaging in debate, but it appears that the Right is here and attempting to sway the discourse (which was obviously known, but now it is Known.)
It works in Latin America; if you move there and learn the language, you will enjoy high status as a white man, though your grandchildren will most likely be brown and dull-witted.
But losing by state violence isn’t exactly losing at all, because it shatters the Cathedral’s entire history and interpretations of civil rights, nonviolence, etc.
[*If the Cathedral’s attempted genocide of the Tutsi filed to shatter its myths about itself, what could possibly shatter its myths about itself?
Pious attribution of all manner of wonderful good intentions and good conduct to the Cathedral deleted.*]
Ratio.
Around age 13, I found a copy of The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich in my parents’ basement, read the whole thing, and recounted to my mother about the Night of Long Knives, when some of Hitler’s rival Nazis were chopped to pieces and thrown in a swamp.
She said, “When you do something like that, you’re the real loser because you de-humanize yourself.” I was not entirely convinced; it sure seemed to me that the guy feeding the tadpoles was the real loser.
Lol he’s channeling Trudeau when you kill your enemies they win.
Yes lol. And as if “””they””” wouldn’t just memory-hole whatever the fuck measures were necessary to suppress dissent.
This guy just doesn’t have the brain cells to understand the “celebration parallax” meme. (“It’s not happening, and it’s great that it is!”)
In a sane society, nobody as dumb as Always Fabricating would have survived to adulthood.
[*Idiocy deleted*]
Not what that research shows.
>This is fertile ground for a pro-white student movement as being a genuine minority increases social capital.
They will not just let you white kids use the rules of their own game against them.
The point was never being a minority, that was a Trojan horse to disguise anti-white hatred until they felt themselves secure enough to start saying it loud enough for normal people to hear.
There is far more anti-white hatred today than 10/20/30/40 years ago. Most the of hatred was fermented by whites in academia and passed down onto the minorities they let into the academy.
The students who would be pro white student movement do exist in surprisingly (and increasing) large numbers… but they look suspiciously brown. I suppose that just means that Hispanic is the new white.
Field report on my priest:
My sins are great, my spirit is weak, and my need to become stronger is evident.
By letting my despair and rage regarding my father’s death, cremation, funeral service, and the demon worshiper articles influence my words, I communicated with my priest in an undiplomatic manner, letting off the fact I had considered leaving the parish. He played me like a fiddle, got me into an unwanted confession when neither prepared nor ready, and made me apologize for speaking to him in the way mentioned in the comment thread below.
The answers I received in response to my intolerable grievances were as follows:
“Paul saying women should remain silent doesn’t mean what it means, contextâ€
“Women speaking in front of iconostasis regularly doesn’t matter, she’s not a priestâ€
“It’s not a canonical violation if she is not officially a priest/deacon/readerâ€
“Women speaking in church is not her being in a position of authority/equalityâ€
“Women speaking in church is not an userpation of the hierarchy of men and women, how dare you imply such a hierarchy should existâ€
“Women speaking in church is not her being a “priest†without the title of priestâ€
“Being a priest is only about performing sacraments and sermons, not being an authority figure over the congregationâ€
“There is no “authority†in the church hierarchy, we are all in submissionâ€
“Both articles were only about expressing a different opinion, stop overanalyzingâ€
“So what if the Copts are heretics, point was the opinion expressedâ€
“Stop purity spirallingâ€
“Spend more time on yourselfâ€
“Stop sowing division by being disobedientâ€
(disclaimer: not saying all statements above are necessarily false, just listing statements)
He also said he received a blessing from the bishop, and that having his wife talk in church is final and is not going to be changed.
My error, which is an error of youth caused by a lack of wisdom, is that I failed to stop trying to voice a grievance when it was immediately brushed aside.
No boomer priest is going to care about the opinions of some 24-year-old kid never raised in the church or with the diaspora, only got back a year ago, and barely speaks any Russian. I believed in Jim’s words below, that he was simply a normiecon who only needed to see another person who didn’t believe in the consensus, but because of my lack of discernment, I failed to realize communication was pointless and harmful.
And it is so horrible, because the woman herself is (or appears to be) the kindest and most virtuous woman in the church.
If there is anything to learn about my field report for the readership here, it is that if someone is not going to respond to thoughtcrime, cease all communication immediately.
At least he says he loves me (?) and allows me to commune. I get along with the others at coffee hour and have made good friends, so I’m not leaving. Also leaving would imply Donatism. The only thing I will be doing from now on is leaving the building when she speaks for the few minutes she does; and, I guess it’s not so bad if she manages to quiet the congregation during the communion of the clergy.
Sounds well enough like a demon worshipper to me, the third party. Leaving for that which you will not stand is good. In your shoes I would keep in touch with your fellows and search for another church to commune with. I am not in your shoes, therefore I will instead wish you the best, and confirm that the details you have given me make your priest sound very unsound indeed.
I can sympathize with those for whom the Tao of the Troll does not come naturally, given years of experience in the hoary old wild west days of the internet taking of such poorly armed adversaries.
A sense of grace, tact, and insuperable soul skewering shivs that pierce strait to the amygdala can hardly be mailed through a comment box, but one can comment on the tactical contingencies of particular exchanges.
I think the biggest overall issue here is that you, both, allowed yourself to become emotionally compromised (“lol umad bro”), yet at the same time, were giving a perverse degree of deference to your interlocutor.
In combat sports circles, this is sometimes called the ‘sensei effect’, where a trainee, if he is rolling with his instructor, will semi-consciously gimp himself, act in ways that are almost in expectation of the instructor countering him, even or especially if he is otherwise a superior fighter when matched up with anyone else.
Instead of acting within a frame that you are laying down Divine Law, it sounds like instead you were acting like you needed to justify yourself to him, which in turn made your implicit antagonism come off as childish and petty.
I decided to attend my church not because the priest was a normiecon, I attended my church because I loved my priest as a father, the father I never had. Arguably I loved him more than my own family. Having grown up without religion I struggle with keeping my prayers, yet over the past year-and-a-half I prayed every night for God to protect and help my priest, my confessor.
The only reason he was able to manipulate a confession out of me was because I learned on Saturday that my mother has stage 3 liver cancer, and thus I decided to attend and then stay after vigil because I wanted to ask my priest to pray for my mother (in hindsight a big mistake). I didn’t even get a chance to ask my priest to pray for her (I told him but didn’t ask anything about my mother at confession), he sent me out the door and left to do other things.
I spoke to Father regarding my father’s death last week because I was grieving and I wanted sympathy from him regarding the demonic women-priest funeral service. The subject of women priests obviously came up and I asked why he has women speaking in the church, something I decided not to ask of him (out of a perverse sense of respect).
In retrospect, when I met with my priest again on Thursday, I did not approach him as an equal, I approached him as a beaten child approaches his abusive step-father, begging him to tell me that him beating me wasn’t really him beating me. How could I give him anything less than complete deference? To be honest, while I was filled with pain and anger regarding the initial conversation, I was relatively straightforward and stable with the second conversation (discounting telling him I was considering leaving the parish).
This all happened because I am a liar, chiefly to myself. I wanted to believe a narrative about my priest, ignoring the red flags, pretending he was a normiecon, and making excuses for his shortcomings (“women speaking in church is no problem, I’m sure Father has a good reason for it, I don’t want to offend himâ€). When I could no longer maintain the unconscious lie, I began doubting my sanity.
After he had beaten me, my priest triumphantly declared, “you can’t always be right about everything,†“you are brilliant yet you lack wisdom.â€
It’s clear from reading your posts that you are a bit twisted up inside and emotionally volatile. Priority number one for you should be becoming manly, finding clarity and purpose. Meditate on your great ancestors and their struggles and find their strength deep inside you. Emotion may pass over you like the winds but you are an oak tree, your trunk is unbending and your roots are firm in the ground.
Paraphrasing heavily – “If you think your brother is in error, first go to him alone and reason with him. If this fails, find two or three elders and return to him and reason with him. If this fails, stop arguing with him and separate yourself.”
Tricky to find two or three elders on this issue in a converged church, and tricky when the man in error is an elder. Still, its a format with power when you can apply it.
Deception, self-deception, denial etc. is the ultimate test of fitness for a man. Easy to stay alive, easy to get a woman pregnant. Telling the truth is hard, finding out what it is is hard. Words are an illusion. Watch what people do. Listen to what they say. If they are not congruent, let their behavior define them.
The root word of authority is author. If a woman is speaking on a matter she is the authority. Maybe less if it’s just a reading of something a man wrote. In any case, you know where this priest stands.
It was good of you to confront the priest. Now you know where your frame is weak.
The field report is most welcome; we should be getting more of these in general, as it could be an exceptional resource to both Commenters and Lurkers. Way to take the dive, and it’s even better that you came back with a less than victorious story to tell. It is never easy to analyze your own defeat. I have no advice to give and only wish to reinforce what others have already written.
If you were telling him the Bible, the communion of the Saints, and the voice of Holy Spirit within, he would have heard your master’s voice.
Perhaps, in hindsight, it is good that he did not hear my master’s voice.
It is likely he thinks I’m merely a petty child who’s a little “misogynistic” – a child, perhaps, but a “good” child overall who got carried away and now is behaving
On the other hand, if he learned that I am a Reactionary, a different animal…
Thinking back, I never showed him my true power level. When he asked me if I was pro-life, I told him about feminism and how if I had daughters I would set up arranged marriages for them, but in retrospect he probably thinks that I’m talking about something completely different from what I was actually talking about. Perhaps God was protecting me from him, or, perhaps Gnon know all along I was lying about him to myself.
I will stay with him and see if I can find more about him or use him. Plus I have close friends there so I don’t think it’s best for me to leave just yet.
“Being a priest is only about performing sacraments and sermons, not being an authority figure over the congregationâ€
Of Christian ministers Paul sates in 1 Corinthians 4:1, “This is how one should regard us, as servants of Christ and stewards of the mysteries of God.†Stewardship translates the Greek word oikonomia. oikos, meaning house and the word nomos meaning law. Thus oikonomia means house law.
God has given ministers authority to dispense his word and his law upon congregation. Performing sacraments is presupposition upon holding authority given by God over the congregation. If the minister is not an authority figure, then he does not have authority to perform sacrament.
Guessing that he will just say what Paul says in Corinthians “doesn’t mean what it means, context”
“There is no “authority†in the church hierarchy, we are all in submissionâ€
In submission to what if there is no authority?
“Stop sowing division by being disobedientâ€
If there is no authority and no hierarchy how can there be disobedience? Disobedience to what? By what authority does he have to tell you to stop being disobedient? Yet he commands you…
—–
Pure gaslighting. Forget the stance on women in the Church. This guy doesn’t even understand or be truthful of his position as a priest in the Church. That is a far more severe issue.
As far as I can tell, all churches are like this. A friend tried the very thing Help attempted though he questioned it publicly not just alone with the preacher. His pastor admitted that he was right about scripture on the proper role of women but he’d upset some women so he had to go.
Your friend’s priest was a normiecon. My priest is a completely different animal.
Is it time for a second look at home churches? Or pop-up, men’s only Bible studies, maybe ones where you lead off speaking very honestly about red-pill issues, and guys are allowed to curse occasionally? If you’ve got a Bible, one wife, obedient children and aren’t a drunkard you’re basically qualified as a church elder already. Years of seminary and a salary seem logical to us now, but aren’t specifically commanded biblically.
Downside is it marks you out a little bit socially. Argument for it is we’re commanded to be in communion with other believers, but we’re not commanded to be in submission to false prophets. A real challenge when the established church is already converged.
Are there any churches consistently good on this question? As a Protestant, happy to be finally attending a church that considers the 19th amendment to be wrong and don’t let women vote in their government. But even so, more normiecon than I would like still.
Fighting an entire culture is hard to do. Curious to know what the best others have found in any circumstances. The most common “conservative” compromise is to forbid female officers in the church, but to be a compromised egalitarian in almost any other question of importance.
Long time lurker, first time poster.
That’s not because of sklavishmoral minoritarianism though, it is because every place in the world outside of the global (anti-)american theocracy is a hue-ocracy that explicitly recognizes the superiority of whiteness.
(As opposed to the GAE implicitly recognizing the superiority of whiteness, by ‘white privilege’ being defined as an inherent ineffable quality all whites are born whose magical power makes everyone else worse than them, such that Others have no power over their own destiny – that they could only hope to prevail by convincing the inherently superior to willingly disenfranchise themselves.)
(This should have gone here https://blog.reaction.la/science/origins-of-the-white-race/?replytocom=2849818#respond)
>In submission to what if there is no authority?
>If there is no authority and no hierarchy how can there be disobedience? Disobedience to what? By what authority does he have to tell you to stop being disobedient? Yet he commands you…
That was one of the first things that jumped out at me too.
This guy isn’t just letting women preach from the pulpit, he is spiritually female himself.
You are paying too much attention to what he says. Pay attention to what he does not say.
Do you believe that my priest is my enemy, or is he a normiecon? Some commenters here think he is an enemy, other say he is merely a normiecon.
What is the difference between a normiecon and a conservative entryist like Archbishop Chrysostomos?
Thinking back while he did say that vaccination should be a choice, he was not exactly happy when I criticized Metropolitan Hilarion (Alfeyev) for his promotion of the vax. On the other hand, he supports Putin in his invasion of Ukraine. His Facebook is almost perfectly clean of anything “off.” Either way I don’t trust him.
I don’t know. Probably normiecon.
But he is citing the fake consensus of enemies.
That enemy shilling works against normiecons is more or less the definition of normiecon. Not on their guard against hostile entryists.
I think more analysis is needed to make a better assessment. I am new to faith practice in current era, but based on what the Orthobros are saying (and given that that is your self-selected faction, you should go with their advice above others), you should probably stick it out there. So more analysis is in order, but it is an unenviable position; the priest is supposed to be your leader, the guy you turn to and defer to, so him also being the target of your “counter-intelligence” operation is going to suck.
Personally I tend to judge these things sociologically. How does he compare to the norm in your local Russian Orthodox circles? Enemies are moving the needle in the wrong direction of the norm of their chosen sphere of influence. Normiecons tend to be within that consensus. I could comment about Reformed Protestant circles, but have no idea about Russian Orthodox ones.
Am not convinced you’re the real thing, Mr. Help.
Supposedly your priest said: “Stop purity spirallingâ€
I’ve never heard anyone use that term who didn’t get it from Jim but maybe you mean he was expressing the same concept (pharisee-ism) and you’re translating into the terminology used here.
But you’re probably real.
I’ve not been reading these threads in depth because many opinions of the heterodox (that’s ortho for “goyim”) are… not correct and painful to the eyes. In an earlier thread with Feanor, I’ve not hidden that I don’t consider myself a reactionary in the same way as others here. That being said, they provide helpful perspective on a lot of points, so I drop by now and again.
For example, the Old Testament view on women is so different from feminism that until I saw it translated into game theory, I wasn’t able to *comprehend* it. Quite literally could not accept it at face value because lacked the broader framework. If woman are spiritually/mentally equivalent to men, it would be monstrous to shackle them within traditional subservient marriage. If, as is actually the case, women are spiritually/mentally different than men, then the role of wife makes them stronger and richer than they could be otherwise. See Aidan’s post on how a woman with a good man flourishes.
Jim approaches Church problems with Jim’s thought process and Jim’s goals. His goal is to such a human life as would naturally derive from the pleasures of patriarchy, mannerbund and building a future for his children. The Orthodox goal is to save our souls. That’s abstract. Concretely, this manifests in moving our soul such that we can become free of the influence of the passions. The problem with the carnal, physical world is that we’re slaves to our circumstances. Reaction is entirely concerned with mastering these circumstances. If your children are murdered, you will be unhappy, so the reactionary quite reasonably strives to create a polity that prevents murder. That’s fine. Doesn’t contradict Orthodoxy but it has limits.
I know some guys who are bluepilled/beta towards women. Extremely frustrating for me to watch. These are close friends/family, so I can’t and won’t throw them out of my life. Their actions, their weakness, exerts control over me. Every time they do the lame and cringe things demanded by the bluepill, I wince. Internally, I revile them. (Archaic verb but apt.) Can’t help it. Now, the goal of Orthodoxy is to improve my soul such that I’ll be free of this inform that the others exert over me. When these guys do something horrible and bluepill, I want it to have no power over me. For you, this would be easy. They’re not your close friends/family. Perhaps you will say “just stop caring about them” but that too would be an example of their control over me. If someone else can unilaterally change me/my disposition, then he has control over me.
Again, this is abstract but suppose you capture and torture a wild wolf. Then you let it go. If you did that to a man, he’d spend the rest of his life seething about how much he hates you. If you do it a wolf, it won’t resent you. It won’t spend every moment pierced by shame and plotting revenge. If it finds you ten years later, it will, naturally, dismember you, but it won’t spend every breath dominated by your memory.
Orthodoxy is a more social religion. We don’t seek reduction to the beast because their is no love in such a state and such scraps of love as we feel are some of the best parts. There’s nothing like a friend who will really watch your back, who, on a very, thinks you’re great. So, in Orthodoxy, we seek both the animal freedom from lingering resentment and the divine joy of love, which isn’t something you can conjure with clever social technology. The heterodox can call this an impossible goal but they should admit that it’s suitably defined. Not a nonsense concept.
In your own case, you’re talking about a woman reading making you so upset that you have to leave the Church. How much better to become like righteous Job who saw all of his vast wealth stolen and all his family killed and said “The Lord gives. The Lord takes away. Blessed be the name of the Lord.” He was, of course, stricken with grief but he was not mastered by it. His wife kept suggesting he kill himself because, in her view, how could he not be overwhelmed?
Others have their own passions that master them.
To circle back, the reactionaries lack our goal and our methods. They’re just trying to use tech and social tech to make decent lives more likely.
I get it, though. You don’t know where else to go to someone who will understand your objections. Will talk to my priest about this and get back in a few days.
Well, of course, as a disclaimer, I did admit I am a liar. This is a dangerous and de facto illegal website, so of course I will be lying about some details.
For example, my father wasn’t a German Lutheran, perhaps he was an Anglo Unitarian. Perhaps my mother did not develop stage 3 lung cancer, perhaps she was sent to a psychiatric hospital for schizophrenia. That sort of thing. I say what is relevant to the details of this website.
He didn’t. I did as a summation of what he told me.
Despondency, judgment and wrath are my cardinal sins, and obviously I did not consider leaving the church for the sole reason of women speaking in church. When Father made me confess, what he heard in some ways was different from what I meant. For example, when I confessed being angry and intemperate with my priest, I wasn’t referring to the content of what I said but the way in which I said it. So sure, I will keep going, I won’t be leaving.
You need to have an intent to deceive people for it to be a lie. Hiding your identity by muddling details isn’t lying.
There are some things Help says that are bizarre coming from an Orthodox Christian cradle; as you noticed, he uses NRx terminology instead of Christian terminology in his field report. However, over half of the members at my church only attend on Pascha and only half of those people for Orthodox Christmas. My priest told me how many of the regular members of the congregation were surprised when he told them that they are not supposed to do prostrations on Sundays. In other words, the “off†details may just amount to him being unaware of certain conventions and ways of thinking due to ignorance.
In my opinion, Help is the real thing, because only a true believer would stick around at his church after having his grievances ignored. If he were not a true believer, he would not have gone to church last Saturday for Vigil to pray for his ailing mother. Help is struggling not only with the death of his father but also, as he says, with the terrible sins of despondency and anger. Most Orthodox Christians who return to the church have a moment roughly one year afterwards when the Devil tries to get them to leave their spiritual father and their church or monastery, and it is likely that the Devil used the death of his father to attempt to get Help to abandon the church.
One book that greatly helped me with overcoming despondency and anger was Despondency: The Spiritual Teaching of Evagrius of Pontus written by Swiss monk Gabriel Bunge. Link listed here: shorturl.at/dyzJ1
Not only incorrect, but in certain cases, such as with the bastard problem, wicked and deranged. There are certain issues that are best avoided on a secular reactionary platform. However, reactionaries are the only people in the West capable of destroying the Cathedral by replacing Progressivism with Christianity. The people in modern Orthodoxy, in particular Orthodoxy outside of Russia, are almost entirely morally compromised. My hope is that NRx can either establish or help Christians establish Christianity as an official state religion and that all the little details will dissipate over time.
We will see if reactionaries are capable of destroying the Cathedral but the strong point in their favor is that they have an accurate idea of the problem. Alternative resistance is conservative “we must embrace gay marriage to thwart gay fornication” and Alex Jones “we must defeat the pedophile vampires to restore the constitution.”
(I’m doing the Jew thing. Sometimes reactionaries are “we.” Sometimes “they.”)
>> “Stop purity spirallingâ€
Is this actually something people say outside OL NRX ?
Figured he was giving summarized account rather than exact quote. It also seems inline with how liberal Christians will react to quoting scripture they don’t agree with.
I think the phrase has been leaking out to irl in the same way ‘the cathedral’ has.
Correct.
If I recall right, the NRX term is “Holiness spiral”, which could be seen as a kind and type of Purity spiral.
“Purity spiral” tends to be used by leftist types as a way of attacking gatekeeping, and old traditional Christianity.
“Holiness spiral” on the other hand, is exclusively used to attack the never ending “progress” of leftists becoming even more “holy”.
Holiness spirals emerge from the internal dynamics of single adherents to a given faith. They can, and do, happen with any faith based rhetorical framework. An adherent observes a fellow believer do something, or say something, that creates the impression, real or imagined, that their commitment or relation to the faith is demonstrably higher than expected, either of that specific person or than the baseline expectation of their type of adherent, and the observer is compelled to act in a similar manner, or say something similarly, with the introduced necessity of magnification in order to maintain their current faith status, real or imagined. The dynamic is wholly internal, and it can be set off unwittingly by someone being very honest or legitimate or adamant. The observer(s) is compelled to mimic and modify, and the natural tendency is to modify the amplitude, because it is far harder to come up with something different or new that will be equivalent in effect. So they take the Act/Word and add to it with the tools they have.
Adherent 01: “I was thinking about [shared faith] the other day, and [entity worshipped] spoke to me, and I realized that I needed to [commit act/state position/perform sacrifice] more. So I did, and I felt [entity worshipped] more deeply.”
Adherent 02: “OMG, I know right? I too was thinking about [shared faith], which I obviously do a lot, maybe more than a lot of people, and I felt [entity worshipped] speak to me… but this was different, because I commune with [entity worshipped] a lot, but this was… different. And I knew, I just knew in my heart, that I needed to [commit act/state position/perform sacrifice], which I already do, like, A LOT, but I realized that I needed to do it even more, because doing it a lot, which I do, maybe too much haha, but like actually there is no “too much,” and doing it more is better, and that’s what [entity worshipped] showed me!”
The example is cluttered and highly religio-social, but it demonstrates the scenario well enough. The relation of an act of devotion inspires observing fellow travelers to repeat and amplify. Adaptations introduced to the amplification can earn greater status for the repeater, so the tendency is always to add more, not less. In rhetorical structures that lack moderating influences or hierarchy, the only limit to the amplification and adaptation tendencies is the credulity of those assembled. You can observe this in recordings of college students doing meetings for whatever current thing. Free of moderating influences or unassailable hierarchy, they will go from “socialism == good” to “exterminate the unbeliever” alarmingly fast. The thing to remember is that Holiness Spirals are internal to the participants, so the key to figuring them out, predicting them, and curtailing them lies in the quality and quantitative aspects of the adherents/members. The lower the IQ, the lower the creative capacity, the higher the chance that the amplification/moderation Step will be dramatic.
—–
Purity Spirals are different, as it is an outside measurement being deployed to suss out the Ideal Hierarchy, contrasted with the Extant Hierarchy. Much of the actual process is internal, but there’s less creative necessity required. Instead, familiarity with canon, or deep knowledge of texts (holy or otherwise), is the critical element for mapping, predicting, curtailing, or deploying purity spirals.
Adherent 01: “You know, I love [venerated thing] a lot, so much so that I was going over the [canonical text/media] again the other day, and I realized that [widely accepted stance] isn’t actually accurate because [minor technical element] is not considered to the proper degree. In order to be more loyal/pure/righteous, one must [modified stance with technical element enhanced in import].”
Adherent 02: “Interesting point, but have you considered [different minor technical element] from [canonical text/media] as well? It is therefore even better to [further modified stance with both technical elements enhanced in import].”
Adherent 03: “I completely disagree because [esoteric observation not in common understanding] means that both [minor technical points] are irrelevant. To be more loyal/pure/righteous, we must venerate [esoteric observation].”
Notice the difference: the Holiness Spiral occurs at greater intensity without moderating influence (though it can occur with moderating influences, of course), while the intensity of a Purity Spiral is greatly increased by the complexity or prevalence of moderating influences. Holiness Spirals can occur in any group for many reasons at any time. Purity Spirals require adherents seeking perfect or refine a given hierarchy, be it institutional or dialectical. Notice, too, that Holiness Spirals can really only spiral in one direction, while Purity Spirals can go multiple directions, depending on the alacrity, command, and personality types of the participants. If the caliber or quality of the participants in a Purity Spiral are high enough, they can actually reverse and undo steps towards mania or foolishness.
Very, very rarely is a Holiness Spiral a thing you’d want to happen to your own group. Even in small, low importance situations, say, a bible study or clan meeting, a Holiness Spiral can quickly lead to hostility, fragmentation, and ill sentiment between members. But Purity Spirals are actually necessary and beneficial in many cases, particularly early on in a group/organization/ideologies formation, or when being confronted by hostile actors, be they skin-suit-entryists or malign adversaries or what have you. The most important thing is knowing when it is appropriate, where it should be curtailed, and how to curtail it.
Of all the groups I have observed, researched, or participated in, the Jim Tribe is the most adept at avoiding Holiness Spirals and deploying constrained Purity Spirals. The lion’s share of responsibility for this is Jim’s, which is as it should be, but no one lives forever and the things that Go Without Saying must be said, must be recorded for posterity and/or future Jimian Christians. This is not a simple task, but it is, in my estimation, an essential one.
Help, I am sorry for your loss regarding your father. My father is still alive, so while I cannot fully understand your loss, given my own love for my father, his loss will certainly have me devastated. I will keep you, your father, and your mother in my prayers tonight.
However, you need to calm down and take a chill pill.
Unless your priest is highly intelligent, he is in all honesty most likely just retarded. As a smart person at 24 years of age, you do not have the experience to understand just how retarded people are. Your priest may have a degree, and given that he is in the Russian church on the West Coast, a career, but he may just be a retard.
If he says he loves you and gives you Confession, I do not believe he is an entryist who is trying to hurt you. If he were an entryist, he would be encouraging you to leave the church because you could influence the other parishoners, just as Archbishop Chrysostomos defrocked clergy who refused the jab. I think he recognizes, just as you do, that you are a troubled man facing tremendous difficulty, and wants to help you succeed.
Please stay at your church, keep going to Confession and Communion, keep your prayers, and this will all pass. If it really bothers you, you can walk outside for a little bit when the women read Lives of the Saints or whatever during the Communion of the clergy and then walk back in. Your priest should not be that unreasonable to forbid you from doing that.
With the recent discussions on the aptitude of women choosing men, I figured this video would be amusing to watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AKTwdZDmoM
many such videos, much horror for dads with daughters
That looks super fake and gay, as a dad though my goal is to convince my daughters that dating is for losers and to marry young. We’ll see how successful I am.
Women being notoriously bad at selection is not fake and not gay. If parents don’t play a large role in guiding their daughters, it’s not surprising if they run off with a janitor or worse.
I’ve seen it happen in well off liberal families where the daughter marries a bum.
I meant the show looks fake and staged for drama. If she picked boring normal dudes it wouldn’t be interesting to watch. The number of black men is the real tell.
Of course women pick losers though, you don’t need a tv show to tell you that. There is an interesting advantage though specifically for girls with rich dads: a poorer husband ensures greater allocation of family resources to her.
“a poorer husband ensures greater allocation of family resources to her”
Say what??? You can’t be serious!!!!
Which father will allocate more resources to the daughter that married a bum?
Any father who wants grandkids.
If a son in law is wealthy, the dad can cut off his support and still trust his grandchildren will be looked after. By marrying poor, the daughter ensures the dad-bux keep flowing. Women receive the greatest RoI from focusing on manipulating men and this starts with Dad, Especially if he’s rich (my three year old does it!)
There was actually an interesting study on this that showed it was evolutionarily sound. More support means more grandkids and thus greater gene spread. Basically dads give in once a baby is in the oven. Or as heinlein put it, getting a girl pregnant turns the dad from enemy to co conspirator.
Something about this position feels vaguely off…
Yes, it feels off because it IS off. He is claiming that the Dad will essentially reward the daughter who choses poorly. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever and has also never happened historically.
What usually happens, and has happened historically is, that the Dad cuts that daughter off from his life so as to make an example out of her in order to encourage other daughters (his own and those of the community) to choose better.
He’s mangling something real, but I can’t tell if error or shill.
Daughters do get more support than sons overall. Grandparents travel more and farther to visit grandchildren of daughters than grandchildren of sons – absolutely certain they’re descendants, whether or not the father got cucked. Single mom daughters may get cut off, or may get supported, can go either way in current year.
But then he’s arguing daughters would rather have a poor baby daddy than a rich baby daddy. All else being equal that’s ridiculous on it’s face, but then in thug America all else is not equal, as has previously been discussed.
You’ve never once seen a rich girl marry a poor man? Please. Reams of history prove this wrong. Shit I know a half dozen guys in my own social circle who married way up in wealth.
Get outside and talk to some real people sometime.
“Yes goy, it totally makes sense to not take 500 dollars so your father will give you 100 dollars. Your father will only love you (and give you money) if you are poor.”
Pics/Links or it didn’t happen.
Also everything you say the study says only points to the idea that men are willing to invest in their grandchildren, in this case his daughters offspring. (which is not that radical of an idea) Doesn’t sound like it says that it is “beneficial” to mate with a broke loser to get more gibbs from daddy.
If historical novels or scriptural stories are any indication, what has happened historically is that the Dad completely cuts that daughter off from his life and forbids any of his family (of which he is patriarch) from having anything to do with said daughter as well.
I know a rich girl who married a poor guy, so the millionaire dad gave him a job. The dad bought their house, pays all their expenses, and set up trust funds for all their kids. It was way easier for the daughter to get this support from the dad than to marry a similar millionaire.
Saying this ‘never happens in all of history’ is baffling nonsense.
When I have children, I intend to practice primogeniture.
@neofugue
>However, there are other quotes which are more sinister:
>”They are the wards of a dimension where extremes do not exist, where all truth is witnessed in the royal way, in the mystical truth encompassed only by moderation.”
Complicated and dense argumentation goes over my head. Just don’t get it. Which means sometimes I can’t distinguish between nonsense and something profound but badly stated.
