Jim's Blog

When I was going through the xsls tables linked in Office for National Statistics:Deaths by vaccination status, England I skipped lightly over the primary table referencetable31.xlsx, because most of the data was blatant lies that someone simply made up.

Well, most of the summary data, that directly expresses the supposedly glowing health benefits of the jab is obviously pulled out of someones ass, but it was immediately obvious that it was inconsistent with much the raw data, and there is a lot of raw data on which the summary data is supposedly based, which is merely obfuscated. This collection of xlsx files is a gold mine, and I urge my readers to mine it for me. (But it still seems me that the best stuff is in the xlsx tables linked by Previous Versions of this data, which are less thoroughly cooked and less obviously fabricated from thin air.)

Well, Steve Kirsch has been mining it, and he found this little nugget.

Referencetable31.xlsx/Table9

Unvaccinated, age 10-14, 96 deaths in 2,094,711 person years
Unvaccinated, age 15-19, 160 deaths in 1,587,072 person years
boosted, age 10-14, 4 deaths in 1,678 person years.
boosted, aget 15-19, 42 deaths in 127,842 person years.

Which, if we divide deaths of all causes by person years works out as:

Seven deaths of all causes per 100,000 person years for pureblood children ages 10-19
Thirty five deaths of all causes per 100,000 person years for boosted children ages 10-19

Deaths of all causes, eh? I wonder what the cause of those additional thirty seven deaths (forty two deaths plus four deaths minus the nine deaths that would be expected had they had deaths in the same proportion as the purebloods) could have been. It is a mystery. Must have been caused by all those unvaxxed kid whose presence so enraged the Awesome and Mighty Covid Demon.

I urge my readers to mine this for me. There is a whole lot of stuff worth mining, and the gold need to be graphed, and the graphs need to be memed.

A lot of the data in table 9 is inconsistent with other data in table 9 in ways that make it look as if they ad hoc adjusted some of the bigger numbers to make the summary totals come out right, but not other numbers or were adjusting them by the seat of their pants without regard for consistency or plausibility. Some of the numbers appear to show that the jab causes a radical reduction in non covid deaths, which appears improbable, and is explicable as an effort to remove the massive increase in deaths from the summary totals, without too much concern as to whether the detail data makes sense. Hence my sarcastic remark in the previous article that Referencetable31.xlsx appears to show that the jab cures cancer. The older data looks less obviously cooked.

I would do it, but I am trying to make some small amount of progress with my blockchain project.

The jab adversely impacts the immune system, primarily, or a least the primary identifiable and understandable link, through the brain immune system connection.

The major obvious impact is that if you get China flu before you get jabbed, you become immune to all China flu variants, and stay immune for a very long time, perhaps forever.

If, however, you get jabbed, you are just as likely to get China flu as someone who has not been jabbed, though less likely to become seriously ill, and if you get it, you are not going to become immune. You are likely to get it again.

Another obvious impact indicative of immune system dysfunction is a three fold rise in cancers, recently reported at the Ron Paul hearings.

As a result, countries with a very high level of vaccination and boosting have very high levels of China flu, in particular Israel, the most jabbed and vaccinated country on the planet, has the highest level of China flu infection on the planet. The correlation is apparent world wide.

The jab does reduce the risk of dying as a result of Covid. No doubt about this. What is the risk of dying as a result of being jabbed?

The New Zealand data indicates that excess mortality within a short period of being jabbed is about one in a thousand. What is the excess mortality of being infected with Covid? It is very hard to tell – but what one can tell is that they do not want you to know, which should tell you that it is probably a lot less than one in a thousand.

More deaths recorded as with Covid, mean less deaths recorded as cancer, heart disease, and being run over by a truck. What we really want to know is deaths with Covid as compared to deaths without Covid. Which data is curiously difficult to find.

Our best way of estimating it is to look at the US social security payouts for evidence of the death rate, and correlate that with China flu levels before the jab. For the first few months, mighty high excess death rate, and then zilch. Looks like for a little while, an excess death rate far over one in a thousand, then far less than one in a thousand.

