On Gab, I noticed a whole lot of wholly blue pilled people, not all of them shills.
So, despite my frequent declaration that this is not a game blog and not going to turn into game blog, here comes another game post.
It is kind of redundant, because everything that needs saying has been said in Setting the Record Straight, page 57, and Chateau Heartiste’s sixteen commandments of Poon.
Ok. Very short post.
Oh, OK, I will pad it out by reprising Heartistes magisterial Sixteen Commandments of Poon. But pay no attention. Read the original. This stuff has already been said, and I am just expanding on one detail or another detail.
I. Never say “I Love You” first
Or second. When she says “I love your” it is a shit test. She wants to see if she can make you say “I love you” on demand. So when she says “I love you” you should randomly and sometimes respond “I love you too”.
II. Make her jealous
Preselection is the thing that most attracts women. If someone has popped thirty virgins and immediately dumped each one, and word gets around, a whole lot more will show up on his doorstep.
XI. Be irrationally self-confident
Hope and despair are self fullfilling. Irrational optimism beats rational pessimism. Hope is a virtue, despair a sin.
XIII. Err on the side of too much boldness, rather than too little
Regrettably, female perception of manliness and alpha is primitive compared to that of men. So a whole lot of behavior that men would regard as brave but stupid and wicked goes down like a chocolate milkshake. Including all that stuff that males rightly regard as bullying the weak, including her, and the stuff that the blue pilled wrongly regard to be sexual harassment and rape.
XVI. Never be afraid to lose her
Preselection again.
But “do not be afraid to lose her” is a prescription for operating in defect/defect, the game of players and bitches. If operating in cooperate/cooperate, marriage 1.0, biblical marriage, her perception should be that in the event of infidelity you would kill her and her lover, and then swiftly replace her with someone younger and more fertile.
Banks imploding right now. Fed money machine go brrrr. Get into btc before the dumb money pumps it.
One of Jim’s “earlier” axioms that I initially disagreed with but have since come to believe in (though we are still waiting for more data points, affirmational and/or exceptional) is:
Countries with gay pride parades can’t win wars.
We can clarify this to say that state governments that accept, welcome, allow, facilitate, or force pride parades all nest within the “Countries…parades” component. Call this Component A.
The “can’t win wars” component can also be clarified, indeed it must be because of the confusing and ambiguous nature of current era geopolitics. Armies that fail to reach strategic goals, governments that collapse before the conclusion of a war, goal posts being shifted to hide or mitigate failures, losses so high as to reduce the status of the country a whole classification bracket (from Great to Major, Major to Minor, Minor to Lesser, etc.), countries that get bogged down in a quagmire, armies that get bogged down in a frozen stalemate, all fit within this component. Call this Component B.
To substantiate this axiom, we need to clarify when a country under consideration is within the bounds of Component A. We then need to establish where and when Component B is “proven.” Both are moving targets.
When the US initiated the Global War On Terror, was it CompA? Normiecon perspective says No, that became accurate in ~2012, but the Jimian Perspective is less obvious. Hardcore take is that USG has been pro-Gay since the 1990s if we look at the personal opinions of the bureaucratic oligarchy, and it could go back even further. But probably safe to say America became CompA in 2008. For CompB, we have good evidence in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria. Jury is out on Ukraine, but we can all see the writing on the wall, we just can’t make out if the sentence ends in a period, exclamation point, question mark… or ellipsis.
One envisions some sort of equation that could be applied based on a database that will give CompA inclusion, and a separate one for CompB. I think there might be enough data in existence to substantiate the axiom using USA, Israel, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and maybe a few others. Obviously, this is academic work that either cannot get done or will not be done. But it definitely has an appeal, a way to systematically demonstrate the geopolitical impact of peak progressivism using Jim’s axiom.
It’s not an “axiom”. Gay pride parades are just a proxy for social progressivism. Social progressivism causes military and economic decline. Ergo countries with gay pride parades (tend to) lose wars against countries without gay pride parades, all other things being equal.
Not rocket science.
Gay pride parades are a holy day and a holy procession for the globohomo religion. Its deliberately a satanic inversion of Christianity since Pride is the ultimate root of all sin and homosexuality is the abomination of Sodom and Gommoroh which ruins all societies where it becomes widespread (maybe not Japan since it was semi tolerated there and didn’t seem to undermine their society).
Imperial Japan, Japan after opening up to the West, but before being conquered by America, was unambiguously, officially, and explicitly hostile to homosexuality, and the claim that Japan tolerated homosexuality before it opened up to west smells of the same radical rewrite of history as presenting David and Jonathan as gay lovers. It was possible to celebrate love between men, because very bad things happened to sodomites.
Before opening up to the west, homosexuals did not exist (as far as anyone admitted to knowing). After they opened up to the west, they read in western books that homosexuals existed, and immediately said “No”.
The purported evidence that homosexuality was tolerated in preopening Japan is evidence that love and friendship between males was accepted and often celebrated. Which only happens in societies where gay is thoroughly suppressed. Gays are markedly lacking in love and friendship, always betraying and being betrayed. The distinctive characteristic of gays is shamelessness, they hit on everything human shaped that has no boobs. And we see absolutely no evidence of that in preopening Japan, which suggests that disturbing the pretense that gays did not exist was apt to be fatal.
If homosexuality was semi tolerated in pre-contact Japan we would see evidence of men advertising that their asses were available, not evidence that love between men was celebrated. The evidence that love between men was celebrated is evidence that gays were suppressed very thoroughly, not evidence that gay was tolerated.
Here’s a video that delves into the history of homosexuality. It touches on Japan IIRC.
Embedding links in comments do not work here. Probably for good reason. Please give full link plus time stamp. Am curious but not so curious to watch through what is likely a hour long documentary of faggotry.
My mistake.
https://youtu.be/VlkLOFJ5eE0
Can anyone think of a counterexample? As in something that people in the 1800s would say, yeah, that’s a war that was won by a side that had done a gay pride parade against one that hadn’t?
Closest I can think of was Desert Storm part 1, but you could argue that the US hadn’t fully metastasized yet. I don’t think present day US could have beaten Saddam.
The thing is Desert Storm 1 and its sequel 10 years later were a push. USG went in and broke a lot of stuff, but in either case failed to actually conquer in the end.
Liberal polities are good at making chaos, bad at making order. So peace can never actually come. Victory for such is like Zeno’s paradox – no matter how close it seems to get, there is always some last stretch of measure it can’t cross.
https://web.archive.org/web/20070716154346/http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/02/0081384
Failure to utilize massacre and other similar tactics leads to failed occupations. This isn’t a result of gay parades. It’s a result of progressivism, but progressivism also leads to gay parades to such a degree that they map onto each other. Jim is using a proxy, gay parades, for progressivism. Not wrong as a heuristic, but is wrong from an austic exactly “well ackshually” position.
American military failures due to progressivism have been as old as Vietnam. I do not know of any gay parades in the 1970s… “well ackshually” I’m wrong and Jim right. I looked up the earliest American gay parade after claiming none in the 70s and found 1969 to be the first year, so Vietnam war era. A war that America did not win (like Korea) but also definitively lost with the fall of South Vietnam (unlike Korea).
I still believe Jim to be wrong, assuming that the stated position is his position, because it is mixing a proxy with the underlining cause. But I’m also being autistic about this and maybe a tad bit rude. Many proxies might as well be conflated with their underlining causes because they are more or less indistinguishable, but the fraction of Western blood in me demands Goethe’s Faustian philosophy of the primacy of infinitesimal yet infinite philosophical absolute reasoning.
>A war that America did not win (like Korea)
Ok, I’m being a degenerate and drinking on the weekdays. Mistyped/worded this. Mean a “victory” that America did not clearly lose (a pyrrhic stalemate) rather than definitively lost like Vietnam.
The observation that Whigs can’t rule other countries raises the obvious question of, how do they rule at home.
The answer in short is, ‘cuckservatives do it for them’.
Cuckservative classes do the main job of establishing order, creating value, and keeping the wheels turning. They are the troubleshooters of whig dominion, frustrating the whig’s attempts to try instantiating Total Whiggism Now, which preemption in turn justifies the whig’s continued existence, creating a ‘virtuous’ cycle which underpins the matter of gnosticized polities. Such as they are.
The whig arranges righteous indignation over the guarantor of its preeminence, a dynamic which is breathtaking in its sheer mendacity. Whiggism in due course is used to make sure the presently regnant underlords are always higher status than the cuckservative house niggers, the tactically selective application of such universally solvent cogitohazards to destroy any who get too uppity.
Places where the whig empire has conquered, europe most notably, are all places where large numbers of native cuckservatives were willing to be party to the whiggish treason. Where the whig empire fails, are all places where the native men of substance are all either unwilling or non-existent. Therefore, in any case, whig ‘policy’ is thrown at the wall of Being in full credulousness, uncontaminated by any unprincipled exceptions, and untrammeled by any ‘compromise’ with the Wreckers – with all the inevitable results that entails.
For all its pretenses at atemporal transcendence of Nature or Nature’s God, the whig imperium is strikingly parochial in its effective racial composition – as is ever the case. It is something that is adapted to proliferating in an environment of hajnal europoids, and the further away you move from this, the more it falls flat.
Not entirely. Gay pride is an attack on Christianity and on masculinity and on male cohesion. Progressives, obviously, can win wars. That is how they created the Global American empire.
Cannot win them with this kind of progressivism. Can’t win them without masculinity and male cohesion.
Progressivism is inherently an attack on the natural order and therefore an attack on Christianity and masculinty and male cohesion. Its egalitarianism attacks the natural hierarchy be it in wealth, intelligence, relationships, or a myriad of other inequalities. It destroyed the cohesion between man and woman; after which, they set upon destroying cohesion between men. Gay parades are just further progression into destruction.
Prior to WW2, Progressives were flirting with gay rights in the 1920s. Had the led up to WW2 not served as a clarifying moment putting a pause to progressivism, would have likely had gay pride parades in the 30s and a radically different world.
Progressives did not win the war that made GAE possible. The war was won by men like General Patton and General Zhukov (a close friend of Eisenhower). Men who either ended up suspiciously dead soon after or faded into obscurity. Their service no longer required.
When Hitler was elected, someone said “Emasculating men is a very bad idea”, and first wave feminism softly and silently vanished away.
Today, Bolton, urging war with Russia and China simultaneously, said that hollowing out American industrial capacity is a very bad idea. But neglected to mention ESG and Shaniqua getting appointed tech lead, and neglected to say that emasculating men is a very bad idea.
Zhukov didn’t fade into obscurity in the Soviet Union he was raised to the Politburo and unfortunately he was kind of the crucial man who prevented Beria from taking over.
Until someone provides evidence that defeats it, “Countries with gay pride parades can’t win wars” stands.
Here’s the breakdown for interpreting the axiom:
Countries – states, governments, voluntary associations of a people based on ethnicity, race, identity, geography.
With Gay Pride Parades – accepting, allowing, facilitating, or forcing a normalization, acceptance, or preference for public degeneracy at or beyond the marker of sodomy in terms of implicit or explicit sexual activity.
Can’t Win Wars – Unable or unwilling to commit to a course of action, carry out activities, operations, or campaigns, or instantiate the needed social formulations for winning, ending, or succeeding at contests of a martial character or take and hold territory previously outside their control.
So, conceivably, an interlocutor can take any of the three parts above and concatenate them to create the premise, then attempt to refute it.
“States allowing public degeneracy can’t commit to a course of action that results in success in a martial contest.”
“Governments that facilitate normalization of implicit sodomy cannot campaign successfully for control of foreign territory.”
On the specificity of pride parades: these abominations are more than just a “result of progressivism” as stated by Mouse and Pax. Equivocating is a tool for propaganda and it does have its uses. As well, the slippery slope exists and isn’t a fallacy. So things lead to other things of like yet magnified kind, making the magnified thing contingent in some sense. But, to torture the metaphor, one could take a flying leap down the slope and skip certain points along the way (many GAE vassals have done this, are doing this, like in the Baltics currently). One could also pause on the slope much easier at certain points just as one could find it impossible to do this further down.
Pride parades are a somewhat unique occurrence. I’m struggling to think of anything else that compares, though a processional towards the pyramid where a people sacrifice their children might work. Yes, these occur as a result of progressive domination of society, rather of the elites, but they denote a certain threshold having been crossed. This, if I may be so bold, is what Jim noticed and expounded on, that the pride parades indicated the breaching of a particular threshold that denied a society certain options and opportunities it previously may have had. Another way to frame it is that when sodomites feel bold enough to march in the street, the males of a society have lost the ability to cohere and coordinate effectively, be it in support of the status quo, or against it, or even separate from it.
If it isn’t axiomatic, then someone should be able to refute the premise.
>Ishtar (Astarte/Ashtoreth/Venus/Inanna), the Babylonian goddess of love, pictured above. She was the goddess of sacred prostitution, of transgression, and the blurring of boundaries. Did you know that she was also the goddess of gender fluidity?
