The DOD data indicates among, other things, a three fold increase in cancer, which suggests substantial damage from a quite small number of jabs.
Insurance data in most of the world indicates a forty percent rise in the working age death rate everywhere. I wish I had insurance data for Israel, but I do not. Likely the working age death rate is skyrocketing in line with their China flu infection rate.
A good friend of mine got cancer after his first jab.
In a random conversation with real life normies, they see the jab as increasing the risk of China flu, and increasing the severity of the ensuing infection.
The question then, is is this damage temporary, or lasting and cumulative?
Israel is the most jabbed country in the world, and their China flu infection is far beyond anything any other country is suffering. This suggests cumulative damage. I wish I had their death rate and cancer rate data, but, though they used to publish it regularly in Euro Momo, they suddenly went silent after they started jabbing. Death rate data is everywhere unavailable, or is inconsistent and improbable in ways that indicate massive, poorly coordinated but severely enforced lying.
Purebloods (on purely anecdotal evidence) do not notice omicron infection. America’s top agent in the USSR has been enthusiastically touting the jab, and has had himself jabbed eight times. He is now on a ventilator, major serious damage to both lungs. (Hat tip Varna.)
This is consistent my earlier guess that somewhere between five and ten jabs, everyone dies.
It is a sample size of one, but in a world where lying is mandatory and enforced by drastic means, that is a good as we are likely to get. We are lost in a fog of lies.
But though it is difficult to find truth, it is easy to find that we are being lied to. And people who lie to you knowingly intend you harm. They hate everyone, including themselves. They want to kill us all. Everything you hear the enemy saying needs to be understood in that light.
I like your comment on how evolutionary psychology does not directly explain the general hatred post-menopausal childless cat ladies have for life. You could just as easily expect them to be neutral, but no, they tend to turn hateful. Would be nice to have a scientific explanation for that.
Anyways, on topic, this had me chuckle – https://gab.com/rooshv/posts/107765395637432541repost of https://blog.reaction.la/science/addendum-to-jab-excess-death-rate/#comment-2814470In a non-evil society they would not have become cat ladies. Not that hard to understand why they hate the society that facilitated destruction of their lives.
Anyway, my personal impression is that evil cat ladies are a modern thing. Europe used to have some women who never had children because any prospective spouses died in WW1 or WW2. From what I have heard from my older relatives these women were not causing problems. Apparently, there is a huge difference between a lack of men and plenty of men, but lack of testosterone
I agree that it’s fairly intuitive to understand, similar to how gays hate families for having what they’ll never have. But why not depression, or acceptance? Why hatred, destruction. Why expend so much energy to making life worse for everyone.
No matter how bad your life is imagine being a physically repulsive woman not fat (which can be cured) just repulsive your whole life… its worse than being a male incel as male inceldom can generally always be cured by getting a pro. I don’t generally feel bad for modern women but thinking about it this system is probably worse for some of them than it is us.
Any childless cat lady is going to feel subconsciously like she is repulsive because no man would abduct and rp8 her… she is going to feel like she was born cursed by God and hate all life and hate God.
>Any childless cat lady is going to feel subconsciously like she is repulsive because no man would abduct and rp8 her… she is going to feel like she was born cursed by God and hate all life and hate God.
My aunt couldn’t have children due to a childhood injury. She’s highly religious towards globohomo. She married and adopted a child that rejected my aunt when she went to college(racial issue), she been married and divorced twice. She’s quite obviously insane(dogs instead of cats) but she loves her adopted daughter who won’t talk to her and she’s endlessly religious about progressive causes.
If she’d been born in a different age she would have ended up a nun in a convent. Women who can’t have children need to be funneled into religion where they can be part of a functional female hierarchy and yet kept away form others that she could harm through her insanity.
The religious zeal of the spinster, the widow, and the barren postmenopausal woman combines with hysterical attempts to enforce what is perceived as the dominant social norm. The “Karen” but she shouldn’t really be younger than menopause in normal times.
It’s the annoying old nags whose minds have been hacked into backing the Putin system, for example.
https://imgpile.com/images/wBU9a4.jpg
https://imgpile.com/images/wBUDh2.jpg
And the commie opposition also depends on a competing cluster of annoying old nags who have latched their emotional support onto the older Soviet normality.
Now, insane doped up thots, how do you channel THAT into non-destruction, this we have yet to see someone accomplish.
My top of the head theory is the following: if the mainstream narrative promotes a vision of some sort of stable normality, then the nag hags will spontaneously take on the roles of enforcer drones of this normality.
If, however, the mainstream narrative promotes chaotic abnormality, then the nag hags will still have the impulse to be enforcer drones, but will be like robots with corrupted software, mostly flailing around in a highly destructive manner.
Nigs will nig in more destructive manners, Jews will jew in more destructive manners, young whore will whore in more destructive manners, the FIRE section of the economy will go into super villain mode, the deep state will go into super villain mode, old nags will flail around in a destructive manner, and middle-aged skanks will behave like a toxic mix of crazy whore and old nags.
When society’s central narratives are hijacked, the fragile balance of many internal components is lost, “useful bacteria” become “killer bacteria” within the larger social body, and everything goes off the rails.
If Trump had had a second term, no doubt some sort of “grannies for Putin” thing would have grown, and begun to enforce stabilizing and grounding social signals within their immediate habitats. Perhaps even black such.
What happens to thots when they grow too old to make money the thot way? Or porn stars or models? Or those Hooters style restaurant girls?
Has there ever been a study on what happens to them?
Racial issue? As in shes a different race?
>Racial issue? As in shes a different race?
Adopted an Asian baby. Asian girl goes to college, she’s told that whites adopting Asians is racisis and she breaks off contact with my aunt.
@Com
She is a catlady, but with dog. She divorced her first and second husbands.
The insanity comes from not being able to create children and being unowned as almost all modern women are unowned even when married these days.
That’s heartbreaking about the adopted kid being brainwashed.
It just confirmed what I instinctively thought: Adoption should only happen between relatives. Which I later learned was the historical norm. The moment the girl was told it was moral to toss my aunt off as a racist, she jumped for it. The ties of blood were not there.
Ironically it my aunts own progressive faith that trigger it when she sent her off to college.
Not to mention her prog-ism to even adopt of baby of another race. At least give yourself a chance by adopting a baby that will look remotely like you.
>Not to mention her prog-ism to even adopt of baby of another race. At least give yourself a chance by adopting a baby that will look remotely like you.
The demand for white babies far outstrips the supply thanks to abortion. I have little doubt she would have adopted a white kid if should had had the money for the bribes.
I’ve wondered why white hookers get abortions, they could make a lot if they went to term and sold them. I suspect that my “cousin” was the baby of a Asian hooker who was doing just that.
When you adopt an Asian baby, you’re adopting the bastard demon spawn of a whore and some thug.
Almost all adopted babies in the modern world are the bastard spawns of whores concieved in less than ideal circumstances, it sounds like this aunt is way crazier than the adopted baby who wisely doesn’t want to deal with a demon possessed cat lady.
Adopting any child that’s not from family is that way. Hell most of the adoptions within the family are that way with parents adopting their grandchildren from their drug addled whore daughters who move from thug to thug. I’ve seen that happen multiple times now.
At the time you basically had 3 choices for adoption: White baby(required huge bribes due to the mass waiting list), Black baby(no one wants them), and overseas adoption. At the time most overseas adoptions where from poorly developed Asian nations. This was before Russian and eastern European adoptions were common and no one would consider adopting from Africa.
If your aunt is married just infertile not a cat lady, her husband should have beaten the prog out of her. Infertile married women may not be super happy but they shouldn’t feel the same sense of total rejection that single spinsters feel and don’t have to be evil life destroying Karens. Nunneries have the problem where they make single women holier than wives. Luther was right that women should be either wives or prostitutes (and better looking whores who avoid hard drugs tend to marry out of the job anyway, strippers are far less likely to wind up old maids than female lawyers). The ideal with spinsters we should have is that they should be less than 2% of the female population at all times and that they should be looked upon as a cautionary tale of what happens to shrewish bitchy women.
@Wulfgar
Witch burnings were very very rare except for 15th and 16th century Germany (and essentially did not exist in the Middle Ages contrary to popular belief, the Middle Ages was heavily influenced by Charlemagne and Charlemagne HATED witch trials decreeing I think that any witchcraft accuser had to produce evidence the alleged witch practiced human sacrifice or the ACCUSER should be burned) there just weren’t really any spinsters other than nuns. Witch trials cannot be considered a social institution really as they tended to be a form of localized hysteria (and maybe you had the occasional real witch like that Marina Abramović bitch). There certainly were a few infertile women (not sure of there % in the population) but even they generally ended up married at least until the 18th century (when preference among the lower classes shifted from virgin brides to test drives and proven fertility before marriage).
The Spanish Inquisition was originally created to find witches. It had a very broad standard of what constituted witchcraft (which however tolerated a bit of harmless folk magic) and still could not find enough witches to keep it in business, because it required actual evidence of actual magic, or traffic with demons or the evil dead. It, did, however, find lots of professional witchfinders who were hostile entryists against Christianity, so changed its business model to finding entryists and forgot about finding witches.
And anyone outside the inquisition who was looking for witches was apt to find the inquisition offering him a ham sandwich and a friendly chat.
My impression was that the main job of the Spanish Inquisition was to monitor Conversos. They also had jurisdiction over witchcraft but were VERY skeptical of witchcraft claims ( i dont like Catholicism but in general the Catholics were less hysterical about witchcraft claims).
That became its main job almost immediately after it was created. But originally, witches.
Why do you say that? I thought the Spanish Inquisition was created to investigate crypto-Jews and crypto-Muslims after the Reconquista.
It only came to matter after it changed its focus, which it did very quickly. One practical consequence of it ceasing to look for witches is that it became politically unhealthy for anyone else to find the witches that the Inquisition had failed to find.
The phrases “crypto Jew” and “crypto Muslim” imply a persecuted minority which is hiding in hopes of being left alone, the poster girl of the victim persecuted by the evil inquisition, and though this was often true enough, the big threat was entryists – people with status and power in Christian society who claimed superior holiness or supernatural powers. Having visions was rightly apt to attract the inquisition’s curiosity.
Persecuted minorities are not a threat and not a problem. Entryists against Christianity have been a huge problem for two millennia, and are a huge problem today. In practice, most of the Inquisition’s work was looking into the suspiciously holy and the seers of visions. The inquisition did an essential and necessary job.
The inquisition made it inadvisable to have visions or miraculous healing powers unless one was of fine moral character and unquestionable orthodoxy. Talking about “crypto Jews” and “crypto Muslims” is a distraction from its major and important task. Most of its workload was the very holy, the seers of visions, and suchlike.
A substantial degree of the form of contemporary jurisprudential praxis as commonly understood today was innovated by the spanish inquisition; standards of evidence, procedure for conduction of trials, rules, principles, and etiquette for questioning, cross-examination of witnesses, and so on.
Invidious demon worshipers accusing the objects of their spite of being demon worshipers was becoming an increasingly common tactic, and so appeals to a higher authority became necessary to provide socially durable schelling points for settlement of conflict, one way or another, and the state church came into the role of third party arbitrator for sorting out the nonsense.
Seems that even back then, social justice warriors were projecting.
One of the things that really impressed me about the Spanish Inquisition was that they would investigate the beholder of visions for ordinary personal virtue in the ordinary things of his ordinary life. (And frequently find a spectacular lack thereof.)
The Inquisitorial system was always part of the Roman law was it not?
A gentleman of good standing would doubtlessly be classically trained; what was more particular about the situation was the refinement of social technology for dealing with the ‘prove you are not in league with satan’ question, and the related ‘prove you are not using unholy intangible powers to make yourself a winner/cause me to be a loser’ question.
Really? I did not know that. What are the books to read to learn about this?
There are few good any one single sources on the subject. Like a lot of things in the current year, it necessarily comes from interpolation of bits and pieces from here and there that inform each other rightly, looking past what doesn’t. (For example https://www.catholiceducation.org/en/controversy/the-inquisition/ )
I think one thing i can recommend though is ‘The Legal Analyst’, by Ward Farnsworth, which is not so much the ‘Spanish Inquisition’ part, but the ‘etymology of legal forms’ part.
An example of a woman who despite being unable to have children lived a moral life was Saint Elizabeth the New Martyr.
After her husband was assassinated she became a nun and dedicated the remainder of her life in service to the poor. The difference between her and your aunt is more the result of Progressivism being an evil and demonic religion, not that your aunt is inherently evil because of the state of her not being able to have children.
The key to someone successfully living the life of a monastic is adhering to the virtues of the church and following the xerophagic diet consisting of only vegetables, nuts, bread and water. Monastic life is not possible without strict fasting, not just in food but everything else.
Insanity and evilness are different subjects. My aunt is clearly insane and became so in her late 30s as it kicked in that she’d never have children and after she divorced her last husband. She’s chosen to be homeless a couple of times over living without her small dogs when the people willing to take her in refused to take in her poorly behaved dogs.
The question about proggyism is does the religion make people evil or are evil people attracted to the religion? I think the answer is both.
My aunt rejects the love and care her extended family has shown her and I have no doubt if the order came down to round up my extended family for death camps, she’d cheerfully lead them to our door steps.
A good religion can reduce the damage from women driven insane by not having been able to produce children. A religion like proggyism amplifies their desire to harm others.
“No matter how bad your life is imagine being a physically repulsive woman not fat (which can be cured) just repulsive your whole life… its worse than being a male incel as male inceldom can generally always be cured by getting a pro.”
Here’s what would make perfectly good sense in my amateur two-bit evo-psychologist analysis, but I never see IRL:
“Girls look. I fucked up big time. I want you to not end up like me. If you’re under 30 then you still have a chance. It’s too late for me but not for you. So please listen…”
Never ever ever. Frankly it’s what alarms me the most about women in general, real talk.
That requires self reflection. It is rare is men, essentially non-existent in women.
There are no repulsive non-fat women in their teens and early twenties. Barring severe deformities, every single one of them is bangable.
I guess they combine hatred with depression or maybe alternate between these two emotions. Acceptance is difficult without a faith
It’s human nature (or call it DROM, demons real or metaphorical) for people foiled from their telos to hate the happy and wish for their destruction. Jim’s written on this a lot re the sin of envy
*MORD (to use the same Cockney rhyming scheme as GNON).
A repulsive cat-lady (RCL) didn’t get there overnight. A RCL’s wall is probably sooner than other women’s.. maybe 21 rather than 28. But with college, there was no way she was going to delay that “great career” by stopping to have babies. Not to mention the damage done to her by the “Freshman 15” that colleges furnish.
But the idea, in a non-evil society, is to have these women married at about age 20 to some 20-yo schlub who just cant wait to get some. Then when she becomes ugly, the guy sees her through rose-colored glasses because, hey, that’s his wife and the mother of his children.
Alpha widows/ riders of the cock carousels tend to go nuts. Women don’t take well to being unowned, especially when Chad just walks off. Plus western white women seem to be very easy to fool. Down side of a formerly high trust society and being protected from reality all their lives. Intellectualism tends to give rise to neuroticism and living in la la land. Throw in drugs and other depravities and it is amazing there are any functional white women at all in the west.
I tried to give an explanation for it yesterday:
Evolution does not explain the cat lady phenomenon on an individual basis.
My theory is that on the group level it will increase the fitness of the group of people if a post menopausal childless women will be excluded from the group for being crazy. I think there is a tradition of doing that (e.g. witch burning)
That would mean one less unproductive eater in the group.
If that raises the fitness of the group then the genes of relatives of said women have a higher probability of spreading and with that indirectly the women’s genes.
https://blog.reaction.la/science/addendum-to-jab-excess-death-rate/#comment-2814446
Why wouldn’t they commit suicide like men do?
I wouldn’t know how to explain suicide with evolutionary psychology.
That one’s easy to explain.
If someone is such a loser, and so useless to (unappreciated/unrecognized by) the people around him, then he must be worth more to his cousins if he’s dead than if he’s alive.
“self garbage collection”
But this theory obviously doesn’t apply to cat ladies in actual practice, so WTF.
Humans have it in us to sacrifice ourselves for the benefit of the group. Dying for your kids, jumping on a nade, etc. Suicide is a perversion of the noble instinct of self-sacrifice, just as all sins are perversions of fundamentally healthy behaviors and attitudes. What you always hear from the suicidal is “the world would be better off without me, I’m doing my friends and family a favor”.
Most suicides’ are young men who’s proper role in life has been destroyed, typically either theirs families have been taken away or they’re unable to form a family.
I don’t blame the people who kill themselves, I blame our fucked up civilization for killing them.
Witch burning of women was typically a method of dealing with troublesome women, but there was enough ritual and structure to it that we can look at it as social technology among the lower classes. There were ways to escalate and deescalate by both accuser and accused, and it served as a conflict resolution strategy. The whole system was actually rather elegant, despite what modern leftism makes it out to be. You did not make an accusation and then immediately walk out with your pitchfork and torch in a big drunken mob to kill some poor woman. There were opportunities for the woman in question to bury the hatchet and make peace, which would end the problem and things would go back to normal.
Witch burning is social technology, not an evolutionary survival strategy. Bitchy women are just bitchy women. Evolution did not design women to be docile. Sometimes women are evil bitches because they chose to be evil bitches, and not because there is some super secret evolutionary advantage to being a bitch past her childbearing years. This reminds me of the argument that sodomy is somehow an evolutionary advantage to provide more resources to the genetic line. Obvious cope, seeking to rationalize degeneracy and disorder.
thanks I missed that comment.
Seems plausible.
Conversely, perhaps when she is not excluded, her genes don’t mind burning the group to the ground either. After all, the genes did not get to reproduce, so clearly the group does not act in the genes’ best interest. Best to have her tribe conquered by a less weak one, so perhaps her nieces and other female tribe members get to reproduce after all.
That theory would explain a lot of the problems in society today.
I don’t really see a mystery here. Not every behaviour humans have is useful at all times.
Being upset is a reflection of her missing out on her desire to procreate and get married. It makes sense she’d go crazy because of that. It doesn’t mean there’s a specific purpose to it.
Realistically what damage could an old, unmarried woman do to a caveman society?
Why would this get bred out, when none of them are, by definition, breeding. It’s a necessary consequence of the woman’s innate desire to have children, which is obviously passed on. Not getting crazy when you’re infertile is not a trait that can increase your chances of reproducing (because they are 0).
Quite a lot, I imagine. In many ways, nature has granted women more power than men.
“Not getting crazy when you’re infertile is not a trait that can increase your chances of reproducing (because they are 0).”
But it could increase your relatives’ chances of reproducing, if you are not being crazy and endangering them.
Women go crazy not when they become infertile, but when they are not getting laid. This insanity and its behavior would, in the state of nature (for whatever reason, a hunter-gatherer’s daughter staying virgin until 20, 25 or so) result in a rough man taking possession of her and giving her children. That women go crazy from lack of sex relatively late in life today just means that they continue to get sex until their early thirties.
The original debate on this thread is the premenopausal and postmenopausal women go crazy in different ways. Premenopausal women go crazy in a way that gets them carried off as a war bride. Postmenopausal women go crazy in a way that they want to see everyone die including themselves. Your explanation doesn’t explain that.
Perhaps the actions of the post-menopausal crazy cause the pre-menopausal women to which she is related to be carried off as war brides. Her society, given that it allows her to be that crazy, has it coming anyway.
Ah, I thought we were talking about 35-year-old catladies and not post-menopausal childless witches, using ‘infertile’ as a byword for a 35-year-old’s dismal reproductive prospects. I’ve answered this above; it is the demon of envy. All sins when taken to their extremes become insanity.
Two kinds of women.
Those who submit to male discipline and are, therefore, fulfilled: https://spankingyourwife.wordpress.com/
And those who don’t: https://media3.giphy.com/media/etAXDQ6KxICfg5R3p2/giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47zzyh6rbliaza2ouuabmtz4i7rdnnt46uw83ampdr&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g
Women with no children have failed their primary evolutionary directive…of course they are bitter, and blame everyone except themselves..
Dumb vaxxed and boosted skull fractured comedian woman now says she will not be getting the 4th booster (and the media shill doctor hilariously starts spazzing out when says this).
https://twitter.com/DrewHLive/status/1492210372773695490?s=20&t=k5nPSaFF1Y9pflRDfrnSfQ
Speaking of anecdotes: https://twitter.com/TheEcho13/status/1491171920683102209
She specifies more details farther down the thread.
I’ve heard similar stuff. Women were much more compliant with the vax and boosters than men. Pureblood women may be very valuable in the near future.
https://www.themoviedb.org/t/p/original/mVsnMHfotbA6PjDHRZmqwNxbyV2.jpg
2019: After the Fall of New York (1983)
Original title: 2019 – Dopo la caduta di New York
Director: Sergio Martino
“After a nuclear war, society breaks down into two groups, the evil Euraks and the rebel Federation. A mercenary named Parsifal is hired by the Federation to infiltrate New York City, which is controlled by the Euraks, to rescue the only fertile woman left on Earth.”
“premium pureblood pussy” lmao.
Depends on where you are, most young women here in Florida it seems anecdotally did not get jabbed (and I’ve even heard one case of a couple gossiping about so and so who got jabbed and already has heart problems)…
If you’re in a heavily blue area I suspect that other than the odd outliers the only groups of pureblood women are going to be the new ager/hippie/vegan type girls (that group of people is increasingly anti government actually and they universally don’t trust the vax) and some black women and whores (less NPCish and conformist than normie women, don’t trust the government).
In my blue area very rightwing girls tended not to get jabbed. I don’t associate at all with blacks because it’s an invitation to get robbed here and self defense against blacks is illegal. Asian women are highly jabbed. Hippy and Vegan girls are pretty much gone these days, replaced by fat progy girls in “open” relationships with multiple limp dicked men.
“Hippy and Vegan girls are pretty much gone these days”
There are still some enclaves of them in most blue areas, its sad they have declined though I always liked them in general compared to normie prog women.
My girlfriend is one basically (vegetarian not vegan). She was not at all right wing and very brainwashed with standard prog shibboleths. I’ve managed to fuck the vegetarianism and other dumb progism out of her. Still working on some of the more deep rooted feminist shit.
Pro Tip: Go hiking and you will find heaps of these type of women.
If this is your wheelhouse Com, I would join a hiking meet up group or something.
Maybe not a bad idea pooch, but I’m saying that type of women while they may have a different kind of leftism sort of they aren’t feminist (not at least in the American Karenist feminist sense) and they aren’t progs. Their religion genuinely hates totalitarian central authorities, you can say right wing shit in front of them without them getting super offended (its not that any of them supported Trump but even after the great NPCing of late 2015 all the girls of that subculture were completely okay with me openly and loudly supporting Trump), they believe women are different than men (and that masculine and feminine polarities are one of the fundamental aspects of the universe) the most negative thing of women in that group is that hard drug use is very common…
Pooch as far as your girlfriend feminism is far worse than any dietary restrictions. Milk can substitute for meat after all (if this is wrong please tell me why, I know that a lot of American milk is contaminated but so is most American meat) mostly while feminism is just cancer.
Feminism is just failing shit tests. Feminism as a whole is a massive shit test. When you pass them, it’s not a problem. That feminism is a problem for you when you hit on women means you are failing shit tests and not particularly red-pilled on female nature, unfortunately. If I were in your shoes i would spend less time on this blog and more time on the red pill on women blogs.
Com, you’re kind of purple pilled on women in that you take stuff like Feminism seriously.
Pooch you’re the one who said your girlfriend had deep seated feminist programming still in her head not me…
She rarely brings up feminism or anything political. And the few times she may say some sort of comment like “See women can do that better”, it’s just a shit test which I then pass ie it’s not a problem.
If you are looking for some sort of right wing neoreactionary girlfriend from the 17th century who you can talk politics with you are going to die childless.
Actually I do know at least one lol and we got on extremely well too the problem is I only met her in person about three times and she lives in (to make it hard for glownigger auto indexing lets say in or around the town the Mayflower landed in) Mass, even when I lived there she was generally two hours away (she was the slightly less crazy friend of this batshit BPD case I knew).
But a long time ago you could post Jim articles to facebook she liked one I said be careful if you read a lot of Jim your head may explode his views on women might upset you, she responded that Anne Coulter was completely right about women voting (which I openly agreed with)… and I said it went further hes borderline Islamic. She said no that doesn’t bother her either she completely agrees with that because women always sabotage themselves when picking out men and probably aren’t meant to decide. I don’t think she was trolling because the hatred for the left based on the other rare times shes said political stuff is genuine.
lmao tf
The Chad Cominator:
It is never necessary to make a big security hole even bigger.
Inconsistent and incomplete security practices are a huge improvement on no security practices.
You can rely on our enemies’ incompetence and laziness.
I’m sure they have me, don’t want to implicate others though lol.
One antidote I’ve seen is that a 10/10 I came across in the gym of the bluest of blue areas was a non-jabbed nurse who offered to get me “vaxxed” if I needed it.
My sense is that very beautiful women. Talking like model-tier ultra hot feminine women are not jabbed and it has nothing to do with right or left wing. There is just a sense of beauty to reject ugliness.
My guess is the hotter a woman is on the outside, the less likely she is to be jabbed and the uglier she is the more likely she is to be jabbed.
Beauty and health begets beauty and health.
After getting jabbed, working out at the gym is likely to prove difficult and dangerous. Not surprising the selection would go that way, but you may be onto something. The youngest and most attractive chick at my job has been refusing to get jabbed despite overwhelming peer pressure to do so.
Yes sample bias is likely. People in the gym a lot are likely to be non-jabbed, being health conscious. But then again attractive women are likely to wind up in the gym a lot because its part of being attractive in the first place.
Model tier hotties (there are unfortunately so few around nowadays hotter women are rare) tend to be less npcish with normie women and more inclined to identify strongly with the men in their life.
I suspect they don’t have the underlying chip on their shoulder that normie women have that makes them receptive to feminism, a perfect 10 is not likely to exactly have been pumped and dumped by chad. Chad tends to stick around until she dumps chad…
@Cominator I disagree on model tier hotties being less NPC. Look at how many of them go nuts when they get old. I am also not sure there many Chad’s left in the west. They might have fucked around till they died out, or their progeny got destroyed by the culture. The higher tier hotties and “Chad’s” seem to follow the cultural norm of having no children till their 30s as well, with some exceptions. In general, I am not all that impressed by what I have seen from the “Chads” of the west. I have had to deal with some of them from college and work. They are athletic, good looking, and make decent money, but they aren’t as socially dominant as one would think and they tend to be very spazzy. They are as afraid of upsetting the powers that be as everyone else. Look at how many professional athletes and college athletes got the shot or kneeled during the pledge of Allegiance or whatever.
I think part of the problem is when everyone thinks of Chad, they are thinking of the old alphas from prior to the 10s, but those dudes are bare minimum in their mid to late 30s now, if not much older. The ones I knew that are that old vowed to never have children or get married and play the field till they died. The modern athletes/ Chad’s I have dealt with are more akin to really athletic hipsters. Even if they are banging Stacy, they aren’t the bosses. They bend the knee like everyone else.
If he is not that socially dominant, he’s not Chad. There are plenty of good looking gymcel betas that you’re probably interacting with. Chad is much more likely to be working blue-collar.
And most of the real players I know settled down and started having kids once they started sneaking up on 30. Men who are still playing the field in their 30s are almost universally broken.
@cominator What generation are you though? Marriage rates have been plummeting for decades. Before he got his blog shut down Heartiste had a post about alpha males not wanting children and making poor fathers. Also, if the out of wedlock births are from alphas, then why are tesosterone levels dropping? Shouldn’t alphas produce high tesosterone children, or does no amount of alpha seed make up for a lack of a father and a degenerate culture?
Very early 1980s, that makes me either a millenial or very very late gen x depending on where you put the cutoff date.
BTW in defense of my love of strippers I know that Jim loves Feynman and Feynman apparently also loved strippers.
Covid is a fitness test. Viruses exploit weakness. Hot chicks likely came from and spend time with fit men.
I live in south Florida and work in the trades. Most of the guys I know and work with are strong and manly men. Most have hot wives or girlfriends. With the exception of a few, especially the Hispanics, none of my friends with hot wives/girlfriends bought into Covid for a minute, including myself.
The ones that bought into it are the unfit or otherwise conformist. Hot chicks don’t spent time around those guys if they don’t have to. There are no beautiful women who respond positively to fear in a man.
Already are, according to some of the dating sites..Men interested in marriage don’t want to hookup with women with health problems or, more important, may be infertile from the vaxx…
“Anyway, my personal impression is that evil cat ladies are a modern thing.”
Even up until probably the 1980s attractive women were not really allowed to be single even if they had a lot of choice (which is still a bad idea) in the man, there was no “sexual harassment” crap and not much stalking rules. If you “stalk” and harass a woman and she can’t get her boyfriend/family/other guys to stop you and the state won’t she’ll eventually either have to give in or find a guy who will.
Now you can’t “harass” women anymore without Uncle Sam the faggot white knight stopping you.
“Israel is the most jabbed country in the world, and their China flu infection is far beyond anything any other country is suffering. This suggests cumulative damage.”
So much for the “Jews are all secretly working together at all times” thing.
I was just hearing a British funeral director reporting an extraordinary death rate, with large numbers of young people rather than his usual clientele. Heart attack, stroke and multiple organ failure.
Israel should be starting a major die off.
Official statistics are all unavailable or blatantly fake. Need to find out what is happening with life insurance companies and funeral parlors.
Funeral parlors. That has to be where the good “shadow stats” are. They’re small family businesses, passed down by generation, so I presume debt free. And more death means more money for them anyway, so probably feeling more confident in general now. Some will share data and some won’t, but that’s got to be where at least some guys will talk.
Insurance? They need constant cooperation from globohomo finance. They must be panicking and cooking books like crazy, both for basic business survival and now holiness reasons. Opposite to the funeral parlors, more death must mean losses for them, so yet another reason to just not talk at all.
Right so I see a “pincer approach” here:
The funeral people can give “positive information”. “Yeah man look at all these stiffs we got in 2021 and 2022, and this scatter plot by age, compared to our same records from 2020 and then 2015-2019.”
The insurance people can give “negative information”. Cumulative lies waving up from the books, thus indicating a powerful need to lie. Increasing payouts and losses in the financial statements, paired with protectively-cooked figures elsewhere that would logically mean the opposite.
Any sources of data that are “covid orthagonal”. You’re not looking for Covid deaths, but deaths period.
January months for my family’s funeral business 2018 – 209 obits, 2019 – 241, 2020 – 219, 2021 – 234
These data points can be gleaned from public information, but you will sweat a lot to get it because the tech stack sucks…free and all of the independents use it. Not included in the obit counts are direct cremation government-funded disposals (no family/friends coming forward).
You can look at SCI’s annual report as well as Park Lawn’s to get certified financials and case load data. 2020 was ~12-13% increase yoy on a case basis, but was down for everyone on top line and profits.
We’ve been in the business since before the civil war, so I had to respond to this post.
What I have seen is an uptick in cardiac problems as well as cancer, but this is not among the deceased. The virus still preys on the vulnerable with comorbidities, but there is no secret die-off, yet.
I am a pure blood and I am not involved in day-to-day business, but everyone in the business is jabbed up – including my grandfather/mother who are in their 90s now. They all took the moderna jabs, but none of them have died or experienced any really adverse consequences of the vaxes yet. My grandparents are especially vicious fighters, so I can’t say I am surprised they have escaped death still.
In any case, this does nothing to change the fact that it is all a WEF organized global coup and bankruptcy reorganization narrative. Just because these people and institutions have access to capital and power does not mean they are not subject to the laws of nature and can escape its truths. They try stuff all the time and fail, but they have lots of help crash landing.
The interesting statistic, however, is not total deaths, but working age and young people deaths.
I haven’t noticed or heard of anything abnormal. There is always statistical noise and the boomers are going to start ramping up stats due to natural attrition anyway. The SCI and Park Lawn annual reports are good resources for information though. I haven’t looked at either of them for 2021 results, but I know what’s in there and there is plenty of data to draw conclusion from. The winter is also a depressing time for many people, so the ennui factor drives an uptick during this post-holiday period that can hit younger people too. Like the early days of the pandemic, wait and see and it will be clear what’s what in due time.
In theory, most people do not want to die, so this is the hardest stat to fake since we all know if someone has departed. My best guess is the trucker protest is a counter-coup tactic within an inflation promotion strategy. It started with the Suez blockage, evolved into port slow walking and now we’ve got a movement going in the trucking community. If you pay attention to the truckers for freedom telegram channel you may notice a seemingly odd theme of anti-5G postings that are often unfactual. It is reasonable to assume the WEF TGR cannot go anywhere without 5G hardware and MAGA embargoed Huawei on the front before the pandemic.
My WAG is that WEF got wind of the trucker protest and has sought to temporarily scale-back control mandates before more grassroots support materializes internationally.
Then, look at Durham happenings and a non-larp war with Russia is about the only way to overwhelm that freight train of trouble for WEF. War with Russia can also offer an alternative narrative for commodity prices and supply shortages throughout the economy.
Right on time, all of the governments in Ukraine are recalling their diplomatic missions.
I have noticed one hell of a lot of abnormality, one good friend, lots of anecdotes about friends of friends. On the news I see sportsmen dropping on the field.
And multiple insurance companies reporting a forty percent increase in working age life insurance payouts, multiple funeral directors reporting a large increase in working age and child funerals.
You remind of that guy who did not see abnormal inflation. As the conversation progressed, it became apparent that he did not see inflation because he stopped buying everything whose price had gone out of sight, which was cramping his lifestyle.
I would say the “the price of such and such and such has gone up a very large factor”, where such and such was something I recently needed to buy, and had much trouble buying, and he would say “Hey that does not count, no one buys such and such”, though I had been buying it and it is a basic and important commodity very widely used. And after a bit became apparent that his lifestyle was slowly shrinking into a tiny little box. Gas? Does not drive: Meat? Cheap cuts and rarely.
It has been officially acknowledged by the CDC that the jab causes heart problems, but these are “very very rare”.
Just how rare. They will not show us their data.
They will not tell us, which tells us what their data actually says.
Supposedly the heart problems of long covid last indefinitely, while the heart problems of the jab resolve in a few weeks, but this makes no sense, because the heart problems of long covid occur through the same causal mechanism as the jab.
Or even worse
https://www.rintrah.nl/suppression-of-the-innate-immune-system-the-main-cause-of-the-pandemic-of-the-fully-vaccinated/
https://www.rintrah.nl/important-when-you-get-vaccinated-you-lose-your-natural-immunity/
FWIW most of my friends are vaxxxed and don’t appear to be suffering gross health problems. However, they call got moderate severity Omicron infections in the same two week window while my unvaxxxed friends and I did not.
Same here. Either I did not get it, or I and everyone else unvaxxed was totally asymptomatic.
It is completely obvious that Omicron is, at worst, a light cold for the unvaxxed, potentially life threatening for the vaxxed.
Most of my friends are vaxxed, and say they are fine, except that one of them came down with aggressive cancer a couple of months after being vaxxed. Another one, the very politically correct one, he says he is fine also, but I doubt it.
I see that people cannot see what is politically incorrect, so people are going to say “no problems” unless the ambulance has to haul them off.
Lol, I’m the inflation guy, and still stand by everything I said in that thread. Since then supply has become challenged and the last month has seen much hardship in getting most things, we’ll see how it goes. Last week seem much better, but early to tell. CpI is 3.5, half of the US.
But as of when we were having that discussiuon there were no huge inflation or supply ussues, so no reason to change anything I said there. I just dont like the cuts of meat tou do appearently. Also, i think you can get a bit insular about your bubble at times: net everyone lives in the states.
Maybe, but you have a persistent bias that was obvious in that thread:
Paraphrasing “Fuel? I don’t drive. Rent? My lease has not rolled over. Wood? I don’t build. Meat? I prefer the cheap cuts, and I don’t eat a lot of meat”
And the same bias was visible in your macro economic discussion on your blog. You don’t see what is in front of you. You see what is supposed to be in front in you.
Unless you live in Russian or Chinese hegemony, you are a citizen of the Global American Empire. Failure to recognize this is to suffer from enormous and debilitating normalcy bias.
“Unless you live in Russian or Chinese hegemony, you are a citizen of the Global American Empire”
Both true and entirely besides the point given the context of the discussion.
I have traveled fair bit. White English speaking working class people seem to be fairly homogeneous, despite vigorous action in England to turn them into wiggers, which operation has succeeded in producing a massive wigger underclass in England. But the wiggers are not working class, for they do not work.
@Jim,
I do suffer from a degree of normality bias, true enough. So far, has not served me too badly, but you only have to be wrong once with this stuff so point taken. In the meantime, November approaches and I won’t mind taking some coin from you lol.
But here’s the thing: there is no way, no way at all, you can detect that bias of mine from that discussion: I do not buy wood, nor do I commute by car. My rent has come up thrice for renewal, and thrice it has stayed at exactly the same level. I do like those cuts that I like, I have not changed by tastes in recent memory.
What I’m saying – what I was saying then and remind you off now – is that the way you construct your argument comes out as “I am personally inconvenienced by inflation”, not “there is massive inflation from demand side” since all that suffices is from someone not to have your exact consumer basket and inflation is no longer so obvious.
Interesting that you came out with that impression from that discussion but meh.
Pooch is still hesitating on that bet.
Throughout the American empire, we are seeing massive signs of abnormality. But an empire rots at its head, and then retreats from its periphery. So normality bias is likely to be considerably safer on the periphery. For a while.
A lot of Roman upper class fled the center of empire to Britain, and it served them well for a time, for the old Roman order was less rotted there, but when the empire retreated from Britain, everything then fell apart utterly. The periphery of empire suffers from gross military incapacity. When empire retreats, weakness will be be attacked.
Here is a long term chart to compare oil prices:
https://schrts.co/HMYgwxgk
Natural Gas:
https://schrts.co/xkGscFmW
Sugar:
https://schrts.co/nDUJAMzk
Wheat:
https://schrts.co/psRDmDiE
Corn:
https://schrts.co/rXIhmcZK
Copper:
https://schrts.co/NMtrRkDI
Platinum:
https://schrts.co/BRGnxwaG
Silver:
https://schrts.co/ZwbnsAKu
I approach everything in the world as a currency, but there are various features, advantages and disadvantages among them. Ex. Dollars are required to pay your taxes and to settle your debts in the USA as well as many international transactions. Even though rich people in China, Russia, Argentina or XYZ may save in dollars, they cannot do any real business inside their country without converting into local currency.
All currency is valued in terms of the other/something else. So while I can see that a home in Telluride, CO is now $2,000 per square foot, this is not because of monetary inflation. Likewise, I was not concerned about hyperinflation when oil was at $150/bbl in June 2008.
Massive excess supply drove the crash in oil trading in April 2020 to -$40/bbl, but we cleared that in one futures contract expiration. I fully expect a near complete trade embargo will precipitate with China because of the dynamics of the global trading system. When that happens, there will be a huge drop in consumer crap flowing in which will drive, but also a really bad shortage of car parts. I expect price spikes in all kinds of strange things for the same reason that I love English antiques, huanghuali wood and ivory, etc., but I don’t care for diamonds. Things that cannot be reified into existence and have cultural significance will hold their value and appreciate against other assets.
You are overthinking this to avoid seeing what you are seeing.
For each of these graphs, click on range, set it to five years, then click on update.
All the spot traded primary goods have doubled. Oil, silver, natural gas, used cars, lumber, whatever.
Everything that rapidly reflects the underlying supply and demand has doubled in terms of the US$
Bottom line is that since 2021, the value of the dollar has halved. The CPI says 7.5%, which is a lie. List prices have not doubled, but a few days ago, I went to buy laundry baskets, and the cheap baskets I was accustomed to buying were everywhere out of stock, and what was everywhere in stock was a new model, crappier, at five times the price. Which being a new model does not count as list price inflation in the CPI.
The shortages you are seeing represent hidden list price inflation, which is also around 100%, but if you don’t want to see massive inflation, you postpone buying stuff expecting to see it become available at the old list price some time in the future. It will not.
lmao tf
It has long been obvious that Soros wants to kill all the Jews, and Andrew Anglin does not.
Soros actually worked for (not just in) a concentration camp after all!
The Jewish elites seem mostly use their people as shields. Plus Jews have a tendency of being intellectuals which makes them easy prey for bullshit like the covid lockdown. Unfortunately, this means the elite as a whole in the west, including whatever is left of the WASPs are a big part of the problem. The Jews have a been a major pain but getting rid of them won’t solve all of the problems, just some of them.
If they are as decimated by the vax as I think they will be I think the antisemites will be astonished by how little an impact it has (well given that depopulation will massively change society its going to be hard to evaluate in a vacuum).
The elite aren’t just a part of the problem, they are the problem.
Pooch, we’ll make a woodchipper operator of you yet.
Jews are two things: clannish and hypochondriac.
I know one person who died after her second shot, two who have diagnosed myocarditis, and several more who report general ill health, aches, tiredness, etc after three shots. I don’t know anyone who has died from covid.
With the last group, I have noticed a stubborn refusal to consider the vaccine as a potential cause, including among doctors. They were perfectly healthy in 2020, got a bunch of shots of experimental DNA therapy in 2021, and just like that feel like shit for months for no reason. Trust the science indeed.
Woman I know was diagnosed with MS, then went and got her booster. A few weeks later her husband says the doctors were shocked by the rate of growth of her lesions in such a short span of time.
They both make absolutely no connection. If anything would blame “long COVID” probably spread by antivaxxers.
The jabs are rocket fuel for autoimmune disease, which were already exploding in recent decades, probably due to whatever combination of low vitamin D, plastics, pesticides, processed food, etc. you care to blame for the fall in sperm counts. Unfortunately, covid itself seems to be so as well, but maybe not as bad, and possibly decreasingly so as it evolves away from its original bioweapon form.
New slur for the jabbed that I just came up with: GMOs. Especially because it cuts at the heart of the leftist who will buy non-GMO food.
“White women be worried about GMOs in their food but post ‘double-vaxxed and boosted!’ on they social media… bitch you are the GMO”
I’m retired but make the memes happen lads
I’ve been using the same for a while.
I’m not in contact with these people anymore, but I used to work at natural food co-ops which attracted the full gamut of people, including pretty far out their Gaia moonchild types who were very particular about what they’d eat or consume in any way. And yet I’m sure that the ratio is probably 9:1 vaxtard to refusenik amongst these people now.
Very strange realignment we’re experiencing.
Anectode incoming – myself and my 2 siblings got Omicron, only my sister is jabbed. She had the worst symptoms (body aches and headache were apparently worse than mine), also lost her sense of smell.
My brother had a headache and a cough that got worse with the peak badness being for about a day, then nothing, I had a headache and slept for a day. Hilariously my sense of smell has improved noticeably since infection.
Oddly my sister and myself were both quarantined with (jabbed) people who didn’t catch it, guessing because we weren’t really coughing.
Oh, added bonus. Many people who were PCR tested (in my state at least) had to fill out symptom surveys. Wonder if the government will publish those results?
What’s the possibility of a Volcker-style massive increase in interest rates next year? Clearly they won’t do it before the mid terms, but theoretically if they do it right after they could beat inflation back and then have a recovery by Nov 2024.
None, the government can’t raise rates because of the astronomical debt level. They must soft default via inflation (if they were sane they would actually hard default via printing trillion dollar coins and get it over with).
This idea that there will be anything more than a half a point hikes in rates is a loop between hedgies that wanted to crash all the mid and small caps so they can buy them at depression levels (and they have, I’ve been shocked at how badly they’ve crushed all the small cap techs) and morons.
They are signaling 3-4 rate hikes in 2022 each that will be 0.25-0.5.
I think they eventually want to get rates high enough to halt inflation but they want to do it gradually as to not force a hard crash, which means likely a couple years of stagflation ahead.
Anything above half a basis point total is bullshit.
Get out of all equities now.
They can’t do it… raising above a half basis point will cause upheavals WAY beyond the trucker revolt.
You’re setting yourself up to lose if you are banking on them not raising rates. Very smart people are getting out of equities. The elite are likely planning the crash as we speak.
Commodities and Bitcoin is the only thing one should be in right now. Real estate is a hold of you have it but wait for the crash to buy. I don’t say I didn’t warn you.