Above, the archbishop seems to be arguing for the golden mean. Certainly seems sinister. Far as I know, that’s not a Christian view. No such thing as an excess of virtue. Then there’s the question of defining your two extremes. Here, he accurately depicts feminism as one extreme and ignorant 50s conservatism as the other. Not the same thing as reaction.
We wouldn’t say women belong in the house because such is their arbitrary role. We would say that women belong in the house because they’re inclined to rebellion (shit tests) and emotionally resemble children. A child ought to have parents and a woman ought to have a husband. An orphan can survive and grow but he’s missing something good and proper for his development. Likewise, a woman can survive single but she’s created to thrive with a husband. A father doesn’t depend on his children but they still form an indispensable part of his life. Likewise, a man doesn’t *need* his wife the way she needs him, symmetrically, but she becomes indispensable to him.
This is not what the archbishop presents as the conservative extreme and it’s not his “moderate” compromise. Not his golden mean.
Classic enemy shill behavior. Fails to acknowledge the Christian position, takes for granted that no one Christian anywhere ever has ever thought what every Christian has taken for granted until about 1930
Fails to acknowledge the existence of those he intends to exterminate. This is the same bundle of tactics we see with every enemy shill entryist everywhere, therefore, what they intend, he intends. This Archbishop intends the murder of every Christian everywhere. He wants Christianity utterly erased. I have seen too many shills and too much shilling. I can see what they are up to.
He hates Christ, and he hates us.
All shills maintain a stubborn and intransigent failure to notice certain things, no matter how obvious, not matter how urgently relevant, and no matter how plainly said.
And then when you find the precise outlines of what they are strangely unable to see, you can identify their intent, which intent is democidal. Thus, for example, the inability to see their attempted extermination of the Tutsi.
They demonetized the Tutsi so that they could not defend themselves, they impaled Tutsi women on giant spikes. When the Tutsi employed uncut diamonds to buy weapons and fund the transport of weapons, they demonetized uncut diamond. Many many Tutsi peoples were exterminated. This is the same deadly blindness.
Hear precisely and exactly what he cannot say, the limits of the unthinkable thought, see what he cannot see, the limits of the unseeable sight, and you will know what he intends. He intends to erase Christ from the earth, which he thinks can be achieved by the murder of us all.
What a shill or entryist says never contains any useful information, What a shill or entryist cannot say reveals much. He seeks to erase Christ from the earth.
I’m missing some context here. Which archbishop are you guys talking about?
Some more encouraging actions by DeSantis. Apparently he just recently suspended 4 women on the Broward County School Board for incompetence (historically deep blue area). This is more of the pattern I’ve noticed with him—governors have historically very very rarely used the power to remove officials that are in the executive branch (the power is pretty much plenary and unilateral, and can be overturned only by the Florida senate voting to do so). DeSantis plays basically only by the Rules as Written (RAW), not the code of normie conservatism. Dunno whether he’s got it in him to overcome the normalcy trance, but he does have an army of Florida men than he’s been building.
That is excellent news if true. Hopefully it touches off a trend. I keep going back and forth on Desantis the man, but I stand by my position that the RNC is trying to use him to derail Trump. St. Anglin has a good angle on this ongoing operation:
https://stormer-daily.rw/ben-shapiro-who-is-jewish-is-still-out-there-shilling-like-a-maniac/
Excerpt: “I don’t know what the first five tweets mean. Like literally, I have no idea what any of that means. I searched ‘the Mythology of the Emerging Democratic Minority Majority (MEDMM)’ and there were no results for that, using that acronym, and the ‘myth of the emerging Democratic majority’ is something totally unrelated to what he is saying.
That is purposeful gibberish, which is intended to dazzle the goyim. People are supposed to think ‘oh that must be something smart, because I don’t understand it.’
Then at the end he gets to the point: ‘goyim, stop attacking the FBI and supporting Donald Trump.'”
We’re in strange territory here. Desantis is a governor par excellence, but this makes him quite the asset for the uniparty to use to derail their biggest threat, that being a Trump 2024 campaign. It might be better for him to attempt a gubernatorial takeover of another state after he’s done in FL. Imagine Desantis in charge of the assets and resources of TX. Even more fantastical, what if he somehow took control of CA? It would be a very tough job, but if he managed to restore CA even a bit, he’d be undeniable King Governor of North America. Desantis has many routes to overlordship, but there are also many pitfalls along the way. God grant him strength, humility, and wisdom.
A lot of the news outlets are outraged that it’s ‘elected’ officials that DeSantis is axing. Just like the ‘elected’ Soros DAs that he’s axed as well. The beauty of it is that RAW doesn’t care whether they’re elected or not, and I doubt DeSantis does either. As I understand it, he replaced them with loyalists. It’s very hard to defend the school board members he axed—a grand jury even recommended ejecting them (of course it was DeSantis’ grand jury), and they were pretty criminally incompetent.
I don’t think DeSantis is planning to challenge Trump in 2024, although he is keeping his options open. It’ll be interesting to see how Florida handles the election in 2022 and whether DeSantis has what it takes to suppress the fraud this time.
Historically, what happens when the elite is too decadent to hold a free election is that struggles over the counting become increasingly physical, and eventually irrelevant.
We are at the point where struggles over the counting become physical, and DeSantis, unlike Trump, seems to be prepared for this eventuality.
First man to toss normality bias aside is apt to win.
Both men are encumbered by the mores and norms of a dead code. These encumbrances are different enough that, in certain lights, one seems better or worse than the other, or maybe more or less likely to shed the last vestiges of normality. It will be a fascinating and anxiety-inducing run up to the 2024 not-election. But that is the politics of the moment. The Politics of History, the broad trends and events with which we are concerned, do not hinge on Trump or Desantis in the abstract. 10 years hence, we could very well be living under the dominion of a lucky and capable bodyguard for some minor politician, a warrior turned king by standing precisely where he needed to to Take Hold. The likelihood of this, or any other potential outcome, is too complicated to really calculate, so all we really have is the axioms and observations we have coalesced over the last 20 years, and the wisdom and observations of our intellectual antecedents. I think this is enough to guide us pretty well; we know Trump’s failure mode(s), and we know a RINO when we see one. The wildcards are IEW, Grasping The Nettle, Normalcy Rejection, and chance.
RWDS!
Reactionary
Women
Demand
Stability
Real
Woman
Dance
Sonata
https://ifunny.co/video/ktok-asking-sisters-pop-culture-questions-G72RgLpY8
What’s your explanation historically for how Occupied America went from Tammany Hall machine politics to free and fair elections, that is, in the opposite direction of outright oligarchy?
Tammany Hall was not plausibly accused of rigging elections. It was plausibly accused of being corrupt. However the trend line has been steady with judges, senior bureaucrats, and leading politicians strangely acquiring greater and greater wealth. It is obvious that corruption has been escalating rapidly and steadily since the days of Tammany Hall. Compare and contrast Hunter Biden with any Tammany Hall figure. Tammany Hall lost power to people immensely more corrupt than they were.
The cathedral’s story about how wonderfully clean, transparent, and uncorrupt the American system is fails to conform to my experience of doing business in America.
I don’t know enough about this subject matter to disagree with you, but it seems like the system has been very corrupt for very long.
And yet it continues, without apparent end.
End is in sight.
P
R
A
I
S
E
G
N
O
N
People have been predicting that for generations. “The end is nigh! Things are terrible and getting worse! The system can’t continue to stumble on forever! Soon there will be a CATASTROPHE!”
And then the prophesied time comes and goes and nothing happens and nothing changes.
I’ll believe it when I see it.
Valid point. But every generation, and now every year, political change happened faster and faster, while technological and economic change happened slower and slower.
If you attempt to fit a curve to the rate of political change, you get infinite political change in few years. Infinite leftism in finite time.
Infinite leftism means everyone tortures everyone else to death for being insufficiently leftist. Of course, when you get close to that point, usually what happens is that Caesar sees his turn is coming up next, and makes it at least as dangerous to be too far left, as it is to be insufficiently far left, whereupon the holiness spiral comes to a sudden stop.
[*deleted*]
Reiterating.
Nothing will happen because nothing ever happens.
Over the past few years, the unprecedented, unthinkable, and impossible has happened with great regularity. Trump could not possibly win the Republican Nomination. Having won the Nomination, Trump could not possibly win the presidency. The Global American Empire making war on Russia could not possibly lead to Russia making war on the Global American Empire. And sanctions could not possibly blow back and cause catastrophic damage to western economies with no major damage to the Russian economy.
None of that happened🙃
A whole lot of impossible things have recently happened. A lot more impossible things are going to happen faster and faster.
You locked down the political system against outsiders so that a Trump can never happen again. But this merely guarantees that something even more shocking is going to happen.
This is the boilerplate shill salvo on /pol/ right now. Our shills aren’t even trying at this point.
[*deleted*]
FDR won three terms, everyone expected a fourth. Term limits introduced because even the elite got scared. His VP Truman replaced him, inherited/won two terms. New Dealers in power for two decades.
Starting to look bad, like US is some Warsaw Pact fake democracy. So they run Eisenhower for the other party to make it look like there are two parties. Eisenhower is this conservative hero, supposedly, but really a political general appointed by FDR who said “before I end up, either this Republican Party will reflect progressivism or I won’t be with them anymore.”
Party ruled 1933-61, a whole generation. JFK/LBJ were party members but some other faction, didn’t work out for them somehow. JFK probably won 1960 on electoral fraud and Nixon chose not to contest it. Nixon is the first “insurgent”, even then he was Eisenhower’s VP.
USA politics has been gate-kept for a long time. Reagan was allowed to do some things, but not any thing.
This is the thing,
Is it a central conspiracy as jim say, done ” by people around a table that they could feel the wormth of each other” ?
Or multitude of conspiracies without central command.
Some things point to the former, others to the latter
It is just hard to believe the former, conspiracies are rarely successful and if successful not happening like they intended to .
Both. Consider the communist party of the Soviet Union. There is the central conspiracy to spread world revolution and work tirelessly for the good of the party. And there are a million factions, each of which believes they should be in charge.
“FDR won three terms, everyone expected a fourth.”
FDR did win a fourth term, but died three months after the inauguration. The Democrats knew his health was failing, which is why in 1944 they replaced his commie VP Wallace with the more moderate Truman.
Less publicly communist Truman*
Truman was a commie but was rather incompetent. He tried to lose the war in Korea in a why that wouldn’t get him impeached and succeeded in handing China over to the Reds.
What ‘free and fair elections’?
Popular governance is like spherical cows; the only place they really exist is in the confabulations of an ill-minded ideologist.
It is inherent to the structure of things for all democracies to be oligocracies in practice, and the only difference between then an now is that the openly oligocratic dynamics became increasingly occulted instead.
[*deleted*]
I have been pondering our situation lately and I am slowly persuading myself that what we need is not a Caesar but a Mohammed.
To return to bronze age social technology, we need radical social change. Caesars do not typically implement radical social change in their societies. It is largely political change. But Mohammed, or Ayatollah Khomeini, those men do successfully create a new social order.
For a new Mohammed to arise we would need a religion for which Mohammed could rally the faithful. An American Mohammed would need a church that is not just right in its bronze age social technology, but also right in a doctrine of military force — it needs the attitude of crusaders and conquistadors undertaking the Great Commission. It is unclear to me that any of the existing Christian churches in America could do so, for wont of being too pozzed and lacking appropriate theology.
Many of us on this forum wonder “what could we do”. One thing we could do would be to formulate the doctrine and theology of such a church, and then establish it, and then begin to evangelize it to our own closest networks.
If any of you is a highly charismatic public speaker capable of delivering fiery sermons while leading men in battle that would also be helpful
(PS I’m not using Mohammed to be pro-Islam, rather he’s just the best available archetype for “obscure guy who starts religion and conquers.” I’m also aware of all the historical debunking on him, etc. It’s just a metaphor.)
I thought that’s what Jimian Christianity was. Jim may not have formalised it, but it’s a matter of someone collating all his scattered writings here and there and compile them into a coherent whole the way Euclid compiled the elements. It’s already here.
The issue with Islam as propounded by Muhammad is that it is not compatible with science and Technology. That’s a big flaw.
The position here seems to be that it is too risky to do much more than post in a comments section and have a few beers with the boys where you drop redpills.
Which I cannot disagree too hard with. I personally don’t want to be a leader of anything. Maybe once the lefties start killing each other some sort of network can be fashioned. I’m trying to cut any sort of reliance on anything related to GAE until then.
The historical; debunking of Mohammed resembles the historical debunking of the Bible – it is politically motivated nonsense, history completely pulled out of someone’s ass, Mohammed lived as depicted and did what he did. We have plenty of independent evidence that Mohammed was who he was and conquered what he conquered, and reasonable historical evidence that the Exodus and the Kings of Israel happened. The Debunkers are, like the Global Warmers, torturing inconvenient evidence to make it no say what it plainly says.
People get the leaders they deserve. In other words, if you want to summon Mohammed, you need to live your life in such a way that Mohammed would want to lead you. Or, as Moldbug would say, become worthy.
For the best possible outcome, to get a holy and regal emperor, a Christian Caesar who will conquer the stars, you yourself need to become holy and regal.
Meritocracy [*deleted for non standard use of the term “meritocracy”*]
We don’t need a nutty new religion (maybe a new variant on the old) with a bunch of nutty new rules…
We need a Caesar who does the Suharto thing…
But no one seems very keen to renew their faith in the old religions. Most seem content to just pay lip service to morals and ethics while smirking in doubt at anyone that expresses faithfulness. Caesar isn’t going to step out of fiction into reality, and there is no one in the military that isn’t cucked or broken. A new religion movement is no more of a long shot than Desantis or Trump or Macgregor.
I see a Christian Nationalist movement alive, well, functioning, and animating the undead corpse of the Republican Wing of the Republican party, and I see our enemy’s fear.
They have been issuing a whole lot of hysterical articles on the Republicans becoming Christian Nationalists.
Indeed, but that is “already faithful” growing more faithful, more honest about their faith, as they slowly realize that there is no pendulum and we are approaching a “for all the marbles” potentiality. I was aiming more at those who do not want to go the WEF/eat ze bugz/progressive route, but are not part of a faith tradition.
Gnon be praised!
With each passing day, this solution just looks more desirable.
And more justified.
Suharto was only possible by an old state religion. His purge was carried out by men of faith and imposed the old faith.
I’m not an expert on this but my casual study impression is that Indonesian Islam was almost shamanic in most places at least it was before the late 90s and 2000s when the Saudis were promoting Wahabbism and jihadism with billions of dollars.
Apparently his official ideology was vague and ambigious on Islam or Shamantistic pantheism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancasila_(politics)
So? It was not what the Saudis think is true Islam.
What mattered was that a whole lot of Indonesians thought, and still think, that it was true Islam.
Suharto was deliberately vague, elastic, and inclusive about what constitutes Islam. Which is a good thing for a state faith, other wise you wind up killing a lot of very good and potentially useful men, and also a very dangerous thing for a state faith, you are apt to get a whole lot of entryism.
In due course, Suharto’s state Islam got a whole lot of entryism.
Other than the massively well funded Wahabbi entryism of the pre Trump era it didn’t get too many troublemakers. Suhartos final solution to the leftist problem seemed to have worked.
I see in Indonesia massive and substantially successful efforts to converge Islam to Harvard.
Obviously, I am a great fan of this approach.
The immediate problem is that a prophet without an army turns into a martyr real quick. And anyone successfully building an army gets the blackwater treament.
But, many ways to work towards that goal anyway.
We want to buid two things: a faith, and an army.
Faith needs a story, needs priests, needs a congregation. The more priests back up the same story, the stronger that story gets. I have already written my version of our story, but just like Jesus had four versions of his story, so I hope more will give their version of our story.
Our existing churches will not build our faith, will not build our army. I tried attending nearby once, priest snuck in a comment on evil dictator Putin invading innocent Ukraine. Haven’t returned since. My strongly preferred solution would be our own church sermons, like the medieval hedge sermons. But I am not doing that, and so far no one else is doing that, so I completely understand why others here still attend church.
To build army, need soldiers, need weapons. Heard some interesting ideas on private security firms. Who knows.
“Our company offers 24/7 staff for street cleaning, landscaping, and custodial services, for adaptive and preventive beautification.”
“With our fully anonymized smart contract system, customers maintain their end of the deal while enjoying complete legal separation from contract fulfillment repercussions.”
I’ve started to notice a new Leftwing shibboleth/euphemism. Recently my brother visited Mt. Vernon. Seems now about half the exhibits are about slavery. Well on all the little exhibit placards they don’t use the word “slaves”. They now use the phrase “enslaved people”. I thought to myself, “that’s Lefty for you” but then I saw another Lefty, in a different context, use essentially the same phrase, “enslaved person”. So it now must be a new thing. Sounds subtly pernicious. “Slave” implies a station in life. One’s place in the hierarchy. “Enslaved person” carries a connotation of being wronged against. Being a victim.
Midwits love compound nouns. It makes them feel smart.
Indeed, but there’s more than midwittery involved. Seems they will use whatever vernacular they can think of to gin up more resentment against whitey by using subtly more inflammatory phrases.
We will have arrived at the “next stage” of the nascent genocide when the Voice begins spreading a collective euphemism for “evil whites,” similar to the term “cockroaches” used by the Hutu in reference to the Tutsis. Expect it to start out on “black twitter” or some other space that is considered a “protected class space.”
Prestige comes from power. Exercising power without restraint feels righteous (a powerful addictive feeling). Most people don’t have direct power, however, they can utilize the language of prestige and act as conduits of power and in doing so share power and prestige that they don’t own.
All these terms like POC, Enslaved person, etc are the colloquialisms of Harvard and the Ivy League (Power). Largely not midwits even as standards have fallen massively in the last X years. Most people can’t get into prestigious halls of power, however, sounding like Harvard is like carrying around a Gucci bag. Sure, one might not actually be rich but they can definitely fake it (and fail).
It’s less about feeling smart and more about feeling righteous and powerful. You notice the midwits more because they have absolutely no shame and are dangerous in large numbers. The extreme example of Antifa/BLM smashing windows and shouting ACAB. The more common example being a 40 year old single white women screaming at you for being ____.
Except that every now and again they come across someone who really is righteous.
The spiritually righteous are persecuted by the law, harassed in the streets, chased out of their professions, and are in danger of becoming martyrs.
But yes, I get what you’re saying. Sometimes these Cathedral creatures come across someone who really is righteous and sometimes they run into a Rittenhouse and eat lead.
Good observation fren.
New current thing just dropped.
Yep. Just did a Google (intentional) search on “enslaved person” and it IS a thing. There are pages of results on the new terminology.
I wonder if a “drop date” or timeframe could be established, like a period of time when the first Harvard/Yale professoress used it and how quickly uptake occured…
Google ngram viewer shows it starting to creep up around 1991, and it goes exponential around 2015.
That ties in on some “back of napkin” research I did in university. Pet Terminology gets introduced by some Pet Minority or minority advocate of not-color in a “””paper”””, it gets repeated by a few others, percolates for a bit, then suddenly appears everywhere. I know this gets us no closer to a useful formula, but I believe it ties in loosely with the “turn on a dime” the Academy does on topics like Pol Pot/Cambodia.
…forgot to add: the terms get popular with the In Crowd of a given silo of learning, like africanized psychology or urban mathematics or whatever, then they7 spread out from there.
[*held pending shit test*]
Why in the world would anybody claiming to be of the right not wish to support Donald Trump?
[*Rothschilds blah blah blah*]
Take the shill test.
In the unlikely event that you pass the shill test, will restore your comment.
The nail in the coffin for Poochgate. Pooch was crimethinkpoasting prior to J_A_N-VI.
[Pooch says: 2021-01-04 at 15:54]
lol.
and [Pooch says: 2020-11-29 at 22:08]
lol.
Also, I think this is the comment thread Red was talking about — it confirms that he warned that the next right-wing “thing” would probably turn out to be some kind of glownigger honeypot (which was corrrect lol):
https://blog.reaction.la/uncategorized/i-am-back/#comment-2684975
Closing remarks.
– for Pooch to make an abrupt turn and start shilling Cathedralite memes means that whoever gave him that task knew he was a regular here — which means his computers were compromised before or after the thing(s) he did that gave the feds leverage over him.
– Attempting to use Pooch’s identity here to shill (and some truly furbrain memes at that) was just all kinds of stupid. They wound up revealing lots of information which _will_ be shared and can be used to guard against future attacks.
– It would appear that what did Pooch in was too much optimism — he attended some rally in the hopes that Trump would cross the Rubicon. Optimism is good in small doses, but harmful in large quantities. A dose of bone-chilling pessimism seems warranted by recent events.
Pooch said some strange things, but what’s your problem with the statements you quoted? Hitler was leading a socialist party. That’s plenty of reason for calling him a leftitst.
Maybe there are some very Nazis left in Ukraine or some other places, but arguing in 2020 that they went extinct is not beyond the pale. Sure, lots of people are called Nazis, some might even be sympathetic to Nazis, but who is arguing for socialism AND nartionalism? Can you name anyone outside Ukraine?
Obviously you are not reading Gab. We are afflicted with a gigantic army, an enormous horde, of robotic npc shills on Gab and the chans, endlessly shilling a form of socialism that would supposedly be nationalist.
They are recycling phrases, slogans, and arguments, that Stalin’s shills and entryists used against Hitler, Mussolini, and Franco in the 1930s. Nothing has been forgotten, and nothing has been learned. It is like they got put in a time machine in the 1930s and were brought forward into the Trump campaign.
Maybe when they failed Stalin sent them to Siberia, and global warming recently thawed them out. (Just kidding)
Gab was a shithole filled with shills last I checked. Is it worth using these days?
The shills keep blocking me, which clears the air something wonderful.
True, I’m not reading gab. Is it worth the time?
Not reading Ted sallis is a mistake, yes.
No problem reposting it for days,e reason I think whole shit test idea is stupid you really think Jews deep state has an HR police for it’s trolls or propagandists. Silly
I do have a problem believing it. Sure East Asians are civilization capable and for that very reason are like the kikes my biological enemies so no I’m not in favor of some nick the faggot married to a kike living behind enemy lines schilling Marxism disguised as reaction Land,like moldberg the libertarian red diaper San Fran is schilling controlled neocon 2.0 disguised as reaction. Elysium run by slopes and kikes I’m supposed to bend a knee to.
So if you want to take out the part about sharing the planet with gooks and kikes I’ll sign. In my opinion 120 years ago we could have wiped the planet clean and should have but Jews and Christ cucks interefered. Jims hung up it seems on which of the two are worse leftists. There’s no way of knowing but it is knowable it’s not some adhoc virtue signalers lootfest that’s the cover the control of the world is the real game and it’s the Jews far as I can tell but because our own race traitors could have taken the world without leftism and didn’t and other reasons too complex so no I’m not signing off that Jews are just pawns of the Illuminati it’s remotely possible but all evidence point other way. I find it really suspicious nrx basically blew itself up rather than admit that. It doesn’t matter though the only possible civilizati9n that works is one based on biology and reality so when that’s instituted Jews gotta go anyway.
Which brings us to the Christian thing again no. I could say it in Latin being a good catholic boy but I’m done with that. To the extent Jim is right about it not being the Jews it’s the Christian’s. It’s a anti rational death Jew heresy that celebrates whores thieves is anti family state law reason. It’s the very thing the Jews exploited to manipulate us into self destruction while feeing virtuous about it. So no sadly we must part with this part of our culture it no longer serves us. Christs teaching are the most extreme leftism there is. Besides we are grown out of religion reality should be our religion our biological reality of competition with others our truth.
I’m fine with the natural subjugation of women children it’s hbd reality they are not meant to build maintain defend civilizations
Faggotry until cured must be suppressed just like subversive art culture etc. probably don’t ask don’t tell again would be enough w death penalty as official penalty.
No way monarchy it’s stupid sure Jefferson lefty revolutionary but republic best of bad choices there’s no permanent solution were a biological mess in constant fucked flux but without the sun races around we would have enough time to maybe reach escape velocity
Anyway I keep promising I’ll stop coming back here I miss early nrx but it is done
I can’t tell if he’s trying to fool us or his supervisor…
And yet, strangely, you still have not managed to notice what Soros is infamous for on the right.
What do we think Soros has been up to that is particularly obnoxious, how do we think he got his money?
Also, you argue the way Jews argue, despite announcing yourself an ex Catholic.
Oh never mind. I recollect. You are not an FBI shill, nor indeed any kind of government shill. You are a shill for old internet scam – that is why you passed a shill test designed to detect government shills.
You simply do not know what Soros is infamous for, because you are just faking having political identity and political interests. If you looked it up, you would have no problems passing that test with flying colors also.
He did not post his name, but he did post it. Are you sure he is a shill and not just a crank? That wall of text looks like crazy internet ranting.
Nah, I remember their legal advice from very long ago.
They enter groups that don’t much like the government, and sell magic spells that will give you immunity to government.
But I keep forgetting, being beleaguered by government shills.
Looks like a distinct shill script can be identified by one specific topic the shill will never go near. How many distinct shill types are there that are common enough to matter?
This blog gets Soros shills that can’t answer Soros questions, 9/11 truthers that cannot notice Mueller’s crimes, fed shills who can’t answer the woman question, Marxist shills and Harvard shills (maybe they are both the same as fed shills because they never respond to the multiple choice question on why women misbehave), and there are flat Earth shills that appear when people bring up technological decline (and I am inclined to think of all conspiracy theory stuff like faked moon landing, aliens, and lizardmen as being in the same bucket). There are older scripts less active in recent years: Vlad shilling immunity to government and sovereign citizen shills (could be the same thing as Vlad). Once upon a time the internet was full of Young Earth creationist shills, which recontextualized 00s internet atheism for me when I learned that.
So the rambling wall of text is to drive off anyone who could realize it is a scam. That makes sense.
His blocktexting style reminds me of viking/colleen ryan. Might be the same guy. In which case, not an employed shill working for some focus group, ‘just’ possessed.
“Ordinary Americans are just so upset they aren’t getting their baby-murder anymore” seems to be the figleaf they’re going with to remove outer party members from their seats at the table. Sarah Palin ‘narrowly edged out’ in the special election in Alaska.
(This should have been a non-reply comment.)
@Vlad
This just in:
“Fed shill denies that there are fed shills…”
Anglin has been trying to humorously dismantle the contemporary “neo-Nazis” for a couple of years now, mainly calling attention to the ones not being feds, being retarded leftist simps who like to play dress up.
On a more mainstream note sometimes I wonder if the current one-party state in Scotland is an experiment in producing a globohomo version of national socialism.
Or rather an experiment in is it possible to get the pleb to support this implied program until you achieve your ends (alleged independence) and then go full klaus on their asses.
“Obviously you are not reading Gab. We are afflicted with a gigantic army, an enormous horde, of robotic npc shills on Gab and the chans, endlessly shilling a form of socialism that would supposedly be nationalist.”
You are an excellent shill remover, and I must apologize for once doubting that the shill problem was even real, but you are certainly right, and you can certainly vanquish them.
How can this be generalized to a huge platform like Gab, generalized to more average staff?
If this can be done, I suggest a useful platform can be made today without waiting for new cryptographic technology.
It was not the earlier comments on Nazis that are suspicious, it is his later comments, especially in contrast to the earlier ones. He used to acknowledge that Hitler was a socialist and a leftist, but more recently he was pushing, “Hitler is the real right wing.”
Yeah, Pooch did a 180 in a relatively short period of time. For context, there’s a comment thread here:
https://blog.reaction.la/science/origins-of-the-white-race/#comment-2848822
Plot twist. Globalist Power Terminated II is a really sneaky GPT-2 artificial intelligence that has been heavily modified to dig through jim’s blog and hunt for suspected shills. Occasionally GPT-2 gets overly zealous.
Joking aside I’m somewhat lost on the Pooch Hitler stuff as well. Nazi socialism did exist. Look at war time German coal production for example. Goebbels complained much about shortages, yet production kept increasing? Kinda what happens when rail is socialized and profit is not allowed. Sort of difficult to do maintenance or build new capacity if there is no profit. Calling Hitler a leftist seems fair although somewhat meaningless. I can’t find the quote, but I remember reading a former Nazi described Hitler as the belt buckle that bound the left and right together in a fairly unhappy marriage.
“Can you name anyone outside Ukraine?”
If one has a very elastic definition Asia has a bit of national socialism going on.
The Kuomintang… Kinda sort of historically but not really but it’s complicated. Anti communist socialist nationalists. Some of the senior KMT leadership had pleasant memories of the Third Reich, but they are all retired/dead.
Echos of it in South Korea though mostly in aesthetics. Korean Nazi bars are fairly interesting places, or at least they were before the Israeli embassy made a fuss. There are some loose intellectual ties between Germany and Korea during the 1930s that survived.
CCP is going nationalist while trying to retaining Marxism with Chinese characteristics whatever that means. I’m sure the western media could construe that as Nazi if they want to.
Before I.VI, Pooch called Hitler a leftist and a socialist. After I.VI, Pooch called Hitler a rightist. Obviously Hitler was a socialist; it was there in the name and in his actions. The important part is that Pooch was capable of seeing the obvious before I.VI, but incapable soon afterwards.
Makes sense. My comment is out of date. Wrote out half of it, went to eat, wrote the other half and posted and found you had already answered Karl’s, and my, question. Would delete if I could.
A lot of the Cathderals moves over the last few years have been overtly following the Nazi game plan. POC is their “Aryan” race. Reichstag’s fire events to justify dictatorial control, plans to genocide inferior peoples, etc. Nazi style control of companies, etc. My guess is they view it as funny that they’re using the “right’s” tactics against the right, but it’s a well proven leftwing game plan for power. Not long lasting power and German national socialism resulted in the same sorts of decline in economic output and reduced food stuff production that socialism always causes.
National socialism is really race socialism, the idea that the means of production must be controlled by the race. In Cathedral’s case the race is POC/Faggots/Trannies and they are actively pushing Nazi esq policies to achieve it.
I can neither confirm nor den-
🤖 🤖 🤖
Check out GPT-4Chan. Lots of hysteria from the left about it. Makes me wonder what GPT-NRx would output.
https://huggingface.co/ykilcher/gpt-4chan
It would be useful to check when Pooch began shilling to give us a time from I.VI to compromise. Once we have a first shill date, we can check if there were other right wing events that might have been traps. It is also probably safe to assume that if you were not on a very secure connection prior to I.VI, then your pseudonym has been burned and the government knows your real identity. That would explain how Pooch was selected.
Feds sucked up every phone being used at Trump’s rally and the capital that day. If the person sucked up wasn’t a glowie, fed or antifa they raided them. I’m assuming that’s how they got him. People don’t often do basic opsec like turning off their phones despite many cases of the cops just grabbing everyone’s phone number in a given area.
