Origins of the white race:

The white race is the youngest and newest of the races, originating about ten thousand years ago.

Blacks are in fact a very diverse set of races, some of them considerably superior to other black races – same skin color, different physical and psychological features.

About sixty or seventy thousand years ago, a very small black tribe or large family with the outward urge characteristic of modern whites left subsaharan Africa, and headed out into Europe, expanded, eventually exterminating previous races in the region. Sea levels were lower then, and they had impressive seagoing ability, they island hopped all the way to Australia, where they failed to exterminate a different race with which they could not interbreed, but replaced them over most of Australia. Small and diminishing populations of older races remained here and there throughout the world.

They were, however, still black. Probably a better quality of black, but still black. Pretty much everyone still around was black or brown.

About twelve thousand years, the climate started getting nicer, and northern Africa, now a desert, became wet. Agriculture started in Northern Africa, consisting of patriarchal groups united by descent in the male line owning property. There was also a people focused on fishing, sea travel, and shellfish gathering, but they disappeared and the survivors were assimilated into the grain farmers when the oceans rose ten thousand years ago. To establish security of property over larger groups, more capable of defending that land, priesthoods developed. These people were brown, dark eyed, and dark haired. More or less the same people as modern middle easterners. In Europe, brown skinned largely blue eyed people, with a various hair colors hunted and gathered.

The middle eastern agriculturists rolled into Europe, displacing, replacing, and exterminating the hunter gatherers.

Inland of Europe, Eastern Europe, the pontic steppes, the hunter gatherers were advancing their technology of clothing, housing, and food storage to deal with very harsh winters. Which means that being nomadic they needed to transport more stuff, which was a problem. They were becoming herders, rather than hunters, and they made their domesticated horses, still too small to carry men, pull wagons, which enabled them to create and keep more stuff.

And in Eastern Europe, the farmers ran into nomadic herders that were too technologically advanced to exterminate and replace. So, to make peace, they traded hostages and women, an event recorded in the Norse legends of the Æsir and the Vanir. These guys were ancestor worshipers, and at least some of the Norse Gods were remembered as originally human ancestors all the way to the beginning of recorded history. The conflict is also remembered as Cain murdering Abel.

The mingled race evolved into whites, among them the Aryan race. The Aryan race, organized patriarchally and aristocratically, equipped with copper weapons and horse drawn chariots, expanded westwards into Europe, killing the men and marrying the women, replacing and mingling with middle eastern grain farmers, and South East into India, where they failed to do such a thorough job of upgrading the locals. The locals in Europe and India had priestly organization, rather than aristocratic. The Aryans in Europe rubbed out that priestly organization, and mostly replaced their demon Gods with the Aryan ancestor Gods. In the middle east, Aryans ruled, but failed to have large biological impact. Nomadic patriarchalists, probably originally Aryan, also worshipped the one God. Hard to know if this was part of the original Aryan faith, or they picked it up somewhere along the way. “The ancient city” plausibly speculates that it was original, and presents suggestive evidence supporting that thesis. Organizing under Kings and priests, the descendants of the Aryans created Bronze Age civilization. In the middle east, failed however to have a very large biological impact, though they ruled the place. In India, the demon gods of the locals survived more successfully, and entered the Aryan religion more extensively.

In Europe and the Middle East, and to a lesser extent India, Bronze Age civilization went decadent, failing to reproduce, with high levels of infanticide, demon worship, and human sacrifice. Without Kings, property rights in land and cattle was only practical under patriarchal organization, but with Kings, emancipation becomes all too possible, and in the latter days of Bronze Age civilization we see Kingship running in the female line, which suggests that the male line had become uncertain. In the collapse of Bronze Age civilization was overrun by peoples who preserved the original precivilized Aryan ways, though some of those peoples may have mingled extensively with lesser races in their travels, perhaps largely as a result of abducting women.

Because of the collapse of trade, they had to use iron, and did not have furnaces hot enough to melt it. So they made bloom iron from very high grade iron ore, which no longer exists anywhere except in very tiny amounts. Bloom iron you have to heat and hammer, and heat and hammer some more, like kneading bread dough, for a very long time before it becomes a useful material. And if you use the kind of iron ore that still exists today, no amount of heating and hammering is going to produce a useful material, because there are too many non metallic impurities in the bloom. To get useful iron from the kind of iron ore that still exists today, have to heat it hot enough for the iron to melt, and thus separate from the non metallic impurities.

Indra is the same ancestor as Zeus, Thor,and Jupiter, whom at least some of the Saga period icelanders recalled as an originally human ancestor living somewhere near the Pontic steppes.

So it is fair to say that the white race started with Thor.

1,861 comments Origins of the white race:

Anon says:

Queen Elizabeth is dead. RIP
king Charles III reign is declared
The wheel of history keep turning..
Is it Charles I reign or Charles II reign?

Cloudswrest says:

There’s no comparison between Charles II and Charles III.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

Complications from stroke and cardiovascular issues.

Sasuga.

Globalist Power Terminated II says:

🤣

Globalist Power Terminated II says:

[*deleted for not being funny*]

jim says:

Stuff with actual entertainment value will be allowed through

Leon says:

How much free testosterone did men used to have a century ago? I just took a free testosterone test and scored 160.8 pg/ ml.

Anonymous Fake says:

[*deleted*]

jim says:

The value of nationalism depends on the value of the nation.

Anonymous Fake says:

[*deleted*]

jim says:

You are as unfamiliar with nationalists and nationalism as you are unfamiliar with conservatives and conservatism. I am not going to allow you to lecture us on your hallucinations on what is outside your bubble.

You passed the Christianity test, and it understandable and forgivable that you are unfamiliar with non converged, non gay, and non demon worshipping Christianity. Not a lot of it around. But there is no excuse for being unfamiliar with conservatives and nationalists. You need to get outside your bubble.

Anonymous Fake says:

18th century nationalism was used to replace kings (those born into power) with politicians (those hungry for power) based on pointless ethnic squabbling. The Church was of course attacked too, for being an institution for those hungry for power yet unable to use it for money or sex. Yes, there was corruption, but it was better than what came after.