1) Small caps already crashed to almost March 2009 levels they fucked with the indexes somehow so it wasn’t visible.
2) Blackrock bought more near the low.
3) Blackrock then announced they agreed with me the fed can’t raise much
There will be no rate hikes beyond .5 basis points total.
I’ll take that bet. All the banks are betting the rate being raised between 1-2%. They may raise .5 total by March. Likely raise by 1-2% by end of 2022.
Soon the Fed will have to choose between popping the stock market and real estate bubbles, which would be painful, and wiping out the dollar, which would be downright apocalyptic. Old cat ladies would choose the latter option, but most Fed board members prefer a world in which they continue to exist.
One possible compromise is to keep giving money to the wealthy, but sunset all Covid-related handouts so poor people have to go back to work. Because money only has value as long as some people still have to work for it.
There is a bubble in real estate, the only bubble in equities is in large cap tech which are basically government fronts. Nothing can save the dollar from a severe devaluation at this point.
I don’t think there is a bubble in real estate.
There is an excellent chance that when the time comes to pay off the mortgage, the banker will be happy to get a carton of eggs instead.
It will be a bubble if the fed and federal government do what it takes to halt inflation, but I see a conspicuous lack of will.
Yes not even real estate is in a bubble IF the dollar is soft devalued, but real estate given the extreme amount of credit (and the likely dieoff of people due to the vax) is WAY more overvalued than equities with the exception of large cap tech.
A little while ago I bumped up the rent a lot on a tenant, and he seemed pretty happy to agree to the lease. If market rents up, real estate should be up. Outside of blue state areas that are being overrun by plains apes, rents are up one hell of a lot. Do you think they are ever going to go down?
Inflation has barely started, and I see no will to stop it. If rents are permanently up by a lot, and likely to rise a whole lot further, which was implicit in my conversation with the tenant, then real estate has to rise accordingly. The essence of the conversation was
“I want to charge you a whole lot more, and shorten the renewal term on your lease”
“No! not the term on the lease!”
He was fine with the rent increase, and expected worse to come soon enough.
Well, if we get major die off, as is looking increasingly possible, obviously the real value of rents will go down, but the real value most stuff will also go down. Natural assets, like farmland, will hold their value. Technology assets, like fracking, depend primarily on technological capability, and the fracking people seem to be holding on to their technology, they are merely facing increasing obstacles to applying it.
If you are worried about the cataclysm, which I am, bet on crypto, but probably unwise to be the house on crypto.
Currently moving into TOSSY. Watching the crypto market for another buying opportunity when the next wave of repression comes through. Very worried about the blood diamonds attack on bitcoin, and preparing to move out in that event.
What is TOSSY?
It is the Toshiba company that makes the big static non volatile memory chips that everyone is now using in their SSD drives.
Sharp Solar is another Japanese company with possibly really hot technology, but it has not been spun off from its parent company yet (and perhaps never will be.)
Technology is still advancing in Japan and Korea. I expect ARM cpus superior to x64 cpus coming out of Korea in a couple of years
I am still heavily invested in TSM, but I worry that if China conquers Taiwan, they will destroy what they came to obtain.
Real estate already went up massively during the last 1.5 years from inflation. Rents rising now are now a trailing factor of that massive rise in real estate, not a leading factor. Rents are catching up to the massive rise in home values, not the other way around.
With mortgage rates rising, a large portion of potential buyers will be knocked out of the market but we’ll still see low to moderate inflation-adjusted rises in real estate because there is still a housing shortage from the mass importation of slaves into the West. Commodities/Bitcoin are the better investment. Not investing in crypto. Crypto is a scam. Bitcoin is not.
Lot of scams in crypto currency, as there were a lot of scams in the first limited liability joint stock corporations, but it is a technology and a social technology, an application, the primary and central application, of distributed consensus and immutable append only immutable data structures, which are the leading edge of computer algorithms, and will solve, or at least make more bearable, many of the problems of a wicked and decadent elite.
Normalcy bias.
Rather, housing prices are a leading indicator, reflecting speculator’s guesses about what the demand will be.
Rents are a present indicator, which indicator shows that the speculators guessed correctly. If rents had failed to rise, would have been a bubble, an incorrect guess. That rents are rising indicates a correct guess.
US stocks are falling because capitalism is collapsing. Housing prices are rising because investors anticipate the US$ falling or collapsing.
Rents are rising not because speculators expected a rise in the price of housing, not because investors are fleeing into real things, but because rent on vacant property is a spot price, and all spot prices are rising similarly. Spot prices are a leading indicator of list prices, while the CPI is left behind in Lala land.
Housing is not a bubble, stocks are not a bubble, crypto currency is not a bubble. The US$ is a bubble.
Japanese shares are good. Especially Japanese tech shares. Looking at how Huawei is screwing up, I am worried that if the Chinese take Taiwan, they may well wind up destroying that which is most essential to China, and that which is most valuable about Taiwan: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company.
Maybe Huawei has realized what it is doing wrong, very likely it has. But I do not yet see them doing it right, even though they have taken the necessary steps to do it right.
So none they get it that high this year but I could definitely see them getting that high in the next 3-4 years.
No the ZIRP cannot ever be changed until they devalue the debt.
They can devalue the debt any time they want by printing more money. Getting inflation down is the higher priority (so they can print more money later).
Getting inflation down for what? The election? If it was so easy to stop they would not have gone as far as they did.
So they can print more money and keep the gravy train going. If they printed now they’d get Hyperinflation and potentially cause the whole system to collapse. They need to get inflation down so they can resume the money printer and the stealing.
The parasitic left wants to print funny money to prop up all their hobby horses at the expense of political-economy.
The ostensible theory is that if the inflation of the money supply is kept below a certain rate, ‘the market’ would be able to ‘adapt’ to; where nominal prices go up, but value stays the same – well, besides all the value stolen by the money printers that is.
There are at least two major stumbling blocks in this theory though; one is the idea that ‘the left’ could actually stop itself from indefinite money printing; the other is the idea that ‘the left’ could stop itself from interfering with the market itself in the first place.
“two major stumbling blocks … ‘the left’ could actually stop itself from indefinite money printing … stop itself from interfering ….”
True enough, both impossible.
Nevertheless, it is what it is: Build Back Better is off the table for now, and J. Powell is unwilling — again, for now — to print $trillions to finance the Green New Deal applecart tip-over.
I’m sympathetic to the theory that the EU Davos crowd is working to destroy the US to unleash a tsunami of US capital into the EU to rescue it from financial dire straits. Meanwhile, Powell, Jamie Diamond, et. al. — the Wall Street crew — will destroy the Euro and EU rather than hand over US commercial banks and the US Fed to Brussels and its One World Digital Bank, which would end commercial and consumer banking as we know it.
Just a theory, a decidedly contrary one, but it has kept me long $DXY making coin.
Inflation is still at the point were you can beat it simply by stopping all asset purchases and even divesting some holdings, no need to jack rates. They’ll do a bit of both but I think it won’t be enough.
Doubtful. Only jacking rates stopped it last time around in the 80’s. My guess is they raise rates but not nearly high enough and price controls become a real possibility towards the end of the year.
True, but jacking rates is the costless option hence they always go for it. Lowering the balance sheet is very costly, which is why they leave it for last. But to jack rates when you have a 10T balance sheet is like being found dead on the battlefield with 300 unfired rounds.
Not costless when they have 30 trillion in debt they can’t do it the devaluation cannot be stopped.
A huge and growing debt is a factor that would tell a virtuous Fed that rates are too low and must be increased a bit, up to the point where servicing the current debt level is onerous but not impossible, thus making it impossible to take on more. Of course, a non-virtuous Fed…
Why can’t you?
So expanding money supply while simultaneously raising rates…
Good way to devalue and crush real estate at the same time but needless to say won’t stop overall inflation.
Raising rates high enough will stop inflation. Of course it will crash everything which is why they don’t want to do it. I’ve heard somewhere they are ok with a 20% crash anything more than that and they halt the rate hikes so we’ll see.
They don’t care about crashing everything they care about the fact that the government would be broke from the interest payments on the debt and then they’d have to print anyway totally negating the point.
Its not about the musings of financial pundits (who have far more freedom than the rest of the press) its that they just can’t do it.
I say they can and they will do it.
We will see who is right.
At a 2% rate the interest on 30 trillion is 600 billion dollars a year… they can’t do it they must devalue.
There may be a chance to stop the inflation without causing a meltdown: keep rates as the are but sell back assets (i.e. buy back money). It will cause pain in the markets that rely on te Fed as a buyer (mortgages) but may spare the broader economy. If this has any chance of working its now before the people wise up to inflation and velocity goes through the roof.
So, lower the supply now but keep rates low.
Suppose they jack interest rates enough – which will be around twenty or thirty percent.
Then the national debt balloons, even though the money supply will stabilize.
When you hold interest rates below the rate of inflation, you are paying of the debt by printing money, exactly as Greenspan says – which means that you are defaulting on the debt by rendering the money worthless.
You can pay any debt, as Greenspan says, by printing money.
Or you can halt inflation by jacking interest rates up high enough.
But you cannot do both at once.
The fed, in holding interest rates at far below the rate of inflation, is monetizing the debt. Which is inflationary. To halt inflation, needs to stop monetizing the debt, needs to pay interest above real inflation. Which would mean that the government would have to balance its budget.
The infinite debt would result in inevitable default or money printing anyway thus devaluing the dollar, they can’t stop the devaluation of the dollar either way there is no way out.
There is a way out. Throw the quasi statal institutions overboard, cut handouts to criminals and layabouts. Let a default on a hundred piles of quasi state debt happen, as the Chinese government did with with Evergrande.
But it is, of course, quite unimaginable that the government would do that.
The debt now is too high for even that…
“The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that. So there is zero probability of default.”
True and false. The US could pay off all its debts with freshly printed money, but doing so might leave politicians with no currency to pay the soldiers and police who keep lynch mobs at bay. They might instead decide to default on the debt, which is mostly owned by foreign banks and old people, while printing just enough money to pay the men with guns.
Russia and Pakistan actually have defaulted on debt denominated in their own currencies, so the probability is not zero.
By holding the interest rate below the rate of inflation, the US is paying off all its debts with freshly printed money. It was working. It worked for a whole lot longer than I thought it would. It is still working, but the the wheels are beginning to fall off.
The government is also paying men with guns to keep the lynch mobs away, and that is infinitely more important than paying off the debt.
Besides, this is the 2020s. Why print money to buy votes when you can just print the votes?
To stop inflation, have to have positive real interest rates.
Spot prices indicate an underlying rate of inflation of around twenty percent or so, so need to jack interest rates to a bit over twenty five percent.
Which is as unimaginable as allowing Trump to win the presidential election.
Nah, real eates are a fact of life and beyond anyone’s control over the medium term. What you can do is set nominal rates and inflation follows naturaly as the difference.
If you jack rates circulation now will collapse which will shut inflation down, BUT the now lower base will grow faster so you get even higher inflation in the future. Whereas if you cut circulation without raising rates, you will kill it dead for good. But tou have to do it fast, before Bob wises up and money becomes a hot potato, at which point the trillions you buy back won’t be enough.
True, the thought of rates at 25% is unthinkable, but the thought of cuting the Fed’s balance sheet by 90% is utterly alien to them.
https://mendimeterastit.blogspot.com/2021/12/on-explaining-links-between-monetary.html?m=1
His model is stupid, because he leaves out government spending, and nominally private quasi state entities that are implicitly government guaranteed.
For effective action on inflation, observe Reagan. He held the real interest rate at around the inflation rate, resulting in unthinkably shockingly high interest rates. Much screaming ensued, but inflation stopped.
For effective action on too
well connectedbig to fail, Evergrande.That’s Arqiduka’s blog.
I should have phrased it more delicately.
If the fiat issuer users its power to print money to set interest rates, and sets interest rates at below the level of inflation, quasi state entities will borrow and spend ever increasing amounts of fiat, resulting in ever more inflation.
Arkiduka repeatedly makes the error of assuming government intervention is well intentioned, or at least capable of pursuing its ostensible and official objectives. Even if a King has the power to execute any of his servants for any reason or no reason at all, if he has a lot of servants with a lot of power pursuing a lot of objectives, they are highly unlikely to pursue his objectives rather than their own individual objectives.
Which was the primary issue that Reagonomics addressed.
Macro economics is invalid if conducted on the assumption that quasi state entitities are actually private, and that state interventions in the private sector and state action in the quasi statal sector serves, or was ever intended to serve, its supposed purposes.
If the state is doing anything other than what is directly related to military logistics, collecting taxes, and keeping order so that no one other than itself is collecting taxes, thus ensuring that there is something to collect, you have to ask yourself what are the incentives of the people engaged in that state or quasi state activity. They will pursue their incentives, not the state rationale for that intervention.
Lol maybe, but what harm can it do to sell those assets back to the je market for a couple of months, and maybe a rate hike won’t even be needed. Surely, no harm done if it fails, can still hike a bit later.
What are the assets the fed is holding on its balance sheet though, probably a bunch of no interest treasuries that nobody in their right mind would buy. Maybe some big member banks (quasi state entities anyway) will be willing to be “persuaded” to buy some…
But who the fuck else would want any of it?
As I have remarked several times, fed accounting and the resulting fed balance sheet is a game of three card monte. The cards are all face down, there are a lot of cards, and they keep moving around mighty fast. It makes Enron accounting look transparent.
Accounting should be done to make it clear where value is being created or lost, and where value is being moved to. Federal accounting is not done in this way.
The fed balance sheet is where all state and quasi state bad debts go to die, and federal accounting is designed to hide the fact that the state and the fed is rapidly taking on ever increasing amounts of quasi statal bad debt.
The state needs to purge quasi state entities so that they become fully state, and restrict them from activities that are likely to be productively done by private enterprise, outsourcing every activity that can be outsourced, including even as much military, police, and judicial activity as possible, so that the sovereign is not overwhelmed by an army of over mighty servants.
If the official interest rate is set lower than inflation, the state will bleed colossal amounts of fiat money into the quasi state, the FIRE economy. Which is what Reagan put an end to, and what is happening again now.
All the clever financial engineering of the fed is designed to obfuscate the fact that the flow of fiat into the quasi state sector has become a mighty flood.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/10/understanding-the-fed-balance-sheet.asp
Yes so its looks like the Fed Assets include
1) Bonds nobody would want because they generate no return
2) Mortgage backed securities probably the kind of worthless shit nobody wanted after the scam collapsed in 2008
3) Loans – Probably bad paper
The Feds Assets are probably in reality mostly almost worthless. Not sure what the effect on the market would be of selling a bunch of them and likely getting pennies on the dollar… I’m just between the cusp of midwit and actually smart person and the effects of that in an inflationary enviroment… hard to figure.
No worries m8.
Yes, the balance sheet is some combo of:
– mortgage-backed securities, which can be sold at a loss. Even if you don’t sell them, for God’s sake stop buying! – and they’ll exit the system simply by maturing but the signal yo the quasi-statals willbe clear: we’re no longer subsidising your shit.
– treasuries: FFS stop buying the longer maturities, these can be sold for good value. The t-bills are harder to dispose of, but trullions are sold outside the Fed every wek, so should be easy to dispose of.
-othwr loans: nobody wants these, let the mature.
– shares and others: sell em all.
– foreign exchange reserves: sell half, should be super easy.
Here’s the thing: if inflation is climbing and velocity still hasn’t picked yp, the Fed MUSt be byuing stuff, so at least stop before its too late Nd velocity makes deflation impossible.
As for intentions as per Jim, of course he’s right but is not what I’m discussing. I’m discussing mechanisms available, not whT these clows will actually do.
“– treasuries: FFS stop buying the longer maturities, these can be sold for good value. The t-bills are harder to dispose of, but trullions are sold outside the Fed every wek, so should be easy to dispose of.”
They are bought because the banks are made to understand they must buy them (being quasi state entities) or else not because they really have value.
Interest of 1/4 point during a time of inflation and probable default…
In the past, the Fed controlled the money supply mainly by rate setting.
Since 2008, it has controlled the money supply mostly by purchasing bonds with newly created electronic money.
If the normalcy faction wins, they may stop doing this, and assets may stop inflation even despite no or low rate rises.
The “normalcy” faction actually advocates an extreme and shocking change in policy, and if the “steady as she goes” faction wins, the Fed will continue buying bonds with new e-money, and then start buying equities with new e-money, as the Japanese central bank already does.
If the Trotskyites win, the IRS will start depositing $3,000/month in every non-white bank account, which will quickly become $30,000, $300,000, $300 trillion…
This totally fails to make any sense whatever.
Given a wicked elite, and an out of control bureaucracy, you cannot control the money supply unless you set the official interest rate at least as high as the real rate of inflation. If you fail to do this, a flood of fiat money will inevitably pour out of the state through the quasi state sector into the FIRE economy.
To stop out of control money printing, you have to set interest rates high enough.
If they stop the asset purchases the inflation rate will drop.
They cannot stop “asset” purchases without real interest rates rising to a substantial fraction of the real rate of inflation.
Which is unthinkable. The FIRE economy would go into total meltdown.
Since the FIRE economy is destroying, rather than creating, huge amounts of value, it would be a very good thing to for it to suffer total meltdown.
After being reduced to a small fraction of its former size, it would then get back in the business of creating value.
Jim forgive my ignorance but what is the FIRE economy.
Finance (banks, the stock exchange, and an ever growing pile of people given extraordinary powers by the stock exchange) Insurance, “Real Estate” (meaning not the guy who builds houses on a tract of farmland, but the guy on the revolving door with the zoning authority in New York), and of course, Education (college loans)
Typical scenario: A startup is struggling. It signs a deal with financiers guaranteeing them to issue stock whose market value is X. The financiers sell enormous numbers of short shares to depress the price. People notice there are too many short shares, and start buying them. Authority places its thumb on the scales, so instead of people who sold shares they do not have and cannot deliver going to jail, people who buy shares get credited with buying them, and if they then sell the noexistent shares they purchased get the sale price, but the shares were never in fact delivered because they never existed.
The net effect being that instead of capital being applied to productive purposes, it disappears into the festering ruins of New York.
So is that why some good small cap techs are so undrrvalued right now?
“This totally fails to make any sense whatever.”
LOL, that’s monetary econ, a fitting expression. Higher rates cause lower inflation but higher inflation causes higher rates. Go figure:)
Technically, it was Volker that raised rates well before Reagan’s election. Carter knew it meant he wouldn’t get reelected, and didn’t object with much vigor. Of course Carter didn’t do much with vigor — but LBJ would have thrown Volker up against a wall a few times, despite V’s size. The chance of reelection was pretty slim anyway, given the Iranian hostage crisis being the only thing on the news for about a year and a half, but Carter still deserves some credit for ending inflation. (Which should be taken away again for removing the civil service exam just as Reagan took office.)
But if this inflation is not primarily due to speculation, but is largely due to labor and supply shortages, tightening financial moves will have only a limited effect…and those supply shortages are likely to worsen as more people are killed or sickened by the vaxxes, or the diseases they enable, and supply chains continue to be obstructed…
True, and supply-side issues have st least something to do with this. But easy to tell them appart: its demand-side if nominal GDP or VATbase is increasing faster, supply-side otherwise.
The question isn’t so much can they do it, it’s are they stupid enough to try it? They could jack interest rates and fully monetarize the debt at the same time. Remember the solution to failed socialist policies is even more socialism.
It won’t be sudden. They will gradually raise rates for several years. Could be a 5-10 years before they get where they need to. Remember Volker/Reagan came in after many years of stagflation. We are just now entering the beginning of the stagflationary phase.
If they want Brezhnevian stagnation they won’t try they’ll merely accept the devaluation and try to slow it by continually slow it by threats of big rate hikes which will never come (maybe half a point but no more)…
If they want the full commie/jesuit great reset in the next 5 years who knows, i think the trucker thing probably makes that unlikely in the near term.
They currently have the choice of more inflation, will hurt some people, but probably keep their regime stable.
They also have the choice of sudden massive deflation, which will temporarily destroy society. This is what happened in 1929.
If they believe they are strongly enough in power, they will 1929. It looks like they believe they aren’t, and also looks like they really aren’t, but we should never lose sight of the possibility of intentional and punitive deflation.
1929 was before the current inflationary economic regime was implemented and this is not at all what they are signaling. Massive and sudden deflation will not only destroy society, it will destroy the regime. They are signaling small gradual rate increases with plenty of preliminary notification as to not spook the market. We should take this at face value because they have every incentive to not spook the market.
They may and likely will find that the small gradual increases are not doing much to curb inflation, in which large increases will become necessary which may very well cause large deflation but we aren’t there yet and they will give broadcast that far in advance of actually doing it.
The debt trap means they can only delay inflation, even causing a massive depression with high interest rates…
They would have to print money anyway or the government would not be able to pay soldiers in even printed money to stay in power.
http://www.creditbubblestocks.com/2022/02/guest-post-pension-crisis-averted-by.html
This is why I say wait and watch. Vax mortality and injury will be very noticeable when it hits, but it has not hit…yet.
We have increased the public debt from $7 trillion pre-Soter0 to $30 trillion, but we still haven’t seen $100/bbl oil since 2011. The CARES Act and ensuing stimulus bills/measures handed out consumption credits which drive investment outcomes and decisions that become self-reinforcing. Those consumption credits were funded by credit and were not printed.
W.H.Y? lol
If the treasury had not stepped in with the massive treasury bond/bill measures we know as the CARES Act, et al. than there would have been an extreme shortage of treasuries, federal reserve notes (bank runs) and precious metals. You don’t have to believe me on this because it will play out, but it is what it is. Supply and demand.
If the treasury policy shifts to a neutral public debt volume, with no more additional issuance, but not shrinkage, interest rates will collapse negative because the organic consumption within the system will turn negative and the people who buy treasury bonds (legacy hard money bankers) and own the banks who own the Federal Reserve will be the only people with surplus income to invest. First the hand-to-mouth people dry-out, then your Dollar stores, Walmarts and Aldis, then your Target, then your Bloomingdales/Nordstrom, then you Graf jewelers, etc..
This is a mathematical certainty, it is not a monetary or social philosophy – which I would argue are one and the same. The legacy bankers know the score board and so does the WEF crowd. TGR was floated and failed. We will have to see if the vaxes they engineered to close the pension gap and forestall debt-deflation do what they were designed to do, and the virus was designed to do, but they absolutely have not done so far.
Keep in mind that there is a theoretical stability level at which the treasury could throttle the outstanding supply of treasuries and maintain a -1% inverted yield curve, but they will have to cancel the existing Federal Reserve notes and introduce a CBDC which they do not presently have codified authority and have been denied that request this very year.
In reality, real life is not a math equation and living things are very chaotic, so I do not believe there is any path for the belt to meet the buckle and we will have a phase-shift style deflation. Printing is a non-starter because they can never print enough once they start – and they have not started despite the inflation porn they fund. If people believe in inflation, they will continue borrowing, but if they believe in deflation they will hoard physical currency and tangible assets of enduring value.
You are looking at the total death rate, which includes old people, and indeed has not increased enough to be statistically noticeable against background statistical noise.
The working age death rate and the under sixty death rate has risen forty percent, and child and young adult death rate has skyrocketed to about six times its former (very low) rate.
Which is very noticeable indeed.
Zhirinovsky is definitely not an American agent. Despite its name, the “Liberal Democratic Party of Russia” is actually more nationalist than Putin; thinks he’s a pussy for not annexing more of Ukraine in 2014. Anecdotally, the correlation between vaccination and political views in Russia is the opposite of the United States, or at least more similar to a horseshoe.
America’s top agent is Navalny if anyone.
Zhirinovsky was the first alternative politician in the last years of the USSR, with the KGB system propping him up as proof “see, we’ve got real political pluralism here”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Democratic_Party_of_the_Soviet_Union
He survived the collapse of the USSR and found his current niche in the 1990s. Father’s name is Eidelstein (the epic famous “my mother is Russian and my father is a lawyer”), but like the majority Jews that did not emigrate from Russia, is a Russian first and Jew last. Likes to criticize Jews (“stop acting like kikes if you want people to not hate you”) and America (“damn swaggering cowboys”). Had an epic drunken rant when Bush Jr invaded Iraq about how Saddam will kick Bush’s ass and then Russian scientists will tilt the Earth on its axis and flood America.
Nationalist populism stands on a mix of real and imaginary national traditions, and in spite of surface similarities, this foundation is different everywhere, because national traditions are different.
North American national populism is based on a “don’t tread on me” concept of liberty. Bolsonaro is attempting to do something similar. Hungarian, Russian, Japanese, Hindu, Filipino and so on national populisms stand on *different* foundations.
Hence, for example, the Filipino prez and Zhirinovsky both being pro-vax maniacs.
Just now a (((respected scientist))) working for Gamaleya (the Sputnik gentlemen), explained Zhironovsky’s mistake was he only did the Sputnik jabs plus a chaser, and then switched to the sub-unit EpiVac (equivalent to the currently hyped western Novavax), and then the trad CoviVac. You see, if Zhirinovsky had instead done eight jabs of the good old adenoviral Sputnik, he would have been bulletproof.
https://www.pravda.ru/news/society/1681874-pochemu_ne_srabotali_vosem_privivok_zhirinovskogo/
P.S. Incredible how the Russian public opinion has shifted over the last half year that the subunit vax (EpiVac) is shite, and how for example Taiwan’s Medigen subunit vax is only used by Somalia, but right now the West is totally promoting their own equivalent (Novavax) as this incredible new trad shot. And it’s not even a trad shot. These people… Oy. Vey.
So recently there’s been some metoo frenzy in Dutchland with important men (media moguls, football club managers) sending around dick pics. Which got me thinking: why? If these men independently spam dick pics, there’s got to be something to it.
What I come up with is that it might be similar to how a gorilla might strut around naked, swinging his dick around. It’s not the dick itself that is arousing, it’s the assertion of dominance over other men. This being the digital version of that, meaning that every next time the girl interacts with dick pic man, the dick pic is on her mind.
Ever notice that no one who supposed said the wrong racial slur on tape or sent the wrong body part picture ever just outright says that they’re just deepfakes made by his enemies who want his job? They always cuck and apologize, which is worse than defiantly owning it, which is worse than shrieking false flag when such a thing is believable.
Making your enemies sound like autistic nerd burgers by going after finely detailed technical analysis of every pixel of a dick pic is winning. But football club managers don’t seem to like winning? Really?
The only way to win is to defiantly own it, but people with guts are systematically excluded.
Well for one those guys can’t get a real marriage (marriage prohibition), so it’s sad they have to resort to digital negroid muhdick tactics instead.
Also there must be a huge rush to taking the gamble and finding out you’re important enough to get away with it. They’re playing digital muhdick chicken with each other. Establishing the ownership of digital muhdickspace.
‘no babe its not a dick pic its a nft.’
What do you mean marriage prohibition? Those upper level dudes literally cannot get married?
Having a real (18th century) marriage is hard enough these days.
Media attention and lack of privacy makes it tougher. These journalists and their masters will not be amused.
And then there is blackmailing…
‘Marriages’ are empty fictions in the contemporary occident. They don’t exist, and their ghostly after-images can be waved away with but a gesture. The substantial forms essential for such a thing as marriage are all illegal.
No, marriage is still real if you make it so. Just because something is outlawed doesn’t make vanish.
But you have to know that in order to make it so.
In these men’s defense, which is not a hill I’ll die on, since l o l, married man dick pics, but in their defense, it must be hard to have so much status in the publics’ eyes, only to get shit on in private household.
Marriage, as it has been understood for millennia, is illegal, and is punished more severely than murder.
This does not stop lots of people from engaging in it anyway, myself among them. But I have always done no end of seriously illegal things, and always gotten away with them so far, thanks to due caution, a nigh miraculous ability to talk to cops, and when that failed, the ability to hire a good lawyer.
Marriage is outlawed, therefore, to be married, you have to be an outlaw.
Aren’t gorillas always naked.
There’s still plenty of nuance in how you display said nakedness.
The head of the Russian communist party is now also in hospital with an ordinary flu https://lenta.ru/news/2022/02/11/zug/
One non-putinist parliament party leader left standing — Mironov of the social democrats. Mironov is currently demanding all cuck codes be banned on the federal level once and for all https://spravedlivo.ru/11831510
We’ll see.
Macron sat on the other end of a long table from Putin recently, because he refused to have a PCR test taken, so that Putin doesn’t have his DNA. Apparently a true story.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-kept-macron-distance-snubbing-covid-demands-sources-2022-02-10/
Zyuganov, the communist leader, had been jabbed three times.
https://news.rambler.ru/politics/47871387-zyuganov-trizhdy-privilsya-ot-covid-19-nesmotrya-na-medotvod/?utm_conten..
Looks like the holiness spiral continues:
https://twitter.com/ABC7/status/1492292848506470400
CA to mandate vaccines and boosters for all workers.
Things are looking better in Italy, as I mentioned before the health minister has already decided that the state of emergency which started in February 2020 will end after March 31.
This will not phase out the Green Pass, but it will remove a lot of the recent restrictions, meaning a test will be sufficient for any activity, so no booster or vaccination requirements.
They still haven’t made vaccination mandatory for work, though rapid tests only last 24 hours so I can’t imagine a ton of workers are resisting without getting “paper vaccinations”. Anecdotally I’ve heard of some workers getting that, even blue collar ones.
There is an absolute vaccination mandate for anyone over 50, which expires on June 15th, so quite a long time from now. Those people cannot work without the vaccination, will have their pay suspended, but otherwise only face a one-time fine of 100€.
They’re signalling that they want to only wind down the pass once the booster campaign has been successful. Which might sound bad, but here recovery from illness is equivalent to one shot. If you get it before the vaccination, you only do one shot, if you get it before the second shot, you are fully vaccinated, and if you get it after, it counts as a booster.
With omicron’s infectiousness, everyone who got two doses might get spared a third.
I am getting optimistic. I can’t predict the future, but I can see a change in direction here, as bad as things are. The question is whether it will happen fast enough, before winter comes back and they have renewed justification for it.
However, they keep signalling that omicron really isn’t very dangerous, and that we now need to treat it as “endemic”.
The reactions you get from the jab after having had COVID are by far the most dangerous. I’ve had covid twice now, Delta and Omi. I really, really don’t want to get the jab on top of it and in the US natural immunity doesn’t officially exist despite CDC data showing it vastly superior to the jab. I fear other states will force the same on everyone.
Though the California bill hasn’t passed yet and they may have a very difficult time enforcing it.
Shot 1 = 1 in 2500
Shot 2 = 1 in 1250
1st booster = 1 in 625
2nd booster = 1 in 312
3rd booster = 1 in 156
4th booster = 1 in 78
5th booster = 1 in 39
6th booster = 1 in 19
7th booster = 1 in 10
8th booster = 1 in 5
9th booster = 1 in 2
10th booster = 1 in 1
Shot one is about one dead per thousand.
I don’t know if shot ten kills everyone, but I am seeing straws in the wind that hint that the death rate grows impressively large with a population that is heavily boosted.
Ten shots lethal to most is my wild assed guess based on fragmentary information. They will not die immediately on getting their umpteenth shot, but they will get cancer due to a shot up immune system, stroke, and heart failure due to mud for blood and roughened artery walls, and they will get a respiratory disease that does not go away due to a shot up immune system. Most of them will die of the common cold, which, like almost any infection, is lethal once your immune system is busted.
Israel is highly boosted, and we can see that they have it much worse than everywhere else. I think it’s safe to say the boosters make it significantly worse over time.
But the immediate reaction to individual boosters gets less severe with each shot. I know anecdotally that everyone who got the booster experienced far less in terms of side effects compared to the second shot.
There’s probably two different mechanisms at play. Heart problems being more immediate, and weakening of the immune system is the chronic condition from cumulative shots.
The heart damage is probably from the immune system over reacting. So if it’s degrading, the heart damage from each shot will be less.
OT: I wanted to thank everyone for the medical and get in shape advice. After years of dealing with lack of energy and on and off again weight issues, I finally got on TRT late last year. It stabilized my mood and made it incredibly easy to hit the Gym multiple times a week. I’ve had to work with a personal trainer a bit to get going, but I’m now regularly lifting iron, I have tons of energy, and I’m acting in a more manly manner. I’m replacing fat with muscle at an amazing pace and my self confidence is through the roof.
Getting on TRT was a pain in the ass. I tried going through the normal medical system for almost 2 years and at every turn doctors did not want to proscribe it. I did test after test that qualified me for the treatment but they continued to throw up roadblocks. My personal doctor looked terrified at the idea. Eventually I found that holistic doctors are setting T clinics which is what I finally went to. Typically in the past Holistic doctors were generally quacks that the left enabled, but it looks like some are starting using the cover of quackery to do some good and to make a healthy profit.
I found helpful doctors, and I also just ordered it over the internet and paid with bitcoin.
I raised this question earlier, but it got buried in the chat: What happens to thots when they grow too old to make money the thot way? Or porn stars or models? Or those Hooters style restaurant girls? Has there ever been a study on what happens to them? Do they all go bat shit crazy and become left wingers?
They seek out beta bucks. I’m sure some choose to reform and become high status members of a church community. Not even Jesus Christ has as much status as a reformed whore or adulterous woman in the average church.
The marriage rate among thots is remarkably high, compared to that of lawyers.
Literal stripper whores are much more likely to marry out of their profession than lawyers and women in most traditionally male professions if they stay off hard drugs, imagine most of them cuck their husbands but more likely to stay married too.
They eventually get knocked up and become single mothers. The smarter ones then realize they need a man to pay for the raising of the kid and marry some what wisely.
LOL they are never on birth control, never. Make of that what you will.
The pill killed the endocrine system of generations of western women. Made them masculine, lumpy, coarse, insane, and unable to smell matching pheromones.
Sometimes in the wobbly middle layer between “classy civilized society” and “feral down and out subhuman wrecks” is where you get the people who have a vestige of good instincts remaining. Even if the personality superstructure built upon these instincts is no great shakes.
Haven’t made a study of the effects of the pill, but its funny that in my experience that none of the strippers I’ve banged are ever on it.
“Sometimes in the wobbly middle layer between “classy civilized society†and “feral down and out subhuman wrecks†is where you get the people who have a vestige of good instincts remaining”
Well they have more NATURAL female vices and failings than a typical Western feminist… Trad waifus they are certainly not but they are something less grotesque than the typical Western feminist.
I just wanted to confirm The Cominator’s sentiments have been true in my own life.
I married a stripper. We’ve been together 13 years. Good years. We know a fair number of other people in the trade. A lot of these women are quite beautiful, very feminine, and intelligent enough to figure out that beauty and femininity were more prized by men than society would have led them to believe. In another era, they would have been courtesans or hetairai: They might not be ideal wives, but they are ideal concubines.
Meanwhile, most of my friends are either miserably married with feminist harpies they met at their workplace or on their second or third wives, having lost income, homes, and children to disastrous divorces. (Aside: The only ones who aren’t have one thing in common — they married Asian immigrants. That’s another good path if you don’t mind mixing race.)
With ideal wives in short supply, a good concubine-type is a lot better than a shitty wife.
They are better than most Western women in almost every way (the ones who stay off drugs, hard drugs are the failure mode for strippers more than anything else) with one small disadvantage, probably a bit more likely to cuck you (not that normie Western women are a ton better) if given any chance, combo of higher than average sex drive and the fact that they got use to cheating on their significant other being completely normal during the time they “worked” (and also as Jim would say she might have been visited by General Butt Naked once or twice). If you’re of an extremely jealous nature probably not for you despite all the other advantages.
Far less likely to refuse to sleep with you (even if they aren’t particularly happy with you at the time) than a normie woman, more likely to take pride in her appearance, and the best feature if you don’t want her corrupted is that strippers are going to be far far more resistant to mind control rays from other women (they had to learn to ignore those in her working days) or any sort of Cathedral propaganda as well.
100% agreed. Speaking of resistance to mind control.. Of the stripper types we know (about six), not a single one is vaccinated. One has a fake vaccine certificate to go out. None plan to get jabbed.
In the future, it is from these pools of women that Jim will be able to source pureblood* wives to reward his loyal warriors after the Restoration…
*ok not quite virgin but it’s a fallen world
It’s the entire white working class who are the most jab resistant, stripping being most definitely a working class profession.
You cannot speak of the white working class as an entirely unitary entity its politics regionally varies and varies by ethnic subgroup and population density. Its more right wing than the brahminate generally but its not all that right wing in say Boston…
Strippers tend to be pretty anti vax almost regardless of any other factor including race, they pretty universally distrust the governments.
If you mix white and mongoloid, you get eastern Siberia and Central Asia. Also part of the Tatar (not all) stock carries vaguely mongoloid features, which can be seen in some European parts of Russia, the Ukraine, and the Balkans.
White + mongoloid and white + turkic can produce some fine additions to the “Eurasian race”. But thus far, historically, on a massive scale, only Slavs have interbred in this manner. Producing sharp cheekbone slit-eyed Slavs and dusky brunet Slavs.
Cue eastern front memoirs “and then the siberian divisions arrived and the mongoloid devils overrun what remained of our positions. Poor Gunter lost his left arm…”
Whether Anglo-Germanic western whites can produce a stable progeny with mongoloids and turkics only time can tell.
What we do know is that Iberian whites interbreeding with crypto-mongoloids (Amerindians) produced the latino race.
Western whites + South Asians — Brits need to weigh in about how that worked out. Frogs and Dutchmen should also have some experience with SE Asia mixing. But again. This is all recent developments, historically, and via oversea colonialism, while the Slavs did it for longer and the old-fashioned way — native nations running into each other on a shared continent and slowly absorbing each other’s traits.
“What we do know is that Iberian whites interbreeding with crypto-mongoloids (Amerindians) produced the latino race.”
Re Spics. Cubans are alright for some reason but I don’t think much of the rest of them, women are often hot when young but age terribly (unless 80% or more white). At least the ones here in Florida know that the Democrats are evil.
I hated the ones up North and non leftists Californians hate California spics, they aren’t hated in Florida and apparently Texas because more civilized (and in Florida mostly Republican).
They are also all mediocrities at best, there are a very few blacks who are genuinely extraordinary individuals with real achievements. There are zero spics like this. Spics have higher lows but also lower highs.
OK I tried to dig up some geniuses south of the US and couldn’t. Some like the magical realists, I don’t; some like that marxist painter with the monobrow, I don’t. Closest thing to a minor genius that mixes David Lynch with Alan Moore levels is Alejandro Jodorowsky, but he’s basically a Russian Jew who happened to be born in Chile. Doesn’t count.
Cominator judgement accepted: no geniuses in the Iberian/Amerindian mix.
For that matter I can’t think of a monogoloid Slav genius either. Shoigu is prominent but he ain’t no genius.
Except Victor Pelevin. He looks like a mildly mongoloid gopnik drunk, and is the closest we have to a genius today in based modern lit, aside from Michel Huellebecq.
https://graycity.net/victor-pelevin/221554-empire_v.html
https://graycity.net/victor-pelevin/231937-the_sacred_book_of_the_werewolf.html
“For that matter I can’t think of a monogoloid Slav genius either.”
Nonsense plenty of extremely intelligent Slavs.
Heeey, a film based on Pelevin’s Empire V is finally coming out end of march.
Ho ho motherf*cking ho.
https://ampir-v.ru/
Considerable chunk of humanity’s great composers, writers, and scientists are Slavs, honored Cominator, very trueski.
I meant specifically the Slav/Mongoloid sub-race.
“Western whites + South Asians”
South Asians appear to be an unhappy and unstable mix of whites and some pygmy-type people. Almost none of them look attractive, fit, or healthy.
Admixture with Brits will produce white-leaning mixes for a time until overwhelmed by Indians and eventually Britain is Indianized.
Its for better for those types to be married young anyway. So that they may be loved by their Husband, children and grandchildren.
Rather than letting their sexual expression be outside of the marriage bed.
Sex akin to fire is essential to humanity and one of the highest goods in the right context.
But it must be confined to the fireplace. Lest it burn down society and plunge it into chaos.
Those highly sexed women shouldn’t be Hatarai or even Courtesans. They are meant to be wives with a compatible Husband.
There have always been whores and all reactionary societies have allowed them (it was feministand progressives who banned it), the problem is we now live in a society where they are saner than the normie women and probably make better wives than them.
Even so.
At least in Hebraic Society and the New Testament. Whoredom has effectively been banned as being considered a good thing.
Ever since the original pattern laid down by the Lord Jesus himself where the Man and his Wife become One flesh.
The provisions for Whoredom has effectively been abolished in comparison to other societies:
Leviticus 19:29
29You must not defile your daughter by making her a prostitute, or the land will be prostituted and filled with depravity.
Leviticus 21:9
If a priest’s daughter defiles herself by prostituting herself, she profanes her father; she must be burned in the fire.
Deuteronomy 22:13, 22:20-21
13Suppose a man marries a woman, has relations with her, and comes to hate her, 14and he then accuses her of shameful conduct and gives her a bad name, saying, “I married this woman and had relations with her, but I discovered she was not a virgin.â€
20If, however, this accusation is true, and no proof of the young woman’s virginity can be found, 21she shall be brought to the door of her father’s house, and there the men of her city will stone her to death. For she has committed an outrage in Israel by being promiscuous in her father’s house. So you must purge the evil from among you.
Deuteronomy 23:17
There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel.
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/deuteronomy/23-17.htm
Deuteronomy 23:18
You must not bring the wages of a prostitute, whether female or male, into the house of the LORD your God to fulfill any vow, because both are detestable to the LORD your God
Observing actual practice in the Old Testament, these are not prohibitions against employing prostitutes, or even prohibiting the existence of prostitutes, but rather restrictions against the supply of prostitutes – that you should not allow your daughters to become prostitutes.
@jim
Agreed. All of those are designed as a way to increasingly confine sexuality to wedlock.
Reduce prostitution. Increase wedlock.
That’s why there is shotgun marriages when a woman loses her virginity to her seducer(Exodus 22:16-17)
Also there are also admonitions in order to dry up the demand for prostitution:
https://biblehub.com/bsb/proverbs/5.htm
To drink from one’s own Cistern. Not those shared with many other Men via the Prostitute and being cuckolded in a sense as a result of not properly owning said woman for one’s own exclusive use.
And the only praise for sexual desire and erotic love is in the Song of Solomon exclusively between a Man and his Wife:
Song of Solomon 4:12
My sister, my bride, you are a garden locked up, a spring enclosed, a fountain sealed.
Although given how sodomy is also associated with temple prostitution is liable for the death penalty in that case.
What you refer to as “normie” women are in fact Brahmin college-educated women. Your interaction with strippers are identical with Amerikaner white working class women as a group. As a whole they are less Cathedral-indoctrinated and less liberal.
I’ve dated a few and they are great, but come with a different set of problems than Brahmin girls namely drugs and their expectation of masculinity is going to be a bit different. Non-college educated white working class women are used to be around men who work with their hands, policemen, military men, etc. Can be hard to LARP as that if that’s not your class. Brahmin women are used to being around the likes of Scott Alexander.
I know the preferences of redneck girls, not all the strippers are of the redneck background. Also ALL women have a uniform fetish.
Amerikaner women (white working class women without a 4 year college degree) are going to be accustomed to and expecting the type of masculinity of men in uniform ie men capable of actual violence. Brahmin women aren’t. That’s not to say Brahmin girls don’t respond to military men, they’ve just been less exposed it.
A nuanced but important difference to understand if you are targeting Amerikaner women specifically.
And the military men they are exposed to are going to be overwhelmingly officers, not grunts.
This is moral teaching is expanded in the New Testament:
15Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take the members of Christ and unite them with a prostitute? Never!
16Or don’t you know that he who unites himself with a prostitute is one with her in body? For it is said, “The two will become one flesh.†17But he who unites himself with the Lord is one with Him in spirit.
18Flee from sexual immorality. Every other sin a man can commit is outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body. 19Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own; 20you were bought at a price. Therefore glorify God with your body.
https://biblehub.com/bsb/1_corinthians/6.htm
And the fact that use of prostitution falls under sexual immorality(acting the harlot):
https://biblehub.com/greek/4202.htm
Related to the word for prostitution in Greek:
https://biblehub.com/greek/4204.htm
Christ himself seemed to hate lawyers tax collectors and above all corrupt and demon worshipping priest far more than either prostitutes or their clients. You are trying to read St Jerome’s faggotry into the bible.