I’d say basic opsec is not bringing their phones to any event that might interest law enforcement.
Cops are lazy. They might confiscate a phone you carry with you, but not bother raiding you home looking for one. Even if they raid your home later, you might have time to clean it.
I would kind of like to offer an article on OPSEC, but I also do not want to bring too much attention here. The discussion itself tends to draw eyes. Western Rifle Shooters blog used to have a lot of good info on all that. Search WSRA OPSEC articles and read up.
Doubtful. Judging from photos the average participant looked like naive boomercons too married-to-normality to expect to need opsec. Not sure how many people were there that day, but the on-the-ground cameras record a crowd stretching to the frickin horizon. You’re saying aaaaall those people got raided? I don’t buy it, if that was SOP, it’d be less of a niche topic “remember those Jan 6 folks still in jail?” brought up occasionally and much more of a kitchen table issue where everybody on the Right has a cousin who got raided, but wouldn’t cut a deal and turncoat for the feds.
Majority would probably turn informant given the amount of oppression they’re using. We know they went after everyone who was at the Capitol but not necessarily the people at Trump’s rally. Pooch claimed he only went to Trump’s rally but it would be smart to not admit being at the Capitol.
By “at the Capitol”, you mean entering the building, right? It’s clear there were nowhere near as many surrounding the building as there were at the rally, but even that would be a quite a lot of raids.
Yes, it would be useful.
Kudos to anyone who wants to sift through 75K+ comments to pinpoint exactly when the sketchpoasting began though.
You’ve done a great job digging this stuff up. I’d say pooch became boring at least 3 if not 6-9 months ago. He was probably glowie pooch at that point.
What’s the LOLs for? As Karl noted Pooches statement was correct there.
Is that in light of the later Marxian bullshit Glowie Pooch was pushing?
If so, best to quote both items.
They likely seized his computers when they raided him. First they do is looking for groups he was part of that they could then use him as an informant or a shill in. The feds can decrypt pretty much every system out there as far as I know. Last really secure encryption was Truecrypt which the Feds likely shutdown.
It was really dumb of them. But they probably have a shill quota to keep so they use whatever they have at hand to meet that quota. In the Soviet Union most arrests were done on the basis of whatever quota the cops had for the month. If they couldn’t find people who actually broke the rules they grabbed random people and send them to the gulag. Cops as always are lazy.
Nah. I LOLd at “sanders campaign” and “Nazis went extinct”.
WOW.
This is a great better explanation as to why Truecrypt got shut down. Supposedly there were fatal flaws that greatly limited the effectiveness of Truecrypt, and its successors fixed those issues. It’s likely that the usual glownigger reversal/doublespeak principle applies and in fact Truecrypt was solid security wise but its successors actually _introduced_ problems.
This makes sense. It’s also reminiscent of the Stasi — spending precious time setting up more surveillance hardware even as their regime was literally collapsing around them.
It’s probably not a coincidence that TrueCrypt went down a year after the Snowden leaks…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrueCrypt
A mysterious and sudden turn of events…
Open source project advocates switching to closed-source, proprietary software…?
Move-along-because-there-is-nothing-to-see-here.jpeg
Wow, that’s not sketchy at all. (Also, note the lexical sleight-of-hand with that last sentence.)
Jim did some posting on it back in the day. The creators of truecrypt basically put a warrant canary that the feds were fucking with them without saying that the feds were fucking with them. But we never heard the details.
That’s the one. I thought it was damn stupid to go to the rally after seeing the cops and antifa working together at earlier events. It took a lot of federal effort to get the crowd into the building(they only had to murder 3 unarmed protestors) but mobs are easily manipulated by bad actors.
The proud boys being lead by a literal glownigger made things much worse than I would have guessed. There was no one to police false flaggers so the glowies drove all the events to their desired outcome. They fucked it up of course(visuals where shit and the only people killed where unarmed protestors) but they’re resorting to more and more naked force so it doesn’t really matter. People are terrified because of the display of power. It’s harming their legitimacy but they’ve stopped caring.
That’s crazy. Maybe it sounds redundant but the amount of energy the left invests in shilling far outweighs the energy the right invests in defending against it. That is, outside this place.
Look at mainline right wing discourse outside of Jim’s blog. It is a wasteland of shills and provocateurs. That is a pretty good return on investment, unless we can mainstream shill tests into meme culture. I am planning on doing some work on that. Quick, memorable lines that a fed could not notice or say.
The left using the federal government to pay for their shills. You’re literally being taxed so they can shill you.
It sounds enough like Pooch that I think he was writing it, probably from prison with a black prison guard from Northern Africa standing over him and a script written by a Jew employed by Soros in front of him. Or it could be a human trying to imitate Pooch, or a computer running the usual scripts through a style filter in order to make one voice sound like many voices.
So Roe V Wade being overturned, cathedral move or something they didn’t expect? They’re looking for a narrative to justify the midterm rigging and reigniting the abortion debate is useful in that regard.
I’m thinking about this because I they’ll probably arrest and try Trump before a DC jury in the near feature and Trump’s only defense is going to be an emergency appeal to the supreme court. I’m curious if they’ll get involved. If Row v Wade repeal was a cathedral op then they won’t get involved.
The cuckservatives are [*bullshit deleted*]
You not only don’t seem too familiar with conservatives, you do not seem too familiar even with cuckservatives.
They are trying to find a way to be simultaneously blue pilled and Christian, which is foolish and wicked of them, but the foolishness and wickedness manifests rather differently from your account of it.
https://hiddencomplexity.substack.com/p/new-virus-found-by-wiv-scientist
There is an assertion that the Vaxx is supercharging extant viruses, speeding up their evolution. There also seems to be an increase in rare virus infections being reported. Is this an unintended side effect/consequence of Rev. Dr. Professor Shaniqua playing with gain of function, or was it intended?
Mutation rates are not affected by vaxxing. Mass vaxxing simply changes the environment that determines which new mutations flourish or perish.
An increase in infections (rare and otherwise) is to be expected when most people suddenly have an impaired immune system.
Gain of function research is about creating a new virus. I do not see how it could affect evolution beyond the effect of releasing a new virus that will then compete with all others that are already there.
https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflares-abuse-policies-and-approach/
Astonishingly, Cloudflare has decided they will NOT ban Kiwifarms, and that they will never suspend users because of the content they post again. They wish to be neutral. This is an incredibly unexpected backpedal since banning Stormer and 8chan.
But they explicitly say they now consider these to be mistakes.
What do we make of this?
Another minor data point in favor of my proposed possible halt of the spiral. Talk is cheap, let’s see if the do more than talk.
Cloudfare is part of the Deep State’s information gathering service. From time to time it steps on the Deep State’s content control service, and gets told to move over. This is it replying “No, you move over”.
Internal conflict in the deep state between information gathering, and information control.
Control isn’t working out well for SWIFT. Possible reason why information gathering is winning out in this case?
SWIM happened to be at a dinner party with the CEO of Cloudflare a few years ago, months after they deplatformed the Daily Stormer.
The CEO adamantly did *not* want to kick them off, held off as long as he could but eventually was essentially forced to because a cabal of some of their biggest customers threatened to pull their contracts — (Salesforce & Google primarily, but also quite a few others).
Pulling off a pressure campaign of that scale takes unity & coordination. I suspect and hope that there is a lot less of that on the left than there used to be.
The government controls the big tech bigwigs directly via coercion though lightly asked for as confirmed recently by Zuckerberg on Rogan.
How much of that was honest and how much was CYA for Metarburg? Joe Rogan Experience is a Cathedral apparatus used to keep dissident inclinations safely corraled within the boundaries of acceptable alternative narratives. I don’t know if Rogan knows this, and I don’t know if he’s trapped in that role or chooses to play along.
More and more they’ve stopped hiding the controls they’re using on the public. They’re ruling more and more through iron glove so the velvet is no longer necessary. It’s a bad idea as men become cynical but they’re loving the open displays of power too much to care.
The important thing is that there is now an official admission the security state strong-arms the media moguls. I’ve always suspected but it was never confirmed.
I never thought it was the FBI directly (especially since operation mockingbird was originally cia) i thought it was someone else… given how heavily papist the FBI at least was I also speculate that our “friends” the Jesuits were involved… but anyway it’s confirmed now…
A few of Joe Rogan’s smarter commenters have been asking questions along the lines of why do sketchy people like that CIA glownigger Mike Baker keeps making appearances and doing damage control…
It seems like the Cathedral is backpedaling — and they shall backpedal all the way into the grave, praise gnon.
Backpedaling only works if someone can do a Stalin and start killing leftists. The senile retard ain’t no Stalin and I think Ron Klain is a Pol Pot wannabe.
And you can’t walk anything back if you aren’t in lockstep. The fractious nature of the in-power elite, with their various factions, is not capable of coordinating in the way the Great Zoom Call of 2020, not at this time. That could change, but so long as the Gaia Faction, Corona Faction, Octogenarian Faction, and others are out of sink, they can only move forward with any sense of cohesion. If a faction back peddles too quickly, they will be pounced on by the others.
…which makes me wonder if that’s where a Stalin might arise: imagine the CIA tries to back peddle too quickly or too much, the other factions brand them as MAGAsleepers, and they just kind of go with it. Obviously the CIA has too much baggage to win over the Right easily, but DoD might be capable of something like that.
Lol, how fast they folded
https://blog.cloudflare.com/kiwifarms-blocked/
TLDR
“We have blocked Kiwifarms. Visitors to any of the Kiwifarms sites that use any of Cloudflare’s services will see a Cloudflare block page and a link to this post. Kiwifarms may move their sites to other providers and, in doing so, come back online, but we have taken steps to block their content …”
How sad and pathetic , if you read the article you notice the desperation and humiliation. Kiwifarms have been operating from 2013 with all the problems they say they are blocked because. Clearly this was a public humiliation to force cloudflare and bring them back in line.
Merchant-cuckery on display for all to see.
You can’t blame the merchants who are helpless against state power and who the left absolutely hates. I’m most sympathetic to green grocer arguments with merchants…
I would be more sympathetic if they didn’t relish in the suppression and impoverishment of those they cancel and dis-employ so much. And the signage and marketing for both CoronaVaxxing and child tranny bullshit makes me livid. It’s one thing to put up the sign, and it’s quite another to plaster signs over every square inch of window and wall. This might just be the HR Karens and catladies driving the holiness displays, but still…
I did not include big pharma in that… there will be no mercy for the managers of that.
Minor rant, 78 hours without sleep and counting, apologies if this is a schizopost. Jim blog relevant stuff at the end.
I’m a slightly mixed race American that looks 100% East Asian. I grew up in a moderately blue college city of around 1 million people in a fairly red state. I live in a majority White suburb. I went to school in a heavily White school system. The few ‘Black’ kids were actually mulattoes. I’m also fairly well traveled having been to many parts of what could be called Old America. Rural or small town America inhabited by Americans of old WASP stock. A surprising number of East Asians are also sprinkled around in those areas.
The first and only time I personally felt racial hostility direct at me was from a fully Black college kid who had a little too much to drink and was looking for a fight with, in his words, “a fucking Asian.” Luckily his White friend managed to calm him down and violence was avoided. In retrospect it reminded me of guys who walk down the street with a pit-bull on a leash. Is that why high status White men tend to have that one Black friend? More-so, all the other incidents of racism I’ve seen involved wealthier Whites hating on ‘trailer trash.’ I’ve traveled through some of the extremely poor, mostly White, New Mexico rural areas full of ‘trailer trash’ and all I saw where decent people trying to live in a world they don’t understand anymore. They were also happy to sell chile peppers and beer to me. I even nearly caught my first and only, speeding related, felony in a small, nearly all White, New Mexican town. The court was happy to dismiss… is that the privilege I hear liberals complain about so often? But I digress.
Point is, my experience in America, as someone of Asian genetic background, has been highly pleasant. The majority of other Asians of my generation and younger appear to disagree and it’s throwing me for a loop. Like the world got turned upside down. The ‘Stop Asian Hate’ movement is bizarro world on crack.
Nearly every single ‘Asian Hate’ incident of assault or murder had a Black perpetrator. Those statistics showing 150% to 2000% increases in attacks on Asian-Americans came from cities like New York City where it went from 2 to 20. It might as well be an accounting error. Overall crime with Asian victims, and the demographic committing it, did not change outside of previous general trends. How do so many Asians go to “White people are racist” explanation?
The only major ‘Asian Hate’ incident with a White perpetrator was the 2021 Atlanta spa shootings. The names of the spas sounds like brothels, the workers look like prostitutes, the spas themselves look like brothels, and there are a long list of arrests and investigations resulting in convictions for prostitution. One of the misbegotten children of the dead “message therapists” said his mother never said what her work was… The spas are clearly brothels, and hookers ending up dead is as old as the profession; however, the “Asian community” goes to “White supremacy and racism” as the explanation. The shooter, Robert Long, also killed a White woman, a White man, and injured a Hispanic man. Unless Whites and Hispanics are Asian too I doubt this was racially motivated. Long also had a history of a sexual dysfunction and deeply held religious convictions.
I would have been perfectly happy for this incident to be swept under the rug because brothels are shameful and the world doesn’t need to have this shoved in its face. The “Asian community,” in all its wisdom, decided to push it to the forefront such that everyone would see it and then they had the gall to suggest that there was no evidence of prostitution. Damaging the Asian brand in America just wasn’t enough, they had to also gaslight everyone as well.
The other, most asinine, bullshit I’ve seen recently was the idea that it’s racist to ask Asians where they are from. I ask people all the time where they are from. Most people, and especially Whites, are happy to oblige since they can boast about their X% heritages and how they ended up in America or a particular state. I’m happy to answer where I’m from for the same reason “I too have 1% Native American my fellow Indian Elizabeth Warren.” The ‘nation was built by immigrants’ mythos is 20th century Americana at it’s finest along with Zippo lighters.
Bring up any of the inconsistencies in the blame White people argument to the “Asian community” and they accuse one of “internalizing racism and White supremacy.” Oh and you better support affirmative action for Blacks at your own detriment. So not only does the community that is suppose to have my back is undermining the brand and gaslighting me, they actively stab me in the back. The “Asian community” would accuse me of self hatred of my “Asianness” or what ever that means, when in reality I just hate the people, some who are Asians, that are trying to shit up my highly pleasant life.
https://blog.reaction.la/politics/why-east-asians-vote-democrat/
I have a more general view that doesn’t necessarily run counter to Jim’s theory. The Asian American vote was once fairly 50-50. Most Asians live in California or other big blue cities. California was once just another regular American state where you could have a decent life style. As California became more and more communist and terrible to live in, the communist mentality took over among it’s inhabitants. The “if I can’t have nice things neither can you” which becomes “if I must suffer then you too must suffer” which culminates in “if I’m starving so must you.” The mentality is pan-racial as evidenced by Soviet Union, Venezuela, Cuba, China, and I think is a large factor why East Asians have increasingly voted democrat, but more importantly why California is in a self destructive race to the bottom. “If we must have shit electrical grid with rolling black outs and mandated electrical vehicles that you can’t even charge, then so does the rest of the country.”
LA voters will soon vote on a law that compels hotel owners to house homeless people alongside paying guests.
Leftism spread among Asians because like women they are conformists (at least when non conformity risks ostracism) at heart.
People going leftist due to crabs in a bucket thinking is just another good reason that if we get a chance there should be no mercy.
Asian American conformity has been decreasing over time. The newer generations have no concept of saving face. On personality tests, the more acculturated score more similar to White Americans than the less acculturated by big margins.
Leftism in the Asian American population has increased in spite of decreasing conformity. I don’t think this is a problem of conformist pathology. I think this is a problem of liberal American cities bringing out the absolute worst out of people. You can find a large number of cities that are 75% White or greater where the Whites are voting democrat at similar or even higher levels than Asians.
Asian Americans are voting extremely similar to White alone people in Portland, Oregon for example. The liberal Whites resides in the cities. The conservative Whites escape to the suburbs or largely reside in the rural. The liberal Whites have gotten increasingly liberal over time. The conservative Whites haven’t changed much at all. The vast majority of Asians reside in the cities. The rise in their liberalism has tracked White liberalism.
Another point against the idea of conformist personality being the cause is how many of these Asian Americans are agitating for political and social change back in Asia that has nothing to do with Asian politics or society. Things like advocating BLM in South Korea.
NRx needs a solution to the City Question (CQ). The CQ is many orders of magnitude larger than the JQ ever was. Solving the CQ likely also goes a long ways to dealing with the WQ. The bastion of Soviet Communism was in the cities. It was the kulaks who paid the price.
The system has a tendency to hijack pre-existing instincts and social mechanisms and to redirect the energy into the *needed* directions.
Perhaps the younger Asian Americans are behaving like the Eastern European inteligentsia, whose combination of a superiority complex toward the “natives” and an inferiority complex toward the “holy west elites” has produced a globohomo cargocultism.
Anyway, cannot condone long stretches without sleep unless a life and death situation. Get sleep man:)
The answer to the city question is that when leftists are drawn and quartered, flayed and broken on the wheel, and burned and boiled alive it will be in public and in the cities.
B-BA-BASED!
A bloody short term solution and then what? Entropy away towards leftism again? We need steady state solutions. Cities inherently create problems with space. Men need to own space to be men. Cities increase the cost of space such that many men never own space. Men who own nothing protect nothing and destroy out of spite.
Cities also break down traditions of virtue. Too much anonymity prevents fraternal bonds that regulate and pass down morality and ethics. A rat race to ever greater degeneracy.
Yet for all the problems cities create, nations can’t live without cities. Centralized hubs of power are advantageous even if detrimental in the long run. And cities are so entrenched into our concept of nations that undoing them would be a herculean task.
Cominator solution would require a permanent state of war which is something the right has never done well. Every anticommunist regime purged a few and then stopped all together. South Korea, Taiwan, Chile, Spain, the list goes on and on. All fell to progressive (soft communism) forces a couple of generations down the road.
Cities are not the problem. Republics are the problem. The cycle of history is that good Kings create a virtuous elite. A virtuous elite finds it can run thing just fine and do not need a King to maintain good behaviour and social cohesion. So they dispense with the King. But are unable to maintain the elite virtue necessary for a Republic to exist.
Spengler wrote of cities (I admit I might be a Spengler shill):
“Long ago the country bore the country-town and nourished it with her best blood. Now the giant city sucks the country dry, insatiably and incessantly demanding and devouring fresh streams of men, till it wearies and dies in the midst of an almost uninhabited waste of country.â€
The history of cities has always been of unsustainability. Growth was historically fueled by the rural migrating to cities, or in Rome’s case the relocation of slaves.
“The provinces are now everything whatsoever — land, town, and city — except these two or three points. There are no longer noblesse and bourgeoisie, freemen and slaves, Hellenes and Barbarians, believers and unbelievers, but only cosmopolitans and provincials. All other contrasts pale before this one, which dominates all events, all habits of life, all views of the world.â€
We see this today with voting patterns. Everything is determined by urban vs rural.
The cycle of history shows change in regime from monarchy to democracy with stages in-between. The cycle of history also shows changes in the balance of power between rural and cities that coaligns with form of regime.
Cities are a problem. Republics are a problem. The values of virtuous Kings originate from rural rather than the urban. Trump, for all his urban tendencies, loved and admired the rural over the urban. The extreme progression of the urban threatens to endangers the ability to draw upon the rural in the future.
A good king and a virtuous elite are going to have to deal with this problem.
The internet has made big cities economically irrelevant. Production and distribution of real goods bypasses big cities as much as possible. Everything that gets delivered to cities is tribute paid by the real economy to the state and the FIRE economy, they are no longer distribution centres. They exist because the powerful like to be able to speak to each other in person, so big cities exist to provide services to ruling elite.
If we have a feudal system, we get a distributed elite. Poof. Megalopoli go away. We may still have some port city megalopoli, which have a genuine distribution functionality, but there is a limit. A well functioning civilization will build more ports, rather than make a small number of existing ports ever more gigantic. Above a certain size, gigantic ports do not work very well, and most existing ports are far past that limit.
Diversity + proximity = war.
We need fairly segregated spaces, with trade and cultural protocols tailored for the specifics of each race. Only way to build trust, and avoid such a mess.
I don’t know that you could say the opposite of leftism is trust, but the opposite of leftism is something like that which builds trust.
As men we do not really need friends. Not the way women and children need friends. We need men we can trust.
I realize I am not saying anything new, just pointing it out.
I don’t understand your point. Sure, we need men we can trust. The men I can trust are my friends.
What is the difference between “friends” and “men we can trust”?
Probably just different variations in the term trust. In a functioning society, should be able to trust that walking into a hospital won’t get you murdered by the doctor.
Going beyond the minimum is a friend.
I have a lot of normie NPC friends, blue and purple pilled guys. Guys that are fun to hang out with, have a beer with. But they will all fold under a little pressure.
We need a Cesar, a high priest, a faith. A mission, a hierarchy, a chain of command. That will build the kind of trust we need, and I need.
Aristotle describes three types of friendship. They are friendship based on utility, friendship based on pleasure and friendship based on virtue.
A friendship based on utility is one which I may develop with a business partner or a neighbor with whom I trade vegetables and advice. These are the most common and the quickest to dry up. A friendship based on pleasure is one which I may develop over a shared love of cards and liquor or a friend I meet to go hiking with. As long as you share the same interests and activities you’ll keep such friends around. A friendship based on virtue is one which I may develop over the course of a lifetime – these are the friends I call at two in the morning to bring a shovel and a garbage bag.
Everybody has lots of friends. For most people not more than a handful will come help you at two in the morning.
“friendship based on virtue”
Thanks for pointing this out. I think this is a major reason why Asians in America, and many Whites as well, have gone left even though Asians have integrated well into American life. Most friendships in America are based on pleasure. Some on utility.
Friendships based on virtue are near nonexistent. Fraternities are less about fraternal virtue and all about drunken pleasure. Men only societies like the Freemasons have been forgotten and hollowed out. Churches, schools, workplaces, regular daily life have all become spiritually female. City inhabitants (most Asians live in cities) are especially vulnerable.
I think that maybe that’s why organizations like the Proud Boys exploded in membership so quickly. There’s a complete void of male fraternity based on virtue in standard American life, but a desire for virtue based fraternity remains.
It’s the same mode of thought that saw perfidous Albion ally itself with the ottoman dunecoons against their cousins in the Czardom – to their ultimate detriment.
The invidious impulse sees the tallest, the greatest, the grandest things around, and thinks to itself not, ‘i should emulate/align with/advocate that’, but instead thinks, ‘i should bring down that’.
It perceives any outbreaks of greatness as threats to be removed, and at the limit, perceives greatness itself as an evil to be destroyed, and makes common band with all other minds of similar bent in this ad-venture.
As perfidious Albion was in the Crimean war, Austria Hungary’s actions completely surpassed Albion. They get help from the Russians to put down the Hungarian revolution of 1848 only to side with their historical enemy the Turks against the Russian.
Such is the dynamic.
Human beings don’t do gratitude very well. The best among us fake it reasonably well, but very few of us actually feel it in our gut. That’s why Franklin and others tell you to make someone like you better, get THEM to do YOU a favor, not the other way around.
Pretty much nobody but people ‘on the spectrum’ (and honestly, not even most of them) work like the social diplomatic model that we teach pretty much everyone but salesmen. That social diplomatic model (crudely phrased as if you’re nice to X they’ll be nice to you) is that people work kind of like an integrator, summing up all your positive and negative actions toward them and their feelings about you is that integral, perhaps run through a smoothing filter emphasizing more recent actions.
The only good thing about said model is that it’s easy to code for computer games, but it bears no resemblance to how neurotypical people work. We are selfish (some of us more so than others) AND ungrateful. Maybe some fantasy races or alien races are less ungrateful, but to the best of my knowledge none of us are conducting diplomacy with them.
A whirling salami-slicer of leveling, opportunistically cutting down every upgrowth of human species, until eventually the gyrations have ground all down to meat kneaded in mud, the decomposing remains of a cosmic accident feeding the carrion eaters, in yet another silent solar system.
chilling.
Potential Fermi paradox solution. One of the more horrifying ones.
The Dark Forest solution to the Fermi Paradox requires a civilization killing rifle – the capacity to shoot bullets at near the speed of light and hit a distant planet. Which is well beyond current technology, but not very hard at all. The acceleration is relatively easy, it is the deceleration for a soft landing that is hard. If you do not care about a soft landing, if you intend a hard landing, considerably less hard.
You launch a very large very thin mirror with extremely powerful lasers. After reaching near light speed, it divides into a collection of smaller, but still quite large, mirrors, and each smaller mirror does a Miura-ori fold into a compact impossible to detect projectile.
But I don’t think advanced civilizations will be planet bound, I don’t think a civilization capable of being a threat to its neighbours will be planet bound. I expect and intend that we will settle the Oort cloud, which will make it very difficult to kill us.
If you attack a distant and little known advanced civilization on sight and fail to kill it, you are in for a world of hurt. So a little conversation would be a good idea.
The technology for planet killer near light speed bullets is a long way off. The technology for long range interstellar communication is readily achievable.
If Terra can only support 500 billion people, it will not be long afterwards that Mankind will be more prevalent in orbital habitats and low-g planetoids/moons than on Terra. if you do not have a weapon capable of wiping out an entire solar system, then you had best start by talking.
Even if it were possible to detect, it would make little difference, assuming it’s coming in right behind it’s light front. Although you might see the acceleration lasers well in advance (Mote In God’s Eye). Maybe they could laser illuminate the sails a few milliradians off axis with the sails tacking. That way the target civilization would not see the light.
The quickest way to eliminate a whole solar system is to detonate the sun into a supernova. That way everything out to a number of light years is toast.
Interesting factoid, if the sun were to supernova, no human would ever see it, even briefly. The supernova starts in the core and the hypersonic semi-relativistic shock wave takes a few minutes to reach the surface, but the neutrinos from the explosion radiate out immediately at the speed of light, virtually unimpeded by the intervening mass of the star.
While neutrinos hardly react at all with matter, the flux is so high that the reaction with chlorine atoms is enough to instantly boil salt water, including the salt water in your brain. Everybody’s head would explode like the unfortunate residents of Herculaneum long before anything visible happened to the sun.
Making a star go supernova is likely to be difficult, because you would have to do something to the core involving a gigantic amount of energy, and the core is enormously well shielded.
Send the projectiles to the target on a very slight angle, rather than a straight line, then the target will not see the lasers driving them. You send them up to high speed slightly off target, and then change their course slightly so that they are now heading to target from a slight angle to line of sight to target.
They will approach the target in very close to line of sight direction, because you will be adjusting course while your projectiles are still quite close to you and quite far from the enemy, but your lasers will be substantially off line of sight direction, because your projectiles will be substantially off line of sight direction while close to you.
Destroying a whole lot of targets by direct impact is likely to be a lot easier than detonating their star, but if your enemy is settling its oort cloud, detecting all targets is likely to be difficult.
Sweet, I am crossing Nova Bombs off my 0300 fears list!
But the hyper mirrors thing could also be a sort of postcard too, right? Send it off and have it cruise through the target star system, unfolding like a giant billboard, maybe?
For an advanced civilization making contact with a civilization it suspects may be lower tech, gigantic billboards would be useful, but the lasers necessary to propel big billboards are also capable of communicating directly.
What would be more useful, given that accelerating something to near light speed is likely to be a whole lot easier than bringing it to a gentle stop at its target, is sending out “small” flyby probes at near light speed. Albeit such probes cannot be all that small, given that they need to phone home.
If you suspected a possibly competing civilization, you would like to take a closer look at them before attempting to communicate.
Darkies view Asians as weaklings and I agree with them. If you want to be respected you have to be willing to fight back.
At least until they take up the mantle of the Roof Korean, and then the Spearchuckers know to fear them.
I lived through Rooftop Koreans and they only got away with it because they credibly threatened to shoot LAPD if they tried to disarm them. The national guard didn’t descend on them disarm them at bayonet point which is what happened to every white group that tries to organize a defense.
Asians have no excuses for their failure to defend themselves because the feds have never used forces to prevent that defense. They simply suck up to power and let the darkies do whatever they want to their oldsters and women while repeating the cathedral mantra.
The Rooftop Koreans were visibly far more masculine than their descendants. City living Asians can’t defend themselves for the reason city living Whites can’t defend themselves. Something about cities is dropping testosterone levels. Might be something in the water. Might be a lack of physical activity that comes with city life.
Nah, not city living. World war 2 Japs were urbanites, with women as property and they were way manly.
Emasculated by the same people who are emasculating us.
I agree with that, but WW2 urbanites also did not have endocrine disrupting chemicals in their water and food supply.
Highest levels of phthalates in results in the lowest levels of testosterone. The effect was most noticeable in boys aged 6 to 12.
Obesity is not helping either. Fatter a man gets the more screwed his endocrine becomes which causes him to more easily get fatter and so on and so forth.
During WW1 and WW2 it was noted how wimpy English troops were compared to their Australian and New Zealand counterparts. Higher levels of protein in their diet was generally how it was explained but just 50 years before English men were considered powerful warriors. The more likely reason for the differences was the status of women in those countries.
Lower status women = higher T. Chemicals are an issue, but we’re not sure to what extent. But we know that making boys and men low status compared to absolutely kills their testosterone production.
Why do you all write “Asian”? In US English this (usally) seems to mean Yellow. In British English it (usually) means Pakistani.
Is “Yellow” offensive? Why do you all use a word that applies equally to people from India, Pakistan, China, etc when you could easily be more precise?
The differences between Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, etc. are -for a German like me- very minor in comparison to Indians or Pakistani. I mean, no White will mistake an Indian for a Chinese, but many Whites might mistake a Korean for a Chinese or Japanese.
In America Asian generally means East Asian, IE the higher Asian races like the Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese.
Pakis are not Asians. They are Middle Eastern
Indians are not Asians. No one here calls dot Indians Asians, and if dot Indians are not Asians, Pakis are not Asians.
Long was a incel being tortured by progressive christian parents. They should have found him a girl to marry instead they condemned him as evil for fucking hookers. Fucking hookers is bad for him, but burning with passion with no outlet is worse because it triggers that most basic response to not getting laid: Murderous violence to attract female attention.
Now there is an entire state capital city in the US that doesn’t have running water with a Shaniqua in charge of the water department. Things seem to be falling apart fast.
The Mayor’s name is “Chokwe Antar Lumumba”
Hence, no water.
LMAO
I propose an equivalent male name to Shaniqua; Shaquan.
I’ve always been fond of “Treyquarius.” such power, very nogg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chokwe_Antar_Lumumba
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-global-history/article/lumumba-university-in-moscow-higher-education-for-a-sovietthird-world-alliance-196091/8720DF55AA0CEBC782EC8B215AC08D47
The Soviets had a Lumumba university, from Khrushchev’s peak to the collapse of the empire. For many people to this day the existence of the Patrice Lumumba university was an example of how absurdly idiotic the system was.
Just the other day I heard of a battle in Ukraine taking place along Patrice Lumumba Avenue.
If you ever visit the USA, stay away from Martin Luther King Drive/Avenue/Boulevard, no matter what city you’re in.
An entire state comprising 12% of US population will have no electricity and thus electrical vehicles that go nowhere. Btw the gas engine car is being banned on a national scale by 2035. Without electricity the water pumps turn off so good chance California will not have water as well.
https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/avoid-charging-evs-california-grid-operator-warns-blackouts-urges-energy-conservation
California loses water and transportation? Stop, I can only get so hard!
Ruin happens bit by bit and then all at once.
“Ordinary Americans are just so upset they aren’t getting their baby-murder anymore†seems to be the figleaf they’re going with to remove outer party members from their seats at the table. Sarah Palin ‘narrowly edged out’ in the special election in Alaska.
All states are blue states now.
That’s why I I’m wondering if over turning Roe vs Wade was a cathedral plan from the get go.
The RINO strategy is [*deleted*]
Stop telling us about Republicans. You only read what leftists say about their enemies, and have no idea what Rinos say to Republicans.
[*deleted*]
Deleted for presupposing that a well known traitor was “a literal war hero”
[*deleted*]
John McCain committed treason in the military in Vietnam long before he went into politics to commit some more treason.
Jim, he’s just trolling you at this point. Hellban the simpleton.
He was also one of the Keating Five.
https://grrrgraphics.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/mccain-mad-bomber-ben-garrison_1_orig.jpg
https://grrrgraphics.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/mccain-tumor-removal_orig.jpg
McCain was especially evil because other than the Keating Five most of the shifty things he did weren’t especially money related…
He also caused a fire on an aircraft carrier that killed hundreds of people luckily for him his father was the commanding admiral.
Not so much a singular plan i feel, or at least not so much a singular body with every player working towards a singular plan, but more so, yet another incidence of taking advantage of a contingency, in a whole chain of contingencies, going all the way back.
The Gaia Demon is cursing us with drought because not enough babies are being sacrificed to her.
Lol. Yes, also not enough whites renouncing their evil worldly possessions, and not enough schoolkids becoming sacred tranny prostitutes for wise and kindly nigs’n’pakis.
It is a complex issue, saving the world is.
Mary Peltola doesn’t look native. She almost looks White. Her father is a Ward H. Sattler. Sattler Sattler Sattler…
https://www.avotaynu.com/books/MenkNames.htm
https://www.hebrewsurnames.com/SATTLER
https://www.geshergalicia.org/families/sattler/
How curious.
Palin blew her chances starting with that nonsense about Paul Revere riding to warn the British.
It’s not hard to say “yeah I got the words tangled, he rode to warn the colonists to stop the British and we need to do the same” but she couldn’t do that. Visibly doubling down on obvious untruth torpedoes any kind of public trust.
Like all real Americans, Sarah Palin knew that when the British caught Paul Revere, he warned the British their attempt to seize the people’s guns would be resisted by deadly force. Something that real Americans regularly do in today’s conflict with our government.
Since the chattering classes and the educationists have erased the British attempt at gun control from the ride of Paul Revere, they were ignorant of this, making themselves look hilariously stupid. All the gunnie voters knew what Sarah Palin was talking about.
In that incident, Sarah Palin once again demonstrated herself vastly better educated that the staff of the New York Times, though the staff of the New York Times define a “good” education as one that teaches the required lies, and in that incident they demonstrated that they learnedly knew the lies, and Sarah Palin knew the truth.
Anglin is so based these days:
https://stormer-daily.rw/ohio-doorcam-shows-angry-boyfriend-shot-by-father/
On the other hand the lad did touch the father’s property without permission and I’m not just talking about the door.
She was spoiled goods. Marry her off to the boy or do as the bible commands when a daughter is a harlot in her fathers house.
It’s been a long time since I looked at Daily Stormer, 5 or 6 years. When did it adopt the Anime/Cartoony aesthetic?
I think a year or two ago after the site kept getting shut down and he had to move from site to site.
NPR be like: “Guys, guys! It’s the 3 C’s. Covid, Climate Change, and Conflict. That’s why we are having food shortages. Covid inhibited planting by making farmers sick. Climate is decreasing yields. Those evil Russians are blocking Ukrainian food export which is why we don’t have food. Totally nothing to do with our policy on natural gas, our push of green tech, lock downs, or our foreign policy and our self imposed import ban of Russian gas.”
Is listening to NPR similar to the daily Pravda reading experience?
Today’s Pravda is MSNBC-tier, only pro-Kremlin.
https://www.pravda.ru/
And without the Rainbow Fag’s Burden civilizational agenda of course.
I am announcing to my frens here that I’m going underground for at least a month, maybe more.
Good luck to everyone and see you guys later.
Take care friendo. I guess we should get use to this. You will be missed.
Quick question before you go: Are there any good Russian-language right-wing discussion forums out there?
Interesting but not unexpected development. Although in this case the customers did opt in. But probably not optional in the future. In any case it’s trivial to “hot wire” thermostat leads. If this happened to me it would take me all of 15 seconds to pull off the thermostat and add a jumper.
https://gab.com/PrisonPlanet/posts/108924248553082468
Tbqhfamalam that’s fucking hilarious. Though, who here doesn’t have a smart phone? I would not be surprised if it is more than a few, but it is pure facepalm whenever I hear good ol’ boys blathering on about staying off lists and being “secure” while they are wholly owned by their carrier. I’d genuinely love to go internet free, but I cannot figure how to do it with work and pastime necessities.
I’m on so many lists from my military time that I suspect if I were to try and minimize my profile it would attract more attention, not less.
Commenters at Founding Questions were wondering what the purpose of Biden’s speech was going to be. Judging from his rhetoric so far – Trump and everyone who supports him is an enemy of democracy – the purpose of this speech is to set the stage for the arrest of Trump. And soon after that, the arrest, etc., of Trump supporters.
I predicted this for April, May, or June of 2021. [Edit, I wrote 2020 here, typo, intended to write 2021]
I got the timing badly wrong, but everyone else was predicting the resumption of normality.
The capitol happening was on Jan 6, 2021. Did you mean April, May, or June of 2021? Or did you mean it was supposed to happen in the lead up to the summer riots of 2020?
Typo:
I predicted the crackdown as coming April May June of 2021. The crackdown however, has not really started yet.
You were right, and really everyone should have recognized it had to go this way. Democrats refused to recognize the outcome of the 2016 election and turned the security services on Trump. Then they stole the election in 2020. Stealing it again and declaring political opponents enemies of the state is a fait accompli.
I know there is a lot of hollow chest pounding from the Right, but there is also a significant percentage of America that is fully on the Trump train. His base of support was the “Faithful 30%,” the Ride-or-Die niggas that got on board in 2016 and stayed on board. What I am not certain of is whether that is 30% of conservatives, or 30% of Americans…
If/when the purge-down begins, I think they will ignore the inner cities. No sense riling up the plains apes any more than they are, and they will, at least initially, cheer and hoot as whitey gets carried off by the once-raciss police. But black males secretly love Trump, and I think the only ones that will get hoovered up at first will be domesticated negros and conservative mulattos.
Many fair-weather fans will ditch their Trump paraphernalia ASAP, but I don’t think that will save them. Covid taught us that there are plenty of informers in every community. It will, as always, come down to demographics, and if an area is red enough, there will be trouble if they attempt to mass arrest. I’m not trying to be excessively optimistic here, but I just can’t see the current Cathedral configuration being very competent at something this distributed and complex. The Feds will focus on the high level targets and states will be tasked with going after the smaller fish.
Clownworld’s attempt at a Reign of Terror will be, like everything else in Clownworld, ultra fake and ultra gay.
Welcome to Current Year.
I took the speech as incitement of Antifa and their fellow travelers to violence. More bash a fash/punch a nazi knockouts for a warmup, also more multi-person kill teams like the one that got Aaron Danielson in Portland and the one that failed to get Kyle Rittenhouse (but may still be distributed and self-organizing rather than top down, at least for public consumption).
Probably they also want blacks to do more burning and polar bear hunting, but I’m not sure a political speech is enough for them to get the message. Need a another gentle giant or George Floyd, not a speech. But if they do figure it out we’re into South African farm raid territory as well.
Strangely, a Trump arrest and raids and camps for his supporters might be on the back burner for a while now. Let their bio-leninist street troops run wild with no provable chain of command first. Initial police and fed stance will be stand down for Antifa, arrest anyone who defends themselves.
So more of what we’ve seen already in Trump election years, only even harder and with less effort to keep the mask on. Until their 87k “IRS” agents can be deployed, then things go to purge/crackdown territory.
Yes, that is the plan.
But their capacity to carry out plans is falling apart, and there are other elite factions who have a different plan.
What they will try to do is, anyone who marches in the streets or otherwise protests will be scanned for facial recognition and have his bank account seized as we saw in Canada.
They will hope that this inspires you to pick up a gun and shoot up a Wal-Mart or something out of despair, so their soldiers can put you down like a dog while they shake their heads sadly and impose more gun control and other restrictions on whites.
Remember kids, shooting up a Walmart is bad. Instead, find out where your local Federal DA lives and works and make sure he hears your complaints. Peacefully, of course, just like the religion of peace.
When they arrest Trump – plainly it’s not “if” at this point – they will establish a lockdown order, “in the interest of maintaining peace and stability, and preventing domestic insurrection,” etc.
What Americans do then will be a key moment in the history of the US. If most people meekly stay in, well, that’s it, I think. (And by the way, it will probably be imposed as a “temporary measure for this one night,” but we all remember “two weeks to flatten the curve,” right?)
OTOH, if enough of us do as Mitch McConnell (or whoever) recently predicted and riot in the streets, or engage in various forms of no doubt entirely peaceful protest, then exciting possibilities open up.
Right now, in this moment, I am resolved to ignore any unconstitutional lockdown stay-at-home orders and go out and like, peacefully protest or whatever. Whether my nerve will hold when I’m faced with the reality of it, I have no idea. This is totally new territory.
All kinds of interesting things are, or will soon be, entirely possible. =)
GNON be b-b-based!
If such a night comes to pass, perhaps I will enjoy some of the fine cuisine that certain anarchists made famous.
For better or for worse, I think this one is up to the niggers and sluts. If they stay in and stay quiet, everyone will. If they riot and loot, then the Timid Plurality will feel covered enough to violate the Stay At Home order.
If they do another Two Weeks to Restore Normalcy, they will lead off with the Blue out in force, hoping and praying the stupid fucking Conservitards back the blue right into the gulag.
So many ways it could go… rereading what I wrote, it seems pretty thin. On the one hand, all I see are meek obeyers looking for the next thing to comply with. But I also see Trump flags, FJB decals, and plenty of soft dissent. In addition to the Peasants Of Color and roasties, the Karens will will be an influential force. I see it as likely that there will be an army of them shilling for Daddy Government, but I can also see wine aunts with Winchesters gunning down enforcers when the Bota Box runs dry.
Fuck this timeline lol.
I think a lockdown while they arrest Trump is the point at which you either hoist Old Glory and the black flag, you flee the GAE, or accept all is lost and lay down to die. I do not have the means to flee the collapsing GAE, and I do not want to face St. Peter and have to admit that when America died I was hiding in my basement. I know they will come for me soon enough, so I might as well come for them first.
America died decades before you were born, bro.
I do not care about the institutions. Fuck them, let them burn. America is not Congress, or the President, or every single Secretary, Director, or Chief of Staff. America is the Americans and if fighting for them kills me, then I died in good company, for a good cause, and you cannot get a better epitaph than that.
“America died decades before you were born, bro.”
This is no longer about luxuries like a peaceful and prosperous Republic. It’s about not being genocided.
That’s why there’s nothing to lose by engaging in various activities, including, but certainly not limited to, marching around while holding a sign.
If we do nothing they’re not going to wait until the timing is perfect for us, to make their move; they’re going to do it while they think the timing is perfect for them, i.e. as bad as possible for us. There is no “wait it out.” They’ll use infrared and high-power microphones to verify that you’re in stage-4 sleep at 3:00 am, then they come into your house. Obviously, given the 87K new “IRS agents,” etc., they have the desire and ability to do this long before they enter the “leftists eating each other” phase. Of course they’re going to go after each other eventually; that’s what leftists do. But unless we do something outside the box, we definitely won’t be around for that part.
That is the crux of the matter. Once you know that they are rounding up dissidents, you do not wait. They will come for you, so fuck up their plans and take the fight to them. All of us are marked for death once the genocide starts. It will be about surviving what comes, or making them pay. And remember; they will have no qualms about coming to your house and killing your family. Do unto others… but only once the time is right.
Which is also why, despite my liking Gavin, his fake FBI raid was poor form. Owen Benjamin announced that whole thing was a fake.
Was it fake or is it a cover because he flipped?
https://stormer-daily.rw/owen-benjamin-says-gavin-mcinnes-hoaxed-raid/
Fake, he takes this week off every year
The political moves of Biden are confusing, have become unpredictable. I think my assertion in another thread that these toons are firstly insane and secondly not working in tandem is the best model of prediction we can hope for. Other than a model following historical precedent which is best when predicting the larger turns of fate. These people are not acting within their own interests, seem to be acting against it, and are not coordinated in anything but hate of the opposition. By that I mean their conclusions are reasonable but their antecedent premises are false, have been false for a long time, are thus incongruent with God, and have befuddled them.
Brandon the Befuddled would be a perfect name to describe this game of clowns.
Biden is these days mostly a deep fake video, and there is more than one elite conspiracy generating these deep fake videos, and when the real Biden appears, more than one conspiracy issuing him his script.
I am nonplussed. You are asserting that Joe Brandon is not speaking in front of people, that what we are watching is a graphical generation? What about the people in attendance?
At this point, I guess anything is possible, but if someone threw out that assertion in a discussion/debate, I would assume they were trying to muddy the water or pull a Westboro/Flat Earth type of credibility reduction by association trick.
I have not investigated the extent to which Biden videos are deep fakes, but I checked out one video that was an obvious poorly done deep fake (does not blink, a chronic problem with deep fake videos – it is hard to get the blinks correct.)
@Kunning Druegger
Stable diffusion subreddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/x4rtzz/i_hooked_my_webcam_up_to_stable_diffusion/
https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/x4vhaa/movie_stills_deepfakes_walter_white_as_the/
That is freeware that has only been released to the public about 2 weeks now run on computers by hobbyists with minimal post-processing.
The fact Biden ranges from wandering after icecream trucks to able to give coherent speeches suggests more then one Biden. In the past we’d assume body double, but these people are untrustworthy and think tech is magic.
@S
I’m not following, but that may be because of intellectual limitations on my end. It looks trippy and cool, but what it doesn’t look like is a political speech occurring outdoors with “in the wild” light being streamed out over the internet and television by myriad camera and recording devices of varying quality and capacity. If he was sitting in an “office” or some other interior location with fixed lighting and a static background, this idea would make more sense. If we only say two flavors of Brandon, dynamic exterior and buffoonish OR static interior and competent, it would not only be more believable, I’d consider it highly likely.
Tech decline is bad enough as is, but building effective and powerful LED walls, or using complex and comprehensive motion capture, or doing both while running strong and dumb AI as a finishing touch, would have a massive footprint, in terms of equipment and personnel. Some of the best event technology in the world with highly competent and capable technicians still has glitches, particularly when you add a livestream component.
I want to reiterate that I might not be understanding how the whole deep fake thing would work, or what those links are demonstrating.
I jumped the gun. I’ve been paying attention to this weird and trippy stuff SD’s been coming out with over the past weeks and assumed the state of the art is better. Sorry- tech optimism got the better of me.
Went over the entire speech and it is regular Biden on a teleprompter.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RdP8kMvBI4
19:34
24:48
He screws up, stops and the gets the line right.
A buddy of mine is getting ready to flee America. I told him if he goes I will go with.
[*deleted for utter detachment from the reality that is in everyone’s faces*]
If you pass the shill test, I will allow a debate on what universe we live in.
I passed the shill test multiple times before you even asked me, you silly retard.
Not under this email address – thus not under an email address where HR and your FBI supervisor are looking over your shoulder. Maybe someone calling himself London Guy passed it, but I track shills by their email address.
Until you pass it under this email address, everything from you, except an attempt to pass the shill test or a response to the comment to which your replied, but failed to respond, is going to be silently deleted.
You have nineteen comments under this email address, none of which commit any thought crimes, or even notice that anyone on this blog is discussing thought crimes.
“It the Jews”, and “I hate women too” are not thought crimes, provided that the Jews implied are orthodox, or located in Tel Aviv, or are regular small businessmen selling bagels or running a pawnshop, and that you hate women for being wonderful. Is a thought crime if “name the Jew” results in telling us what Soros and Victoria Nuland have been up to. Is a thought crime if the problem with women is that unowned women are unhappy and do destructive and self destructive things, that women are wonderful in their proper sphere, but innately and inherently cause problems outside it.
“Gas the Jews” is not a thought crime.
Noticing what George Soros and Victoria Nuland have fiat been up to is a thought crime.
>they will establish a lockdown order, “in the interest of maintaining peace and stability, and preventing domestic insurrection,†etc.
This will work extremely well. Our side has zero leadership and zero organization; the enemy controls the state and the information organs. Disorganized and confused conservatards are not going to put up any serious resistance, and any resistance they do manage will be easily quashed and then used to justify further repression. This is not a fight we can win with the resources we have. Please don’t go out there and get yourself locked up or killed. There’s no point in it, and we’ll need you later. The Right can’t do riots; the Left can because they control enforcement and punishment. What works for them absolutely will not work for us.
>If most people meekly stay in, well, that’s it, I think.
That’s it, all right. America has been over for decades, maybe even a full century. Don’t sacrifice yourself for a rotting carcass and a bunch of 19th Century propaganda. Right now, the Left is running the table, and this will continue for the foreseeable future, but they are busily destroying the basis of their own power. The question is: what comes next? Stalin II? Total economic collapse? Gradual Brazilification? Opportunities might develop later, but going into the streets is a boondoggle and will remain so until something major changes.
Going into the streets, whether for peacful protesting or rioting, is something lefties have been doing successfully to achieve their aims. I don’t see how it could work for the right. Of course, it might be fun.
That’s what the I.VI suckers thought.
Rioting works when it is state sponsored.
A mob versus an organized force gets massacred. For the right to riot successfully, We need a Caesar. And Caesar is only going to show up when he sees he is going to die if he fails to come forward.
Sulla and Julius Caesar were in obvious and imminent danger of death. Caesar Augustus was not in imminent danger of death, but being a teenager, was less subject to normality bias, and could see death coming from further away, could see he had to rule or die.
Me: they will establish a lockdown order, “in the interest of maintaining peace and stability, and preventing domestic insurrection,†etc.
NEET: This will work extremely well.
We don’t know. We’re in a game-theoretic stag hunt.
If you’re the only one who like, mostly peacefully protests, then you’re just a lone nut who will affect nothing. If 20 million do that, it’s entirely different. For this reason, if for no other, it’s a bad idea to talk down the idea of energetically protesting.
By the way, someone has to be wiling to be one of the first movers. If everyone just waits to see what everyone else does, we’re done.
Sometimes all it takes is one person saying, “Fuck these people. We don’t have to live like this.”
Cannot do anything interesting without a leader. We await Caesar.
You can put stress on the system. You can demonstrate the false nature of their myth of invulnerability. You can damage faith in their institutions. You can do all sorts of interesting things. You just cannot expect to survive the doing.
Sometimes all it takes is one person saying, “Fuck these people. We don’t have to live like this.â€
This is true; I’ve done it. I’ve been the first person to offer a reasonable objection to some stupid new rule that folks at work were proposing. Often, other person(s) will then chime in and agree with you. And I’ve also been that second or third person when someone else spoke up first.
In the situation we’re anticipating one person won’t be enough, but a sufficiently large number of people…
First mover in a stag hunt game with enemy shills and entryists. Not very promising.
First mover has to be a plausible Caesar. Only model for this sort of thing is Augustus Caesar, who was completely outside the state power structure when he got started. Had enough money to pay enough soldiers to grab some more money, and, far more importantly, had a name that gave him some slight basis for legitimacy.
I am not good at math, let’s just get that out there.
I don’t think we are all playing the same game. I think the elites are playing Stag Hunt and the Commons are trapped in Prisoner’s Dilemma. The outcome of the PD game is contingent upon the results of the choices in SH, but the rewards in SH are all decided within PD.
Here’s a quick summary of the situation:
We’re in a stag hunt, but not a standard one, because we also have an upcoming Schelling signal: the arrest of Trump.
They certainly want violence when Trump is arrested and if they fail to get it they’ll send their glow niggers out to create it. Without elite leadership it wouldn’t be wise to give them what they want. Trump failed as a leader when he fled, but he might make a good maryr.
They want violence, but they want it to be isolated and uncoordinated violence.
Large scale violence, leaders stepping onto the field to coordinate violence, would mean shit getting Real.
Indeed, St. John. I think the violence can be scattered and uncoordinated at first, because it will distract LEO and create an opportunity for score-settling, looting, and general mayhem and disarray. If it continues, becomes a protracted suspension of normality/social contract, people will begin coordinating out of necessity, creating local then regional confederations. *That* is a set of circumstances conducive to a Caesar or Caesars to rise, stepping up to streamline things or just talking advantage of warriors needing leadership. It is stereotypical American to need the circumstances to dictate action, rather than taking action to set the circumstances. Many who would abstain from “jumping in” if someone deliberately rises to power would go along wholeheartedly if the common perception was that it was borne of necessity, as opposed to executed intentionally.
The Cathedral needs just enough violence, or more accurately footage of violence, to unite the sheepdog class behind the banner of Constitutional Preservation. Too much and the infighting on the Left will explode, driving the Grill Class to slip into Hobbesian Dynamics. But the lack of leadership, and leadership potential, on the Right is the ace in the whole for the Cathedral. A leader, or leaders, must rise.
Caesar is not a local warlord in an anarchy tyranny… that is more like how the Daimyo of feudal Japan came about…
The first mover problem is the problem the saints solve. Many lose their lives in this. This is why we venerate them.
The saint gives up his life to determine the disposition of the enemy. Caesar sees it. Caesar concludes that the enemy is implacable and makes his attack.
Yes, Caesar is important, but, again, the church venerates saints, not Caesar.
I think Wulfgar Thundercock III is saying the same thing at https://blog.reaction.la/science/origins-of-the-white-race/#comment-2850259
Agree. One of the many issues of good times//weak men is that those who may have a martial inclination always want to be a general or an officer or some secret frog SpecOps guy (that meme with the Redditor saying there’s a mistake and the Commissar screaming Get In The Trench comes to mind). No one wants to be a support officer or logistics manager or a slit trench digger.
Strategic ambiguity is your friend. Or, as Jesus Christ puts it, be as subtle as a serpent and as harmless as a dove. As far as I can see, and I speak from direct personal experience, they have no answer to this.
They have no answer to us just sitting around with our thumbs up our asses? Yeah, we’ve got ’em there.
>They have no answer to us just sitting around with our thumbs up our asses?
>us
Who is this “us” person you are talking about?
Don’t do that. We are all in this tribe. If Neuro- is feeling blackpilled, it’s your duty to admonish, correct, and support. If he is right, you must contend with readjustment of perspective. Purity Spiraling has its place, but it shouldn’t be invoked over a simple disagreement.
If his “us” is misplaced, explain why.
JJ, maybe I didn’t understand you. I interpreted your recommendation to be “as harmless as a dove” as to just sit around doing nothing. Even if it is true that that’s our best move right now – which is far from obvious to me – it’s hardly a “Ha, we’ve got ’em now!” move.
Or maybe you meant something else.
My original post was in response to Karl, who was pondering how street-level action could work for the right. I answered that you would need to do it as Christ would have done it, further explictly claiming that I had done so myself.
My reading of Neurotoxin’s reply was that Neurotoxin was including me in the set of people who are “sitting around with [their] thumbs up [their] asses,” or possibly including meme warfare in the set the activities whose effect was identical to “sitting around with [one’s thumb] up [one’s ass].” My response to his post is a reference to the old joke from the Lone Ranger:
The Lone Ranger and Tonto are riding out in the west, when suddenly hundreds of Indians appear on the horizon. The Lone Ranger says, “looks like we are done for, Tonto.” Tonto replies “who is this ‘we’ person, white man?”
This is perhaps not the best joke, as Tonto is clearly outgrouping the Lone Ranger in order to save his own life. So for that I am sorry.
The possibility that Neurotoxin was not including me in his tribe seemed rather remote, or if true rather inconsequential, and I was not too worried about it. What you seem most concerned about is that I might not be including him in my tribe. I can understand your concern.
Orthodox Christians, as I understand, see their Heterodox brethren as lost sheep, but until such time as those sheep return to the fold are not in communion with them. I am not yet in communion with Orthodoxy, but I am slowly working towards it. The fruits of the Orthodox Christian faith are revealed in Russia’s success in the Ukrainian land. No other branch of Christianity seems to be resisting the evil of the world quite so well; not even very traditional Catholics such as those who celebrate the Latin Mass.
But, as you say, this has little to do with a simple disagreement, or, more likely, misunderstanding, and ideas of congregational purity should not really apply to such things. Furthermore, I have no idea what religion Neurotoxin is.
The joke makes the most sense if Neurotoxin is despairing as you suspect he is, and that the effect of his comment is to try to include me in his despair or make me join him in his despair. In such a case, if Neurotoxin were given to despair and did not correct himself after the proper Biblical procedures were followed, I would indeed have to outgroup him, spiritually, to save my own soul.
My reply, then, was intended to accomplish two things: firstly, to find out precisely what Neurotoxin meant by his post, and, secondly, to admonish him in a slightly humorous way if indeed he was taking to despair.
@Neurotoxin
To be as “harmless as a dove” means to be harmless physically, at least while certain types of physical action would result in one’s pointless death, injury, or imprisonment. It does not mean that you cannot engage in street-level spiritual and memetic warfare, both of which are devastating the devil and his minions, especially when you also try to be as “subtle as a serpent.”
JJ, thanks for the response. I wasn’t thinking nearly that deeply. I just thought you were saying “Just sit around and do nothing, that’ll fix ‘em.†Apparently you were not saying that, so good. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
I am not despairing or black pilling. Au contraire, I’m trying to steel myself for a Red Terror which seems both unthinkable and inevitable. I’m trying to be prepared emotionally and in other ways.
Furthermore, I have no idea what religion Neurotoxin is.
Neither does Neurotoxin! I was raised Christian, went through a long non-religious phase (atheist/agnostic), but the benefits of old-school Christianity are becoming more obvious over time. Also, I have seen some very weird shit, but that’s a whole ‘nother blog.
On the memeing thing, a response to you and Jim and Red far above:
One issue with this for me is that it’s seductive, too seductive. Part of me WANTS to do exactly that, just keep memeing, but… I fear the appeal that this has to two vices: cowardice and laziness. I’m pretty sure I’m not a coward (though it’s not like I’ve ever been seriously tested), but I damn well KNOW that I have procrastination issues, which, I have to face it, is a form of laziness. And so when people say, “Don’t do anything overt yet,†I see the point but I have to watch myself. What are my motivations here? Am I seeing the point for the right reasons?
I know you guys – JJ, Jim, Red, etc. – have your hearts in the right place. Obviously. But when someone says, “Don’t do anything yet,†I swear I can practically SEE the serpent whispering his seductive councils in my ear. If the Devil exists he knows exactly what our vices are, right? He knows exactly what he has to say to have the highest chance of getting you to do the wrong thing.
God, if you’re there, help me.
I will add my voice to the council of friends saying, “Wait, spread our ideas, and do not act.” Now is not the time, and Jim is right on that. We still need to wait, and prepare the field for a leader.
I also agree with you that once the left wing death squads go out, that it is time to go hot, leadership be damned. Part of that is my particular circumstance, where due to me having been in military intelligence. They are not going to leave someone like me alone, so going out shooting is better than being shot in the back and dumped in a ditch or mass grave. Maybe you do not need to worry as much as I do.
@Wulfgar I think the order to disarm the public will go out before the death squads. Failure to disarm the public will result in a lot of dead enforces no matter how large of an army of IRS thugs they hire.
The tribe to which I was referring is the Jim Tribe. Many, even most, JT members have a deeper philosophical or spiritual allegiance, and that is fine, as we (meaning me) discovered a while back that the Jim Tribe is a collection of leaders scattered all over with varying degrees of status and influence.
The only purity testing required here is decided by Jim and Regulars, and that is when shill tests get deployed. So long as we are on the same page regarding women, race, and political ur-theory, all other details are secondary.
Your Tonto joke was hilarious.
I elaborated on my predictions for how It will Go Down in this effort post: https://blog.reaction.la/science/origins-of-the-white-race/#comment-2849289
I beleive they ahve already begun to build the investigative apparatus for identifying and tracking thought criminals, though it is not ready to be deployed. Indeed, it will never actually be *ready* as Sh’neekwa can’t build, but it will still be deployed, and the Dark Brandon speech was one or more factions jumping the gun. Auron Macintyre just had a breddy gudd stream on the speech* and one of the many things he said is that once the Message goes out, it cannot be unsaid, no matter how much they want to or try to walk it back, as the Voices That Speak will repeat and amplify, adding their own signature, twist, or spin in whatever way they believe will enhance their status or standing. Biden has declared open season on MAGAfolks, and we are now waiting to see which department in the Executive branch will act first, though it might also be some private organization or some “””grassroots””” group.
I hope this is not fedpoasting, but I fear that if “we” wait for official death squads and highly publicized raids, it will be too late.
*https://youtu.be/uDiLADhqa2E
Kunning they may attempt a reign of terror but it will be incompetent and fake and gay. Leftists will be denouncing each other for being MAGA (for bullshit reasons) and whether said denunciation are acted upon will be random.
The real problem is that you aren’t going to be able to count on anything close to a functional economy.
Agreed Com, the defection on the left angle is obvious but I didn’t really think about it. I think there will be a lot of normies/greengrocers scrambling for cover and it will add confusion to the fact that it will not be Left v. Right, but rather System v. any threats/challengers, real or imagined. They are far from competent, but equally far from powerless. Like some hulking retard with a length of garden hose whipping around, there will be a ton of collateral damage as Freak the Mighty swats at the hornets pouring from the nest they decided to attack with no real plan in place.
Cominator:
“they may attempt a reign of terror but it will be incompetent and fake and gay.â€
Com, we cannot afford to assume this. Leftists managed to slaughter 100 million people in the 20th century.
That is true, Neurotoxin, but look at the masculinity of the leftists then as compared to now. It is not even a contest. They might have been effeminate or unmanly for their time, but GAE leftists are probably the faggiest, least masculine men in all of human history.