The jab, however, is creating an impressive bump in the excess death rate, which the pandemic initially did also, but soon thereafter, failed to accomplish.

We now know that the virus was a bioweapon, created in the lab for mass murder, and released to create terror, which would result in people begging the authorities to take total control of their lives. But RNA viruses are genetically unstable – once released, it is going to very rapidly evolve back to a level of harm normal for the virus’s mode of transmission, very rapidly come to resemble all the previous Covid virus outbreaks, so rapidly dropping lethality is unsurprising. It is obvious that they intended to kill tens of millions, hundreds of millions, but it fizzled.

The science to create really terrifying bioweapons is now known in principle. It has been known for some time, as the science to create nuclear weapons was known shortly before world war II. Fortunately, this time it was implemented by Shaniqua, not Oppenheimer. And even when worked on by good people, not really quite ready yet. And there is a curious inhibition about it. People are busily developing Wolbachia strains to infect mosquitoes, and if the mosquito species is causing enough harm by spreading a really deadly disease such as dengue to a whole lot of people, only then they can get permission, with great difficulty, but they always write up their plans as if they were doing the mosquitoes a favor and as if they were not doing anything to make the disease more potent and more capable of spreading, even when there is no natural Wolbachia disease among the mosquito species targeted. It looks like controls on improving diseases to harm mosquitoes are a lot stricter than controls on improving diseases to harm humans. When they measure the effectiveness of a plague, they never measure the effect on mosquito numbers or on the number of bites suffered by humans, only on the number of humans infected by mosquito carried diseases, as if a number showing harm to mosquitoes might cause them problems.

Deaths immediately after the jab are still fairly uncommon. One in a thousand is not small, but it is not large either. On the other hand permanent impairment of the immune system is likely to have serious consequences, but no immediate consequences. We would expect to see quite a lot of shingles and cancer, and I am hearing quite a lot of shingles and cancer anecdotes. Anecdotally, seems to be quite a bit of shingles and cancer, though I don’t have any good data yet.

Ron Paul hearing today reported a threefold rise in cancer cases among the US military, which sounds roughly consistent with what I am hearing anecdotally.

That hearing also reported a three fold increase in miscarriages, but what I am hearing anecdotally is not miscarriages, but loss of fertility and menstrual cycle. It also reported a ten fold increase in “neurological syndromes”, but right now what would be a lot more interesting is the absolute numbers for brain fog, rather than relative numbers for “neurological syndromes. Just how many of us are being rendered permanently stupid? The Ron Paul hearings failed to mention shingles, but what I am seeing is that the jab causes some older people to develop shingles, maybe the US military is too young for this to be all that noticeable.

Obviously the people who funded, supervised, and engaged gain of function research on the bioweapon will be breaking out the champagne on hearing about the effectiveness of the jab in causing US military casualties. Their jab is doing what their bioweapon was intended to do, and failed to do.

It is obvious that the emergency rooms and ambulances are being flooded with “mild” heart attack cases. And they genuinely are mild in that the death rate among the jabbed is only one in a thousand, while the heart attack rate is clearly considerably higher. How much higher, hard to tell, since everyone is averting their eyes from the data. Which tells you that the data is horrifying. But even a “mild” heart attack is apt to lastingly reduce your capacity to live your normal life, and in this sense, not necessarily very mild at all.

One high, and as yet unknown, risk, is that repeated boosters, and the repeated China flu infections that the boosted are apt to get, is creating cumulative damage. Well, if the original bioweapon failed to have the desired effect, maybe the boosters will. It is very possible that the endlessly boosted population is going to wind up with immune systems resembling those of the gay population. This is the basic operating principle of religions of human sacrifice. More death and suffering, more power for those imposing human sacrifice.

Supposedly Fauci was funding research in China and other places to develop a vaccine against the Sars viruses.

But, Darpa knocked back one of his front organizations because it proposed, among other things, gain of function research. But Fauci continued with that research regardless.

Gain of function research is not what you do if you are developing a vaccine against an existing disease. Gain of function research is what you do if you are developing a bioweapon, and their “vaccine” research did not look much like vaccine research, but like parallel development of a bioweapon and a vaccine against that bioweapon. They were developing a vaccine not against Sars viruses found in the wild, but against their own custom much transformed and much adapted to humans bat virus.

A virus does not particularly want to be a bioweapon. Natural selection favors the virus evolving to the appropriate harmfulness for its mode of transmission, which for viruses transmitted flu style is you sick enough to cough and sneeze and dribble snot everywhere, but healthy enough to walk around and live your normal life, while infecting other people living their normal lives. If the virus kills you, it dies too. If the virus incapacitates you, the snot does not spread far beyond your pillow.

Cholera can be cheerfully lethal, because its spores can survive outside the body a very long time. RNA viruses are fragile, so need to be spread in a more targeted fashion. If they are stuck on your pillow, they are going to die before they get to travel anywhere interesting. The basic difference is that cholera can survive soap and water, survive washing machines, can survive in dirt and on dirt, in rivers and streams, while China flu cannot.

Allegedly the virus was extremely lethal when it first appeared in China, with people dropping dead in the streets from their blood oxygen levels dropping right down without them being aware of it. I don’t know if it is true or not, but this mode of killing people has been rapidly diminishing. Maybe there was more of it when the virus first hit China. A pattern of high but rapidly diminishing lethality is common with new diseases. It is also what we would expect from a bioweapon gone wild.

After the first few months in the US, it became apparent that excess deaths were no longer showing up in social security statistics. They cooked up fake deaths from Covid, and now they are hiding real deaths from the vaccine.

Why would the medical establishment cook up a bioweapon?

Power. They are demanding, and getting, gigantic amounts of power.

It is kind of obvious however, that the vaccine that they developed is a total failure. An unprecedented number of young healthy people are dropping dead of heart attack and stroke, there is an epidemic of brain fog that everyone is piously ignoring, and the vaccine does nothing to prevent the spread of disease, with likelihood of being infected in a fully vaccinated household equal to the likelihood of being infected in an unvaccinated household.

So why are mandates being introduced and threatened that you cannot go places unless vaccinated. It is obvious that vaccination cannot protect anyone else.

Power.

Their bioweapon is not working, and their vaccine is not working, but they are rolling along as if both their bioweapon and their vaccine worked, and are applying a total all channel propaganda offensive that both of them are working.

Because our enemy’s science projects are managed by Shaniqua, neither of them are working. If the virus was ever dangerous, it is now no more dangerous, and probably less dangerous, than the old flu. Very soon after the bioweapon was released, total death rates went back to normal, and even back when they were above normal, it was far from clear whether this was an effect of the disease, or an effect of inappropriate use of ventilators. You still need an oxygen mask with China flu a lot more often than you are likely to need an oxygen mask for the old flu, but this is unlikely to kill you, while a ventilator is highly likely to kill you. Not that an oxygen mask is safe if worn for a long period. Pure oxygen at normal atmospheric pressure is going to burn you. But pure oxygen inhaled through a mask is a lot safer than a ventilator. Air enriched in oxygen, rather than pure oxygen, is reasonably safe. It is advisable to breath oxygen no purer than needed to bring your blood oxygen levels up to close to normal.

Is the vaccine more dangerous than the old flu? Yes it is, considerably more dangerous. During flu season lots of people got flu, and the total death rate went up a little bit, but kind of hard to tell against background fluctuations. With the shots and the boosters, the death rate for working age people has gone way, way, up.

Chinese engineers are weak at creativity. They have an alarming tendency to dutifully follow and implement specifications literally without regard for what the specifications are intended to achieve. But this should not slow catch up too much, as they are smart, industrious, and dutiful.

As general rule, engineers from the periphery of the Han Hegemony, Korea, Japan, and Vietnam, are a lot better at tasks that require insight and judgment – not a big gap between them and whites. Thai and Khmer are inferior, lacking Han smarts though Thais have Korean judgement.

Contrary to this cheerfully racist generalization, Taiwan is now the leading manufacturer of the best computer chips. Intel and AMD depend primarily on TSMC (Taiwan) and Samsung (Korea)

White technology has been stagnating, because Shaniqua with a Harvard PhD is project lead, and Japan, Taiwan, and Korea are now well ahead, except, of course, in rockets.