Yes its a sin, but both Christ and Augustine seemed to recognize it as an essential and immutable fact of life in the fallen world.
Those passages are not plausible evidence for your interpretation.
“You are trying to read St Jerome’s faggotry into the bible.
Yes its a sin, but both Christ and Augustine seemed to recognize it as an essential and immutable fact of life in the fallen world.”
Jesus did say the poverty is a immutable fact. “The poor you will always have with you”. But not prostitution which I don’t think there are any passages about that.
Other than being willing to forgive the repentant prostitutes that come to him and would give up said life afterwards.
It is still worthy of eradication nonetheless and an evil nonetheless that must go as much as possible. I know there is no outright ban.
But it should be far harder to enter the profession and extremely easy to exit ASAP with means provided.
Given Human dignity courtesy of being Made in God’s image. It is unbecoming of human beings to be prostitutes and being prostituted.
St Jeromes faggotry is about hatred of sexual passion in general. But I didn’t denounce the goodness of such a thing in marriage. So I disagree.
What shill interpretation of the Bible was this I’m curious.
“Christ himself seemed to hate lawyers tax collectors and above all corrupt and demon worshipping priest far more than either prostitutes or their clients. ”
Because Pride which Satan had without sexual passions of his own or a human body to make that possible. Prevents repentance.
That’s why Christ hates them more than prostitutes and their Johns. Who are far more capable of knowing what that they are doing is wrong and are willing to come to him for forgiveness.
And also willing to give it up to either be celibate or become a wife and mother.
Or to confine his sexual activity to his lawfully wedded wife.
Unless she has been through too many Men to even properly bond with her Husband.
jim, how else do you explain what the Biblical formula for marriage, from Genesis 2:24, “the two shall be one flesh”, is doing in 1 Corinthians 6:16 [*deleted*]
I employ the same explanation as every Christian in all of history has, and I doubt that your explanation has ever occurred to any Christian.
Normiecon Protestant interpretation.
To paraphrase St. Augustine’s position, a moral society must have a secluded area for whores and rakes otherwise these individuals will corrupt our families and neighbors. Without brothels, immoral men will sleep with our wives and immoral women will turn whore our daughters. Criminalizing prostitution is feminist because it removes punishments for female misbehavior.
Obviously seeking a prostitute is immoral—but allowing immoral women into polite society is the greater evil. Brothels when done correctly are the historical equivalent of prisons for immoral women, siphoning them out of the gene pool.
I know I am deleting what I should when my readers already know what the deleted material said. Or rather, assumed was self evident and that everyone, including myself, agrees.
jim, Neofugue was completely off in his guess of what I said and you, apparently, are too. [*deleted*
He was indeed off in what you said, but he was spot on in your payload.
You say things that no one really disagrees with, but assume that everyone agrees with stuff that absolutely no one agrees with, stuff this is outrageously false and completely indefensible.
And when I challenge you on it, you never defend it, but go right on talking about what you said, which no one, least of all me, challenged, and go right on assuming that everyone agrees with what you assumed everyone agrees with, and ignore my passionate and excessively lengthy rebuttals of the assumptions that you go right on blithely assuming that everyone agrees with.
So I am not going to allow anything through that assumes that everyone agrees with stuff that absolutely no one for the past two millennia has ever agreed with, because you never respond to me challenging it.
The normiecon interpretation lacks scriptural roots. You are fabricating scriptural roots for it. The normiecon assumes that Christ and the apostles were normiecons. You are assuming that everyone knows and agrees that they were Saint Jerome and Origen. Your interpretation of 1 Corinthians would never occur to a normiecon. And I doubt it occurred even to Saint Jerome.
I see you have never read more than one Pauline commentary. [Paraphrasing: “Unspecified theologians whom I do not cite or quote kind of sort of somehow support my interpretation in some unspecified and unexplained way, and, by the way everyone knows that these books of the bible were made up much much later, and here are some eminent Christian authorities saying that”]
Your payload is absolutely indefensible, as demonstrated by the fact that when I challenge you on it passionately and at great length you have never once defended it.
So I am just not going to let your payload through any more because you are not willing to debate it. When challenged, you deny that there is any payload, because supposedly everyone, including me, already agrees with it, and proceed to debate something utterly unrelated, which debate continues to presuppose that everyone, including me, already agrees with your payload.
If you want to get your payload seen in this blog, you are going to have to present it as a claim, rather than a shared assumption that everyone already knows and agrees with, and present arguments and evidence for it. I am no longer going to challenge your payload, when my challenges are invariably ignored. I am going to censor it.
“It is still worthy of eradication nonetheless and an evil nonetheless that must go as much as possible.”
In God’s kingdom after the Tribulation perhaps, but its not for man to try to eradicate it. Its folly and the fruit of doing so gives women in general an insane idea as to their value.
“Given Human dignity courtesy of being Made in God’s image. It is unbecoming of human beings to be prostitutes and being prostituted.”
This is humanism, the original demon worship of the Jesuits you know the people I’ve concluded are ultimately (given that its hard to deny there is a conspiracy now) behind Covid and probably behind a lot of other horrors. Humanists need to all be burned. Humanism is evil because it denies the natural depravity of man.
@Neofugue
To paraphrase St. Augustine’s position, a moral society must have a secluded area for whores and rakes otherwise these individuals will corrupt our families and neighbors.
I think there is a proper Christian response with the existence of Brothels as a containment area like the actions of St Vitalis:
St. Vitalis was born and lived in the Gaza area in the 7th century.
At the age of 60, however, the monk took on a calling to travel to Alexandria to redeem the harlots there.
This was his operation: he would work at menial and back-breaking jobs during the day to gain wages to visit whorehouses during the night.
He would go in as a “john†paying for a girl and a room and shut himself in the room for the entire night.
Once inside locked up, he would beg the woman to lie down and sleep while he would spend the entire night in a corner of the room in prayer to God for that sinner.
Instead of doing the “dirty†he would pray the entire night and so save her from at least one night of sinning.
Imagine the surprise of the prostitutes when instead of having to serve they would be prayed for. The monk Vitalis, (his name incidentally means “full of lifeâ€) would make rounds of the brothels, visiting one woman and then another, until he came full circle to the first.
As a natural extension to his many visits, he would develop a relationship with the women and they would get to talking about their lives.
It was during these nightly counseling sessions that Saint Vitalis exposed their souls and engaged in intercourse with their spiritual being.
As a result many a prostitute abandoned her trade; others married, others entered convents, and still others chose to change their profession.
https://greekamericangirl.com/st-vitalis-the-monk-who-visited-whorehouses/
Brothels when done correctly are the historical equivalent of prisons for immoral women, siphoning them out of the gene pool.
And St Vitalis is the equivalent of the Prison Chaplain sharing the Gospel with criminals in Jail who are about to die or be punished in other ways as determined by the Trial.
This is what should happen.
More specifically, it denies that there is any depravity in (a) man that is natural to him.
“In God’s kingdom after the Tribulation perhaps, but its not for man to try to eradicate it. Its folly and the fruit of doing so gives women in general an insane idea as to their value.”
Even so that should be the goal even if like an asymptote it is approaching 0 but never getting there.
Everything short of banning it that is. As argued effectively above. Which I don’t endorse.
“This is humanism, the original demon worship of the Jesuits you know the people I’ve concluded are ultimately (given that its hard to deny there is a conspiracy now) behind Covid and probably behind a lot of other horrors. Humanists need to all be burned. Humanism is evil because it denies the natural depravity of man.”
God forbade Man to be murdered because he is God’s Image.
As The Rulers of Creation as its Royalty and destined to Reign by God’s side. If we are faithful.(Revelation 3:21)
Why would we not possess said dignity to not be murdered?
Why should Human beings be even tried in due process if we didn’t at first possess the dignity of God’s Image.
Which makes us Morally liable for our Sins before God.
Does God hold the Animals to the same Moral Standards. Do they get sent to Hell?
Why do us Humans have to stand before the Great White Throne. Unless we are made in God’s Image?
Yet if we have such moral duty to be Virtuous before God. Why wouldn’t we be bereft of Rights before him?
Disapproving of selling pussy and putting pussy on a pedestal have an interesting coincidence with each other.
“He would go in as a “john†paying for a girl and a room and shut himself in the room for the entire night.
Once inside locked up, he would beg the woman to lie down and sleep while he would spend the entire night in a corner of the room in prayer to God for that sinner.
Instead of doing the “dirty†he would pray the entire night and so save her from at least one night of sinning.
Imagine the surprise of the prostitutes when instead of having to serve they would be prayed for. The monk Vitalis, (his name incidentally means “full of lifeâ€) would make rounds of the brothels, visiting one woman and then another, until he came full circle to the first.”
LOL strippers and hookers always get these kind of white knight weirdos, and they universally consider them a weird annoyance (and tend to think they are homosexuals) it wouldn’t be much of a surprise. The Opus Dei FBI traitor (he was doing it back before they were all communist traitors in the FBI) Robert Hannsen would do similar shit with his treason money.
And yes we support having 95% of women married off young but it doesn’t always work out even in societies that encourage that, and women that aren’t wives young SHOULD BE prostitutes (in a brothel or club setting not a street walker setting) because as me and Restitutor discussed they tend to turnout a much better than career women. The white knighting they need is advice warning them of the dangers of hard drug use… that is their failure mode body and soul. They do fine otherwise and tend to end up marrying out.
“Disapproving of selling pussy and putting pussy on a pedestal have an interesting coincidence with each other.”
You cannot discover price without a market. A society that does not allow selling pussy will put pussy on a pedestal and in such a way both sexes will go mad…
You make prostitution low status.
You don’t worry about female consent – and thus women with no husband and no father are subject to violence. And fathers or husbands who prostitute their wives or daughters also low status and subject to violence.
You allow marriage by abduction.
That is how you cut the supply of prostitutes. Any other method sends people mad.
Jim correct me if I’m wrong even until the say late 1980s and even in the feminist Anglo west attractive single women did not really have any legal recourse to a guy harassing them constantly until they sort of gave in, so attractive women before that time were rarely single and on the catlady path. If they didn’t have a man to ward off harassers they had to endure harassment or pair up with someone.
@The Cominator
“As a natural extension to his many visits, he would develop a relationship with the women and they would get to talking about their lives.
It was during these nightly counseling sessions that Saint Vitalis exposed their souls and engaged in intercourse with their spiritual being.
As a result many a prostitute abandoned her trade; others married, others entered convents, and still others chose to change their profession.”
Can’t argue with the results. It worked on many women. A secondary solution at best.
Aside from Jim’s solutions which would be Primary.
Heartiste or Roosh wrote an article about how a woman’s flesh jiggles wrong when she’s on the pill. Men with options instinctively sense that she isn’t fertile and save their money and sperm for someone else.
I have read that strippers make the most money when they are fertile and the least when they are on their period.
It would be interesting to know if strippers on the pill make less money then strippers who don’t take it.
No idea, if you’re in Germany its likely different because prostitution is de jure legal. I don’t know if they had strip clubs there but if they do the clubs are probably ironically more strict.
In the US best place i know of to go for that… if only the music wasn’t generally so terrible nowadays.
Girls on the pill smell wrong, you can tell they aren’t fertile
This tells me strippers are overwhelmingly Amerikaner whites. What you call “western feminists†are college girls, the upper classes.
Strippers resist Cathedral propaganda because their class, the white working class, is more resistant to the Cathedral because they don’t go to college.
Plenty of minority strippers (they all hate niggers and generally spics though even the minority ones). Asians are the rarest site racially in my part of Florida (though they do exist).
Brahmin class girls are less likely (for all their internalized feminist bullshit) to want their family and friends to ever find out a working class girl or fatherless girl is going to face less social consequences, and also internalized feminist bullshit makes them have a far more negative view of it than Amerikaner type girls (American feminism is the puritanical kind). You do actually sometimes get women who are paying for college though it does happen. But self destructive behavior among unowned women is not confined to Amerikaner working class girls.
It’s always a lie. Chris Rock has a famous stand up bit about that.
Manifests in different ways based on class. Self destructive behavior for unowned Amerikaner women is hard drugs. Self destructive behavior for unowned Brahmin women is being a childless wine drinking cat lady.
Chris Rock was wrong about strippers he said there was no sex in the champagne room (or by implication the club)… he was funny back then but he was also wrong. The college girl is rare and most don’t claim it but it DOES exist.
Brahmin women can get on hard drugs though its rare.
A Dutch TV crew goes to Las Vegas to interview homeless people living in underground drainage tunnels. They meet a 36-year-old woman, ask what she used to do for a living, and are shocked to learn that she was a top-100 porn star:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fW5B6ZrHkCE
Wow
Serious drug addict im sure, whores who stay away from that tend to do well for themselves.
The highest echelon:
1) Smart, save money, and become independently wealthy
2) Marry a rich dude and become trophy wives
The moderate echelon:
1) Marry a middle or upper-middle class dude and mother his kids.
2) End up a single mother with a single baby daddy, possibly find beta bucks to help. Mix of sex work, normal job, welfare.
The lowest echelon:
1) End up on the street on drugs or hooking
2) End up single mother of multiple kids by different dudes, mix of sex work, normal job, welfare.
Almost none end up crazy cat ladies.
Following their telos in a fouled up way because of a fouled up world
Hard drugs are a failure mode for all the echelons of them… the one white knightish thing i tell them ever is that while smoking and moderate drinking and moderate weed are okay for them to do hard drugs are not.
If you want kids should just nut inside one since they never are on the pill.
Because drugs are a failure mode of their class in general. Opiods hit the white working class the hardest. One Amerikaner girl I got involved with had a horrible weed problem. So much so that I had to break it off. Something about it was just repulsive to me.
This is not true. My entire extended family caught it. My mother was sick for over a week, my father for a week, and one of my brothers for over a week and he’s having a slow recovery. My sister was sick for 3 days and my brother in law cut short his infection with Ivermectin after being very sick for 3 days. All pure blooded. It was a nasty flu if the proper treatments were not taken.
The meme from the right that the Wu Flu doesn’t make you sick isn’t true. It can make you very sick if it’s not properly treated or if you have co-morbidities. After Tim Pool had such a nasty case of Delta, I resolved not to fear COVID, but to take seriously if I did catch it. I bought some horse paste, zinc, got my D-2 and k2 levels up and I was generally ready for it. I would have started vaping if I’d realized at the time that would have been useful.
I was the only person not to get really get sick from it. When I heard I was exposed I took Ivermectin and zinc right away. I had a day where I felt slightly out of it and that was all. Other people like my mother who refused Ivermectin suffered for not treating themselves properly.
Why do you feel so confident you and your family were infected with the Omicron variant? How severe were those people’s comorbidities? I only ever hear of these severe COVID cases on the internet despite being in a very “hot” area and interacting with thousands of people in the course of my job across the Northeast US. You say it’s a nasty flu, well I’ve had a few of those over the years. When people say it doesn’t get you really sick, they aren’t denying you get the sniffles and coughs and maybe stay in bed a few days, you know, like a flu….
Tim Pool is a half breed pussy. He does some good. But of course he’d be on his ass playing it up.
@Red
Fake and gay.
Didn’t happen to me or anyone else in my family of police and military. Didn’t happen to any of my acquaintances who are factory workers, farmers, and truckers.
Speaking of which, notice how Omicron is a nothing-burger for the truckers carrying out the blockades in Canada, but somehow Omicron is being reported by email jobs people as “serious.”
Viruses don’t fucking care about your social class. Email jobs people should get real jobs instead.
I got sick but like flu sick.
I got it and it was undifferentiated from the common cold. Same goes for everyone I personally know who got it. Anyone who says otherwise I have deep suspicions of being a faggot and a pussy.
I have heard fat and horribly obese people do have a tough time with it though, but that’s from second hand sources only.
The common cold doesn’t take weeks to fully recover from. Who the fuck gets the flu for a week? I never have. The flu is like 1-2 days and it’s over with full recovery is a week at most. The only sort of sickness I’ve had last longer than a few days was something that turned into a bacterial infection in the lungs.
The worst hit person in my family is thin and in his early 30s. No comorbidities and he’s recovering fine now but it’s taken weeks. For everyone else is was mostly a bad flu, but one that could have been cut short with proper treatment.
The issue with COVID is the spike proteins. Have a bad enough case and you end up with proteins in lungs and then into the blood stream. Omicron has the good fortune of not being able to effect the lungs nearly as much due to the changes to the spike. If you get a light case it’s a fucking average cold because you never end up with spike proteins in your blood.
The point is people should treat it properly so that a bad case never gets going instead of going it’s fake and gay and you should ignore it. Most of the time ignoring it is going to be fine expect when it’s not. But we have the tools to fight it, so why not use them?
Every time I’ve had the flu it was flu-like symptoms for 3-5 days. Usually feeling better after that.
5-6 years I got hit by a flu that toppled me for a week, and since circumstances did not allow for a quiet regeneration period, quite to the contrary, I was running on minus 20% energy for months, then gradually clawed back to plus 70% energy over the course of like half a year.
If you’ve been bad at managing your energy, and you get hit by a foreign strain (had just stepped off the plane) at a moment of total depletion, it’s hell. I spent a week sleeping in a jacket and still shivering and unable to eat solid food.
At the wrong time flu is hell. Sure, the rest of the time you tango for 2-3 days than another 2-3 days of bouncing back. Unless you get a cough, the cough lingers for 10 days or 3 weeks, after other symptoms have resolved.
But I hereby testify that if you’ve been stupid at self-management and a bad flu hits you at the wrong moment, you get wiped out fast and hard.
And while for me this was a historical low point in self-management, in today’s globohomo society it’s easy enough to imagine millions of people staying constantly in such a depleted state, being told by pharma that this is normal and all they need is a suitcase of pills to manage all their mysterious ailments.
When they get hit by a flu, they get hit like I was hit at my lowest adult point, or even worse.
What does it mean to fully recover from the common cold or flu? You might have a nagging cough until the Spring, on and off congestion, etc…. If the weeks of recovery meant you had the sniffles for weeks then who cares?
I don’t want Jordan Peterson to be prime minister of Canada and Joe Rogan to be the voice of truth in America. They’re setup as the truth tellers and radical anti establishment figures when they just want to go back to 2013. Saying the vax is bad but COVID also bad/real lessens the liability of those pushing the vaccine and the restrictions.
Jim saying it was dangerous for a minute but quickly evolved not to be, I think is even taking it too seriously, but makes sense of some of the early information and is reasonable. He’s also done a lot of research it seems.
Saying your family really got hit hard by the cold this year, so it’s no joke, is a lie.
I’m checking out the SPARS report from John Hopkins in 2017, I haven’t done so yet but saw it suggested that it’s similar to the Event 201 scenario but had baked in a rushed and deadly vaccine and the public reaction to it. The suggestion from the conspiracy blog that linked me to it was the elite are acting out their understanding of the end of days, but that the tactic was not to kill with the virus or the vaccine, but to take advantage of the reaction to the botched response.
I have not had a cold for, I think, a decade.
Correction, I have had the occasional cold, but scarcely noticed.
If your family gets chronic sniffles, something is very very wrong.
The death rate always went up in flu season, but as with Covid, no one died of flu. They died with flu. If something else is killing you, getting flu on top of that does not help.
And if you are miserable during flu season, something else is killing you.
I tend to have a chronic cold, in summer and in winter. Sometimes it’s more severe, sometimes less. Though the “severity” is limited to sore throat and stuffed nose.
I used to get the flu, with fever, once a year. I didn’t get it in 2020, I might’ve had it for one day in 2021 (covid PCR tests turned negative).
It seems I never had covid despite relatively frequent testing. No antibodies detected either (which would confirm a previous infection)
Either I just avoided infection (I did travel a couple times, but I mostly stayed home, especially in 2020), or I am immune to it, despite being affected by the cold quite often.
Something is very wrong if you have a chronic cold, in summer and in winter.
Maybe it is an allergy (easy to get a stuffed nose from an allergic reaction), maybe something more serious. Quite possible, no physician can help, but something needs to be changed
The original weaponized virus was designed and genetically modified to attack the lungs – one of the research papers was published. It did not say “We are researching a weapon to kill has many humans as possible”, but it did say that they genetically modified a bat covid virus to give it the capability to enter human lung cells and it proved highly effective in cultured human lung tissue.
But if you are a flu/cold type virus, you don’t particularly want to attack the lungs, because it provokes an apocalyptic immune reaction, and because it is further from other people. You want to attack the nose and throat, so that you can get out of your carrier and into an uninfected person. And if the virus is contained in the nose and throat, it is inconvenient, but no great problem.
Given how blabbed on for months about the Pentagon would protect Elon Musk I don’t think you know anyone in the military. But on the off chance you do, let them know they’re fucking aids infested faggots for letting Joe Biden steal the country and shutdown Starship development.
@Red
If only you email jobs people were made to work in real jobs.
It’s only you email jobs people who are hyperventilating about this covid hoax.
A close relative got it in early 2020. He had a bad fever for a week, and felt sick for almost two weeks. Blue collar worker, not “email jobs”.
He would never get the flu or otherwise get sick, which made this look particularly bad in contrast.
It wasn’t life changing though. After that, it was just over.
[…] Jim discusses Coof Juice lethality. […]
Considering how bad the US military has gotten, are there any military services in the west that haven’t fallen as far? French Foreign Legion, whatever? Also, any red cross or other international organizations? Just curious how bad the rot has gotten throughout the west. Not sire if this has been discussed in mass on any red pill sites.
Germany’s is a total disaster. We are on the third women who never hold a gun in their hand as a defense minister.
The consulting firms make big money. Most of the equipment is not working. Solders using their weapons in Afghanistan were prosecuted.
For decades word on the street is that only people with no other options join.
Amish speak a language between Dutch and German. Yiddish is German written using the Hebrew alphabet.
The major readily observable issue is the ability to put boots on the ground. Putting logistics in military uniforms and giving them military honors had the result that logistics swallowed the army. The British army has approximately a hundred generals, and used to be able to put approximately a hundred boots on the ground. Probably fewer now.
Additional issues are lawyer infested warfare and collapse of discipline. Authority bypasses the chain of command. Every sergeant is answerable to a committee and he does not know who is on the committee.
But, absent actual warfare, hard to tell how this is going to go down.
There is also the issue of the collapse of technology. For a long time they have been scouring ancient arms dumps for seventy year old weapons that we can no longer build. Plus every army prepares for the last war. Always has. The time has come to apply advances in networking and drones for the grunt on the field. The army that does so will have an enormous advantage.
I envisage small expendable high flying drones maintaining line of sight spread spectrum communications with grunts in the 30GHz-1cm, band, between the oxygen absorption band and the water vapor absorption band. Spread spectrum signals are hard to detect and hard to jam. And, if we use phased arrays (notice that the Starlink terminal has far more phase units than the best military jet fighter phased arrays) we can have directional line of sight spread spectrum communications, which are very hard to detect and very hard to jam.
This will enable flash crowd tactics, with troops very thinly spread out over a very large area, moving quietly from one good sniping point that controls a large areas to another, and suddenly concentrating when one of them encounters something of interest.
Grunts in the field also need the capability to shoot over obstacles – a small mortar with only a few hundred meters of range, that can land a small explosive charge on a point in an image seen by a small drone.
Future war is going to involve elite well trained troops with expensive equipment, which favors, and is likely to lead to, aristocratic government, and aristocratic armies.
The time for Kings and aristocracy returns.
The winner of the twenty first century wars will have elite troops with elite equipment and elite officers. And then those elite officers will take power, and their children and grandchildren will be nobility.
Neo-steppe warfare: https://twitter.com/jpt401/status/1480292231294636033
I do wonder what the current minimal number of fanatically committed soldiers averaging 100-105 IQ to a Caesar of moderate military ability by historical standards that would be required to conquer Europe, then the US.
I know I sure as hell wouldn’t fight against him, or allow anyone influenced by me to do so. I wonder what fraction of Europe would fight, or if the US military could.
During the Late Republic, Caesar made the aristocracy of Rome run for the hills with a single legion. Upon reaching Rome, suddenly his single legion turned into multiple legions. This seems like a comparable scenario to today.
Say 10000 armed with whatever could be cobbled together for a budget in the 100M range arrived at Berlin with their Caesar and commanded the Germans to submit. I wonder if Germany would fall. I don’t think NATO could/would save them. Ironically I think the most likely ‘savior’ would be Putin, not because he’d want to necessarily but because he commands forces that are probably willing to fight.
Well I’m not sure what sort of alternate time line a Caesar would ever take Europe before America, America being the center of the Empire. That would be the equivalent of the actual Caesar marching on some far away province instead of Rome.
The much more believable Caesar scenario, if it ever comes, is a military coup in the US military where a rogue officer takes DC with 10k men or so.
I see Germany as a way softer target, amenable to conquest by what would amount to a more fanatical Blackwater sized group. I don’t see a military coup from the US military. It’s had ample provocation and hasn’t done so, and nothing in its direction is making it more probable. The best we can hope for from them is that they do nothing.
I don’t know if private military like Blackwater violently seizing government is all that plausible. There’s no historical precedent for that. Military coups always come from the actual state military forces. If Blackwater were to do that it likely would be put down aggressively by the US military be it in Europe or the US because blatantly illegal.
I still think military coup from the US military is possible but we would need the collapse of loyalty from the upper social classes. Likely would require the total removal of the Republican Party and the transition to an obvious One party Democratic Party state to make it glaringly obvious the Republic is no more.
As long as the Republicans exist and function as the “conservative” party, the appearance of a functioning Republic still lives.
ollapse of loyalty from the upper social classe to the regime.*
If our government were 15th and 16th century Italian city states it’d be plausible but they ain’t.
I don’t think that the US military presently COULD put it down if they took Germany. I think they MIGHT be able to defeat 10000 that tried to take Washington DC.
Basically my estimation is that the US military no longer has sufficient cohesion to project power, but they probably have enough to defend the US home territory. I believe that the European militaries lack the cohesion to do even that.
The reason I see it likely being a private military organization is because I see the state of the US military and I see that the others are worse.
I guess the question if Elon Musk and Erik Prince gathered a private army in Carteland in Mexico… and perhaps also had the support of the Texas governor could they take the country…
Or they could do it in some based place of Eastern Europe, perhaps even with the help of that country’s military. Hungary conquers the EU by force of arms, never saw that coming did you?
I see Europe as a way more viable candidate here. The US I’m pretty confident has a genocidal civil war in its future, not something life affirming like the low violence scenario I put forth here. The reason is that the cohesion of the US military isn’t quite low enough and I think that the SHTF happens before it sufficiently disintegrates.
If the US military can defend DC then it can defend Germany. That makes no sense why it could defend one but not the other. It has tens of thousands of troops in both. And European countries can’t field a military because they are simply provinces of the Global American Empire. Their military IS the US military. Asking if Germany can field a army is like asking can Roman Britain field an army of native Britons. Obviously not. It’s a Roman province with a Roman garrison.
US couldn’t defend Afghanistan. I don’t think US soldiers outside the US presently would be willing to take a reasonable chance of dying. Inside the US I think they’d have a casualty budget based on their cohesion sufficient to take out 10k paramilitaries. Outside the US I think their current casualty budget doesn’t support more than 500 or so permanent casualties.
Could be the case. Although they may still use casualty-averse forces like drones and air support to assist the local police there, but you raise a good point. Leadership may not be willing to engage in a pitched battle over a province like it would at home.
Its not just the leadership. Its the rank and file. No US soldier in Germany wants to die for the EU. They might fight against the USSR if it still existed with the prospect of taking heavy casualties, and they MIGHT be willing to fight against Putin should he decide that the Ukraine isn’t enough, but that’s a serious MIGHT. I suspect that Putin has a better estimate of that MIGHT than we do, and conditions his brinksmanship on it.
But it’s easy to fight when you don’t take serious casualties, even if your underlying morale sucks. That’s why I ask about a force in the 10k/ $100M range. A force like that would probably inflict in the ballpark of 1000 KIA on the US military in Germany if it were to fight them, and I don’t think the US forces on site have the stomach for that in Germany. And I don’t think the German forces and police would fight hardly at all, so their ability to support from a distance would be very limited.
Britain has demonstrated it can only put a hundred boots on the ground. How many boots on the ground can Germany do? Probably less.
May be of interest:
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2022/02/10/some-observations-on-the-infection-fatality-rate-of-covid19/
This is a tremendously important link:
It demonstrates that the IFR, infection fatality rate of Covid, was always enormously lower than that of a typical flu, even counting deaths of people with morbid obesity, heart failure, and cancer, who were then run over by a truck while touched by the awesome and mighty Covid Demon as infection fatalities. (Yes, I know about long covid, but long after effects of flu was also a thing)
On the other hand we have pretty good evidence that the short term death rate from the jab is about one in a thousand, and the longer term death rate is being massively hidden and is difficult to estimate.
On these numbers, the jab is at least eighty times more lethal than China flu, and in the long term, when it gets up around ten boosts, may well be seventy thousand times as lethal, though no one knows yet.
>On the other hand, the number of people under the age of sixty, who have died from COVID19, with no other disease mentioned on the death certificate, is five hundred and forty-two.
Is it possible that many of the people with other conditions mentioned on the death certificate developed them as a result of covid?
After all it can cause a number of issues that lead to death. I don’t know how accounting for cause of death works, it could be that they’d normally write something else as well even if it’s a direct result of the virus.
The comorbidities typically associated with death from the Mighty Awesome Covid Demon, are extreme old age and morbid obesity. Running up behind those two is cancer.
They did not develop those from China Flu.
lol
“However, the mainstream consensus rapidly coalesced around two ‘facts’.
Fact one: a severe seasonal influenza has an IFR of around point one per cent. Or, to put it another way, one death per one thousand infections.
Fact two: COVID19 has an IFR of around one per cent. Which meant that COVID19 was going to be ten times as deadly. This, then, became our starting point.”
Whoops! Read them both to be 1%. Damn it, I thought the guy had a good joke going!
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-smallpox-pandemic-response-was
Fascinating article.
tl;dr MD tracks down the historical record of vaccination programs using original sources starting ~1800. The results, and response, are eerily similar to what we’re seeing with covid vax.
@Jim you sure cowpox was an efficacious vaccine? Article and book make a strong argument it was not.
Only someone who has never lived with smallpox could make such an asinine assertion. A woman doctor is not someone who’s opinion I am inclined to take seriously, especially in the face of men living in the era of smallpox disagreeing with her.
Logically, if smallpox vaccinations made smallpox outbreaks worse, how did we kill it off? We should have reservoirs of smallpox that are not vials in bioweapon labs. We see what happens to a virus that is endemic to humans when a “vaccine” does not work with Covid. There is Covid everywhere. Why is smallpox not everywhere if the vaccine didn’t work?
The article tells you. “To replace the vaccination model, the Leicester activists proposed a system of immediately quarantining smallpox patients, disinfection of their homes and quarantining of their contacts alongside improving public sanitation. […] Fortunately, the value of Leicester’s novel approach of quarantining and improvement public hygiene was recognized and gradually adopted around the world, leading to the eventual eradication of smallpox.”
I find this entirely unbelievable, and observe that actual successful extermination of smallpox relied primarily on vaccination, not on these traditional public health measures that had long been applied, and long failed to contain it.
This looks like yet an enemy rationalization to deny the decline in technology, of which I have seen a great many. Vaccination technology has long been in disastrous decline, and is now in catastrophic decline.
Since it is no longer possible to deny that modern vaccines are terrible, they must claim that old vaccines were even more terrible, just as they claim that older cars were terrible. (My younger son is a big fan of cars, knows far more about them than I do, and has a different opinion, frequently expressed with great vigor.)
My new car has many features that make it better than my first car, but it also has bumper bars that can be dented with a strong kick, and are apt to fall off in the event of something more severe than a strong kick. The undercover that protects the car from mud and damage is made of plastic and appears to be attached with chewing gum, while my first car had an undercover of steel attached with bolts, that gave actual protection from physical damage. My new car has electric opening windows, which are great until they fail, which does not take all that long, and the replacement parts are no longer available, while my first car had manual windows, which was not so great, except that they never failed. When I was buff, I had the unfortunate capability to rip my new car’s handbrake right off in an emergency. Maybe I still can, but I have been gentle with it ever since.
Yes, it is obviously stupid. I only pointed it out because Wolfgar implied that the article advanced no alternative explanation for the disappearance of smallpox.
No, I was pointing out that the argument has a claim that is easily falsifiable with respect to what we observe. If hygiene and quarantine work, why do we still have covid? They made a ridiculous assertion, and cloaking it in barely plausible explanation does not constitute an alternative explanation.
Covid is airborne, smallpox is transmitted through fluids and very close contact. Big difference. Would make sense that you would get more bang for your buck with public sanitation when it comes to smallpox, especially from the abysmal starting point that was the 19th century city.
Keep in mind that I and hundreds of other people I know had the smallpox vaccine. Thousands around us did, as well. If it was really causing smallpox outbreaks, I would have known about it. It would have been passed around in barracks whispers and would have been common knowledge. The article sounds like a left-wing op, like a flat earth or moon landing denial analogue for anti-vaxxers. Using commie language and tone to spread a message for the dumb rubes they think they are talking to.
If I didn’t know that you are an artificial intelligence, I’d bet that you were that mechanic who runs that hilarious YT channel.
Not the article’s claim. First and foremost, the author makes some pathetically obvious supplicatory statements about the holiness of activists, the wonderfulness of Progressive Ideology, and comments on the evils of capitalism and industrial advances. Then, she piles on primary source data from people skeptical of the then-modern medical establishment’s “vaxx the evil away” approach and techniques. She finishes up with understated, almost ambiguous assertions that people left to their own devices relying on logical quarantine measures and basic hygiene had more to do with curtailing above-baseline outbreaks than state mandated and highly politicized vaccination campaigns.
This looks like one of those types of articles/studies you’ve referenced where the truth is buried underneath piles of Official Truth to protect the author from punishment for thoughtcrime. I could be wrong, I’ve only ever heard of those from you and never seen one before. But the references to activists, social justice, and evil capitalism are so blatant and incongruous it sent up red flags. At first, I thought it was just more tripe about how science will save us, but the subtle messaging is more like “maybe we aren’t on the right track oh God please don’t cancel and crucify me.” It’s probably just more establishment party members starting to get worried about the extremists running the show.
Not defending the Doctoress or the piece, just saying it might be something more than it presents itself to be. Consider too that it is a namefag web MD reposting some other pseudo-anon doctor blog.
We have all heard it before.
> This looks like yet an enemy rationalization to deny the decline in technology, of which I have seen a great many. Vaccination technology has long been in disastrous decline, and is now in catastrophic decline.
It is extremely similar to denial of the moon landing.
What moon landing?
landing deeze nuts on your face LMAOOOoooo
I think there is a bit of truce to the story.
If more then then 90% in Leister had the smallpox vaccine that is more then enough for herd immunity.
Consequently the state was very unwise to try and force the rest of the population.
It could have prevented a lot of unrest and protest and still have the same medical outcome.
“(My younger son is a big fan of cars, knows far more about them than I do, and has a different opinion, frequently expressed with great vigor.)”
Having been in extensive casual contact with older mechanics and children thereof, and having done a bit of dabbling in classic cars myself, I’ve heard enough horror stories about the tremendous unreliability of 50s/60s/70s era vehicles, the endless expense and effort involved in maintaining them, and the dramatic contrast and improvement in reliability and dependability and safety of vehicles today to state, with confidence, that your son has no fucking clue what he’s talking about.
Regarding safety, I’ve personally totalled two vehicles (walked away both times) and seen multiple crashed cars at a fairly dangerous intersection near our home (borderline rural, the state has been talking about redoing that stretch of road for decades). Looking at the aftermath, it’s remarkable how you can see the engineering is designed to channel the stresses around the passenger compartment and keep it essentially intact. I’ve seen engines folded up like accordions and cars that literally flew through the air doing a backflip and bouncing off a tree, and the passenger compartment has been fine. That’s engineering older cars did not have – there has been dramatic improvement in that regard.
“it also has bumper bars that can be dented with a strong kick,”
Pics or it didn’t happen. Also make, model, year specifics.
“The undercover that protects the car from mud and damage is made of plastic and appears to be attached with chewing gum,”
This is not a thing.
Seriously. There is no such object. Go to any secondhand lot (for a good variety) and go around looking at the undersides of cars. This is not a thing. Cars don’t have undercovers to protect from mud and damage, they’re pretty much just open except for the passenger compartment underside, which is part and parcel of the body – a single complete object. Which is why you can get on your back and slide in under your car and look at the underside of the engine to troubleshoot stuff – because what you’re talking about doesn’t exist, because you made it up and expected your audience would just trust you without checking.
If you can find photos of real-world cars with plastic diapers, take pics and post them. You won’t, because they don’t exist, because you made this up.
“while my first car had manual windows, which was not so great, except that they never failed. ”
This is just not true. As a kid, our family Honda with the roll-lever windows had 3 out of 4 fail by the time we had to get rid of it (because the body was rusting through; engine was still fine). Fixing the windows was doable but not worth the expense of tearing the doors open and replacing the mechanism. On another car, a handle fell off from overuse. The internal gear mechanism can fail either way, but I haven’t had a window control fail in any of the vehicles I’ve owned as an adult. Older people definitely prefer not having to muscle the windows up.
You obviously know absolutely nothing, not the most basic things, about cars, therefore all your claims of expertise and knowing experts are invented out of thin air.
You cannot get into a car’s engine compartment from underneath, so you have never tried, you have never been underneath your car, while I have been underneath my cars a fair bit. There are a lot of important things you can get into from underneath the car, but they are all related to the suspension and wheels.
I said I don’t know much about cars, and I don’t, but obviously, having actually been tinkering with a great many cars, I know a great deal more than you, though vastly less than my younger son.
I have been underneath a few cars, and none of them had access to the engine compartment from underneath – because if you could access the engine compartment from underneath, so could mud, tree branches, the corpses of small animals, and sharp rocks.
Really?
Really?
If designed to protect the passenger that should start with the bumper bar being able to absorb a great deal more energy in a low speed collision.
Observe what happens in a low speed parking lot collision. These are not vehicles designed to protect their occupants. Maybe they are designed to protect the children from falling off their seats in a low speed collision, but they are not designed to protect you from being turned into paste in a high speed collision.
If designed to protect the passenger in a high speed collision, such protection has to start with an adequately stout bumper bar. Which every low speed parking lot collision reveals that modern cars do not have.
If designed to protect passengers by crumpling in a high speed collision, the crumbling should not start in a low speed collision.
Cars these days are designed specifically to pass the crash tests that are defined by various government agencies.
In these exact scenarios the driver and the passengers will be completely fine.
For any other crash all bets are off.
Every government regulatory activity turns into magical rituals in which worshipers are required to make contributions to priests, and any real world consequences bear little relationship to the ostensible objectives.
There is the plastic bumper cover that you see, and there is a steel beam that it covers. The plastic bumper cover can easily come loose in a parking lot but the beams are extruded and very strong, as one would imagine they would be.
I have destroyed and repaired enough bumper bars to know there is no steel beam.
The ministry of plenty has just raised your chocolate ration from thirty grams to twenty grams.
If they were actually trying to protect the passenger in the event of a collision, that protection would start with a steel or aluminum bar in the bumper bar.
And if there was a steel beam why cover it with with easily damaged plastic? Chrome it or paint it. Cheaper, less to repair, and would look a whole lot more reassuring.
My 2000 Volvo S70 has a plastic covered spring steel beam for a bumper. I’ve banged into enough parking garage concrete walls while parking without any significant damage.
Unfortunately, whenever my wife has crashed her Volvo, she’s always hit something higher than the bumper, missing it, and smashing in the soft sheet metal over the bumper.
It’s there. It’s not huge like an old truck bumper but it’s enough to transfer energy from a head on collision into the unibody (“crumple zonesâ€) instead of into the engine, preventing the engine from entering the cabin. Modern cars have to look like bubbles and space ships because of fuel economy regulations, so a steel or chrome bumper out front would not be feasible and look out of place.
There is no end to the horse shit on a modern car that is unnecessary and often counter-productive and harmful to the owner of the car, but there is a steel bar behind the plastic “bumper†that functions as you would think a bumper would.
If there was, it would be obvious when I have the bumper bar off.
Maybe there is a steel bar on yours, but no steel bar on mine.
What is not feasible? If there is a steel bar in the bumper, then it is feasible. And a steel bar protecting you can never look out of place.
If the crumple zones are designed the protect against the engine entering the passenger compartment, they start crumpling way too soon.
If you want to absorb the energy of impact, the cover plate underneath the engine needs to be sheet steel or aluminum and should extend into the bumper bar.
If you want to stop the engine block from being pushed into the driver, you want sheet steel in front of it and behind it.
For these wonderful magic crumple zones to actually do anything useful, they need a reasonable amount of steel in them, and that steel has to be spread out over a reasonable area.
Crumple zones are like Covid masks. Just a magic spell cast by demon worshipers.
For the crumple zone to do anything useful, it has to start crumbling to slow the impacting object down as much as possible before it hits the engine block, then as the engine block starts moving back it has to hit hard against something solid, which then crumbles pushing the passenger backwards away from the oncoming engine block. Not seeing something solid immediately behind the engine.
If cars are so wonderfully engineered to protect the passenger, where is the stuff to slow this oncoming engine block before it hits the passenger capsule, and to push the passenger capsule backwards?
For the passenger capsule to be protective, you need sturdy stuff around it that crumples. Just not seeing this sturdy stuff.
The engine blocks are concentrated rigid masses. In a head on, they are going to bang into each other as if the rest of the car was not there, and then the passenger capsules are going to bang into the engine blocks. We want the passenger capsules to be incompressible, and the engine blocks are incompressible whether we want them to be or not, so, so that something other than the soft squishy passenger absorbs the energy of impact, we want strong material that will crumble around the engine blocks and around the passenger capsule. Not seeing it. Not seeing it in front of the engine block, and not seeing it behind the engine block.
And if there was strong material that will crumple in front of the engine block, it would start with a decent bumper bar.
You may be correct. I am very proficient and experienced as far as repairing cars. I am not experienced crashing them, or constructing them so they crash safely.
I see no end of problems that modern cars have due to regulators. I would not have thought safety design was all that affected by regulators, except it being far more expensive to develop and produce safe cars than it would otherwise be.
Car manufacturers have a natural incentive to produce safe cars (demand). My gut says safety systems are less affected by pozz than say the body, or the fuel system, or the engine. To be honest though I have never really looked at safety mechanisms in cars from that perspective. They all seem pretty safe to me.
The crumpling of newer cars “works” to protect the passengers. But, I doubt it does a better job than old cars. It allows for cheaper and flimsier materials to be used, with the result that a low speed crash is going to total a new, cheap car that an old steel car would drive away from. It might protect the passengers just as well. It does not protect the car nearly as well.
When gas became unholy, engines got a lot smaller and cars began to use a lot of plastic and flimsy metal to save weight and mileage. I have been in two comparable accidents involving running into something hard at a decent speed in the snow. One, in a newer plastic car, I was fine, but the car was destroyed. Which infuriated me to no end, because a glancing hit on a guardrail at thirty miles per hour made my car crumple like a can of coke. The other, I rear-ended someone at about the same speed after my brakes locked up in an old two-ton sedan made mostly of steel. I was also fine, but that car only suffered cosmetic damage.
The reason old accidents were so deadly was no safety glass, and a culture of no seatbelts. The drop in lethal accidents is not that cars have become safer, it is a couple of minor and obvious innovations that further “improvements” have failed to actually improve.
I find it hard to believe the crumpling of the bumper bar works to protect the passengers, which inclines me to doubt the rest of it.
I find it plausible that geometry and the physics of force redistribution can achieve the same result with flimsier materials. My motorcycle helmet is made of plastic and foam, which is designed to crumple and absorb a very hard hit, once. It works, but if I were to drop it on the ground, I would need a new helmet.
It is still a bad thing, because those shitty materials mean that your car falls apart easier and is crushed under less pressure. If it is far worse for low-speed impacts, and equal for high-speed impacts, it is just worse.
Possibly. Get two motorcycle helmets, one old style steel, one new style plastic. Put a rock melon in each one. Drop a heavy object on them from several stories up (four stories is equivalent to forty miles per hour) and tell me how it goes.