“Com, we cannot afford to assume this. Leftists managed to slaughter 100 million people in the 20th century.”
It was run by masculine Pale of Settlement Jews, Chechens etc and even then they mostly killed each other and mostly killed innocent people by destroying the economy.
“look at the masculinity of the leftists then as compared to now. It is not even a contest. …GAE leftists are probably the faggiest, least masculine men in all of human history.”
Thank you for this. Com, ditto.
I agree with both Wulfgar and Com’s analysis, but it must also be said that, as it stands right now, the feminized leftoids in power have plenty of muscular, physically dangerous sheepdog thralls to do their bidding. That doesn’t mean they always will, but it does mean that we are not merely up against the poindexters and faggots in the managerial class.
I noticed that as well. Some of the American guys who took off for the Ukraine to help make it safe to rape little boys and have gay pride parades where in pretty decent shape.
The enforcement arm of the state still has some power. Next generation is likely to be nothing but faggots and women but we are not there yet.
What’s in it for these sheep dogs? They have not know that their masters hate and want to destroy them.
Even those masculine men are heavily feminized compared to historical men. Those muscular, dangerous men were bullying tribal cavemen, not fighting a real war. Look what happened to them when some of them went to fight for Ukraine. They were looking at a real fight, where the other side has artillery and air support, too, and they did not lioe that one bit. When they could not shoot an enemy who was massively outclassed they bravely, bravely ran away. Meanwhile, the Russians have taken more casualties in six months than America did after two wars over two decades, and they fight on.
They lack faith. They believe in nothing but empty t-shirt slogans and sanitized viking memes. They have nothing to prop them up when the going gets tough. They will fall in under the Cross and Old Glory, or they will break, because we have faith and they do not.
Interesting point Wulfgar. I remember the FBI and ATF taking glory pics in front of the burned Branch Davidians compound where they’d just got done using armored vehicles to barbecue women and children to death. They where taking tough guy poses in front of the ashes like they’d actually done something brave. They were in shape but they were weak and evil men with no stomach for an actual fight.
We must also accept the that the side of Right and Good is not in fighting trim, not in any holistic sense. There are those among us in peak condition I am sure, but there are lots of us with hearts in the right place but bodies not, or bodies in the right place but brains lagging behind. The Cathedral is counting on a quick victory, so they replicate memes that reinforce the “inevitableness” of their victory, and then fall sway to their own propaganda. I am convinced this is what happened in 2016. So it will be a numbers game: numbers of bodies, numbers of tech toys, numbers of incompetent leaders, and numbers of days, weeks, months, and years of protracted struggle. The GAE lost in AFG well before 2021, but it wasn’t obvious to all until much later. the timeline in Ukraine *seems* shorter, but we can’t really know that just yet. The longer “it” goes, the more Faith matters. When it’s asymmetrical, excess capital can assuage a lot of faithlessness. At no point was the Taliban going to invade the US, same with Iraq, Haiti, Grenada, Lebanon, Vietnam, and even Germany. So the Cathedral has no institutional capacity for what a civil unrest scenario does to people, infrastructure, and institutions.
Time is their greatest enemy, they thing they cannot beat. But the bloodletting that implies is actually physically painful for me to consider.
Red, the sheepdogs firmly believe that the current crop of GAE leadership is temporary, that they will get voted out and a new Reagan will come, or some other dumb shit. But this only comes out if you press them hard (don’t do this, it never ends well). Mostly, they just don’t think about it. Every enforcement action is justified because if it wasn’t, they wouldn’t have been given the assignment. Every target/perpetrator is a bad guy, because if they weren’t, they wouldn’t be targeted. It really is that simple with the ones that, on paper, should be very aware that they are being used as SonderKommandos.
Wars are usually won before they are fought.
You don’t just pile in and start shooting.
Need a leader and need a faith.
The faith is taking shape. Christian Nationalism.
The leader, however is not yet apparent. Trump flunked out when he called the lawyers instead of the militia, and then ran away when the militia showed up anyway.
So, till the time arrives, it’s meme warfare. Which is highly effective in preparing the ground for full warfare.
“You don’t just pile in and start shooting.
Need a leader and need a faith.â€
The last thing I want is to pile in and start shooting. But once they start coming for us, we don’t have a choice. At that point, the question of whether we have a leader is irrelevant; your options are to fight back or to simply sit there and let them kill you.
Exactly so.
P-PR-PRAISE GNON!
They are evil, malicious and opportunistic. They will go for the low hanging fruit. Like everyone here, surely you are also making preparations so that you will not be the low hanging fruit.
I agree with y’all that right now is not the time to do anything out of the ordinary… but Trump could be arrested any time.
Hell, it could be that he already has been as I write this sentence. Could be any other time before he can get the GOP 2024 nomination (though why they don’t just fraud him out of that I don’t know).
alf: “Like everyone here, surely you are also making preparations so that you will not be the low hanging fruit.”
Yes, doing what I can.
Trump’s Truth Social is still banning people whom Gab accepts. Trump’s supporters still rot in the dungeons of D.C. If Trump is captured it is entirely his own fault.
Trump is not your problem.
Well put, mirrors my experience.
Kill with kindness.
To everything, there is a time. A time to kill with kindness and a time to kill with unkindness. A time for peace and a time for war.
When the time comes, we shall strike without mercy. But as Jim wisely says, now is not that time.
Now is the time for preparations. For instance, never too late to start a family, Wulf (-:
> The Right can’t do riots; the Left can because they control enforcement and punishment. What works for them absolutely will not work for us.
[*Unresponsive*].
“Unresponsive” my ass.
You censor more truth than Twitter or Facebook, you pathetic faggot.
A handful of our guys could wipe out antifa and BLM without raising a sweat, as Kyle and many others have demonstrated.
But then they would get the treatment that Kyle and many others have received. Which was the point of the comment to which you replied, but which point you ignored and failed to respond to.
And from here on I am going to silently delete everything from you except a response to that point or an attempt to pass the shill test.
Any minor or short-lived protests will be handled by official forces withdrawing, then, when things have calmed down, they will come back and use the surveillance recordings to figure out the mass arrests.
They’ll stage a false flag terrorist attack either right before the or more likely after the arrest. PF or Proud boys will be the go to fed groups for it. After that mass arrests.
That is assuming they’re capable of it. They fucked up I.VI pretty badly, utterly failing to get the right optics for it despite having everything in their control. I doubt their false flag terrorist attacks will be better organized.
They just had to have the two White marines standing behind him too.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/06/what-fog-data-science-why-surveillance-company-so-dangerous
Forgive the faggy leftist source, but this is how the cake is baked. That LE is outsourcing this capability to a private third party suggests that their innate surveillance capabilities have materially declined. Looks like a combination of facial rec and geolocation is the best they got now. Like Jim said, low-hanging fruit. Leaving one’s phone at home and obscuring one’s face now likely sufficient for real world opsec.
It was brought up on founding questions that this may be a call to the various factions of the left to start some infighting, as the only thing the left fears is other leftists. If so, how many factions of the left are there, what can they be grouped up/ labeled as, and what troops do they have?
When leftist struggles go physical, the outcome is apt to be surprising to everyone, including leftists. The left has conspiracies inside their conspiracies.
There are few things more depressing than the sight of grown men wearing nothing but a t-shirt and pants out in public.
The state of ‘mens fashion’ in latter years in abjectly impoverished – and has been fore the past hundred at that.
Step into the first clothing store you see, and you will find only dirges to mediocrity. Grey, black, and blue is the order of the day, this day and all other days. Monotone coloration, frequently, and absent of any patterning, detailing, variegation, or decoration. You could find more variety of style on a single rack in the women’s section than in the entire ‘men’s department’ altogether.
It should be understood that good fashion is not simply something one does for oneself, it is something that gives fairness to the eyes of everyone around you. To be well dressed elevates the spiritual health of every space you are in, just the same way as each other aspects relate to beauty.
For me it’s middle aged guys still giving each other bro hugs. Look me in the eye and shake my hand.
It’s not a matter of maturity, *noone* is out here looking good. What i need to impress upon here is just how thoroughly soul-draining the puritan aesthetic is. So many men going through daily life feeling like shit yet don’t have the ability to consciously articulate what those feelings are exactly or why it is happening and this is one of the biggest expressions of that; they can’t recognize how *ab*normal the abjectness of this situation is because they have known nothing else; they feel pain yet don’t necessarily recognize it as pain – a part of them may even deny that it is pain, conditioned as it is by the very sources of its abuse – and to the extent they do recognize the pain, it is so oft inchoate; they cast about for minor momentary things that have changed in their memory to attach the directionless feelings too, without grasping that the great matter of the issue has already been the case from the beginning, yea, from long before their beginning.
Top business men, top military men, top academoi men – they all dress like paupers. A simple button up and vest combination is enough to elevate you above the fashion standards of 99% of any social situations one might find themselves in today. The only ‘sumptuary displays’ you see validated in kept outlets is people spending 200 dollars to buy a shirt that looks barely different from something you could pick up in walmart.
This was going to be my objection to your position; I am not going to buy 6 guns worth of clothing that amounts to 2 outfits that are only “fashionable” or “quality” because of the name on the tag no one sees. I do not dress “nice” by any measure, but half the time it is “working fingers to bone” clothing, and the other half is usually… well, to your point, slovenly as my fellow Carthaginians do. What should I be wearing? I used to always dress for “work” even when not working, and that dress code was demi-tactical, given that I was in the “art trades,” so my clothing was all gear for remote locations or whatever. Of late, I have been feeling the urge to dress better, but I am not quite sure how to go about it.
How about a Fascion Guide for us, St. John? And anyone else who has the balls to contribute. I still reserve the right to go grayman as needed, but I would jump into better dressing with both feet.
First commandment of fashion. Lose weight and put on muscle. Nothing fits a fat man, and nothing makes a fat man look good. If you are fat, might as well wrap yourself in a potato sack.
Which is a large part of how Kings lost power. Nothing that King George the Fourth wore could be fashionable. Ideas are more powerful than guns, but fashion is more powerful than ideas. Kings lost power because George the Fourth was unmanned by slut queen Caroline, but she was able to get away with it because Beau Brummel could snub George the Fourth. The problem was that Beau Brummel could destabilize men’s fashion, because the elite were wearing heavily decorated baggy clothes. So elite men’s fashion was something that could never be fashionable. So Beau Brummel got to out status King George the Fourth, making it impossible for him to perform the King’s proper role as the fount of all honors, mortal and divine, by which Charles the Second was able to redirect status competition into prosocial pursuits, notably science. (I am going to promote this comment into another fashion post.)
Second commandment of fashion. Having lost weight and put on muscle, buy something that fits your actual body shape. This is, inevitably, tailored to fit you, and only you. Therefore expensive. Buy something tailored to fit you and only you from the cheapest possible source in the cheapest possible way, for what makes it fashionable is the tailoring, not the name of the man who tailored it.
Why do Musk space suits look good? Because they are designed to be tailored, each one manufactured to fit one particular astronaut and no other, unlike NASA space suits, all of which are designed to fit anyone including a morbidly obese transexual. Because it is very difficult to keep a morbidly obese transexual alive in space while allowing it freedom of movement outside the vehicle, NASA space suits are impractically expensive, and make movement difficult.
This fashion advice is of course fashion advice for men, for female fashions are silly and do not matter. But the same applies to women, except that women should have about double the percentage of body fat that a man should have, and should not be undulyu muscular, and that women want some attention attracting flim flam oddities to make them look different from every other women – until everyone imitates the fashion leader, whereupon the fashion leader gets a costume with different attention attracting flim flam oddities, resulting in the never ending change of women’s fashions, and unchanging stability of men’s fashions.
When we bring women back under control, only whores (in the old sense of whore, not the twentieth century sense) will wear attention attracting flim flam, and they will all be extremely low status, and in danger of mistreatment, since their status will be similar to that of a stray dog. And the attention attracting flim flam will increase the danger of mistreatment, which is why they will enthusiastically decorate themselves in attention attracting flim flam. “because when those louses go back to their spouses, diamonds are a girl’s best friend”
When women are under control, respectable female fashion will have the same stability as men’s fashion, but disreputable female fashion will, alas, be where the action is. We just will have to keep it low status, in the same way as we will have keep gays in the closet. A bit of status lowering violence, here and there, now and again – though of course not so lethal.
My Rock&Roll rig is on fleek. I have a single patch and everything else is “tailored” haha. But yeah, my wardrobe needs some work. I know those mechanics, as it isn’t a suit until it’s Your suit.
So is it best to just always roll in a button up, vest, and jacket? For a while, when I was no longer in a uniform, I enjoyed wearing polos and sleeper cargos (they look like dress pants, but they have mag pockets and such) because it felt way more comfortable.
You are absolutely correct about the being fit aspect, but I personally feel no outfit is complete without a weapon. Soft handed folks disagree, but I don’t take a man seriously unless he carries a weapon he trains with. I’d love to have an AR pistol, something sleek and refined in matte colors, at all times, but we aren’t quite there yet. I have a work knife but I am not a blade guy; I have no training with them and I have no idea where to get it. G19 is simple, but there are are Sigs and CZs that are absolutely top tier.
G19 is the move. If you have a $1000 gun budget, and you buy a $500 Glock, that is a lot of money for ammo and range time. If you buy a $1000 race gun, then you are not going to spend as much time shooting it as you should. You do not need a top tier gun. You need a gun that you know like the back of your hand.
You do not need an AR pistol. If you need a subgun, get a CZ Scorpion. If you want a short AR, stick with a 13 or 14 inch barrel and get your muzzle device pinned and welded. Throw on a CQB/PDW stock and you are good to go. Super short ARs are for assassins, not warriors. And again, if you need something like that, get a Scorpion or something akin to it. Load all your fighting magazines with hollowpoints because full metal jacket will not get the job done. Practice, practice, and practice more, until you can change a magazine blindfolded and your aim is instinct, not thought.
Combat fashion follows what I heard called the purple dildo unicorn principle. If wearing a purple suction dildo on your forehead like a big faggot unicorn made you win fights, then all the hardest killers would be wearing big purple dildos, and the purple didlo would inspire respect and fear. If you killed all the other guys, then it will start to look good no matter how ridiculous it looked before you started stacking bodies.
Men’s fashion is based off of what killers wear, and modified to best accentuate the ideal masculine form. You want to wear something that makes you look like a badass? Take inspiration from mercenary gear and special operations uniforms. Keep in mind that if you dress like that, theb you better be ready to walk the walk or you will get called out.
Data on shootouts indicates that, astonishingly, the small gun with the cheapest ammo, the gun than is easiest and most comfortable to fire, is the gun most effective in resolving the shootout to the shooter’s satisfaction.
I conjecture, it is not the gun, but the practice with the gun. The gun that you are most likely to practice with, that is easiest cheapest, and most fun to practice with, is what you should buy. Most people, on being hit with a 22, don’t instantly drop dead, but lose interest, enthusiasm, and capability to do you harm. Don’t worry about one shot stops. Worry about one shot hits on target.
Kyle hit an assailant in the arm that was holding the gun. You think he would switch arms and go on shooting?
Your conjecture is almost certainly correct. It is treated as a truism in the community of serious shooters that I know and run with. If you cannot afford to feed the gun, then you cannot afford that gun. Get something cheaper, and a few hundred rounds of ammunition to go with it. A bad gun you know well is going to do you better than a great gun that you have not shot.
The data I know of was looking at caliber efficiency in stopping an attacker. Single round stopping power is pretty common in rifles and shotguns, about three rounds for most pistol. A rough estimate is that only 1 in 10^number of hits will continue to fight. If you get to three shots and he is still coming, mag dump him until he stops twitching.
Would you be interested in me putting together a practical post on gun ownership?
I’d love to see that.
Ditto, Wulfgar.
Yeah, I am aware of the “.22 is enough” argument, and I find it compelling. I prefer a larger caliber and I am comfortable with it through practice. Something to consider: Rittenhouse was up against a hyped group of NPC-kit normies who had been spun up into a mob. They were not people trained and dedicated to “the art of score” as it were. If someone is wearing the modicum of body armor, .22 is a joke. You may get lucky with in ocular cavity hit, but other killing locations, like the “face delta” or arterial spots or what have you, are not really a trustable option for .22, as the target could get lucky with a through-and-through with no significant damage. Velocity is the real killer, but the mass is also relevant in many, if not most cases.
I get that AR pistols/SBRs are a fad and/or a “needs dedicated training” platform, but the form factor + velocity of caliber makes for quite the convincing argument to stay the fuck away. 5.56, 3200BLK, I have even seen 7.62, permanent argument concluders to be sure. I think the better option is the pistol-to-carbine conversion kits: https://caagearup.com/product/mck-micro-conversion-kit-stabilizer/
That song is a hoot!
Looks to me like respectable women had a perpetual arms race concerning hats, skirts, corsets, you name it.
Some truth in that. But if you look at high fertility populations, for example Amish, no arms race.
That there was arguably an arms race indicates a problem. The French aristocracy definitely had the arms race of which you speak, and definitely had a huge problem with out of control women.
Do you think sumptuary laws were at some times in response to this? I know dress codes for woman were common at one point. It seems like the reduction of expense in clothing has made fashion a hideous peacocking game for women in the last centuries.
Jim, a quick note: “fashion” is trend-oriented status mimicry for women and gays. Style is the timeless aesthetic principle you’re referring to.
Some of it was intimated upon in the first post. What one needs is to make a conscious decision to deviate from the puritan aesthetic. The biggest limiting factor to good style is not price, but availability. You could go into a store and not find anything that deviates from pauperism in style at any price.
Consequently, filling out a good wardrobe is often necessarily a work of time, observation, and opportunity. Off-price/commodity surplus stores are good for this (eg, Burlington, TJX, Ross, NOZ, Familia, et cetera), as there is usually a constant churn of items at prices far below ‘primary’ outlets, which by-and-by can lead to good finds.
In terms of colour, finding anything that doesn’t come in black or blue is of course difficult. Forest tones work well for standing apart, tans, creams, reds, and greens. Bright whites as well. Purples and pinks are more situational.
In terms of coordinating colours, this is one of those things where the rulings that can be spoken of in abstract are little, and the rulings that can be felt are innumerable; to have the particular articles in question in front of one’s own eyes is necessary, so we can only say you must use your good judgement there. Outfits where each item shares the same colour theme of course always work. In outfits with more than two pieces, an ‘inner’ theme that differs from the ‘outer’ theme works well. In cases where the top and the bottoms have a different colour theme, it is not a hard and fast rule, but one may generally want the tone of the pants to be equal or lighter in shade than the top.
In terms of patterning, frankly, *any kind at all* is preferable in comparison with the monotony that you will, again, find it difficult to avoid seeing everywhere.
In terms of outfitting, short sleeves and open neck area generally give an inherently dressed-down feeling, and in the latter case, can give a feeling of sloppiness even, hence the value of neck decoration. This doesn’t necessarily mean ties mind you. Layering works well here, for example, a sweater with a high collared shirt underneath, or a collared button-up with a collared polo underneath, or an outer layer with a turtlenecked layer underneath, and so on. Scarfs and neckerchiefs fit into this dynamic as well.
More can be said, but those are the main character beats, and the exact details may be left up to the subject to fill out.
“Purples and pinks are more situational.”
“Pinks”? When you say “situational,” I assume you mean “costume party.”
I can see one or two shirts in the closet with a very light shade of pastel, bordering on white, that can work as an inner layer, or by itself in bright sunny conditions, which could technically be described as a shade of ‘pink’, but maybe not what first comes to mind when one might hear the word ‘pink’.
I don’t share St. John’s utter disgust for the black/grey motif, but I am a neo-Puritan after all, innit? A pink shirt with a gray suit rocks hard, if you have the body and mind to pull it off. Purple, I don’t know about for me, but many a niggnogg lookin’ like the classiest cottonpicker with the right blend of purple and black or grey.
Purple is a colour of royalty, and works well in pieces that accentuate a larger ensemble.
Before the columbine ship I liked wearing black all the time in high school and unlike in middle school I was rather well liked in high school.
I prefer sedate earth tones as well, but I am also almost always “on the clock” while others are having a good time, so it fits. I’ll wear particolored double suits if it helps the situation, but I prefer my colors matte and my presence unremarkable.
Well, you two:
You do you, and all that.
Oh no you don’t, i aint gonna that one slide faggit, i’ll be doing you too!
#nohomotho
It is not gay if you are wearing boots.
I have always translated “you do you” as “your retardation is none of my concern, for the pigs of which you speak belong to a farm I do not own.” But you couldn’t have known that.
Oh shit, Pseudo has seen through me!
(Kunning: I’m pretty sure Pseudo was kidding.)
First of all, you mustn’t look like Stephen Paddack when the time co-, er, that is, always dress above the sandals, shorts, stained T-shirt look. I of course prefer my shooting tweeds when appropriate.
Jim’s advice is good, though you may not always need tailored clothes to start out. Try dressing like a well-maintained, well-off member of your caste for starters. Clean quality clothes, well-kept quality shoes or boots, etc. Don’t buy ripped jeans as your only pair lol. Be conservative and understated. at the very least until you learn how to be more of a peacock. You may want to buy multiple pairs, you may want to spend a bit more per piece than you’re used to. (Also keep in mind that expensive clothes may not necessarily be sturdier than the cheap stuff.)
You could try haunting a smaller men’s wear shop (choose one catering to your target look, and that also has some class) and see if the staff can help. This will speed up the learning curve progression. Note that it can be difficult and tiresome to find the right clothes on your own unless you’re a clothes hound or a woman.
Oh yes, and depending on personality, also try to avoid pieces that require fanatical dedication to keeo in shape. Dry clean only, hand wash only, etc etc.
Biden declared war on American patriots yesterday and [*deleted*]
Take the shill test.
Our enemies want us to go to war without Caesar.
“There are few things more depressing than the sight of grown men wearing nothing but a t-shirt and pants out in public.”
I’m feeling attacked. I’m a Western Sunbelt Merican and I’m pragmatic. It’s those frigid east coast northerners who fret about suits n’ ties with leather gloves. I’m partly joking. I love suits with gold cufflinks and wish there were more opportunities to wear them, but even blue jeans and a tucked in button up short sleeve shirt is a bit too hot where I live. When I travel north I see a lot more high end male fashion; although, I do agree with you that male fashion is getting worse.
The entire point of male fashion is to denote status. Men dress up for two different audiences. To denote status to fellow men. To denote status to women. I would argue that since the social environment has become feminine, men are more invested in impressing women than impressing fellow men. Thus, men are far more invested in following female whimsies than showing masculine achievement. And if fashion for women is in the gutter, why should men try hard? However, women’s fashion is in the gutter, and men follow suit.
The problem of poor men’s fashion stems from not policing female fashion.
I generally prefer long sleeves in most situations – when it is hot it keeps the sun off, and when it is chilly it keeps the wind off. Pioneering men of the old west dressed much the same. Though indeed of course, cooler latitudes also give a wider latitude for creativity.
The basic thing is that female status is artificially inflated, while male status is artificially repressed, which is reflected in their respective offerings. The man of 2022 dresses like a pauper because he, effectively, does in fact have the status of a pauper, even – or especially rather – if he is formally very rich himself.
Yep. Before being a dad I started making my own clothes. My first piece was hella ugly but I intend to return to it when more time. I dislike being a big fashion industry monkey.
My clothing style is lazy and slightly offensive though. My woman buys me my best clothes but I tend to gravitate towards wifebeaters with prints of hot women. Also I still dream of having dreadlocks one day.
Yeah, we all need dreams. Sometimes I dream about getting “Hitler’s Chosen” tattooed on my inner lip.
lmao rarely has an internet comment turned me so red.
Mens fashion consists of imitating either priests or warriors. The poor state of fashion today is a result of priestly Marxist larping of the lower class and the replacing of warriors with athletes as the signaling font for physical courage. Western “dress clothes†are a direct memetic descendant of the garb of a puritan preacher.
Warriors are not allowed to signal refinement, so we have no high-class warrior clothing. The best we can do as rightists is to signal capacity for violence and hint at refinement and taste. Or, while fitting in to roughly conventional norms, hint at the capacity for violence. Interestingly patterned and colored button-downs are what I pair with a generally biker look, but if it is hot, I will just wear a close-fitting t-shirt or wifebeater. In an age of impoverished fashion and worse fitness, my body is higher status than anything I can put on it.
I’ll second Jim’s point ; a simple black t-shirt (appropriately sized, not baggy, tight enough but not too tight) and some jeans will look good on a fit man. If a guy has a Joe Schmo body most everything he wears will make him look like Joe Schmo. I don’t see any reason why men need to be wearing codpieces, or togas, or whatever you’re proposing. Tailored suits are nice, but most men can’t wear tailored suits in everyday life. It’s not what you wear but how you wear it.
>It’s not what you wear but how you wear it.
You have stockholm syndrome from a lifetime of aesthetic abuse. You, like any others, have lived a life where everything looking like hell is ordinary, and thus likewise think nothing of inflicting your own part of that hell on everyone else with one’s own hellish dress. It is telling that suggesting even the merest of elevations in one’s couture trigger knee-jerk responses of doubling down on pauperism.
Holy war.
https://imgur.com/a/FAaEiOZ
[*enemy black pilling deleted*]
It is completely obvious that the Global American Empire is very afraid of Christian Nationalism, and very afraid of its own fighting men, very afraid of the US military grunt.
Is that fear well founded? You confidently tell us they have nothing to fear. Perhaps that is true. And, yet, they are afraid.
The Christian nationalism meme is designed to [*deleted*]
Our guys created that meme. We get to say what it is. You don’t.
The only acceptable additions to “just Christian” are [things that can be and are substantially converged to demon worship*]
If you are going to lecture us on what real Christianity really is, need to take the short affirmation:
Jesus Christ is Lord, born in Bethlehem, died at Jerusalem, and is, is from before the beginning of the world. Fully God and fully man. God is three and God is one
It is remarkable how rare it is for people telling me what Christianity is to be able to say that. I think they fear they might catch on fire.
Here’s the affirmation, because it’s worth repeating…
Jesus Christ is Lord, born in Bethlehem, died at Jerusalem, and is, is from before the beginning of the world. Fully God and fully man. God is three and God is one.
https://www.vatican.va/content/pius-xii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_29061943_mystici-corporis-christi.html
And there is no such thing as an “invisible church”. The Church is a body, too, and it has no need to be linked with a temporal secular institution (and a flawed one) in nationalism. Doing so is falling into a trap for all the reasons I keep saying.
Catholic and Orthodox are both accurate descriptions of the Church, in spite of schisms. Protestantism is essentially a cursed meme from the beginning.
And baptism is necessary for salvation.
OK then, I will debate with you on what Christianity is.
Christianity was organized from the beginning by cities, and as the Roman Empire splintered, by nations.
When the Tsar subdued a Kingdom, he would not rule directly, but rather install a King better aligned with his interests. And he would not incorporate their State Church directly into the Russin Orthodox Church, but rather install a leader of their state Church.
Christian charity is intended primarily for near, rather than far. Universal charity is cold as ice, and Paul strongly discommends it. National Churches have been the rule until the Church of Rome claimed universality, a claim that led to rivers of blood, which rivers eventually washed over Rome itself, a claim that was continually resisted by deadly force, with nominally Roman Catholic Kings frequently at war with the Pope.
Before the war of Northern Aggression, each state had its own state Church.
The Catholic Church, not to be confused with the heretical Roman Catholic Church, is ruled by the consensus of the Bishops of national Churches. And national Churches have always been patriots of their nations. When the Tsar army installed a Russian Orthodox priest as head of the national Church of some Kingdom to render that nation less truculent, that priest was supposed to become a patriot of that Kingdom, or at least pretend to it, and he no longer styled himself Russian Orthodox but (name of nation) Orthodox.
Christian Nationalism is a long standing Christian norm, subverted by the Roman claim to universality, and now by the progressive McChristian claim to universality. We are commanded to love our neighbor, because the human heart is too small to love the whole world. If your Church is not Christian Nationalist, it does not love its neighbors.
From the time of Constantine until very recently, Christianity has always been a state religion, and the Roman Catholic Church’s claims of universality were resisted in that even supposedly Roman Catholic Kings wanted to appoint their own Bishops, which disagreements frequently turned lethal, resulting in rivers of blood, which rivers of blood eventually washed over Rome itsel, thus Churches have always been national Churches, and thus always nationalist.
@jim
You said in another thread you want the father to be king in his house and high priest of his family, how you squire this with christianity system of churches and priests.
If the father can be priest, why churche and priest ?
your system seem to be derived from the “domestic religion” of the indo-european.
That the father is the priest of his family is standard old type Christianity. Maybe it became standard when Christianity conquered pagans among whom it was already standard.
If father can be king, why kingdom and king?
A man is king under his own roof, but to protect that little kingdom needs a larger kingdom.
Thus, we understand the Housefather and the Church of Housefathers as well.
Corruption in the Vatican doesn’t mean Rome isn’t the rightful headquarters of the temporal powers of the Church. And corrupt popes or the lack of a pope don’t nullify the legitimacy of the idea of the pope.
The Church has a right to some temporal power of its own. It isn’t supposed to take excessive temporal power, as in theocracy, but enough to fulfill its spiritual mission.
Charity is optimally in line with local leverage and subsidiarity yes but there must always be some element in one’s charitable outlook towards all of humanity. Nationalism, forcing one’s allegiance to a nation rather than seeing a nation as a means to an end, is where the wheels come off.
Nations, just like government forms, can be put away when they are no longer good. Ukraine deserves to be buried. Ruthenia or something more traditional can replace the idea of Ukraine.
Church councils as well as the pope speaking under a declaration of infallibility are authoritative on spiritual issues. Nations are not the final authority so the “-ism” of nationalism is the problem here.
What nullifies the idea of the Pope is that leadership of the Church was from the beginning collegial, the consensus of the leading Bishops. Paul was never Bishop of Rome, he gave himself the higher title of Apostle to the Gentiles, and appointed Bishops in each gentile city. After Peter was killed or went underground, James the Just led the Church among Jewish converts in Israel, and Paul and James were the important Bishops, governing collegially with each other and with other Bishops. And Paul negated the proposal to have only one set of rites and practices. Unimportant practices should be appropriate to each peoples’ nature, history, and culture, prefiguring and permitting the current practice of Orthodoxy where different nationalities get different national orthodox Churches.
What nullifies the idea of the Pope was that singular leadership of the Pope was even heard of until the eleventh century, never in practice widely accepted at any time ever, with the Holy Roman Emperors appointing their own Bishops, and powerful vassals of Kings and emperors appointing their own Bishops, and when, from the eleventh century to the sack of Rome, the Pope claimed broad temporal powers and singular leadership authority over the Church, seeking Kingdoms, rather than farms, the Bishop of Rome frequently found himself at war with the Holy Roman Emperor, which eventually led to the sack of Rome.