19th century nationalism was used to attack Christianity by suppressing Latin and Greek as the universal languages, as well as local traditional dialects and their cultures, with completely artificial languages imposed by government schools.

20th century nationalism gave us every stupid conflict you can imagine, from WWI to Black Panthers to The Troubles. Globalists, either neocons or commies, got away with looking more respectable than they deserved against the nationalist straw men.

Now we have 21st century nationalists, Ukraine’s cannon fodder goyim, fighting for globohomo and their glorious leader Zelensky because the flag and the anthem were shown and played at the right moments to brainwash them. They will readily kill their Russian brothers due to the uncanny valley gap, but will gladly submit to Brussels as long as they get to keep their blue and yellow flag next to the rainbow flag.

Any word that ends in “-ism” is going to end badly except for Catholicism. Nationalism ends unusually badly even by secular standards. It begins badly, too. We don’t need it and allowing the left to use it as a punching bag straw man is not in our interest.

jim says:

Nationalism has been used by leftists against Kings and Empires. And it has been used by Kings and Empires against international leftists.

Right now nationalist leftism is no more, except in the Ukraine. Our enemy is international leftism, the “Global Rules Based Order” (Where they get to decide the rules from moment to moment and not tell anyone what they are)

Contaminated NEET says:

>18th century nationalism was used to replace kings (those born into power) with politicians (those hungry for power) based on pointless ethnic squabbling.

Why and how did nationalism do this replacing? It triumphed because it was better than kings at motivating and organizing huge masses of cannon fodder to fight, exactly “because the flag and the anthem were shown and played at the right moments to brainwash them.” Changes in military and propaganda technology made huge masses of cannon fodder a better bet than small armies of elite warrior-aristocrats motivated by personal loyalty to each other. Until and unless things change, nationalism, for all its flaws, is the best way to win wars. Even the Soviet Union went hard into nationalism when the chips were down and it was either victory or annihilation. You can think you’re better than nationalism, but when you get into a fight with a nationalist neighbor, you can adopt it, or you can perish.

Of course, Jim contends that things have changed, and wave after wave of expendable zerglings is no longer the dominant strategy. We’ll see. There hasn’t been a serious fight between great powers since 1945, and no one can really know until there is.

jim says:

> Changes in military and propaganda technology made huge masses of cannon fodder a better bet than small armies of elite warrior-aristocrats motivated by personal loyalty to each other. Until and unless things change, nationalism, for all its flaws, is the best way to win war

Technological change renders hordes of grunts irrelevant, though neither side in Ukraine has quite figured out the implications and the technology.

If you stuff a horde of grunts into trenches, this enables your people and equipment to move through the territory, and prevents the other side from moving through the territory. That still works. But you lose grunts at an intolerable rate. The Russians are adapting to the new reality faster than the Ukrainians, but everyone is still using equipment, tactics, strategy, and training designed for World War II.

The Bismark was the most formidable battleship ever. It could move faster than any other battleship, and it could sink other battleships at range where they could not fire back, because the Bismark’s guns had longer range. And then some biplanes launched from a small primitive aircraft carrier damaged the rudder so that it could no longer move faster than any other battleship, and a horde of battleships closed on it and sank it.

Not very long thereafter, battleships ceased to be relevant, and sea battles consisted of aircraft carriers sending their planes at each other. We are still in the “sink the Bismark” phase of adapting to technological change in war.

Fidelis says:

Any word that ends in “-ism” is going to end badly except for Catholicism.

jim, I recall how you said the 39 articles came about to combat demon worshippers able to rationalize their worship and pass nicene tests. AF here reeks of the lavender mafia crowd, perhaps you need to revive such.

Kunning Druegger says:

I was just contemplating this. Every time xir posts “we” or “us” my skin crawls.

jim says:

It is absolutely obvious he is not we or us, and the state of the vatican shows that my short demon worshipper test is not bulletproof, though it seems to catch most of them.

I may take to banning any post phrased as “hail fellow X”, when it it competely obvious that the author is not X

The Cominator says:

there was no 18th century nationalism except the natural nationalism of preferring your own, 19th century nationalism was cancer and was the same as the 20th century nationalism which caused the world wars.

jim says:

We have always had natural nationalism, as for example the gens of the Roman Republic.

The founders of Rome traced descent in the male line from Alba, and those that were high ranking by primogeniture became the fathers of the Roman aristocracy, directly related to each other in the male line, grouped by descent in the male line, and with authority within a gens according to primogeniture in the male line. And the horde of random armed refugees that joined up became the ancestors of the plebs. But the plebs, despite their lack of biological connection, seem to have been fiercely patriotic and loyal to Kings who claimed descent in the male line by primogeniture from Romulus, who claimed descent from Alba, albeit Romulus’s claim to primogeniture was doubtless fictional.

The plebs seem to have been unenthused by the Republic, and rather keen on legitimate monarchy. The big point of the Aenid being to give Caesar Augustus fictional legitimacy.

zero says:

All monarchies have some level of myth around them, but why is Romulus connection to Alba likely fake? All the royal families in Europe had likely legitimate descent from both Robert and Charlemagne.

jim says:

Probably descended from Alba, since the group that formed the governing elite in Rome were descended from Alba, (and pretty much everyone in a leadership position in the entire region was descended from Alba) but legitimacy and nobility was by primogeniture. That he was raised by wolves would imply illegitimate.

What was supposed to happen, is that a bunch of albans should have as their leader the man who had descent through the eldest, as in “I am the eldest legitimate son of X, who was the eldest legitimate son of Y, who was the eldest legitimate son of Z, while you are the eldest son of Y’s younger brother, so I am in charge”. That Romulus killed Remus suggests that they were led by the man with the swiftest sword.

A man could have only one wife, but an unlimited number of slave girls and concubines. However, sons by slave girls though they inherited membership of the group and protection by the group, did not inherent status, so the sons by slave girls were always under the authority of the eldest son of the legitimate wife. Sons by concubines were even worse of, not even inheriting membership of the group and protection by the group.

zero says:

That makes a lot of sense. I wonder if raised by wolves is a euphemism for being raised in the trojan war camp before the Sabines, it wasn’t uncommon for the poor to use dogs as nurses. I didn’t consider the lack of primogeniture, but the history of Romulus does have a big old hole there.

Globalist Power Terminated II says:

Wow, really bro? That’s crazy.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

News preacher: ”Far right extremist groups’ like Oathkeepers are full of federal law enforcement; this proves we need to have more feds in them, to keep an eye on all the feds.’

someDude says:

Hahahahaha! We call this an infinite recursion loop. System hangs

Adam says:

Weren’t the 87,000 new IRS agents supposed to be armed or did I imagine that part? Had a normie friend tell me today they weren’t armed and I couldn’t find any credible information.

Anyone have a non-bullshit source of information on this?

S says:

https://stormer-daily.rw/ap-fact-checks-irs-plan-to-kill-you/

Special agents carry guns and can use deadly force. The number the AP gives for the special agent job ad are low, but they also say 87,000 is for hiring for the next decade to replace attrition and retirement.

I’m almost positive that is supposed to be dealt with in the normal budget process so something is off.

Adam says:

Thanks

Kunning Drueger says:

in 2023, the state of Illinois will be drastically changing how bail works. The details I am about to relate are hearsay based on a social media post I overheard, so take with salt and by all means fact check me and correct as needed or desired.

Purportedly, not only will the vast majority of felonious crime be shifted to no cash bail, but further enforcement restrictions will see no removal of trespassers from property by police (offenders will be ticketed) and house arrest and electronically monitored “people” will not be sought after until 48 hours have passed. There are other significant changes as well.

This is insane for many reasons, and the only goal is to weaponize negros against white and law abiding populations. While plains apes will be able to squat literally wherever they want, you can bet your ass the cops will arrest anyone who helps those who fuck around find out. Further still, only conservatives and honest people will abide by court dates and orders, pay bills, respond to summonses, and generally make it trivial for law enforcement to find them and punish them. Consider how few blacks actually pay taxes, obtain and carry documents and identification, or participate in polite society. This is a normalization of the worst aspects of urban shitholes, and it is going to result in the dystopia of Chi-Raq expanding to the borders of the state. I don’t think it will be overnight, but it will happen exponentially, and MSM selective coverage will mean the nation at large will hear about every single instance of a tax-cuck losing their cool, and nothing at all of diversity+proximity results, no matter how often or extreme.

Thinking men and warriors on this blog will be able to quickly deduce ways to take this situation and turn it into an opportunity, so I’m not going to list some of the ideas I already have. But I will go ahead and state that I believe this is directly tied to the shift towards white genocide becoming a physical reality as well as an initiative intended to facilitate a further unveiling of the permanent bureaucracy taking explicit control and dispensing with the democracy charade. The Adversaries are banking on the expectation that sheepdogs will continue to enforce the laws selectively as ordered, and the citizen participators will just go along with it. I believe the 2026 prediction is still on track and useful for planning and countermeasures, but we should also be prepared for a breakneck acceleration from 2023-2026, particularly the final fourth of that span. The elite faction in power must secure their persons and property, so the creation and expansion of private security groups who answer to their clients alone is basically guaranteed.

A2 says:

Steve Bannon just got arrested in NYC for errr newly found charges related to something for which he has already been pardoned. That’s just how NYC works.

https://nypost.com/2022/09/08/steve-bannon-surrenders-to-new-york-prosecutors/

Kunning Druegger says:

It’s being reported that he turned himself in. This ties into my post below, in a way. Conservatives are going to put themselves into the camps if something doesn’t change culturally soon. Remember how many kiwis voluntarily turned in their guns after the Mosque False Flag attack? As I recall, people were making videos, crowing about how proud they were to disarm themselves. I expect the same to happen here, with some conservative Judas Goat like Ben Shapiro leading the charge. I have also seen conservative commentators on YouTube talking about how “no one is above the law” in reference to the Trumped up charges from DOJ regarding the “top secret documents.” Mainstream conservatives seem perfectly comfortable with making sure their own get “justice’d” to the letter while being completely blind to negro and female behavior. It is unbearably frustrating.

Your Uncle Bob says:

Turned himself in, still got handcuffed and perp-walked for the media. That’s not a great sign for the rest of us. An even worse sign is he was one of the few who did get a Trump pardon, out of the many who should have, and it’s not worth anything to the Who?, Whom? crowd.

The police in the video were all middle-aged white men, overweight but with a little muscle underneath, and not too short. That’s a mixed bag in regards to another conversation below, but it’s not the case they’re all midgets and Shaniquas yet.

Dr. Faust says:

All cops are bastards. Don’t care that ACAB is a lefty meme. Conservatards ran that dumb back the blue campaign not realizing that the police do nothing but protect blacks from whites. Without police protection whites would protect themselves.

Kunning Druegger says:

The problem I have with this stance is that the Right is not in a position to be turning folks away I get what you’re saying, and I have written extensively in this specific section about the foolish sheepdog mentality, but it remains plain that we on the Right need them to wake up to what’s happening, not accept that it can’t be any other way. They need to be shamed, not shunned at this point. Down the road, who can say.

jim says:

I, who have the nigh miraculous ability to talk to cops (not recommending that other people try it) have found that not all cops are bastards. Most of them are good people trapped in a horrifyingly evil system.

If the state would let them enforce the law as written, things would be fine.

What I expect of a good cop is not that he will enforce the law as written, but that he will look the other way when I enforce the spirit of Old Testament law. And, what do you know, lots of good cops.

The Cominator says:

Good people don’t volunteer to work in an evil system doing evil things except perhaps if the alternative is starving.

jim says:

It is a high status job with good pay and prospects for dumb people, and normality bias, plus stupidity, makes it hard to perceive the evil until one slowly accommodates to it by small degrees.

As a result of lust and wrath, have committed no end of illegal acts without a stain on my character, and quite rarely had to resort to expensive lawyers. And this is largely a result of good cops quietly evading doing the wrong thing.

Kunning Druegger says:

Com, do you pay your taxes?

clovis says:

Remote passive cooperation in evil, as the Pope says about the
vaccine. That’s what paying taxes is. Being a cop is not so remote or so passive cooperation in evil, but just like a lot of public school teachers got into it with good intentions not knowing what would be required of them, same thing is true of cops. Then you try to tell yourself you’re still doing some good despite all the nonsense because starting your career again in middle age is hard.

Alyosha says:

I am in close contact to a very intelligent military analyst close to Scott Ritter. He knows that Russia has inflicted over 400,000 casualties onto the Ukrainian Military. He also knows that the Ukrainian Army will collapse soon, within 3 weeks, and any alleged gains that they might have made, which are unconfirmed and might not exist at all ie no gains possibly, will be completely reversed and more and only expose Ukrainian soldiers even more and will cause more rapid casualties to Ukrainian soldiers.

Putin will guide us to victory. Z.

jim says:

If they had taken four hundred thousand casualties, would have collapsed already.

It is obvious that they have taken a great many casualties, but that they were able to launch this offensive, indicates fewer than I had thought.

Alyosha says:

Perhaps. All correct maybe. But even the more conservatively estimating Scott Ritter himself I think estimated that Ukraine has suffered over 250,000 casualties, and that was many weeks ago if I remember right. So I could believe his friends estimate that weeks later it’s risen all the more higher and greater.

Karl says:

“Casualties” sometimes includes wounded. One soldier who is wounded and later recovers might can be counted as a casualty although he is fighting again.

Kunning Drueger says:

A casualty is any soldier or force member or operation participant who is rendered combat incapable. A guy who gets obliterated, a guy who gets shot and killed, a guy who gets wounded and sent rearward, a guy who gets unmanned and is sent rearward, a guy whose vehicle gets damaged and he is no longer able to move with his unit, a guy who gets captured, a guy whose unit is unable to hold or move to a position due to infrastructure damage or battlefield conditions; these can all be casualties. If some badass takes 3 hits to the plate and loses a few fingers, but refuses to be taken from his position, he is not a casualty, just as some reddit battalion pussy suddenly realizes parity in warfare is not a lived experience he wishes to entertain and therefore flees is a casualty.

if a whole platoon retreats after losing a single guy, they can be counted as casualties. If an officer fails to check in with a status update, he and his men can be counted as casualties. When counting enemy dead, each documented body part can be counted as an individual casualty. The first thing any serious warfare historian, armchair or otherwise, learns to do is disregard “casualties” as a meaningful term. Must official casualty reports have a section wherein the describe what they consider a casualty and a table or index with a terminological breakdown. Some countries over count both their own and the enemy, others just their own or just the enemy. Media entities inflate and deflate counts at their whim. Generals inflate when they require resupply and deflate when they need job security. Casualty reports are more often noise than signal and have to be interpreted carefully.

Alyosha says:

Of course I admit it’s also possible that Ritter’s colleague has overestimated the casaulties and Russian successes and it might even be possible that Scott Ritter has overestimated the casaulties and Russian successes. But also possible that maybe they’re right and have been right.

ArkyShrugger says:

Ritter told Judge Napolitano that Ukraine has lost 60% of its officer corps, and has an army of 700K. Sixty percent of 700K is just over 400K. Maybe someone misheard Ritter and did some math, and came up with Ukraine losses of 400K.

Anonymous Fake says:

[*deleted for disconnection to reality*]

jim says:

I am not at all sure what the Ukrainian situation is, but I know what it is not.

Anonymous Fake says:

Look just being able to draft at all with a 1.2 fertility rate is proof of what I’m saying being true. Moribund nations that aren’t dead yet can temporarily create shockingly huge armies because any coup capable leader who could overthrow a tyrant and his draft has already left.

Russia has been wrestling with an implausibly massive opponent that regenerates its military losses absurdly easily, despite falling apart in every other way. It’s doing as much damage as it can to Russia with its dying momentum.

Motivation can create a huge army, and so can a robust population growth, but what we see now is that an extremely low fertility rate can too.

jim says:

I don’t think anyone doubts that you can put together a huge army by conscripting everyone and shooting deserters. And this true, uncontroversial, and boring fact is a horse pulling a wagonload of lies. Which I am going to go right on deleting rather than debating, because debating unresponsive shills wastes far too much space.

Severian says:

Russians abandon izyum completly. lyman under attack and will probably be abandoned soon. Russian command ostencibly doesn’t want to fight a battle with reinforcements arriving by piecemeal. the whole front must have been seriously undermanned.

Only saving grace is they haven’t lost many men by retreating.

Severian says:

In fact as Lyman is abandoned the retreats will probably continue further as it’s an important linchpin in the North of Donbas.
My guess is the decision was taken by the Kremlin overnight and we’re just seeing the unfolding of a large retreat operation to ths Kharkiv region. Basically Kiev lite.

What comes next?

spit roast beef says:

What comes next?

Nukes.

Globalist Power Terminated II says:

😀

Praise Gnon!

S says:

The Russians retreat, form a new line and resume pounding Ukrainian positions with artillery until Ukraine runs out of men. The center of gravity in war is the army.

The only way the NATO advance changes the game is if they manage to break the Russians ability to wage war. This requires a breakthrough into the Russian rear. The speed and depth of the advance is not fast enough to pull that off. Alternatively the Russians aren’t able to reform a line, but I find that unlikely.

To change the course of the war there needs to be a realization, a way to fix things and implementation. It isn’t clear NATO is capable of even the first step given they’ve waited this long expecting Ukraine to produce an offense on their own.

Severian says:

Lyman is being defended and they should be able to hold the Oskil river. So that’s probably going to be the new frontline.

Kunning Druegger says:

Unless NATO is willing to go full bore, the Hohols will not be able to hold a line like that. I have seen further corroboration of JJ’s assertion that many more NATO units are being moved into or toward the conflict, but in my estimation they waited too long; popular sentiment is shifting. Articles starting to appear about how “revolting and disliked” the Ruthenian refugees are. The young men who didn’t stay and fight are starting to show their colors, and there are only so many swastikas that can be tolerated by effeminate Europe before they become cross. I think we will see the biggest changes in Germany first, but I don’t think it will stay contained there. Italians seem to be very tired of bankrolling Zelensky and dealing with the refugees. Spain has already started to resist paying up for Zelensky. I cannot substantiate this, but I am fairly certain France is already coordinating with Putin. Turkey and France are the indicators here; they retain enough sovereignty, for various reasons, to pivot away from the GAE bloc position that has thus far dominated EU politics and response to the SMO, and they stand to gain the most if/when the NATO consensus falls apart. The Baltics will probably be the next conflict area, and it will probably begin once footage and reports of Russian speakers and “””collaborators””” being slaughtered in the reclaimed zones starts to pour out. It’s kind of hilarious, in a sick and twisted way, how the Banderists seem to be ready, willing, and able to make the same mistake the Nazis did; instead of focusing on the war at hand, they will begin slaughtering their version of the Jews, that being Russians and Russian speakers. The question in my mind is, will the NATO forces on the ground collaborate, ignore, or forestall the ethnic cleansing? The precedent is mixed, if we look at the Balkans.

Karl says:

Maybe the mood in Germany will be shifting regarding sanctions, but not regarding Ruthenian refugees. Those on the right see them as deserters and draft dodgers, which is considered much better and more honorable than fighting against Russians. Those on the left never say anything against any refugees.

Globalist Power Terminated II says:

What comes next?

I dunno, someone once said that u should be expecting the unexpected or something like that.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

Defense in depth is a matter of course for a historically fluent commander.

The surest means of knowing where the enemy’s forces are attacking in strength is to ‘feel’ them moving through successive screens of picket lines, which you then flank with sickle cuts of mobile reserves. Such is basic doctrine for the Russian army.

Mister Grumpus says:

This is interesting and very Jimmy when read from the right angle:

Big city hedge fund zillionaires, trying to prep for “the event”, are being forced to rediscover Throne, Altar and Freehold:

“Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system, and asked: ‘How do I maintain authority over my security force after the event?'”

In the Guardian no less.

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2022/sep/04/super-rich-prepper-bunkers-apocalypse-survival-richest-rushkoff

Fake says:

Heck, I would love a “How to become a local warlord” guide with steps for establishing patriarchy for your men and perhaps denying it to your enemies. How to install and “motivate” a pastor to preach trad, jimian Christianity to your group. How to tell your men, “She’s your property to do with as you please. Just remember your Christian duty and don’t bother other men’s property” so they can sire-all-the-children without worrying about her running off or attracting White knights. . How to create the customs of marrying your daughters off before they’re X age or treating a man as alpha while in his house or dueling to maintain honor.

I bet that community would dominate its neighbors like Genghis Kahn’s did and spread to both the oceans in two generations.

Starman says:

@Mister Grumpus quotes from the link:

“Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system, and asked: ‘How do I maintain authority over my security force after the event?’”

That merchant will have to learn how to be a warrior. First step, be loyal to your men who are loyal to you. Do what Julius Caesar did at Alesia, not what Trump did on Jan 6th.

Jehu says:

His problem honestly isn’t that hard, because he can use solutions that don’t scale.

There exist a fair number of warrior types that effectively have the code of honor: stays bought. As long as you treat them decently, and in particular, treat their families decently, they’ll let you call the shots for at least a generation. They can at least fake gratitude for that long. What you want are the ones that aren’t exactly neurotypical but who can fake it well enough to have decent looking wives and families. If your connections are something like the CEO mentioned, you just comb through your security force that you already have for your business and find candidates. You don’t need very many if your objective is just to protect your haven, so you can choose the easier psychological profiles.

zero says:

It’s fascinating how few people understand the scope of the cathedral, this dumb Marxist thinks Zuckerberg is going to what? Stop the implosion of the American economy by just like, being a good guy maaaan. If she truly sat down with billionaires asking questions like that its another tally for Jim’s proposition that the “elite” really are that dumb.

S says:

I suspect she is making parts of the story up. While possible, I don’t expect rich people people to do interviews where they talk about how they are trying to figure out how to screw over employees their lives will depend upon.

zero says:

I agree, but this whole European policy of freezing their own subjects to death has me reassessing my assumptions of just how stupid and incompetent people at the top can be. I would expect bezos to know how to handle a security detail but I’m not sure some corrupt party capitalist might not actually be that nuts. Either way it’s always informative to read what the commies are writing, they have so many insane presumptions about the world it’s easy to find out what their religion is

Javier says:

I think I remember this guy. I read an article like this years ago where a tech dude talked to rich people about “the event.”

the stupidity of it all is that the event is obviously going to be wide scale economic collapse due to worthless currency, and without money the western elite loses everything. it won’t be global either, China will likely survive just fine. the rich hidey holes will become very expensive graves for the roaming morlock hordes and eventual caesar

Kunning Druegger says:

This is warriors + priests as it should be:

https://t.me/asbmil/4981

The GAE has no equivalent.

Kunning Druegger says:

St. Anglin has been down for ~3 days now. Does someone have a link to the new domain, or is he dark completely?

S says:

Works on my end
https://stormer-daily.rw/

Kunning Druegger says:

Weird…

https://www.isitdownrightnow.com/stormer-daily.rw.html

Says it’s been down for 3 days…

Leon says:

The link will not load for me either.

The Cominator says:

wouldn’t for me.

Starman says:

Daily Stormer is working fine for me.

Cloudswrest says:

Me too.

Cloudswrest says:

Last night,YES
This morning, No

jim says:

Works for me. I am, of course accessing it through an overseas vpn

If you cannot see it, likely blocked by your nameservers and/or your ISP.

To fix the ISP problem, use a VPN. If it is your own vpn, point Bind9’s nameservers to yandex. If it is someone else’s vpn, you should be using their nameserver (check with https://www.dnsleaktest.com) and you have no way of finding out (and should not have any way of finding out) what nameserver their nameserver is using. If they will not let you see daily stormer, your vpn is in the enemy camp, and you need a new vpn.

Possibly your ISP is fine, but you are using evil nameservers. Use Yandex nameservers.

cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 2a02:6b8::feed:0ff
nameserver 2a02:6b8:0:1::feed:0ff
nameserver 77.88.8.8
nameserver 77.88.8.1

S says:

Update- now it doesn’t work. Worked earlier today.

S says:

And back again.

jim says:

After fixing the problem with your ISP, nameserver, or vpn, report on who was stopping you from accessing thought crimes on the internet.

We need an enemies list.

Daily Stormer is fine. You are blocked by your ISP, DNS, or VPN.

Aidan says:

ISP blocked for me

Mike in Boston says:

Daily Stormer is fine. You are blocked by your ISP, DNS, or VPN.

Querying http://www.daily-stormer.rw on a nameserver from a U.S. consumer ISP returns A records for 200 IP addresses, all in the 23.163.176,xxx subnet. Nameservers provided by a European ISP give me the same set of A records.

Trying to connect from that U.S. ISP, all those addresses time out:

$ curl -vvv http://www.stormer-daily.rw/
* About to connect() to http://www.stormer-daily.rw port 80 (#0)
* Trying 23.163.176.207… Timeout
* Trying 23.163.176.139… Timeout
[etc.]

Trying to connect from a European data center gets me an nginx temporary redirect to an error page:

* About to connect() to http://www.stormer-daily.rw port 80 (#0)
* Trying 23.163.176.182…
* Connected to http://www.stormer-daily.rw (23.163.176.182) port 80 (#0)
> GET / HTTP/1.1
> User-Agent: curl/7.29.0
> Host: http://www.stormer-daily.rw
> Accept: */*
>
< HTTP/1.1 307 Temporary Redirect
< Server: nginx
< Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 03:40:26 GMT
< Content-Type: text/html
< Content-Length: 164
< Connection: keep-alive
< Location: https://vanwa.tech/hostname-not-found.html
< alt-svc: h3-23=":443"; ma=86400

A traceroute from the U.S. gets to London before timing out. A traceroute from Europe gets me to Hurricane Electric in the U.S. before timing out.

Could be routing weirdness, could be consequences of an attack on VanWaNet, which is much maligned by Globohomo this week for daring to do business with thought criminals.

jim says:

You should be OK with a vpn outside of Europe or the US. If you are not OK, you know who your enemies are.

That this policy was put in place uniformly delineates the extent of empire.

I always lease servers in places less likely to be compliant with the Global American Empire, but I don’t want to say what those places are.

A2 says:

DS currently not reachable through various european VPN locations but choosing one outside Europe worked for me.

jim says:

I would guess the vpns are not receiving directions. If, however, your vpn location is giving you an IP that is firewalled from daily stormer, you will not be able to get through, and it will not be the vpn’s fault. The same vpn service, giving you an IP in a different location, will likely work fine.

The correct IP is:
ping stormer-daily.rw
Pinging stormer-daily.rw [23.163.176.88] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 23.163.176.88: bytes=32 time=348ms TTL=54
Ping statistics for 23.163.176.88:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss)

Looks like nameservice is generally not blocking them. Rather, routing on the internet is blocking them.

Leon says:

I turned off my wifi and was able to access the site. I have tried to access it wifi from multiple locations and been unable to. It must be the wifi provider.

jim says:

The network is provided by multiple levels of ISP and DNS. Your DNS has a DNS and your ISP has an ISP.

To figure out who is blocking you, use ping and traceroute. If DNS related, DIG, to find the DNS that your DNS is using.

Dr. Faust says:

“STEVE BANNON BOMBSHELL: The FBI Conducted 35 Raids Targeting Trump Supporters”

https://rumble.com/v1jeelh-steve-bannon-bombshell-the-fbi-conducted-35-raids-targeting-trump-supporter.html

Guy says:

that puts the fake raid on McInnes in a different perspective. something might be up with that

Wulfgar Thundercock III says:

Maybe McInnes got the Pooch treatment.

Globalist Power Terminated II says:

Could be the case that he was compromised from the get-go, but who knows?

Globalist Power Terminated II says:

For sure.

TheDividualist says:

Hello Jim!

>They were becoming herders, rather than hunters

Nope, sorry, the 10000 Years Old Explosion book was clear on this: farming came first, as without the lactase mutation using land for herding was less efficient than farming. With the lactase mutation, dairy produced 4x as much calories as meat, so it was efficient. Also, taking other people’s livestock is a whole lot easier than taking grain, so it made more sense to wage wars with neighbors. All these wars for milch cows made our ancestors winners.

Lactase made us winners as it turned us into cattle rustlers so there was a lot of genetic selection for winning small wars.

(That continued into recorded history. The Pale in Ireland was not supposed to stop armies. It was supposed to make it difficult to drive cattle over it.)

Especially when they invented the chariot, that is when they really won, the combination of long-range shooting and mobility, shoot-and-scoot.

My favourite mystery is who the hell are the ancestors of Hungarians. Usually, unless they have a huge number of people, conquerors took the language of the conquered. Think France. And Normanns, twice.

Was there a Finno-Ugric, Uralic speaking population living in the Carphatian Basin? The chronicles are silent on this… everything else about Hungarians is Turkic, the old graveyards look exactly like the ones in Kyrgyzistan.

Your Uncle Bob says:

Agriculture of plants goes way back, yes. Herding of horses came later but arose independently, the pipeline was hunting to herding to riding, in a non-farming population. From bones left, horse meat was vitally important for a long period, overlapping with when we started using them to ride and pull wagons.

Cattle herding goes back farther (but somewhere else, the first horse hunters were hunter-gatherers), and this story I’m fuzzy on but it most likely arose independently as well before later being combined into a package with farmer-only communities. That’s a trend in general, two different communities might have different domesticated plants, or one has plants and one has an animal, and when one small community somewhere put them together into a package they were the ones who took off and expanded, genetically and spatially.

Also, my favorite minor point, lactose tolerance can’t have taken off until after we were already consuming dairy in some form. If one person got the mutation in a population not using dairy, how would they ever know, and what reproductive advantage would they have? It was likely yogurt and khefir rather than raw milk at first, but it took a dairy-consuming herding population for it to take off.

jim says:

Yes. You don’t get lactose tolerance until you have been pastoralists for centuries. Herding first, lactose tolerance later. Gregory Cochran lies on this issue, because he lies on Aryan conquest.

Cloudswrest says:

It would seem obvious to me that, without competition for land, herding is MUCH easier than agriculture. Herding converts grass into food, and on the steppes and great planes there’s infinite grass. And for 18th-19th century great plains, infinite buffalo. Just keep them corralled within a manageable area. Maybe domesticate some for dairy.

jim says:

Because of the harsh environment of the Pontic steppes (hard to survive over winter without stores and equipment) not much competition for land.

EH says:

It’s “Pontic steppe” not “Pontiac steppes”. (Same error is in article.) There are other steppe regions but each one is generally referred to in the singular, though usage differs. But definitely not “Pontiac”, which is a car named after an Indian chief / town in Michigan.

“Pontic” is from the Greek “pontus”, meaning “sea”, specifically the Black Sea, which is immediately to the south of the Pontic steppe.

jim says:

Thanks

jim says:

> > They were becoming herders, rather than hunters

> Nope, sorry, the 10000 Years Old Explosion book was clear on this: farming came first, as without the lactase mutation using land for herding was less efficient than farming.

Gregory Cochran is too politically correct to give an accurate account of recent human evolution, because the truth is mighty racist.

The truth is Aryan conquest, and he does not want to say that.

TheDividualist says:

I think what Biden and Trump recently said really sped up the countdown to civil war, it might happen before the Biden “administration”, LOL, ends, what do you think, Jim?

Prediction: NOT a race war. Religious holy war.

Those are nasty….

Red says:

2026 still looks like it’s on track. Biden’s probably going to be reinstalled as president in 2024.

Anon says:

Seems pretty conclusive that Izyum has fallen at this point, unless both Russians and Ukranians have been lying/ not telling the truth the past 2 days and been reporting its false fall. Unsettling news given what Big Serge has said about how crucial it is to both sides that they have it/ how its the pivot point to who will be winning bigly this phase.

Red says:

Putin continues to prove to be a weak leader. If you’re going to war then you should really go to war. No half measures. Defending a critical area with limited troops because Putin wanted to keep the number of troops small is just asking to be sucker punched.

Wulfgar Thundercock III says:

From what I am hearing, it was American/NATO troops that spearheaded the push. Without them, the Russians probably could have held and punished the Ukranians even more. This is a movement of desperation, and the Russians probably were not expecting to have to fight American and NATO units. Putin has to hold back so that he has his army in reserve. Victory typically goes to the commander who can hold his reserves the longest, and the GAE just committed theirs.

Red says:

The problem was the lack of reserves in the Izyum area. Russia rushed them in but they were too far away to arrive in time.

This is just the start of NATO units in the Ukraine. Now that it worked they’ll flood the war zone with them. Weakness triggers ever greater escalation.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

Well, to coin a phrase, them and what army?

Red says:

Any capable NATO units. Then when those units start getting taken apart they’ll escalate again safe in the belief that Putin is too much of a weakling to respond back in kind.

Wulfgar Thundercock III says:

What NATO country has the stomach to take IEW casualties in this day and age? They are already facing a recruiting problem. Once hundreds of NATO boys and girls start coming back in body bags or missing a limb or three, that will only get worse.

Red says:

First the most effective units will be the sort of men the cathedral would love to see dead. See WW1 France for a prime example of this behavior by leftist governments.

Second, when NATO units get destroyed they’ll escalate again eventually landing us at WMD sorts of weapons. If the NATO units had gotten their shit pushed in that might have been the end of the escalation cycle. Weakness begats escalation.

S says:

What ‘WMD sort of weapons’? Short of nuclear weapons, no one gives a shit and they would already be using them.

And if NATO got their shit kicked in, they might have panicked and escalated to prevent from losing because they are unable to admit defeat getting us escalation anyway. Remember NATO units being deployed was an escalation because the Russians shut down the Ukrainian ability to conduct offenses.

Kunning Druegger says:

I think Putin is very hesitant to go up against actual NATO units because he doesn’t feel ready yet. I don’t think it is cowardice, necessarily, but failure to take a plunge can always seem cowardly, and later on, even if it wasn’t (like in 2014 not hitting the AFU; if they had, it would have been the walk-over they expected back in February, but hindsight is 20/20), it is remembered as such.

I believe the lack of readiness is due to his tendency to pursue autarky and multi-polar paradigm. The yellow Chinese are probably the worst ally to have, as they aren’t known for loyalty or determination outside of their Middle Kingdom clay. Chinamen can slaughter chinamen perpetually, but they don’t have a great record going up against others.

Honestly, can anyone here outline a situation wherein NATO would back down? They are building a highway to h*ck with no off-ramps. they want whites and the based of the earth to die so that they can curate a menagerie of drugged out, dependent, room temp IQ proles. So they will throw manly men on the pyre, particularly since these guys seem perfectly willing to do it. And, as their forces get annihilated, they will escalate to the biggest weapons that they can, up to detonating a dirty bomb or worse in Kiev or something. After normie America has swallowed every silly big lie up to this point, why would they think they couldn’t sell that one?

Russia is trying to color within the lines. They seem to believe that if they follow the rules crafted by the NWO, they can shame the adversary into doing the same. It is stunningly, and depressingly, similar to the way law & order conservatives think they can vote harder or constitution better. We always look at the Cathedral Faithful as the greatest asset on their side, the thought leaders and icons that demonstrate the proper holiness dances for people to mimic to have goodness and equality rain down from the skies, but their greatest asset is populations, foreign and domestic, that actually believe in a Rules based Order. Fucking rubes.

S says:

“Honestly, can anyone here outline a situation wherein NATO would back down?”

The same thing that caused Fauci to back down.

“And, as their forces get annihilated, they will escalate to the biggest weapons that they can, up to detonating a dirty bomb or worse in Kiev or something. After normie America has swallowed every silly big lie up to this point, why would they think they couldn’t sell that one?”

Russia has more tactical nuclear weapons. The Russians aren’t going to back down from a nuclear attack so attempting it will kick of WW3.

“Russia is trying to color within the lines.”

It is working for them. Europe is in the midst of an economic collapse, Russia is managing to take on all of NATO on peacetime footing, the price of their exports are going up and the military is getting better at killing.

Stalling for time benefits the Russians because the US is disintegrating faster than them.

Red says:

“Honestly, can anyone here outline a situation wherein NATO would back down?”

The same thing that caused Fauci to back down.

Fauci backed down because the Cathedral humiliated him by cutting off his access to TV interviews.

Russia has more tactical nuclear weapons. The Russians aren’t going to back down from a nuclear attack so attempting it will kick of WW3.

Hitler thought he could gobble up Poland just like he’d gobbled up Austria and Czechoslovakia without France and the UK declaring war on him. Hitler was shocked when they declared war over Poland.

Weakness begats escalation until a war that no one wants happens. Cathderal shills scream that Nuclear war won’t happen because Russia doesn’t have the balls for it. The people warning the Ukraine could lead to nuclear war have mostly shut up because Russia fails to respond to NATO’s provocations.

The shills continue to be right about Russia willingness to retaliate. They’ll be right up until the moment the nukes fly on the path we’re on.

“Russia is trying to color within the lines.”

It is working for them. Europe is in the midst of an economic collapse, Russia is managing to take on all of NATO on peacetime footing, the price of their exports are going up and the military is getting better at killing.

Stalling for time benefits the Russians because the US is disintegrating faster than them.

When stalling for time best not to let the other guy sucker punch you, drag down your pants and fart in your face like NATO’s just did.

S says:

That is the optimal situation for Russia. Fighting NATO in a place where Russia has massive artillery superiority, short supply lines, strong air defenses and a limited front means they can inflict lopsided casualty ratios and bleed NATO dry.

Killing Ukrainian conscripts just ticks down the clock until Ukraine runs out of men. Killing NATO soldiers improves Russia’s position relative to NATO.

Pseudo-Chrysostom says:

One shouldn’t get too caught up in daily vicissitudes that they lose sight of the broader trends in longer time horizons.

Premade highways are very convenient, but the one thing that’s missing from all these discussions is how even huge territorial gains would substantially alter the ultimate strategic balance at play here. You could cover hundreds of miles of ground, and lose, because you were heedlessly throwing your forces into meatgrinders, and you lacked the capacity to sustain such efforts in the first place; at the end of the day, the correlation of forces were simply not pattered in your favor.

Movements into occupied positions are, as a general rule, costly, for some obvious reasons. Hence, there are generally only three things that make assaults pay off; routs, encirclements, and access to strategic targets the enemy cannot afford to lose.

Per late cold war Russian doctrine, the ‘front lines’ consisted mostly of lightly manned picket and reconnaissance units directing fire support onto enemy targets, while larger forces elastically redeploy in response to enemy movements; by all indications the bulk of forces either withdrew in good order or were operationally deep in the first place, mass routing or encirclement is not on the table. And unless the puppet regime can strike all the way to Stalingrad, they aren’t threatening Russian oil refineries, shipping ports, truck factories, or other critical infrastructure either. So you are ultimately left with a situation where the occupational forces have stuck their shiniest dick into a blender with little to no real pay off.

On the other hand, the question of how the GAE can sustain its war effort is very much an open one. Tactically and operationally, they have yet to evince good solutions to the Russian’s reconnaissance-strike complex – who have evidently subscribed to the old Amerikaner precis that it is a lot cheaper to trade the steel in an artillery shell for the iron in a soldier’s blood – which has been chewing their own efforts to mulch. Neither side looks like they have figured everything out, but the important thing for the results of this conflict is that the RF are doing it better than the rest.

And on the more strategic level, the bureaucratization of all levels of occidental society has rendered the GAE a fair-weather friend at best. Its days of being the arsenal of communism are generations past. It is simply not capable of fighting a peer in an industrial conflict anymore. A number of rocket artillery trucks that you could count on your fingers is the literal best it can do. The AFU could move over Izyum; they could move over Luhansk; they could move over the whole Donbass; but all that has been accomplished is buying a few weeks of celebratory preaching in return for a hastening of the end.

Calvin says:

For the record, Jim, this is the sort of behavior I was describing earlier in microcosm: https://twitter.com/FridaGhitis/status/1573098613089374208

Iranian man slaps a bitch (presumably someone else’s) for something or the other, half a dozen other men beat him up and pin him against a car. Genes for touching someone else’s woman do not seem advantageous in this sort of environment – he certainly didn’t come off as the alpha. But all the other men acquired alpha cred in the act.

Kunning Druegger says:

What a bunch of whiteknight faggots.

Cloudswrest says:

Robert Zepehr has a new video out where he argues the *recent* Out of Africa theory is untenable. African populations have double digit introgression of an extremely archaic “ghost” population, probably homo erectus, that is not present is non-African populations. It may even be the case the gene flow was in the opposite direction. Cro-Magnons migrated into Africa, bred with homo erectus (pre-dating breeding with Neanderthals), creating modern negros.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lABvt4l0S3Y

As an aside, it would be an interesting (mad scientist) experiment to try to distill, as much as possible, an individual from the ghost population, by selective cross breeding of Africans.

jim says:

The latter is the only thing that makes sense, and the higher African races have legends of such a migration.

Rumbauer says:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *