Denazifying the Ukraine at Pokrovsk

Well, the technological trend I foresee is for low class males to become increasingly redundant due to automation. Not saying we’re there yet, but we are headed there. Whereas females will always have value, because they have a pussy which we enjoy fucking. Eggs are more precious than sperm.

You will still have meat robots for a while; they won’t all disappear forever in a single generation, lol. But restricting the lower quality (perhaps that’s more accurate than lower class, but ideally there shouldn’t be much of a difference) elements from having males will be eugenic. And men will have much more pussy to swim in.

men will have much more pussy to swim in

This is solved with IVF and cheap nannies. This is why I say the idea space is vast.

Here’s an investment idea: your IVF corp buys eggs from beautiful, smart, but very femlib women, so they can pursue their email degree in the Moloch city. They fertilize and implant them in cheap wombs, and raise them collectively to be ideal wives. The IVF corp then attracts the very best talent by signing contracts enforcing a certain amount of corporate participation in exchange for one of their women. You’ll quickly get an arms race in benefits packages, as the outputs from the top fraction of humans are multiplied by more effective techne.

Once you free yourself from the libshit mind prison, the configuration space is immense.

problem that Yarvin addressed here

Yarvin is attacking two libshit memes by “agreeing and amplifying”. One, that a life lived in maximum support of hedonism is grotesque. Two, that the lower cannot effectively manage themselves, and leaving them to live in their own shit so that you don’t have to admit decolonization was a disaster is incredibly cruel.

Also, again, they won’t all disappear immediately. But gradually they will, alongside increasing automation.

The costs of not following my solution outweigh whatever costs following it will exact. Again, even implementing your ideas, this will remain true. Perhaps you only think in terms of the coming decades, but I look centuries ahead & to the conquest of the galaxy. No need to keep breeding low class males.

So you prohibit the Lower Elements from producing male offspring. Boom. Everything solved. (I’m exaggerating, but in the long-term I am obviously correct.)

But women will always have a pussy.

It’s a jewish idea, you guys always killed the men and were extremely jealous about the whole deal. The aryans that conquered and dispersed you leveraged defeated men as labor and legion fodder, its more scalable.

Roman elite died out because they made marriage communist with retarded divorce lawfare. Not because of downbreeding or population pressure. Similar situation here.

Also, I get that “selection against the lower class” triggers you emotionally for some reason, but “U JOOISH” is not a valid answer (your arguments have been obliterated), and I’m the poorest kike you know.

I am advising selection on the lower class, I am just not advising elimination of all lower class men. You are acting like that is the only solution, and as if it’s not a waste of perfectly good meat robots. Besides the twist on keeping the women, this is late 19th early 20th proggism; they were flipping out about the catholic retards they themselves imported, and decided they had to kill all of them starting with the most obviously demented first. This is a weird and unnecessary leftist meme, that exists only because leftists believe too much in equality. We are not equal, we do not have equal social positions, so we do not worry about the underclass. They get pushed into ghettos or into manual labor farms and someone finds a productive use for them. They don’t even breed much, that requires social tech they cannot fully comprehend. It’s the biggest nonissue.

You are likely mad about retarded arabs in your country. Put them to work and you will be less mad about them. Killing the underclass men does not fix the problem of an underclass existing, because now you have made a half-underclass with men now thinking about promoting one of their bastard children. It’s stupid and counterproductive even for what you’re advocating.

You want more pussy, you make it. You want less underclass, you move to a richer neighborhood. The poor will always be with us, and when we are in the middle of the genetic mod intelligence feedback loop, the poor quality humanoids of 130IQ will seem as disgusting and dull as the niggers littering the first world of today. Inequality is not solvable, you have to deal with it. The best way to deal with it is to allow property in persons, and they’ll get traded around by the smarter until someone finds a good use for them, even if that good use is just “go be stupid and disgusting somewhere else”.

If you agree to the principle that low quality people should reproduce less than high quality people (perhaps you don’t, but then you’re retarded), take it a step further and ask why they should bring low quality males at all into a world that doesn’t need them and in which they are apt to cause problems. (Low quality females still have a pussy though.)

Differential breeding works!

Lets not burn up good capital

Argument from false consensus. Lower class males were good capital in the past, and were needed as soldiers. They are increasingly becoming useless in both regards.

The trend is towards automation and elite warfare, like it or not. Again, think in terms of centuries rather than just the coming decades. You want Cosmic Infinniger. No thanks, we have enough niggers and wiggers already. Need less, not more.

Quality usually trumps quantity, and so contrary to your predictions, Israel sodomized Iran, not the other way around. It’s your emotional attachment to wiggerdom that prevents you seeing it. But I’m a greater wigger than you are, and I confess to the increasing uselessness of my class. Emotions don’t matter.

I am suggesting the open market find “opportunities” to make use of the underclass.

And I suggest gradually phasing out the underclass via prevention of underclass male offspring, which moreover provides other social boons. The mechanism can take many forms, and I argue for the principle itself here, not the exact method of implementation. That would be premature indeed.

The open market can do just fine without an underclass. And in the long-term it will, whether or not my idea is adopted. Not all genes should propagate, and genes that were propagation-worthy yesterday may not be propagation-worthy tomorrow. The open market will be ecstatic.

Good points Jim and Scarebucks.

The lynchpin of this seems to be attaining a lowered M:F sex ratio, because… something about choice, I guess? Abundance mentality?

A reactionary society can do away with choice, while also pursuing sexual abundance. This proposal need not replace any old-school Jimian program, but serve as a potential supplement.

Ironically, the radical feminists would probably agree with you the most. They advocated something like a 20:80 M:F ratio

In their system, women are supposed to have all the political power. In any reactionary system, they will have none, which is why even being massively outnumbered by women should not be a problem. But 1:3 is a good ratio in my view.

The “couragous conversation” that’s been needed the most in America is: Just what in the hell was slavery really about and why?

My position is that it was an alliance-with-far-against-near and high-low-versus-the-middle phenomenon. The “high” importing an entirely new “low” to squeeze the “middle” (poor white labor) against. Sounds familiar.

As far as I can tell, this AI/robotics fantasy going around is the same thing all over again, “but getting it right this time” in that AI & robots go into “sleep mode” when not needed, and can’t fuck, vote, steal, complain or reproduce.

Abraham Lincoln won the presidency by running on a platform of sending africans back to africa.

The ‘Free Soil’ movement was understood by most people at the time as the No Niggers movement.

My opinion is that John Wilkes Booth and his whole circle were Jesuit agents and this was not all that uncommon knowledge at the time of the assassination. Thus the Jesuits killed Lincoln, though whatever the reason it wasn’t likely because he was going to forcibly send all the former slaves to Africa because there is no evidence of that. The free soilers were definitely understood though at the very least the “no niggers in the territories” movement.

Here is what the large language model says on Jesuits and Booth

There is no evidence that John Wilkes Booth had contact with a Jesuit priest in connection with the assassination plot. The idea is a prominent historical conspiracy theory, but it is unfounded (Cominator: Read on, too many connections for it to be unfounded and Booth not technically having converted himself is not evidence against since he may have been ordered to remain on paper a Protestant)
While Booth himself was an Episcopalian, several people associated with the broader conspiracy had connections to the Catholic Church and Jesuit institutions, which fueled later anti-Catholic conspiracy theories.
Key facts regarding the Catholic connections of the conspirators:
Mary Surratt, a boarding house owner where the conspirators met, was a devout Catholic. A Catholic priest, Father Jacob Walter, served as her spiritual advisor, visited her in prison, and accompanied her to the gallows. He was not a Jesuit.
John Surratt Jr., Mary’s son and a Confederate spy involved in the initial kidnapping plot, was Catholic and had attended Georgetown College, a Jesuit school. He fled after the assassination and eventually joined the Papal Zouaves (the Pope’s army) in the Papal States, an escape that a “lapsed priest” later used to suggest Jesuit involvement.
David Herold, who escaped with Booth, also briefly attended a Catholic college.
Dr. Samuel Mudd, who set Booth’s broken leg during the escape, was a Catholic and an alumnus of Georgetown College.
Father Bernardin Wiget, a Jesuit priest and president of Gonzaga College High School (another Jesuit institution), was a character witness for Mary Surratt during her trial and heard her final confession.
The “Jesuit plot” theories were largely promoted by anti-Catholic figures after the assassination, such as the defrocked priest Charles Chiniquy, but historians widely dismiss these claims as having no factual basis. Booth’s own religious upbringing was Episcopal, and his motivations appear to be rooted in Confederate sympathies, not religious directives.

Well, I’ll have to think about it some more. Thanks for the feedback.

This is not to discount your overall objections here, but just to clarify where I stand.

There was never any doubt.

But to call it pro-natalist–well, sometimes what seems like a fair compromise for everyone only ends up making all the parties unhappy. The segregationists and exterminationists will see generations of mutts, and be frustrated at the lack of movement toward the desired ethnostate, while the moralists and pro-lifers will see abortions becoming not only legal but mandatory, and consider it an affront to Christianity and a moral abomination.

(I am not a pro-lifer, I am a pro-property-er; but if you doubt this outcome, simply observe how the anti-abortionists already complain bitterly about this industry that caters almost exclusively to the negro race and assorted helots.)

It’s only really justifiable on utilitarian grounds, where a crumbling empire, finding that it is no longer capable of sustaining monogamy even after a coup and a good-faith effort to restore the social technology, decides to give up on monogamy and search for a semi-functional solution based on polygamy, which is (by a considerable margin) the lower form of civilization but is at least an improvement on the longhouse matriarchs. In other words, a last resort.

And being a last resort, it may very well come to that, eventually, if the right fails to take power, or takes power but lacks the will or the skill to do what is necessary to restore monogamous propertized marriage. It has happened in the past; nevertheless, I will keep rooting for the better outcome.