What the Roman Catholic Church tells us was the normal and universal consensus has never been the Christian consensus, and rivers of blood ensued from endless failed attempts to make it the consensus, which rivers eventually washed over Rome itself.
The command is “Peace on Earth to all men of Goodwill”. Which implies you are allowed to go old testament on men not of goodwill. As Christian nations with great regularity have always done.
Not going to war with men of goodwill is a considerably lesser constraint than that which applies to neighbours, hence nationalism. If you are required to love your neighbours, you are required to love your nation. And not love all nations equally, because those far are not neighbours, and those unneighbourly are not neighbours.
The church is not supposed to have independent temporal power and certainly not power that crosses borders, “my kingdom is not of this world”.
Do you not hear your own weasel words, sanctimonious fag? “have a right”, “some”, “enough”. Why and how much?
There is no information or reason in your posts, just impotent proclamations.
“Protestantism is essentially a cursed meme from the beginning.”
Speaking for myself, that sentence tells me all I really need to know about whether to regard AF as a friend or an enemy.
Anyone who openly calls my faith a “cursed meme” is no more on my side than is an SJW or a Communist revolutionary.
When asked for my religion, I call myself the last Anglican.
Unfortunately the Anglican hierarchy was taken over by post Christians, who interpreted Jesus as Jesus the Jewish Community organizer, around 1820-1832, and not very long thereafter, by people who believed themselves atheists, but were, or became, demon worshippers.
Yup. If these fuckwads weren’t shitting their pants with fear, then what exactly would they be doing here then? What do they attempt to accomplish by, for example, using Pooch’s identity to shill leftoid memes?
I get my news from JB and Stormer, so I just didn’t realize how much the Biden Speech had affected our fellows in the Soft Right. It has really stirred up trouble, lads. The younger and hotter of our fellows is itching for a fight, which makes sense. There was a pre-covid meme along the lines of “We’d rather not, but if it’s a boog ye want then it’s a boog ye’ll have, for it’s better to settle it now in Virginia than sabers crossed o’er the land” or some shit [it was in reference to the gun rally in Richmond VA IIRC]. The young’uns are double insulated from any kind of sufferings, too young for the start of GWoT and not old enough to have kids, I suspect. Whatever the case, they’re hopping mad.
But the older ones are… well, Boomers they remain, but I think they are actually starting to play a bit o’ the chess with quad Ds, as it were, and they, or some of them, realize that this is incitement, pure and plain. The Bidenistas want the Right to make a move, so they can corral their sheepdogs, point and point out “See?! See, we told you they hate the Beatles and the Constitution and Our Way o’ Life!! Have at them, for the homeland! Find the Halfling!”
Jim, I get that we aren’t starting a new religion. I get that you aren’t the prophet (tendies upon his name). But I think you should consider writing a post for widespread propagation that tells everyone in the Right “Hold, lads! Hold!! Don’t fire until you see the whites are on our side!” I really am starting to believe They are close to toppling. They are running out of rope, and the noose is firmly around their neck, and they need someone to come along and cut it before it pulls tight. And they believe it is the sheepdogs. They believe they can spin this with Them on the side of Order and The Others as the enemies of Order.
We want them to keep chucking kitchen sinks at the problem. If they find something that works, they’ll slip out of panic mode and start thinking longer term. When they are stuck at full throttle, only able to respond to crises as they appear, they seem to consistently choose the worst option. As awful as it is to live through, this is exactly what we want to happen.
We need to buy time for Caesar to wake up and take power.
So this is a theme that I also see over at FQ. Severian and his commentariat seem to think (with a few dissenters) that Biden’s speech reveals some sort of desperation on the part of the left. I just don’t see it. The purpose of the speech seems very straightforward, “We’re going to arrest Trump soon; let’s lay the groundwork first.”
On the trying to provoke us thing: Nah, they can whip up a false flag any time they want. If they get really desperate they’ll just kill a couple of gay black guys and leave a MAGA hat near their bodies as “evidence” that it was Trump supporters.
As to whether they’re feeling desperate or cocky or whatever, I’m not getting any readings on that. It’s impossible to get anything from a senile old retard who isn’t even speaking for himself, but is serving as someone else’s puppet and mouthpiece.
If I were a leftist right now I wouldn’t be feeling desperate. I’d be feeling like I had things pretty well in hand. My play would be to avoid riling things up.
I see it as a declaration of war on Trump and the people who voted for him. They’re morally justifying the genocide they intend to commit. That’s the sort of comments I see all over reddit. The shill line is that It’s unfortunate, but MAGA people have to go.
They do want Trump supporters to attack them. Thier false flags are not great and they’d love the real thing. I’m not sure if that speech was intended to trigger that or not. They do seem to be working on a large scale false flag attack probably with lots of casualties. PF exists just for that purpose and the feds spent well over a year setting them up for something like that.
I don’t see any desperation from the left. I think they see more apple carts to knock over. The fact that they get to murder the people who oppose them and steal their stuff makes it all the more appealing to them.
The only real question in my mind is do they do it after the rigged midterms or before the rigged midterms. They’re generally running with abortion as the reason the Democrats are beating the polls by 10-15%. They may just stick with that.
The desperation isn’t obvious until their “cunning” plan falls apart. Compare the GAE in March with the GAE in August in terms of the response to Russia. Compare the Biden Regime in August 2021 to the Biden Regime in August 2022.
A helpful analog here is the military operations of the GAE in the Global War on Terror. Look at how it was portrayed in 2002, 2012, and 2022. For the majority of time in that double decade stretch, the sounds and images portrayed an overwhelming military power putting paid to a fractured and incompetent enemy whose only recourse was to hide in caves and unfairly blow up civilians in the face of fully covered Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance assets from the ground to space, smooth operators with high kill counts, smart bombs, and a million men to utilize. All for naught. Nothing in current year can honestly portray that GWoT was a success. The participating militaries are weakened, their supporting populations revile them, their managing governments have decreased positions on the whole range of issues and regions.
The Cathedral will always portray itself as dominant, powerful, and competent. They have no capacity for humility. As they get weaker, they strive to seem stronger. When the head bureaucrat is giving Hitlerian speeches with menacing red lights, calling the opposition evil and in need of extirpation, the counsel is desperation, not confidence.
This doesn’t mean they are going to collapse tomorrow. But when did Obama ever do any of the stuff Biden is forced to do regularly? They height of Cathedral control was 2012-2014; that’s when they attempted their biggest power grabs and most far reaching plots and operations. Now, Biden Regime has to make every single policy initiative some Tolkien-esque conquest of world-saving proportions.
Maybe I am off on this one. I am open to hear how I am. In the words of Baron FistRazor: “The opposite of Love is not Hate, it is Indifference.”
The height of Cathedral control was probably WWII it just got crazier stupider and gayer since then.
The Cathedral was founded by Wilson and Colonel House and other than not liking blacks they were just as crazy stupid and gay as the modern Cathedral. FDR’s version worked a lot better… the 60s was a farther left faction seizing the institutional machinery.
I really do hate the Beatles.
Totally off-topic, I never considered Prince to be all that alpha. Turns out he has a son, and the list of model-tier celebrity girlfriends he dated stretches a mile long. Even more surprising is the things those women say about him. He definitely knew what he was doing.
Boy bands are so gay.
Intentionally so even. The Beatles, like a lot of ‘pop art’ from that period, was literally a CIA instigation. Kids like John Lennon were conditioned from birth to be mouldable plants, dispensed to various social engineering projects.
David Hogg and Greta Thunsperg are some latterday examples of this (“they aren’t sending their best”).
It’s great that this has become (relatively) common knowledge.
I think the character Ruby Rhod in The Fifth Element is a parody of Prince.
“If you wait by the river long enough, the bodies of your enemies will float by.”
— Some Asian guy, IDK.
Meme warfare is the most effective thing we can do. The less legitimacy they have when they start the purges the stronger the resistance will be. The downside with that is they’ll focus on that resistance instead of murdering each other. I’d much rather watch them mass murder their fellow leftists while waiting for Cesar rather than have a shooting war with no elite leadership. But we really have no control of how that plays out. Once they start disarming people the die will be cast.
Give to satan what belongs to satan. They will talk about how righteous it is to kill us, but when push comes to shove, they will kill the path of least resistance, ie each other. They are trying to stop themselves from killing each other: ‘look at those evil white Christians! We must not be divided!’
But they are divided, irreconcilibly. All we need to do is hold the line, and soon they cannot help but tear into each other. And then, slowly, our opportunity will come.
They will also tear into easy targets on the right. This may likely include Trump. I wish it weren’t so.
Red: “Meme warfare is the most effective thing we can do.”
I see the argument for this, but as I said to JJ below, I fear how seductive it is. I wonder if it’s appealing to my brain, or to some vice like cowardice or laziness. So I fear this argument. I fear that, for the wrong reasons, I will accept it too readily.
Civil wars have to be won before they are fought.
I have been randomly dropping red pills and Christian white pills on random normies, not as street evangelism, but to see how they react.
Demon worship memes such as Covid and Gaia are dead in the water.
Faith in the Republic lingers on, despite the heavy body blows of Biden announcing he needs to crush the opposition to save democracy, and the 2020 election.
Christianity only seems dead. Its resurrection is quietly under way.
Comes the hour, comes the man, but the hour is getting alarmingly late. If Caesar is our guy, Pinochet, Sulla, or Monk, he will probably announce, and quite likely believe, he is saving the Republic, but for this to sell, we need people to be pretty relaxed about the likelihood that he is going to be fairly elastic about what “Republic” means.
Memetic struggle still matters. Our enemies know this – look at all the shilling.
Winning a civil war requires a leader. A leader requires a memetic basis for his leadership. Christian Nationalism, somewhat to my astonishment, seems to live and to have broad appeal.
I regularly disparage the regime as fake and gay, and people.do not defend it. I have one friend thatndoes, but he is also old, so he cannot imagine a world without democracy because the Founding Father’s were the greatest and wisest men in all of existence and democracy is the best system ever and America is in great shape and cannot ever lose, flag, or fail. All the people my age are just sort of resigned to it. If something else comes along and looks good, they will jump on it.
Low-effort meme warfare, such as the boomercon and the griller do, is indeed seductive. It appeals to people who are useless and cowardly because it lets them pretend they are not.
Your goal in meme warfare is two-fold: to harvest salt from the enemy, and to generate keks in your allies. You will know you are doing it right when the enemy is screeching at you to stop laughing, beating on you with his fists while you are exalted in mirth.
If I had to pick the perfect example it would be Tyler Durden’s fight with Lou in Fight Club. Lou beats the crap out of Durden but Durden still wins because he has a higher tolerance than Lou for ultra-violence, which is of course the supreme authority in this situation.
Rule one of street fighting: Always be crazier than the other guy.
You need to calibrate this. Antifa will have a much higher capacity for violence than Lou, being motivated by perceived holiness rather than by money, and having more backing from the state. Thus, you need be smart. Maintain your resolve to out-violence the enemy, but with a little more thrust-and-parry.
Less commitment, more ambiguity. Fluid.
While a little bit of a scrap can be fun and even funny, having your brains dashed out by a brick is not. Everyone remembers Rittenhouse. No one remembers the poor soul who got brained.
Obviously this path is not for everyone. If you are worried about violence, or death, you may wish to choose another route. It is written (Dt 20:8):
Or, as Tyler Durden says, you decide your own level of involvement.
“Less commitment, more ambiguity.”
?
Can you elaborate on this?
The enemy should never know how serious you are. He should never know if you are going to defend a (physical or memetic) position to the death or abandon it in the next second.
It is like poker. You rarely want to call. You want to always be either folding or raising. And you need to be aware of your emotions, your tells, and use prayer and meditation and other techniques to diffuse them.
Everything you do, you do in a lighthearted manner. The enemy is at war, therefore we are at war, and we know all of these things, but does the enemy know we know? The cheekiness that we portray is a shield against him knowing this, and it has the added benefit of making sure we never take ourselves too seriously. One must always be humble before God.
I recommend prayer as your foundation. Use an arrow prayer. God is unknowable and we cannot reach him logically, but we can reach him through love and humility, like an arrow that pierces the cloud that exists between us and God. Humble your heart, want to be close to Him, and use a single word prayer such as “God” or “Love” or the Jesus prayer.
Pray without ceasing. The prayer will spring to your mind when you need it the most.
JJ, thanks for your reply.
Alright, so I’d like some dating advice guys. I haven’t had sex in a while and would like to date some decent looking chicks. I don’t make much money and I don’t have any close friends (I used to be in a band and hung out with a bunch of degenerates, plenty of sluts to go round but I got tired of smoking weed and partying with boring dumbasses). I’m on good terms with the guys I work with. I’m tall and in great shape, people think I’m a few years younger than I actually am. I don’t have any trouble getting 4s and 5s to talk to me; in fact I recently had some girl tell me she had been dreaming about me (a 4), and I wasn’t trying to impress her at all.
However, I don’t want to waste my time with 4s and 5s. I think shooting for 6s and 7s is reasonable, what should I be doing? My understanding of the red pill on women is that they need to dominated and told what to do, and are irresistibly drawn to charming dickbags (preferably with a capacity for violence). Certain kinds of drug dealers, gang bangers, and the like do well with women. I’ve known a couple who’ve had naked chicks roaming around their place regularly. I know that with women it’s better to be too mean than too nice.
I’ve heard many different kinds of advice, “treat women all the same regardless of how hot they are”, “aloofness”, “lift weights” (I lift regularly). What advice would you give?
Generally speaking, hookups are a numbers game. Proposition enough women, and eventually you get hits. On that note, being openly forwards with your sexual intentions is not a minus, but a plus for women. Lust always comes before love in the female of the species, and they love men with volcanic barely moderated libidos (if you don’t have a volcanic barely moderated libido, then you need to at least give the impression of it).
If you are interested in anything more than one night stands, things can get a bit more complicated, but if getting your dick wet is all you’re looking for, that suffices.
Think with your dick.
Social events that have a regular attendance (church, school etc.) are what I would look if your thinking more long term. The hot single girls are usually fairly aggressive in looking for guys. If you look the part and can pass shit tests, should be pretty straight forward and natural.
If you understand the basics, and it seems you do, I think it really boils down to two things, the most important of which is access point.
Eg, where do you meet chicks? Context for women is everything. Shame you ‘re no longer in a band. The higher status you are in your access point, the easier it is to pick up chicks. Many men with zero pick up knowledge will pick up a girl just because they’ve been drinking and hanging out at a friend’s shed for years.
The worse your access point, the more you’ll need to play up the second point: number’s game. You can pick up chicks in a club, you’ll need to wade througj a sea of whores is all. Lots of you rejecting girls and girls rejecting you. All part of the game.
Chicks will travel a really long distance looking for alpha, and affluent chicks will look for alpha in rather expensive places.
If you have any more specific advice regarding location at all levels (country, state, city, type of venue), it would be appreciated. Access to girls is very important for me when deciding where to deploy my time and money and I can’t afford to do reconnaissance in dozens of cities. Specifically looking for 18-20 year olds of high IQ, light pigmentation, demure personality, and northwest European descent. It seems that being near a good university is important, but it is hard to identify that based purely on number crunching because there are intangibles such as climate and natural geographic beauty.
Specifically looking for 18-20 year olds of high IQ, light pigmentation, demure personality, and northwest European descent.
My computer seemed to autoreply
1. There are almost no high IQ white women. White women are midwits all IQ wise at best.
2. The very rare exceptions tend to be cluster B or extreme manic depressives and they aren’t demure anywhere (not that I’m personally all that wild about demure since demure girls never have liked me much).
3. Northwest Euro means light pigmentation but why be so picky to exclude Slavic girls.
This feels like a slide thread…
Here’s what I think is the most powerful argument for defying any lockdown order upon Trump’s arrest and vigorously expressing our anger:
The arrest of Trump will be the last thing that the right has to a public Schelling event.
May be the last chance for us to have a Caesar from the right. The scenario would be Trump arrested, wave of repression, Caesar announces he is going to save the Republic, since the repression is obviously undemocratic. If no Caesar, have to wait for the Republican meme to finish dying.
I have some hope for DeSantis in that scenario.
Caesar crossed the Rubikon in a “do or die” situation.
When they arrest Trump, a lot of people should realize that they will also be arrested, maybe not next, but within a few years at most. That means that a lot of people should have motivation to become Caesar simply to save their own lives.
But emigration seems much easier and much safer to ensure survival. Most potential Caesars are rich enough to simply leave the West and live a quiet life outside of the empire. That narrows the pool of candidates.
A possible Caesar is then only someone who either missed his chances to emigrate while he still could or someone who is not motivated primarily by survival.
Normality bias might help us getting a Caesar. Someone with power who does not understand how dire the situation is when Trump is arrested and therefore misses his opportunity to emigrate while he still can. Not ideal. Would be better to have someone who understands the situation right now and is willing to risk his life by not emigrating.
Another possibility might be someone from the military. A man can become a general or colonel without being rich and some military men might be unable to emigrate legally. (Not sure whether the last is true in the USA, but in Germany persons with security clearance cannot freely travel).
Artemis 1 launch scrubbed for second time due to “hydrogen leak”. The leak appears to be somewhere in the filling infrastructure, not in the rocket itself.
They probably didn’t have the gas cap on tight so it failed OBDII EVAP test. LOL
Liquid hydrogen is tricky stuff. I doubt Nasa has the tech capability to handle it any more.
Liquid hydrogen gives better performance (if the rocket is big enough that air resistance does not matter too much) It is more expensive than liquid methane, but the inherent extra costs are not that high, and if you are after substantial delta V (moon or mars) the better performance means substantially less fuel, which reduces the fuel cost to substantially cheaper than methane. The big extra cost is that infrastructure for handling large amounts of liquid hydrogen is inherently more expensive, takes longer to build, and all that. I suspect the reason Musk went with liquid methane rather than liquid hydrogen is the same has the reason he went with stainless steel rather than carbon/carbon, or exotic high temperature alloys like those used in jet turbines.
He is in a hurry.
Also if you are going to mars, have to keep it liquid over a long journey, and equipment to keep it liquid is bigger, heavier, more expensive, and would take considerably longer to develop than the equipment to keep methane liquid.
Space is cold. Keeping hydrogen liquid in the cold doesn’t sound that difficult.
You would need a big (tennis court sized) sun shield like they have with the Webb telescope.
The sun in space radiates a lot of heat. People in space radiate a lot of heat.
The Webb space telescope is a long, long way from people and has a very elaborate sun shade, but the ambient temperature of its parts that are not actively refrigerated are 42K, which is about double the boiling point of hydrogen at atmospheric pressure.
So, to keep hydrogen cool by the cold of space, would need a high pressure tank with a big sunshield, with the people and stuff on the sunny side of the sunshield. Doable, Maybe you send out a hydrogen tanker rocket which unfolds a big origami style sunshield, an oxygen tanker rocket with a less elaborate sunshield, and a people rocket.
Space is a vacuum, which is insulation. No convenient working fluid all around you to carry heat away with, only radiation.
Some comments on hydrogen:
1. While hydrogen is lighter for the same oomph, the tanks are heavier. This is not such a big deal if your stages are not trying to individually get large delta V. (refueling counts as separate stages for this purpose, but the relevant number is the delta-V your stage could reach not what it actually reaches in any particular case). It is a big deal if you need super high delta-V on a single stage, such as an SSTO. I haven’t done the math on how big a deal this is for Starship’s ~7km/s delta V. But since Musk is also trying to minimize cost to build, he probably doesn’t want to have a very large fuel tank which would be hard to make both light and cheap.
2. Typically hydrogen is run highly fuel rich. If fuel cost is relevant instead of performance being the only concern you could run it closer to stoichiometric.
3. Currently, hydrogen is typically produced from methane. If you instead produce methane from hydrogen as Musk proposes to do on Mars, that will obviously affect the relative costs.
You run hydrogen rockets fuel rich because it does not cost that much in fuel weight to run them fuel rich, and it keeps the engine temperature down. With a more elaborately designed engine, you could have it fuel rich near the engine walls, and nearer stochiometric in the main part of the burn.
Musk’s engines run considerably hotter than the engines NASA used to build.
There are major advantages to a hydrogen rocket done right – as there are major advantages to a rocket made of carbon-carbon rather than stainless steel – but to improve the art of rocketry, Musk needs a factory that can continuously iterate rocket design with short turnaround time.
It takes him long enough to build the ground facilities as it is, and it is looking like NASA cannot build the ground facilities at all.
While running fuel rich does keep temperature down, it’s my impression that with regenerative cooling of the combustion chamber and nozzle, temperature in the main combustion chamber isn’t particularly a limiting factor.
Where temperature does matter is in the preburner(s) because there is at least one component (the turbine) which is basically impossible to regeneratively cool. But you can run the preburner(s) away from stoichiometric even if the main combustion is stoichiometric.
I was watching the first attempt hoping that NASA would say fuck it and launch hoping that it would all work out like it did with the James Web. The fireball would have been amazing.
I forgot about the second attempt since I assumed they’ll just keep on scrubbing it. The older tech on the rocket seems to be working but everything new connected to it is not.
Jackson, Mississippi just lost clean drinking water. America continues to become a third world country.
It did not lose clean drinking water. It has not had water that is safe to drink without first boiling it for a long time. What it just recently lost was water pressure. You turn on the tap, and nothing comes out.
If I write up a decent sized post or series of posts on firearms buying and training, how many of you would be interested in reading it? Jim, would you promote to a post if decent, rather it stay in the comments, or not interested? How many of you are familiar with firearms, and to what extent? Do I need to go over the basics in detail, or do I start from an assumption that you all have basic competencies down and cover the intermediate levels?
Well, what is your level of expertise, your credentials?
If you have shot off a whole lot of ammo from a whole lot of guns, and can very quickly bring the gun on target and hit the target, that is a pretty good credential.
In which case I would love to have that content as a blog post.
When i shot guns, it seemed to be very muscle memory based, the procedures and the maintenance and so on, like a crafting skill . Movements of the hands. My memories are now faded, but being muscle memory would expect to pick things up again fast. I think that all such crafting skills need high resolution well-lit video on a clear white background with all the usual E-celeb crap cut out. It would be a lot of work
I do not think you can learn shooting by video. You have to do. You can add on to existing skill by watching someone work and copying what they do, but you have to have a basis to start from.
Agree, and I will add that I personally need immense amounts of repetition. Just going through it over and over with snap caps mixed into your mags for simulated malfunctions. They are too pricey for me, but getting a blue gun* is honestly a great way to safely practice drawing and re-holstering. I have heard some folks go as far as getting an airsoft with gas blowback as well, but I think Paul Harrell had better advice: find a fully operable .22 version of your gun to practice with. Lot’s of roads to proficiency, and not one of them goes through celebrity GunTuber Land.
*https://www.blueguns.com/
As I keep repeating, empirical observation of shootouts indicates that the man with .22 had the most satisfactory outcomes. I conjecture that is because that is what people practice with.
But you do not want to practice with airsoft. You should practice with the gun with minimal noise and recoil and minimal cost of shooting that can nonetheless still kill people.
Buy a gun for practicing shooting with. Don’t buy a gun and put in the gun rack to look cool and be ready for emergencies. Because if you do that, when emergency comes, you will not be ready.
A gun you do not shoot is a gun that should be sold to buy a gun you will actually use. Only once you can afford multiple guns and practice with them can you afford to keep a safe queen or a range gun.
Jim, that’s an ok standard I guess, but it makes me “well credentialed” lol. I’ve taught basic firearms familiarization courses and been in a bunch more advanced classes. Still, outside of very basic stuff, I would not consider myself as someone who can give advanced guidance. I’ve shot a lot of guns, and I am very comfortable acquiring and hitting targets, but less comfortable fixing broke pews or any kind of complex distance shooting (I’m slowly working my way into that).
Wulfgar, I’d say start with the basics and scale up. That gives Jim the opportunity to suss out if he’s on board with the idea, it gives us a chance to review your style/voice and editorialize, and creates a corpus for the Eternal Lurker to work with.
We don’t need advanced guidance. Advanced guidance is Ivan the Troll.
We need basics.
Good basics always leads to advanced technique. Laying down a good foundation will always lead the better students to ask the pertinent questions. I have been in classes that were just a couple boomer POGs regaling the class with story after story, then making the written test open book and the range qualifier almost impossible to flunk. Bad bad bad. The basics classes I took that were valuable were with instructors who knew what seemed like everything there was to know, but that only came out as we progressed through the course and questions were asked that naturally extended into deeper concepts. I think shooting might be similar to coding in that you can read all you want, and talk about it all you want, but the doing of it is 90%. best training I ever did was 2 days in the classroom and 5 days on the range, with one whole class devoted to range etiquette, RSO/Instructor commands, and blue gun practice.
Shoot (lol), I forgot to add that, in addition to Wulfgar, both Starman and St. John have demonstrated ballistic theory proficiency, so they will be useful in critiquing Wulfgar.
That is basically my only credential. Lots of training and the skill to put bullets where I want them. I qualified expert every time in the Marine Corps, with scores in the 240-245 range. You can look that up and see what you think of it, but it is the only objective measure I can point to.
That is the best credential
What do you think of the 2016 changes?
I was out by 2016, and I have no interest in what the Marine Corps did after I left. it was already shifting in a bad direction when I was in. I cannot imagine they were improving quality or making the standards higher.
Any info or advice on reloading ammo, reload kits, tools etc. would be great.
What little I know of that endaevor, it appears to be heavy in specific tools that require a workshop, intimate familiarity with said tools, and a stream of inputs like brass, powder, and lead. Your best bet is to find someone that does it and make friends and become a sponge. Lots of those guys are Tinker Types, and if you approach them right, they will literally not shut up about it, which is exactly what you want. Look for small gun stores, as in guys with a lot of guns and an FFL.
Inputs really depend on cartridge and what you want to do with them, modern reloading is really just custom manufacturing, buy the inputs and make your own load, it can be extremely useful for hunting with unusual calibers or conditions as it lets you use more appropriate bullet designs that may not be commercially available. Primers are the limitation because fedgov fags are at war with America and it’s illegal to build new primer factories altho trump lessened that, it is the primary source of ammo shortage no one in the industry talks about because they are good serfs. Lead and brass are expensive but brass can be reused and pure lead can still be bought, if your going for volume it will be Expensive! For target or hunting it’s pretty affordable. The big equipment isn’t needed as it can be done with very simple tools one cartridge at a time. but in my opinion the easiest is black powder cartridges. Many were designed specifically to be reloaded with hand tools by soldiers so they are easy to work. You don’t have to load only black powder pressures if the brass and gun can take it. Lead alloy doesn’t work well at modern rifle velocities without gilding or jacket and I don’t know much about modern rifle cartridge reloading. With pure lead and some pure alloying metals very good standard velocity and slower bullets can be made that are devastating on game. Primers are in short supply right now but it is possible to make them safely at home with accessible ingredients. The only way I would ever recommend making them is one primer at a time with a compound mixed wet and absolutely safe in slurry form,you will need to know your chemistry well and choose compounds carefully or you will be in enormous danger. It will involve powdered glass which is nasty but not to bad, and if you ever set off an ounce of primer compound you can say good by to your face. There is some risk of metal poisoning so the lead has to be handled outside when molten and the heavy metals should not touch things inside your house, no putting the kit for it in the closet, same for mercury or lead primer compound making. A good hand washing and shower plus keeping the clothing for work separate is a must. I prefer the lead primers but they’re still poisonous. Corrosive primers are fine as long as you don’t mix mercury or anything else embrittling with brass you mean to reuse. Hot water and a very good cleaning within a few hours of firing with a brush used mid flush will protect barrels and the corrosive primers are much easier to make. If you want to shoot a little reloading isn’t that expensive and with a good bullet at the right velocity with the right lube it is definitely a way to take game. Just be extremely careful and knowledgeable when working with powder, primer and metal as it can be very hazardous if you don’t know what your doing. Muzzleloading is an easy way to get started and it isn’t old fashioned, a good rifle with ball will knock deer over very well. It’s also a way to learn about cartridge loading because you are making a cartridge, patch, lube, alloy, powder compound and grain, charge. It’s a lot of fun. Most people don’t know how to shoot muzzleloader so it gets an awful rep for accuracy but a rifle can be 200-400 yards accurate and I know a couple guys who have smoothbores they shoot to 80-100 yards and take deer with. I love lead lol
The fake pope just dissolved the leadership of the Knights of Malta to make it more “democratic.” No longer is noble blood a necessity.
Pope isn’t fake. Doctrine of universal and peaceful acceptance ensure that he’s the real pope. But yeah, gay.
The papacy is fake and always has been, since the 1050s they’ve been the heretic bishops of Rome.
Here’s a DS post that contains an interview of Andrew Tate by Tucker Carlson. I will do a review of the interview and some observations after I finish watching, just wanted to link here if people would prefer to make their own minds up without some midwit holding forth on the subject and man:
https://stormer-daily.rw/another-dream-i-had/
I get much grifter vibes. Like if Dan Bilzerian got really into the manosphere.
I don’t want to fight in front of the kids, but I disagree. Rather, if he’s grifting, he’s using GNON compliant memes to do it. So while I won’t be subscribing to take his Game courses, I am quite pleased to see the type and amount of positive response he’s getting. It further confirms Jim’s thesis: whoever offers real patriarchy will be given an army in return.
Like what? I watched about 2 minutes of the video and I got nothing but grifter vibes.
I can’t sit through a 30 minute slow ass video looking for something good. So what’s the good stuff?
I am not finished going through that particular one, will do a review ASAP. For what it is worth, I have watched an inordinate amount of his short clips. They popped up in my feed awhile back, and some of his comments piqued my interest. So I watched a bunch, and I kept trying to figure out the angle. He apparently has some “school of Game” type deal to divert beta bucks from OnlyFans type dudes (which is probably the most valuable thing to come out of Game Lite), and I think that is the grift. But he is using Red Pill on Women 101 to sell it, and it works quite well, as it is the Truth beneath the silence that all men know and feel regarding the way society is oriented to indulge female whore nature and protect them from consequences.
Just post the clips you’re talking about.
I didn’t save them. YouTube Shorts is a weird algo. It offers up things, and if you watch the whole thing, it shunts more into your eye magnet. When I started watching them, I was in no way prepared to do a deep dive, I was just laying in bed trying to fall asleep. I am going to go through that video and find timestamps, and I will dig up some clips for y’all niggas, but I am really not looking forward to the process, and I bet a lot of it has been removed (this was a few weeks ago). I posted other comments about Tate, there’s some more info there, too.
LET THEM WATCH *breaks plate*
In all seriousness, if he is grifting while selling the truth, why not. But the first clip I saw was him bragging about his harem of girlfriends. Sounded to me like the typical fantasy sale to young men.
I had a similar experience of him being algorithmically hurled in my face, and he does talk about some serious red pill stuff. Stuff like women are prettier when they are younger, that a man should be in charge, that women are too irresponsible to run their own lives and that men need to save them from themselves, and other stuff along those lines. He also talked about what a shitshow western governance has become and was talking about anarcho-tyranny. I got the sense that it was not so much that he knew the concept, but he was describing the effects.
He is a kickboxer, a pimp, a casino runner, and he seems connected to at least some Eastern European mobs. He is not a good man, but he is manly and he does accurately describe women and encourages men to be loyal to their friends. He passes the woman test with flying colors multiple times, so I am almost certain he is not an op. Unless a faction of the Cathedral decided that it is the 1930s all over again and they need some manly men for a war.
I agree with everything you said. It wasn’t really the algorithm by the way, at least not entirely. He had his followers compete to make clips of him and spam all social media a few months ago.
So it would come from tons of accounts, and it was often boosted by other followers of his. For a while the most common comment under his videos was a sort of running joke, people would post “I see this guy more than my dad”. It was a good viral marketing campaign for his “Hustlers University”.
I do think he is a grifter. But a grifter and a shill are not the same thing. I think he is relatively red pilled on women at an intuitive level and a manly man. But he doesn’t articulate things the way we would here. He reels in young men with redpilled ideas and sells them questionable courses online.
Still his influence has been great, he introduced plenty of gen z boys to ideas adjacent to reactionary views on women.
He is basically indistinguishable from Heartiste. His only real differences from NRx are the conclusions he draws because he sees the current system as a given. He recognizes defect-defect but his approach is to defect faster and harder instead of pursuing cooperate-cooperate be siezing a woman as his own. However, he does attack the foundations of the progressive attitude on women and has a bad habit of noticing bad political behavior. Probably why they got together to ban him across the internet.
“He is basically indistinguishable from Heartiste. His only real differences from NRx are the conclusions he draws because he sees the current system as a given.”
The current system is a given until it isn’t.
Grifters are not necessarily shills.
Though there is massive overlap, and grifters hire shills. But a shill shilling for a grifter is only a minor irritation, while a shill shill shilling for the state is a threat to your life and liberty.
With his success and his profession, and given the areas where he frequents, him not having a harem would be more suspicious. His pitch is that you have to be the kind of man women want to fuck if you want to get laid, so the harem is saying, “Women want to fuck me, so I know what I am talking about.” You would not take advice on how to get laid from someone with no bitches, after all.
Fair points. If he consistently speaks the red pill, not the purple pill, then that is impressive indeed.
I definitely agree with the idea but it’s not an absolute. I think of Freddie Roach who was a terrible boxer but one of its greatest coaches.
Tate is into guns and cars so we’d definitely have common ground. His thoughts on women are exact. He is quoted saying ‘women are property.’ Which is a succinct nrx expression. He hit a big audience as well and the cathedral hate and fear him so he did something right.
His classes are pure grift. He’s not making anyone rich but himself. He’s not aligned with the alt right and neither should he be. He’s also muslim which is probably what gives him the balls to speak bad thought.
Is he really muslim? A superficial search tells me he is orthodox Christian, though heavily flirting with islam.
At any rate, have to give it to the guy — he knows whats up.
Maybe he isn’t but he uses halal and haram in interviews so I just assumed he was.
I actually do that IRL. I didn’t realize I was being a cool guy, I just really enjoyed the Islam Is Right About Women era. Also, Halal and Haram are actually quite linguistically useful.
Generational thing. Halal and haram is being used by the young adults and kids. Same with Deus Vult.
It does not matter one bit to me if he makes himself rich by chipping away at the foundations of the Cathedral. More power to him.
So I found another version of Biden’s recent speech with the red lighting and podium.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZrGIIIBhNg
Move and countermove. Prediction and analysis. I’m divided on these people. A part of me just wants to know WTF are they thinking. Curiosity. The other part just wants to know how to defeat them.
What I know is that this is a powerful image, a perfect meme, instantly relatable in tone and symbol. In many ways the speech is calming to me.
A few years ago two men broke into my apartment while I was there. With a great sense of terrible timing the two picked the lock of my front door while I was just finishing a shower. I was draped only in a towel when I heard the door open and my heart began pounding and I grew fearful. When I entered the main room and saw the two standing there I felt only a fire build in my chest and as vulnerable and outnumbered as I was I committed totally to a fight. Neither of the intruders seemed interested in fighting a half-naked guy and tumbled over each other to flee.
Badass.
learn the lesson m8:
https://concealednation.org/2019/07/man-breaks-into-house-while-homeowner-taking-shower-close-by-shower-gun-comes-in-handy/
https://www.youtube.com/c/TacticalRifleman
I’ve found this youtube channel to be informative. Please watch some videos and give your opinion if you have the time.
On a cursory glane through, it seems very similar to these guys: https://www.youtube.com/c/panteaoproductions
Honestly, there’s a significant but small amount of info that can be conveyed through YouTube video format regarding guns. Basics, talk through/walk through, and learning jargon and terminology so you are empowered to ask good questions in an actual class. They also highlight various products, brands, and people/entities worth looking into. And that’s it. Anything more is superfluous. And they all do the same videos, basically. The gun companies keep a list of the most eyeballs-attached channels, and they send their products to them for “testing,” which is just free marketing. Paul Harrell, Gun Jesus, and Garand Thumb are the only ones even slightly entertaining IMO.
Another thing to watch for is who they associate with. Anyone that has maintained ties with Black Rifle Coffee Company should be shunned and ignored, for instance. The videos with guns are really only useful in piquing interest and introducing topics. The next step is to find a based local gun shop, shooters club, or training shop. Obviously, I am an opinionated faggot, so take advice with salt.
I forgot to mention: Warrior Poet Society. Their products are over priced but purportedly high quality. Their free videos are no different than the rest of training GunTube. They have a “+” service (https://www.watchwpsn.com/) that I found interesting but not noteworthy. I mention them because John Lovell is an explicit Christian who puts faith and ideology first in all he does, and for this he is mocked and shunned by the rest of GunTube. If/when Christian Nationalism becomes “a thing,” he and his organization will most likely be there. He is RPWQ and GNON compliant.
Anyone too close to the bro-vet community should be avoided, too. Dakota Meyer was attacking people for wearing military-style equipment to train, as if only a military contract gives you the right to defend yourself. Tim Kennedy is another loud voice that is soft on the individual right to arm themselves and defend their communities. Grand Thumb came out to defend the people training and told them to wear their kit when practicing, so he knows where his loyalties lie.
There are good and bad youtubers, but I would not worry too much about someone’s politics if they give good advice. Focus more on analysis of shooting and firearms more than anything else. The fun videos with lots of shooting and not much information are a waste of time. Watch reviews for any weapon you want to buy before you drop hundreds of dollars on a lemon or when you could have gotten a similar gun for much cheaper.
They were unarmed, and intended a cold burglary. When the plan went astray, they withdrew swiftly. Against a hot burglar, you would have had a bigger problem.
Dark Brandon:
“Every single MAGA, including your friend Obi-Wan Trump-obi, is now an enemy of the Republic.â€
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abUGy_C7P84
Brandon Lives!
Peace through Pronouns!
Is it bad that I can feel the pull of the propaganda, or is it good that a low-budget 90s cutscene is more inspiring than Biden’s actual call to arms speech?
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/watch-msnbc-declares-all-republicans-evil-and-threat-democracy-pundit-says-we-are-war
“MSNBC Declares All Republicans “Evil” And A “Threat To Democracy”; Pundit Says “We Are At War”
This isn’t persuading any independent voters to their cause. Anyone still undecided is stuck in a normalcy bias, most likely some aging boomer or Xer. They’re not believing the idea that republicans are any more evil than they’ve ever been. They’ll believe a lot of nonsense that gets said by the media but not if it ventures too far from the norms they adjusted to in the 70s. In that regard it’s not helping democrats in the midterm, likely the opposite. Elections are moot, will be rigged if important. Yet the midterm election presents a problem of scale that I don’t think they can overcome. So the rant is counterproductive for campaigning.
After 2020 election I began to lean more into Moldbugs theory of the slow drift hellscape but each new act of the left is more audacious than the last. And I think it’s by intention or escalation of their nature we could be nearing the event horizon of the leftist spiral. The dam bursts a crack at a time and then all at once. Let’s hope things get really interesting.
https://youtu.be/uDiLADhqa2E
Here’s the MacIntyre livestream that discusses the Dark Brandon Speech in depth. I think they hit a lot of interesting points, even if the proffered analysis is still mired in normalcy bias on some levels. Red, and anyone else flabbergasted at the state and disposition of the Sheepdog Class, I draw your attention to the stream participant American Ostrakon. AO has a history of valuable insight, life experience as a soldier and a contractor (purportedly), and seems to be fairly familiar with martial things. Listen to his befuddlement at what is going on. He cannot properly internalize what’s right in front of him, and is stuck in a loop, asking the same question over and over again. This is a window into the Sheepdog mindset. AO has MacIntyre to guide him, explain things to him, and gently correct his delusions and misperceptions, while the vast majority of cops, soldiers, and agents do not. One thing that is paramount in the armed services, as in jobs where you are armed, is that you cannot allow indecision to get into your OODA loop. It is better to make the wrong decision quickly than the right decision too late. While this is logical and reasonable, it is an exploit in the sheepdog brain; if you align the circumstances properly, you can get Mr. -dog to gloss over details, ignore evidence, or disregard obvious deer and just act like it’s a horse, all so the OODA loop is protected.
[*post restored, despite looking very like a fedpost. Maybe shills have been given a longer leash, so that they can pass the shill test, or maybe Frank is the real thing.*]
Who is going to “disarm the public� The cops who hid under their beds when Antifa and BLM destroyed city after city? The faggots in the FBI, who sent 20 fat clowns in body armor to arrest senior citizens like Roger Stone and Peter Navarro?
You guys spend half your time making fun of Shaniqua and the other half of your time making Shaniqua sound invincible. Very strange.
I will allow your comment through if you pass the shill test.
Say something that cannot be said from an FBI office with your supervisor checking contents.
[*Total fail at passing shill test*].
That almost word for word my parody of a shill trying to sound like one of us while avoiding any forbidden thoughts, and refusing to notice our forbidden thoughts.
Tell us what problems do black people, gays, and trannies cause?
What has Soros been doing?
Off-topic, but detranstion videos are horrifying and increasing in numbers. Considering what has been happening to extremely young children, we will be seeing these types of videos pop up for decades to come.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IawS_e36ZnM
As detransition [sic] becomes a thing, you see, and will continue to see, the polite conservatives reach out to, feel bad for, and pray for/with these specimens that have “seen the light.” This is compassion fucking with their heads.
Once you go a certain distance down some paths, you don’t get to walk back. You can divert yourself, crash through the morass and hope you find a different path (this is what God did for me, btw; he lead me to a new path, one where none of my past mistakes magically disappeared, but whereupon I get the opportunity to live differently), you can sit down and weep and wait to die, or you can double down and speed along the path to perdition even faster.
For the foolish/disgusting/blasphemous “people” that have physically carved away their humanity, or chemically altered their souls permanently, there is no earthly way to become whole again. It is not going to happen. it doesn’t matter if they were children, too young to understand. It doesn’t matter if they were women, to simple and selfish to realize the stakes. In this life, some things are unforgiveable, by yourself or others or Nature, and if we say Nature and are correct, we must also mean Nature’s God. God will do what he can and will do, and nothing in heaven or on earth, in this life or the next, is above God, so attempting to set constraints on God from our position, even if we can deduce that constraints may exist, is an evil fool’s errand.
You can see what I mean in the video linked, or in that blog Jim had a few months back about that damnfool “girl.” These creatures are little more than status/popularity antennas, with the gain set way to high, so they are dangerously sensitive to whatever signal they fall in the way of. That crying freak, no matter how emotional the context is, no matter how serious the situation, is still positioning itself in the social hierarchy.
“Listen up, y’all: a *detrans woman* is about to speak, so check your intact genital and unfragmented mind privilege, because I am just as needy, bossy, motivated to talk while incapable of listening, and I crave attention and praise for my latest antics.”
That is all I get from these types. Yes, there’s good data for figuring out where to mail the execution summons in a coup-complete world, but what do these ruined people really have to offer anyone? As someone who did irrevocable damage to themselves, avoid people like that. Some, like myself *I hope and pray* have found a different path, and are actively working to be an entity apart from what they were, but it isn’t simple or easy, and to be painfully honest, I am pretty sure it’s never going to happen, not completely. The only time you let someone who has significantly damaged themselves get close to you is if they have something you cannot obtain elsewhere, or if it is readily obvious that they are actively working at being a wholly different person, and the fruits of that struggle are numerous and obvious.
Sorry Shirley, I mean Steven, I mean Shirley: you’re still an attention seeking whore who was too ugly to be an actual whore. Just because Matt Walsh made you look silly on the internet doesn’t mean you spitting in God’s face and calling Nature fake can just be “moved on from.”
Come time for the Restoration, whores will be auctioned off naked and/or in chains like farm animals — and will benefit greatly being treated as such.
That de-tranner in the YouTube video won’t be getting any bids. What are you going to do with her?
A nunnery or a monastery. The auction is for whores so they do not do this shit, not for the poor degenerates that already have.
Yeah, post-op has bought and paid for their ticket, there’s no breaks or returns on that ride. It is heart-breaking in the extreme, particularly for the children gelded and ruined at the behest of demon possessed scum and evil parents, but some forms of evil cannot be undone, only extinguished. There must be a path to salvation (I am not speaking theologically, I don’t have that capacity) from types of damnation. It’s like proximity to a volcano; past a certain threshold, there is no escape.
Dear Lord, Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.
Yes, that poor girl has to acknowledge her complicity in what was done to her, and her evil motives in allowing it to be done, repent of her sins, and accept the dreadful consequences as merited punishment. She wanted to be popular, and everyone told her that transitioning was way cool.
They appealed to her wicked motives. As a tranny, she got the privilege of social superweapons with which to terrorize those around her, and discovered that being able to terrorize is not actually all that great, that being able to make everyone around you responsible for your unhappiness is not going to make you happy.
What makes trannies seem cool and high status to naive children is the social superweapons, and desire for social superweapons is evil, and those that possess them use them for evil.
A life in a convent is an acceptable and dignified option for repentant women, as Wulfgar and Jim said, but for unrepentant women however…
…I heard that the war in Ukraine has caused some supply chain issues with fertilizer.
“it doesn’t matter if they were children, too young to understand.”
I can’t agree with this, if what you’re saying is “They deserve to be punished.”
I agree if what you’re saying is, “We can’t treat them socially as if they were normal people.” In that case the point is indeed obvious. Like, “You may have caught leprosy/ the bubonic plague/ whatever through no fault of your own, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to invite you to my house for dinner.”
For me, this falls into the nebulous territory of Human Shields and Collateral Damage. No one with a healthy soul relishes in innocents suffering for reasons outside their understanding or control. But due to the nature of modern conflict, tactics, and strategy, every war will generate terribly unfair and heart breaking situations. the fucking monsters foisting this evil on children and stupid people are ultimately to blame, but it won’t be enough to declare them guilty and leave it at that. The defiled and ruined human in that video is actually, categorically, less-than-human, and they did this to themselves. Were they ready to make such a decision? Were they fully formed mentally and informed intellectually? Are they responsible for their actions? These are relevant and important questions for wiser men than myself, deep questions that will take much time and consideration to answer. But there is a competing necessity to deal with such individuals in the moment. people like that ruined women are a cancer on society, both when they made the decision to carve away their humanity for popularity and acceptance, and when they realized the damage that they’ve done. Listen to how she talks about herself; yes, she’s realized what a terrible mistake she made, but the underlying sickness is still there: the desperate need for attention and relevance. We saw this as well in that longform substack from that girl that de-transitioned before a surgeon got to her. She felt boring and unnoticed, so she found a community willing to validate her with attention and praise if she conformed to a model. Now, she is seeking validation through attention from a different community. the sickness here is not trannie surgery or sexual perversion, those are the symptoms. they are more extreme than other symptoms, incurable and untreatable in my opinion, but the underlying sickness remains. We must make women property again. When I hear a Detrans say that, I’ll believe they are reachable and curable. But I am fairly convinced “she” (both women, actually) are just as virulently “strong and independent” as any other femoid foot soldier of the Cathedral. They were, and remain, carriers of a destructive mind virus that contributes to the dismantling of civilization, and their newfound sense of importance as “survivors” will only contribute to that virulence. This sucks, and I don’t like it. Because of my own life trajectory, I must believe that, if there is a path back to wholeness, or some sense of whole, that we must strive to walk it. If there’s is no path… what good is it to pretend?
For those who don’t get mangled by surgery, there’s definitely a path back towards wholeness. For those mutilated, what path is there, and does it matter if they were gelded because of others, or themselves?
If their parents etc did it to them despite them fighting against it I feel bad for them… if they participated themselves in any way… no pity.
Niggers, because of their low IQs and lack of impulse control, are the prime source of dysfunction wherever you find them. Every criminal nigger should be executed and the rest should be sterilized.
Gays are repulsive disease-spreaders with no shame and no sense of self-control. They should be rounded up and exterminated.
Trannies are confused gays and should get the same treatment.
Pass.
Sometimes, it might be cool to actually let some shill comment be displayed, just to remember how do those look like.
Or, even better, to make an entire blog-post about failing shill-tests, just to have nice cheat-sheet under one link. 🙂
While I doubt that some higher-up is actually checking all that shill content here or on the other sites, it is amusing to see… deepness of modernist/ progressivist/ leftist brainwashing. The self-censure those brainwashed people are able to inflict on themselves even when nobody is watching.
By the way, your tests are quite effective outside of anglosphere, especially demon-worshiping and WQ test. Less so tests about Soros and such, but never mind.
They did not hide under their beds. They came out in considerable force to protects Antifa and BLM from being wiped out in fifteen minutes.
BLM and Antifa are only possible because of massive police protection and massive state funding. They are total and blatant astroturf. The Chinese Communist party demonstrations are more credible, without the party even trying very hard to be convincing.
I figured you for a shill because you are assuming the fake consensus that Antifa and BLM are the real thing, when everyone, including most normies, knows that they are astroturf. But maybe you are a dupe of shills. I get a few of those, and always mistake them for shills, because they are massively outnumbered by shills.
Actual conservatives are waking up to the reality of the enforcement arm of the Cathedral. Before the convergence was complete, the police and military were viable ways to oppose Degeneracy Inc, as many Sheriffs acrually did let their troops stomp actual criminal scum. Now that every PD is converged and most SDs are emasculated, they will need detox and rehab from “backing the blue.” I have been experimenting with this using your position (police enable riots and protect Antifa/BLM), and it is a terribly jagged and bitter pill for them to swallow, but when you walk them through the logic (roof Korean mythos, what shop owners can and will do, etc), they actually pick it up quickly. As the raids, apprehensions, and gun seizures escalate, it will become more common to see normiecons lashing out at blind police support.
“Wiped out” by whom? Almost all Antifa and BLM riots were in far-left shitlib cities where they have few opponents, let alone armed opponents. There’s a reason Antifa and BLM didn’t take their act to the suburbs. They’d get slaughtered in the suburbs, and they know it.
> I figured you for a shill because you are assuming the fake consensus that Antifa and BLM are the real thing,
Nonsense. Antifa and BLM are a bunch of low-IQ mutants and subhumans who obviously depend on Soros funding and Soros prosecutors, but they only have Soros prosecutors in the shitlib cities. If Antifa or BLM rolled into Grady Judd’s county in Florida or a hundred other places with right-wing sheriffs and DAs, they’d get slaughtered and the people who slaughter them would be considered heroes.
Again, you guys can’t have it both ways. Don’t tell me Shaniqua is a joke but also tell me we can’t possibly defeat Shaniqua.
There are ample opponents to having their businesses burned and their homes vandalized in shitlib cities, it is just that they are terrorized by an ever more dangerous and criminal state security apparatus.
Kenosha is a shitlib city? It is small town America. Yet antifa confidently attempted murder on video, rightly believing that they could never be prosecuted anywhere ever.
Which assumption was proved correct when they did not prosecute Grosskreutz for illegal possession of a firearm by a felon. Something that would earn me a SWAT/ATF raid and my dog shot got him favorable press tours and celebrity leftist status.
[*deleted for unsupported confidence*]
Kenosha is a swing area,
https://bestneighborhood.org/conservative-vs-liberal-map-kenosha-wi/
that has mostly elected Democrats, but was recorded as voting for Trump in 2020, and recently elected Republicans to key offices. Absolutely average small town America. If you want to argue differently, you need something more than confident assertion.
I linked to a political survey, which reports “marginally democratic”. Antifa and selective prosecution was enabled by state power, not by political support and lack of will to resist among the public. State power, as we are now seeing, that the mainstream Republican Rino Republican party has no will or capability to resist. The protesters appear to have been bussed in, in that none of Kyle’s assailants have local kin, and none of them reported a local residence. Like all antifa operations looks astroturfed.
This post is all the proof needed to show that we have many miles to go before even enthusiastic conservatives start to wake up to the cold, hard reality of how bad it has gotten. The only consolation is that the rot, stupidity, and ignorance is ubiquitous.
I’ve been seeing countless takes like this on Twitter lately and I can’t tell if it’s a coordinated op or if ruralites genuinely misunderstand power dynamics this badly.
The 2020 riots literally started in the suburbs with Ahmaud Arberry and the 3 men who rightfully killed him are doing life behind bars. Antifa and BLM mainly operate in cities but they’ve done the same in the suburbs and they do so with impunity. Jonathan Pentland is another example. It doesn’t matter where you are, Cathedral operatives are above the law.
Correct me if I am wrong, but the pattern appears to be some “””heinous and racist crime””” occurs in a blue zone that just happens to be a place where Obama phones are very prevalent, a mob forms incredibly quickly with signs and slogans already crafted and penned, the footage goes viral, Mainstream Media picks up the story and goes to wall-to-wall coverage, then “spontaneous” outbreaks of “mostly peaceful and barely even fiery protests with bricks” occur, then it spreads to dense suburbs with high numbers of blacks or no real boundaries between urban density and suburban sprawl.
Even when the spotlighted incident occurs in a suburb, the protests start in cities IIRC. Whatever the case, whatever details I have misconstrued or gotten wrong, I distinctly remember noticing a formula. I think this will happen again, but not while Democrats are “in control” of the executive, or are transitioning out. The race kerfuffles are a tool for intimidating whites, redistributing wealth and “housing,” and punishing moderate liberals for insufficient holiness. This may be incorrect, or out of date, or unlikely going forward, as the unrest manufacturing apparatus is barely restrained by the DNC controllers. We may see a new iteration with suburbs being the focus. There is also the slight possibility that the corona overreach and the clumsy war drum routine has significantly altered the temperament of the do-nothing conservative plurality. This may be excessively optimistic, but I could see an orchestrated outbreak of “spontaneous protesting” snowballing into an actual civil unrest scenario.
“occurs in a blue zone”
Usually but not always. Trump won 60+% of the vote in the county where Arbery was killed.
“I think this will happen again, but not while Democrats are “in control†of the executive”
Why wouldn’t it? Trayvon and Ferguson happened when Obama was president. Other than that, generally agree.
The cops stood down for antifa because they were ordered to stand down.
They will come and take your guns, arrest or kill you when they are ordered to do so.
You’re crazy. The average American big-city cop is a fat 5’6″ pussy — and those are the male cops.
Meanwhile, the overwhelming majority of patriots are in the suburbs and rural areas, where the police are overwhelmingly right-wing. The idea that suburban police forces are going to go door to door collecting guns from their friends and neighbors is utter lunacy.
If they will not, the IRS or the ATF will.
Civil war may well ensue, but to win it, we will need a CEO, a Commander in Chief, a King.
I tend to agree that gun confiscation in at least some parts of the country will be very difficult for them.
The cops are mindlessly obedient so they’ll initially try to enforce the rule but after a bunch of them get shot and most people say sorry I lost my gun in a boating accident… I think the cops will start spending gun confiscation shifts at the donut shop. The feds are going to be more zealous but they are cowards as well so the FBI/ATF etc are going to give up too once the body count starts rising.
The marines would have the guts to do it but marines (soldiers in general) are not so mindlessly obedient as cops and the non coms and juniour officers are generally very sympathetic to us.
The military, or at least large parts of it, are not going to be on our side. The men that would have been on our side are not enlisting anymore, which is why all branches are having such a problem making recruitment numbers. the military is being hollowed out, but what remains will be against us.
> the military is being hollowed out, but what remains will be against us.
The vast majority of the military are useless administrator types, not door-kickers and trigger-pullers. The overwhelming majority of competent trigger-pullers remain on our side.
The idea that chubby GI Janes are going to go door to door confiscating ~350,000,000 firearms is utterly stupid.
First, they make sure all weapons are registered. Then they call them in. They don’t intend to do door to door searches. That will not get all weapons, or even most of them, but every white who has a weapon will be a criminal.
Equally stupid is the idea that all 350million weapons will be wielded against Them. You are committing the same stupidity of which you accuse us. How many Americans are “useless administrator types, not door-kickers and trigger-pullers”? Further, your assertion that “The overwhelming majority of competent trigger-pullers remain on our side” is a pet belief, a sacred cow of the Right, and I have serious doubts that it is true. The German Government just recently made assurance is to its security forces that they will most definitely not be having a cold winter.
There’s a lot of moving parts in this distributed situation. Our adversaries are largely incompetent, yes, but they have inertia and the elusive promise of “return to normalcy” on their side. By transmitting a blended message of “these guys are pure evil, arrest them!” and “we know it’s distasteful, but it’s very necessary to save America!” they will be able to bamboozle many of the tip-of-spear types, who are not really known or selected for their ability or tendency to think deeper about orders given.
Hmmmm but that begs the question if the old military is truly dead they may not be any guttsier about gun confiscation than the cops.
There are 10 private security officers for every 1 police officer in the US as of 2020. They are a motley assortment of corpulent do-nothings all the way to hardcore SOF types. Make of that what you will. Contractors do all the jobs that matter, and gun confiscation will be no different. I have yet to meet a female bureaucrat that accepts the answer “no” or “it is impossible.”
Will those private security officers die for their pay check? When gun confiscation start then death camps are not far behind and men of good will know it. There may not be a lot of takers for those sort of raids.
Nuts.
If he’s not a shill on payroll he’s at least a smarter, self-directed shill. Off the bat, irrational aggression designed to elicit either pushback and engagement, OR aggravate you and push you off your own side’s platform. He glows.
But taking it at face value – cops won’t enforce red flag orders? They already do. Cops won’t 3 am no-knock raid suspects who own guns, whether the crime is real, white collar, or made up entirely? They already do. Cops won’t swallow their principles and think of their pension, plus the immediate paycut they’ll take if they go private sector (city police make three times the average income where I’m at, before any overtime or private security gigs)? They already do.
I don’t expect same day, door to door gun confiscations for quite some time, and I’m a pessimist on some things. But… they don’t need it. Red flag laws have been expanded recently, and will be expanded further. Boomer-tier social media posts are already enough to get your guns confiscated. Degree-of-separation from anyone accused of right wing extremism will be the next step. A divorce, a domestic disturbance call either well intentioned or made up out of malice, a call to CPS either well intentioned or made up out of malice, have long been enough to get you raided and your guns taken, and that’s on purpose, and the list will only be expanded. They take every one they can get one at a time, and boomers and normiecons never think they’ll be next, and even the few on our side who get it realize it’s never go time for just one house.
This. It will be a “secondary” enforcement action, portrayed as an unintended consequence.
“Well, we were serving a warrant for [widely considered bad thing] and due to the circumstances, for the safety of everyone involved, we confiscated any guns in the house.”
“You wouldn’t want a criminal to be armed, would you?”
“Calm down sir. We received an anonymous tip that there was some disturbance going on. You don’t mind if we take a look around right? Are there any firearms in the house?”
“For the safety of the [children/battered wife/Roborovski Hamster] residing in the domicile, we collected the dangerous firearms.”
Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion are whatever the officer says they are, as that will be decided ex post facto at the court date. Any weapons collected will be sent off into the red tape abyss. Well over half the females in this country will blindly support a full on national gun grab with the minimum amount of footage/reporting of a gun accident or use. This kills me to say it, as I was one here who advocated pretty hard for LEOs on multiple occasions, but the whole sheepdog community, like the GWoT veterans, are useful idiots for the Cathedral at this point. I’m starting to doubt even Sherriff’s Deputies will think twice if rape, molestation, or pedophilia assertions are attached to the suspect.
BLM was mostly about replacing good virtuous cops with commie cops and ass kissers who will do anything for that pay check. With the military I think the rot is almost total but it’s harder to tell what’s going on with local cops.
> But taking it at face value – cops won’t enforce red flag orders? They already do.
There’s a big difference between some cops going to get a couple guns from a guy who just got caught smacking his girlfriend around and cops going door to door collecting ~350,000,000 firearms from right-wingers.
Let’s not be retards here.
It will very likely not succeed, but the attempt is going to be unpleasant and get a whole lot of people killed.
As usual with these situations, they don’t do a global “round up”. They just do opportunistic enforcements as they are encountered, as well as targeted enforcement towards specific individuals. Also all above ground legitimate sales and distribution are eliminated. Black markets are created which lead to more corruption.
What happens is that anyone who uses a gun for any reason gets the book thrown at him in the court system. [More official lies of the same sort, only allowing one through because too tedious and wastes too much space to respond them all]
So how come all the people attempting to kill Kyle with an illegal gun were piously ignored?
How come the government is heavily involved in gun running to black and hispanic gangs?
They want blacks and browns armed so that they kill white people, and white people disarmed so that they can be killed. Black and brown gun crimes get a slap on the wrist.
José Inez GarcÃa Zárate came to San Francisco illegally, lived on crime and welfare, murdered a white girl for the hell of it with an illegal gun, and was not only absurdly acquitted for murdering a white girl on the basis that she was white and he is brown, but also was never prosecuted for possession of a stolen gun.
That was simply infuriating. If memory serves, there were some shots right after the verdict of the jurors exiting the building with smirks on their faces. Also, the murderer had been deported multiple times before. The cleansing fire can’t come soon enough.
[deleted for confidently reporting leftist factiods unchecked.]
Do a little homework before telling us what the loudspeaker is saying. We already know what the loudspeaker is saying.
Why Thor and not his father Odin?
I nominated Thor, because common to all the Aryan peoples.
Check out this link: https://huggingface.co/ykilcher/gpt-4chan
Do we have the requisite brainpower, talent, and technology to build a “GPT-Jim” bot? What would it cost in time a nd compensation? I think the applications are obvious and many. Idea originally floated by Pax.
