Normally I do not report on or respond to the day’s news. This blog is about what the news of decade or a century ago turned out to mean. And no end of people are reporting on the day’s news, most of whom have researched it far more thoroughly than I am willing to do.
But, prematurely, I am going to report on what this offensive seems to have turned out to mean.
The original plan of the Global American Empire was to logistically exhaust Russia. “Russia is a gas station masquerading as a nuclear power” “Russia is running on Soviet leftovers.” “Russia’s GDP is less than that of (insert insignificant country here)” The latter meme was an echo of Reagan in the primaries. He did not believe the official story about Soviet GDP pushed by Harvard and the CIA.
Well that does not seem to be working out. Sanctions arguably improved the Russian economy by forcing national capitalism on it from the outside. Living standards have fallen, but not by much, and the Russian entrepreneurial class has been invigorated.
Soviet GDP was as fake as Reagan claimed, but this time around, it is Global American Empire GDP that has been revealed as fake and gay. Nato’s cupboard is bare. Gains and losses of a few square kilometers of chewed up dirt and shattered buildings do not matter. What matters is that Nato is running out. That the meme of “The Greatest Ukrainian Counter Offensive” was floated was a recognition that the Global American Empire is losing the war of attrition.
The objective of The Greatest Ukrainian Counter Offensive was to replace slow grinding war of attrition with decisive war of movement. The Ukraine would cut to the Black sea near Mariupol forcing cut off Russian troops to surrender, or at least to abandon the Black sea coast without a fight. They would make a counter envelopment around Bakhmut, forcing Russians to abandon Bakhmut without a fight. They would get turf without slowly and attritively grinding.
The offensive has so far achieved significant tactical Ukrainian victories, but looks increasingly unlikely to give them the hoped for strategic victory, which is probably why they announced it was postponed yet again. It has not been postponed. It has failed so far.
What has happened was that the Ukraine has hurled a good chunk of its reserves at some point on the front, attempting to restore war of movement, and a significant advance happened, often with Russian troops forced to abandon some important chunk of hard won land without a fight, and the the Russians would make some countermove to stop them, and war of attrition resumed. The retreats failed to create cascading weakness. And then they would hurl another good chunk of their reserves at another point on the front. Presumably if the Ukrainians had some important success, the rest of the reserves would have been thrown in and The Greatest Ukrainian Counter Offensive announced. It has not been announced because each such thrust, though it made important initial gains, soon got stuck.
The theory underlying the Great Ukrainian Offensive is that once reserves have been deployed to a front, it is mighty difficult to adapt to circumstances and opportunities by redeploying them elsewhere. If you try to redeploy the normal foul ups of war ensue, those left to hold the front are apt to conclude that due to malice, neglect, or chaos, they are being abandoned to die, and decide to mutinously leave, turning the redeployment into a disorderly retreat. So, if you have reserves, you have choices. You can strike in one place and not strike in another place. This restores war of movement when your forces penetrate behind enemy lines, forcing the enemy to swiftly abandon overnight turf won over months or years in the slow grind of attritive warfare. So the Ukraine built up its reserves, for a decisive blow restoring war of movement.
And the Russians were forced to abandon overnight quite a lot of turf that had taken them months to gain. In this sense, substantial tactical victories ensued, which no one seems to be reporting – because the Ukrainians were seeking turf that mattered, and got turf that has so far turned out to not matter much.
One of the big ideas that a lot of pro Ukraine bloggers were talking about was counter envelopment of the Bakhmut cauldron. Ukrainian forces would strike deep into Russian held turf north of Bakhmut and south of Bakhmut, threatening to surround Bakhmut, thus forcing Russians to abandon it without a fight. Or actually surrounding it, forcing Russians to surrender.
And they struck. And they penetrated behind Russian lines, causing a great deal of destruction. This threatened the jaws of Russian cauldron, forcing the Russians on the north and south jaws of the cauldron to abandon overnight much hard won turf, to abandon the jaws of the cauldron. But it did not threaten to envelope Bakhmut with a counter cauldron. On the northern jaw of the cauldron the Russians quickly captured some new turf to recreate a northern jaw for the cauldron in a new, smaller, position, but the Ukrainians successfully forced the southern jaw wide open.
The Russian cauldron that made it difficult for the Ukrainians to supply and replace troops in Bakhmut is no more. This is a big Ukrainian tactical victory. It is a strategic victory, but Bakhmut continues to fall nonetheless. And Ukrainians are still advancing on the flanks north and south of Bakhmut. But it is a strategic defeat, because now it is back to grinding attritive warfare on the flanks, so they have committed their reserves to more of the same old same old. More of the attrition that the Global American Empire cannot afford.
The Ukrainians are now able to pour more and more troops into the tiny little part of south eastern Bakhmut that they still control, and are doing so. They can now pour vast amounts of fresh meat into the same old meat grinder and have done so. That is their strategic victory. I expect the fresh meat to be soon pouring out again, if they are not doing so already.
The Global American Empire still attempting a counter envelopment of Bakhmut, attempting to create a counter cauldron. And they are attempting to recapture areas of Bakhmut that they lost in the little the south east corner that remains, and have had some success. Russians retreated in Bakhmut, and on the flanks. Russians were on the defensive, though they are now back to advancing into the tiny little part of Bakhmut that is still under Ukrainian control. But on the offensive, or on the defensive, on the retreat or on the advance, they are decisively winning the war of attrition. The fall of Bakhmut has been delayed, but probably not delayed a whole lot. Only a square kilometer or so remains in Ukrainian hands.
War of movement was always a long shot. The Greatest Ukrainian Counter Offensive is far from over, but it is looking like a longer and longer shot. That it was tried at all means that the Global American Empire no longer has confidence in war of attrition. They have realized they are losing the war of attrition.
Normally a war of attrition comes to a negotiated end. The loser usually loses decisively, usually after making increasingly desperate attempts to change the war of attrition to a war of movement, the winner usually wins decisively, the negotiations are one sided, but the loser retains a nation, retains the capacity to recruit and arm an army, and learns from its failures. A decisive defeat in a war of attrition is seldom all that decisive.
But the Global American Empire lacks the capacity to negotiate. This war could continue for quite a while, and may well continue long after the Ukraine becomes a footnote like Serbia in World War I or Poland in World War II.
What they do when reality becomes painfully evident is avert their gaze and look around for some new shiny thing. They may well forget about the war, without attempting to end it, without allowing anyone else to end it.
When wars of attrition come to negotiated end, the loser retains the capacity to recruit and arm an army. The loser agrees to the negotiated end because that allows him to retain the capacity to recruit and arm an army and gives the government a chance to physically survive.
When wars of attrition continue beyond the point where the loser wants a negotiated end, the attrition eventually destroys the losers capability to recruit and arm an army. So how can the war keep going for a long time? It does not look like Ukraine can stand the present attrition very long without losing the ability to retain and arm an army.
If Ukraine cannot stand the attrition for a long time, the only way the war can keep going for a long time is if new belligerents entering the war. That is certainly possible, perhaps even likely, but only if the Global American Empire does not avert their gaze. Or do you think that any nation will volunteer for this war, if the GAE is no pushing?
For a long time, Moldova hesitated to crush its Russian minority, seeing that unpleasant things had happened to Georgia. It is now throwing its hat into the fray, simultaneously with The Greatest Ukrainian Offensive beginning.
My interpretation of the Greatest Ukrainian Offensive is that someone in Washington said quietly to himself “Oh $#!%, we are being attrited, not the Russians”, but of course that is not the interpretation that all goodthinkers believe, and evidently not the interpretation that the Moldovan authorities believe. War with Russia will remain policy even if everyone loses interest in the policy. It will become like the plus in LGBTQIA+ The plus is vigorously and effectively enforced, even though no one knows or cares what it stands for, and even though no one except people who do post graduate studies knows what IA+ is either.
All goodthinkers will go to war with Russia when the time comes that they need to to keep the war going. Because anything less would require them to notice defeat, and of course noticing that is not possible.
The Patriot missile system requires a whole lot of turf. You cannot put it in the parking lot of an apartment building. Why did they locate in a densely built up area? Well, if it worked, such a location would make the area safer, not more dangerous. Patriot missiles have a well known propensity to turn around and blow up stuff near their launch point even if no one is shooting at the system and jamming its electronics. I conjecture that the well known problems of the Patriot missile system were unthinkable, so they just did not think about them. Like the jab. Normies in aged care are telling me that the jab is killing them, but employment demands never ending boosts to “protect” old people. (Even though it was known from the beginning that the jabbed are more likely to catch and spread covid, the claim merely being that they are less likely to die of it.) Aged care is the last redoubt of boosting, and they are sailing right ahead even though everyone seems to have forgotten about Covid. When Germany goes to war with Russia and loses, it is not going to make the news, even in Berlin, especially in Berlin, just as the horrifying and obvious to normies effects of endless boosting fail to make the news, and no one even knows or cares that aged care is still sticking to it.
>LGBTQIA+
You absolute bigot. Don’t ya know it’s LGBTTIQQ2SA? Wait… I’m being told I’m a bigot for not saying 2SLGBTQQIA+. 🙃
>someone in Washington said quietly to himself “Oh $#!%, we are being attrited, not the Russiansâ€
A good chunk of DOD is thinking that but daring not say it. You can tell when they refuse to talk about it. When I talk to State Department types, they are fully enthusiastic about WW3. No hesitance on their face, no quiver in their voice. Full conviction and if they fail it’s obviously because they didn’t actually try. Oddly similar to college communists who insist real communism has never been tried yet.
DOD doesn’t start wars or even determine how to conduct wars. State does and I see no indication they think Ukraine is going bad for them.
State is better at goodthink than DOD. This may have interesting consequences if, as is likely, the situation becomes such that any thought about the war is apt to result in badthink.
Just a few years ago all State could think about was how they were victorious in teaching Afghan women about post modernist toilet art. They gloated about it. Today no one at State ever thinks about Kabul falling within days. They have no historical perspective.
They’ll find the next shinny new toy to fawn over and quickly forget about the previous one. Today it’s Ukraine. Taiwan is a prime candidate for tomorrow. It’ll just be another in a long line of one failed revolutionary crusade after another.
State Department be like
https://en.meming.world/images/en/9/92/Death_Knocking_On_Doors_meme_1.jpg
> You absolute bigot. Don’t ya know it’s LGBTTIQQ2SA?
I always say LGBTP. You can’t leave out the Pedophiles and Perverts. That is the very core of the pride movement even if they do not admit it.
US Army air defense and electronic warfare capability is patchy to non-existent. The most effective system they have is mounting a phalanx on the back of a truck. THAAD isn’t even operational. As far as jamming observation drones and other data-link based operations, forget about it.
P+ for succicntness. Pederasts et al. A bit graciously neutral in portraying the true sadistic evil these types express, but succint. PGRT+ has a nice ring, pederasts, groomers, rapists, (child) torturers and their supporters.
PGRTHIV+
Looks like they just make this stuff up without any regard for reality. Regime propaganda. Newsweek mentions the great “success” of the Patriot Missile system in Ukraine.
https://www.newsweek.com/patriot-missile-system-ukraine-war-russia-pentagon-kyiv-1802594
Correct me if my impressions are wrong:
What I’ve perceived about much of WW2 warfare is that only the Allies had generals who were actually talking to each other, discussing facts and giving bad news. Meanwhile the Soviet, Nazi and Japanese armed forces were commanded by people who were too scared to say unholy or defeatist things and get into trouble.
That movie Downfall exemplifies this. No one felt safe to tell Hitler or each other the truth.
I perceive the same in GAE now. No one wants to be excommunicated for outwardly doubting the inevitable victory of the own true good and holy cause of Russia Man Bad. Putin can’t punish them, but they can punish each other for badthink.
Unless I’m just full of shit, what does game theory call this pattern?
>What I’ve perceived about much of WW2 warfare is that only the Allies had generals who were actually talking to each other, discussing facts and giving bad news. Meanwhile the Soviet, Nazi and Japanese armed forces were commanded by people who were too scared to say unholy or defeatist things and get into trouble.
Correct. The Japanese Navy went as far to lie to the army that Midway was a great victory and they didn’t take the sunken Carrier off the roster of available ships. The army responded by doing things like building up Guadalcanal not knowing that Japanese naval power had been gutted and couldn’t protect them.
Though in Germany’s case there was a fundamental problem that during WW1 the German military had taken over the German government, leaving Hitler is a position where he was always worried about the political machinations of his generals. Also German generals regularly lied about battlefield conditions for their own purposes and to avoid blame for failures. Rommel indirectly caused Dunkirk when he lied about the size of the armored counter attack that him Arras to make his victory seem bigger. Hitler feared if the Allies had reserves of that size that they might be able to break through the Panzer lines and cut them off, so he become hesitant at Dunkirk and stopped the tanks until the infantry could catch up.
Fundamentally the problem with Germany and Japan was the military staff was engaged in politics by design in both governing systems. With Russia is was the endless systems of lies that at every level of any Communist system. No one could trust anyone and telling the truth against a higher ups lies got you bullet to the back of the head. Though as the war went Soviet Generals and Leadership told fewer lies and trusted each more, while Germany experienced the opposite trend.
This is why ‘the playing fields of Eton’ are so essential. The cadre for doing anything need to have a long history of doing things together. Because the most important skill for any large scale endeavor, is ability to work, coordinate, and communicate with each other on higher levels, which is simply not possible between strangers or new acquaintances.
This is also one of the many reasons why blotation of bureaucratic intermediation is so damaging; actually meaningful communication of greater value is rendered impossible.
That’s a great point.
I’ve been told that the Amercian WW2 military leadership was historically unique, in that it was explicitly chosen to be younger guys, largely unencumbered by WW1 trench baggage, who already knew each other from sports at the military academies. They brought the band back together.
That’s not entirely correct, though they did have some good younger generals. World War II is characterized by having German generals on both sides of the line in the European theater. I think, on balance, Germany has produced the most high quality generals of any cultural ethnicity group.
Marshall fired most of the older generals so that most of the generals were younger. Still it wasn’t all based on merit.
The firing of Terry Allen de La Mesa was a fucking disgrace as well as the fact that incompetent political hack Omar “Hurtgen Forest” Bradley was promoted (he was also the guy who fired Terry Allen probably out of jealously). Patton got treated better than Terry Allen did.
Ike, Bradly, and Mark Clark where FDR’s bitches. They pushed out everyone who wasn’t with the program. They tried damn hard to get rid of Patton as well but everyone knew he was the best general we had and he had political support back home.
As it was Ike’s and Bradly’s refusal to Marines to handle the navy gunnery fire support at D-Day would have doomed the invasions if Germans had even slightly better defenses. The Navy eventually had to push destroyers into visual range to take out some of the bunkers because army troops couldn’t direct fire worth a damn. This was done over a newspaper mistake about a battle were the Marines got credit for the army’s actions in WW1. Petty and stupid.
Circular firing squad. More realistic men are getting punished by others for casting doubts on suppositions produced by the spiraling feedback loops of the demon-faith, more virtuous men are getting punished by others for diverging from the demon-faith, even when the others themselves also agree with the divergents, because they are also afraid.
Rommel and Guiderian would argue with Hitler constantly (they eventually got dismissed but they would not hesitate to argue) and some of his other generals would occasionally argue with Hitler. (Keitel had the reputation of always agreeing with him and Jodl being mostly a yes man) Japan the army and navy would argue with each other but it was very rare for people in the same service to argue with each other.
Downfall was very late that movie was about what everyone was doing when everyone knew it was over… including the apparently real incident where there was a semi orgy in the bunker because they were all probably going to get executed soon so why not.
The big problem is Hitler couldn’t trust those arguments because his generals constantly lied and they really didn’t understand the bigger picture. Try to take Moscow in 1941 was pointless as Germany was going to run out of oil at the end of 1941, the only target that mattered was the Ukraine and the Caucuses. Hitler had ordered up Barbarossa with the Caucuses to be the primary goal and his Generals lied to him while making the attack on Moscow the primary access of attack with the best units allocated for it.
Rommel’s attacks in North Africa were amazing, but fundamentally impossible to win due to Germany’s lack of oil and Med transport. This made Rommel’s bitching at Hitler rather stupid since there wasn’t any way he could be supplied with enough resources to actually win. Rommel should have been leading the charge in Ukraine in 1941 instead of fighting in North Africa.
Rommel had a better point about Overload in 1944 that the tanks need to be right next to the beaches due to fighter bombers, but he’d blown his trust with Hitler by that point.
Hitler fucked up a lot, but a lot of those fuck ups were the total lack of trust and cooperation within the political and military elites of Germany. Hitler is ultimately responsible for that lack of cohesion but it wasn’t the case that his Generals were right and Hitler was wrong in most cases.
Hitler sort of understood that the only hope of victory was getting to Baku or Iran but he’d also delude himself on everything with the idea that “his will” could overcome reality.
It was kinda impossible for Germany to ever reach and hold those objectives tbh which is why the war really couldn’t be won.
You don’t have to actually invade places with soldiers by necessity to bring them into alignment; many players in the middle east were favorable to Germany at the time, and if they demonstrated ability to secure their property in transit, and deny the security of Wilsonian property in transit, then an alliance becomes a matter of course.
Much of the ‘allies’ around the world on the Wilsonian side essentially took this character. As escourt one day can easily be a privateer the next. Military power directly contributes to the effectiveness of diplomacy, and the prospects of property security that may come from alignment with one party or another is a major part of that.
> Thinking Arab opinion mattered much
The British quickly occupied Iran (in fact its one of the few things they cooperated with the Soviets directly on) and crushed the Iraq revolt to make sure it didn’t.
There was no getting the Iran oil without the German army actually reaching Iran or knocking out Britain itself.
The best chance for victory was invading Egypt in 1940 with 3 Panzer divisions while pretending to prepare to invade the UK. The UK was still quite weak in the middle east in 1940 and the Germany could have easily have taken Malta and probably Egypt. Once Egypt is secured the Med becomes an Axis lake then Iraq and Iran falls into the Axis fold.
Would need to take Gibraltar too… then still need to get to Iran and the Soviet Union would have attacked if the Axis got as far as Iraq…
No need. Axis land based aircraft made naval operations in the western med pretty close to impossible without massive Carrier support(see the Convey runs into Malta). Malta’s fighters and sub bases were the only thing keeping the royal navy going in the west. Also Malta was very lightly defended in 40.
The Soviet’s logistics even into Iran was pretty bad, it took a massively funded and American run infrastructure upgrade to change that. Invading to Iraq wasn’t happening without resulting in Turkey joining the Axis putting all the Russian oil fields in range of Axis bombers. Soviet Russia without oil wouldn’t last long.
Though as St. John pointed out Germany didn’t need to invade either, just trade oil with them. Taking Egypt makes that possible.
>The British quickly occupied Iran
Yeah, them and whose army?
The whigs had very little means of actually projecting force in the orient, and Culturally Enriching Suez and Anatolia makes it practically impossible.
I think Hitlers only real shot at winning a war against the Anglo-Saxons was to find a way to team up with the Soviet Union, however cautious or temporary, at least until the primary world hegemon’s back was broken.
There was just no way Germany was going to come out alive from an existential war with the Soviet Union when the worlds premiere empire got to watch from offshore and feast on the carnage.
It’s a lesson China and Russia seem to have learned from, though it might be a bit late in the game to tackle the full weight of modernity which the Anglos have since unleashed on the world.
Hardly. China with its vast industrial capability could take on the full weight of modernity on its own, and Russia, with vastly smaller industrial capacity, is taking on the full weight of modernity right now, doing OK and arguably winning. There is panic among some elements of the elite of the Global American Empire, and the blandly confident majority are lost in delusion. The “New Economic Consensus” is an attempt to gaslight elements of the elite that are realistically panicking with pious delusion that something is going to be done. There is no will or intent to do what needs doing, and suddenly elements of the elite are realizing that being led by the insane could result in very bad outcomes for them.
According to “When Titans Clash” https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/164875.When_Titans_Clashedm Hitler began the war in a collaborative spirit of trust with his generals, and became more autocratic and paranoid when defeats piled up in the East, whereas Stalin began the war fresh off his officer’s purge, terrified and controlling, but became more conciliatory as his generals began making some wins.
Essentially both leaders exchanged places in their leadership style. Interesting if true.a
Victory has a thousand fathers, defeat is an orphan. I suppose the natural bent of things inclines that way.
>Unless I’m just full of shit, what does game theory call this pattern?
This is cybernetics, not game theory. I really like this diagram: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethical_regulator_theorem#/media/File:Ethical_Regulator_System.gif
When you take out awareness / feedback, you take out truth, which makes intelligence fail which leads to bad action/regulation.
I recommend studying cybernetics, first because it is really relevant to politics/ruling, it being a form of regulation, second because it is one of the very few social sciences that have a firm rooting in biology e.g. thermal regulation. I keep suspecting that cyberneticians have some really serious redpills and they don’t get caught because they hide it in tech-jargon. For example, democracy inherently fails even the basic concept of cybernetics, how could a regulated system regulate its regulator? It would completely fuck up the feedback signals.
Cybernetics as a language paradigm caught on bigly in China (which my good friend Nick Land took as a further sign it was a rising power), which in turn came primarily by way of intercourse with the Soviet Union apparat, where in turn the language of cybernetics as a framework caught on even more-so than the anglosphere theorists who propounded it.
Mainly because the technocrats and the whig acolytes did not really overlap as demographics beyond a superficial level, with the later not actually being interested in making things work better, and the technocracy that was rolled out to make the world safe for whigism was quickly rolled back up in the post-war years.
I think at the very least a big chunk of the apparat is genuinely psychologically incapable of admitting defeat (at least at the hands of White Christians) and will gleefully escalate this conflict not only to the last drop of Ukrainian blood, but direct US/Russia conflict all the way to nuclear war before giving up. A sort of a fake and gay version of (someone else’s) death before dishonor and all that. Whether they’re the faction currently in control I have no idea, but imo there’s a decent chance.
As Madeleine Albright said, “I think this is a very hard choice but I think, we think, the price is worth it.”
>I think at the very least a big chunk of the apparat is genuinely psychologically incapable of admitting defeat (at least at the hands of White Christians)
A phenomena which springs from the same well as the solipsistic narcissist’s propensity for backbiting, leftism, gnosticism, in general.
Because it has no concept of more transcendent teleologies, anything beyond itself to define itself, devalidation of its conceits, insecurities, inner narrative of Being, is effectively an experience akin to death, and reacted too in much the same manner; something more real to it than actual death in reality.
Because its capacity for world-formation is spare to nonexistent, and thus does not really have a ‘concept’ of such greater teleological motions of Creation at work, such matters exist more like abstract ‘totems’ in the mind, that are merely labeled with the same name as the-thing-as-such, but whose inner reality and function in an ideographic system has little to no coherence with the-thing-as-such. To wit, devalidations that arise as a consequence of reality are modeled *as if such aspects of Creation are an other ape creature like itself*, and are in turn dealt with in the manner it also deals with other ape creatures; by trying to ‘browbeat’ Creation for daring to gainsay it, and trying to ‘gaslight’ it into changing its tune, doubling down on repeated insistence on its conceits in hopes that its ‘counterpart’ gives up.
No one is in control. The “Russian defeat is inevitable” faction is in the saddle, but I suspect the horse has its own ideas. Sanity may well prevail. The prospect of nukes may make people start thinking.
Tbh it says a lot that I can’t decide if that’s a good or bad thing. I suppose that sanity in this is only good if it leads to sanity in other fields alongside it.
Admitting defeat in a war, especially one that is ideologically based, especially one into which so much capital has been invested, is not easy to begin with.
There’s also the fact that as I pointed out eastern europeans genuinely hate russians with passion and will not relent or admit defeat to them if they can help it.
I think you’re giving them too much credit. It’s much easier for them to just continue this for another 5 years or so.
There’s no universe where these people just say “okay, putin won”, and give up, especially given they aren’t risking anything of their own to begin with.
Even leftie sociologists admit that democracies, in general, aren’t capable of admitting defeat in a war because it’s far too politically damaging.
It’s dictators who usually quickly try to come to a peace agreement if their invasion didn’t succeed as planned, in order to cut their losses.
The loss to the political class for a defeat in war is more important than some lives they have little to do with.
I normally deal in gold, but, this conflict has presented some interesting black market opportunities. About to close a deal with a key Ukrainian contact with ties to Tel Aviv. Word is, invest in Raytheon. But you didn’t here that from me.
yawn!
My grandpa always told me, “Handi, someday when you’re older and you go trolling online, always tailor your bait so that you never get more than one or two perfunctory responses from your targets despite posting constantly. That’s how you’ll know your schtick is really ruffling some feathers.”
[*deleted*]
The fact that you persist in the same routine despite it being seemingly targeted at people who aren’t even on this blog makes you look like a shill. Just saying maybe switch to a different narrative
You are insufficiently entertaining. Get some new material. I am contemplating a new censorship criterion: unfunny clowning.
Your point, I suppose, being that whole lot of Ukraine funding and weapons have mysteriously gone astray. A giant cloud of Hunter Biden types are at this moment flying hither and yon and living out of carryon bags. But most of them look like Hunter Biden, and though a whole lot of them are biologically Jewish, absolutely none of them wear silly hats or would touch gold.
I’m laughing. More updates on the adulteress wife please.
My bad friends. But, I got bored talking of schvartzes. So I switched to my favorite topic: money!
If we play this right friends, we can make a bundle on this Ukraine thing by investing in military contractors.
No we cannot. Because people like Hunter Biden know where the money goes, and you don’t and I don’t.
Some military contractors will do very badly, because they will be taken over by Hunter Biden types, who will do very well, the shareholders not so much.
This clown is obviously some kind of FBI informant sent here to undermine bitcoin investment.
Imagine LARping as some kike crying out in pain as he strikes you.
Has this guy takin the shill test yet? I don’t think so. Next he’ll be talking about street shitting!
You’re a huge faggot who wants daddy Jim to punish you with ban.
[*deleted for unfunny clowning*]
You are on moderation till your material improves.
According to (official) Russian sources, Bahmut/ Artjomovsk has fallen under complete Russian control today:
https://sputnikglobe.com/20230520/russian-forces-take-full-control-over-artemovsk-wagner-group-head-prigozhin-says-1110484908.html
Until now, “official Russian sources” did not lie, but merely eschewed the truth sometimes. So I doubt very much they are lying now.
Off topic:
https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1659950572416401412?cxt=HHwWiICw2YaQqokuAAAA
KD Link:
https://archive.is/wip/d00bh
I’m seeing reactionary being tossed around a lot on twitter now and it does appear the left is getting ready to crush even McChristian churches that refuse to turn their children over to sodomites soon. Though this is the typical submit or be destroyed drivel that’s always coming from the Cons.
What a completely cucked frame, punching hard to the right as always. Don’t you know true patriots love poopdick and child grooming, those crazy people that don’t like sterilizing and raping children are preparing to make us look bad! May the revolution devour its supporters first and foremost.
What if they really just want a bunch of white guys to be KIA?
They would have kept going with the vax. The war is people who wanted to murder white people but don’t want to share with the covid demon.
Surprised you didn’t mention RU taking out Zaluzhny. No official confirmation yet, but I’m 80% convinced he’s dead or seriously injured. The reason Zelensky is spending so much time overseas, besides the usual begging, is that he knows he’s next once he sets foot in Ukraine. Wagner also claiming a Territorial Defense General might have been killed in early May.
Is it still a war of attrition if Russia is inflicting actual decapitation strikes? Seems like it’s no more Mr. Nice Putler after the drone attack on the Kremlin.
Sounds like the Cathedral is prepping the normies for the inevitable
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/05/19/russias-military-has-adapted-is-now-a-formidable-enemy-for-ukraine.html
The “New Economic Consensus” is coded recognition of the logistic failure of the Global American Empire.
However it proposes to revitalize the American economy by creating more fake blue state businesses and more regulation. It lifts planks from the Trump platform, while inverting the meaning of those planks.
I can hear people saying behind the scenes that Global American Empire is going down the tubes unless they can restore the Trump economy. The lifted planks are coupled with America’s capacity to hold and defend its empire, so they were not lifting the planks to get normies to vote for them, for normie votes do not matter. They are lifting the planks to address the concerns of elite factions. But instead of national capitalism, quasi state capitalism. Instead of people who organize production in America by Americans being the good guys, and if laws and regulations get in their way, maybe we need to look at the laws and regulations rather than the people breaking them, it was those dreadful capitalists who hollowed out the American economy, and the government needs to get on their backs. Instead of “Drill, baby drill”, it is “the green economy”.
Digressing: Green energy is only workable if we have long life high energy storage stationary batteries that can handle an enormous number of charge discharge cycles, and if end users of energy can and do install those batteries. Which at present we do not, though interesting technologies are under development, and interesting prototypes are running right now. Green energy is distributed, the energy grid is expensive. For green energy to be workable, has to be local energy, locally stored for when the sun does not shine and the wind does not blow. Centralized Green energy and centralized green energy storage is always going to be a gigantic boondoggle, creating holiness rather than energy.
Distant tangent, is storage of potential energy in electric batteries a red herring? Lets say, assuming no advancement of nuclear fission to produce stable small scale cells, you use the energy output of a stationary plant to synthesize hydrocarbon fuels. Instead of replacing basically all of energy infrastructure, you just scale existing designs. Is this a capital inputs nightmare? I always saw the obsession with electric batteries as another greenie holiness spiral, unnecessary until we enter environments with very little free oxygen.
Generating liquid fuel by nuclear power is a workable, well developed technology, and is ready to roll. It just cannot compete with fracking. We would have to pay considerably more for fuel – but not intolerably more.
Green energy, on the other hand, is only workable if we have batteries built of common non toxic materials that can take many, many, many, charge discharge cycles. Sulphur sodium batteries, chlorine iron flow batteries, ferric oxide iron flow batteries. Ferric oxide iron flow batteries (IRFB) with hydrogen ion membranes look very promising in terms of material costs, but these batteries are designed for big central grid applications. Because the cost of distributing energy over the grid is far higher than the cost of energy itself, this is not really workable. You are going to wind up with houses with solar panels on top taking energy from the grid at night, and sending energy back to the grid during the day when the sun shines at a tenth of the price they pay in the nightime, rendering the cost and efficiency of the batteries irrelevant, making the batteries just yet another greenie boondoggle. Green energy production is inherently distributed, and green energy storage has to be distributed. The cost and inefficiency of grid distribution dominates everything else. For green energy to be actually economic, has to bypass the grid as much as possible.
When people do green energy economics, they never factor the elephant in the room into their story. The grid is the elephant. Grid distributed green energy is just not viable.
Non-battery forms of energy storage, such as compressed air?
A lot of people are doing interesting work on energy storage, but the current state of play is that it does not quite work at any reasonable price, and centralized storage can never work because the elephant in the room is the cost of the grid and of managing the grid. Electricity at the house costs far more than energy at the power station, because grid costs, and centralized energy storage on the grid increases your grid costs. Which are very difficult to measure and predict, but are by far the dominant factor in the cost of electrical energy.
For green energy to be actually useful, need end user storage that can store a reasonable amount of energy and take an enormous number of charge discharge cycles. Useful energy storage will first appear as centralized grid storage, which makes green energy much more expensive than the cost of a reasonable area of solar panels, and would make it much more expensive even if the centralized grid storage was free, because of the cost of moving intermittent energy to and from centralized storage.
The intermittency of green energy considerably increases your grid costs, and failure to transform the grid to accommodate the increased cost and complexity of managing intermittent power repeatedly has led to states that have gone all in on green suffering from grid failure. For green energy to be useful, needs cheap solar panels, and they are getting cheaper and lighter, and needs distributed cheap power storage capable of taking several thousand deep charge/discharge cycles. Which we do not have at all. We have some interesting research work and prototypes for cheap energy storage.
We need an energy storage Musk, but Musk already has too much on his plate, and we have a severe shortage of Musks. Good ideas for energy storage, like good ideas for rockets, have been rattling around for a long time without going anywhere. Musk’s rockets give effect to ideas that Wernher von Braun ‘s team in Germany had, but, because of fortunes of war, never got around to fully implementing.
I think electrolytic concrete is a low hanging fruit in terms of logistical preconditions. Store your energy along with holding up your roof and insulating your rooms.
Concrete batteries have woefully bad performance, and degrade horribly after a few charge discharge cycles, and crack the concrete.
I like the concept in an abstract sense. Performance in terms of watts per ton isn’t a major target when it is something you can include ‘as a matter of course’ adjunctively rather than something you are depending on alone. The main limiting factors in need of breakthroughs is understanding physio-chemical changes in solid electrolytes, with regards to long term integrity.
The most compelling is making ammonia, out of hydrogen from water and nitrogen from air. You can run a piston or turbine engine on it, big or small.
It stores as a liquid when cold at atmospheric pressure, or when warm at high pressure. I’ve heard of electrochemical solid state devices to do the synthesis, but maybe they’re fake, so far anyway.
Horribly poisonous, but lighter than air at least.
A solar province like Chinese Namibia could send out tankers every day, full of the stuff. Both the plants to make it, and plants to store and burn it, could be floating, tied up to the docks with big ropes and extension cords fat as coffee cans.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6GGJWelpBA
Off-and-on semi-establishment figure Oliver Stone points out the obvious: Our Friend, The Atom, is the next step up the Kardishev Scale for humanoid civilization, potentiating transformations no less profound than that which resulted from proliferation of hydrocarbon fuels; and coincidentally can also offer everything gaia worshippers ostensibly say they care about. So why aren’t they promoting it to the moon? Why has that step not been taken? paused mid-stride for 80 years hence?
(Because they don’t actually care about Human civilization, obviously.)
(https://fee.org/articles/the-first-atomic-age-a-failure-of-socialism/)
That’s quite interesting. I new the cathedral pushed back hard on nuclear power, but I wasn’t aware how much socialism strangled it in the cradle.
If Musk’s Starship isn’t strangled by the USG, he should be paid large sums to build nuclear reactors like he built Starship. We’ll need them on Mars.
Suddenly we are seeing the anti technology de-industrialization position under elite attack from multiple directions. Seems to have set in when the sanctions on Russia failed.
I don’t think many in the elite are waking up, but the “New Economic Consensus” (which is just a rebranding and remarketing of old economic consensus that the everything everywhere in the world economy should be run from New York skyscrapers) indicates that it is enough that the Biden Presidency is running scared.
Eugyppius has written about that yesterday, about “anti-technology position under suddent attack from current elite(s)”:
https://www.eugyppius.com/p/energy-transitioner-in-chief-patrick
Interesting read. He’s a German, BTW.
There is no sharp difference between calling for more human sacrifice because more human sacrifice is more holy, and calling for more human sacrifice because you can shake down people down by threatening to sacrifice them.
The intermittent energy market is not a market, because it consists of state entities setting prices for nominally private quasi state entities, whose board members are apt have government regulator hats, “private” business hats, and official scientist hats. So the priesthood of official science are apt to become strangely wealthy, and the more the reliance on intermittent energy, the wealthier they are apt to become.
Germany theoretically has a free market in bulk electricity, and the theoretical price on this market is about one third of what consumers pay. Which is not necessarily unreasonable, but where the remaining two thirds goes tends to depend on official science.
This is a coded admission that the Greatest Ukrainian Counteroffensive was tried, and failed, and that it is back to war of attrition. This indicates a level of realism that I did not expect.
The “New Economic Consensus” is an attempt to address elite concerns about American incapacity to fight a war of attrition. But it is just elites trying to gaslight other elites. It is not really an attempt to address American incapacity to fight a war of attrition.
What I read between the lines of “the New Economic Consensus” is elites saying “Oh $#!%, the Global American Empire is going down the tubes, and the economy means we cannot fight wars any more.” To which the Biden presidency has responded politically, without any intention of addressing the problem, and perhaps without any ability to address the problem.
But if you link the American economy to the current difficulties of the Global American Empire (logistic exhaustion in the Ukraine) then you are kind of admitting that American GDP is fake and gay, which I thought to be an unthinkable crime thought. But obviously elites are thinking it.
Bakhmut, we hear, has not yet fallen, and The Greatest Ukrainian Counter Offensive, we hear, has yet to roll. And if the Biden presidency has its way we will be still be hearing all that when the only way to keep the war going is to throw Germany into it after Poland and the rest.
But, to my surprise, and contrary to my predictions, a policy of stubborn delusion about a falling empire is evidently copping some serious pushback.
Like most failing empires it’s unlikely they’ll be able to fix things especially with a puppet at the controls. They’ll need to put someone with real authority in charge if they want to meet that challenge.
I wonder if anyone’s floated the idea of re-installing Trump and letting him fix the Economy this time?
That they are pretending to lift planks from Trump’s platform would seem to suggest that the idea has been furtively floated. The “New Economic Consensus” is not a sales pitch for the masses, but for the elite. And it tells us what the elite elements that it seeks to gaslight are thinking.
In 1933 they decided to cut the faggotry, pederasty, and women’s lib so that they would be in shape to defeat Hitler in 1939. A replay of that tactic would be to re-install Trump to make peace and restore the economy so that they could face China or Russia a decade or so down the track.
The New Economic Consensus only makes sense if some elites want to restore the economy so that they can handle opponents of the Global American Empire. And since that will take a while, those same elites must want peace until the economy is restored. The “New Economic Consensus” is a response to demands to address logistic failure, and addressing logistic failure will take a while.
And the first step has to be the unthinkable. Fire Shaniqua as tech lead, get the childless old women out of management, cut back the authority of Human Resources to keeping track of employee paper work, and repeal Sarbanes Oxley. The reforms required are currently unthinkable. But in 1933 women’s liberation, faggotry, and pederasty disappeared without a murmur and not a dog barked, so it is doable. Restoring Trump would merely be a good first step.
I think the greatest fear is that lose of reserve currency means the omnipresence security state won’t be sustainable without the credit card and if that happens WHT follows shortly is. lot of people connected to the regime, the democratic party, even establishment Republicans must flee the country or swing from lampposts.
It’s going to be wood chopper this time. Hanging is too good for them.
I’m interested in, and puzzled by, the fact that the US has never had a lampposts/woodchipper/guillotine moment yet. We don’t even have the European tradition of right wing hooliganism, ours is only left wing. Even the ancient tradition of tar and feathers died off shortly after the revolution.That there’s nothing at all suggests to me there’s some mechanism of control at work, that I’m blind to like a fish is blind to water. And it suggests not only that no lampposts moment is ever coming, but that any less bloody retrenchment is also impossible, because such a mechanism of control would be deployed against anything possibly tending towards lampostism as well.
Counter-argument: this is just my normality bias talking, and when the day comes it’ll be a doozy.
Counter-argument: extrajudicial punishment of known criminals was a going concern until the early 20th century, so it’s not foreign to heritage America at all. Partial comeback to that, extrajudicial punishment was never directed against elites to begin with, and was stomped flat the moment it came into direct conflict with the state religion.
Counter-argument: the mechanism of control isn’t a mystery at all. General problem is lack of freedom of association; spearhead thereof is the Furiously Boy-loving Informants infiltrating every white male organization down to gyms and self help groups just on the off chance one of them goes off the reservation. Solve the infiltration and not only are lampposts back on the menu, the peaceful side of dissident politics is as well. That my midwit self can’t see a solution doesn’t mean no one will.
Still – what am I not thinking of? What is the mechanism of control that’s kept Americans silent in the face of every provocation so far?
Lack of freedom of speech and freedom of association, starting with the War of Northern Aggression. North Korea does not have a “hang them from the lamposts” problem either.
Surveillance of would be dissidents in the US is more pervasive than East Germany until the security state falls nothing can be done…
https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Markets/Japan-to-tell-top-listed-firms-to-have-at-least-1-woman-executive
Globohomo is really trying to ruin Japan lately
I’d love to see them just walk away like the Saudi’s did. Do they have a real intelligence agency that’s not controlled by GAE? I think that was the key to the Saudi’s flip.
Japan may be the last to leave us even after Britain the Japanese are odd… having had their Emperor break tradition to order the surrender in the face of prospective annihilation the Japanese sort of accepted us as their rightful rulers to some degree and they are stubborn about changing such allegiances.
The Samurai were loyal to the court in Kyoto long after it became completely dysfunctional like DC is now for centuries before the period of warring clans began…
They have a very weak hand. No oil, no iron ore, no food. They might flip when the Chinese navy is stronger.
TBH they should have sided with Russia last year. Russia supplies everything they need, and they supply everything Russia needs. But that would have been an extremely brave move.
They are completely occupied. Of course the occupiers are retards, but it’s also not like they have much in the way of a tested army themselves. If the intention is to split off, need to wait for GAE to be otherwise occupied in the pacific.
Meanwhile, news from based Russia.
1) Dzhambetov returned there for a year, fought on the side of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, killed Russian citizens and actively recruited Ichker militants to Ukraine. What he says? Well, he promises to kill “Rusnya” (an offensive term) [*rest of your claims deleted without investigation, because of what I found when I investigated this one*]
Dzhambetov is a double agent:
https://www.easternherald.com/2023/05/17/chechen-militant-dzhambetov-who-fought-on-the-side-of-the-armed-forces-of-ukraine-shot-several-servicemen-of-the-armed-forces-of-ukraine/
And when he shot his demon worshiping colleagues in the Ukrainian army and defected to Russia via Europe, it became obvious whose side he was really on.
That the Russians are giving him a warm welcome is not indicative of Muslim supremacy. They are welcoming him for service, as they welcome other Muslims that serve Christian Russia against the common enemy of demon worshipers.
Everything you report is manipulative, deceptive, and misleading, by selective reporting and framing, but in this case the deception was outright lying by omission. I have cut you a lot of slack because your arguments often contain a grain of truth, but in this case the selective omission of relevant data amounts to flat out lying. No more slack for you.
Now if he had exited the Ukraine without leaving a trail of dead bodies of demon worshipers behind him, you might have had a case. But the dramatic manner of his exit makes the reasons for his welcome obvious, and omitting those reasons a lie.
I will allow through stuff that contains relevant English language links that directly support your claim. I am not going to bother investigating your claims unless you do the necessary work to make it one click easy. They will be deleted with the remark “unsupported and implausible claims by someone who has flat out lied about similar matters before”
[*deleted*]
You claim this and that, but lack English language links, or any links, that are consistent with your framing and interpretation of events. I am not going to look into your claims because why should I dig up evidence when you cannot be bothered to do so. The first link I hit back when you pushed your original lie said “Double agent”. You say something different. Could be true, not going to spend the time finding out when you will not and you are a liar. Not going to take your say so for it, not going to look into the matter. If you have some links that support your frame and interpretation, give us those links, not your claims.
[*deleted without investigation, for false reporting of events in your previous comment*]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXWI0P5NMDU
Normie youtuber reacts to a podcast where they argue that divorce is in fact not real, and that women should not be able to divorce due to “abuse”.
He’s horrified at the idea and so are most of the commenters, citing personal experiences of how many women are being “abused” and cannot stay with their men.
I’m more interested in what your opinion on the people he’s reacting to is.
They seem to have some ideas they’re not able to argue very well, perhaps lacking a fully coherent worldview.
Comments on youtube are censored and AstroTurfed. Don’t take them seriously.
I’m going to bet that the podcast that’s being reviewed is a controlled opposition op. The sort of guys who are going to be honest about “abuse” are not the sort to do a podcast with a bunch of women and a faggot with blue hair.
The Twitter Con I posted link urging Christians to give in to the Homos and to fight reactionaries instead also posted a link to this podcast. Likely part of the big push against Christianity the left is getting ready to launch.
> I’m going to bet that the podcast that’s being reviewed is a controlled opposition op.
It’s possible. They keep showing up on my youtube shorts feed. To the point where it’s getting annoying. The comments are mostly supportive but the videos and arguments aren’t very on point.
It’s usually them dunking on some dumb whores with very surface level arguments. They also seem like players rather than men who want to start families and advocate for that.
Part astroturf, part censorship, part idiocy.
I’ve definitely encountered variants of this arguments irl though: “are there not circumstances in which a divorce is preferred above staying together?” Examples I’ve heard are of people who will say they are glad their parents divorced because it just wasn’t fun at home, or of old women who became a lot happier when their husbands died.
My cookiecutter answer is, and as always open to alternatives and/or refinements, somewhat as follows:
yes, but those circumstances are exceedingly rare. As Jesus said, when divorce happens, both people are bad, and they have behaved badly. Good people do not separate what God has joined together.
The red pill addition to that would be something like: many relationship troubles stem from the husband not taking correct ownership of his wife. Moreso, because it is in fact illegal to take correct ownership of one’s wife, marriage has become very tricky, marriages unstable. The correct approach is to fix this problem at its root (coverture), not to treat its symptoms (divorce), which in the long run only worsens the problem.
Also, the way he speaks is typical of (semi) young guys with no marital experience. When men live together with a woman for a long time, reality hits them often enough for them to stop their worst white knighting. He scoffs at wanting a definition of the term ‘abuse’, because in his mind it is clear as day how ‘abuse’ supposedly works.
Just another one of those things where previous generations knew that feminism was to be taken with a pinch of salt, but not saying it out loud, the joke has been lost on the new generations.
Women absolutely love to be dominated and they will do whatever it takes to find a man willing to dominate them.
If they are complaining about abuse, it is a complaint about not being abused enough.
Women find freedom uncomfortable and unsettling, and bondage comfortable.
I don’t think anyone actually believes the abuse allegations. In my old life when the police showed up at ‘my’ house to remove me from everything I owned and render me a homeless destitute they clearly knew there was no abuse. My friends knew as well but the ones who wanted to fck my ex wife strangely found they needed to try to support her due to my ‘abuse’. The guys at church who make sure to pipe in and add “abuse” into Matthew 19, when it is not there, clearly want to fck their neighbors wife and should be ashamed of themselves.
Fast forward to new me and friends, family, random strangers, they have clearly seen times when my wife clearly has a swollen face. What happens is nothing at all but the women will come commiserate with my wife saying things like, “we sure do deserve it at times don’t we?” Or they will say, “why do we push for this?” Clearly women know they are trying to get slapped around on purpose, want to get slapped around, and soak their panties imagining it.
Of course the alleged demonically possessed trannies that run Hollywood, alleged by me, have done a great job showing the wife uninterested in her husband who slaps her around but strangely interested in her white knight savior who helps her run away and then hides with her, while she takes charge and she rapes him. Men who believe and support the Duluth racket are just weak beta male white knights
I had a girl friend who talked about how her previous boy friends beat her and when I dumped her for increasingly cruising for a beating behavior she promptly accused me of beating her. Failure to give a woman what she wants always results in an accusation of it.
I’ll just add in as well that passing shit tests results in less to no shit tests for awhile. My wife does not issue severe shit tests any longer, mostly she just repeats mild old shit tests that I already passed which I then pass in an off handed joking manor. Like she knows I will pass but feels compelled to just check a little anyway.
I will also add that we know women respond very well to dominate and aggressive sexuality. The dividualist brought this up. Meaning being roughed up, moved around, tossed around, controlled, choked, slapped, etc during sex but with my wife I found that this came to an end. Guessing roughly seven or eight years into marriage she no longer responded positively to this stuff and would just start crying, silently. I spoke with her about it, why the change, and she said that before it felt like she was being conquered but now it feels like she is being punished. So she cries because it means she messed up somehow and made me angry. I do not know if other men have a similar experience but going still to this day I have to be much much more gentle sexually than before.
Same here.
This is very interesting information.
If I had to guess, I’d wager it has more to do with children than amount of time. Well, naturally you’re supposed to have children with time so there’s a link there, but it’s about the children and time by itself wouldn’t produce the change.
What I’ve personally observed is that women who have children seem to experience a personal growth similar to that of a young man establishing himself. The experience realizes them as women. At the very least women who had the child in a relatively stable marriage.
Perhaps after years of cruising through all the shit tests, having children, her investing her beauty and youth in you, etc., etc., she really interiorized she is yours, so now the conquering doesn’t make sense anymore, that no matter what she’ll hold water for you until death. Like the male fantasy become true, after years of hard work.
I’d also guess that your “gentle” still looks quite “intense” by 21th century standards, I wouldn’t expect candles and gay music in the background.
21st*
Those arguing against it point to women being killed by their husbands. What is the response to that?
When it is framed as “your daughter is going to be killed by an ‘abuser'”, it is something that sways people towards fighting this “abuse” that is taking place everywhere, all the time, and could be done by any man.
And supposedly, being beaten to a pulp by the drunken husband coming home every night along with her children was the norm before all the women’s rights movements rectified that.
I don’t doubt that there are a few pretty violent low IQ men who will simply beat their wives for no reason. Though, we had to structure our society as a whole around this marginal problem, and effectively destroy marriage for it.
Ultimately it is none of their business. Not their wife, not their problem.
To a socialist, everything is a social problem, everything my neighbors do is my problem, because everything is all about me.
People have to learn to mind their own business, before they start creating problems where there was none before.
Checkout the women that they point to.
Long ago I asked for a poster girl of a plausibly virtuous woman being killed by her husband. No such poster girl could be found. If such existed, everyone would know her name.
“Refuges for battered women” are run by feminists looking for ammunition. They are strangely short of ammunition.
Men do not kill wives who might be faithful, for the same reason they do not burn fifty dollar bills.
Men only kill their wives for good Old Testament reasons. If there are counter examples, the feminists are mighty hard up for them.
There are women who end up with very mean and cruel men but in clownworld this is their choice… if a girl ended up with one via arranged marriage I’d have more pity.
> Men do not kill wives who might be faithful, for the same reason they do not burn fifty dollar bills.
Well some mentally ill men will do all sorts of deranged things for any reason or no reason. That said it’s not that common. Given serial killers exist, not unreasonable to think that there are also some number of examples of husbands killing their wives.
One archetype that is often heard is that of the man who came back from the war and was suddenly violent and perhaps suffered from “PTSD”. This is such a cliché that it makes a story somewhat suspicious in and of itself when you hear it. Nonetheless, I don’t know any war veterans as anyone in my family who participated in WW2 is long dead.
> Checkout the women that they point to.
It seems everyone who talks about this has some relative or friend who was ‘abused’ in some way. Not really possible to verify such a story though, and would make you look bad for questioning their supposed personal tragedy.
Women regularly make up stories of abuse. I should know, it happened to me.
Claiming abuse is a social super weapon regularly abused by women who cheat or woman who want their men to beat them but they’re men are unwilling to do so.
Men who come back from deployment tend to find that their wives have been cheating on them the entire time they were away. Most military wives head to the bars the moment they deploy, it’s a well known behavior.
What’s going on with police families? Leftists pull out a variety of studies claiming high rates of wife beating to paint cops as psychopaths. Are these women complaining about not being abused, or are they actually getting beaten because they’re cheating a lot? The few cops I’ve talked with came across as pretty level headed average guys, so maybe the women felt like they fell for a bait and switch?
“What’s going on with police families? Leftists pull out a variety of studies claiming high rates of wife beating to paint cops as psychopaths. Are these women complaining about not being abused, or are they actually getting beaten because they’re cheating a lot? The few cops I’ve talked with came across as pretty level headed average guys, so maybe the women felt like they fell for a bait and switch?”
Opinion: American Leftists want to replace the existing police services with people under their control, loyal to themselves, and willing to enforce their agenda regardless of its legality. So they will demonize the existing police.
Duluth is alpha male on call.
Women call, and in the resulting conflict is apt confirm their husband’s betahood. Although it is dangerous to treat the cop as beta, they are perfectly happy with courtesy of one alpha to another, and are always cautious about the possibility of sudden unexpected violence, which you can use to your advantage – their caution will send beta signals to women’s supersensitive radar.
So a whole lot of cops get called, and nothing happens – which is to the left proof that they are ignoring wife beating.
Most cops are very low IQ guys with psychopathic tendencies though with better impulse control than criminals (the only real difference between typical cops and typical criminals). This already inclines them to wife beating at the slightest provocation or no provacation at all, but then the average cop wife has a fetish for low IQ psychopaths in uniform more so than the average woman and such a woman is probably inclined to bad behavior and nuclear shit tests often.
So probably the cop’s and wife beating is not made up, but the women also provoke it I’m sure even though likely most of their husbands don’t need much provocation.
“Opinion: American Leftists want to replace the existing police services with people under their control, loyal to themselves, and willing to enforce their agenda regardless of its legality. So they will demonize the existing police.”
The left doesn’t really need to replace police to get mindless obedience.
>Most cops are very low IQ guys with psychopathic tendencies
That’s a common perception, yet on average they seem… well average. They do have some elevated psychopathic traits, but no more than say firefighters. Back to IQ though, I found this:
So I’ve got to wonder, are the women that marry cops looking for low IQ psychopaths, getting disappointed when they realize they married an average dude, and then claiming abuse whenever they participate in domestic violence surveys?
Logically one would expect counter examples to exist, but if a counterexample exists, would be on a poster. You can see the lesbian women libbers digging mighty hard for propaganda against marriage and fidelity.
Obviously plenty of men are so deranged that they would deliberately harm themselves, so would deliberately harm a faithful wife but the time they get that deranged, the wife has checked out. I would conjecture that propensity to harm a faithful wife correlates strongly with propensity to self harm, which women accurately perceive as beta. Their alpha radar is super sensitive and super accurate, though four million years out of date.
There is no shortage of examples of men killing wives plausibly suspected of infidelity. But there is a strange shortage of examples of men killing plausibly faithful wives, which one would expect to make the posters.
All women who complain about abuse are complaining about lack of abuse.
Compare men complaining about rape with women complaining about rape. When you pooh poo rape, outraged feminists will start screaming about some horrible horrible horrible rape – by high status handsome white star athletes, horrible horrible they say, oh the horror. When men complain about rape, it is blacks, hobos, and vagrants.
Similarly workplace sexual harassment. Women in overwhelmingly female occupations strangely suffer no end of workplace sexual harassment and sexual assault, while women in overwhelmingly male occupations strangely do not.
> while women in overwhelmingly male occupations strangely do not.
Not sure about this one. I would certainly prefer to work with mostly men with a single or a few women, than be in an office with only women.
However, the overwhelmingly male occupation par excellence is the military. We hear no end of complaints about rape in the military.
From men, I hear that the women will sleep with many of their fellow soldiers and then make up stories of harassment/rape if they are caught lacking in some way.
Also frequently get pregnant and discharged – but that’s a different matter.
“Also frequently get pregnant and discharged – but that’s a different matter.”
They do this to get out of long deployments in places they don’t want to go from what I hear. Or sometimes because women sometimes subconsciously want to get pregnant and start fucking raw with no birth control and it just happens.
Isn’t pregnancy quite common right before the navy deploys? The poor girls then get to stay ashore.
While it’s not entirely rational, because I have actually worked with a handful of respectably competent women, I’d still prefer to work in a male-only environment.
I’d certainly sidle towards the exit if the boss is female. Many horror stories.
@The Cominator
Same reason why Nurses act similarly. They are far more surrounded by death.
Mortality salience in women may raise Libido. In War Men not only act as a Masculine Archetype.
But that the risk of death is substantially raised.
We had a lot of men who came back from the war and suffered from PTSD. That includes some of my friends.
(Although I suspect much of that PTSD was not just from combat itself, but also from subsequent treatments by subsequent Croatian governments. As if they were losers, and not victors.)
I have never heard that any single one of them was violent toward his wife and/or family.
Quite a few of them were violent toward – themselves. That is, they committed suicide. However, local feminazis are hard-pressed to find any evidence of “macho-militarism” as cause of “domestic violence”.
This seems to be the case. Rittenhouse has PTSD for a similar reasons. Men need to be rewarded and praised for doing manly violence, not shamed and attacked for it. Combat is extremely hard on your system and the stress of having it framed as evil makes it much worse.
Rittenhouse needs to see the hand of God in his violence. How, pray tell could such an overwhelming fraction of the bullets he fired under high stress unerringly find a child molester? It was like God was guiding his aim, almost like the scene in the final episode of ‘Persons of Interest”.
There is also an interesting relationship between where the bullets hit, and his assailant’s rap sheets.
PTSD is a stress disorder. Which as Aidan says:
https://chevauchee.substack.com/p/so-you-want-to-be-a-pirate
> The best way to do this in reality is to ride motorcycles, on or off road,
I have a feeling we discussed this before, though I can confirm. Riding a motorcycle is the only thing in my life that involved confronting some level of fear for my life, over and over.
Though I ride very cautiously as I don’t have an actual death wish; so most of the danger was in my head, rather than real. Maybe I am a coward but it would be kind of a waste to die for a thrill.
You see this all the time in green fighters who have never stepped into a live competition before. The number one thing that always gets them is gassing out from adrenaline dump.
Cultivating the ability to keep your nerve under pressure is the core of veterancy.
Gonna have to disagree with you here. A record number of men these days cut off their dicks in favor of a perpetually bleeding wound. Way less rational than burning a $50, or just being a mean drunk with a shitty job.
This is kinda like saying bantus shooting each other means we need to steal everyone’s guns (and europoid’s especially). Men cutting their dicks off and men pulling LTRs are not overlapping demographics. People are getting their narrative wires crossed.
What? No it isn’t, it’s just an observation. And men cutting their dicks off are all descended from men who survived the massive evolutionary winnowing effect that the male sex has had to endure, and still wound up with at least a psychological vulnerability to being persuaded to do things like that. Much easier for a man to get convinced to commit irrational violence than to get convinced to cut his nuts off.
I don’t observe troons having success in pulling poontang (usually part of the reason many troon out to begin with), let alone getting married, and I don’t observe the proverbial random drunk mcwoman beater for no raisin that seems to exist everywhere in people’s heads but nowhere in people’s social circles, either.
All of the troons’ male ancestors, without exception, pulled poontang. You think the genes for such a predisposition just popped out of nowhere in this generation in particular?
I had one in my social circle. One of my great uncles. Was a farmhand with a godawful boss. Drank with his buddies a lot. Came home one night, great aunt asked him something innocuous he didn’t even remember, and he punched her in the face. She hit the wall, he went to pass out on the bed, and by the morning she was dead. Spent about fifteen years in jail over it, told me the story as a more or less broken man when I was a boy.
>All of the troons’ male ancestors[…]pulled poontang.
This is trivially true, but I’m curious what you think the implications are (ie, the payload).
Keep in mind what prompted this discussion in the first place, which is salami-slicer tactics used by anti-natal daemonhosts to get the nose of the camel under the tent (the nose being ‘what if a man kills his wife for no raisin’, and the camel being fully gnostic androgyne murder-suicide cult).
Your great aunt was a shit testing harpy bitch for many years before that incident.
Very simple. It is enough to establish that a propensity for behavior obviously and dramatically against a man’s sexual best interest (homosexuality being another prominent example) can and does make it through the selection filter to manifest in modern generations and that whatever genes give a propensity for it are not enough to cripple chances of reproductive success. Therefore the argument that no man would ever kill his woman for bad reasons because it is against is sexual interests is very implausible. To be plausible, would have to argue that it is more disadvantageous to be born with a propensity to excess violence against females than to be born with a propensity to engage in self-sterilization.
That’s it. It’s not a policy recommendation. It’s an observation of a real thing that I’ve seen inside my family. If I were recommending policy it’d be arranged marriages at a young age between families whose patriarchs know each other well. That seems to have the best outcomes, though as with all things there are some unfortunate instances where even that goes wrong.
And yet strangely, despite endless searching, feminists have not found a poster girl. This is a fact you need to explain.
I explained it. If you don’t like my explanation, need to provide an alternative.
Doubtless if the state, the officially unofficial state Church, and the media (but I repeat myself) were pushing men to burn fifty dollar bills the way they are pushing men to cut their dicks off, we would see no end of men burning fifty dollar bills.
But we see absolutely zero men burning fifty dollar bills, and absolutely zero men killing plausibly faithful wives.
Not how great uncle described her, or the situation. Have no real reason to disbelieve him. He was torn up for the rest of his life about it.
The upshot is not that it is impossible for such-and-such to happen, but how plausible or implausible it is *compared to everything else*.
‘Not all X are like that’ but it is fatuity to hang yourself on whether all X or no X are like that – categorically imperative thinking is the root of almost all intellectual sins.
Men predisposed to be vulnerable to the psyop in later days were also much better socialized in more civilized times of yester days.
Alcohol is called liquid courage because it turns off the inner policeman and frees you to do what you normally want to do but stop yourself from doing.
Considering all women are shit testing harpy bitches to one degree or another, whenever a man smacks his wife after some drinking I assume she has had it coming for some time. They always do.
Going back hundreds of years now the modern western man is far, far too lenient with his wife and daughters. There is a line in a movie I forget what one, a Muslim guy says to a white guy “You should beat your wife every morning. If you do not know what for, she does.â€
That quote best describes the reality of the situation I think.
Self-destructive men today don’t have contact with women (or anyone at all, for that matter), and self-destructive men yesterday either had the benefit of embeddedness in more adaptive social super-structures which don’t exist today, or were not selected by fathers for marriage in the first place.
It is implausible today, was implausible yesterday, and will be implausible tomorrow.
Nuts
1. As Pseudo-Chrysostom said, non overlapping demographics.
2. That cutting your dick off in favor of a painful bleeding wound will make you popular and high status is a government promoted delusion, similar to the pole sitting that Gibbon rightly ridiculed. No one is promoting the (considerably more plausible) belief that killing your wife will get you knee deep in hot chicks howling for your dick. And in a society where unfaithful women were apt to be killed, it would not, because female sexual choice would be under male control. Pole sitting was part of a system of ideas that encouraged not having children and ditching faithful wives in favor of celibacy. But in such a society, men considered suitable prospective sons in laws would be a non overlapping set with men considered potential pole sitters, as in our society, men apt to cut their dicks off is a non overlapping set with men apt to pull chicks into long term relationships.
1. In the days of monogamous society with female sexuality under male control, overlap existed as most all men were married and bachelorhood was rare and noticed. Men who will do irrational things irrespective of how negatively it impacts their sexual fitness have always existed. A good number of them reproduced anyway.
2. That cutting your dick off in favor of a bleeding wound is a thing you can convince men to do is all the proof one needs that men do not always behave rationally according to their sexual best interests. All of these men’s male ancestors successfully reproduced, yet their offspring now accept the idea of self-sterilization. Do you think such irrationalities sprang out of nowhere, or that they have no antecedents back in history? A misdirected sense of male aggression is way less evolutionarily deleterious than a willingness to mutilate your sex organ, yet the former has verifiably made it through the evolutionary filter to the present day. Genetic propensity for pole sitting did not come from nowhere.
I mean, Christ, have you never even met so much as a guy with a propensity to flip out without warning when shitfaced after a lousy day?
> Do you think such irrationalities sprang out of nowhere, or that they have no antecedents back in history?
I think it’s social influence, not genetic. If they hadn’t been convinced to cut their dicks off their energy would go towards more productive things. I don’t think it’s their natural propensity.
> I mean, Christ, have you never even met so much as a guy with a propensity to flip out without warning when shitfaced after a lousy day?
I agree with this, though. Some men are very volatile, also drugs can do that.
transubstantiation via genital mutilation is one of two state religion approved miracles available to white men to achieve absolution, the other being anal sex. it only shows the terrifying lengths humans will go to for religious status.
it’s funny to me because throughout my youth I ridiculed Christianity for being a ‘guilt cult,’ yet achieving forgiveness for original sin is vastly easier and less harmful than becoming an adherent to the modern depraved blood worshippers.
Woman are regularly killed for cheating on their husbands and even more often for stealing their children via family court. The OJ murders were about Nicole not letting OJ see his kids and Goldman for fucking OJ’s wife. If anything I would bet the number of deaths have increased due to the woman’s movement, since men can no longer beat their women when they need it keep the in line.
If I’d been on the OJ jury I would have voted not guilty because the bitch had it coming.
I do. Evolution selects against such behavior because it results in failure to pass on the man’s genes. I observed some “domestic violence” first hand as a kid and the wife pushed her husband hard to induce the beating. She did this over and over again. It made her happy when he beat her. Some women need to be beaten.
“Those arguing against it point to women being killed by their husbands. What is the response to that?”
Argument from false premise. As with children being safest from abuse in a household with their biological parents married to each other, safer than every other living arrangement from single mother to married step-parents to lesbian couples. We’re naturally most outraged by the worst violations of the natural order, i.e. most outraged by the rarest occurrences of abuse. Then useful idiots and knowing bad faith actors channel that outrage to tear down that system that most prevents abuse.
The above is so well documented it’s beyond reproach. I suspect with less direct documentation that marriage to a faithful wife is similarly correlated with highest level of protection from murder and criminal assault. Also similarly, a husband offing a faithful wife is such an outrage the natural order that useful idiots and bad faith actors legislate against it, all the while increasing total violence against women.
Supposition that dwells on the possibility of threats a theoretical woman may theoretically face from a theoretical husband leaves unspoken the threat(s) a theoretical woman may face from *literally any other state of affairs* – which omissions of emphasis of course implying, sotto voce, the desired presumptions.
You see the same tactic in practically everything that ever comes out of a whig mouthpiece.
@notglowing
YouTube comment sections are massively censored, with automated censorship shutting down even benign comments.
Real discussions, even of a neutral manner, are impossible on YouTube.
I asked my wife where she was getting all her pro-Russia talking points, and she said YouTube comments. Apparently their censorship of Russian-language channels is a lot less rigorous.
So the NOG’s last minute not!offenses via throwing their commissar brigades (‘national guards’ like azog and uragan) into the meat grinder has come to naught, and NAFO trannies on twitter are now declaring victory on how the Glorious Defense of Bakhmutgrad has been completed successfully and there is no reason to stay any more now that Its Purpose Has Been Served – always a sure sign that things are ogre.
It’s likely a hail mary will be thrown at some point soon now – perhaps a drive at the Zaporhyzia power plant for Reasons; either to wave it as a flashy talking point, or to hold it hostage like a suicide bomber.
The Ukrainians are accumulating a large pile of reserves eighty kilometers from the Zaporhyzia nuclear power plant, which contains an enormous pile of nuclear waste stored in deep reinforced concrete bunkers.
The obvious intent is to grab that pile and hold it hostage like a mad suicide bomber.
Am I dense, or can’t this be good news?
Zelensky and his crowd make off to Haifa or Miami with their bags of loot, and then the Zaporhyzia hijackers get choppered out to Thailand with ski masks, fake passports and $250,000 in cash each. What a bargain!
It’s a perfect way to publicly play out, in relative miniature, the “nukes are all we have left that’s scary, so let’s hold the world hostage with them forever†gambit. Beginning, middle and END.
Let’s have this out now. All I want anymore is some way to work out losses in Ukraine, Taiwan and the Mideast that don’t include mushroom clouds. That’s my “success conditionâ€. I’m reminded of the remaining Cambodians with an IQ over 90 who helped the Vietnamese invade in 1976. “We’ll be their bitches for generations but at least some of us will still be here.â€
Ukraine attacked into Russia proper. Small numbers to avoid being spotted and crushed in a couple hours when the local forces mobilized, but being trumpeted as a victory on twitter.
Nuclear weapons in a military base that seems to have been the target of the attack.
The attack seems to have penetrated Russian defense lines, seems likely to be one of many similar attacks, looking for a point of vulnerability.
The basic idea of the Greatest Ukrainian Offensive is to attain war of movement. So, hit the Russians where they are not. This looks like it caught the Russians with their pants down, but that on the face of it, does not look this will suffice to attain war of movement. The Ukrainians failed to take the nuclear base, so, stuck in attrition again. Had they taken the base, big gap for Ukrainian troops to pour through, and nukes.
If they did manage to capture Russian nuclear devices, would they be able to use them?
…be able to use them?
Eventually. Until then, the looming threat would be the card.
In moments of mounting desperation, the likelihood of glow in the dark gayops and other unusual happenings goes up.
Doubtlessly there have been no end of imagined 5th column larps put in the pipeline by various factions in the GAE as they indulged in dreams of colour-revolution’ing Russia, which were now being activated and thrown at the wall to see if something sticks. The whole ‘we are russians attacking russia’ thing is cringe as hell, but par the course for the level of strategic subtlety we can come to expect from our incumbent nomenklatura – such as it is. Nafonistas can’t decide whether they want to deny involvement or to take credit for the sake of cheap feelings of social validation – which exposes the astroturf and invalidates the whole larp to begin with. The answer of course is whatever is convenient for the argument at the moment; including multiple times over the same conversation even. The usual cognitive two-step of Late Wokitalism.
There is no actual content to the mouth-noises, just all different ways of repetitiously proclaiming ‘I am Power’ over and over again. ‘Your objections are irrelevant, because I am Power’. Heady stuff for NPCs, practically tailor-made catnip for the kind of person ‘running’ things now.
Cominator, the comment thread on which you are replying is somehow broken, so your comments are not being seen correctly.
The thread seems to go through a comment that does not exist in the database for some reason.
It looks like several comments including one of mine went poof.
I recently found out a guy in the outer orbit of my social circle died from a fentanyl overdose. We went to all the same schools, kindergarten to university (even got the same degree), went to the same classical concerts, the same charity fundraisers, we lived in the same wealthy neighborhood. I remember his parents were sophisticated, solidly upper middle class, cultured. The type of people that came from many generations of fine breeding. The aesthetics that can’t be faked. I remember the guy was good with the girls and later the women. He was popular, athletic and bright. The type that was on the high school student council, the varsity football team, in all the AP classes, and in all the college equivalents. By all means he should have had a bright future.
I didn’t know him well enough to feel sad at the news, but well enough I feel a tired unease. In my father’s day the young men of our social circle died from crashing fast cars, hunting accidents, kinetic encounters in distant lands. In essence they died while on adventure. Unfortunate but unavoidable as men. In my generation the young men are mostly dying from despair. Suicide (I know of more than several now) and drug overdose (again more than several). Thematically fitting that I found out this news from a chance encounter in a liquor store. I ran into a former classmate of mine. He, I learned to my shock, is a recovering cocaine addict. I couldn’t be too judgemental though, after all we both ended up buying liquor.
America’s spiritual rot is widespread; the upper middle class, even located far away from the coastal cities, is no exception. This has all been widely off topic, but oddly precisely on topic. I remember the party line on Russia (before the nuclear gas station one) was that it’s a degenerate nation full of alcoholics, drug addicts, AIDs, and abortion. That all those problems would mean Russia could never win against America. I look at America today and see all those things and more. More fundamental than Russian GDP being real and American GDP fake, Russian spirit is real and American spirit fake.
Winning in Ukraine likely doesn’t really matter to America’s fallen elite, lower and upper. The war is exciting. It provides a false telos. An intoxicate that reminds them they can still feel something, anything, so long as it distracts from the terror of staring into a nihilistic abyss. So they will play war with other people’s lives, and when it ends in Ukraine they will shift to a myriad of other nations.
I am seeing inconsistent data on fertility, abortion, and death rate for Russia. The stats are all over the place, but they all show them as bad, but getting very slightly less bad. I would have expected them to get a lot less bad. On the other hand, the absence of change may be because no one really has any recent data, so they are just projecting no change.
All births are registered, so I would expect the official count of births to be reliable (it is obvious that none of the other data is reliable, or even all that plausible) but I just cannot find the official count of births for any year later than 2021.
What will be interesting is the official count of births for the period nine months after the start of the war, but we probably will not have that data for quite a while.
The Russian fertility rates are bad, but better than most of Europe and legacy America. It is an intensely odd thing for people to say Russia is done because of x, y, z while being conspicuously blind to also having x, y, z in often worse rates. The Russians supposedly have as low as 1.5 and as high as 1.8 fertility rates. The EU average is 1.5, as low as 1.1 and high as 1.8. The legacy American fertility rate is 1.5. When they fudge the numbers by including Hispanics and it’s 1.8.
What’s more, in areas where Russia has worse rates, it has been slowly but steadily improving. Take suicide for example. Yes, they are still significantly higher than America’s, but the trend is continuously downward since 2000, down over 50%. Even during Covid and the war it has declined. America’s rate has been continuously upward since 2000, up 60%. Of course trends don’t continue forever, but if they continue as they are for the next 20 years, America’s suicide rate will be more than double the Russian rate.
Part of this is the increased potency of newer drugs; the increased potency of the logistics of the drug trade (easier access and encouragement to use.)
Dont forget the part of the plan where a colour revolution would happen in russia, it would get divided in chunks, everyone would turn gay or trans and china would be isolated from the siberian resources.
I see this refrain repeated over and over, but what could possess people to think that any Eastern European country, within America’s sphere (NATO/EU) or otherwise would be convinced to adopt the liberal-homo lifestyle? Hungary, Poland, the Baltics, are all fiercely conservative and none too tolerant of that way of life. The cultural germ for that sort of behavior does not exist east of the Hajnal Line. If we move over to Asia, even facing down many big gun barrels, none of the Arab/Muslim states budged on this. Poland and Hungary did not budge despite endless threats to cut their EU gibs pipeline. Ukraine is no different. Even if they were incorporated into NATO, the EU, you name it, their fundamental nature is so different from the West. This delusion that they are somehow fighting for homosex is an ignorant transposition of American values and cultural mores which are divorced from any concept of fighting for one’s homestead.
Hungary is resisting. Poland and the Baltics are compromising. Poland held its first Gay Pride Parade in 2001. They will compromise further. Each compromise makes it more difficult to resist further compromises. The Gay Pride Parade is the victory march of the conquerors. The statues to the honored dead will be destroyed soon enough, the altars desecrated and Churches turned into Gaia museums.
Gay pride parade in the streets of Kiev
Any Church that resists will be burned, as our and Kiev’s churches have been burned. The priests will burn their pinch of incense to Caesar.
There are pride parades, granted. They are also extremely sparsely attended, and I would wager there are more homegrown counter-demonstrators/hooligans than native born Poles marching. Would it be ideal if there were no pride parades? Of course. But in and of itself it means nothing apart from the State Dept flexing its muscle (and as we can see, it is a very weak, atrophied muscle).
Turkey was able to do away with them without openly compromising their “democratic values” by essentially manufacturing or exaggerating security threats as an excuse to shut them down. As Poland et al become more defiant, I wouldn’t be surprised to see them do the same.
It is not the attendance that matters, but power and violence.
It does not matter how many attend. The police show up, the president shows up, the motorists are forced from the street.
They are backed by the authority and violence of the state. The Churches in the Ukraine are being desecrated, and vandalized, and burned, as ours have been. If the pastor does not want his church building trashed, he will burn his pinch of incense to Caesar.
If only half a dozen show up, they are still victorious conquerors, and the normies are the defeated and demoralized conquered subjects who dare not disagree with their masters.
Not one counter demonstrator of the crushed, defeated, and conquered subject population dared show his face, for they would have been beaten up and then thrown into jail for a very long time.
I am not Christian so I can’t speak to the issue on churches, but it’s my understanding that the ROC essentially functions as a Russian forward operating base (espionage, influence, etc), if this is what’s being referred to. AFAIK the Ukrainians themselves are no less fiercely Christian in the Slavic rural sense than any of their co-ethnics
ROC Christians and priests were fleeing terror in the enemy occupied areas of the Ukraine before this war began.
Let’s reframe the scenario. Mexico mounts an invasion of Texas after holding a referendum among the local Mexican population where most would like to be reincorporated into Mexico. The local Catholic churches support and organize the Mexican population in service of this. Would cracking down on them by the US govt be perceived as an anti-Christian measure, or a nationalist one?
A further reframe. Suppose that the state had been terrorizing Catholics for some years before the Mexican invasion, and Catholics had been fleeing to Mexico. How old do you think the Ukrainian “Orthodox” Church is?
It was very recently created by state power in 2018. And suddenly all Christians are Ukrainian Orthodox. Or beaten up and quite possibly killed. Let us put that in your scenario. Do you think any of the suddenly converted priests of that Church can read the biblical passages on homosexuals in Church?
This is a conquering alien hostile regime.
The priests are unmanned, for they have burned their incense to Caesar.
>I doubt it, for they would be beaten up and then thrown into jail for a very long time.
I find it hard to believe this’d be the case in Poland where the current majority party has anti-gay in its platform. This is not Israel, where being sufficiently anti-gay will, in fact, get you tossed in jail
The platform is ignored. They campaign on what their people want, but dare not give them what they want, are without any power to give them what they want. And when the gay parade marches, no one dares reveal what they feel by so much as a hostile face.
In Poland, gay and bisexual men are allowed to donate blood, though no one wants gay blood, which carries no end of horrible diseases. Men can declare themselves women and force everyone to agree, and employers are forced to hire gays.
From Wikipedia:
>In November 2018, following government pressure and threats, more than 200 schools cancelled a planned anti-bullying campaign called “Rainbow Friday”, which the Campaign Against Homophobia had promoted in hopes of building greater acceptance for LGBT students in Poland and fighting hatred and homophobia in schools. The Minister of Education, Anna Zalewska, had warned that any principals who allowed such events to take place could face negative consequences. She also asked parents to report any such activities to authorities,[121][122] however it was reported that many students defied the ban and turned up to school in rainbow colors regardless, and that many schools also refused to comply with the warnings.[123]
In April 2019, Conservative party chairman JarosÅ‚aw KaczyÅ„ski called the LGBT rights movement a “foreign imported threat to the nation”. During a lecture on patriotism, Kaczynski also said “everyone must accept Christianity”.[124][125] That same month, after an activist displayed posters of the Black Madonna with a rainbow halo, Interior Minister Joachim Brudzinski denounced the posters as “cultural barbarism”. The activist was subsequently arrested by the police on charges of “offending religious feelings”. Amnesty International condemned the arrest as “just another example of the constant harassment” and said that the activist “now faces up to two years in prison if found guilty under these absurd charges”.[126]
In June 2019, the newly appointed Minister of National Education, Dariusz Piontkowski, criticised an LGBT rights declaration that Mayor of Warsaw RafaÅ‚ Trzaskowski had signed, saying that it was “an attempt to sexualize children by force” and “raise children who will be given away to pedophiles at some point”.[127][128][129][130]
These are public servants, unafraid to state their views and invoke the law to enforce them. I don’t think your statement holds water
That was five years ago. Four years ago, however …
Three years ago, the tyrant trod on their faces and they licked the heel of his shoe, defeated, crushed, and conquered.
Pardon the shitty formatting
So which way around is it? Are the American elites so full of gay that they need to impose it on everyone they can, because anyone out there not being pro-gay is a threat to them?
Or if the imposition of Gay Parades done as a sign of GAE hegemony, and if a country like Poland had already been totally LGBTWhatever-friendly the demand would have been for something else?
Nothing irritates a fool like the wise and virtuous.
@Asher
I noticed that faggot pride parades in Japan are basically jews and White people. Don’t really see any Japanese faces in them.
Even Japanese faggots don’t like associating with dirty gaijin faggots.
[*deleted for presupposing color revolutions are spontaneous grassroots outrage*]
The Yellow revolution obviously refutes your account of color revolution. Look it up.
A rather long winded, nearly two week, likely on going conversation with Red has borne some fruit. Much thanks to Red. Got a catchy phrase that captures and condenses a good deal of truth.
SJ was talking about how being rough with his wife eventually petered out as she no longer felt being rough was him conquering her. It sounds like SJ had successfully moved from playing the game of players and bitches to owning his wife.
Conquering a woman sounds like a great way to frame the processing of trying to own a woman. It’s also something that I think most men could really latch onto. Much better than hooking up or dating.
Per last threads discussion of the low IQ ‘elite’ here is a post from Ed Dutton over at Vdare;
https://vdare.com/articles/the-rayner-effect-why-are-leftist-though-not-conservative-women-politicians-increasingly-so-stupid
The discussion is centered on how leftists don’t breed but conservatives, particularly religious conservatives, do. I do appreciate that Dutton draws attention to the IQ destroying matriarchy, in this lovely quote;
“Raised by an illiterate single mother, she recalled being accidentally given dog food as a child because her mother couldn’t read the label on the can. At 10 years old, she became her bipolar mother’s caretaker, then gave birth to her own illegitimate child at 16. Born in 1980, she was already a grandmother at the age of 37.”
Feral women select breeding partners based on sexual aggressiveness and preselection, which indirectly selects for low IQ, impulsiveness, and an inability to consider the future. That’s high future time orientation, I believe, but the high/low in that always throw me off. Dutton goes on to make this claim;
“Eventually, the dominant elite of the future will be filled with conservatives, who will occupy positions vacated by retiring high IQ leftists who are not replacing themselves.”
I do not see that this is a given. The elite in the corporation I work for, the c-suite, came out to my facility a few weeks ago due to the magic AI database that now runs everything leading to massive product destruction. I had a chance to speak with the CIO briefly in a meeting. He was a total moron, barely able to string sentences together. I do not see this improving until after a collapse.
As Cthulhu swings ever lefter the powers that be choose ever dumber and dumber ‘elite’ capable of believing the ever increasing leftism. Belief that gay men in dresses are actually women is now required to get into an elite position at my very very large company. Even being aware that you are pointing deer and making horse does not appear to protect oneself from the menticidal effects of the lie. I do not see the elite being replaced by an intelligent elite, but the opposite.
This.
That’s where the winnowing effects of natural selection come in. We don’t live in Africa, so the natural environment isn’t obliging to those with low intelligence when, as is increasingly the case, the regime’s ability to regulate it breaks down.
High time preference, low future orientation.
Yes it frequently trips people up, since we tend to associate moreness with betterness, but you can remember it as like a preference for ‘timeliness’, ie, ‘I want something right now, not later’.
Our elite is increasingly composed of people who lack the far future mental horizon. The New Washington Economic Consensus is an effort to gaslight elements of the elite that are worried about the future.
America is de-industrializing because productive assets are under the control of people who are incapable of operating them and see no reason for their continued existence.
Budweiser and Star Wars burned their brand in part because of self delusion, but they cheerfully entertained such delusions because they just did not care. Not having future orientation, they have no interest in being reality oriented to aspects of the present that merely have future impact.
This is the Rhodesia/South African story, right here. It’s not even that they’re too dumb to be able to maintain stuff. They just don’t see why they should. They just don’t care. They care about other things.
Maybe the people who burned Budweiser and Star Wars had no future orientation, but maybe this was simply a case of people destroying corporate assets for personal gain.
My guess is some did it to feel holy and did not care about the costs that others have to bear. Some went along because the were cowed and didn’t care for company assets. In either case, this does not strictly show lack of future orientation
Torching your future prospects prima facie shows low future orientation.
It doesn’t torch their future prospects, though; it torches the company’s future prospects. The people who make the stupid/holy left-wing decisions prove themselves loyal followers of the state religion and do just fine.
We are straining the definition of ‘future orientation’ now. People who care about (their) patrimony have future orientation. People who don’t, don’t.
This, amongst other reasons, is why you cannot trust gays; they have no stake in the future, and so have no compunctions against actions that leave a wasteland in their wake.
At the end of the day you are left with the simple fact that some men are Godly and some men are Ungodly, which passeth all understanding.
No commissar ever got fired for tanking his temporary host/fiefdom.
@SJ
The dumb elite will be replaced by smarter, more capable elites after the dumb elite’s aircraft carriers get sunk.
Why? Where are these smarter, more capable elites? Suppose a bunch of USG carriers go to the bottom, are our rulers just going to step down then? There’s no potential rival with both the will the and the power to replace them. If anything, our leaders will take a serious military defeat as proof they need to crack down harder on dissidents and wreckers, and redouble their efforts to tap into the world-shaking power of anal sex and black girl magic. The true believers will be certain all failures stem from not following their faith fervently enough, and the cynical sociopaths will be disappointed to have to limit their tyranny to domestic audiences and thoroughly conquered foreigners only, but they’ll make do.
The Ukrainians attempted to grab Russian nukes, as the antifa thugs attempted to take Kyle Rittenhouse’s gun. Had they been closer to succeeding, it is likely those nukes would have been launched to keep them out of enemy hands.
That which cannot continue, will not.
Trees do not grow to the sky, but they grow till they fall over.
There is an increasing likelihood our elites being turned to glass.
Suppose nukes are not used, but suppose Nato logistic exhaustion results in intolerable and enormous Ukrainian casualties. Moldova and Poland get thrown in to keep the war going, followed by Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Czechia, and then Germany. Finland has a real army, but most of the rest have only symbolic armies, with absolutely no capacity for war, particularly Germany. Paris announces it is now a Tributary State of the Greater Han Chinese Empire. The US government announces universal conscription with mandatory sex change for draftees (because diversity is our strength) and bans coal, oil, and gas as part of the New Washington Economic consensus (since according to the consensus that stuff is bad for the war economy)
And then escalation begins.
And then real escalation begins. And after that …
Your argument assumes that the unthinkable just cannot happen. That the new abnormal will just go on and on and on. Doubtless that was the Ukraine was thinking when it sent people to grab Russian nukes. What could possibly go wrong?
History is one long stretch of the unthinkable happening and the unthinkable just going on and on, and on. When the Romans abandoned Britain, the Britons had three centuries of unthinkability.
After twenty years of nuclear and information epoch warfare, I wonder what our elites will look like. A long period of general warfare is going to produce monarchic and aristocratic regimes. The current bunch of clowns are just not capable of running a war.
War is the father of us all. Sooner or later, social orders more capable of warfare will prevail.
>wonder what our elites will look like.
A 3-way competition for power among:
Edward Escobar, the former cartel leader turned Arizonan warlord.
Robert Musk, CEO of New Starlink.
Jeb Kimball¡ the leader of New DC.
Featuring side characters:
Joshua Bateman of the FLDS of New Canaan.
General Nolan Flynn of the American Legion.
Arcade Bacow of Harvard Square.
Papa Thompson of Hell’s Angles.
Dick Nuland of State Department Contingency.
On a more serious note, Jim talks often about tech decline. We even see this in games. Fallout New Vegas remains unparalleled in open world RPG experience. Sad!
Reformatted and reposted with backlinks on Diamond:
https://diamondapp.com/posts/660dc1c7766044ce27ecbb1d9d461e27b2df76275d2008213af582c81550ef94
Wait, you just gave me an idea. While I agree FONV wins if we are purely looking at the unmodified games, there fan made mods, very often total conversions out there, and the FO4 based total conversions absolutely beat any unmodified game in the series.
My point is: fans are doing a better job at game development than game developers.
My greater point: reserve elites. If there are so many great game developers who are not hired as a game developer, there are also like people running businesses who can absolutely take over the job of the elites when they fail.
It would sure be nice if all nukes had an “oh shit emergency disposal†option where they take off and blow up over the ocean someplace. We’re gonna need that.
Huh, when did the Ukrainians try to grab Russian nukes? I missed that.
Grayvoron is a nuke base in Russia near Ukraine. The Ukrainians attempted to capture it yesterday and the day before. Grabbed a good chunk of Russian territory, but got stuck in attritive warfare in the village around the base.
Russian posted video confirmation of a whole lot of blown up tanks inside the Russian border, Belgarad region. Claim to have attrited twenty percent of the battalion. A second thrust followed after the first one was contained.
>Sooner or later, social orders more capable of warfare will prevail.
Fair enough; I can’t disagree with that. But how long is sooner or later? Like they say, the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.
@Contaminated NEET
Every single rotten member of your insipid brahmin class, in the 1980s, thought the Soviet Union would last decades or centuries more.
But my mother would always say, every time she saw a Soviet grocery store, that “their shelves are always empty.”
You can’t even hold a candle to my mother. Fuck off.
@Contaminated NEET
Without those carriers, nobody will be obeying those faggot jew rulers.
Crack down with what? The Ghost of Kiev?
You modern brahmins are fucking retarded. Go get your booster shot with TheDividualist.
Let’s discuss: The revolution kept progressing in Russia through WW1, until the people were more afraid of the revolution than they were afraid of the Czar. Similarly, the GAE is losing its teeth out there pretty fast.
Still, I don’t know how to apply this analogy to our present situation.
When some carriers sink in the China Sea, yes, people outside the GAE will lose the last of their fear/respect for DC-GAE, and it’s BRICS Uber Alles.
But within the GAE, I do agree that it’ll be blamed on heterosexuals and SAT questions having only one correct answer each. “If the Navy had more Shaniquas then the Nimitz would still float today.†So yes, the Ghost of Kiev will indeed go to work, but only domestically. GAE as sealed kill-box, Cambodia style, for a little while longer, while the BRICS set up refugee camps for us outside Tijuana.
No? Something different?
The carriers may sink long before the regime loses its ability to terrorize its populace. Decades or centuries of Brazil. But when the carriers sink, a group of armed whites that cannot overthrow USG can go take over an African country. Then after four generations of high fertility, you have an army capable of conquering the United States.
@Aidan
The regime will have no ability to enforce anything beyond the DC/NYC city limits after the carriers are gone.
The FBI is just a dinky little militia.
A county in the middle of Appalachia can easily destroy the FBI, when there’s no magical F-35 to provide the FBI with air support.
Who is sinking the carriers? China?
Starman’s point is that if the conflict in the South China sea goes hot, US will in the air and sea. America is an airsea empire. Such a defeat is likely to have consequences.
Appalachia? Maybe not; they have a long history of orneryness and lots of rough country to hide out in. But in every metro with 100,000+ people, and the vast majority of rural “red” areas, they can hold the reins indefinitely. Even after major military defeats overseas, they’ll still have all the planes and tanks and whatever other hardware they need to keep control of the USA. You don’t need an F-35 to back up the FBI; a Super Tucano will do just fine. I doubt they’ll even need to break out the heavy equipment very often: they still have a stranglehold on education and entertainment, and can put whatever programming they like into the NPCs’ minds. A fully controlled internet with accounts linked to real identities will come very quickly on the heels of a serious military setback, to protect us from misinformation, defeatism, and enemy propaganda, with draconian penalties for circumventing it. Yes, intelligent and motivated White and Asian men will be able to get around it easily, but most people will be either too dumb or too apathetic to bother.
@Contaminated NEET
So does every State and County. A Super Tucano won’t do shit against a Russian Manpad, or manpads from the local armory.
You brahmins really have no clue about the wonder weapons, especially space travel.
I actually had a fellow member of your social class on Gab, argue with a straight face, that LEO satellites can stay over a single country. That couldn’t fathom that a geostationary satellite can see an entire hemisphere.
A Hollywood script writer was in total disbelief that Elon Musk controls 99% of all US medium to heavy lift to orbit. That Elon Musk launches 80% of all annual orbital upmass. That Elon Musk controls the majority of the world’s satellites, and that those satellites can reach every single other satellite in Cislunar space.
Nobody who is not a jew, a pedo-faggot, or a nigger, actually likes pedo-faggot nigger worship. The aircraft carrier forces them to bow down to that worship.
Kalogerosstilitis often says that Greece would immediately come under junta rule, if NATO actually fell.
Brazil and South Africa wouldn’t be Brazil and South Africa today, if the US didn’t exist.
Nonsense. The USG will be able to maintain an internal sovereignty on violence long after technological decline destroys its ability to project power on the world stage. Brazil has no overseas power, but it has enough police power to impose Nigger Communism on its productive white and white-ish populace.
The east Germany like surveillance is not easy to maintain and without it hard to keep anti government militias from forming and if militias form and the military is a pathetic shell of its former self… many things become possible
Brazil is stabilized by the Global American Empire hegemony. Any internal movement deemed racist or sexist would have any cities it controlled flattened from the air. Also it would be demonetized, deplatformed, and cancelled. Uncut diamonds ceased to be money because Tutsi movements resisting Cathedral sponsored genocide and cut off from the banking system had been using them as money.
When it cut Russia off from Swift, the Global American Empire diminished its capability to do other disliked racial and ethnic groups what it did to the Tutsi.
Question is, what do you think would happen to Brazil without GAE hegemony supporting its state? That is what will happen to the US when GAE imperial power fails. I don’t think anything based would come out of Brazil in the absence of US power. At best a lukewarm brown military caudilloism that causes Brezhnevian stagnation.
Or we could destroy savage nations, conquer land, tame a wild continent and have the power and freedom of ancient warlords.
The megafauna (including human) is the least of your problems. Even more hazardous is the microfauna.
Mosquitoes
Malaria
Tsetse flies
Mango Flies
Bot flies
Sleeping sickness
River blindness
…
Read Conrad’s “Heart of Darkness”.
A significant property improvement project needs to be done in order to open up tropical Africa to the general white population (and livestock). Extincting the predatory flies with gene drive technology would go a long way.
If someone is researching something that will kill off dangerous tropical insects, he is an evil mad scientist destroying the balance of nature, and ethics committees will drop down on him like a ton of bricks. If someone is researching something that will kill people, no problem, and anyone who thinks there is a problem is a conspiracy theorist.
@Aidan
The USG’s entire basis of power and centralization is on its techno weapons to dominate sea, air and space (and it needs to be nice to Elon Musk, if it wants to continue to dominate space).
Its FBI is just a militia, which can be easily stopped by any militia a flyover sheriff can muster.
As Jim has already said, Brazil wouldn’t be Brazil without the USG’s techno military propping it up.
Brazil was once ruled by military emperors who killed niggers on a routine basis.
You failed pseudo-academics are really a cancer on this blog.
Aidan is a good guy I just think he’s wrong here.
@Cominator
My contempt for academics and brahmins really began in early 2020. When that wretched class was dog piling you, when you were the first to realize covid deaths were a hoax.
You were 100% right about opposing the lockdowns, right at the beginning. But all these mediocre academic posters STILL dogpiled you, even after the BLM Letter (where the credentialed experts basically confessed that they were making shit up about the supposed “dangers” of covid).
The final end for my respect for the academic class, whatever political affiliation that they have, was when they hyped lawyer Sidney Powell’s stupid “Release the Kraken” bullshit.
Aidan wasn’t one of them.
The question is, how many men would show up in arms if the local sheriff called on them to fight the FBI? Today, none. If the fed looks like a weak horse? Nobody knows. I don’t know, and you don’t know. But I see gay flags flying in the deep heart of Appalachia.
There are no based classes anymore. Only based individuals. Your conviction in the will and virtue of the Amerikaner is commendable, but I think misguided. The number of men capable of acting as an elite in America today probably does not reach five figures. The physical fatness of the Amerikaner is soul-deep. They’re spiritually fat. They just want to grill, man. They have become slaves- and quality men can indeed become slaves.
The best hope is the concentration of high quality men, and their coordination in military ventures into an elite.
@Aidan
1,000 militia men showed up at the Bundy Ranch in 2013, without being called up by a local Sheriff. While the US military’s reputation was still intact.
The FBI backed down.
A local sheriff in middle America or the South would have no problem calling up 1,000 militia men today.
You retarded brahmin pencil neck.
Sure back when the American civic religion still lived. With the death of Christianity and our shared civic religion the religion of the Sodomy is all that’s left. I kind of doubt they’d show up today.
@Aiden,
America’s a sea empire. The moment our navy failure so will the empire and the part of the empire that want to be a land empire are the Red areas. We’re likly to end up with local elites with real power quickly after the first rusty aircraft carrier graces the bottom on the pacific.
@Starman
Aidan is massive understating here:
When I ventured around legacy White America, and I mean really got to know the people, go to their churches, break bread with them on Sunday with their families, drink beer around a fire, I saw profane levels of promiscuity, inked up bodies, and many opioid habits. They are a truly fallen people, and I have severe doubts about them forming based militias. I really encourage you to get out more. Maybe not to the degree of fraternizing with the poor folk of rural small town White America, but at least visit Walmart and really look at the people.
Look at the BLM riots. You’d think the reaction would be far greater than some ranchers on horseback in the middle of nowhere, yet Kyle Rittenhouse was easily separated from a group. That happens when your group is small. Look at the reaction of Korean-Californian store owners during BLM vs their actions during the LA riots. It’s like based roof Koreans went extinct. The capacity for organized violence has severely declined in all groups not state backed.
You are hating on academics, but are doing the worst sort of academic malpractice, ivory tower pontificating. You have little real world experience with the people you’re championing.
Elite spiritual rot shows up as physical rot of the worst sort among the lower classes. While elites might champion the worst sort of filth, a significant chunk are smart enough to not practice what they preach. See how they often live in all White gated communities while advocating open boarders.
I often find your writing interesting, and find much of it insightful in areas I don’t have time to devote to study, but how about we don’t start calling others “failed pseudo-academics” unless they really deserve it.
I mean, man, that’s just… surprising complementary based on what actual “academics” look and sound like these days. Are you ignorant of those people as well? Must I link here a plethora of deviant homosexuals, screechy cock starved feminists, and all assortment of degenerates for you to understand just how much of a complement you’ve hoisted upon Aidan here? Not saying he don’t deserve it but… damn man, no one here gave me such wonderful accolades. Making me jealous. 🙃
>microfauna
DDT + ivermectin had us most of the way there. Problem is, like the green revolution in agriculture, they were deployed to give us more homo erectus, while home use was backpedaled.
Tangentially, that’s one of the things that got me through covid unjabbed. I knew ivermectin was handed out at the drop of a hat in Africa, sometimes prophylactically every year in river villages, so why was it being suddenly cracked down on here?
>gene drive technology
There’s something to that one, it’s not as bad as mrna vector vaccines or solar energy, but it’s enemy mindset to wait for the future tech to be perfected while the proven, engineered tech sits on the shelf.
DDT and Ivermectin are fine. I’m not knocking them. But they are at best a “suppressive” solution. I’m more interested in a “final solution” to these fuckers.
Such a “group” would have to be nation-sized. And they would need to be able to manufacture military technology and develop sophisticated infrastructure networks without drawing the notice and ire of USG. Which is impossible.
There are no revolutions without either an outside base of support, or substantial internal elite defection. If the USG is conspicuously defeated, both are likely to be forthcoming.
The “New Economic Consensus” is not an attempt to appease the voters about the destruction of the American economy and gaslight them into thinking something is being done. It is an attempt to appease and gaslight elites who are alarmed by the US losing the logistic race against Russia. They want war postponed and the economy rebuilt. (Which only Trump could do.) As the war gets hotter, those elites are going to become more discontented.
With external defeat, internal revolt becomes militarily easier, and in this “a group of armed whites” would have substantially better prospects. But they would still need major internal elite defection or external support.
With Musk apparently getting behind DeSantis I think we should abandon Trump and back DeSantis too… Musk has some chance of buying out the vote riggers for DeSantis.
I do not think Trump does.
I think the less insane faction is gathering around Musk with DeSantis as their standard barer. They’re still likely to lose to the Demon worshipers who are likely to resort to open violence and the FBI locking everyone up who doesn’t bow before Baal.
DeSantis really doesn’t have any charisma, he’s more like a Beria than a Stalin. He’d make a great prime minister for a monarch but I couldn’t see myself following him into battle.
Would he? DeSantis knows a good PR stunt when he sees one, but falls short on power plays. As Yarvin has pointed out, the so called don’t say gay bill is weak, and if DeSantis really wanted to get schools under control he would pass a law that would give parents direct control over schools. He’s no Beria, more of a Shepilov.
Who is going to follow Trump into battle after January 6th? Fucking nobody.
DeSantis has gotten better with speaking and he is better with consolidating power than Trump.
Is he better at consolidating power than Trump?
Trump failed because he failed to create an adequate staff of Trumpists. Does DeSantis have any Desantis? His electoral apparatus is full of Bushites.
You would follow DeSantis to battle? I wouldn’t follow a fat faggot politician who lets his wife tell him how to pronounce his own name to a buffet.
Trump is old and also fat, but at least he grabs by the pussy and has some degree of seriousness and strength to him as seen in his last interview. The problem with Trump is that last time that facade died quite ignominiously and it’s not very credible anymore. However, if you are going to vote, since you will not win because the prog priests will rig the election, you might as well actually vote for a man that even if he doesn’t really mean it, he sounds like he grabs by the pussy and is strong and masculine, at least project the image and the desire for it. Or just don’t vote at all.
He’s consolidated the government of Florida completely behind him in 4 years…
And as far as Desantisites, DeSantis staff never leaks and never betrays him. Florida’s bureaucracy used to leak during Covid but he took care of that. DeSantis has a Stalinesque talent for consolidating power behind the scenes…
We have no better option as Trump just won’t be allowed to win and he has no plan nor the resources to reverse that. I don’t think Musk would back DeSantis without a plan. Musk says he’s an autist, no way any autist looks at the 2020 election and thinks it was legitimate.
As far as I know Musk hasn’t said he is with DeSantis, I guess we’ll find out today what exactly is up in your evening time.
Trump won’t be allowed to win, but no one else is going to be either unless they are fully part of the Cathedral. If they actually let DeSantis wins, that’s bad news, not good news.
You still want to believe that you can have it the easy way, that you will be allowed to vote yourself out of this inferno. Personally I don’t believe that at all, so the premise of my viewpoint is entirely different. You want to vote for the man you believe can give you the easy way, I want to vote for the man that raises the proper flag.
“Trump won’t be allowed to win, but no one else is going to be either unless they are fully part of the Cathedral. If they actually let DeSantis wins, that’s bad news, not good news.”
Oh DeSantis could make a pro gamer move…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbMKc17EtGI
Why should “we” “back” any of the wooden horses in this sham of a race?
I believe it was poster Jehu who put it very poignantly in a previous thread: “Do you want [the fruits of civilization], or do you want a theoretical say in how society is run?” Any elite with the resources, the reach, the loyal subordinates and the sheer brass balls required to make the kinds of changes you’re interested in is not going to need your backing, or the backing of any other prole voter.
A Republican voter is like a simp for politicians. He pours all of his hopes and dreams into one idealized figure, obsesses over them for months, finally works up the courage to register his interest directly, proceeds to get friendzoned and findommed and generally humiliated, claims he’s going [MGTOW] and swearing off [women] forever, then repeats the entire process again without any variation as soon as the next crush pays him the slightest bit of polite attention.
Or like a junkie or a nigger on crack cocaine, he knows it’s killing him, spiritually and in many cases literally, but all he can think about is getting that next hit.
It’s time to grow up. Enjoy the spectacle, as a spectator, if it entertains you, but find the demon who keeps whispering in your ear that your opinion and your support matters to the people in charge, and stab him with his own pitchfork. If you want to feel important, be important, whether that means taking up Aidan’s piratical route, or being on the bleeding edge of tech like Jim or Elon, or jamming up the system with work-to-rule strikes, or lawfare if you’re super rich, or just pumping out lots of kids if you’re ordinary. All of those things might be important; votin’ and grillin’ and whorin’ sure ain’t.
Elections today are a puppet show. Only children and morons could find them entertaining.
If elections realistically simulated civil war by only allowing in-person voting by armed white men, they would be interesting to watch.
>If elections realistically simulated civil war by only allowing in-person voting by armed white men, they would be interesting to watch.
There’s more than one way to fight a war. It doesn’t have to be bullets and bayonets; it could be TV shows and school curricula. Just because we lost so badly we didn’t even know we were in a fight doesn’t mean it wasn’t a real war.
Drag Queen Story Hour is not war, it’s what happens when a nation goes too long without war.
No, it is a war. And our failure to recognize it as a was is why we lost so badly.
Well, OK, drag queen story hour is more of a victory parade than a war. But Friends,</i), the Beatles, X-Men comics, middle school textbooks, ads with dopey dads and wise Black friends, etc. absolutely are weapons in a civil war, and they blew us to smithereens. The fact that we would have beaten them in a "fair fight" doesn't mean a thing, because we didn't, because they defeated us before it got to that point.
I feel confident that 1000 white soldiers could knock over any little African shithole and if you don’t you should hit the books and read some history
“And they would need to be able to manufacture military technology and develop sophisticated infrastructure networks without drawing the notice and ire of USG.”
You incorporate as a PMC, buy a shitload of guns, gear, and boats on investor cash, and then oops, change of plans, we’re going to Africa. The aircraft carriers are floating brothels full of fags and Filipina hookers if not rusting on the floor of the south china sea. USG can do nothing but seethe across the Atlantic while Rhodesia 2.0 is established.
Enslave the local wildlife. Raid the beaches of the world for white wives. Sell access rights to resources to the Chinese at first and declare your state a safe haven for whites. Attract a bunch of talent from around the globe. Industrialize. Do the population math with an average TFR of 10.0. Take over the entirety of Africa eventually.
As amply documented in “Africa Addio” where a small band of white mercenaries take out a whole African platoon.
The great Eeben Barlow would agree with you.
https://sofrep.com/news/eeben-barlow-south-african-pmc-devestates-boko-haram-pt1/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/sierraleone/1343727/Airborne-adventurer-keeps-Freetown-free.html
You just planted in my mind the hilarious spectacle of hundreds of bikini-clad beauties crowding the beaches of Mykonos to see the approaching pirate ships while loudspeakers warn them to flee inland to safety. “Dammit Aidan, our boat’s not big enough!” “Then line them up and just take the prettiest ones.”
Thank you.
“enslave the local wildlife”
If you mean blacks then absolutely fucking not. Any future White state will have to be based on 100% physical exclusion of non-whites. No shitskins inside the wire at all. The policy needs to be shoot on sight.
If the Chinese Ambassador needs to visit your new nation, he can have the meeting on a ship floating in the harbor, but he cannot set foot on your land.
The kids and grandkids will have to have it pounded into their heads over and over and OVER, that you cannot allow any shitskins inside, EVER. Otherwise they’ll be right back in this same situation in a few decades.
Somebody needs to pick the crops and scratch bauxite out of the earth at first. After a couple of generations of high fertility, we will not need the blacks anymore. They can have their fertility kept low-to-zero and slowly die out.
Yeah, I realized my post was stupid immediately after I hit submit. Neglected to read the context about sinking carriers etc. Yes, with external military defeat of USG anything is possible.
Keeping a captive population and sustaining the imposition of a soft genocide on them across multiple generations tends to require a level of vindictive glee, sadism, and petty spite that is uncommon outside of the more gnostically inclined; elsewise it will tend to be subverted into something else.
Civilized men will either just kill them and be done with it or just exile them to other lands and be done with it.
That level of exclusion is not possible in any sustainable way though a period of doing it like that was arguably beneficial for Japan.
>Somebody needs to pick the crops and scratch bauxite out of the earth at first.
How well did that work out for America’s cotton industry? For Rome? For the Ottomans (yeah, why do they sometimes look so white)? Any slave based economy? The thing with slaves is that they have a tendency to become free or folded into the master population over time.
I see no reason why African TFR cannot be kept under 1.5 by peaceful methods. Just making them work for their food (no handouts whatsoever) should do it.
The problem with demographically distinct slave races (as opposed to slavery as forms of intranational criminal justice) is bioleninism; they are irresistible schelling points for use as wedges for subversive purposes. It never not happens.
Which doesn’t mean there are no angles for such tactics *without* easy access to pet marginalities, but it is far less easy, and there is no fatal demographic bomb sitting under your feet that needs only the slightest blips in your perfect order to go off, either.
I side with Pete and John on this one. This time we pick our own cotton. I would rather import white men from America and Europe to serve as a stock class and laborers than keep Africans around. American and European men can bring their families and work for good wages while we run around with our sons raiding coastlines and shipping routes for booty and treasure. We can take the best women, and pass the rest off to the working class men to be their obedient wives. No Africans.
Consider Cambodia. Yes, the “unthinkable†just kept on not happening, the revolution just kept on progressing, until the place was so hungry and gutted and exhausted that the Viets just walked in and put the regime out of its misery.
We might see MS13 similarly very soon, if not already. Or the Bukele Option. Or both somehow. My understanding gets fuzzy right about here.
[*Deleted for telling us about mainstream republicans. You don’t know any*]
About a month ago, I was hospitalized while unconscious. By the time I woke up some hours later, the health issue had sufficiently subsided that I judged further treatment at the hospital to be a cure worse than the disease, so I left ASAP.
Did they clotshot me while I was asleep? Evidence in favor:
1) In the days after my discharge I developed a LOT of skin rashes, Google claims this is cannot be a symptom of what put me in the hospital but is a known side effect of the jab. There are other possible explanations for these rashes – I’m very outdoorsy so I might have encountered some kind of allergy out in the wilderness. We don’t get a lot of summertime bugs in my region but we do get some, and I don’t use bugspray. However those explanations are somewhat dubious, because if environment irritants were the cause I really think it would’ve come up before now, in all the time I’ve lived here I don’t think I’ve ever had skin rashes so pervasive and long-lasting.
2) The medical profession overall is known to be thoroughly captured by alphabet cultists and all their attendant ideological pathologies
3) They had reason to believe I was homeless, and my understanding is that nurses (understandably) take a very paternalistic attitude to such people, utterly disregarding their consent or lack thereof if they perceive it would get in the way of “doing the right thing” (does a vet bother asking a stray cat whether it wants to be spayed or neutered?)
Evidence against:
1) I have experienced no other symptoms that cannot be credibly explained by the placebo effect.
2) COVID hysteria has died down certainly in everyday life and somewhat in hospitals. This specific hospital is in a vaguely urban area, but the precinct it’s located in voted for Trump (according to the official account) by a decent margin. IIRC half or more of the personnel did not wear masks.
3) My medical discharge papers record that I received no immunizations and none of the procedures they did were credible vectors for secret vaccination. (Then again, if they were willing to jab someone without asking them they’d probably also be willing to lie about doing it.)
Accidentally posted before I finished, just want to add: sorry for the off-topic probably-schizo post but this has been keeping me up at night and I’d like to put this issue to rest. Thanks in advance to anyone who can give me some closure one way or another.
@Cataclysm Reawake
You should ask TrevorGoodchild.
https://gab.com/TrevorGoodchild
https://poa.st/@TrevorGoodchild
Easier but not certain, covid tests can come back positive after vaccination. Might have been better closer to the event, but then the whole problem with the vax is you keep producing spike proteins.
Better but more expensive, find a private doctor, pay cash, and ask for blood work and ekg for preventive diagnosis of any heart problems before you increase a workout. If doctor isn’t sympathetic to anti-vax say it’s in relation to what you now believe to be mild covid. If you’ve got heart problems you didn’t have before, suspect vaccination, plus you know what to keep an eye on.
If they jabbed you, would probably have swelling and pain at the site of injection. The rashes are likely a fungal infection from nigger standards of cleaning and hygiene at the hospital. Maybe one resistant to antifungals. Hospitals are death factories. Probably Shanikwa was on her break instead of cleaning a bed that somebody died in not too long ago.
Jim, I’ve a couple of modest requests:
1) I don’t dispute your 1933 thesis. Clearly it happened. I’ve seen many of the specific movies and shows you’ve cited, and talked to people who lived in those times, who confirmed that a lot of women were jealous of John Wayne’s spanked costars. But how did the Cathedral get the whole media to stop on a dime and make that turn? Was it something that FDR could do because of the massive amount of power that he had?
2) Have any of us actually dug into the 2022 Florida elections? There’s a very substantial swing there but I don’t think we really understand the pareto of said swing to the various causes. We know, for instance, that he outright removed several supervisors of Elections in high fraud counties. But is there evidence of suppression of ballot harvesting? Does the ‘honest’ part of high tech ballot harvesting rely on walking hordes of ballots around and pestering everyone likely to be browbeatable into voting for you until they do so, and closing the feedback loop by having the list of who has already voted leaked to you (I don’t think that the parties are supposed to have that information but I have little doubt that the Dems get it for free)? Is the blatantly dishonest portion of such basically jimmying up ballots for anyone that the harvesters couldn’t harvest for whom there is reasonable confidence they won’t show up on election day?
Everything that ever gets done gets done via cadres of men with personal relationships with each other. This is not less true when bureaucratization is involved, but even more true.
Broadcast media changed over night because someone had a discussion with someone who had a discussion with network exes, studio heads, and other nodes of leadership. They simply started walking in a different direction, and everyone simply followed them. There was no ‘pushback’ because the polygonites were themselves the source of the pushing for feminism et all in the first place.
Presumably then there’s no way the Left could currently execute this because it lacks sufficient cohesion, even in the fact of an existential threat? 2020s left doesn’t have the ability to execute a strategic retreat like the 1930s left, or does it?
Both less cohesion amongst the daemon summoners, and also far more pervasive daemonic possession in the main – which in many ways are effectively the same thing.
It does not. Nor does it have the ability to realize that a strategic retreat is necessary, nor has it prepared any positions to retreat into.
In the 1930s, the US elite was full of white men who knew what manliness was and what it was good for.
They absurdly do, remember when they went from covid = nothing (the truth) to omg covid will kill us all.
absolutely not absurdly
No. There are generations of momentum behind the axiom “woman good, it is impossible to have standards for woman’s behavior that are too low”. For Covid, there were mere weeks of propaganda the regime needed to deprogram in order to, most of which the
Election security is a stronger argument for your position. “Muh Russia” was the party line for four years, until it successfully changed to “literally impregnable”. Even in that case, four years is very far from generations.
Ignore everything after “deprogram”. You and me both want an edit button – even if it expired ten minutes after posting.
Always leave the Name or Mail field empty until you’ve done a final proofreading, so that if you accidentally submit too soon, your comment gets rejected.
Same way it got the whole media behind emancipation and women’s liberation in the first place.
>But how did the Cathedral get the whole media to stop on a dime and make that turn?
It’s not hard.
You simply construct an argument that is “don’t you think you work hard enough to deserve more or at least as much as those people over there?”
Real wild stuff going on in the Lutheran Church right now or the LCMS:
Equating “pedophilia” with a speck in ones own eye like all the other sexual sins here in this:
https://twitter.com/treblewoe/status/1660707127541768194
https://twitter.com/treblewoe/status/1660484641692819456
Of course those people are “Anti-racist”:
https://twitter.com/treblewoe/status/1660653425648975879
Recommend following @treblewoe on twitter.
In a healthy society, it is expected that every man who is not a criminal, vagrant, layabout, cripple, or imbecile should have a wife. If he doesn’t, put a young maiden in his tent and see what happens. If she comes out sobbing, it’s because he didn’t ravish her and make her his wife. This happens to a kissless virgin PhD in the 1994 movie Stargate, and it’s a real pleasure to watch. Welcome to the tribe.
Russia is not a healthy society; the traditional values that the Jewsheviks destroyed did not magically reappear when the Jews packed their bags and left. Russians still have great difficulty getting married, staying married, and making babies. They should all re-read Anna’s Rocking Titties https://blog.reaction.la/uncategorized/game-2/#comment-2868185 as adults to get some idea how courtship and marriage are supposed to work.
So if you come to Russia, don’t expect a buffet of innocent young maidens. Actually, one old guy very much wanted to take me home and introduce me to his daughters, but he caught me at a bad moment and I declined the invitation.
As an aside, I once again had lunch in the nearby university town. Jesus salvator mundi, this time it was a literal bearded tranny — in all visible respects a (slovenly dressed) woman except for her unkempt, scraggly beard. And a too low voice. Came with a reasonably normal looking girlfriend (hipster) too.
I suppose this signals the hellbound “Pride” is coming up then. A good time to have my mid-day repast at home for a month or so.
Speaking of trannys, I had posted earlier that I was going to be put in a position where I needed to interview one for a job. I got my subordinates to agree it wasn’t a good fit, but we had an issue as weeks went by without any other candidates.
Pressure mounted to just give it a shot, but I basically waited it out without acting and other better interviews eventually came in. Way too close though never doing that again.
The thing was disgusting and sad. It reminded me of some kids I had gone to school with, played sports with, now degrading himself because his disgusting fetish became a protected class.
A2, you might want to comment with a fake email and a third country vpn
Everyone here is commenting with fake emails
It’s an entirely fake email — at least if it’s the same one as this comment –and I think my problem was that I switched my VPN to a country that gets blocked by WordPress. Or it could be that the VPN IPs were used for spamming and blocked. The net result is my comments from there disappear or get sent to moderation.
If you are in a position to interview, you should be in a position to suggest candidates to HR.
HR is likely to be unhelpful if you are dealing with barren women, but fertile age women are apt to be helpful.
I am, have done so before, but don’t personally know a lot of people looking for the kind of work I’m interviewing for at the moment. I used to grab promising service industry workers that I’d come across but have come across less and less of them as time goes by.
My HR is fairly decent, relatively speaking, we have been successful at keeping our heads down while not internalizing any of the insanity consuming every company around us…so far.
That’s great news — rightwing thought successfully applied to the real world. Make sure to mention internally what an improvement it was to wait to find the right person rather than just hiring whoever turned up (or however you might want to formulate it).
If anything, the problem was HR not sourcing enough good candidates. Let’s improve in that respect, in the case anyone complains.
I do recall that in tech hiring a truism has been it’s superior to be choosy rather than just hiring warm bodies. (I would rank hiring a tranny as worse than a warm body, since it will inevitably also destroy the organization.) Use this to build the case for you being utterly right if need be.
Moving this to a new thread, because buried too deep to allow specific relies anymore
Starman, none of your insults are even close to being on target. Your rage makes me think that you are coming up short on some aspect of your telos. But sure, the Bundys. Unfortunately, we have to step away from numbers and technology into the domain of intuition and character judgement, the domain of wordcel brahmins like myself. /s
What happens when the US military looks like a weak horse, its imperial power collapses, but DC insists on bussing thousands of starving niggers over the shenendoah into West Virginia? How many white men living there are going to proactively take care of the problem? Do you think there is the collective stomach to burn the shanty towns and public housing, hear the screaming of African women and children in their death throes? Even the lesser option, to round them up and forcibly march them back over the mountains to Virginia at gunpoint?
What happens when it’s not the FBI that gets sent in to defeat the evil racists, but the National Guard? Even if they don’t have tanks or planes and their highest tech is an M240 attached to the back of a pickup truck? What if rebellious areas are simply blockaded? They can feed themselves, but they won’t prosper.
This is not the bundy ranch where LARPers can show up with their gucci operator gear once it is obvious that there will be no real violence and hang around. A locality will not be able to scare the Cathedral off by baring its teeth. The Amerikaner not submitting will lead to an incredible amount of very real, brutal violence. It is not that they cannot win (under circumstances involving good leadership), it is that the stomach for what this involves is lacking. In the same way that Britain can only field 100 men that can fight, the number of Amerikaners capable of resistance may be very low. There may be ten in your entire county. Plan for the worst case scenario.
Red: “The moment our navy failure so will the empire and the part of the empire that want to be a land empire are the Red areas. We’re likly to end up with local elites with real power quickly after the first rusty aircraft carrier graces the bottom on the pacific.â€
This is more realistic than Starman’s fantasies of peasant revolt. But who are these local elites who can command enough loyalty? To prevent blockade by the fed, need either a self-sufficient area to secede at once, or mobile banditry. A state seceding raises again the question of sufficient will and loyalty to actually war with the USG. The presence of local elites even on the state level is not guaranteed. There are many formerly proud civilizations that degenerated into tax farms of slaves over which tides of blood regularly roll and the most brutal tyrannies are passively endured by the barely-human peasant.
Mobile banditry on the other hand is the most likely outcome, and ultimately the future belongs to white mobile bandits. My intuition tells me that the possibility of mobile banditry abroad exists on a much shorter time horizon than the possibility of mobile banditry at home, if only by a generation. Most of the time, a civilization is conquered by another civilization before things get bad enough for internal mobile bandits to reestablish an aristocracy, but America is unique in that there is no other empire on the continent which threatens it. If we get nuked, if there is a sudden collapse, I will be be the first to raise the black flag, but colonizing Africa with a PMC is a solution to the contingency of Oriental stagnation and decline, which I today consider the likeliest outcome. I make the case for this long-form on my new blog and I’m happy to debate the practicalities and specifics but Brazil’s based military emperors that shot niggers did not a great nation make, nor is it clear that such would necessarily be reestablished in the absence of GAE power.
If you want to be realistic the PMC thing doesn’t sound like it at all either. While China and Russia don’t seem to be proponents of unified global government, they are still interested in government. They are talking about defending a multi-polar world order and produce real and viable international law, and they are indeed taking actionable steps in the physical world for this, it’s not just talk. What country in Africa are you going to colonize that will not bring this into the multi-polar international law council and complain? And why would Russia or China or the Arab League randomly let you take land like this? No, this is not viable at all.
While I don’t 100% agree with Jim in some things, we are in his blog for a reason, he is indeed right about a lot of things and is a very wise man. As he has said multiple times, and I’m inclined to agree considering the options, what will be required is backing from a foreign elite, probably Russia as the proxy of such multi-polar world order. That would mean you’d get deals with everyone once you got in through them. And there is an increasing acceptance for something like this to happen in the Russian zeitgeist, because they are getting very sick of the shit that is happening with Ukraine. There was someone on TV only half-jokingly saying that Russia should be training terrorists in Scotland (perhaps he meant Ireland, but concept is the same).
To be honest I’m not clear that after the continue collapse that is happening before our very own eyes the USFG will continue to have the logistic ability to bus niggers anywhere. They might not have the logistic ability to enforce law in general anywhere and especially not on states with something that resembles red government. This is kinda happening to a certain degree already in many places, at least that’s what I’m hearing. The US dollar will remain for some time, because the rest of the world has it entrenched in their gut like a cancer, but the multi-polar world order is already taking steps to solve this and it will not take that long, perhaps only a couple of decades or less. The condition the US will reach within this decade and the next is completely unpredictable at this point, too many variables and possibilities.
One of the possibilities is that the USFG will absolutely squeeze Europe to the utmost poverty to maintain itself for as long as possible and their vassals will cooperate… hopefully not. Macron is an absolute faggot and I’d like to see him hanging from a post but he has already shown certain inclinations towards realignment, it would influence the rest.
The “multipolar world order†is a shibboleth that identifies resistance to the GAE and the petrodollar while couched in a soothing liberal frame. It has no ideological content. When the GAE falls, there will be a huge amount of war between nations. The analogy is the collapse of the Bronze Age. China does not give a fuck about the well-being of blacks. They will be happy to trade with us. The collapse of the GAE power will cause such an orgy of civil war, starvation, and brutality in Africa that our state would be a near-singular source of material.
“I’m not clear that after the continue collapse that is happening before our very own eyes the USFG will continue to have the logistic ability to bus niggers anywhereâ€
If there is gasoline in the station and food on the shelves, the USG will be bussing niggers as its highest priority. The last drop of gas and last loaf of bread will be spent in nigger worship. If there is no gas and no food, then yeah saddle up and be a warlord. But long before there is no gas and no food, there will be opportunity for conquest in the 3rd world.
Now time for a potentiality you hadn’t considered. What if it is in Russias and Chinas interests to keep the US a shithole? To both nations a “militarist right wing resurgent Unites States†sounds like a nightmare to them. What if Russia and China, fearing an American restoration, instead give just enough high tech weapons to the Cathedral to maintain domestic order, but not enough to project power abroad? America as a communist shithole with tanks but no aircraft carriers sounds like a geopolitical dream for RU and CN.
America as what Egypt was to Rome is the worst case scenario.
I disagree with your reading.
The Chinese are a mercantile people by nature, this is what they’ve always been and done long before Europeans set out to explore. They had the means much sooner, but instead they just went around trading. When the Mongols started invading, they did not think “let’s kill them all” like Europeans would have thought, instead they just built a wall to be left alone. The multi-polar world order is their notion of Mandate of Heaven as it relates to other nations, it means “we are here in our Middle Kingdom and the rest of you savages stay in your places and we’ll trade for money”.
Syria getting re-accepted into the Arab fold and Iran and SA being all friends again goes way beyond the scope of resistance to the GAE. They are actively promoting stability and mercantile relations everywhere and they’ll continue. You claim that it could be in China’s interest to keep the US a shit hole, that’s how you think, that is not how they think. If they think about you, they’d think about who is a better trade partner, they don’t care.
When the GAE falls there will not be a huge amount of war between nations, because China and Russia are actively working against it. China doesn’t care about internal affairs as long as they can trade, but they want to trade, they want peace and stability. Russia did not sit quiet in regards to Syria, they will not sit quiet for random war. This is not a Bronze Age collapse, the only thing collapsing is your government, no one else. The death of your government will greatly improve everyone else’s life around the globe, from day to night, many European countries might in fact fully recover because the base is there, it’s just being suppressed by State Department.. Whatever war we have not is not despite the USFG, all the war we have is basically USFG made.
China does not necessarily care about niggers, but it cares about the mercantile deals it has already set there, you will not waltz in like it’s your house and they have no say. And if you believe Russia might think keeping the US a shit hole is good, what makes you believe your PMC would not be strangled in its crib?
There will not be more war in Africa after USFG dies, in fact there will be a lot more peace and prosperity, as there used to be before the USFG set out to murder and destroy in Africa and the Middle East. There might be some conflict, but even conflicts will be mediated by China and Russia, and by extension the rest of the countries involved in this world order. The BRICS convention thing they are doing in Saint Petersburg is not a transient thing, I think they think they are serious about it.
If you were to convince China that you’re a better trading partner then I think you get their support, but then you are again going the Jim route, getting backing from a foreign elite.
What Russia’s opinion on keeping America a shit hole is, I’m not sure. China will not waste their time with that, perhaps the Muslims want revenge for the last few decades. Hard to say, I have a feeling Putin genuine believed in that he would be able to reach agreement with “western partners” and was genuinely surprised he couldn’t and had to go to war. He is still being genuinely and uniquely civil about it too. It doesn’t sound like the political player you are describing. As for Muslims, even after everything SA still wants to be friendly, establish Dubai as an international center, etc., etc., I don’t think they care enough. More than keeping it a communist shit hole, they’d be more likely to try to turn it into their faith.
I don’t think so, there is still plenty of gas and bread and the elite seems to be increasingly disturbed at what is happening. Some of them are genuine demons that will continue until everyone is dead, but some others seem opportunistic actors, we’ll see.
It seems to me Musk is getting an increasing support from different elites going rogue. Not all elites are worthless niggers or faggots with only the death cult sustaining their power.
Personally I hope all hell breaks loose and I get an opportunity for total revenge, I don’t care that much about anything else at this point. I just want to crush my enemies.
With how much China exports to the US, it’s nuts to think they want to kill that golden goose by making the US a shithole. They would lose most of their economy if the US market collapsed. I agree that China would want a stable US government that can trade with them, they just don’t want a gay bully.
Xi went along with the Fauci/Jesuit/Democrat Covid hoax so while probably all of China doesn’t Xi certainly does.
This probably won’t happen because China has never been a colonial power, but if they conquered North America and ruled it as a territory, white people would become second-class citizens, a huge step up from the absolute pariahs we are now. Chinese over white over brown over black, with the other three shooting blacks on sight.
I conflated UAE and SA here talking about Dubai, but honestly I just think the Arabs are all in the same page.
>The Chinese are a mercantile people by nature
Which is why they are/would be agnostic about whether the people they are buying minerals from are Igbo or Under Neuer Management – and if you watch Empire of Dust, you would get the impression that they would much prefer a return of the later.
Chinaman be like “It’s all so tiresome”
PMC activity has been growing in Africa ever since the first mercenaries where hired during decolonialization. This is a trend that shows no sign of reversing or even slowing down. The Chinese have shown to be not very good at PMC operations in Africa while the Russians show great aptitude. Africa is a big continent, the Russians have many European obligations, and the Chinese a growing list of vulnerable investments. A small conquest, with Chinese backers, might be feasible in the near future.
Yes, if you offer better trade you might get a deal, this is part of my position since the beginning. As I said and I’ve been arguing for, you would require foreign elite backing, in this case it’s Russia/China since they have decided to walk together hand in hand. If you get it in Africa with China or you get it in America with Russia for restoration, one way or the other you are going to have to deal with China and Russia or they will deal with you.
Do you have any idea how much food aid is sent to Africa and what is going to happen to it if global trade networks are interrupted? A small Rhodesia-like state is not going to provoke the same reaction from RU and CN as America does. When it starts looking like a world-geopolitical threat, it will be too late. Those two just want to be left alone. We will not just honor extant deals with China, we will make them sweeter. No land ownership though. It is not that china wants to make the US a shithole, but if the US becomes a shithole, they may be very reluctant to sponsor right wing actors promising restoration.
The Arab world had dirty tendrils in Africa before and during European colonialism and it will make another grab for Africa when the carriers go bye bye. But wouldn’t fighting the Arab hordes on the savannah be glorious?
This is going to be a Bronze Age collapse. Without European navies, the seas are not safe for trade. Hell, I plan for my new state to make them unsafe for trade.
I have the feeling the Russians will be pretty successful at convincing all the regional players on letting their grain shipment freely flow into East Africa. Unlike America, Russia is fairly popular in Africa. Getting the Arabs on board is likely as they’ve been reconciling with Iran which is already Russia friendly. Main issue is keeping the Turks from being flaky.
Arab civilization died with the Abbasid Caliphate in 1258, and its people became tribal, brown, and stupid, solving the woman problem at the expense of every other prerequisite of civilization. Now they’re losing their women too, as their daughters slut it up with smartphones.
I foresee everything within 40 degrees of the equator becoming a fourth-world cannibal holocaust. White people need to retreat to a place with long, cold winters, regroup, and purge themselves of all modern perversions, especially feminism. After a few generations of high eugenic fertility, they can think about reconquering the sparsely-populated middle latitudes with a shoot-on-sight attitude toward diversity.
Whites going north are not likely to purge themselves of feminism the nords have always been the great simps of all the races.
The nords were manly enough until their warrior class got wiped out in the Great Northern War.
As civilization declines, the urge to simp grows stronger as more men compete for a shrinking pool of fertile women. Assyria solved this problem, and survived the Bronze Age Collapse, by requiring all girls to be married by age thirteen.
The Arabs like money and slaves, have a lot of troublesome unmarried young men, and are smarter and better warriors than the Bantu. Them exploiting Africa is a no brainer, as it was a no brainer for them before the Europeans took it over.
Aidan, you strike me as a warrior, and not the keyboard kind. Have you written or can you write any actionable advice for males that are undeniably “spiritually fat” but have tried and thus far failed to acquire the strength of will to endure the interesting times ahead of us? Asking for a friend.
I do not claim that title as I have never killed a man in combat, but imagine you are sitting at a table with your ancestors, all the men who share your exact y-chromosome. There are enough to fit in a courtroom, about 40 for every millennium of history. Imagine they are watching your life and passing judgement- what would you have to do to make them proud? Brood on this often.
A good way to think, I’d say, though my ancestors would likely scratch their heads and beards in puzzled silence if I told them what I do and have done. Which means I’ll have to do better.
That is an evocative image, thank you.
This is as good as admitting you can’t waltz in, that you will indeed require foreign elite backing. But if you think China would be willing to make a deal with your PMC and allow you to conquer some part of Africa because it’s beneficial for trade, why would they not do the exact same thing for a restoration in America considering the potential of such a market? China was happy to deal with Trump, the Koreas would have declared peace already…
In my opinion, that food “aid” is a cancer designed to destroy Africa much like welfare in America has destroyed blacks and turned them all into niggers. Its absence would be an improvement, not a loss.
Why would Russia and China completely ignore you randomly conquering a country if they happen to have deals with that country? It’s not reasonable, you need to get backing from either country, which will give you the other one or at least give ground for some options.
And if you are dealing with China and Russia, it’s unlikely you would have open war with the Arabs. Though I wouldn’t totally rule out low intensity conflict between the PMC and some sort of Hamas to see who gets what mine.
As for fighting Arabs, well, fighting Arabs is the national celebration of the land I was born and raised in. But I’d rather kill leftists, my bullets for the traitors.
The entire world is being degraded and held back by the USFG, its death is only a great boon for everyone else. This is not a collapse, in truth the world is at the cusp of a renaissance if the USFG truly collapses.
It might seem crazy to Americans who live far away from here, but I assure you in Europe as soon as the Gay Tranny Aunt Samantha stops threatening the opposition to prog religion, many countries could have regime changes overnight. Greece is literally two days away from becoming “fascist”, but they have kept the “fascists” down using the projected power of Tranny Samantha.
The USFG single-handedly has been wreaking havoc and bullying the entire western hemisphere into feminism, faggotry, niggers, climate garbage, poverty, misery and everything else. And they have also tried with the rest of the globe as much as they have been able to, which has not been a small amount.
If Washington, D.C., New York, Los Angeles, London, Brussels and Geneva get nuked the world magically turns into a paradise in a month.
“Its absence would be an improvement, not a loss.“
In the long run. In the short run, hundreds of millions will starve and die in wars. China was not backing the Taliban, but when the Taliban won, China sat down at the table and signed deals with them to keep the roads open regardless of the Talibans “civil rights†record. The deal comes after the conquest. But of course we’d be amenable to signing on with the chinks to protect some asset in Africa, and then “hey well you asked us to provide security, one thing led to another, now we control the country and half of the neighboring one. By the way I own this mine now but we’re willing to offer you a sweet deal on the metal…â€
“why would they not do the exact same thing for a restoration in America considering the potential of such a market?“
War comes before trade. The perceived threat of a strong America is scarier than the upside of prosperous trade with a strong America. If America strong, trade, but if weak, keep it weak. Again though this is merely a possibility, I’m not wedded to the idea.
“I assure you in Europe as soon as the Gay Tranny Aunt Samantha stops threatening the opposition to prog religion, many countries could have regime changes overnightâ€
Maybe. Good for you if it does. I note that Britain has 100 fighting men, while every mosque has a cache of AKs and RPG-7s in its basement. Europe may not get the regime change it’s hoping for. Though if you are Polish or Hungarian maybe, or somewhere in the Balkans (if fighting Arabs is your national celebration) then you’re right that your nation is likely to come out ahead. It may involve some modern Hussars against Islamic Western Europe.
As an example of the “return of historyâ€, if USG power disappears and the Chrysi Avyi wins Greece, it’s going to war with the Turks over Cyprus. India and Pakistan are going to war. India and China are going to war. Israel and its neighbors are going to war.
The federal government maintains control of its empire at home using information era warfare. Any actual leader is immediately detected and neutralized. It doesn’t need aircraft carriers or jets to do that. It controls the religion of its subjects, preventing the will to organize. It surveils constantly for any beginnings of organization and grabs the leaders when they are at home, asleep. We haven’t seen any Wacos in 20 years, because no groups are allowed to get as far as creating a compound.
These methods will still work when they don’t have a navy or airforce. They just need the nsa, money, and control over the narrative.
Largely correct, but people believe narratives that are backed by violence or by status symbols that imply the capacity for violence. Red and Starman are right that as the capacity for violence declines, so does faith in the narrative. But nothing can replace the old narrative without it winning in the arena of violence first. What remains when men lose faith in the narrative without a replacement is a savages worldview of primitive superstitions. The narrative has lost many Amerikaners, but instead of social justice, they believe in getting big and fat and important in a petty communitarian way like primitive tribesmen.
I see, you are right. Maybe when Shaniqua runs the nsa into the ground, the Cathedral will have to fight Amerikaners with artillery and small arms, without control over everyone’s religion. We could hope a Jimian will become a local warlord that unites his neighbors ala Temujin. Or we could just maraud our way to the dark continent.
Do you think any bit of 17th century Christianity will reappear if the Cathedral is too trannified to competently undermine opposition? The Amish might teach their neighbors patriarchy.
While the overall capacity of violence declines, the willingness to use violence to silence political dissent is clearly increasing. How to put it… the average Soviet citizen was silenced not by the tanks of the military, but by the KGB whose fighting ability was about equal to the police, but their willingness to use violence against dissenters was very high.
When a kid is handing out Bibles and trannies attack him and they arrest him, not the trannies, people take note, I think.
Of course, the Soviet citizen did not have AR-15s.
The truly big, deciding question of our age will be whether they will attempt to disarm Amerikaners, and if yes, what will be their reaction.
This ridiculous shit about Nazi flag guy crashing into the White House might be the first step towards creating an excuse for that, with the second step being a 100-men-strong fake insurrection. Of course with Nazi flags lol.
They just demonstrated their massive power with the covid delusion. They can program the NPCs with whatever they want and we have no capability to counter.
Yes but: NPC’s instantly conformed because they were afraid of something. So get more clear about what they were afraid of. They weren’t afraid of Covid, or of white supremacy, or of Russia.
Can that X that they feared change, or loose its teeth in comparison to something else? That’s the real question at hand here.
Where is your new blog?
Linked in my name now, or at least it will be when my comments are relevant to its scope
Good stuff. I wonder how long substack will tolerate it.
I don’t share your enthusiasm for conquest in Africa. Africa was called the white man’s grave fro a reason. Easy to die of disease in that region.
A 1000 man might also be able to conquer a nice part of Europe. There aren’t many man willing to die for the governments of Germany or England, for example. And the climate is much more healthy for whites in Europe than in Africa.
With adequate application of DDT on one’s clothing, habitation, and bedclothes, not so bad.
DDT and personal hygiene prevents most tropical diseases, and ivermectin cures most of the other stuff.
Jim what are your thoughts about mosquito spike protein transfer? Are the non vaccinated at risk from mosquito bites with jabbed blood?
I could capture some mosquitoes in an urban area with a mosquito catcher and draw their blood for testing to determine if they are loaded with spike proteins, but I am unsure of how to test for it. Any advice?
The stuff does not replicate, so though contact is bad, and there is evidence of the possibility of undesirable effects from contact, a mosquito bite is not a lot of contact, and the amount so small as to be difficult reliably test for without a pretty good lab.
When USG can no longer be the extortionary force on the world that it is due to a no longer dominant military, the US dollar collapses because countries are no longer scared of US soft power, backed by US hard power, to not transact in dollars.
This means:
Prices rise 10x. The US can no longer print infinite dollars. Cheap Chinese goods become expensive Chinese goods. Only rich people can drive cars because the cheapest cars are now 80k. Mopeds, scooters, and various improvised motorized vehicles become the norm.
Homelessness increases massively. Drug addiction increases massively. Gangs start taking over large swathes of the cities and fight for control of the drug trade. The police are bought off by the gangs (who are run by whites). The US becomes Mexico.
So rather than live in mexico, come conquer Africa with me. Being a gang lord in Mexico is pretty nice. Sitting on an ivory throne, wearing a leopard skin, with ten wives and a hundred children over ten thousand helots as a patriarkos of New Sparta is much better.
With what force? As you’ve pointed out:
Unless their names are like Pedro, Jose, and Carlos you’ll have a hard time finding people willing to stomach conquest. If you want Whites, your operation in Africa will look like a PMC operation solely there to provide merchant security.
Aidan, where can I sign?
There are enough men of exceptional capacity and warrior spirit out there. But, they are atomized and cannot coordinate. That is why I am spreading awareness of this. The barrier to cross is bringing them together and getting them on a ship.
For fun, please run a crypto crowd fund campaign. Sell token shares of future profits, like these somolians https://archive.is/EpT4F
You might be successful and afford some better equipment.
I am in. Once you start getting it together, hit me up.
There can’t be any attack surface- no organizations or even chats, channels dedicated to the project, which is on the timeframe of years. Likewise, no crypto funding or anything. I need to come off as a lone nutjob until the week that the ships sail.
Re there will not be a total Bronze Age Collapse as Asia and Eurasia will be relatively intact and they may not like random would be conquistadors taking over their mineral supplies whatever you promise them. You’re chances of success are much greater as a mercenary company which already in a position of dominance in Africa over the governments there you “serve” can take over the perfect country at the perfect time. On whatever pretext… they didn’t pay you what they said or something.
A coup by mercenaries over non-payment when you are already a power in Africa looks less radical to the Asian powers than you going in and doing a Cortez.
The Bronze age collapse was total because literacy was in the hands of decadent, immoral, demon worshiping priesthood that failed to reproduce, and whose adherents failed to reproduce. As a result, with the sole exception of the Israelites, who grabbed a couple of dissident Egyptian priests to lead them, we have no records from groups that survived except through the eyes of their enemies. Similarly, the barbarians that conquered to Roman Empire in the west were largely, though not completely, illiterate, and those few of them that could read had to move their lips while reading, so the dark age, though not completely dark, is rather dimly lit.
This time around, the winners are going to be internet connected, even if most of the internet goes down, and they are going to be busily texting.
Yes Com, The Eurasian land trade routes are going to be fine (Aren’t you predicting socialist economic collapse in China anyway?) on the condition that CN and RU can provide security for them. They’re highly motivated to do so and they probably can, regional wars not causing huge disruptions.
The sea trade routes are going to become very dangerous, as moving copper and tin at the end of the Bronze Age became very dangerous. Somali style pirates wherever people are poor and hungry, which will be many places. Nations with no navies will want navies, and realize the knowledge to build them has been lost.
But it doesn’t matter that much. What matters is no more global policeman.
China it depends on whether Xis successor follows in his stupidity…
How many people are aware of the fact that the amount of assets lost in bank closures exceeds now the numbers lost in 2008?
The ground is falling out from underneath people’s feet, yet no mouthpieces say a peep about it in any of the ministry of public enlightenment’s outlets. Or rather, you could say that’s precisely why there is no Public Discourse about it.
None of the coyotes want to be the first one to look down and check if they are still earth or airwalking over a chasm.
All the local banks are putting up signs advertising the great rates they’ll give you on 3 month CDs around here. They must really be starving for cash.
Really makes me wonder why the Federal Reserve isn’t panicking yet and lowering rates in a hurry, but then I remember the lag time between the Fed rate and market rates and realize it’s probably too late.
Or maybe they’re just confident they can create a little consolidation and everything will be fine.
A little consolidation, and great rates on three month CDs, is life support for the dollar exchange rate, which postpones the crisis of de-dollarization.
They can kick the can down that road for quite a while longer, but the kicks are getting harder and moving the can less far each time.
The government is trying to curtail the excess dollar in circulation by means that do not involve spending less money. Something has to crack somewhere.
Is that just by the numbers or did you adjust for inflation?
Haller was finally translated and the translator has a blog. Looks good to me: https://hallertime.substack.com/p/grundsatze-der-hallerismus-ii
“First, personal power, since it derives from personal property, cannot possibly be omnipotent or omniscient, since the personal power of any man can reach no further than the extent of his personal means, and moreover finds natural boundaries in the means and property of others. The patrimonial ruler is the most powerful actor in the land, but never the only one. For the lowliest grunt with a home and family of his own, and a source of income to pay for their upkeep, enjoys a measure of personal power in his own right, and in fact exercises the same proprietary rights and privileges as the mightiest of Kings, only on a much smaller scale and in a much smaller sphere of influence.”
Throne and freehold. Perhaps altar will come, too.
I am not 100% sure I understand it fully, but it sounds like running an Occam’s Razor on liberalism/democracy. The power of an elected politician is of a different kind and from a different source than my power over my house. What if we were ruled by men who have the same kind of power and from the same source as I have over my house, just larger?
Feudal lords historically held great sway over economic planning of their fiefs. Fiefs being something akin to hereditary, for both owner and worker, corporations. European peasants, having lived under such economic organization for over 1000 years likely developed some degree of genetic familiarity, or at least indifference, towards economic predestination. The separation and decline of feudal power over economy (end of seigneurialism, serfdom, noble monopolies, etc) led to economic uncertainty. Peasants do not like economic uncertainty, they do not like adventures. They certainty don’t like uncertain economic adventures that financialized capitalism promises with its endless rotation of faceless, and often quite powerless, Harvard CEOs to which no true loyalty can be formed.
Desires for planned economies are really just ancestral peasant genes whimpering for lordship. The great irony of socialist worker politics, which claim to break the shackles of “oppression,” at its core desires predestination by a higher power. Unfortunately for true socialist workers, those higher powers full of priests and rabbis often want them dead. Fortunately for true socialist workers, there’s a solution that doesn’t want them dead. Monarchical neo-feudal planned economy. Corporations as fiefs with hereditary leadership positions. A formalized economic nobility that answers to a king.
The City of London (not the same as London!) provides a semi-blueprint. Business voting power scales with employees. Employees are selected by the business to vote on their behalf. This selects for loyalty, while keeping leftist machinations under control. The city government itself is a corporation, one that answers to a (currently weak) king.
The manorial lord in the dark ages was a factory owner and CEO who coerced the serfs to work part time in his factory, the goods of which only his soldiers could safely trade with others in a very dangerous time, and left them time to work on a farm feeding themselves. As coinage began to recirculate, a result of greater peace and prosperity, serfdom rapidly declined. The peasant became a tenant on the land and paid his rents in cash, and the factory became part-owned by contract by the lord (he usually sold share in his property to raise money for warhorses, weapons, armor, and to pay soldiers) rather than controlled and operated by him behind his walls. Every element of modern capitalism was working healthily and in identifiable form by 1300.
How did a peasant commune work? It was a legal entity that could itself be bound by contracts, and entitlements to the profits thereof were denoted by holding a piece of paper that granted part ownership of the entity. In other words, it was a strikingly modern corporation.
All collective groups were the personal property of someone, administered as part of his household. The enterprise/business came into being later as book keeping fiction, which fiction came to be made real by the participants believing it existed, and Charles the second merged the already existing concept of the corporation, with the already existing concept of the enterprise, to create the publicly traded joint stock limited liability for-profit corporation, creating modern capitalism. Which is now being eaten by postmodern capitalism, where the books track holiness (ESG) and the observance of talmudic ritual (regulatory compliance), rather than the movement and creation of value.
>Every element of modern capitalism was working healthily and in identifiable form by 1300.
Separating formal political power from economic power has been a major source of decline similar to separation of Church and state. An army marches on its stomach. Law is based in organized violence. A lord that cannot feed an army isn’t going to have one for long and will cease being the law. Separating a lord from economics effectively hands over political power to merchants who are infamously feeble practitioners of violence. While merchants are great at moving stuff, they are terrible at multi-generational stewardship. Law breaks down. Moral is based in faith. A lord without faith isn’t going to be able to convince the army to march. Separating a lord from religion effectively hands over political power to roaming priests. Such priests are well known to be Gnostics with gross appetites.
Historical capitalism occurred with merchants and priests unified under a lord by being (partially) owned by a lord. A chronistically close approximate would be company towns of the 19th and 20th century America. Even Walt Disney’s company (a company town and a cult of personality based faith) although its clearly been hijacked by hostile merchant priests and is dying. We do not have company towns in modern capitalism. The CEOs of today are not lords (on average) no matter how much we desire them to be. They are a faceless cadre of merchant priests from Harvard ransacking value as they waltz through the revolving door of companies A, B, C, …, X, Y, Z. They have no true loyal to the company they command, a deeply unsettling experience for the common worker.
America’s titans of industry had more in common with the manorial lord in the dark ages than what we have today. That America was far more capitalistic and innovative. Crime was lower, the streets cleaner, and the cities more beautiful.
Here’s an academic paper that anyone interested in Aidan’s Neo Rhodesia should read:
https://www.nas.org/academic-questions/31/2/the_case_for_colonialism
This caused a stir when it came out because it was considered beyond the pale, and it was very well thought out and reasonable. It was memory holed after the author’s institution declined to cancel him.
If we look at “a new country in Africa” like being a startup, then we could use the example of mergers & acquisitions as a point of interest. By this I mean we don’t necessarily need to carve out a swath and form a country out of whole cloth. We could instead make entry as consultants and contractors, become indispensable as managers, then seize the memes of reproduction. This is similar to one of Ghiley’s proposed concepts, though he uses a European power in his example.
Another dimension that needs to be considered is reproducibility. We almost always discuss scaling, and it is important, but reproducibility is critical. Waco got Waco’d because Waco was just Waco. If there had been 3 Wacos, or 5, or 100, the circumstances change dramatically. while I may come visit to buy wives for my sons, and I’d be happy to help with logistics and transpo, I’ll sadly not be moving to Aidanisia because I’m committed to fighting for Amerikaners. But there are parallels that stand out for both endeavors, the key one being the importance of diversification of holdings. Any successful trench building (Orania style operations) need to be replicated in many places, not isolated to a single place.
St. John fully btfo’d Starman. I agree he’s interesting source of content & perspective, but I’m pretty sure he just drops in here when he gets frustrated with his Gab campaign or whatever. This blog is some kind of Formative Experience, so when he gets the mads or the sads he stops by for a round of Fuck You Dads, which is amusing if unproductive. Scholarship is vitally important. It’s the rare warrior that can articulate as well as he can annihilate, and for this reason alone there needs to be a symbiosis between men of the pen and men of the blade. Competitive sparing is fine, but holistic denigration is a game for women or faggots. The usurpation of the warrior elite by the managerial elite was predicated on the notion that the latter was better to have in all cases than the former. Synthesis and symbiosis. Any wordcel that esteems himself better than working men because he’s eloquent should get the rope, and any NonCom that thinks he’s smarter than the generals needs to ask himself why he’s only in command of the mop detail after 3 decades of “service.” There is not a single element of our extended synthetic-tribal network that doesn’t bear the shame of disappointing our ancestors. We have all failed to cross Rubicons of mind and body. Allowing atomization and Bioleninist-style faction squabbling is probably not the best idea.
>very well thought out and reasonable
That’s an interesting publication you got there.
Huh, I don’t “believe” in guilt by association, buuut association with Chomsky (heh, guilt by association) is really setting the tone for this,
(Now where have I heard “universal values” from before? Sounds rather puritanical!)
and this,
(Oh, a consent fag.)
and this,
(oh no, evil anti-colonial Nazis harming poor black people. They must be stopped!)
and this,
(I wonder, what kind of “rights” are we talking about.)
and this,
(Oh I see, women’s rights at the cost of land ownership. Suspiciously anti capitalist here)
and, and, and, and…. every single paragraphed is tinged by a progressive crusade morality. That naturally plants the seeds for it’s own failure.
>We could instead make entry as consultants and contractors, become indispensable as managers
I see evidence this worked well in India, South Asia, and East Asia. Those people are capable of following directions without constant oversight. They are manageable, hence you cant make entry as consultants and contractors. I don’t see evidence this worked out in Africa. Those people are incapable of following directions. They are unmanageable, hence other than plantations under extreme oversight, anything slightly more complected ended up being done by imported Whites. The Chinese found out the same and gave up on hiring local Africans. Now they just import labor from the mainland.
>Any successful trench building (Orania style operations) need to be replicated in many places
Safety in numbers gets grilled into every service member. “Where is your buddy!” American military organization disintegrates as soon as the uniform comes off. The few historical examples where it did not rapidly evaporate were in highly religious groups (check out the lesser known Zarephath-Horeb). This points to a spiritual problem. Orania can’t be widespread replicated via capitalism or militarism. Only via spirit, one that is taught to a leadership cadre by a dedicated priest hood that also sets out with the cadre as it ventures out (hence its warrior priest nature).
Aidan is not wrong, but he is jumping the gun so to speak. Need to create a warrior priesthood first. Steve Bannon was inadvertently doing that in Italy before getting evicted. He had even started moving into a monastery. What this says is, create your monastery outside of GAE, perhaps Russia. They are accepting American refugees and even building a small Americatown for them.
“ Need to create a warrior priesthood first.â€
The battlefield bonds of brothers who actually fight together are sufficient for elite cohesion in the first generation. By the time the second generation comes into power, then you need religion as a mechanism of cooperation.
There’s great potential in you but terrible nativity. A shared baptism by fire will exact a terrible price. That’s if you manage to corral the faithless men there in the first place. Your endeavor would predominately attract the mercenary sort, and without obvious state backing, they are liable to flake at the worst time. Remember, Cortés had to scuttled his ships even with a shared faith.
I encourage you, if this is what you really want, to dip your toes into Russian PMC work in Africa first. Conquest is a hell of a lot more than just mercenary work, but it’ll at least give you experience with the type of men you’ll be putting in extraordinary conditions and attempting to lead. It’ll also give you a good idea of the people you want to conquer. The Russians may even like teaching you quite a bit. You’ll also have a far better hunting ground for recruits.
You want to be Cortés. You’ll be asking men to stick with you for the rest of their lives in some god forsaken land among a bunch of savages who want to fucking kill all of you. That’s a tall ask. You better at least have sheer force of will. A mystic. A cult of personality. Effectively a faith to pull this off. This takes you right back to my point. You need to create a warrior priesthood first, and as the leader of any aspiring war band, you’re the first priest.
I cannot stress enough how much of a priest you need to be. One that retains a warrior mindset. The most expedient path for you is to be the based Jim Jones for American expats in Russia. You can organize far more openly there. As you are now this is all a terrible idea that is going to get you killed.
I am not going to hire a bunch of mercs, I intend to lead, if I end up leading, young committed men with no future in the West.
Your plan is not likely to work without experienced mercs among you…
Ukrainians are having a harder time against mercenaries than the proper Russian military. Not bad considering 50,000 were recruited from jails.
Wagner managed to inflict around 3 times their own KIA.
>I am not going to hire a bunch of mercs
>young committed men with no future in the West.
That’s a contradiction. You’ve just described what a mercenary is in the second part. Swap out West for Scandinavia in the 700s-900s and you just described the mercenary viking conquers of England, Normandy, and Rus.
Sounds extremely effective to me. A new Normandy on the Ivory Coast. What’s the problem? I am a humble man. It’s likely I’m not the best leader for such a task. I don’t enjoy leading others; I’m better at inspiring them. If a better leader arises among my followers I’d happily hand the reins to him.
It’s a proposal to revert to the leftism of 1890, of Kipling’s White Man’s Burden, in which whites are allowed high status and Africa is allowed to be functional but only for the purpose of breeding infinity Bantus.
It’s so much worse than that. It’s a reinterpretation of 1890’s White Man’s Burden by a liberal using a current year progressive looking glass. Take this ridiculous proposal for example:
Really!? A multiracial Hong Kong of Africa? This modern leftist is trying to take a colonial system that works in Asia and blindly transplant it into Africa. You can be fairly hands off in East and South Asia. That’s what made Hong Kong and Singapore and Macau possible. Africans are liable to tear up nice shit for no good reason. You can’t be hands off with them unless it’s they are out of sight and out of mind (far away in the jungle). Colonial Europeans practiced segregation in Africa for a damn good reason. The leftists of 1890 were well aware of racial differences, something which leftists today aren’t allowed to see. You are not giving Kipling enough credit.
Sure maybe.
Just saying this is allowed because it’s a sincere attempt to bring back a dead leftism, rather than a dog whistle for more rightism. They maintain a small stable of such proposals so they have a backup plan if things go really badly wrong.
Botswana copied Singapore and is doing quite fine. The thing with Africans in general is that they need a competent Lee Kuan Yew and Singaporean governance to function in a Civilization at all.
Actually not Botswana but Rwanda:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX0ozxrZlEQ&pp=ygUQUndhbmRhIHNpbmdhcG9yZQ%3D%3D
The Tutsi’s who now run Rwanda are fully human and were recognized as such when Europeans showed up in the area. The Hutu’s are more typical of the African races, IE worthless.
It’s likely that that Tutsi’s genetic linage came from a group of cattle headers who escaped to Africa during the bronze age collapse based on genetic testing and their own oral history.
Rwanda was doing poorly because the US organized a genocide against the Tutsi via the Hutus. With the Tutsi’s back in charge things have improved a lot.
Official science tells us “Genetic studies suggest that the Hutu and Tutsi of today are hardly distinguishable”
Official science also tells us you cannot tell by looking at them, but obviously you can tell by looking at them.
Belgians, back before truth was forbidden, theorized that the Tutsi were “Hamitic”. Which is Aryans and/or semites from the collapse of Bronze Age civilization heading southwards in Africa by land, river, and sea, taking black wives, and their descendants invading further and also taking black wives. It would not be hard to test the truth of this hypothesis by gene testing. Since we strangely seem to lack data proving it false, I suspect it has been proven true.
Much harder to tell the difference when you’re watching a Hollywood movie in which African-Americans have been randomly cast as “Tutsi” and “Hutu”.
I used to party with the wealthy international students in college. Many Africans from Ghana, Kenya, etc. African elites with little money sense… ah the parties, they were magnificent. Anyways, enough reminiscing.
@Mayflower Sperg
The differences between various groups are pretty stark. With Tutsi and Hutus, the nose is the biggest obvious definer. Now that I think about it, Bantu nose is really the biggest obvious indicator you’re around the wrong sort of Blacks in general be it in America or Africa.
>Hollywood movie
Hint, they’re all Bantus.
@i
They want to do it with Guinea-Bissau i.e. Bantu land which betrays their intention. They want to uplift West Africa via Singapore method. Good luck.
[*Whig history thinly disguised as reactionary history deleted*]
Before we digress to new topics in whig history, let us discuss old topics in whig history. You have been banging away on the topic of color revolution, big cities and “popular uprisings”, and I have been censoring you for utter detachment from reality.
How does the Yellow Revolution, perceived by all the official media as a popular uprising, but perceived rather differently by Filipinos, fit? If you want to argue your account of color revolution, rather than presupposing all reactionaries agree, I will allow the argument through.
I am interested in arguing these questions with you, but you never argue, you just post arguments that presuppose that everyone already agrees on an official narrative that no one believes any more. You argue X therefore Y, where the “therefore” presupposes universal acceptance of stuff that no one believes, not reactionaries, not mainstream Republicans, not mainstream Christians.
I will say that popular uprisings alone aren’t sufficient, but are in fact a necessary ingredient, for a successful color revolution. [*deleted*]
Nuts.
You can always raise a mob to do very bad things when they know it is entirely safe to do very bad things, and you cannot get people to peaceably assemble for the redress of grievances when they know it is very dangerous to do so. So, the first step in manufacturing the color for color revolutions is to let it be known that the one is safe and the other is dangerous – which means that the coup is already well under way, and the mob is window dressing for finalization of the coup.
A color revolution is just a coup with democratic decorations.
[*hail fellow Reactionary deleted*] Mobs of angry peasants are supposed to be more than a catalyst, but are supposed to be a necessary ingredient [*hail fellow reactionary deleted*]
They are never a catalyst, never have been never will be, and are only a necessary ingredient if your official faith requires democracy, and you want to pretend your coup is democratic.
[…] The Great Ukrainian Counter Offensive […]
https://twitter.com/arya_amsha/status/1661735724352434177
Lactose Tolerance is 60-80% in NW India incl Dalits.
So there’s the skin color & now lactose thing debunked.
Gonna go drink milk & OHP – on a Upper/Lower + Arms split.
ਅਕਾਲ
The map you link to contradicts your claims, showing India eighty to ninety percent lactose intolerant.
The map of lactose tolerance that you link to corresponds very closely with what us racists call whiteness, except for a big discrepancy in Africa from cattle herders with substantial semitic ancestry. It also shows a blob of Aryan ancestry in Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Iran, and Afghanistan, and though those guys are not exactly white, they look more like the rest of us milk drinkers than you do. Most of their upper class pass just fine.
This is really weird. Growing up in India, every kid I knew drank milk and this term lactose intolerance was as unheard of as feminism. Of course, all milk then was unpasteurized straight from the cow’s udder. This whole lactose intolerance bit coincides with mass pasteurization IMO
Intolerance to pasteurized milk is a good thing.
Every kid everywhere can drink milk. Some develop lactose intolerance later than others. And some of us never develop it.
Milk suppliers in Asian countries have a habit of adding lactase into the product to help with lactose breakdown.
In the India I grew up in, it came straight from the milkman. They added just water to boost their profits.
Most lactose intolerant people can drink a cup of milk without noticeable side effect. They just won’t be able to benefit from lactose because gut bacteria is eating it. Cutting milk with water in effect lowers the lactose concentration which would make it easier to digest. That’s a low tech alternative to adding lactase.
Naaah, that was a profits thing. They were not diluting it with water to reduce the effects of lactose. They wanted to make more money. My mother had a running feud with various milkmen over this all my childhood. It was also a hot topic of conversation among my friends’ mother as well. They compared notes over which milkman/maid was known to dilute with water
I assure you, no one wanted their milk diluted. It just did not taste that good.
So kids of all races are lactose tolerant and develop intolerance later as adults?
And
Caucasians either develop lactose intolerance later or not at all, while Asians and Indians develop it earlier?
Babies of all races need to be able to drink mama’s milk. Human breast milk contains more lactose than cow’s milk. Herders developed a gene mutation that kept lactose tolerance on. Caucasians do develop lactose intolerance, but at a very old age.
Yes. Most develop lactose intolerance before they are entirely adult, but are lactose tolerant when they are little.
I see, so different races have genes that turn off at different times? Those that evolved pastoral, it turns off later, while those that evolved farming, turns off earlier.
Must be a population density thing then. High population density areas cannot support the extent of milk drinking that pastoral areas can. It would make sense that those the civilized and settled earlier would develop lactose intolerance first.
There’s also a use or it lose it factor. The Japanese make their children drink milk for as long as possible. Kids who stop drinking it early develop lactose intolerance in pretty short order, while the kids who regularly drink it can continue to consume it until adulthood and thus gain the benefits of milk drinking had for children.
[*silenced because a people defeated, conquered, and under occupation by the Global American Empire are in no position to gloat over what that empire is doing to its native people.*]
According to various studies from the 1970s, phenotypical lactose tolerance was around 70 percent in the north and 40 percent in the south. More recent genotypic studies suggest a tolerance of 20-30 percent, much less prevalent in the south, and tilted heavily towards steppe enriched groups (so higher among brahmins in the south, and northwest populations generally). That said, most Indians also tolerate lactose intolerance very well, and lactose charged deserts (i.e. with lots of evaporated milk) are not uncommon at all. And in the mainstream media there is generally a sense of surprise at the actual rate of lactose intolerance.
Part of that is, the relatively wealthy and mainstream adjacent population really has a fair bit of lactase persistence, but it is a big country and there has been massive population growth in groups where it is not so common. The old studies suggest a lot more phenotypic tolerance (hydrogen breath test) than the new ones.
But it’s true that there is a lot more lactose tolerance in Pakistan and Afghanistan than India. And the upper class there, and the upper class in the north of India, passes a lot better than in the South — but then you have the problem that all the smart guys looked like Mahalnobis and Ramanujan. In Afghanistan you get the sort of denatured but distilled Aryan — what is to Aryan as what Sacha Baron Cohen tries to portray Khazakhs are to Whites — with improved versions found farther away.
The smart guys in India are not purely “Aryanâ€, they are definitely the hybrids between aryans and the prior civilization’s elites. That’s why you get dumber the further northwest you go in the subcontinent. Max dumbness being afghanistan where even the smart fraction is mostly morons. Maybe there’s a contribution from too many wars killing off the best and brightest in the steppe and adjacent regions.
Afghans were making pretty good guns indigenously, when Indians no longer were. Still were making good guns quite recently, though now they have a flood of American guns. Looks to me that Afghans are not dumb. And likely, indigenous gun making reflected the fact that they generally have more Aryan ancestry than the Indians.
The high civilization areas of India 200AD-800AD were initially regions of high Aryan racial mix, though they subsequently moved a fair way southwards – but high civilization is a reflection of the elite, and elites were racially stratified. (As our noisy transwarrior endlessly reminds us)
Mate, learn to read maps. You’re not helping our cause.
I said NW India not the rest. He thinks I want Gangetics or Tamils in the same category.
That’s on him & beyond pasteurized there’s also A1 vs A2 cows ie Desi v rest.
The while thread bye Arya Amsha is on Panjabi milk consumption & he’s a Punjabi Khatri.
I just find Dalit class whites claiming Nobleman lineage when they have even less pedigree by virtue of being in the new world.
Really maps to the Western Right Varnaashram breakdown by Dharmic Reality.
ਅਕਾਲ
The map shows a small area around Karachi in Pakistan with 70 to 80% lactose tolerance, falling off with distance from Karachi. It shows the part of India closes to Karachi, the part north west of Ahmadabad, as fifty to sixty percent lactose tolerant.
So OK, you are only half descended from bread eaters – presumably the distaff side. Both my X and Y chromosomes originate from the Pontic steppe near the Caspian sea.
The map hints at seaborn invasions by milk drinking people, perhaps the sea people of the collapse of Bronze Age civilization at work. We know the milk and herding lifestyle originated on the steppes, far from the sea, and we have lots of records of overland invasions by chariot riding people living in tents and wagons from deep inland, from far from the sea, but the current distribution of milk drinkers is strongly connected to the sea. Immediately after the collapse, no one was writing anything down. Maybe shortly after the collapse the sea people felt it was getting a bit crowded. The Israelites complained that when conflicts over turf got harsh, the children of Dan always hung close to their ships, prepared to abandon Israel if the going got tough. Maybe there was a whole lot of that going around. That was a time of mass migrations, when entire nations would travel very long distances, and if you want to transport a whole lot of stuff a long distance, due to unpleasant neighbors eyeing your cattle, your women, and your grass, shipping it is a lot more practical than trekking overland.
One third of that population is Dalits.
You continuously fail at reading comprehension and recognizing caste.
Should I get an average skin tone chart of ‘Americans’ (whites) by including blacks and Hispanics.
Both your X and Y chromosomes have left Dharma. I would rather be one that follows Dharma regardless of ancestry than one who doesn’t.
We choose Krishna you choose the Sena. We choose Hanuman you choose Lanka.
https://twitter.com/madh_enjoyer/status/1660998450589073408?s=20
ਅਕਾਲ
Your faith does not go back to the Aryans. Read the “Ancient City” for a reconstruction of the ancient faith. The Aryans believed in gods whose burial places they could identify, and they knew the patrilineage of their descent from those gods.
Sikhī is a schism of a schism of a schism. It was the leftward edge of Hinduism, with touch of Islam. Sikhi became a martial warrior religion only with the formation of the Khalsa in 1699, and you lost that faith in war with the British in 1849 with a woman ruling you, so Sikhi is now no longer a warrior religion, but a transwarrior religion and the Khalsa is no longer an army, but a social event for transwarriors. When you have the faith back that you had from 1699 to 1849, then it would be time to argue the lineage of that faith from the Aryans. Your faith is not only not the faith of the Aryans, it is not even the faith of the Sikh empire.
[*more transwarrior bombast deleted*]
My medieval weapon is bigger than your medieval weapon, and I am not limited from above to medieval.
Aryans believe in the Khalsa [*No you don’t, The real Khalsa is a holy army, your Khalsa is a social event for transwarriors*] and Guru Gobind Singh Ji. [*No you don’t. He was a warrior King and High priest, what we call a Paladin. You have not had a Paladin King or Paladin priest since a woman ruled you during your war with the British. All your priests have big hats and small symbolic weapons useless in combat against an opponent armed with a real weapon.*]
Enough with your sophistry –
Hand over your women.
Our shotgun is already loaded. [*No they are not. You do not dare possess guns and ammo, being under hostile enemy occupation and completely subjugated, I own guns and ammo, and I own crypto currency, while you have no money that could be useful in a conflict situation, putting you at the absolute mercy of your masters. If they close their bank doors, you have no means for large scale cooperation*]
Allowing this comment through in full so that people will know what I am censoring and why.
I wish some Hindus would weigh in on the topic of purifying the Hindu faith. There was time when Hindus led the world in science, mathematics, and technology, making the best steel in the world, and the best swords in the world. And strangely no one knows what their Hinduism was like. I find it hard to believe it was irrecoverably lost, I suspect that no one wants to know, for priests and lawmakers write everything down. What was their policy on cow worship? I suspect it was that mistreatment of other people’s wandering cattle was severely prohibited, but killing your own cattle and eating beef was entirely fine – I suspect it was the original policy of the Aryan invaders, that the cattle of the elite were free to wander, and conquered trying to grow bread had to suck it up. I know that some evidence exists for this, but I have only seen it mentioned vaguely at third hand.
Nihang Singhs own guns without license. [*deleted*]
Things get rather violent in North West India from time to time. Why do I never hear news of people using guns to deal with it? If Sikhs have guns, link me to news of them bearing them when there is trouble.
It’s simple. Hindus must abandon the poisons of universalism going back to the Hindu reformers of Harvard days and revert to the laws of Manu and Varnashrama. The biggest problem is the subversion of varnashrama which led to the erosion of Hindu patriarchy.
The problem is that it’s coup complete. Only a monarchy can restore varnashrama. Democracy will continue to destroy us.
Hindu patriarchy and the original varnashrama are strongly linked.
I mean I think you are wrong that old Hindus put forth laws against eating cows to protect their own cows, but I also don’t see it as a terribly important point to argue over. Maybe they did, maybe they didn’t, but the time when Hindus came up with cool math and astronomy and steel was well was well after they decided eating cows was no good.
I don’t have an answer yet but I have several leads, or rather funny phenomenon that point to possible answers.
For example, there is ritual cleanliness. Brahmins are very “clean” people (and, probably, also clean people — but do not promote a society of actually clean people). When you drink water, you pour the water into your mouth and your lips do not touch the glass you are drinking from. For touching another’s saliva would be very unclean (let alone a non-Brahmin’s) God forbid, you do not eat in a place where the food is cooked and handled by non-Brahmins. I do not know what the rules are but I am sure they are rather intricate and involved. And you certainly do not wear outside shoes inside the house. (This is a good rule, sensible, but there is a religious intrinsic regard for it that isn’t very rational). Okay well is it a clean country? Obviously not. Water purification confers cleanliness, so there is water everywhere, but water everywhere without thought and care does not create clean and therefore the result is not clean. Obviously God cares that we are clean, that we are hygienic, so the impulse and origin of what are taken to be rules and practices are good; but the point is to actually be clean and hygienic and people do not care enough about that.
There is also the problem of smart theology and very, very smart wordcels saying complicated things like the world is not real and does not matter. Well, that is a problem. This is not actually a doctrinal position, the doctrinal position is that a man who knows only the real world is much less lost than the man who knows only the mind bedeviled by theoretical questions about why the world is not real.
Hindus won’t like me for saying it, but I think there is also the problem of idol worship. It is not that I am actually opposed to it as a cultural or cultural-religious practice of becoming close to religion, but it turns religion into a technology of performing rituals, praying to this god for that and that god for this, and detracts from the ultimate fact that God ordained us to live a certain way, and it is no mistake that the religion at its very heart speaks to an Almighty and omnipotent deity as behind it all.
That leads us to the final problem. Which is that I mentioned a doctrinal position but there is no doctrinal position. When the British came to India they were shocked that the Vedas were preserved in perfect concordance among the Brahmins is Kashmir and Brahmins in Kerala, mostly due to a practice of rote memorization that resemble error correcting codes (you memorize it forwards, and backwards, and in streams of multiwords and streams of multiwords reversed, and so forth).
And so that is there, and that is possibly doctrinal but no one speaks that language anymore, and the people who do speak it and do practice it are not of and among the people. They are magic buttons to be called upon when you need to do things like get married, or mark an important moment in your life, or pray because something tragic has happened. And there is great value in that, but serious productive people do not take what the Sanskrit speakers who have memorized the ancient wisdom seriously, except to the extent that (if they are traditional) they think memorizing the ancient wisdom is a good thing. The priests are pot bellied and wear funny garb and walk in funny ways. This sounds sacrilegious. But it is true, and detracts from the true appeal of the religion over the mind and soul of its adherents in the real world.
Anyway, that is what is wrong with it. It is not an answer to what was right with it centuries ago. But the common explanation on Unz.com is not correct: it is not admixture and racial failure that explains the problem today (though there has certainly been very dysgenic population growth in the past century). The admixture event, and strict caste endogamy thereafter, had been frozen centuries before the good stuff happened, and millenia before the good stuff ended.
Was it?
Take a careful look. Jews have a habit of dating stuff they came up with 2020 back to the precedents set by the people who built the second temple. I am ignorant of Hinduism, but I suspect you are equally ignorant of second century Hinduism in the kingdoms of relevance. Today’s Brahmins are like the Jews, legalists, so are bound to find very ancient precedents for the latest religious innovation.
Do you find, from a second century Kingdom of relevance, a straightforward prohibition from a sovereign or jurist or equivalent, against eating beef? Or is it just someone looking at ancient laws on cows, and saying “obviously this implies a prohibition on beef eating, in fact it is so obvious that no one needed to actually write that down”. Kind of like Christians looking at an ancient law saying that virgin who was forced has not herself committed the crime, unless she was strangely in circumstances where it was strangely easy to get away with forcing her, and interpreting it as “any woman can point her finger at any man and have him hanged”, jumping from “the woman is innocent if she plausibly says so” to the “the man is guilty if she plausibly says so”
If cows are allowed to wander around, laws against molesting wandering cattle (even if they happen to be eating your wheat) do not equate to laws prohibiting beef eating. Check if you can find early prohibition of beef in kingdoms that had science and technology.
I think you will find that second century Hindus with no end of strict laws prohibiting harming a cow, and sixteenth century Hindus saying “well, obviously if they could not harm a cow, they certainly could not kill it and eat it.” In a social environment with hungry cows wandering around eating anything they can find, does not follow.
What you are complaining about is legalism, in the sense of Talmudic legalism (“Legalism” is a word with two or three very different and largely unrelated meanings, but in the context of religion, always means Talmudic legalism)
Christianity tossed legalism so thoroughly that for the most part it stayed dead. For example, replacing ritual cleanliness entirely with actual cleanliness. When camping in the wilderness, we don’t bury our poop outside the camp because there is a rule in the old testament telling us to bury our poop outside the camp. We bury our poop outside the camp because poop is dirty and attracts flies who spread the dirt. We don’t interpret the old testament rule about burying poop as a rule telling us to bury poop, but as a synecdoche for cleanliness. And while camping in the wilderness, apply the rule by trying to remain clean appropriately to the circumstances. We don’t think the Old Testament rule to bury your poop outside the camp means “bury your poop outside the camp”. We think it means “don’t do stuff that is likely to get poop on people or food”, leaving your poop around in or near the camp being one of those things.
I’m not Hindu Indian and perhaps only distantly of Aryan descent (~75% East Asian and ~25% Anglo America), so who knows if my genes bear any relevance.
I’ve been doing a small dietary self experiment. Only whole grain wheat bread I bake using organic flour eaten with dairy (milk, cheese, butter) from grass fed cows. I’ve lost 6 pounds in the last week with a very low level of exercise. A mere 15 miles of running and some weight lifting. I’m constantly feeling bloated from the sheer quantity of fibrous grain I’m eating and can’t eat more, yet still feeling hungry often. This isn’t sustainable. The nomadic conquerors clearly were meat eaters otherwise they wouldn’t have the energy to take India. The main source of meat for Aryan conquerors would have been herd animals, so cows and potentially the occasional lame horse. That Hindu Indians don’t eat beef today, or much protein at all, indicates something went severely wrong.
@AryaMan
By Idol worship, you mean monotheism?
After all, isn’t the crucifix an idol?
Symbols are needed, no?
What I think you wanted to say is that the Hindus in one edge of India may not necessarily feel kinship with Hindus at the other edge because they worship different Gods.
In contrast you have Shia Muslims from India who travelled to Iraq to fight Isis when word got out that ISIS was destroying Shia Shrines.
[*genocidal rant by someone utterly at the mercy of his enemies and frightened to do anything about it deleted*]
You envy whites, for obvious reasons. Everyone does.
@Aryaman
It goes to show that such standards has to be applied across the board.
And at least the universality of the requirement for proper hygiene would have contributed to greater cleanliness.
Including ensuing Water sources are clean. As well as the use of fire to purify the Plunder that wouldn’t burn are subject to.
And washing flammable objects in “waters of purification” which is just water with detergent from combining wood ash and fat mixed in water.
I think this is the original reasoning behind the ritual purity laws alongside uniformity of religion.
Cleanliness is everyone’s responsibility. And the poor be damned if they don’t clean themselves up at least.
You say your X chromosome is steppe. Haplogroup T?
My X and my Y chromosomes are steppe, near the Caspain sea., I forget the haplogroup.
[*silenced due to irritating transwarrior bombast from a defeated and conquered people*]
You are not going to get anywhere until you notice you are defeated, conquered and subjugated and need to do something about it.
The Khalsa will acknowledge defeat after [*1849]
You were defeated. When you created a social event for transwarriors and called it, with approval and endorsement from the hostile enemy army of occupation, “the Khalsa” you admitted defeat, and disowned any intent or capability of doing anything about it, and assured the hostile occupying army that you have no intent to develop the capability do anything about it. You became transwarriors when you recreated a transKhalsa that the British approved as safely harmless and impotent.
Your faith is a left heresy from the warrior faith of Guru Gobind Singh Ji, which was a right wing heresy from the original pacifist leftist Sikhism, which was a left pacifist heresy from the fratricidal demon occupied Hindu faith, which was a demon corrupted heresy from the original Aryan faith.
You lost your faith when a woman stood in the shoes of a warrior King High Priest, and your Khalsa was defeated and dispersed by the British.
To have your faith back again, you must regroup, reorganize, and refund a real Khalsa with a real paladin leading it, and the real Khalsa must shoot the transKhalsa. And you cannot refund a real Khalsa with enemy controlled money.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cis-Sutlej_states?useskin=vector
Mata Sundari is said to have thereafter issued another Hukamnama to the Sikhs, wherein she ordered Sikhs of the Panth to dissociate themselves from the man who had disobeyed the order of their Guru’s Spouse and had replied in rather insolent terms to her (“Banda Bahadur†by Sohan Singh) . No copy of this Hukamnama has existed and no one knows if it was genuine or a forgery on the orders of Farukh Siyar. The fact is that Mata Sundari’s supposed Hukumnama set in motion the wheels of the defeat of Banda . The Khalsa started deserting Banda Bahadur’s forces.
https://www.sikhnet.com/news/tragedy-banda-bahadur
https://www.manglacharan.com/post/conduct-of-the-khalsa
ਅਕਾਲ
You were defeated by the Muslims then because a woman ruled the The Tatt Khalsa, and defeated in 1849 by the British because a woman ruled the Khalsa.
A Khalsa has to have a warrior King high priest. Which you did not have when you were defeated, and do not have now.
[*unresponsive*]
Info about 1st & 6th Gurus carrying weapons. 2nd Guru Sahib raised Akharas (Wrestling Gyms)
[*unresponsive*]
Please present scriptural evidence predating the sixth guru for any earlier guru carrying weapons.
No.
[*deleted*]
Thought not.
You are heretics conquered by your enemies and thoroughly subjugated. Transwarriors, demanding that you be treated like the warriors you were, once upon a time.
Before the sixth Guru, Sikh’s evaded repression by being pacific. Since this became suicidal, the sixth Guru decided they needed an army. Now you evade repression by being disarmed and by not having an army though the faith of sixth Guru makes the army the central expression of your religion. You do not have a real Khalsa, and without a real Khalsa, you do not have a real faith.
[*unresponsive*]
I asked for evidence of Sikh’s with guns today, and evidence of Sikh religious leaders bearing arms before Guru Hargobind
You were disarmed and lacked the capability for organized violence before his rule, and in 1849 under the rule of a woman, you became disarmed again and lost the capability for organized violence.
We are ruled by our enemies, and know it and say it, though we have guns, and money that is not under the control of our enemies. You are ruled by your enemies, disarmed, and have no money except that which your enemies control, but you bombastically pretend otherwise.
Women cannot join the Khalsa.
Forsaking Banda Singh for eschewing Meat & Alcohol is correct.
Listening to your mother is correct in certain situations.
Beyond that – you’ve shown an inability to have a good conversation – You want other demoralized. Misery loves Company –
The Khalsa knows only the company of Singhs & Saints – Demoralisation is the first step in conversion (to Christianity).
ਅਕਾਲ
You don’t actually have a Khalsa. If you did, your fertility rate would guarantee you eventual world conquest. You have a transKhalsa.
And when women ruled your Khalsa, you did not actually have a Khalsa either. Which is why you were defeated.
It would have been correct if a warrior King Priest had excommunicated him, for subscribing to the holiness requirements of an enemy faith. But because it was a woman playing the “Who is more alpha? Lets you and him fight” game, it was a horrifyingly incorrect decision, which led to your defeat. She was metaphorically, and probably literally, in bed with a Muslim.
Mother of the Khalsa and wife of the Guru you’re talking about.
[*Usual bombast from a conquered, defeated, and impotent subject race who have lost the capability to even think about organized resistance deleted*]
Young and horny widow of the Guru. Such women are dangerous in power, for they are unconsciously looking for someone more alpha to bang them. And, being in power, may have to look afar for a man who can measure up.
As for “mother of the Khalsa”, if your Khalsa has a mother instead of warrior priest King, it is no Khalsa.
Back when you really did have a Khalsa, your mechanism for transfer of power kept giving you an ass for a lion. Your female leaders betrayed you from within, and led you to defeat. And you have given up even thinking about what it would take to recover from that defeat.
I’m trying to find good info on the British Sikh wars, what I know about is mainly from reading Flashman and the Mountain of Light twenty years ago.
Wikipedia info seems to suck as it does not seem to mention the woman who was acting monarch of the Khalsa at the time (though in Flashman that was clearly the case and I trust that more than wikipedia nowadays).
Flashman gives you more accurate history, as Conan gives you more accurate prehistory.
But Flashman is still a whig source, though he has no end of history that modern historians would prefer erased.
I can still personally kill you.
[*more bombast deleted*]
You will have to get in line. There is a queue.
[*deleted for sheer irrelevance*]
Nothing that Sikhs dare to do has mattered since 1849. You lost, and you have no interest in doing what is needful to get back what you lost.
Based Jim. “Please form an orderly queue. Attackers will be shot in the order in which they arrived.” What a flex.
Listen closely, brown dog; Jim is an old man, with many sons, many friends, and probably many enemies. None of his other enemies managed to get him. What makes a transwarrior like you think that you could handle him? Or survive the vengeance of his sons and/or friends?
[*unresponsive*]
[*nigger noise deleted*] o well you can’t kill every Sikh.
No one needs to kill every Sikh. Only sufficient Sikhs to get his way. The Khalsa renounced the capability for organized violence in 1849. It is no longer an order of warrior priests, but an order of priests that put up shrines to women who were disastrous leaders.
And anyone with guns could kill ever Sikh except that Globohomo would stop him. You survive because your masters choose to allow you to survive. The Khalsa gave up guns in 1849, and since you gave up the capability for organized violence, he could kill them one at a time. The Sikh faith, the Khalsa will not stop him. The Globohomo faith will.
Sikhs are posturing under the protection of Globohomo, and are careful to keep their posturing Globohomo compliant.
According to that map lactose tolerance is higher in southern Pakistan than in central France. I have to say, that rather tickles my funny bone.
Some parts of that map, notably Australia and New Zealand, are obviously wildly wrong.
Yeah, I thought it was weird. Central Europe has a dairy culture; South Asia, not so much. But for what it’s worth I did some Googling and found that the map is from an article in Nature from 2013, which takes the map from a paper, which in turn takes it from this paper, which seems to be the source.
It says they excluded “recent immigrant populations” so maybe Australia/NZ is abos/Maoris.
Ok, here’s all the data used for the map https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00439-008-0593-6/MediaObjects/439_2008_593_MOESM4_ESM.pdf
The data used for the high estimate in Pakistan/North India is from a study from 1976 with only 5 ethnic groups represented and n=55. Nothing to put too much stock into.
What are you talking about? India has the largest cattle population in the world and we don’t eat beef, what do you think all those cows are there for? Milk is absolutely central to the Hindu diet
Ghee and other milk products that are lactose free are absolutely central to the Indian diet – milk products. Not milk.
The traditional recipe for ghee first removes all the lactose by letting the milk sour, then extracts butter from the lactose free milk, then removes the remaining milk proteins from the butter.
I was referring to the guy who said South Asia doesn’t have a dairy culture- that’s the only kind of cattle culture we have, since we don’t eat beef.
While adults chugging glasses of milk regularly is certainly more prevalent in the north west of India, fermented milk in the form of yoghurt and curd is prevalent across the entire subcontinent, barring the chinkis in the north east. And most traditional Hindu desserts are milk based (not just milk products, actual milk). Hindu religious rituals call for copious amounts of milk ( liberals give us grief about wasting milk in temples every year). Filter coffee and chai (though recent entrants into the diet) are full of milk and they are drunk on the regular by all strata of society. Everyone eats ice cream and does just fine.
I believe the same is the case in Europe, with cheese and butter – I don’t get the feeling that chugging glasses of milk is something adult Europeans do regularly either, though I may be wrong.
And I’m not even starting on all the other ways Hindu culture is entirely intertwined with the cow. Yes drinking cow piss is a thing. And cow dung is thought to be medicinal in some ways. I suspect it influences the gut micro flora in beneficial ways. The cow is thought of as a machine that processes grass into all kinds of beneficial end products.
Mate, I’m not very pleased with you calling NE Indians Chinkis. It is just not amusing. You could have banged away at them for converting to Christianity, but this, I just did not like.
Lactose tolerance or intolerance is not a hill I’d die on. The Japanese are even more lactose intolerant than us and have an advanced society. Our job is to figure out what made Hinduism great in the times gone past and try to get back to that.
You are indeed wrong.
There is some mixture that is not dravidian or aryan in the northeast. Met quite a few from that region, it’s quite obvious. Not so obvious if it is chinese type or austronesian type, but definitely distinct from other regions.
I and pretty much everyone else I know drinks milk everyday, typically with breakfast. It’s also a staple when eating peanut butter product like peanut butter and jelly sandwiches and any sort of breakfast cereal like oatmeal isn’t complete without milk.
I also use with protean powder/collagen and brewers yeast drinks. That stuff tastes a lot better when mixed with milk.
I drink tons of milk because I need the animal protein and unlike most of the far right don’t like tons of meat all the time and the one sympathy I have with left wing anything is believing that animal factory farming for meat is something of an evil abomination.
The milk debate is much to do with the breed of cow that produces the milk. We Hindus across India can drink native cow milk and indeed our grandparents had cows at home from which they drank fresh milk every day.
I believe that mass dairy farming and mixing of buffalo and cow milk in packaged pasteurized milk has created health problems in this generation.
@com
Sorry to say but milk is factoy farmed just the same. Find a local farmer if you haven’t already. Look for Swiss, Guernsey and Jersey cows, they produce the best milk. More expensive by far but very very worth it.
If you aren’t doing fairly intensive strength training, you don’t need a lot of animal flesh. Milk and eggs, particularly yolks, with the occasional steak is absolutely plenty. The lots of meat thing is really for people that are trying to maintain large amounts of muscle. That and instinctual hatred of the antihuman gaia cult is what gives rise to the all meat all the time memes.
I didn’t mean if you specifically chug glasses of milk, friends- I’msure you do, and so do I (though it makes me fat). I was just wondering if it’s part of traditional Europe cuisine, like would it be something a Russian or French peasant may do daily. Maybe they do.
@somedude- point taken, I said it in jest. I mean no disrespect to our mongoloid compatriots. And I’m not arguing for great lactose tolerance in Hindus or anything, I really don’t care about it- I was just wondering out loud because ours is a cow and milk and milk product centric society, which doesn’t fit well with the current understanding of lactose tolerance . No biggie, merely academic curiosity, whatever the truth turns out to be.
Mate, I’m not very pleased with you calling NE Indians Chinkis.
Our job is to figure out what made Hinduism great in the times gone past and try to get back to that.
—-
Possibly, a move away from Brahmin led SJWism as displayed above, and a move back to Hindu Monarchy?
Most of the social damage done in India has been by the clerical – Brahmanical classes. From land reforms, to SC/ST the woman laws etc.
Brahmins will spit, froth at the mouth, and REE at any suggestion that they’re essentially the biggest fags (unmanly) beings on the face of Earth at this moment.
I can pretty much predict what sort of pajeetry this response will generate – possibly related to recent clashes with Nihangs?
https://twitter.com/AJA_Cortes/status/1662610960677216257?s=20
https://twitter.com/AJA_Cortes/status/1662694722068967430
Brahmanism is not the Vedic Religion, but a post-Buddhist post-Hunnic post-Gupta offshoot.
& it shows – for the average Indian, giving up meat/alcohol is the definition of piety. Watch the predictable responses flow in! LOL.
ਅਕਾਲ
Yes
And do not believe what today’s Brahmins tell you ancient Hindu’s believed. Check the holiness spirals of today and of five hundred years ago against the sources – and put yourself in the shoes of those sources, the environment they were in, the situations they were dealing with. A legalist will rip words from their social context, and find an directly opposed meaning by applying those words in a very different social context. Like Christians, you are going to have to try to understand the spirit of the law.
@somedude- point taken, I said it in jest. I mean no disrespect to our mongoloid compatriots.
—
Don’t apologize – Bodh Avatar (The Buddha) compared Brahmins to dogs or worse than for a reason. Even a dog only mates in the same species.
There are tomes on the vaginal excretions of women of various countries but no proper histography of India unless by foreigners.
Brahmins are just massive coomers whose entire feminist Hindu unity spiel is an attempt to create whores they can share in a brothel.
Vedic Dharma has an ethnic core & ethnic hierarchy. All priestly classes today – whether Libtard SJWs, Brahmins or the Vatican seem to be importing niggers to spite/shit-test their own Warrior Core.
ਅਕਾਲ
@SherSingh
Mate, I will attempt to engage you in Good faith. There are several aspects of your writings that puzzle me exceedingly, if I am to be very polite.
1. First you attacked the Dalits and went as far as talking about burning their villages, raping their women and inflicting collective punishment on them for some misdeeds. Yes, we do have a Dalit problem, but it is drowned out by our Abrahamic problem and our Hindu Elite Defection problem by several orders of magnitude
2. Then you took the side of Khalistanis against the Indian state. Fair Enough, death to the secular Indian state, I hate it too. But then when you know those same Khalistanis take support from the Jehadis, you still persisted knowing that the Jehadis are Blood enemies of Sikhs in a way that the Secular state is not. The Secular problem is again dwarfed by the Jehadi problem
3. Then you spent a bunch of time insulting White Christians on this blog knowing full well that several of us are guest students here, trying to learn from them so we can apply all those concepts back home and solve the Abrahamic and Hindu Elite defection problem. Why create ill feeling with such insults?
4. Now you attack Brahmins attributing to Buddha things he never said about them. Link me to where the Buddha compares Brahmins to Dogs? To be sure he uses their own reasoning to prove that they are inferior to Kshatriyas, that some Shudras may be superior to some Brahmins. He says that Brahmins are earning much demerit by saying that they sprung from the head of Brahma. But where does he call them or compare them to Dogs?
It seems to be you are trying to pit Sikhs against Hindus, Buddhists against Hindus, Hindus against each other (how else am I to reasonably interpret your writings against Dalits earlier and Brahmins now?), Reactionary Hindus against Reactionary Christians all the while ignoring the actual, bigger problems we have in India with regards to the Abrahamisms and Defection by our own Elites.
You may attack the Brahmins for their failure to defend the Dharma against aggressors. You may attack them for their failure to interpret Hindu scripture by the spirit of the law rather than the letter. You may attack them for their inability to update their tactics in light of new data in the form of the Abrahamisms. You may attack them for their defection to the Progressive Cannon now and Marxist Cannon earlier. All these attacks are valid for it is the cross and Burden of the Elites to carry the shame of failure.
But this particular direction you are attacking them from tingles my spider sense.
You can figure out where a man’s loyalty lies by figuring out whom he studiously avoids attacking or only offers token ineffectual attacks when prodded.
Our resident Sikh has “attacked†almost everybody in most vehement and vituperative terms except globohomo, which is the crux of the issue.
He is a rabid dog
Well, a rabid dog is wildly indiscriminate.
Resident “sikh” is very careful not to step on globohomo’s toes. In fact, earlier he argued that it is justified for Khalsa to ally with globohomo to defeat the Indian State because apparently globohomo is the lesser evil if evil at all.
@Anonymous Good on you mate. I apologize for my own lack of humor. A day will come when we can take all these jokes and sterotypes in our stride. I mean stereotypes are fun. But in this charged atmosphere, the slightest thing seems to cause nuclear fission.
Our Mongoloid compatriots are the ones who defeated the Mughals time and again on Forays to the North East culminating in the magnificent victories by Gen. Barphukan. Their victories are our victories and most significantly, they achieved these victories calling themselves Hindus and their King called himself the Chatrapati. The chattrapti also derided the Rajput general of the Mughals as a sellout and a traitor to the faith.
Of course, their subsequent conversions to Abrahamism 2.0 distresses me most deeply. Again, a failure of our Elites and defection from Nehru. Our history over the last millenia has been a most discouraging tale. I know that Dharma does not take kindly to despair and yet, here I find myself…….
Yes, you defeated the Mughals a lot, but when Mata Sundari was ruling, the Mughals got lots of gruesome revenge. The story puts the Sikhs in an embarrassingly bad light.
Banda Singh was obviously an entryist from an enemy strand of Hinduism, but it was very much the wrong time to pursue that quarrel. A male ruler, concerned about the likelihood of being taken prisoner by the Mughals, not to mention the likelihood of his subjects being massacred, would have pursued that quarrel at a more opportune time.
Admittedly, I stopped paying close attention to him some time ago. He reacts to reason with indiscriminate growling. There is no sign he is even contemplating anyone’s arguments. There is evidence he might not even comprehend the arguments in the first place. He can’t even understand a map far simpler than a driving map (lol, is Sher Singh a woman?). Hilarious in conjunction with his disdain for Dalits.
You can quibble that the growling isn’t as indiscriminate as a rabid dog, or that he doesn’t precisely have rabies. but subhuman like a dog he is, and foaming at the mouth he is too.
He could have been the Sikh Cominator. A prickly but interesting conversational experience. Instead, he’s just a disappointment that I see no use in further engagement with. That’s all I have to say on this topic unless circumstances change.
@someDude
Muslims you mean. The Abrahamic problem is just Muslims.
Christians just don’t do those kinds of things.
Although skin suited versions of them are definitely a problem. In terms of being vanguards of progressivism unfortunately.
@someDude
Btw. Do you take issue with Christians taking Dalits off your hands?
They are a problem yes. So Christians will see what they can do with them. Although the stories I heard involves Dalits finally cleaning up their acts afterwards.
No longer living in filth and so on.
@i
Christians in India are part of the coalition of Fringes and can be counted upon to support any cause that would hurt Hindus and oppose any that would benefit Hindus even if such support or opposition comes at a cost to Christians themselves. Christians in India have exactly the same politics in India that you accuse Liberal Indians in the US of having.
They supported the Creation of Pakistan knowing that The Muslims there would cleanse them out and thats exactly what happened. They blame Hindus for the Rape of their nuns when they know that the rapist was probably Abrahamic 3.0. This is because for all the quarrels between Christians and Muslims, they see each other as cousins, albeit distant and hostile, but cousins all the same, closer to each other than to Hindus. Not so with Hindus who are polytheists and not people of the Book.
Christianity might be great for the west, but for India, it is problematic. Problematic because, for all Indic religions that originated in India, India is the holy land. For Abrahamic religions, the holy land lies outside. In case of any conflict with any Christian powers, their loyalty is always in doubt. Given the Fog of war and the sheer number of problems war brings, this is an extra problem sane Hindus would rather than not have.
Regarding the Dalit problem, it is really an Elite Defection problem. Like women in India, Dalits have been given legal Superweapons in the sense that anyone they accuse of caste discrimination is in a hot soup with no consequence to the accuser in case of a proven false accusation.
So? I never suggested that Hindus should tolerate Christians in India. Or Christians tolerate Hindus in America.
@Jim, yes you never suggested that
around 2021, I went to a wedding in India where the bride and groom and several guests were American citizens but originally from India. All enthusiastic Biden voters, all holding the same tiresome left liberal positions. All very proud of their enlightenment. Most of them were also Anti Modi to be sure, but the fact that the few pro Modi ones were also pro Biden was quite instructive.
No reactionary Hindu has ever suggested, unless with malice, that Americans should tolerate Hindu immigration or Hinduism. It is inevitable that they will become part of the coalition of the fringes.
Somedude… so you understand why right wing Americans and especially techbros hate you guys with a passion. It’s not for no reason. Anyone who supports Biden deserves not only death but to go to at least a temporary but a fairly long stretch in hell. Indians in America are generally far far worse than jews. There are a few exceptions like D’Souza but its like 95% of you people.
They’re pro-Biden because they’re pro destroying Americans so they can replace them. Invaders tend to think that way.
Dual citizens vote right-wing in India to strengthen the country they love, while voting left-wing in America to weaken the country they intend to conquer.
Would America ruled by Indians be worse than it’s present rule by Judeo-Progressives? I’d settle for any regime that allows niggers and those who behave like niggers to be shot on sight, because then white people could have nice things again.
We have a whole lot of dot Indians ruling right now. When the elite want to do something dreadful to legacy Americans, they hire someone who perceives legacy Americans as foreign aliens, which means they used to hire Jews and now hire dot Indians.
The dot Indians in power are as bad for Americans as Jews in power, and for the past ten years Soros, Blinken, and Nuland have been doing their damndest to get white people to nuke white people. They want the people who hired them to do the dirty on us nuked. They want those they were hired to harm nuked, they want those who hired them nuked, they hate us all.
“Would America ruled by Indians be worse than it’s present rule by Judeo-Progressives?”
Indians are the worst progressives there are and on the whole far far worse than jews, ordinary jews somewhat identify with the country though often in a misguided in fucked up way. Indians just want to replicate the slums of Calcutta here, there are a very very few good ones (mostly ones who don’t intend to stay and are into teaching meditation practices and such) but the rest of them the ones with permanent residency or citizenship in a country they intended to destroy… it would be best if they branded and set loose naked in the woods to be hunted for sport.
“The dot Indians in power are as bad for Americans as Jews in power, and for the past ten years Soros, Blinken, and Nuland”
I would argue that while there were Nuland’s and Soros among them most of the jews had some scruples and some feeling for Americans. Indians are far far worse.
Well, of course, but Soros and company got their jobs because they hate us – which also means they hate their masters. And the same is true of the dot Indians now in power.
yes, I understand the antipathy that Americans feel for left voting Indians in the US, which is most of them. And you also understand the antipathy Hindu reactionaries feel for Christians in India and missionary activity in India. Its not exactly a mirror image, but it’s pretty close.
But your problems like ours are essentially one of Elite defections. Both problems are coup complete
With Jews they had to search hard to find the truly evil and psychopathic frontmen and true fanatics they couldn’t take any jew as your typical jew’s politics were about the same as the typical potato nigger in Boston (although the jew was generally more intelligent) they had stupid political views but the monstorous deep hatred of the country and everyone else just wasn’t there. Most jews have authentic close friendships with non jews and the truly ethnocentric Orthodox just wanted to live apart not be the ruling class of a slum they created. Whereas the Indians the fanatical hatred and willingness to be the most obnoxious subversives they can be is almost universal among Indians here.
I’d MUCH rather have jews be the middleman class because other than the odd Soros and Nuland (and perhaps the moment in time of the post Bolshevik revolution when the Jews hated the Russians and wanted revenge due to pogroms and such) there is stuff that if asked that a normie jew is not going to want to be a part of. There will be no such scruples with Indians.
When? They never stopped hating russia, and the bolshevik revolution was not a beginning either, but a culmination, of hatreds going long before.
Their hatred is generational. Nothing in this world will swerve them from their desire to see all of the Tsars/Kaisers/Caesars descendants and inheritors wiped from its face utterly.
Knowing many of these people, I think the actual reason is simpler and more banal. Now what I’m saying here does not include the odious, shrieking Indians in public life who have their position precisely because they hate the native country.
The reason Indians are the way they are is because they are taught to hold America in contempt in school, because they are not disciplined for their insular arrogance, because America itself does not hold itself up and teach itself as superior and its native people as a body to be feared and respected.
There is also the problem that aside from the really smart and productive ones, you cannot really lawfully come to the country without being a scammer of some kind or another (if you are being honest with yourself); at least not anymore. So the country attracts those with a predilection towards scamming.
Jim asked elsewhere – regarding the question of eating meat, and cows particularly, the answer has clear basis in Manusmriti holding to both the letter and the spirit, though possibly an unnecessarily strong interpretation of the spirit. The text makes it clear animals are to be eaten, but generally only out of necessity, to feed those you are bound to maintain, or in the process of a religious ritual, and specifically not to satiate ones own desire going so far as to offering strategies to substitute meat with other stuff that might satisfy this desire. It is pretty abundantly clear that eating meat for the sake of food and desire by itself should be avoided.
I would not holiness spiral about it, and I would feed my army all the good stuff whatever that might be.
“basis”? Sounds like legalism.
Where in an English translation of the law of Manu would I find the relevant text – the actual sections used to support the ban on eating beef?
Jews are always inventing new laws and boring loopholes in old ones, and when they create a new one, it is always justified as a strong interpretation of the spirit of the old one, when it is in fact a gross violation and evasion of the spirit, intent, and purpose of some other old one – they justify the loophole by very strictly adhering to something utterly irrelevant and meaningless that is vaguely related, then swiftly start boring loopholes in their new law. And Brahmin legalism sounds suspiciously like the Jewish legalism that Christianity was a revolt against. I have told many time the story of how the prophesied fall of Jerusalem and destruction of the temple came to pass, which began in the grossest and most direct violation of the Lord’s commandments and of the specific particular law that they were so enthusiastic about strictly upholding, spectacularly and thoroughly violating the spirit, intent, purpose, and letter of that law in order to very strictly adhere to an absurdly strict, but irrelevant, interpretation of the law, so that they could violate the Lord’s commandments on coveting, theft, and murder and feel extremely righteous about violating them.
What I suspect is that modern Brahminism is a similar evasion of the law of Manu, and Hindu civilization was and is decadent and its faith demon infested because (as the Jews of the time of Jesus and the Jews of today are not adhering to the law and the commandments) you are not adhering to the law of Manu. You complained that Brahmin ritual cleanliness failed to correspond to actual cleanliness. Perhaps Brahmin right conduct to fellow Hindus fails to correspond to actual right conduct to other Hindus.
I have been scolding our Sikh transwarrior because his Khalsa is no Khalsa. I am not scolding Hindus for not following the law of Manu, because I am utterly ignorant of the law of Manu. I know what a Khalsa is, no idea what the law of Manu is, other than that it is right about women. But I suspect that when Hindu civilization was great, it did follow the law of Manu.
What happens is that laws necessarily reflect the particular circumstances and people of a particular place and time, and necessarily need to be adapted to different circumstances, people, places, and times. It would be absurd to follow the literal words of the Old Testament about feces when flush toilets exist. The Christian way of doing this (spirit of the law) is obviously right, the Jewish way of doing this obviously wrong, and has repeatedly led them to catastrophe. I am ignorant of Brahmanism, but your complaints about ritual cleanliness suggest that Brahmans have been adapting the law of Manu Jewish style.
The British East India company based law for Hindus on the law of Manu. Coming from a Christian tradition, would likely have tended to apply the Christian method of interpretation, but, again, I have no idea.
You obviously need to re-activate the law of Manu on women. Perhaps there is a whole lot more stuff you need to re-activate. And a whole lot of too clever by half laws that provide rationales for not actually following the law of Manu that you need to de-activate.
Manusmriti Ch 5: https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/manu/manu05.htm
Lots of proscriptions against eating mushrooms, etc. that are no longer regarded as mainstream, which only the very pious follow. Probably based on sensible contemporary health practices at the time, and in any case not much reason is given for it, so probably not very important.
Then a whole bunch of stuff suggesting that eating meat is okay if it is first sacrificed. And even says it is a sin for a Brahmin to refuse to eat meat when he is officiating another ceremony or right, or as a guest, provided it is lawful. (Suggesting there was indeed a holiness spiral about this at the time that Manu put down).
But then goes on to make very clear that even if it is not unlawful, it is very virtuous indeed, to abstain from causing animals harm unless absolutely necessary, and that it is hard to eat animals without causing them harm.
The governing principles are, in short:
so it is not a sin to eat meat, your warriors and workmen probably should be eating some, it is virtuous to abstain from eating it, but you shouldn’t go around making a big deal.
And no special restrictions on beef.
The restriction on “village pigs” (not all pigs) probably refers to wandering pigs. Pigs carry parasites that affect humans, and frequently have quite a lot of such parasites. And vice versa. For some reason it is a whole lot easier for parasites to be capable of prospering in both humans and pigs.
[racial bombast from a half breed deleted*]
[*impotent boasting by a man of conquered race deleted yet again*]
For all that our polygonites screech about Russia being patrifascist ground zero, it can pay to remember that they, like almost every other country in the year of our Lord, 2011+12, are infected with a disease called democracy.
Not many are aware of the fact that they have a round of elections for high office coming up in 2024 as well, which represent vectors through which the GAE can inject chaos into the situation.
Congenital solipsists – both leftists and NPCs – are highly sensitive to the validation of numbers, consensus, which is why staging ‘elections’ and fixing the results is such an effective tool for defective factions, almost regardless of how asinine the execution may be. Of course at its core it is always an expression of conquest over a people by a faction, and the intended result is given teeth by the power of force possessed by the conquerors, regardless of the window dressing. There are nuances though.
On one level it is a coordination point for their extended faith; ‘Democracy is too important to allow un-Democratic results’. Like priests of Jove reading the Auguries of bird carcasses, the theater of the Election is what groups of whigs use to give themselves permission to do what they always and already intended to do, and to finesse fence-sitters into standing by and letting them do it, for want of alternate coordination mechanisms.
On another level, is of course the cynical veneer of squid ink; all elections are fake, whether subtly via conquest by the best mind controller, or blatantly via the best banana republican, the core is always conquest by forms of coercion; but the inveterately priest-ish character of demotism appeals to the sneak-thief instincts of the leftist; ‘this is the Will of the People’ *stabs* ‘its not a knife’ *stabs* ‘im not stabbing you’ *stabs*.
And yet on another level, it is also a form of fetishistic projection; a whig will engage in theaters of demotism even when it runs afoul of its ostensible purposes or interests. The gnostically inclined tend to have a perverse need to make their victims validate their own victimization.
~
It’s probable that the war faction is hoping the Ruthenian killing fields can be slow-rolled until election season, and they give their dreams of colour-revolutioning Russia a go. If or when the situation starts deteriorating rapidly for the NOG, there very will likely be sudden wide-spread public enthusiasm for a Korean style cease-fire and freezing in place.
Which would of course be a wishful result very convenient for them.
But there would be no good reason for Russia to simply stop when they no longer have means of stopping them.
Bakhmut was on the last line of the pre-made 2014-2022 period fortification networks, and unless the hohols have been very busy the last few months, there is nothing but open fields past that all the way to Kiev.
They’ve used up almost all of their reserves to symbolically keep it painted yellow, and troops presently standing the lines also being all there is, with little operational depth; a very fragile state of affairs.
I suspect it is only the specter of the will-they-or-won’t-they offensive by NOG’s NATOized Legion(tm) that is staying the RuM’s hand at the moment, who have certainly been making an effort to entrench in every sector of the front in preparation. The prevailing feeling is probably that the correlation of forces favors them and so time is on their side, that the onus is on the GAE to attack and bloody themselves on prepared defenses, or suffer a worsening position anyways.
I do not know how big the Ukrainian strategic reserve was, but if it was two hundred fifty thousand, they have now committed most of them to grinding attritive warfare, and cupboard is looking as bare of men as it is of artillery and rockets.
And if was considerably more than two hundred and fifty thousand men, it is now considerably smaller than it was.
I enjoy watching Alexander Mercouris’ insightful commentary on the Ukraine war, but cringe when he starts boomer-splaining how these events will affect the upcoming US or UK elections. Electoral politics is a puppet show!
I’ve been seeing more campaign billboards of late e.g. “Thou and I, United Russia, register to vote”, “LDPR – the first political party of the new Russia” (so named before “liberal democracy” came to mean “drag queen story hour”), “LDPR – telling the President the truth” (I guess that can be helpful sometimes), “KPRF – a society for everyone” (yeah, everyone who likes waiting three hours in line to buy a loaf of bread.)
Most Russians, including Putin himself, generally believed in the principles of Progressivism until Western Progressive elites of the pre-Trump era needed a villain that epitomized white male heterosexuality, and they chose Russia.
Was talking with some normies I know who are pretty right on many things (not vaxxed), and then one of them brought up this:
https://twitter.com/AniTrendz/status/1662217048725016576
A new anime seems to have come out, very popular here and in Japan it seems, and this iconic scene seems to call out the exploitation of a 17 year old in the entertainment industry. The director says straight up that she didn’t force her to do anything, and the main character here I presume went on a rant about child labor, minor exploitation, etc.
There’s no reason for me to state the obvious about what I think of this (if you don’t believe me, just bring up the woman question and I will give you answer). I’m more concerned is that Japan seems to be going down the tubes along with America, but in this case, the woman question seems to become more and more difficult to answer or explain because there’s been a generation now who hasn’t got the subtext of what the past generations said, so they take to heart all this bs like in every anime of female fighters who are in majority of cases many times stronger than the average man or even superman shown along with them. I assume the reality check that comes after this shitshow will be a real wake up for most of them, or maybe they will keep on chugging on about thinking of girls like anime women, despite their lying eyes showing otherwise.
Kick-butt anime waifus are an adolescent ideal where two things teenage boys are greatly fascinated by – martial excellence and physical indicators of good breeding – are combined in a single figure.
It is also a form of displacement activity, where the atavistic desire for a mannerbund is not consciously understood for what it is, and this yearning is sublimated into projecting characteristics of idealized brotherhood onto a feminine figure – they only kind of figure that comes to the conscious mind’s attention when imagining something that fulfills their yearning for deep bonds of brotherhood, in a world where it has been rendered all but extinct via SCALE, atomization, and open queerness.
I agree – fighting anime girls aren’t quite the same as “strong women” in American media, and they aren’t written the same way.
It’s why western feminist commentators rant against them – they argue, correctly, that these characters are designed solely for the entertainment of men, rather than in order to push progressive values.
The idea of a female character’s purpose being to attract the “male gaze” is seemingly intolerable.
Japan seems to have fallen off a cliff starting around the beginning of Covid. I guess America is threatening with feeding them to China, and their economy is only about a quarter what it was in 1990 in relative terms.
> and the main character here I presume went on a rant about child labor, minor exploitation, etc
I doubt it. I haven’t watched the latest episode but such a rant doesn’t fit the tone of the show.
The anime has a pretty unhinged premise by western standards, but it’s more of a drama about the dark side of the entertainment industry than something trying to preach to the audience.
The MC is somewhat of a white knight saviour of women in peril, so the dialogue is pretty in character.
The overarching story is about how a female star was killed by a crazy stalker fan, and he finds out her ex boyfriend who probably works in the same industry probably fed the weirdo information about her whereabouts. He wants to find the man and kill him.
> He wants to find the man and kill him.
The ex-boyfriend that is. The stalker killed himself.
Evergren topic.
I got around to reading the King’s Chapel Book of Common Prayer (1785) written revised by one James Freeman, who Wikipedia reports was in frequent communication with Socinians, and whatever his allegiance was convinced into nontrinitarianism of some kind or another.
Of his prayer book, he said
The wife’s vows in his revised prayer book published in 1785 were,
In the Establishment Book of Common Prayer it was obey, serve, love, honour, and keep — in that order. I didn’t realize the subversion was so blatant and manifest as early as 1785.
As a reader of this blog I come across esoteric theological disputes that I don’t know much about, but was shocked when I came across this 1785 revision of the Book written by a prominent American minister who was apparently very in touch with Socinians.
(Though I do understand how demoting Jesus from truly divine to a very early socialist rabble rouser who was pretty good for his time invites Jesus 2.0 holiness spiraling, and do get the merit of Anglican concern about works of Supererogation)
Basically, I am reporting consilience.
I hear Jim ranting about Arianism and Socinians and this and that and don’t really know the theology deeply.
Randomly surfing the web, entirely independently of Jim, I come across some early prominent American minister, who apparently had his own version of the Book of Common Prayer in 1785.
See what is in there, see the vows are all shockingly symmetric for 1785. I feel like I have glitched, spend an hour really making sure all normal versions of the solemnization of marriage as recently as the late 1800s were terribly asymmetric. Finally read about the 1785 revision and realize it is a prominent minister who was a nontrinitarian of some kind or another, probably Socinian but I don’t really know.
Anyway the relevant point is the consilience.
Happens to me all the time. Makes reading about history a lot more fun.
For example, been reading a biography on Winston Churchill. Guess who were the biggest disturbers of political rallies in the early 1900s — suffragettes, of course. They’d bang bells, crack whips or even throw acid in the faces of speakers.
Another one; in the Boer wars, guess what was the single biggest issue the Boeren had with the British? It was that the British insisted on treating blacks and whites as equals, a policy the Boeren were sure would led to chaos and suffering.
These heresies, Arianism and Socinians (among others), and these political actors, suffragettes and egalitarians (among others), are ancient demons that Moses chased out, Jesus chased out again, and the apostates condemned. The Gnostic, even demonic, impulse is embedded in humanity. Genesis touches upon that truth with Satan being around before Adam and Eve.
Read up on the Babylonians. Ishtar and Molech. See how their idols now dote American aesthetics. Snake women on courthouses and child sacrifice as sacred political platform. None of this is new. None of this suddenly popped up in the 1700s, or the 1500s, or the 1100s, or the 400s, or the etc. Evil has been constant and ever present with us.
[*Jewish account of what Christianity is deleted*] in all my years of catholic school I got the impression that [*Jewish account of Christianity deleted*]
If you spent years in Catholic school, the man writing your scripts obviously did not.
I am heartily sick of Jews telling Christians what Christianity is. No it is not.
The old atheism movement had a point that young earth creationism is obviously stupid and it is unlikely that Jonah was swallowed by a whale. The new atheist movement is just totally full of $#!%, and the Jewish story about what Christianity is has always been a dead horse. No one is listening to that stuff that Jews have been pushing since the sixth century. No one ever did. The Jews are in a bubble. For fourteen centuries Jews have been telling that story and for fourteen centuries Christians have been ignoring them.
I will debate that story with a Jew who says he is a Jew and I have done so. I am certainly not going to debate that story with someone who says he learned it at Catholic school. No you did not.
-“ I’m heartily sick of Jews telling Christians what Christianity is†LMAOROTFIT
Socinians are thinly disguised nontrinitarians. Someone who actually says “nontrinitarian” has dropped the disguise.
The Socinian denies that Christ has come in the flesh by coming up with a too clever by half overly complicated redefinition of Christ. The non trinitarian just denies that Christ has come in the flesh.
First Epistle of John, Chapter four
1. Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.
2. Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:
3. And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
So, according the first epistle of John, that minister is a false prophet who probably has a demon inside using him a loudspeaker.
And in addition to failing the short affirmation, would have also failed the Woman Question test. I have noticed near complete overlap between the results of the this worldly woman question test, and the entirely other worldly affirmation test. Which strange overlap could be argued as evidence suggesting that demons might be something a little bit more than metaphorical.
[*link to enlightenment story about Christianity deleted*]
Nineteenth century atheists knew their Christian history. Modern atheists have no idea.
[*Jewish progressivism and what Jews think Christianity is deleted*]
We have heard it all before. Even the left blogs don’t carry that stuff any more because it has been said too many times.
Speaking as a non-Christian who does acknowledge women need owners, I have to wonder why that is. I wonder if it’s the same in, for instance, prog Islam vs the real deal.
I think I’ve figured out why the christian affirmation test works: It demands that the person burn a pinch of (spiritual) incense to Christianity. To do so would be such a “sin” against their faith that they can not.
On the other hand, those who neither hate nor fear Christianity would have no issues saying it, for it does not offend his faith.
Makes sense. I can say the words, openly admit I don’t actually believe them, and not burst into flames because I’m genuinely being honest and not attempting to cover for demon worship.
Every left wing political and non-conformist Christian position native to the English speaking world was expressed in English during the English Civil War and English Commonwealth i.e. in the mid 17th century.
This uprising was defeated in the British Isles but not in the American colonies; it’s important to understand just how extreme Harvard was in the 18th century by not forgetting that positions normal now were not normal then. A university preaching Puritanism was like an NGO advocating Naziism in a world in which England itself only had two universities, that establishing universities was controlled by law (and never permitted), and those two universities could only employ Church of England priests as faculty.
Parts of America have also had terminal birth rates and replenished their populations by immigration much longer than that immigration has been visibly non-white. New York is one example. Been doing it for centuries.
In the news. A possibly bio-engineered pathogen?
https://www.sfgate.com/cannabis/article/cannabis-farms-infectious-pathogen-18115205.php
Crops always suffer from lack of genetic diversity. Populations that lack genetic diversity always get plagues, because what works against one member of the population works against every other. It is a huge problem with bananas, because bananas reproduce clonally – their fruit is seedless.
With seedless watermelons, they are sterile hybrids of a sexually reproducing population so it is less of a problem. We need to do the same thing with bananas, but sexually reproducing populations produce inedible bananas, and so no one does it. No one seems to have a population of sexually reproducing bananas whose sterile hybrids are predictable. Apple trees have a similar problem. Sexually produced apple trees are unpredictable, but there are a lot of sexually reproducing apples, and a lot of apple varieties, so when one variety suffers a plague, no one notices. There are not enough sexually reproducing bananas.
Jim’s prediction that there will be some surprising happenings in the future, is bearing fruit.
https://gab.com/TrevorGoodchild/posts/110442630145306097
https://gab.com/LillianBey/posts/110442328746021318
https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/1662415381288591360?cxt=HHwWgIDR7ef-ipIuAAAA
Hell, that’s nothing. Those who pursue an America-oriented policy in America are considered a traitor in America!
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/its-time-pay-democrat-voters-demand-fulfillment-past-promises-reparations-sanctuary
It sounds like Democrats are starting to think that turning the USA into Zimbabwe wasn’t such a great idea, and they’re desperately looking for a way to leash the monster they created. In the old days they could lose an election and spend the next four years blaming Republicans for the lack of “progress”, but that can’t happen with an army of Shaniquas stuffing the ballot boxes.
They are compelled by their internal dynamics to move ever leftwards, ever faster. There is no way out for them.
But the big crisis is the Ukraine. They cannot cut a deal, cannot accept defeat, and cannot win.
The current plan is “if Ukraine can disrupt Russian defences and impose a dynamic situation on them, Russian units are likely to rapidly lose their coordination.” (The much postponed greatest Ukrainian offensive)
They just have no plan for losing, because failure to defeat Russia is just unthinkable and unimaginable. They can only escalate. Their war aims grow ever more extreme (war crimes tribunals for Moscow) at the same time as the objective situation deteriorates.
They are concerned that failure in the Ukraine would “undermine allied confidence” (would result in countries all over the world abandoning the Global American Empire).
“They are compelled by their internal dynamics to move ever leftwards, ever faster. There is no way out for them.”
Or what? No, really, what if a dozen or so of the top dems and Biden’s handler sat down in a room together, said “we will do x because we don’t want to die” and then just dared the wokies to do anything about it? We all know democracy isn’t real anyway. Do they fear the rise of some fake and gay Red Brigades waging an actual physical insurgency against them? Hell no. Do they fear the media turning on them? Wouldn’t matter if it did (because again democracy is fake) but they can instantly stop that by just telling it not to. They’re not compelled by anything, they do it because they genuinely believe the things they say.
Wars are won by armies, and armies are made by shared faith. Everyone in or around the ruling classes who doesn’t share the whig faith is alone, even if there are millions of them, and are easily crushed; because the faithful can act as one to crush each of them if they raise their head, while they have no means of coordinating a change of course; because regardless of how disastrous the policy of a gnostic faith can be in practice, it can keep ensuring none within its sphere can get from zero to one to oppose it either, long after it has lost the ability to accomplish anything or stand up to anyone else.
But the weaker it gets, the greater the opportunities become for the daring; and Interesting Times oft bring unexpected shifts in inertial trends.
The faithful are told who to crush and when, and when to riot, by certain set means of communication which are wholly controlled by a handful of people. Supposing, per my example, tomorrow a dozen of the highest high meet in one private room and decide as one to surrender Ukraine to Putin. The media is told to downplay/ignore this as much as possible. Antifa is not instructed to riot. Who’s going to do anything about it and what are they going to do? Remember that right after Mao died Deng and co met in one room and all of a sudden the Cultural Revolution was over and Madame Mao and cronies were packed off to the slammer.
The people in charge are likely more concerned with what butts they are going to put their weiner in after they smoke some meth tonight, or who can help them steal more money from whatever projects are going on, or maybe even what pretty young whore they are going to cheat on their shrew wife with this weekend rather than charting a good course for this empire of many nations. Should one of them decide he wants to grab power and chart a course he is now alone facing the combined faith of the demon worshipers.
Someone Doing A Deng would of course be a great scenario, but – is there anyone in the USG-NGO ecosystem today that looks like a Deng to you?
People like Soros or Kissinger weren’t just cynically consequentialist hedonists, they – and more significantly, the people they select as their replacements – really are earnest gnostics, and will pursue their gnostic compulsions to their advantage if they can, but will never ultimately give them up even when it costs them, as it inevitably does.
Which I believe you yourself are arguing too.
They’ve spent their whole lives crimestopping around each other, they do it in their own heads too.
They’ve spent so long coding their messages in dissimulation to avoid running afoul of rivals and underlings, that they’ve forgotten how to speak the truth.
Even when they are alone with each other in a closed room, they still can’t communicate with each other anymore – cannot say what cannot be said.
What I’m saying is they’re no more constrained to anything than the CCP’s Politburo was during and after the fanatically Maoist Cultural Revolution. If a handful of people near the top decide to do to the wokeists what Deng did to Madame Mao and the Red Guards nothing would happen to them. They do what they do because they genuinely believe the things they say, not because they are afraid of anything.
I think in certain respects an judeo-puritan style deep state is less well organized than a Politburo – which, whatever else you can say about it, at least represents a clear chain of command. But that degree of chaotic formlessness is also part of its staying power; organization which can potentially rival it is easily singled out for destruction, because openly organizing for anything is ‘fascism’.
A side-effect of this as an organizing principle though, is that the kinds of people who rise through its status hierarchies are also selected for genuine faith in the demonic idols – as you say – which is adaptive, as far as it goes, for such an environment.
The problem is that such a decision would indicate lack of faith in globohomo. They worship demons. Acknowledging defeat in this war indicate lack of faith in the power of Satan. Since their social cohesion is based on metaphorical and often literal demon worship, the problem that such a little group of men would face is maintaining internal cohesion against true believers.
Did they admit defeat in Syria or any of the other failed interventions? Nope, they quickly found a new distraction to expand blood and capital for no material gain. Purely for masturbatory purposes.
Deng and co accomplished it under a regime every bit as fanatically dedicated to its own form of demon worship. It was literally less than a month between Mao’s death and Madame Mao’s true believers getting dragged off in chains. Completely doable.
The Gang of four was not removed by Deng, but by Hua, who was a slightly less insane true believer.
Deng noticed that one form of insanity had been rolled back, and proceeded to roll back Hua. Hua was a sincere Marxist. I don’t think Deng ever believed in Marxism, but he reluctantly went along with it.
If the Ukraine war gets dumped overboard, likely to be dumped overboard by the boys who think that prisons are racist, police are racist, borders are racist, and whites owe reparations. Conversely, if Global Warming and reparations gets dumped overboard, likely to be dumped by the fans of Global American Empire.
But, on the other hand, if anything gets dumped overboard, it opens the door for dumping more overboard.
You’re correct, I did forget about that interim step. But still, Deng did get rid of Hua as Hua got rid of the gang, and nothing happened to either of them as a result of their disposing of more leftist than thou true believers. The bureaucratic apparatus was more than willing to comply in spite of being systematically stuffed to the gills with doctrinaire Maoists for decades.
I’ve come to a realization of how strikingly communistic America is, no longer a mixed economy its 90% what the Soviet Union was but by stealth
– The majority of economic consumption above the level of basic subsistence is now done by the government sector backed by unlimited reserve currency debt, this is why I hope we lose reserve currency status as soon as possible
– Most assets owned by Blackrock and Vanguard (I’m almost sure Blackrock is a government front) followed by major insurance companies (which are quasi state enterprises even in more truly free market systems) which may or may not be government fronts
– While market elements exist these powerful government forces set the prices for everything behind the scenes, under Biden I’m almost sure they’ve been directly setting prices in such a way to kill the HODLers and mean reversion traders who used to be able to make money too (under Trump me and a lot of other people were doing well and under Biden me and all the rest of them I know are basically broke)
– People in government and with high government connections all get rich, everyone else gets poorer
– The decisions of any enterprise above more than say 15 people (basically everything above that of a small shop) are driven primarily political considerations as the managers fear the regulators more than their customers or shareholders (ESG, hiring women and recent immigrants in preference to white male natives, white male natives being the buergois class background people of the system) or if its truly a big corporation where the CEO has to be a globohomo priest with connections they fear being booted out of the club
– Big companies are not allowed to fail
– Law is byzantine subjective capricious and anarcho tyrannical. It always is to some degree because humans suck but its far more so now than in any period that has ever existed in any English speaking country.
– Prices continously rising and standard of living continously falling as the system destroys private enterprise, price competition and private virtue (as there is no motivation to actually work hard)
And yes I know Moldbug said long ago America is a communist country and I knew the country has been quasi socialist for a long time…
But I never quite put together how by stealth we’ve become essentially like the old Soviet Union now in all but name and appearance until now.
There’s still one major difference: If you don’t like living in the USA, you can get a passport and leave, unless you owe back taxes or child support. Do you think they’ll close that loophole anytime soon?
They will close it the second many people start using it.
There is already an expatriation tax.
The entire economy is dependent on interest rates. Rate which are dependent on the Fed Funds Rate which is set by a committee without market forces. In effect a command economy lies beneath the illusion of market economy.
The interest rates are only a part of it as banking is never really a free market thing.
At my work we have a magic database filled with tiny minute instructions giving everyone in production baby steps for everything. Let’s call this program Dave, because it has a person’s name anyway. Our corporate forces all management to go to worship retreats, multi day, where everyone must have faith in Dave. Everyone has to believe in Dave and trust Dave. You see, Dave is a machine learning smart artificial intelligence like Skynet and it must be obeyed.
It is not artificial intelligence of any kind, it is simply a database. Much worse every low level manager used to be able to input their own data into Dave. Well all the data they have inputted is bullshit. It’s just years of lies from every level of every department all meant to make that one manager look a little better to their superior for that one day. Dave is a database filled with bad data.
Well corporate now worships Dave. Everyone at my company, a company with a twelve digit market cap, must have faith in Dave.
A few weeks ago at a production facility a production guy finally got sick of following Dave’s idiotic moron instructions and quit. They replaced him with an obese single mom because they magic of Dave means we can now replace every straight white male with a defect. The new defect didn’t realize that much of what the old guy did was fake bullshit he had to do in order to trick Dave into thinking he was Dave compliant. For example he had empty bags with their RFID tags on them that he would put on the production line so Dave would be happy that they were going through production for a product that did not use that ingredient. Dave demands you add the ingredient anyway.
Oh man I can’t even begin to tell you how stupid and bad this database is. It would take too long. But yes this is one small example.
So the new defect who is running production actually adds the ingredient because you must obey Dave, trust Dave, have faith in Dave. Days of production is totally ruined before anyone figures it out. Corporate comes out to figure out what went wrong.
I attempt to explain to a c suite guy a few of the problems with Dave. Let’s say their is a room with five switches and each switch needs to be flipped in order, one through five. Dave will instruct the worker to walk through the entire plant opening each door one time, ONLY one time so no backtracking, and then after each door in the plant has been opened only one time by this employee is he allowed to flip one switch. It must be the same employees badge opening each door one time each only before each switch is flipped. Why? In God the Father’s name, why would anyone do this?
The c suite says, ‘you have to have faith in Dave. Dave has a computer for a brain. People like us just can’t understand but Dave is really smart’.
Meanwhile they find the empty bags with the RFID tags on them stored by the old production guy so he can get his Dave compliance without destroying our production. This shows the c suite the sabotage they knew was going on because nothing else could explain the ruined product since it was Dave compliant. That straight white male must have sabotaged the obese single mom before he left!
Worse the other managers at work are now crime stopping when I talk about Dave. See they must have faith in Dave so when I point out the ridiculousness of following this broken database, with specific insane examples, they then repeat back to me nonsense like, “sure Dave has problems taking day to day changes into account”. If I press on they go totally blank like they can’t hear me and just walk away. They are scared to doubt Dave. Legitimately they are afraid.
Oh and of course after the team of straight white men created Dave they were immediately fired so a corporate diversity team could be put in charge. They are smart enough to watch youtube videos and that’s about it.
The future looks like sheboons, fat gay cross dressers, and other defects blindly following the instructions in a broken database and then looking for the straight white guy to blame when it doesn’t work.
I believe it. I left my corporate IT career in the early 2000s, after I had to spend two days in a conference room being talked down to by several HR cat ladies, told to stop raping women and stop being a racist.
I sacrificed a good life as far as material concerns go and got a job in construction. Construction has a lot of down sides too but at least you are working with men and being honest and assertive still raises your stock among your peers.
I really don’t know how guys can manage corporate life these days. I would rather be homeless than have to bite my tongue like that.
@SJ
That future won’t last long after the carriers are sunk by hypersonics.
Some time ago we discovered that a diverse workplace cannot make chips, and America had to outsource its silicon foundries to Taiwan.
We are now discovering that a diverse workplace cannot make shells and rockets.
Communist countries cannot create wealth, diverse countries cannot create advanced technology. America is both so…
Without wealth, cannot make war. Without technology, cannot make war. War is the father of us all.
Would love to see your frame on this subject Jim – McCarthy frames “war as the father of us all” in a demonic way orchestrated with his main antagonist Judge Holden. It doesn’t have to be seen in this light however, good men can wage war to protect their families, territories, and the sanity of our species… McCarthy is framing this necessity as a great American Evil – in reality it was eugenic and paved the way to the most prosperous country in the world (up until it was destroyed by Harvard). Engineering and politics can’t be separated – teams are made by people with common interests and viewpoints and this is by far the strongest when they are from the same ilk.
McCarthy is like Orwell and many other writers of that era; they placed truth in the mouths of villains, as a way of resolving the psychic dissonance that arose out of the gnostic weltanschauung they were formed in.
Wait, I though the reason that American outsourced Silicon Foundries to Taiwan was environmental regulations. They were doing IC design just fine. Are you saying running a silicon foundry is harder than designing Cutting edge chips? Or is this more a brain drain from American manufacturing thing?
Intel has been creating new US foundries to make advanced chips, and the chips fail to roll off the line. Their IC design is fine.
This is now when leftism has hit its inflection point. But the US started outsourcing IC manufacturing to Asia in the 1990s when the US did Design just fine, the best in the world at that time.
I thought that whole outsourcing of IC manufacturing to Asia was all about a combo of environmental regulation and Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantage where the US decided to focus on Design and Design automation and leave that dirty polluting stuff to the East Asians.
A great deal of money has been spent trying to get chip manufacturing in the US and Europe. It was outsourced in substantial part for environmental regulations, but now they want to insource at least some of it, and have been trying.
Sure environmental regulations was a part, but the silicon industry didn’t really fight.
I was always told by older American engineers that chip design was easy with high profit margins while the actual manufacturing was hard with lower margins. They outsource manufacturing thinking they could dominate the upper segment of the value added chain.
What they didn’t consider was that by sending all the designs to Asia (first Japan, then Korea, then Taiwan, and now China), that the Asians could simply ignore IP and reverse engineer. With local manufacturing, turn around time was fast and the rest is history.
How true is this story?
@Pax Once you got the foundry, you don’t have to go to the trouble to reverse Engineer the schematics. The Design house basically gives you the blueprints. You just have to manufacture to spec. You got the blueprint, you got the design. No need to decapsulate the package and put it under a microscope and regenerate the blueprint.
The manufacturing house can easily steal the design which is why the USG might have been worried about SMIC. I don’t think TSMC or the South Koreans have been doing any stealing of blueprints or passing them to other design houses or to the Chinese etc. TSMC has been around for over 2 decades now and I’ve never heard of anything like that from them.
@Jim, right! So trying to get chips manufactured in the US and failing to do so is a recent phenomenon. The US was perfectly capable in the 90s and 00s.
They just did not want to due to the burden of incoherent and malicious environmental regulations. No one like dealing with Federal bureaucracies, EPA being no exception. Its not necessarily the cost as much as how emasculating it is to genuflect before malicious, envious, parasitic bureaucrat-priests.
“Comparative advantage” means that whites are better at inventing things but Asians are better at producing things. When everything that can be invented has been invented, whites become superfluous.
Not everything has been invented until we have made the stars our own.
Would also be nice to have fail-safe thorium reactors down here on Earth, if white men can invent them before the whole world converts to what Aidan calls “Asian bugman managerialism”.
Well as I pointed out we are basically in a stealth communist country so Rand is relevant to some degree.
Who is John Galt?
An old barren spinster’s sexual fantasy. Randian libertarians have this odd idea that they can simply turn away and be in peace. Pol Pot does not let one turn away.
Rand had many typically female shortcomings but was pretty based, John Galt didn’t suggest the state would leave you alone (AT ALL). Ayn Rand wrote We the Living a fictionalized account of her personal experience following the Russian Revolution (and almost everyone who reads it thinks its exageratted in terms of how bad the Bolshevik state was) she knew better than that 1st hand.
John Galt basically says in a communist system do the bare minimum to survive but contribute nothing beyond that, you want to contribute to its collapse by not giving it any surplus to steal not help it out.
>John Galt didn’t suggest the state would leave you alone
In the book they successfully hide out in Galt’s Gulch. A small town in Colorado. They have effectively disengaged from tyranny and are able to live in peace. This is unrealistic. History show every city, town, village, and isolated homestead inside a communist country gets raped by roving bands of commissars.
In Pol Pot’s Cambodia, there were no Galt’s Gulch.
>in a communist system do the bare minimum to survive but contribute nothing beyond that
Sure… but it’s also shit advice. You either get out while you can, which is what Rand did, or you learn to play the system and crush those beneath you, which is what everyone left behind ended up doing.
Galt’s Gulch was about getting out if you can.
The town was secret and the regime in Atlas Shrugged was more soft globohomo than Pol Pot, in globohomo even the tyranny is mostly prancing faggotry. We the Living is about the hardcore version…
Dagny Taggart is Ayn Rand. The whole book is her fantasy.
Galt’s Gulch is her dream of being able to remain in the country of her birth, Russia, yet remain untouched by Soviet Communism. A completely unrealistic scenario (unless you’re that one orthodox guy who escaped to deep Siberia).
It was never about getting out if you can. It was always a longing for what she left behind. A wish she could have been fucked by a counter-revolutionary. This is why Randian Libertarians are naive. They are reading fantasy too objectively (heh) when they should be reading it metaphorically. In fact, this is a common failure of libertarians. I love them, but they are autists.
It’s alright Pax, we all started Libertarian. We all got our start reading Rand. They we started thinking about Evolutionary biology and one thing led to another and here we are.
But we’ve got to start somewhere, right? Ayn Rand and Libertarianism is where most of us start.
Other than Hoppe (who is basically one of us) Rand is the most based libertarians since she basically makes an exception to “non agression” for leftist of all kinds and just says they should all be killed upon identification.
Not as good as Hoppe but she isn’t bad.
Her basic flaw, which poisoned libertarianism at its root, is family and adultery. But on almost everything else, she is great.
She also argues that the state should be minimal because everything that the state necessarily has to do is necessarily wicked, which argument undermines the status of warriors. I say a state should be minimal because everything other than the military, war, taxation, and protecting taxpayers from other bandits is a distraction, and the state is necessarily far too big to afford distractions. A state always has terrible scaling problems so has to outsource everything that can be outsourced, including as much law enforcement and justice as possible.
Also bad on religion, of course. You need an official faith so that everyone is playing by the same rules. The primary earthly job of a priesthood is organizing consensus on right conduct, though it is an odd fact that the Christian consensus on purely other worldly matters is such a reliable tell about earthly alignment and activities. People do line up behind other worldly alpha males.
But I still say that Ayn Rand is great.
But the primary conflict of today is not about how the economy should be organized, but whether you line up behind Gnon or Moloch. When Deng came to rule China, we got world consensus that the economy needs to be run by entrepreneurs financed through the corporate form created by Charles the Second. No one except the usual fed shills is pushing socialism, and Ayn Rand is primarily the moral argument against socialism. Today, we need the moral argument for Gnon.
“Socialism with Chinese characteristics” is a whole lot more capitalist than Capitalism with New York characteristics, though Xi is mucking stuff up, injecting the party into corporations with effect similar to ESG and HR in the west. That is why he is having big trouble getting chip making inside China.
The Old Believers survived many attempts to exterminate them by settling in places that are ridiculously hard to get to. Socialists are cruel but also lazy, so most of their looting takes place in and around big cities.
The Amish are more vulnerable because America’s dense road network makes all arable land relatively easy to get to.
“your job is to cash as many pay checks as possible for as long as possible”
Social justice requires hiring people who cannot make competent decisions. So, create a computer program to supervise them in minute detail. Which however, still requires competent people to make decisions from time to time that get into the database: “sure Dave has problems taking day to day changes into account†However, these are the people that the program was intended to replace.
ChatGPT can replace a whole lot of the email class, which does not produce anything anyway. (Recall all the jokes about those twitter employees, and the out of touch multi million dollar moron who shot Budweiser in the foot.)
Computers mean that a considerably smaller number of competent people can supervise a far larger number of diversities, but you still need those competent people. Which winds up looking even more sexist, racist, homophobic, and transphobic. So you fire all that oppressive straight white male privilege, and the computer slowly and mysteriously becomes increasingly idiotic.
I keep getting ads on yt videos for the new version of Grammarly, which fully writes emails for you.
Entire email threads between AIs, no human involvement needed.
Crazy times ahead.
[*nigger noise deleted*]
If Sikhs had guns and a real Khalsa, then those noises might be significant. One pays more attention to the barking of an alsatian than a chihuahua.
But if you had a real Khalsa, I suspect its warrior priest King would not have any difficulty saying that Mata Sundari had been a catastrophe as leader of the Khalsa and had been enthusiastically in bed with her Muslim captors. The Tat Khalsa was almost as fake as your current transKhalsa, because ruled by women. How is a widow going to get any action when all the men around her are her subordinates?
When women perceive the men around them as betas, they are apt to take action to get abducted by a strong man in a stronger tribe, and the way Mata Sundari led the Tat Khalsa makes total sense in the light of evolutionary psychology, and would make absolutely no sense were a man rather than a woman leading the Khalsa.
A woman has no tribe, no faith, and no country. She has her husband’s tribe, her husband’s faith, and her husband’s country, and Mata Sundari had no husband.
You are screaming meaningless insults and empty threats like any nigger, but I am not deliberately insulting your faith. I am giving you helpful advice. I telling you that you are in the hole you are in because you have departed from the faith of Gurū Hargobind. I know what he would have said about a female headed Khalsa.
If he was around today, he would tell you what I am telling you. You need patriarchy, guns, ammo, crypto currency, and organization for organized violence.
Why did Elizabeth I avoid doing this kind of shit is it just because she by all accounts had an extremely high outlier IQ for a woman.
I’m guessing substitute husband- William Cecil, 1st Baron Burghley was her main advisor for her reign.
No her substitute husband was Robert Dudley and she probably had a bastard kid with him at one point…
The living arrangement points to fucking. The life long spinster behavior points to barren womb.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Dudley
There is corrobarating evidence he was in fact her son, Elizabeth went into seclusion once for about 7 months saying she was ill which would have corresponded to when she was born.
There is far more corroborating evidence that Elizabeth had health issues, likely ovarian in nature similar to her cousin Mary. Ambassadors regularly reported on suspected royal pregnancy and described it in terms like “3 months swollen.” That wasn’t the case with Elizabeth. The Spanish ambassador wrote that Elizabeth was dropsical and “swelling extraordinarily.” I do not recall pregnancy ever being mentioned by the ambassador. Dropsical isn’t a word used to describe pregnant swelling. It’s used to describe illness by evoking images of rotten bloated fish.
I wasn’t being metaphorical when I speculated on a barren womb. Elizabeth was very likely infertile as was unusually common in the Tudor family.
Elizabeth I did in fact do a lot of shit, her sexual impulses led to much bad and foolish behavior. But she was rather keen on certain manly and martial Englishmen of her court, and wanted them to win and England to win. She presided over an England of pirates and adventurers, and she was great because rather keen on the pirates and adventurers who made England great.
Please, delete the previous comment of mine. Let me rewrite
So why wouldn’t Mata Sundari be similar to Elizabeth in this regard wanting Sikhs to win and wanting Sikhism to spread? Were there not certain manly and martial Sikh men in her court whom she would have wanted to win?
When you say the way she led the Tat Khalsa, what specific actions of hers are you talking about?
Not resisting a Mughal empire that massacred Sikhs. Allowing herself to be detained. A man would have been much less inclined to be taken prisoner, and much more inclined to avoid circumstances that might make it possible to take him prisoner. If the Tut Khalsa had a man ruling it, would not have been able to take him prisoner without a battle.
Evolutionary psychology. If a man is taken prisoner by the enemy, unlikely to survive and reproduce, if a woman is taken prisoner, likely to survive and reproduce with the jackpot of conqueror semen. Hence the disturbing and notorious response of women to invasion and invaders, and Mata Sundari’s response to invasion was disturbing.
She, being a woman, naturally acted in an umanly fashion, and caused her Khalsa to act in a manner that was unmanly.
Women ruling a Khalsa tended to get no end of manly, martial, and dangerous guests. Perhaps Elizabeth’s Spanish ambassadors were made of different stuff. English pirates and adventurers were attending Elizabeth’s court. Spanish pirates and adventurers were not.
In one of her speeches, Elizabeth talked about the fact that she was a woman, and her job required manliness, implying she had difficulty supplying the necessary, but just had to man up. Mata Sundari’s job also required manliness, and she did not man up.
This blog is the first I’ve heard about her. I’ve been looking up a bit more about her online. So far what I’ve looked up does not seem to indicate what you are accusing her of. I’m curious about what source you are using. Can you please share them with me?
The woman ruling when the Khalsa was defeated by the British was Jind Kaur not Mata Sundari. I know nothing of Mata Sundari and my most extensive source on Jind Kaur that I’ve read is the fictionalized portrayal given in Flashman and the Mountain of Light.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jind_Kaur
Mata Sundari was not the one who caused the Sikhs to get into a stupid war with the British and caused them to be defeated.
She was the one who caused the Sikhs to be defeated by the Mughal empire.
So Jim’s talking about Jind Kaur and Not Mata Sundari?
I don’t think you can conclude that the Mughals defeated the Sikhs in Mata Sundari’s time. On the time line mentioned, the Sikhs were a small sect and the Mughals were at their zenith. From that vantage, survival is victory and the Sikhs survived, their best days ahead of them in the form of Emperor Ranjit Singh.
Also, can you please point me to the source you are using to look up Mata Sundari.
Search Banda Singh. If you search Mata Sundari, nothing informative comes up.
[*nigger noise deleted*]
After a bit of research, it does seem there is considerable controversy over her excommunication of Banda Singh. Some say it happened, others say it did not. Seems to be considerably controversial. Still, on the whole, she acted in a way that is above average for women. She did not disgrace herself.
Either way the point about not having women in charge is well taken. It is indeed problematic. A woman in charge means the men around are not stepping up. The Tipitaka is also clear when it says, “Doomed is the race that permits itself to be led by a woman”
The Sikhs may lionize Mata Sundari as the English do Elizabeth-I, or the Russians do Catherine, or the french do Joan of Arc or the Hindus their innumerable queens like the Rani of JHansi for propaganda purposes, but at least their Elites should not believe their own propaganda
However, to be fair to Mata Sundari, Elizabeth I did not face trials like this. The English were no way in such an inferior position vis-a-vis the Spaniards as Mata Sundari was in comparison to the Mughals. All the way from the start of their faith in the 1400s, to about 1730 or so, the Sikhs were always 6 feet from the edge. The English under Elizabeth 1, not so much.
There were reasonable grounds for foresaking Banda Singh at the right time. She did it at the worst possible time for the Sikhs, and the best possible time for the Mughals, which looks like the typical female behavior “lets you and him fight”.
Singhs left Baba Banda Singh Ji when they were reduced to eating bark.
[*deleted*]
Maybe if the Tat Khalsa had not excommunicated him at the worst possible moment for him and themselves, and the best possible moment for an invading Mughal army, his Sikhs would not have wound up eating bark.
[*unresponsive nigger stuff deleted*]
[*nigger noise deleted*] I come on here to share Sikhi – not be lectured on it [*nigger noise deleted*]
You came here to posture as a warrior, and we called out your posturing. You are no longer warriors. Warriors have guns and the capability for organized collective violence. If Sikhs want to posture as warriors, they have to walk the walk, not just talk the talk.
On this blog, people are not allowed to dress themselves in false identity – I will call out you as a fake warrior and delete your posturing just as I delete the posturing of the shills that they are reactionaries, and the posturing of “Christians” who are strangely unable to say certain things from the creeds. We have fake names, but true identities. I am what I am. You are not what you say you are.
[*nigger noise deleted*]
Most of your woman advice isn’t actionable [*nigger noise deleted*]
I have been actioning it since before
alt.seductionexisted, and before I could consciously explain it.Conscious thought explaining my actions followed quite some time after the existence of
alt.seduction. Action that needed explanation precededalt.seduction. My instincts and the air that I breathed as child guided me, and much later I learned the reasons for my instincts. And most of game is still very difficult to express in words, for the mating dance long predates human speech, which is why Aidan Maclear cheerfully refrains from too much explanation.You’ve literally claimed the Taliban arose from alt.seduction [*nigger noise deleted*]
For as long as the Taliban have been trying to tell globohomo in English what they were about, and what their objections to globohomo are, they have been obviously aware of the body of thought that began on
alt.seduction. Further, the Taliban appeared in 1996, some considerable time afteralt.seductionappeared. So they did not arise onalt.seduction, but it is in their roots, as it is in our roots. We did not appear onalt.seductioneither.alt.seductionwas horribly purple pilled, and neither we nor the Taliban are purple pilled.They did not appear on
alt.seductionand we did not appear onalt.seduction, but the research and social engineering that provides empirical support for the red pill first appeared onalt.seductionWe and the Taliban both appeared long after
alt.seductionwas effectively dead.[*nigger bombast deleted*]
All of the women advice is completely actionable. Many of us have wasted considerable amounts of time attempting to teach other men how to take the action. Alas, as the saying goes, you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink.
Game in three easy steps;
1. You are better than her.
2. She wants your validation, you are her judge, so give her your validation.
3. Always be sexual, immediately and non stop. If this makes her leave you just saved a lot of wasted time.
Now go do it. Go do it a lot. Learn to pass shit tests. Hell the first time I cold approached a girl and asked her out, clumsily, back in college she laughed at me and said, “You?! Why would I ever go out with you?”. I cried in my car while I drove home. Mid thirties me would have banged that girl that night.
[*nigger bombast deleted*]
Good information. Here is Aidan’s summery about game in 3 points:
1. Pass her shit tests
2. Don’t show weakness
3. Dominate other men
(from “SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT” pdf, page 58, which also goes into more detail about each point)
Maybe steps two and three works in a bar and as far as step one goes you’ve got to elicit the shit test before you worry about passing it.
A neg works because it interprets an innocent statement as shit test, which you then pass. Also any dhv is likely to elicit a shit test.
I have a corollary point to add based on my own retarded life choices and present circumstances. It should go without saying but I wish someone had said it to me:
Don’t keep the company of bluepilled males, ever.
It’s crucially important to have a group but only if it’s a maennerbund that has your back no matter what. Your old drinking buddies from college who conformed to the professional world, who became women respectors and hang out with faggots they met at the office, these men are not your loyal brothers in arms. They’ll always undermine you and run interference on you. In their own minds they even think their white knighting is actually for your own good to help you comply with women’s whims as the ultimate standard of acceptable behavior. It’s better to wing it solo than to have to deal with complications from your own side of the wire.
The only end for these males and their genetic line is complete destruction, if not in this generation then in the 2nd or 3rd. Purge them from your social register so they don’t bring you down with them.
You become who you surround yourself with. I have had blue pill friends try to warn girls away from me because I’m a player, so a bad man who tricks women, which is great though. Really helps your game if other guys are warning her you are just a player.
One of the things I notice frequently is that attacks on the Brahmin class / priestly class is most vehemently and vituperatively conducted by other rival Brahmins/priests themselves, frequently wearing the guise of warriors, merchants or other lower classes. Priests can be chameleons when seeking to undermine other priests.
Sher Singh’s obsession with certain topics, viz skin colour and lactose intolerance etc make me believe that he is a Priest wearing the guise of a Warrior. Merely wearing ceremonial warrior robes and bearing ceremonial weapons do not make a warrior. Reading Sher Singh’s various posts here make me believe that Sher Singh is of the Brahmin class, who is merely wearing the guise of a warrior to attack whom he perceives as rival Brahmins. This has been a tactic of the priestly class since time immemorial. The Brahmin – Dalit alliance is everywhere and has been a poison used against Monarchy and Warrior rule everywhere around the world.
Kshatriyas mostly tend to be suspicious of Brahmin rivals, but rarely make priestly attacks on Brahmins. Rather Kshatriyas tend to resolve the problem by Kshatriya means.
I acknowledge that society needs to be ruled by true Kshatriyas, and we need a Monarchy, but equally a virtuous priestly class needs to sustain the sane State religion and support the Monarch but never allowed close to the levers of power. Because power tends to corrupt even a virtuous priesthood over time. Power needs to be handled by the Warrior, not the Priest. The virtuous Priest should be accorded due respect in society but never allowed to handle power. Unvirtuous priests need to be helicoptered.
I don’t think there is any controversy in this. We all acknowledge the ills of priestly rule on this blog, in fact that is the overriding theme of this blog. But equally amusing is how other/rival priests pretending to be warriors tend to attack fellow priests using thinly disguised priestly memes.
Ouch, I intended to post my response to his attacks on Brahmins here, instead it went to a whole new comment and went under moderation. Oh, well!
The Khalsa is Sant Sipahi – both priest and warrior. [*nigger noise deleted*]
Not any more it is not, you ceased to be warriors in 1849 under the rule of a woman, and the Tut Khalsa failed to act in the manner of warriors when they were under the rule of a woman.
He also seems to lionize the Nihangs and keeps going on about Nihangs this and Nihangs that.
Yet the Nihang leader would recently wish to excommunicate Banda Singh Bahadur, who was a bonafide military Genius at the level of a Peshwa Baji Rao or a Gen. Barphukan. This is very Problematic.
I did not realize that a military Genius like Banda Singh Bahadur was so controversial. And this without a leftist historian trying to rewrite history and posion the well. The Sikhs pretty much did this to themselves. Relative the size of their population, The Sikhs have about as many problems to fix as we do.
Are you aware of any Sikh intellectuals that are talking about stuff like this the way we are re-evaluating about Ashoka’s legacy?
[*nigger noise deleted*]
Biden’s handlers have been doubling down on Their Greatest Strength lately, helicoptering in Commander Trayquarius into every position of import in their military.
Good news for anyone worried about USG’s ability to project force going forwards.
I will repost my response to Sher Singh’s latest attack on the Brahmins here. There are several aspects of his writings that puzzle me exceedingly, if I am to be very polite.
1. First, he attacked the Dalits and went as far as talking about burning their villages, raping their women and inflicting collective punishment on them for some misdeeds. Yes, we do have a Dalit problem, but it is drowned out by our Abrahamic problem and our Hindu Elite Defection problem by several orders of magnitude
2. Then he took the side of Khalistanis against the Indian state. Fair Enough, death to the secular Indian state, I hate it too. But then when he knew those same Khalistanis take support from the Jehadis, he still persisted knowing that the Jehadis are Blood enemies of Sikhs in a way that the Secular state is not. The Secular problem is again dwarfed by the Jehadi problem
3. Then he spent a bunch of time insulting White Christians on this blog knowing full well that several of us are guest students here, trying to learn from them so we can apply all those concepts back home and solve the Abrahamic and Hindu Elite defection problem. Why create ill feeling with such insults?
4. Now he attacked Brahmins attributing to Buddha things he never said about them. I asked him to Link me to where the Buddha compares Brahmins to Dogs? To be sure The Buddha uses the Brahmins’ own reasoning (about their own superiority) to prove that they are inferior to Kshatriyas, that some Shudras may be superior to some Brahmins. He says that Brahmins are earning much demerit by saying that they sprung from the head of Brahma. But where does he call them or compare them to Dogs?
It seems to be Sher Singh is trying to pit Sikhs against Hindus, Buddhists against Hindus, Hindus against each other (how else am I to reasonably interpret his writings against Dalits earlier and Brahmins now?), Reactionary Hindus against Reactionary Christians all the while ignoring the actual, bigger problems we have in India with regards to the Abrahamisms and Defection by our own Elites.
You may attack the Brahmins for their failure to defend the Dharma against aggressors. You may attack them for their failure to interpret Hindu scripture by the spirit of the law rather than the letter. You may attack them for their inability to update their tactics in light of new data in the form of the Abrahamisms. You may attack them for their defection to the Progressive Cannon now and Marxist Cannon earlier. All these attacks are valid for it is the cross and Burden of the Elites to carry the shame of failure.
The Brahmins’ (And the Kshatriyas) single greatest Failure is that they failed to mobilize Hindu society to counter the Abrahamisms and invasions. The Elites bear the full brunt and full responsibility of Failure. No excuses for them. No passing the buck for them. No hiding behind extenuating circumstances for them. Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown and so on and so forth. They were the Elite and they Failed.
But this particular direction he is attacking Brahmins from tingles my spider sense. He basically all but wants the rest of Hindus to set up lynch mobs for all remaining Brahmins. Why do I never hear anything like this vis-a-vis treasonous Khalistanis, progressive newscasters, JNU professors, Abrahamic preachers, Jehadis and so on and so forth?
[*link to more nigger bombast by Sikhs with neither guns nor the capacity for organized violence deleted*]
Brahmins control the men with guns. What are you going to do? You don’t have guns
And Brahmins control the money you use. You can’t organize collective violence without money.
[*nigger bombast deleted*]
This is getting mighty repetitious. If you want to relive the glories of your ancestors, first have to acquire guns, money, and form a Khalsa capable of organized violence.
[*racial envy deleted*]
[deleted]
From reduced prison sentences, preferential hiring & special weapons laws.
[deleted]
What enrages the niggers is that despite the state’s thumb on the scales in their favor and against whites, they are still obviously inferior, and live inferior lives. Despite the state’s thumb on the scales against me, I am better off than you in many ways, and better than you in many ways.
Of course you’re better than me.
You invented the Taliban on usenet seduction boards in 1992.
The English language spokesmen of the Taliban were obviously familiar with the modern red pill, and the non English language adherents of the Taliban are reported by their guests to be familiar with the modern western red pill, which developed from the information originally published on
alt.seduction. Butalt.seductionwas horribly purple pilled and generally enthusiastic about the sexual revolution. However an implication of the information published onalt.seductionwasWhich implies that the western sexual revolution was a really bad idea and should not be allowed.
Another implication of the modern western red pill, frequently expressed on
alt.seductionis that the sexual revolution makes family formation difficult and dangerous, which is immensely frustrating to both men and women.God’s thumb is heavier. Case in point, America losing the Ukraine despite Russia having no advantage other than not being ruled by Jews, niggers, and homos.
[*nigger noise deleted*]
Let Sher Singh’s plight be a reminder to all those who would act against Kin. None of your former kin will stand up for you when you are under attack from anybody.
Such are the wages of employment with GloboHomo
Proof glowniggers actually promote holocaust denial for whatever reason, probably the same reason they likely promote flat earth and the fake moon landing.
The glownigger here failed all shill tests on covid could not say a slur (he could say glownigger but no slurs as seperate words) etc. He ended up unironically defending lockdowns and Biden’s election.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/tnum/428696452/
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/428696452
Feds promote holocaust denial the same way they promote election denial; purposefully cockamamie to throw turds in the punch bowl, ‘prebunking’ genuine voices via serving up mysteriously loud yet easily discredited and ridiculous voices to people first.
I had always thought the adherents of the people who claimed that no jews were harmed during the filming of the 3rd Reich were just kind of dumb and I had always thought that lie would have been too un pc for the feds to promote but apparently not… its actually a glowop.
Holocaustianity is a critical plank of the modern religion, so it’s only natural they poison the well, like everything else vaguely right-wing.
Zoomers today don’t really care about the victimology of khazars though, each passing year making it ever more divorced from generational experience, so it has been going away by turns here and there.
And every year the Nazis get browner. The mall shooter, an indigenous passing Mexican. The White House truck attacker, a Hindu Indian. Zoomers don’t care about Khazars (outside of their big milkers memes) because they are increasingly nonwhite.
Zoomers don’t care about khazars because when you’re an incel who can’t get laid to save his life, the medicine your society needs is a tad bit stronger and more radical than what Uncle Adolf had to offer.
Maybe that’s a part of it, but I think the main driving force has been a question of inheritance. Parents pass down religion to their kids. Most White Americans belong to some form of Holocaustianity cult, and I see that even today that most young Whites at least pay lip service to the icons. Hispanics (among others) did not grow up in the cult. If they believe it’s because they were converted by Jews or Whites. Most did not convert.
There is plenty of evidence that Germans committed enormous crimes against lots of people, particularly Jews – just very tiny crimes compared to communism, and without gas chambers in the camps.
The holocaust is a myth based on real events – and what makes it mythical is the gas chambers, which were invented to make deaths from German socialism as different as possible to deaths from communist socialism.
Yes yes but I’m a bit surprised the feds are shilling it but reading the thread one of the deniers glows like a quasar. I’m agnostic on gas chambers there is no physical evidence but supposedly they were all blown up before the Russians got there. But tons of people said they saw them…
I think their use was exaggerated and most jews starved died of disease or were shot but I suspect they existed. But in any case 4 to 6 million died so it’s mostly true.
I forget the exact date when everyone suddenly started remembering having seen gas chambers, but it was in the early seventies.
A search of google books 1939 to 1959 does not show anyone claiming gas chambers in the camps. I researched this topic sometime back, but failed to record the evidence for when the myth suddenly burst onto the stage. Someone should redo the research and document the oddly late and oddly sudden appearance of gas chambers in the camps.
Which I neglected to record and document because Jews bore me and everyone gives them far too much brainspace. If you think too much about Jews, your brain is enemy occupied. Jews do not matter and they have not mattered since the crucifixion.
Gas chambers were mentioned in various places in the Nuremberg transcripts (have they been altered) and confirmed by a few hundred sources including SS men who had already been released and theoretically did not have to fear any retaliation.
The one thing I think the revisionists are right about is that probably most killings were due to exposure, epidemics and starvation as while you can kill lots of people with gas keeping it up with the supposed consistency the germans did in the holocaustianity narrative was probably impossible far simpler to starve them.
Even one of the SS men who confirmed the gas chambers I think mentioned difficulties in keeping them operating consistently, one was that after a couple loads the Sonderkommandos would essentially say fuck this shoot us. I cannot remember the source…
What I recall seeing in the Nuremberg transcripts is
Question: “Did you set up gas chambers in the camps?”
Answer “Not that I know of, did not happen under me.”
So yes, indeed, they were mentioned.
And after that, no one talks about gas chambers at the camps again for more than two decades.
Jews bore me. If you want to do some homework on this topic, checkout first hand sources and get back to me. I recall finding a strange lack of anyone remembering gas chambers at the camps until after 1973 or so. Get the first hand sources. Not sources that claim some other source said that some other source said that some other source mentioned gas chambers.
It is entirely true that a whole lot of Jews were murdered in a multitude of ways, among them trucks with deliberate exhaust flow into chamber of the truck, “mobile gas chambers”. But the great majority of the deaths were due to malign neglect in the camps, exactly like the vastly larger communist killing fields, which needed to be rewritten to make their deaths as different as possible from the vastly larger killing fields of the communists, so after 1973 or so, gas chambers in the camps.
What happened, to the best of my recollection, is that no one remembered gas chambers at the camps until after the “Gulag Archipelago” came out, whereupon suddenly a whole lot of people suddenly remembered gas chambers at the camps.
Check me with first hand sources, for I checked first hand sources, but very quickly became bored with Jews. I really did not do enough homework, but I did enough that if there was any report of gas chambers at the camps, “stationary gas chambers”, in the decades immediately following World War II, I should have found it.
https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1550/64/1550648140575.jpg
https://famous-trials.com/nuremberg/1932-hoesstestimony
Here is one. Still agnostic on gas chambers but there was some immediate non physical evidence.
Its boring but my main point was for some reason (ie probably the same reason they promote Black Earth) there is a glowop promoting this stuff. Its overdone probably because of that.
I stand corrected. This is Hoess testifying to gassing over a million Jews and murdering three million or so.
Still, rather odd that the only witness to the gas chambers of Hoess and the gas chambers of numerous other Nazis seems to be Hoess, and that Hoess claimed:
“During the first interrogation they beat me to obtain evidence. I do not know what was in the transcript, or what I said, even though I signed it, because they gave me liquor and beat me with a whip.”
I retract my claim that no one remembered gas chambers till 1973, but I still would like to see some evidence other than a confession. Industrial scale mass murder requires an industrial scale workforce. What did the rest of the necessarily numerous Hoess workforce say? Was there any physical evidence presented supporting the confession? If no physical evidence presented, a genuine confession is unlikely.
“Marie Claude-Valliant-Couturier, a former member of the French Resistance who spent three years at Auschwitz, provided the following testimony concerning atrocities she observed at the camp” …
But how she came to observe the gassing is not asked by the prosecution, nor the defense lawyer, nor explained by her. She testifies to thing happening that she could not possibly have been present during. She testifies to have herself seen the crematoria and explains how she could see them, but does not explain, nor is she asked, neither by the lawyers of the prosecution nor the defense, how she knew of the gassing.
Still, that the trial was obviously rigged and conducted unfairly is a far thinner case against gas chambers than I thought I had.
It’s pretty clear they *wanted* the narrative of specially unique evil to be there from the beginning, but had trouble actually getting it there, at least in that specific regard, so it like many other things was quietly shelved, until a few decades later when they pulled it off the shelf and succeeded that time around.
There are a number of reason for this –
1. the desire for it suddenly becoming that much more keen, due to the mysteriously stubbornly persistent image problem of the soviets.
2. in 1946 memories are fresh and the narrative gleischautung going forwards still inchoate and not yet fully solidified on a specific form; in 1970, anyone who might say anything otherwise – whether out of naivety or principle – is long since out of the picture (or part of the program to begin with)
3. related to above, the whig theocracy by this time has a much more solid grip on power; specifically in terms of what voices are heard and what voices are not heard
Eg, https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1671/42/1671429570399591.png
Obviously the industrial scale factory of mass murder that Hoess confessed to would produce an industrial scale amount of physical evidence, and require an industrial scale number of workers who would have witnessed, and instead of that evidence we get an obviously coerced confession and the very strange testimony of Marie Claude-Valliant-Couturier and her even stranger cross examination.
So, no credible evidence, but I claimed, incorrectly no evidence.
The first mass killings by gas chambers were supposedly jury-rigged by the equivalent of a sergeant and five or so subordinates, apparently on their own initiative.
All these stories – unlike the Wehrmacht disproportionately (but not without exception) shooting any Jews they encountered as suspected partisans, or detained Jews dying in large numbers of disease while in a state weakened by starvation, which is typical of every time a warring party detains people and isn’t clearly and overwhelmingly winning the war – smack of the kind of literary embellishment that Jews delight in and the complete lack of engineering competence exhibited by most Jews.
https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2011/10/holocaust-nazi-perspective/
I spent a few minutes slowly loading primary docs and just getting other ones than the one moldbug is quoting but i assume it could be found if i spent some more minutes.
SS Judge Georg Konrad Morgen testifies that Kriminalkommisar Wirth operated gas chambers in potemkin villages run by jews looting the dead jews at the Nuremberg trials.
” At the last stop they reached a big room, and were told that this was the bath. When the last one was in, the doors were shut and the gas was let into the room.
As soon as death taken place in, the ventilators were started. When the air could be breathed again, the doors were opened, and the Jewish workers removed the bodies. By means of a special process which Wirth had invented, they were burned in the open air without the use of fuel.”
..without fuel? wat mean. Whatever.
Might explain those pictures of happy jews in swimming pools and cinemas and soccer fields at supposed extermination camps. They were the vultures running the show.
Or maybe Morgen got kicked in the balls until he said all of this stuff. The denialists disregard every word from the nuremberg trials because ball kicking.
There is overwhelming physical evidence of people in camps dying of hunger in very large numbers. It is just the gas chambers that were mysteriously able to vanish, and the bodies of the people killed by them that mysteriously vanished. Also the bodies of people shot tended to mysteriously vanish.
Hence the strange lack of physical evidence for the industrial scale mass murder.
Heh. All those holocaust survivors from the extermination camps. Did they work the camps? Were they the ones doing the killing until everyone starved?
https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1662/65/1662654000899709.jpg
“people who claimed that no jews were harmed during the filming of the 3rd Reich”
Nobody claims that including the Nazis’ own records.
The Nazi Government left behind huge amounts of records that say things like: we went into the village and shot 75 people; there were 48 Jews and we shot 45 of them.
Which of course adds up to a whole lot of Jews, but does not add up to 1. a genocide or 2.a particularly weird kind of production line execution.
Google ngrams shows “the Holocaust” is a narrative that was forced around the time of the Eichmann Trial, which is also around the time “Holocaust denial” appears.
The most common thread of holocaust denial [*by government shills poisoning the well*] is that [*usual endlessly government pumped well poison*]
Yes, that thread is bunkum. Of course it is bunkum. It is intended to make anyone who doubts the official narrative look evil and stupid. The people at your shared desk in your open plan office full of shills are pumping it out right now. You are telling us what the guy next to you is typing.
The big holocaust lie is not that a whole lot of Jews were wrongfully killed, murdered. Obviously a whole lot of Jews were wrongfully killed. The big holocaust lie is that the enormously larger mass murders of communism were just an unfortunate oopsie where despite the best of intentions a few greedy kulaks died due to the unfortunate umpteenth year of unfortunate crop failures caused by bad weather, while the far fewer deaths caused by Nazi socialism were totally and complete different.
The big holocaust lie is not that there were a whole lot of deaths. The big lie is that these were deaths of racism, when in fact they were deaths of socialism, also known as envy and covetousness.
It is no myth that a whole lot of people, disproportionately Jewish, died in the camps. What is a myth is gas chambers at the camps. How they died is a myth manufactured in response to “The Gulag Archipelago”, because why they died is a lie.
[*unresponsive*]
Those are plausible and arguable claims, but the trouble is other people, especially me, made a bunch of contrary claims, and you are not actually arguing against those claims, but sailing right along as if they had not been made.
So if I try to argue against your claims, you have successfully derailed the discussion. If I respond to you, I acknowledge that you made those claims, and they are arguable. But you have not acknowledged, and have no intention of acknowledging, that I made my claims, and that they are arguable.
I asserted, among many other things, that socialism is simply envy. The socialist does not want to feed the poor. He wants the rich not to be rich. And the black wants the smart kids to be stupid. He wants to pull down that which is above him, but he has no desire to lift up that which is below him. Which is demonstrated by the actual behavior of socialists. Presumably you do not agree, but you do not actually mention what you are disagreeing with.
Pleonexia
Nobody knows what pleonexia is, everyone knows what covetousness is, everyone knows what envy is.
However envy is worse than covetousness. Covetousness is the desire to have what rightfully belongs to someone else. If you want a wife like Trump’s, or a flying palace likes Trump’s, that is not covetousness and not envy. If you want his wife, and his flying palace, that is covetousness and if you passionately and insatiably desire it, pleonexia.
However, it you want him to not have what he has, if you want what he has destroyed, that is envy. And socialsts and our noisy transwarrior display, and have frequently expressed in the most intemperate terms, envy. Ser Singh, has frequently expressed in the most passionate terms, the desire to destroy what white people have, and regularly gloats that globohomo is destroying it, which destruction he enthusiastically supports.
Our big problem is not intemperate and extreme covetousness, it is that envy has become the center of the officially unofficial state faith.
Marxist theory is that steel making facilities and the kulak’s cows were stolen – wall street allocated him those cows. Which is covetousness. But Mao destroyed China’s pre-revolutionary steel making facilities, and the kulak’s cows usually somehow wound up dead, which is envy.
An important implication of Marxism, frequently expressed by our shills as a shared assumption on which all reactionaries agree, is that capital does not produce value, that it is merely and instrument of rule that oppresses the workers, a meme expressed in the term “sweatshop”. From which it follows that capital should be destroyed. That destroying China’s pre-revolutionary steel making facilities and the men who knew how to run them would actually improve China’s capability to make steel. A basic meme of the Great Leap Forward is that China did not need the stuff that Mao destroyed.
Another form of this meme is the blue state meme about capital – that what red states have – land, cattle, mines, factories, and so forth is not capital, and is undesirable – causes global warming, rapes the earth, oppresses workers and minorities and is unproductive. Capital is supposedly bits of paper issued by quasi state enterprises in the blue state Megalopoli. Which bits of paper are immensely productive. Which implies that because America has so much of this immensely productive wealth creating capital, it was going to defeat Russia in attritive warfare. The left literally wants to kill the cattle, because global warming, and in parts of Europe are doing so.
Our persistent shill, Anonymous Fake, who gets all his stuff deleted but keeps on commenting anyway, wants suburbia and exurbs destroyed and all conservatives relocated to giant government housing projects in the big blue cities. It is for our own good he tells us. Having a house and garden oppresses us, while living in a giant government housing project will empower us. A theme also implied in song “ticky tacky little houses”. People move to big cities because that is where the elite don’t have what their parents and grandparents had, because people without gardens tend not to reproduce, so most people in a little box grew up in a home with a garden, and they do not like the people who today have what they grew up with but no longer have, and they do not like the existence of what they no longer have.
Envy is actually appropriate in my model, though! We want elite university degrees and prestige, because attempting to make Trump University etc is a complete failure. And we want elite cities like NYC and DC, because the right basically cannot make real cities at all, just endless suburbs and strip malls no one likes.
Envy of capital is (no sarcasm) unfortunately a side effect of legitimate envy. We want to elevate ourselves and tear down our enemies, duh! If this results in some capital burning then that’s just materialism, and it is beneath the concerns of warriors and priests.
Now destroying NYC and making everything a subdivision would be an interesting scenario, when you think about it, but if the morlocks can’t do it I’m not betting on it. There’s something architecturally significant about that place, and this is integrated into my analysis as a given.
If no one likes suburbs, why the obvious envy? Why your obvious and admitted envy? As for “strip malls”, the shopping experience is unpleasant or pleasant in proportion to the right of shop keepers to deal with bad people and the number of bad people around. Very white red state areas with a law abiding population and/or a castle doctrine that allows malls to adequately deal with bad people have very nice malls – though not as nice as high end malls in poor countries where periphery security can shoot bad people and totes big guns. The shopping malls in Singapore are stunningly magnificent because bad people get flogged and there are lots of affluent shoppers who demand beautiful surroundings. Even in poor third world countries full of very bad people, if mall security can shoot such people, the shopping malls in affluent areas of those countries are very nice. Chinese shopping malls are wonderful, and red state shopping malls in very white areas are quite nice, though nowhere near as nice as they used to be before all this degeneracy and crime.
It is a complete failure because we always have an official state religion, in our case an officially unofficial state religion, and universities are always seminaries of the official state religion.
Send some tanks into Harvard, and it will be Trump University.
Your own economic position is overwhelming evidence we have enormously more people with a useless training in priesting than we need, and a university by its nature can only train people in priesting, even if it is ostensibly training them in computer science, rocketry, theoretical physics, and so forth. So we need vastly fewer universities than we have, and vastly smaller universities than we have. We need instead the system of enforceable apprenticeship that the enlightenment official religion destroyed, where parents had great parental power, and apprenticeship tranferred some considerable portion of parental power to the master.
Envy is never legitimate. It is far worse than coveting, and coveting is always a sin, and a disgrace. I have many very grave sins, but have never experienced envy, or even coveting. It is a sin that is complete alien to me. It is disgusting perversion, like homosexuality, or transexuality, an abnormal deviation that our officially unofficial state religion seeks to inculcate in everyone. Normal healthy people do not experience it. You are disgusting, and your sins disgust me. Everyone has lust, wrath, pride, gluttony, and sloth, but normal healthy people do not experience envy, any more than normal men lust for boys. If there is a lot of envy around, and there is, something is horribly wrong, just as the epidemic of obesity indicates something is horribly wrong. There are a lot of envious people around for the same reason as there are a lot of transexual children in school. It is entirely unnatural for this disgusting sin to be so common.
The reason covetousness is mentioned in the ten commandments while envy is not is because coveting is rather common, but in a normal society, which ours is not, envy is very rare. There were no homosexuals back in those days as far as any normal person knew, and no envious people either.
The state religion inculcates envy, just as it inculcates obesity by food regulation and the infamous food pyramid. Soon to become the Aztec pyramid of human sacrifice, and/or the altar of Moloch where people publicly incinerate their offspring. Probably the latter.
You people who think this way are idiots. As Jim said people who envy are basically spiritual fags, coveting yeah I’ve coveted but I’ve never experienced envy either its alien to me.
I would hypothetically in minecraft NOT burn down NYC to the ground though I would kill a lot of the population… but in minecraft DC needs to go. The Library of Congress can be spared but the rest of it absolutely needs to get the treatment that the Mongol meted out to the Persian cities.
>As Jim said people who envy are basically spiritual fags
Most notably the envious do not experience hope, gratitude and meaning. Those are the spiritual rewards that sustain a healthy person.
Every leftist is hyper stimulated yet spiritually dead, the way that morbidly obese are over fed yet malnourished.
Envy also stunts the growth of the envier. Much like homosexuality and usury envy takes what is fertile and makes it sterile. During my middle age I did attempt to help a few of the bucket crabs I knew from my poor youth as a gutter trash. Alas, they were filled with envy, and hence unable to lift themselves up. The envious look at a happy and wealthy family and do not think, ‘what are they doing that gets such amazing results?’ Rather they think I must destroy them so they are as unhappy and poor as me.
Adults who live in little box seldom have an intact biological family, but usually grew up in a house with a garden and father. Which they miss terribly, but instead of thinking “what does it take to recreate what I enjoyed as a child”, they are apt to think that people who have such things are hateful and horrible, and houses that have gardens and are apt to contain intact biological families are hateful and horrible. They hate what they do not have, and conclude, as Anonymous Fake concludes, that the people who have such things are somehow cheating them and robbing them. The absolute central essence of socialism is killing the cows of the kulak with two cows. See also the Duluth model. Fathers and husbands are automatically evil and automatically in need of punishment.
I’ll give one thing to AF that lots of those people now are tied in with the globohomo stealth communist system somehow and willingly support it lest they be exiled for heresy this was not true in the past but is largely true after covid and they should go not because of what they have but because they support globohomo.
The number six million is numerologically significant to the eurasian descendants of matriarchal demon-worshippers, so you see it constantly refrained in their writing over the centuries. You can find khazar newspapers in the 19th century talking about how ‘The Tsar is murdering six million jews’.
Frankly, even one million deaths doesn’t comport with the census data.
The mythology of lampshades, soap, electric train station floors, rollercoasters of death, masturbation machines of death, tom and jerry shotguns, showerheads, gas chambers, crematoriums… is exactly that: mythology.
There are so many holes and inconsistencies in the mythology that it is almost passe to point them all out. But one ought to be able to anyways, since there may always come times where a truth becomes necessary. That, at least, you can never forget.
Of course it is in fact quite easy to kill massive numbers of people; all you need to do, is just not feed them. Something the communists were very good at.
Pointless to discuss census data, too many official lies and too much falsification of history. And, in any case, one death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic. It was an immense human tragedy for those swept up in it, an insignificant minor inconvenience by the standards of socialism. It was a lot of Jews, an awful lot of Jews. If you worry about exactly how many, you have Jews on the brain.
When we win, we will teach kids about democides roughly in proportion to their size, and no one is going to remember the Jews among so many. But they will remember that when sin is politically mobilized as holiness, the results are apt to be extremely bad.
Yes, a still notable if non-specific amount. The main point being it’s not a Magic Number.
Based on my readings and just gut check understanding, I think ~1.3 million total deaths of undesirables, most of which were executed by Einsatzgruppen. I would wager it’s 600-800,000 Jews total, the rest being the other groups. This is a massive bloodletting, not unparalleled but systematic in a gut wrenching way for outsiders, though very justifiable on two counts: the Jews of Europe were truly awful to their Christian neighbors for many centuries, and the Nationalist Socialists, like literally every other socialist regime, needed a particular Type to hang all of the ills and issues that resulted from their poor economic and infrastructural management.
The devil of the lolacaust is really in the details, and once any rational white male looks at them, even at a cursory level, it just doesn’t add up. The gross total number of Khazars in Europe before and after, the resources needed to operate ~7 industrial death camps (every single one found by Russian communists), the dearth of labor in the Reich after Barbarossa, the physical limitations of cadaver immolation using wood and coal (a limited resource in desperate need in nearly every sector) using facilities with no hermetic sealing, the in fighting and factionalization between the Jews themselves. As usual, St. John nails it in a sentence where I take paragraphs to barely land the punch:
6 million is a magical number on which to hang a mythology that is perpetuated to this day.
Indeed, if Jews really were in control of a shadow, one world government, we should be expecting *another* hall of costs pretty soon to rejuvenate the mythos, as many of the OG Survivors are now in their 60s U+1F60F
It’s a fascinating topic the first time you encounter it, but it becomes so tiresome, like an LSD trip that never ends, as there is truly no end of men out there who are completely ignorant of the whole affair. That might be another useful task for a Jimbot: always ready from a Square 0 redpilling on Holocaustianity.
https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/ecc33b7a-0820-4777-a70f-55a8f157fd1d_984x469.png
Gayto prepares false-flag operation at Zaporhyzhia nuclear plant.
They already tried the false flag operation a short while ago. They sent saboteurs in disguise, who were intercepted with explosive devices close to the plant. Which plant of course has massive security against such attempts.
To actually accomplish the objective, they are going to have to rush the plant with the sixty thousand fresh reserves they have for the purpose, which will make the falsity of the flag rather obvious and may not succeed, because those men have been sitting there for a while, and I expect the Russians have prepared a very warm welcome party.
The basic idea of the Greatest Ukrainian Counter Offensive is you build up a large reserve, and then a large chunk of that reserve suddenly shows up at one point on the very long front and cuts through the front into the Russian rear areas. But the “suddenly shows up” part does not seem to be working, probably due to shortages of war material and chaos in the logistic supply lines. What seems to be happening is that the troops show up on schedule, and their equipment fails to show up on schedule. And then they sit around twiddling their thumbs for quite a while while the plan is revised.
War of attrition does not seem to have yet reduced the Ukrainian capacity to hurl fresh meat into the meat grinder, but it does seem to have reduced the Ukrainian capacity to hurl properly armed and equipped meat into the meat grinder.
Yep, I just have to riff on the blatancy of their ‘ground watering’ with headlines.
I claimed that the Taliban, like the alt right, was born of the alt groups of usenet.
But the alt groups were dead before the Taliban and the alt right was born. You misrepresented me by attributing to me the claim that the Taliban was born in
alt.seduction. Very plainly it was not. Thealtgroups were horribly purple pilled, and the Taliban and the alt right never were. But the alt right is the alt right, because of its memetic ancestry. Which memetic ancestry has always been visible in the Taliban’s English language spokesmen attempting, unsuccessfully, to inform globohomo of their issues and demands.You are an impotent frightened transwarrior who dare not criticize globohomo, for globohomo is what is keeping you and your people alive when you have no guns, and no money except that controlled by your enemies. The Taliban had guns, money that their enemies could not control (money in the Hawala system) and organization for organized violence.
A Khalsa that does not have guns, money that its enemies cannot control, and the capacity for organized violence is no Khalsa that the Guru Gobind Singh would recognize as a Khalsa. Your faith requires a Khalsa, you do not have one, and dare not create one because Sikhs are conquered, defeated, disarmed, and afraid.
Unfortunately the Taliban public relations account on Twitter has been suspended.
This is a response to @i in regards to his query about the Christian problem in India. I fear that the comment I posted in direct response will get buried in the comments there
Christians in India are part of the coalition of Fringes and can be counted upon to support any cause that would hurt Hindus and oppose any that would benefit Hindus even if such support or opposition comes at a cost to Christians themselves. Christians in India have exactly the same politics in India that you accuse Liberal Indians in the US of having. The same cognitive dissonance that Modi loving Trump hating Indians in the US do. These guys are Trump Loving and Modi hating.
Let me give out a couple examples from Hundreds. They supported the Creation of Pakistan knowing that The Muslims there would cleanse them out and thats exactly what happened. They blamed Hindus for the Rape of their nuns in Bengal when they knew that the rapist was probably Abrahamic 3.0. And when it was revealed that it was illegal Muslims from Bangladesh who did, they never apologised or retracted but moved on to the next accusation and pretended as if the earlier event just did not happen. They are completely blind to any atrocities that Indian muslims commit on them while banging on Hindus for non existent ones.
This is because for all the quarrels between Christians and Muslims, they see each other as cousins, albeit distant and hostile, but cousins all the same, closer to each other than to Hindus. Not so with Hindus who are polytheists and not people of the Book.
Christianity might be great for the Occident, but for India, it is problematic. Problematic because, for all Indic religions that originated in India, India is the holy land. For Abrahamic religions, the holy land lies outside. In case of any conflict with any Christian powers, their loyalty is always in doubt. Given the Fog of war and the sheer number of problems war brings, this is an extra problem sane Hindus would rather than not have. Given past precedent, Any tolerance for Christians and Christianity that Indians display will only lead to a civil war at best and the extermination of Hindus at worst. War is the Father of us all.
Regarding the Dalit problem, it is really an Elite Defection problem. Like women in the west and in India, Dalits have been given legal Superweapons in the sense that anyone they accuse of caste discrimination is in a hot legal soup with no consequence to the accuser in case of a proven false accusation.
@Dharmic @anonymous, please feel free to chime in
Hinduism is fake and gay. What is the point of trying to build a good civilization when you are just going to reincarnate as a dumb cow?
Hinduism is not the reason Pajeets suck its a racial thing. And anyway Catholics (and Muslims and Jews) should not talk about other religions sucking if you’re not Protestant Buddhist Orthodox or whatever Shinto-Buddhist hybrid the Japanese are your religion sucks and causes lots of problems.
we lost a lot of social capital during the invasions and occupations of the last millenium. For any tribe, elites matter. We just lost too many pro social elites over the last millenia. What we were left with was defecting elites or common stock which does what it needs to survive.
what we are seeing with Modi is an attempt to rebuild some of the Elite.
Take out the Japanese pro social elite and the common stock will slowly degenerate over time.
Take the example of what you call wiggers or white trash. Or the opioid epidemic. An epidemic of despair, really. What could have possibly caused that except for elite defection by Elite Whites? Or faliure of Elite pro social whites to look out for their own.
What you call the Pajeet phenomenon, which manifests most commonly as a lack of civic sense is caused by exactly that. The loss of pro social Elites and Elite defection
Pajeets are more like an enemy tribe that’s invaded and working towards the destruction of Americans. It’s not exactly a dumb idea from their perspective, it’s just very annoying and damaging to the US. But again, our problem’s go back to the American elites wanting to destroy white Americans and the Pajeet is one of their many tools.
Very much like Indian leftists wanting to destroy Hinduism and thus their use of Christian missionaries and Indian Christians as one of their many vectors to do so.
Correct.
But much like the McChristanity I’m watching getting curbed stomped by the Religion of Sodomy in the US of A, only weak religions with major problems have trouble fighting back. People back strong horses in religion just like in politics and war.
Time to make Hinduism great again with reboot with a version that worked better.
Thanks mate, but it’s a task way over my head. Smarter minds than me will have to figure this out.
Besides youre lucky that you still have literature describing the last working version of Christianity from Charles II. So many of our libraries and books were burnt during the invasions, that most of what we know of Indian history is from the accounts of foreign travellers since the Islamic invaders couldn’t burn those accounts sitting in china, Tibet, Greece Rome, Portugal, Japan etc.
This is not going to be easy and the black pill comes easy to me
We’ve long observed that over seas Christian missionary efforts are generally a state funded Gay American Empire activity. The sort of Christianity you’re seeing is the GAE sort.
Secondly, @i is a McChristain faggot who’s completely blue pilled on woman and thinks that magical Negros can build civilizations. He gets beaten like a rented mule by men who know better, shuts up, but never learns anything new and continues in his sinful ways of spreading lies and discord in the service of the Gay American Empire.
This. Generally I think the agreement here is that this is a conversation between reactionary Christians and reactionary Hindus. We all can spot the difference between the blue-pilled faggot editions of our respective religions and agree not to insult each other using the blue-pilled edition as an argument.
I have noticed serious efforts over the years on this forum by certain forces to disrupt these conversations and prevent engagement. Starting with certain fake “white Christians” (trying extremely hard to prove their “whiteness” and “Christianity”) insulting Hindus as street shitters and India as the land of street shitting in theological debates (which observation was true for a long time after independence, but in recent times considerably less true), and people like resident “Sikh” who aims to muddy the waters, there is no end of shilling to prevent us from having productive debates.
I admit that we do have our legitimate differences and we do discuss those in a meaningful manner on JB. I have learned to ignore the blatant and contentless insults.
I maintain that GAE is targetting Hindu Nationalism in particular since the efforts to remove Modi from power in 2024 were acknowledged by Soros himself. The recent weaponization of Sikhi and promotion of Sikhi victimhood against Hinduism is just another chapter in that story. Further all the “spontaneous protests” against the BJP government are a reflection of GAE efforts towards that end. Yes, the secular Indian state is bad because of socialism and being blue-pilled, but still less Left than the present GAE.
[*bombastic war talk in the name of a people disarmed and without the capability for collective action deleted*]
You, who have no guns and no capability for collective violence, are complaining about other people using guns and collective violence to get their way. A less bombastic tone would be advisable.
Nah insults about street shitting are not coming from shills trying to disrupt honest conversation or whatever, but white reactionaries who really hold those views. The insult is probably extrapolated a bit out of context from its origin in chans filled with Indians blathering about being Superpower in year T+10.
So I’d just get over it and move on to the extent there’s at all interesting or worthwhile in the conversation. Reactionaries really do not like Indians and whether or not that’s warranted I see the logic and don’t really care since they want what I want.
Most Indians come to America because of the promise that the GAE is turning all our daughters, sisters, and future wives into worthless whores and they want to come fck our daughters, sisters, and future wives. Worse it rarely works out for them due to their low SMV. Then they open up a restaurant or a 7-11 or something with their family’s money, money they earned by being good hard working family oriented people back in their homeland. Then they blast their nigger lite music like that moosewahla or whatever other nigger lite shit that GAE is feeding them.
How do you think the imported Indians are going to do in America?
Don’t mind the convenience store ones as much as the others. They are dwarfed in number by the worthless ones who work in tech.
“Street shitter” is a crude and insulting form of a relevant and legitimate complaint that corresponds to the Hindu complaint of ritual cleanliness that fails to correspond to actual cleanliness.
Concerning the likelihood of a future genuinely Muslim civilization allying with a future genuinely Christian civilization against Hindus, Christians have a notorious tendency to interpret everyone’s gods as demons, often quite unreasonably, unfairly, and arbitrarily, and I have no hesitation in interpreting Krishna as a demon, but we do not interpret all gods as demons. Quetzalcoatl got officially interpreted as a saint, which was obviously more reasonable than interpreting him as a demon, and Rama is an obvious Christophany. A Christian could, and probably would, deny Rama ever existed, but if acknowledging that in some sense he existed or exists, would be impossible to cast him as anything other than a Christophany, just as it would have been a considerable stretch to cast Quetzalcoatl as a demon.
You have a horrible infestation of postChristians and McChristians passing as Christians in India, and we have a horrible infestation of postChristians passing as Christians here, and I share your concerns about (post)Christians in India.
Casting Quetzalcoatl as a saint was undoubtedly in substantial part a cynical ploy by Spanish priests to ease their subjects into Christianity, but it would have been hard to sell a genuine Christian on the proposition that if Quetzalcoatl is in some sense real, he is a demon. Given that their subjects believed in these beings, the Spanish priests had to categorize them, and they categorized them appropriately. The ones cast as demons, very obviously were demons. It was not Christians being bigoted or manufacturing propaganda. When they cast most of the Mexican pantheon as demons, that was not a cynical propaganda ploy, but well founded. Christians continue today to so categorize them, not because of the authority of long dead Spanish priests, but because those beings, if in some sense real, are what they are.
Krishna’s character is displayed by trickery and by seducing virgins and wives, probably in reality not ten thousand of them, but doubtless quite a few, while Rama’s character is revealed by his gratitude for partially eaten fruit given to him by one of his subjects when he has accepted unjust exile for the sake of peace. Both of these sound like a core of real events incorporated into legend. So no way Christians could cast Rama as a demon. The legend of Rama is in large part about patriarchy and stable and enduring marriage. The legend of Krishna is about subversion, adultery, and kinslaying.
I personally do not get very bothered about the Christians in India. Hindus are converting, or at least were converting, not because of Christian trickery but Hindu failure to bring forth a coherent and effective religion.
Rama is the ideal Hindu man, and Sita the ideal Hindu wife. Feminists have been shrieking at and burning the Ramayana since they first got their hands on it. For it shows the grace and devotion with which a woman proves her fidelity to her husband, and makes terribly clear how important it is not only that the king is not cucked, but that his subjects do not have a shadow of doubt about it.
Thankfully, the lodestar of modern Hindu nationalism is Rama Rajya and after decades of interference by Leftist courts, Modi is consecrating a beautiful temple to Rama at the site of his birth. Cathedrals are being built.
Re: Comminator
Nah modern Hinduism is a whole bunch of the problem. The various castes today look very much like they did back when they were making good steel and inventing trigonometry, though in the past 50 years the caste distribution has probably changed somewhat unfavorably.
What you complain about are not people who are dumb per se (maybe too dumb to do the jobs they are in) but who think they are smarter than they are, who cooperate poorly, and who are difficult to work with. That is a religious thing. And a lot of the problem is the ones you complain about are selected for being scammers.
Indians are in a way uniquely bad here. I’m sure Vietnamese who come here tell all sorts of lies on their immigration papers but if we weren’t overcrowded in terms of housing and we didn’t have too many foreigners and nonwhites already I’d have no complaints about Vietnamese at all. They work honestly in non parasitic professions, they don’t scam their way into jobs they aren’t qualified for etc. I even think that unlike most Asians they vote mostly Republican if they become citizens…
@someDude
Which is what I noted in my earlier comment. So called Christians who are Liberals are skinsuit wearing liberals.
@Red
Ethiopia, Mali and current day Rwanda are Black African Civilizations.
Ethiopia:
Eurasian settlers from around 3,000 years ago:
https://archive.ph/Oc8Al
Rwanda:
Tutsi are Aryan Bronze age cattle herders fleeing the bronze age collapse.
Mali:
No cities, just villages made of straw and mud. AKA not a civilization. Civilization means city.
Try again faggot.
In all fairness to i, the average White American (or just about anyone outside of Africa) is going consider an Ethiopian, Tutsi Rwandan, or any other Cushite descendant as Black and African. I seem to remember i being some kind of South East Asian? Indonesian? If so, nigger ignorance is a typical blind spot among those people in similar fashion to Swedish nigger ignorance.
Pretty much the only people who care to know the difference between Bantus (our blessed nigger friends) and the others are either those who have direct dealings in the dark continent or anthropology nerds like us. But he should know better. The difference between Bantus and Cushite descendants has been pointed out to him, and he had no counter argument.
He continues to slyly lump the groups together with linguistic tricks. This is Jewish behavior and not faggot behavior. Which in fairness to you (Red), isn’t much different these days.
I’m just surprised he’s hasn’t trotted out that Hebrew Gold mining operation that built a stone fort as proof of great Bantu civilization.
I’m fairly sure Duckingman was the SEAmang.
I seem to remember that about Duck.
@i never identified himself beyond his McChristain and we wuz kangz talking points.
You’re right, I got them mixed up.
Dat’s rahght! We wuz da real jews a’ shaht.
I’m not too sure on the ebonics translation.
Actually there are a bunch of black jews left over from the women fucked by the Hebrew gold miners in Zimbabwe. They lost literacy but they still had a pretty good oral remembrance of Judaism.
@Pax Imperialis
Where? I must have missed it. I didn’t pay too much attention to older threads.
@Red
https://infogalactic.com/info/Mali_Empire
@iFaggot present an actual argument not just a faggotPedia link.
I bothered to visit the page. Featured prominently is the magnificent architecture: https://infogalactic.com/w/images/c/ce/Great_Mosque_of_Djenn%C3%A9_1.jpg
Mud huts? Oh no no no. A giant mud temple!
Well, the mud is reinforced with logs held together by mud, which is a step up. A rather small step up.
But presenting Wikipedia as an authoritative source is itself enemy action.
Not just a mud temple: a mud temple built by Frenchmen in 1907! Supposedly it’s a reconstruction of an older temple built by Africans and then allowed to decay into ruin. Honestly, this looks plausible, but even so, the great African Wonder of the World was built by White colonists. Civilization 5 doesn’t tell you this when you build it.
Even the wikipage is reluctant to call them cities until the Arabs and Berbers show up. Places like Timbuktu became cities only under Arab warrior/traders rulers and where later conquered by Africans as the Arab intermixed with the locals. After which the cities became more like towns again as things broke down.
I used Infogalactic. Since it was a recommended Wiki alternative to Wikipedia on the Voxday blog.
But it was too convenient for me not to use.
Yes, but it fails to demonstrate that blacks ever built anything other than mud huts.
Here’s a pretty good example of African life in a patriarchal setting:
https://twitter.com/kunley_drukpa/status/1658554759798824961
Not the sort of people who can build civilization.
And this cousinhood is being remembered now that holy war begins with demon worshipers.
For Christians, Rama is obviously a Christophany, and Krishna obviously a demon, so Christians are not necessarily going to ally with Muslims against Hindus, but obviously there is something there. If Muslims were going at it with Krishna worshipers, Christians are going to be inclined to sympathy with their cousins.
Once upon a time, Hindus led the world in science and technology. What did those guys think of Krishna and eating beef?
Jim, in the post on Krishna, I did mention that no Hindu takes your interpretation of Krishna seriously. Krishna words were NOT an encouragement to kill kin.
As for what ancient texts from classical India have to say on the subject, I just confess my ignorance. I’ve read Hindu classical drama from that period and to be honest there I found lots of references to Indra, Kama, varuna, Agni etc but none to Rama or Krishna. Ofcourse my reading is not exhaustive. I’m no scholar. I read them for fun.
perhaps Dharmic can help. Perhaps Suones, if he is lurking here, if he can refrain from picking fights 😉
he British conquered India as an almost accidental byproduct of trying to improve the taste of English food, and the stuff that got in their way when trying to buy spices indicates that a whole lot of Indians do take my interpretation of Krishna seriously.
The Chinese have defected on each other taking help from Mongols and Japanese without a Krishna equivalent
The zorastrian preists of Persia defected on their shahenshah quite easily without a Krishna equivalent
Machiavelli cautions the prince not to permit any foreign entity on their soil with the right to bear arms as it becomes a magnet for the coalition of fringes who invite the outsider to help their cause
Had there been an armed Hindu Occidental company in Britain during the English wars, I all but guarantee the weaker of the two parties approaching this company for assistance
No need to look to Krishna where Human nature will do
besides there is no record of any king anywhere using Krishnas words as a justification for his allying with the Brits against kin.
>besides there is no record of any king anywhere using Krishnas words as a justification for his allying with the Brits against kin.
You missing Jim’s point, the English Conquered India because you couldn’t act civilized enough to just to sell them spices. When your people can’t act cohesive enough to defend themselves or even do basic trading in a honorable way, there’s a problem with you.
Doesn’t mean you can’t fix that problem, but the first step in fixing a problem is to acknowledging that it exists. Something we’re finding almost impossible to get American McChristians to do so it wouldn’t surprise me if Hindus have similar issues.
Right, but the problem is not Hindus’ interpretation of Krishna’s words as saying that it’s okay to kill kin, let alone getting support from non Kin to do so.
Defection as a strategy is as old as life. It’s pre Human. it’s a pretty successful survival and replication strategy and so we are stuck with it as explained in neurotoxins excellent post on the topic.
The Hindus got conquered by the Brits for several reasons, part of, but not all of, which was their inability to act cohesively. Inability which does not arise from their interpretation of Krishna’s words.
I mean no one, no Hindu in contemporary India interprets Krishna’s words that way.
Defection is failure mode that typically results in wholesale replacement of people. It’s maladaptive. You lucked out it was the English and not a Mongol horde that rolled in when you failed.
The question is why are you in failure mode? We’re pretty well identified the spiritual and religious reasons the west is in failure mode.
Jim’s suggesting it’s worshiping a demon. If that’s not the reason, maybe you guys should work out where the defection is coming from.
You brought up the Song Chinese defecting to the Mongols, the reason for that defection was clear: Song China had devolved into hard core leftist socialism. The sickness was their state religion and thus they lost the mandate of heaven.
Yes, there is a reason for it and that reason is not our interpretation of Krishna’s words as permission to kill Kin.
I may not know the answer to what made Hinduism great and what is fundamentally wrong with it at the moment or where it went wrong or what the crux of th issue is, but I do know a fake answer when I see one.
You need a lot more intelligence to come up with a proof for a mathematical proposition than to figure out if the proof is legit. I am of the second category.
Besides I’m a Buddhist in personal space and a Hindu in the political space.
Fair enough.
Krishna’s words authorize, and indeed command, detachment from the here, the now, and the personal in dealing with immediate and pressing moral issues. The moral hazard of this should be obvious. The far perspective is the first resort of those rationalizing defection against near. Today in America and western Europe it is the rationale of those who want to kill the cattle and make us eat bugs.
you did speak about detachment in earlier comments. Thats just an injunction that in the case you find yourself in a situation where it is necessary to kill kin, don’t do it with glee and don’t get into a guilt trip and lifelong remorse either. It was just an injunction to avoid the extremes of emotion when doing what must necessarily done.
Sanskrit has several words that are loosely, but not exactly, translated to English as detachment just as it has several words that loosely translate as consciousness.
Speaking as a non Hindu ignorant of Hinduism, the Vedas are about seventeen centuries before Christ and probably mostly predate the conquest of India by a few centuries, the law of Manu about two centuries before Christ, about a millenium after the conquest of India, and I doubt you are going to find any trace of Krishna in the official state religions of the scientifically and technologically leading states until many centuries after Christ, even though Krishna is the beginning of the Kali Yuga, which is probably before Christ by a few centuries, though I doubt that Krishna lived and the Kali Yuga began nearly as long before Christ as Hindus would. like to believe. Krishna probably became a big deal at roughly the time of Christ, more or less, guessing wildly in the total absence of knowledge from the way religions work, though he lived at least couple of centuries earlier, and maybe a lot earlier than that. Because I think that Krishna reflected the Kali Yuga, and contributed to it, I conjecture that his religion would probably show up around the time of Christ, but the scientifically and technologically advanced states were centuries after Christ, and, in my complete ignorance, I would expect them not to be big fans of Krishna. Rama does not show up for several centuries after Christ, and no substantial Rama worship until about a millenium after Christ.
I’m ignorant as well as are most Hindus. However I am apt to agree with you, in the absence of proof to the contrary, that Krishna became big in India during the mediaeval period.
This is from my own reading of Hindu classical Drama where I just don’t see references to Krishna which means he was not as big then as he is now.
Also the Vedas speak extensively about the geography and terrain and seasons of India. The only natural phenomenon they speak of which is not seen in India is that of fire under water which can be seen in Azerbaijan. So that would indicate that the Vedas were composed after the Aryans finally won India.
Right wing in India is in many ways Left wing in America.
Certainly when it comes to guns and economics.
Modi reinstated guilty first pro Dalit laws when the supreme court watered them down. Bjp was talking about raising the age for female marriage to 21.
Every few years Modi attacks the cash economy & attacks the middle class with random taxes like a 20% fee on foreign transactions.
Indians are the single most pro gun control constituency in America.
That alone is enough to be anti Hindu.
How fascinating that Indian RW = American LW on economics. How very Sagarika Ghosh of you. You guys really need a different script if you’re going to try to pass off as a Sikh warrior
[*Fake right criticisms of Modi, similar to the fake right criticisms of Putin, deleted as the fake right criticisms of Putin were deleted*]
Also democrats are a capitalist party they’re far from socialist.
[*deleted for total incoherence. Whatever you intended to say, you are not saying it.*]
Nuts.
America is a communist country.
You tell us that Modi is bad for not being sufficiently right wing, though he is right wing enough that the Democrats and the State Department want to overthrow him, and then you tell us that the Democrats are not actually left wing. These narratives would be less transparent if you kept them separate.
India is overall a very leftist country & is constitutionally socialist.
Modi has in fact [*triumphalist globohomo propaganda deleted*]
when globohomo is today desperately short of artillery, your victory announcements are unimpressive. Wrath of God incoming.
I twitted you on your transKhalsa lacking men with guns, you switched to talking about men who do have guns. But suddenly the inability to make warships and tanks is biting them.
[*an entirely valid attack on Modi from the right suppressed*]
If I thought you were actually a rightist, rather than someone trying to get opponents of the Global American Empire to quarrel with each other, I would allow it through.
But you are a faggot. You can criticize Modi, because the Global American Empire does not like Modi. Just as Vlad criticized Putin.
Modi’s operations on money are horrifying, but government money is already screwed. To engage in organized violence, you need to be able to move money over distance, because flows of weapons, supplies, and war material have to be counterbalanced by flows of money, or else the weapons are going to go astray. Government paper money just is not very useful, and that Modi is making it even less useful does not make much difference. Taliban used the Hawala system. Crypto currency is a better solution.
Hinduvta, GAE & Jim christainity are all priest led movement.
[*deleted for presupposing your transKhalsa is a warrior movement*]
If the people and leadership of your transKhalsa had the warrior spirit, they would be doing something about getting guns and money that the government cannot control.
[*unresponsive*]
A Khalsa is a holy army whose mission is to establish and maintain theocratic governance in the Punjab. Your transKhalsa is not an army and shows absolutely no interest in becoming one. You are not a warrior, your transKhalsa is not composed of warriors, but priests. Priests who are far too comfortable with Global American Empire occupation.
It’s funny all these “entirely right wing / valid” criticisms of Modi/Putin coming from these Basil-types end up with the payload that there is no alternative but to accept GAE as the de-facto global power as GAE is so much more decent and acceptable than the horribly evil Modi and Putler.
So that settles it, Sher Singh is the Indian Basil
Wow, Does Globohomo see Old type Hinduism as a threat? A serious enough threat that they deploy SS. Jim did say it earlier, but I did not take it seriously.
I’m flattered.
[*argument from fake consensus*]
I don’t see businessmen complaining about Modi, despite his operations on money. The attack on paper currency was bad but was an attack not on businessmen, not on workers, but on ill-gotten resources of enemy political factions.
Modi is bad on economics because he does not yet realize that what he needs to do is give Tesla a large tract of land and tell Elon Musk that the government will not interfere with whatever he does, so long as he pays for any real and actual externalities and abides by his contracts. He can pay people what he wants, maintain conditions as he deems fit, and so on.
He should be offering white capitalists special visas that let them form their own communities and enforce their own law, because the only way to learn is to learn under those who have done. Under his regime Indian cars have been getting much better, and Indian defense has been getting much better and it is time to accelerate that much further.
In short what Modi needs to do is make it possible for talented white men to think to themselves “wow, I could get very rich if I did so-and-so in India” which is presently restricted to large corporations that know how to handle the bureaucracy and red tape though much less so than it used to be.
He needs to make it possible for them to hold the wealth they earn in a sound form they control, so that they can reasonably anticipate repatriation. And he needs to make it possible for them to have and bring families and coworkers with appreciably nicer living standards than what they are coming from.
It helps you do not have to worry about random thugs shoving your wife into the street.
An attack on common rural people – for whom the state has always been hostile & foreign.
[*rest deleted because unresponsive, and projecting false consensus. You are attributing to your interlocutor a position that is clearly the opposite of the position taken by him, and by all the usual commentators here.*]
[*American Democratic Party line on Modi’s economic policy deleted*]
Your mind is enemy occupied.
Indian economic growth has settled into the low single digits despite the new formula & both agriculture + manufacturing have been stagnant.
The democrat line is that Modi is not leftist enough – not that he’s not leftist.
Modi is not the Taliban.
Aryas will not accept cow slaughter & these clowns on here will find themselves lynched.
ਅਕਾਲ
And they pay their shills to remind us that he is a leftist because he is not leftist enough.
No he is not, but the Global American Empire is falling and war is coming. He may well have to become the Taliban, and if he does not, someone else may well step into a role and a job that events reveal as necessary.
Aryas have always accepted cow slaughter. Law of Manu says so. I am Aryan in both the male and female lines all the way back to the Pontic steppes, and my ancestors have always eaten beef, and very little carbs. You only banned beef as a result of racial admixture and the rise of demon worshiping holiness spiraling priests.
Obviously there were vegan faiths around at the time of Manu, but it seems likely that beef bans only made it into the state religions of the civilized and advanced Hindu states in the medieval period.
At least you’ve finally started spouting [*not what anyone said, or is likely to say*]
No one here is saying, or is likely to say, the stuff that federal shills say.
[*bombast inappropriate to a defeated and conquered people who have no guns, no money that their enemy cannot control, no will to fight, and are under hostile occupation by men with guns, deleted*]
On this blog, people have fake names but real identities, and I am not going to let you pretend that you are a warrior or that Sikhs are warriors. Under the rule of a woman, they stopped being warriors in 1849, and are displaying a striking lack of interest in resuming that dangerous activity.
I have been telling Hindus that the law of Manu was a good thing, and I am telling you that the Khalsa was a good thing. If you want to posture as a warrior, Sikhs need to recreate a real Khalsa. Until you do, no posturing allowed.
[*boring*]
… make you eat bugs …
You are just repeating triumphalist globohomo propaganda. Bored now. Going to silent deletion unless you provide some new material. If globohomo tries to stop us eating beef, the kulak with two cows is armed. Globohomo is too gay to anything about distributed local resistance, and Sikhs have no guns. Muslims in the Punjab continue to eat beef, which makes them manlier than sikhs are, and whites in the west will continue to eat beef. It will probably cost more, but taste better.
[*boring*]
Law of Manu, chapter five has a long, long list, of what may and may not be eaten. The rhinoceros and the pig get special mention, but all the usual meat animals are just lumped together, as animals with divided hooves. You have to kill them in the appropriate manner, but otherwise, it is open season:
28. The Lord of creatures (Pragapati) created this whole (world to be) the sustenance of the vital spirit; both the immovable and the movable (creation is) the food of the vital spirit.
29. What is destitute of motion is the food of those endowed with locomotion; (animals) without fangs (are the food) of those with fangs, those without hands of those who possess hands, and the timid of the bold.
30. The eater who daily even devours those destined to be his food, commits no sin; for the creator himself created both the eaters and those who are to be eaten
I doubt that the state religions of the advanced Hindu states prohibited beef until Hindus went decadent.
@aryaman, it’s okay to invite talented people to come settlement India and form their own communities. But to allow them to be armed to enforced their own law and order would the east india company all over again.
No state can permit outsiders, even benign ones to be armed within its borders.
Not allow
At one point about 1/5 of Americans where what they call the Pennsylvania Dutch, IE German immigrants who only spoke German. They settled in all German towns, passed German laws, and continued their own culture while being armed. They were a boon to the country as Germans are generally a boon wherever they go.
When their loyalty was in question during WW1, they were forced to fully integrate by the US government, but shutting down their German language news papers and governments.
Outsiders who bring a strong culture and productive work capacity are a danger when your state is weak. They’re a boon when your state is strong.
You continue to take the wrong lessons from the UK conquest of India. You were conquered because you were weak and couldn’t trade in a civilized manner. The very fact you where weak made it impossible for you to keep outsiders out. Focus on building cohesion and strength while importing the best people from outside.
@Red
I wouldn’t be opposed to an armed amer…indiakaaner state but not sure how good of an idea it would be for the hindoos to allow such a thing if they wanted sovereignty. A more symmetrical deal involves a base of support for a, totally hypothetical ultimate ebiil I disavow etc, anti GNC warband that is not to have any permant habitation in their lands or a martially powerless base of purely economic operations that is allowed to send material support abroad provided they pay up in taxes and goods to the hindoo state as well.
Imagine a role reversal, would you really want a hypercompetent martial force bred from the descendants of your former conquerers setting up shop in your country? It’s not really comparable to the germans who are and were a close cousin people to the anglo
@Fidelis All very good points. Probably a bad idea to invite in armed Anglos to India.
The descendants of continental teutonics easily integrated with the descendants of island teutonics because they were both teutonics.
The word ‘dutch’ itself is basically a permutation of deutsche, and in past times peoples living in Germania, Britannia, and the low countries, were all called ‘dutch’.
Saw an article in The Week titled “Are the Democrats doomed?” Hmm, looks interesting, so I read it, and it’s a college Marxist explaining how Democrats are insufficiently anti-white and anti-capitalist, and need to get with the program lest the Republicans clean their clock in the 2022 elections. Cuba and Venezuela aren’t socialist enough for these morons.
“and need to get with the program lest the Republicans clean their clock in the 2022 elections.”
As if the people who consider the Demoncats not lefty enough would vote for the Republicans instead?
As if it matters who anyone votes for when Shaniqua’s counting the ballots.
The neighborhood walk-in lawyer handling my case asked, “So why do you want to live in Russia?”, and I gave my usual answer about rainbow flags. He checked a dictionary and said “delusion”. This is how I’m seen by Russians who’ve never lived in a progressive fagtopia:
https://41.media.tumblr.com/c90793900018cc6c79423659eff4c52e/tumblr_n4pch3riW41r25f9go1_1280.jpg
Are you really moving to Russia?
Already moved there, see previous comments. On a three-year tourist visa but might as well apply for residency now and see what happens. Probably getting the 1/6 treatment if I ever set foot in the GAE again.
Shit man. Good luck. Were you in the crapitol?
Rule #1 of The Jim Blog Club: Don’t ask fro Doxx-able information.
Rule #2 of The Jim Blog Club: Don’t ask fro Doxx-able information.
No, but it’s not like the government needs a reason to lock you up. Being a right-wing white supremacist is bad enough, and I violate sanctions every time I buy a loaf of bread.
I’ve already doxxed myself; the Russian government knows who I am and the US government will figure it out in about five minutes when Shaniqua gets back from her break.
Does the Russian government mind that a resident is a white supremacist?
No, and we are not white supremacists. Enemy word. It is just that whites are the highest race, and that everyone wants to be ruled by whites. Everyone wants to move to countries with white governance. Lots of Africa is very empty, but when whites ruled South Africa, everyone wanted to move there.
I favor an elite selected on the basis of demonstrated ability, virtue, (demonstrated by the Pauline criteria), descent from previous members of the elite (semi hereditary), and general acceptance of the state religion, rather than on purely racial grounds.
The MVD men didn’t send me a copy of their report, but I’m still here, so apparently not.
Personally I would not move to Russia stating any political reason. That can only be used against you later. Say you like Russian girls, property is cheap and you think you can make business there. Everyone will understand.
Do you have any blogs or other sources from someone with a similar perspective to yours describing their experience migrating to Russia? A first hand account would be very interesting to peruse. Thank you.
https://halfreeman.wordpress.com
Remote relations appear to be dropping like flies recently.
First cousin’s son in-law (43) dropped dead of “suddenly” a few weeks ago while brushing his teeth (dissecting aorta).
First cousin of wife (late 50s) died earlier this year of a sudden fulminate cancer.
Another first cousin of wife (early 60s) just dropped dead today of “suddenly”.
Sorry to hear that.
I still, fortunately, lack any fatal cases of Suddenly in my immediate circle. Although a neighbor is back to work after an extended absence following a heart attack (known vaccinated, 50s so earlier than you’d like but not unheard of), and a vaxxie coworker of mine now has joint hypermobility syndrome (he blames on long covid but was vocal about vaxxing). The second one can’t be hypochondria, the wrists and thumbs visibly bend farther than they should and than they used to. It’s a little disturbing when he shows it off.
I don’t mean to defend the vax by saying I haven’t seen Suddenly first hand though. I’m reminded of the extinction of the largest megafauna of the Americas after humans’ arrival. Did we literally hunt and kill every last mammoth in person, or did we hunt just enough we pushed them below replacement? For a large enough K-selected mammal, it makes no difference at all. Push fertility per breeding pair below 2 and it’s all over.
Similarly, the vax doesn’t have to literally Suddenly every single recipient, it just has to push fertility below 2 (really, what, 2.3?) and it’s all over.
I haven’t seen any suddenly first hand but my father suffered liver and kidney failure post vax and nearly died. The hospital was, of course, empty not overflowing and was never overflowing but was empty the entire time as I went and checked myself several times. Of the two LDS families I know who post vax are strangely infertile, early twenties couples, yet were fertile pre vax, one of them is now pregnant. I’ll post if she suffers a miscarriage.
Fertility is already below 2 for the West outside of the Amish and the LDS. Though GAE was recently celebrating at getting the total baptized not ex communicated LDS fertility rate down to 3.3.
I know a couple that is Vaxxed that has had a baby… after 2 miscarriages and a heavy menstruation that might have been an auto-abortion.
Also, I’m pretty sure that that LDS fertility rate you mention is either a global statistics, or includes lots of spics, nigger, and mystery meats. My personal observations lead me to think that the white LDS fertility rate is at or lower than 2.3
When I lived in the city their were maybe five other children in my ward. The good men of church were married, by age forty to forty year old childless spinsters. Or rather they married young, by thirty, to single moms whose half breed baby daddy was in prison or deported.
Now I live away from the city and when church ends it looks like someone kicked over an anthill as a carpet wave of children spill forth. White children, might I add. My neighbor with the least children has three and wants more. Alas his wife leads his household and he is completely blue pilled so she refuses his voiced desire but not command. We just welcomed a new marriage, a twenty one year old member to a nineteen year old virginal girl. We are already asking him when his first baby will be here. Soon, he assures us, they are trying.
The blue pilled betas have thin virgin wives and three children. Though many arguments and both in the couple suffer from the “mysterious brain defect” of depression. Now you will not get a virginal wife if you convert and you will be hounded with a never ending horde of sluts until you get married, as everyone is expected to be married. But your children will have an entire community raising submissive girls who must follow the law of chastity. If you have game your can tell a single mom to give her bastard up for adoption before you marry her anyway.
I’ll take your word about there being based rural LDS wars, but it seems like there are engaging in unprincipled exceptions to what the LDS church leadership is telling them, such as:
Gordan “Go to college, yes even the women” Hinckley
Thomas “Women, you need to go on missions” Monson
Russell “Take the clot shot” Nelson
And perhaps they are rural enough that they can’t go to the temple except for their marriage. Then they wouldn’t have gotten the latest updates to the endowment such as Women no longer being saved through their husband and God (and not Adam) naming Eve.
No not based, not red pilled, still progressive, still blue pilled. Many of the men are still servant leaders with unhappy marriages. Couples still get divorced after the women go crazy due to a servile husband who can’t pass shit tests and she still uses the old he was abusive canard. The men are still destroyed for it.
Yet even the servile weak husbands still have three or four children before their divorce. The community still raises virgin daughters for my sons. The people still try, even though as you point out the progress of leftism is still the beat of the drum everyone is marching to if only five steps behind rather than one.
We’ll know things are bad enough to bail once women are no longer expected to follow the laws of God/gnon where you can tell what is good because a good tree makes good fruit. Rather than the results determining morality, consent determines it and God is gone replaced with man who will do as they wilt. For now, children everywhere, my young children roam the neighborhood, and these people are not replaced yet.
Sounds like the Evangelical community in the 90s. I knew multiple Christian families that had 6+ kids even while pushing the servant husband shit. But their kids failed to have kid of their own. LDS is just behind the times but the road is still leading to the same hell on earth for them.
Where I grew up there wasn’t a lot of virgin christian girls, well there where a lot of girls to pretended to be virgins while offering up their buttholes as a “sin” free way to fuck. But even the girls who were virgins when they married were infected with Feminism. They generally failed to have children because the men don’t know how to be men and give in to the standard feminist shit tests.
https://archive.ph/cBFf9
Milley and Austin “personally” intervene to “halt” the drag show at Nellis in NV. This is part of a general, if slow and obscured, push back against the DEI ratchet by a faction(s) in the Pentagon. Milley has been going around like travelling preacher with a sermon about the Strength of Diversity, but if you actually listen, or read, it’s pretty obvious they are desperately trying to get back to just negros and faggots diversity because trannies are force reducers that enervate the remainder and animate the opposition. Every clown soldier picture increases doubt on the GAE side and gives credence to the Axis of Multipolarity rhetoric.
I cannot go into much detail, but the faltering faith of Milley et al has been noticed by the Managerial Elite of the IC, particularly in the “civilian partners” camp, and the “consensus” is negativity, but there’s also more than a few Musk-style liberals who want to return to the ~2012 neoliberal world order.
I said this a while back, and Starman references it when he refers to “sunken carriers,” but I repeat it for emphasis: the turning point will be on the seas, with the blue water navy. Whether it’s a double down on clownworld catastrophe or an attempt to salvage viability, I can’t say. Women are fully in control of the IC, the State Department, and the massive network of NGOs/nonprofits, but the military is in the frail, liver spotted hands of the generals.
Over three quarters of all the stryker vehicles delivered to the colonial administration in Kiev for The Greatest Ukrainian Counter-Offensive, are actually inoperable, duds, which would all require maintenance overhauls to do anything more than continue sitting in the motor pool to rust. And there is nothing i’ve seen that indicates things are any better for literally anything and everything else the GAE has under its remit.
The USM is a paperworkocracy, and that means it is a system optimized for producing paperwork that says such-and-such has 100% readiness, rather than producing actual readiness.
A bureaucrat officer thinks to himself, if [thing] is good, then having more ‘oversight’ for [thing] will result in even more [thing]. Which of course begs the question: what does ‘more oversight’ mean? What forms are created by the expression of this desire through the skein of reality? The answer, of course, is more paperwork.
Notarized paperwork in triplicate, certifying that such-and-such has taken place. And the more certifications, the more the bureaucrat officer feels the yawning chasm of his fearful insecurities of control-freakery papered over by wood-pulp placebo.
And in a paperworkocracy, the way you get ahead is by having better paperwork than the other guy. How to have the best paperwork? Simplemente; have the greatest willingness to tolerate the greatest of departure between the world of paper and the world as such. Good working order in things is not what brings advancement, good paperwork brings advancement.
Any of those who suffer from sentimental attachment to notions like valuation of truth, virtue, or accomplishing the ostensible purpose of the organization, are duly ejected from the innards of the beast, while such sorts of beings that are least prone to thoughts that lead to verity, and most compatible with broad-spectrum, systemic, and sustained distortion about anything in particular, are selected for long rewarding careers all around, stocking the beast to the gills. The bureaucrat officer creates an earthly paradise for Bureaucratic Man to proliferate in.
The great fatuity of wand-waving is not that what the wand-waver demands is not delivered – but that it is. The wave of the wand conjures great pusillanimous chimaeras, which fit the wand-waver’s criteria far better than the the desired [thing] itself, taking its place, and consuming it utterly, for more of itself.
Armored vehicles delivered to Ukraine are mostly dysfunctional.
Interestingly, shells work, but manufacture of shells cannot be increased. I conjecture the factories were built by men long retired, and cannot be changed, nor can new ones be built. But you could just put them on three eight hour shifts, and run them twenty four seven. Seems like the obstacle to that is bureaucratic.
The point defense system for the patriot missiles is a miracle of super duper high tech, and works great against ordinary missiles, but, as expected, fails against hypersonics. Hypersonics were not in its threat model, and are out of scope. Patriot missiles have a high failure rate and an alarming propensity to turn around 180 degrees and blow up something near their launch point, but mostly they work. America can no longer build warships, which is strange, for what is a warship but a regular ship clad in a whole lot of armor and carrying weapons.
It is not that the US is lagging in high tech – well not by much. Lacks hypersonics, the drones are crap, and stormbreaker production is belated and very slow, while the Russian equivalent, which they misleadingly call guided bombs, is being produced in very large numbers. Rather there is an across the board incapacity to make stuff.
As I said, US GDP is fake and gay.
I think things would have to get truly dire yet for them to fuck up even making shells. (Making them *at scale* is of course easy to fuck up, like anything requiring large scale coordination.)
Has there ever actually been a single example in history where a patriot system was successfully used in combat? Any version at any time.
Because the disturbing trend that I am starting to notice, is that not only was its original form a cargo-cult fetich of highly expensive bits mashed together into something that looks like a surface-to-air missile system but doesn’t actually perform such a function, none of its ‘updates’ have substantially changed this fact either. A decades long telephone game where every party is blowing smoke up each others asses to avoid looking incompetent to the other, all while the albatross just sits there.
Kinzhal isn’t really a “hypersonic”, it’s just a ballistic missile, not that different to Scud which was in Patriot’s threat profile and was used against Patriot thirty years ago. Patriot effectiveness has been heavily litigated; back in the Gulf War the “Patriot doesn’t work” crowd were bad guys, trying to argue that the fearsome communists could build thirty year old export monkey models that overcome the US air defences. Now they’re trying to argue that more capable, but not radically different, weapons can easily be shot down by Patriot. Who knows what is the truth?
America definitely failed to build new warships, the Zumwalt being an open hard failure, and its key system – the radar that incorporates both X and S band – not only failed but has been recommenced under a different project name and will supposedly be installed in future, more conventional ships, decades late. That certainly looks like technological decline.
The current pattern for a naval escort was set by the USA in 1984, when it ordered the first VLS Ticonderoga-class cruiser. At the time, a ship one to two decades ahead of its time. But today the USA is still building substantively the same ship, while a few countries (such as the British, the French, and the Italians) have actually deployed escorts with dual band radars, albeit it in small numbers.
Even if the Patriot system worked perfectly every time, at $5 million a shot, the enemy could easily overwhelm it with cheaper missiles. The US had total air supremacy over Iraq and was destroying many Scuds before they could launch, which greatly reduced the Patriot’s workload.
I don’t believe Patriot is a junk weapon, though whether it can intercept specific Russian weapons is another question. I suspect it’s less effective against Russian weapons than US media claims, and more effective against Scud.
But Patriot is also an old weapon. It entered service in 1984, the same year the Ticonderoga class cruiser was ordered.
If Russia had the same kind of SEAD/DEAD that the US and UK had in the Gulf War, Ukraine would be in bigger trouble than it is.
Some shells work, but there must be some duds. There have always been some duds in any shell production. Does anybody know anything about the rate of duds and how it changed recently?
What is the Russian dud rate comapred to NATO’s dud rate?
@Pseudo-Chrysostom
Very astute observation of the US military bureaucratic structure. It matches my own observations when I was in the military.
There was sayings such as “training ‘documented’ is training done.” And then because all of that extra “training” got “done,” the senior officers would schedule even more training hours, further incentivizing this trend.
A man would get promoted for being able to quote the most obscure instruction from random manuals and department organization manuals, better than the next guy.
People who knew how to bullshit their way thru supervisory position qualifications, including knowing the right people so they could get qualification requirements blazed off, got the supervisor qualifications done faster than the next guy who did them for real. And the bullshitter then was able to get promoted.
This is what I saw in the higher ranks.
Matches what I saw, as well. So many man-hours wasted in a pre-deployment cycle doing pointless computer learning classes, men promoted on paper merit instead of how capable they really were, pointless things like the fitness tests and uniform inspections being valued over qualifications related to job performance.
Anyone who had been in more that a tour or two was almost certainly too incompetent to do the civilian version of my field, which was far more lucrative. The first-termers had to run pretty much everything, while constantly facing interference from above by people who did not know what needed to get done. My unit was also a dumping ground for the people who the special operations guys did not want, but had reenlisted anyway. I washed my hands of it about halfway through and gave up trying too hard.
This likely explains the logistic failure in medium tech (ships and tanks) and the incapacity to ramp up production of shells.
There are probably some elderly smart guys on the edge of retirement still around in the missile factories.
I am describing the opposite problem. The older men in my unit were the ones that could not leave the military to make more money in the civilian world. The young men were the most competent, and it was mostly the older guys who were out of the loop. There was definitely some learning/growing pains for the brand new guys, but within a year, the E3s/E4s were more capable than the E6s/E7s that had a decade of service. Then the good ones leave, the incompetent reenlist, and the cycle continues.
The logistic problem is the opposite problem. High skill older men keeping the plant running and slowly retiring. No one has learned all the important stuff, so you cannot staff more shifts or more production lines.
I was an infantry Army officer in the early 2010s. This is true of the officer class as well. The Army could attract competent officers for an initial term of service, which is about 3-8 years. The competents were white and east asian males paying for college and looking for adventure.
After their obligation was up, all of the competent officers either got out or went Special Forces…and then got out because it wasn’t much better in SF.
What remained were the mediocrities who knew they couldn’t do better in the private sector, plus a not insignificant number of morons who managed to avoid the small handful of things that will get you kicked out. This meant the entire regular Army officer staff from Major up to Colonel was mediocre to bad.
There are a few competent fanatics that stick around, but they are surrounded by careerists and as a result never get to truly shine. They mostly end up doing damage control and is the main reason why DoD has been able to kick the can down the road as long as it has.
avoid the small handful of things that will get you kicked out
You definitely aren’t in the force anymore. My cousin is an Officer. Extremely competent and was a guaranteed promotion on the next board. He made one joke about gays while in a civilian bar off base. It got reported (by a female civilian) way up the chain of command and next thing he knows he’s off the promotion board. Now he’s being constantly sidelined and is as good as kicked out.
When I went to MEPS, I pointed out to a woman that if she lost some weight she would have a much easier time. She was borderline obese. That got reported to a SNCO at MEPS by one of the civilian volunteers (also a woman). The SNCO proceeded yell his head off me about respecting women. It got reported the OSO and I was nearly taken off the selection board.
DoD civilian logistic force is the same. No one learned how to deal with private sector. So the government that doesn’t know how to order stuff combined with a private sector that doesn’t know how to make stuff. The amount of paperwork just to buy an audio video system is mind boggling. Over a year just to contract and install routers.
I know more than one SNCO currently serving while >50% disability rating. Many pill poppers. One is on something like 6 different prescriptions. Some of the young fit guys jump ship and try out for Special Operations. More capable E3s/E4s rings true in some units.
What, you didn’t like the annual don’t rape women certification? 🙃
As was said in Blazing Saddles, “I like rape!”
Seriously, though, it was all a massive waste of time. Days of it, so while we were working up for a deployment, we spent man hours totalling something like 2 months doing training that was redundant by the time you were an 8 year old, let alone a grown man in a military unit.
If there are three things you can say about any bureaucracy, it is that, 1, they don’t learn anything, 2, they don’t remember anything, and 3, they are always forgetting things.
People can learn things, but Institutions are not people. ‘Peacetime’ militaries usually start wars as Institutions run by procedure, are thrown into chaos as procedure heedlessly dashes itself against the rocks of Being, repeatedly experiencing failure and catastrophe, and end the war, if they succeed and survive, as teams of people run by fiat, having relearned all the old forgotten lessons once again.
Or to put it in more prosaic terms, victory in war tends to go to the side that can afford to make the most mistakes.
Success in a bureaucracy marks you as a threat to be eliminated, not an asset to be cultivated. Actual accomplishment of the nominal purpose the institution supposedly exists for is a rallying flag for all the Bureaucracy Men to put aside their usual backbiting and come together in focusing their backbiting on side-lining the source of collective embarrassment. Decoration for valor in battle guarantees you will never advance far in the GAE’s janissary corps.
In other words, you can’t ‘nudge’ a bureaucracy; it will sooner crash its ostensible responsibility with no survivors, than shed one iota of its accumulated sinecure, in response to changes in funding or ‘incentives’. Only personnel matters, the power to hire and fire. Changes in behavior means changes in personnel. You either kill it and replace it with something else – still using the same letterhead even, if you like – or be killed by it.
https://anarchonomicon.substack.com/p/cocytarchy
Pray that the White and Christian populace of the world will rise to protect itself and its purity and its culture and way of life from these Muslim Black Brown Jew Commie Democrat Socialist Mongrel “Migrant” Invaders.
[*temporarily held back*]
You will not replace us.We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
You will not replace us. [*temporarily held back
This post has not been deleted, but I am holding it pending you giving us the Christian affirmation and taking the shill test. How does the genetic distance between the chimps and blacks compare to the genetic distance between chimps and whites?*]
What is your position on the Azov brigade and Andriy Biletsky serving a Jewish overlord who seemes to want all Ukrainians to die, installed in the Ukraine by the Jews Soros, Nuland, and Blinken, installed by people who hate Ukraine and Ukrainians with every fibre of their being? Do you think that is entirely congruent with white Christian nationalism? How does your white Christian Nationalism see their white socialist nationalism?
Do you think the the Azov brigade and Andriy Biletsky make Zelensky look bad, or do you think that Zelensky makes National Socialism, the Azov brigade and Andriy Biletsky look bad?
Affirm that Jesus Christ is Lord, born in Bethlehem, died at Jerusalem, and is, is from before the beginning of the world. Fully God and fully man. God is three and God is one.
[*deleted for entirely unsurprising inability to acknowledge the divinity of Christ or the biological differences between whites and blacks*]
This conversation illustrates what government shills are allowed to say, in order to pass as fellow right wingers, and/or fellow Christians, and what they are forbidden to say.
[…] The offensive seems to be turning out much as it turned out three months ago. […]