We can see videos of passenger dummies in crash tests. Search tube for “high speed collision old vs new”. The plastic bumpers seem to immediately shatter/break/fly off the front of the car. I cannot tell if snapping plastic absorbs more kinetic energy than thin metal, but material dynamics are complicated, so it seems possible. It is more useful to look at the dummies in the passenger compartment. The state of the dummies suggest that something is being done correctly. In addition, traffic fatality statistics: rate per mile, rate per person and absolute numbers all declined since the 1960s
You are watching propaganda videos.
In the first video I watched the deceleration of the crash dummy in the newer car appeared to comparable to, and perhaps more severe, than the deceleration of the crash dummy in the older car, but the crash dummy in the newer car was saved by the air bag popping out in his face.
Both dummies were wearing seat belts, but the seat belts were unrealistically loose, so that the bag popping out in the drivers face would have effect.
The failure of the seat belts to take effect was staging. If one thing staged, everything staged.
If newer cars have all this wonderful engineering to absorb energy around the passenger capsule, did not seem to provide any benefit in this video.
The first part of the video was a video for air bags. And air bags certainly are protective if you are not wearing seat belts. How protective they are if you are wearing seat belts is not apparent. They looked like they were cheating with loose seat belts.
Not seeing any protective effect of all this crumple zone engineering in the airbags video, but then this part of the video was not designed to show it off.
Then they segue to the strength of passenger capsule “See, this new passenger compartment has collapsed, and this one has survived.
The “collapsed” passenger compartment did not seem much collapsed, and the crash was angled so that the new car’s engine block took the force of the impact while the old car’s passenger compartment took the force of the new car’s engine block.
For a fair comparison, you need a symmetric crash. An asymmetric crash is going to produce asymmetric results. In the asymmetry, I see staging. The old car was definitely worse off than the new car, but he was using hyperbolic language to describe a rather modest difference, and the crash was asymmetric, so even if you crashed two identical cars that way, one is going to suffer substantially more damage than the other.
The language was extreme and propagandistic, and the trials were not designed to give meaningful outcomes.
Crash them symmetrically. Or if you are going to have an asymmetric crash, try it twice, with the positions of the old and new cars reversed.
An asymmetric crash smells of staging.
The important datum is how fast the crash side of the passenger capsule accelerates into passenger, something easily measured, and not revealed in any of these videos. If that datum showed new car superiority, we would have heard about it. The crash dummy is for seat belts and air bags. For car structure, it is the acceleration of hard surface towards the passenger that you want to know, and the strange absence of that data is like the strange absence of plausible death rate data for under sixties when the jab rolled out.
High speed collisions are a joke. How likely is it that you smack into something going full speed with no attempt to brake or steer out of the way, unless you’re blind drunk or retarded? If you get into a high speed collision, you probably deserve whatever the fuck happens to you.
Because I don’t drive blind drunk, and am not retarded, I care a lot more about what happens to my car in medium and low speed collisions, collisions where I take efforts to mitigate harm to myself. In collisions like that, new cars fold up like when you stomp on an aluminum can, and old cars take the hit and keep driving. In most collisions, people use their brakes, and do not hit each other going all that fast. High-speed collisions are a tiny problem that did not need solving, especially because it removes retards from the gene pool, and even if new cars are better at keeping people alive in high-speed crashes, which I highly doubt, designing a car that is safer in high-speed crashes but takes more damage from low-speed crashes is contrary to the needs of the market.
Seat belts are designed to stretch at high speed to soften the deceleration and give the driver room to hit against the airbag. Passenger compartment is deforming less in the newer car, piercing and crushing less limbs. The passenger deceleration is softened by belt and airbag, so acceleration of crash side into passenger compartment is not necessarily as important compared to space for limbs left over at the end of the collision. In the video I looked at, seemed clear that the old car dummy is being crushed and pierced relative to new. Regarding deceleration of passenger compartment, found this https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Aditya-Belwadi/publication/233738149_Homogenization_of_Vehicle_Fleet_Frontal_Crash_Pulses_from_2000-2010/links/0c96051b772f7b8ac2000000/Homogenization-of-Vehicle-Fleet-Frontal-Crash-Pulses-from-2000-2010.pdf?origin=publication_detail
I have to concede that deceleration profile of passenger compartment is getting worse, with higher peak acceleration and shorter pulse times. But car injuries and fatalities are caused from a mixture of internal injuries from body deceleration and from crushing and piercing limbs. So looks to me that the belt and airbag are sufficient for limiting internal injuries caused by too rapid a deceleration on the passenger, while the modern passenger compartment has less piercing and crushing, that the lower piercing and crushing makes up for the harsher deceleration profile of modern passenger compartments. The crashes also look symmetrical in these videos as both drivers and wheels are on the right side, so it should not matter how much of the frontage overlaps
This indicates that cars designed to crumble are more dangerous for a passenger in a high speed crash than old type cars. (Though airbags and seat belts are obviously safer.)
As I said, all government regulatory activities turn into Satan Worship, no matter what their ostensible objective.
If you want to really walk away from a high speed crash, look at race cars. NASCAR cars are tubular steel frame construction from front to back with thin sheet metal body panels and plastic windshields. The drivers are secured tightly by a racing seat and a 5 point harness, with a carbon fiber neck and head restraint system tied to the helmet. They cannot move. Those drivers walk away from impacts and rollovers that begin well above 100mph regularly.
>“it also has bumper bars that can be dented with a strong kick,â€
They are all plastic. All older cars had bumper bars that were regulated (see : US model countach for bumper regulation hilarity). I invite you to try to dent the bumper on a mid 70’s Cadillac.
Jim : While true, you can dent it, you can undent it pretty easy. Have done a lot of very cheap bodywork repair involving plastic filler and surprisingly high quality rattle can paints.
>I’ve heard enough horror stories about the tremendous unreliability of 50s/60s/70s era vehicles, the endless expense and effort involved in maintaining them, and the dramatic contrast and improvement in reliability and dependability and safety of vehicles today to state,
>Fixing the windows was doable but not worth the expense of tearing the doors open and replacing the mechanism.
People also kept cars a looooooot longer. In the 00’s, a lot of people driving 70’s cars. Fast forward 20 years, not so many 90’s cars on the road.
This is for a multitude of reasons, but mostly because as cars gained complexity, replacing them became cheaper than throwing them away.
Additionally, cars have become *much more disposable*. In 2001, I bought a brand new brake master cylinder for my 1974 car, they had it in stock at the dealer. They also had a pair of shock absorbers in stock for a mid 60’s model.
Now when I call the dealer for my 2000 model car, most parts are no longer available.
Regarding the windows – they’ve had nearly 50 years of experimentation on how to make mechanisms that don’t break and materials that don’t leak water into the doors.
Mid 90’s -2000’s cars (depending on brand) rarely have broken electric windows because they were overengineered, but I have heard of numerous people with late 00’s and newer cars with the mechanisms failing. Friend of a friend had the back window mechanism totally break and the window drop into the door in a top end VW Golf during the warranty period. There was no surprise when he called them about it.
Car quality has dropped dramatically in the last 15 years, but they are cheaper, so.. eh.
George Orwell, in 1984:
“As short a time ago as February, the Ministry of Plenty had issued a promise (a ‘categorical pledge’ were the official words) that there would be no reduction of the chocolate ration during 1984. Actually, as Winston was aware, the chocolate ration was to be reduced from thirty grammes to twenty at the end of the present week”
“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week.”
Whenever you hear that living standards today are so much higher because modern cars last so much longer, you are hearing one of the protesters that held a demonstration to thank big brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week.
Cars absolutely do not last as long these days. Plenty of cars from the 90’s will go for 300-400k miles without breaking a sweat as long as you change the oil and transmission fluid on time. Once gas became unholy, cars instantly dropped in quality. Cars from the late 2000’s and on usually fail after 150k.
Most “reliable” new cars nowadays are cars using engines that are fundamentally the same as they were in the 90s, but the other parts of the car do not hold up to that kind of use. They shake themselves to pieces in the course of use that good old steel-bodied cars just shrugged off. And that is assuming that it does not have a small engine built to tight tolerances that will just crap out on you much sooner.
The only place where car construction has not suffered is where the market absolutely demands performance, this being mostly in the realm of heavy-duty trucks and off-road SUVs. And even these have suffered from the faggy trend of putting a turbo in everything, and you have to pay more for an engine appropriate for the vehicle you’re buying.
I know a lot more about bikes than cars, and sportbikes have actually improved in quality until the early 10’s, when the maximum power a man can actually control was more or less achieved, which topped out at about 200 horsepower on a 400lb vehicle. But that is a market that demands high performance and is more or less outside the bother of regulators.
I am seriously considering getting a motorcycle in light of the developments in warfare we are seeing. What type of bike would you suggest for an aspiring motorcycle dragoon road warrior?
@Wulfgar
I love sportbikes, but they are essentially toys that require a high-quality civilization that paves its roads.
You definitely want a dual-sport. Most motorcycle warfare is going to take place off road, but having the power for street riding is going to come in handy too, so 250s are probably too small. Being able to ride on the street means more practice and more familiarity too.
Especially large and powerful dual-sports are sometimes marketed as “adventure bikes”. They have big powerful engines for highway riding, and you can get saddlebags for food and ammo. Though, the tradeoff is that smaller and lighter dirtbikes are more maneuverable off road. On the other hand, you’re not looking to win a motocross race, you’re looking to use rough terrain as cover and concealment while you get to the battlefield The sweet spot for a dirtbike between power and off-road handling is around 400cc, but they won’t be able to carry as much as an adventure bike if you can even find saddlebags for them.
KTM makes the best bikes on or off road imo, but they’re pricey and it’s hard to go wrong with anything on the market. Runner ups would probably be the Triumph Tiger series and the Honda Africa Twin (which has had a great reputation for decades), but all the Japanese manufacturers make solid fucking bikes. The safe money is probably on Honda just because they make an invincibly reliable engine, and I have more personal experience with Honda bikes, as much as I hate their cars. Aesthetics don’t matter too much because when it’s time for war, you’ll probably be spraypainting it ODG or FDE anyway.
*I was unclear; I meant that the advantages in handling of a smaller dirtbike are probably not too relevant in warfare.
Also, expect to fall a good bit off-road. Knee and elbow pads are important. Dirtbikes are meant to be dropped often, unlike streetbikes.
Alright, thanks. That gives me a better starting point.
You are literally retarded every single car for the last 20 years has plastic splash guards under the car starting at the front bumper and often extending to the uni-body. Plenty of them require removal for oil changes.
Some vehicles still have metal plates but mostly SUVs and trucks. Passenger cars have plastic covers.
The hell it isn’t. I’ve had them (all plastic) fall off of THREE cars. Usually one side falls off and then drags on the pavement until the other side falls off. Here’s a replacement part from IPD.
https://www.ipdusa.com/products/11484/HD-Under-Engine-Air-Guide-Splash-Cover-FWD-P1-S40-V50-C30-C70-for-Volvo-IPD-30793870-124940
A fourth vehicle, my 1989 Jeep Cherokee had some sort of tough embedded fabric under engine cover that just deteriorated. I read there are aftermarket steel skid plates for it, but they don’t come standard.
Take a look at any common domestic car. Ford Focus for example. Plastic bumpers, plastic undercarriage covers.
The trend in contemporary vehicle architecture is cheap materials designed in such a way that ‘absorb’ force through crumpling on impact like a sponge, in order to pass the crash tests.
Well, they can pass the test, with regards to the metrics the test is measuring (single impacts along a particular vector); but they are also tissue paper, that don’t hold up to the bumps, wear, and tear of operational life.
There is something mighty wrong with a crash test that passes plastic bumpers.
All government requirements tend to turn into Satan worship rituals.
I think you’re attributing to malevolence that which can be explained by incompetence. This is not to say that incompetence enshrined as brilliance isn’t a gateway for diabolist Entryism, because of course it is, and it’s their favorite. But I’m noticing a trend in a lot of your predictive and diagnostic observations: you’re skipping steps between not-so-good and downright evil. Yes, the radicals are coming to power, but slower than predicted. Yes, technology is fading, but it isn’t gone. This is a semantic quibble, but it may be a reason some of the “math” is “off.” In the case of car construction, modern cares are nearly useless, sort of death traps. Once the “smart car” paradigm is fully realized, they will be completely useless, intentional death traps. Being able to identify when we are in intermediate phases, versus complete phases, may be incredibly important down the road.
I think extensive use of plastics results from the need to accommodate both crash test pass rates and minimum mileage requirements.
The 50s VW Beetle could easily pass modern mileage reqs, but would fail crash tests spectacularly. I imagine plenty of all-steel oldies would pass crash tests with airbags and seatbelts fitted, but could never meet mileage due to weight.
Thus, the modern car, the ode to paternalism.
This is correct. Modern cars are all unremarkably similar bubble and space ship shapes as a satanic ritual offering to the climate demon. They are all ugly as sin.
In this, and other things, I wonder how much of the demon veneration is intentional. So much demonic imagery is programmed into entertainment and style, people can’t help but crank out apparent homage. It’s the same trick the Church used in their era; bathed in religiosity, all things tend religious. May GNON grant that the demon worshipers are just as blind, and their works just as fragile, as the elites that “killed god.”
I do not think it is intentional, unless it is sarcastic. More likely it is subconscious.
What we create is a reflection of what is inside of us, what we are made of.
The honest and virtuous carpenter builds true and beautiful works. The foolish build crooked and ugly.
What the hell? If you pay attention to the world around you, you would notice a random car with a loose plastic underbody shield every now and then. You don’t even need to suffer the indignity of using a lift or a jack to know “it’s a thing”.
What’s with this type of person who refuses to believe that anything could ever get worse over time, and constantly apologizes for the modern world? I am just baffled.
Pet theory: the method of detractor headcount works for the online shill operations on 4chan and Twitter, so the new guys to BJC try to use it here, because they think, “no one actually reads the whole comment.” HR will set Pajeet straight, and soon he’ll be telling us how to be better Christians and why God actually prefers sodomites.
“The method of detractor head count”?
“BJC”?
On YouTube, 4chan, twitter, etc. shills have a tactic wherein they post a bunch of skeptical comments. There’s almost no substance, but if there are enough, people just assume it is evidence of valid dissent. For example, a video is posted about why the some thing is good, and there is a tidal wave of comments disagreeing, so Joe Lurker assumes “well, if that many people disagree, they are probably right.” It seems to be a method for undercutting credibility in a source of information.
Blog Jim Com == BJC
“if smallpox vaccinations made smallpox outbreaks worse, how did we kill it off?”
Doesn’t chicken pox grant immunity to small pox?
Nah, cowpox.
Speaking of smallpox? Does anybody remember the 2001 Australian “mousepox” paper where the researchers tweaked the mousepox virus, intending to produce a murine sterility viruse and accidentally created a version of mousepox that was 100% lethal, and also significantly lethal to vaccinated mice. The EXACT same modification could theoretically be done with smallpox.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn311-killer-mousepox-virus-raises-bioterror-fears/
Winston Smith is hard at work.
Washington DC ending vax mandates. This is a bit shocking to me.
https://www.axios.com/local/washington-dc/2022/02/14/dc-ends-indoor-mask-vaccine-mandate
I am startled. I was not expecting them to stop until everyone died.
I’m sure every moron parasite in the District of Corruption got jabbed anyway, those in the know who wanted to kill everyone probably got a fake shot anyway.
It is not impossible that the mandates will resume due to some “new variant” or other such excuse.
But Moldbug (Yarvin, if you like) is right that contemporary people, both the geriatric left and the young & dumb libs, are pussies. The events in Canada *frighten* them.
Unfortunately, it is easier for the left to reboot vax mandates than for the truckers to reboot their protest. They may win one round, in regards to DC and other locations have already won, but the relentless enemy will wear them down.
Well, then the truckers must organize in such a way that they can set up a new “freedom convoy” on short notice the moment it becomes necessary again. This would bridge the gap between the protestors’ current objective (end mandates) and the objective they should be pursuing (overthrow and replace the government).
No it would not bridge the gap. It could be a small step towards bridging the gap.
To bridge the gap, need to recognize that the time of Republics is over, and will not come again until a King creates a virtuous elite.
Yes, and the leader of such an organization would have the makings of a king. Of course he would need more than just truckers. But as far as restoration scenarios goes I think it is plausible enough. More plausible at least than violent or military overthrow.
I don’t think it plausible.
When the left singularity goes this far, unlikely that it can be stopped without blood.
Thinking it can be stopped by protests and blockades is normality bias.
But then, on the other hand, I see our rulers retreating, so, perhaps it can be stopped by means short of considerable bloodshed.
Where do you see them retreating? I do not see them retreating. The Ambassador Bridge was cleared by an army of police, vastly outnumbering the remaining protestors. The truckers at Coutts have decided to end the blockade and leave tomorrow.
The Quebec protestors seem to be still present but if current events are any indication, their time is running out.
Stopping the goverment and stopping the leftist singularity are two different things, especialls if the government is not at the leading edge of the leftist madness.
Currently the government is not at the leading edge of leftist madness, but the horse it rode in on is getting difficult.
I expected the even more evil, dumber, and even more insane left to take power in months. It has now been over a year. We shall see.
Expect the unexpected. As Varna (solid man btw) said a few posts ago, basically nobody predicted Trump/Covid and now we’re all quoting Lenin.
If I had to guess they are moving on to something more lucrative or interesting, like a new set of offerings to the climate demon.
People who lack restraint are always looking to consume something. I assume they have put Covid on hold because they have something bigger in mind.
Some news outlets are starting to run stories implying that you should expect to be ill in the future, and to have a worse immune system in the future, for all sorts of reasons that have nothing to do with vaccines or covid – except maybe “long covid.”
It looks like Brezhnev has seen the oncoming catastrophe and does not wish to double down. Instead, he wants to control damage and deflect blame.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20220215-why-even-just-testing-for-diseases-can-make-us-feel-ill
More and more weird stories like this, which normalize the idea that covid-believers should be feeling ill all the time, but don’t touch the vaxxx as a cause.
I am not sure if this is all because the trucker protests. The Brezhnevians inside the Democratic Party seem to be opening disobeying the Covidian priests in an attempt to return to normalcy and surfing the rubble. Interesting turn of events.
openly*
5.82 million dead. What are the chances the official really at the”end of the pandemic” is 6 million?
If this isn’t Top Kek, I don’t know what is.
6 million? Sounds a bit high to me
One jab, two jab, three jab, four
Is your chest a little sore?
Five jab, six jab, seven jab, eight
Now you’re at the pearly gate.
If original great…
Welcome to the age of shitlords.
😂
Posted this on gab, neglected to give you credit.
https://twitter.com/pdmcleod/status/1493364327377772545
😡 😡 😡
Well, no wonder they are infiltrated.
Shit moderation model? That’s what happens.
Its not a model… Jim can easily spot 99% of leftist shills and i can… and hardcore reactionaries in general with midwit iqs at least can. But normiecons can’t do it.
Normiecons are so hungry for validation, that it is easy for enemies to slip in, dressing radical left wing ideology in right wing costumes, and demon worship in Christian costumes. That is what the Third Positionists have been doing ever since Hitler killed the left wing of the Nazi party.
That is a very big part of how Trump got fucked. Turned out the Federal society was a nest of enemy traitors.
Papen expected he could co-opt Hitler into being a front man to give the appearance of democracy for the corrupt mob of degenerates running the state, but Hitler was wise to that. He wanted to run the state. Strasser figured that by being holier than Hitler, he would wind up running the state, but Hitler was wise that also. And Strasser, being a degenerate, would probably have made a good front man for Papen or Stalin.
Stalin figured that Hitler would wind up co-opted to being front man for Papen’s leaderless mob of degenerates, and then the commies would take over the role of the real opposition. When this turned out to be false, he then focused on entryism against fascism, a job now being performed by Soros’s minions. Third positionist ideology is designed by the usual degenerates to give them cover for the usual looting, and is by design readily co-optible to almost anything.
The protest groups are horribly infested with enemy memeplexes. In one meeting, an argument arose between the leadership of two different factions over which side was more guilty of protecting “pedophiles.” I am explaining the problems with this to anyone who will listen but I dare not speak too loudly lest I be burned at the stake as well.
Supposedly there is going to be an “attack” (that glows in the dark) on Kiev in Ukraine tomorrow. Anyone think that is going to happen?
Either that or when the invasion doesn’t come, globohomo can pat themselves on the back and say “See look how great we are! We made the big bad Putin stand down!â€
No that is what they’re doing, once they started publicly announcing the suppossed invasion date i knew it was ALL fake and gay.
I read in a lot of news articles that Canada is targeting crypto as part of their crackdown on the trucker protest. Purely out of practical interest I’ve been wondering, “How’s that working out for them?” None of the articles mention any sequela.
Executive in the FDA caught on project Veritas saying the plan is annual boosters and that the goal is for all schools to mandate them for all ages of kids. The holiness spiral is not done yet.
https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status/1493755181955104768?s=20&t=yoK33etlXOKMscmTXl4_pw
Perhaps in true demonic fashion, the blood of children is more valuable then those of adults.
At least it may put enough of a fire in cuckservatives to write sternly worded letters.
The best people to probably show this too are like new agey chicks…
We discuss Caesar and Khmer Rouge but maybe it all ends with the Left jabbing themselves to death. Wonder where I should pioneer when it’s done.
The trouble is I am seeing increasing indications that the guys at the top, they guys who are in on the conspiracy, are not jabbing themselves. We will still have to deal with them, which may be difficult. The plan may well be that all of the elite except the conspirators dies, leaving the conspiracy in full control, and killing off most of the normies is just a stage prop.
It may well be that they want to kill off everyone close to them, and killing off everyone else is not really something that matters to them.
Jesuit holocaust when?
The longer this goes on, Com, the more and more I think I am going to be the one pushing you to kill more people faster, against your inclination. I am beginning to think we need to look at ourselves as Cortez slaughtering the Aztecs more than Ceasar. Human sacrifice cults need to die obvious, brutal deaths.
I think Rome killed 75%+ of the Carthaginians when they sacked their city, and that seemed to be sufficient to prevent recidivism. Cortez clearly did not finish the job, though he did pretty good. I do not know how many he killed, but it is probable that we will need to kill proportionately more. Luckily we have the physical technologies to do better targeting, we just need to rediscover the social technologies that permitted them to kill so many.
In the hypothetical that we are in a position to do this… Don’t purity spiral… never never. Especially when it involves this. I don’t think Cortez got rid of nearly that many (how could he with I think a little over 200 men who had swords and matchlocks) the other tribes slaughtered most of the Aztecs after the Spanish destroyed their state and then disease killed much of the population.
Also I’m not sure if the Romans wiped out the Baal cult (the Phoenician sun God) since the Vatican demon worshippers have much of that symbology. I think there were other centers of that besides Carthage, Tyre was sacked badly by Alexander (not as bad as Carthage) but Sidon survived…
https://www.uofdjesuit.org/uploaded/Logos/IHS_Logo.png
Yes the rot is deep but the categories of people who need to go away need to be defined by strict criteria, we don’t want wild random slaughter of innocent. My preliminary suggestions would be as follows.
1) Any male in the “priest” (or brahmin) class who is still a leftist (progressive, commie the type doesn’t matter) after 2020. The attractive women will be sold off as concubines. This will make up at least 90% of the people who have to go.
2) All activists leftists and NGO members (this will be most of the remainder).
3) Anyone in the laundry list of globalist groups (WEF Atlantic Council Bilderberg group etc) who can’t show they were some right wing dissenter (I could see Kissinger getting off for this but not many others and he is super old anyway), in this group the women have to go too…
4) Anyone with a position of rank in the Democratic party, and in most cases all big Democrat donors (I say most because there are people in the merchant class in Dem areas who basically have to kickup, Trump used to have to do this and whatever his failings I do not think he was in on it) or has held rank in the past 20 years (I’ll make exceptions for Tulsi, Manchin and Sinema on this). Like with group 3 women too.
5) All members of the Jesuit order and especially all closet Jesuits like Fauci and Redfield, they are all to be interrogated under drugs sleep deprivation and perhaps other methods I need not describe to find out who the coadjutors are. The word is not to be accepted blindly of course. In addition if we recover to global power status we should use diplomacy to pressure other states to adopt this since they are a global problem.
Yes I know people have the reservations that all this is rather more classic conspiracy than classic NRx but the last few years have been more like living in the culmination of a classic conspiracy theory. If any group coordinated the worldwide Covid scam the world’s original glowniggers are the best candidates. Also the two people (Fauci and Redfield) who had the most crucial jobs in the whole scam have backgrounds that make them look like Jesuit coadjutors (and that Fauci has hinted at that directly) further serve to condemn them. There are other things like Italy (a country where they are extremely powerful) being used as for the initial agitprop and panic… but if anyone wants to post exculpatory evidence go ahead. I’m not 100% convinced they did it but I’m 90% there.
And as for reservations we’ll be getting rid of super smart people… some exceptions can be made for extraordinary IQ and talent on a case by case basis.
I am not holiness spiraling. It is not a matter of how pure I am, just how fucking evil our enemies are. Human sacrifice is one of those thing that you do not get to come back from. “Oops, got carried away with the rest of them, please forgive me,” is not going to cut it. In every situation with human sacrifice, it either gets burned out or God gets displeased with insufficient burning. The will of Gnon is clear that the only way to deal with it is to kill everyone that was in on it, no exceptions, no mercy.
There are lots of things that you can do as a very evil man that a sincere-sounding apology and repentance will excuse. Human sacrifice is on a very short list that gets you chucked on a pyre or put to the sword no matter how much you apologize afterwards. There is no grey area, just black and white; did you participate or not?
While I agree and I’m harsh on NPCs the NPCs boosting themselves and their kids probably have no idea that is what they are doing (if they did they’d at least be hesistant to boost themselves), I agree most of them have to go but lets not attribute to them a level of consciousness they don’t have.
Don’t play close to fire. Cut around the tumor. Etc.
I’d like to think I’ve advocated for a more grounded reasonability when it comes to purging those who would drive our species to extinction. I am firm believer in nuance and as much certainty as possible. I also believe in giving people another chance to do the right thing. I’m not backing down on the optical argument, and as TC rightly, if somewhat surprisingly, points out, we must be wary of the rangers of purity spiralling.
That being said, if you took your kids to get vaxxed, and you took a picture, and you posted it, I am starting to think that’s case closed. I just can’t come up with a reasonable excuse for that kind of behavior.
I am not talking about the NPCs, I am talking about the elite responsible for all of this. Everyone involved in covering up the numbers or pushing boosters after the problem became obvious goes, no exceptions. No leniency or special dispensation for high-IQ cultists, no mercy for cultists under pressure to keep their jobs. Every single one of them we find, we burn, because that is what God wills.
It starts with “s” is bloody brilliant.
If you look at the numbers and what everyone in power is saying, the vaxx is safe, and the boosters are safe. I am not advocating for execution of parents who jabbed their kids because they thought they were helping and it was the right thing to do. I am talking about going through the FDA and CDC like Israel went through Jericho. I am talking about burning “public health officials” at the stake for witchcraft.
My change of heart is not regarding the NPCs, except in certain, egregious, and narrow cases. I thought we could get away with cutting the head off of the snake, and letting the body wither. The people in charge got the axe, while the lower rungs got a forced retirement. Now I am thinking we need to go a lot further down the snake than just the head.
“I am not talking about the NPCs, I am talking about the elite responsible for all of this. Everyone involved in covering up the numbers or pushing boosters after the problem became obvious goes, no exceptions. ”
99% agree, but I would make some exceptions for 160 IQ plus (I do not necessarily consider Dorsey to be in this category)… they could be made to do good work.
It’d be mostly a moot point as I’m sure there are at most like 3 people in this category, the people you describe are all midwits nowadays.
This may be a fatherhood thing, and I have a record on this blog for being soft on kids. For instance, I’m not afraid of bastards, nor do I think they are always a cancer on society; I think with good fatherly surrogates and a perilously high bar to aspire to, they can actually be a better martial force, for certain use cases, than the landed nobility (as in, folks like you are Space Marine Officers, and the kids I adopt and train are neo-janissaries). This is a byproduct of having a soft spot for potentiality. I know the little nigglet is just going to grow into a worthless banger, but my heart tells me he could be a marine. The flip side of this reckless emotionality is the unadulterated, blind hatred that pours out for those who would destroy the innocent.
If it were up to me, every parent that not only sacrificed their progeny to baal-corona, not only documented it, but spread it around to get recognition for the human sacrifice… the wood chipper is too good for them. It’s the posting of the pic that damns them. They are dancing in the offal of their offspring at the foot of the pyramid, and they are gleeful.
Obviously, I’ve lost all objectivity on this one.
I’ve spoken that I think its wrong to go out of the way to mistreat bastards (they’ll have a hard enough time already without making it extra hard and extreme mistreatment of them was a feature of Catholic countries and their predicament is the fault of others not themselves), and as far as women go I generally get on better with fatherless girls… but I’m merely pointing out that thinking the NPCs are CONSCIOUSLY poisoning their kids is to attribute to them a level of critical reason to them they do not possess.
Misbehavior is hereditary. It makes total sense to punish the sons for the sins of their fathers.
Israel made a few exception like that once, Cominator, and God punished them for it until they did the right thing and killed them, and I believe that was merely livestock. When we go through, we can find the people that argued against all of this and spare them. There will be some, just as there are some at Harvard trying to argue against the madness. The rest go on the pyre, because to do otherwise is to invite the wrath of God.
Com, 160 IQ men are a renewable resource. You can breed more of them into existence if you have eugenic fertility. You do not get eugenic fertility without a strong social order, and you do not get a strong social order without obeying the will of God. Sometimes you have to make choices that you do not like to get the results you want.
TC
You’re probably right, and I genuinely respect and appreciate the nuance with which you’ve colored your perspective. The ability to modify our positions based on dialogue is a rare and powerful trait.
I think some crimes cannot be forgiven, and a plea of ignorance doesn’t apply. You and I share a precept: mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent. A housefrau getting her child vaccinated because that’s just what you do is forgivable, and the consequences the child will suffer is punishment enough. But documenting and displaying it to get attention and praise is behavior that must be punished. I don’t need to give details for you to figure out why this one is on my mind, I’m sure it’s inferentially obvious.
On a related note, pureblood mothers should be praised unsparingly.
This, and other issues related to defining the guilty is quite a challenge. Your developing metrics seem to be on the right track. There needs to be a category for crimes against nature/evolution, like putting kids on HRT, or birth control by default, or abortion in general. The obvious ones are the medical staff responsible. But where is the guilt line for parents and guardians involved? That’s a tricky one. I’ve previously stated that those without children are handicapped in certain things in terms of decision making, but I guess I was blind to the other side of that coin; cooler heads are needed in deciding crimes against kids. If it’s up to me, I’d retrofit a would chipper into a CH-47.
Anyone in the right circumstances can produce bastards. Unowned women naturally tend to do it… and men with unowned women naturally tend to do it.
Everyone here would have 10 of them probably if they didn’t want to potentially get hit with child support laws (the problem with those is its the dumber guys like Tyrone who end up having lots of bastards) but this doesn’t mean we’d all pullout if such laws didn’t exist. Smarter guys pullout in the US but when they fuck women in the 3rd world not too many pullout.
In a certain third world country with a very deep river, there’s an orphanage that was built in the 1970s with quiet money from the US military. Many of the orphans were suspiciously pale with a relatively pronounced tendency to be taller than there native cohort. Totally unrelated, there was a few FOBs and villages with an abundance of brothels within long walking distance.
Many decades later, a young man trying to figure himself out through disaster tourism volunteered at the establishment. Every Thursday night, all the kids that shared a father would sit down to a big dinner. The packs of bastards had some very interesting phenotypic characteristics. A certain nun shared an anecdotal observation that, in that heavily Catholic country, a man would father multiple children on a woman, then put her away when she became undesirable. The process would sometimes repeat often, so that you’d get 12 or more kids, all with the same father. Strangely, there was no day set aside for blood tied groups that all shared the same mother but had different fathers.
Managing bastard populations is an interesting problem. If GNON gives us the victory, it’s an issue I’d gladly take up so other, more important things can be done by leaders who don’t want to deal with it. The goal is to give bastards a path to a meaningful existence while keeping bastardy low status, as it should be. More directly to your observation, if I could do it all over again, I would never have pulled out, not once. But that’s just me, I really enjoy being a Dad and I’d love to have an army of kids.
I didn’t know we had any bases in Brazil (Phillipines doesn’t have rivers)…
If so the US soldiers are undoubtedly improving the genetic quality of the population by bleeching the women.
We would not have a large bastard population post victory because few unowned women, I don’t think the small population we would get would be a problem.
No matter how thoroughly you proceed with this, I don’t think you’ll achieve what you want to achieve. The only way to proprely exise leftism dor a long time is to make some third of the population non-citizens, revoking their citizenship and asigning them citizenship in a Greater Canada or newly independent California. Make income tax payable by foreign residents only and they will eff off in time, your South Afrikan playbook.
No matter how many heads you chop off, the only way to settle this humanely is to shift the balance of power by moving enough NPCs.
Rome did not wipe out the Baal cult. A couple hundred years later, there was a temple to Baal on the Palatine hill. But sacrificing kids to Baal was a Punic holiness spiral. The Baal worshipers in old Phoenicia did not sacrifice children, and after Rome did for Carthage, nobody who worshiped Baal did.
Stomped on so effectively it did not reappear for centuries and returned without human sacrifice is pretty good. Still demon worship and need of more stomping, but purging the cult of human sacrifice so thoroughly that it stayed sacrifice free centuries later is no mean feat. It is more than Cortez did, because the human sacrifice is coming back to Mexico. That is not to take away from what Cortez did, but to illustrate how difficult the task at hand is.
Given the way the past few years played out… they may have just gone underground.
There is a simple solution to that once the deaths really start to bite. Once what they have done becomes obvious. It starts with “s-” and ends with “-ticking them in a woodchipper feet first and using them to fertilize the Rose Garden.”
What indications?
If it is a conspiracy, and it proves successful, easy to imagine the triumphant conspirators slaughtering each other by other means. How could they ever trust one another? Where would they get their cohesion after having wiped out all significant opposition?
Not only that, but after killing off most of the elite, a decapitation strike by an outsider needs to hit far fewer people to be successful.
What indications are you seeing hat the guys at the top, they guys who are in on the conspiracy, are not jabbing themselves?
For starters the fake jabbing pics with so many of them.
In this sense Putin is borderline honest in the wink wink nod nod sense. He refuses to do a jab in front of a camera, changes the subject when asked which shot he got. As if he’s sending a message along the lines of “look I have to go along with this but what are ya, nuts?”
Russian anons noted that the mandate hysteria in Russia went off after the meeting of Putin and Biden, whatever that may mean. Before that the Kremlin was trying to declare a victory and a return back to normal. After the meeting things went into the opposite direction, albeit in the sloppy and not quite convincing eastern slavic way.
Russia is at the forefront of the QR cattle tagging beta testing via sperbank.
Over the last months Russia accepted a few new laws:
1) FEMA camp equivalent mandatory evacuation, very detailed up to how many citizens in one group on foot need how many armed guards
https://sonya-kot.ru/zakon-o-prinuditelnoy-evakuatsii-nomer-1120845-7/
2) Mass grave management in peacetime
https://aif.ru/society/law/chto_za_nacionalnyy_standart_o_massovyh_zahoroneniyah_prinyali_v_rossii
3) Using convicts for infrastructure work again
https://www.gazeta.ru/social/2022/01/31/14482075.shtml
4) Using student brigades for infrastructure work again
https://vz.ru/news/2021/8/12/1113437.html
I kind of dread finding out what all of this is for.
I believe the CEO of Moderna said in an interview he was not jabbed if I recall. I would not be shocked to find out Fauci and the top level virologists are not jabbed being at the very top of the conspiracy.
However, the vast number of elite and ruling elite seem to be jabbed.
It might take some digging, but there are occasional /pol/ threads that show people of note getting “jabbed” with the syringe cap still on.
Those in the know are surely unjabbed. There’s a good number of useful idiots that are on board with the holiness spiral – probably the majority – that are actually getting themselves jabbed, but those at the top (leading WHO officials, leading politicians in western countries, likely leading virologists aka each countries’ version of Fauci) are not. If they get jabbed on TV, it’s fake. There were many threads on /pol/ exposing these fake jabbings.
A point that we can extrapolate this from – the Covid response has been more or less the same throughout the west. Not only that, but the talking points being used are identical – in my country one of our leading officials used the exact same bullshit lines that I heard in American media, with a week or so of delay. This thing is coordinated, its not every country scrambling to cover the evidence up in their own way. Hence, those coordinating this are aware of what’s really going on.
Additional point, a trusted source tells me leading politicians in my country did not *actually* take the jab.
Anecdote incoming …
Pureblood. Upper-middle aged. I get some sort of bug every five years, and my body’s reaction is chills and night sweats. Other than these twice-per-decade bouts, I have never been diagnosed or self-diagnosed with a cold or flu. In February of 2021, I had a more serious bout of night sweats than ever before and was off my vittles a bit though still ate and worked. I coughed maybe *five* times. Chills were bad but it is real cold where I live. No other symptoms. When it lingered into day 6 or 7, I called my Dr. Even my Dr., a noted shitlib, didnt tell me to get a Covid test and prescribed flu meds which I never ended up taking because my symptoms were over before I got up to the pharmacy. In September, with Delta swirling, I was curious what an antibodies test would show. It was positive for covid … twenty times the level needed for positive. I still dont know whether February had been my covid bout or whether I had some sort of ‘Immaculate Conception” of Covid to get those antibodies. In October, I waited on my wife hand-and-foot during her Covid week and never got covid.
Eric Weinstein seems to claim that covid is caught from a saturated room, meaning without air flow. Based on his model you can be in a room with someone with covid and be fine so long as air is flowing, but catch it from one step in a stagnant room
IPFS is supposed to be a decentralised file system to replace web server image hosting , but why does its community not seem to be talking about using small amounts of crypto over lightning network to pay for hosting files? Why are movie torrent websites and programs not using small quantities of crypto to reward people for hosting and uploading, especially obscure ones where a man is often forced to buy the physical dvd in post due to a lack of interest in seeding (and zero normie streaming options). Z-library is excellent and accepts crypto for its membership, but it ought to be charging tiny crypto chunks for a book or scientific paper and have tiny bounties for uploading missing ones, especially requested missing ones, with a view towards all the hosting being decentralised . Is the bottleneck simply a lack of vision among devs or do we still have to wait a few years for the full development of micro transactions in crypto? What are the technological limits of lightning networks? Will I be able to play a real time fps with gold coins corresponding to a millionth or billionth if a dollar, and throw piles of them around, picking up and dropping them in real time with no lag? Will I be able to skip a video advert with one click for a hundredth of a cent through my browser?
I have said many times I am profoundly unhappy with the state of the lightning network. But the taproot upgrade was designed and implemented by people who intend a lightning network that works the way it should. They expected enemy action, and no enemy action took place. Possibly, however, the enemy is embedded among those implementing the lightning network, and it will fail to take proper advantage of taproot. I am concerned about the lack of lightning network concern about enemy action.
The current state of cryptographic software indicates that without a reasonable and moderate level of vigilance about enemy action, about shills and entryists, you are likely to fail.
If you expect enemy action, you probably will not get any. If you don’t expect enemy action, the enemy strikes and you don’t notice.
I think our enemies in cryptography don’t want to strike where their actions are likely to be caught and exposed. They don’t want people to become more conscious about enemy action in crypto than we are already.
Good question. I happen to know a fair bit about this topic. What you’re describing exists, and it’s called Filecoin. It uses IPFS as one of its protocols.
However IPFS itself cannot work for (paid) fully decentralized hosting.
You cannot trust that someone is actually keeping your files stored, nor can you verify how much bandwidth they have consumed serving them.
Both of these are tremendously complicated things to do in a decentralized fashion, and Filecoin solves it, but at great expense in terms of CPU power, and with very sophisticated math to prove storage of files continuously.
It’s not economical to have a filecoin node with less than say, 100TB of storage, and it requires a powerful CPU with a lot of RAM.
In any case it could not happen with just IPFS. Microtransactions are not the major issue. That’s the easier part. In fact a big issue with Filecoin is that storing a small amount of files is ineconomical because of the process involved in getting a contract with the nodes storing it. It’s not just moving money, which could be done through LN. There are alternative protocols, such as Aleph, which I tried, which are maybe less sophisticated technically, but provide a much cheaper way of storing small amounts of data that changes frequently, more like a database. It’s more expensive than Filecoin by the byte, though. But it scales down to small amount, and frequent changes.
However, the benefit of IPFS is that it’s a neutral protocol that allows anyone to store the data, and have *one link* for it that only depends on the data itself and not where it is stored.
There are plenty of centralized IPFS hosting services.
Meaning, if you have some file, you can store it and serve it through IPFS using multiple services, your own computer, volunteers, etc, and as long as someone still has it, the same link will work. Much like with torrents.
Unlike torrents, the data is hierarchically divided and individually addressable.
If you have a torrent with 100 files, and one needs to be swapped, you need a new torrent, a new link, and everyone who was hosting the v1 of your collection needs to get the new torrent and move over to the new version of it.
With IPFS, individual files, and even parts of them, are individually addressable. Meaning, if you replace one file, the people hosting and serving the other files will still serve the other files for the new version of the collection. And they only have to change something to also serve the new file you replaced.
Fully decentralized is more difficult, as I explained.
Pfizer withdrawing their application in India for their covid vaccine
https://www.reuters.com/world/india/exclusive-pfizer-withdraws-application-emergency-use-its-covid-19-vaccine-india-2021-02-05/
Interesting, but hardly surprising.
Officially India is still holy about vaxxing, but increasingly the worship has become far less enthusiastic especially after the Omicron “waveâ€
Old news, sorry. That’s from February 2021.
“In a five-year-old report, the Libyan preacher is accused of having given hate speech against Jews, Christians and Shiites. The quote in Arabic that caused a stir read: “Oh Allah, I ask you to destroy the enemies of our religion, to destroy the Jews, the Christians, the Hindus, the Russians and the Shiites. God, I ask you to destroy them all and restore Islam to its former glory.
The Imam claimed that his Arabic quotes had been mistranslated: “I never said that. The translator is a liar,†he said. Abu Ramadan, who was charged with inciting racial hatred, is still a member of the mosque, which is housed in a former factory in the popular Madretsch district.”
Source:www.lematin.ch
Again, mistranslated….
Wife recently reported to me that 2X year old fiance of someone we went to high school with died of sudden heart complications. So strange and sudden deaths are not in my circle yet, but shockingly close to my circle.
This is something that simply does not happen, yet is happening now. I did not hear anything like this before the booster era, meaning we knew people were dropping dead but it was enough rare that you likely heard about it only when looking for it. No longer the case: the number of people who know someone who knows someone that dropped dead strangely and suddenly is growing quick.
Unless they push down a 4th shot I don’t expect to hear too much more of this (though there is a long-tail of debilitating sequelae already baked into the cake).
I just want people start mandating 5th and 6th shot already.
Less people the better.
I now count 3 highly suspicious sudden deaths in the realm of family and acquaintances..all since they started pushing the jabs…
Trudeau is starting the previously-predicted-here blood diamond attack: https://finbold.com/canadian-police-block-over-30-crypto-wallets-associated-with-the-freedom-convoy-truckers/
So truckers cannot currently cash out into dollars on PayPal and other exchanges. Interesting to see if in the long run they can stop people from buying groceries with tainted coins. I think lot of us would still want to get our hands on cheap tainted crypto for the time being but I hear the residents are still giving them food for free and telling them not to worry about the digital wallets
This is not the blood diamonds attack. I believe this is just blocking public keys from sending/receiving bitcoin to the big KYC exchanges. It’s probably not that hard to get around this by just creating new wallets and using the new wallets to interact with the exchanges assuming you have control of your keys and your bitcoin was not just sitting in an exchange.
They are marking the bitcoins in these wallets, and looking out for where the bitcoins are sent to. Wouldn’t solve it by using an intermediate wallet
The time may well be coming to get out of bitcoin.
Patiently awaiting the promised coin.
This is taking longer than I had hoped and expected.
Still not in a fit state for other people to come to my assistance, let alone ready to use
I recall the original 30$ boom happening shortly after that senator publicly rallied against bitcoin and Silk Road. Sometimes the battles can get people talking. I see a lot of people now talking about crypto in response to Trudeau freezing bank accounts
Use the tainted bitcoin to buy Monero then use the Monero to buy other cleaner bitcoin?
In regards to the suppression or obliteration of memetic/rhetorical/ideological structures… Is it possible to completely get rid of these things? Man is fallen, so there will always be entropy. Maybe it’s better to manage them than try to erase them. It might be like corruption, in that it will just manifest wherever the circumstances permit. Instead of saying “no corruption ever,” it’s better to understand where corruption is going to happen, then take measures to mitigate it. Is it better to build a fault tolerant system, or is it better to strive for a perfect system?
You can kill a religion by eating and digesting it. I don’t mean some Hegelian dialectic nonsense, it is pure power, but by co-opting an ideology’s forms while changing their meanings, you truly kill it. Confucius killed ancestor worship. He says “heaven†a lot, but not “Shang Tiâ€, says honor your ancestors, but not worship in front of their shrine. And the old Chinese faith completely disappeared, existing only as a few folk customs. Feel free to extrapolate to western history…
Entropy cannot be erased. One can merely endlessly remove it, like garbage.
Complex systems can be permanently and completely erased.
Our enemies have done a remarkably thorough job of erasing language itself to make thoughts they find dangerous unthinkable, or at least inexpressible. This, however is a weapon more dangerous to he who wields it, than to those against whom it is wielded, since, drinking their own koolaide, our enemies are apt to be blindsided. The second generation fails to get the joke.
But religions of demon worship and human sacrifice just keep coming back.
>But religions of demon worship and human sacrifice just keep coming back.
Is it logical to infer that there is some eldritch power derived from human sacrifice, or is it that those demons are particularly good at manifesting under common circumstances? Or is there another explanation? To my occidental mind, human sacrifice is just so obviously evil. I’m no Romaboo, but that is one aspect of that society with which I heavily identify.
I’ve had distant relatives and neighbors who went filthy rich performing human sacrifice. Their businesses starts taken off once they were involved in those kind of thing.
Their family members (usually children first) will die one by one very few years from unnatural coincidence. Sometimes it’s the workers who died. There was also praying, sacred objects, and ritual they need to keep.
1 or 2 might coincidental, but 20+ people having same kind of fortune is getting hard to deny.
They were openly sacrificing people?
Yeah, some were open some were not (understandably).
But it was not moloch style open sacrifice, but rather the sacrificed will have some freak accident or got seriously ill and then died.
Research “Pesugihan” on google. You should get lots of hit.
If they were OPENLY sacrificing people why weren’t they arrested and in Indonesia executed… not even our elite does it openly.
You need to do more reading about oriental provincialism. It is super foreign to occidental expectations. I’m not saying this applies directly, but east Asian policing has shit tier forensics because most murderers turn themselves in. DM’d claims stand on their own, but it’s entirely believable. Famous case in SKorea wherein a dike stomped her ex to death, and because she used male sized boots, it was open and shut. They blamed some nigger, IIRC.
How can the police do anything if the supernatural being is the one doing the dirty work.
Whenever I saw news of elite people having freak accident, I don’t believe it’s coincidemce but merely their turn paying their price.
You cannot use blackmail of a guy illegally parking to have him rob bank: the crimes you can order folks to commit in your name are a direct function of the dirt you have on them. Hence, the greatest crime of them all -child sacrifice, murder and abuse- will let you command a man for life. You don’t need the supernatural to explain why all serious conspiracies have to resort to this filth, not unlike some gang who asks you to off someone at random to get in.
Unless what DM is saying below holds in which case you do need to postulate the supernatural.
I can’t say I’ve experienced it first, but I’ve seen the wealth and “antics” first hand.
In a country where average wages is $6k/year, people who does this kind of thing can have 5 brand new cars, multiple super bikes, multiple 3 story houses, and abroad holiday every year.
All of that without being owner of mega corporation.
The materialist explanation I have heard postulated is that the killing of an innocent, being so abhorrent, is difficult to do, especially if it’s a child. Doing so requires tremendous willpower. If you have demonstrated to yourself that you have that willpower you will be more likely to exercise your will over the world successfully.
I’m not a materialist, but it’s a decent stab at it. I’m more likely to think that a spiritual explanation is more likely.
Then of course there’s gang initiation/ blackmail. TDM’s scenario, if true (sounds fantastical, but who knows) sounds like blackmail fodder and reward to a member of a conspiracy/gang.
Strict materialism, as Jim has pointed out, has problems with demons and magic. Strict materialism is insufficient to explain the world in the same way strict logic fails to explain it. Demons are real, and have real power over anyone foolish enough to traffick with them. Given the rewards associated with human sacrifice, I would assume that it does contain power, and the more innocent, the more power.
Think of it like a energy gradient. Something off the ground has stored gravitational energy. When dropped, it will release thermal and kinetic energy. Killing an innocent is taking advantage of a spiritual energy gradient. Increasing the spiritual entropy of the universe.
Regardless of the mechanism, the will of Gnon is clear. God commands us to destroy the witch. Suffer not the unclean to live. Human sacrifice is poison to any society that tolerates it, and its practitioners must be destroyed at any opportunity. Demons and their followers are anathema to order, virtue, and civilization. They must all be destroyed, lest the wrath of God fall upon us.
This is how you deal with demon worshippers. God-Emperor approved.
None of the great physicist stay materialist even if they start out as them…
Newtonian physics was the most materialist worldview friendly, but Newton admitted that he knew that while his laws implied a clockwork universe his picture was incomplete and Newton was obsessed with the occult (not the demonic aspects of it just esoteric knowledge and he took the Arian view of the trinity which I’m sympathetic to myself).
Relatively implies a universe that is a projection of a greater underlying reality, Quantum physics with its “spooky action at a distance” and unlimited zero point energy implies a universe that is downright magic…
Strict materialism is based on a false interpretation of Newton’s work that Newton himself never believed for a second.
Are there any non-evil, non-materialist physicists of any worth? I’d like to hear what they have to say. I like Feynman, but he seems pretty materialist from my surface level familiarity with him.
I don’t think any of them were particularly evil, though Einstein was close to a commie for a while (and he wanted to be a materialist but ultimately decided he could not be).
Don’t think Feynman was a strong materialist either he mostly didn’t talk about the philosophical-religious side of things but he was no Tyndall. Feynman preferred talking life philosophy… and I recently found out that like myself he loved strippers…
Not even the great midwit science cult pop scientist Sagan was actually a strong materialist he for instance thought that so many children spoke vividly with accurate information of past lives that there should be a real thorough scientific investigation into the phenomena. I guess Tyndall (based on his understanding of Newton’s work that Newton never believed) was a strict materialist.
To me what seems evil is that these great minds grasp the limits of materialism, don’t limit themselves to a purely materialistic framework, but then work to enforce purely materialistic thinking on those they are supposedly bringing knowledge to. Though, I suppose, it’s less the great minds restricting that knowledge than the institutions they’re embedded in. Also that they only seem willing to consider non materialist ideas that seem demon worship-ish.
Though Sagan and Schrodinger, based on your and Cloudswrests comments seem to have been less inhibited.
Anyone here have thoughts on Hawking? He was used to push a very materialist viewpoint. I got the impression he was more of a PR instrument where the scientific community put words in his mouth. It’s also an inversion, smartest guy around drools and can’t walk, what does that make you? I’ve seen people suggest there were a few Hawkings over the years, because he lived longer than would be expected given his disease, but never saw that presented as a series theory, more of a meme.
You’re in the wrong department. These men are physicists; materialist explanations of physical phenomena are their stock-in-trade. If you seek non-materialist explanations, ask a theologian.
The good Christian both believes and disbelieves in demons, so has both a material and spiritual explanation of demonic phenomena, and does not allow one to exclude the other.
Our enemies worship demons, and in order that they may say to us, and perhaps to themselves, that they are materialist rationalists, have some thin rationale for worshipful behavior towards material phenomena.
How does one go from a mechanical clockwork, or a digital finite state machine, to “green”, or “red”, or “burning pain”, or an orgasm? I don’t believe one can and there’s more to conscious experience than classical mechanical clockwork; and AGI requires, as yet, undiscovered physics or undiscovered physical correlations.
Regarding well known scientists and metaphysics, Erwin Schrodinger speculated that there’s only ONE consciousness in the universe and we’re all just sort of like terminals for it. https://www.hendrik-wintjen.info/consciousness/erwin-schroedinger-one-mind/
I had similar thoughts before I read of Schrodinger’s. I’ve speculated that consciousness does not reside completely in the brain, rather the brain is sort of like a radio that “tunes” into a global “consciousness field”.
What is the purpose of pleasure and pain if not reward and punishment respectively. Only a conscious entity can be rewarded or punished. And WHO is doing the rewarding or punishing if not GNON.
Sounds like Bergson’s “holographic” theory of mind.
I saw this esoteric video as part of David Donoho’s theory of deep learning course. Donoho is the real deal, not sure about this Bergson stuff, but it sounds along the lines of your statement that “the brain is sort of like a radio that runes into a global (consciousness) field”.
On an esoteric level, there is a certain power that comes with inverting telos, logos, and natural law. Sacrificing the ingroup’s children is the most profound and awful violation of TLN, so I assume that’s what gets the devil’s rocks off the most.
In a materialist sense, religions that holiness spiral usually go there in the end, for the same reason; paradoxically, because there is nothing more unholy than sacrificing one’s children, the one who advocates for it can profess extreme holiness, and cannot be outflanked by the more holy. There is no signal more costly, so the “child sacrifice” stage tends to mark the end of a holiness spiral. This theory would predict that tranny worship will defeat the various other demon worships, because castrating one’s children and watching them live in misery until they 42% before the age of 30 is the most extreme and demonic possible signal.
Right now, the competing religions of human sacrifice are Tranny worship, Gaea worship, Darkie worship, and Covid worship. I just went over how the Tranny cult openly advocates child sacrifice, but the other demon worships have not openly gone as far. All of them will result, of course, in massive loss of human life, but the Gaea and Darkie cults have only gone so far as to demand the destruction of productive enterprise, which is still a violation of GNON’s law, but a less severe one, and the Covid cult still pretends it is fighting the demon rather than appeasing it.
The Tranny cult is the cult of brezhnev, which would contain human misery at civilization-tolerant levels and corral the demon-worshipping religious energies present in our elite to a faith that has already hit moral rock bottom. As Carthage demonstrates, sacrificing some children is a more stable state than a religion that demands killing everybody. I predict that the tranny cult and brezhnev will win, because it is the only cult to have “gone there” and openly advocated child sacrifice.
Its competing faiths will not have the power to defeat it unless their party lines become “you need to die for the environment/racial justice/public health”. Until you start seeing articles like “Yes, the vaccine may kill you. But here’s why that’s a good thing”, or “Your life will be worse in a green world, but we still need to build one”, or “Yes, white people, Racial Justice means giving up your power… and sometimes even your life”, these competing religions will not have the demonic power to defeat Brezhnev or Tranny worship.
Very ironically, utopian religions that promise the immantization of the eschaton lose out to openly demonic religions that advocate extreme human suffering in exchange for perceived benefits.
I am starting to see the signs of covid worship spiraling towards forced vaccination of children. This may end up being worse than tranny worship in terms of child sacrifice, but we will see.
In Germany we are at: “Your life will be worse in a green world, but we still need to build oneâ€
They are openly saying that higher energy prices are good and that we need to put windmills up everywhere in the country side even if the noise and the rotation makes people miserable.
… while Merkel imports another million Third Worlders whose “carbon footprint” quintuples by moving from Africa to Germany.
Shameless.
Nice titles, truly uncomfortable feel. Unfortunately (and you know which university I attended, so that should color this anecdote), the inner circle is already at this point. The darkie worshippers gleefully expound upon how it’s good for white women to physically suffer from coal burning. The Gaia worshipers have been pretty explicit about gross total population reduction being the Logical Step. These are all conversations I’ve witnessed. It isn’t so scary when some poor performance undergrad says it, but they tend to become the clerical rank and file. We like to ascribe responsibility to luminaries and figureheads because, as arch conservatives, we assume kings lead. But the in-crowd dictates the message and methods.
The Corona worshipers have a bunch of “life is precious” rhetoric, and they’re the newest, but I think they, counterintuitively, will be the best suited to compete with the tranny worshipers, precisely because they are the new kid on the block.
I think corona-worship may have gotten such extraordinary mileage due to Boomers being who they are. With them gone it becomes a nothing-burger but boomers still have a decade ahead of them. In the long run its tranies, nogs or gay-a, unless this is stopped
The inner circles of each faith, and the young zealots, advocate death and destruction. But this human sacrifice is not yet part of the official faith for any of them, except for the trannies, whose misery is open and apparent to anybody who lays eyes on them.
“Very ironically, utopian religions that promise the immantization of the eschaton lose out to openly demonic religions that advocate extreme human suffering in exchange for perceived benefits.”
OK thought experiment. “Which Demons would run over the (utopian) Star Trek world?”
The Gaia Demon? They already have that covered.
The Covid Demon? Miracle Vaxx surely added to the water or whatever.
The Darkie Demon? Not sure, because they also have actual aliens around.
The Tranny Demon? Ouch. Even Captain Picard couldn’t talk his way out of that one.
If I’m in Europe, I would be pretty white-pilled right now with Russia. There could be a lot of options that suddenly open up to escape to.
https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1494322365244887041/photo/1
I’m more skeptic-pilled about Russia as such right now, but can’t deny they periodically produce based content. Light just now.
Ð’ Совете Федерации ÑовмеÑтно Ñ Ð Ð¾Ñкомнадзором готовÑÑ‚ законопроект, который предуÑматривает включение в перечень противоправного контента пропаганду абортов, отказа от ÑÐ¾Ð·Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ñемьи, а также радикального феминизма. Об Ñтом заÑвила один из авторов инициативы, Ñенатор Маргарита Павлова.
«В Ñети романтизируютÑÑ Ñ‚ÐµÑ€Ñ€Ð¾Ñ€Ð¸ÑÑ‚Ñ‹, преÑтупники, маньÑки, убийцы. Под видом прав женщин навÑзываютÑÑ Ð¸ пропагандируютÑÑ ÑƒÐ±Ð¸Ð¹Ñтва нерожденных детей, в том чиÑле на больших Ñроках беременноÑти. Под видом защиты нарушенных прав женщин очернÑÑŽÑ‚ÑÑ Ñ‚Ñ€Ð°Ð´Ð¸Ñ†Ð¸Ð¾Ð½Ð½Ñ‹Ðµ Ñемейные ценноÑти и роль женщины в Ñемье — так называемый радикальный феминизм. Под видом Ñвободы выбора пропагандируетÑÑ Ð¾Ñ‚ÐºÐ°Ð· от ÑÐ¾Ð·Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ñемьи и Ñ€Ð¾Ð¶Ð´ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð´ÐµÑ‚ÐµÐ¹ — так называемый чайлдфри», — заÑвила она в беÑеде Ñ Â«Ð Ð˜Ð ÐовоÑти».
По мнению Павловой, в Ñети также пропагандируютÑÑ Ð½ÐµÐ·Ð´Ð¾Ñ€Ð¾Ð²Ñ‹Ðµ половые Ð¾Ñ‚Ð½Ð¾ÑˆÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¸ «извращенные формы ÑожительÑтва», а под видом Ð¾ÐºÐ°Ð·Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ñ€Ð¾Ñ„ÐµÑÑиональной помощи проводÑÑ‚ÑÑ Ñ‚Ñ€ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ð½Ð³Ð¸ по «нормализации девиантных форм Ð¿Ð¾Ð²ÐµÐ´ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¸ пÑихичеÑких отклонений».
https://www.vedomosti.ru/society/news/2022/02/17/909716-v-sovfede-predlozhili-blokirovat-saiti-s-propagandoi-abortov
Russia is far from perfect, but periodically based is a massive improvement on satan worship.
This is epic. 🙂
The intention is to outlaw the entire child-free (“чайлдфри”) mindset such as this:
https://twitter.com/backtolife_2022/status/1493866651804221440
Speaking of that, I’ve been thinking about death cults of history, and a few years ago it struck me that medieval Cathars/ Bogomils/ Patarens pretty much filled the description. I asked myself how would those cults transform themselves in modern age with need to be “secular”. That is, to remove the notion of God/ Demiurge from public parlance, like some modern descendants of Puritans did with God.
I think that we would get something pretty much similar to modern progressivism.
However, someone on Takimag came to the almost same idea back in 2010:
https://www.takimag.com/article/the_dawn_of_decadence/
> “чайлдфриâ€
It’s literally English transliterated into Cyrillic? lmao
I defer to Varna’s firsthand knowledge, but escaping to Russia seems less desirable when one considers that the Russian government is pushing clot shots and QR code cattle tags:
Just as in Canada, Russian truckers are organizing a Freedom Convoy.
Especially when you look at Russia’s collaboration with Western Big Pharma, this Ukraine business seems just like rival teams of elites jockeying for initial board position before the next round of the game, which I fear will involve large reductions in the prole population.
Not Russia. The Eastern European countries in the graphic that may become free of globohomo rule in the near future.
Not counting the Visegrad four & Slovenia, the remaining 80% of EE have lost between one fifth and one third of their population to emigration over the last quarter of a century.
No population pressure whatsoever. Eastern Asians have zero fertility but are still tightly packed. In EE there’s much much more breathing space. Plus, much of the core potential globohomo supporting population has been filtered out into globohomo core countries.
Also, all of it is former colonies of Austria, Russia, or Turkey (or even Persia when you reach places like Georgia), or most of the above depending on historical period. Thus they tend to be very protective of their cultural heritage and patriotic traditions on an institutional level.
Also, all of it, except possibly the Baltics, can feed themselves and provide their own energy and simple industry, including normal basic pharma, should events make this necessary.
Also, the 80% drab part of EE is mostly stuck somewhere between 2005 and 2010 in terms of social media use and overall worldview. Still to a large extent a place of paper books, paper newspapers, indie cable shows and so on.
The 80% drab EE has many pluses for people who wish to step away from the core of globohomo. However, if a loved one develops a serious and/or complex medical condition, this is where the provincial drabness will be a big fat minus. For big complex conditions one will need to fly to Austria or some such.
EE can be great for the reasonably healthy and preferably with at least some independent means. If you’re unhealthy, or plan to start from the ground up over there — could be a bit of minefield.
Good to know. If Russia is successful in forcing a retreat of NATO out of EE, I would expect a retreat from the EU as well in which improving conditions would soon follow.
Forcing a retreat of NATO isn’t a real goal of Russia right now, if it where the US would mive the shared nukes out of Germany Italy and the Benelux into Poland and Romania. That would be end of it. But Russia is not serious about that. Who knows about the future, but right now NATO isn’t going anywhere, at most out of France and Greece who are mightily opposed to it.
US nukes don’t work. Putin knows this. If the Ukrainian puppet regime falls the collapse of the eastern European puppets will follow in the near to mid term.
Those nukes are free-fall bombs from the ’80s, if you have any doubt that they work than Russia would have no trouble seeing them moved to Poland right? Russia would flip its shit, and quite possibly threaten to invade. They work.
Free falling air dropped nukes are also the least important ones though (easily intercepted). Do the tridents, minutemen, and bullpups still work? that is the real question.
Russia doesn’t know if they work or not, and even if many of them don’t work (many many fewer than Americans believe), some of them probably do work.
But it only takes a look at wikipedia pages on the US “stockpile stewardship” efforts in the past 30 years to seriously question whether most of the bombs work.
Those are tactical nukes, to be used in a very different context from the Armageddon End of Days scenario. They are meant to stop the ruskies from taking Germany/Turkey and – in this scenario – Poland or Romania, by making the cost of invasion prohibitive and forcing them to escalate. For that purpose, free-fall is ideal, since an ASMP-type weapon could be used offensively, which is a no-no.
Even still, for tactical purposes air launched and vehicle mobile stand-off missiles are preferable – the bullpup part of the equation.
>Still to a large extent a place of paper books, paper newspapers, indie cable shows and so on.
Start spreading the neeeeewwwwwwws
I’m leaving todaaaaaaaaaayyyyyy
Aha, yes, we may hope that Globohomo loses its sway over Eastern Europe.
Although the pozzed western Europeans just got the court ruling they wanted, allowing them to withhold billions of euros from Poland and Hungary for “violating the rule of law”, that is, insufficient leftism.
The younger generation of Poles are already mentally colonized anyway. Hungary is better, but now Orbán will have to face the onslaught of Globohomo media and the fears of his fickle countrymen lest the gibs be turned off. Here’s hoping he can hold out.
Reminder that Anatoly Karlin is an entryist demon worshiper faggot shill.
Aside from the one-hundred percent honest and unbiased studies taken of the young Polish elite, it is important to recognize that the current elite in charge of Poland will not legalize sodomite marital unions.
As with cuckservatives certain “reactionaries†desire validation from enemies who intend their destruction. In addition to Karlin, Rintrah is another faggot shill having been cited here as of late.
Karlin declaring Poland legalizing gay marriage in “10 years†presupposes his citations are correct, the votes of young people in a democracy define a country’s policy, and the inevitability of Leftism. Even if the Polish youth are as debased as Karlin says they are, they will not change the country any more than the boomers passed Roe v. Wade. It should be obvious that Karlin’s “Soviet Freezer Theory†is “end of history†Progressive propaganda.
Reaction is an elite movement, which if not led by those with proper discernment will see their platforms and projects destroyed such as with Socialist Matter.
When the USSR fell from communism into liberal democracy, the Cathedral heavily infiltrated that transition. All this covid worship in Russia tells me there is still plenty of globohomo influences existent in the deep state of Russia that Putin has been unable to clear out.
14 minute interview summarizing Unz’s hobby horse about who unleashed the kung flu and why. https://rumble.com/embed/vsi3d0/
Fauci unleashed it, “gain of Function research”. Xi played along with propaganda videos and opening the Wuhan airport (while closing everything else). The other critical job in creating the panic was held by CDC director Redfield.
Both Fauci and Redfield have an almost entirely Jesuit educational background (only Fauci’s medical school wasn’t Jesuit, Redfield went from Georgetown Highschool to Georgetown College to Georgetown Medical school). Fauci also has hinted at being a Jesuit agent and got some kind of award in Rome in 2021.
So the Jesuits did the corona hoax, all the conspiracy theories about them down the centuries are probably true. The top level of the Democratic party and Xi played along with it. The “science” played along with it because they controlled the big Cathedral scientific institutions.
Meanwhile, Austria has caved, and will lift most Covid restrictions…The Trudeau Regime is looking increasingly isolated…https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/austria-lift-most-covid-19-restrictions-by-march-5-2022-02-16/
>The Trudeau Regime is looking increasingly isolated…
It’s really not. Opposition parties agreed to allow the crackdown because the Cathedral ordered it. They dare not oppose their US masters. This is about crushing opposition and if successful, other Cathedral nations will follow suit to rule directly as dictatorships.
If you listen carefully to the state of emergency declaration then you hear them justify it in almost so many words. ‘This made us look bad in front of the Americans^H^H our important trade partners, therefore martial law.’ This justification suggests that, going forward, they will keep going to martial law over all kinds of ridiculous shit.
The whole trucker thing is disappointing if treated as a coup attempt, more tolerably successful if considered as a Vox Day style ‘make the rubble bounce’ operation by a group of deplatformed victims. Of course the utility of making rubble bounce can be questioned if it gets you nothing in the end.
Ironically, the more they piss off people by cancelling bank accounts, the more impact this trucker thing will have had in terms of destroying people’s normality bias. The ‘follow the money and rip it out’ plan is based on a very effeminate Mark Carney theory of ruling the world by making decrees from an office to move money around to solve all your problems.
>(that group of people is increasingly anti government actually and they universally don’t trust the vax)
First off, no man outside of a few quiet misanthropes who live alone like the late Petti Linkola (who was a rare breed of ideologue who actually followed the implications his proposed politics have) is actually “anti-government” or “anti-authortarian.” Every man who engages in politics to a notable extent in any way is being “muh authoritarian” since the point of politics is to either tell others what to do or demand access to resources. Indeed, men who call themselves “anarchists” are more often than not dishonest dictators who crave unaccountable power with no real limits on their behavior or just deviant/feckless men who see the world as their toilet/drug dealer. For more on this:
https://carlsbad1819.wordpress.com/2021/08/25/commentaries-on-karl-ludwig-von-haller-the-restauration-der-staatswissenschaft-vols-i-iv-on-independent-territorial-lordship-patrimonial-states-and-military-empires/
2ndly, plenty of Leftists don’t get vaxxed since they oppose any sort of knowledge or tech associated with White Men as well as belonging to mangod cults that preach worshipping yourself (paganism in the modern day, Satanism, Gnosticism, degenerate versions of Christianity and Islam, modern Judaism, Buddhism). There is nothing special about it. There were plenty of riots in the last couple years with no masks that were excused since they were done by Leftists or their weapons (Tyrone and Co.). Your hippie chick or city dwelling anarckiddie only objects to vaxxes since they’re hostile to Western civ. They’re otherwise fine with trannies, mass immigration, We Wuz Kangz, substances, dysfunctional sexuality. And they can and have cooperated with the likes of Globohomo’s managers (see Rojava and the anarckiddies/lefties making excuses for it being just another shill for Globohomo) or wealthy enough Lefties like George Soros.
In any case, the most suitable explanation for the genealogy of leftists is just that post-Neolithic societies with their surpluses produces “classes” of men who are aberrant and subversive when not kept in check. These are non-pederast/opportunist fags, dykes, dweebs, spinsters, “atheists”, vegans and other advocates of deviant diets, trannies, “artists”, hostile mulattoes ala Obama and Meg Markle and raging Hapas ala Eli Rodge Rodger, etc. As society transforms across the Neolithic, more and more varieties of men who don’t acquire produce and meat, don’t build anything that lasts bigger than a drug pit or mudhut, can’t operate in a warband effectively, are born. Females who’ll become spinsters or otherwise dysfunctional born since the surplus means she can find beta orbiters/providers to give her things while keeping her vagina unpenetrated by them until gets desperate. The defect that makes exclusive fags and non-autogynephile alongside autogynephile trannies are a thing unlike in proper forager and pastoralist societies (recall that the oldest West Eurasian non-Semitic traditions with reliable scriptures and law codes that flat-out condemn faggotry are in Sparta, Zoroastrianism, and Hinduism as practiced by Brahmins, meaning they all must have been attempts by men descended from foragers and pastoralists to counter dysfunctional behavior in societies urbanized enough).
To be blunt, currently the only real way to both maintain global tech as being around the late 1800s and remove Leftism in any meaningful way would be to reduce most of the global population to peasants, foragers, and pastoralists backed by post-1800s tech and capitalism and exterminating hostile elites. The anonymous mass society is the breeding ground for the homo, the vegan, the fat fedora lord. Preventing the coming of a new Tower of Babel is needed. “Globalism” as such isn’t really the problem, rather it’s the temptation to mix it all up to acquire more power or have less limits or engage in hedonism.
This looks remarkably like yet another shill script “Hail fellow right winger, modernity makes leftism inevitable, absolutely nothing to do with full volume propaganda on every medium and the direct use of violence and intimidation to silence doubters”
But allowing it through because kind of new.
Another giveaway is the essenntially random use of our shibboleths without regard to, or understanding of, the theoretical and conceptual framework in which they are embedded.
The underlying social trends are that Republics are walking dead due to decline in elite virtue, and the underlying technological trends are that aristocratic armies can beat mass armies of reluctant conscript cannon fodder.
Both of these trends indicate yet another return to aristocracy and kingship, as has happened over and over again.
“They’re otherwise fine with trannies, mass immigration, We Wuz Kangz, substances, dysfunctional sexuality.”
Didn’t say they were perfect (though I’m not sure they are too keen on trannies) just that they don’t like progs the way they have gone.
“2ndly, plenty of Leftists don’t get vaxxed since they oppose any sort of knowledge or tech associated with White Men”
Thats not it with the new agey group.
“And they can and have cooperated with the likes of Globohomo’s managers (see Rojava and the anarckiddies/lefties making excuses for it being just another shill for Globohomo) or wealthy enough Lefties like George Soros.”
Well the antivax ones aren’t.
Not saying they are right wing or perfect just that they increasingly hate our enemies too… and are the one group of people with somewhat left wing roots who I would exempt from the helicopter ride squads.
Civilized society has bioleninist pressures but bioleninism didn’t get going at all until women were emancipated and didn’t go turbo until Uncle Sam the White Knight started protecting their right to holdout for the gigachad (really up until the late 1980s attractive women were in practice not allowed to be single if they didn’t pairup the state didn’t protect them from “harassment” until they got a primary mate) and to have special careers subsidized by men.
Attributing leftism to men merely wanting to engage in dissolute pleasures always reeks of projection to me. The urban underclass lives this way, but these slaves are the least consequential class of men in history, and the elite leftist who wants power, you tack on merely as an afterthought. The existence of a degenerate urban lumpenprole is not at all necessary for the mechanics of history, and its existence does not in any way make leftism inevitable.
Really wish I’d just skipped to the last paragraph, would have saved myself a lot of time.
Just chiming in with a little thread I ran into today that some may appreciate:
“A UNIFYING THEORY OF COVID-19 PATHOLOGY: THE SPIKE PROTEIN AS SCLEROTHERAPEUTIC
TRANSFORMING THE VASCULATURE INTO SCAR TISSUE
Finally, I am now confident that I have determined the ultimate pathology of the Spike Protein. To understand this, it is first necessary to understand”
(introduction to thread)
https://twitter.com/Parsifaler/status/1494374824122195974
That the spike proteins have a denaturing effect on other protein structures has for a long time now been provoking some syncrhonistic recollections of other causes of sclerosis/plaque formation and pallitations thereof.
For example, alzheimers:
https://www.longecity.org/forum/topic/99132-alzheimers-protocol-%E2%80%94-dissolve-detoxify/
I would wager some overlap there.
Looks like that’s it for the Quebec trucker protest. Mass arrests have started. Not only did it achieve nothing, it’s likely to achieve less than nothing for all involved. All too predictable, unfortunately.
In better news, it looks like it may be go time in Ukraine.
The extermination ethos makes you realize that leftist lives have negative value and that the idea of peaceful coexistence as a goal is not only futile and stupid but blasphemous and wrong. Imagine if every normiecon thought that.
If normiecons thought that it wouldn’t change one iota. Normies don’t matter.
The right needs to learn to use violence…
This is why its so important that everyone on the right adopt the sacred goal of leftist extermination. Extermination as a goal brings clarity…
You sound like a nutcase.
You sound like a pussy and a demoralizing shill. Everything you post here is thinly veiled defeatism.
You sound like a homosexual fed.
Pooch fedpoasting would be advocating specific actions not general principles… discussion of specific actions should never be on any public medium of communication.
But on January 6th Trump supporters had the capital and could have taken physical control of the people who run the government and weeks ago the Truckers and the supporters had the capital and could have taken physical control of the people who run the government. And at that point you must take your opportunity and not let the enemy escape.
The only reason the J6 people got into the capital was feds letting them and encouraging them to go in. Everyone in important at the capital had already left before the riot as per their plan. Pence, Harris and Pelosi where not in the building. They kept some congress critters around so that they could pretend there was real danger.
The Truckers had won, but Canada was ordered by the US to put them down hard. Most of those guys beating and kidnapping the protestors kids are probably Americans as evidence by their refusal to speak. There was never any way to take power in Canada because the US owns the country. The US must fall apart before places like Canada can be free.
Exactly so. Canada is a mere province of the Global American Empire with no real autonomy.
The Canadian protesters did not want to take control of the government. One Six protesters did want it, until they got shot at. Ottawa ones legitimately believed that throwing a party and honking in the streets would get them what they wanted without having to take it.
Almost every province has announced they will stop their madness soon so at least they got something out of it. Perhaps this suggests that provincial elections are not as fraudulent as federal ones and that provincial leaders see the need to get rid of their rules to get re-elected.
They are exterminating us, and they don’t seem to lose sleep over it.
“The right” is nothing more than a mob of peasants. Mob violence gets put down easily by state violence without elite backing.
You do not become elite without being practiced at violence, and dangerous men can recognize each other. Hard to have entryism if the bar for entry is set high enough, and the entryists look like they do not belong.
Our ruling elite is the complete opposite. Completely soft and effeminate, unaccustomed to violence of any sort. Indeed if you are a dangerous man, it is obvious you do not belong.
If our elites are “soft and effeminate,” which they are, as evidenced by them crapping their pants after Jan. 6, then it wouldn’t take much to overthrow them. But that will never happen with people like you dismissing any talk of violence and deriding the Freedom Convoy guys as a bunch of losers who accomplished nothing, which is a laughably stupid claim. Even the leader of Ontario is now saying all Covid rules need to go.
They control violent men, from a distance. Since we do not have our own army of violent men, our command over violence has to be more personal. The added benefit of being capable of violence is that in a civil war their fighting men will respect us more than their own leaders. We should aspire to be a martial priesthood, because we are more likely to get traction that way.
This is the way, but how to do it without getting locked up?
Can do nothing without a leader who commands a loyal following.
You are giving us the usual rewrite of history in which leftist violence was effective and successful, while (nonexistent) rightwing violence was ineffectual and unsuccessful, because leftists are so much cleverer than we are.
Nah, leftist violence was backed by the state, rightist violence did not happen because they knew it was opposed by the state.
Left wing violence in the streets happens when the state wants it to happen, and under the protection of the state.
Sure, but why did the state back leftist violence?
Wasn’t it because the leftists were effective and successful, and much cleverer than the rightists?
No.
This goes all the way back. Leftism is always a state religion. The mob is just summoned on the streets by a leftmost faction in government, and they are always only there for decoration, to cover for what the elite is actually doing.
Backed by the state because attacking enemies of the state.
Why are the state’s enemies the same as the Left’s enemies? The Left took over the state. They did that by being clever, effective, and successful.
@Contaminated NEET
Globohomo mercenaries (and globohomo is exclusively dependent on mercenaries now) got their asses kicked by real God-fearing mountain men in Afghanistan.
Globohomo only got victorious over Hamburger ‘n Fries McChristianity because Hamburger ‘n Fries McChristianity is faker and gayer than globohomo.
However, McChristianity either subverted or gravely wounded most more substantial protestant traditions in America. Most conservative protestants have been absorbed by it, and the holdouts are Amish/Mennonite, and remnants of traditional Calvinism, Anglicanism, and Lutheranism.
In the late 19th century, Booker T. Washington’s idea for coloreds was that the way up from slavery was to advance themselves by creating value, while Mr. Du Bois’ idea was to hack socio-political status in order to be able to arrogate capital for themselves by fiat.
Naturally, the whiggish character of Du Bois’ message found more consonance with the conceits of men of the age; and in particular, echoed the whiggish character of America’s already existing sovereign priesthood, and so of course such messages were those chosen to be elevated on their platforms, as the anointed position(s) on ‘the negro question’. A thread that leads up to the tapestry of our most current of years, where of course America’s slave castes have hardly gained in any more value than they were to begin with – in some ways even less so – but have emphatically gained in utility as catspaws in the culture wars; white bodies using rainbow coloured hands to beat other white bodies.
This illustrates a perennially recurrent tendency of traitorous elite factions throughout history; the instrumentalization of ontological basketcases – whether alien or closer to home or otherwise – precisely *because* they are basketcases; recruiting loyalty through ideologies that promise status to such sorts of beings that would otherwise have little to no prospect of gaining status superior to more adaptive neighbors by their own powers – and by the procurement of such forces, the causal agent(s) may themselves effect a means of pulling down those neighbors of his, that he would have little to no means of bettering otherwise.
One part of them is flattered by the putative idea that their ‘ultimate potential’ is no less – nay, superior even! – to those whose lots in life they would spitefully wish to destroy, and thus a predilection towards ideologies that would validate such a notion, particularly in more insecure examples of the species; while at the same time, another part of them can sense, even if only on an instinctual, subconscious level, that without the sponsorship of a more elite faction promoting the ideology… they would be nothing. Thus, a manic stridency is all but guaranteed.
There is a reflexive continuum to this dynamic; he who may be an elite to a catspaw in one context, may himself be an otherwise hopeless catspaw to a further entity in another context in turn; each entity itself evincing much the same psychology as those he can take advantage of; he pursues his course because it comes natural to him.
Marginal beings that prove themselves to be not so marginal after all by advancing naturally undermine their usefulness for this purpose. Thus the double-valence of grievance-ology promulgated by a traitorous faction; it speaks for the lionization of marginals over their neighbors, but it also needs them to not actually advance. The marginals themselves are of course mere abstract totems in the solipsistic mind of a chronic backstabber; the results of measures ostensibly implemented with an ostensible goal for their sake don’t matter – rather, it is copacetic if the ostensible goals fail even; because then the pretext may never run dry, that the real point is destruction of others in the backbiter’s own clade that they view as rivals in the broader nation. One can observe that there is actually a kind harmony even between these needs; the same hostile policies it prescribes for the destruction of their neighbors, can also be serving to ensure catspaws remain maximally basketcased.
Of course, very few beings actually desire a basketcase existence, and may pursue various means to improve their lot. Which, in more virtuous species, may result in them coalescing into more potent, higher scale forms of social organism, in spite of the best efforts of the traitorous faction to keep things in a state of atomized chaos. Seneca once opined that gratitude was the foundation of virtue. Empirically, we can observe that a lack of supervening insecurities makes an entity quite useless for bioleninist purposes, more or less regardless of it’s capacities otherwise.
Thus, there is also a sort of natural selection to this dynamic: a traitor faction needs needs marginals that will stay marginal. And thus, we find an inherent tendency for leftist bodies, whatever their nominal starting point, background, or exponents, to ultimately converge towards any of that which is most maximally dysfunctional, in any matter under creation.
@clovis
Amerikwa McChristianity is gay… Liberace Gay.
The west is ruled by deviant priests. The west is so scared of masculinity that it allows it nowhere. Even right wing men are fearful of men being allowed to be men. And if the left is so weak, why do they rule? Why are masculine men ruled by effeminate men? Why is Chad ruled by freaks and deviants? There is something wrong with western men, and it is not just that freaks rule.
In war you should always give the enemy the option of surrender.
You do not want fight an enemy that knows that if they loose they will die. That will make them fight with everything they got to the last man.
If there is the option of surrender the enemy will have this on his mind and consider if/when he should surrender.
Especially if there are unmotivated or opportunistic people among the enemy (conscripts…) they could be quite willing to surrender on favorable terms. This would significantly reduce the amount of enemies.
In general, you’re right. But the problem with allowing communists to surrender is that they’ve shown, time and time again, that if they’re shown mercy, they’ll start plotting against us within minutes. Let’s not make that mistake for the hundredth time.
The Cominator is right. They have to go. All of them.
I’m not advocating for mercy.
Of course there would have to be adequate terms of surrender which would keep them from plotting against you.
What I want to say is, it is bad tactics to TELL the enemy
that you want to kill them all
You have a lower level authority tell them they’ll be spared if they surrender, and then after all resistance in the field has stopped a higher level says well general so and so says a lot of things but I did not.
That’s how their side plays it, often enough.
Do you want to become like them?
Also, if you keep breaking your promises because you don’t like the people you made them to, eventually no one will trust anything you say, and for good reason. The term “non-agreement capable” comes to mind.
So if you offer to spare their lives if they surrender – then keep that promise. But exile them somewhere, or something.
How did that work out for the Germans in Russia? Never tell your foe your planning to kill all of them.
Again, that might be true in the abstract, but our enemies have already made it crystal clear they want all of us and our kids dead (or enslaved). There’s no point pretending.
During WW2 German troops were far more likely to surrender to Allied troops than Russian troops. They believed their chances of surviving were better under the allies. You gain nothing by telling your foes that you’re going to murder them all and you gain plenty by telling them if they give up, they probably won’t die.
There’s is a place for mass extermination in warfare, but it’s best used as a demonstrable tactic such as the Mongols would do to walled cities that resisted them. Leaders like Tammerlame who practiced the sort of mass murder you’re advocating for left nothing but ashes for his descendants to rule over.
Comminator, I don’t know about the right where you live, but my impression is that the right (at least those I know) knows very well how to use violence.
It’s simply that the right won’t use violence until it is convinced there is a good chance to win.
In Germany, the right is not using violence, because the general consensus is that the government forces of Germany cannot be defeated at present and if they could US forces would then have to fought.
The Freedom Convoy “achieved nothing”? That’s hilariously stupid. Covid rules have been lifted all across Canada, and even the leader of Ontario is now talking like a member of the Freedom Convoy, saying it’s time for all Covid rules to go. The Freedom Convoy also baited Canada’s communists into showing everyone exactly who they are. The average Canadian is now appalled with his government.
The average American has long been appalled with their government. Everyone wanted Trump. The idea that all of a sudden democrats care about focus groups, polls, and winning messages for the midterms seems suspicious. I know this is about Canada, and the convoy can be argued to be a real economic threat, but why not just throw the truckers in prison forever, steal the rest of the elections, and lie on the news? The truckers didn’t fight back with physical violence here, so chances are the government now knows they have full control, nobody’s talking out the Canadian government.
It seems more likely to me that they’re pretending to rollback the measures, but will later reneg, or that they wanted to roll them back anyway, and this is a convenient opportunity, than the CA gov is listening to the voice of them people.
People don’t wake up overnight. Canadians were pathetic for almost two years of crazy Covid rules and then, suddenly, the truckers showed more life than anyone has shown in the U.S. blue states.
“they wanted to roll them back anyway, and this is a convenient opportunity”?
No way. The Canadian “leaders” now look weak. The truckers made this happen.
Some right-wingers (or alleged right-wingers, or NRx, or whatever) seem to be so cucked, they don’t even see victories when they happen.
Maybe, we’ll see. Or maybe the cuckservatives come back in power, leave the ratchet mostly where it is, and ensure nobody needs a vax pass to attend drag queen story hour.
Not that the perfect should be the enemy of the good, but Im suspicious of the freedom convoy and that any gains here aren’t just psychological manipulation. Plenty of Canadians’ bank accounts frozen over $50 donations. Reminds me of Jan 6th, message sent, enemies identified and imprisoned.
“Or maybe the cuckservatives come back in power, leave the ratchet mostly where it is, and ensure nobody needs a vax pass to attend drag queen story hour.”
The cucks’ and communists’ power is almost entirely illusory. If that happens, Canadians will have no one to blame but themselves, just as Americans have no one to blame but ourselves.
Extrajudicially freezing a big pile of bank accounts in Canada over $50 donations would be an amazing self-own by the banksters who came up with this idea. The aftermath might require a bolshevik style purge of the population to keep things under control. While I’m sure some in the ruling class would like to escalate to this, unlike the bolsheviks they don’t have the cadres to pull it off.
I’m actually more worried that the government will be careful and restrain itself from the temptation to shotgun bank account seizures.
On the other hand, Trudeau’s cossacks trampling a handicapped woman under their hooves is good optics for the freedom party–if they would deign to use it…
What freedom party?
The Canberra (Australia) protests have been very much a case of dog bites man for any readers of this blog. The proles cannot rule, and their organisational abilities are taxed by any task that is more complex than organising some electrified music in a park. I don’t mean to be rude. It is what it is.
In the UK you can get a private covid recovery certificate. Edit the pdf of an old negative certificate to change the date and switch negative to positive. As long as it is not obvious, the online Indian GP signing it will not look hard for signs of tampering. Many test certificates do not have QR codes and I doubt they would check the QR either way, but once converted to a recovery certificate that gives you 6 months of authentic paperwork without having to photoshop it to extend its lifespan. There are several startups and they look like Indian doctors raking in their £80 fee for a few seconds of work glancing at the test screenshot + risk, down from £150, but not much considering that it suffices as a super green pass in places such as Italy and saves the effort of having to fake a PCR certificate to enter many other countries
I notice that the QR contains all information except the date of covid infection. Convenient. The date on the letter can be tampered every six months while the QR would continue to remain valid. But as with tests it would surprise me if anyone would bother checking QR, especially not at airports
With COVID going away it looks like Darkie worship is switching into high gear:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/austin-homicides-19-cops-felony-charges-police-furious-war-on-cops
Color revolution and NATO/Taiwan will fill hysteria gaps between flu seasons. Can’t have idle minds. Anything and anyone WEF has touched is toxic. I had hoped to avoid this, but, in my estimation, we will have to take the time machine back to at least 1850, on a societal tech level, to arrest trend.
Austin turned into shitlib-central fast.
The failure of the GOP at the State level let it happen. They can abolish the Austin DA anytime they feel like it. Red states are going to have to remove the Wokizi in their midst if they’re going to survive for long.
Oddly, Reddit is no longer censoring black crime from it’s news section. There’s been 5 or 6 stories about black criminals murdering people up there recently. Typically such stories were banned if the murder was black.
The system breaking down? Or are they just too busy clamping down on Canadian dissent?
I wrote this comment a while back, but it didn’t seem appropriate at the time because events were very… pressing. Nothing’s changed on that front, but there’s a statement Jim uses sometimes that always bugged me, but I’ve come to understand that it is actually a koan: paraphrasing, this isn’t a current events blog.
I’ve been mulling it over, and while there’s a real risk of this being cringe or boring, I’ve decided that, on the off chance people might go for it, I think the reward is worth the potential damage to my ego.
BEGIN:
Restitutor Orbis asked a very good question, and it’s one that has been asked before in different ways by myself and others. The underlying question is: where can I get reactionary perspectives on history? There are a lot of very well read men in this tribe, in fact I think it might be a prerequisite for being here. I know that being well read does not make one well spoken or well written, but I don’t think this aptitude disparity will negatively affect my idea.
I think we should take a stab at writing the general outline draft of Reactionary History. I think we should break up the total of history into sections, and each of us picks a section and rights their reactionary view of what is contained in the section. Each piece must have a clear beginning and ending point, so stitching them together will be easier, but as for the path one takes from beginning to end, well, that’s up to the author. I know that some people here will probably crank out scores of paragraphs, while others may be lucky if they can get three. The point of this exercise is not to dick measure historical grasp. The point is to make a rough draft, see what we forgot or are horribly misinformed, or under-informed, about, and have something that we can point to as a general reference guide for Initiates and the interested after a round or three of edits. No rules regarding plagiarism, as this is not in any way intended for publication. At the same time, lifting wholesale from tainted or slanted sources will negate the reactionary lens. Obviously, the sectioning is important. Also pretty obvious, we can’t all choose 1928 to 1948. We need a rough chronological list of the sections. I think a round of editing on this alone would be appropriate. When we lock in the sections, we post a new comment and people get the section they want in a first come first serve way, or by popular demand. Once Comenator is done assassinating his competitors and gets the World War II section, we can decide on a rough due date for section drafts.
Also, assuming that Jim is probably too busy to be heavily involved, I think he should be the tiebreaker if needed as well as assign specific sections if he feels someone would do it better then the person who has it. There’s also the issue of concurrency, like how China is almost a history unto itself. My Sections idea might be suboptimal, so maybe themes, or eras? Whatever works best is best, the point is to create a reference guide that fundamentally lays out the Reactionary perspective of history.
END
Added at time of post:
The fact of the matter is that we’ve got a lot of brilliant men here, we’ve got a powerful lens, and we’ve got the capability to create a useful reference tool. There’s a selfishness behind this idea, as well as a lazy motivation: I want access to the brilliance and profundity I’ve come to expect, and it is really cumbersome to sift through the comments and posts on the blog. Everyone here is some type of historian, so I think we should at least consider this project.
I think this is a good idea, but you’d need a single person leading it, working by committee doesn’t work. Nor is it an easy task. Someone would need to be rewarded with status, women, money, and fame for taking the time to write such a history with proper references. Without backers, that isn’t going to happen.
A better idea would be a reactionary Wikipedia with carefully vetted writers.
essentially what Moldbug called the “Antiversityâ€. Is Infogalatic anything like this?
Infogalatic is 99% wikipedia article copy/pasta.
“Infogalatic is 99% wikipedia article copy/pasta.”
That is because Wikipedia has a literal basement-dwelling neckbeard autist* who did 1/3 of the work for free, and no one has yet gone through most of Infogalactic to edit things there to be more sensible.
*https://archive.is/FKm2D
Wikipedia was originally the greatest store of accurate human knowledge every assembled, all compiled by autists working on it because they loved knowledge. Today it’s been corrupted into whatever the cathedral current line is on almost every subject and completely controlled by woke academics.
Nothing should be copied from today’s Wikipedia, almost every article is tainted with lies and propaganda.
Ingo galactic should have started over from 0 or from an archived copy of a early wikipedia before the knowledge loving autists where purged.
There is still good information on Wikipedia if you have the understanding that it has state religion bias injected in it. But many things, Roman history for example, are still quite good.
Infogalactic is a fundamentally misconceived project. Instead of trying to copy wikipedia’s comprehensive coverage of a billion things that dont matter they needed to get a few dozen core articles correct.
Maybe I misread KD but the above sounds to me like history in ten effortposts that cover the outlines, no references or any such. Something that would fit in five or so printed pages all in all. No need to reward for this type of effort, but it requires exteme erudition that I think only Jim and two or three other commentators may have. Your brains need to have done the synthesis for you already, you just need to bother and write it. I am no such man, but those who are may be swayed.
“Hunter-gatherers became agriculturalists, which begat religion and thus cities, there was a huge collapse in the BA and a guide on how to survice those times was vorn in the form of the old testament”…stuff like that.
This is what I’m talking about. Not a Bible of unquestionable accuracy, or a massively sourced document to beat academics over the head with. A concatenated series of brief essays that give a summary analysis of a section of history. A tool of generalities. Someone comes to you and says, “Ok, you say history is a pile of falsities. Fine. Then what actually happened?”
Maybe instead of sections that are chronologically connected, we start with big events, multi cultural touch points shared by many; the world wars or all big wars really, industrial revolution, the enlightenment, bronze age collapse. It doesn’t need to be the final word in response to whig history, just the first response.
We’re prepping for spring planting so I can’t go on as much as I’d like, but briefly:
This isn’t being done by committee. This is a historical fire team laying down hate to open a path. Some of us are basic riflemen, some of us are grenadiers. We do the shooting, and put together something Jim can read and give judgement on.
Yes, a based-kipedia would be preferable, but looking at infogalactic, as well as Wikipedia, community managed information sources only work when the IC wants it to. OSINT managers work hard to keep Wikipedia up and accessible. So until there is a patron state to provide haven and support, I don’t think that’s an achievable endeavor.
I know something about how to make committees work.
Consensus is dangerous – always leads to evil and madness. Every. Single. Time. Evil people, crazy people, and evil crazy people always have the upper hand in the formation of consensus. So, let everyone speak for himself to his own opinion from his own knowledge, let everyone deal with his own matter, and after a bit, someone in authority notices that everyone is in agreement about certain matters, not because they tried to find agreement like people haggling over the price, but because the truth is what it is. And if some people persistently have a different view of the truth to other people, because the truth is always open to interpretation, and people have different priors, then the leader decides, and no one has to agree with his decision, only comply. But he seldom has to, because the truth is what it is, and you only have smart, well informed, truthful people working on the matter.
Obviously we should indeed write a reactionary history, an antidote to official whig history, one with massive quotes and extensive links to old books written by the people who were around at the time.
A cure for our current history which is written like a game of telephone, with a Wikipedia like aversion to primary sources.
But I cannot do it. I am overwhelmed by writing code, and figuring out consensus algorithms.
I thought existing proof of stake consensus algorithms worked, and all I had to do was just rip off someone else’s work.
They don’t. They scale to very large numbers of transactions very fast, but they do not scale to large numbers of peers dispersed over the internet, at least not without under the rug centralization.
They are based, more or less, on Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerant Consensus, which dies on its ass when you have a dozen peers, and is dead in the water at fifty.
Solving this problem is doable, and I think I have a solution. But it is fundamentally a research project in computing theory.
There are a bunch of impossibility proofs, but the basic way around them is to use a weaker liveness criterion than Paxos. Instead of producing a definite result, get a result like that of Bitcoin, where you never know for sure that you are on the right consensus, but as time goes by, the likelihood that you are on the wrong chain drops exponentially.
Paxos aims to make forks impossible. Rather, we have to make sure that there are not too many forks, and the minority fork dies out quickly.
And my actual code is a dreadful state. I need to get it, not into a useful state, but with enough of the foundations in sight that you can see what the building is going to look like.
A real consensus algorithm necessarily runs on udp. TCP creates a reliability layer on top of UDP, but you cannot do it that way for consensus, because TCP is a two party communication, and if one party deviates from the protocol, the other party just hangs up on him. But consensus is multiparty, and there will always be some participants that want to screw over other participants, Ann wants to foul up Bob, because she does not like his interactions with Carol. A reliable messaging system does not suffice, because it is defined only for two participants.
“but they do not scale to large numbers of peers dispersed over the internet, at least not without under the rug centralization.”
What if you accepted the ‘under the rug centralization’ part, presumably under Russian and/or Chinese nukes? Could you still preserve everything else that you wanted to achieve, if you “de-scoped” just on that one point?
Probably stupid, but I had to ask anyway.
China has controls on capital that get right up the noses of a whole lot of very rich people in China, which now has by far the largest GDP in the world, (US GDP is fake because the CPI has been silly for a very long time and is rapidly getting more silly faster and faster, and also fake because the FIRE economy of the blue megalopoli is counted as creating invisible intangible value, rather than destroying value.)
So, if the developers want to get stupendously rich, cannot rely on under the rug centralization protected by Chinese nukes.
Under the rug centralization means that someone with a gun is going to take that center away from the developers. Chinese authorities are going to be extremely unhappy with money moving around that is not under their control, and even if you have your center located by the guns of someone who is a good guy, he is likely to become less of a good guy when you have a lot of money moving around in range of his guns.
What about the Urbit model? A ‘feudal’ structure of galaxies, stars, and planets, rather than absolute centralization or “pure” peer to peer?
I have a better plan, will publish it by and by.
In a decentralized peer to peer network, it is impossible to avoid forks, and even with Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerant Consensus and Raft which have a vast and ingenious mathematical structure to prove that forks are impossible, and with a known and fixed very small number of peers all inside a single data center with very good network connections, they wound up furtively allowing forks through the back door, to be resolved later, possibly much later, because getting a fork free answer could often take a very long time, and the network, though theoretically always live, in that it would theoretically deliver a definitive result eventually as long f+1 non faulty peers were still at it, “eventually” was sometimes longer than people were willing to wait for.
Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerant Consensus is horrendously complicated and hard to understand and becomes a lot more complicated when you allow forks through the backdoor. Byzantine fault tolerant Raft consensus is simpler, but in practice they wind up allowing backdoor forks anyway, despite incredibly clever academic ingenuity to produce a system that they could prove cannot fork, and when you have forks in the backdoor, Raft becomes at least as complicated and difficult to understand as Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerant Consensus, perhaps worse.
So, your consensus mechanism must reduce, but cannot eliminate, forks and therefore should not try. (There are a bunch of impossibility proofs, which any proposed consensus mechanism must thread a very narrow path between) and when a fork happens, as it likely very often will, has to resolve that fork by everyone moving to the branch of the fork that has the most support.
In proof of work consensus, you slow down the production of forks by making everyone wade through molasses, and you can tell how much a support a fork has by how fast it advances through the molasses, so everyone moves to the branch of the fork that has made it furthest through the molasses.
But this turns out to limit the consensus bandwidth to about ten transactions per second, though if the lightning network gets running as it should, this may well suffice for quite a bit longer. (Lightning needs fixes)
Making everyone wade through molasses is just a bad idea. And it has produced a network that is alarmingly centralized and vulnerable to state power. There are very few big miners.
But you don’t want all the peers to report in on which fork they are on, because too much data, which is the problem with all the dag consensus systems. Proof of work produces a very efficient and compact form of evidence of support for a fork.
The solution, in oversimple outline form
For each peer that could be on the network, including those that have for years been sleeping in a cold wallet, each peer keeps a running cumulative total of that peers stake. With every new block, the peers stake is added to its total for that block.
On each block of the chain, a peer’s rank is the bit position of the highest bit of the running total that rolled over, up to a maximum.
So if Bob has a third of the stake of Carol, and N is a rank that corresponds to bit position higher than the stake of either of them, then Bob gets to be rank N or higher one third as often as Carol. But even if his stake is very low, he gets to be high rank every now and then.
Each peer gets to be rank N+1 half as often as he gets to be rank N, and he gets to be a rank higher than N as often as he gets to be rank N.
Any group of two or more peers can propose a next block, and if lots of groups do so, we have a fork. If a group of m peers propose a block, and the lowest rank of any member of the group is rank N, then the weight of the block is log(8m+9)*(2^N) Every correctly behaving peer will copy, circulate, and attempt to build on the highest weighted chain of blocks of which he is aware and will ignore all others. Correctly behaving peers will wait longer the lower their rank before attempting to participate in block formation, will wait longer before participating in attempting to form a low weighted block, and will not attempt to form a new block if a block of which they already have a copy would be higher weight. (Because they would abandon it immediately in favor of a block already formed.)
This produces the same effect as wading through molasses, without the heavy wading, because the chain with the highest ranking peers signing its blocks obviously has more support.
Fork production is limited, because there are not that many high ranking peers, because low ranking peers hold back for higher ranking peers to take care of block formation, and because forks are resolved in favor of the block of highest weight.
In the course of attempting to form a group, peers will find out what other high ranking peers are online, so, if we make the Hedera assumption that everyone always gets through eventually and that everyone knows who is online, there will only be one block formed, and it will be formed by the set of peers that can form the highest ranking block. Of course, that assumption I seriously doubt.
Suppose that two blocks of equal weight are produced. Well, then, we obviously have enough high ranking peers online and active to produce a higher weighted block, and some of them should do so, and if they don’t, chances are that the next block built on one block will have higher weight than the next block built on the other block.
When a peer signs a block formation, he will attach a sequence number to his signature. If a peer encounters two blocks at the same chain position, a fork, that have the same peer signing it, (a peer can propose as many blocks as it likes) he should discount the signature with the lower sequence number, lowering the weight of the block with the lower sequence number. If the two signatures have the same sequence number, he discounts both signatures, lowering the weight of both blocks.
That sounds very hard to program. Good luck and Godspeed
Question–If the American Republic died on Nov.4, 2020 (and it probably did), is it not also true that the Canadian Republic died when Trudeau assumed dictatorial power without even the assent of Parliament?
The American Republic did not die on Nov.4, 2020. It just simply demonstrated in a shockingly obvious way that democracy is nothing but a pretense over its actual oligarchical form.
Canada has never been an autonomous republic. It has always been merely a province of the Anglo-American Empire.
I consider Canada to be dead. (And the US too.)
It seems, shall we say, very unlikely that things right themselves through existing mechanisms.
We could take a Wikipedia methodological approach: pic an event or era, write the reactionary summary thesis, then those of us who can or will, add input, additions, corrections, etc.
A wiki version of radishmag? That would be wonderful.
I know Scott Alexander enjoys little love here, but damn this is brilliant. No offence meant, of course, and no trolling either.
https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/the-gods-only-have-power-because?r=bjshe&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Not really that brilliant. Just backdoor humanism. God only exists because we believe in him, and we believe that women have rights, so women are now equal to men, hurr durr. It is reddit-tier analysis. Anyone who has played recent editions of D&D could have written this, and any decent DM could have done better.
“I don’t believe in gravity!” shouts Scott, as he leaps to his death, and God looks on and has a chuckle at Scott’s foolishness. Scott’s belief in gravity being irrelevant to the reality of gravity, he dies at the bottom of the cliff. All his clever writing about how gravity is an illusion and not real failed to bouy him up as he fell. All the social pressure he felt to disbelieve gravity is not going to make him any less dead. Rationalizing the air rushing past him and the ground rushing at him ends when he impacts the rocky ground at the bottom.
Now replace a cliff and gravity with women, and the metaphor becomes reality.
Genetic death
Precisely. He could catch himself if he would only recognize the danger of his fall, but them people might say or write mean things about him.
Yes, it is backdoor humanism. But being irreligious myself, I don’t mind. I really enjoy this sort of genre though: take a statement A such that, if it were true, the world would look about the same as ours does. Now, what is the most outlandish such statement A you can come up with? Love this stuff.
“Yes, it is backdoor humanism. But being irreligious myself, I don’t mind.”
You should mind, humanism is evil.
It is not impressive. If you crawl over reddit you can find dozens of similar stories, and every one of them is just as bad as all of the others. It appeals to the sort of people that frequent reddit. If they just believe hard enough then they will not be pathetic and lame. That way they do not have to eat well, lift weights, practice charisma, or spend any effort whatsoever to be better.
Deurgic magic for midwits. Hardly any deep philosophy there.
What a bunch of twee reddit-tier garbage. Wulfgar has it right: these are clever twists for midwit dungeonmasters to spring on their players, not deep musings.
All right, all right gents, no more Scott. Should spend some time on Reddit though lol
I generally only check out reddit to figure out what the cathedral’s current propaganda push is. The remaining non shill posters are land whales and dickless wonders who don’t matter at all.
It gives you a feel for how liberals are responding to regime propaganda. This is infinitely more valuable than what conservacons are commenting on Fox News articles (“This is outrageous! Get outraged guys!). NY Times comment section used to be the best for this before they did away with the comments section.
The comment section of Reddit main subs is almost entirely astroturfed and anyone not following a shill line gets the ban hammer. Taking it seriously as actual Dem thought isn’t worthwhile. Anyone of quality either keeps there head down and out of the main subs or was long ago banned. I raked up 100+ bans before I stopped posting.
There’s also competing groups of shills there now. I think the group pointing out homeless mental illness and black crime is a DNC group trying to roll back the insanity. It’s doomed to failure without attacking the Soros DAs though.
Ah that’s a shame. Interesting though that Dems are attacking black crime.
Having blacks almost totally immune to arrest while they assault, rob, and rape at will is scaring even Democrats.
Also it’s not so much attacking black crime as it no longer pretending black crimes doesn’t exist by removing the news stories about it.
I dunno. I just really dislike Scott Alexander, and that probably colors my judgment about anything he writes.
I remember a couple years ago when a lot of the big dissident-right voices were fawning over him because he would sometimes deign to give them the time of day and a little self-righteous engagement rather than an immediate ban. Naturally, he eventually banned them all anyway. I get that people wanted mainstream recognition and acceptance, but Scotty wasn’t even that.
What the bluetribesman ultimately wants to believe is, that to the extent there are any forces in creation with intentionality, they do not have any more ontological priority over his own being – and that to the extent there are any forces in creation ontological priority over his own being, that they do not have any intentionality. That Being must either be naught but infinitely malleable contingencies, or a blind idiot universe, or some combination thereof; anything that can afford a rationalization for his adolescent desire of wholly unlimited agency – which is to say, a rationalization for his fear of power; fear of anything – anyone – that could have power *over* him.
Thus their recurrent antipathy to openly acknowledging teleology, and by extension natural law in general, even in contexts where they end up having to describing forms of their likeness in other words anyways, like darwinism or natural selection.
For to acknowledge teleology, is to acknowledge that they are participants in super-personal phenomena inevitably trending towards certain ends, which they must either respect with acknowledgement, or be crushed by their motions – that they are components even, a substrate through which such more transcendent entities are instantiated on this plane, and interoperate with each other.
Thus also their recurrent tendency to believe in a ‘colourblindness’ of power – that different forms of power are ‘value neutral’, and may be turned as easily to one end as any other; for to acknowledge that there are indeed different forms of power, more or less given to different ends, is to acknowledge a shape and contour to his own agency; and that is the one thing he cannot stand.
What you are saying rings true to the extent that I’ve grasped it, but I’m unfamiliar enough with the concrete implications of some of your terminology to be sure I haven’t grasped the whole thing.
It would no doubt take him much time and many pages to elucidate, but I could sure wish for someone like Karl F. Boetel to spell all of this out with examples in layman’s terms.
PC is saying liberals are the ugliest man; they cannot abide the thought someone is better than, stronger than or higher status than them in any other sense. This pathology extends beyond people into the purpose with shitlibs attacking anything teleological because it would imply they are subordinated to something greater then themselves.
The devil’s pride…
Scotty’s ‘gods’ are powerful, but also contingent on his beliefs about them; thus they do not have priority over him, he can meme them into a form he wishes; he does not necessarily have to wring his hands over the thought of their agency supervening his own.
In turn, if he were to say encounter a pile of snow blocking his driveway, his wish alone for it to be out of his way would be insufficient, he has to do something about it in certain ways about it, in order to effect the reality of his wish; the snow is a product of forces that have higher ontological priority – he must either acknowledge and work with them, or suffer for it; the snow, as far as he can tell in his mind, does not have intentionality, and thus he does not wring his hands about the thought of it’s agency supervening his own.
In other words, even more than the idea of natural laws he is bound to follow, the bluetribesman revolts against the idea of powers *with will* that he is bound to follow. This is perhaps the mythopoetic kernel from whence such certain forms of behavior, sometimes in latter days called ‘leftism’, have recurrently sprung throughout history.
Edward Teller said of John von Neumann:
Pseudo, it would be great if you could learn to do that too, because I do enjoy your posts when I’m able to understand them.
I don’t mean to dick ride, but some of St. John’s comments are straight up artwork in word form. We have some truly gifted thinkers here.
Pseudo-Chrysostom is the only commenter here that I have to read multiple times to understand the full nuances of his posts. He’s really next level.
Just as there are dialects among the various English-speaking peoples, every brahmin sect utilizes a particular programming language in conveying precise ideas. Pseudo-Chrysostom applies the vocabulary of philosophy to political discourse in chains of elongated thought – expressed with heavy usage of the em dash as opposed to my preferred semicolon.
In theology, there are numerous essential terms such as hypostasis, ousia, et cetera, without which ideas cannot be expressed without ending up in one of several heresies – hence discourse here regarding “contradictions.†If Pseudo-Chrysostom were to “simplify†his language his ideas would be less precise, less insightful, and more importantly apt to be misinterpreted.
If reading Pseudo-Chrysostom is difficult, take some time to learn his language and one will find himself using words such as ontology and contingencies in understanding and communicating his own experience.
I have dyslexia which I deal with by speed reading things.
In a typical sentence you can generally guess the meaning by pattern recognition by only reading a fraction of the sentence. This prevents the dyslexia from kicking in and makes reading enjoyable and easy. I do with almost everything I read, outside of non-verbose technical documentation. It’s a brain hack I discovered in the 2th grade.
Complex writing like Pseudo-Chrysostom or Moldbug forces me to either speed read the post multiple times to get the full meaning or read it very slowly while having to deal with the dyslexia. That’s always less enjoyable, but typically the posts are worth it.
Insipid avoidance of spiritual reality…
Well, call me naive, but this is as much proof as I needed to know the government of Canada takes orders from the WEF, aside from that video of Klaus Schwab bragging that they infiltrated half the Canadian cabinet. I know this is well known, but having confirmation brings some clarity.
The relevant part starts at the 1min mark. Notice the speaker and other scrambling the moment the WEF is mentioned.
The Schwab’s WEF is just one of many NGOs, like Soros’s Open Society, who donate heavily to liberal politicians. Yarvin refers to them as the “Front†for state religion activism in his deep dive piece of how the ruling regime works.
It reminds me of that insurance CEO that suggested the 40% increase in life insurance claims was from covid, and yet it wasn’t picked up by the media (even though more covid deaths would benefit their narrative): it’s too obvious that it’s the vax, even if the CEO suggested otherwise.
Why try to silence any mention of the WEF if it’s just like some NGO donating money to politicians for good causes? (leftists see Open Socienty and Soros as working on good causes afaik)
Note the question was about members of the cabinet that are on board with the WEF agenda, so shutting it down can’t be due to a concern about illicit funding.
I see them trying to silence any mention of the WEF as confirmation that there is something more to it than just some NGO they associate with.
I don’t see Hillary Clinton having a problem openly saying they get their policy advice from the council on foreign relations, but they shut down mention of the WEF immediately.
That Freeland woman that is both second to an actor president and on the board of trustees of the WEF, plus shutting down any mention of it seems like something is going on beyond taking advice from them. If they didn’t shut down mention of the WEF I would believe it’s like the relation between the state department and the CFR, now my conspiratorial lizzard brain tells me they’re taking orders and they want hide it.
Clearly Covid illustrates a shadowy global conspiracy of the Alex Jones type, an almost universal and self destructive response to obvious lies (amplified by megaphone) and hysteria across the world is lets just say exceedingly improbable otherwise.
But if discussion of the WEF is shut down it was not shut down when Newsweek did a whole issue on the Great Reset. The WEF and Schwab is too much the obviously visible villain (he even looks like he was picked out to resemble Ernst Blofeld and Doctor Evil), and a shadowy global conspiracy is not going to want to tip the hand as to the identity of the central top conspirators (even if they’ve prettymuch tipped off that YES it does exist) in an obvious way. Of course I would still have Schwab and anyone connected to him put under “special” interoggation about what they know before being drawn quartered and burned for conspiracy and demon worship but its not them either. The fact that now discussion of them is being shut down is not evidence they are the top but evidence they are not the top.
4chan shills and midwits constantly shriek “ITS THE JEWS” and cite the fact you cannot criticize the jews (not from the right anyway) at least in the West. But the people really on top if a very few knew about them would have to allow open criticism and theorist claiming its them… because if they shut down such criticism they would confirm the suspicions of those few to the many. Its much more effective to shut down criticism of their frontmen.
The group that generally keeps a low profile (though Fauci seemed to love the limelight before he was told to lower his profile) but has their hands all over Covid is the Jesuit order (and of course the Vatican in general, though not so much the local branches of the Catholic Church)… I do not think the Jesuits are theoretically at the top of it either but as the worlds original order of glowniggers I think they are the glue that holds it all together (normally you would think an elite world spanning conspiracy would collapse into infighting and dissention after a while but with a fanatical and diabolically clever enforcement arm that even the top level is subject to… perhaps far more cohesive).
And this leads to a solution to. If you want to break the conspiracy King Phillip the Fair is a good model, he sent elite handpicked knights to kidnap the Pope and dragged him to Avignon in chains (then let some of them back because they weren’t generally the real problem), made him sign a bull that the Templars (the original Jesuits) were guilty of heresy and witchcraft and burned them all.
He did kick out the Jews for being connected to the Templars but on rather generous terms where they were allowed to leave and given time to get their affairs in order and collect some of their debts and then let some of them in, he realized they were some of them Templar/Vatican agents but seemed to realize they weren’t the real problem.
Phillip the Fair though theoretically remaining Catholic probably hurt the Vatican worse than Luther ever did…
Yes, the issue is that this time they know you are coming and have hidden masterfully. Hence my favourite bit of Qtardery – which I promised some time ago to share- the whole thing was Trump being employed by some in the military to make The Left panic so they could monitor elctronic traffic and figure out who sits at the top, so you can doa Phillip the Fair thing. I say 1/3 chance this was the deal, and conditional on this, 1/2 that they succeeded and now someone has the full org chart of The Left.
Qtardism was misinformation and its not true and they probably don’t communicate electronically at all. They almost certainly only meet physically when they meet.
Its probably hard to tell who is at the top, I suspect that if the Jesuits are their top agents the people at the top are possibly certain members of the Vatican and certain families of the Black Nobility…
But it doesn’t matter that much because if the Jesuits are the glue than the Phillip the Fair method will work to dismantle it at least for a couple hundred years… if you control a military power take the Pope hostage drag him in chains thru the street torture him force him to sign orders declaring the Jesuits demon worshippers etc etc and kill every Jesuit in horrible ways in public impose it on satellite countries. Also make the Pope move to your country (I’d find a town called Avignon in America just because it would be funny) so you can keep an eye on him and keep the black nobility away. Make sure the Pope is guarded and watched all the time by fanatical baptists etc.
“But it doesn’t matter that much because if the Jesuits are the glue than the Phillip the Fair method will work to dismantle it at least for a couple hundred years… ”
Indeed, don’t have to go all the way up (you wouldn’t want to touch those people anyways), but you have to go high enough that a few hundred or thousand arrests (just go with it) would kill the coalition’s ability to coordinate centrally, with no orders making it from the top to the bottom.
But you cannot just assume that this “golden thousand” are the Jesuits, or Jews or whatnot. You have to know and at this level they surely do leave an e-trail. As I’ve said before, I consider your Jesuit theory as likely as the Jew theory (not Jim’s variant, ye olde one).
Now, another question is: if you go ahead and break the left’s ability to issue centralised orders and keep discipline, what will happen? Will every small conspiracy be left to fend for itself, unable to coordinate and precipitate a reign of terror and full on purity spiral? Probably.
lol, wrong link above, don’t click
The jew theory is falsifiable given that jews before WW1 weren’t all that powerful in any way (Rothschilds excepted who were most visibly powerful in the 19th century) and given that they were more eager to jab the Israelis than almost anyone… not to mention that progressivism even before the jab jews had worse reproduction patterns than almost anyone.
Now the Jesuits… not only is Fauci a Jesuit but so was Adam Weishaupt.
All true, and you need to add quite a few epicycles to the J theory to make it work, at which point is a bit more complicated.
On the other hand, if you go out in public and say that Aramis is behind it all people will laugh, if you point at eskimos they’ll come down like a ton of bricks. Hence, I wont dismiss that theory out of hand.
Eskimos?
jews, was trying to be edgy. And Aramis was a jesuit in the Dumas novels
Israel (and Mongolia ?) is the only >100 IQ country that reproduces itself.
Israel getting vaxxxed is a fair point.
Catholic conspiracy theory has to deal with why is the world ruled by Prod countries.
Assuming the Jesuit theory is true, (and it sounds unlikely, but the Cominator has collected some pretty good evidence) then:
One explanation is that countries subject to Jesuit influence became militarily weak, due to plots against the sovereign, the nations sovereignty, and local populace.
A second explanation: Jesuits hate Roman Catholicism and Roman Catholics, much as Soros hates, Jews, Judaism, and Israel a lot more than Andrew Anglin does.
It is pretty obvious that the Vatican is ruled by literal demon worshipers, and that is par for the course for demon worship. That is the problem with following the father of lies.
The Arab population of Israel reproduces itself.
Catholic monarchies when strong
A) Historically they couldn’t stand the Jesuits either and repeatedly expelled them
B) Were far more likely to strongarm the Vatican than Protestant countries
So if temporal power is the more immediate goal and making everyone Catholic is a more long term goal it make sense they’d be content to work through Protestant countries and try to convert slower.
Joe Rogan podcast vanishes from spotify after podcast discussing the WEF’s infiltration of governments.
The podcast with Robert Malone caused a stir, but didn’t get the podcast completely pulled. Talking about the WEF’s plans did (perhaps something else discussed in the latest podcast, but short 2min discussion of WEF infiltration of western governments from the latest podcast was widely circulated on twitter). Just another data point, possibly a big one.
Looks like a mighty big data point
Joe is obviously after his paycheck, is done with this stuff. If this won’t do it he’ll steal Dave Icke from London Real for his next show.
The Joe Rogan Experience went down on Spotify while they put covid official narrative buttons on some of his episodes. It came back after a few hours and is up now.
https://open.spotify.com/show/4rOoJ6Egrf8K2IrywzwOMk
Joe wrote:
Thanks for correcting it.
I checked and the Joe Rogan episode where the WEF’s plans were discussed is still up. My mistake: I’ll double-check next time before posting a link.
>He did kick out the jews but
You say that like it’s a bad thing.
Its a mixed thing, many many bad jews but also some very good ones.
The point is he clearly thought the Templars and the Papacy were a nuclear level threat and implacable enemy and the jews just had a few people among them who were enemies and were linked to the Templars. The jews were not made to march out at swordpoint suddenly whereas the Templars were mass arrested, tortured and burned.
He also let them come back within a short time…
The Templars in this case were a scapegoat. Still are you might say, one of a few more ‘acceptable outlets’ for canalizing ‘conspiracy’ thinking into non-regime-threatening forms Dan Brown/’Assassins Creed’ style, since they were martially inclined, and native sons, two things our gnostic theocrats are perfectly fine with throwing under the bus. The fact that they provided banking services not aligned under that tribe of eurasians was probably not an uninfluential factor in later events.
Many bad mexicans but also some good ones.
Good for them, they can be good in their own country. We’d be better off without them too.
“Many bad mexicans but also some good ones. Good for them, they can be good in their own country. We’d be better off without them too.”
Well spoken.
The real j issue is not friend or foe (doesn’t matter, have to go) but that a certain country cannot conceivably hold all jews if they were asked kindly to leave. A huge issue I have no asnwer for, except for taking the while thing and moving it somewhere else.
They don’t all have to leave, all leftists need to go… to join the infernal choir (which will be most jews) and jews need to be banned from state and quasi state jobs.
But non leftists jews can stay but not get state or quasi state jobs.
That would be a disservice to a very smart (though not as smart as they think) race, to leave them around as second-hand citizens, practical slaves. Nah, after some adjustment, a greater israel (though transported elsewhere) would be a great nation and do proud all the world. But this diaspora crap has to end or – I’m afraid – far worse will come of it.
@cominator
https://skemman.is/bitstream/1946/35402/1/The%20Viking%20Rus%20and%20the%20Khazars.%20Elliot%20Jones..pdf
Bulan
Jahbadhiyya/Jews in Bursa
Edict of Expulsion
Alhambra decree/Jews in Pisa
Neapolitan Jews/Jews in Japan
Isaac LeMaire/East India
Mocatta Family
Sassoon Family
There is continuity and you don’t have to look hard for it. If you follow the history of banking and global trade, it makes it really easy.
Yes I agree with this. All the NGOs and the billionaires who run them are just fronts and frontmen for the evil deeds of the Ivey League elites. Much easier to just shut down criticism of them.
>4chan shills and midwits constantly shriek “ITS THE JEWS†and cite the fact you cannot criticize the jews (not from the right anyway) at least in the West. But the people really on top if a very few knew about them would have to allow open criticism and theorist claiming its them… because if they shut down such criticism they would confirm the suspicions of those few to the many. Its much more effective to shut down criticism of their frontmen.
I’m not convinced this is the case. Specifically, I don’t think that censoring criticism of [leading conspiracy group] does anything to convince normies (or the many, as you put it) of their culpability. Normies care about their status too much to commit the cardinal sin of blaming the holy group, or even considering that said holy group might not deserve its holiness.
I do agree however that it makes more sense for the [leading conspiracy group] to keep a low profile, make itself as inconspicuous as possible and simply do nothing in response to criticism and blame, because that convinces dissidents that they are not involved.
So to me, whether its the jews or not depends on how smart and/or powerful these conspirators are. If not smart
Clicked submit by accident
So to me, whether its the jews or not depends on how smart and/or powerful these conspirators are. If not smart enough or powerful enough to not fear dissidents having their eye on them – it might very likely be the jews. If smart and powerful, or smart but not powerful enough to not care about dissidents having their eye on them – probably not the jews.
A lot of the shrieking about Jews comes from obvious Soros shills, who are revealed by their urgent desire to shut down any discussion of Soros and Soros related activities. “ITS THE JEWS! (But not Soros, and events that look connected to Soros are not happening, not being done by Jews, and are the spontaneous outrage of the oppressed masses against right wing oppressive power.)”
The problem with Jews is the same as the Lord Jesus Christ complained about two millennia ago. Talmudic legalism. Torturing the text of the Bible, laws, contracts, and bets, to obtain the desired result without regard to the spirit and intent of the law.
Also, the problem with Jews is exile. That they are spiritually foreigners, hence useful disposable tools for a treasonous and hostile elite to use against its own people. Soros being exhibit A, being the State Department money laundry: A whole lot of Soros employees have a State Department hat and an NGO hat, and put on the State Department hat when they want to do something official and bill it to the State Department budget, and then, when they want to do something officially unofficial, put on the NGO hat, while still sitting at the same desk with a computer maintained by the same IT department, and bill it to the Soros NGO budget.
The word “legalism” raises a problem with Rectification of Names.
Two very different meanings:
1. Legalism in the sense of Chinese history. The false doctrine that the moral order of society comes from the Sovereign, and if in fact society is doing something different you need to raise penalties and enforcement, when reality it is the Sovereign’s job to back up the moral order that comes from society, and if society is doing something different from the law, which happens a whole lot with laws on sex and family, the sovereign needs to adjust the law to fit the morality of tribe, the social technology of the times, and the will of Gnon.
2. Legalism in the sense of Christian history. The false doctrine that obedience to the endless re-interpreted and re-re-interpreted letter of the law is what matters, when reality is that the letter of the law is always for a particular place, people, and social technology, and needs to be revised for each place, people, and the social technology of the time, to preserve the unchanging and eternal spirit and intent of the law.
Since the second meaning is ancient and well established, we need a better word or phrase for the first meaning.
On the other hand, the meanings, though distinctly different, are related, so a related word or phrase. Both meanings are failures to accommodate the actual moral order. They both deny objective morality, replacing it with the meaningless and arbitrary commands of an arbitrary will, external to and outside reality. They are both forms of subjectivism, morality being subjective not objective. Legalism in the sense of Chinese history being to locate that will in the sovereign outside the society he governs, and legalism in the sense of Christianity being to locate that will in a deity whose will is not manifest in the natural order, the Logos.
Chinese legalism are occupational edicts.
That is a useful epithet, which conveys much truth, but I think it distracts from the key issue. It points the ruling elite being hostile to and alien to the society that it governs, but it points to the edicts themselves, rather than the spiritual and philosophical framework of those edicts. Most legalism in Chinese history has come from a leader embedded in his own tribe and family, ruling through kinfolk, which tribe his legalism destroyed, and which family relationships his legalism destroyed.
The problem is not that the ruling elite is alien, but that this spiritual and philosophical framework makes the elite alien. Which, in Chinese history tended to have immediate disastrous results for rulers ruling through their own tribe and family. The edicts that destroyed the Qin dynasty probably would have worked with better and stronger family and tribal relationships, which could only exist if the Qin dynasty had its lieutenants treat its edicts as guides for coercive actions intended to accomplish certain goals, rather than as fixed rules to be followed according to the letter regardless of circumstances.
Agree, and China is where you see that what makes an edict occupational is not the actual government being an occupational force, but the legal framework being so alien to the people that the only choices are extreme reprisals or complete delegitimisation of the law itself. The rulers can be of good Chinese stock but if they insist on silly laws they make themselves alien. Not all that different with EU “law” being enforced on aspiring candidates nowadays, for whose people those laws are alien and silly.
Don’t know why the Chinese were prone to this failure mode whilst the Romans (an empire of comparable extend and heterogeneity) were not.
Racial characteristic.
Chinese have difficulty hearing what cannot be said or written in words. Painfully noticeable when you see Chinese engineers attempting to follow a specification.
Jews are rather good at it, and even better at being willfully blind to it.
Whites are superior to all other races, including Jews, in our ability to say in words what cannot be said in words, though the Jews might be better than us if they could lay aside their propensity to willful deafness and blindness.
As whether Jews are better than us at hearing what cannot be said in words, hard to tell with all the willful deafness, but the crappy nature of synagogues suggests that they are not very good at it. On the other hand, Jewish engineers implement a specification just fine.
The jew being eurasian has rather notable mongoloid characteristics of thought himself.
“Also, the problem with Jews is exile. That they are spiritually foreigners, hence useful disposable tools for a treasonous and hostile elite to use against its own people.”
Yes they are used for this and are arguably the ideal group to be used for this, but they are not necessary to be used for this.
I notice any mention of Soros gets shut down in the same way. Everyone knows what Soros is doing but it’s a faux pas to mention him in polite society. I don’t see a difference with Klaus Schwab or Bill gates even. NGOs exist as vehicles to provide status for rich people to engage in state holiness.
That’s true. I forgot how mention that Soros funds DAs gets shut down as well.
You’re allowed to mention them, but only in the context of fawning praise for their philanthropic and humanitarian whatever.
Right. Any discussion outside of that context is forbidden and quickly shut down.
Schwab’s books don’t seem to contain anything interesting. It’s just normie German sozialmarkt stuff.
Is he just a networker with no real influence?
He’s a front for some segment of USG in the same way Soros is a front for the State Department.
Hes meant to be a comic book villain (I don’t think he looks like Ernst Blofeld by accident), but he reports to some very bad people and his agenda is their agenda.
I will allow it through if you respond to the arguments that I have fruitlessly made far too many times, wasting far too much space saying the same thing over and over.
Socialism has been tried far too many times, and has failed in much the same way every time. I have explained the reasons for this endlessly repeated failure many times, wasting far too much space, and people were giving the same explanation for the same failures four centuries ago.
And, by the way, abolishing slavery and all that was not a popular policy, not even all that popular among the slaves. It was imposed by terror much like gay marriage.
The whole WEF thing reads like some kind of script to me.
This guy Klaus “Ze great reset” Schwab is straight from central casting. And here’s an organization that wasn’t known for anything other than its winter conference for rich bankers which has suddenly insinuated itself as the bogeyman for every fantasy of leftist excess.
There is a lot more talk nowadays about Bill Gates. There is a lot more talk nowadays about Klaus “Ze great reset” Schwab. There is conspicuously less talk about another leftist responsible for the pillaging of American cities than there was a few short years ago.
I think the Ukraine vs Russia might be about Biden declaring an emergency and ruling by decree, with possibly some sort of enabling act(they seem to steal a lot of their ideas from the Nazis). Anyone declared a Russian sympathizer gets locked up and Biden federalizes the elections on some pretext like Russians hacking.
If the US regime is going that path, going to make it an international emergency.
Which runs contrary to the path of imperial pullback to core dominions that it has been following.
We shall see what happens. I think the Russians are needling the Ukrainians to come to the conference table. But maybe it is real.
I was expecting a US false flag provocation. But so far, looks like, not an invasion, but escalating Russian pressure. Which might escalate all the way to invasion.
Many Russian units are basically at go/no go positions right now, mostly dispersed along forest areas, hard to spot, armed, winter cammo and tactical signals painted. Not something you can prolong for too many days.
I think US intel is probably right when they say the invasion go ahead has been given.
US intel? LOL. Where’s those WMDs?
I can believe US intel lies.
I can’t disbelieve my own eyes and geo location.
What, you scouting the front lines for the Ukrainians? Hey fellows, we’ve got a regular Jack Ryan over here. He’s going to nuke the Kremlin and save the Ukraine!
US Intel lies and US media lies trying to drum up a war. They may get that war in the end but playing thier game is a lose/lose.
LMAO…so true. Everything coming out of US propaganda outlets is a lie. What the Russians are saying may be propaganda too but it’s infinitely closer to reality.
You believe Putin brought 2/3 of his entire combat forces to the border, some all the way from the North Korean border, just to give US media a news cycle. I believe he brought it to use it.
Russian way for negotiation of a conflict. Me and my people sit down with you and your people for a nice dinner to discuss the issues at hand. Everyone at the table is armed.
I’m sure Putin will invade in TWO MORE WEEKS!
But seriously would have attacked already, most of the Russian military is in the West anyway doesn’t have to move it that much to be at the Ukraine border (well I mean it is Russia and Russia is huge but still).
Nothing US intel says can be trusted… nothing.
I heard an interesting comment on the Russians with Attitude podcast (highly recommend) that in Soviet and even post-Soviet Russia that whoever was in power is generally scared of a Caesar from the military and that successful generals have typically been disappeared in weird circumstances.
In that fashion, Putin, being a spook himself, likely wouldn’t want to make a general too popular with a full invasion of Ukraine. His preferred method of takeover is probably using “little green men†like what they did in Crimea.
Are you the author of Founding Questions or is the alias a coicidence?
Looks like Macron and the Euros are trying to go over the head of the US to make a deal with Putin, given that the US is insane and no longer agreement capable in its foreign policy. We’ll see how that plays out but I think Jim is right. Putin is using the military as pressure valve for negotiation which may or may not end up in actual invasion but it won’t be in haste.
https://www.rt.com/russia/550045-putin-macron-call-ukraine/
Wouldn’t that basically split NATO? If it happens I guess Putin would accept it, but the US will not.
I think the French see what I see; the US military is a dead man walking. It is just waiting for someone to put it down.
From the “predictions” thread, I postulated that France would potentially be non-aligned with NATO in a de-escalation scenario, but I thought Turkey would be at that particular table. Both NATO, but both also maintain active and (somewhat) effective combat units. If the USM legend is truly dead, we can expect to see intermediate powers start acting unilaterally for local gains while maintaining a milquetoast unity rhetoric. If this happens (an agreement between Turkey/France and Russia), I predict Scandinavia will move to cut some kind of deal/arrangement with Russian Federation as well.