It is not that hard – the technology is increasingly available, but I don’t see any useful applications. Not obvious to me. What do you have in mind?
The illusion of consciousness is fairly thin.
A Tesla has substantially more sensory input than the human brain, and arguably has more computing power than the human brain, and the network of which it is part has enormously more computing power and data input than the human brain, yet Tesla owners perceive cats and dogs as people, while they do not perceive their Teslas as people.
Someone took one for the team and read Anal Schwab’s panflet.
It’s pretty dumb, which lends credence to Edward Dowd’s speculation that Schwab, Harari etc. were always meant to be cartoon villains against which the population revolts, with the actual leaders of the NWO coming out of that revolution (I think Dowd gives them too much credit, they may just be that dumb, at least this latest crop of villains).
Rather, I think our enemies simply are pretty dumb.
Once upon a time, clever rationalizations were needed to explain why a deer is horse, and passing as one of the faithful required a great deal of smarts.
Now clever rationalizations are damned near impossible, and attempting them is likely to get you falsely suspected of crimethought, for example Scott Alexander. It is a lot easier to believe everything you are told to believe if you are dumb as a post.
“It is a lot easier to believe everything you are told to believe if you are dumb as a post.”
This is something that Teddy Spaghetti is generally right about, its the midwits (not the high midwits I mean the 105-115 IQ ones) who tend to be the ones willing to believe anything if authority and the people around them do.
The downright stupid person will stubbornly maintain the sky is blue.
I talk to a few midwits. They theoretically believe the official state religion, but after a beer or two are receptive to crimethought.
Often they react as if the crimethought was completely new to them, it had never occurred to them before, but its truth glaringly obvious.
In a world of lies, truth serum is very useful.
1) Not every midwit is a cathedral zealot but cathedral zealots are overwhelming midwits
2) Don’t care if they can commit thoughtcrime while black out drunk if anything the fact that at some level they know its a lie even still but they still go on… that makes me hate them even more.
They don’t need to be blackout drunk. Just one or two beers to loosen their tongues. And they are good people, most of them. I am not too bad at telling who is a good person, and it is a lot easier to tell when that person has had one or two beers.
Post 2020 I deny its possible to be a leftist and a good person.
The majority of people “on the left” aren’t leftists. This doesn’t mean they should be spared, necessarily, but the headcount of actual leftists is objectively low. It has to be, structurally.
> Post 2020 I deny its possible to be a leftist and a good person.
Exactly right. No mercy.
Mercy to leftists is in almost all cases wrong because
1) They come back
2) They’ve hurt us all economically and in other ways and their houses etc should really go to us also if they have women them too.
3) Psychologically some of us need revenge.
Now there are perhaps some people with very rare critical talents who you have to spare but probably no more than one leftist in a hundred.
Absolutely.
The earth shall be soaked with their blood and their women shall warm our beds.
So help us GNON.
The midwit evolves an exceptional sensitive sense of micro-breezes, and is able to detect the direction the wind is blowing quite rapidly, so rapidly that they will accommodate it minute to minute. Such that, a stalwart Cathedralite can enter a room full of based bros and, within seconds, suddenly find that they do in fact agree that something is up with women, vaxx propaganda is in fact heavy handed, and there is in fact a sinister and destructive course of action being followed. Of course, should they get out their eye magnet and be subjected to the appearance of online consensus, the weathervane wil rapidly spin, and they are off on a different track.
MASS GRAVES!
MASS GRAVES NOW!
There was a large biological effect in the middle east, but it was swamped by the relatively recent Arab influx.
Horse riding might have happened shortly after domestication. A great book on this is:
“The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World” by David W. Anthony
It has a lot of raw data and explanations of why something should be believed, rather than conclusions.
The Kalash people of Pakistan might be a remnant of Aryan invaders. Some interesting genetic studies have been done.
My wife did Super-Hots this year in the pepper garden, and that spicy bitch tried to kill me with one. Jokes on her for, after I passed out and shit myself, I awoke to a revelation. As I was paddling her mercilessly while dry heaving, it occurred to me that the devious plans of females are always missing some critical element. No matter how smart they appear, femoids always forget some crucial aspect (in my wife’s case, she forgot the fact that I am based-god of self-poisoning, and if the Chinese chemicals couldn’t take me down in my teens and twenties, a 3 million Scoville unit kill shot isn’t going to either).
The gynocracy that runs the permanent bureaucracy in the GAE initiated a plan that had been percolating in the Academy for decades in approximately 2006: get femoids in the visual power avatar positions. They had already begun to take over the boardroom and bedroom, but dumb hoes cannot conceive of non-visual power. So while they were taking control of the merchant class leadership and permanent bureaucracy, they felt horribly diminished by not controlling presidencies, prime-ministerships, etc etc. So they hatched a bunch of conspiracies to move roasties and spinsters into positions of visual power. They wanted to be the prom queens of humanity. They used academic literature, entertainment and artistic avenues, non profits and lobbyists, literally every possible point of leverage to get vaginas in pants suits with flag lapel pins. Just as liberal America believed their own hornswoggle about Hillary being widely desired and loved, so too did they fall for their own lies about females being better CEOs and Leaders. This grand muff-spiracy went into overdrive when Hillary was sent to the spiritual kitchen to make metaphorical sandwiches for Teflon Don and the boys in 2016, and ever since, the whole of the Cathedral, the entire GAE and its tentacles, have a single aim of making women leaders in front of cameras and crowds.
So, in summation, all of this, all the craziness we’ve been experiencing, is purely the fallout, side effects, and consequences of the devious plan to put women in visible power. That’s it. That is all. Literally nothing else, no Great Reset, no LWO, no dystopian bifurcation of 99% bugmen and 1% elites. there is no gameplan, and once Kamala ascends to the throne of the US, they will declare a week of celebration, and that will be that… of course, the whole world will gradually collapse and humanity will enter into a new dark age, but that’s none of their concern, they’ll just hire a contractor or something and head off to Cabo to celebrate. pack it up boys, shut down the site, Jim. KD has solved it all. Nothing left to do but take a few percocet, pour some scotch, and watch it all collapse. For any females reading this, this entire post is low quality sarcasm, carry on with your flawless plan.
“My wife did Super-Hots this year in the pepper garden, and that spicy bitch tried to kill me with one. Jokes on her for, after I passed out and shit myself, I awoke to a revelation. As I was paddling her mercilessly while dry heaving…”
I need to learn that icon where you’re laughing so hard you’re crying.
But to address your actual point: No, there’s more than the female thing there’s also e.g. the anti-white thing.
No, I am utterly convinced that female miscalculation is the simplest and most complete explanation! Yeah, obviously, the whole post is silly. I actually read a few flat-earth style “panacea conspiracy” posts that attempted to tie everything together in a tidy, simple explanation involving aliens, free masons, globalists, and Jews, and I was struck by how far backward these idiots bend over to make a sloppy, complicated mess of conspiracies into a single, simple situation. Like looking for keys under a lamppost. I thought, “If you’re going to do that, just blame women. It’s way easier and far more realistic.”
[*deleted*]
On what do you base that factual claim?
Putting women in charge when women are meant to serve and obey (sometimes queens do actually work but female democracy can NEVER work) explains a lot of things but 2020 showed there are also conspiracies. Whether installing women is by design and part of the conspiracy or idiocy which guarantees it will fail… I can’t tell you that.
https://stormer-daily.rw/chile-voters-overwhelmingly-reject-globohomo-constitution-by-massive-margin/
Elections don’t matter, yes, but why would the GAE not put their thumb on the scale for this one, Jim?
1. The vote will have absolutely no effect, much as electing Trump had considerably less effect than expected.
2. Democracy is Chile is fragile and discredited, having produced utterly catastrophic results the last time around, which catastrophe was wonderfully fixed by Pinochet. Blatant vote rigging, 2020 style, would discredit it even further.
https://stormer-daily.rw/ugly-bitch-becomes-leader-of-failed-british-state/
lol
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1567266589342310401
Now California is going to have rolling blackouts, how will all the ‘nothing ever happens’ / ‘everything is going swell’ explain this stuff? They can’t send the army of engineer corps to every failing part of american infastructure to fix it like they did that one boondocks town.
https://twitter.com/i/events/1562145892135669760
Madness of this sort (probably) can’t go on forever…
Inflation has long been massively understated in official figures, which have an increasingly absurd hedonic adjustment. It is now being ridiculously understated, with them abandoning any statistical jiggery pokery, and just lying barefaced. The decline in living standards was subtle and slow, is now obvious and massive.
how will all the ‘nothing ever happens’ / ‘everything is going swell’ explain this stuff?</I
The cope I expect is "Everything will be fine once we get a Republican back in the White House."™®
“Jimian” women in real life.
https://twitter.com/718Tv/status/1567161951343583232
Indeed. Couldn’t have asked for it louder. I’ve noticed, on the extremely rare instance I’ve actually discussed the “come get me” actions/tendencies of wahmens, even hard conservatives have a hard time agreeing with or even seeing such actions for what they are. A big aspect of this is that, with notable exceptions, these females don’t realize what they are doing, it’s their lower brain pushing them to advertise themselves. You see this in a lot of so-called “immigration attorneys” (almost always female, BTW). they are fully convinced that they are acting out of compassion, not lust. You could line up their clientele and walk them through the preponderance of their “client type” (massive overrepresentation of tatted up gangers and young males with no families), and they just don’t see it. Not excusing their actions and proclivities in any way, just emphasizing the futility of discussing the phenomenon with the expectation of any real progress.
Another hilarious comment.
https://twitter.com/PunishedVoryn/status/1567309389396164611
The sad thing about all this is how the female hindbrain hasn’t adapted to a situation where being abducted will lead to her death rather than a happy marriage and successful reproduction.
Also hilarious that the nigger probably thought he could get away with it because he was driving his boss’ van
Crimestop on the woman question is by far the most deeply ingrained cathedral directive.
Yarvin’s latest:
https://graymirror.substack.com/p/on-money-and-power
I haven’t read it yet, not past the first paragraph, but I will make a kneejerk prediction: Uncle Yarv is still a lurker here. I accept that I may be wrong, and apologies to those of us who can’t stand him.
Well if he would get to the point from time to time that would be nice.
People in denial complicate the shit out of everything.
You think Uncle Yarv lurks here? I give it a 20% chance that Uncle Bannon lurks here with the certainty that Prophet Jim is too much of a red-pill even for him to swallow.
Now, if Uncle Trump lurked here, he would have been God Emperor Trump by now.
But I’m pretty sure that some influential people do lurk here. I’ve seen more than a couple memes in the mainstream that first made their debut on the comments section of this blog. That can’t be a co-incidence.
If I were American, I would be praying that a future General Monck or Future Augustus was lurking at this blog.
As it is I am hoping that Suones can become a sort of Hindu Jim. We already have a Hindu Yarvin here, https://manasataramgini.wordpress.com/
DharmicReality is your best commenter by a lot…
You will notice that he naturally defers to Suones
If not the future Monck/Augustus lurking here, then at least the voices in the wilderness calling his name.
Without a means of mass communication that resistant to both shills and censorship, which Jim and the super brain crew are at least doing a great job of describing and white-papering, crickets and wild honey are all we’ve got.
It’s analogous to the reformation, which was ultimately the result of 1) the catholic church being rather corrupt and 2) outsiders and discontents suddenly being able to write, print and distribute books.
You remember 2015-2016 4chan and Twitter I mean holy shit.
Procedural, committee based institutions only have one way of learning truth, and that is dashing their ships against the rocks of Being; only while the splinters are being gathered from the wreckage to build new ships does the question of how to chart a different course become actionable.
The sclerosis of peacetime militaries are a classic example of this. That a peacetime military will run into catastrophes on the joining of conflict is, in practical terms, an inevitability. The most important thing then for the clouds of visionaries with competing visions vying for social dominance, is not so much that the visions which were relevant to the catastrophe were not adopted ahead of time – which is simply all too expectable – but that they are already sitting there ‘on the shelf’, available to be pulled off and applied immediately in the inevitable event of calamity.
That is one of the great value of fertilizing the discourse with your memes.
>The sclerosis of peacetime militaries are a classic example of this. That a peacetime military will run into catastrophes on the joining of conflict is, in practical terms, an inevitability.
Here’s an excellent study of this occurrence covering the Royal Navy. Wonderfully detailed, not at all “fiction-ized” as so many history books seem to be these days:
https://b-ok.cc/book/2616615/8d0da3
The Rules of the Game by Andrew Gordon
He covers Jutland in painstaking detail while documenting and drawing parallels with Nelson’s navy and how it became little more than a well ordered joke due to no dangerous adversaries and the insidious effects of flag signaling usurping individual captains’ initiative. Cannot recommend it enough.
Ukrainians just took back a sizable portion south of Kharkiv including the small city Balakley. Barely any Russian forces to hold them back. That was a bigger victory than the whole Kherson offensive they tried.
Don’t get too excited; Wagner and a bunch of militias are assaulting Bahkmut. The AFU is trying to pile through their salient in the south, pulling a ton of units from elsewhere. If the AFU can hold and expand the salient, they may strengthen their position at the negotiation table. But I don’t see it being very likely that they will turn the tide in any real way.
Hue and cry is going up all over Russian telegram over the RF leadership leaving the AFU supply arteries intact, and I think it’s a valid point. But, just as Trump was not a desperate moron grasping at straws, the RF is not some shit tier paper military. They may have underestimated the AFU’s ability to conduct an offensive, but I think it’s equally likely that they are more interested in depleting NATO assets than they are looking undefeated on paper.
https://t.me/asbmil
https://t.me/topwar_official
“the RF is not some shit tier paper military. They may have underestimated the AFU’s ability to conduct an offensive, ”
Six months into this crap and stuff like this happens? Yes, yes, they totally are a shit tier paper military. They had a small elite that was capable, as seen in Crimea and Syria, and a lot of drunken dumbasses led by corruptocrats. The small elite has been bled dry by attempting to support the drunken dumbasses. Insisting that everything is secretly going exactly as intended is the same “trust the plan, guys” bullshit that dumbasses on the right have been swallowing since GWB and that culminated in the self-own of J6. No. Don’t trust the plan, trust the evidence of your own eyes. If the evidence of your own eyes says that Trump is a lazy incompetent dumbass grasping at straws and unworthy of putting your own life and freedom on the line for him, then he probably is a lazy incompetent dumbass and putting your life and freedom on the line for him might end with you in solitary and the subject of a political show trial AND YOU SHOULDN’T DO THAT. If the evidence of your own eyes is that the Russians are incompetent drunken dumbasses, THEN THE RUSSIANS ARE PROBABLY INCOMPETENT DRUNKEN DUMBASSES no matter how much you wish it were otherwise.
Do not trust human authorities on any topic where said authority conflicts with visible evidence. Put not your faith in princes and all that crap. Trump is a decent guy who was totally out of his depth in the shark pool and was never a savior. Putin is a corrupt asshole who is perfectly capable of speaking the truth when it serves his purposes, but he massively misjudged everything about this from top to bottom and he is not your savior either. No matter how much you want a savior.
And Jim is just trying to run an imitation cult here, with his imitation shahadas and so on. Don’t trust him anymore than you trust anybody you don’t know personally.
As for Kherson and “tried”, I don’t know why you bootlickers keep trying to assert your preferred reality into existence. It doesn’t matter how you characterize it beforehand, what matters is what the end result is. The end result is not in view yet. What is in view is trends, which are that the fighting near Kherson is ongoing, the intensity is as high as it has ever been anywhere in this conflict, that intensity is being sustained, the Ukrainains are provably gaining ground on a daily basis, and all the bridges are out. Ukraine has supply lines, Russia doesn’t. You cannot wish these facts out of existence by repeatedly asserting a la Vox Day that the offensive is “over” just because you desperately wish it so.
In short:
STOP LYING TO YOURSELF.
“shit like this” looks suspiciously like direct combat between Russian forces and NATO. We are hearing people from the “Ukrainian” offensive speaking in English.
It was obvious that Russian forces were about to defeat Ukraine. Ukrainian forces have taken intolerable casualties, and are collapsing. The current Kherson offensive of was preceded by repeated attempt to launch the offensive using only plausibly Ukrainian forces, and in each attempt the Ukrainian forces collapsed. Collapse was imminent on the eastern front.
So it now looks like NATO is now directly intervening to save Ukraine from imminent collapse, or rather more directly intervening than in its previous somewhat deniable interventions. We shall see if Russia is shit tier compared to NATO when we hear (on the alt right media, you are not going to read it the lamestream media) of significant NATO casualties.
We saw what happened when the west sent mercs. Looks like it is now sending troops with a less readily deniable connection to the Global American Empire. Though the connection will continue to be piously denied for quite a while.
https://mobile.twitter.com/mdfzeh/status/1567913682272673792
Obviously, those aren’t dushkas, but M2s.
We always knew of course, but they’re just getting openly blatant with it now.
Signs of desperation at this point. The polygon could keep its cattle irrational indefinitely, but the solvency of its forces on the ground couldn’t be spoken of the same way; the situation remaining as it was was not sustainable, and the longer it went on the worse their standing would get; a ‘battle of the bulge’ sooner rather than later was the only bet to make. Alea iacta est.
No wonder Europe has to send all its ammo east.
Any idea how much troops NATO committed to this operation? Just some NATO officers moved from staff work to field work or are NATO troops driving NATO tanks and operating NATO howitzers?
It is a deep dark secret. And I do not know the answer. Officially, none. Hard to tell. But if NATO is the reason why this offensive finally got off the ground after endless fails, would have to be a significant force.
Let’s circle back in 2 weeks, Mr. Tomato. All of the Slava Ukraini posters from March and April mysteriously disappeared when Putin wasn’t ousted and the RF altered its strategy and the momentum. All the economic geniuses got mysteriously invisible as well when the ruble rebounded and the sanctions flew all the way around the planet, bypassing Russia and landing in the EU. I can’t be sure, but I don’t think this will be much different.
Welcome back Whitey.
When the ‘secret offensive’ that was announced months in advance actually started going ahead, i found myself pleased, because it means the puppet regime has abandoned it’s holding action and rapidly accelerated the time-table on total destruction of their forces by throwing the into the woodchipper, even when momentary gains give an appearance of strength in the short term.
FWIW, the reasonable Z commentators are saying that the RF forces are being rocked back pretty hard in specific spots due to changes in tactics and the NATO contingents leading. Much hay will be made of this, of that we can be sure.
The battlefield changes are of little importance; what must be explained is why the RF high command is leaving the supply columns and routes untouched. On the side of optimism, they want to compel Zelensky and the prattling commentary corps to induce a massive push into the salient, leaving everything else weak. I don’t honestly know what the GAE would do if the AFU and the foreign detachments all invested Kherson, then the RF nuked it. Condemnation, yes, moaning and wailing, when do they not, but… can you imagine a more stark statement of intention? All of the recently bloodied NATO SOF guys, the leaders, and the largest army in Europe, gone.
I don’t think this is likely, just musing about how one would speed up the annihilation of opposition, and luring them into what appears to be a breakout due to grave miscalculation would probably work.
Possibly Russia is losing.
On the other hand, after the first few weeks they abandoned war of movement and accepted the war of attrition that the Global American Empire was seeking to impose, and in the fall of Severodonetsk., their tactics look like they were content to not take Severodonetsk as long as the Global American Empire was content to continue feeding troops into the woodchipper. One may optimistically hope that a similar strategy is unfolding in Kherson.
Current picture from pro Russia Rybar.
https://twitter.com/mdfzeh/status/1567989589691842561/photo/1
Whole west Izyum front seems to be falling apart. There better be some Russian BTGs on the way.
I am pro-Z, and I want Russia to win, so keep that in mind.
We have 2 instances to consider: there’s an extant example of RF military underestimating the AFU and over estimating the effects of their tactical endeavors; there’s an extant example of a strategic feint that looked very much like a tactical blunder.
In the first instance, Putin was not alone in his assessment. Literally everyone thought Zelensky would flee, the AFU capitulate, and the whole affair settled in a matter of days or weeks. Normalcy bias gets all of us in some way at some point. Contrary to the “Basil” types, once the AFU held and the RF had to change doctrine, they did so, and quite rapidly. For those that think it was not swift, consider how many years it took for the USM to cobble together and deploy the Surge Tactic, which wasn’t some genius, complicated triple backflip of an idea. So, if in fact the RF MoD has been buggered for fair, the precedent is that GAE MSM will crow about victory pride parades in Moscow for a few weeks, AFU will continue to push into liberated Russian clay (going slower and slower with each passing day, as the same army that was getting mercilessly ground down last week won’t suddenly transmogrify into a new, fresh army), a few RF generals will be sacked, and the Russians will shift tactics yet again.
In the second instance, it is still not clear whether the push toward Kiev was a feint by design, or if it became a feint by necessity. The Necessity option makes a certain amount of sense; the RF thought their SOF would deploy an enclave of based warriors and, after the AFU capitulated, the tank columns out of Belarus would parade into Kiev and relieve them. When that failed, the SMO pivoted in purpose while leaving the conscript army “stalled” in place to draw off and lock down the AFU elements in that theater. If it was always going to be a feint or not, the precedent here is that a bad turn for the RF provides an opportunity for them to convert it into a good outcome. As I wrote above, I don’t think it would take too much footage and “footage” of RF forces and DPR/LPR militias getting beaten back and defeated in detail to induce a literal global demand for Zelensky to pour everything he has into a widening salient and “break their backs.” Planned, expected, or otherwise, this would provide Russia with an opportunity to annihilate them in a massive cauldron, but that would require mass mobilization or a string of nuclear strikes, both of which, at this moment, seem unlikely.
I think a lot will be made clear in the next 2 weeks, but it might not seem that way. There’s a reason we are suddenly hearing English and seeing AR platform rifles and .50cals in the battle vids instead of hearing Slavic and seeing AKs and DShKs. The NATO contingent that has been holding back in country has been thrown into this offensive, and I will state (and may be proven wrong, we’ll see) that I think the NATO shadow leadership that has been pulling strings behind the scenes is stepping into the light and taking over the actual fighting of the war. Whether this is tactical or strategic, I cannot say, but the AFU has been suffering grievously all summer, and, as @RYBAR has pointed out, if the AFU offensive isn’t stopped and Izyum falls, the fall offensive planned out by the RF is probably going to be aborted.
Either way, we are not on Musk time, Soros time, or normie time. Ukraine was never going to be the finish line, it is merely the opening campaign in the Third World War.
I also want western elites to get their teeth kicked in. I just think the Russians have been kind of making it up as they go along.
It’s also obvious Putin underestimated the extent of and how willing the EU was to sacrifice itself to the US. Had he been wise to it, he would be already building gas pipelines to Asia before the war. Meanwhile EU is building LNG terminals.
China has been reluctant to help with tech imports too, probably because they don’t want to risk their own export markets with sanctions for now.
I will refrain from military predictions because we just don’t know the true state of RF and AFU forces and their capabilities. But it’s not very clear to me that Russia can prevail in wider economic war as a whole and there is the distinct possibility that this thing may have been a blunder.
So they are rushing out of their defensive positions into a bulge with a river in the way…
Hopefully the Russians are giving ground in order to encircle the troops who rush into the Bulge.
I mean, it took me 8 paragraphs spread between 2 separate posts, but yeah, that’s what I said lol jk.
The issue is head count. The RF is dwarfed by the AFU in Ukraine proper. Of course, the RF is a continental military and the AFU is a regional military, but it’s not like the RF can (or should) pull troops from elsewhere and put them in UKR. In fact, I’d argue that Putin expects this conflict to escalate and spread, which is why he hasn’t gone for a general mobilization or greatly increased the troop commitments to the SMO. It’s like he expects the hammer(s) to fall elsewhere, no matter how bad it seems.
To annihilate the AFU in an encirclement/cauldron, I think he would need significantly more troops and assets than are in place currently.
the Ukranians could be pinned down on their front with minimal troops plus artillery once they hit the river.. if the Russians can also restrict reinforcements via artillery from attacking the encirclement pincers maybe they don’t need overwhelming numbers…
I think they will parallel the Russian Severodonetsk strategy, where they made no attempt to close the cauldron. Ukraine just eventually wised up and stopped dumping fresh troops into the meat grinder.
Likely the Russians will not attempt war of maneuver until things have ground on for quite a while. Current strategy is attrition. They did not want or expect a war of attrition, but are now fighting one. We will likely soon see if NATO has stomach for attrition. NATO has shown surprising acceptance of economic hardship, so far. Winters get cold in Europe, however.
Easy for NATO governments to accept economic hardship; the Greens are all for it and NATO population can’t do anything about economic hardship.
Finding NATO soldiers for a war of attrition is more difficult as very few people volunteer for a war of attrition.
The economic hardship “inflicted†on NATO is exactly what the gaea-worshippers and great reset commies want.
” The Russian soldier is temperamentally unstable; he is carried on by the herd instinct and is therefore not able to endure a sudden change from a triumphant advance to an enforced and precipitate withdrawal. During the counterattack we witnessed scenes of almost unparalleled panic among the Russians, to the astonishment of those who had experienced the stubborn, almost fanatical resistance the Russians put up in well-planned and efficiently organized defenses. It is true that the Russian can be superb in defense and reckless in mass attacks, but when faced by surprise and unforeseen situations he is an easy prey to panic. Field Marshal von Manstein proved in this operation that Russian mass attacks should be met by maneuver and not by rigid defense. The weakness of the Russian lies in his inability to face surprise; there he is most vulnerable. Manstein realized his weakness. He also realized that his own strength lay in the superior training of his junior commanders and their capacity for independent action and leadership. Thus he could afford to let his divisions withdraw for hundreds of miles, and then stage a smashing counterattack with the same divisions, which inflicted heavy blows on their startled and bewildered opponents. ”
https://www.isegoria.net/category/war/panzer-battles/
Everyone needs to go to that link and read the whole page, every entry. Non-negotiable.
Here’s an interview with Scott Ritter. Purportedly, all of his predictions have been dead on. The short and sweet tl;dw is that the offensive is over, the RF gave ground to spare their soldiers, and the meat grinder is going to ramp up yet again.
This fully supports some of my assertions, but we won’t see the full picture for a while, maybe ever. A note on the source: this Judge Napolitano is pretty much a Law & Order conservative, and for this I find him decidedly grating. He does cover interesting topics and has good guests occasionally.
Apologies for samefagging.
>Ritter asserts that the AFU is now a NATO military force, and he says so explicitly.
>Ritter asserts that so long as UKR does anything but capitulate, Putin won’t stop.
>Ritter doesn’t believe the RF will initiate action against NATO nations outside of UKR proper. He says that Putin wants a resumption of the 1997 boundaries, then states that Putin wants NATO infrastructure and troops out of Poland and the Baltics.
>Ritter asserts that the IC in the US is choosing to believe Russia is weaker than it is, and that is affecting their advice and operations. He further states that this is occurring at the upper management layer, and that it is political, not delusional. [here we see Ritter’s normalcy bias showing]
>Ritter predicts collapsing governments and civil unrest due to the support of Ukraine.
>Ritter postulates that the US military industrial complex will be building equipment for Ukraine, as opposed to shipping its reserves and field assets, which is what has been happening up until now.
>Ritter predicts that there won’t be a “Ukraine” by this time next year.
There is a pretty good analysis of the Ukrainian counteroffensive near Kharkov on this new blog here.
https://bigserge.substack.com/p/ukraine-counterattacks
Briefly, there is no operational risk to the Russian war effort in the Ukrainian land from such counteroffensives, but Ukrainian forces can temporarily take towns and kill civilians who had worked with the Russians.
>Ukrainian forces can temporarily take towns and kill civilians who had worked with the Russians
These allegations started making the rounds ~24 hours ago, and footage has begun to leak out. Additionally, there are rumors that at least once, AFU soldiers requested evac due to overwhelming opposition and artillery, gave their coordinates, and then were bombarded by AFU artillery. When this all comes to light, millions of GAE subjects will somehow blame Russia, Trump, or Christianity for the atrocities committed by literal neo-Nazis.
New information might repudiate my previous post. Russia may be directly fighting NATO. This is from a German anon on /pol/ so please take it with a grain of salt.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/394672608/#394674804
Izyum is, according to Big Serge, the key on which it all turns. Take Izyum quickly, they can roll up Russian forces in war of movement. Don’t taky Izyum, they are fighting an attritive battle while stuck in a killing field.
Sources seem to claim Izyum has fallen, posting pictures of a Ukraine flag being raised of it allegedly. Wonder if they’re true or fake images. If true hopefully will be recaptured soon.
If Izyum has fallen, Russia is in deep shit. If it has not fallen, Nato is in deep shit.
Even if they do, their offensive is the same as what ISIS did in Syria and Iraq. They are using IFVs in small squads to lightning into positions held by reservists and guards units, which is then followed up by armored detachments. This type of warfare can consume a desert country remarkably fast, but it is incredibly sensitive to air attacks, and it only gets you a serial node network. Great for propaganda pictures, useless for consolidation and defense. They appear to outnumber RF manpower 3-4 to 1, and it also appears they are taking casualties 5 to 1. This is not the German Army of 1940, it is a NATO army using Daesh tactics.
We can confidently assert that this is a one-off, propaganda offensive if there’s no follow up. We shall see what they do with the expanded salient. Humvees and Buffalos are not going to fare well against massive artillery bombardment. They had 8 years to build the defenses the RF was grinding through all summer. I think this was a massive and costly push to get morale in the GAE up, and to ethnically cleanse traditional Russian speakers for the expected negotiated settlement they think they will be getting in November.
Isn’t that totally delusional on NATO’s part? The reason Putin is reserving strength is because he expects he will need it in the future to fight NATO. Being able to fight NATO forces piecemeal and in a situation optimal for Russia flips the incentives; instead of wanting the end the war as quickly as possible, they want to extend it as long as possible to destroy as much of NATO’s conventional forces as possible.
This is part of the reason I suspect Russia has been dragging it out, NATO depletes their high tech stuff while Russia is just using unlimited shells.
This, and testing tactics and learning how large the gaps are between theory and practice.
Off topic. This mosquito abatement “algorithm” looks pretty shady to me. So let me get this straight. So instead of breeding mutant mosquitoes to diminish, or even EXTINCT (preferable) the wild mosquito population, they’re breeding mutant mosquitoes to make the wild population “human friendly” in the sense that they will no longer spread “dengue and other viruses” because the “new” mosquitoes carry some viral suppression bacteria!!! Sounds like dual use research to me!!!!!
https://twitter.com/cordeliers/status/1567880801924038656
It might also just be plain Gaia demon worship. Pests like coakroaches, bed bugs, and the rest could be easily eliminated if the cathedralites didn’t think of keeping them around as holy (and even eating them in the future to be holy). Here they banned pretty much everything that could be used to kill roaches over bs pretenses when I know in my gut its just gaia demons telling them what to do.