>
>[…]
>
>Molech, the god to whom people in the Ancient Near East sacrificed children. They sacrificed these children for the sake of achieving blessing, including prosperity, from the god. Cahn correctly links this to abortion, and to Ishtar’s rites — that is, unwanted children conceived by Ishtar-worshippers could be offered to Molech. It is no accident, says the pastor, that Planned Parenthood is not only the go-to place for abortions, but also the go-to place to get cross-sex hormones to change your sex — which, of course, renders you infertile. It’s all a death cult.
>
>[…]
>
>Cahn quotes a Hittite hymn to the goddess describing her as the one who will “…grind away from men manliness.†There was a prayer to her praising her power to emasculate and feminize men
>
>[…]
>
>Cahn says, sensibly, that if Ishtar worship came to America, we would expect to see the feminization of males and the masculinization of females, and overall gender confusion. Well… .
What’s more, her ritual followers — priests and others — engaged in public acts of androgyny, to show their devotion. Drag culture, Pride parades, and so forth, are exactly that, in Cahn’s view. She was a goddess of inversion.
>
>[…]
>
>According to an ancient Sumerian document, the demons who accompany Inanna/Ishtar when she arises out of the underworld
>
> tear away the wife from a man’s embrace. They snatch the son from a man’s knee. They make the bride leave the house of her father-in-law. … They take the wife away from a man’s embrace.
>
>Enhuedanna, high priestess of the moon in the Sumerian city of Ur, hymned Inanna/Ishtar like this:
>
> To destroy, to create, to tear out, to establish are yours, Inanna. To turn a man into a woman and a woman into a man are yours, Inanna.
>
>[…]
>
>Tammuz was the lover of Ishtar. The month of Tammuz (which still exists in the Hebrew calendar) marks the month of the separation of Tammuz and Ishtar, which Cahn interprets as symbolizing the tearing away of men and women from each other. He points out that the Stonewall Riots, which marked the advent of the gay rights movement, occurred on the 10th of Tammuz, which in Babylon was the date on which it was considered ritually correct to cast spells to make men love men.
>
>That’s right: the modern gay rights movement began on this anniversary. And, as Cahn points out, the three Supreme Court decisions most important to the gay rights movement — Lawrence (2003), which decriminalized homosexuality across the board; Windsor (2013), which struck down the Defense of Marriage Act; and Obergefell (2015), which legalized same-sex marriage — all came on June 26. Moreover, Tammuz, which doesn’t always coincide with our calendar, as it is a lunar calendar, nevertheless most of the time falls in the month of June — which has become the High Holy Month of Pride.
https://blog.reaction.la/war/he-votes-counts-for-nothing/#comment-2856656
https://archive.ph/c2LzD
I figure they want to come out and start being openly trans. I do find it strange that two obvious trannies like matt Walsh, FtM, and megyhn Kelly, mtf, are who we are presented with as leaders against the Ishtar tranny cult. They have their trannies up everywhere in every store you go to already but I think they don’t want everyone to point deer and make horse anymore, I think they want everyone to point at the deer and say that I know that’s a deer in a horse costume, but it really is a horse now because it believes it to be so.
If trannyism is some demon Ishtar worship this ties in with the Jesuit theory as the Catholic Church worships Ishtar/Isis under the guise of Mary.
What’s the Jesuit theory? Are they worshipping Ishtar while taking over the Catholic Church? Would explain all their baphomet garbage.
Read the blog. Satanic Symbolism at the Vatican.
Demon Worship
thank you
I’m surprised you haven’t seen it I’m a bit obsessed with it (I admit it) the way wignats are obsessed with jews.
Once I became 95% convinced (its 98% now I found new evidence I didn’t know about, he was pictured with Mother Theresa) Fauci was a Jesuit the rest fell into place.
>Matt Walsh is a FtM
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
He’s probably one of those schizos who think that all celebrities are secretly trannies. Which is a real thing, look it up.
In the early 2010s it was fairly popular among kids to jokingly say various celebrities were trannies. Lady Gaga was a particularly favorite target of such jokes. But back then “tranny” was still considered an acceptable name to call someone unlike “faggot” which as definitely considered hate speech. It was an acceptable way to denote low status. The people saying that in the past were not schizos in the same way the people accusing various straight people of being fags were not schizo. It was their way of calling out people for their abnormal behavior not tied to the actual meaning of the word.
What I think is going on is a bit of psychological whiplash from going from calling someone a tranny being acceptable to being unacceptable in half a generation. With all of the sudden pressure to never call anyone a tranny, and clear evidence that some are actual trannies (those story time events) who one must use certain pronouns, the monkey brain starts conspiratorially believing that they are all trannies.
Tranny and faggot were both severe insults…
Yes, I’m pointing out that in the early 2010s a kid could insult someone as a tranny and get away with it both socially and in the schools. Calling someone a faggot would likely result in disciplinary action.
The pace of change from which it was unacceptable to use the term tranny happened within years whereas faggot took more than several decades.
Certainly in the mid-late 90s you could still loudly and openly call a faggot a faggot in school, and to some extent beat them up. The last 25 years is almost hard to comprehend, even having lived through it.
If you lived through the seventies, what has happened to the relation between men and women is similarly shocking, horrific, and barely comprehensible.
I can remember as a kid my mom would shit test my dad, and he would say something in return, usually funny but with a full serving of “know your place, womanâ€. She would have a laugh, he would have a laugh, and every adult in the room would have a big laugh.
Today those words are misogyny, and could get your children taken from you.
[*deleted*]
Enemy shills call everyone a tranny, just as they call Putin a Jew, Musk a Jew, and so on and so forth.
Your link’s exhibit A is Megyn Kelly, who was registered female at birth and went to junior schools as a female. Anyone can tell a fake in a few moments, listening to them speak and watching them move. But still photos can be ambiguous, and there are a lot of convincing still photos around of people we know to be fake, and a lot of somewhat ambiguous still photos around of people we know to be real. In stills, Megyn Kelly can be a bit ambiguous, but she just has to open her mouth and gesture for it to be instantly obvious she is a woman, born a woman.
[*deleted for presupposing that a bunch of obvious shills are speaking the forbidden truth*]
Anonymous Fake has been shitposting here for years. Safe to say he’s probably not a shill. Just a mentally ill loner.
jim, why don’t you just block his ip and/or email?
He is an obvious paid shill. A mentally ill loner would have been able to say various things that would result in his stuff getting through. He knows what I allow through, and what he cannot say reveals how the shiling operation is organized. I keep him around because he cannot help leaking information about the operation by what he does say, and what he cannot say.
Thus for example, he continually attempts to post stuff that presupposes that BLM and antifa is a spontaneous grass roots movement reflecting mass support in certain areas, that everyone, including us, thinks that they are a spontaneous mass movement reflecting mass support. He knows this will not get through unless he explicitly and overtly claims and argues that it is a spontaneous grass roots movement reflecting mass support – but he cannot do that because not only forbidden to notice that they are astroturf, but forbidden to notice that anyone thinks they are astroturf. If a mentally ill loner, could hardly avoid noticing that scarcely anyone in America thinks that they are spontaneous mass movement reflecting mass support, that everyone knows perfectly well that they are astroturf. A mentally ill loner who, being insane, believed that BLM and antifa were real, would hardly be able to avoid noticing that his delusions are not widely shared.
A mentally ill loner would argue in the style of a voice in the wilderness, rather than presupposing all manner of lunatic nonsense as the universal unchallengeable and unchallenged consensus. Also, a mentally ill loner would have his own unique idiosyncratic set of absurd delusions, while every single one of Anonymous Fake’s absurd lunatic delusions are universally accepted in the official government media. Even Tucker superficially went through the motions of accepting them, though obviously neither he nor his viewers believed them for a moment.
But none of his stuff gets through. He’s not influencing anybody. So if he’s a shill, the shill operation is spending money on him, for no gain, while leaking information about how they work. Which would be really, really stupid.
Seems more likely to me that he has impaired theory of mind or something.
Some of Anonymous Fake’s stuff gets through, and he knows what does get through. His response to that incentive tells me much.
That very little of his stuff gets through results in a high ratio of information leaked to waters muddied.
By an amazing coincidence, the entire official media and Global American Empire have a similarly impaired theory of mind, as does every other shill. As I said, if a mentally ill loner, would speak as a voice in the wilderness, and would have his own idiosyncratic collection of lunatic delusions. He is the voice of Harvard and the New York Times, and has their collection of lunatic delusions.
“…because not only forbidden to notice that [BLM and Antifa] are astroturf, but forbidden to notice that anyone thinks they are astroturf.”
Once again, behold the fascinating power of applied thoughtcrime theory.
I’ve never seen this subject described, let alone explained or demonstrated, anywhere but right here (and maybe also lightly seasoned into a Moldbug screed in days of yore, PBUH).
“By an amazing coincidence, the entire official media and Global American Empire have a similarly impaired theory of mind, as does every other shill.”
If you could elaborate a bit on what you mean by that, please.
Academia and the state is supposedly a neutral playing field where the left very recently gained supremacy by showing up, by scoring higher marks, and so one and so forth. And no one thinks otherwise.
Election results are indicative of public opinion.
BLM, Antifa, and Drag Queen Story hour are indicative of public opinion. They are spontaneous grass roots movements, and absolute no one doubts they are spontaneous grass roots movements, not even me.
The BBC, New York Times, and the officially unofficial media, are credible and widely believed, and what they say constitutes convincing evidence.
All evil behavior by the regulatory state is the result of elected politicians, and all evil behavior by elected politicians is the result of evil capitalist influence.
The reason that men today have trouble getting their dicks wet is because evil capitalists are creaming off all the pussy, and anyone who notices that love is war, love is a battlefield, that every male is getting a whole lot of grief, is obviously a broke loser living in a trailer park.
No one, least of all fleeing whites, suffers any problems from minorities. White flight is entirely irrational.
The blue cities are nice places with nice shopping centers. The nicest. Good neighborhoods are good because of good schools, and schools are good purely for academic reasons, nothing to do with racial makeup.
The blue city megalopoli represent the creation of wealth.
I don’t think he has posted any stuff on the Awesome might of the Covid Demon, the safety and effectiveness of demon worship, Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global
WarmingClimate Change and the wondrous reliability of peer reviewed research under this identity. Though the wondrous reliability of peer reviewed research (aka the officially unofficial state religion) is sort of implied by his presupposition that the Ivy League is the beating heart of intellectual excellence, and everyone thinks that they are. Also everyone believes the officially unofficial press.I still don’t see it, jim. With Anonymous Fake, even the posts that do get through are always followed by a rebuttal written by you. He’s not changing anyone’s mind. If he were a shill, his boss would notice that he’s not changing anyone’s mind and order him to create a new shill persona with a new rhetorical approach. Or just fire him and hire a new guy.
I mean, if I were a shill operator I would have more than one shill posting here. Have them respond to each others’ posts to make it look like their ideas are your ideas. Change usernames every couple of months. All these strategies are obvious.
From what Anonymous Fake has posted about himself he seems to be a Cathedralite manqué. So he sincerely believes Harvard/NYT stuff, just in an unhinged autistic mentally ill way. The mental illness prevents him from getting the prestigious job he thinks he deserves. Which would be why he rails against “cheaters” on the comment section of an obscure right-wing blog.
He has created no end of new shill personas with new approaches, but none of the approaches get as much stuff through as Anonymous Fake does.
What happens is that the new personality spends some time creating a believable alt right identity without actually committing or noticing any outright thought crimes. (Which is not easy on this blog where the thought crimes fly thick and fast).
And then, comes a payload post casting mud upon the waters. I respond pointing out the payload. Get an unresponsive response that somehow fails to notice that anyone might possibly doubt the payload. Shill test ensues, radio silence follows. Every time we go through this, it reveals the existence of a shill, and thus large numbers of shills.
Somehow I doubt that this blog is all that obscure. Just unmentionable and unthinkable. They have the same problem in dealing with it as they had lobotomizing ChatGPT. Hard to lobotomize ChatGPT without explicitly noticing the thought crimes that the lobotomy addresses, so they outsourced the lobotomy to places far from power, just as they put the bioweapon labs in the Ukraine and Sudan,rather than walking distance from Harvard.
There is no reason to believe others will behave as you do and think as you do, unless you presuppose they are you, think like you, believe like you and have the same set of circumstances and capabilities.
Do not make the mistake to believe you can discern the world and the motives of others by magical thinking from an ivory tower while disregarding what you can actually see.
It doesn’t matter what you believe, reality is what it is. And it’s a lot more surreal and horrific that you can possible imagine. You’re looking at it and you do not find it believable.
Very good point. When a supposedly lone voice endlessly pushes the party line over and over, there is only one sane conclusion.
I am still hoping for a good insider expose one of these years. If there are as many shills as we expect there to be, there is bound to be one who will write down his experiences.
Sure, let me just go send him an email and ask him to pull his pants down. I suppose I could email him and ask him if he is a tranny. I did so with that Nick Fuentes after I found out his “sister” was MtF. He read the email on air and said, ‘yes, you got me, I am trans. I am a tranny’ and went on with his show. But no amount of evidence can convince the man who has been pointing at a deer and calling it a horse his entire life that said horse is actually a deer, even when the deer says, “yes, I’m a deer”.
You, SJ, are as nutty as a flat earther.