Well, if Taiwan is out in front, why cannot China be out in front? I am guessing that Taiwan simply had a head start because of more intercourse with the west and with Korea. A little leaven leaveneth the whole loaf. You don’t need too many creative people. I conjecture that TSMC filled the gaps with a handful of foreigners. There are lots of people from the periphery of the Han Hegemony in Taiwan.

Last time I checked, an all Chinese desktop was about four years behind today’s desktops, and more expensive, because the Chinese government, suspecting hardware backdoors, twists party members arms to buy Mainland Chinese. And Mainland Chinese are having trouble getting production up, even of chips four years out of date. They have long planned to catch up, but catch up is mysteriously not happening.

Biden has decided to cash in on this tech lead by banning Taiwanese and Korean chip makers from supplying advanced stuff to China, with the chief target being Huawei.

Huawei’s smart phones are TSMC chips running Google software. And they are not allowed to obtain that stuff any more, and if they do somehow obtain it, not allowed to export it.

Huawei are investing heavily in existing Chinese chip building facilities. This New Years eve, promised to be back in the export business real soon now. An important announcement coming up some time this year. Which is not the same thing as promising to be back in the export business this year.

They have been buying up businesses, making alliances with businesses, and hiring people who are in the general vicinity of TSMC. Buying people who are not directly involved in chip making, but have a lot of chip making connections. Maybe they have been importing some leaven. Or maybe they are just hiring spies. Well, obviously they are hiring spies, but is hiring spies all that they are doing?

If they are merely hiring spies, will not do them any good. You can give a Chinese engineer the recipe, and he will follow it to the letter, with the result that it will not work. But I get the feeling that they have already figured this out and have already done something about it. China has been hiring spies for many years with conspicuously underwhelming results. If they have addressed their fundamental problem, I expect China to be beating everyone in chip making in a few years, as Taiwan has been beating everyone. Huawei is betting the house on catch up yielding imminent results. They are acting as if they believe that the fix for China’s stubbornly persistent tech lag is imminent.

In response to this post, a Varna has drawn my attention to a Russian report, 2020 September.

China is hunting for specialists for the production of electronic components in South Korea. Back in August, there were tons of vacancies on local sites for electronics professionals with excellent conditions.

This is likely to solve China’s chip lag problem. Huawei’s confidence suggests that this program is bearing fruit. I predict that competitive Chinese made chips will arrive this year or sometime in 2023.

Since Huawei seems to be leading the charge, they will probably be derived from the Arm cpu design, which draws less power than the X86 architecture. Huawei wants to produce phones, but the Chinese communist party wants made in China desktops and laptops. Likely they will find themselves getting Arm laptops.

Preparatory to this, Arm China recently declared independence from Arm, both hijacking Arm’s intellectual property, and indicating intent to develop Arm based chips beyond the current Arm design. Breaking away from Arm only makes sense if they expect that they will not need further intellectual property from Arm.

I was expecting a significant rise in the excess death rate among young people.

If it is happening, it is less impressive than I was expecting. The claim that the jab is saving lives is not obviously and outrageously stupid. It is not obviously true either.

What it is, however, doing, is sodomizing people’s immune systems.

It has long been known that the jab does not prevent you from getting China flu, nor spreading it. What it is claimed to do is prevent you from getting really ill as a result. But to verify this claim we would need doctors and patients to not know if the patient had been jabbed, since it is obvious that in practice the purebloods get treated by the medical industry in a way completely different to the way they treat the jabbed, radically different.

Supposedly the vaccine studies had double blind studies, neither patient nor doctor knew who had the vaccination, but actually, they lied. They just went through the motions of science, were not actually interested in the answers.

Maybe it does reduce the severity of symptoms – it seems likely that it should. It is plausible that it does, we just don’t have data. We just don’t have enough trust and trustworthiness left for scientific research to be conducted when there is money on the table.

But, I hear you ask, “what is this stuff about sodomizing the immune systems of the jabbed?”

Well, get this British National health service data, before it gets “corrected” Vaccine surveillance report week 42, page 13

Covid 19 rate per one hundred thousand among persons ages forty to forty nine vaccinated with two doses, 1731
Covid 19 rate per one hundred thousand among persons aged forty to forty nine not vaccinated, 773

What has been happening is that the rate of Covid infection among the jabbed has been rising steadily and rapidly, and now substantially exceeds that of the purebloods.

This is consistent with the widespread circumstantial evidence that the jab buggers your immune system as well as your blood clotting system.

I was seeing data that shows the jabbed are less likely to spread the disease, then data that they are at least as likely to spread the disease, and now data that they are far more likely to spread the disease. Looks like any immunity wears off fast, while impaired immune function is lasting.

Worse, if it is indeed the case, and it likely is, that the jab reduces the severity of the symptoms, we have a Marek’s disease problem. The jabbed are breeding the virus for greater lethality. The jabbed are dangerous to the purebloods.

There is some controversy over what the UK Variants concern VOC technical briefing 17 shows about the effectiveness of the vaccine.

Several sources claimed that table five of UK Variants concern VOC technical briefing 17 showed vaccination made you more likely to die of China Flu

“Fact checkers” said that table five said no such thing, and indeed when I looked at it, table five was about something totally unrelated.

But strangely, table four said much the same thing, in a different breakdown of the same data as the alleged table five allegedly used to cover.

From which I conclude that the document has changed, and is likely to change yet again.

Official version I downloaded

Official version right now (Which when last checked, has not yet changed from the version I downloaded.)

Page Fourteen:  Deaths classified as Covid deaths for the period under analysis:  Vaccinated seventy deaths, unvaccinated forty four deaths.

The vaccine is well known to give no protection against mild cases of the disease.  This data does not suggest it gives any protection against serious cases of the disease.

Because the data in table four is broken down differently to the alleged table five, one cannot say whether vaccination is greater risk or lower risk, but it is clearly no big improvement, and may well make things worse, which is consistent with its failure to provide any discernible protective effect against mild infections or the likelihood of spreading mild infections.

Of course another explanation is that vaccination has no effect on death rate, because there is no death rate.

A ninety year old man goes into a clinic, because he is worried that his anticancer medication is aggravating his heart failure, liver failure, and kidney failure. They ask him about Covid symptoms,like they ask everyone else.  He has a blocked nose.  They swab his nose, find covid, but he is not running a temperature.  Five days later, his nose is no longer blocked.  Twenty seven days later he is hit by a truck, and bits splattered all over the place.

He gets counted in the above table..

We have big programs for monitoring flu. And it has “disappeared”.

Nah, it is not that flu is being deliberately misdiagnosed as Corona.

Rather, it is the other way around. Corona is being deliberately named as not just another flu in order to sound scarier. Which, now that governments have generally abandoned programs of large scale iatrogenic murder by ventilator, is killing only about the same number of people as most of the other flues usually did.

Every flu season it is a different strain of positive stranded RNA virus. Each flu season, it is a new flu. But all positive stranded RNA viruses interbreed, exchange genetic material indiscriminately, and all respiratory positive stranded RNA viruses interbreed with other positive stranded respiratory RNA viruses a lot. So making a distinction is arbitrary and artificial, a sharp line drawn on nature that lacks sharp lines.

Because they are all related, there is a lot of cross immunity between them. So making an novel and unique vaccine that targets one very specific variant is unlikely to be effective, because they go on changing, as they always have. Should have manufactured the vaccine using the same well tried (and considerably less dangerous, though far from safe) technology that they have long been using for each new flu.

The flu is always changing. And always the same. From now on, every flu season is another outbreak of the dreaded and terrible Corona virus that threatens us with vast Corona doom. Or when people stop being scared of the dreaded corona virus, maybe they will change the name again. Corona is a bigger change in the genetic and antigen signature than usual, but saying that this change is big enough for a species name change is arbitrary. That each new flu excludes the others tells us there is a great deal of cross immunity. Which we should expect from a virus that is always cross breeding.