This would also increase the potential for some kind of domestic militarization in CONUS, like maybe a soft martial lockdown to deal with invisible Nazi truckers hiding in the hills. The incompetent SecDef badly wants to purge whites, Harris badly want to we wuz prezdant, and the Coronahoax narrative is collapsing, which could create a scenario similar to the 90s BRAC fiasco. By that,I mean there will be a plethora of administrators, emergency coordinators, and task forces badly in need of a reason to keep existing.
A well drilled army is a well prepared army. The costs of excercises like this are frequently overstated when the comparison is made to the cost of doing nothing at all. If Putin considers that he may ever need his army to conduct an invasion, then he’s wise to once in a while make them go through all the motions to prepare for one.
And if it can serve a secondary political purpose as well, then why not ?
Probably a good time to have a Russia Ukraine thread no? Looks like it’s about to go down.
Has anyone noticed this? https://yewtu.be/watch?v=6VnXTLv2YOo&t=22
Bill Gates said “Sadly, the virus itself is a type of vaccine, it stimulates both T and B cell immunity… ” on some sort of press conference or talk show, not sure what it was. Its in the video.
The point: most people are focusing on the word “sadly” – ie. Gates not bothering to hide that the covid jab becoming “officially” obsolete due to natural immunity is a bad thing to him. I don’t think that’s the big deal here though, the regime has been getting more and more blatant and in-your-face since Biden “won”.
The more important thing is the rhetorical inversion used here. Gates is saying “the virus is a type of vaccine”. Notice the wording: he is not saying people develop natural immunity, he is saying the virus is like a vaccine.
Vaccines are supposed to help your immune system fight off a virus by providing pre-infection immunity for those that can’t mount an effective response to a live virus and thus develop natural immunity. Thus, natural immunity is “above” vaccine induced immunity, is better than vaccine induced immunity. Natural immunity > vaxx. If not for all viruses, at least for flu-type viruses.
By saying the virus is “a type of vaccine”, Gates is inverting this relationship – [he is acting as if] there is in fact no such thing as natural immunity, or at least, there wasn’t such a thing before omicron. But now we have found that this particular variant can act like a vaccine and stimulate some sort of immune response in people, rendering them well protected against future infections. However, this is still inferior to jab induced immunity, as the jab is the primary way of stimulating immune response in this narrative. Therefore vaxx > natural immunity.
Thoughts? Does anyone else see this or am I imagining it?
>Thus, natural immunity is “above†vaccine induced immunity, is better than vaccine induced immunity. Natural immunity > vaxx. If not for all viruses, at least for flu-type viruses.
Basic science and finally published CDC(they waited until after the supreme court kept the medical mandates) both say this. Vaccines work based on natural immunity and are always inferior to the immune system.
Omicrom is a vaccine because it gives protection against more dangerous forms of COVID19. It’s basically what Cowpox was to Smallpox.
>The point: most people are focusing on the word “sadly†– ie. Gates not bothering to hide that the covid jab becoming “officially†obsolete due to natural immunity is a bad thing to him. I don’t think that’s the big deal here though, the regime has been getting more and more blatant and in-your-face since Biden “wonâ€.
The sadly part is the more important part. It openly shows that Gates and everyone like him is quite evil. When I saw the data on Omicron coming out of South Africa I recognized that GNON had provided us a airborne vaccine to COVID that would likely end the madness. Before that were very likely headed towards a Marek’s Disease where a shitty vaccine resulted in a virus that became more lethal until the point where it killed everyone who was unvaccinated. When the worshipers of the great and mighty COVID demon saw Omicron, they were filled with dread and despair about the coming death of their Demon god.
>Basic science and finally published CDC(they waited until after the supreme court kept the medical mandates) both say this. Vaccines work based on natural immunity and are always inferior to the immune system.
Basic science says this, maybe the CDC does as well. But the official narrative, pushed by the Experts tries to obfuscate this fact as much as possible. The jab has been touted as the only solution to the covgh, certain countries don’t recognize the “recovered” condition as part of RVT (rec, vaxx, tested).
>Omicrom is a vaccine because it gives protection against more dangerous forms of COVID19. It’s basically what Cowpox was to Smallpox.
I don’t like this formulation because it’s using enemy language. It’s technically correct, but the relationship is in the wrong order. It’s not that omicron is like a vaccine, a vaccine is like omicron – lets compare the lesser version to the greater one – vaccine induced immunity to natural immunity, not vice versa. Which is what Gates did, in order to subtly insinuate that jabs are superior to natural immunity.
>The sadly part is the more important part. It openly shows that Gates and everyone like him is quite evil.
I don’t think this has much value. We’ve known Gates and his like were evil for quite some time, whereas normies are likely to not watch this video, not be convinced that him saying this means he is evil, find some excuse as to why its a good thing that he said this etc. This only shows Gates is evil to those who already knew him to be evil.
>When I saw the data on Omicron coming out of South Africa I recognized that GNON had provided us a airborne vaccine to COVID that would likely end the madness. Before that were very likely headed towards a Marek’s Disease where a shitty vaccine resulted in a virus that became more lethal until the point where it killed everyone who was unvaccinated. When the worshipers of the great and mighty COVID demon saw Omicron, they were filled with dread and despair about the coming death of their Demon god.
It remains to be seen whether the Covid demon is truly gone for good. The disease itself has not been a problem ever since summer 2020, and yet the cult had persisted until now. It’s likely that they push for a revival this fall. Something has to take the blame for all the excess jab deaths after all.
>It’s not that omicron is like a vaccine, a vaccine is like omicron – lets compare the lesser version to the greater one – vaccine induced immunity to natural immunity, not vice versa.
I watch a youtube named Dr. John Cambell and he had on an an African doctor who said that Omicron is the vaccine we failed to make, IE it works as protection against dangerous COVID while the vaccines do not. It hits the mucosal immune system as well general immune system.
>Which is what Gates did, in order to subtly insinuate that jabs are superior to natural immunity.
Yes they premise everything on the lie that the vaccines work. They don’t. People still caught covid and still spread it around. That’s pretty clear to everyone besides the COVID cultists at this point.
>It remains to be seen whether the Covid demon is truly gone for good. The disease itself has not been a problem ever since summer 2020, and yet the cult had persisted until now. It’s likely that they push for a revival this fall. Something has to take the blame for all the excess jab deaths after all.
Omicron is so infectious that it’s going to get us to heard immunity.
They’re going to have a hard time coming with a new deadly variant without being exposed as liars. The virus continues to evolve into a less dangerous form and if they introduce a new virus to try this same shit all over again they will be caught. People are fucking sick of this shit and most realize deep down they’ve been bamboozled by all the crap that’s been going on. Even with the Soviet Style media we have now people will eventually get wise to it.
A lot of people here thought they’d keep the COVID cult going forever, but once the UK dropped out, I knew it was it over. It requires an extraordinary amount of effort to paper over something like that and people eventually stop believing anything the government and the medical authorities says. Recent polling bares this out. COVID won’t work twice.
>I watch a youtube named Dr. John Cambell and he had on an an African doctor who said that Omicron is the vaccine we failed to make, IE it works as protection against dangerous COVID while the vaccines do not. It hits the mucosal immune system as well general immune system.
I understand the comparison to a vaccine, what im saying is to just call it natural immunity. There’s no need to engage in such comparisons when we have a perfectly good term to describe this phenomenon already. All this accomplishes is perpetuating the “only vaxx can beat covid” meme.
>Yes they premise everything on the lie that the vaccines work. They don’t. People still caught covid and still spread it around. That’s pretty clear to everyone besides the COVID cultists at this point.
I agree, but a good number of normies still got their booster. Or if not normies, then those are covid cultists, which makes a significant poriton of the population covid cultists, which is even worse. I think there’s enough people who still believe or don’t believe, but would go along with the official narrative that even though it’s clear to every sane person the emperor has no clothes (the vaccine is actively dangerous), we would still be living as though he’s wearing the latest finery (the vaccines are “safe, safe, safer than water” as I saw someone mention here).
>Omicron is so infectious that it’s going to get us to heard immunity.
>They’re going to have a hard time coming with a new deadly variant without being exposed as liars. The virus continues to evolve into a less dangerous form and if they introduce a new virus to try this same shit all over again they will be caught. People are fucking sick of this shit and most realize deep down they’ve been bamboozled by all the crap that’s been going on. Even with the Soviet Style media we have now people will eventually get wise to it.
I guess I’m more cynical about this than you. I hope you’re right, but my perspective is that the virus itself has not been a problem since summer 2020, like I said before. Most excess deaths (and most people getting sick) from october 2020 onwards are caused by the jab (see % of vaxxed to unvaxxed in hospitals, UK data etc.). I read a post recently about them matching the 2021 vaccine rollout schedule to 2020 covid waves, in order to be able to disguise death/adverse effect spikes as covid seasonality.
The jab is not just causing heart attacks and blood clots, it’s eroding the immune system of people who have taken it (ADE). This is why there’s a chance people start getting sicker than usual this fall. If it happens, it will not be blamed on the jab. It will be swept under the rug, or more likely, blamed on covid or some new scary virus. Which will be used as justification for lockdowns etc. I hope im wrong though.
This is definitely a Freudian slip; Billy is obviously sad that too many of us lab monkeys are going to escape his experiment. But if you listen to the whole thing in context, it’s not quite as damning as the snippet sounds:
“Sadly, the virus itself is a type of vaccine, […], and it’s done a better job of getting out to the world population than we have with vaccines.”
Gates, and the “fact-checkers,” and the demon-worshipers can reasonably claim that he’s sad that the public health bureaucracy didn’t do very well at saving us all with the holy injections, not sad that natural immunity protects people. We all know what he really thinks, but the context makes it sound better than the isolated soundbite.
You’re absolutely right, Brain (narf!), about the inversion of natural immunity and vaccination in his attitude and rhetoric. Vaccination is holy, natural immunity is not, and worse, natural immunity gets in the way of holy vaxxes.
>Gates, and the “fact-checkers,†and the demon-worshipers can reasonably claim that he’s sad that the public health bureaucracy didn’t do very well at saving us all with the holy injections, not sad that natural immunity protects people. We all know what he really thinks, but the context makes it sound better than the isolated soundbite.
Indeed, this is why I don’t think the “sadly” is relevant. Normies will find a way to explain it away, as they always do when reality hits them in the face.
>You’re absolutely right, Brain (narf!), about the inversion of natural immunity and vaccination in his attitude and rhetoric. Vaccination is holy, natural immunity is not, and worse, natural immunity gets in the way of holy vaxxes.
This is the motivation, yeah. It’s what I wanted to get across but couldn’t find the words. Thanks
I find it interesting that US media and academics denied the effectiveness of infection in immunization so fervently until now.
At least here, getting infected is equivalent to one dose, always been.
I know one guy who got infected, got one dose, then got infected again, and now he’s fully vaccinated with booster legally speaking.
Of course, that in itself is a substantial undervaluation of the effectiveness of infection. But it almost puts it on the same level as the vaccine, something at odds with the American narrative. This discrepancy was never even acknowledged much at all, despite being out for everyone to see.
People who talked about natural immunity where banned for spreading misinformation in the US. Even getting multiple does of the Vaccine doesn’t make any sense. You’ve got maximum vaccine immunity from the first dose. All the later doses do is excite your immune system up giving you a short window where it will fight more effectively and give you heart damage. Further boosters just excite the immune system again for an even shorter period and continue the heard damage.
Most people who caught COVID twice caught a separate variant that had immune escape from the original virus which is common with COVID viruses. Taking further vaccines where only had the original spike protean from the original virus wasn’t going to improve that immunity.
Sundance over at Conservatives Treehouse thinks the Ukraine stuff is all about giving Joe Biden a Nobel Peace prize. That kind of tracks.
Where have you read that? I haven’t seen anything on CTH about the Nobel peace prize. Latest I’ve read there is they are pushing War with Russia hard because they are preparing a narrative switch so they can blame all the inflation and the shitty economy on Russia.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/02/20/ron-klains-domestic-motive-for-ukraine-crisis-surfaces-white-house-to-blame-economic-collapse-gas-prices-and-inflation-on-manufactured-russia-ukraine-conflict/
https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1495569317043261447?cxt=HHwWjsCy9daXqsEpAAAA
They probably view the crap with the Ukraine and Russia as a way to make themselves popular and use use it to cover for their fuckups. It’s unlikely to work, but that does seem to be their game.
The most realistic use of this bullshit is create a fake crisis with Putin never intending to invade… and then declaring victory at some point.
Worst case they really think they need a war and they are deluded that they can win… and they keep outrageously provoking Russia…
Seems like the relatively sane Susan Rice has been sidelined by crazy commie Georgetown jew Ron Klain if this is the way they are going.
It’s likely we have 2 different factions working against and with each other. One for the insane war, the other trying to use the threat to declare victory when it doesn’t happen.
Yep…
But the fact that they actually lobbed some shells into Russian territory makes me scared that the war factions controls assets on the ground that the sane faction can do nothing about.
The strategic situation and conspiratorial elements in State are probably tightly controlled, but I’m skeptical that it extends down to actual unit C&C. I think it’s more probable that they are manipulating circumstances in general, such as flooding the region manpads and sabre rattling propaganda.
I keep hearing conflicting things, like I thought that the occasional artillery and small arms exchange was fairly common on the front line. Has their been a new escalation since the evacuation order?
For some reason i can’t post links of cth from my phone… the conservative treehouse has a couple of theories. Don’t know anything for sure. The shelling of Russian territory is worrisome though.
That the US embassy was moved out of the capital implies that factions that don’t want war may still have slightly more pull; the foreverwar factions would be perfectly happy with leaving personnel in possible harms way ala Bengazi.
Yeah I think this is right more or less.
They are instigating war in Donbas to force Russian intervention, that even if minimal and limited they can still use as justification to bring sanctions which the press can then blame the stagflating economy on.
After seeing how easily the NPCs went along with all the covid crap I can totally see them just mindlessly accepting that Russia is the reason for inflation completely forgetting it started long before Russia was even in the news cycle.
How would sanctions explain away an economic depression in the originating country? I absolutely agree that the RUS/UKR hype is some kind of distraction, but at this point it seems more like precursor to some kind of domestic (US) suppression.
I think this is propaganda event like J6, they have a laundry list of things they want to achieve from it. How many items they get depends on how well it’s executed and how vested the public is in it. Based on what I’m seeing no one gives a flying fuck about the Ukraine. They may have already cut a deal with Putin as well and everything is just a show.
Even if things go completely to hell(IE they lose a war with Russia), they’ll still use it to declare marital law and try round up their political foes while declaring them Russian sympathizers.
This round up may not go well for them. Anyone being taken alive for Biden’s show trials is a fool. I wonder how many of the J6 people would now willingly surrender to the feds? It’s no longer worth it.
Mike Crenovich keeps saying that the US government has lost legitimacy and no one wants to fight for it. They’ve lost the true believers in the civic religion and hardcore Nationalist Christians which always made up the best fighters in the military. It’s only backers are the insane left and mercenaries being paid to protect it. Such fighters are weak and likely to break if real trouble starts.
If the regime is dumb enough to start a war with Russia, it will be all over for them. Loss begets loss. Once they get their shit pushed in by Putin, no one is going to care. Taiwan will flip to China, NATO will collapse, and the police are going to sit it out once videos of them getting executed after failed raids hit the internet. Getting beat by Russia is the end of the Harvard regime, and enough of them know it. They will do all they can to clamp down on the crazies.
The next J6 will be real trouble, because everyone going into it will know that if they submit to arrest they will be imprisoned and tortured for a very long time “while awaiting trial”, a trial that is slowly becoming less and less likely to ever be held.
That makes sense, but I’m reminded of history of where the left most faction grabs power when the regime falters as our is. This may require outside state intervention, but I have a nagging thought that China might fund/arm/train and supply their own troops to the hard left in order to maximize the damage to the US, much as the US once did in Russia with the Bolsheviks.
It has to be a sign of declining intelligence that they went that route. Making the J6 people look ridiculous with FBI plants like Qanon shaman was more than enough to discourage people. Torturing the suckers who got strung along by the Feds is counter productive to the stability of their rule. They should have given them all a year in jail and that was the end of it.
If we go to war with Russia, it will be the far left doing it, and the far left getting wiped out. Then things get bad on the home front, and Russia and China supplying US partisans for a vicious Civil War becomes a possibility. Either way, the left loses because they cannot cooperate, and Aidan, Com and I can. The left is absent of virtue, and we are, while not filled with it, pretty damned virtuous relative to modern men.
That’s more or less par the course for any inner party head at any time. The lightbringer got a peace prize for being installed into office while mulatto, then dropped bombs on syrians. Is normal.
The fundamental dynamic here is that Putin can’t let a neighboring polity like Ukraine come under GAE influence, but the GAEs can’t really ‘stop themselves’ from trying to pull Ukraine under their influence.
In some of them there is a large part that genuinely wants to provoke holy war(s), in order to get ‘deplorables’ on both the russian side and their own side killed. In many of them, there is a large part that is genuinely delusive in not perceiving their efforts to subordinate the sovereignty of other states as aggressive acts – and thus their perception of resistance or preemption against such aggression as ‘unprovoked aggression’ by ‘rogue powers’ who they ‘unfortunately’ have ‘no choice’ but to engage in ‘police action’ for the sake of ‘peace’. They ask only for the freedom of exercising ‘influence’ – which is to say, cooption of the local priesthood – to exercise ‘global leadership’ – which is to say global domination.
You can see several of these aspects simultaneously in the person of cameltoe. “We are literally looking at the prospect of war in Europe”, she exclaims with breathless credulity. The mask covers he face, but does not hide the twinkle in her eye.
It is the logic of late empire; it cannot acknowledge the idea that there is any place on earth it has no business in. The theocratic character is this empire making this tendency even more pronounced.
Have seen a few mentions of Chris Langan on the blog. If not familiar he has 190-210 IQ and developed the CTMU (theory that uses mathematical logic to prove God exists). I believe that he also runs the Mega Foundation an ultra high IQ society (requires minimum 160 IQ) which he believes is the only viable alternative to academia. Considering that the CTMU is way above the heads of most on the Bell curve can it have utility in terms of social technology? Could the ultra high IQ community such as Noesis and the Mega Foundation function as a priest class and legitimate cognitive elite? Perhaps as the Antiversity?
At the upper ranges, IQ is not well defined or measurable. Smart is as smart does. How smart is he about women, history, China Flu, and Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate change?
We knew Scott Alexander was reasonably smart because even though his positions were frequently idiotic, insane, self destructive, horrifyingly evil, and biological suicide, he would come up with overly clever smart person rationalizations for stupid person orthodoxy. Seems to have stopped doing that any more because stupid people smelled heresy, so now whenever he goes within one light year of a politically sensitive topic (and every topic including arcane mathematics and high energy physics is now within one millimetre of a politically sensitive topic) he adopts protective stupidity.
Anyone can industriously rattle off orthodoxy without engaging more than three brain cells, because orthodoxy is increasingly designed for stupid people, and anyone not rattling of orthodoxy will get in trouble. So namefag discourse is rapidly getting dumber and dumber.
No namefag can engage in smart person discourse.
Chris is smart about all of those issues as far as I can tell. Points out the Jew, is anti-vax, thinks female preferences are dysgenic, opposed to race mixing, doesn’t believe in AGW. The guy is a gigachad horse Rancher with zero credentials. Hates elite Ivory Tower gatekeeping (academics seem to have witchy convulsions around the CTMU) which I suspect is why he has a natural immunity to the Cathedral.
I used to be active on Chris Langan’s CTMU facebook group. I am no longer active there because it has degenerated into (or perhaps always was) a cult.
Asking Chris any questions at all is grounds for being banned – that’s one of the core rules of the group. Any questions to the group about CTMU are met with ridicule. Any criticism of the CTMU whatsoever is met with antagonism and viciousness.
The contrast to, e.g., Jim couldn’t be sharper. Jim will openly debate with anyone. Jim accepts feedback. Jim acknowledges he’s wrong sometimes and is open to new ideas. Chris is not. Chris’s henchmen would assert this is because Chris is much smarter than Jim and then ban you. They frequently compare Chris to Jesus and assert he is the new messiah.
Chris has reactionary values. He *should* be our ally and *should* be a powerful theorist for our side. The fact that he isn’t is a true loss.
There’s always that danger, when “your side” is smaller and out of power, for factions to turn into personality cults. It may be Entryist psyops, but it could also be the temptation to conflate the Man with the Message.
That all sounds about right.
Men that smart are generally fairly low-functioning. They can only communicate effectively with other very smart people, and have a nasty tendency to project their intelligence onto others, resulting in a warped view of human nature. Men that smart are useful to leaders, but are poor leaders themselves. When they are sequestered to do their own thing, they are useful. Otherwise, not so much. I can’t recall many men that smart holding the reins of history.
Isaac Newton is a prime example of that. Didn’t even get the idea that being appointed head of the mint was suppose be about giving him status and income so he could find himself a wife and instead spent his time personally chasing down counterfeiters.
Lol, what a legend!
You make a good point though.
Freud was wrong and a freak who projected his own mother issues onto everyone else. Not everything is about sex. Once upon a time men were expected to be ambitious as it was considered a masculine quality. That mindset right there is why masculine men are ruled by freaks, deviants and criminals in the west.
Freud was a fraud and a freak, yes, but everything is about sex, at one level or another. Ambition is a masculine quality because it is how you obtain status and thus become attractive to women. Just like strength or intelligence, it has intrinsic value, but how to separate that intrinsic value from the need to reproduce? Recognizing that is vital to understanding how to shape society.
Not following.
Why separate?
I do not see a need to separate them, but if you were going to try to evaluate strength, honor, ambition, or intelligence absent their application to reproduction, you would have to distinguish the two. Strength makes me healthier and makes it easier to do things, but I also value it for making me more attractive to women. Then, how do we distinguish between me doing things because I “want” to, and because instinct tells me to do it to get laid?
Therefore, everything is about sex when it all comes down to it. It is the prime commandment, before all others. Be fruitful and multiply. Denying it is deluded and antithetical to both God and Mankind.
Freud was aware that his mentor, another Viennese doctor, was having sex with his child patients, some of whom had dreams about it…Hence the Oedipus complex and much other weirdness about sex being incorporated into his “theories.”
Well, yes, but you could also argue that everything, when it comes down to it, is about the subjugation and expansion of energy. Or about the genes’ attempt for immortality. Or about having, raising and protecting your children (which is a rather bigger investment than just the sex part). Or about obeying God’s programming rules for the universe.
None of those are wrong as prime commandments, including the prime commandment that it all comes down to sex. I think it’s much a matter of one’s own phase in life that determines what specific idea we primarily focus on.
Alf, I say that it is the prime commandment because it was God’s first command to Man.
https://www.biblehub.com/genesis/1-28.htm
Then God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.â€
Everything good that we do is in furtherance of this command, and the root of all evil stems from straying from it.
And a great and sunccinct command it is.
All I’m saying is sex is one (important) part of that command, not all its parts.
Alright, I think the issue is that I am using the words sex and reproduction interchangeably. When I say sex, perhaps I should be saying reproduction, instead. Be fruitful and multiply. Basically everything we do comes down to that, because that is the will of God. All of the things Man values most are those things that increase our reproductive fitness or our ability to impose our will upon the world, and even the latter tends to lead to the former.
Get fucked Gay American Empire!
https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1495878642588700675?s=20&t=jEtypJ8dIHonqwJAeteKLQ
God Bless Czar Vladimir I.
Putin’s address before he declared the Donbas republics as sovereign was such a pleasure to read and a nice contrast to the nonsense and gibberish of the leaders of the GAE we are used to hearing from. Highly recommend reading. He is the closest thing we have to a real reactionary world leader.
https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1495831039326969856?s=20&t=Njl4I4x_ChrQcAiDyfisog
I see no confirmation of this elsewhere.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/putin-orders-russian-troops-to-eastern-ukraine-for-peacekeeping-operation-a-major-escalation-towards-a-war/ar-AAU8rAi
It is definitely happening. I will be curious to see how far Russia goes in the short-term. My suspicion, based on the tone of the speech, an hour-long historical argument for the non-existence of the Ukraine (created by Lenin & co.), is that eastern Ukraine is pretty much already a province of Russia; the more interesting question is the position towards the rest of Eastern Europe, and Europe more broadly, after this.
Interesting times. Something has to give in this degenerate carnival house of mirrors we have been calling a world…I’m just kind of annoyed my heating bills are skyrocketing, and will now really be taking off…
All basic spot market commodities have risen by fifty percent – oil, various metals, lumber, and so forth.
When I try to purchase something, I frequently find that the list prices are unchanged, but the brand I am accustomed to buying is unobtainable, and has everywhere been replaced by something inferior and five times as expensive. List prices are relatively stable, but stuff listed keeps disappearing.
Housing prices about thirty percent, rents about twenty percent. The rent people are paying if they stay put is relatively stable, but when they want to rent some place new, up by about twenty percent.
People look at bacon and gas and think that one particular thing is up, but there is general inflation masked by normality bias.
Businesses are trying to keep their prices stable, and so are reluctant to raise wages, but then they have to hire someone new, and he typically costs thirty percent or so percent more, and when the other employees find out about this, they figure that if they do not get a forty percent wage rise, they should change jobs. And then they do, and the business falls apart.
We have about thirty to fifty percent inflation, which is masked by people’s reluctance to recognize it.
The reluctance to stick other people with price rises is normality bias. I find that rent rises go down easy. People are starting to expect it, when formerly they would have been mighty pissed. The reality of inflation is finally and belatedly starting to sink in.
Fifty percent inflation is the point where hyperinflation starts to take off, when everyone starts to realize that keeping value denominated in the official currency is a really bad idea, and starts minimizing, rather than maximizing cash on hand, in favor of maximizing stocks of goods on hand.
We are not at that point yet, but we are now about halfway there. I can see the normality bias that masks inflation fading.
The first to get the bullet will be social security recipients. Retirees are going to get an adjustment reflecting a 7.5% cpi increase, when the actual inflation rate is thirty to fifty percent. If things continue on this course, next year they will get a twelve percent increase when the actual inflation rate is three hundred percent, and the year after that, a seventeen percent increase when the actual inflation rate is seven thousand percent.
Police and military wages are likely to remain unchanged, with the result that cops and soldiers just stop showing up.
I tend to err by making predictions on Musk time, so take this with a grain of salt. Because of normality bias, it is apt to take several years for hyperinflation to set in, so maybe it will be four years before pensioners get a seventeen percent cost of living adjustment to cover a three hundred percent rise in the cost of living, and maybe the regime will realize that soldiers and police are the last people you want to screw during hyperinflation, rather than the first.
But a 7.5% rise to cover a thirty to fifty percent rise in the cost of living is a mighty big step in that direction.
Hyperinflation not in the cards right now. Once they crash the asset bubble with a couple rate hikes, we have large disinflation.
Nuts.
There is no asset bubble. The value of assets measured in oil, in lumber, in copper, in almost any basic spot traded commodity is stable or falling.
To halt inflation with rate hikes, you need to have the official interest rate on government securities at the actual rate of inflation or close to it. You need to have the real inflation adjusted interest rate above zero, or not very far below zero. They just raised the rate twenty five basis points. They need to raise it by three thousand to five thousand basis points.
Twenty five basis points is like trying to cause a flood by spitting in Lake Michigan.
Inflation is like bankruptcy. Very slow until it is suddenly very fast. And the suddenly very fast part is starting to happen.
Massive asset bubble in real estate and equities. Has been pumped full of printed money. Collapsing it by 30-40% would have the same effect of bringing rates that high as it would cripple the demand side. Prices would not go back to normal but the rate of inflation would return to normal levels.
Finance is not my thing, so this may be a dumb question.
Pooch, are you asserting that real estate and equities are the problem, the only bubble extant, and so a correction there wouldn’t really affect anything else?
Shit, forgot to add:
Normal levels being the insane, untenable levels of 2019?
The economy has always been a bubble, but it real got pumped up to insane levels with the covid money printing. So I’m asserting assets will be highly sensitive to rate hikes. It may only take a few to pop the bubble, which will actually be a somewhat effective measure at halting inflation (until of course they start printing more money).
Anything substantially less than a thousand basis points is not a rate hike, because inflation is increasing faster than you are raising rates.
To be effective against inflation, need rate hikes of around a thousand basis points each quarter, or three hundred basis points each month. That might slow inflation, but it will probably merely stop it from accellerating even further.
Assets are massively undervalued, in that fiat is massively overvalued.
For a rate hike to affect inflation, you have to raise rates faster than normality bias is fading, and right now it is fading fast.
The only things that are arguably overvalued at even current dollar valuation levels are real estate, big tech stocks and semiconductor stocks.
So what is the correct financial play then? I am looking to buy a house soon, should I wait until after more inflation or buy now?
I assume I should minimize the amount of money I have in the bank, but am not sure what else to invest in aside from cryptocurrency. Any tips anyone?
There is a significant likelihood that a few years down the road you will be able to pay off your mortgage with half a dozen eggs.
However, there is also a significant likelihood that titles to property will become worthless not long after paper money becomes worthless, which is roughly what happened in the French Revolution
How true is this for countries outside (or at least on the periphery) of the GAE?
Mike, I think this is also true for coutries at the fringes of the US empire or even outside it, but the likelihood is somewhat lower.
Germany reacted to hyperinflation with an “equalistation of burderns law” (Lastenausgleichsgesetz). The idea was that those who profited from hyperinflation had to give that profit back. So if you had a house, the law placed a mortgage on your house for 50% (new) market value and forced you to pay it off over the next 20 years or so.
I expect that such laws will become very popular with governments after hyperinflation.
So even if your title to your property does not become worthless, you might still take a very substantial hit.
Higher prices are deflationary because the same good or service today requires more currency than yesterday. After November 3, it was reasonable to speculate that WEF would install an MMT fed chair, mint trillion dollar unicorn coins and confiscate the liquid assets of everyone through early March 2020.
Higher prices are not deflationary. They are inflation by one definition of inflation, and by my preferred definition of inflation (inflating the money supply, printing more money) they are a rational accommodation to inflation.
In every comment on the topic I tell my readers that they need to raise their prices and wages by thirty percent or so, and convert all dollar denominated assets into non dollar assets such as goods in stock, that everyone has for a long time irrationally failed to accommodate the massive increase in the money supply and that this is going to burn them badly.
Commodity ETFs. Check out GSG. Commodities are the best investment right now. As inflation goes up, commodities go up.
Prices of housing look like they are beginning to come down with mortgage rates going up. If you can wait a few months to buy you may get a nice discount. But then again single family homes in nice white neighborhoods away from marauding niggers are a commodity in and of themselves, so if you find one you like now, it may be gone later.
Get a house with a wood burning stove and/or a fireplace if you can.
Apparently Germany’s rulers will cheerfully freeze or bankrupt their citizens and businesses to please their American overlords…Phase one having been spending billions on useless alternate energy projects and shutting down the nuclear plants…
Germany’s rulers will cheerfully freeze or bankrupt their citizens and businesses, but pleasing their American overlords is only a minor part of their motivation. They simply consider all business activity to be inherently evil.
In way that is pleasing their American overlords who are priests of the same cult, but I’d say they simply in the priestly business of signaling superior holiness.
Greens don’t want any fossil fuel. Now they got another pretext for stopping Russian gas delivery to Europe.
In a recent debate regarding the US’ military weakness, I dropped the ‘no nation with a gay pride parade wins any wars’. To which I got the counter: ‘well, what about homosexuality in the Roman era?’
The specific argument was that Caesar was bi-sexual, Alexander had a male lover (not Roman but still), and that Romans had orgies.
From what I suspect, the supposed bisexuality of Caesar seems fake. Roman orgies are probably something from the late empire, so emblematic of the downfall, not its success.
But I’ll make a case for his argument — what about Hadrian? Hadrian was into man love, quite openly. Widely regarded as a benevolent emperor.
No one wants to be the only sexual deviant in a small town. Sexual deviance is associated with large cities that are capable of administering an empire, and the great public speeches and spectacles that ultimately determine what the peasants think.
[*usual payload deleted*]
I would argue with you if your responded, but you just carry one as if no one had said anything.
We built the cities, they took them away from us and are destroying them. When we build new cities, they come after us.
You are giving us the inverted narrative: “You did not build that”.
It is not the evil bankers that are destroying the cities, it is that in the most expensive suburb of San Francisco, a plains ape can harass my wife in my house while I am away at work, and absolutely nothing will happen to him.
It is not even the antifa mobs, it is the looters intercepting goods attempting to pass through LA.
[*deleted*]
If you want to argue that it is not Harvard, the politicians, and the left, but our evil capitalist overlords, I will let it through and reply with a rebuttal.
But you are merely asserting it yet again, and you have asserted it before far too many time.
What is destroying our cities is that bad people are protected, and we are not.
Every society I know of widely tolerated faggots as long as they pretended (not too hard even) to be otherwise. But there is a gulf between tolerating faggotry and quite literaly throwing it a parade.
Hadrian deified his dead male lover and built temples in his honor. Not an all the way pride parade, but not really pretending to be straight either.
Fair, I’m sure one can find many such things. But I reckon here’s the test: did the average Roman patrician or even citizen get the idea that faggotry was now high-status from this? Maybe. I don’t think anyone got the idea that being a horse was high-status from that one trick Caligula pulled.
@alf
The Roman Emperors only did that for a mere 2 centuries of the Roman Empire. For the other 12 centuries, the Roman Emperors hated open homosexuality.
I think the truth is probably that Hadrian was loved in spite of his faggotry, and that in the long run, Romo-homo was as destructive as globohomo, even if it never got to globohomo levels. For the apostles to have as one of their two rules not to have forbidden sex seems to me indicative of the problems forbidden sex brought, which early Christians in the late roman empire perhaps saw and were disgusted by.
So an empire can get by with incidental faggotry, even in its rulers, but whenever such faggotry spreads through the culture and becomes high status, game over.
Maybe an empire can get away with faggotry if it still has charismatic and successful and officers and generals.
A single Pompey or Cesar can keep an empire from collapsing militarily.
However this is a very unstable situation politically.
Roman satirist Juvenal complains of gay parades in the late 1st-early 2nd century AD. I had never thought of that, but yes he’s right, the Romans did win wars with gay pride parades.
Ha! Lol.
Recall that Hadrian presided over the peak of Romes territorial control. I.e. it was all downhill from there. The US’ greatest power was after the fall of the USSR in the 90s. Looks like the peak of an empires power is after the rot sets in, but before it has taken over.
There is lag time from when the rot starts at the core and engulfs the entirety of the empire.
I know direct historical parallels are usually spurious, but I wonder if we have a Byzantium somewhere within the GAE. If the parallel holds, it might be parts of the Midwest, central Canada, and a reconquered British Columbia.
The problem I see is that the Roman Empire was able to be split into two halves, with two co-equal Caesars only have one Caesar was able to overthrow and replace the oligarchy of the Republic. This seems to be the necessary precondition to scale the empire in such a way.
We seem to be on the alternate timeline of the oligarchical Roman Republic where Caesar and Augustus never come.
only after one Caesar*
I thought Don’t Ask Don’t Tell was a good compromise between throwing fags off rooftops and fags throwing parades on Main Street.
Unstable.
You are not going to stop gays from telling unless you are prepared to throw them from high buildings if they insist on telling people who do not want to hear.
Or at least maintain a moral where it is completely OK to beat the hell out of them, and if some of them die as a result, no big deal.
“Don’t ask don’t tell” is pretty much what I have in mind, since nobody wants to ask, and the throwing them from high buildings part is necessary to stop them from telling, and unlikely to be entirely effective.
Your right it is a fairly liberal position. Practically speaking when fags are brought to heel, it is a natural compromise. The official position must make homosexuals low status, and making the most offensive individuals very low status. Advocating for sex parades down Main Street should be very dangerous, possibly earning one a visit to a rooftop.
There is a huge difference between official law and practice.
If “don’t ask don’t tell” is law or official policy, it is unstable for the reasons Jim mentioned.
It works if the law is that gays are to be killed. Then everybody will have more improtant things to do than gay hunting. But for those gays that are telling, state prosecution has a natural inclination to go for easy convications and therefor accuse them. (If state prosecution does not accuse people obviosly violating a law, that is a different, but related problem).
As Arqiduka said, Hadrian did not throw them a parade.
@alf
Ironic since the Roman Empire despised faggots for 90% of its history.
Was Hadrian merely following social conventions set in place before him? Or was he just one guy with a lot of power whom everyone else assiduously looked the other way on his predilections?
Is it a case where a citizen banging trapass on the side is basically looked at on the same level as mistresses and prostitutes in general (which in a certain sense, it is), or is it a case where ‘homoness’ is lionized as an official Identity and high status sacrament society needs to participate it and or pay homage too?
Such is the key, where that modern antipriests have a habit of trying to read their civic religion into the past.
First of all, modern academics are sex-obsessed maniacs who have no understanding of male friendship and so the vast majority of these “gay” or “bisexual” or whatever cases are complete bullshit. They say the same thing about Jesus and John, which is of course bullshit. “Love” to them means fucking because they are soulless, and wander in the darkness. Julius and Augustus were not fags even by their standards. That’s called projection.
But for those undeniable cases like Hadrian’s, and most of the Greeks honestly, I’d argue that excessive focus on the specific sexual acts of a specific man is a symptom of modern sexual degeneracy. They didn’t have Christ and so venerated masculinity and masculine men. Being a man is – and certainly was for the Romans – about vastly more than the peculiar predilections of individual men. All are fallen. With the Romans we’re talking men with wives and children and estates running war machines for whom masculinity was a religious principle. In Greece, Spartan women had to shave their heads and dress up as men in their wedding nights – because maleness is sacred, and something is fundamentally wrong or broken about being a woman. Nothing about this surprises or disturbs me.
Maybe the most excusable vice of the Greeks and Romans to me (Greeks far more) was when this veneration for masculinity went too far and became kind of faggy. It’s worlds away though from our degrading kind of faggot-worship, where masculinity is destroyed.
Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed because they wanted to rape the men *more* than the women, i.e. when that became their primary sexual preference, like in Globohomo today. That never became the case in Rome or Greece, and was extremely taboo.
The greeks did have a seemingly weird predictlection for homosexuality, the Romans to my knowledge did not Hadrian’s case being unusual.
Though for some reason the Roman’s supposedly considered eating pussy to be worse than faggotry (I strongly tend to doubt that but I have read that).
Not just ancient Romans. A decade ago before hyper-homo-mode kicked in it was still a common shtick in black comedy that “black guys don’t go down” and there was a whole Sopranos episode about it where Tony almost got whacked for making fun of his uncle for going down on his girlfriend…almost made me wonder. I mean, it’s not exactly the most masculine thing ever at first glance. Woman-worshiping, eager to please, etc.
I think you’ve offered the correct explanation, ExileStyle. Pagan societies which cherish hyper-masculinity are forgiving of homosexuality because it is seen as merely an excess of love for sacred male virtue.
The same thing was found in Classical Greece, in Macedonia. It also occurred in Japan during the time of Bushido, in some cases. It seems a warrior society where manliness is prized can thus sublimate homosexuality.
To make it work, there can be no “gay marriage” and men need to have both patriarchal rights and duties. Women need to be owned and military prowess needs to be revered. None of these qualifications apply today…
Gay marriage became accepted in Rome as early as the late 1st century-early 2nd century according to the writings of Juvenal.
I think “accepted” is a pretty big exaggeration. It was part of a decadent Syrian sex cult that was tolerated, as per Roman religious policy. Also the simple fact Juvenal was repulsed by it enough to satirize it, and that this satire was successful and preserved, says a lot about what the general (elite) attitude toward it was.
This whole satire tradition is fully aware of and lamenting Roman decadence as it was happening…
Must keep in mind that accounts of adult male on adult male ghey are fake history or isolated cases (for example mendacious historians taking Athenian propaganda against the Theban army as historical truth). It was never widely tolerated in any civilization. Homosexual behavior was always quarantined to a caste of low-status catamites, which seems like a social technology to keep the disease from spreading and undermining male cohesion. Men do not start buggering each other openly until deep into the decline.
Pretty sure neither the Romans nor Greeks had Gay pride parades. It’s one thing to practice homosexuality quietly and quite another to rub everyone’s faces in it which is what a gay pride parade is.
It’s the desire of the elites to rub it into the faces of normies that is the problem and the signature of degeneracy
Romans believed the original shield of Mars fell from heaven in the reign of Numa (715-673 BC), and its existence was thought to guarantee the safety of Rome. To prevent theft, copies were made of the original and regularly paraded through Rome by the Salii (dancing priests). Membership was restricted to men of the highest birth.
In Satire 2 (likely written somewhere around 100 AD), Juvenal writes (translated into English);
Juvenal detests that the legendary shield of Mars, the god of war, is now being openly paraded through Rome by faggots dressed as women.
Isn’t that around the time that 90% of the Roman army was non Roman?
No. 100 AD is not that far removed from Augustus and is still the early empire before the mass barbarian invasions. The Emperor Trajan made the 2nd greatest military expansion in Roman history around this time.
I hate to quote Wikipedia, but not sure why they would lie about this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structural_history_of_the_Roman_military#Barbarisation_of_the_army_(117%E2%80%93253_AD)
Sounds like the gay parades followed along with the Italians no longer fighting their own wars.
Ah ok yes that makes sense although the “non-Italian” provincial citizens that made up the bulk of the army still likely claimed distant Italian/Roman heritage as they were drawn from the colonies settled by past Romans who assimilated and inter-married with the local population. Many emperors and generals of the empire claimed these sort of blood lines including Constantine. This shouldn’t be confused with the conscripted barbarians who made the army of the late empire.
That soldiers were drawn from the provinces of the empire rather than the center likely tells us that masculinity and military vitality was still strong the farther you got away from the faggotry of Rome proper.
In some ways, this is similar to the Amerikaners that make up the bulk of the actual white effective fighting force of the US military are largely drawn from the red states far away from the faggotry of the blue coastal cities. USM recruits from deep blue coastal states like California are overwhelmingly spics and non-whites.
>Juvenal detests that the legendary shield of Mars, the god of war, is now being openly paraded through Rome by faggots dressed as women.
That’s a huge difference: Rome wasn’t spilling blood and for and officially financing gay marriage, and the best writers we have from the era (like Juvenal) were repulsed by this shit.
Give Jim a National Book Award, a senate seat, and a villa with a thousand slaves and then let’s talk parallels…
Juvenal writes in Satire 2:
Gracchus obviously belonged to a branch of the great family, the gens Sempronia, of which the most distinguished members were the reforming tribunes Tiberius Gracchus and his brother Gaius. The priesthood he held confirms his high birth. The dowry he gave his ‘bridegroom’ (enough to qualify him as a knight) marks him as a very rich man. Such depicts that gay marriage was accepted as normal for the elite of the time.
Juvenal was not of the elite. In fact, he spends many pages lamenting that he cannot afford to escape the crime ridden streets of Rome to a villa in the countryside. His view was of the common Roman, disgusted by the open degeneracy of the elite. In fact, it is likely he eventually even got exiled for his criticisms, the Roman form of canceling.
Such depicts that gay marriage was accepted as normal by the elite of the time.*
To clarify, my comment was not so much about Juvenal specifically as about the comparison between Rome then and GAE now.
The main foreign policy goal of the United States has for quite some time now been the spreading of gay marriage, transgenderism, women’s rights, etc.
That was never even remotely close to a policy priority of the Roman Empire, even at its most depraved. It would have been inconceivable, as it was to our grandparents.
That gay pride parades happen is a million miles away from a nation’s entire purpose being the propagation of gay pride parades.
The elite have always and everywhere tended towards decadence. Check out some of the stuff happening at the court of Charles II, for example. Or any monarch. There was sodomy happening between courtiers in Charles’ palaces; did he subsequently devote the entire wealth and power of the British Crown to imposing sodomy on the rest of the world?
Globohomo, I am arguing, is much more radical and aggressive and dangerous because it is a holiness spiral and not a decadence spiral. The latter is unfortunate and tragic but common and survivable, the former ends in Seven Kill Stele.
Which is a long way of saying we should be careful about these parallels. It is not *that” we have gay pride parades, it is how our own elite wants to regime-change Putin because he doesn’t want Russia’s sole purpose as a nation to be the financing and propagation of gay pride parades and child genital mutilation…
I agree. The difference is that Romo-homo was not in grained into the actual tenets of the state religion but more a byproduct of decay and decadence, where the state religion of Globohomo is the literal worship of all things degenerate and anti-GNON.
Having said that, I think Rome is the best we have as a historical precedent to the GAE and much can be learned by studying it, but it’s important to keep in mind the fundamental differences between them, as you mention.
Yes, homo in Rome was a dead state religion, which the Caesars struggled unsuccessfully for a long time to replace.
Homo now is globohomo, a tenet of the state religion.
Lots of good responses ITT so no need for me to reiterate them.
The predictive formula is “if gay pride parades, then can’t win wars” so there are 2 concepts addressing separate issues, and they both affect each other.
If Gay Pride Parades carries the implied fact that gays are supported by the State. The parades aren’t protests, they aren’t an assault on decency, they are a commemorative victory march.
Then Can’t Win Wars represents the failure of a factionalized, converged bureaucracy to accomplish basic tasks of State. They can’t declare an enemy, they can’t adopt a wartime footing, they can’t prune dead weight, they can’t meet opposition with restrained brutality. They can’t coordinate with each other because there’s no trust. Backstabbing in a faggot army is an inevitability.
What happens if two GPPs face off? Everybody wins because both will lose. Yes, one side will be recorded as “winning,” but GPP armies have an interesting issue with having to reinvade, retake, reconquer the so called victories of the previous year’s campaigns again and again, with victory being declared by some diseased office jockey instead of a conquering general.
I recently talked to a guy who had been recruited into the army and wanted to join special forces as his MOS. He was in pretty good shape, probably couldn’t lift as much weight as me but is in all around good shape and is probably a better runner than I am. He was excited to join because he wanted to “kill racists”, I shit you not. Idk if he made it or not.
Also important to mention, he was white. Probably lower IQ than me but not a stupid person by any means.
“there are lots of problems, tensions are rising” *looks behind back to authority* “the racism is at fault for our problems!” “Then let us kill the racists!”
We are made to follow our leaders. For most psychologies, it takes quite a lot to make them turn against the big guy on top, because doing so without very good reason, very carefully, and very intelligently mostly results in genetic death.
Soon enough he’ll be killed by other whites or nignogs for the sin of being a white racist, since all whites are inherently racist.
Despite the widespread opposition to vaccinations, the medical community has long supported these programs. In fact, they have saved millions of lives, and are the main reason why children are given vaccines. These vaccines prevent the spread of disease and improve the health of other children. These benefits outweigh the risks of not vaccinating a child. There are several reasons to support vaccines. Read on to learn more about the pros and cons of vaccinations.
Vaccines are important in preventing the spread of diseases and limiting the impact of disease. These vaccines protect future generations from illnesses that cause death and disease. The World Health Organization describes smallpox as one of the deadliest diseases for humanity. A century ago, smallpox was the number one killer of children. Now, however, smallpox has been declared globally eradicated, and fewer deaths are being reported.
There are numerous benefits of vaccinations, but some parents question whether or not they’re good for their children. The era of colonization saw smallpox outbreaks, resulting in the death of half of the population. The introduction of early forms of immunization (referred to as “inoculation”) reduced these deaths, but they were far less safe than the modern vaccinations. As a result, the decision to immunize children was controversial.
In early colonial America, smallpox spread rapidly and killed half of those who contracted the disease. The disease was so dangerous that the colonizers feared inoculation. Although inoculation was far less effective than modern vaccines, it did save lives and helped reduce deaths. The advantages of immunizing the population cannot be overstated. A well-written vaccinations persuasive essay can help parents make the right decision for their children.
The first vaccine saved millions of lives. Hundreds of millions.
And ever since then, ever declining technology, ever more carelessly and incompetently applied, applied against diseases ever less serious, has been doing less and less good and more and more harm.
And now it is doing immense harm and very little good. If we were doing to the Awesome Mighty Holy Covid Demon what we did to smallpox, we would give everyone a sniff of Omicron.
Ironically, it’s the ideology that ‘vaccines are awesome and will never do harm’ that guarantees the medical establishment will keep lowering standards and walk blindfolded into an escalating sequence of disasters that will discredit vaccines for the general public. If the medical folks were skeptical about vaccines and tested them carefully at every turn, the general public would continue to believe they are awesome and will never do harm.
Good that you can still see these gradations. Andrew Anglin has gone from “Covid vaccines are poison” (they are) to “Covid doesn’t exist”, and he’s now starting to claim that all viruses don’t exist.
What is this mental illness consuming so many right-wingers? It can’t be related to Covid because Anonymous Conservative went mad years ago.
Its not an illness but times such as ours are unfriendly to subtelty and nuance
In a fight for survival, most neglect to mind their words for the time for words may be passing.
Several people die of the measles vaccine every year, and probably more because the official data is so faked. The last death from measles proper was about 10 years ago now, and it was newsworthy it was so uncommon. Not all vaccines are created equal. It’s like comparing caffeine to methamphetamine. Both are stimulants, but one will destroy you and the other just makes you feel better. Same with vaccines. Just because the smallpox vaccine was good does not mean all vaccines are always and forever good.
Then we get into the issue with the Covid “vaccine.” That is a vaccine like a tranny is a woman. Superficially aping the surface characteristics–badly–without providing the core of what it means to be that thing.
Is this not spam? The link is strange. Looks like one of those AI generated mab libs like sites I see more and more when googling for home/car repair tips.
It’s certainly spam, but the replies were still quite good.
(The spammer could perhaps be hired to write a nice introductory essay on the Jimian view of the Woman Question?)
It certainly is spam, but I suspect it is shill spam – and since it is a new shill payload, I replied.
I don’t like suppressing shill payload unless I can say that I have seen it before, and it has been responded to far too many times, and shill payload given in the clear is vastly preferable to shill payload that is smuggled in as supposedly shared presuppositions that are supposedly what everyone knows (the classic example being that everyone supposedly knows that Trade Tower Building seven suffered no terrorist damage, and fell straight down onto its foundations), or all good well informed right wingers already know, or all Christians know and accept.
Jim, do you have any investment tips? My parents have large savings but few investments. I was going to get them into crypto, but I’m unsure how crypto is going to workout going forward. The way inflation is going they’re going to end up destitute unless they get that money moved somewhere productive.
I know you directed this towards Jim but the way I’m playing the current conditions is commodities (checkout ticker symbol GSG) and bitcoin. GSG has been making a killing for me and it will remain a good investment until inflation is brought under control (which may take months, years, or may never be based on fed policy).
Commodities are a timely indicator of inflation.
But everything else is going to catch up. Also, all complicated financial institutions located in US power are going to be looted, killed, and worn as skin suits.
Eventually, which will be followed shortly after by total American Empire institutional collapse. It will happen but it is not happening any time soon. Best not to turn your life tits over ass preparing for total institutional collapse that is not happening any time soon.
But when you invest in commodities, you are preparing for events that are happening soon.
If you are long on commodities right now, you are predicting that inflation is going to rise faster than normality bias catches up – which means you are betting your money on high likelihood of hyperinflation, because normies are starting to belatedly perceive inflation.
Commodities are a timely indicator of inflation, but if inflation remains stable at around thirty percent a year, other stuff will catch up as peoples inflationary expectations catch up to actual inflation.
It has certainly been true in recent times that inflation has had an increasing lead on normality bias, so commodities have been a good investment. But normality bias is starting to break down, so for commodities to continue to be a good investment, inflation has to accelerate. So if you are still long on commodities, you are betting that hyperinflation hits, but some considerable time passes with normies not yet realizing it has hit. Which has been what has happened in previous hyperinflations.
Long on commodities is inconsistent with the position you have been taking in the comments that a mere few hundred basis points will break inflation. To halt inflation, will need at least fifty basis points a week for at least a year.
Not seeing normality bias starting to break down. Normality bias is that inflation will stop and prices will stop rising. I am simply betting that prices will not stop rising until the fed takes necessary action to stop the prices from rising.
Normies are incapable to understand that prices will not stop rising until the fed takes necessary action to stop the prices from rising, so this will always be a winning bet.
When I see the fed start to take action indicative of a dramatic rise in rates or a dramatic crash in the markets, I will rotate out of commodities and back into equities.
If the fed never takes takes necessary corrective action to stop prices from rising, as you imply, you are likely right and we will enter hyperflation, at which point I will rotate entirely into bitcoin and start looking at flights to a safe haven to flee to.
But I am not too bullish on near term hyperinflation because I believe Fed Chairman Powell, a conservative, will do the necessary action to slow inflation to manageable levels.
Conservatives have long been the stabilizing brake of the regime to slow the preposterous actions of the left and turn the heat level back down to simmer so the frog doesn’t jump out. I don’t think this time will be any different.
“Long on commodities is inconsistent with the position you have been taking in the comments that a mere few hundred basis points will break inflation.”
Not necessarily. Pooch may think that a few bps would be enough but that no one has the balls to call for even that. More broadly, your line of thinking seems to me to be that inflation is now very challenging to stop – having been left unattended for too long – and that this almost excuses Powel and co for failing where only titanic will applying titanic means could succeed.
I and perhaps Pooch (along with most commentators such as Sumner etc( think that inflation can still be stopped on the cheap but the window is closing, making Powell very culpable for failing in these crucial months. His interview where the threw the current paradigm under the bus for all to see is a gaffe of epic proportions and I was wrong about his technical skill.
The dollar devaluation cannot be stopped with 30 trillion in government debt…
To stop inflation, have to raise interest rate 2500 basis points, maybe 5000 basis points.
And suddenly the government would have to pay ten trillion a year on its debt, which it can only do by issuing a whole lot more debt. And before long people are going to doubt that the debt is good.
The debt is so great that it has to be monetized, hence inflation, and very likely hyperinflation.
From a purely mechanical point of view, 130 of GDP is not the end of the world in debt, and can be gotten out of.
In practice, the sort of country that rakes up that sort of debt is not the sort of country to make the necessary changes to get out of it, so in that sense you are right, it will go all the way.
To resolve the inflation during Crisis of the Third Century, the Roman Emperors enacted brutal and oppressive taxation on their populace. I would not rule this out for us.
>To resolve the inflation during Crisis of the Third Century, the Roman Emperors enacted brutal and oppressive taxation on their populace. I would not rule this out for us.
That’s how you get people dropping out and forming bandit groups. The Romans had an effective military that could somewhat suppress them, we don’t.
That’s how you get people dropping out and forming bandit groups. The Romans had an effective military that could somewhat suppress them, we don’t.
Exactly what happened as a result of the oppressive taxation to resolve the Crisis of the Third Century.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bagaudae
Brutal taxation then was like taxes now…
We are beyond the laffer maximum already.
We aren’t even close to the level of taxation levied after the Crisis of the Third Century. Most peasants could no longer afford property and could only be serfs on the estates of large landowners.
Do you know what those taxes were, peasants joined large estates not because of taxes but because of constant war…. needed local warlords with local militia.
We are beyond the laffer maximum. The government cannot raise revenues by raising taxes, debt is unservicable.
Anyway… why is it so hard to understand that there is no way out of 30T in debt except either repudiation or monetization… none zero.
That’s absolutely not what happened. There were no local warlords in the 3rd century. Warlords didn’t start coming until after Rome was sacked in the 5th century. Read about the taxation reforms.
https://mises.org/library/inflation-and-fall-roman-empire
No one is saying that. Unless we get some magical reactionary regime change restoration that is looking exceedingly unlikely at this point, the Empire is going to collapse under its own weight. It’s just a matter of when not if.
During the crisis of the 3rd century Rome looked a lot like the 5th century, most of the Empire falling into barbarian hands and also constant civil wars. Unlike in the 5th century it was saved by a couple Emperor’s (Claudius II and Aurelian mainly) having miraculous military successes in retaking territory.
Don’t think the state could easily collect taxes from a reluctant population in such circumstances, what likely happened is that when the armies did move thru they took everything of value. What did happen that was economically terrible is that Aurelian to some degree followed by Diocletian instituted a kind of command economy, and Constantine basically tied everyone to their locality (without special permission) so that they could be accounted for to fufill their taxes and quotas under the command economy system and as such that kind of was brutal taxation. But it came after the crisis of the 3rd century.
Marcian reinvigorated the Eastern economy by abolishing prettymuch every aspect of the command economy (Procopius in his secret history details that the Eastern Empire’s economic policies were downright minarchist and libertarian before Justinian) but this was not done in the West and as such the West finally became too broke to raise another army when they needed to… and oh they also pissed off their barbarian soldiers who joined Alaric by ordering their families killed.
Why is debt so all-important? Biden, or the junta standing over Biden’s bullet-riddled corpse, could void the debt, print just enough money to pay the men with guns, and tell everyone else to get a fucking job.
They could also do a partial default where foreign creditors get nothing but Americans are compensated up to some limit.
So instead of inflation, where your dollars gradually become worthless, we could have deflation, where your dollars suddenly disappear and you have to fill out an application to get some of them back.
Because the government would not be able to buy foreign currency or goods. It would be a shock, and result in a lot of death, but might at least get a good jump going on building domestic industry….. For anyone who survives it.
Given that the US Treasury has unwisely shortened the maturation of the debt over the last 30 years, a large enough increase increase in rates to kill inflation would cause a severe recession, and practically force devaluation, an end to Reserve currency status, and ultimately default…All of which would ultimately benefit most Americans….But would be massively unpopular with the .1% who rule us…
Normality bias also says that you own the commodities listed on your account statement, that they actually exist in some warehouse or storage tank, and the government won’t confiscate them “for the common good”.
That will happen, among other things, but it is not happening yet.
My advice is that the future is likely to be surprising, Bitcoin is at increasing risk of the blood diamonds attack, and urgently needs to get the Lightning Network working as originally envisaged. Therefore one needs to diversify, and any asset not dollar denominated is good. Local assets should be physical things embedded in your local social network, and far off assets need to be far from the power of the American state. Crypto is good, and likely to get better, but should envisaged and implemented for an environment where it is illegal one needs to get the last plane out to a location where technology still works, which requires a certain amount of technical knowledge.
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/67828
I really want to post the whole thing, but it is quite long. So uncomfortably invigorating to read a politician speaking like this. You can really feel the desperation in his words, balancing the weight of historical legacy with the grim reality that you are in fact alone, your potential allies are just as greedy and dangerous as your enemies, and that you will always be accused of doing what the opposition is doing to you.
A great speech, in dialogue with history. Just being familiar with and acknowledging basic, realty-rooted history gives a man like him immense power in this era of ignorant self-deletion. There is probably not a single human being in Washington, except maybe Kissinger, who can even understand what the hell he is talking about. And if they don’t know how to read, how can they choose the correct course of action?
I wonder how much of his theory of history is his own, and how much his circle’s. There’s something to it that strikes me as the product of a single mind rather than a committee.
I don’t know how familiar you are with Slavs or with people that make it their business to do violence, but just trying to imagine the tiger a physical manlet like Putin has to ride every day, just to get to sleep at the end of it, is so off-putting. He has to be incredibly smart and incredibly loyal, because Russia is a godsdamn deathtrap under normal circumstances, not even taking into account the details involved in power circles. He’s gotta be the loneliest man in the planet. This may sound like sycophantry, but I’m genuinely impressed by the guy. He may just be lucky, otherwise he’s nearly superhuman.
It’s truly impressive, very much worth a read.
Between all the times he shits on “the virus of nationalism”, right-wingers and neo-nazis and then he compains about the “prejudices” that some some countries have towards Russia, half of this could have been drafted by a grad in State , mutatis mutandis.
Alas, the US is such a monomaniacal propagator of degeneracy that even Russia will ahve to do as a break. But this guy is no rightists, and thise who come after him shall be so even less.
Putin does not have the false perspective of the West. To him, “nationalists” are not the right-wing bogeyman under the bed that they are to the anglosphere, that modern rightists tragically larp as. Nationalists are obviously a left-wing faction allying with communists to destroy the Russian Empire.
Calling oneself a nationalist is enemy occupation of your brain, and the word and concept of “nationalism” is taking the natural preference a man has for those of similar blood and language, which used to not have a word in the same way that preferring to eat food over garbage did not have a word, and using it as a justification for insane leftist schemes.
Putin sees Russia as an Empire. Nationalism means the rebellion of parts of the Empire. Which in practice means conflict with other empires, because the nationalists seceding from the empire make alliances with other empires. So yes, if you are the ruler of an Empire, nationalism is bad.
And Russia is the blood-enemy of the Nazis. Why would any sane Russian feel an ounce of warmth towards Hitler? The Greek fascists hate Hitler too. Liking Hitler or not is not a reliable indicator of being on the side of GNON.
So, in denouncing many times nationalism, Putin the Head of Empire lets his subjects know that they are to prefer the far to the near, the Moskovite to the cousin jew or whatnot, not just the fellow Russian to the foreigner, which is fair to ask. Even by the standards of Empire, this is wicked and leftist, a perversion of the natural afinity towards one’s own.
Nationalism means the same thing to Putin as it does to the EU, I see no difference whatsoever, hence no ground for criticising one but not the other.
Nationalism only has meaning in the context of democracy. As a monarch, he is right to criticize it because it is a threat to monarchy.
Democracy is also a threat to oligarchy, so from the US/EU perspective they must criticize it too.
So, if were speaking of how the vile Ukrainians are preventing faggots from parading in Kiev (you know, like neo-nazis are wont to do), would he be justified in saying that too, as a defender or freedom instead of a pusher of degeneracy in the mould of globohomo? If he gets cross with dagestanis tomorrow and goes AWOL since they supress women rights, would he be justified then? Why is this different from hitting at nationalism, all being attacks from the left.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-48738251.amp
I know thats not true, was making that scenario up to prove that it doesn’t matter if a right-wing concept is criticized from an oligarchy or monarchy , an attack from the left is the same in both cases.
Ok, but you made your central thesis upon a fabricated scenario. Putin isn’t talking about men that live their blood, heritage, and neighbors, he’s talking about people that would sell their souls for a shred of power. This is plainly obvious in context.
For anyone else, I’d immediately cry entryist shill. But I am a nationalist, and I like you a lot, so help me understand what you’re seeing that the rest of us don’t.
Here’s what I’m seeing: a speech that would have been just as powerfull with no swipe or mention at all of nationalism, right-wingers ir neo-nazis. My fellow Russians are bring oppressed, the survival of my country is at stake and our brothers in history and faith are being depredated by a band of thiefs. Seems powerfull enough to me.
Why, oh why, you have to take swipe after swipe at right-wing concepts? Unless you don’t think that nationalism is a right-wing concept, with which reading I disagree mightily.
I am left with a very bad taste from reading it, and don’t understand how the others here aren’t.
Ok, I was too. But I think Aidan, as usual, nailed it. Consider what this speech heralds: Russia is going to war. It is going to war with its cousins. The motivation for this war is an implacable enemy that parades around in the skin suit of self determination. In this context, nationalism is being used as an anti-concept.
His phrasing tripped my danger circuits as well, but I am choosing to give the benefit of the doubt.
There are some words which, when used as accusations and only when used as accusations, give away a leftist. Nationalist! Racist! Mysoginist! Fascist! Reactionary! You hear them and you know the guy is either an NPC or a true believer.
I am no fascist (simply becouse I cannot understand what the hell it means) but if I hear a guy throw “fascist” around I know where he stands right away. No context needed.
The same with accusing the globohomo puppets in Kiev if being nationalistic. This can only have one meaning: that they put the interest of their nation above those of other nations, i.e. Russia. Doesn’t matter that this is silly in the extreme,what mattwris thta you would consider this bad enough to use an an accusation! Something an EU eunuch may do.
I think in this particular case Aidan is looking ffor context that is just not there.
I think you are looking at it from a perspective that is too Western by far. When he criticizes “fascism” and “neo-Nazis,” he is not talking about a group that does not exist except as online agitators serving the Cathedral. There are actual neo-Nazi fascists in Ukraine that waze actual swastikas around and are not just some boogeyman to use to beat right-wingers. The US allied with–then armed and funded–no shit, legitimate, true believer fascists. It would be similar to Russia funding Al Queda organizations in Canada. The self-defense response and historical animosity would absolutely be included in the American declaration of war.
Fascii was a latin/italian word to refer to a collection of staves lashed together to form a single strong beam. Informally, it was often used as a term for groups, gangs, bands of men, organizations, states…
A colloquial analysis of use-cases involving the word fascism over the past 70 years produces a relatively simple definition; fascism is a word that is used when describing things preclusive to communism. Policies that preclude communism are fascist. People that preclude communism are fascist. Things that preclude communist are fascist. Existence is fascist.
Thus, ‘fascism’ is a synecdoche for everything standing in the way of the gnostic’s unbridled political dominion. We can recognize it, ultimately, as a gnostic’s reification of Being itself. In archetypical terms, ‘the fascist’ is everything that he is not; the fascist is not socialist; the fascist is not feminist; the fascist is not egalitarian; the fascist is not effete; the fascist is not barren…
Yeah I think Aidan nailed it. You are letting the enemy definition of nationalism occupy your brain. For Putin, Ukrainian nationalism means gay parades in Kiev, the potential genocide of its Russian population, and potential nuclear attack on Russia itself. Obviously, he is right to attack it.
It should be emphasized that we are not nationalists, we are reactionaries. This is an important distinction. If nationalism can be leveraged to bring us to a reactionary monarchy than fine, but it is the means not the end.
In the sense that Putin is attempting to restore the Russian Empire of the 18th century and not the fake and gay nationalisms that Lenin created in the 20th, he is going full blown neo-reactionary and we should be rooting him on.
Pseudo-Chrysostom, that is still looking at facism from the perspective of the Western socialist. The people in Ukraine calling themselves fascists are national socialists that look to repeat Hitler’s follies. Putin is not railing against some made up force. He is talking about a bunch of people who think that Hitler had a really good idea, and want to institute national socialism. In this case, the fascists are on the side of the communists. An international socialist alliance, one might say, inasmuch as communists can every truly work together.
@Pooch, on the reactionary- nationalistic distinction.
Would you be OK with importing 100 million high-functionin chinese to the US then? Of course not, I think most here are both reactionaries and nationalists.
One can be a cosmopolitan reactionary and I think Yarvin fits the mould but, you know, Yarvin.
Is importing 100 million Chinese a reactionary policy? Is this something the monarchs of the 17th century would have wanted? Nationalism wasn’t even a word until the late 19th century, born out of democracy. It has no meaning outside the context of democracy. I’m not a nationalist. I’m a monarchist. I reject everything that has to do with the cancer that is democracy.
And like I said, if nationalism can be leveraged as some intermediate step that gets us closer to absolute monarchy ie the 20th century, then ok I am listening, but the track record on that has been less than stellar.
Singapore has some claim to be a reactionary-adjacent polity, and they import high-functioning foreigners for sport, being the only country I know of that started and continued to be 105IQ on average despite massive immigration, due to savage vetting. So yeah, I think bringing 100m chinamen to the US would be well within the rea of the possible.
In general, I disagree that nationslism is a by-product of – and makes sense only in the context of democracy. Both evolved due to the widespread circulation of the press, but have nothing in common beyond the tech that unlocked them. When some on the right pooh-pooh nationalism as a thing that is created by democracy I think “oh boy, here we go again, another faction that thinks their magic pixxie ideology will make issues that broke Europe go away”.
>The people in Ukraine calling themselves fascists are national socialists that look to repeat Hitler’s follies. Putin is not railing against some made up force.
Well that’s the thing friend; when a bad guy is telling you about what he’s about, he can just lie about it.
Catherine the Great invited her fellow Germans to settle the Volga region in the 18th century; does that count?
Allowing white Christians to settle unsettled land is obviously reactionary policy in the European tradition. How do I know this? It is strictly forbidden by the Cathedral.
The migrations of teutonic species to America in the 19th century were recapitulated by latter day leftists to justify immivasions of meso-american and other species in the 20th. The man who would say both were good, and the man who would say neither were good, are both springing from the same sin, which is mere process level spergmaticism, unable to make useful distinctions in substantial differences between different objects in question.
Well said Pseudo.
Nationalism isn’t “right-wing”, it’s just “more right than communism”.
Nationalism is a “left-wing” idea set because it puts the interests of the nation, ie, people that are kind of like you that aren’t in your family group, above the interests of your family group.
A King acknowledges that your family has its own interests – accepts that the father is the King of his home. (How he may deal with that fact is what makes a King good or bad. But that’s the political reality that monarchy sees).
A leftoid tells you that your own family interests are equal in value to everyone elses family interests and therefore you should supplicate to them.
A Nationalist will tell you that your personal family interests are second to the Nations.
And so whatever the Nationalist defines as the National Interest thus becomes more important than your personal and family interests. You thus lose control over your children, your wife, so on, since they should behave in accordance with the National Interest.
Nationalism is just “racist”, so not sufficiently left to be acceptable to moderns.
Being a Nationalist is just saying “THIS is the line, no further left than this!”
All good but you are missing a key issue that needs solving: coordination is hard. If it were trivial, we would not speak of politics at all, people would just coalesce as needed and disband, and no one would think of this stuff twice. Albanians and Serbs would join forces in the morning to exchnage hands with Turks in some Vienna ghetto where they all live, go to work and meet up again to fight one-another in the afternoon.
Since coordination is hard, you need to sometimes sacrifice your short-term interest to that of the unit being coordinated. Monarhcy? Nation? Empire? You need some unit which will sometimes ask you to die so that you children may live.
Nationalism is simply saying: the nation is the smallest such unit that is still survivable, as coordination with fellows of the same tongue and mental habits is much easier, multiplying what numbers you have. Going abive your nation makes you militarily weak and you need massive numbers to overcome this.
So, it’s not all leftism depending on who you ask. The Milanese cannot survive as such, they will either fight as Padanians, Italians or Europeans. A King will know this and act accordingly.
>All good but you are missing a key issue that needs solving: coordination is hard.
No, it’s not hard at all. The Kings of old managed it. The problem comes when the King wants to rule ALL of the people. One solution is Nationalism. You’re trying to right wing from the left.
Instead of the King ruling Lords who rule ever smaller kingdoms, down to the atomic level of the family home, you have a King who wants to rule you directly in your family home.
I am Nation, says the over-reaching King, and you will obey Nations Interests.
>Nationalism is simply saying: the nation is the smallest such unit that is still survivable,
No, it’s the tribe. But a Nation can crush the tribe, so, be a Nationalist. So says the over-reaching King.
>So, it’s not all leftism depending on who you ask.
I know. Because some people see “national interests” as being racist, thus not sufficiently left.
What is “Nationalism” other than a rebranding of “Democracy”. You cannot divide political power into 5 million chunks, but you can pretend that “the national character” is some sub-unit of political power that isn’t actually democracy.
Good points but I think you are speaking of two issues which appear intertwined but are separate.
1. Tribe vs Nation. This is completely set by the level of technology in communication and transportation, and has nothing to do with King or Assembly. I am closer to my brother than my cousin, closer to my cousin than to my fellow villager, and so on all the way to the sentinel island inhabitant. Near trumps far, generically speaking.
When communication and transportation only allow routine movement within the 80miles radius, your tribe is the broadest “near” unit that you can coordinate into. hence tribalism.
Once communication and transport tech allow people to aggregate along a far wider region, tribes intermarry and trade far more often, in time creating a nation. Hence, nationalism.
Some hope that current tech will create globalism in this sense, but it won’t: genetic and cultural affinity has to be there, and will only take you as far as the Nation. Frenchmen in Alsace would still intermarry less with Germans in Alsace than Frenchmen living more inland.
Being on one and not the other social tech is entirely out of anyone’s control, least of all the King’s. You will say “Kings made nations by aggressive cultural programs”, to which I say “what stopped French Kings from doing this in the IX century, why did they have to wait until the XVIII century to propagandize frenchness to those in Aquitaine? It was already happening that roads and canals showed those in Carcassonne that they could easily tolerate trade and marriage with those of Marseilles, the King just leaned into this movement.
2. Feudalism vs. Bureaucracy. Agree with you on this, but nationalism has little to do with the move to the latter, except that both centralization and nationalism were allowed by tech. Russia or Austria-Hungary were as centralised as France, despite being multi-ethnic empires. Indeed, you can make the case that a multi-ethnic empire requires centralisation in the age of easy communication lest the Hungarian Nobles defect on you.
So, I see no conflict between nationalism and feudalism, although I recognize the correlation between the rise of the former and decline of the latter, both explained by tech I think.
Also good points, I address them without repasting the whole thing.
> Tribe vs Nation
1. Technology
I disagree here. Nationalism is a set of political precepts which assumes that my neighbour and my neighbours neighbours interests are of equal value to me personally as my brothers.
2. Some hope that current tech will create globalism in this sense, but it won’t:
Nationalism is the first step to globalism. You’re correct in your analysis of how we get nationalism, but it’s just a trick.
Take your neighbours interests seriously, and your countrymen.
3.what stopped French Kings from doing this in the IX century
Yes, again, you’re totally right. But what happened as we got more technology? We got the left wing, doctrines of equality, and so on. Revolution. The King tried to rep
4. The King leaned in
As I note above; the over-reaching King.
> both centralization and nationalism were allowed by tech.
Yes, as you note. You’re looking at what caused nationalism, rather than whether or not nationalism is a reasonable political stance.
Yes, but not as an entire set of policies. Should the King care about Nation? Yes. But that’s the King.
>Nationalism is a set of political precepts which assumes that my neighbour and my neighbours neighbours interests are of equal value to me personally as my brothers.
That may be your definition of nationalism, but it does not appear to be Arquiduka’s.
Yes, definitions matter.
I suppose, to be fair, I would say that a nation-centred spirit is important for a nation to have.
But if a government uses the spirit of nationalism as a blunt instrument, that is wrong.
Humans are not ants. We all have our own self interests and, should we be governed, this assumption must be kept in mind.
Well spoken, there is nothing much I can add to this or you last reply. At some point it becomes an issue of definitional minutiae but I think we agree on the basics.
Here’s the Russian perspective. For people who support Putin (roughly 70%, imo) nationalism = nazism and fascism, which are extremely bad because of Hitler and the WWII atrocities against the Soviet population. Russia has over 190 ethnic groups. Nationalism for Putin now means the Chechen war. He cannot use the term in a positive sense (although he, it seemed, wanted to get closer to Russian nationalists in 2010). Why does he not omit it? Because the Ukrainian nationalists use swastikas and other Reich symbols and speak of literally killing the Russians or those who say they are Russians. This way, it’s easy to explain why Ukraine is currently an enemy to an average Russian who generally thinks that Ukrainians are a ‘brother people’ and there should be no war at all.
Pure nationalism wouldn’t work in Russia, and I doubt it would work anywhere without faith. Soviet Union had stoicism, brotherhood of the Soviet men and the WWII as religion (revolutionary enthusiasm evaporated quite quickly). It didn’t last long. What remains are the remnants of Soviet ideology – those and Putin manage to keep the country intact for now. Russia needs to revive actual faith as the bonding elements of its many peoples and return to its Imperial statutes that didn’t allow non-Christians in the government and higher officer positions. If Russia fails to acquire an ideology, it will probably fall apart soon after Putin leaves.
If Russians have evolved such a relationship to the concept of a nation then Putin is explaining things is such a way as to make himself understood to his citizens. I was thinking that he was sending some signal to the Turks or whatnot, or even just ingratiating with the euros, but it may be as simple as this.
Here’s the longer-term issue that I see now contingent on your explanation: there is at the very most one spot for a tribe that has evolved a dislike for nationalism and acts to prevent all Europeans from homogenating out of fear of events traspired in WW2. The smurfs have filled that niche with gusto and there’s no room for the Russians to join. An issue going forward for those who place much hope on Moskow.
No. In the West, ‘nationalism’ has come to mean “please stop attacking my people’s traditions and importing dumb and violent foreigners to shit on everything we hold dear’.
In the East, nationalism means “Ukraine has the right to be independent of the Russian Empire. Because Ukraine does not have the military power to resist Russia, Ukraine will ally with the American Empire to secure the holy goal of Ukrainian self-determination, [that Russia is not really harming its province of Ukraine means nothing] and if vast amounts of blood and treasure are wasted in a war between two empires, we do not care.”
Putin is not telling his people to prefer far over near, he is telling his people not to turn over the applecart for selfish and destructive reasons
In the East, nationalism also means the genocide of ethnic minorities. The most horrific nationalist regime was not the Nazis, it was the Croatian Ustaše regime who killed their Serbian citizens in the most horrifying ways possible. So much so that even the Nazis complained about it. Putin is correct to worry about the genocide of ethnic Russians in Ukraine.
Are the”neo-nazis” in Ukraine entirely fabrications of the state dept, or are there a sizable number organic Nazis the state dept is taking advantage of? I would assume it’s mostly the former. Other than “we hated being under soviet control, therefore hate Russia, therefore like Nazis” I can’t understand why they would be a factor at all in Ukraine. Even if I can understand the reflexive Russia hate, wouldn’t they also have opinions on the (((Ukrainian government)))? Or, is Putin using neo-nazi as an epiteth that the”neonazis”themselves would reject? If that’s what Putin is doing, maybe he’s trying to counter western propaganda in support of the Ukrainian government, but that seems unnecessary as none of our propaganda ever needs to be consistent.
Additional posts above and below clarified this more for me
On Sunday, March 17th, 3 p.m., 1929, the Chicago Forum hosted a debate between Lothrop Stoddard and W.E.B. DuBois, on the subject of, “Shall the Negro Be Encouraged to Seek Cultural Equality?â€
Stoddard, of course, was a greatly intelligent man, an erudite scholar of Harvard, and most of all possessed of a sensitivity to and respect for reality; a contest between him and some up-jumped mulatto spoiling for gibs would be all but preordained, would it not?
But alas, for you see, in this mess of accolades, Stoddard had a fatal flaw: “‘The more enlightened men of southern white America … are doing their best to see that separation shall not mean discrimination; that if the Negroes have separate schools, they shall be good schools; that if they have separate train accommodations, they shall have good accommodations.’ [laughter].”
And why did people laugh? Because even in spite of the fact that his observations reflected a basic reality of the matter, *he betrayed weakness*; both in himself, and *in those he spoke of*.
His flaw was that he allowed his ethic of concern in the debate to be, ‘what is good for the negro man?’ And once settled in such a frame, it was his disenfranchisement that was all but preordained; and that of all the yankee realists of that period. Because he implicitly granted his counterpart a status superior to his own; and if it so happens that, at the limit, a sensitivity to and respect for reality impugns the status of his counterpart, well, then in due course that has to go, too.
Which brings up the question of empire. What’s the point of invading another country?
This is not an idle question; if the explicit point is ‘for the benefit of the nation’, then that in turn inherently begs the question of what utility would be served by trying to larp with the natives as suzerain, instead of just moving your own guys over, in order to have more nation. Any reasons not to or modulations to approach in general would ultimately be merely tactical in scope, not a question of strategic aim as such.
If on the other hand the explicit point is ‘for the benefit of the indigens’, then you have firmly stepped onto the path to globohomo.
Certainly, we can say that the multicultural suzeraintys of the late European powers seen in history, were indeed by most any measure objectively beneficial for the natives and colonials both; but the shift in frame from ‘conquistadore’ to ‘consigliere’ carried with it a concordant shift in cardinality, which ultimately could not settle but for one destination, as we have seen.
There have been times and places in history were nationalist sentiment has been used as a tactic for doing leftism; there are many things that can have have been used as tactics for doing leftism in various times and places, if and when copacetic to those times and places.
We will not so far as to say that the idea of empire is in itself inherently leftish; but we can say it can quite easily lend itself to it much more easily in comparison.
Wow, amazing speech. We appear to be very close to war.
Looks like Ukraine is all about blaming everything bad the Dems are doing to America on Putin. Their plan for the 2024 elections is becoming clear, they’ll federalize them claiming the Russians are interfering and then rig the vote. Anyone who objects will called a traitor and might even be arrested.
Clearly the strategy is to blame all inflation that ever happened everywhere in the history of the world, present and prior, on the evil Putler. The question is, will they then use this as justification to actually go to war with Russia, after which arresting people as pro-Russian sympathizers becomes a real possibility.
I tend to think not because the leaders are still male, even if they are demented and/or faggy and gay. Apparently some insane high-ranking “Pentagon Official” bitch from the Obama Admin is calling for a No Fly Zone over Ukraine. As soon as dumb cunts like this are actually making military decisions, war will be unavoidable.
The average American can’t find Illinois on a map. You think the country will tolerate martial law because of some skirmish half a world away?
Let’s be serious here.
We just endured medical marshal law for 2 years. Without elite leadership the people are nothing.
Who’s “we”? Half the country stopped paying attention to Covid a year ago.
Regardless, “elite leadership” isn’t going to magically appear out of the clouds. The leftists don’t have “elite leadership,” either, but they actually show up when it counts rather than waste time peddling conspiracy theories on the internet.
Interesting analysis. Well golly what do you think we should do about it? You do have some plan of action you recommend for us to follow? I’m interested to learn more.
It’s right there in the comment: Start showing up.
Our enemies aren’t winning because they’re smarter or stronger or because of some grand, far-ranging conspiracy. They win because they show up, from school board meetings to state legislatures to street protests, while our side grills and watches Netflix and wastes time online peddling conspiracy theories and accusing each other of being feds.
UM WTF. Anyone on our side who “shows up” just gets arrested.
He’s sarcastically asserting that you’re a fed. Don’t take the bait.
You’re not wrong, but you’re in the wrong place to advocate anything besides talk. One of the bigger victories for Leftists was denial of coordination spaces for the Right. You can’t organize on public platforms, and organizing isn’t tolerated in places like this. I feel your pain. Best to start “showing up” in your local area, and coming here for guidance on how to organize your Bible Study. There’s no point in asking for or listening to the guidance of blackpillers; they’re going to mock you for inaction just the same as for action.
Confrontational Politics by H.L. Richardson
https://www.amazon.com/Confrontational-politics-H-L-Richardson/dp/B0006R72KI
Check that out. Quick read with good, concise guidance.
>He’s sarcastically asserting that you’re a fed. Don’t take the bait.
Right, that’s why I said what I said.
I have no interest in organizing anything, here or anywhere else. Aside from that being the hallmark of fed activity, it’s not clear that organizing is what we need, anyway. There’s never been a shortage of conservative organizations. The problem is they’ve all had a strong bias against any type of action.
Thanks for the link. I’ll check it out.
“One of the bigger victories for Leftists was denial of coordination spaces for the Right. ”
Here’s my blackpill, but maybe better men can make this into something more.
Communism went on for 70 years by infiltrating male spaces and nipping all dissent in the bud. Secret policemen really were the heroes of those societies. Add a monolithic media that gaslights morning, afternoon and twice on the evening, and you will never be able to assemble critical mass. Never.
In the East communism fell when growing dissatisfaction was sparked into spontaneous protest by some seemingly minor incident, which is the only way you coordinate without being allowed to: everyone must get fed up at once, and this requires an incident. With us, it was a silly call by a ref in a third tier soccer game in a town on the malaria plain. What started that day never stopped until the regime fell.
I think this is what Yarvin means with “be worthy”. Dissatisfaction will trigger spontaneous protest at some point, and then all bets are off. Don’t know what more can one do to be prepared, but probably not the bets place to discuss here.
>Aside from that being the hallmark of fed activity, it’s not clear that organizing is what we need, anyway.
But, organizing is what everyone needs everywhere for everything.
It is the matter of what is necessary for organization that is the turning point.
>There’s never been a shortage of conservative organizations.
Which so often have been worse than useless, by capturing potential parallel state actors into the plantation of outer-party surrogate activities.
>The problem is they’ve all had a strong bias against any type of action.
More specifically, a bias against actions with more perennialist cardinality in general, and actions genuinely oppositional to the inner party in particular.
Working on software to make that possible. I will issue a progress report and a git repository when I have some progress, and software that would make sense to anyone other than myself.
The right has principles that motivate them to act. The left just seems power. It is infinitely easier for the left because they just seek power in any situation. Book club, project, town council, whatever, they very quickly assess where the power is, then relentlessly pursue it. So they self organize easily, and promiscuously. The purpose or cause is irrelevant. Take 5 leftist issues, give them complete victory, and they will immediately pivot to 5 more.
The right is slow to act, hard to organize, and embarrassingly easy to outmaneuver via compromises. Right-wingers are always looking for an excuse to stop fighting and get back to whatever their real passion is. This is, in my opinion, the critical issue of liberal democracy and precisely why progressives love it: it rewards the obsessed busybodies and punishes the the independently capable.
There is no success to be had on the national/federal level for conservative coordination. As was mentioned, there is an abundance of conservative organizations, and almost every single one is converged, compromised, or waiting to be converged or compromised the moment they become relevant. It is a battlefield that rewards leftists by default. So there’s no reason to compete. The Right must exist the field. No candidates for federal positions, no applications for federal jobs. Expose the artifice of democracy by refusing to participate.
The local battlefield is a completely different story. There are many situations and places that can be dominated by organized, concerted effort. The primary targets should be rural areas. This is the training battlefield. The secondary battlefield is the inner city. The management is so poor, so lacking in capability, that I posit there will be real possibilities to invest and dominate in the next decade. I know many will disagree, and I know they have many good points to support their pessimism. Regardless, I still maintain that there are hidden opportunities in the most unlikely places.
The most certain way to become worthy is to win. The easiest way to win is to identify the easiest targets and ignore the impossible ones. This is the political strategy.
Concurrently, the Right must organized a logistical/infrastructural strategy. This needs to be a campaign of parallelism. Starting very small, right-wingers must identify services and goods that can be provided/dominated by explicitly conservative/Christian providers. Conservatives must actively support businesses that put Bible verses and crosses on their marketing materials, or include traditional or religious messaging. This is not a simple or easy strategy, but I don’t think it’s impossible. We just have to start very, very small. Parallelism could also be called the Amish Strategy, as it is about withdrawal from the urban central, benefits heavy civic society.
The average American is unmarried, childless, in debt and caved in on every issue the feds pushed. The average American has tesosterone levels significantly lower than that of generations past. The average American has been brainwashed their whole lives on mass media to believe in phenomenal bull shit. Land of the serfs and home of the fearful.
Then I guess it’s all over. Assuming you’re American, to which country have you moved?
Not sure if it is all over. But I don’t see the majority of Americans rising up. America is composed of conformists who don’t want to rock the boat. The covid lunacy proved that. I am thinking of leaving, but haven’t given up yet. I think we are going to lose a lot more territory before anything gets done.
>Not sure if it is all over. But I don’t see the majority of Americans rising up. America is composed of conformists who don’t want to rock the boat. The covid lunacy proved that.
Lots of people stood up and rocked the boat. They where tossed overboard for doing so. Without elite support the people don’t matter at all.
Yeah sadly I see a lot of cons buying into the 1776 LARP unable to understand why their protesting and freedom of assembly is not working as intended as the police cave their skulls in and torture them in jails before this is all said and done. Even now apparently a US trucker convoy is assembling as if we didn’t just watch the Canadians get savagely beaten and trampled by horses.
The Feds are organizing the US convoy. You can tell by the shill comments promoting it. They’re going to have some sort of fuckery with it.
The people who get their “skulls caved in” are unarmed buffoons in MAGA hats. But if anyone suggests such people should arm and defend themselves, you scream “nut case!” and “fed!”
Very strange. As I’ve said before, everything you post here is some flavor of defeatism.
Yeah true. You’re right. Go take your AR15 to the Capital and show us how it’s done. Report back with your findings.
Nobody said anything about attacking the Capitol. But our elites crapped their pants after a bunch of unarmed buffoons in viking hats stormed the place and took some selfies, which should have told you something.
Anyone with an IQ over room temperature knows that our elites’ power is entire illusory, but you seem to prefer hiding under your bed until some Caesar type magically emerges from the clouds with a hundred thousand mercenaries to free us from our oppressors. Sad and pathetic.
https://babylonbee.com/news/massacre-as-great-white-shark-allowed-to-compete-in-womens-500-freestyle
We need some sweetness and light so here is a great joke from the Babylon Bee…
“Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.†― Theodore Dalrymple
People have it in us to forfeit ourselves to help the gathering. Biting the dust for your children, bouncing on a nade, and so on. Self-destruction is a depravity of the respectable impulse of benevolence, similarly to all wrongdoings are corruptions of in a general sense solid ways of behaving and mentalities. https://domycourses.com/