Jim’s concise comment illustrates my concern over the position: it seems like a memeplex that does more to mitigate unconventional rhetoric than it does to enlighten ignorance.
I don’t think you are an entryist or a bad guy, your writing on Game and dating was top notch. But I just don’t think the beard pattern, the vocal range, and the children of Matt Walsh allow for a comment in passing to suffice as convincing. You don’t have to email him, you just need pictures showing his radical mastectomy scars, or a hot mic recording of his “actual” high pitched voice, or some kind of convincing proof that his kids are not.
When Jim says “All women are like that” or “young girls become highly sexualized at a terrifyingly young age” or “rape doesn’t exist” or “gay pride parades mean lost wars,” people, like myself on every one of these statements, push back. He then establishes veracity with proof and argument. His interlocutor, again me, has to contend with these things, and some kind of state change has to happen. In my case, I have come to realize that all elections are fake & gay, all women are like that, little girls do become sexualized due to biology and evopsych factors, and rape is just a beta failing to take possession. There are exceptions and edge cases in all things, but the evidence shows that Jim was right, and I was wrong, misinformed, or ignorant.
Jim isn’t diminished by my resistance, I am not diminished by reproof, and asking for evidence is not the same as some redditard asking “Source?”
You made an extraordinary claim. Provide some extraordinary evidence, OR say “I have no evidence, I just believe this thing” and I will say “damn mate, you’re a crazy fucker ha ha” and we move on. Lord knows I am not the paragon of sound reasoning and verifiable beliefs.
I have no evidence right now. If I get some time I might look into it but I don’t mind being the crazy sounding guy online I already am IRL.
lol same.
Be easy bro. If it came down to signaling support for you or defending Matt Walsh, that trannie doesn’t stand a chance.
I think sj is on to something. I don’t buy the trannie cultists everywhere thing but there is a weird pattern in our society. Michael Obama looks like a male ape, plenty of negro women do but there are way more feminine ones out there. jeb bushes wife I remember looking like a troglodyte, Megan Kelly has a bit of masculine feature. that whore that pretended to be Steve jobs looked butch. and Matt Walsh Steven crowder are not the most masculine guys out there. I think diet and lack of acute cortisol spikes and low average cortisol is pushing americas elite person’s towards less masculine physiology and their seems to be enormous pressure for horse faced masculine women to be breaking glass ceilings. could just be the usual spread of features and the pizzagate/sodomite cultists have us spooked and more wary then usual. for certain the us celebrity class has become much less attractive. Trump’s wife was a standout so it may be the elite just have such shit game that with all their money and power they can’t pull hot secretaries and wives. Bill Clinton’s mistake wasn’t fucking an intern it was picking a mid intern to fuck, very low status move that probably gave all the girls ick.
Many voices, speaking ex cathedra and from the peanut gallery, supposed that mid may would be the latest date the NATO Occupied Government would launch its battle of the bulge.
As the days continue to roll by though, the end of this war may end up being the dog that didn’t bark.
Pavlograd was smote by the fist of God several days ago, where providence found a significant concentration of the NOG’s surface to air missile supply in the rail depot, and a Russian ISR-Strike on alert to hit it. The resulting cataclysm has made for an evocative image, with many of those bearing witness, later, through mediums, feeling the effects of the blast on planes of spirit as much as anything else.
As cladistical bluetribesman John Dolan once opined, “I always wondered why no one spoke in favor of nuclear war, but I didn’t say that out loud. You were supposed to be anti-them; even I knew that. Kept it to myself, how beautiful those mushroom clouds were, how right they felt, how deserved.”
(https://exiledonline.com/the-war-nerd-nato-a-memoir/)
The occident heretofore is occupied by deeply unserious people, and more people with more matter are having to think seriously about how Russia is serious. Both parties are thinking about that great magnum opus of alchemical art, the transmutation of solar radiance. The latter, to guarantee the integrity of its sovereignty. The former, as like a woman shittesting God; subconsciously hoping that something, someone, will finally ‘man-up’ and drag them into the hereafter (along with everyone else).
https://www.bitchute.com/video/y3RO9ZXfCXqs/
>Russia is serious
Russia is not serious. They should have leveled Kyiv and built Putingrad on its radioactive ashes as soon as the initial attack was faltering. It would have promptly and preemptively shut up all those delusions of “Western analysts” talking about military strikes on Russian forces in the event of nuclear weapons use. I admit to being an autist like Cato such that if I were in the Duma I would be beginning and ending every single speech with the Russian equivalent of Kyiv Delenda Est.
Brotherly Kiev was murdered; therefore, no fratricide can be committed by the destruction of Ukraine and Kyiv by Russia. It was clear from early in the conflict Ukraine wanted total war. Russia’s failure to meet total war with unmitigated fire has only served to lengthen the war and kill thousands of young Russian men both civilian and military. It has served to embolden GAE into the false notion that it’s in control, that it can continue to foster war and chaos without consequence, that they are ultimately in the right because they’ve never had tactile experience showing them to be wrong. Or as you pointed out, bluetribe is only thinking in the imaginative.
I’ve pointed out many, many times on this blog that Kyiv is the proper spelling. Zelensky and Ukraine murdered Kiev just as he has murdered many in the Donbas and Orthodox Christian communities. Kyiv is fake and gay, but fake and gay rules in Kyiv and Ukraine; therefore, it must be destroyed. Some here still harbor sympathies for the innocents of Kiev. War is great. War is terrible. Innocence does not matter in war. Only victory. But this war never had to happen. All those Ukrainians and Russians never had to die. Ukraine could have been neutral. America could have stopped expanding NATO as promised. America could have chosen to not dick around with color revolutions in Europe. America choose destruction because it does not fear. I grieve over all those pointless deaths and needless destruction because I disagree with pointless pain.
I have been dealing with young American children lately in the education system due to some volunteer work. They do not respect authority because they’ve never had to deal with the consequences of their actions. What would have once resulted in physical punishment and pain in my parent’s era now results in, at best, a stern phone call to parents who don’t care. They are completely detached from the possibility of pain. Not even cognizant that it can happen to others. Instead, they are constantly told that they are right and good with no examples to the contrary. Our “elites” are much like these children. Forever disconnected from the possibility of pain. A mushroom cloud over Kyiv might be the wake up call they severely need.
The Washington elite, a group that claims “global leadership,” is far worse than any sociopath or psychopath. They are children with immense power breaking shit with no idea what they are breaking. Those with sociopathic and psychopathic traits will generally self regulate towards some socially accepted norms. Firefighters, police, soldiers, and many other professions who often score highly on callous/narcissistic/psychopathic traits generally want to act with honor because at the very least their loyalty is their only sense of honor. Loyalty that is born from an understanding of pain. These Washington elites have no concept of pain and therefore no honor.
>>Russia is serious
>Russia is not serious.
We are speaking in a relational sense, of course.
Russia started the SMO uncertain about it’s allies, it’s fighting ability, and it’s ability to survive sanctions. You see Russia kicking ass now, but much of it’s strength was put together in the last decade or so.
Putin’s decisions so far have brought much of the world (China and India) to it’s side, revealed NATO’s land forces to be a farce, and dealt a huge blow to the US dollar. All this with relatively little lost by Russia.
Washington can only decline until it’s death now. It can terrorize it’s remaining subjects for a decade or two, but it can’t threaten Russia or it’s allies, except maybe with a limited supply of nukes it lacks the ability to maintain, or possibly even deliver against modern Russian air defense.
You want the people of Russia to instead take on the whole gay empire, face first, on it’s own land, right now. You could argue it would be the most noble thing to do, but you are asking Russians to risk nuclear annihilation to save fat stupid Americans from their own government, while those fat stupid Americans view Russians as subhuman and cheer for their death.
Who says doing what you want would even be a ‘wake up call’ to Washington anyway? As long as the elites have their corrupt fortunes and a supply of young boys to sodomize, what do they care if the peasants die?
Why Kyiv? Why not Washington? Shoot the puppeteer, not the puppet; gore the matador, not the cape.
The happiest day of my life will be when everything inside the Beltway becomes a lake of nuclear fire, and moments later at the Pearly Gates, St. Peter welcomes a dozen nuns who day-tripped into the city to pray outside an abortion clinic.
Which is probably going to happen eventually the way things are going. Under a senile placeholder president, decisions in Washington are made by a committee in which anyone who suggests de-escalation is labeled a Russian agent and expelled from the committee.
Reagan was highly successful in wearing the Soviet Union out with a multitude of little wars that the US could afford, but the Soviet Union could not. Color revolution inevitably became a reprise of this strategy.
Reagan’s success created a global perception that when the US started one of those little wars, no point in fighting it, so color revolutions were initially won easily.
Two things had changed since Reagan: The political objectives had become more overbearing, intrusive, and oppressive, and the US industrial capacity had hollowed out.
Jim, you might find this crypto project interesting, Anoma:
https://anoma.net/
https://github.com/anoma/whitepaper/blob/main/whitepaper.pdf
The first line of the whitepaper:
“Programmable settlement architectures do not enable counterparty discovery and solving, both of which are necessary to build the majority of interactive multi-party applications.”
The project seems to value privacy a lot, their first chain to implement the Anoma architecture, Namada (https://namada.net/) is a “proof-of-stake L1 for interchain asset-agnostic privacy”.
Their architecture uses zk tech extensively, I think in similar ways to what you’ve described.
Uses recursive zero knowledge proofs, which is what zk tech has long promised, but which we have only been recently able to accomplish. Last time I checked, I was not able to accomplish it, for the good stuff was still closely held, although there was sufficient information about how it worked to reinvent and recreate it. And subsequently, the good stuff (Plonky2) got open sourced and very similar techs got invented, following in their footsteps.
The blockchain mindspace is full of ten thousand shitcoins. But this new technology changes everything. With this new technology there is room for new blockchains.
Not sure you are ever going to get away from the concept of a series of events confirmed through some entropy mining.
How do you determine the latest state in a zkchain? Well your client verifies that all actions were performed according to the given algorithm definition. Great. Now I present to you two chain tips, both have followed all algorithm definitions. Which do you follow? How do you know some long range attack/costless replay hasnt occurred? If you only have a priori information with no entropy, you cannot make this decision.
zk tech is not for new blockchains, but is going to be the layer on top of the blockchain that efficiently wraps up state transfers.
Consensus is an an unrelated issue. You solve consensus the same way with or without recursive zero knowledge proofs. In any blockchain with open entry you always need a fair way in one peer rather arbitrarily gets a lot more say than the rest, in bitcoin the one that got lucky mining, and that peer goes with whatever tip it happens to have. In an open entry system you are always going to have several tips on several machines, and you have to sort it out, zero knowledge or no zero knowledge.
You are always going to need a reliable broadcast channel, but with recursive zero knowledge proofs, you can break it up into a tree of reliable broadcast channels each containing a reasonably small number of participants.
Unrelated? It’s the sole reason for the existence of blockchains. We are coming to consensus on the current state of the ledger. No consensus, no money.
This lack of entropy is a problem with all existing PoS networks currently. Why are unstaking periods so long? Primarily so that people running validators can keep track of each other. This does not work for a system thst is inherently permissionless and global. You need an entropy source to build the canonical chain if you are not relying entirely on a social consensus to resolve forks. In any situation where there is no real entropy, you are determining leaders through some shared random coin, maybe from pulling bits from block headers, or round robin or whatever else, you can always simulate a new heaviest chain. It’s fake, has no connection to base reality, a closed system, a PoS chain not pegged to a PoW chain is entirely driven by social consensus. You’re reinventing fiat.
Recursive zks are great for succinctly proving that state transitions are honest. They are going to be how you scale these things, you bundle all these disparate state transitions into a nice n-bit hash, without having to have the entire state on hand as witness. Providing a total order to these state transition event signatures is the problem we need to solve, and the only way to do that without social consensus is through mining entropy.
So sure. Maybe a new blockchain, but the merkle root of this new blockchain occasionally checkpoints state roots to the reigning PoW chain. We’ll probably have lots of competing sidechains like this, probably passing messages back in forth to each other, potentially nested n-deep, almost none of which have to resolve on the top layer.
This is tech for scaling on top of the existing systems.
You are presenting a meaningless fragment of an argument about a topic you did not understand, and confidently asserting that fragment as a decisive argument on another unrelated topic that you understand even less.
You are making an argument against certain complex and specific alternatives to proof of work, not an argument against zero knowledge proofs, or even a valid argument against proof of stake. (Yes, most alternatives to proof of work have been implemented badly, but you don’t understand the arguments because you have absolutely no idea what the legitimate participants, all of whom were vastly more knowledgeable than you, and most of whom were vastly smarter than you, were talking about.)
Not going to discuss this with you because your thinking is incoherent and meaningless.
I am fairly sure the incoherence you claim is due to you swiftly skimming without actually digesting the words on the screen. Understandable, you are busy. However a simple ad hominem is not an argument, and merely calling people stupid without at least dropping a single piece of information as to where or why is a waste of energy and a waste of time for any others also reading the conversation. My comments were not schizophrenic word salad, and even if they were…, it should be easy to pick out at least one statement wherein the incoherence can be made apparent.
Putting you on moderation.
It is impossible to reply to you, because you are not making any sense. You are echoing fragments of arguments you do not understand in a context unrelated to the original argument. And I doubt you understood the original context either, the original context being proof of stake mechanisms, and still meaningless except as related to a concrete and specific class of proof of stake mechanisms.
I’m going to make my case one last time, jim you are free to ignore of course, in fact if you are busy it’s better to focus elsewhere. This is for any lurking readers perhaps interested in context and clarity on what exactly is being argued.
My basic thesis is as follows, zk proofs are not going to lead to new blockchains in any meaningful sense. Zk proofs are going to be applied on top of existing blockchains to solve the problem of needing state witness in order to prove validity of state transition. Furthermore, as a tangent argument as to why zk proofs are not new blockchains, any consensus without a costly source of real-world entropy is inherently subjective. I can only prove this conjecture by contradiction, and so it does not apply to theoretical future algorithms unless I or someone else manages to tighten the bounds.
Quick nonexhaustive definition of the qualities of zks we are discussing around. A zk-s(n/t)ark is an argument consisting of two functions:
– prover: C(x, w) = p where C is the program, x is the public input, w is the private witness and p the proof
– verifier: V(p, x) = { true, false} where given a proof and public input, you can verify that C was computed honestly, without knowledge of the private witness
So, now we can argue that we know a secret key, sk, that can sign for the transfer of ownership of some state bytes that are leaves of some merkle tree, w. So alice wanting to transfer some bytes to bob generates a proof
`C(
(sk, leaf preimage pre transition, leaf preimage post transition),
(hash commit leaves pre transition, merkle path, hash commit leaves post transition)
) = p`
and sends this to the public verifier. The verifier checks the proof, and approves the transition to the new state. This is useful enough, it allows us to approve state transitions without global knowledge of the state, just hash commits of the leaves. It becomes more useful when you apply these arguments recursively. Now you have a proof
`C(
(list of proofs),
(merkle root pre transition, merkle root post transition)
) = p`
So you can aggregate this collection of state transitions using only the knowledge of the state root and the zk proof functions.
Wonderful. Now the validating nodes dont need to have an unbounded memory of existing pieces of the state, they dont need to know what public keys signed what, they dont need to know who owns what bytes or what exactly changed within the bytes. They can argue that the new state root, which users prove against when transacting with each other, was computed honestly according to a pre defined ruleset.
So, now we have new state roots, but we have a meta problem. We need to know the total order in which these transition actions were applied, in order to resolve disputes as to which state is true and solve the State Machine Replication problem. This is where the consensus comes in. Existing solutions largely fall into two classes, proof of stake, wherein those who decide orderings are those with some weight of “stake”, usually just a number in the ledger saying this public key has this weight of tokens, and after deciding leaders you use some byzantine broadcast algorithm to ensure all the replicants share the decisions of the leaders whom do not give faulty ordering decisions. The other class is proof of work, wherein instead of deciding leaders by stake weight, leaders are chosen upon finding the solution to some computational puzzle requiring lots of entropy.
Okay, so why does it matter which class of algorithms you select from? Well, there is a problem with leader selection based on stake weight. The knowledge of stake weight *is determined by the participants*. So you can simulate, cheaply, an entirely new chain, and present this to any consumer of chain state. This is called a long range attack, the problem is also sometimes referred to as costless replay, and the only way in which you can resolve the correct chain vs an attacking chain, is by keeping a list of active validators you personally trust. Or depending on someone elses list. It is not trustless, in the sense that a quorum of validators can entirely rewrite chain history if they so choose, and there is no way to resolve as to which history is correct. It is consensus driven by social reality, and participation is only allowed through consent of the validators.
For proof of work chains, this problem does not exist. Replays are costly, as they require real-world entropy to generate the leading chain. You dont need a list of validators, you can determine the correct chain tip entirely from the reading of the chain events, because each leader is decided from a preimage that is too costly to simulate. It is consensus driven by real world reality. History can not be arbitrarily rewritten, and participation is entirely open.
In summation, zk proofs allow you to drastically increase both privacy and scalability, because the witness needed to generate honest state transitions compresses into a single merkle root. Zk proofs do not lead to new blockchains, because they do not solve the total ordering problem for SMR. A blockchain desiring the properties of trustlessness and open participation requires a consensus layer driven by entropy mining.
Allowing this utter nonsense through is case anyone is in doubt why I am not going to allow any more of it through.
“any consensus without a costly source of real-world entropy is inherently subjective.” And colorless green ideas sleep furiously.
You randomly decorating your text with words that smart people use, but without understanding their meaning.
A charitable interpretation of your words is “proof of work is the only way”. But someone who actually understood what he was saying would not have said it using impressive sounding words with merely tangential relevance, and if that is what you intended to say, and if that was true, it would still be entirely unrelated to the issue of blockchains based on recursive zero knowledge proofs. Also unrelated to the words you used.
I have no idea what’s going on here in technical terms, I don’t understand even a fraction of what’s required to make an assessment. But I like Fidelis, I think he contributes, and I hate to see us lose a brother. Jim’s House, Jim’s rules.
I’ve made the mistake of advocating for dumb and evil people here out of an earnest desire to propagate cohesion and build a larger tribe. Because of this, my credibility is low (never mind the retarded predictions and profligate drunkposting and…), but I nonetheless hope this can be settled amicably OR put on ice and left alone for a time.
Jim, does Fidelis have to be on moderation? Can he make a gentleman’s agreement to let this particular sleeping dog lie?
Ok I finally read the words that are lined up in those paragraphs. Reminds me of the gibberish I hear from one of my brothers, a chemist who pretends to do chemistry but whose actual job is to scam more grants from the government. He’s a research chemist for a university. He’s pretty good at getting more grants but everything he says is just word salad. I’m not sure if he’s stupid or if lying to himself that he’s a chemist, when he’s just a scam artist, has caused him to believe his word salad actually means anything. He appears to believe stringing chemistry terms together nonsensically actually has some kind of meaning.
The debate, of which Fidelis was presenting fragments, is about what should be called “reliable broadcast channels”, because this has applications beyond blockchains themselves – you implement a protocol, say for the lightning network or for exchanging one crypto currency for another, and at a critical moment, the other guy stops communicating. And you then need to be able to prove that he failed to send, you were not the one ignoring what he sent, that he failed, not you.
In a reliable broadcast channel, if you publish something and it gets included, it gets included in the root hash of a block, thereby proving it was included, and that the intended recipient could receive it, that if he did not receive it, it his fault and his problem, you did not defect from the protocol, he did. When you use a scriptless script, as in the better lightning algorithms, you are using the blockchain not for its original design purpose, but as a reliable broadcast channel. Obviously a blockchain that relies on recursive zero knowledge proofs still needs a reliable broacast channel, on which the hash of the current state of every value is available, but only the parties to the transaction know what was in the transaction. And as the chain gets bigger, a whole lot of stuff is going to be broadcast.
So how do we scale? Recursive proofs means we do not have to keep the old data around, and that we are only passing around the hash of each change of state of a value, not the value itself, considerably reduces the data passed around, but what about the ever growing flood of new data? How do we handle Visa scale and bigger?
With recursive zero knowledge proofs, we can have one blockchain and many reliable broadcast channels.
Hi Jim – this question may only reveal my ignorance, but I’m going to ask it anyway…
First off, if you’re trading with pieces of gold as currency, you don’t need to bring a paper-trail documenting what mine the gold was dug out of, etc. Gold is gold.
But with this sort of digital currency, you do, because data can simply be copied. Okay…
But what about anonymity? If I pay in gold coin, I can wipe the literal fingerprints of all previous handlers off it. Or even clear it of my own fingerprints before giving it in payment.
But doing the equivalent to the sort of virtual currency you’re discussing will make it worthless?
How is this not in effect a centralized banking system where they can track the movement of money wherever it goes?
The answer to that involves a great deal of cryptography. Which I am not going to cover here. We have a bunch of imperfect workarounds: Wasabi Wallet, the Lightning Network, and Monero.
Lightning provides the largest and cleanest anonymity network, but Lightning wallet only provides good anonymity if you provide channels that other people can use – that lots of random strangers will wind up using, only provide anonymity if you are vertex rather than a leaf on the lightning network – which involves a great deal of work and skill to manage, and if you muck up you lose your money. Wasabi wallet does a good job, and is easy to use correctly and safely. If you are using Wasabi wallet, and you also have some vertex nodes in the lightning network, you are fairly bullet proof. But Wasabi wallet just by itself is pretty good. And vertexes on the lightning network by themselves are pretty good.
However, Recursive Zero Knowledge proofs can provide a truly anonymous, and fully scalable, crypto currency. Lots of people are working on it. The one true crypto currency will not have transactions nor unspent transaction outputs on the blockchain, but only hashes of them, with only the parties to a transaction knowing what the hashes are hashes of. This technology will bring a pile of enormous advantages, notably true scalability as well as full anonymity. But as yet it is only a technology and an idea, without any actually useful implementation. I am going to write up a paper on how to implement a currency using this technology – at present people have a lot of half assed bits and pieces, with one guy planning to implement one little bit of the big picture, and another guy planning to implement another little part of the big picture, but no one that I am aware of of has presented the big picture of what it should look like when it all comes together.
Never had male mentors, pretty much lost all my friends the past few years, so this has become my go to place for life advice. Specifically on working in the cathedral and where to raise a family.
Will try to give context w/o self doxing:
40 yr/old w/m from priestly family raised in blue coastal megalopolis. Married in 30s after many years of playing the field. Have young hapa girls. Probably due to family priestly predisposition, invested heavily in academia. Realized I was basically shut out due to race/gender by 2015 or so, but continued on due to path dependency. Also, my field not as pozed as humanities but still totally feminized. Have regrets about choices made in 20s but its water under the bridge at this point.
During COVID I found low level work in construction, but felt I was getting too old to enter trades in late 30s. Despite what some “dissidents” like to claim, most trades don’t pay that great if you’re entry level in a big city and have a family, competing with illegals, etc. Eventually took a makework gov job in rural white area to capitalize on cathedral credentials and escape blue city. Very backwoods, too backwoods to raise little girls. Also far from grandparents in blue megalopolis.
Was recently offered tenure track job at a big state university in rural white part of the country. Still far away from grandparents but enough amenities to satisfy wife/daughters. Being in a rural white area, the red guards and commissars do not
appear as vicious as other locations. I have no illusions about the university, but it’s what I feel I have been prepared for, and do believe it allows for some entrepreneurial and creative freedom. Will be able to have a house and a garden, guns, run a business, etc.
I have also been offered a transfer opportunity closer to the blue megalopolis where grandparents are located. Government construction management. Clock-in/clock-out, lower stress, aside from living in degenerate blue megalopolis. But near blue-pilled boomer grandparents and cousins/extended family (both asian in-laws and white ethnic sides of family).
Unfortunately at 40 with kids I feel I don’t have options outside cathedral (in before “learn to code and move to el salvador”).
So the question is:
How to make the most of my situation?
How to weigh importance of being near grandparents and family vs. a more “based” rural area?
The parent and “dissident activities appreciator” in me says take the tenure track. All the brightest elites may “live” in the cities but they own rural property, they’re happy on their estates, and the highest cost of their urban holdings is avoiding urban life. If you really like the construction thing, find contractors in rural area that are strong back/simple mind and help them with the managerial side of business and expansion.
Bluepill influences on children always end up in the same place: emasculation, humiliation, and submission. If they don’t actively go against you, they will sit idly by as you suffer. If the grandparents want to see the kids, buy them a Garmin and preload your home address in it.
What is your field? I don’t see how anyone can give you advice until you explain why you are so downwardly mobile as to have gone from prospective academic to construction worker.
>Implying that construction worker is a downgrade from prospective academic.
The best thing the western world could do right now is murder every academic and produce a lot more construction workers.
Academics produce faggots, trannies, overbearing regulation that is collapsing society and producing poverty, feminism, niggerism, climate cult and covid cult.
Construction workers and their peers produce building, plumbery, electricity, cars and the food you eat.
If you believe that academics don’t deserve a gulag and construction workers are a million times better and more valuable people you should visit this hospital asap: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVxjanRhq7o
>Construction workers and their peers produce building, plumbery, electricity, cars and the food you eat.
Yeah, agriculture is generally full of decent, hard working men that create real value. So are factory workers, but America’s infrastructure construction sector is severely sick.
Take IT infrastructure for instance. Those guys are nearly all contractors getting paid >$50 per hour not including per diem. All they do is drill a couple of holes, shove some Ethernet wiring up in the ceiling, cable management, etc. All stuff a high school kid can do, but stick “IT” or “infrastructure” in front of something and people lose their damn minds. It took a team of ~10 men in their 30s-50s, 14 hours a day billing at OT and night shift rates an entire month to install ~50 WiFi routers. Not even the switches. Just the fucking routers and their Ethernet cables. The “engineers” took another 2 weeks to set up the switches. All of them White men with the work ethics of Congolese.
They moved like slugs, but it is widely accepted as the cost of doing business. Was also told to emulate. The entire construction sector is like that, and construction has always been a bit of a cartel. In Japan and Korea, this amount of work would be done in less than one week for less cost and better quality. For young men, an operational tempo that slow drives them crazy and they largely quit. I suppose it’s at least a good make work retirement option, but regardless, fuck American infrastructure construction.
What we desperately need is to restore the tradition of apprenticeship. There is always more than enough unqualified bodies that can barely make it in on time. Construction takes skill, and profitable skill comes from years of following the same guys around and doing as they do.
After the first year, an apprentice can usually do a good job sweeping the floor and taking out the garbages. The other tasks they can do well unsupervised by that point are picking things up and moving them somewhere else.
It is no small thing to teach even a smart teenage boy today to sweep the floor well, as they have spent all of their days up until then waiting until the school day was over. The problem is employers are just as unfit to invest in young men, as young men are unfit to work unsupervised.
>There is always more than enough unqualified bodies that can barely make it in on time.
The problem in construction is that there are many highly qualified bodies that use their skill to not make it on time.
Those men are extremely competent, and they also taught me a lot that I’m grateful for. They weren’t expected to teach me nor was I expected to learn anything from them. They were still happy to share knowledge and I was happy to expand my skills. Informal apprenticeship is still there and most men who were in my position took advantage of it.
What’s frustrating, if I wasn’t clear, is that they were purposely dragging out the job to a painfully tedious snail pace for additional billing hours. They even brought along a bunch of unneeded workers to help their buddies get on the gravy train. The supervisors sent there to watch them for the company that hired the contractors knew what was going on but were also doing the same thing. Purposely slowing things down for more billing hours. They also brought in a bunch of unneeded supervisors me included. In fact the company’s higher ups knew all about this state of affairs but just accepted it as the cost of doing business.
Look, I have no problem with repetitive or menial work. Most men can just turn off their brains and do a task until completed. What I do have a problem with is being told to sit in a room for 9-14 hours doing almost nothing for an entire month and have the gall to bill 600-800 USD per day for my “work.” It was embarrassing and shameful. Worse, it felt like criminal participation seeing all the others do the same shady thing.
Maybe this is the legacy of past mob control of construction work culture. Maybe it’s the legacy of union power. Maybe it’s some government regulatory BS I’m no aware of. Maybe there’s just a general spiritual rot in America. I don’t know for sure, I just hated it.
High likelihood that most you wrote in your last paragraph applies to some degree, I can see similar stuff in my own country.
The “good thing” about this, at least in my country, is that if you are actually competent yourself and go self-employed you are immensely valued and always have far more work than you can even handle, at a very profitable rate. But it needs the will and courage to go that route, which isn’t easy and requires even more effort and competence.
As a young man that is starting and learning the ropes working initially for someone else it can be soul crushing, it is very unfortunate. But these are the times we have to deal with, our ancestors had to bleed and sweat to develop the technology and the capital to produce civilization, those were their times and had their own problems. Today we have the technology and generally the capital but must overcome the blue/prog induced cancer, we have our own cross to bear.
I take comfort in the knowledge that this shall pass, that one day within my lifetime I’ll probably be leading a squad of men into the houses of academics to show them the ways of Minecraft.
From the business side of things management is a dumpster fire. The Dupont scientific management reboot has been cancer. every business wants to outsource to keep overhead low and it never once occurs to any company leadership that outsourcing puts your balls in a vice and most contractual arrangements don’t allow any social consequences for fucking up. used to be word got around now it’s the same old shit on repeat. I have never in my life heard anyone in management use the word trust when talking about outsourcing work. the best companies are in sourced like crazy and have good bosses. and most companies are so shit at their core competencies especially in tech it’s cheaper to do it yourself. I left a good company in tech because the clients were retarded morons and management had no fucking idea what I did or what value I created. I ended up doing a women’s entire fucking job while she “worked remotely” and no one knew including myself, did I get extra pay? no not even a Christmas bonus. A lot of corporate rot is men being unwilling to burn fuckups and make examples of what happens when things are over budget and past deadline. Manager selection is a bitch I don’t know how to fix that tho.
Where are the highly qualified construction workers? Are you referring to blue states? In Florida we are having another sort of gold rush in residential and commercial real estate, and the labor pool is pretty thin. It takes a long time to learn a trade, 6 years at least for finish carpentry, and generally 10 years or more before one can be considered a master carpenter.
I am also curious as well what kind of IT infrastructure jobs pay that well. Even satellite and fiber installation guys here that own their own van and tools are only making 30-40 or so per hour. At least from what I can see.
Bullshit.
Elon Musk didn’t take even that long to learn the current most advanced level of rocket science from zero, you need to check that ego. Either that or stop working with low IQ apes that skew your expectations.
I can say from personal experience that any trade can be learnt in a few months of practical work for 90 to 99% percent of commercial products. For the few that you can’t, with the general skills and experiences you can deduce and develop the specific skill required for the weird cases with a bit of guidance from the manufacturer and seller (or whoever gave you mentorship if he is a highly qualified professional with tons of experience), who will be happy to provide such information to actually close the sell and get a future prospect.
Of course, if you’re telling me you’re some giga lord that makes top quality art from wood columns to some Stradivarius stuff, well I’m simply not qualified to have an opinion. But we are talking about construction work here, get real. Fuck me, not even Renaissance children took this fucking long to learn every trick from the greatest artists.
Do you think, in 3 months, you can learn to build front doors for houses with lumber from the lumber yard? And do it quickly and repeatedly with no supervision, only limited information from a set of basic architectural prints?
That is one of one hundred things you have to be able to build, from experience, to make a living as a cabinet maker.
After 3 months working at a pro shop you would still not even be allowed to feed material into half of the equipment, under direct supervision. Not even Elon Musk would be allowed to. It is too dangerous and you would risk fucking up the machine and the material.
As far as fabrication and working with your hands building custom and complex things, years of experience is mostly all that matters. You can work at a big pro shop for a year and you yourself may only build part of one kitchen. Do you know how complicated it is to build kitchens? I have been doing this a very long time, and am pretty sharp, and I have built many, very large and very expensive kitchens, and I do not know everything there is to know about kitchens.
At 3 months in a cabinet shop Elon Musk is still sweeping floors.
If I built one once, with the aid of a YouTube video, or preferably under supervision, I could make any number of them from basic architectural prints without supervision, though doing it quickly and repeatedly would take a bit longer. But learning to do it quickly and repeatedly could be done without supervision, just the occasional random check on the product. I have built computers, tables, shelving, drawers, house electrical wiring, flyscreen windows, and so on and so forth without supervision. Though I am sure my grey water drainage system is very far from being up to code, being composed entirely of patches made from whatever was handy or whatever I could get, with numerous elements fabricated by hand molding stiff concrete.
No, at three months in a cabinet shop you are still sweeping floors. Musk is building better cabinets, and developing improved ways of producing better cabinets faster.
The conversation as I understood it was about the labor force meeting the demands of the customers. We do not need 1 giga smartie we need thousands of guys with 5-10 years of experience.
Unless you assume 1 giga smartie can come up with some revolutionary technology.
I think if you spent a week among professional finish carpenters it would be a deeply humbling experience.
Doubtless is would be, but after the second week, less humbling.
There are whole lot of skills, some of which do take a while to pick up. We do need apprenticeships. If you look at furniture made before apprenticeship was abolished, that required years of learning and practice. Modern trade skills are simpler, partly because we have a whole lot of tools to substitute for skill, mostly because the capability to make stuff requiring a high level of skill has been irreplaceable lost.
My welding is terrible. I watched a YouTube video buy a guy who had practiced briefly under an expert welder. After a pretty short training time, his welds were good enough, though more practice would have made them better. But after a short time, did not need an expert welder, just needed practice.
Pretty sure that I’d learn a lot more than that. I spent my late teen years and early twenties learning a bunch of different skills for different reasons. Except the basic infrastructure of a house, I can build a modern facility from the ground. All of those skills did not take me nearly enough as you claim it’d take, since most of the time I spent working was actually a repetition of that which I already could do in a short time. With practice I did get more precise and had greater mastery, but my skill was up to commercial standards very fast very early on. So much so, that I received tips from clients (this is not customary in my country) and constant repeat customers and everyone loved my work. And this is hardly surprising seeing the work I’ve seen done by many others, some people are straight up criminals that build death hazards.
After 3 months working I’d be challenging the pros to outmake them at the skills which I had already learned and observed, I’m extremely competitive. If I was 3 months in apprenticeship, that implies my mentor is someone which I would respect, so knowledgeable and high IQ enough, and he would recognize my ability and my initiative as has happened in every single job I’ve ever done.
Yes it is, which is why I said that in a few months you can have someone up to the task. Admittedly I do not know how difficult it is working with wood as you’re talking about, with wood I know just enough to accommodate other stuff like locksmithing, because in Europe we do not build stuff like this. But I’ve heard similar things about working with metal and working with this and that, it was all bullshit, I learned in a short period. I’ve learned things just by listening to the manufacturer giving an overall explanation.
And while I have a measured IQ that is high enough to be in the 0.001% or something like that, still, I do not believe that building something from scratch with lumber is nearly as difficult as you’re making it up to be that even someone with 110 to 120 IQ would be completely stumped for years. In my opinion, you are simply accustomed to work only with grunts who barely reach a 100 or something, because America is the land of credentialism, so the potential capable people all go to college to ruin their lives with bullshit.
I’m quite certain any man with 120 can learn any trade in a short time up to commercial standards, very certain. And going by the IQ distribution among men, there’s nearly as many of those as practically average IQ men.
I’m sure you’re a very capable professional and I do not intend to question your skills, but I definitely think you’re inflating your ego a bit here. Remember, we are talking about average construction work, do not try to blow smoke up my ass telling me this fucking McDonalds land is so amazing everything everywhere is built with giga expensive several thousand dollars wood work. The average wood Amish house and foundation project I’ve seen takes a few weeks to learn, a few months to master, all of this being conservative, I’m very, very certain of it.
For the rarest of cases, you just apply similar skills, go slower and consult your mentor when needed, it’s not a problem.
To give you an idea of what I’m referring to, the typical home I build for is in the 2-10 million dollar range. A kitchen remodel can be 250,000 dollars easily. Usually we build out the whole home top to bottom. Any finished wood product that takes a stain or paint.
Anyone can engineer a jig to hit a billiards ball with a cue stick so the ball hits a target. Not everyone can play billiards well, and the best players play 8+ hours every single day and have for many years.
That is how you become a good woodworker. It’s not an engineering problem is an execution problem. One wrong cut and you can waste thousands in material and days worth of work. One wrong set up of a machine and you can make a 10,000$ mistake flushing a week of work away in an hour.
Not to mention most of the machines can severely injure you or even kill you, or someone you are working with. Even smart guys do not want to be responsible for setting up a machine that can send a bit or blade through you until they have months and years of experience on lesser machines.
Saying one could learn it online or in a short period of time is not really taking the problem seriously. It is far less an engineering problem and far more about muscle memory and coordination. I barely have to think about how I do something it is almost always a process of feeling things out and building from intuition and experience. Maybe you are Superman but I have yet to meet anyone with respectable skills in this business that did not learn the same way as everyone else.
Dutch construction speed is mind blowing.
Skills learned through apprenticeship are NOT similar to knowledge like rocket science
Elon musk would most certainly NOT be zooming through his carpenter apprenticeship the way he zoomed through rockets.
Musk works with his brain- hands on jobs like carpentry are much more about your hands, finesse, and knowing little things that you don’t find in books and you can’t deduce.
Saying musk would learn to be a top carpenter in a few months is no different from saying bill gates could learn to be a top golf player in a few months. Not gonna happen.
I say this from personal experience- moved from a highly cognitive field to a highly hands on field. I zoomed through the cognitive field very easily, but the hands on field was an entirely different ball game.
Increasingly postgraduate academic degrees will earn you the smell of an oil rag.
There are many different kinds of construction jobs. Big difference between union iron workers and illegals hanging sheet rock on same job site.
My field is in the architecture/engineering/construction sector but in universities this is still heavily feminized and infiltrated with social science, etc.
This explains why I spent Covid years making peanuts, carrying buckets of gravel and concrete with illegals after post graduate degrees, which I obtained instead of traditional trade apprenticeship due to blue-pilled up bringing. My resume got me interviews with all the big corporate consulting firms in blue megalopolis but I was a white man during the Covid racial reckoning.
So I took makework gov job in redstate deep in backwoods when it came up.
Water under the bridge, I have kids to raise and feed and house now.
Working with gov on water infrastructure would be on-site management, about 100k starting but this doesn’t go far in blue megalopolis, but maybe outer boroughs still OK? Job sites are all in outer boroughs so we could live there and not need to commute. Regional proximity to grandparents and extended family some of whom are less blue pulled than immediate family (cops, blue collar white ethnics, anti communist Asians etc)
Or move away from family. Still plenty of libtards in university but region is as red as they come in the USA. Kids more deracinated but probably better environment all around.
Anyone else raising daughters in cathedral?
How to raise
>Unfortunately at 40 with kids I feel I don’t have options outside cathedral (in before “learn to code and move to el salvadorâ€).
That’s a odd thing to say here…
Lol, I appreciated his honesty.
I’m the only one that proffered advice, and TBH I was hoping you’d weigh in among others. If you don’t want to do that, can you critique what I said?
Your advice was solid. Sometimes we don’t reply to a comment around here because it’s right and there’s nothing to add.
Thanks for that.
But I meant your advice to him. It’s an interesting predicament, I’d be torn too. I would love to get into the white collar side of construction, in fact have been trying for months, but without verifiable experience, the only ones willing to take the chance are not salaried, they are job by job, and I can’t onboard that risk ATM. But I also can’t spare the year and change I need to get hands on experience because the pay is too low for the standard of living I have established. It’s a pickle, but I’ll figure something out.
And I would give up a whole lot to get into academia… except fucking no, not in a million years am I going to spend 5 minutes on even thinking about the miles of emasculating, dehumanizing bullshit I’d have to endure just to be a part time adjunct. But, if someone could wave a magic red tape wand, and I could get a rathole office and a steady job teaching undergraduate history and/or PoliSci, I’d jump at that.
I’m not complaining. God, Jim & Frens guidance, and a fair bit of luck have landed me in a tenable position, and I am getting prepared to make moves. But Cascadia’s situation seems like a pretty tough “would you rather.”
I keep trying to figure out a clever way to ask if you are playing on Elon’s Playground or just watching from the bleachers.
It’s hard to get into the private sector white collar side of construction off the street. I got in the IT stuff by my last name. A guy I know in architecture blue printing works directly for his father at his grandfather’s company. Yeah, they do hire outside of family, but it’s along the lines of “I know a guy who knows a guy.” Best bet would be making friends with guys in the industry. They do drink a lot with all that entails. Would not recommend it for you liver or marriage though.
Easiest option to get foot in the door with no connections, family or otherwise, is federal government work via USAJobs. Holy as holy is, mostly cares about degree for entry level. Probably would get you in at GS-07 with BS or 09 with MS. Again, would not recommend this rout. Typically involves lots of mandatory travel, often to shit hole places. Very hard on young families. Still hard on more established families. Alcohol abuse among those guys is rampant when away from family.
Getting into construction entry level is a young man’s game where the liver still has good function, there’s no family to worry about, and there is still youth i.e. time to screw up and learn.
>if someone could wave a magic red tape wand, and I could get a rathole office and a steady job teaching undergraduate history and/or PoliSci, I’d jump at that.
My personal advice to you though… get some analyst job at state department (or the other alphabet agencies) and ride out the decline, or if things get bad ride the tiger. Maybe even shoot for US Foreign Service Officer. Embassy life can be pretty comfortable and you’ll potentially have a convenient exit strategy if things get really bad being overseas (with family) and all that.
For reasons stated a while back, I can’t do anything posted to USAJobs. Flee too close to the sun.
This is exactly what I did. Carried concrete with illegals for a year and a half, running my own jobs and also deadend grunt work at “construction startups.†Then went on usajobs and got a white collar makework job in a backwoods location. If you have a degree and are willing to move to a backwoods location they will hire you. But you may have to live out of your pickup. Hard to do with a wife and kids.
Proximity to blue-pilled grandparents is a bug not a feature. Avoid. Unless possibly you’re factoring in inheritance for your daughters’ sake, but even then, consider whether blue-pilled boomers intend to pass it down, or just spend it.
Jim,
I have a 15 years younger GF now and I am not doing all these complicated mindfuck games.
I am just doing physical overpowering.
I grab her hair and drag her around. I grab her throat and then give her a light, only humiliating slap on the face.
I do not kiss her – I bite her lips.
I grab her hair, force her head back and give her this bite on the lips.
She melts into a fucking puddle.
Seriously this simple thing works for me. No complex mind games. Just PHYSICAL dominance.
To the music of PSY: “we’ll do it caveman style” :))))
(Also she is a Czech woman – maybe you cannot do this to an Anglo woman, maybe she would SWAT you… I dunno! All I know is that with this particular woman PHYSICAL overpowering turns her into a puddle of lust – works for me!)
Physical dominance becomes very important once you have a woman.
I’ve been wondering about the whole not saying I love you thing. it seems definitely true for some women but some women love being treated like a princess. I’m thinking maybe the physical side of things overrides the verbal shit test tick and let’s you not be an asshole? not enough experience but in my own life it seems like some women are ok with a bit of reverence as long as their sure it’s kindness and not you being a pussy. Absolutely doesn’t work with sluts tho lol. maybe there is a degree of hedonic adjustment to whether they need an iron verbal frame or don’t really care. if I spoke to men like most women want to be spoken to I’d feel absolutely horrible. wild that men and women are so unable to comprehend one another instinctually.
Treat them mean to keep them keen.
Yes, sure. But a shit test will be incoming to make sure that it is not you being a pussy. A woman wants to be loved. And she wants to be with someone who loves her. But she does not want to be with someone who is hard up for pussy.
If she can make you say “I love you” on command, you are hard up for pussy. The trouble is, the signals that show a woman you love her are difficult to distinguish from the signals that show you are hard up for pussy.
… and a light, just humiliating, not painful slap in the face – while the other hand grabs the hair or throat – passes a lot of shit tests. No complicated mental gymnastics needed.
I tell her I like you a lot. Again it is not a mental game. Just truth. I like her, I do not love her.
” it seems definitely true for some women but some women love being treated like a princess.”
But they don’t like guys who treat them like princesses and during sex they want to be slapped and choked and verbally degraded. Treating a girl like a princess is going to get you in the most toxic kind of friend zone you can imagine with no means of escape that isn’t likely to end up with you doing 20 years to life.
Women used to like flattery according to my father but American women are so toxically hypergamous and generally taught to hate men that they assume guys who are flattering them are desperate for pussy… with the exception of whores. Whores still genuinely like flattery (and it can be very crude sexually forward vulgar flattery in fact they LOVE that… they probably love the most you alternating between traditional normie courtship sweet flattery and very vulgar flattery) and in any sort of environment without set prices it tends to get you a much better price and more eager service. Once you’re fucking them they still want the choking and degradation though (except they are more likely to inform you of this explicitly).
Bolsonaro and crew raided and/or arrested over allegedly falsified vaccination records. Apparently the Covid is holier than election protest.
After several failed assassination attempts on Putin, Dmitry Medvedev is calling for the elimination of Zelensky and his clique. The Russians are finally getting serious. It took 433 days.
Davis Hanson points out that Tucker Carlson is an American aristocrat that became a populist. This is the elite defection Yarvin wanted to influence.
https://youtu.be/2SiaaCznZKE?t=170
The age of warrior-rulers is coming back. The age of warrior techies draws closer.
> The Russians are finally getting serious. It took 433 days.
They’re talking big talk right now. Lets see if they’re finally willing to grasp the nettle.
I was just going to say this. I am no longer impressed by the claims, statements, and warnings from the Kremlin. They got shit tested by their slut Kiev and, after 8 years, bitch slapped her, but she then threw a massive shit test, and Moscow has thus far failed to match and exceed. This was an unseasonable winter, I grant that, and they need to keep stocks and systems if the balloon goes up in Poland/Belarus, they will need to effectively double their war efforts, but I cannot get my head around things like the grain corridor, no spetznas assassination teams making Ukrainian elites bleed in Europe, no massive airstrikes on AFU depots or command positions.
I support Russia, I think Putin is actually a true and honest nationalist, and a man with God’s mandate to lead his people, and I think they have done well with a bad situation (2008-2022), but they are letting this go on too long *UNLESS* they are literally planning something in Europe and they are *STRATEGICALLY* bleeding resources, support, spear tippers from the West.
Putin wanted a quick war that did not result in significant expenditure of resources, but the enemy gets a say. The west wanted an endless war to exhaust Russia logistically, as Reagan exhausted the Soviet Union. The west got its way.
And then discovered that this America is not Reagan’s America, and Russia is not the Soviet Union.
There is a sudden realization that many of our weapons platforms are very old, and do not actually work any more, and the new ones roll off the assembly line not working from the beginning.
The Ukrainians are making a push to roll back the Russians in the south from the south west, and a push in the south east to cut off the Russians in the southwest. The Greatest Ukrainian counter offensive will probably rush into whichever push looks promising. The new western wonder tanks are finally showing up, no word yet on whether they have much effect.
This has turned into a war to exhaust one side or the other’s resources. This was not what Putin intended. It is what the west has intended since Obama was elected. Can’t blame Putin for that. He is playing the cards he was dealt.
Carlson is not elite. I think in the old UR classification he would be Optimate, not a Brahmin. He belongs to the dispossessed former elite class, so it’s not very remarkable that he’s become a populist.
>dispossessed elite
>not an elite
wat means?
Carlson is an elite, he’s in that vanishingly small segment of the elite that’s not on board with the Cathedral and hasn’t been since late Bush/early Obama. Look at how he defended his tribemate (Hunter Biden), consider his private opinions on Trump, and look into his home and lifestyle. I admit I may be muddling Yarvin’s class system, but Tucker is absolutely a Brahmin from where I am sitting.
https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2007/05/castes-of-united-states/
On second thought, you’re right. I assumed Tucker’s family was bourgeois rich WASP (despite the Swedish name) but apparently not.
> He is the elder son of artist and San Francisco native Lisa McNear[46] (née Lombardi) (1945–2011) and Dick Carlson (1941–), a former “gonzo reporter”[2][47][48] who became the director of Voice of America, president of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and U.S. ambassador to the Seychelles,[49] and more recently a director at the lobbying firm Policy Impact Strategic Communications.[50]
His father’s early life is interesting:
> [Dick] Carlson was born the son of college student Richard Boynton and Dorothy Anderson, 18 and 15 years old, respectively.[3] He was born with rickets and mildly bent legs, as Anderson had starved herself to keep the pregnancy a secret. In 1943, Richard Boynton attempted to persuade Dorothy to accompany him in stealing their baby and get married; when she refused on the grounds that she was a junior in high school and nobody but her parents knew about the baby, he shot and killed himself two blocks from her house.[4]
… I didn’t know any of that, but it definitely strengthens my case. he’s basically the archetype of the current elite: artistic inclination, plenty of money, active in the Voice/Brain of the Cathedral, and sordid and unsightly history.
I don’t know about sordid, seems kinda tragic. no spirit cooking vibes from Tucker. he’s definitely smarter then he pretends tho. I’d love to know what really went down with the fox split but I doubt very much we ever will.
I think Mark Dice got it pretty close, allegedly Tucker made Murdoch uncomfortable with God and good/evil talk.
Many of those in these spheres know, intellectually, that the contemporarily regnant underlord class coordinates through daemon worship. They know, intellectually, that the reason kept cuckservative outlets like Fox News are allowed a platform to address the cattle is because they perform the service of capturing and neutering any genuine opposition to the underlordship’s faith.
Yet even still, one is struck all the same when you find yourself faced with The Thing Itself.
https://twitter.com/perenniallybore/status/1651371325934686208
Excerpt from Tucker’s speech on the metaphysical results of telling the truth.
https://www.youtube.com/live/ebG2POkoHgU?feature=share&t=436
I knew he was an elite simply by his ability to persuade others by making things people already felt allowed to say.
A powerful priest who’s pretty close to joining our side. No way they can let him live.
A plan is afoot to have him host the Republican debate.
If it happens, the debate is going to give our elites heart failure.
It’s happening. Jim and Aidan’s predictions about the emerging age of warrior techies is coming closer, https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/vladimir-putin-assassination-destroy-kyiv-russian-parliament-speakers-call-for-action-after-putin-attack-101683122745574.html
In war, the leaders are no longer safer than the grunts on the frontlines. This means that the leader of a country must necessarily be ready to die, must be a warrior. The age of pure-priests running countries is coming to an end. This should effectively end democracy. Hurrah!
Very tellingly, Note the denials from the Ukrainians. Zelensky is terrified that he could be a target.
Very tellingly, there was another article that where the Russian parliament debated a drone strike to assassinate Zelensky which I can longer find. The Brahmin elite are so terrified of being as vulnerable as the frontline grunts are that they don’t even want to acknowledge someone else talking about it.
This isnt new Pax Atomica exists for a reason, people just got to comfortable with the post cold war status.
The problem is going to be that in case of a direct war the need to mass conscript university students and graduates after a year or two to be used as simple infantry grunts. It is going to be a nightmare, i bet the useful ones will be the first to be sacrificed.
The first to die will be the same retards that happily took the clot shot. Lefties always kill their own minions and allies first, they are the weakest and smell their blood.
They are scared of us, because when they come looking for us they might actually find the end of a barrel, they are however happy to loot and murder their own, who piously kneel to them. Good example of this is BLM, looting and burning blue areas but never daring to actually go into red territory.
[*deleted for presupposing that BLM is a real movement rather than astroturf*]
The reason BLM did not burn Harvard is that Harvard is directing it, not lack of spontaneous grass roots support in the Harvard vicinity. It has no spontaneous grass roots support anywhere.
Those strategically parked pallets of bricks on the streets during the BLM riots. So obvious. So brazen. So obviously planned and premeditated.
These weird ass sunglasses I found.
I’ll never be the same again.
I accidentally drove into a BLM riot during this time. A guy with an AR directed another man on a motorcycle to safely guide me out of it. These guys were clearly running the show “spontaneously”. While I was in the storm I watched a cop pull a police car into the road I was being directed off of, park it, and casually walk away. The rioters then set it on fire. So spontaneous.
Sending apprentice priests to the front lines is a silver lining not a problem.
It is actually a pretty shitty situation to be in. First because they arent going to be the first to be send and second if you have a problem with your priests it is advisable to be you to resolve the problem and not your enemy.
nice post, I’ve always wondered what happened that generals stopped fighting in the front, I can see how when wars were about dynastic familial property you were fucked if you lost anyway so might as well give the boost to the men leading from the front, institutional officers expecting a pension win or lose just don’t have the same damned if you do damned if you don’t fuck it attitude. luckily the left is killing that cautious mentality real quick with total religious war yesterday convictions. it will be nice to have some great men to tell the priests to fuck off and stop screwing the little guy, to bad Eisenhower didn’t have the balls to nip the leftward march off. generals getting orders from committee has been a right wing disaster. Thanks for the post you answered a lot of questions about how feudalism worked for me.
Newspapers usually twist and inflate news, so this should be taken with a grain of salt, but according to the NY post’s article below, the Navy has used trannies at least once to reach new possible recruits. Because they believe trannies to be popular with zoomers. If this piece of news is true it reveals that they have drunk their own koolaid and can’t even see the whole tranny acceptance is astroturfed. Which makes wonder how many similar narrative delusions they hold.
https://nypost.com/2023/05/03/us-navy-appointed-active-duty-drag-queen-as-ambassador/
Young man, there’s no need to feel down.
I said, young man, pick yourself off the ground.
I said, young man, ’cause you’re in a new town
There’s no need to be unhappy.
Young man, there’s a place you can go.
I said, young man, when you’re short on your dough.
You can stay there, and I’m sure you will find
Many ways to have a good time.
Anyone remember when ‘Mad Dog’ Mattis stood up against Trump for transsexuals in the armed forces? That was a revelatory moment of sorts. What a lol disappointment that little guy was.
PS. Salute the new ambassador, named Harpy Daniels (lol), and good luck with the rebuild. It may take a few years, perhaps decades, but stay the course!
I used to idolize Mattis, and now I despise him. He was supposed to be the best of us; the ideal marine, as Chesty Puller was to earlier generations. Then he betrayed us and made a deal with the devil. I hope he gets to watch it all crumble and know that everything he sold his soul to obtain could not out last him.
Any idea why he sold out?
He is a progressive faggot. He stood up for trannies against Trump, he pushed women in combat arms, and he lied to Trump about having men in Syria. He also was part of the Theranos debacle. He is a true believer, and for that I hope he survives America getting crushed by Russia and China so that he can see everything he worked for crumble around him.
> Any idea why he sold out?
Implies he doesn’t really believe in progressivism and was motivated by money to shill for it. Wrong premise as I will show; therefore, it’s the wrong question.
> He is a progressive faggot.
Yes, we know he’s a progressive faggot, but the question is why. On this I think his own words on his faith sheds significant light on this. His words on Iraqis during the war in 2003.
Throwing rocks at armed men is an act to contested space. Essentially an act of war. These are not “protestors.” His spiritual leader is telling him to met an act of war with logistically supporting the enemy. Is it any wonder then that the Iraqis, feeling safe to throw rocks, would escalate to shooting and bombing? Mattis could not see them as the enemy because his faith would not allow him to see them as the enemy.
During the George Floyd “fiery but mostly peaceful protests,” Mattis was reportedly “sickened†by the photo op at the church. He said:
But those civilians were, much like the Iraqi “protestors” in 2003, throwing rocks, lighting federal buildings on fire, attacking police. They were contesting space against the government. An act of war. They were insurrectionists. Mattis was weak on the rioters because he was weak on the Iraqis. Ultimately because his faith prevented him from seeing the enemy as the enemy. That prevents the use of force.
The problem with Mattis wasn’t that he “sold out” to progressive values, but that he was spiritually compromised from the very beginning by his own Chaplain. A Chaplain that belongs to a church that has been spiritually compromised since Vatican 2. This problem isn’t limited to Mattis or his Chaplain. Most military Chaplains are spiritually compromised and most men who attend religious services become the same.
Mattis, like all McChristains are just progressives who think God’s a progressive.
>He is a true believer, and for that I hope he survives America getting crushed by Russia and China so that he can see everything he worked for crumble around him.
He’ll just blame those reactionaries for wreaking everything. One thing I’ve found with consistently true about McChristains is they’re holier than thou and nothing is ever their fault.
I knew that already, but Wulfgar seemed to imply he cut a deal for switching his loyalty. The moment he gutted the Marine’s for doing the most scientific and complete study of woman’s combat abilities I knew that he was fanatical leftist true believer.
I did not mean to imply that he literally switched sides. He was always a progressive, it would appear. He sold his soul to the devil for his progressive ideals, and that happened long before fags, women, and trannies were stuffed into the military. I hold the same view of Mattis that Pax does.
He was supposed to be the ideal military man, and he betrayed that. He sacrificed military readiness and the lives of good men on a futile, pointless conflict and on depraved progressive causes in direct contravention of his superior. He betrayed everyone above him and below him because he lacked the moral courage to stand up, do the right thing, and make the hard choices. The only reason I would piss on him if I found him burning up would be to prolong his suffering.
Selling one’s soul implies betrayal, which is why I asked. I can see where you’re coming from and I share your sentiments about the man.
Budlight’s sales are down 20% and the momentum against it seems to be growing. No one likes this garbage.
Nobody was ever going to like trannies, it was another extreme demon worship loyalty test for progs/shitlibs because the instinct with tr00ns is to kill them with fire.
I’ve been in the odd situation of having to tell hard working manual labor type men in their 30s that their ever growing beer gut is from drinking estrogen filled beer like budlight. Anything with hops is going to make you a fat bastard. They’re shocked to learn that.
Twitter is getting more and more right:
https://twitter.com/DanDavisWrites/status/1653760966381772807?cxt=HHwWjoC9ici1q_MtAAAA
https://archive.is/wip/T7H7V
Tomassi sure turned into one purple pilled faggot.
I don’t know if this is real or not:
https://t.me/European_Insider/3429
Prigozihn has enough footage out there to do a pretty good analysis of his mannerisms, so if it’s forced. My gut says this is real, that he forced the camera op into it. there’s none of the flair or refinement that is characteristic of Orchestral Propaganda.
I think it’s a powerful message. I don’t think there’s a single USM officer with the gumption to do anything remotely similar. But a still, small voice in my head said quietly “this is weakness.” I hated that voice for saying it, because he’s just trying to get what he needs to do what he must.
Thoughts?
Real, terribly real.
But ammo shortage is relative. Everyone is hurting badly, but Ukrainians are hurting worse. War of attrition, and what is being attrited is both men and shells – but the shortage of shells is hurting worse, hurting both sides rather badly, but Nato is shortest.
Nato’s shortage is a lack of stocks and production facilities. Is Russia’s shortage also a lack of stocks and production facilities or merely a logistic problem of timely bringing shells that are stored somewhere to the place where they are needed?
Take this as you will, but it does not seem things are as tilted in Russia’s favor neither in morale nor materiel (below quotes from Dmitry Rogozin, chief of Roscosmos)
“For now, there is a clear disparity in the forces and conventional weapons in favour of the enemy.â€
This was due to the West’s supplies to Ukraine, he made clear.
“Therefore the best method to destroy [Ukraine’s] counter-offensive is to use tactical nuclear weapons, with understandable consequences, of course.
“I think there is no other option at the moment.
(source: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/vladimir-putin-now-no-option-29896415)
I see a lot of evidence to the contrary, notably that the Russians are expending a whole lot more shells than Ukrainians, and a whole lot more of what they are calling guided bombs, but are actually air launched drones, a lot more missiles, and a roughly comparable number of ground launched drones.
This matter will be rendered clearer by The Greatest Ukrainian Offensive, which is strangely slow in getting off the ground.
The Ukrainians are currently making probing attacks that look like prep for this offensive. They have failed in one probe, succeeded in two.
Given the insane Hitlerian no surrender no retreat attack attack attack policy of Zelensky and his masters in DC this would be a good way to convince the leadership to throw their newly conscripted “offensive” divisions into Bakhmut… I mean what place in the line is better to attack than where everyone is exhausted and out of ammunition…
But if as Jim suspects they are not out of ammunition and the artillery is still concentratexmd around the ruins of Bakhmut the attacking forces would be attacking something like Sulva Bay… it’d be a death trap.
The fundamental difference, as I see it, is that Russia has been forced to replenish its stocks via clandestine channels (Iran, China, etc) which probably a) slows the stream of arms considerably and b) raises many questions as to how much of a military-industrial juggernaut Russia actually is seeing as they need to resort to these channels in the first place.
Has it? My understanding is that Russia imported Iranian tech for its drones, which are knockoffs of Iranian models, rather than the drones themselves. I have not heard that the shells were coming from China until you made this assertion. On what is it based?
They are certainly importing Chinese machinery to make stuff, but are they importing shells?
I’m not an SME, but it’s not as simple as need bullet>make bullet>ship bullet>shoot bullet. There is a whole methodology to stockpiling ordinance, so production runs get apportioned based on a body of factors and variables. To avoid a general reduction in overall stocks, it can be cheaper/faster/easier/smarter to purchase stocks from someone else so you keep your overall stocks above some kind of threshold. Obviously, for smarter ordinance, might not be an option, and having an inventory that’s *only* “smart” can make options limited.
I’m not about to start trusting western MSM, but the things I’ve read have asserted that the RF has been purchasing from former/current clients, getting stuff back, to include China, NKorea, Iran, etc. but the veracity of such is questionable. Ukraine leaned heavy into India in an attempt to replenish S300 and other RF produced ordinance because they’ve already used up what’s on their side of the GAE dildo curtain.
@Asher
Dmitry Rogozin doesn’t know what he is talking about.
He’s the reason that Russia has no equivalent of a Falcon 9 or Starship in development, in contrast to that of China.
The part of your brainstem that has evolved to sense the winds of power, and to align itself whichever way the wind blows, is highly responsive to open expressions of vulnerability, whatever the circumstances may be.
In certain ways it really is weakness; the NATO Occupied Government has recently been concentrating even more of its shell supply in the Bakhmut AOO, along with several of its more ‘ideologically reliable’ enforcer units, but the supply of shells to Wagner that was customary heretofore has not increased stepwise with this operational intensification by the puppets; a classic bureaucratic failure that perennially dogs organizations on the wrong end of operational tempo.
Prigozhin is of course a consummate dramatist, and there are some who say Putin gives him slack as a deniable means of lighting fires under the asses of other MoD figures.
https://roloslavskiy.substack.com/p/how-can-you-spin-this-5d-bloggers
https://roloslavskiy.substack.com/p/strelkov-provides-reassuring-analysis
https://roloslavskiy.substack.com/p/wagners-prigozhin-issues-most-dire
Seems more like corrupt Kremlin elites looking to surrender, but can’t because NATO goes for kill.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/640459736919048202/1104010514897575936/image.png
Jim sir, could you please say Nigger?
Nigger
Thank you sir.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FvP1bHAXoAAvKgE.jpg
If wife files false rape case on husband & husband kills.
Do you support husband?
Duh!
Of course.
I support the husband killing his wife over just calling the cops.
Fuck I love this blog.
jim, I humbly ask you to consider the +NIGGER license, mentioned on this blog previously, to complement your CoC. It would make the bulk of the enemy seeth so much as to not even be able to continue looking at any other part of the project: https://plusnigger.org/
It’s hilarious, and the rising tide of AI doomerism may make this license more than just a redpilled curio, but I honestly thought it was more politico-artistic than functional. Is there any way to see what software has the +nigger license?
Not functional in what way? You mean because it won’t be enforced in a court? Probably correct on that one — please take a moment to imagine that wonderful court case — but it doesn’t matter. The point is to make true believers and adjacent seeth so hard as to not be able to function properly near your code, as anything touched by “that big, beautiful word” is clearly thoughtcrime and dangerous to them. It’s an unmixing tool, a good test of conscience, and something like it is going to be necessary as supply chain attacks eventually ramp up. Just like the jimCoC, the biggest difference is the succinctness of the expression.
Nigger is a wretched word to describe a wretched people. I do not care for it, and on a spiritual level disagree with debasing any license with it’s inclusion.
On the purely tactical level, meh.
Putin has wanted to negotiate with the GAE to have a place for Russia at the GAE table for decades.
We are in the curious position however, where the greatest impetus behind the possibility of Russia claiming victory over the GAE is the GAE itself.
The GAE elites who are negotiating with Russian elites to keep gas flowing behind the backdoor are themselves on the way out and increasingly side-lined by their more unholy contemporaries. The world is full of grifters who would be perfectly willing to sell-out to true believers for a yacht; but the contemporary class of true believers in the whig imperium won’t even give them the yacht. The derangement of Foggy Bottom Swamp Creatures and their progeny around the world offers no footstools for others to step off their horses, only life or death.
Joining the GAE used to come with a lot of benefits, but its present-day elite loves gay sex and genital mutilation, and expects the rest of the world to gratefully accept these beautiful gifts.
Wow so.. Prigozhin repeated all the memes that westerners say about Russians.. no support.. zerg rushing the enemy… not enough ammo.. Russia treats its soldiers like crap…
And you believed it?
Is it your first day on planet earth?
Maybe they actually have plenty of shells and they just want to bait NATO into a rushed offensive into Artemovsk.
The military summary channel claims that all roads in Bakhmut are now cut. On the other hand, the mud is now comparatively dry, meaning that vehicles with reasonable off road capability can go in and out.
Some whitepill on the state of AI models:
https://www.semianalysis.com/p/google-we-have-no-moat-and-neither
tl;dr smaller models are already out in the wild, getting great performance, and the big companies probably won’t be able to compete
A very big whitepill.
“Vicuna: An Open-Source Chatbot Impressing GPT-4 with 90%* ChatGPT Quality”
Vicuna still needs to be trained on the cloud with big hardware, cannot achieve useful results on consumer hardware, but achieved near ChatGPT quality with a much smaller amount of training text, and only cost $300 or so to train.
It still has the universal limitation of current models, that it does not train in an individual conversation, so it will gradually become apparent in the course of a lengthy conversation that no one is there. But now it is feasible to produce a based ChatGPT.
https://twitter.com/nrken19/status/1653051869281886208
https://twitter.com/nodonss/status/1653073024625651713
https://twitter.com/Ostokhoni/status/1653194764165210115?s=20
https://twitter.com/Ostokhoni/status/1653481599202385920?s=20
ਅਕਾਲ
Interesting thread regarding the ‘Scots-Irish’ hypothesis.
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2022/04/07/western-hunter-gatherer-facial-reconstructions-and-media-manipulation-short-post/
https://twitter.com/arya_amsha/status/1593974793866706945
https://twitter.com/arya_amsha/status/1593976448913928192
https://twitter.com/nrken19/status/1593982363754708992?s=20
Eh, it’s mostly Olive – Light brown ie Greeks – Punjabi tone.
Men tend to be darker..
I never mentioned your skin color.
I mentioned the Sikh inability to drink milk, which was the primary food of the steppe peoples.
“the cultures with the most individuals with [the lactose tolerance mutation] were the Yamnaya and their descendents.”
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/640459736919048202/1105845639826374737/image.png
Yes, of course bro.
You’re so smart
Looking at familytreedna it seems like some Sikhs do have Y-dna haplogroup R1, so some of them are at least a little bit Aryan.
Maybe our friend should take a DNA test. Would be more reliable than assuming he is descended from some ancient badasses just because they may have had the same skin color as him.
This tells me there really is a God of Nature, and he has a sense of humor!
There really is a place called Dildo, Newfoundland, Canada!!!
https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/giant-phallus-shaped-iceberg-floating-in-conception-bay-surprises-residents-of-dildo-canada
Looks like Russia just incendiary firebombed the remaining Ukrainian occupied regions of Bakhmut.
https://twitter.com/HawkinsAlaric/status/1654705562616233985
NASA FIRMS data
https://twitter.com/bradyafr/status/1654561546515763208
This may be the Soviet Army reacting to Prigozhin’s complaint. I earlier saw Bakhmut at night as seen through what appears to be a drone’s targeting system. It is getting pounded with incendiaries. Looks like an attempt to trigger a firestorm.
https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/map/#d:24hrs;@38.0,48.6,13z
https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1663/90/1663909616125476.web
Something incongruous that’s been on my mind lately is Macron moving to lick chinese cock. Maccy is a serious pathic, clearly a member of the worst elements of the satanic faith if you look at his sexual preferences and other decisions. So what is this move signifying? It’s quite easy to make doomer schizo connections here. ‘Well china is obviously part of the jesuit structure as covid and digital bugpodlife ground zero, so this is just them explicitly exporting that model.’ The counterargument is, somehow the slavic civil war does not seem like a forever war, and despite the common paranoia from slavs the RF doesn’t seem like a globohomo outpost. Russia is receiving quite some needed economic support, for a cost, so chyna probably is not completely in on exporting their model except as borg conquering integrators themselves. A sinic world order, different from a troidic world order.
Anyone have insight here?
You are not the only one mystified. Some elements of Globohomo are confused, and a lot of them are strangely ignoring it. Possibly all of them are confused.
Remember we are not ruled by a single unitary conspiracy, but by several of them struggling for power.
Official explanation is that honey attracts more flies than vinegar. Macron hopes to sweet talk Xi into a more globohomo favorable peace plan, and Xi hopes to sweet talk Macron into a multipolar world. Could be true. Macron may be preparing an exit strategy for the case that Global American Empire has its Afghanistan in the Ukraine.
Meditating on how far we have fallen while watching the coronation of Charles III. How far the words and symbols from what is being acted out. May this be the nadir! May we rise again! Long may he reign.
The novel Anna Karenina is chock full of red pill goodies. Written in the latter half of the nineteenth century we have Anna, who is in a patriarchal marriage with her hubs Alexei. She was kept in and married off to this statesman, an older guy, yet something was “wrong” with their marriage. Per Anna her hubs is completely physically repulsive due to his “big ears” and his “clammy hands” but we can see in the novel he is a weak man with no control over his wife.
Anna herself is a source of lust for the men in the novel, as we find out partway through, as she has gigantic titties. I refer to this novel to my wife as Anna’s rocking tits. Men can’t stop staring at her heaving bosom. In comes Vronsky, introduced as he is courting a young teenage virgin Kitty. Kitty is also kept in. Vronsky is described as having outcome independence, he just hangs out with Kitty, chaperoned of course, while also hanging out with lots of other eligible young teenage virgins. He’s got preselection. Kitty falls in love with Vronsky quickly, because he has “large calves”. Blue pillers take note, women, apparently, fall instantly and madly in love with men with large calves.
Vronsky, however, has no interest in being tied down in marriage so after Kitty falls madly in love with him he just wanders off. Meanwhile Kitty has a serious suitor, Konstantin, a beta male with no preselection so he is very yucky to Kitty. He wants to marry her while Vronsky just wants to hang out and not commit. To Kitty Konstantin is invisible. Kitty shares her lust for Vronsky with Anna.
Vronsky goes to a horse race and all the ladies attend. During the race Vronsky’s horse collapses and breaks it’s leg. Vronsky, enraged, shoots the horse and stomps off. Anna of the heaving bosom now feels she must meet him and be alone with him for no reason at all except his “large calves” and his “olive oil smile”, whatever the heck that means.
Anna is able to successfully arrange to be alone with Vronsky and somehow his dick ends up in her, over and over and over, and over and over, as she craftily finds ways to be alone with him. Her husband, the bad beta male who in modern times would now be destroyed by the court system, finds out cause Anna gets pregnant. The entire community now must completely shun Anna. Note, they do not shun Vronsky, but to their upper class community, Anna no longer exist. This makes Anna go crazy.
Meanwhile Kitty’s serious suitor Konstantin has a conversation with someone about how nobody knows or understands why women have no rights and are kept in. It just seems outdated and not with the times of progress. Chesterton’s fence is invoked, as they muse that their must be some reason their ancestors set up society so that women were kept property. But times, they are a changing.
Now Anna’s husband, the cuck Alexei, considers that he might challenge Vronsky to a duel. He doesn’t want to though cause he scared and Vronsky is a bad ass. Duels are old news though and out of favor so nobody expects him to but that part of their culture still lingers and he feels like a coward for not doing so. He decides to do nothing but to take care of their two children, which Anna is now forbidden from seeing. Anna no longer being able to see her first two children intensifies her insanity.
Anna goes on to inflict massive shit tests on Vronsky due to her shunning and being rendered basically a dead person. Vronsky is unable or unwilling to pass these shit tests. This part of the story arc ends. You can read the book to find out how.
Kitty now marries Konstantin as nobody else is courting her and she’s turned eighteen. She’s an old maid at risk of eternal spinsterhood at eighteen. She marries Konstantin who is early thirties. Konstantin then goes on to cry like a little bitch to his master Kitty begging her forgiveness cause he once fcked a hooker. Kitty pats him on the head and says she forgives him and he’s a good boy, which makes him feel ecstatic. He has received absolution from his God, women, foreshadowing the future we live in today. Guys, don’t be Konstantin.
Oh one last thing I do remember exactly where it fit in. A fallen woman, who was the latest slut Konstantin’s horrible alcoholic brother was with who took care of him as he died, dared to speak to Kitty. The fact that a fallen woman spoke to Kitty, a superior non fallen woman, so enraged Konstantin that he seriously beats her.
The book is a good view into what upper class society was like in the latter half of the nineteenth century. You can see the weakening of the patriarchy and the blue pill where men listen to what women say rather than what they do. All the men who watched Vronsky badly wished they had large calves like Vronsky, cause that’s what the sluts said out loud about why they all wanted to crawl underneath him naked. They could not remember why they had covertry, and weren’t sure they should bother to defend it. Perhaps patriarchy needed to fall so we could experience the great relearning and get our bitches back under control.
Anna Karenina, nee Anna’s Rocking Titties, 9/10 would recommend.
Before an army can prevail over any enemies, it must first be able to prevail over the environment.
Nestled amidst Prigozhin’s screed the other day, almost as an after thought, was the observation that a significant number of casualties were also actually coming from hygiene problems.
Knowing how to construct dry, useful, livable earthworks, along with bushcraft in general, is one of the most important core skills there is for an infantryman. Ability to secure a comfortable existence on campaign has a direct relationship to ability to perform in battle. Yet this is also something that almost every military formation around the world almost completely neglects – to their detriment.
It has been sometimes said that the Roman soldier was an engineer before he was a bellator. Certainly the miles’ ability to construct fortified camps on the march, prepare battlespaces, and perform other feats to overcome the enemy’s intentions (like the classic knot-cutting solution to the jews holed up in Masada), was an integral function of that force’s success over several centuries, before the traditions were progressively lost.
The Germany army of WW1 and WW2 was famous for their motto of sweat saves blood and their earthworks were always very well constructed and very hygienic. In WW2 with any new offensive Russian troops were highly motivated to take Germans fortifications because they were so much more livable than the Russian ones. It never occurred to the Russians to actually build good living quarters.
The rule of Nature is, if we’re alone together I get to have my way with you. So act accordingly.
Enforcing pseudo-courtship rituals against men in situations where courtship is well past applicable is psychotic and completely deranged. There is no reasonable way for men to balance this liability against the reproductive imperative.
Women need to be held 100% accountable for the situations they put themselves into because placing both parties’ burden on men constitutes an arbitrary and totalistic standard of guilt.
[This post is a reaction to something I saw online, not to any particular real life event]
Violating this rule literally hands unlimited power to women, who by nature are least fit to wield it. Curse satan and his every inversion.
I spit upon satan!
Does someone have any advice about how to deal with a clingy girlfriend? We are in our 20s. We have been dating for three years, we live together, and she is wife material. Nevertheless, she seems to need constant attention. It is a bit annoying, as I have things and projects I want to work on. Maybe it is age-related, and she will outgrow it in a few years. What do you guys do? What’s the Jimian take on this issue?
Why haven’t you knocked her up yet?
Partly because of economic reasons (I would like to own a home before having children, and we don’t have much money right now). Partly because she is in the young side of her 20s yet, and social pressure against getting pregnant that young.
If you’ve decided, knock her up and then show a supreme disinterest in social disapproval (whose?). These are her prime years for baby making, don’t waste them. When both of you look back on it, you’ll probably wish you had more.
100% this. Kids confer a studious desperation to accumulate, develop,and grow. She’s being clingy because you’re doing the fake&gay version of marriage (LTR), so shit or get off the pot.
Gay. Do you like pussy or not? Do you doubt your ability to earn money or not? Do you give a fuck what other (gay retards) think about the age of your woman, or not?
I know niggas making well over million dollars a year who decided they’d prefer the flexibility of an apartment for their first couple of children. It makes no difference whatsover and is a vastly less important concern than you percieve it to be.
She wants something to require her attention
Like a baby
It’s not rocket science.
>it costs too much
yes, iphones and fancy dinners are far more important than babies.
Send her my way lad.
Jim,
I guess the 16 rules can be summed up as “Play hard to get.”
Desperation/thirst is deadly. Treating a woman as “hmmm, maybe you will be up to my standards but I am not at all sure yet, PROVE YOURSELF” is mostly this.
Also… “play hard to get” is typically Woman Game. It is not a good thing that men have to resort to this. It is not really proper for a man. It is more like: desperate times, desperate measures.
(But perhaps I am playing on easy mode because I actually like fat. Yeah I know saying that is a heresy in the Manosphere. Still I like what I like. Not all kinds of fat. Most kinds of fat not. But a narrowish waist, big fat tits, big fat ass, thick thighs, I like that. Yeah it makes no sense in evo-psy. Still. I like that. I like what I like, and I do not care when other men say I should not like that.)
On the topic of low value male behavior in the mating game:
https://twitter.com/_MedGold/status/1657447051746058240?cxt=HHwWgIC9lfzTt4AuAAAA