State of the Ukraine war

The current strategy of the war faction of Thermidor is to fight the war to the last Ukrainian in order to attrit Russia.

Trump is obviously unhappy with this strategy, but the war faction, Marco Rubio, tell him that Russia is suffering huge enormous stupendous gigantic colossal casualties, so if we keep going just a tiny teensy weeny little little bit longer the Russians will concede better peace terms than they are now offering.

On the other hand hand, if we and Russia keep going at it bit longer, we will reach the last Ukrainian, and the political fallout from the disappearance of a European American client state is likely to be worse the Afghanistan retreat. The war faction strategy is likely to leave egg all over Trump’s face, and may well be intended to do so. Undoubtedly many recent recruits from the Deep State to Maga are chafing at Trump actually doing the job of president. They would much prefer to do that job themselves. “Oh Trump disastrously $@%#& up the Ukraine war, so he should leave this sort of thing to the experts”

The actual casualties on both sides are covered by fog of war, but we have some indicators of the ratio of Russian to Ukrainian casualties.

1. Russians are fighting a war of attrition, where the objectives are to maximise the cost in blood and treasure to the enemy, and minimise one’s own expenditure of blood and treasure. They only advance when they run out of Ukrainians opposing them on the front, whereupon they advance until they find some more Ukrainians willing to form a new front, and they retreat when the situation becomes unfavourable. We see lots of videos of four Russians on motorcycles taking a system of bunkers and trenches.

The Ukrainians, on the other hand, are fighting a war for bullet points in the next Washington power point presentation. In so far as their tactics make any sense, they make sense only in a war of maneuver, and this is not a war of maneuver.

2. Far more shells, rockets, and bombs are landing on the Ukrainian front lines, than are landing on the Russian front lines.

3. There are far more Russians on the front line than Ukrainians, which means that every individual Ukrainian on the front line is getting shot at by lots of Russians, while Russians on the front line are getting shot at by fewer Ukrainians.

4. The Russian army is obviously growing. Despite fog of war, we can see that the Ukrainian army is obviously shrinking.

Under these conditions, Putin is unlikely to offer easier peace conditions, and as the Ukrainian army continues to shrink, is likely to offer harsher conditions.

If Trump accepts current Russian peace terms, there will be a great deal of outrage and indignation. If he accepts even worse Russian peace terms next month, even more outrage and indignation, and if the war continues to the last Ukrainian, he is going to get blamed for that by both the war faction and the peace faction even more.

24 comments State of the Ukraine war

Anonymous Fake says:

https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1940515035090243862

This is an interesting interview of someone who I imagine to be a voice of Thermidor. He describes how insanely difficult it is to become an elite warrior, but at some point he says [*Does he say that?*]

Jim says:

Does he say that? I have always found your reports of what people say somewhat strange. I would have allowed this comment through if you had given me a timestamp in the video so that I could check what he is actually saying.

Your Uncle Bob says:

Tucker is increasingly open about positioning himself to the right even of Trump on some issues. Is he only building his interview business, trying to be the Rush Limbaugh of the new media landscape, or is there an option of a presidential run, outflanking Vance with his administration baggage?

And whichever way the above question is answered, is he trying to nurture a new voter bloc for actual results, or is his role to keep the plebs sated by throwing them red meat without any actual deliverables? The new Rush Limbaugh would be an apt metaphor for the latter.

These would be interesting conversations to have with someone who wasn’t AF. If you must wedge issue, at least pick a good one.

The Cominator says:

Tucker cannot be trusted completely. Trump was all set to refuse to even declare an emergency over the fake and gay covid virus and the rest of the right would have fallen into line. It was Tucker’s discordant voice early on that prevented this. Tucker is generally good but on that occassion he was disastorous.

Jim says:

The big lie on the Ukraine is still being shouted through every megaphone, though it is no longer a thought crime to doubt it.

“Putin is a dictator,” “The Ukraine is a democracy.” “The Ukraine is winning, winning, winning.” “Putin will fall” — meaning Russia will fall and the carpetbaggers will be able to resume the looting of Russia.

The “winning” narrative makes peace negotiation impossible, because Trump either believes it, and makes utterly unrealistic demands, or fears the reaction from the self deluded should he make realistic demands. Or perhaps something of both.

Tucker cannot counter the “winning” narrative, because of his interview form.

He has done a little to counter the Dictator/Democracy narrative.

Your Uncle Bob says:

Tucker cannot be trusted completely. … [covid]

Yeah fair point.

Tucker may even be a literal glowie. He’s got the family connections, and acknowledges a failed, or “failed,” application to the CIA in his young days. I’ve said that before in other contexts, and didn’t want to beat a dead horse, but it would have been relevant here.

With the very major failure of selling Trump on lockdowns and vaccines, and the possible glowing, Tucker being anointed to get out ahead of a crowd that can’t otherwise be defused is a real possibility. But I’m also wondering (over-optimistically?) if there’s any chance it’s a first step towards elite defection.

Fidelis says:

My read on Tuck is that he is indeed a glownigger, but he has spiritually defected onto our side. You can see when he talks about Amerikaaner proles, he struggles emotionally. He identified with the EducatedTM bureaucracy sect until something shook him out of it, and now he almost feels dishonest when speaking honestly, because it goes against a lifetime of programming.

I do believe that, regardless his origins, he is now spiritually on side. His one talk about the Russian upper class all being champagne socialists right up until the real reds killed them en mass, and how America was now there in that very state, that was a thought crime. Someone still fully possessed by leftism would not be able to make such a connection and then vocalize it as he did.

Hesiod says:

Tucker sings a different tune these days as this clip suggests:

https://x.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1944509884017569825

He tried, after the 2020 election fraud, to walk the Narrative highwire while maintaining some virtue. Didn’t work too well for him.

furor kek tonicus ( dicks out for Harambe ) says:

Tucker cannot be trusted completely.
.
Tucker was friends with Hunter Biden. whether or not you think he might be trustworthy now he certainly was not at the beginning of his career.

Karl says:

Would the war end if Trump were to accept those terms? My impression is that Western Europe would keep supporting Ukraine to fight to the last Ukrainian.

Jim says:

The Ukrainian Nazis will do what they are told.

The Cominator says:

By who is the question…

Jim says:

>> The Ukrainian Nazis will do as they are told.

> By who is the question

Indeed it is.

Pax Imperialis says:

5. Both Ukrainian and Russian sources agree the Russians are massively outproducing war making materials compared to what the Ukrainians can get. Most importantly, this includes drones, the main method of inflicting casualties. Last report I saw was mutual agreement Russia is outproducing by a factor of 6 to 1, and that was probably a year ago. All indications point to the Russian government having extensively ramp up production.

Mossadnik says:

As a committed Mossad agent, I’d like to apologize for Jeffrey Adolf Epstein soaping and lampshading those 8 gorillion innocent teenage prostitutes.

Hesiod says:

It’s regretful how much oxygen Epstein sucks up over on The Donald. Before that, though, the Israel-Iran squabble elicited much Manichean noise. Shills gotta shill with something. Ruined the anniversary meme-ing of the first assassination attempt against Trump somewhat today.

Mossadnik says:

Well, I can believe we provided “Lady” Lindsey Graham with male prostitutes, but then again, he seems like a genuinely unhinged warmonger everywhere on the globe (I bet he masochistically enjoys getting severely beaten by those male prostitutes, who might even be black), not exclusively an Iran hawk, so do we really need to blackmail him? This “Israeli honeytrap” narrative could well be itself a CIA psyop. But of course I would say that.

Pax Imperialis says:

Of all the things to attack Trump for, why this? You’d think that if Trump was involved, some leftist would have leaked it by now. This whole thing is coming off as manufactured controversy.

Mossadnik says:

Of all the things to attack Trump for, why this?

Probably at least some of the loud kvetching is an astroturf by foreign governments who seek to undermine Trump, boosted by Musk’s algorithms because His Sperginess unfortunately fell for the “pedophilia” hostile meme (and with all due respect to ketamine insights, only readers of this blog tell it like it is) and also possibly seeks himself to undermine Trump.

I doubt too many Real Americans give a flying fuck about this latest and lamest iteration of pizzagate, which — not altogether unlike covid worship in the previous Trump Administration — serves primarily the interests of your hegemonic rival, Chyyyna.

Fidelis says:

Friends and family see it as a reason to distrust Trump. They’ve independently brought it up. It’s not a particularly big wedge issue, but it is a little cut. You can only take so many of those little cuts, and this one is being pushed not long after the Iran affair, which no ordinary Joe was happy to see either.

Don needs to wrangle the glowniggers before they strangle him next.

Mossadnik says:

Whoever is pushing this on the public doesn’t want to see America Made Great Again, and doesn’t want red-blooded military-age male Trump supporters to sign up with ICE to expel those beaners.

Fidelis says:

Please, by all means go use the megaphone, if you have one.

The issue is, this is a normie plausible storyline for Don being irretrievably stuck in the swamp. So of course they push it, it works. Don would have been better off yelling about how disappointed he was in Kash and whomever else, then moving on to the next thing, than the delivery we did end up getting on it. Instead we got him wagging his finger at the public, saying something along the lines of “why do you care”, and doubling down on the glownigger line. It was indeed a misstep, however small, and our enemies are pouncing on it.

I personally do not care, except that the glowniggers are still out and about wrecking the world as they please, and lying to our faces about it. I would have liked King Don to wear the crown and do something about the problem of lying scheming glowniggers. Everyone would have.

Jim says:

Trump is not irretrievably stuck in the swamp. Obviously. The swamp tried to murder him twice, and he was massively betrayed the first time around.

But he is unable to abolish the swamp with a wag of his finger. He is still making the mistake that Hitler did not make, and trying to rule through the swamp.

Hitler had his own people, and Trump does not have his own people, and has not seriously tried to create his own organisation.

Epstein files, failure to take public video of Fort Knox (it is increasingly obvious that the gold has mysteriously evaporated) and putting Marco Rubio in charge of the Ukraine all reveal weakness. There is some substantial truth in the normie narrative that he is just another swamp critter or irretrievable stuck. Remember Covid.

If he does not confront the swamp on the Ukraine, it is going to be a disaster for him — the swamp is set on expending the Ukraine to attrit Russia, and then blaming Trump for the ensuing debacle, then sending a few more nations into the meat grinder — probably Lithuania and Poland with a conflict they start over Kaliningrad. This is a betrayal led by Marco Rubio.

After the last Ukrainian, the last Pole and Lithuanian. But, if Trump fails again, I expect this operation to be interrupted by civil war or nuclear war. As we get closer to the left singularity, expect the unexpected. California is already in state of insurrection, and some members of the Trump cabinet are willing to use that word, but Trump is not, and Newscum is not.

Trump has two crises on his plate, the Ukraine and the insurrection, and so far everyone agrees to deal with both crises by pretending them away. Supposedly what is happening in the Ukraine is a stalemate, because the lines are not moving much. Not a stalemate, a war of attrition, and in attrition the lines do not move much, until one side capitulates or its army is gone.

On the Ukraine, he has to accept the Russian peace terms before they become more severe. On California, he has to arrest the insurrectionists at the top. This will be easier to get away with after the New York election, so stalling is a reasonable tactic. Let us pray it is only stalling, and only a tactic.

When Ice hit a part of the Democrat’s child trafficking operation, Ice found itself cut off and surrounded, but things did not escalate all the way to lethality — one of the insurrectionists fired a gun, then ran away, then no one else fired any guns. So there is still some excuse for not saying “Insurrection” yet. But things are escalating. Recall an obese member of congress body slamming a cop. I said things would escalate, and now one of Newscum’s men has fired a gun — ineffectually, but it still a gun.

Conflicts over sovereign authority will escalate until decisively resolved.

Mossadnik says:

this is a normie plausible storyline for Don being irretrievably stuck in the swamp.

Are normies going to say, “Sure, I’d like to support Trump for physically removing the illegals off our communities, but uh-oh he might or might not have been naughty and hung up with the wrong people some decades ago, welp then, guess I’ll just forget about the whole agenda and everything I actually voted for?” Are you sure these are normies who think this way and not terminally online autistic groidpers? The heck is going on in America?

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Fake Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *