Covid 19 and the faith

The posters glow in the dark – they are FBI and/or CIA employees. Therefore, anything they say about the the three letter agencies most likely the opposite of the truth, and anything they say about us, or rather imply and presuppose about us, while pretending to be one of us, we can easily see is the opposite of the truth.

What we believe implies that female misconduct is a major, indeed the major, obstacle to sex, reproduction, and family. Your paraphrase of our beliefs is our beliefs paraphrased to as to imply no moral criticism of female conduct, that only the sexual behavior characteristic of males is can be sinful, and that women who behave sexually in the way characteristic of females are little angels.

Your version of our beliefs was reasonably accurate – except that not only did you commit no thought crime, you failed to notice our thought crime – that we say that female sexual behaviour is different from that of men, and that unless restrained by male authority, female sexual behavior is very wicked behaviour.

Your rendition of our beliefs is accurate, except upside down. You represent hypergamy as a male quality, rather than distruptive female conduct.

It is not a thought crime because denying women agency is absolutely standard progressivism. If women do bad things that have bad results for themselves and everyone around them, it is supposedly some man’s fault and men must be punished.

But the problem with the material that I silenced was not that you failed to commit a thought crime. The problem was that you told us what we think. And that is not what we think and not a thought crime either.

I am not going to allow enemy shills to show up and say “hail fellow reactionary, we all agree on …”

Their ultimate goals are incoherent, mutually contradictory, and conflicting, being not only too evil to reveal to us, but too evil to reveal to each other, and too evil to be fully recognized and clearly thought about by themselves even individually.

The Khmer Rouge was run by very smart men, but their plans were doomed to fail because detached from reality.

Our elite is composed of stupid men, for example Obama and Hillary, and they are even more detached from reality.

Completely obvious. It was Obama and Hillary that launched and ran Arab spring, Obama that weaponized the spy apparatus, Obama and Hillary that purged the army leadership.

If you look at events in Syria and Libya, Soros was a minion, who was brushed aside when the time for shooting came. Fifth Generation warfare, first applied in Afghanistan and Arab Spring, is not a Jewish concept, it is a post protestant concept. The people running stuff are not Jewish, the ideological rationales are not Jewish. Soros is a minion, and the Rothschilds have been out of power for near a century.

You make a reasonable argument that deserves response. But then you tell me what I think, what we think. It is not what we think, and explaining yet again to those that will not listen what I think, what the Dark Enlightenment thinks, what neoreaction thinks, is a waste of bandwidth.

I am not going to debate with people who find the position of the right so unthinkable that they will not think that anyone thinks it. I am not going to entertain critiques of our position that refuse to notice what our position is, for such debates go nowhere.

I have issued no end of posts explaining my beliefs and our beliefs, and no end of comments responding to people misrepresenting and misunderstanding our beliefs, and the latter gets tiresome because they sail right on continuing to misunderstand and misrepresent our beliefs and my beliefs.

Is Obama the secret King? Sort of, but only so long as he continues to give effect to the leftmost belief system, for our enemy’s cohesion rests not on loyalty and obedience to a man, but to a faith. No man rules alone, so asking who the secret kings are is the wrong question, because it presupposes that our enemies’ cohesion relies on subordination to a super powerful secret King. Their coordination does indeed rely on a very small number of people, the equivalent of the invisible central authority that Winston Smith received directives from in 1984, but those coordinating rely on shared loyalty to a faith, not shared loyalty to themselves. Their cohesion comes from a broadly shared faith, a faith whose center is Harvard. The US government is not run directly by Harvard. It is, however, run by the faithful of the faith of Harvard, and if the CEO should deviate from that faith, as for example Trump in the presidency or Musk in twitter, stuff stops working.

Yoel was a Jewish pederast who ran twitter censorship. And twitter censorship was identical to censorship everywhere because he, like Soros, is a mere minion who does what he is told. And Musk released the emails revealing him to be a mere minion who does what he is told. The orders come from the TLAs, and the revolutionary purge and redirection of the TLAs was done by Obama. So in this sense, Obama is the secret King. But Obama could only do this because giving effect to the faith of Harvard, and had he tried to do something different, would have met the fate of Trump or JFK.

Yoel was a Jewish pederast who supposedly ran twitter censorship. Therefore, you say, Jews rule the world. Except that it is perfectly clear that he did not run twitter censorship.

And now you will completely ignore everything I just said and just explained. And I will go right back to censoring you instead of debating you.

> but the supposed sudden transition from hyper-Puritan Christianity to anti-Christian demon worship

Nothing sudden about it. The process has been running for centuries – most religions subject to a holiness spiral transition to demon worship a whole lot faster. Harvard Christianity became non Christian, then anti Christian in a vast number of tiny steps.

Each small step along the way was arguably reasonable.

Thus the protestants complained about additions to Christianity by the papacy. And got money and power by so doing. So the Puritans, being more protestant than the protestants, found even more additions to complain about. They argued that marriage was not a sacrament, noticing that the Christian marriage ceremony was swiped wholesale from the highest status and most durable Roman marriage ceremony, plus a Christian priest reading the relevant scriptures.

So the Puritans in New England, those dour people with the funny hats and a tendency to execute witches, had secular marriage by the magistrate, and only secular marriage.

And, being secular, was a contract, not a sacrament. Thus “I do” instead of “with this ring I thee wed”. And, being secular, all those terribly-oppressive-to-women verses from the bible got left out. And being a contract, no divine mandate for it to be fundamentally unequal, and compulsory if a woman got nailed.

Holiness spiral on that for a few generations and you have a gay marriage celebrated with giant black dildoes.

And then there was Saturnalia/Christmas.

Those witch hunting Puritans with their funny hats were apt to confiscate your Christmas goose and put you in the stocks if you celebrated Christmas, arguing, quite plausibly, that Christmas was a pagan addition. And today, if you are in Global American Empire country, you cannot buy Christmas wrapping paper that references Christian symbolism.

> Normally history, and nature, function like a swinging pendulum,

Not seeing this pendulum. History is more like a cars being driven over a cliff. After falling three hundred feet onto jagged rocks, they don’t go into reverse and start climbing back up the cliff, but continue over the jagged rocks in small pieces. Most civilizations, empires, races, nations, cultures eventually crash and burn, vanishing utterly.

Trees grow till they fall over. They do not grow then shrink again. Religions tend to turn to demon worship, and then devour their own people. They do not turn to demon worship, then turn back again to God. They self destruct in unbearable evil.

A few centuries after the fall of Assyria, Xenophon saw the empty ruins of their capital. He asked the locals who had lived there. The locals did not recall.

History does not look like a pendulum. It looks like a car being driven at high speed along a narrow track on the side of a mountain. Once the car goes off the road, it rapidly goes further and further off the road, faster and faster.

> do you have examples of elements of Christianity that survived the spiral and that the Cathedral still advocates for?

Christianity, Christian tradition, and the New Testament gently discourages slavery. For example the New testament forbids Christians from slave trading (without forbidding Christians from buying slaves from Jews). So when Harvard sponsored terrorism against the Southern States and worked to create civil war they were holier than Jesus. So, holier than Jesus in 1860, and holier than God in 1950
Their current position on affirmative action and all that is descended by holiness spiraling in very small steps from their 1850 position on slavery, which is descended by holiness spiraling in very small steps from the traditional and genuinely Christian position of moderately discouraging slavery. There is no Jewish equivalent.

This was debated at the time, and during the whole transition from Puritanism to demon worship by small degrees both sides of the debate claimed to be Christian up to around 1950 or so, when the claim of Harvard to be Christian became increasingly unbelievable and disbelieved, and was eventually quietly abandoned.

Affirmative action is a holiness spiral on a genuinely Christian position, and the abolition of marriage, fatherhood, and family a holiness spiral on “purifying Christianity from pagan additions” – they decided that marriage was not a sacrament, and desacralizing marriage rapidly led to desecrating mariage. That business about sacral marriage being a pagan addition goes all the way back to the more protestant than protestant Puritans of 1640, with absolutely no Jews in sight.

When two faggots get married so that they can purchase small boys from child protective services and pass them around as party favors in a gay orgy, everyone has to cheer until the wedding organizer gives the signal to stop cheering, or else you will likely lose your job. This is a holiness spiral on the purification of Christianity that gave the puritans their name. You can trace it back in small steps to 1640, with not a Jew in sight until around 1950.

Of course, that marriage is a divine sacrament administered by the groom under the supervision of the priest “With this ring I thee wed” is an ancient Christian tradition, and that marriage is performed by God, though his human representative on earth, and through the Christian groom, is a position clearly expressed in the New Testament, but the protestants had already purified Christianity of all the genuinely unchristian pagan traditions, so the Puritans did not have much to purify. But the ring obviously derives from pagan Rome, so, hungry for things to be pure about, they proceeded to first desacralize, and then not very long after, desecrate, marriage.

Those witch hunting Puritans of New England had thoroughly desacralized marriage. Then they even more thoroughly desacralized marriage. Then they went on desacralizing it even further. Which by small degrees became systematic desecration of marriage.

Those witch hunting Puritans had purified Christianity of such “pagan additions” as Christmas and Marriage. And then they went right on purifying until by 1950 or so, nothing Christian remained. From 1640 to around 1930-1950 the attack on marriage, fatherhood, and the family proceeded with not a Jew in sight.

The attack on fatherhood and family started around 1640 or so, with them pulling the New Testament passages on the duty of the wife to obedience and submission from their purely secular marriage ceremony.

Child protective services kidnapping children and selling them to “married” gay couples is a holiness spiral on a holy spiral on a holiness spiral which began with sixteen forty puritans pulling the biblical texts on the submission and obedience of the wife from the marriage ceremony, and proceeded endlessly by small degrees from then to the present.

Affirmative action is a holiness spiral on the genuinely Christian tradition that Christians are forbidden to engage in slave trading and encouraged, but not required, to free their slaves.

You can trace the attack on marriage, fathers, and family all the way back to 1640, and affirmative action all the way back to 1790, with not a Jew in sight until about 1920 or so.

When a religion goes demonic, it does not stop until defeated in war and conquered due its evil against its own people. If we look at ancient history, not a pendulum in sight. Always ends with the car crashed after going off the road and falling down a thousand foot cliff.

> Religions aren’t like trees. Individuals are like trees. Religions, cultures, and societies are like forests. A forest will grow or shrink based on the availability of the resources needed to sustain

Not what history shows. Religions, cultures, and societies are like a car driven at high speed along a narrow mountain road. Each tree in a forest independently pursues its own good, and the good of its offpring, but a religion, a culture, and a society has mechanisms of large scale cooperation. When these break down, it ceases to be. And thus we see empty shelves in British supermarkets, and a British army with a hundred generals that can only put a hundred boots on the ground, who are apt to be defeated by handful of rifle toting camel herders.

> > “and the abolition of marriage, fatherhood, and family a holiness spiral on ‘purifying Christianity from pagan additions’”

> How do you explain Weimar Germany and the Frankfurt School?

Until the west resumed feminism in 1963, the Frankfurt School had zero interest in reifying women as class and gays as a class. They were all about economics, Marxist Economics. They wanted to reinvent Marxist socialism to head off the challenge from National Socialism. All economics all the time. While Jewish minions were deployed once the decision was made to resume feminism, there is no evidence that Jews played a role in the decision, or were particularly keen on it.

Weimar was feminist, first wave feminism, but Hitler, unlike the west, took no strong action to reverse it, so he did not see Weimar feminism as a Jewish plot against the white race. The west reacted to National Socialism by going socialist (the New Deal) and stopping feminism, perhaps they saw Nazism as reaction to Weimar moral degeneracy, which derived from feminism, but Hitler suppressed moral degeneracy without paying much attention to the root cause, moment to moment female sexual choice. Perhaps he saw moral degeneracy as Jewish, but not feminism as Jewish.

When the Australian authorities were cracking down on women in 1790s and early 1800s, they saw moment to moment female sexual choice as whoring. The stereotypical female convict did not trade sex for money, but rather allowed her boyfriend to rob her master. It was women giving it away they thought of as whoring. Hitler’s attitude was completely different.

Not allowed to say “we”, unless you can pass the shill test.